►
From YouTube: Human Services Committee Meeting 10-7-2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
There
any
Corrections
additions.
Okay,
all
of
those
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed
all
right.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
for
consideration
is
HH
1,
its
ordinance
17
I,
know
19,
creating
title
2
chapter
15
of
the
Evanston
City
Code
forming
a
citizen
police
Review,
Commission
staff
recommends
approval
of
ordinance,
79
or
19,
and
that
is
for
action.
There
are
five
folks
signed
up
for
this
to
speak
to
this,
and
everyone
will
have
three
minutes
and
I
will
call
out
your
name.
C
Are
you
ready
for
me
all
right
good
evening?
Despite
six
revisions
proposed
ordinance,
I
mean
I,
know,
19
remains
an
unconstitutional
restriction
on
free
speech.
You
may
have
deleted
the
word
prejudging
from
215
7b,
but
that's
irrelevant
when
you
still
prohibit
members
from
speaking
outside
committee.
C
Meetings
on
pending
matters,
I
want
to
be
clear
that
I'm,
not
speaking
on
behalf
of
other
members
of
CPAC,
but
if
the
ordinance
has
written
were
in
effect
now
I
couldn't
stand
up
here
and
tell
you
that
at
last
month's
HSE
meeting
in
in
tonight's
meeting
that
the
information
APD
provided
to
you
about
complaints
contained
and
still
contains
incorrect
and
or
misleading
information,
but
it
did
last
month,
and
it
does
tonight
too.
I
hope
your
desire
to
know
true
and
accurate
information
is
stronger
than
your
desire
to
silence.
Citizens.
C
I
also
wouldn't
be
able
to
tell
you
my
concerns
about
the
privacy
interests
of
individuals
who
are
on
the
footage
we
see
last
week.
I
saw
something
I,
don't
believe
I
or
anyone
on
the
committee
should
have
seen
and
I'm
troubled
by
it
in
the
few
years
I've
been
on
CPAC.
This
is
by
far
the
most
personal
and
private
video
I've
ever
seen,
and
the
only
one
that
didn't
occur
in
public,
but
rather
in
the
privacy
of
someone's
home.
We
heard
the
name
of
the
person
the
address
mental
health
information.
C
We
saw
their
face,
the
face
of
other
citizens,
the
inside
of
their
home,
and
we
saw
the
person
in
the
state
of
near
undress.
I
objected
to
going
into
closed
session
because
I
don't
believe
that
there's
a
legal
exception
that
applies
I'm
having
to
discuss
that
separately.
There's
some
who
might
believe
that
my
objection
was
a
desire
to
make
the
footage
public,
but
I
was
well
aware,
and
we
were
explicitly
told
that
the
footage
would
not
be
shown
if
we
did
not
go
into
closed
session
and
I
was
okay
with
that
no
images
were
blurred.
C
No
personal
information
was
bleeped
on
the
audio
upon
looking
at
the
City
web
page.
That
explains
the
investigation
process.
Although
there's
noticed
a
complaint
and
said
police
might
review
video,
and
that
is
a
civilian
oversight.
Committee
exist,
there's
absolutely
no
notice
to
complain
and
said
anyone
other
than
the
police
will
review
the
video
and
no
real
explanation
of
what
CPAC
does:
there's
no
opportunity
to
consent
or
object
to
the
review
of
video
by
others.
C
In
this
particular
case,
I
have
good
reason
to
believe
that,
even
if
consent
were
obtained
that
it
might
not
have
been
considered
valid,
although
the
disclosure
of
the
video
wasn't
pursuant
to
FOIA
I,
don't
believe
its
disclosure
complies
with
either
FOIA
or
the
officer
warren
body
camera
act.
What
I
saw
wasn't
my
business
and
I?
Don't
think
I
had
the
right
to
see
it.
The
last
minute
deletion
of
the
confidentiality
and
non-disclosure
form
doesn't
fix
this
problem.
C
B
D
A
government
can't
silence
the
speech
of
citizen
on
matters
of
public
concern
like
this
I,
don't
know,
what's
so
difficult
to
understand
about
this
most
essential
and
basic
element
of
democracy.
I.
Don't
believe
that
my
responsibility
is
a
citizen
and
volunteer
member
of
a
committee
that
has
zero
power
to
impose
discipline
on
public
employees,
outweighs
the
privacy
interest
of
the
individual
who
has
accused
the
officer
of
wrongdoing.
D
I,
don't
believe
that
the
sheer
fact
that
they've
made
a
complaint
waives
their
right
to
privacy,
I'm,
really
I
was
really
hopeful
that
this
third
time
would
be
a
charm.
But
after
doing
a
word-by-word
comparison
of
tonight's
version,
with
the
version
presented
on
9/4
I
can
only
conclude
that
there's
an
unrelenting
commitment
to
drafting
an
ordinance
that
protects
the
police
without
proper
considers
consideration
of
the
rights
of
citizens.
Minimal
edits
were
made,
some
of
which
were
good,
but
those
improvements
remain
overshadowed
by
the
steadfast
restriction
of
free
speech.
D
Elected
officials
in
reviewing
approving
this
ordinance
need
to
stop
focusing
on
protecting
the
police.
The
police
have
so
many
layers
of
statutory
and
contractual
protection
between
the
FOP,
the
officer,
worn
body,
camera
Act.
The
uniform
peace
officers,
disciplinary
Act,
also
known
as
the
police
bill
of
rights,
the
police
are
nearly
impenetrable.
You
have
to
work
for
and
protect
the
citizens
who
elected
you
more
needs
to
be
done
to
protect
the
privacy.
D
D
A
few
minor
improvements
made
the
new
prohibition
on
family
members
of
city
employees
serving
the
inclusion
of
copies
of
citizen
complaints
and
interview
transcripts
to
the
committee
and
the
omission
of
the
confidentiality
and
non-disclosure
form
other
than
that
more
needs
to
be
done
to
protect
the
citizens,
privacy
interests
and
to
ensure
that
the
government
isn't
infringing
on
the
free
speech
of
committee.
Members
I'd
also
encourage
you
to
consider
the
inclusion
of
an
anti
retaliation
provision,
as
previously
recommended
this
court
right.
Your
time
is.
A
F
It
should
be
understood
that
by
making
Commission,
seven
nine
Oh
nineteen
more
of
an
activist
organization,
it
would
become
it
would
become
influenced
by
interested
parties
and
their
agendas.
This
would
detract
from
its
role
as
an
oversight
body,
making
it
likely
that
it
will
become
more
of
a
quasi
autonomous
organization,
pursuing
its
own
agenda
and
less
subject
to
the
Commission
addressing
complaints.
So
what
we
were
glad
to
see
that
that
there
were
a
few
lines
that
have
been
deleted
in
the
new
version
of
this
ordinance.
G
Good
evening
call
a
sudden,
a
member
of
the
fifth
Ward
I,
stand
this
evening
in
opposition
to
your
approval
of
ordinance,
seven
nine
zero
one,
nine
based
upon
the
following
concerns.
This
ordinance
as
written,
can't
be
supported
by
the
citizens
network
of
protection,
because
they
will
not
improve
equity
and
equality
in
Evanston,
the
citizens
network
of
protection
has
been
working
with
the
City
Council
and
the
Human
Services
Committee
for
more
than
ten
years
to
improve
civilian
oversight
of
police.
Over
the
years
we've
been
a
resource
to
this
committee.
G
We
have
provided
this
body
with
research
and
recommendation
from
numerous
academic
and
illegal
sources.
We
gave
this
committee
information
about
improving
civilian
oversight
from
the
United
Nation
Office
of
Drugs
and
Crime,
an
extensive
research
and
policy
analysis
for
organizations
like
campaign,
zero,
the
movement
for
black
lives
and
the
Center
for
popular
democracy,
but
it
seems
that
these
recommendations
weren't
considered
we're
graphing.
This
ordinance,
members
of
the
Human
Service
Committee,
the
city,
deserves
a
civilian
oversight
board
that
is
centered
on
equity
and
equality.
G
The
only
way
to
do
that
is
to
have
a
civilian
oversight
board
with
the
necessary
powers
and
scopes
of
responsibilities.
This
ordinance
that
is
currently
up
for
vote
is
severely
inadequate.
The
ordinance
should
adopt
a
proposal
that
meets
the
following
requirements:
establish
an
all
civilian
oversight,
Commission
with
discipline
power
with
the
following
powers
and
responsibilities,
evaluate
the
potential
racial
impact
of
any
new
laws
they
create
and
involve
community
organizers
and
people
who
work
with
disadvantage
as
populations
in
every
step
of
the
process,
implement
a
common
language
on
how
to
evaluate
these
topics
from
patrol
officers.
G
All
the
way
up
to
the
mayor's
office
now,
of
course,
collect
data
on
the
results,
democratically
elected
members
from
candidates
offered
by
community
organization
organizations.
They
should
reflect
their
communities,
especially
the
elements
of
their
communities
most
affected
by
police
abuse,
determine
policy
for
the
police
department
based
on
community
community
input
and
expertise
without
recommendations
aimed
at
reforming
police
practices
and
policies,
as
well
as
recommendations
that
provide
alternatives
to
police
share
policy
and
policy
changes
in
public,
excessive
formats
and
analysis
and
investigations
to
analyze.
G
H
Discipline
and
dismissed
police
office,
the
whole
public
disciplinary
hearing
select
the
candidate
for
police
chief
to
be
hired
by
the
mayor
evaluating
hire
the
police
chief
if
needed,
receive
full
time.
Come
competitive
Seraph
for
all
members
receive
regular
training
on
policing
and
civil
right
not
have
current
form
our
family
of
police
officers
as
members
serve
as
an
advisory
to
the
city
management
and
City
Council
on
issue
of
police
union
contract
that
can
potentially
negatively
negatively
affect
the
mission
of
the
Citizen
of
a
site
board
by
providing
recommendation.
H
B
A
B
E
A
A
I
J
So
I
have
a
couple
of
things.
J
Kimberly
Richardson
made
some
of
the
changes
that
were
brought
up
last
time.
So
thank
you
for
that,
but
so
I
still
have
a
concern
about
215,
seven
and
mr.
Richardson
and
I
just
had
a
conversation
about
that
and
she
explained
to
me
kind
of
the
city's
position,
but
we
will
get
to
15-7
under
meander.
Remember
responsibility
and
it's
B
remember
shall
refrain
from
making
any
comments
outside
of
the
committee
meetings
regarding
independent
complaint
or
investigation.
J
I
guess
for
me
the
things
that
the
members
can't
talk
about
are
things
that
are
an
executive
session
and
so
because
it's
an
open
meeting
I
still
just
feel
like
that
makes
it
seem
like
this
body,
can't
talk
about
things
outside
of
the
open
reading
that
they
would
otherwise
speak
about.
So
you
know
we
have
open
meeting
policies
and
then
we
have
executive
session
policies,
and
so
you
know
it
just
seems
like.
J
If
we
have
executive
session
policies
that
this
board
is,
you
know
trained
on
and
operates
under,
then
those
are
the
things
that
they
cannot
speak
about.
You
know
I'm
not
crazy
about
the
idea
on
here
that
police
where's
it
at
you
know
the
police
names
and
all
I.
Redacted
I
know
that
I
think
in
the
first
version
it
talked
about,
even
though
they
redact
that
you
can
for
them,
but
because
we're
not
talking
about
police.
You
know
people
by
name
we're
not
talking
about
citizens
by
name.
J
You
know
I
just
feel
like
that's
an
undue
burden
to
say
this
board
in
particular.
You
know
now
cannot
discuss
things
that
are
discussed
an
open
session
outside
of
the
meeting.
It's
not
what
we
do
for
other
boards
and
commissions.
We
just
say
you
can't
talk
about
executive
session
things
outside
of
the
meeting.
So
that's
my
first
thought.
My
second
thought
is
I
am
so
I
am
the
liaison
to
the
board.
J
Unfortunately,
just
with
my
life
schedule,
I
have
not
made
it
and
probably
should
at
the
next
rules
me
to
excuse
myself
and
have
someone
take
over
who
can
make
it
the
night
they
meet,
but
I
I
just
took
a
look
at
the
website,
based
on
what
Miss
builder
said
about
how
to
file
a
complaint
and
what's
listed
online.
So
it
seems
to
me
just
by
a
cursory
read
of
this.
It's
pretty
thorough
in
terms
of
telling
people
how
you
file
what
happens
when
you
file
that
there's
this
CPAC
board.
J
You
know
you
can
click
on
the
link
to
see
who
C
PAC
is.
There
is
not
information,
at
least
from
my
reading,
about
the
video,
and
so
you
know,
I,
don't
think
it
can
hurt
us
to
add
something
about
that.
However,
we
communicate
when
you
file
a
pleasure.
You
know
whatever
we're
giving
to
people
who
might
be
interested
in
filing
a
claim
or
a
complaint,
that
they
are
clear
that
their
video
might
be
viewed.
I,
you
know,
I
am
troubled
that
were
reviewing
video
I
thought.
J
We
were
always
doing
things
that
were
buzzed
over
and
such,
but
that
just
might
be
something
people
want
to
know,
I
think
that
can
just
help
them
to
decide
or
to
know
that
their
information
is
out
there
and
is
protected
right.
I
also
think
it
might
help
people
to
know
it's
a
thorough
process.
The
CPAC
is
actually
not
just
hearing
from
the
officer,
but
there
there's
a
thorough
process.
They
can
access
this
video
in
a
private
manner
to
make
their
deliberations.
J
A
I
It
then
draws
me
to
item
D,
which
is
all
members
must
sign
a
confidentiality
non-disclosure
form
regarding
the
executive
session
information.
Where
else
would
you
see
this,
but
in
executive
session?
So
I
guess
my
comments
to
the
committee
like
all
of
our
boards
and
communities.
This
is
very
serious
work.
The
front
section
talks
about
the
evidence
and
community
City
Council
determines
in
the
best
interests
create,
as
his
interview
commissioned
to
increase
transparency.
So
I
guess
my
comments
would
be
in
maybe
chief
you
can
give
us
just
a
little
bit
of
background
on
the
video
is.
I
If
you
truly
don't
want
to
see
this
and
trust
me,
there
are
some
things
that
I've
had
to
look
away
or
remove
myself.
Then
maybe
you
do
that
right,
but
it's
clear
to
me
or
I
guess
what
I
would
communicate
to
the
public
that
this
is
a
very
serious
Commission
I
mean
I.
Remember
the
first
laQuan
McDonald
video
I
had
a
very
difficult
time
watching
it.
I
When
I
saw
the
full
video
with
the
16
shots,
I
couldn't
watch
it
twice
so,
but
seeing
that
video
gave
me
the
full
impact
of
the
injustice,
what
was
done
so
chief
I,
don't
know,
I
mean
again
I,
see
myself
kind
of
torn
but
I
understand
in
terms
of
the
transparency.
How
necessary
is
and
I
think
it's
a
bold
move
for
you
to
open
up
this
to
that
very
small
committee.
Maybe
you
can
give
us
some
insight.
Well,
I.
K
Gratification.
It's
counterproductive
to
what
they
originally
signed
up
for.
A
lot
of
things
can
emanate,
in
particular
civil
litigation
on
a
part
of
the
city
being
a
defendant
when
that
video
isn't
treated
in
a
way,
that's
commensurate
with
the
police
officers,
Bill
of
Rights
the
rules
of
civil
litigation,
which
we
have
attorneys
to
to
advise
us
on
that
and
so
forth.
K
So
having
a
declaration
of
privacy
with
that,
video
is
very
much
needed
and
I
think
that
was
the
intentions
that
our
mayor,
when
he
formulated
this
new
committee,
was
to
to
clean
up
some
of
the
things
and
put
a
new
committee
in
place.
Now
it's
my
understanding
that
I've
been
gone
for
eight
years,
but
they've
been
doing
the
video
for
a
number
of
years
and
it's
been
confidential
until
it's
time
to
dissolve
one
committee
and
a
new
committee
comes
into
effect
for
their
own
self-serving
gratification.
K
So
I,
don't
appreciate
that
and
I'm
gonna
stand
up
for
the
police
officers
when
they
write
and
take
swift
and
good
action
when
they
wrong.
They
deserve
to
be
protected
under
the
law.
Just
like
a
citizen
does
and
my
allegiance
is
to
both
I
believe
that
transparency
is
key
in
having
a
great
police
department
and
we
have
led
the
way
in
this
community
for
many
years
with
having
Human
Service
oversight.
So
this
is
nothing
new
to
the
city
of
Evanston.
K
It
is
nothing
new
to
the
police
department
I'm
here
to
serve
at
the
behest
of
the
aldermen
and
the
city
manager
and
the
mayor
in
making
government
transparent
in
all
respects,
definitely
in
light
of
some
of
the
negative
things
that
we've
had
in
law
enforcement
in
the
past
ten
years.
So
if
you
got
any
other
questions,
I'll
be
more
than
willing
to
to
address
them.
I
I
I
L
I
So
it's
a
serious
responsibility
anyway,
you
want
to
shake
it
right
and
it's
almost
like
damned.
If
you
do
damned,
if
you
don't,
if
you
try
to
redact
it,
then
you're
hiding
something
and
in
some
situations,
if
they're,
seeing
the
same
information
that
we
use
counsel,
it's
a
violation.
Well,
it's
it's
the
exact
same
information
that
we
would
see
right
so.
I
M
Good
evening,
deputy
manager,
Kimberly
Richardson
I
am
one
to
the
question
of
the
redaction
or
the
blurring
of
the
face.
So
that
is
something
that
we
typically
do
for
FOIA
requests,
however,
due
to
the
time
frame
for
which
we
have
between
the
complaint
being
one,
you
have
to
go,
it's
a
process
like
anything,
and
so
you
have
an
individual
who
makes
a
complaint
initially,
and
then
they
follow
up
with
a
call
from
our
o-p-s
staff
will
follow
up
and
interview
them.
M
Once
the
interview
is
conducted,
then
they
go
through
the
process
of
the
chain
of
command
to
review,
which
then,
at
the
end,
the
police
chief
will
make
his
recommendation
for
how
to
perceive
of
discipline
for
discipline
necessary.
So
in
that
timeframe,
even
though
it's
not
always
that
you
have
to
remember,
we
just
now
using
body
cams
so
in
in
previous
previously
it
was
mostly
audio.
M
It
was
that
coming
from
a
dash
dash
cam,
it
was
not
video,
and
so
that
was
a
conversation
we
had
a
year
and
a
half
ago
about
well
when
we
start
implementing
video
cam
body
cam.
How
will
that
impact?
How
decisions
are
made?
And
so
what
you're?
Seeing
is
that
this
is
still
new
and
the
time
that
it
will
take
for
staff
to
do
redaction
will
add
additional
time
for
when
the
plaint
can
be
reviewed
in
process
and
then
brought
up
to
human
services.
M
So
we
were
being
asked
to
expedite
this
process,
but
at
the
same
time,
we
have
this
new
technology
for
which
we're
now
viewing
our
complaints,
and
so
we
can
slow
the
process
down
and
redact
it.
But
that's
going
to
take
longer
to
redo
to
proceed.
We're
asking
this
committee
because,
as
you
all
have
said,
the
chief
as
well
of
Alderman
Braithwaite.
This
committee
is
very
important
of
any
other
committees
that
we
have
the
constituents
with
the
city.
This
is
one
of
the
few
communities
that
is
dealing
with
personnel
issues.
M
That
is
that,
even
though
they
may
not
have
the
final
say,
it's
still
important
that
they
are
being
unbiased
and
even
when
it
comes
to
knowing
who
the
police
officer
is.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
there
are
some
police
officers
who
have
higher
interaction
with
other
with
the
communities
and
others,
and
so
they
may
have
more
complaints.
M
Just
for
that
higher
interaction,
well,
we
don't
want
to
bias
the
committee
by
saying
they
see
that
same
person
and
they're
no
longer
listening
to
the
content
of
the
kind
of
the
other
conversation
or
the
interaction
there
now
just
saying.
Well,
this
is
that
officer.
This
is
his
behavior,
and
so
it's
is
to
give
both
parties
the
ability
of
fairness.
We
I
heard
the
word
equity
earlier.
Well,
that's
fairness,
and
so,
in
order
to
allow
for
that
to
occur,
we
want
to
have
both
parties
be
anonymous
to
the
committee.
M
The
chief
knows
who
the
individual
are
at
the
end,
the
day
by
the
Bill
of
Rights.
The
chief
has
final
seong
discipline,
and
you
know
city
council.
You
have
in
the
past
have
requested
information.
Additional
information
on
a
committee.
Excuse
me
on
a
complaint
where
you've
gone
to
exact
session,
but
there
in
the
day
you
can
give
some
direction,
but
you
don't
are
you're,
not
the
arbiter
of
the
final
decision.
M
B
A
B
A
And
I
mean
harkening
back
to
the
conversation
that
we
had
about
the
ethics
ethics
changes
to
the
ethics
ordinance
tonight.
This
this
committee
is
a
extremely
important
committee
that
has
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
influence
over
what
what
happens
to
these.
These
complaints
and
the
officers
involved
in
them,
and
so
I
I
think
it's
very
important
that
again,
that
not
only
the
members
should
refrain
from
making
any
comments,
but
they
should
also
sign
the
confidentiality
and
non-disclosure.
A
You
have
to
put
it
back
in
and
that
they
understand
that
they
are
in
a
lot
of
ways
sitting
in
judgment
over
the
very
important
issues
and
that
the
appearance
of
impartiality
or
bias
or
unbiasness
is
extremely
important
to
maintain
the
integrity
of
the
committee
itself
and
I'm.
All
for
you
know,
disclosing
whatever
needs
to
be
disclosed
to
the
public,
and
you
know
would
support,
of
course,
support
that.
But
I
think
in
this.
In
this
instance,
those
two
things
are
hard
ones.
That
I
would
think
need
need
to
be
included
and
I
think
I.
A
A
J
Then
we
talk
about
video,
so
I'm
not
opposed
to
video,
but
if
we're
saying
we
don't
want
bias,
so
we're
gonna
fuzz
out
the
faces
of
the
officers
you
could
just
as
well
have
bias
by
seeing
the
face
of
the
citizen
in
the
video
and
hearing
their
address
and
their
mental
health
status
and
whatever
else
so
all
right.
Well,
I,
don't
want
to
make
it
a
longer
process.
I
think.
J
If
I
see
the
citizens
face
and
know
what
drapes
they
have-
and
you
know
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
so
I
think
if
we're
talking
about
in
this
instance
with
the
video
keeping
people
in
anonymous
and
it
needs
to
go
across
the
board
and
needs
to
be
everybody
in
the
video
that's
going
to
be
identified.
If
we
want
people
to
make
non
biased
decisions,
it's
a
small
city
but.
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
so
I
think
that
that's
codified
in
Section,
two
15-7
and
it's
the
exact
same
thing
that
we
have
to
adhere
to
all
of
them,
Fleming,
which
it
says
in
item
C,
a
member
shall
recuse
of
him
or
herself
from
deliberations
in
which
he
or
she
has
personal,
professional
or
conflict
of
interest
of
any
nature.
So,
if
you're
going
into
this
concern
about
bias,
then
you
probably
should
recuse
yourself
I.
J
I
So
to
that
I
just
want
to
clarify
the
two
things
I
heard
so
in
terms
of
anyone
being
biased.
I
think
that
that
clause
would
cover
any
member
shall
recuse
himself
and
terms
into
the
deliberation,
so
I
think
that
they
answers
that
question.
I
love
the
fact
that
whoever
put
this
in
that
there's
training
involved
and
I
think
anytime,
that
we
see
a
video
of
any
graphic
nature
or
something
that
has
come
to
executive
session.
I
A
threat
of
litigation
works
if
that's
teed
up,
so
that
somebody
doesn't
like
flip
the
switch
and
all
of
a
sudden
we're
watching
a
video
like
it
comes
with
a
legal
definition.
The
chief
of
police
explains
what
we're
about
to
see,
and
then
he
takes
a
step
by
step.
So
my
two
questions
to
you
is
number
one.
During
the
complaint
process,
whoever
submitted
their
complaint
are
they
checking
a
box
or
they
informed
that
someone
else
will
see.
I
M
To
answer
your
first
question:
no,
and
that's
something
that
we
need
to
move
forward,
doing
if
we're
going
to
have
on
a
redacted
video,
an
unredacted
of
everyone,
all
parties.
So
this
is
I'm
the
police
officer.
So
that
was
something
the
chief
and
I
were
discussing
that
we
need
to
to
start
doing
tomorrow
and.
M
As
to
how
the
processes
at
the
aunt
of
you
I'm,
not
in
the
room
at
that
time,
sergeant
Hart
is
that
officer
that
is
going
to
discuss
the
process
with
the
committee
now
remember,
the
committee
has
to
request
to
go
in
to
exact
session.
So
there
are.
We
started
the
process
of
reviewing
and
there's
at
some
point,
someone
may
have
a
question
for
which
they
want
to
see
video
to
either
affirm
that
issue.
M
I
J
M
B
J
M
On
the
wording
of
what
we
should
utilize,
but
I
believe
that
you
raise
a
good
point
since
we
don't
let
them
know
that
that
video
is
going
to
be
reviewed
by
outside
parties.
We
need
to
make
sure
they're.
Ok
with
that,
if
they're
not
ok
with
it,
then
we
have
to
figure
out
what
best
way
we
can
communicate
to
the
committee
that
video.
L
End
and
well
I
think
it's
trying
it's
going
around
the
same
issue.
I
was
just
trying
to
get
clear
on
our
making
sure
that
it's
not
just
the
police
officers
who
are
remaining
anonymous
that
were
truly
protecting
the
privacy
of
the
complainant
as
well
and
so
I
think
I'm
understanding
where
we
are
and
all
of
this.
M
I
So
I
mean
I
think
it's
important
and
I'm
sure
the
mayor
understands
the
importance
of
this.
The
value
of
this
conversation
is
important,
because
I've
learned
a
couple
of
things
in
terms
of
you're
right,
I'm
used
to
hearing
the
audio
and
now
with
the
police
body
camera
there's
a
an
additional
level
of
detail.
We
understand
that
we're
gonna
check
the
box,
so
anyone
filing
understands
that
the
review
committee
will
see
the
video
I.
I
Don't
know
if
that
means
that
the
person
who
is
making
the
complaint
has
an
opportunity
to
see
the
video
I,
don't
know,
but
that's
probably
something
you're
gonna
have
to
apply,
so
they
do
perfect,
so
they'll
they
can
make
that
determination
and
it's
crystal
clear
that
you
have
an
officer
who
was
explaining
the
scenario
and
what
they're
about
to
see
and
able
to
help
them
process
through
it,
and
also
that
there's
a
training
session
involved
with
this.
That
I
hope
would
include
the
confidentiality
in
all
those
legal
consequences.
I
Should
someone
outside
of
that
should
someone
step
outside
of
that
committee
and
share
the
information.
I
think
there's
a
very
clear
statement
that
I
read
that
they
will
be
removed
from
the
commissioned
by
the
immediately
removed
from
the
Commission
by
the
mayor,
which
I
think
is
a
good
statement
and
I
would
move
to.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
that
we
reinstate
item
D
under
subsection,
25
15-3.
B
A
The
whole
thing
I
mean:
we've
amended,
we
amended
the
ordinance.
Are
there
any
other
amendments?
Anyone
wants
to
make
okay,
then
the
ordinance
is
for
action.
It
will
go
to
the
City
Council,
all
those
in
favor
say
hi
bye,
any
opposed.
Okay,
three
two
one
it'll
go
on
to
Council.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
A
O
A
B
O
O
O
We
are
supporting
art
for
Robert
Crown,
we've
formed
a
new
equity
subcommittee.
We
have
had
an
arts
organization
luncheon
and
we're
planning
a
bright
night
for
the
Arts.
The
first
thing
I'm
going
to
do
is
just
run
through
some
of
the
organizations
and
the
artists
that
we
funded
and
programs,
so
we've
funded
programs
from
mudlark
theatre,
the
actors,
gymnasium
young
Evanston,
artists,
Evanston
symphonies,
middle
schools,
side-by-side
concert
and
orchestrations
for
the
gospel
choir,
kids
global
network,
introducing
social
justice
work
through
photography,
Evanston,
Dance,
Ensemble
identity,
dance,
which
does
a
program
at
family
focus.
O
We
have
allocated
money
to
paint
the
piano
in
Fountain
Square
and
a
series
of
music
and
dance
classes
for
those
with
special
needs
by
Utah
and
the
hi
Duke
art
encounters
programs
and
North
lights.
The
Northlight
theaters
work
in
the
schools,
Mitchell
Museum
of
the
American
Indian,
the
Evanston
Art
Center's,
aren't
making
program
that
goes
along
with
their
books
and
breakfast
program.
O
P
Good
evening,
I
just
like
to
mention
two
initiatives
that
are
new
in
this
period.
The
first
is
that
we
formed
a
new
equity
subcommittee.
We
take
really
seriously
all
the
initiatives
that
the
council
is
taking
on
matters
like
this.
It's
also
something
we
feel
strongly
about
individually
and
as
a
group,
so
we've
formed
a
subcommittee
of
three
Arts
Council
members,
three
public
members
with
prominent
positions
in
the
art
community
and
we've
just
met
for
the
first
time.
Our
next
order
of
business
is
to
go
through
some
racial
equity
training.
P
Together,
all
the
individuals
have
done
that
type
of
training
before
what
this
really
is
to
tell
us
how
to
mobilize
and
bring
action
and
make
change
within
the
organization
and
a
very
early
priority
that
came
out
of
our
first
meeting.
Is
that
we're
very
interested
in
supporting
the
efforts
of
Parks
and
Rec
to
bring
back
the
world
arts
and
music
festival
sometimes
called
the
ethnic
arts
festival.
So
that's
an
important
initiative
that
we'll
look
forward
to
bringing
forward
some
of
the
things
that
are
discussed
in
this
it's
a
later
meeting.
P
If
we
may,
and
then
it's
not
just
handing
out
the
money
that
you
kindly
grant
to
us,
but
also
a
convening
and
connecting
function,
that
we
think
is
important.
It's
been
a
couple
of
years
now
and
since
since
there
were
any
of
these
executive
directors,
the
arts
organizations
coming
together
for
a
luncheon
but
much
more
importantly,
for
a
conversation
they
used
to
be
held
with
about
eight
people
attending
and
then
they
weren't
held
for
two
years.
P
We
were
pleased
that
that
one
inaugural
one
bringing
them
back,
we
had
25
executive
directors
there
and
half
the
Arts
Council,
really
robust
conversation
biggest
single
thing
that
came
out
of
it
was
a
real
call
for
some
kind
of
online
place
where
all
of
the
different
arts
events
would
be
publicized
in
one
place.
The
city
doesn't
work
for
that,
but
we're
following
up
on
that
at
the
moment
about
hope
these
twice
a
year,
we'll
want
to
keep
them
reasonably
special
and
finally,
yeah.
O
We
also
have
an
event
coming
up
the
bright
night
for
the
Arts,
which
is
where
the
mayor
gives
out
some
awards
and
it's
on
Thursday
evening,
December
6
at
the
block
Museum.
So
in
addition
to
mayor
haggerty's
presentation,
we're
going
to
have
identity,
dance
to
a
performance
and
we'll
have
some
other
of
our
grantees
presenting
some
of
their
accomplishments.
So
we
hope
that
you'll
come
I
know.
Last
year,
Peter
alderman,
Braithwaite
came
and
I
think
it
was.
O
It
was
a
good
time
and
it
gives
everybody
in
the
arts
and
a
chance
to
meet
each
other
and
connect
and
see
what
we've
been
doing
this
year.
Family
focus
and
the
Chamber
of
Commerce
are
going
to
be
our
co-hosts,
so
they
bring
people
from
the
business
community
and
people
from
the
family
focus
community,
together
with
the
Arts
Council,
with
some
of
the
people
that
we've
funded
some
of
the
organizations
and
should
be
great
so
we'll
extend
invitations
to
the
entire
council,
the
mayor
city
manager
and
we
hope
you'll
all
come.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
Not
as
much
two
things
so
that
I
love
that
you're
gonna
work
with
Parks
and
Rec
I've,
been
speaking
to
director
Hemingway
for
a
year
about
bringing
back
the
ethnic
arts,
fair,
so
I
think
now
we
have
the
world
arts
fair.
We
have
something
we're
all
doubt,
but
so
I'm
glad
to
see
you
guys
supporting
that
and
then
I
also
didn't
want
you
to
forget
that
you
are
also
helped
with
the
you
are
beautiful
signage
over
a
shoot
that
didn't
make
the
thing,
but
you
ever
drive
down
oak
tin.
J
There
is
a
you:
are
beautiful,
there's
been
a
little
bit
of
a
discrepancy
with
the
beautiful
it's
hard
to
see.
We
they
let
the
students
paint
it
and
it's
a
little
hard
to
see,
but
anyway,
it's
beautiful
over
there.
So
thank
you
all
very
much
for
that.
People
in
the
community
really
like
to
have
some
art
and
South
Evanston.
So
thank
you.
Yeah.
L
I
I
was
gonna,
so
I
just
also
wanted
to
thank
you,
and
thank
you
probably
enough
for
stepping
in
to
do
an
amazing
job
with
this
committee.
I
applaud
just
the
diversity
of
the
group
that
you're
working
with
and
just
a
comment
to
Toby
so
I
think
we
all
were
very
big
fan
of
the
ethics
art
festival.
The
issue,
if
I
remember
correctly,
why
it
was
cut,
was
not
because
we
didn't
like
it.
It
was
because
there
wasn't
enough
money
to
support
it,
and
so
somehow
the
math
was
off
and
I.
I
So
as
in
costing
the
city
of
Evanston
and
the
unfortunate
thing
is,
we
haven't
found
a
way
to
monetize
it
and
actually
charge
the
participants
number
one,
and
it's
really
off
the
I,
don't
want
to
say
off
the
backs,
but
it's
funded
through
the
participants,
booth
fees
and
I
think
the
year
after
I
think
we
stopped
at
the
year.
After
there
was
just
a
huge
rain
one
of
the
days
and
it
completely
wiped
out
all
of
the
vendors
you
know
turned
over
their
tents,
etc.
I
A
B
A
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity.
I
believe
I
spoke
a
little
bit,
I
think
at
City
Council,
and
not
to
Human
Services
Committee
directly
so
and
I
was
trying
to
find
my
public
comment
on
that.
But
this
is
along
the
lines
of
that
public
comment.
If
I
was
to
FOIA
myself
some
day
so
in
terms
of
healthy
work
environment,
obviously,
that's
a
really
good
effort
to
continue
to
support
I.
E
The
best
way
you
can
ensure
the
integrity
investigation
is
make
sure
the
person's
been
heard
and
take
the
time,
and
if
it
takes
a
little
bit
longer
than
you
expect
go
with
it,
go
with
what
you
feel
as
a
person
who
has
some
expertise
in
handling
trauma.
The
level
of
these
things
that
come
too
far
forward
if
you've
been
abused
in
any
way
in
any
shape
or
form,
which
probably
most
of
us
happen
when
you
get
in
a
situation
that
makes
makes
you
either
anxious
or
alarmed
or
fearful.
E
That's,
usually
your
reaction
to
something
that's
gone
on
before
that
you
recognize
and
want
to
stop
if
it
has
to
do
with
sexual
harassment
or
racism.
These
things
are
pervasive
in
our
society.
It's
not
unusual
for
these
things
to
be
underlying,
so
I
suggest
that
we
got
to
take
a
holistic
approach
and
that
we
need
to
have
outside
help,
and
it's
not
all
about
business
models
and
saving
your
ass
and
excuse
me
and
saving
it
behind.
So
it's
a
guard
to
legal
fees.
E
The
legal
fees
happen
because
of
what
I
presented
earlier
about
equity
and
justice.
If
you,
if
you
address
equity
and
justice
in
everything
you
do,
then
those
sorts
of
things
will
fall
out,
because
people
will
believe
in
the
system
and
make
use
of
it.
You
should
see
a
decrease,
not
a
steady-state
affair,
of
where
you
stand
in
terms
of
helping
people
and
complaints.
That's
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
E
Q
J
Then
I
complimented
you
on
being
very
honest
about
people's
kind
of
lack
of
trust,
some
some
things
in
this
building
we've
seen.
You
know
at
least
this
year
alone,
where
we
spent
quite
a
bit
of
money
on
health
base
healthy
workplace
claims,
because
we
give
staff
the
option
of
having
it
handled
outside
the
building
and
that
cost
quite
a
bit
of
money.
So
I
would
like
to
know
more
information
before
we
proceed
with
going
the
way
we've
gone
now
is
there's
a
service
that
we
can
outsource
to.
They
can
handle
these
claims.
J
Then
we
can
just
kind
of
get
their
refined
eggs
back
to
us
and
you
know
even
look
at
how
to
process
it.
The
other
thing
I'm
interested
in
is,
as
we've
seen,
kind
of
an.
What
I
guess
is
an
increase
in
healthy
workplace
claims
that,
regardless
of
what
the
finding
is,
we
have
two
staff
who
are
probably
still
working
in
the
same
space
together
and
as
far
as
I
know,
there's
nothing
that
we
offer
for
kind
of
mending
that
relationship,
because,
regardless
of
the
finding
someone
is
going
to
be
upset
and
then
we're
expecting
them.
J
You
know,
as
we
should
have
paid
staff
to
come
back
and
work
together,
but
that
might
not
be
the
healthiest
way
to
move
forward
and
I.
Think,
as
you
know,
employers
somewhere,
we
want
to
offer
a
healthy
workplace.
We
should.
We
should
offer
something
like
that.
So
I
also
would
like
to
have
more
information
brought
back
to
this
committee
about
how
we
could
do
that
I.
Imagine
within
this
brilliant
city.
We
have
some
mediators.
J
We
could,
you
know,
use
to
offer
that
experience
if
people
were
interested,
because
we
do
want
this
to
be
a
productive
and
healthy
work
space,
even
if
they've
gone
through
our
system
and
haven't
been
satisfied
with
the
findings.
So
those
are
two
things
that
I
would
like
to
be
brought
back
to
the
committee
for
us
to
decide.
J
Q
Q
Right
so
there
is,
there
are
several
companies
that
do
receive
the
complaints,
but
they
are
not
the
investigators,
they
simply
are
receiving
their
fact.
Finders.
They
just
receive
the
facts
and
then
they
dish
it
back
out
to
either
private
attorneys
or
to
the
employer
to
complete
the
investigation.
So
it's
not
like
EAP.
Where
EAP
we
don't
want
to
know
the
information
that
is
being
addressed
and
and
received,
they
receive
they
receive
the
information,
and
then
they
find
resources
for
the
folks
for
mental
health,
substance
abuse
addiction
issues.
Q
We
would
not
necessarily
be
in
the
same
situation,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
to
avoid
any
corporate
liabilities.
So
the
city
has
the
right
to
know
all
of
this
information
to
investigate
into
resolved
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
the
employees
are
heard
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
the
employees
are
satisfied
with
the
results
and
to
make
sure
that
their
concerns
are
being
addressed.
As
the
citizen
had
previously
addressed.
We
do
here
all
of
our
employees.
Our
employees
are
first
and
foremost
the
most
important
things
we
welcome
them.
Q
Coming
in
with
complaints,
we
listen
to
them.
We
make
sure
that
we
transfer
folks,
if
necessary,
we
move
them
so
that
they're
not
involved
in
a
certain
situation
where
they're
not
comfortable
more
recently
and
I
believe
earlier
this
spring,
we
removed
somebody
from
the
vicinity
of
the
employee
that
had
made
the
complaint,
so
it
made
up
the
transition
a
little
bit
more
easy
and
the
investigation
to
take
place
a
little
bit
more
openly.
So
I
think
that
the
way
that
things
are
being
done
now
seems
to
be
working.
Q
We
haven't
received
any
complaints
about
integrity
issues
about
confidential
issues
about
any
other
types
of
resolution.
The
one
thing
that
I
would
address,
which
I
put
in
the
very
end
of
the
report,
is
that
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
city
manager
knows
that
he
or
she
needs
to
address
the
significance
of
the
report.
Q
So
if
the
reports
have
a
sustained
finding
and
recommendations,
I'm
recommending
that
the
city
manager
work
more
closely
with
the
affected
department
to
make
sure
that
the
employees
concerns
are
being
addressed
and
that
there's
discipline,
that's
being
recommended
or
counseling,
that's
being
recommended
that
the
city
manager
make
a
better
effort
to
make
sure
that
those
things
are
addressed.
I
think
that's
where
the
fallout
was
happening,
wasn't
so
much
that
the
investigation
wasn't
being
done
or
that
the
investigations
weren't
resulting
in
good
findings.
But
rather
there
was
a
fall,
the
fallout.
Q
Q
We
can
only
make
the
recommendations
we
send
them
up
to
the
city
manager's
office
and
then
it's
up
to
the
city
manager
to
work
with
a
department
head
to
either
impose
discipline
to
mandate,
counseling
I
think
that's
where
the
issues
were
coming
and
that's
what
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
City
Council
directs.
The
next
city
to
make
sure
that
that's
a
priority
that
they
address,
that.
Q
Anonymous
it'll
depend
on
the
complainant,
so
if
the
complainant
wants
to
remain
anonymous,
they
would
send
over
a
an
anonymous
complaint
that
ex
person
did
X
thing
and
expect
the
city
to
make
that
resolution.
If
the
complainant
is
identified,
then
they
would
report
back.
Judy
said
this
about
Peter
and
Judy's
not
happy
with
this
and
wants
this
to
happen
to
Peter
and
they
like
what
I
didn't
really
say
that
and.
Q
And
then
we
would,
we
would
need
to
then
interview
Judy
again.
We
would
then
need
to
interview
Pierre
again,
so
the
call
is
just
for
them
to
receive
the
complaint,
so
they
would
receive
the
complaint.
Judy
says
this
Judy
says
that
I
would
then
need
to
say:
hey
Judy
I
need
to
meet
with
you
again.
I
would
need
to
interview
with
you
again
and
listen
to
all
of
your
complaints
again.
So.
A
Q
In
my
opinion
that
some
employees
just
aren't
getting
handled
as
quickly
as
possible,
some
employees
feel
that
there's
too
much
delay
and
I
think
that's
what
happens
is
after
you
know
a
couple
of
weeks
of
Investigation.
The
report
goes
up
to
the
city
manager's
office.
They
have
to
wait
for
the
next
bi-weekly.
Maybe
that
gets
canceled
in
their
city
council
meetings.
So
all
of
that
delay
then
causes
more
angst
for
the
employee
who
doesn't
hit
a
resolution
or
or
similarly
if
the
employee
is
being
disciplined
or
there's
a
recommendation
for
a
discipline.
Q
Q
Q
Say
Sicily
saying
that
she
come
plates
to
McMillan
or
judy
complaints
to
me
that
Ike
has
said
something
inappropriate
or
has
done
something
inappropriate.
So
I
would
talk
to
Sicily
at
an
interview,
her
interview,
other
witnesses
that
might
have
observed
or
seen
something.
Then
then
I
would
end
the
conversation
with
talking
to
Ike,
hey
Ike.
What
did
you
do
if
there's
any
corroboration
and
the
evidence
we
would
conduct
it
just
like
any
other
investigation?
If
there's
a
sustained
finding
so
Sicily
says
you
know
what
I
want
this
to
happen
and
we
agree.
Q
Ike
needs
to
be
disciplined.
I
needs
to
be
counseled
on
something.
We
would
then
send
that
report
to
the
city
manager's
office
with
those
recommendations
and
then,
ultimately
it
would
be
up
to
the
city
manager
to
meet
with
Mike's
department
head
and
say:
hey,
you
know
what
what's
going
on
here.
What
do
you
think?
What
do
we
do
and
then
make
the
decision
accordingly
and
I?
Think
that's
where
the
delay
has
occurred
and
that's
where
there's
been
less
of
what.
A
I
Want
to
say
thank
you,
Jennifer,
and
she
spelled
a
lot
of
this
out
on
in
detail
on
page
55,
so
I
like
the
fact
that
you've
identified
what
the
issue
is
and
I
think
under
new
administration
and
next
city
manager.
That's
something
that
we'll
all
keep
in
mind
and
make
sure
that
he
prioritizes
or
she
the
other
piece
of
information
that
I've
found
interesting,
were
the
results
of
some
of
your
surveys.
So
it's
good
to
see
that
information
I
have
to
be
honest,
like
I
made
I,
don't
think
this
was
in
our
first
panel.
I
I
Some
would
agree
that
I'm
comfortable
to
talking
to
my
supervisor,
which
I
think
Anna
totally
like
I,
didn't,
have
a
benchmark
and
I
thought
that
it
was
a
lot
worse
than
that
and
then
89
percent
of
the
respondents
of
answered
always
are
often
usually
my
supervisor,
treats
me
with
respect
and
dignity
and
creates
a
healthy
and
positive
environment.
For
me
and
my
coworkers
again,
that
is
a
really
high
percentage.
So
if
there's
ever
a
challenge
like
329
I,
don't
know
what
your
process
or
methodology
was
for
administering
it.
I
J
Another
question:
do
you
just
write
so
then
your
memo,
which
I
just
finished
I,
guess
I'm
gonna
start
my
same
concerns,
part
of
it.
So
when
you
say
you
know
which
is,
we
should
stay
the
same
because
you
don't
have
any
complaints.
My
question
is:
who
are
people
complaining
to
right
so
if
I
want
to
make
it
healthy,
workplace
claim
and
I
feel
like
Jennifer
treats
me
unfairly
because
of
whatever
Who
am
I
going
to
complain
about
that
right
and
so
I
think
I
mean
I'm
just
type
of
that
ugly
right.
J
J
So
so
there's
that
part-
and
this
is
good
to
know-
I
thought
that
the
phone
call
system
must
like
it,
the
EAP,
where
you
call
and
they
do
it
on
you
know:
I
did
a
very
cursory
kind
of
Google
search
for
that.
I
understand
understand
about
the
city
manager,
its
responsibility
in
terms
of
the
discipline,
but
I
also
concerned,
because
you
know,
is
good.
The
city
manager
just
say:
hey
I
saw
Jennifer
spit
in
the
hallway,
therefore
write
her
up.
There's
no
investigation,
there's!
No
anything
I
am
the
judge
and
jury
to
make
that
determination.
J
J
There
are
those
kind
of
things
within
our
system
to
me
that
aren't
really
setting
us
up
to
say
we're
actually
having
a
fair
system
I'm
still
concerned,
I
mean
I
appreciate
that
people
are
able
to
go
outside
and
have
these
done
by
attorneys
I'm
still
not
exactly
sure
who,
and
why
and
how
we
determine
that.
But
I
know
we
can't
continue
to
the
same
at
$10,000.
Bill
for
a
healthy
workplace
claim
either
sure.
Q
So
a
couple
of
things,
so
the
city
manager
could
certainly
try
to
discipline
somebody
for
having
seen
something
if
there
was
a
disciplinary
action
form
that
came
to
my
office,
and
it
said
this
person
needs
to
be
written
up
because
the
city
manager
observed
Judy,
spitting
I,
would
say
we'll
wait
hold
on
Judy.
You
know
that
would
be
Judy's
the
bad
person
today.
So
if
that
were
to
come
down
into
HR,
and
that
would
be
a
disciplinary
action
form
that
would
come
in
HR
would
certainly
red
flag
that
and
say
wait.
Q
Nobody
can
just
write
up
sunny
for
doing
something.
There
has
to
be
some
evidence.
There
has
to
be
something
other
than
he
said.
She
said,
because
we
cannot
discipline
folks,
for
he
said
she
said
that
just
becomes
a
very
difficult
situation.
So
again,
some
similarly
with
investigations.
He
says
he
said
he
said
situation
isn't
always
the
best
idea,
so
we
will
always
go
in
and
try
to
look
to
see
what
was
happening.
What
was
going
on,
we
would
have
spoken
to
to
Judy.
It
said:
hey
Judy,
did
you
spit?
Yes,
I
spit
I?
Q
Didn't
you
know?
Was
it
on
accident,
or
it
flew
out
of
my
mouth
or
something
like
that,
then,
if
there's
anything
to
corroborate
discipline,
we
would
do
so
accordingly,
as
far
as
coming
to
HR
sure
I
will
concede
that
there
might
be
some
folks
who
aren't
trustworthy
of
HR.
There
are
plenty
of
other
options
for
people
to
file
complaints,
what
they
can
file
directly
to
the
city
manager's
office.
They
can
file
with
their
supervisors.
They
can
file
with
their
department
head.
Q
So
employees
have
many
different
options
on
how
to
file
complaints
about
unhealthy
workplaces
about
harassment.
There
are
several
different
ways.
During
sexual
harassment,
training
we've
been
teaching
employees
that
there
are
several
they
can
file
directly
with
the
city
manager.
They
can
file
with
Michele
they
can
file
with
their
department
had
their
supervisors.
There
are
plenty
of
people
who
can
receive
these
complaints.
J
Q
I
A
B
A
R
Want
to
provide
a
quick
update
on
what
we
have
come
up
with
after
further
research
and
review,
we
have
identified
seven
immediate,
immediate
actions
and
for
long-term
and
ongoing
actions
to
address
issues
of
language
access.
So
in
the
next
30
to
90
days
we're
proposing
to
implement
a
citywide
language
access
guidelines,
we
currently
have
a
contract
with
language
language
line
solutions.
There
we
have
their
telephone
interpretation
services.
We
are
proposing
to
make
sure
that
all
employees
know
about
the
service.
In
that
it
is
utilized
within
all
of
our
city
operations.
A
A
R
R
R
Well,
none
at
this
point,
I
mean
people
can
make
a
request
to
have
an
on-site
interpreter.
If
they're
coming
to
the
meeting,
but
I
mean
you
raise
a
really
good
point
right
for
the
people
who
cannot
make
it
to
the
meeting.
This
is
where
we
conduct
our
business
right
yeah.
We
have
not
explored
closed
captioning
on.
J
R
J
Think
at
least
offering
that
I
don't
know
about
the
closed
caption
of
how
we
do
that,
but
I
think
at
least
offering
either
the
notes
or
we
do
those.
You
know
those
short
City,
Council
bullets
or
whatever
actions
like
at
least
to
have
that
and
Spanish
would
be
nice,
because
then
people
can
at
least
see
what
we
you
know.
A
A
If
we
can
do
that
and
if
they
won't
do
that,
what
the
cost
of
it
would
be
because,
again,
I
think
you
know
this
is
where
we
do
business
and
if,
if
we're
only
providing
minutes
in
Spanish
or
if
we're
not
even
providing
that
that's
really
cutting
off
a
large,
you
know
part
of
our
population
from
not
getting.
You
know
any
any
active
information
at
all
about
how
their
government
works.
J
So
so
thank
you
for
putting
this
together.
I
know
this
was
initially
not
your
task
and
you
have
been
tasked
with
it.
So
thank
you
for
doing
that.
My
only
question
or
a
concern
still
is
that,
as
these
documents
are
translated
that
they
can
be
accessed
easily
somewhere,
our
website
is
not
be
most
user-friendly,
and
so,
if
I'm
trying
to
then
find
something
in
a
different
language,
it
might
be
nice
to
have
it
all
in
one
place.
J
Well,
also
that
we
just
I'm
sure
we'll
do
this
be
be
mindful
when
we
make
our
database
of
staff
who
are
bilingual,
you
know
I
just
hate
that
the
onus
is
gonna,
be
on
whatever
staff
and
I
know.
You're
gonna
make
a
policy
about
how
to
ask
for
assistance,
but
you
know
the
thumbless
is
on
a
limited
number
of
staff
to
then
you
know
speak
for
other
people
coming
in
sure.
B
P
R
So
the
idea,
for
you
know
implementing
the
language
line
telephone
service
is
to
eliminate
that
we
were
really
trying
to
get
away
from
not
inviting
will
staff
to
rely
on
by
the
bilingual
staff
to
translate
for
them
and
then
therefore
have
that
issue
of
divulging
your
your
business
to
people
that
might
not
be
qualified.
So
these
would
be
these.
These
are
qualified
translators
that
you
have
over
the
phone.
We
really
want
to
only
use
staff
only
if
it
is
absolutely
necessary,
but
not
our
first
line
of
offense
great.
A
Paulina,
could
you
reach
out
to
rotary
I
believe
they
well
I
know
they
used
to
have
a
simultaneous
translation
department,
but
to
find
out
what
what
it
is
that
they're
using
I
doubt
that
they're
using
live
people
just
to
translate
well,
they
must
be
using
something,
and
maybe
we
could
piggyback
on
that.
Well,
since
they're
applying
for.
J
Everyone,
it's
nice
to
meet
another
look
at
the
meeting,
goodness
question,
so
we
have
these
new
signs
now
you
know
the
little
wood
things,
and
so
we
took
down
the
paper
size.
You
know
they
tell
you
first
floor.
Is
this
it's
all
for
that,
but
those
aren't
in
Spanish,
which
so
are
you
gonna
put
the
paper
ones
back
up
in
Spanish.
We're
gonna
have
a
language
hotline
at
the
301
desk.
So
if
someone
comes
in
and
needs
to
be
out
where
to
go
and
that
through
one
Operator
is
not
bilingual,
they
can
figure
that
out.
J
R
Good
question,
so
no,
we
have
not
thought
about
the
the
signs
for
work
to
find
what
what
I
was
thinking
more
about
the
it
was
more
about
the
lines
of
know,
people
knowing
that
we
have
the
services
available.
Those
are
the
posters
said.
I
was
thinking
about
my
week.
That's
a
good
point
and
we'll
look
into
those
as
well
worked
if
I
work.