►
From YouTube: Human Services Committee Meeting 5-2-2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
so
welcome
everyone
to
the
meeting
of
the
human
services
committee
of
may
2nd
2022.
We
have
a
quorum,
so
I
consider
us
ready
to
do
our
business
and
our
first
item
of
business
is
approval
of
the
minutes
of
our
meeting
of
april
4th.
With
someone
make
a
motion.
B
A
No,
all
right,
so
the
minutes
are
approved.
We
are
our
first
main
item
of
business
is
hearing
about
the
the
e-plan,
and
I
know
we
do
have
at
least
one
public
comment
regarding
the
e-plan.
Would
you
like
to
go?
First,
yeah,
okay,
yeah
come
ahead.
C
D
Good
evening,
chair
and
members
of
the
human
services
committee,
I'm
don
zigler
evanson
resident
since
1979
a
faculty
member
of
the
uic
school
of
public
health
and
chair
of
the
evanson
health
advisory
council
or
ehec
ehack
is
a
collection
of
professionals
from
academia,
medical
public,
health,
social
and
educational
services,
mental
health
fields
and
private
citizens.
Here
in
evanston,
our
mission
is
to
assess,
encourage,
evaluate
and
advocate
for
community
health
and
to
provide
counsel
to
the
evans
and
health
department
regarding
programs
serving
people
with
or
at
risk
of
health
challenges.
D
D
I
plan
stands
for
the
illinois
project
for
local
assessment
of
needs,
evanson's
contribution
to
this
process,
and
our
requirement
is
our
e-plan,
which
our
able,
hhs
staff
will
be
presenting
tonight.
You
know
this
is
important.
D
However,
while
easy
to
describe
in
general
terms,
this
will
not
be
easy,
as
they
are
influenced
not
only
by
social
determinants
of
health,
but
also
political
and
commercial
determinants
of
health.
Therefore,
please
support
these
priorities
through
a
total,
all
health
and
all
commitment
by
city
leadership.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
A
Thank
you
so
ike
shall
I
turn
it
over
to
you
to
or
how
do
you
want
to.
A
E
E
Not
only
are
we
going
to
be
focusing
on
these
plans
in
the
next
five
years,
we
also
have
to
put
strategies
and
implementations
in
order
to
see
that
these
help
priorities
or
addressed.
Are
they
going
to
be
addressed
significantly?
That's
the
hope,
but
it
is
forced
to
present
to
this
committee
these
indicators
that
we
have
based
on
data
and
not
just
data.
We
also
sought
the
input
of
our
community
members
who
range
from
those
in
medicine
and
public
health,
academia,
and
what
have
you
to
come
up
with
these
health
priorities?
E
We
have
indicated
three
health
priorities
that
we'll
be
focusing
on
in
the
next
five
years,
even
though
the
health
priorities
in
evanston
are
broad,
we
arrive
at
a
consensus
that
these
are
the
health
priorities
that
we'll
be
working
on
in
the
next
five
years,
just
based
on
the
data
that
we
have
and
the
community
input
in
this
process.
E
I
would
also
like
to
use
this
opportunity
to,
if
you
guys
can
step
up
to
the
podium
to
the
to
two
key
members
at
the
health
and
human
services
department.
Who've
worked
on
this
e-plan
we've
met,
I
would
say
every
two
weeks
to
work
on
the
only
plan
and
fashion
a
plan
on
how
to
actualize
what
our
e-plan
and
what
these
health
indicators
are,
and
I
would
like
to
introduce
christine
myers,
who
is
our
community
health
specialist.
E
She
was
actually
hired
a
month
or
two
before
kovidhit,
so
she's
been
with
the
department
for
a
little
over
two
years
and
greg
olsen
who's,
our
public
health
manager,
and
he
has
been
with
the
department
for
over
seven
years.
You
might
have
exchanged
emails
with
them,
but
I
don't
know
if
you've
had
to
meet
them
in
person
largely
due
to
covet,
and
here
they
are
christine.
If
you
want
to
take
it
away.
F
Thank
you
good
evening,
council
members,
it's
my
pleasure
to
introduce
the
findings
of
our
eplan
again.
This
is
the
community
health
assessment
that
reflects
our
understanding
of
health
and
well-being
of
evanstonians
and
lays
out
a
strategic
plan
for
addressing
critical
health
needs
for
the
next
five
years.
F
So
first,
I
want
to
start
off
by
just
talking
about
kind
of
how
we're
thinking
about
health
for
this
health
assessment.
So
in
former
e-plans
we
really
focused
on
health,
behaviors
and
disease
conditions,
so
thinking
about,
for
example,
obesity
and
what
caused
it.
So,
maybe
thinking
about
poor
nutrition
or
thinking
about
lack
of
physical
activity.
F
What
we
increasingly
understand
in
public
health
and
more
broadly,
is
that
we
cannot
stop
at
health
behaviors.
We
need
to
look
at
the
living
conditions
that
influence
our
opportunity
to
be
healthy.
So
we
need
to
look
at
the
built
environment.
We
need
to
look
at
whether
there
is
access
to
affordable,
healthy
food.
We
need
to
look
at
whether
moms
feel
safe,
sending
their
kids
out
to
play
at
the
parks.
Those
kinds
of
things,
and
so
the
things
that
we
focused
on
in
our
e-plan
really
reflect
the
living.
F
So,
for
example,
with
life
expectancy
in
the
u.s
life
expectancy
is
about
78.7
years
old,
and
if
we
look
at
evanston
as
a
whole,
we
look
like
we're
doing
pretty
well
where
we
live
to
about
an
average
of
82
years.
But
then,
when
we
look
at
a
neighborhood
by
neighborhood
level,
we
start
to
see
really
stark.
Inequities
emerge
wherein
we
have
a
13-year
life
expectancy.
Difference
among
two
neighborhoods
that
border
each
other.
G
Oh,
I
have
a
question.
You
don't
have
to
stop
now,
but
I'm
guessing
where
those
neighborhoods
are.
Can
you
just
send
update
that
to
come?
I'm
sorry,
I'm
guessing
where
those
two
neighborhoods
are.
But
my
question
is:
can
you
just
do
a
follow-up
that
overlays
this
with
the
ward
boundaries
absolutely.
F
Thank
you
to
do
that.
Yep
yep,
and
so
this
is
the
same
life
expectancy
map
that
we
just
looked
at
placed
side
by
side
with
our
redlining
map
from
1935..
F
And
so
so
we
see
that
that
area
with
the
lowest
life
expectancy
corresponds
roughly
with
the
fifth
ward
and
our
formerly
redlined
neighborhood
in
evanston,
and
unfortunately,
we
see
in
this
red
lighting
map
a
pattern
that
was
set
into
play
a
long
time
ago,
wherein
we
have
areas
of
concentrated
economic
and
health
disadvantage,
and
we
also
have
in
the
areas
in
blue
and
green
areas
that
were
set
into
play
a
long
time
ago
of
areas
of
concentrated
health
and
wealth
and
privilege.
F
So
those
areas
in
blue
and
green
were
the
labeled,
the
most
desirable,
the
areas
that
were
most
heavily
invested
in
and
the
areas
where
we
had
high
concentrations
of
wealth,
and
so
even
almost
100
years
later,
we
will
see
a
pattern
throughout
these
maps
wherein
we
see
often
the
poorest
health
and
the
worst
economic
outcomes
happening
in
that
area.
That
was
formerly
redlined
and
then
in
areas
where
we've
historically
invested
a
lot.
F
We
see
health
outcomes
and
economic
outcomes
that
are
a
lot
better
and
just
to
let
you
know
that
redlining
map
kind
of
again
set
into
pattern
set
into
place
patterns
that
we
kind
of
continue
to
see
play
out.
So
this
is
not
just
historical.
F
F
We
look
really
good
so
in
the
u.s
there's
a
median
household
income
of
about
62
thousand
dollars
in
evanston,
it's
about
78
000,
but
then,
of
course,
when
we
look
at
a
neighborhood
by
neighborhood
level,
we
can
see
stark
disparities
in
household
income
and
kind
of
thinking
about
how
this
influences
health.
We
can
think
about.
F
You
know
what
kind
of
housing
folks
are
able
to
afford:
what
kind
of
food
child
care
options,
medicine
and
health
care,
and
so
again,
looking
at
this
map,
we
see
that
formerly
redlined
area.
Meeting
household
income
is
about
forty
four
thousand
dollars
where
we
have
other
neighborhoods
that
are
making
over
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
more
than
that.
F
Unfortunately,
these
patterns
also
play
out
by
race
and
so
again,
looking
at
that
household
income
for
evanston
overall
again
looks
really
good.
But
then,
when
we
break
that
down
by
our
major
racial
categories,
we
see
that
actually
only
non-hispanic
white
households
in
evanston
are
doing
better
than
the
illinois
and
the
u.s
median
household
income.
F
This
pattern
again
holds
when
we
think
about
child
poverty,
so
we
have
about
half
the
child
poverty
rate
that
the
u.s
does,
but
then
neighborhood
by
neighborhood.
We
have
areas
where
child
poverty
is
virtually
non-existent
and
then
again
in
that
formerly
red-lined
neighborhood
about
one
in
four
children
are
living
in
poverty.
F
We
can
also
look
at
kind
of
distribution
of
green
space
and
resources,
so
this
is
tree
canopy
cover
by
census
block,
and
so
we
can
see
that
there's
areas
of
evanston
where
we
have
really
good
tree
coverage
and
then
the
areas
that
are
orange
show
areas
where
there's
potential
space
for
more
trees
and
so
a
big
mismatch
in
the
the
land
mass
with
the
current
canopy
coverage,
and
we
see
kind
of
a
pattern
where
western
evanston
and
again
that
kind
of
fifth
ward
area
really
does
not
have
equitable
access
to
trees,
which
we
know
improve
property
values
and
improve
health
in
in
myriad
ways.
F
But
then,
when
we
look
neighborhood
by
neighborhood,
we
see
areas
where
we
have
very
little
on
insurance,
and
then
we
have
down
in
the
eighth
ward
census
tract
81
8102
has
a
15
on
insurance
rate.
When
we
look
by
race,
we
see
these
inequities
hold
with
our
hispanic
latino
evanstonians
having
an
uninsurance
rate
three
times
higher
than
the
city
average,
then
looking
at
health
outcomes.
These
are
just
a
couple
selected
health
outcomes.
F
F
So
this
is
the
rate
and
we,
when
we
look
at
emergency
room
visits
for
mental
health,
we're
really
thinking
about
you
know,
folks,
who
don't
have
a
better
place
to
go,
because
the
emergency
room
is
not
the
right
place
to
be
treating
a
mental
health
crisis
typically,
so
this
kind
of
indicates
a
lack
of
better
access
to
care.
F
Then
kind
of
looking
at
some
mortality
data
in
evanston
overall
for
cardiovascular
disease
deaths.
We
have
about
113.8
deaths
per
100
000
for
the
city
overall
and
then
looking
at
that
black
death
rate,
we
actually
have
a
higher
black
white
death
gap
in
here
in
evanston
than
we
do
in
chicago,
so
very,
very
stark
inequities
there.
F
Unfortunately,
this
this
death
gap
kind
of
holds
across
a
lot
of
conditions.
So
we
can
also
look
at
just
premature
deaths
by
all
causes
where
we
see
that
black
evanstonians
have
lost
13
300
years
of
potential
life
lost
much
much
higher
than
any
other
racial
category,
and
so
these
these
data
kind
of
points
to
that
that
we
have
a
lot
to
work
on.
F
But
I
think
that
these
are
kind
of
the
the
strategic
areas
of
focus
that
would
address
the
patterns
that
we're
seeing
here
at
play,
and
so
the
three
areas
that
we've
selected
to
focus
on
for
the
next
five
years
are
racial
and
health,
equity,
mental
health
and
climate
resilience.
F
And
I
just
want
to
say
too
that,
while
these
are
priorities
for
the
health
department,
we
hope
that
they're
also
priorities
for
the
city,
that
we
can
all
kind
of
align
and
invest
in
and
I'd
be
happy
to
outline
kind
of
the
the
action
steps.
If
anybody
is
interested
under
those
priorities
but
I'll
I'll
stop
there
and
see,
if
you
all
have
any
questions.
A
Wow
amazing
report
committee
members:
do
you
want
to
have
questions
yeah,
council,
member
braithwaite.
G
But
this
is
a
very
comprehensive
report
and
the
news
is,
is
somewhat
painful
to
to
receive
I'll,
be
honest
to
say
that,
but
consistent
with
everything
that
we've
been
hearing.
So
I
would
love
to
kind
of
fine-tune
this
a
little
bit
to
the
work
that
we're
doing
and
add
this
to
the
website
and
the
reason:
why
is
it
help
other?
It
helps
us
to
understand
kind
of
what
we're
doing
and
it
continues
to
validate
the
work.
G
But,
more
importantly,
as
I
look
out
at
other
places
under
the
work
of
robert
simmons,
who
continues
to
do
it
through
her
non-for-profit,
this
becomes
an
excellent
template
that
other
municipalities
can
look
at
in
terms
of
justifying.
Unfortunately,
we
have
to
continue
to
justify
the
work.
So,
thank
you
very
much
for
all
your
effort
to
pull
together
really
good
job.
Of
course,.
F
Thank
you.
I
I
do
hope
that
the
this
assessment
really
outlines
how
important
it
is
to
invest
in
any
efforts
that
really
build
black
wealth,
because
that.
E
C
E
G
H
No,
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
would
like
to
and
thank
you
for
this
presentation.
I
think
you
answered
another
question
I
had,
which
is
we
there's?
No
there's
no
complete
document.
This
is
still
in
draft
form.
So
that's
why
it's
not
in
our
in
our
packet.
It's
not
ready
yet
right.
It's.
E
Not
really
just
not
finalized
we're
hoping
to
finalize
this
document
in
the
next
month
or
so.
Okay,
keep
in
mind,
this
is
one
of
the
objectives
of
the
health
department
to
provide
a
strategic
plan
for
the
next
five
years
of
what
our
health
needs
and
priorities
are,
and
also
to
identify
strategies
and
protocols
to
address
those
issues.
So
it
is
sort
of
in
a
drug
form.
E
We
are
have
have
not
finalized
it.
Yet
I
would
say
at
this
point
is
about
85
percent
80
85
percent
done
until
a
month
when
it's
time
for
us
to
submit
it
to
the
illinois
department
of
public
health.
So
we
still
have
some
time
to
tweet
and
edit
and
maybe
even
add,
more
information
to
it.
H
Okay
and
then
you
mentioned
action,
steps
is
that
ready
tonight
or
you
were
saying
at
a
future
meeting.
We
could
discuss
action.
F
F
You
know,
I
think
the
ox
and
the
evanston
marketplace
are
great
examples
of
things
that
kind
of
fall
under
that
racial
equity
category
within
mental
health.
Certainly,
you
know
the
living
room
is
an
exciting
opportunity
to
support
mental
health
and
then,
within
that
climate
change
priority
aligning
with
the
carp
and
also
doing
you
know,
affordable
green
retrofits,
especially
in
the
fifth
ward
area,
where
we've
kind
of
historically
disinvested
in
real
estate.
F
H
Yeah
definitely-
and
I
would
say
the
last
thing
is
curious
in
in
doing
this
research
did
the
health
department
come
to
the
conclusion
that
it
needed
to
change
the
way
it
serves
it
functions
it
operates
it's
staffed.
Were
there
any
conclusions
that
you
made
in
that
in
that
area.
E
It
is
not
just
a
document
specific
to
health
and
human
services
department.
It
is
a
guideline
to
the
issues
here
in
evanston
and
the
hope
is
not
for
just
the
staff
of
our
health
and
human
services
to
embark
on
this
journey,
but
for
it
to
be
a
journey
that
would
be
embarked
on
by
community
members
and
the
city
as
a
whole.
The
input
provided
in
this
document
wasn't
just
the
health
and
human
services
input.
E
Although
we
were
the
the
organization
that
coordinated
these
efforts,
we
sought
input
from
people
who
are
professionals
in
the
public
health
field
in
the
medical
field,
in
the
mental
health
field,
to
come
to
the
consensus
of
these
three
health
priorities
so
going
forward,
it
won't
just
be
the
health
department
document
and
we're
hoping
that
this
document
will
just
sit
on
the
shelf
that
what
we've
identified
as
priorities
and
ways
to
address
them
will
be
implemented
and
things
that
we'll
work
on
in
the
near
future.
Thank
you.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
G
Just
one
quick
follow-up
chair
and
then
also
to
the
director-
I
I
guess
my
question
is
just
given
the
specific
categories
I'm
curious
to
to
both
of
you.
If
there's
a
anyone
on
your
staff,
that's
dedicated
to
searching
out
grants,
and
if
not,
is
this
something
that
we
can
assign
whether
to
someone
on
your
staff
or
one
of
our
fellows
just
to
look
and
see?
G
I
mean
mental
health,
we're
making
some
well
we're,
making
some
strides
in
housing
we're
making
some
strides,
as
you
indicated
in
mental
health,
but
then
there
are
other
things
that
you
call
out
in
here.
That
would
make
for
either
a
more
detailed
study
or
just
to
see
if
their
dollars
that
are
out
there,
through
local
federal
private
grants
to
help
in
these
efforts
and
then
my
other
second
comment.
I
would
love
to
have
you
and
your
and
your
staff
come
to.
G
I
don't
know
if
we
have
I'll
check
with
to
kirk
just
to
see
if
there's
time
on
the
agenda
to
present.
I
think
this
would
be
great
for
our
committee
in
our
community.
That's
following
this
as
well.
There
are
other
municipalities
that
pay
attention
to
our
meetings,
just
to
share
that
this
work
is
being
done.
Absolutely.
Thank
you
to.
E
Answer
your
first
question:
christine
myers,
our
community
health
specialists,
have
primarily
worked
on
providing
the
data
that
you've
seen
today,
and
this
is
high
level
data.
So.
E
Also,
some
other
data
sets
that
we
didn't
present
today
that
will
be
included
in
the
packet
that
will
eventually
go
to
idbh
as
it
stands.
We
currently
do
not
have
anyone
on
staff
who
works
on
grants.
We
know
that
there
might
be,
or
are
grants
out
there,
that
we
can
apply
for
and
get
us
as
a
certified
health
department.
E
We
only
have
a
few
members
in
the
health
department
who
are
grant
writers
and
luckily
been
able
to
get
the
grants
that
we've
applied
for
a
number
of
them,
but
there
is
an
opportunity
to
hire
someone
on
staff
who
work
on
expenditures
and
acquisition
of
grants,
we're
hoping
to
hire
or
post
that
position
very
soon.
Here.
G
A
Well,
I
think
I
can
speak
for
the
committee
to
say
we
are
looking
forward
to
further
information.
I
think
we'd
really
appreciate
seeing
what
the
strategies
are
and
once
you
send
it
off
to
the
state.
A
I
think
we
we
would
like
to
have
ongoing
updates
about
how
we're
doing
on
implementing
the
strategies
I
mean
this
is
hugely
important
information
that
you're
providing
a
really
important
plan,
and
we
have
five
years
to
make
some
headway
here
and
we'd
like
to
really
be
a
part
of
making
sure
that
that
happens
so
look
forward
to
whenever,
whenever
you
have
more
information,
that's
ready
for
us
and
certainly
the
final
report.
I
A
All
right
so
next
on
our
agenda,
then
we
have
several
other
people.
Who've
signed
up
for
public
comment
and
I
think
they're,
all
virtual
so
is
evie
russell.
Are
you
or
maybe
janet
kirby?
Since
I
see
your
name
well,
let's
go
with
you.
First.
A
A
J
Okay,
hi!
Yes,
I
don't
know.
If
my
comments
are,
I
don't
see
myself
hold
on
hold
on
a
second
okay.
I
don't
know
if
my
comments
are
pertinent
or
not,
because
I
was
looking
then
at
the
various
regulations,
but
I'm
going
to
tell
them
anyway
and
if
they're,
outdated
or
anything
else,
then
take
that
into
consideration.
J
First
of
all,
the
report
on
our
health
was
very
interesting.
It
sort
of
was
curious
to
for
me
to
to
see
how
the
median
income
is
really
like
two
and
a
half
times
my
own
income,
but
that
that
was
sort
of
like
anyway.
I
live
in
front
of
my
color
park.
What
concerns
me
most
about
lifting
the
ban
on
park
closures
at
night
is
if
this
would
include
eliminating
the
existing
time
restrictions
on
using
basketball
courts
and
playgrounds.
J
I
see
I
I
looked
up
the
ordinance
and
I
see
that
the
basketball
court,
which
is
my
particular
peeve
and
problem
since
my
bedroom
faces
the
park,
is
not
part
of
this
rule
change
but
we'll
see,
secondly,
suggested
or
de
facto
elimination
of
the
existing
vague
noise
ordinance.
J
In
my
neighborhood,
for
example,
note
the
arena's
chile,
noise
plaguing
wilmette
residents,
note
the
noise
and
also
chemical,
polluting
fireworks
accompanying
the
football
scoring
which,
by
the
way,
encourages
firework
usage
in
our
park.
According
to
canadian
academy
hearing
center,
the
there
should
be
a
minimum
of
100
feet:
distance
between
fireworks
and
people
which
the
fireworks,
in
fact
rate
from
150
to
175
decibel
at
3
feet.
J
You
cannot
equate
northwestern
with
elementary
middle
or
high
schools,
and
you
is
a
corporate
beast
of
a
different
order.
At
the
very
least,
there
should
be
noise
time
restrictions
for
new,
especially
since
the
night
games
will
only
increase
as
years
go
by
residents,
have
a
right
to
sleep
at
night,
enjoy
their
backyards
during
the
day
and
not
have
disruptive
noises
shattered
at
peace
inside
and
outside
their
homes.
Finally,
the
older
persons
who
have
jobs
with
the
new
enu
should
recuse
themselves
from
voting
on
this
ordinance
regarding
anu
not
having
any
noise
limitations.
J
A
You
now
janet
kirby.
Are
you
there.
C
I'm
here,
but
I
don't
have
a
comment
other
than
to
say
that
the
e-plan
sounds
excellent.
No,
but
I'm
watching
and
listening.
Okay.
A
Great,
thank
you
and
then
betty
bogg.
Were
you
signing
up
to
give
public
comment?
A
L
Go
ahead.
Thank
you
good
evening
committee
members.
My
name
is
betty
bogg
and
I'm
the
executive
director
of
connections
for
the
homeless
as
an
agency
that
is
headquartered
in
the
fifth
work
and
that
serves
primarily
poor
people
of
color.
We
are
deeply
grateful
for
the
important
analysis
presented
in
the
e-plan
this
evening.
L
We
witness
firsthand
how
disparate
social
determinants
of
health
play
out
in
real
time
and
are
grateful
for
the
opportunity
to
do
our
work
in
partnership
with
this
community.
To
do
our
part
in
addressing
the
deep
inequities
that
exist
here
and
elsewhere.
We
know,
as
many
others
do,
that
housing
is
health
care.
L
We've
been
speaking
in
public
comment
and
council,
commission
and
committee
meetings,
because
we
are
aware
of
mistruths
about
the
work.
That
connections
does
that
are
being
asserted
in
such
public
meetings.
I
need
to
address
these
mistruths
as
a
steward
of
the
agency,
its
reputation
and
the
investments
we
receive
from
our
community
partners,
the
city
of
evanston,
our
faith-based
friends,
our
participants
who
turn
to
us
when
they
have
nowhere
else
to
go
and
our
staff,
who
are
truly
the
unsung
heroes
of
this
work.
L
First
opponents
report
a
huge
uptick
in
crime
at
the
margarita
over
the
last
two
years.
We
acknowledge
the
uptick
in
calls
to
emergency
services,
but
as
of
la
as
of
now,
let
comparative
data
to
compare
that
up
to
other
locations
connections
does
track
all
of
the
incidents
that
occurred
all
of
our
sites
and
we're
in
the
process
of
analyzing
our
own
data
and
comparing
that
data
to
publicly
available
policing
data
so
that
we
can
have
conversations
with
a
shared
understanding
of
the
facts.
L
We
hope
to
compare
our
reports
to
everton
police
reports
and
has
scheduled
a
meeting
with
the
mayor
council,
member
new
smith
city
manager,
gandursky
and
chief
eddington
from
mid-may
to
review
those
data,
the
other
disheartening
statements.
I
hear
that
we
lack
wrap-around
services
for
our
participants
at
the
margarita.
L
In
addition
to
case
management,
our
services
include
on-site
physical
and
mental
health
care
via
licensed
nursing
staff
and
a
mental
health
professional
who
provides
a
group
and
individual
therapy.
We
offer
substance,
use
disorder,
support
employment,
counseling
and
many
many
additional
supportive
services.
L
A
Thank
you
and
I'd
like
to
mention
two
public
comments
that
we
received
by
email.
One
is
from
ann
and
tom
mcmahon
and
they
are
addressing
the
question
about
the
park
closure.
They
would
like
to
express
their
serious
reservations
about
that
proposal,
which
would
allow
people
to
be
present
all
night
in
city
parks.
They
live
near
lighthouse,
beach
and
the
adjacent
city
parks.
There
is
already
considerable
pub
trouble
being
caused
by
people
in
those
parks
park
areas
after
and
before
11
pm,
especially
during
warm
weather.
The
proposal
would
make
matters
worse.
A
Moreover,
the
proposal
would
encourage
homeless
people
from
evanston
and
elsewhere
to
use
evanston
parks
overnight
and
to
set
up
permanent
or
semi-permanent
camps.
This
makes
no
sense
and
they
they
basically
endorse
the
objections
that
were
included
in
the
memo
from
the
parks
and
recreation
board,
and
then
we
have
another
very
brief
email
from
jerry
fuller.
A
So
next
is
approval
of
the
2022
funding
allocations
for
case
management
and
safety
net
services,
and
I
guess,
could
we.
A
Okay-
and
I
I
guess
we
have-
we
have
quite
an
extensive
memo
in
our
packet
and
staff-
is
here
to
answer
questions.
If
anybody
has
a
a
question
about
any
any
of
that
information
that
was
in
our
packet,
if
you
want
to
take
a
moment
to
find
that
part
of
the
packet.
A
If,
if
there's
no
no
questions
for
staff
and
no
comments
and
we're
ready
to
take
a
vote,
all
right,
then
all
in
favor
of
the
proposed
2022
funding
allocations
for
case
management
and
safety
net
services-
please
say:
aye
aye
oppose
no
okay,
then
we've
got
that
taken
care
of
the
next
is
ordinance.
This
is
item
hs2
ordinance,
44-0-22,
deleting
title
3
chapter
11,
section
8
about
photographers
transient
of
the
city
code.
So
do
I
have
a
motion
on
that
item.
A
So,
at
the
meetings
of
the
lighthouse
landing
complex
committee,
we
regularly
have
conversations
about
the
steady
stream
of
photographers
coming
to
the
lighthouse
area,
the
harley
clark
mansion
for
wedding
photography
and
when
they
show
up
with
to
do
their
photo
shoots
they're
there
for
an
hour
or
or
more
between
the
months
of
may
and
october.
A
They
are
there
pretty
much
every
day
and
on
the
weekends
you
get
more
than
one
photo
shoot
for
a
wedding
when
they're,
when
they're
there,
they,
and
particularly
when
they're
around
the
lighthouse
area,
which
is
a
very
small
outdoor
space,
they
they
do.
These
photo
shoots,
do
pretty
much
dominate
the
whole
area.
So,
if
you're
just
a
regular
park
goer,
you
there's
no
room
for
for
you
there
at
that
point.
A
So
if
we
do
eliminate
this
one
part
of
the
code
about
transient
photographers,
I
would
like
to
make
make
us
aware
that
we
do
have
another
section
of
the
code.
It's
under
the
in
the
parks
and
open
open
space
chapter
of
our
ordinance.
Let
me
just
I
have
my
note
somewhere
and-
and
there
we
do
this.
This
requires
permits
of
anyone
who
wants
to
do
motion,
pictures
or
still
photography,
and
it
requires
application
for
permits
if
these
are
gonna.
A
If
these
events
are
gonna
take
place
on
public
property,
and
so
I
guess
I
would
like
to
have
us
heighten
awareness
in
the
community
that,
if
you're
going
to
do
want
to
do
this,
these
big
photo
shoots
in
in
our
parks
that
you
do
get
a
permit.
G
E
A
G
A
A
G
G
I
can't
think
of
one
situation
where
I've
received
a
handful
of
complaints
about
people
taking
pictures
in
public.
I
just
I
have
to
be
honest,
and
so
my
next
question
that
I
ask
myself
is
then
how
is
this
enforced
and
just
given
the
fact
that
our
police
department
is
probably
at
one
of
the
lowest
levels
of
you,
know
staffing
that
we've
seen
over
a
period
of
time?
I
think
that
this
is
something
that
we
would
want
to
ask
our
staff
to
continue
to
collect
data.
G
I
mean
if
an
officer
is
called
to
this
and
then
the
station
receives
another
phone
call
regarding
a
crime
or
something
else
like
this
is
and-
and
I
say
respectfully
to
anyone-
who's
been
in
convenience.
This
is
like
low
priority,
and
so
I'm
sure
council,
member
reed,
has
a
thought
process
behind
it.
But
those
are
my
thoughts.
Okay,.
M
G
L
M
M
Why
should
you
have
to
pay
a
separate
permit
just
to
go
to
a
public
space
and
have
a
photo
taken
of
you
and
your
family?
And
so
that's
the
problem?
I
think
the
thing
is
that
we,
this
is
a
not
a
helpful
ordinance
to
have
on
the
books
that
you
would
have
to
if
you
want
to
go
down
to
the
park
or
the
beach
and
you
had
a
photographer.
M
Come
take
a
few
photos
of
you
that
that
person
would
have
to
get
a
permit
in
order
to
take
a
few
photos
of
you
as
if
they
were.
You
know,
like
a
plumber
that
was
coming
in,
to
do
work
at
your
house,
so
that
so
I'm
actually
trying
to
eliminate
a
point
of
conflict
where
residents
would
unnecessarily
have
to
jump
through
hoops
for
something
that
causes
really
no
very
little
to
no
disruption.
M
M
H
H
Apply
then,
if
I
we
pull
out
my
iphone
right
because
it
doesn't,
you
don't
have
to
have
a
photographer,
so
this
doesn't
necessarily
apply
to
somebody
who
takes
out
their
iphone
and
takes
pictures
of
their
family
at
the
beach
at
the
lakefront.
This
only
applies.
If
someone
there
is
hired
to
take
those
photos.
M
H
M
And
also,
if
someone
just
wants
to
go,
take
a
picture
of
a
tree
and
they
want
to
sell
that
picture
of
a
tree
that
they
took.
Why
not?
Why
should
they
have
to
get
a
permit
to
take
a
picture
of
a
tree
or
to
take
a
picture
of
a
natural
landscape
within
our
city
and
then
sell
it?
I
mean
there's
plenty
of
data,
for
example,
to
to
relate
this
to
something.
M
For
example,
if
weather.com
the
data
that
weather.com
uses
is
data,
that's
gathered
by
the
federal
government,
they
foyer
that
data
and
get
that
data
and
use
it
and
upload
it
to
their
systems
and
and
that's
how
we
get
certain
data.
M
H
H
A
Now
the
other,
the
other
part
of
our
code.
So
when
a
company
comes
to
town-
and
they
want
to
do
you
know
film
for
a
movie-
they
often
have
bring
in
lots
of
cars
and
trucks
and
they
they
work
with
the
parking
department
to
get.
A
B
B
So
something
like
this:
do
you
folks
ever
get
calls
to
enforce
like
this
per
this
type
of
permitting
like
it?
So
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
ask
is
like.
Is
this
something
that's
just
never
enforced,
and
is
this
like
kind
of
superfluous
like
do
we
do
it.
I
We
we
to
my
knowledge,
we
have
never
enforced
this
ordinance
and-
and
I
I
think
that
tangentially
we
may
get
called
if
there's
a
parking
problem
if
the
limos
block
somebody
in
we
probably
get
involved
that
way,
but
we
go
there
to
manage
that
issue
when
we
nobody's
ever
written
this
ticket.
Okay,
thanks
thank.
G
You
so
chief
while
you're
up
there.
I
guess
we'll
hypothesize
now
that
if
we
remove
it
and
people
are
allowed
now
to
come
in
without
scheduling
and
all
those
other
things,
can
you
look
in
your
magic,
crystal
ball
and
guess
or
pretend
how
many
calls
we
could
potentially
get
once
you
open
up
something
like
this
during
a
busy
season,
without
people
having
a
permit
and
understand
the
rules
and
all
those
other
things
surrounding
it?
Well,.
I
I
I
think,
there's
there's
ways
to
address
that.
If
we,
if
we
decide
to
go
down
this
road,
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
suggest
following
up,
the
chairperson's
recommendation
is
someone
from
the
city
be
assigned
to
to
the
lakefront
that
passes
out
the
city
business
card
said
you
know,
mr
photographer,
I'm
not
going
to
bother
the
bride
and
groom,
but
you
really
need
to
know
this
and
make
a
phone
call,
and
then
I
think
we
can.
H
And
councilman
breitbart.
I
think
this
will
help
again.
This
is
about
making
things
in
some
sense,
not
an
irrestable
offense.
I
just
want
to
so
it's
not
that
it
doesn't
need
to
exist
somewhere
in
the
code.
It's
whether
it
should
eventually
lead
to
an
arrest.
If
somebody
like
didn't
comply
and
I
think
we're
seeing
pretty
good
compliance-
you
know
with
this
as
it
appears
in
other
parts
of
our
code,
but
I
just
want
to
set
the
stage
councilman
reid.
H
Like
the
the
chief
just
said,
we
have
this
in
our
code,
but
we're
not
enforcing
it,
not
because
we
think
that
if
it
wasn't
there
all
of
a
sudden
there's
going
to
be
this
great
rush
of
people
taking
photography,
that's
already
happening,
but
that
it
exists
and
it
really
serves
no
function
because
we
don't
plan
on
enforcing
it,
don't
enforce
it.
H
And
so
it's
really
just
this
exercise
both
for
this
item
on
the
agenda,
but
also,
I
think
the
next
two
is
trying
to
clean
up
the
code
and
get
rid
of
things
that
really
don't
have
a
place
anymore
in
our
code.
So
I
just
want
to
set
the
stage
and
councilman
reed.
You
might
do
a
better
job
than
me,
but
that.
G
I
think
I'll
leave
it
at
this
and
I
don't
want
to
take
a
lot
of
time
discussing
it.
We
just
a
moment
ago
heard
a
brilliant
presentation
given
by
the
health
department.
I
think
that
outlines
areas
that
we
can
all
wrap
our
head
around
and
I'm
fine
to
hear
that
you
know
I
asked
for
it
to
come
before
reparations.
I
think,
like
that's
our
responsibility,
I
we
can
take
the
vote
to
move
it
forward.
I'm
just
saying
I
don't
see
this
being
a
problem
I
don't
receive.
G
I
can
tell
you
all
the
phone
calls
I
receive,
but
this
does
not
even
scratch.
The
surface
is
something
that
I
don't
even
know
the
purpose
of
it
discussing
it.
Just
to
be
honest.
So
if
we
want
to
just
move
this
forward
and
I'll
vote
and
then
we'll
take
up
more
time
at
council
and
see
where
it
goes,
I'm
fine
with
that.
A
Well,
it
seems
then,
as
though
nobody
is
arguing
that
this
is
important
to
keep
in
our
city
code.
So,
okay,
so
are
we
ready
to
vote
yeah,
then
all
in
favor
of
ordinance?
Let
me
just
see
where
were
we.
G
H
A
Okay,
so
the
motion
passed
and
it
will
go
on
to
city
council,
then
we're
ready
for
item
hs3,
ordinance,
46-0-22
deleting
title
nine
chapter,
five
section:
two
burglars
tools
from
the
city
code.
Do
I
have
a
motion.
M
Yes,
thank
you.
This
is
following
that
same
line
of
thought
of
cleaning
up
the
code.
M
The
issue
that
I
find
here
is
that
when
you
read
the
the
law,
it
says
it
shall
be
unlawful
for
any
person
to
have
in
his
or
her
possession
any
nippers
of
the
description
known
as
burglar's
nippers
pick
lock
skeleton
key
to
be
used
with
a
bit
jimmy
or
other
burglars
instruments,
or
tools
of
whatsoever,
kind
or
description.
M
Unless
it
is
shown
that
such
possession
is
innocent
and
and
unlawful
number
one
problem
here
is,
you
know,
it's
kind
of
you
know
civil
rights
one
on
one
is
that
you
are
innocent
until
proven
guilty,
and
this
law
is
framed
as
though
you
are
guilty
until
proven
innocent,
and
there
are
plenty
of
innocent.
M
You
know
non-illegal
reasons
to
have
these
tools.
When
you
know
you,
google,
nippers
and
you'll
see
a
picture
of
things
that
look
very
similar
to
something
you'd
cut.
Maybe
your
dog
or
your
pet's
nails
with
you
know.
There
are
plenty
of
tools
that
are
owned.
M
You
know
that
are
normal
tools
that
could
be
used
in
a
burglary
but
are
not
burglar's
tools
and
I
think,
there's
a
reason
that
stuff
is
in
quotes
because
it's
there's,
you
know
burglars
nippers,
I
don't
think
is
it
is
a
real
thing,
and
so
that's
that
that's
one
and
then.
M
Secondly,
there
is
a
state
statute
that
is
similar
to
this,
but
constructed
in
a
constructed
to
me
in
a
way
that
comports
with
our
constitution
more
where
it
says
that
if
you
are
in
possession
of
these
burglars
tools
that
it
is
unlawful
to
be
in
possession
of
them
in
the
commission
of
a
burglary.
So
it
requires
that
you
are
doing
something
illegal
in
order
to
be
found
guilty
of
possessing
these
tools,
and
so
it
it's
it's
a
much
clearer
standard
than
this.
M
You
know
having
to
prove
yourself
innocent
on
the
street
as
presumably
because
you
have
to
prove
that
such
possession
is
innocent
so
essentially
on
the
street
there
you're
trying
to
convince
the
officer
who's
playing,
judge
and
jury.
Whether
or
not
your
possession
is
lawful,
and
you
know
if
whether
or
not
you
want
to
be
charged
with
it,
and
so
the
state
statute
is
pretty
strong
on
this.
It
allows
us
to
charge
folks,
it's
a
felony.
I
I
He
served
his.
He
satisfied
the
audrey
thompson
and
her
diversion
crew
that
he
had
made
amends
for
what
he
did,
and
so
this
doesn't
exist.
If
we,
on
the
other
hand,
charge
a
class,
four
felony
start
rolling
fingerprints,
it's
an
entirely
different
outcome,
and
I
would
suggest
that
our
use
of
this
comports
with
the
state
statute
in
the
two
citations
it
it
that
we
wrote
in
this
time
frame.
It
deals
with
the
actions
that
the
individual
was
engaged
in,
going
up.
I
Looking
in
cars,
pulling
car
door
handles
prying
a
door
shed
a
a
door
of
a
shed
with
the
pry
bar
that
that
he
had,
and
so
we're
we're
applying
that
state
level.
Training
to
this
situation,
we're
not
we
we
just
don't
arrest
people
because
they
happen
to
have
tools
that
that
that's
not
how
this
works,
and
so
I
I
don't.
I
I
don't
see
us
misusing
this,
I
don't
I
don't
if,
if
there
were
200
arrests,
okay,
what
we're
talking
about
too
and
and
I'm
extremely
confident
in
our
officer's
ability
to
apply
this
appropriately,
where
in
the
case
of
this
youthful
offender,
I
don't
think
I
think
that
completely
complies
with
what
the
council
has
set
forth
in
in
its
alternatives
to
arrest
we're
trying
to
do
something
that
inflicts
no
lasting
harm,
because
a
young
person
made
a
mistake,
and
so
I
I
would
prefer
that
we
have
the
latitude
to
use
this
option
currently
and
if
there
are
any
other
questions.
G
Even
today
there
was
a
divi
bike
that
was
not
returned,
so
I'm
sure
if
we
go
down
that
path,
maybe
that
was
stolen
as
well.
Chief,
you
mentioned
alternatives
to
arrests
and-
and
I
was
going
to
bring
that
up,
so
anybody
can
look
at
this
information
online
in
all
the
juvenile
and
adult
offenses.
I
I
don't
recall
seeing
any
pattern
of
arrests
that
involve
someone
just
maintaining
having
tools
in
their
possessions.
So
I
would
agree
with
that
statement.
G
You
know
my
concern
is,
and
again
I
I
get
it,
but
if
there
isn't,
unless
someone
shows
me
some
data
that
says
there
have
been
kids
and
I
would
love
to
know
if
there's
any
resident
out
there,
that
was
on
their
way
to
work
with
their
nippers
or
skeleton
key,
any
other
instrument
or
tools
that
were
falsely,
arrested
or
felt
that
they
were
harassed
by
the
police,
then
yeah,
but
again,
if
we
don't
have
any
evidence
of
this.
G
These
are
the
things
that
if
there
was
a
problem
we
move
forward,
but
I
think
for
our
police
staff,
there
are
wonderful
things
they
do
and
there
are
other
things
we
wish
they
would
do
better.
This
is
not
something
that
I've
received
a
lot
of
complaints
and
I'll
just
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you,
chief
for
your
response.
H
M
Yeah
well
yeah.
Thank
you,
so
I
I
appreciate
the
example
that
you
you
gave
there
chief
eddington
about
the
juveniles,
so
you're
saying
that
this
juvenile
who
was
charged
with
this
local
ordinance,
was
also
burglarizing,
a
house
or
a
car
or
some
other.
M
So
here's
okay,
using
these
tools
in
a
commission
of
a
crime,
yes,
okay,
and
to
that
attorney
ozarigbo.
Did
I
pronounce
your
name
correctly.
N
M
Okay,
the
city
of
evanston:
do
we
have
the
power
under
home
rule
authority?
It
is
my
understanding
that
the
city
does
not
have
the
power
to
regulate
a
felony.
N
M
Okay,
so
are
we
saying
that
the
city
has
a
tool
to
say
all
right?
There's
a
state
felony
charge,
for
example,
with
right
now,
any
carrying
any
amount
of
psilocybin,
which
is
becoming
legal
and
and
other
which
is
commonly
referred
to
on
the
street,
is
mushrooms,
so
psilocybin,
which
is
illegal
in
a
places,
is
and
becoming
legal
in
some
places.
Now
it's
a
felony
at
the
state
level
to
possess
psilocybin.
N
So
no
we're
not
saying
that,
but
particularly
with
this
getting
to
to
the
burglary
tool
tools,
the
difference
would
be
that
right
now,
under
our
city
code,
9-5-2.
M
N
M
N
If
I
can
just
check
with
the
chief
for
a
second
when,
under
the
current
city
ordinance
when
this
was
charged
as
a
ticketable
offense,
was
that
for
a
misdemeanor
versus
a
felony.
N
I
I
M
I
I
We
have
removed
the
labels
of
felony
and
misdemeanor
and
once
again,
how
we
define
a
felony
is
what
the
penalty
is.
It's
it's
a
year
and
a
day
in
prison
is
the
that's.
That's
the
line,
anything
anything
above
that
lines
of
felony,
anything
below
that
line's,
a
misdemeanor
we've
taken
it
completely
out
of
that
conversation
and
and
much
like
what
we
did
with
the
cell
phone
tickets
before
the
the
governor
changed
the
law.
M
So
what
what
makes
this
a
eligible
for
administrative
adjudication
and
sent
directly
here
and
not
a
misdemeanor
versus
other
sections
of
our
of
our
local
ordinances,
our
local
criminal
code,.
I
M
So,
for
example,
while
I
was
petitioning
to
run
for
an
office
I
used
to
hold
city
clerk,
I
was
arrested
for
a
local
code
violation
and
I
was
my
body
was
removed
from
the
location
I
was
put
in
handcuffs
taken
down
to
the
station
and
I
was
given
an
eye
bond
originally
and
would
have
gone
to
skokie
court.
So
why
was
that
local
ordinance
violation
which
wasn't
a
violation?
Why
was
that
charged?
Why
was
that
not
sent
to
administrative
adjudication,
and
why
was
that
again?
Local
ordinance.
M
He
was
also
charged
with
disobedience
to
police
or
obedience
to
police
in
a
public
place,
it's
part
of
our
code.
So
what,
in
that
section
of
code,
makes
that
something
that
goes
to
skokie
courthouse
versus
this
cause?
And
I
also
know
someone
who
was
arrested
under
this,
who
was
again,
their
body
was
physically
taken
from
the
location
taken
down
to
this
station
and
they
were
arrested
under
this.
I
And
I
would
have
to
look
at
the
specific
facts
of
that
circumstance
to
answer
why
they
were
removed
from
the
location.
If
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
burglary
investigation,
I
wouldn't
find
it
unusual
to
bring
you
to
the
station
we're
sorting
this
out,
there's
still
things
to
do,
and
so
I
think
that
back
to
your
original
question
of
why
which
ones
go
where
it's,
how
the
ordinance
is
constructed,
it's
what
words
we
use
to
build
the
ordinance
dictate
our
actions.
I
M
Well,
no,
the
reason
I
ask
that
is
because
I
I
don't
understand
with
that.
What
is
the
what,
in
that
section
of
code
specifically
says
hey?
This
is
going
to
skokie
courthouse
and
what
makes
this
section
of
code
different
and
says
that
hey,
it's
only
going
to
administrative
adjudication.
C
G
I
guess
chair,
I
would
ask
like
I.
I
feel
the
need
to
say
that,
like
these
are
the
things
that
I
would
request
for
any
of
us,
including
myself,
if
it's
specific
legal
questions
to
not
put
our
staff
on
the
spot
and
I'm
sure
you're
able
to
answer
it
or
put
us
through
this.
This
is
stuff
that
I
would
have
loved
to
have
seen
as
part
of
the
information
me
too.
G
So
if
you,
if
you've,
asked
the
question
of
corporation
council-
and
you
didn't
receive
an
answer,
I
think
that's
a
whole
other
topic
that
we
can
explore
after
this.
But
I'm
just
saying
for
future
future
reference
that
I've
you've,
given
this
more
thought
than
anyone
else
here,
and
I
can
understand
your
reasons
for
it.
But
if,
if
it's
something
that
I'm
going
to
take
action
on,
I'm
more
concerned
about
just
discussing
this
than
getting
into
a
law
discussion
that
I
would
want
to
have
the
ability
to
read
more
is.
M
All
I'm
saying,
and
if
I
can
just
say
that
the
only
reason
I
even
in
bringing
that
up
is
this
is
the
first
I
mean
this
is
the
first
time
we've
communicated
specifically
about
this,
and
this
is
the
first
time
it's
being
brought
to
the
committee
and
chief
eddington
is
expressing
hey.
I
believe
that
this
can
that
these
violations
are
only
directed
to
administrative
adjudication.
That's
what
you
expressed
there.
I
It
depends
yes,
depending
on
how
we
charge
it
certain
now,
when
we
say
misdemeanor
we're
saying
it's
a
state
charge,
some
of
our
local
charges
do
go
to
skokie
and
and
once
again,
that's
a
rather
long,
complex
discussion
that
both
the
corporation
council
and
I
will
need
some
time
to
prepare
to
produce
the
precision
answers
that
you're.
Looking
for.
H
Go
ahead.
No,
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
that
I
mean
that
question
on
whether
or
not
the
city
of
evanston
can
charge
for
a
misdemeanor
versus
a
felony
under
state
code
is
is
still
a
remaining
question
that
I
have
both
for
this
issue,
but
really
other
issues.
I
guess
where
that
may
be
the
case.
I
kind
of
agree
with
councilmember
braithway.
H
These
are
things
that
I
think
we
should
have
sorted
out
before
the
conversation
at
the
committee
level,
and-
and
so
I
want
to
hear
from
holly
carter,
but
I
would
you
know,
I
think,
move
it
as
we
can
with
committees
just
to
table
this
into
the
next
meeting.
So
we
can
get
some
of
that
information,
but
that's
all
chair.
Thank
you.
A
B
And
yeah
my
comment
is
so
I'm
you
know
not
a
lawyer,
obviously,
but
when
looking
at
like
the
the
ordinances
and
comparing
it
to
the
state
ordinance,
I
think
we
should
maybe
take
a
look
at
changing
the
language
instead
of
striking
the
section
where,
instead
of
saying,
unless
it
has
shown
that
such
possession
is
innocent
and
for
a
lawful
purpose.
When
you
look
at
the
state
code,
it
says
you
know,
with
intent
to
enter
that
place
or
with
intent
to
commit
there
in
a
felony
or
theft,
which
kind
of
puts.
B
M
I
yes,
so
if
I
can
jump
in,
I'm
certainly
happy
to
do
that
and
rewrite
the
language.
My
ultimate
goal
is
to
have
you
know
to
move
things
that
we
don't
need
in
out
of
the
criminal
code
and
also
to
make
sure
that
we
are
criminalizing
less
folks,
and
so,
if,
in
fact
or
not,
if
I'm
gonna
take
chief
eddington
at
face
value,
you
know
it
is
good
to
have
a
local
option.
M
I
don't
think
this
wording
of
a
local
option
does
us
any
benefit,
and
so
I'm
happy
to
have
it
rewarded.
That
would
create
that
alternative
to
the
state
code,
but
this
opens
up
a
whole
new
window.
If
you
know
if,
in
fact,
we
can
say,
hey,
there's
a
there's,
a
felony
that
exists
at
the
state
level,
but
we
can
create
a
local
code
version
of
that
that
no
longer
makes
that
a
felony
there's
plenty
of
things
that
I'm
you
know
interested
in
doing
that
would
do
just
that.
M
I
mean
we
could
essentially
would
have
the
home
rule
authority
to
to
make
it
so
folks
aren't
incarcerated
for
drug
offenses
and
and-
and
you
know,
damn
to
be
what
the
state
felony
charges
are
for
that.
But
we
could.
We
could
create
our
own
local
diversion
program.
That
would
supersede
that
which
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible.
But
if
that
is
what
we're
saying
here,
then
I'm
happy
to
explore
that.
Thank.
D
A
Staff
a
chance
to
put
their
heads
together
and
give
us
some
direction
on
this,
but
council
member
brainwave.
G
And
I'll
be
brief,
madam
chair,
and
just
to
the
new
members,
our
councilmember
burns,
while
you
were
in
the
office,
you
attended
many
of
our
alternative
to
arrest
committee
and
the
conversation
that
we're
having
right
now
was
a
conversation
that
we
had
that
involves.
Like
chief,
you
attended
a
few.
You
sent
your
team
we're
talking
hours
over
just
two
or
three
issues.
G
That's
that's
how
complex
this
discussion
is,
and
I
think
the
way
we
wrap
things
up
and
I
would
encourage
you
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
chief
or
with
someone
from
our
legal
department
a
lot
of
these
one-off
issues.
I
want
to
be
mindful-
I'm
not
labeling
this
one
off,
but
a
lot
of
the
issues
that
you're
bringing
up
even
this
evening
were
discussed
in
alternatives
to
arrest
and
at
that
table
we
had
our
legal
department.
We
had
our
police
department,
we
had
members
of
the
community,
we
had
representatives
from
the
naacp
organization.
G
C
G
Of
me
for
for
not
mentioning
your
name
as
well
as
former
council
member
fleming
as
a
part
of
the
discussion
as
well,
so
it
looks
like
there's
enough
people
that
want
to
hold
it
we'll
discuss
it
at
a
later
date.
But
I
do
think
it's
important
that
I
would
encourage
you
or
others
that
feel
strongly
about
this
to
take
the
time
offline,
to
speak
directly
with
our
staff
to
understand,
what's
in
place
to
catch
these
measures,
and
so
chief,
thank
you
very
much
and
to
michelle.
M
It
or
I'm
happy
to
make
that
motion
share.
I
will
just
say
that
you
know
we
can't
take
the
approach
just
because
I
don't
think
this
in
particular
has
been
discussed
in
the
past,
but
we
discussed
reparations
back
when
alderman
lionel
baptiste
was
here,
and
so
just
because
something
was
discussed
in
the
past
doesn't
mean
that
we
just
give
up
and
we
say
we
wash
our
hands
of
it
and
not
have
a
fresh
lens
and
a
fresh
view
with
new
information
to
to
look
at
things.
M
But
anyhow,
I
will
move
to
hold
item.
Hs3
ordnance
46022.
A
A
motion
to
table
we
need
to
vote
on
so
could
we
have
a
roll
call?
Please.
B
A
All
right
and
now
we're
ready
for
items
for
discussion,
and
this
is
about
ending
the
park,
closure
and
police
intervention
for
mere
presence
at
a
park.
This
the
staff
is
looking
for
direction
from
the
committee.
M
Discussion,
but
that's
it
right,
okay,
so
this
is
also
a
referral
that
I
made
in
a
similar
vein
again.
This
is
looking
sim
simply
to
end
the
criminalization
and
the
practice
of
or
or
end
the
fact
that
on
our
books,
folks,
someone
would
be
allowed
to
arrest
someone
in
a
par
for
being
in
a
park
after
11
o'clock.
For
exam
I
mean
I,
I
think
this
is
a
quality
of
life,
as
we
heard
earlier
about.
You
know
the
importance
of
green
spaces.
M
M
I
mean
if,
if
someone
works
at
target
or
food
for
less
or
some
large,
big
or
any
business,
and
they
get
off
at
11
o'clock
or
12
o'clock
after
again
a
long
shift
and
they
would
like
to
decompress
peacefully
at
a
park,
I
think
they
should
have
folks
in
our
res
in
our
community
should
have
the
right
to
do
that.
M
There
are
a
number
of
concerns
raised
by
the
park
board.
One
is,
is
thompson
on
the
call
or
is
miss
audrey.
Is
she
available.
C
M
So
you
know
there
are
a
number
of
concerns
raised
here
by
the
parks
board
which
this
these
conversations
took
place
from
my
understanding
under
director
hemingway.
But
it
says
that
there's
no
precedent
for
any
other
municipality
or
park
district,
not
having
park
closing
hours
and,
for
example,
our
national
parks.
M
You
can
go
to
yosemite
park
at
any
time
dare
night
it's
at
many
of
our
parks
in
washington
dc
or
some
many
of
our
national
parks
are
open
24
hours,
their
parks
are
open,
24
hours
recently
and,
for
example,
in
paris,
which
is
known
for
having
very
restrictive
access
to
their
parks,
recently
changed
the
policy
to
allow
parisians
and
guests
to
occupy
their
parks
at
at
the
night.
M
So
there
is
precedent
for
other
park,
districts
and
municipalities,
not
having
you
know,
closing
hours,
there's
no
compelling
reason
to
have
24-hour
park
access
again,
I
would
say
it
is
given
what
we
just
heard
earlier
from
our
e-plan
and
about
the
importance
of
access
to
green
spaces.
M
One
there's
a
public
health.
You
know
concerns
that
it
could
be
positively
impacted
by
folks
having
access
to
parks.
M
M
Not
too
sure
about
that,
I
can't
find
any
data
or
science
or
anything.
That's
backing
that
up
to
say
that
you
know
someone
being
inside
of
a
park
somehow
don't
know,
and
so
there
need
to
be
an
increase
to
patrolling
in
parks
if
there
are
no
park
hours.
M
Currently,
our
police
department,
from
what
I
got
from
chief
eddington
earlier,
is
that
we
we
don't
patrol
the
parks
now
and
that,
typically,
if
we're,
if
our
police
department
is
in
the
parks,
they're
responding
to
a
call
for
service
in
the
parks,
and
so
it
doesn't
seem
that
there
would.
We
would
change
that
practice
if
parks
were
over
and
open
overnight,
the
homeless
population
would
migrate
to
our
parks.
M
I
think
we
can
make
it
very
clear
in
the
ordinance
that
encampments
are
not
allowed
in
our
parks
currently,
and
so
I'll
come
back
to
that.
But
I
think
we
can
make
it
very
clear
that
encampments
are
not
allowed
in
our
parks.
You
can't
build
structures
in
the
parks
and
a
tent
is
seen
as
a
structure
so
that
that
there
won't
be
any
encampment
and
we
can
certainly
again
legislate
around
that
specific
concern
again,
a
major
concern
with
unauthorized
usage
of
parks
during
overnight
hours,
for
example
there,
as
as
evie
mentioned.
M
You
know
it
would
be
disruptive
for
someone
to
occupy
a
basketball
court
and
play
basketball
at
11
o'clock
at
night.
It
would
be
disruptive
for
someone
to
use
the
tennis
court
at
11
o'clock
at
night
as
well.
I
get
that
and
currently
under
our
code
and
nowhere
in
this
proposal
would
it
eliminate
the
section
which
I
can
pull.
M
I
can
say
that
section
now,
which
is
section
7,
10
3
general
regulations,
which
says
that
practice
on
tennis
backboards,
you
know
you're
not
allowed
to
use
the
tennis
courts
from
or
you
you
can
only
use
the
tennis
courts
from
8
am
to
9
pm.
You
can
only
use
the
basketball
courts.
M
For
a
similar
hours
of
play,
use
of
basketball
courts
is
permitted
between
the
hours
of
8am
and
9pm
as
well.
So
currently,
the
use
of
the
quartz
is
limited
currently
and
if
we
need
to
adjust
something
to
make
clear
that
the
equipment
is
also
and
as
we
add
a
skate
park
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear
that
the
skate
park
that
the
ramps
and
whatnot
can't
be
used
after
9
pm.
I
think
we
can
include
that
here,
but
the
the
real
goal
and
then
just
to
finish
on
with
the
list.
M
So
there
still
would
be
regulations
about
use
that
we
don't
want
unauthorized
use
and
then
noise
being
made
in
the
parks
folks,
congregating
and
noise
being
made
in
the
parks.
We
will
still
have
no
noise
ordinances
that
will
still
be
able
to
be
enforced,
and
so
I
think
all
of
these
concerns
that
were
raised
by
the
board
and
I
unfortunately
didn't
get
to.
I
didn't
know
that
this
was
coming
when
this
was
coming
up
to
the
board.
M
I
didn't
know
it
was
in
fact
going
to
the
board
before
it
did
so
I
didn't
get
to
have
a
conversation
with
them
to
clarify
some
of
this
stuff,
but
the
only
thing
that
would
change
here
is
that
we
would
no
longer
arrest
someone
for
sitting
in
a
park
at
11
o'clock
at
night.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
feel
like
I'm
a
broken
record
this
evening
and
again
I
threw
out
the
question:
what
are
we
trying
to
solve
here?
I,
my
comments
are
brief.
I
I
think
I
I
can
speak
for
myself
that
I
pay
attention
to
our
class
our
staff
recommendations
only
because
they
get
paid
to
think
point.
G
I
pay
attention
to
our
staff's
recommendations
because
they
get
paid
to
think
beyond
whatever
ideas
that
I
can
come
up.
So
I
just
want
to
point
out,
because
I
did
get
a
couple
of
phone
calls
from
this.
I
do
receive
a
lot
of
phone
calls
because
of
crown
and
mason
park
and
other
areas
around
town
that
there's
a
reason
that
we
have
ordinances
that
dictate
the
time
that
they
close.
G
G
I
want
to
draw
to
the
attention
of
anyone
who
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
read
the
the
packet
there's
details
that
support
the
recommendation
there
are.
There
are
some
arrests
that
I
see
we
don't
really
know
what
those
details
are.
I'm
sure
you
can
follow
up
with
the
police,
but
here
again
through
the
police
department,
the
work
of
alternatives
or
to
arrest
that
there
are
sea
tickets
that
are
given
to
residents
who,
for
whatever
reason,
break
the
ordinance
that's
in
place.
G
G
The
other
thing
that
I
want
to
notate
is,
I
think,
it's
important
for
things
like
this
to
socialize
from
your
other
peers.
Had
you
given
me
the
courtesy
of
a
phone
call,
I
would
have
told
you
that
I
get
a
lot
of
complaints
from
my
residents
regarding
the
use
of
the
park
after
a
certain
time,
because
that
involves
for
safety
reason
that
involves
lights
going
on.
G
I've
read
in
the
evanston
now
that
the
concern
would
be
it
would
invite
more
homeless
families
there,
which
creates
a
whole
nother
host
of
problems
that
I
don't
think
we're
ready
to
to
respond
to,
and
then
my
other,
you
know
recommendation
for
things
like
this.
I
I
don't
know.
I.
I
think
that
I
could
predict
that
something
like
this
would
cause
a
little
stir
in
our
community.
G
Those
are
real
numbers
in
statistics
like
I
would
much
rather
and
not
to
be
disrespectful
talk
about
those
issues
at
a
follow-up
meeting
in
depth
in
terms
of
that
impact
that
we
received
in
terms
of
wealth
gap,
health,
whatever
the
case
may
be,
this
is
something
that
definitely
needs
to
be
flushed
out
a
little
bit
more,
and
so
I
am
not
ready
to
support
this
moving
forward
and
will
request
additional
research,
maybe
going
back
to
the
park
board
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
what
their
concerns
were
and
then
seeing
if
you'd
want
to
rethink
this
approach.
H
Did
this
go?
I
know
the
park
board
parks
and
rec
board
provided
a
statement,
but
did
this
go
to
the
park
in
rex
board.
A
Did
it
come
straight
here
so
initially
the
referrals
committee
sent
it
to
the
parks
and
rec
board
and
then
subsequent
to
that
a
council
member
reed
submitted
a
whole
package
of
referrals
that
all
seem
to
kind
of
deal
with
the
same
kinds
of
issues.
So
we
this
issue
got
folded
into
that
new
new
packet
of
referrals,
so
it
kind
of
ended
up
going
to
it,
ended
up
going
both
to
human
services
and
to
but
initially
to
parks
and
rec.
H
This
did
go
ultimately
right,
yeah,
they
talked
about
it
and
that's
what
that's
where
this
memo
came
from.
Oh,
they
did
discuss
it.
Okay,
what
I
will
say
is-
and
councilman
reid,
correct
me
for
wrong,
but
I
don't
think
the
version
that
we're
discussing
tonight
went
to
the
parks
and
rec
board.
I
think
what
went
to
the
parks
and
rec
board
was
was
kind
of
an
all-out.
H
You
know
to
to
completely
remo
to.
H
H
So
I
think
what
we're
hearing
tonight
is
that,
between
the
time
when
this
was
heard
by
the
parks
and
rec
board
and
now
councilman
reed
has
is
open
to
you
know
excluding
things
or
prohibiting
continuing
to
prohibit
things
that,
I
think
were
the
chief
concerns
of
the
parks
board
and
community
members
that
have
reached
out
to
some
of
our
some
of
my
colleagues
here.
H
Nobody
has
reached
out
to
me
about
this
at
all
in
any
direction,
but
everything
that
you
just
mentioned-
councilmember
braceway,
I
think,
is
covered
by
what
we're
a
council
member
reid
is
at
this
point
again
the
noise,
the
issue,
the
concerns
around
our
homeless
population
and
camping
in
the
area.
I
think
that's
why
he
said
that
we
can
still
prohibit
encampments
and
we
have
a
noise
ordinance
and
we
can
still
prohibit
use
of
you
know,
play
equipment,
basketball,
courts,
etc.
A
H
In
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
right,
what
I'm
saying
is
what
they
looked
at
is
it
says,
amending
portions
parks
and
operations
that
would
strike
the
provision
that
makes
it
unlawful
for
any
person
to
use
occupy
play
in
lounge
about
or
loader
in
any
play
or
playground
or
building.
That's
everything
right.
H
Really
to
rewrite
the
language
in
a
sense
to
prohibit
certain
things
that
would
address
the
concerns.
People
are
concerned
about
the
homeless
population,
camping
in
the
in
the
parks
and
beaches.
If
this
were
to
occur,
if
this
were
to
be
struck,
what
he's
saying
is
we
could
write
something
specifically
that
said
prohibiting
encampments
right
right,
so
we
can
go
down
the
list
of
the
concerns
and
I
think
what
councilman
reed
is
suggesting
they
could
be
addressed
specifically
in
the
code
right.
A
Well,
I
have
to
agree
with
council
member
braithwaite.
I
get
a
lot
of
calls
about
dozens
and
dozens
of
young
people
who
congregate
at
lighthouse
park
in
the
summer
months.
They
hot
rod
around
the
parking
lot.
They
can't
they
go
down
into
the
dunes
and
and
build
bonfires,
and
I
mean
it's.
I
think
people
would
be
really
distressed
to
think
that
that
there
was
that
we
might
lighten
up
on
making
sure
our
parks
were
closed
at
11
o'clock.
M
You
can't
this
wouldn't
change
anything
about
whether
you
can
hot
ride
around
near
the
park,
or
you
know,
make
your
loud
your
car
loud
and
whatever
goes
on
with
that
race
and
stuff,
and
it
still
you
know,
whatever
the
rules
are
around
building
bonfires,
I
don't
think
you're
allowed
to
during
the
day
just
go
down
to
the
beach
and
create
a
fire,
and
so
that
would
still
be
the
case
here
that
you
would
not
be
able
to
go
start
a
fire
in
our
parks
or
or
anywhere
else.
M
You
know
again,
I
I
still
see
this
as
equipment
shutting
down
and
now
that
mrs
thompson
is
here,
I
just
want.
If
you
don't
mind
now,
I
do
know
that
this
came
to
the
parks
and
rec
board.
I
think
before
you
were
the
director
correct.
O
O
M
If
I
can
so
you
you
mentioned
young
people,
are
we
talking
about
just
young
people.
O
M
I
would
still
need
to
go
home
if
we're
just
talking
about
someone
who's
in
their
20s,
for
example,
and
they're
in
the
park.
If
they're
not
doing
anything
else,
that's
disruptive,
why
do
we
need
them
to
move
along
and
why
do
we
need
to
criminalize
so.
O
If
you
even
look
at
those
reasons
like
most
times,
there
are
other
behaviors
that
are
going
on.
However,
I
would
say
there
are
some
and
then
there
are
you
know
people
lounging
about
using
the
parks
as
a
way
to
live
and
to
make
it
their
habitat.
But
at
the
same
time,
if
you're
saying
there
is
no
consequence
for
being
in
the
park
after
hours,
then
why
do
we
have
hours
of
the
park?
O
M
I
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
get
at
is.
I
keep
hearing
and
I
want
everyone
to
like
really
think
about
this.
We
keep
saying
we
don't
want
people
in
the
park
and
it's
always
connected
to
some
other
activity.
We
don't
want
people
in
the
park.
Doing
you
know
racing,
we
don't
people
in
the
park
doing
something
else
that
is
illegal
and
that
thing
is
already
illegal,
but
I
mean,
can
you
say
if
someone
was
just
peaceably
sitting
in
a
park
at
at
12
o'clock
quietly
on
a
bench?
Is
that
a
concern
of
staff.
O
M
Get
that
but
a
grocery
store
is
a
building
that
is
secured.
I'm
not
saying
people
could
go
into
fleetwood,
jordan,
I'm
saying
a
park
that
is
just
open
and
outside
there's
nothing
to
steal.
The
benches
are
bolted
down.
They
can't
walk
off
with
the
bench
they
don't
want.
The
trash
can
necessarily
so
there's
nothing
to
steal,
there's
no,
unlike
being
in
a
grocery
store.
When
it's
closed,
there's
no
liability,
there's
no
concern
of
something
being
taken.
O
But
even
if
they're
not
taking
anything
when
the
grocery
store
is
closed,
we
still
want
to
say
hey
it's
10
o'clock.
The
grocery
store
is
closed,
move
on
if
we're
in
a
park-
and
there
is
no.
If
there
is
no
rule
about
what
time
the
park
closes,
then
there's
no
reason
for
us
to
say
move
about,
and
I
mean
it
is
very
dark
in
some
of
our
parks
that
do
not
have
lighting,
and
so
we
can't
say
in
this
park,
it's
okay
to
be
in
this
park
at
certain
hours.
O
There
are
parks
that
I
wouldn't
want
anyone
to
be
in
after
hours
when
it
gets
really
dark
and
there
are
miscreant
behaviors
that
go
on
in
the
park
from
someone
else
that
may
not
even
be
with
that
person
who's.
Just
you
know
kind
of
hanging
out
in
the
park
and
not
doing
anything,
that's
you
know
illegal,
so
I
still
wouldn't
want
a
person
in
those
parks
when
it
gets
like
two
three
o'clock
in
the
morning.
So
I
mean
the
parks
are
closed.
I
we.
O
O
G
G
The
rules
exist
for
a
reason,
and
I
think,
similar
to
an
expansion
of
what
the
director
said.
Then
it
creates
a
whole
another
need
for
staffing
and
there's
crazy
stuff
that
happens
in
a
park
penny
park,
for
example,
and
I
and
I
don't
think
I
need
to
share,
but
I
will
right
before
we
rebuild
the
park
house
member
read:
there
were
dark
spots
in
the
clark
as
the
director
indicated
and
under
that
we
found
beer
cans,
condoms
we've
had
a
young
lady
who
was
assaulted
in
the
day
after
school
at
a
park.
G
So
I
definitely
don't
want
to
open
this
up,
and
I
and
I
want
to
thank
you
very
much.
I
mean
we
had
a
crazy
incident
at
mason
park
with
a
young
lady
that
was
left.
After
all,
the
programming
was
closed
and
I
don't
bring
that
up
to
specifically
speak
about
that
issue,
but
I
think
under
director
thompson's
leadership-
and
I
share
this
with
harry
cars.
G
And
council,
but
it
does
give
me
a
staff
to
to
highlight
it.
So
if
what
you're
I'm
not
really
sure
what
we're
trying
to
solve
here,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
to
note
that
mason
park
fleetwood,
I
mean
you
did
a
lot
of
activities
all
around
evanston
better
than
we've
seen
in
the
in
the
past
to
help
expend
those
excuse
me
extend
those
hours
that
people
would
hang
out
and
making
it
safe
and
fun
for
for
families.
So
I'm
glad
to
promote
that
first.
O
Council,
I
I
do
understand
exactly
where
you're
coming
from.
I
just
do
believe
that
when
you
don't
have
hours
in
the
park,
you
do
invite
additional
behavior
in
the
park
that
you
can't
say
hey
even
for
our
young
people.
You
know
when
it's
about
10
o'clock,
we
start
saying
hey
the
basketball
game
is
over
because
you
know
they
still
have
to
get
a
couple
more
rounds
in
because
the
park
is
closing
soon.
M
Just
if
I,
if
I
may,
I
want
to
just
reiterate
one
more
time
everything
that
folks
keep
saying
is
a
concern
is
already
against
the
law
and
even
the
again
the
basketball
courts
close
separately
of
this
at
a
certain
time
and
we'd
still
have
that
tool
to
say:
hey
the
the
the
the
courts
are
closed.
I
I
will,
you
know,
I'd
love
to
make
a
recommendation
to
send
this
back
to
the
parks
and
rec
board.
I
don't
think
that
again.
M
M
I
don't
think
we
even
understand,
for
example,
a
chief
cook
or
or
someone
who's
when
an
officer,
arrests,
someone
or
someone
who's
prepared.
I
I
my
interpretation
of
the
code
right
now.
For
example,
the
concern
about
the
homeless
encampments
is
that
seemingly
under
our
code,
it
allows
for
encampments
now.
So
it
seems
as
though,
if
I
wanted
to
pitch
a
tent
in
front
of
city
hall
for
up
to
10
days,
I
under
our
code
would
be
allowed
to
do
that.
Seemingly,
and
so
what
part
of
our
code.
M
Not
saying
we
should,
but
I'm
saying
the
concern
that
if
we
were
to
remove
just
this
section
that
said
that
someone
can
sit
in
a
park
peacefully
that
all
of
a
sudden
we're
gonna
have
you
know
you
know
folks,
like
court
scholars
coming
and
creating
encampments
in
our
parks,
because
there's
they
feel
like
there's
some
loophole.
M
Well,
they're,
not
doing
it
now,
when
you
know
seemingly
again
in
our
code,
someone
could
pitch
a
tent
in
in
front
of
city
hall
for
up
to
10
days
and
that
would
be
seemingly
allowed
by
coke.
A
A
It's
not
I'm
not
worried
about
suddenly
finding
homeless,
encampments
in
parks.
I'm
just
I'm
concerned
about
even
small
groups
of
people,
starting
to
just
you
know.
What's
what's
okay
at
10
30,
a
group
of
people
sitting
and
talking
and
having
a
good
time
and
then
at
11
o'clock
I'd.
You
know
we,
the
neighbors
want
them
to
go
home,
so
they
can.
You
know,
have
it
be
nice
and
quiet,
so
I'm
not
looking,
I'm
not
thinking
about
necessarily
wild
and
crazy
behavior.
I
just
people.
A
M
I'll
just
say,
6483
is
temporary
or
permitted
temporary
use
regulations
and
tense
and
non-residential
districts
are
allowed
there
for
10
days.
I
get
that.
That's
not
your
concern,
but
you
know
the
reason.
I
think
that
parks
and
rec
should
look
at.
This
is
again
I
I
do
believe,
there's
a
more
nuanced
legal
question
to
to
examine
too,
given
that
there's
a
2017
illinois
supreme
court
case
where
chicago
because
of
the
protests
that
took
place
at
grant
park
during
the
occupy
movement.
M
Where
folks
did
you
know,
stay
in
grant
park
beyond
the
11
o'clock
closing
hour
and
to
skip
you
know
kind
of
forward
what
the
supreme
court
determined
there
is
that
they
eventually
did
dismiss
the
cases
they
they
allowed
the
city
to
charge
folks
with
being
in
the
park
after
11
p.m,
but
because
it
met
a
threshold
which,
in
chicago
they
said,
was
a
significant
government
purpose.
M
Chicago
says
that
they
clean
their
parks
and
maintain
their
parks
overnight,
and
thereby
that
is
their
interest
in
keeping
people
out
of
the
parks
because
they
are
cleaning
and
maintaining
the
parks
and
that's
their
significant
government
interest.
M
In
this
instance,
I've
gotten
confirmation
from
our
public
works
department
and
from
miss
thompson's
department
that
we
do
not
deploy
staff
to
our
parks
overnight
to
clean
our
parks,
and
so
I
do
think
specifically
that
nuanced
you
know,
legal
argument
should
be
looked
at
to
see
if
we
are
creating
a
law
that
is
that
violates
folks's
rights,
and
I
think
our
law
department
should
look
at
that.
I
think.
M
I'll
move
that
this
be
referred
back
to
the
parks
and
rec
board
for
further
discussion.
B
A
P
The
allegation
was
from
an
arrestee
who
made
several
complicated
allegations
against
three
detectives
that
responded
to
his
address
to
make
an
arrest
pursuant
to
probable
cause.
Some
of
those
complaints
were
they
stepped
on
a
prayer
mat
and
disrespected
the
prayer
mat
and
his
religion
that
they
did
not
have
probable
cause
to
make
an
arrest.
He
was
inadequately
mirandized
denied
access
to
an
attorney
denied
access
to
his
medical
medical
attention
and
his
medication.
P
At
the
start
of
the
interview
interrogation,
the
complainant
requested
a
lawyer
detectives
told
the
complainant.
The
public
offenders
were
not
provided
during
interrogation.
Interviews
of
this
nature,
the
complainant
admitted
made
an
admission
that
he
violated
a
no
contact
order
via
an
email
accused
detective
one
requested
medical
attention
for
the
complainant.
P
The
planet
was
transported
to
the
hospital
for
treatment
for
his
health
condition.
The
complaint
appeared
in
bond
court.
The
court
determined
the
accused
had
enough
problem.
The
accused
detectives
had
no
probable
cause
to
detain
the
complainant.
The
complainant
received
a
one,
ten
thousand
dollar
eye
bond
for
his
charge.
P
A
standard
operating
procedure
over
prisoner
medical
care,
illinois
statute,
but
rest
without
an
award
illinois
statute
to
right
to
communicate
with
an
attorney
accused
detective.
One
was
exonerated
of
all
rule
violations,
detectives,
2
and
3
were
accused
of
rule
violations,
1,
2
and
18
of
department
rules.
Those
were
all
unfounded.
P
This
case
was
reviewed
with
the
citizen
police
review
commission
on
april
6
2022
and
the
commission
voted
six
to
zero
to
move
the
complaint.
The
human
services
committee
for
final
review
prior
to
our
meeting
tonight,
the
interim
chief
concurred
with
the
recommendations
that
officer
detectives
did
not
violate
these
rules
and
there's
no
further
action
or
discipline
recommended
at
this
time.
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
So
that
concludes
our
business,
and
so
I
declare
us
adjourned.