►
From YouTube: Rules Committee Meeting 10-5-2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
D
B
D
We
do
we
have,
we
do
have
public
comment,
I
will
we
have
three
individuals
for
public
comment,
mike
disoko.
E
But
it's
not
a
full-time
job.
It's
not
supposed
to
be
a
full-time
job.
It's
supposed
to
be
a
public
service
position
and
it's
supposed
to
be
not
not
entirely
without
compensation,
but
that's
not
the
point
of
of
the
job.
It's
not
people
want
a
full-time
job.
They
shouldn't
be
public
servants,
they
should
be,
they
should
leave
and.
E
D
Next
is
miss
periester.
B
F
F
Are
you
looking
at
to
what
you're
saying
the
way
that
they've
been
doing?
It
is
wrong?
Is
there
something
that
came
out
from
her?
That
says
we
are
to
change
the
way
we
are
distributing
the
funds
and
where
are
we
going
to,
and
how
is
the
fee
for
service,
although
the
fee
would
be
on
the
sliding
scale?
F
How
do
that
fit
into
the
service
of
helping
the
people
that
you
name
in
your
paper
tonight
that
you
say
you're
supposed
to
be
helping?
I
don't
understand
it
would
like
to
sit
down
or
can't
sit
down,
though,
have
a
long
conversation.
I
guess
it
has
to
be
with
staff
and
any
of
the
consummate
members
that
would
like
to
sit
in
on
it
about
you,
changing
the
way,
you're
doing
the
funding
for
the
cdbg
program
and
the
mental
health.
F
That
section
is
you
have
15
of
the
administration
at
15
goes
to
the
city
of
them
in
managing
the
funds.
Then
you
have
15
that's
supposed
to
go
to
the
public
service
people
that
are
the
not-for-profit.
That
comes
and
say
I
have
this
program
and
I'm
helping
this
particular
group
and
everything
then
the
rest
of
it
is
to
go
to
individual
and
servicing
stuff
that
is
servicing
the
poor,
the
people
that
is
under
50
of
the
area
of
median
income.
F
B
It
will
likely
come
up
in
discussion.
It
is
item
it's
on
our
agenda
and
if
your
question
isn't
answered
in
discussion,
then
mayor
haggarty,
you
said
three
yeah.
If
it's
not
answered
there,
miss
esther,
then
please
reach
out
for
further
discussion.
Kimberly
who's.
Our
final
public
speaker,
mr
ray
freeman,.
B
D
D
B
D
And
alderman
win
has
joined
the
committee
great,
oh
and
alderman
fleming
as
well,
so
we're
just
missing
alden
memphis
this
evening
ray
if
you
can
meet
yourself.
B
Okay,
can
we
unmute
him
or
no
okay,
personally,.
G
B
If,
if
he
pops
up
before
the
meeting,
is
over
we'll
allow
ray
to
have
his
three
minutes
of
public
comment
moving
on
rm1,
I
move
approval
for
august
3rd
2020
minutes.
Second,
is
there
any
discussion.
B
A
Okay,
please
thank
you.
I
I
would
like
to
actually
hold
the
minutes.
They're
they're,
very
long
they're
like
I
think,
they're
eight
pages
long
and
you
know
I
think,
we've
been
trying
to
get
away
from
the
you
know,
extensive
narrative
on
minutes
and
just
kind
of
get
them
back
to
the
more
traditional
minute
format.
A
So
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
remember
what
other
people
said
so
clearly
and
the
only
way
to
really
effectively
do
that
is
basically
to
listen
to
the
meeting
again,
and
you
know
I
already
sat
through
it
for
two
hours.
I
don't
want
to.
You
know,
have
to
listen
to
two
hours
of
recording.
Just
kind
of
you
know
fat
check
all
of
that,
but
when
we
have
the
you
know
more
concise
version.
It's
it's
easier
to
recall
the
you
know,
conclusions
in
some
summary,
so
that's
my
reason.
H
I
just
have
a
question
about
that,
so
I
know
we've
been
talking
about
that,
but
then
we
we
did
talk
about.
Is
there
like
a
format
for
menace
that
we
want?
So
then
our
staff
know
exactly
how
to
present
the
minutes
to
us.
So
they're
not
going
back
and
forth
and
they
know
I
mean
I
did.
I
did
also
note
that
these
were
very
long.
H
I
was
kind
of
scammed,
just
with
my
name,
to
see
if
it
seemed
correct,
but
it
may
be
makes
sense
for
us
to
have
a
format
that
our
our
staff
are
following,
so
that
minutes
are
presented
the
right
way.
You
know
in
the
right
format,
for
each
committee.
D
Iml
has
a
imo
has
a
good
template
that
we
can
use
that
we
can
probably
institutionalize
that
can
make
sure
that
formatting
of
minutes
are
consistent.
H
Okay,
that's
fine!
I
mean
I
was.
I
was
fine
passing
these
because
again
I
just
skimmed
from
my
own
name
and
also
being
in
the
virtual
setting.
I
thought
maybe
the
longer
minutes
people
would
appreciate
at
this
point,
but
ottoman
wilson.
If
you
want
to
try
to
look
through
them
and
compare
and
contrast
going
back
to
the
you
know
the
tape,
I
don't
I
don't
mind
that
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
put
that
kind
of
time
in.
A
No,
that's
exactly
my
point.
I
don't
want
to
have
to
do
that,
so
I
don't
think
any
of
us
should
have
to
do
that.
So
I
think
that
you
know
if
they're
just
more
concise
and
then
once
you
know,
once
you
have
the
minutes,
if
you're
you
know,
let's
say
you
remember
the
community
and
you
want
to
see
what
was
talked
about
that
day.
You
know
you
might
not
want
to
read
eight
pages
of
stuff
and
you
can
just
see.
Okay,
here
are
the
topics.
A
If
you
want
to
see
the
detail,
we
have
these
things
recorded,
so
you
can
go
back
and
see
the
recording
and
actually
see
exactly
what
was
said
so
those
recordings
are
available.
So
we
have
the
detail
from
the
recordings
available
to
the
community.
A
I
I
don't
I
I
just
you're
setting
the
exact
opposite
of
what
I'm
saying.
I
don't
want
to
pass
these.
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
go
through
them
carefully.
It's
eight
pages
that
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
go
through.
I'd,
be
maybe
surprised
if
everybody
else
had
a
chance
to
go
through
the
eight
pages
carefully.
A
A
J
I
I'm
comfortable
with
us
having
less
detail
than
in
the
minutes
that
we
had
in
our
packet
today,
but
I
think
more,
some
detail
in
our
city
council
minutes,
for
example,
would
be
helpful
because
I
don't
find
the
city
council
minutes
to
be
really
very
very
meaningful.
So
I
I
hope,
there's
a
happy
medium
here.
B
Thank
you.
So
we
hear
a
second
from
mr
haggerty.
We're
gonna,
get
the
format
from
staff
and
learn
more
about
what
we
should
expect
going
forward.
Do
we
need
to
take
a
roll
call
on
alderman
wilson's
motion.
D
I'll
go
ahead
and
do
it
alderman
brave
weight,
I'm
sorry,
ottoman,
fisk,
absent
almond
breakfast
after
almond,
win
hi,
alderman,
wilson,
hi
simmons.
C
D
F
I
It's
the
only
thing
that
we
always
run
into
is
whether
city
council
meets
being
scheduled
during
spring
break.
Now,
who
knows
what
spring
break
is
next
year
because
of
the
pandemic?
And
you
know
if
people
are
really
away,
then
I'm
not
sure
what
the
school
schedule
is,
but
I
noticed
there
was
a
march
22nd.
I
think
city
council
meeting.
B
L
Reigning
once
we
set
the
meetings,
we
can
always
change
them
so
and
I
think
we
really
need
to
give
people
some
idea,
especially
those
people
are
going
to
be
running
for
reelection
or
for
for
election.
For
the
first
time
to
know
what
the
schedule
looks
like
for
regular
council
meetings.
B
C
L
B
Meeting
schedule
passes
for
city
council
alderman
rainey.
Will
you
take
r2.
L
R2
is
let
me
get
back
to
my
agenda.
R2
is
city
account
city
of
evanston,
elected
officials,
compensation.
We
have
a
report
of
the
mayor's
compensation
committee.
I
move
in.
I
move
approval.
C
L
L
I
have
been
interested
in
the
way
our
compensation
is
determined
for
quite
a
while
now,
and
I've
tried
to
attend,
at
least
for
the
last
three
compensation
committees,
many
of
their
meetings-
and
I
always
I'm
always
taken
aback
by
how
how
little
consideration
is
given
to
what
the
council
does
and
really
not
only
how
little
consideration
is
given,
but
how
unaware
most
of
the
compensation
committees
are
of
our
work.
L
So,
having
said
that,
there
is
another
issue:
aldermen
and
elected
officials.
Statewide
are
are
really
different
from
employees
and
employees.
You
know,
can
do
a
good
or
bad
job
within
the
year
two
years,
three
years
every
other
month
whatever
and
be
be
called
on
it
or
be
be
rewarded
for
it,
but
aldermen
have
compensation
set
for
four
years
by
statute.
That's
not
our
idea.
That's
the
illinois
state
statutes
idea.
L
So
we
are.
We
are
assigned
a
an
amount
for
compensation
and
we
have
that
same
compensation
for
four
years,
no
matter
what
kind
of
a
job
we're
doing.
The
only
people
who
decide
whether
or
not
we
should
you
know
get
a
different
salary
is
every
four
years
we
get
there's
an
election.
L
I
consider,
as
does
most
human
resource
institutions
or
organizations,
consider
benefits,
vacation,
etc.
All
aspire
compensation
for
many
years
beginning
when
I
was
an
early
feminist
way
back
when
the
issue
of
equal
pay
for
equal
work
was
always
foremost.
On
my
mind,
I
do
not
believe
for
one
minute
that
the
city
of
evanston
would
hire
a
man
and
a
woman
or
a
latino
and
a
white
man
and
for
the
same
exact
job
and
pay
them
two
different
rates
of
pay
that
there
would
be
a
lawsuit
there
would
be.
L
That
would
not
even
be
conscionable
for
the
city
of
evanston.
However,
the
city
of
evanston
has
nine
aldermen
and
those
nine
aldermen
each
year
make
anywhere
from
from.
You
know
they
make
different
pay,
pay,
there's
a
different
pay
scale,
because
the
compensation
includes
insurance,
there's
a
discriminatory
practice
and
it's
only
discriminatory
because
it's
either
or
you
either
are
a
single
paid
insurance
person
or
you
have
family
spouse
and
family.
So
those
of
us-
and
it
could
be
anybody-
could
be
man.
L
Woman,
black
white
brown,
who
happen
to
be
single,
are
compensated
by
the
taxpayers
every
year.
Up
to
you
know
ten
couple
of
twenty
thousand
dollars,
in
some
case
seventeen
thousand
dollars
less
than
others,
and
how
we
as
a
council,
can
look
at
that
and
say
that's
equal
pay
for
equal
work.
We
should
be
receiving
equal
pay
for
equal
work.
The
compensation
committee
this
year
stripped
our
family
covered
alderman
of
that
additional
insurance.
In
terms
of
the
recommendation,
I
fought
against
that.
I
said
that
how?
L
How
can
you
dare
bring
people
down
in
order
to
make
it
equal?
Well,
they
felt
that
with
covid
and
our
budget
constraints,
no
alderman
should
receive
anything
more
than
individual
insurance.
I
totally
object
to
that,
however.
However,
what
I
do
think
is
the
answer
to
the
equal
pay
for
equal
work
issue.
Is
we
all
get
the
same
amount
and
all
aldermen
are
able
to
purchase
insurance
with
that
and
that
we
should
all
get
what
the
top
alderman
is
receiving?
L
Aldermen
are
receiving
up
to
37
000
plus
dollars
a
year
that
includes
their
compensat,
their
their
benefit
compensation
that
that's
that's
wrong.
That
is
really
wrong.
We
should
all
get
the
same
pay
and
we
should
be
free
to
buy
insurance
from
the
city
of
evanston
or
from
anybody
we
want
with
that
money
and
that
that
is
my
argument
that
it
is.
It
is
just
not
there.
I
there's
there's
no
way
you
can.
L
You
can
justify
paying
some
aldermen
16
000
and
some
aldermen
37
000
a
year
and
that's
what
happens
on
the
city
of
evanston,
and
that
is
my
argument.
I
want
everybody
to
have
all
the
insurance
they
need,
and
I
think
the
city
should
do
most
of
the
compensating
for
that
insurance,
but
I
think
that
it
should
be
done
by
allowing
us
as
adults
to
take
that
compensation
and
purchase
insurance
at
the
city
or
elsewhere,
and
that's
all
I
have
nothing
more
to
add.
L
And
I
did
send
sorry,
I
did
send
two
attachments
late
today.
I'm
sorry
about
that.
L
I
can
understand
why
why
those
who
make
get
more
compensation,
you
know,
don't
want
to
give
that
up.
I
don't
want
you
to
give
that
up.
I
don't
want
you
to
give
that
up.
However.
However,
there
there's
just
nothing
equal
about
the
way,
we're
being
treated
equal
pay
for
equal
work.
It
used
to
be
something
people
would
strive
for,
and
I
am
shocked
to
hear
people
come
on
either
citizen
comment
or
send
letters
to
the
editor
saying
how
dare
and
all
old
men
want
to
make
equal
pay.
A
A
So
if
it's
just
the
set
number,
if
you
took
the
whatever
the
you
know,
the
compensation
amount
and
the
insurance
cost
and
just
made
that
the
amount
of
the
compensation-
and
we
could
you
know-
choose
to
get
the
coverage
that
we
choose
from
that
pool
of
money,
that's
up
to
each
individual
person
in
their
certain
circumstances
and
needs,
but
it
would
be
fair
because
that
way,
everybody's
getting
the
same
thing,
and
I
think
it
would
also
be
again
back
to
the
transparency
point.
You
know
we'll
talk
about.
A
M
Oh,
I'm
so
can
alderman
wilson
and
alderman
rainey
then
explain
to
me
exactly
how
that
would
work.
So,
for
instance,
in
the
next
council
someone
is
elected,
who
has
four
children,
five
children
and
then
what
would
their
compensation
be
if
they
wanted
to
get
the
insurance
through
the
city.
A
So
the
compensation
is
x
dollars,
so
I
think
the
top
tier
was
I'm
not
looking
at
it.
I
think
it's
about
30.
L
A
Okay,
so
37
8.,
so
everybody
would
get
37
8
and
if
you
wanted
to
get
your
insurance,
it
comes
out
of
that.
So
the
city
allow
opens
the
plan
up
to
you.
A
M
Right
and
so
then
some
people
could
choose
not
to
buy
or
right
or
or
look
for
some
other
type
of
insurance,
if
possible,
right,
okay
and
then
so,
how
does
that
apply?
So
that
goes
across
the
board?
I
just
want
to
walk
through
this,
that
that
applies
across
the
board,
whether
or
not
you're
someone
who
would
have
you
know
that
that
newly
elected
alderman
is
someone
who
has
health
insurance
through
some
other
entity.
M
N
L
But
it
for
years,
I'm
sorry!
For
years
most
everybody
takes
the
insurance
right.
H
If
I
get
the
extra
payment,
I
just
pay
that
portion
back
to
the
city
and
that's
still
okay
for
our
you
know,
I
don't
know
how
no
legal
and
hr
works,
but
if
I
wanted
the
city
insurance,
so
you're
saying
so
I
wouldn't
get
the
money
I
would
just.
My
cap
would
be
37
000,
which
would
for
me.
I
would
allow
for
that
money
to
still
go
into
the
insurance.
If
you're
one
person,
you
would
just
get
the
cash
you
know
over,
so
that
would
be
fine
for
me.
H
H
So
if
our
cap
is
37-
and
you
know
for
me
as
a
family
of
five,
if
it
goes
up
to-
I
don't
know
40
next
year,
then
I'm
just
paying
out
of
pocket
three
thousand
dollars
we're
not
every
year
adjusting
because,
as
you
said,
we
can
only
adjust
our
pay
every
four
years
right,
so
just
making
sure
we're.
However,
we
factor
the
cost,
because
I
do
think
automarine
is
right.
H
We
need
to
have
fairness
and
pay,
and
this
is
a
job
that
we're
already
under
compensated
for
just
making
sure
we're
not
making
it
so
that
people
then
still
can't
afford
quality
insurance.
M
Okay,
so
I
I
think
alvin
fleming,
you
make
a
really
good
point,
and
so
I
mean
this
is
I'm
just
thinking
this
through?
Is
there
a
way
to
predict
what,
based
on
what
insurance
costs,
the
percent
change
in
insurance
costs
for
the
last
four
years,
and
then
we
could
project
forward
for
the
next
four
years
and
then
so
that
you
know
there
it's
a
guess,
but
it
might.
M
It
might
be
correct
or
incorrect
for
that
matter,
but
it
would
be
based
on
prior
data.
So
you
could
say,
insurance
costs
have
gone
up.
I
don't
know
1.8
percent
for
each
successive
year
and
then
you
know
that
way:
you're
you're,
allowing
for
that
just
thinking
extreme
of
thought
here.
B
So
audra
rainey,
thank
you
for
this
introduction
and
the
background.
Your
memorable.
Equal
pay
certainly
should
be
a
goal.
I'm
going
to
wait
for
further
comment.
Alderman
fleming.
H
B
And
then
also
is
there
any
maximum
of
percentage
raise
increase,
because
this
would
be
what
like
a
substantial
percentage
compensation
package,
raise.
There's
no
issues
with
that
at
all.
D
O
And
on
that
point,
without
questioning
the
legality
of
whatever
combinations
being
proposed
here,
alex
du?
What's
the
deadline
for
us
to
have
this
locked
in?
Is
it
180
days
from
when
the
new
council
and
mayor
and
clerk
would
be
sworn
in.
K
According
to
the
ordinance,
it
just
said
that
the
aldermanic
compensation
committee
needed
to
present
this
to
city
council
240
days
prior
to
the
election.
So
that's
the
only
legal
requirement
and
they
already
did
that
by
presenting
the
rules.
Committee.
D
I
Yeah
on
that,
on
that
point
I
would
just
hope
that
the
city
council
would
make
a
decision
sooner
rather
than
later
how
it
wants
to
proceed
on
this,
because
you
know
we're
in
the
the
petitioning
period
right
now.
There
are
people
looking
at
whether
to
run
or
not,
and
I
don't
think
it's
fair
to
them
to
not
understand.
I
M
I
just
say
that
on
prior
councils,
when
this
decision
has
come
up
generally
speaking,
it
has
been
made
during
this
time
period.
As
kimberly
has
said,
I
think,
since
we
changed
our
budget
to
the
calendar
year
this,
this
has
always
been
at
least
the
two
times.
I
think
that
we
have
done
it
during
that
time
period
were
done
in
october,
at
october,
meetings
or
november
meetings.
L
So
alderman
simmons.
B
L
Could
we
ask
human
resources
to
send
us
back
a
memo
based
on
our
discussion
tonight
regarding
how
this
would
work
and
especially
how
those
who
wanted
to
use
part
of
their
money,
their
salary
for
insurance?
How
that
would
be
handled
by
the
irs
I
mean?
Could
that
could
that
amount
of
money
be
not
taxed
when
they
purchase
their
insurance
from
the
city.
B
Well,
why
don't
we
get
a
memo
with
all
the
scenarios,
possibilities,
taxation
and
all
the
above
perfect,
so
that
request
has
been
made?
Is
there
any
further
discussion.
I
There's
some
yeah,
I
just
said
one
question:
is
it
by
state
statute
that
we
have
to
have
a
compensation
committee?
Do
you
know
alex
or
alderman
rainey?
I
mean
the
reason.
I'm
asking
that
question
is.
I
have
a
lot
of
respect
for
all
the
boards
and
commissions.
I
know
we
all
do
that.
I
Do
a
lot
of
hard
work
for
the
city
and
ultimately
this
is
the
council's
decision
about
how
they
want
to
set
it
up
for
the
next
council,
but
I'm
always
sensitive
to
the
hard
work
that
that
these
different
boards
and
commissions
do
so.
I
was
just
curious.
Is
it
by
state
statute
that
we
have
to
have
a
compensation
committee
or
maybe
in
the
future?
If
the
council
chooses
not
to
go
with
the
recommendation
of
them,
maybe
the
next
council
can
think
hey.
K
H
B
H
I
know
that
you
all
said
cover
all
scenarios,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
for
that
that
piece
automatically
you
mentioned
in
terms
of
the
taxation.
If
people
want
to
use
the
compensation
for
insurance,
ms
richardson,
can
you
ask
if
people
are
able
to
either
opt
in
or
not
for
insurance,
and
then
that
way?
If
there
is
a
taxation
piece
for
that
extra
money,
you
know
they
can
just
opt
in
and
not
have
the
you
know
cash
in
hand
per
say
that
they're
paying
back
to
the
city.
L
L
B
So
the
go
ahead,
all
the
way
for
me
go
ahead,
so
the
so
we're
measuring
the
highest
rate
of
compensation
on
our
current
council
with
a
37
000
insurance
package,
and
so
the
the
recommendation
is
that
we
have
a
compensation,
direct
payment
of
thirty
seven
thousand,
plus
the
fifteen
nine
or
whatever.
That
is
worth
fifty
two.
L
D
Are
you
going
to
address
the
mayor
and
the
clerk
as
well?
No,
I'm
not.
I
Well,
I
I
mean,
I
don't
know,
I
think
the
mayor
and
the
clerk.
Why
wouldn't
well?
Well
I
don't
I
don't.
I
don't
have
a
I
don't
I
don't
know
I
mean,
let's
just
think
I
guess.
Let's
talk
about
this
for
one.
Second,
all
right.
So,
let's
set
aside
the
clerk,
because
that
is
set
up
as
a
full-time
employee,
a
full-time
position,
the
mayor's
still
a
part-time
position.
I
So
I
do
think
the
question
for
the
council
then
is:
do
you
want
to
yeah?
Do
you
want
the
mayor
as
part
of
this
or
does
the
mayor
if
the
mayor
comes
and
has
a
family
and
wants
the
family
plan
or
the
mayor
comes
and
is
just
single
yeah?
Do
they
get
this
sort
of
the
the
gross
up
so
to
speak?
That
we're
talking
about
here.
L
I
think
you're
missing
my
point.
The
point:
isn't
whether
or
not
you
get
to
buy
insurance?
The
point
is:
everybody
gets
treated
equally,
so
there's
only
one
of
you.
If,
if
you
would
like
your
insurance
costs
to
be
folded
into
your
salary,
I
think
you
should
argue
that.
Otherwise,
the
point
I'm
making
is
is
that
we
have
nine
people
who
are
all
making
a
variety
of
different
amounts
of
compensation
which
is
not
equal
pay
for
equal
work.
You
are
one
person,
so
I
think
you
should
argue
what
your
case
should
be.
D
B
A
A
As
well,
I
think
we
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
leave
the
the
mayor
and
the
clerk
in
the
more
traditional
manner,
which
is
they
received
the
salary
plus
they
received
the
insurance
coverage.
So
we
wouldn't
you
know,
do
this
kind
of
added
together,
because
we
don't
have
that
same
disparity
in
the
in
the
compensation,
because
there's
only
one
person.
A
So
so
I
suggest
that
we
leave
those
as
they
are
at
last
cycle,
we've
given
a
23
bump
in
the
mayor's
salary
and
an
18
bump
in
the
clerk's
salary.
So
the
clerk
was
up
to
it's,
it's
64
120
and
the
mayor's
25
317..
L
Ottoman
rainey,
one
thing
I
think
we
ought
to
be
careful
about
is
the
the
recommending
body
suggested
that
the
mayor
and
the
city
clerk
neither
get
family
insurance,
and
we
ought
to
restore
that,
no
matter
how
it's
going
to
be
handled
so.
L
H
I
would
say
I
would
propose
that
the
clerk
have
the
option
of
you
know
individual
up
to
family
insurance
if
they
choose
and
the
mayor's
as
well
with
insurance,
but
have
the
salary
remain
same
the
same
because
if
the
mayor,
whoever
they
are,
was
to
have
the
family
insurance,
which
I
think
is
like
27
000
and
their
salary,
I
think,
is
24
000..
They
still
are
over
with
what
the
aldermen
would
be
at
37.,
and
I
guess
we
could
go
back
and
forth
about
who,
how
much
work
they
have
versus
our
work.
H
But
I
think
that
makes
it
more
of
a
you
know:
pay
equity
standard,
so
the
clerk
is
already
a
full-time
position.
We
are
not
considered
full-time,
though
we
work
full-time,
and
so
I
think,
having
everyone
at
that
37
and
the
mayor
would
be
at
a
little
bit
more
if
they
drew
insurance
would
be
a
fair
skill.
B
B
That
is
what
the
current
mayor
I
mean.
That's
what
the
measurement
of
the
max
insurance
package
is
the
current
mayor's
family
status.
D
So
for
the
purpose
of
the
ordinance,
we're
just
speaking
to
compensation,
we're
not
talking
about
health
insurance,
that
is
separate
no
way.
What,
if
you
listen
to
what
I'm
saying
for
the
mayor
and
the
clerk,
we're
only
speaking
to
the
compensation
amount
of
what
it
is
that
you
want
to
be
able
to
move
forward
with,
we
recognize
everything
else
is
status
quo,
since
you
rejected
this
compensation
committee's
report
last
meeting,
so
we're
just
speaking
to
compensation,
everything
else
would
stay
status
quo
for
the
mayor
and
the
clerk
from
what
I'm
gathering
from
this
conversation.
A
I
What
I'm
intending,
I
I
think
so
and
what
I
would
just
add
is.
I
think
that
as
pay
increases
occur
like
if
you
adopt
that
what
I
don't
know
if
you're
going
or
not,
but
if
you
adopt
the
pay
increases
year
three
and
year
four
for
the
next
term
of
the
council,
that
that
would
apply
to
the
clerk
in
the
mayor
position
as
well.
I
just
think
all
of
that's
consistent
among
council
members
and
all
and
the
mayor
and
the
clerk.
B
Compensation,
I'm
sorry
full-time
compensation
already,
so
it
seems
that
more
of
the
challenge
is
the
disparity
and
pay
discrepancy
and
pay
on
the
on
on
the
automatic
level.
So
am
I
hearing
concerns
in
the
clerk's
office
as
well
or
yeah
ottoman
win.
M
Okay,
my
apologies,
I
think
I'm
confused.
So
in
our
prior
discussion,
we
decided
to
increase
the
aldermanic
salary
for
everyone
to
make
sure
it's
equal
from
50
to
add
on
the
the
largest
insurance
package
possible
for
the
next
council,
if
you,
which
would
be
37
on
top
of
the
15
nine.
Now
three.
M
M
M
Exactly
so
now
for
mayor
I'll,
just
go
for
mayor,
are
we
deciding
that
in
years
three
and
four,
the
mayor
salary
will
go
up
as
the
compensation
commission
suggested
or
that
it
will
remain
the
same
at
25
317.,
I'm
just
talking
about
the
salary
now
yeah.
I
M
I
would
agree
with
that,
then.
I
think
that,
just
as
we
are
deciding
that
the
next
said,
the
next
nine
aldermen
will
remain
at
their
current
salary,
plus
the
pac
insurance
compensation
package
that
I
think
the
mayor
and
whoever
the
next
mayor
and
the
next
clerk
are.
Their
salaries
should
remain
the
same.
The
so
the
mayors
would
be
25
317,
plus
the
insurance
package,
and
the
clerk
is
64,
120
plus
the
package.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
what
we're
all
talking
about.
D
C
D
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry.
Can
I
just
one
good
clarification
from
staff,
because
I'm
I
want
to
make
sure
again
it's
clear:
you
recognize
that
insurance
goes
up
and
the
compensation
for
that
insurance
is
going
to
fluctuate
from
year
to
year.
So
would
it
make
more
sense
to
not
muddle
this
conversation
and
have
an
insurance
stipend?
That's
separate
from
your
name
compensation!
M
Point
I
made
for,
but
I
think
that
we've
all
agreed
that
that's
just
that
the
next
council
is
going
we're
putting
that
risk
on
the
next
council.
B
Well,
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
measuring
off
of
this
current
council's
and
the
largest
family
status
that
happens
to
be
taking
insurance,
so
we're
just
like
coming
up
with
this
number
as
the
new
compensation
package
of
37
000,
and
I
think
we
just
dropped
the
discussion
about
insurance,
and
that
is
the
responsibility
of
the
aldermen
to
pursue
either
with
the
city
or
on
their
own
or
take
the
risk
and
not
be
insured
and
let's
not
even
call
it
compensation
plus
insurance.
Let's
just
call
it:
it's
getting
sure
the
audit,
the
ottoman.
B
The
ottoman
will
get
a
substantial
raise
to
thirty
seven
thousand
dollars
a
year
compensation,
and
does
that
include?
Do
we
need
to
discuss
the
technology
benefit
or
is
that
in
there
also?
That's
that's
true.
D
B
H
Stafford,
just
I
want
to
make.
O
Sure
that
I
understand
we
have
two
issues
here:
there's
the
like
human
resources,
legality,
piece
of
this-
that
we
need
to
have
a
discussion
with
our
director
of
human
resources
about
to
make
sure
that
what's
being
discussed
here
is
actually
doable
and
then
there's
the
public
policy
part
where
we
need
to
make
sure
that
candidates
for
office
who
need
to
file
their
petitions
in
november
understand
what
their
compensation
might
be.
Should
they
be
elected
with
our
rules
committee
schedule
being
what
it
is?
F
L
Well,
I
I
agree
completely
with
tom,
however,
just
to
clarify,
if
we
proceed
along
this
track,
any
any
candidate
is
out
passing
a
petition.
It
sounds
to
me
can
count
on
the
aldermanic
salary
plus
the
the
plus,
an
additional
compensation
added
to
that,
so
that
they
can
shop
and
buy
family
insurance.
I
mean
I
don't
see
that
we're
taking
anything
away
from
anybody.
O
Well,
I'm
not
planning
on
taking
away
or
giving
I'm
saying
if
you're
a
candidate
for
office
or
someone
who's
considering
being
a
candidate
for
office,
and
you
have
other
obligations,
including
your
primary
employment
and
your
family.
You
should
have
some
certainty
as
to
what
you
are
signing
up
for
in
terms
of
what
level
of
compensation
you
might
expect,
and
that
applies
to
anybody
who's.
Thinking
of
running
for
any
of
the
offices
we're
discussing
and.
O
So
I
guess
what
I'm
asking-
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
appropriate,
asking
of
kimberly
alex
as
the
mayor
of
the
chair
of
the
rules
committee
simmons.
When
can
we
have
that
discussion
and
how
much
time
do
we
presume
that
jennifer,
lynn
or
whoever
from
the
law,
department
or
hr
will
need
to
figure
out
some
of
the
ramifications
of
the
things
that
have
been
proposed
tonight?.
B
Very
important,
ottoman's
effort,
and
so
are,
is
any
staff
on
here
able
to
give
us
feedback
if
one
week
is
a
reasonable
time
to
get
back
with
this
information,
we
could
have
a
special
rules
meeting,
because
we
can
have
rules
meetings
as
we
need
them
right.
That's
how
we
schedule
them
so
as
a
courtesy
to
the
candidates
and
those
looking
to
run
for
reelection
compensation
is
something
that
needs
to
be
considered
as
well.
So
is
that
unreasonable
expectation
to
have
a
memo
back
so
that
we
can
take
an
action
on
it.
C
D
B
Perfect
and
then
there's
a
council
meeting
calendar
before
petitions
need
to
be
signed
turned
in
so
that
that
can
be
settled.
Okay,
so
ottoman
rain.
I'm
sorry
mayor,
hagerty.
B
Okay,
so
we
had
a
who
made
the
most
autumn
and
rainy
second
it
alderman
suffered
in.
Did
you
make
the
motion.
O
I
don't
think
I
had
an
actual
motion.
I
was
just
asking
when
we
could
have
the
meeting,
but
I
am
happy
to
make
a
motion
that
we
meet
on
october
19th
kimberly.
Did
you
say
it
was
five.
C
B
I
B
B
I
was
recommending
that
it
be
in
line
or
exactly
the
same
as
the
alderman
on
city
council,
that
the
mayor
and
the
aldermen
have
the
same
compensation
package.
That
was
what
I
was.
C
B
D
Which
is
another
role,
so
that's
typically,
you
see.
That
is
a
number
of
reasons
for
why
the
mayor
makes
more
is
because
there
can
they
have
that
additional
title
as
commissioner
liquor,
commissioner
interesting.
B
Because
I
know
that
some
aldermen,
you
know
have
several
at
least
committee
commissions,
board
roles
and
often
chair,
so
in
terms
of
work,
product
deliverables,
expectation,
time
investment.
B
I
just
never
understood
why
the
mayor
also
has
a
full-time
staff,
personal
office,
it
just
it
just
never
really
made
sense
to
me
on
why
the
mayor
is
compensated
more
than
the
aldermen,
based
on
the
roles
of
the
aldermen
and
our
responsibility
level
of
engagement
committee
obligations,
meeting
requirements,
policy
making
this
doesn't
seem
when
we're
talking
about
pay,
equity
and
and
and
those
other
things.
I
just
would
like
little
discussion.
So
mayor
you're
in
the
role
right
now.
B
Do
you
have
any
feedback
on
why
it's
justified
that
the
mayor
makes
more
than
the
alderman
and
and
that
you're
you're,
better
supported
having
a
full-time
executive
secretary
and
an
office
and
other
support
to
help
you
perform
in
your
job?
I
I
You
know,
and
that
takes
a
lot
of
time
for
folks.
I
can
tell
you
that
you
know
my
predecessor,
mayor
tisdale,
you
know
if
you
went
back
and
you
talked
to
the
compensation
committee
at
that
time
and
sort
of
looked
at
the
surveys
and
everything
else
you
know
worked
a
lot
of
hours
and
you
know
it
was
just
like
you
know
your
job
sort
of
very
much.
You
know
a
40
40-hour
a
week,
kind
of
kind
of
job.
It
is,
you
know,
you
know
the
the
city
manager.
I
If
there's
some
big
issue,
that's
going
on.
You
know
the
first
person
that
you
know
she
tends
to
go
to.
Is
the
mayor
and
says
hey,
I
want
you
to
be
aware.
What's
what's
going
on,
you
know
the
interaction
with
a
lot
of
you
know.
State
legislators-
and
things
like
that
you
know-
comes
out
of
the
mayor-
comes
out
of
the
mayor's
office.
I
You
know
so
obviously
all
the
boards
and
commissions
and
all
of
that,
as
you
all
know,
we
have
quite
a
quite
a
bit
of
those.
You
know
it's
a
lot
of
times
spent
with
the
staff
trying
to
figure
out.
You
know
who
the
you
know
should
we
put
on
these
boards
and
commissions,
so
there's
so
there's
that
yeah.
So
that's
that's
a
little
insight
into
it.
M
I
think
one
of
the
differences
that
I
that
I
think
of
is
the
mayor
is
elected
by
the
entire
city
and
I,
while
I
agree
that
we
frequently
have
similar
amounts
of
work
to
the
mayor,
but
I
think
from
the
from
the
standpoint
of
the
fact
that
that
you
know
my
understanding
from
all
three
mayors
that
I've
known
is
that
anyone
from
any
ward
considers
themselves
represented
by
the
mayor
and
that
I
see
frequently
people
in
my
ward
write
to
the
mayor
first
and
cc
me
sometimes,
and
I
think
that
you
know
that
and
the
mayor
responds
and
then
lets
me
know
thank
you,
but
but
I
do
think,
because
it
is
a
a
city-wide
elective
office
and
and
and
and
steve
is
right.
M
There
are
many
many
events
that
we
are
all
invited,
but
I
don't
necessarily
feel
that
I
am
compelled
to
go
to
every
single
one
of
those,
but
I
partly
because
I
know
the
mayor
will
be
there.
You
know
I
try
to
go
to
those
as
many
as
possible,
but
I
think
that
is
an
obligation
of
the
mayor's
that
is
different
than
than
what
we
have
and
because
the
mayor
is
represent,
is
elected
by
the
entire
electorate.
B
L
Rainey,
I
I
agree
with
alderman
wynn.
I
I
wouldn't
have
any
problem,
and
I
don't
see
why
mayor
hegarty
would
have
a
problem
with
taking
the
maximum
insurance
benefit
and
folding
it
in
to
the
salary
so
that
it
it
it
would
be
more
than
anybody
else.
I
mean
that
that's
what
I
would
do,
but
that's
up
to
you.
I
Well,
I
mean,
I
think,
it's
up
to
the
council
to
decide.
I
mean
again
you,
I
think
you
need
to
think
about
these
positions
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
work.
That's
required,
and
you
know
the
type
of
people
that
we're
trying
to
attract
you
know
and
obviously
the
more
flexibility
there
is
in
the
total
compensation.
I
think
you
know
the
the
greater
the
pool
of
people
we
can
draw
from
who
would
be
willing
to
run
for
these
important
positions.
B
Okay,
so
have
we
given
enough
direction
or.
B
B
D
Yeah,
yes,
so
just
so,
you
know,
augment
briefly
has
just
joined
good
evening.
All
right.
This
is
to
this
is
for
us
to
meet
for
october
19
for
a
rule,
special
rules,
committee
meeting.
D
D
Discussion
of
compensation
for
the
city
council
and
for
the
before
the
2021
election.
G
B
So
admin
braithwaite,
we
have
general
consensus
to
move
forward
with
a
37
thousand
dollar
compensation
recommendation
for
the
aldermen,
and
we've
asked
for
a
memo
and
lynn
to
give
us
feedback
on
if
there
are
any
legal
issues
or
other
issues,
personnel,
wise
or
human
resources
that
we
should
be
aware
of
before
we
take
a
council
action
on
it.
B
We
have
not
changed
any
recommendation
from
the
clerk's
role
and,
except
to
add
back
in
the
insurance
benefit
that
the
compensation
package
recommended.
We
take
the
compensation
committee
recommended
we
take
away
and
to
leave
the
mayor's
compensation
and
insurance
compensation
benefit
the
same,
and
we
have
a
motion
by
alderman
sufferden.
We
have
it
seconded
by
ottoman
rainey
and
if
you
don't
have
any
further
questions,
we're
going
to
take
a
roll
call
vote
next.
G
B
Connection
alderman
rainey
sent
a
memo
and
it's
been
supported
that
equal
pay
and
pay
equity
and
fairness
is
a
priority
that
we
want
to
honor
and
instead
of
having
some
aldermen
getting
59.
G
B
Okay,
can
we
go
ahead
and
take
a
roll
call
vote?
Please
I'm
in
braceweight.
C
B
Motion
passes,
let
me
see
sorry,
we
pulled
my
agenda
back
up.
K
C
M
Yes,
r3
is
a
funding
structure
of
housing
and
community
development
act
committee
and
mental
health
board
allocation.
The
staff
seeks
feedback
on
a
proposed
restructure
to
the
allocation
process
of
the
cdbg
and
mental
health
board
funds
for
fiscal
year
2021
through
a
unified
process
to
allocate
funding
using
a
racial
equity
lens
to
address
inequities
in
our
community
and
the
systemic
obstacles
that
impact
our
lower
income
residents,
particularly
african
americans
and
other
people
of
color.
N
B
N
Sarah
flax
has
a
presentation
we
wanted
to
take.
You
through
we've
talked
quite
a
bit
about
how
we
can
respond
to
the
projects
and
activities
that
we
fund,
particularly
in
light
of
the
pandemic
that
we've
experienced
in
our
ongoing
support
and
the
way
in
which
we
get
money
from
the
federal
government,
as
well
as
looking
at
the
social
services
core
committee
and
how
we've
shifted
away
from
a
provider
focus
more
to
the
customer
focus.
N
So
I
have
asked
sarah
to
be
very
brief
in
her
presentation
if
we
could
give
it.
That
would
be
great
because
we're
looking
for
direction
as
we
go
forward
for
the
2021
funding
cycle.
P
P
I
will
speak
up
my
I
don't
know
what
is
wrong
with
this
particular
laptop,
but
it
I'm
going
to
have
to
have
it
checked
for
sound
because
it
I
always
seem
to
be
hard
to
hear
and
that's
not
normally
something.
That
is
an
issue
for
me
all
right.
Now,
I'm
trying
to
get
my
screen
shared
again
and
I'm
not
having
any
luck
on
that.
So
let
me.
D
You
see
your
screen,
sarah
you're,
seeing
it
okay.
Yes,
we
just
need
you
to
put
in
presentation
mode.
P
All
right,
thank
you
for.
P
Well,
listening
to
our
proposal
on
how
to
reallocate
how
to
redo
our
cpg
and
mental
health
board
funding
allocation
process,
the
objectives
of
this
new
process
are
to
achieve
the
city
goal
of
eliminating
the
systemic
inequities
and
service
delivery,
particularly
for
our
blacks,
latinos
and
other
people
of
color
and,
as
johanna
already
mentioned,
to
use
a
service
delivery
process
that
is
customer
focused
rather
than
provider
focused
in
addition
with
well,
those
two
goals
came
out
of
the
social
services,
core
committee's
recommendation
that
was
made
to
city
council
last
summer
and
was
accepted
and
the
first
phase
of
that
which
was
reorganizing.
P
The
city
staff
into
the
health
and
human
services
department
went
forward.
This
is
the
second
step
which
was
to
address
how
we
use
our
funding
that
goes
to
outside
organizations.
So
we
agreed
on
those
first
two
bullet
points,
and
now
we
are
also
dealing
with
the
additional
challenge
of
facilitating
evanston's
recovery
from
cobit
19.,
and
that
has
really
heightened
the
importance
of
taking
into
account
the
disparate
impacts
on
those
people
of
color
that
we've
already
talked
about.
P
P
Okay,
let's
see
recommendations
from
the
social
services
core
committee,
leading
with
that
racial
equity
lens
there's,
the
client
focused
approach
reduce
the
stigma,
I'm
not
going
to
read
every
single
one
of
these.
These
were
all
presented
at
the
time,
so
we're
we've
been
looking
at
who
those
groups
are
that
were
already
marginalized
and
then
also
most
impacted
by
covet
19..
P
So
we
have
our
blacks,
latinos
and
other
people
of
color,
extremely
low
and
very
low
income
residents,
the
under
percent
and
thirty
fifty
percent
of
area
median
income
also
falls
into
one
of
those
categories:
homeless,
unstably
housed,
disaffected
youth
and
young
adults,
low
income,
seniors
negative
and
the
impact
people
negative
negatively
impacted
by
the
criminal
justice
system.
P
These
were
all
in
our
discussion
of
who
are
some
of
the
groups
we
have
to
look
at,
but
in
addition,
we
families
that
lack
resources
to
provide
equitable
equitable
opportunity
for
children
is
heightened
even
more
by
coping
19,
as
is
essential
workers
who
don't
have
a
work
from
home
option.
P
This
isn't
something
that
housing
and
grants
staff
can
put
in
a
memo
and
say
this
is
exactly
what
should
be
done
in
order
to
focus
funding
on
our
highest
needs.
We
really
need
to
collaborate
with
our
non-profits
and
community
non-profit
partners
and
community
resources,
because
we
really
have
a
great
many
resources
in
evanston
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
are
using
them
to
the
best
effect
to
address
the
needs
of
our
residents.
P
P
P
Some
people
need
more
than
others,
but
they
need
to
be
able
to
get
into
those
services
faster,
and
then
we
also
need
to
maintain
certain
safety
nest
services,
including
food,
domestic
violence,
services,
eventual
emergency,
shelter,
street
outreach
and
drop-in
services,
so
proposing
a
funding
system
that
looks
at
funding
things
differently,
based
on
the
program
or
service
and
the
source
as
well.
Cdbg
is
much
less
flexible
than
mental
health
board.
P
Funding
mental
health
board
service
funding
is
actually
from
our
human
services
fund,
but
cdbg
would
continue
to
be
used
on
a
grant
basis
or
sub
recipient
agreements.
As
it's
called
in
cdbg
speak,
mental
health
board
funding
would
be
partially
grants
and
also
we
want
to
look
at
fee
for
services
agreements
based
on
existing
payment
schedules.
That
might
you
know
all
give
us
guidance
like
medicaid
or
the
illinois
child
care
assistance
program
so
that
we
can
provide
direct
assistance
on
behalf
of
individuals
that
are,
in
that
case
management.
P
P
P
Businesses,
if
it
is
within
five
percent
of
the,
if
it's
no
more
than
five
percent
of
the
lowest
responsive
and
responsible
bid
well,
that
could
be
a
way
of
both
incentivizing
professionals
of
color
to
get
involved
in
providing
direct
services
and
help,
because
in
many
cases,
professionals
of
color
take
higher,
take
lower
pay
scales
to
serve
communities
that
they
are
a
part
of
grant
funding.
These
programs
could
be
grant
funded.
P
P
Fiscal
year
that
starts
july,
1st,
you
don't
get
your
fiscal
year
is
split
by
the
city's
fiscal
year
and
you
won't
get
any
funding
generally
because
we
don't
get
it
released
until
the
second
half
of
our
year.
One
of
the
things
that
this
could
allow
us
to
do
if
we
combined
funding
from
the
two
sources
would
be
to
keep
some
agencies
from
only
getting
funded
late
in
the
year
and,
as
I
say,
help
their
cash
flow.
P
P
Food
we've
already
are
making
dramatic
different
changes
to
our
food
delivery
system,
but-
and
it
looks
like
we're
going
to
need
to
continue
to
expand
and
supplement
food
pantries
and
the
traditional
sources
and
continue
home,
delivered
meals
and
groceries
for
coveted
vulnerable
populations.
So
the
the
needs
have
changed
from
last
year
when
we
were
doing
mental
health
and
cdbg
allocations.
We
also
have
greater
need
for
emergency
shelter
or
differences
in
our
emergency
shelters
due
to
covet
19
and
the
need
to
continue
all
these
other
services.
P
But
so
those
would
be
grants
fee
for
services
would
be
looked
at,
for,
as
I
say,
the
more
direct
services
on
an
individual
client
basis
and
could
also
benefit
our
city
staff
clients
by
allowing
them
to
use
that
same
fee
schedule
to
get
people
into
direct
services,
and
then
there
could
be
a
combination
of
grants
and
fee
for
services
based
on
the
population
served
and
programming
for
other
types
of
services.
Again,
I'm
not
going
to
read
through
all
of
these.
P
What's
really
important
is
that
we
have
a
collaborative
process
to
do
this,
with
both
our
agency
partners
and
others
in
the
community
who
have
really
stepped
up
to
address
coca-19,
including
the
community
foundation,
and
probably
our
health
care
providers
that
we
don't
normally
look
in
on
cdbg
and
mental
health
board
discussions.
Quite
the
same
way.
P
We're
proposing
convening
a
series
of
meetings
about
the
different
needs
and
available
to
identify
available
services
gaps
in
those
services.
That
really
would
build
off
on
the
work
of
the
eoc
subcommittees
and
the
cdbgb
and
esg
cv
planning
work,
and
these
are
just
the
categories
that
seem
most
obvious
case.
Management
is
really
to
to
pin
down
the
the
people
of
greatest
need
and
try
to
figure
out
how
many
and
get
some
scope
to
the
work
we
need.
P
And
then
we've
already
talked
a
bit
about
some
of
the
other
needs,
but
child
care,
for
example,
and
and
programs
for
youth
are
dramatically
different
than
they
have
been
in
the
past,
and
the
needs
are
very
different
and
we
really
need
to
look
at
that.
Not
just
go
out
with
our
standard
request
for
proposals
and
see
what
people
are
providing
implementation.
P
We
really
need
to
look
at
shifting
our
schedule
to
a
planning
phase
for
the
public
services,
part
of
our
funding
and
remember
the
public
services.
Part
of
cdbg
is
really
only
15
of
the
grant
overall,
and
it's
at
this
point
an
estimated
grant
anytime.
We
work
with
it,
but
so
october.
Through
january,
we
would
work
with
community
partners
to
really
develop
this
new
structure.
P
We
should
open
applications
for
cdbg
public
services
and
mental
health
board
funding,
then
probably
in
early
february,
and
make
allocations
in
april,
which
is
actually
not
that.
P
Much
later
we
approved
the
mental
health
board
funding
in
this
year
at
our
april
13th
meeting,
if
I
recall-
and
we
can
open
the
applications
for
the
cdbg
bricks
and
sticks
categories,
public
facilities
and
infrastructure,
housing,
rehab
and
also
economic
development,
and
do
that
on
our
more
consistent
with
our
regular
time
frame,
proposing
opening
applications
for
about
november
one
and
then
having
estimated
funding
allocations
made
by
the
housing
and
community
development
act
committee.
P
At
its
december
meeting
the
rationale
we
had
a
late
release
of
both
mental
health
board
funding
and
cdbg
public
services
was
not
even
available
until
september
of
this
year,
just
due
to
when
the
federal
government
released
the
actual
funds
and
currently
we're
still
working
with
eoc
subcommittees
and
others
in
the
community
to
implement
our
rental
assistance
program,
beef
up
our
food
programs
and
also
to
look
at
what
else
we
can
do
for
child
care,
and
so
this
gives
us
the
flexibility
to
respond
to
changing
covert
19
needs
and
the
potential
changes
in
federal
and
state
funding.
B
L
Thank
you
very
much.
Sarah
sounds
like
an
awful
lot
of.
Work
has
gone
into
your
analysis
and
your
proposal.
L
I'm
curious
to
know
how
committed
and
involved
with
the
mental
health
people
on
this,
and
by
that
I
mean
the
volunteer
types
and
secondly,
I
mean
it
seems
to
me
for
the
most
part,
additional
work
on
the
part
of
cd
by
being
a
good
partner
here
would
be.
We
have
to
change
the
rules
about
public
service.
I
mean
that's
where
our
on
the
ground
money
is,
and
it
just
seems
to
me
way
too
restrictive
for
us
to
really
use
that
category
as
making
mean
of
meaningful
grants,
and
I
think
you
know
what
I
mean.
L
I
might
not
be
expressing
myself
well
to
those
who
don't
know,
but
we
have
such
a
restriction
on
our
public
service
money
through
cd
that
sometimes
we
argue
whether
or
not
this
grant
is
even
going
to
be
meaningful
for
you
know
this
organization.
So
that's
that's.
That's
my
concern
but
tell
us
about
the
mental
health
community.
Are
they
committed
to
this.
P
Well,
we
have
to
go
to
them
with
more
detail,
but
all
of
them
were
involved
and
engaged
in
the
recommendation
developing
the
recommendation
of
the
core
social
services,
core
committee
that
came
to
council
last
summer.
Granted
it's
been
off
the
plate
for
many
many
people
and
most
nations.
In
fact,
they've
been
probably
spending
most
of
their
efforts
just
trying
to
keep
their
heads
above
water,
and
so
I
think,
bringing
this
back.
We
have
to
that's
one
of
the
reasons
for
the
longer
time
frame.
L
P
I
think
that
we
should,
especially
under
these
circumstances,
this
doesn't
mean
we'll
do
this
forever
narrow
our
focus
and
target
more
effectively
so
that
we
don't
have
organizations
applying
if
what
they
are
going
to
apply
for
really
isn't
going
to
be
seriously
able
to
be
funded.
I
mean
I
just
honestly,
don't
see
how
we
can
do
business
as
usual
under
the
many
you
know
under
coca-19
recovery
and
what
we
have
to
try
to
do
to
come
out
of
it.
H
Yes,
thank
you
so
sarah,
my
question
has
to
do
with
how
this
will
work
with
the
money
we
already
passed
through
to
agencies.
So
if
you
put
on
one
of
the
slides
outreach
to
the
homeless-
and
you
know,
and
speaking
with
connections,
they've
now
ramped
up
their
outreach
team,
I
think
they
have
four
staff
members
now
and
they
primarily
work.
You
know
our
our
homeless
agency
here.
So
as
you-
and
I
guess
it's
on
here,
but
just
as
you're
going
through
these
things.
Obviously
some
you
know
a
lot
of
services
are
provided.
H
A
lot
of
services
are
needed,
but
we
do
have
a
lot
of
money
we
already
passed
through
and
so
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
know
this
pool
of
money
is
really
you
know
super
targeted
at
where
we
have
gaps
and
not
just
you
know,
giving
the
same
organizations
more
money,
but
really
the
best
we
can
pinpoint
where
there
are
not
services.
So
by
the
thing
about
child
care.
I
know
I
think
in
last
year
the
state
there
were
some
changes
to
the
child
care
subsidy
funds.
P
Go
ahead,
one
of
the
things
even
with
with
child
or
or
youth
programming.
I
mean
right
now
when
the
schools
aren't
in
session.
Clearly
our
programs
have
to
shift
and
already
have,
but
we
have
one
of
the
things
that
we
see
in
article
after
article
about
the
gap
between
the
well-to-do
and
less
well-to-do,
financially
well-off
students
is
going
to
be
exacerbated
by
the
lack
of
you
know.
P
H
One
last
thing
I
did
forget
if
you
can
make
sure
to
invest
as
your
next
step,
a
loop
in
the
mental
health
board,
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
who
carmen
rainey
was
speaking
of,
but
they
put
a
lot
of
time
into
all
this
work
every
year.
And
you
know
I
would
hate
for
them
to
feel
like
not
until
seeing
this
meeting
that
they
know
there
were
going
to
be
some
changes
and
how
they're
working.
P
J
Well,
the
phrase
that
leaked
out
at
me
in
reading
the
memo
is
the
whole
emphasis
on
case
management,
and
I
I
I'm
correct.
I'm
thinking
that's
a
new
approach,
I
mean
or
a
new
emphasis,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
that's
a
sounds
like
a
very
effective
way
to
work
with
the
people
that
we
want
to
work
with
in
this
program.
You
know
to
create
these
wrap
around
client-based
services
and
really
a
program
that
can
really
help.
J
Families
in
particular
make
some
real
strides
in
greater
sufficient
self-sufficiency,
and
you
know
so
that
they
don't
always
need
need
the
services,
but
I
I
I
think
this
sounds
very,
very
promising.
C
E
J
B
Looks
like
no,
so
with
that
we
do.
We
need
to
take
any
action
or
just
accept.
B
H
C
M
Yes,
I
I
want
to
say
that
I
very
much
support
this.
I
have
served
on
the
parking
committee
and
the
transportation
and
parking
committee
for
the
entire
time
I've
been
on
the
city
council,
my
first
term.
It
was
absolutely
critical
that
we
have
a
I
mean.
I
knew
it
was
critical
that
I'd
be
on
that
parking
committee,
because
eight
out
of
ten
phone
calls
I
used
to
receive
were
about
parking
and
then
gradually.
M
We
have
realized
that
we
really
need
to
address
the
issues
of
transportation,
not
just
parking,
and
but
I
do
think
that
so
many
of
the
parking
issues
that
we
have
now
really
are
more
something
that
could
be
addressed
by
one
of
the
standing
committees
of
the
city
council,
but
in
terms
of
transportation.
I
agree
with
the
staff's
memo
here
that
we
really
need
to
be
looking
at
transportation
issues
from
a
a
much
more
of
an
in-depth
policy
point
of
view.
M
We
have
micro
mobility
issues
going
on
the
pandemic
has
possibly
changed
some
of
those
things
we
have
electric
vehicles
coming
at
us
faster
than
we
even
realize
there
are
the
entire
world
of
transportation
and
how
we
get
around
is
really
in
flux
right
now
and
and
how
it's,
how
it's
addressed
by
the
city
of
evanston,
needs
to
be
done
in
a
more
holistic
comprehensive
way.
Then
we
can
get
done
at
transportation
and
parking
on
a
monthly
meeting.
M
So
I
agree
with
the
dissolution
of
this
committee
and
I
do,
but
I
very
much
support
the
that
we
increase
our
study
and
understanding
of
transportation
policy
and
then
act
on
these
large,
larger
issues
that
are
coming
towards
us
and
be
ready
for
them,
so
that
I
I
agree
with
this,
and
I
think
that
this
is
this
is
the
right
time
to
do
this.
D
G
A
D
O
Thing,
madam
chair,
I
move
item
r5,
which
is
commission
on
aging
membership
reduction.
I
D
I
D
D
B
B
R6
staff
is
recommending
the
rules
committee
to
formalize
the
reparation
subcommittee
from
an
ad
hoc
committee
to
one
established
by
ordinance.
If
approved,
an
ordinance
will
be
created
for
city
council
approval.
I
move
approval.
Second,
I
can.
B
B
So
it's
important
that
we're
able
to
formalize
and
institutionalize
this
work
so
that
the
reparation
goals
can
continue
with
leadership
beyond
any
particular
leader
council
trend
agenda
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
do
that
so
that
we
can
strengthen,
continue
and
complete.
This
work
over
time,
ottoman.
L
Rainey,
yes,
I
agree
and
thank
you
for
everything
done
for
this
for
this
project.
I
wanted
to
report
that
my
latest
report
from
atash
was
today,
and
that
is
our
first
receipts
from
the
month
of
july,
for
adult
cannabis
should
be
here
either
by
the
end
of
this
week
or
the
beginning
of
next
week,
and
that's
money
that
is
rebated
to
us
from
the
state
after
they
collect
the
adult
cannabis
tax,
which
is
then
going
to
be
committed
to
the
reparations
budget.
Thank
you.
D
I
will
just
be
working
with
the
committee
to
form
finalize
the
language
within
the
ordinance
and
we
will
have
that
to
city
council
within
the
next,
hopefully
by
the
at
the
end
of
this
month
of
october.
B
Then
we
have
it:
oh
admin,
rainy.
Second,
yes,
please
thank
you.
G
B
A
Sure
this
is
a
discussion
item
and
due
to
the
covet
19
endemic
we've
been
conducting
our
meetings
with
the
chat
platforms,
the
face
chat
from
platforms
and
some
decorum
issues
have
arisen
and
the
staff
would
like
to
get
some
direction
from
us
on
how
we
should
address
these
issues
and
what
rules
we
might
or
might
not
consider
to
address
the
issues.
A
So
I
think
it
did
this
came.
Our
city
attorney
brought
this
right.
Maybe
she
could
share
some
of
the
specific
concerns.
K
Thank
you,
wilson,
so
a
few
concerns
that
I
believe
have
been
brought
to
my
attention
at
least.
Are
some
people
are
joining
the
meetings
and
not
using
their
names,
so
it
just
says
at
xyz,
so
we
don't
know
who's
attending
the
meetings,
whereas
in
a
live
meeting,
if
a
person
were
to
address
the
council,
they
would
use
their
full
name.
K
I
How
big
an
issue
is
this
I
mean
I'm
just
curious
like
do
we
really
have
a
problem
to
solve
when
we
have
in-person
meetings?
You
know
people
will
come
with
signs.
We
put
a
rule
in
place
for
how
big
or
small
the
sign
could
be.
That
was
allowable.
You
know
people
sometimes
would
jump
up
and
say
you
know,
shame
on
you.
We
disagree
whatever
you
know
we're
using
this
virtual
platform
now,
and
you
know
at
least
the
examples
alex
that
you
just
gave.
I
I
mean
I
don't
know
it's
a
I've
seen
people
you
know
advocate
for
things
based
on.
You
know
some
hashtag
they
put
for
their
name.
Instead
of
you
know
their
name,
and
you
know-
and
I
guess
I've
also
been
on
some
of
these
meetings
where
people
have
burst
in
and
and
said
something,
and
we
certainly
don't
want.
You
know
unruly
meetings
where
we
can't
get
our
business
done.
But
part
of
that
also
is,
you
know,
you
know
democracy
and
how
things
you
know
go
at
our
meetings.
K
Well,
I
think
the
degree
of
the
issue
would
be
up
to
you
as
a
rules
committee
and
you
as
a
council.
If
you
know
the
council
views,
this
is
an
issue.
Certainly
staff
can
create
these
rules.
If
you
know
as
a
council
as
a
rules
committee,
you
do
not
believe
it's
an
issue
and
we
can
leave
the
decorum
to
the
chair
of
the
meeting
and
go
from
there.
G
Thank
you
and
I
I'll
be
supporting
the
mayor
and
alden
radio.
However,
I
do
agree
that
having
your
name
is
is
important.
It
has
not
happened
to
me
and
I'm
assuming
that
the
technology
and
the
security
measures
have
gotten
better,
but
I
have
heard
in
the
past
that
I
don't
know
what
the
term
is
when
someone
just
you
know,
busts
into
your
meeting,
is
either
older,
zoom
bombing.
Is
that
it
yeah.
So
I
think,
having
that
measure
where
someone
puts
their
name
is
is
important.
G
I
see
the
chat
platforms
and
I
have
been
a
part
of
meetings
where
there's
an
appropriate
language
and
conversation
that
takes
place
within
the
chat,
and
I
think
I
would
like
for
whomever
is
our
moderator
to
be
able
to
monitor
that
in
the
event
that
when
it
gets
verbally
abusive,
I
also
think.
Oh
no.
G
If
we
would
have
to
take
a
recess-
or
you
know,
hit
the
gavel
in
order
to
regain
control.
So
it's
a
little
bit
different
in
a
virtual
sense,
but
I
think
to
be
able
to
mute.
Someone
who,
for
whatever
reason,
doesn't
recognize
when
it's
appropriate
to
speak,
is
something
that
I
would
like
our
staff
to
be
authorized
to
do
with
the
chairs.
B
Okay,
is
there
so
staff
we
can
get
feedback
on
that
our
staff
can
take
that
feedback.
Alderman
wilson,
then
alderman
fleming.
A
I
generally
agree
with
most
of
that.
The
only
thing
I
guess,
maybe
I
would
adjust
a
little
bit-
is
if,
if
you're
going
to
speak,
you
should
sign
in
with
your
name,
but
if
you're
just
going
to
kind
of
watch
the
meeting
quietly
and
not
say
anything,
I
don't
know
that
that
would
necessarily
be
required.
So.
G
A
Well,
I
I
think
I'm
fine
making
it
a
rule,
but
if
you
don't
put,
if
you
don't
sign
in
with
your
name,
then
you
can't
speak
so
then
you're
just
subjecting
yourself
to
the
mutual,
but
I
mean
I
think
I
don't
want
to
deter
somebody
from
just
you
know,
quietly
watching
a
meeting
without
you
know
announcing
the
fact
that
they're
watching.
B
Ottoman
fleming
autumn,
mayor
hagerty,
if,
if
you
had
something
after
ottoman
fleming,
please.
H
Oh,
thank
you
and
I
agree.
I
think
the
rule
is
and
alex
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
So
if
you
come
to
a
meeting
in
person
you
sign
up,
we
call
your
name.
You
speak,
that's
part
of
how
we
know
you
want
to
speak.
So
in
this
online
platform,
I
assume
you're.
You
know
you're
doing
something
and
let
us
know
you're
going
to
speak
and
then
the
chair
has
your
name
and
you
speak.
H
So
I
do
think
the
only
time
we
need.
Your
name
is
when
you
speak,
because
some
people
speak
and
they
dial
in
on
their
iphone.
So
then
it
just
says
iphone
and
not
their
name,
and
I
don't
know
with
that
extra
technology
barrier.
I
don't
know
if
they're
able
to
put
their
name
in
there
if
it
always
goes
to
the
you
know,
default
iphone,
and
so
I
hate
to
limit
people.
H
You
know
who
are
calling
in
and
have
a
comment
and
they
you
know
they're
fine,
saying
their
name,
but
they
can't
write
it
in
because
they're
calling
in
and
it
says,
android
or
whatever
it
says
when
you
call
in
so
I
think
saying
your
name.
You
speak
to
your
point:
ottman
braceway.
I
think
our
moderation
has
gotten
much
better.
I
think
the
chat
is
actually
turned
off
now,
which
is
very
helpful,
so
you
don't
have
that
side
banter
and
then
I
think
everyone
is
muted
and
their
cameras
by
our
moderator.
C
H
I
Technology
yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
and
I
think
it's
been
covered.
I
mean,
I
think
people
have.
You
know
a
right
to
privacy
and
a
right
to
anonymity
and
if
they're,
not
speaking,
and
if
they're
speaking,
they
have
to
sign
up,
and
we
have
to
know
who
their
name
is.
But
just
like
a
city
council
meeting,
there
can
be
a
hundred
people
in
the
room
unless
they're
speaking,
we
don't
know
who
they
are
there
and
they
have
the
right
to
to
be.
You
know
anonymous
to
us.
K
B
B
D
No
written
there's
nothing
written
to
this.
This
was
referred
by
alderman
fleming
from
the
last
meeting
of
the
rules
committee
yep.
H
And
it
was
really
more
of
a
right
to
talk
about
pay,
equity
and
all
these
things
and
making
sure
people
anyone
feels
open
to
run
for
office
and
we're
all
aldermen,
which
we
understand
we're,
not
all
men
and
I
was
watching
a
council
meeting
in
another
state
and
they
had
alder
person
and
then
another
place
had
council
member.
I
know
I
tried
to
look
this
up.
This
is
really
well
versed
in
the
illinois
state
statue.
H
I
did
see
our
role
referred
to
as
aldermen
throughout
the
statute,
but
I
did
not
see
something
that
said,
we
have
to
be
alderman,
so
I
was
interested
in
kind
of
seeing
if
there
was
interest
in
changing
our
title
to
something
that
was
non-gender
specific,
so
those
folks
who
maybe
don't
have
a
gender
identity
or
whatever
else
can
be
something
other
than
what
their
title
says.
H
B
I
didn't
I've
never
heard
of
any,
because
I
know
that
some
have
okay,
some
have
gone
by
alderwoman.
I
didn't
think
we
had
any
restrictions
or
limitations
on
how
we
can
refer
to
ourselves.
So.
M
When,
yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
this
issue
was
raised
by
former
alderman
grover,
and
you
know
I
don't
remember
all
of
the
details
of
it,
but
there
was
research
done
by
the
legal
department
about
whether
we
could
be
referred
to
as
older
women.
You
know
this
was
10
years
ago,
so
I've
been
certainly
been
called
alderperson
by
a
number
of
people,
but
there
is
something
in
the
state
code
that
requires
that
we
are
aldermen.
So
if
the
legal
department
could
just
do
a
quick
look
on
that,
I
agree
with
you.
M
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
be
more
neutral,
but
I
think
there
was
a
barrier
to
it,
and
that
was
why
the
city
council
didn't
act
on
it
before.
B
Awesome
yeah.
Please
do
I
mean
I.
I
would
be
disappointed
if
there
were
any
restrictions
on
us
going
by
our
gender
preference.
I
thought
that
I
had
every
right
to
be
order.
Woman
have
gone
by
alderman,
so
if
we
can
get
some
feedback
on
that,
thank
you
so
much.
We
could
get
some
feedback
on
that
and
a
memo
on
how
we
can
formalize
that
option
so
that
all
gender
identities
feel
welcome.
H
K
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
it
looks
like
a
brief
google
search
and
I
haven't
had
time
to
look
into
this
too
much
the
city
of
chicago.
It
looks
like
looked
into
this
recently
when
mayor
lightfoot
was
elected
and
it
looks
like
there's
something
in
the
illinois
municipal
code,
which
sets
the
ground
rules
for
municipalities
in
the
state,
and
it
specifies
that
an
aldermen
is
the
only
officially
recognized
title
for
the
person
holding
that
position.
So
apparently
it
is
in
the
illinois
municipal
code
and
I
can
go
ahead
and
confirm
that.
B
If
you
could
that
we
aren't
waiting
for
the
for
the
state's
schedule
and
for
them
to
prioritize
something
that
we
value,
could
you
look
and
see
what
options
we
have
locally.