►
From YouTube: Plan Commission Meeting 1-27-2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
If
you
look
in
the
appendix
where
we
have
the
tables,
you
can
see
that
we
broke
down
all
the
uses
by
the
type
you
know:
7
11,
the
short
term,
zip
car.
You
know
unrestricted
parking,
so
I
mean
we.
We
did
break
it
down
with
with
all
kind
of
uses
that
are
allowed
to
park
in
the
garage.
B
Okay-
and
it's
for
is
for
the
for
the
applicant
with
respect
to
signage.
What
is
the
like,
how
is
this
going,
how?
How
are
these
parking
spaces
that
are
going
to
be
available
for
public
use,
going
to
be
communicated
to
the
general
public.
C
Sure
I
can
feel
that
this
is
vigo,
with
with
focus
the
the
operation
side
of
how
we
would
accomplish.
This
is
yet
to
be
finalized.
There's
a
variety
of
things
that
we're
considering
and
pursuing
at
this
point,
ranging
from
daily
parking
to
weekly
in
monthly
parking
to
any
sort
of
long-term
agreements
with
any
neighbors
neighboring
properties.
C
So,
obviously,
with
that
there's
there's
sort
of
different
ways
in
which
we
would
allocate
the
stalls
and
how
that
would
work.
But,
generally
speaking,
you
know
to
answer
your
question:
it'd
be
really
similar
to
effectively
what
what
e2
has
done
down
the
street,
and
I
know
they
within
the
last
five
years
did
a
very
similar
process
to
allow
for
public
use
a
lot
of
online
reservations,
be
it
spot
hero
or
anything
else.
C
Obviously,
you
know
we
could
consider
signage
on
the
building
if,
in
fact,
we're
looking
for
daily
parkers
just
to
be
able
to
see
that
that
the
parking
is
available,
we
haven't
considered
exactly
what
that
looks
like,
but
again
it's
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
determined
based
on
on
how
exactly
we
we
continue
and
and
who,
that
user
is.
If
that
answers
your
question.
B
It
does.
Thank
you,
okay.
I
don't
think
I
have
any
other
questions.
Do
any
commissioners
have
any
questions
before
I
open
up
to
public
questions
and
comment.
D
Oh
chair
isaac.
I
want
to
interject
that
the
meeting
is
being
recorded.
I
don't
think
it
was
connected
properly
before
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it
that
that
is
known.
It's
being
recorded.
C
No,
it's
a
good
question.
The
the
weekend.
The
parking
study
was
done
happened
to
be.
We
became
fully
leased,
actually
just
at
that
moment,
so
it
was
done,
I
believe,
over
the
first
weekend
of
october,
so
we
had
a
lot
of
move-ins.
So
we
really
honestly
see
that
as
sort
of
the
kind
of
maximum
use
being
that
it
is
a
move-in
weekend.
C
So
there
were
a
lot
of
cars,
assisting
people
moving
in
and
out
and
you'll
see
as
as
we
get
through
the
weekend,
that
number
trails
down,
certainly
the
the
thursday
and
friday
there's
a
lot
more
activity
in
the
building
and
then
towards
saturday
and
and
obviously
the
rest
of
the
year.
There's
less,
but
I
can
say
you
know,
the
62
number
is
is
how
many,
how
many
residents
actually
have
in
an
actual
agreement
to
lisa
stahl?
C
So
then
it'd
be
up
to
it's
up
to
the
property
management
team
frankly
to
police
and
make
sure
that
no
one
that
isn't
allowed
to
be
parking
in
the
building
is
not
parking
in
the
building.
But
I
would
say
that
that
weekend
in
particular,
there
just
were
a
lot
of
additional
vehicles
around
for
move-ins,
and
I
think
going
forward.
You
know,
assuming
we
had
some
ability
to
use
the
stalls
for
public
use.
C
C
There
are
without
going
back
to
the
plane,
and
we
can.
The
ground
level
does
not
have
any
gates,
so
the
60
or
so
stalls
on
the
ground
level
is
is
certainly
essentially
open.
Access
from
the
alley
side
to
emerson.
C
There
is
a
gate
going
up
to
the
mezzanine
level
and
down
to
the
lower
level
for
secured
parking
and
residents
that
do
have
an
agreement.
They
get
a
clicker
essentially
to
operate
that
gate.
B
C
Yeah,
the
the
infrastructure
editions
again
are
one
of
those
things.
That's
that's
being
discussed
to
determine
exactly
how
we
want
to
do
this.
You
know,
as
is
policing
it
with
the
property
management
team,
reasonable
you
know
perhaps,
but
but
it
may
become
a
situation
where
we
just
want
to
add
some
some
gate:
arms
at
the
entries
of
the
garage
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
keeping
out
folks
that
that
haven't
paid
for
the
parking.
B
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
commissioners.
B
All
right,
we'll
open
it
up
to
to
pa
questions
from
the
public.
Anyone
that's
on
the
call,
if
you'd
like
to
no,
I
don't
believe
anyone
signed
up
to
to
ask
questions
or
make
comments.
Now
is
the
time
to
ask
questions
of
the
applicant.
I
would
ask
they
not
be
rhetorical
or
argumentative
rather
seeking
to
elicit
facts
and
information
regarding
the
applicant's
request.
B
B
Is
there
any
member
of
the
public
that
would
like
to
make
a
a
comment
with
respect
to
with
respect
to
this
item
expressing
their
opinion,
whether
in
support
or
against
the
the
proposal
of
the
applicant
okay
hearing,
none,
we
will
close
the
record
of
public
comment
and
again
I'll.
Ask
the
commissioners
if
they
have
any
any
questions
for
the
applicant
before
we
move
into
deliberations.
B
I
I
have
a
question
for
from
miss
jones
with
respect
to
this.
What
this
is
the
recommendation
that
the
this
item?
I'm
sorry
that
the
the
amount
of
space
is
available
be
reviewed
from
time
to
time.
I
believe
the
recommendation
was
a
an
annual
recommendation.
Miss
jones.
B
Can
you
run
me
run
through
like
the
how
you
foresee
that
you
know
if,
if
this
were
to
pass
and
your
recommendation
were
to
be
incorporated,
how
would
that
work.
D
Well,
we
anticipate
that,
on
an
annual
basis,
we'd
get
a
report.
Actually,
I
think,
similar
to
what
was
recently
submitted
a
few
weeks
ago
that
basically
discuss
current
number
of
parking
spaces
leads
to
the
public
versus
residents.
How
many
of
those
parking
spaces
are
being
used
just
a
general
breakdown
of
how
that
is
operating
at
that
point,
then
we'd
analyze
and
see
if
we
need
to
make
any
further
adjustments
to
what's
required
to
be
leased
to
the
building
residents.
D
B
Do
you
know
how
the
city
enforces
wheel,
tax.
B
For
vehicles
that
are
parked
in
that
are
not
parked
on
the
street
that
are
parked
in
you
know,
on
on
private
property,
how
does
that
work?
I
mean?
Are
you?
Are
you
looking
at
you
have
access
to?
You
know
vehicles
that
are
registered
to
addresses
in
the
city
of
evanston,
with
the
secretary
of
state,
the
information
that
the
secretary
of
state
shares
with
you
to
to
allow
you
to
enforce
the
wheel
tax
and
ms
knight-
and
maybe
this
is
your.
I
saw
you
just
put
your
your
camera
on.
F
I'm
here
hi
everybody,
yes,
we
do
have.
We
are
provided
files
to.
I
think
it's
10
or
30
days
after
somebody
relocates
to
a
new
address.
The
state
requires
you
to
update
your
vehicle
registration.
So
we
get
some
interval
of
time.
We
get
information
from
the
secretary
of
state
on
vehicles
registered
in
evanston.
E
B
All
right,
any
any
other
commissioners,
have
any
questions
or
would
like
to
make
any
comments
with
respect
to
this
item
like
what
do
you
think
about
the
the
85,
the
request
for
85
spaces
to
be
available
to
the
public?
There's
a
there'll
be
a
hundred.
B
I
guess
we're
looking
at
two
different
things
right,
agreeing
that
they
that
the
applicant
only
has
to
provide
170
spaces
versus
174,
which,
in
my
mind
is
seems
you
know
reasonable
and.
B
You
know
these
types
of
issues
happen
when,
with
with
construction,
where
you
end
up
losing
a
space
or
two
because
of
some
con,
because
because
of
some
field
issue,
so
I
I
I
see
that
as
a
as
in
in
my
mind,
I
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
vote
for
approval
of
that
on
the
on
the
use
of
85
spaces
for
public
use.
That
would
leave
what
79
spaces,
which
it
sounds
like
based
on
the
current.
B
B
Spaces
for
residents
that
would
currently
use
any
spaces
so
does
that
you
know.
Does
that
seem
appropriate.
G
I
don't
have
a
particular
problem.
I
mean,
I
think,
that
the
the
important
thing
is
that
the
spaces
exist
they've
been
built
and,
to
the
extent
you
can
you
know
the
applicant
can
find
you
know
others
in
the
neighborhood
or
commuters.
You
know.
Actually
I'd
rather
have
the
commuters
go
in
the
city.
Garages
that
we
already
have,
but,
but
there
certainly
are
that
neighborhood
is,
is
pretty
heavily
parked
with
with
students
and
others
and
if
they
can
entice
them
into
putting
you
know
having
shelter
protected
parking.
G
I
think
that
that's
kind
of
a
win-win
for
both
the
applicant
and
the
neighborhood
and
and
the
city,
quite
frankly
in
you
know
the
spaces
exist
now.
I
agree
that
you
know
170
is
are
the
spaces
that
are
that
exist,
so
it
seems
silly
to
not
to
approve
that
reduction
and
again
the
applicant
controls
the
spaces.
So
if
it
turns
out
more
tenants
have
cars
and
want
to
have
parking
they
can
you
know
they
can
adjust
their
program
to
accommodate
more
more
of
their
tenants.
F
F
B
Well-
and
I
think
this
was
the
this
was
the
last
one
that
was
approved
before
last-
planned
development
was
approved
before
the
tod
regulations
were
were
enacted,
and
you
know
this
was
the.
This
was
the
one
where
there
was
concern
about
the
use
of
the
of
the
alley
which
this
is.
This
site
is
directly
west
across
the.
B
That
we
just
looked
at.
B
Guy
well,
this
was
in
in
december.
There
was,
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
the
vehicles
and
you
know
use
of
the
alley
and
there's
a
lot
of
engagement
by
the
residents
of
sherman
gardens,
which
you
know.
I
would
note
that
we
we
did
not.
We
are
not
getting
much
engagement
on
from
from
those
residents
on
this
on
this
request,
so
I
think
I
I
would
take
that
as
a
sign
of
I
guess,
either
indifference
or
or
ascent.
B
All
right,
so
why
don't
we
put
up
the
the
standards.
B
Okay,
so
standards
for
plan
development
says
a
special
use
plan.
Development
involves
such
special
considerations
of
the
public
interest
that
it
shall
be
required
to
adhere
to
the
specific
plan
development
standards
established
in
the
zoning
district
in
which
is
located.
Compliance
with
the
standards
shall
govern
the
recommendation
of
the
plan
commission
applicable
to
a
plan,
development
and
the
action
of
the
city
council
in
order
to
ensure
that
an
approved
plan
development
is
in
harmony
with
the
general
purposes
and
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
B
Okay,
there's
no,
that's
a
that's
a
mission
statement
and
not
a
an
item.
We
have
to
say
whether
satisfied
or
not,
satisfied
or
not
applicable.
So,
let's
move
to
the
the
next
slide.
B
I
would
say
that
this
is
either
not
applicable
or
satisfied,
based
on
the
the
amendment
that
were
we're
being
asked
to
amendments
of
the
plan
development
that
we're
being
asked
to
review
today,
number
two:
each
plan
development
shall
be
compatible
with
and
implement
the
adopted,
comprehensive
general
plan,
as
amended
any
adopted
land
use
and
urban
design
plans
specific
to
the
area,
this
zoning
ordinance
and
any
other
pertinent
city
planning
and
development
policies.
B
Not
at
all
number
three
each
plan
development
shall
be
completed
within
two
years.
Vehicle
no
special
use.
Personal
building
code
is
issued
again,
not
applicable
all
landscaping.
Treatment
within
the
plant
development
should
be
provided
in
accordance
with
requirements
set
forth
in
chapter
17,
landscaping
and
screening,
and
shown
on
the
required
landscape
plan
that
should
be
submitted
as
a
part
of
a
planned
development
application
not
applicable
next
slide.
Please
all
right.
B
This
is
6-10-1-9
b,
site
controls
and
standards
for
all
boundaries
of
the
plan,
development
of
budding
residential
property
that
should
be
provided
transition,
landscaped
strip
of
at
least
10
feet,
consisting
of
vegeta,
vegetative,
screening,
fencing
or
other
decorative
walls.
In
accordance
with
the
manual
of
design
guidelines,
it's
not
applicable,
I'm
just
going
to
I'm
not
going
to
reach
one
of
these
out
loud
number.
B
Two
walkways
pedestrians
not
affected
by
this
amendment,
so
we're
gonna,
say
not
applicable
number
three
location,
construction,
operation
of
parking
loading
areas
and
service
areas
shall
be
designed
to
avoid
adverse
effects
on
residential
uses
within
or
joining
the
development
and,
where
possible,
provide
additional
parking
beyond
that
required
for
the
planned
development
to
service
the
business
district
in
which
it
is
located.
B
Okay,
so
we're
not
changing
the
parking
that's
allocated
to
the
business
use
for
this
planned
development,
so
the
the
last
part
of
this
of
this
requirement
is
not
applicable.
We're
changing
the
the
operation
of
we're,
not
choosing
the
operation
of
the
parking
it's
just.
Who
can
who
can
use
that
parking?
B
And
so
I
I
would
say
this
is
either
satisfied
or
altogether
not
applicable
principal
vehicular.
Access
points
shall
be
designed
to
prevent
smooth
traffic
flow
with
controlled
turning
movements.
None
of
this
is
being
this
of
this
is
being
changed,
although
now
that
we're
talking
about
this,
I
guess
this
brings
to
mind
a
an
issue
that
I
don't
think
we
covered,
which
is
the
the
applicant
mentioned
that
I
believe
there
are
60
spaces
on
the
ground
floor
and
currently
there
is
not
a
a
gate
for
that
ground
floor.
B
Spaces
will
be
either
on
the
mezzanine
floor
or
in
the
basement,
and
so
you
know,
with
respect
to
a
ground
floor
space.
It
would
seem
to
me
that
the
this
parking
wasn't
designed
for
people
to
it
wasn't
designed
with
a
with
a
separate
foyer
entryway
for
for
parking.
B
At
least
I
don't,
I
don't
recall
seeing
that
in
the
in
the
drawings
or
when
when
we
approved
or
approved
this
a
number
of
years
ago,
because
that
wasn't-
and
this
wasn't
anticipated-
I
I
I
want
to-
I
guess
we
should
just
deal
with
this
now,
because
I
I
think
that
ultimately
looking
at
the
rest
of
the
of
the
items
here
that
this
is
this,
is
you
know
this
may
be
one
sticking
point
that
I
just.
I
think
we
just
need
to
flush
out.
B
If
someone
from
outside
the
building
is
going
to
come
and
park
their
sp
park
in
the
parking
lot
or
in
the
garage,
how
are
they
going
to
leave
the
garage?
Are
they
going
to
be
walking
through
drive
lanes?
Are
they
going
to
be?
Are
they
going
to
have
access
to
the
to
the
foyer?
Are
they
going
to
have
access
to
if
they
park
on
the
garage
on
the
garage
level
or
the
mezzanine
level
access
to
the
elevator?
C
C
There
is
excess
control
points
in
the
at
the
mezzanine
level
to
prevent
any
outside
access
without
a
key
fob
to
get
to
the
residential
floors,
starting
at
2
and
above
so
effectively.
You
know
anyone
that
any
pedestrian
coming
through
the
garage
can
get
into
those
stairwells.
They
can
go
up
to
the
ground
floor
and
then
out
the
building,
either
on
one
side
either
through
the
building
lobby.
On
the
other
side,
it's
just
a
stairwell
that
exits
directly
to
the
to
the
street
on
emerson
street,
to
the
sidewalk
I
should
say:
okay
thank.
B
My
my
concern
is
is
addressed.
Let's
see,
I
really.
I
think
that
that
affected
number
number
three
but
vehicle
vehicular
access
points
are
not
are
not
being
changed
here,
but
the
pedestrian
traffic
issue
in
number
four
is
addressed
and
satisfied.
B
Plan
development
shall
provide
for
underground
installation
utilities,
not
a
not
applicable
market
feasibility
statement,
not
applicable
traffic
circulation
impact
study.
We
actually
got
that
here
and
I
think
it's
satisfied
and
then
the
zoning
administrator
may
have
his
distraction
require
of
the
applicant
the
additional
studies
or
impact
analysis
where
he
determines
the
reasonable
need
for
such
investigation
investigation
is
indicated.
B
D
B
So
with
all
that
being
said,
is
there
a
motion
on
this
item.
B
Okay,
so
commissioner
linwell
motions
for
approval
of
the
amendment
and
development
with
the
staff
recommendations
included.
Is
there
a
second
on
that
motion.
B
All
right
hearing,
none
jones,
can
you
please
call
the
roll
for
the
vote
on
this
item.
E
G
B
B
Next
item
is
item
5b,
which,
according
to
our
according
to
staff,
has
been
pulled
from
the
agenda
and
will
be
rescheduled
item
number
six
is
public
comment.
Is
there
anyone
from
public
that
would
like
to
make
any
comment
with
respect
to
anything
relating
to
plan
commission
all
right
hearing?
None.
Is
there
a
motion
to
adjourn.
B
For
seconds
miss
jones
call
the
wall.
Please.