►
Description
The Housing & Community Development Committee received staff reports and updates on various agenda items. More information, agenda, and packets are available on the Committee's webpage: https://www.cityofevanston.org/govern... Residents and landlords needing assistance with landlord-tenant issues can contact MTO for assistance (free of charge) through 311 or directly at 773-292-4988. Interested in getting on the inclusionary housing waitlist? Please complete the pre-application on CPAH's website. If you have questions, please contact CPAH at 847-681-8746.
A
C
Right
so
welcome
everyone
to
the
September
19th
meeting
of
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
Committee
I'm,
calling
this
meeting
to
order
and
I
note
that
we
have
a
quorum
present.
C
So
just
real
briefly
before
we
get
into
the
agenda
as
those
of
you
who
were
with
us
in
July,
you
know
that
we
created
a
task
force
to
draft.
Excuse
me
a
just
cause,
eviction,
ordinance
and,
and
that
task
force
is
still
at
work.
C
So
we
we
expect
they're
going
to
be
reporting
back
to
us
at
our
October
meeting,
but
staff
is
going
to
give
us
an
update
on
on
their
progress
thus
far
and
then
also
the
the
various
provisions
of
the
revisions
to
the
landlord
tenant
ordinance
that
the
committee
has
already
is
recommending
those
are
being
reviewed
by
the
law
department
and
so
we're
waiting
for
their
review
before
it
comes
back
to
this
committee.
So
October
will
be
a
big
meeting
when
we
get
back
to
the
landlord
tenant
issues.
C
So
first
on
our
agenda
is
public
comment
and
Mary,
and
you
want
to
tell
us
who
we
have
yes.
D
D
Me
yeah,
so
we
have
we
had
some
public
comment
written
that
were
provided
to
the
committee.
Maybe.
D
Yes
and
actually
that's
the.
E
Good
evening
good
evening,
so
also
the
the
task
force.
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
this
is
part
of
the
landlord
tenants
ordinance,
but
there
was
medication.
The
mitigation
fund,
so
I
had
talked
to
Alderman
Reed
and
Miss
Williams
after
the
meeting
and
I
think
I
believe
strongly
that
in
the
landlord
tenants,
ordinance
should
be
for
a
requirement
for
tenants
to
have
renters
insurance.
E
E
E
The
City
of
Evanston
would
have
to
sign
paperwork
with
the
landlord
to
Grant
this
money
so
say
the
tenant
comes
in
Damages,
your
apartment,
past,
the
security
deposit.
The
city
is
offering
a
mitigation
fund
of
up
to
twenty
five
hundred
dollars.
Well,
why
put
yourself
on
the
hook
for
tenants
damaging
a
landlord's
property?
E
What
you're
going
to
do,
if
you
have
this
kind
of
procedure,
you're
going
to
end
up
paying
out
a
lot
of
money?
You
don't
even
know
where
the
money's
coming
from,
because
there
was
discussed
at
the
meeting,
also
that
you
have
no
idea
where
the
money's
coming
from-
and
this
could
also
help
when,
let's
say,
there's
a
fire
at
my
building,
the
tenant
is
not
covered.
Their
things
are
not
covered
if
you
require
them
to
have
renters
insurance.
E
Currently,
the
city
helps
residents
that
are
in
fires
and
puts
them
up
in
a
hotel.
Perhaps
if
they
have
renters
insurance,
their
insurance
could
help
mitigate
some
of
those
damages.
So
it's
not
just
a
one-way
Street
here,
I
feel
like
everyone
should
have
renters
insurance.
It
would
save
a
lot
of
people
time
and
money,
and
it's
very
important
so
I
would
encourage
this
committee
to
find
very
strong
renters
insurance
and
include
that
in
the
landlord
attendance
ordinance.
Thank.
F
G
Hey
folks,
it's
been
a
little
while
I'll
be
really
really
brief.
I
sort
of
just
wanted
to
express
some
gratitudes
to
folks.
Today,
open
communities
was
sort
of
asked
to
give
our
expert
opinion
on
matters
relating
to
upgrading
the
rlto
almost
a
year
ago.
Now-
and
you
know,
we
didn't
quite
anticipate
the
things
that
have
unfolded
in
some
of
the
you
know
interesting
and
productive
conversations
that
have
come
out
of
this
process
but
I,
just
as
we
near
I
think
decision
making
time
in
October
and
beyond.
G
For
some
of
these
matters,
I
just
sort
of
want
to
remind
the
the
Council
of
the
urgency
and
importance
of
tenants
rights
in
Evanston
I
want
to
thank
a
lot
of
the
landlords
that
have
Stephanie
and
and
Adam
Vaughn
Richard
Koenig,
who,
by
all
accounts
and
measures
his
landlord.
But
although
one
connect
deeply
connected
to
open
communities
who
stand,
you
know
either
on
opposite
sides
of
the
issue
or
close
to
opposite
sides
of
the
issue,
but
nonetheless
have
engaged
in
really
good
productive
conversations
around.
G
You
know
making
sure
that
we
construct
a
law
that
avoids
unintended
consequences
that,
as
councilmember
Byrne
said
early
on
is
aimed
towards
not
just
what's
fair
and
balanced
in
terms
of
carrying
out
both
sides,
which
is
important
in
process.
But
what
is
just
in
the
end
result
so
I
just
wanted
to
yeah.
Thank
the
committee
for
that
and
and
express
that
open
communities
continues
to
be
open
to
having
conversations
with
landlords
across
the
city
to
discuss
just
cause
and
other
matters,
and
especially
to
just
cause
task
force.
I
know
that
work
is
difficult.
G
Our
tenant
representative,
Helen
Cho,
is
here
today
and
has
been
sitting
in
those
meetings
and
I
know
that
Hugo
and
and
others
have
been
doing,
the
hard
work
of
consensus
building
among
some
strong
feelings.
So
just
thank
you
for
your
time.
C
A
H
Try
to
believe
we
have
microphones
here.
The
committee
voted
to
create
it
just
as
Force
just
cause
task
force,
but
it
is
composed
of
three
two
committee
members
and
three
community
members,
not
three
committee
members,
as
it
says
here
right.
C
You
but,
but
that's
that's
an
important
detail.
So
thank
you.
Are
there?
Are
there
any
other
Corrections
or
comments
about
the
minutes?
D
That's
true:
okay,
Cherry
Val,.
D
A
A
C
C
No
all
right
so
we're
rescheduled
in
November
and
you're
you're,
going
to
hear
later
in
the
meeting
about
quite
a
long
list
of
issues
that
are
coming
to
the
committee
and
really
requiring
that.
We
have
an
additional
meeting
suggested
that
we
have
that
the
first
week
in
December.
So.
D
Would
be
good
right,
they'll?
Give
the
committee
background
as
to
why
we're
requesting
an
additional
meeting
on
December
5th.
So
that
would
essentially
mean
you
would
need
November,
14th,
December
5th
and
December
12th.
D
We
looked
at
what
we
have
slated
for
the
next
six
months,
including
the
projects
that
you're
currently
working
on
that
will
likely
or
potentially
continue,
as
well
as
the
required
items
that
need
to
come
before
the
committee
based
on
HUD
rules
in
other
projects
that
have
started.
That
will
come
to
you
so
through
the
next
six
months
on
your
plate.
D
The
review
will
be
the
continuation
of
the
rlto,
the
just
cause:
eviction
One-Stop
shop,
updates,
the
action
plan
for
2024,
renewal
of
tenant
landlord
services
for
24,
the
iho
waitlist
management
agreements,
renewal,
the
action
plan,
discussion,
cdbg
application,
the
action
plan,
allocation
and
approvals
home,
ARP
application
for
funding,
non-profit
facilities,
application
presentation
and
decisions.
The
review
and
approval
of
the
evaluation
report
for
2023
and
picking
up
the
work
that
we
left
off
a
little
while
back,
but
the
iho.
D
If,
judging
from
that
very
long
list
of
projects,
while
we
don't
have
a
clear
agenda
yet
as
to
what
the
December
5th
meeting
will
be,
we
feel
that
it
would
be
very
helpful
to
help
you
keep
moving
forward
and
make
sure
that
we're
not
stopped
in
our
tracks
by
the
meetings
in
November
and
December
that
are
going
to
require
a
lot
of
Hud
items
and
those
are
meanings.
We
cannot
change.
We
have
the
nights
to
meet
same
for
q1.
We
have
items
that
we
will
have
to
review
and
that
we
cannot
move.
B
I
Going
to
let
Liz
respond
to
them,
I
think
it's
our
anticipation
that
it
will
not
be
concluded
in
October.
We
will
be
presenting
proposed
language
for
the
first
time
for
the
committee's
review
for
public
response
and
feedback
on
that.
I
So
I
think
it
would
be
prudent
for
us
to
anticipate
more
than
one
meeting
on
that
topic
in
addition
to
the
just
cause
recommendations
coming
out
of
the
task
force,
so
that
is
kind
of
the
thought
process
behind
adding
the
additional
meeting
to
provide
the
space
for
the
committee
to
really
thoroughly
discuss
and
consider
those
proposed
amendments.
That's
what
I
said.
C
Any
other
question
questions
or
comments
from
the
committee,
then,
would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
or
that
we
have
a
December
meeting
on
December
5th.
C
Is
there
a
second
okay?
So
then,
all
in
favor
of
adding
a
December
5th
meeting
to
our
schedule,
please
say
aye
I
oppose
no
all
right!
Thank
you
very
much.
C
Now
we
are
ready
for
a
couple
of
more
meaty
items,
an
update,
a
semi-annual
report
about
our
landlord
tenant
services
and
Marion
water
lead
us
off
on
that.
D
Yes,
I'm
just
going
to
share
items
on
this
screen,
so
we
can
all
follow
along.
D
The
standard
report
has
been
included
in
your
packet
and
it's
showing
that
there
was
264
cases
for
the
first
half
of
the
Year.
This
is
through
July
we've
seen
essentially
the
typical
pattern
that
we've
seen
in
previous
year,
actually
numbers
of
calls
that
have
diminished
a
tiny
bit
not
enough
to
make
it
a
real
Trend,
but
it
has
dropped
down
a
tiny
bit.
D
We
are
seeing
a
slight
change
in
the
top
three
reasons
for
calls
it
used
to
be
the
last
couple
years
where
leases,
maintenance
and
eviction
eviction
has
been
replaced
with
early
terminations
and
question
about
potentially
getting
out
of
leases
or
rent
increases
as
an
example
and
whether
there's
any
kind
of
like
what
are
tenant
rights
around
that
Essentials
MTO
as
being
able
to
launch
recently
the
new
texting
feature
that
we
were
hoping
to
add
they've
been
able
to
serve
12
households.
D
For
that
feature,
they
got
some
pretty
good
feedback
from
Northwestern.
D
As
far
as
how
helpful
it
will
be
potentially
to
help
students,
the
chatbot,
which
was
in
automated
way
to
help
start
requests
for
residents
and
get
answers
to
the
easiest
question,
the
chat
about
work
has
started,
but
right
now
we're
holding
that
off
until
the
updates
to
the
rlto
are
finalized,
because
a
lot
of
the
answers
in
to
that
to
those
are
going
to
be
driven
by
what's
in
the
ordinance,
essentially
so
right
now
we're
holding
off
a
little
bit
on
that
the
Evanston
cold
Trends
are
generally
very
similar
to
the
Chicago
area.
D
Trends
we're
happy
to
hear
that
MTU
has
been
able
to
participate
in
multiple
events
with
Northwestern.
D
They
are
joining
they've
already
joined
one
or
two
events,
I
believe
and
they're
joining
five
additional
events
that
Northwestern
is
organizing
to
be
able
to
discuss
with
students
about
tenant
rights
and
Start
contacts
around
that
and
they've
also
provided
tenant
trainings
in
beers
building
in
Evanston,
as
well
as
helped
something
that's
organized
in
the
last
six
months.
D
C
Okay
committee
members.
J
Thank
you,
I
just
I
popped
on
the
mtl's
website
is
squared
away
the
the
okay
yeah.
D
So
right
now,
squared
away
is
Chicago
only
so
what
we're
hoping
to
do
is
we
put
some
dollars
in
the
budget
to
make
sure
that
we
could
update
that
for
Evanston,
because
the
essentially
we
don't
have
quite
the
same
roles
so
for
it
to
be
valid
for
Evanston,
there's
needs
to
be
a
new
instance
and
then
the
whole
forms
and
response
need
to
be
updated.
D
They
can
text
Evanston
to
205-736-0293
that
information
is
on
the
city
website.
We
did
the
stuff
launch
and
now
we're
going
to
do
some
Outreach
through
the
newsletter
and
social
media
to
make
sure
that
residents
are
aware
of
that.
We
do
do
our
reach
on
a
regular
basis,
generally
quarterly
with
the
e-news
just
to
make
sure
that
people
are
reminded
that
service
exists
yeah.
So
essentially,
it's
currently
on
the
website.
D
J
And
then
you're
pushing
it
out
through
newsletters
as
well.
Is
that.
J
Okay,
that
is
it
for
now,
thanks
chair
and.
H
And
what
is
it
that
you
see
mostly
tested
or
what
is
the
text
used
for
so.
D
What
we
heard
is
originally
the
service
was
a
hotline
that
was
getting
voicemails
or
picking
up
depending
on
the
hours
and
then
would
response
respawn
and
call
back
people
that
called
now.
Some
people
have
off
schedules
or
are
not
able
to
go
during
business
hours.
So
we
implemented
the
text
feature,
so
they
could
initiate
contact
during
off
hours
and,
if
need
be,
would
be
able
to
continue
that
conversation
through
text
or
email
to
be
able
to
get
served
without
having
to
be
uniform
Monday
through
Friday
from
one
to
five.
D
I,
don't
think
it's
an
increase.
No
I
can
double
check
right
now,
but
if
it
is,
it's
not
anything
major.
D
K
But
I
have
three
or
four
I'll
leave
here
and
please
feel
free
to
take
one
or
write
down
information.
If
you
have
questions
about
or
you
have
a
constituent
that
comes
to
you,
I'm
very
accessible
and
if
I
can't
help
you
right
away,
I'll
be
able
to
connect
you
with
someone
who
can
so
I
think
it'll
be
good
to
just
have
a
direct
contact
with
MTO.
You
could
reach
out
to
Anytime,
and
that
should
be
me
so
I'll
leave
those
right
here.
Thank
you
great.
A
D
Not
necessary
an
emphasis,
it's
just
that
sometimes
the
tenants
in
Northwestern
are
just
students,
that's
their
first
time,
they're,
renting
and
they're,
not
always
aware
of
what
their
rights
are,
and
so
having
that
contact
and
being
able
to
make
sure
they're
aware
that
service
is
available
can
be
helpful
for
them.
Thank.
K
Sure
so
I
can
speak
to
a
lot
of
the
calls
like,
for
instance,
about
early
termination,
the
way
it
works.
A
lot
of
these
calls
come
through
to
mto's
hotline
and
some
of
the
tools
that
our
hotline
counselors
will
provide.
Beyond.
Just
the
basic
here
are
your
rights
here.
Are
your
responsibilities
of
the
parties?
We'll
also
provide
additional
assistance,
such
as
template
letters,
so
that
the
tenant
wants
to
exercise
one
of
their
rights
or
write.
K
So
we
do
a
lot
of
that
and
then
I
run
our
eviction
prevention
program.
So
when
tenants
can't
resolve
things
and
they
begin
to
escalate,
will
help
them
kind
of
mediate
with
the
landlord
and
tenant
will
kind
of
sit
folks
down
and
try
to
come
to
some
sort
of
agreement
that
allow
the
tenant
to
stay
and
allow
to
try
to
make
both
parties
as
whole
as
possible
without
ending
up
in
court
or
displacing
a
tenant.
K
Ultimately,
of
course,
we
can't
resolve
every
problem
and
we
don't
really
know
every
outcome,
because
a
lot
of
outcomes
take
a
long
time
to
resolve
and
we
don't
have
contact
again
with
tenants,
but
for
the
most
part,
we're
able
to
help
a
lot
of
tenants
just
with
the
initial
information
and
get
them
set
on
the
right
track
and
I
do
think.
One
thing
that
isn't
reflected
in
here
is
a
lot
of
callbacks.
K
We
get
so
I
think
these
are
all
initial
calls,
but
we
do
talk
to
a
lot
of
tenants
multiple
times,
sometimes
dozens
over
the
course
of
a
year,
because
they'll
call
back
and
say:
hey
I
sent
the
letter.
This
is
what
the
landlord
said.
What
should
I
do
so
I
think
one
one
of
the
best
things
we
can
provide
is
also
just
kind
of
real
world
advice
about
what
has
and
hasn't
worked
in
the
past
and
give
people
that
perspective.
I
know
Marion
mentioned
some
of
the
buildings.
Mto
has
been
organizing.
K
In
one
thing,
we
did
recently
in
a
building
was
bring
out
one
of
our
old
Partners
Taft
West
who's,
a
very
experienced
property
manager.
To
do
a
walk
around
with
the
tenants
and
the
landlord,
and
really
he
did
a
great
job
of
Bridging,
the
Gap
bringing
folks
together
and
allowing
them
to
come
to
an
agreement
about
what
repairs
will
be
made.
How
and
when
and
really
everyone
walked
away
happy.
A
I
just
want
to
comment
that
MTO
has
been
a
really
valuable
resource
for
some
of
my
constituents.
I've
had
people
come
and
contact
me
not
really
knowing
also
like
they
were.
You
know
younger.
You
know,
students
that
are
you
know.
First
apartment
didn't
really
know
what
their
rights
were.
So
some
of
the
pest
calls
I
think
are
you
know
directed
you
know
from
people
who
contacted
me
and
you
know
just
having
a
resource
that
knows
the
you
know
how
to
negotiate.
Those
situations
was
really
helpful.
L
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
explain
if
you
could
just
say
a
little
bit
more
about
the
lease
category,
because
some
of
the
other
categories,
kind
of
weed
into
it
as
well
and
I,
was
wondering
what
a
sort
of
a
typical.
If
there
is
a
typical
kind
of
request
that
you
tend
to
get
around
leases
or,
if
there's
sort
of
a
wide
range.
And
just
if
so,
we.
K
Certainly
get
sure
we
certainly
get
a
lot
of
general
questions
about
is
this.
You
know,
is
this
provision
legal
or
can
I
do
anything
about
this
and,
of
course
everything
is
negotiable.
So
we
can
we
try
to
give
folks,
you
know
tips
about
how
they
can
have
that
conversation,
but
I.
K
Think
the
majority
of
least
questions
we
get
are
around
either
they've
received
a
termination
notice
or
a
non-renewal
notice
or
they're
dealing
with
some
problem,
whether
it
is,
they
can't
pay
the
rent
or
more
than
often
than
not
it's
a
repair
problem
or
a
conditions
issue,
and
they
just
choose
to
move
out
before
the
lease
is
up.
K
So
they
kind
of
have
to
make
the
choice
of
you
know:
can
they
negotiate
something
better
or
will
they
move
out?
And
then
you
know
a
significant
number
of
those
are
also
just
non-renewals
for
for
no
reason,
but
if
we
look
at
our
records
this
often
because
they've
requested
a
repair
or
had
some
other
issue
that
was
unresolved
and
then
when
the
lease
is
up,
it's
not
renewed,
and
so
you
know
that
to
us
looks
often
kind
of
retaliatory
and
we
try
to
help.
K
L
K
K
C
Thanks
council
member
Burns
had
another
question
and
then
we'll
get.
J
To
it
yeah
it
gets
just
to
follow
up
on
that
last
point,
so
the
264
is
is
not
like
Unique
Individuals.
It's.
D
Not
it's
it's
the
best
way
to
be
able
to
represent
really
the
proportion
of
issues.
D
J
Is
there
a
way
to
so?
The
is
is
so
my
question
is
going
to
be:
is
there
a
way
to
that
MTO
can
report
out
on
kind
of
unique
members
of
Our
Community
Serve,
the
the
larger
point
and
based
on
what
was
said
a
moment
ago?
J
J
Think
the
main
thing
is
when
you
look
at
the
type
of
reports
we
get
for
our
social
services
committee
as
an
example,
there's
a
lot
more
detail
and
I
think
if
we
can
moving
forward
get
MTO
to
report
out,
maybe
not
the
same,
because
I
know
that
could
be
very
burdensome,
but
with
a
little
bit
more
detail,
especially
about
outcomes,
and
you
know
the
amount
of
evidence
that
residents
are
just
whatever
details
that
they're
already
collecting
on
their
end.
J
D
D
So
that's
yeah,
that's
the
calculation
we
do
based
on
the
data
they
provide
for
the
cases.
So
that's
something
we
could
include
I
think
the
reasoning
not
to
include
in
there
was
just
to
make
sure
we
weren't
confusing
the
numbers,
but
we
could
add
that
as
far
as
the
outcomes,
that's
also
something
we
had
discussed
initially
when
we
designed
the
report
and
as
Phil
mentioned,
that
can
be
tough
because
they
very
often
get
an
initial
phone
call
doesn't
mean
they
get
a
follow-up
to
say,
hey!
Thank
you
yeah.
D
This
is
what
happened,
and
so
some
of
that
can
be
a
little
bit
challenging.
It
might
be
more
anecdotal,
but
we
could
potentially
add
something
around
a
narrative
or
something
like
that.
The
difference
with
Social
Service
committee
reports
that
you're
used
to
is
that
because
it's
Grant
Management,
there's
specific
reports
with
specific
outcomes,
because
those
case
managers
are
working
day
in
day
out
and
that's
the
report.
Yeah.
J
Yeah
and
that's
and
that's
that's,
why
I
kind
of
has
about
saying
I
I
wouldn't
want
them
to
report
out
the
exact
same
things
as
the
the
the
the
agencies
that
request
funds,
but
I
I
do
think
even
if
there's
a
way
to
code
it
around
which
you
just
mentioned.
Maybe
we
come
up
with
a
code
that
reflects
when
someone
enters.
You
know
someone
reaches
out,
but
then
we
kind
of
lose
track.
J
There
can
be
a
code
for
that
I
know
in
Social,
Services,
there's
another
code
that
talks
about
when
somebody
exits
from
the
program.
So
if
somebody
does
call
in
and
you're
able
to
help
them,
we
might
call
that
an
exit
similar
to
what
we
would
when
we're
reviewing
the
Social
Service
Agency.
So
it
may
take
a
few
meetings
to
come
up
with
a
perfect
fit
for
this
Arrangement,
but
I.
Think
more
information,
generally
speaking,
would
be
helpful
and.
D
That's
something
we
can
discuss
because,
as
part
of
the
texting
feature
being
launched,
we
have
two
relocal
so
at
how
we're
Gathering
data
to
make
sure
that
gets
included
in
the
report.
So
we
can
always
discuss
that.
Yeah.
J
And
the
text
feature
is
I'm
looking
forward
to
square
it
away.
I
think
that
just
enhances
is
is
Builds
on
the
text.
Feature
that
we
have
now
most
you
know
in
my
experience.
Mto
being
involved
could
be
difference
between
literally
like
all
our
war,
between
landlords
and
tenant
and
a
little
bit
of
break.
You
know
where
they
can
find
Common
Ground
again.
It
could
be
the
difference
between
a
landlord.
You
know
either
delaying
or
deciding
against
evicting
someone.
It
could
be
the
difference
from
attended.
J
You
know
withholding
rent
I
mean,
and
these
are
all
I'm,
drawing
from
real
experiences
that
I've
been
involved
in
so
I
I
I,
don't
want
to
waste
this
opportunity
to
say
I
think
MTL
is
doing
really
good
work
and
I'm
I
I
do
look
forward
to
anything
that
we
can
do
to
make
it
easier
for
people
to
just
get
those
quick
hit
questions
we
had
another
another
member
of
our
community
not
too
long
ago.
We're
a
landlord
gets
said
that
they
could
move
in.
J
J
You
know
that
getting
having
a
the
ability
to
get
those
type
of
questions
answered
quickly,
understanding
that
you
know
I
don't
know
if
there
are
always
lawyers
responding
to
those
questions
but
I'm
sure
there's,
you
know,
there's
there's
some
disclaimer
that
says
look
you
should
contact
a
lawyer
but
here's
some
advice
based
on
our
EXP
clearance,
so
that
was
doing
a
great
job.
Well,.
K
Thank
you
and
I
will
follow
up
with
our
hotline
coordinator
and
and
Marion,
because
I
know
we
do
collect
additional
data,
so
I
know
even
just
if
we
started
giving
over
and
you
can
look
and
decide
what
is
best
for
you,
guys
with
demographics
and
other
things.
That
I
think
may
be
very
helpful.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
I
do
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
and
I.
Also
like
council
member
Burns
mentioned
I,
see
the
the
service
that
MTO
provides
to
the
community
serving
as
a
buffer
between
landlords
and
tenants
and
I
think
that
that
is
very
commendable,
but
I
also
I'm
a
little
trouble
with
the
lack
of
clarity
of
your
numbers
here
when
you
said
that
lease
includes
repairs
or
maintenance
issues,
it
also
includes
early
termination
and
even
evictions.
H
H
So
is
there
anything
that
you
can
Implement
to
have,
since
you
already
have
the
information
about
that
person
that
reached
out
to
MTO
to
have
somebody
doing
the
follow-up
instead
of
waiting
a
passive
way
to
have
that
person
come
in
and
say,
hey
everything
worked
out
or
no.
This
guy
is
not
doing
what
he
was
supposed
to
do.
H
Is
there
any
way
that
you
could
have
somebody
following
up
with
any
interactions
that
you
are
in
between
to
get
more
clarity
as
to
what
is
it
really
that
is
transpiring
in
the
community
between
landlords
and
tenants?
Sure.
K
Very
valid
concerns
and
I
think
to
your
first
question
about
the
numbers:
I
think
we'll
be
able
to
figure
out
a
way
to
better
parse
them
out
or
or
at
least
show
what,
if
people
called
about
multiple
issues,
a
way
to
reflect
that
in
a
more
clear
way,
definitely
and
I
think
we'll
work
that
out
and
get
that
fixed,
as
we
add
some
more
information
to
to
the
next
report,
so
you
have
a
better
idea
of
who's,
calling
where
they're
calling
from
Etc
and
then,
as
the
second
question,
it
is
mainly
a
resource
problem
that
we
have.
K
You
know
we
are
a
staff
of
10
and
we
we
have
run
a
lot
of
programs
serve
tens
of
thousands
of
tenants
a
year.
So
it
is
a
struggle
to
do
the
follow-up,
but
we
are
getting
a
few
Community
Navigators
through
a
program
grant
that
we
have,
which
I
think
will
be
able
to
use
some
of
that
time
of
theirs.
To
do
some
follow-up
I
also
think
what
we
could
do,
which
I
don't
think
can
Dawn
on
us
until
you've
brought
this
up
is
certainly
we
can
send
out
some
automated
surveys.
K
We
have
everyone's
email
from
Evanston
that
contacts
us
so
at
the
bare
minimum
I
think
we
could
do
some
additional
Outreach,
even
automate,
that
for
people
who
call
or
go
into
our
system
to
send
a
message
and
a
follow-up.
Let
us
know
how
it's
going.
Something
like
that.
Yeah.
C
Great
okay,
Joanne
is
that
your
life,
that's
on
yeah,.
F
K
Yes,
I
know
we
certainly
can
show
which
landlords
and
how
many
calls
not
I
know
not.
Every
call
may
have
the
landlord's
information
in
it
sometime
for
various
reasons.
Tenants
may
not
want
to
give
it
or
don't
know
it
sometimes,
but
we
can
certainly
give
that
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
that
will
look,
but
we'll
have
addresses
and
landlords
attached.
So
we
could
report
that
and
it
would
show
how
many
calls
have
been
received
about
each
landlord.
B
I
B
Sorry
about
that
sorry
about
that,
it
might
be
helpful
to
see
the
number
of
units
that
are
served
right
if
I
understand
these
are
sort
of
sorted
by
issues
as
opposed.
So
you
might
have
something
that's
in
multiple
categories
right.
So
if
we're
able
to
say
oh,
this
represents
246
calls
represents
153
units
right
then
that
gives
us
some
sense
of
scope.
Absolutely
just.
K
B
D
So
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
semi-annual
report
for
the
iho
wait
list.
D
That's
a
report
that
you'll
have
twice
a
year
in
the
next,
so
we're
reporting
for
July,
and
it
gives
you
kind
of
a
snapshot
of
where
we're
at
with
the
IH
wait
list
between
January
and
July.
157
households
have
been
added
to
the
wait
list.
D
We
saw
the
largest
increases
on
the
wait
list
and
the
zero
to
thirty
percent
Emi
and
51
to
60
Ami
range,
since
the
last
update,
particularly
with
the
local
preference
that
was
I,
was
happy
to
see,
and
we
we
have
seen
a
a
trend
in
seeing
the
lower
income
increased
faster
on
the
wait
list
and
we've
seen
a
trend
of
the
waitlist
growing
faster
as
the
program.
D
D
It's
important
to
remember
that
in
a
current
iteration,
the
majority
of
the
units
are
usually
accessible
to
people
at
51
to
60
Ami
cpf
CPI
did
additional
Outreach
in
the
last
six
months,
so
it
was
interesting
to
see
that
we
had
a
larger
increase
on
the
51
to
60
percent
Emi
range.
We
also
saw
an
increase
on
the
higher
range
up
to
280
Emi.
D
Some
of
our
units
on
the
wait
list
are
older
units
that
were
approved
prior
to
the
current
iho
and
have
higher
income,
and
while
we
know,
there's
a
need
in
the
market,
those
kind
of
higher
income
are
not
always
the
ones
thinking
that
they
may
be
eligible
for
affordable
housing.
So
the
Outreach
for
those
units
is
not
always
as
easy,
so
it
was
nice
to
be
able
to
see
an
increase
there
so
that
there's
a
larger
pool
of
people
to
draw
from
when
units
do
become
available.
D
Cpa
is
now
managing
72,
iho
and
or
affordable
units.
Some
of
those
units
where
affordable
units
prior
the
original
yacho
that
we
have
and
there's
currently
nine
units
are
in
the
process
of
being
leased
up,
including
the
building
on
100
Chicago,
which
has
a
couple
units
at
80
Ami,
currently.
D
Yes,
yes
in
your
report,
what
we
tend
to
do
is
the
top
line
items,
particularly
the
zero
to
thirty
percent
is
grayed
out.
It's
it's
it's
a
large
chunk
of
some
other
of
the
wait
lists,
but
that's
usually
those
units
would
require
a
voucher
to
really
be
accessible
for
ideal.
D
We
do
not
have
any
IIT
units
that
are
accessible
for
people
making
less
than
30
Ami
they
would.
They
would
need
to
have
a
voucher
for
that.
D
So,
when
you're,
looking
at
the
wait
list,
that's
important
to
look
at
that
on
this
snapshot.
You
have
unit
information
as
far
as
the
makeup
of
the
existing
units
that
are
either
occupied
and
being
re-certified
by
yearly
by
siba,
as
well
as
the
one
that
are
being
in
the
process
of
being
rented
up,
whether
they
became
vacant
or
their
new
units.
D
We
also
started
tracking
demographics
when
people
are
willing
to
share
that
information.
That's
why
the
numbers
don't
always
add
up
per
unit,
and
then
you
have
some
information
about
the
just
the
general
makeup
of
the
existing
buildings,
as
well
as,
what's
going
on
with
the
units
that
are
currently
being
in
the
process
of
being
rented
up.
H
You
I
have
a
question.
Actually
I
have
a
few
questions,
but
the
one
I
remember
the
most
is:
what's
the
reach,
how
do
you
reach
out
to
to
these
individuals
or
these
families
that
are
eligible
or
potentially
be
eligible
to
this
housing
units?
Is
there
any
particular
system?
The.
D
Publicity
or
anything
like
that,
so
CPA
does
their
own
Outreach
and
I
would
like
to
note
that
Philip
from
MTO
nicely
volunteered
to
show
up
tonight,
but
was
not
invited,
and
so
there's
I
didn't
invite
anybody
from
CPA
they're
not
here,
because
they
decided
not
to
join.
That's
on
me.
We
don't
usually
invite
them
for
semi-annual
meeting
only
for
the
renewal
and
The
Yearling
meeting.
D
Usually
the
process
so
CPA
does
has
done
some
events
at
the
library
they
have
a
the
social
media
outreach
they
do
some
email
blasts.
The
city
helps
with
that
as
well.
By
doing
kind
of
a
quarterly
e-news
like
we
usually
try
to
ping
our
Communications
team
to
make
sure
that,
on
a
regular
basis,
the
program
is
mentioned.
D
H
You
know
it.
It
just
made
me
think
the
comment
I
I
made
to
Phil
from
MTO
that
there's
gonna
be
a
better
way
to
reach
out
to
to
our
community,
and
so
many
things
that
the
city
is
providing
for
for
its
residents.
I
happen
to
just
pay
my
will
tax
yesterday
and
what
a
great
opportunity
to
create
a
database
for
all
our
all
our
residents.
H
We
all
have
to
pay
some
sort
of
taxes
to
the
city
at
one
point
or
another,
so
I
think
that
Dad
will
create
a
better
way
to
reach
out
to
inform
the
community
and
try
to
do
it
in
a
in
a
diversified
way.
I'll
be
happy
to
translate
to
Spanish.
If
you
don't
have
one
but
I
mean
I
know
you
do
so
it's
just
that
it
seems
like
you
know.
The
number
of
units
is
very
limited
and
the
number
of
people
that
don't
renew
on
those
units
is
almost
non-existent.
H
Stay
there,
because
it's
it's
it's
it's
it's
very
helpful
to
their
families,
of
course,
so
I
I
think
that
more
than
anything,
our
efforts
should
be
geared
for
creating
more
affordable
housing
in
the
City
of
Evanston,
and
this
is
just
an
indication
that
we
need
it.
We
really
need
it
and
unfortunately
there
are
some
other
forces
that
might
prevent
more,
affordable
housing
to
come
into
the
city
because
of
what
we're
doing
in
other
in
other
areas.
So
that's
about
what
I
have
to
say
here
at
this
point.
Thank
you.
I.
D
Think
some
of
the
ideas
you
mentioned
as
far
as
using
other
way
the
city
has
to
reach
out
to
be
able
to
share
some
of
the
positive
program
that
exists
or
something
yeah
that
we
would
also
like
to
discuss
at
some
point
or.
H
D
J
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
was
reading
this
right,
so
how
many
people
are
currently
on
our
waitlist.
D
It's
community
members
that
qualify
as
being
part
of
the
Evanston
preference.
The
majority
is
going
to
be
Evanston
residence.
It's
the
vast
majority.
J
J
And
then,
in
terms
of
the
updates
to
our
iho
ordinance,
I
think
that's
something
that
this
committee
would
discuss
at
some
point.
Is
that
that's
on
the
way?
Oh.
D
D
J
And
I
only
say
that,
because
you
know,
836
is
a
big
number
and
you
know
we're
not
we're
not
producing
nearly
enough.
You
know
iho,
affordable
units,
I,
don't
think
the
the
marketplace
is
producing
nearly
enough.
You
know
on
church
and
Daryl
we're
fighting
a
lawsuit
right
now
from
one
of
the
neighbors.
So
it's
like
every
time
we
try
to
produce
affordable
units.
Somebody's
gonna
try
to
get
an
injunction
in
court.
The
iho
ordinance
isn't
producing
enough.
J
Currently
because
we're
you
know,
we
haven't
updated
in
a
while
and
and
maybe
we've
taken
it
to
as
far
as
we
can,
but
maybe
we
can
increase
the
amount
of
units
that
we
expect
in
developments,
but
these
numbers
tell
me
that
it's
certainly
time
that.
F
I
That's
all
for
that,
if
you'd
like
that
is
definitely
something
that
staff
is
looking
into
as
part
of
the
iho
update
is
looking
at
the
definition
of
cover
development.
Looking
at
the
percentage
of
the
minimum
that
would
be
accepted
for
projects
and
you
kind
of
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
when
you
said
we
have
to
make
sure
that
we're
balancing
to
not
stifle
you
know
development
in
general,
but
I
do
think
staff
see
some
opportunity
and
we're
hopeful
that
you
know.
A
I'll
just
add,
as
we're
looking
at
the
comprehensive
plan
going
forward,
parking
restrictions,
I
think
is
a
big
key
piece
of
this
reading,
a
or
listening
to
a
really
interesting
audiobook
talking
about
parking
and
I.
Think
it's
just
as
expensive
to
build
a
parking
spot
as
it
is.
You
know
to
do
a
floor
of
Housing
and
I.
Think
that's
something
that
is
really
hindering
us.
When
we
talk
about
building
units
and
bringing
people
to
town
and
I
hope,
that's
something
we
can
discuss
in
the
future.
I
B
Lauren
go
ahead:
yeah
I,
just
have
a
quick
question
and
I
may
be
asking
something:
I
should
already
know,
in
which
case
I
apologize,
but
given
that
we
have
a
pretty
long
wait
list
it
like
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
be
like
doing
much.
Outreach
I
mean
because
we
want
to
manage
people's
expectations.
It
just
feels
a
little
awkward
to
be
soliciting
interest
in
something
when
we
know
there's
nothing.
We
can
actually
deliver
on
so.
D
That's
a
very
actually
interesting
question.
It
does
make
sense,
because
one
thing
to
remember
is
everybody:
that's
on
the
wait
list.
That's
going
to
get
contacted
whenever
a
unit
comes
on,
the
market
may
not
be
in
a
position
to
end
their
current
lease
may
not
want.
The
unit
may
not
be
interested
in
the
location
of
that
unit,
and
so,
when
you
see
as
an
example
91
person
on
the
51
to
60
Ami
list
sometime,
that's
not
enough
because
there
could
be
configuration
in
the
household
size.
D
There
can
be
configuration
in
their
preferences
in
a
variety
of
factor.
That
makes
it
that,
especially
for
some
of
those
threshold,
because
we
still
need
to
do
some
Outreach.
B
So
does
that
means
total
sense,
but
does
the
Outreach
sort
of
caveat
that
and
manage
it?
Okay,
I'm
just
think
like
I'm,
just
thinking
here
about
we're
at
this
time
in
our
community
when
housing
is,
is
such
a
challenging
issue
anyways
and
there's
such
a
dire
need
for
affordable
housing
and,
and
so
it
just
seems
like
something
where
we
have
to
be
thoughtful
about
the
messaging
like
this
is
here
for
you.
You
can
get
on
the
wait
list
like.
D
Right
and
it's
that's
something
we
discussed
frequently
with
sipa
as
far
as
the
Outreach.
One
of
the
discussion
we
had
as
well
was
how
to
do
targeted
Outreach
for
higher
incomes.
Those
units
are
affordable
for
those
people
that
need
it,
they're
greatly
reduced,
but
they
may
not
be
perceived
as
as
affordable
to
a
family.
That's
at
30,
Ami,
so
having
the
right
approach
and
messaging
yeah
is
definitely
kind
of
a
back
and
forth.
In
a
discussion
around
that
yeah.
J
To
that
point
then
I
have
one
other
quick
question.
I
think
is
as
long
as
we're
I
I
think.
There's
also
an
argument
to
say
that
the
understanding
the
need
helps
us
respond
better
to
it
and
I
think
if
we
communicate
that
somehow,
when
they're
filling
out
the
list,
not
to
say
that
that's
our
number
one
goal
we
want
to
House
people,
obviously,
but
also
it
helps
us
have
these
discussions.
You
know
when
we
can
better
understand
the
needs.
J
I
just
wanted
to
add
that,
but
the
I
don't
know
if
we're
calling
it
a
tiny
house
Community
or
efficiency
home
Community,
but
that's
in
the
Seventh
Ward
correct.
J
Did
did
the
developer
talk
about
what
Ami
those
homes
would
likely
with
the
Amis
of
the.
C
People
would
like
to
purchase
those
homes
they're
not
going
to
be
strictly
affordable
in
the
sense
of
you
know
eligible
for
cipa
to
take
care
of,
but
he's
talking
about
them
being
what's
important
attainable.
So.
J
C
J
There
was
a
lot
of
some
pushback
about
the
the
cost
of
the
proposed
cost
of
those
homes,
but
I
think
it
serves
an
important
part
of
our
community
that
are
also
at
risk
of
being
priced
out
of
Everson
and
that
need
opportunity.
So
that's
so
separate
from
this
discussion.
I
will
be
really
interested
to
know
what
Ami
levels
we
think
right,
I
would
suspect.
They're
right
and
I
know
we're
not.
This
is
rentals
and
not
purchasing
homes,
but
I
would
imagine
they're
in
that.
E
J
Income
yeah
I
wonder
if
we
could
use
whatever
and
I
could
do
the
math
too,
just
whatever
the
cost
is
and
30
of
the
income
I
think
would
still
apply
for
home
buyers
as
well,
but
we'll
I'll
figure
that
out
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
But
that's
all
chair.
Thank
you.
C
D
Right
if
I
may
add
something
to
council
member
Burton's
Point,
which
is
important
on
the
wait
lists,
it
doesn't
always
look
like
there's
a
really
high
wait
list
or
larger
units.
D
Part
of
that
is
because
cipa
is
aware
that
they
have
very
few
of
those
units,
so
that
tends
to
happen
as
part
of
the
conversation
when
people
sign
up
or
come
to
workshops,
and
so
those
numbers
may
be
under
what
they
really
are,
because
people
that
are
looking
for
three
four
bedroom
units
may
not
even
butter,
essentially
because
they
know
there's
going
to
be
a
very
long
wait
list.
C
To
go
back
to
that
question
about
the
Evanston
preference,
so
does.
Is
that
just
something
that
we're
keeping
track
of
for
our
own
information,
or
does
that
do
they
have.
D
Prepared
right
so
there
is
there's
the
full
wait
list
right
when
a
unit
comes
becomes
available.
The
time
you've
been
on
the
wait
list
will
matter,
but
also
the
local
preference,
the
household
size
they.
They
look
at
all
those
different
factors,
but
the
prioritization
with
within
the
groups
that
are
eligible
there
is
a
local
preference,
yeah.
C
And
then
breaking
it
out
into
the
two
groups
of
iho
existing
units
versus
affordable
units
is
that
those
those
buildings
are
just
grouped
that
way
because
they
were
built
and
or
they
came
into
the
system
under
a
different
yeah.
D
Mechanism,
it's
really
just
language
they're,
not
technically,
I
cho
unit,
so
we
didn't
want
to
put
them
under
the
chart
under
the
I2
units
and
then
sometimes
we
do
get
questions
around
how
many
units
the
Dio
really
ring
about,
and
so
that's
helpful
to
keep
track
of
it
that
way
to
have
them
separated
so
that
we
don't
forget
to
count
them
out
right,
great,
okay,
technically
speaking,
a
lot
of
those
affordable
units
where
part
of
iho
principle
it's
just
there
wasn't
a
formalized
ordinance
at
the
time
right
so.
C
Okay,
all
very
all,
very
good
stuff.
Okay,
then
I
think
we
are
ready
to
move
on
to
staff
updates.
D
Up
so
I
was
just
going
to
give
a
staff
update
on
the
non-profit
facilities
application
for
funding.
That
will
be
coming
your
way,
soonish,
not
so
soon,
but
we
wanted
to
give
you
a
heads
up
on
what
is
happening
and
I
just
need
a
second,
so
essentially
we're
going
to
be,
for
the
first
time
in
a
in
two
to
three
years,
we're
going
to
be
reopening
applications
for
non-profit
to
apply
for
funding
for
improvement
to
their
facilities
that
are
open
to
the
public.
D
D
D
They
can
apply
for
a
minimum
of
25
000
and
up
to
a
hundred
twenty
five
thousand
dollars.
We
have
a
general
budget
of
about
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
of
cdbg
funding
to
award
and
we're
putting
a
maximum
of
five
award
for
this
cycle.
D
It
may
be
less
depending
on
the
application
and
the
committee's
perspective
after
November
during
November
and
December
months,
staff
who
work
with
the
applicants
to
answer
any
question
and
work
through
kind
of
any
potential
issue
to
identify
how
shovel
ready
the
projects
are,
what
is
needed
to
be
done
and
whether
they're
really
truly
ready
to
be
awarded
funding,
and
then
we
are
projecting
to
come
to
this
Committee
in
January,
with
the
Project's
presentations
and
as
well
as
a
staff
evaluation
of
those
projects
and
then
to
have
in
February
discussion
and
allocation
of
funding,
if
possible,
we
so
and
that's
the
I
need
to
pull
up
a
report.
D
We
are
putting
together
a
evaluation
chart
that
we
will
follow
to
be
able
to
assess
the
projects
and
that
will
be
included
as
part
of
your
January
meeting.
Some
of
those
components
will
be
requirements
for
cdbg
funding.
Those
are
very
strict
and
very
specific.
D
The
you
know
as
an
example,
projects
need
to.
We
need
to
make
sure
they're
going
to
be
used
for
the
next
five
years
if
we're
using
cdbg
funding.
So
there's
a
few
things
we
need
to
look
at
and
so
yeah.
Essentially
that's
the
plan
for
this.
D
They
need
to
serve
a
majority
of
population
that
is
eligible
for
cdbg
funding.
They
could
be
presumed
eligible
based
on
the
category
of
people
they're
serving
victim
of
domestic
violence.
As
an
example
is
present
eligible
homeless.
Teens
is
one
of
them
as
well.
We
are
going
to
collect
where
they're
located.
They
need
to
be
serving
right,
cdbg
eligible
population,
so
they
could
be
located
elsewhere,
but
they
have
to
serve
eligible
population.
Okay,.
D
So
we'll
we
will
go
through
all
the
the
one
of
the
biggest
item
to
look
at
as
well
is
making
sure
that
the
awardees
project
is
really
feasible
and
going
to
be
they're
going
to
be
able
to
follow
cdbg
regulation
that
they're
going
to
be
able
to
get
a
contractor
that
can
report
on
sections
like
sections.
We
probably
won't
be
eligible
because
it's
under
250
something
dollars,
but
there's
a
lot
of
added
Administration
that
they
need
to
be
able
to
show
they're
going
to
be
able
to
carry
there's
reporting.
D
It's
not
just
simply
allocating
a
grant,
and
that's
it
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
heavy
lift.
So
staff
needs
to
work
with
a
nonprofit
to
make
sure
they
can
actually
comply
with
that
and
as
well.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
the
project
is
truly
ready
and
that
it's
going
to
happen
in
the
timeline
that
we
have
to
spend
the
funds,
because
we
don't
want
to
lose
those
funds.
J
D
So
it's
for
the
construction
or
Rehabilitation
of
non-profit
facilities
that
are
serving
the
public
in
a
majority
of
eligible
populations.
So
an
example
would
be
a
organization
that
is
serving
homeless
people
or
domestic
violence,
victims
or
any
other
population
that
could
be
eligible
and
need
some
repairs.
They
might
need
a
new
roof.
They
might
need
some
upgrades.
They
might
need
a
small
addition.
They
may
be
relocating
or
there's
a
variety
of
projects.
J
D
J
Do
we
will
we
cap
the
dollar
amount
for
each
Grant,
so
it
could
so
we
can
yeah.
D
The
range
is,
they
have
a
minimum
of
25
000
and
a
maximum
of
125
thousand
dollars
to
apply.
We
provided
a
big
range
because
we
didn't
know
how
many
people
would
apply,
and
even
if
we
have
10
applicants,
it
doesn't
mean
that
those
10
projects
would
be
eligible
able
to
meet
the
requirement
in
shovel
ready.
Okay,
so
we
provided
the
large
range.
You
may
end
up
with
a
mix
of
projects.
Some
larger
we
had
to
put
as
threshold
because
there
is
a
lift
with
cdbg
and
there's
under
25.
J
What's,
the
total
pot
of
money.
D
Currently,
250
thousand
dollars,
some
of
the
criteria
that
we
may
use
for
reviewing
those
applications
is
the
project
visibility,
their
ability
to
meet
Federal
funding
requirement,
as
well
as
City,
Zoning
and
building
requirement
how
realistic
their
budget
is
and
how
well
put
together.
They
are
if
it
includes
David,
Beacon
wage
consideration,
their
sustainability,
the
applicant
and
the
project,
sustainability,
meaning
they
need
to
be
in
place
in
the
next
five
years
because
they
have
to
give
back
the
money.
D
Otherwise,
whether
they've
received
funding
in
the
past
in
the
past
application,
whether
they're
truly
ready
what
the
community
benefit
and
return
on
investment
would
be
the
benefit
to
the
Target
population
and
we've
added
a
component
for
environmental
or
positive
health
impact
as
well.
J
And
you
said
we
only
250
000.
Is
that
what
you
said:
yeah
the
125
concerns
and
because
I
could
see
someone
putting
you
know,
I
can't
really
think
of
something
off
top,
but
something
that
costs
a
little
bit
more.
Not
getting
that
because
we
because
there's
a
lot
of
interest
and
maybe
there's
a
smaller
project
that
they
also
could
have
submitted
for
so
I.
J
D
D
No
that's:
okay!
Yeah!
We
haven't
had
that
discussion.
Yet
Jessica
wingender
on
the
team
as
well.
Lindsay
waiter
gonna
be
pretty
heavily
involved
with
the
applicants.
It's
there's
a
lot
of
communication
during
that
process.
D
L
I
think
you
answered
this,
but
I
want
to
just
make
sure
I
understand.
So
you
mentioned
that
sort
of
feasibility
and
whether
or
not
they're
ready
matters-
and
you
mentioned
that
you
will
work
with
them
to
try
to
assess
that,
and
is
that
just
to
clarify
all
happening
before
we
have
any
discussions
about
okay.
So
that's
a
back
and
forth
iterative
process.
Yeah.
D
The
application
is
designed
for
do
you
have
all
those
questions
included
and
that's
due
November
third,
and
then
after
that,
there's
two
months
before
it
even
comes
to
you
and
then
on
top
of
the
applicant,
we'll
be
there
to
present
their
projects
and
so
you'll
be
able
to
ask
them
further
questions
as
well
before
you
even
get
to
a
meeting
where
potential
allocation
could
be
done,
which
would
be
in
February
thanks,
yeah,
and
especially
with
those
kind
of
this
is
something
that
this
specific
committee
hasn't
done.
D
Yet
it's
the
first
time
we're
doing
it
in
a
couple
years,
as
I
was
mentioning
and
we're
likely
to
see
a
variety
of
projects.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we
bring
you
yeah
some
information
around
that,
and
we
can
highlight
some
of
that,
for
you.
L
This
is
perhaps
unanswerable
because
we're
in
the
after
times,
but
in
the
before
times
before
covid
kind
of
you
know,
put
a
a
halt
to
these
projects.
What
would
have
been
the
normal
range
of
number
of
applicants.
D
My
understanding
is
that
and
I
wasn't
part
of
City
staff
at
the
time,
but
my
understanding
is
that
there
was
maybe
three
and
often
time
it
was
a
mix
of
projects.
Sometimes
smaller
they'd
be
less
than
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
so
it
was
a
slightly
different
process
yeah.
D
So
it
was
a
slightly
different
process.
There
might
be
three
applicant
and
all
three
would
get
funding.
D
We
have
more
money
than
in
the
previous
year
because
we
have
250
instead
of
the
hundred
thousand
us,
but
we
also
had
about
13
to
15.
People
show
up
to
the
webinars.
Now
there's
a
good
chance.
Not
all
of
those
organizations
are
going
to
be
applying
due
to
a
lot
of
part
of
those
meetings
is
going
over
the
requirements
and
them
understanding
whether
or
not
they
want
to
go
through
it
or
whether
their
project
would
be
eligible.
D
C
I
I
can
quickly
give
an
update
on
the
rlto.
I
We
fully
recognize.
This
is
the
first
time
that
the
committee
will
be
receiving
proposed
language
and
it
is
quite
extensive
in
terms
of
the
edits,
and
so
we
anticipate
that
the
October
meeting
will
be
primarily
just
to
review
and
go
through
the
proposal
at
in
depth
and
an
opportunity
for
the
committee
task.
Clarifying
questions
make
suggestions
for
amendments
to
language,
and
we
anticipate
based
on
that
discussion,
bringing
this
item
back
for
the
committee's
recommendation
in
either
the
November
meeting,
or
that
special
December
meeting
that
you
all
just
scheduled
this
evening.
I
I
If,
if
that
is
not
achievable
in
November,
December
I
think
the
plan
B
is
really
to
look
at
additional
special
meetings
in,
in
order
for
us
to
wrap
this
particular
initiative
up
and
make
a
recommendation
ultimately
to
city
council
for
their
their
consideration
so
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
the
rlto
and
then
I'd
like
to
just
provide
a
quick
update
on
the
task
force
associated
with
that
work
as
well.
B
But
based
on
my
experience
at
the
June
meeting,
when
we
do
the
October
meeting,
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
just
read
reiterate
throughout
to
everyone
that
this
is
a
learning
opportunity
and
that
the
committee
is
is
going
to
ask
questions
not
because
we
don't
understand,
but
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
covering
all
possible
like
I,
think,
there's
I
think
we
would
benefit
from
trying
to
have
good
will
and
so
I
think
being
able
to
effectively
communicate
that
we
are
asking
questions
not
because
we
are
ignorant,
but
because
it
is
our
job
to
be
thorough,
like
I
think
there
was
an
assumption.
B
You
know
I
believe
someone
at
some
point
told
us
that
June
that
we
didn't
know
what
we
were
talking
about.
Some
of
the
members
of
the
committee
and
and
I
think
that
antagonism
doesn't
help
anyone
to
achieve
anything
so
I
I,
don't
know
it
as
we
frame
up
that
October
meeting
I
think
making
clear
that
we're
having
this
discussion
to
get
things
answered,
not
making
a
recommendation
tonight
so
much
as
trying
to
understand
the
issue.
Do
you
know
what
I
mean
I.
I
Do
and
I
think
that's.
You
know
why
staff
was
anticipating.
It
wouldn't
be
one
meeting
and
done
because
it's
it's
really
not
fair
to
anyone,
including
the
community,
to
be
able
to
have
a
few
days
to
review
ordinance
language
which
isn't
always
the
easiest
to
digest
exactly.
I
Particular
ordinance
has
a
lot
of
legal
legal
terminology
within
it.
It's
very
complex,
so
we're
trying
to
as
much
as
we
can
minimize
that
legalese
within
the
ordinance
but
I
think.
Inevitably
it
will
remain
and
and
to
your
point,
absolutely
I
think
it's
a
responsibility
of
staff
to
be
able
to
clearly
articulate
the
proposed
changes,
kind
of
the
reason
or
rationale
behind
those
particular
changes
and
afford
the
opportunity
for
the
community
and
committee
members
to
ask
questions
for
clarification.
I
Taking
the
more
iterative
approach,
I
think
will
ultimately
result
in
a
better
product
exactly
and
I
think
that's
ultimately
what
I'm
hearing
from
you.
You
are.
I
I
So,
in
terms
of
the
task
force
in
July,
the
just
cause
task
force
was
created
and
it
consists
of
two
housing
providers,
two
tenants
and
a
subject
matter
expert
and
they
were
charged
with
essentially
establishing
the
just
cause
ordinance
and
bringing
that
back
to
this
committee
for
consideration
at
your
October
meeting.
I
So
to
date,
the
task
force
has
held
three
meetings,
which
we've
kind
of
landed
on
a
regular
rhythm
of
weekly
meetings,
every
Friday
from
2
30
to
4
P.M
here
at
the
Civic
Center.
Those
are
those
meetings
are
held
on
the
second
floor
in
room
2404
and
they're
also
streamed
via
Zoom.
So,
if
you're
not
able
to
attend
in
person,
those
are
available
to
view
via
Zoom,
we
are
maintaining
a
website
which
I
will
make
the
note
tonight
that
there
needs
to
be
some
updates
to
that.
I
Just
based
on
recent
events,
and
we
also
will
post
the
previous
recordings
of
those
Zoom
meetings.
So
if
you
want
to
catch
up
on
the
discussions
of
the
task
force,
that
is
fully
out
there.
In
addition
to
draft
language
that
the
committee
is
working
through
making
kind
of
iterative
edits
to
the
proposal
as
they
go
and
similar
to
what
we
just
discussed
with
the
rlto,
this
would
come
back
for
kind
of
a
report
out
from
the
task
force
in
October.
I
It
is
our
anticipation
that
there
will
be
draft
language
at
that
meeting
for
introduction
and
conversation
so
make
sure
you've.
You
know,
had
a
lot
of
rest
before
the
October
meeting,
because
it's
probably
going
to
be
lengthy
and
again
anticipating
and
recognizing
the
fact
that
this
is
a
topic
that
the
committee
really
hasn't
fully
talked
about
and
kind
of
directed
the
creation
of
the
task
force.
I
We
do
anticipate
that
there
will
be
the
need
to
have
a
secondary
meeting,
which
again
would
be
either
that
November
or
December
meeting,
depending
on
how
those
conversations
go.
I
I
Ideally,
from
our
perspective,
having
that
recommendation
from
the
committee
in
November
that
meeting
in
December
would
be
ideal
just
to
move
things
forward.
But
again,
that's
at
the
discretion
of
the
committee
to
determine.
I
So,
on
the
on
the
project
web
page,
the
members
are
listed,
so
it
includes
council,
member
Reed,
who
is
the
chair
and
a
tenant
representative
on
the
committee
hcdc
member
Rodriguez
is
also
a
member
and
he's
also
a
landlord
Noreen
Kim
she's,
the
director
of
housing
law
practice
and
also
North
Suburban
legal
aid
clinic
I'm.
Sorry,
if
I'm
butchering
her
or
her
agency,
representation,
landlord,
Eric,
passett
and
then
tenant
Helen
Cho
who's.
Here
this
evening,.
I
2023
update
it'll,
take
you
to
the
residential
tenant
landlord
ordinance,
update
page
and
on
their.
You
will
see
all
of
the
information.
As
I
mentioned,
we
will
get
those
videos
of
the
previous
task
force
meetings
updated.
Actually,
during
this
meeting,
I
was
emailing
Lindsay
requesting
that
to
be
done.
I
So
look
for
that
tomorrow
to
be
updated
with
all
of
the
materials,
the
agendas
everything
that
has
been
shared
out
at
that
meeting.
I
think
the
task
force
has
been
very
intentional
about
wanting
this
to
be
a
transparent
process,
which
is
why
you
know
the
meetings
are
via
zoom
in
terms
of
participation.
In
addition
to
being
recorded,
So
folks
can
take
a
look
back
at
what
has
been
discussed.
C
J
And
I
know
this
was
shared
at
the
beginning
of
this
conversation,
but
I
think
it
is
important
to
continue
to
Center
the
information
or
data
that
is
driving
some
of
these
recommendations.
I
think
we
really
need
to
keep
that
front
and
center
both
from
the
landlord's
perspective,
but
also
for
the
tennis
perspective.
J
My
you
know,
I'm,
probably
a
bit
more
useful
on
the
on
the
tenant
side
of
things
and
I.
Think
whether
you
look
at
what
was
shared
with
us
today
that
we
have
836
people
on
the
waiting
list,
200
and
something
of
which,
wherever
it's
a
residents.
That
is.
That
is
a
data
point
that
tells
me
that
there
is
a
need
here,
whether
you
look
at
the
social
service
committee
that
we
just
had,
and
you
look
at
three
out
of
the
four
agencies
that
reported
that
day.
J
The
Moran
Center
connections,
of
course,
and
family
focused
all
reported
that
the
number
one
challenge
that
their
participants
are
facing
is
in
housing
and
on
and
on
and
on
and
on
right,
and
so
what
I
want
to
make
sure
that
before
we
engage
in
that
discussion,
In
The
Same
Spirit
of
what
was
said
a
moment
ago
that
we're
just
centering
the
right
things,
I
think
oftentimes
people.
Some
people
feel
like
we're,
we're
it's
a
solution.
J
Looking
for
a
problem
that
is
100
not
the
case
when
it
comes
to
housing
in
the
City
of
Evanston,
but
I
think
we
just
need
to
revisit
that
before
we
engage
in
these
discussions
at
every
opportunity,
so
I
just
want
to.
We
should
just
have
our
targets
really
clear
at
the
top
of
that
packet.
Here's
what
information
and
data
points
are
driving
some
of
these
recommendations
and
then
and
then
we
should
move
forward
from
there.
Yeah.
H
You
on
that
note
and
I
totally
agree
with
council
member
Burns
again
I
think
that
the
emphasis
should
be
placed
on
affordable
housing.
That's
what
Evanston
needs
and
I
think
that
the
more
the
more
we
look
at
the
amendment
to
the
landlord
tenant
ordinance
I,
truly
think
that
it
could
be
more
jeopardizing
to
that
endeavor
to
bring
more
affordable
housing
into
the
city
than
it
would
Aid
in
the
long
term
in
the
long
run.
I
think
that
that
that
could
be
detrimental
to
our
achievement
of
more
affordable
housing.
H
So
I
I
think
that
I'm
I'm
very
honored
to
be
in
the
task
force
and
I'm,
hoping
that
I'm
bringing
that
input
into
it,
not
antagonistic
as
to
tenants
rights,
because
I
think
that
everybody
in
this
world
has
a
right
to
to
be
happy.
That's
what
we
are
made
for
to
be
try
to
be
happy
and
housing
is
basic
need
of
everyone.
H
C
A
F
This
country,
so
you
know
it's
and
our
problem-
is
we
only
have
so
much
geography
to
build
on
knowing
something.
But
you
know,
I
haven't
looked
at
what
the
audience
is
now,
but
I
wondered
as
I
was
reading
through
things
again.
What
is
the
enforcement
mechanism
for
the
city?
I
C
Well,
then,
I
think
we
are
we've
gotten
through
our
agenda
and
thank
you
all
very
much
for
being
here
this
evening
and
our
next
meeting
is
October
17th.
C
So
look
for
look
for
a
big
packet
and
get
a
good
night's
sleep.
The
night
before
yeah.