►
From YouTube: Social Services Committee 09/09/2021
Description
Social Services Committee 09/09/2021
A
Well,
I'm
saying
we're
in
an
unusual
situation,
but
we
have
a
quorum,
so
I
think
we
should
proceed.
I
have
not
heard
from
council
member
reid
and
I
don't
want
all
of
you
to
be
sitting
here
and
not
making
good
use
of
your
time
and
commitment
and
we
do
we're
in
a
kind
of
unusual
start
to
our
committee,
because
we're
trying
to
start
before
we
have
our
final
members
seated,
but
so
we
can
get
everybody
going
and
because
we've
got
a
lot
of
important
work
ahead
of
us.
A
So
we
are
also
a
committee
without
a
chair
at
this
moment,
so
having
no
other
real
way
of
figuring
out
how
to
do
how
to
do
this.
I'm
going
to
just
take
that
role
of
taking
us
through
the
agenda.
Obviously
I
can't
vote
or
anything
like
that,
but
it
seemed
to
be
the
most
expeditious
way
to
to
get
us
going.
So
I
actually
would
really
just
like
to
start
our
meeting.
A
This
is
the
inaugural
meeting
of
our
social
services
committee.
Even
though
we
don't
have
quite
everybody
seated,
but
we
will
soon-
and
we
have
a
as
jessica
said,
a
relatively
short
agenda,
I
also
what
I
think
would
be
good
is,
since
this
is
our
first
committee
meeting,
I'm
just
going
to
introduce
myself,
I'm
sarah
black's
housing
and
grants
manager
for
the
city
of
evanston,
and
that
ask
each
of
you
committee
members
to
please
introduce
yourself
and
then
we'll
move
into
our
our
agenda.
B
I
can
go
for
sarah
hi
everybody.
My
name
is
derek
ohanian
and
I'm
a
resident
of
ward
3
over
here
in
south
evanston.
I've
lived
in
evanston
for
the
past
couple
of
years,
but
lived
in
the
chicago
metro
area
for
probably
the
last
seven
years
now,
and
I'm
really
excited
to
be
a
part
of
this
group.
I
think
we
can
do
a
lot
of
great
work
for
the
city.
C
D
I'm
demeta
cravens
I've
been
a
resident
for
about
eight
years
in
evanston,
I'm
currently
in
ward
6,
but
I
was
in
ward
5
for
most
of
the
time
until
last
year
I
started
off
on
the
mental
health
board
for
the
last
two
years.
I'm
actually
a
mental
health
therapist.
So
mental
health
is
really
important
to
me.
E
F
E
G
H
H
F
Good
evening,
can
you
hear
me
it
looks
like
it's
working
wonderful
good
evening,
I'm
samantha
olds
fry
I'm
an
evanston
resident
of
the
fourth
ward.
I've
been
here
for
oh
my
gosh.
Coming
up
on
four
years.
I
have
a
background
in
public
policy,
health
care
appropriations
and
policy,
so
very
excited
to
be
here.
F
H
F
A
G
A
A
I
A
I
J
A
G
A
J
A
A
I'll
ask
for
public
comment:
that's
the
next
thing
on
our
agenda
and
we
did
not
get
any
public
con.
Anyone
signed
up
for
public
comment,
but
if
any
of
the
participants
any
of
the
attendees
would
like
to
make
public
comment,
you
can
raise
your
hand
and
then
we
can
jessica
can
promote
you
to
being
able
to
make
public
comment.
A
A
J
I'm
oh
yeah,
I
I
will
take
two
seconds.
I
am
devon,
reed,
I'm
the
council.
Member
for
the
eighth
ward.
I
am
one
of
two
aldermen
who
are
serving
on
the
social
services
committee.
I
think
this
is
you
know
an
extremely
important
committee,
I'm
glad
that
we've
reorganized
the
former
committees
to
to
be
more
purpose-oriented,
and
so
thank
you,
sarah
and
and
jessica
for
leading
on
that
and
everyone
else,
who's.
A
part
of
that,
and
particularly
important.
J
A
But
it
has
become
very
timely
and
important
to
get
our
esg
grant
allocated,
because
one
of
the
things
that
is
happening
at
some
time
in
the
not
too
distant
future
is
all
of
the
eviction.
Moratoria
are
going
to
be
ending
and
we
are
already
working
on
dealing
with
evictions
and
trying
to
prevent
them
through
rent
assistance
and
other
assistance.
A
All
of
the
money
that
comes
out
through
the
cares
act
and
the
consolidated
approach,
appropriations
act
and
even
arpa
is
limited
to
helping
people
who
are
impacted
by
copic
19
and
regrettably,
there
are
some
people
who
just
are
not
necessarily
financially
impacted
by
cobit
19,
but
still
have
need
for
rent
assistance
and
other
help.
So
this
committee
will
has
the
responsibility
for
allocating
our
emergency
solutions
grant
or
making
recommendation
for
that
allocation
to
council
for
its
uses.
A
Now,
one
of
the
things
I
will
be
absolutely
frank
with
you
is
esg
is
not
a
flexible
grant
at
all.
It's
not
like
cbg.
It
is
very
prescribed
by
the
federal
government.
The
eligible
uses
are
street
outreach,
shelter,
operations,
case
management
and
direct
assistance
for
people
who
are
homeless
or
at
high
risk.
Homelessness.
A
There's
also
prevention
funding,
which
is
the
other
form
of
direct
assistance,
and
that
is
to
prevent
people
from
being
evicted,
usually
for
lack
of
ability
to
pay.
Obviously,
so
they
are
the
other
category
of
homelessness,
and
there
are
three
versions
of
that:
we're
not
going
to
go
into
that.
It's
not
really
relevant,
but
so
really,
we
have
not
only
limits
on
how
we
can
use
the
funds.
We
have
limits
of
what
proportion
of
funds
can
be
used
for
which
of
these
services,
and
that
is
coming
out
of
the
hearth
act
at
which
emergency.
A
The
the
esg,
when
they
moved
esg
from
emergency
services,
grant
to
emergency
solutions
grant
under
this
new
way
of
using
funding
prior
to
that
change,
really
all
of
esg
was
used
really
primarily
for
shelters
and
street
outreach,
that's
sort
of
not
for
not
for
the
getting
people
into
housing
or
keeping
them
housing
and
the
change
to
that
was
really
driven
by
the
housing
first
strategy
that
hud
adopted.
At
that
point.
This
was
during
the
obama
administration
anyway.
So
what
happens
with
esg?
A
A
And
connections
for
the
homeless
is
our
provider
of
street
outreach
work.
They
also
provide
shelter,
so
we
fund
them
for
shelter
operations
and
they
provide
prevention
and
rapid
rehousing
services.
The
ywca
provides
for
shelter,
so
they
get
money
for
shelter
operations.
Now.
What
happens,
though,
and
people
have
asked
about
this-
and
I
want
to
make
it
clear-
we
have
other
agencies
that
work
with
families
that
need
that
direct
rent
assistance.
A
A
The
key
thing,
the
other
key
thing
is:
we
are
able
to
switch
funding
between
prevention
and
rapid
rehousing
based
on
need,
so
we
start
out
with
an
allocation,
but
hud
agrees
that
you
fund
people
in
need,
as
they
present.
In
other
words,
it's
not
like
you
go.
Oh
I've
still
got
this
much
money
in
rapid
rehousing,
but
I
don't.
I
have
any
prevention
money,
so
I
can't
help
this
family.
It
doesn't
work
that
way.
It
is
flexible
that
way.
A
But,
as
I
say,
we
really
have
like
zero
flexibility
with
this
money,
because
it's
almost
it's
almost
more
like
a
contract
for
services,
I
mean
you,
you
say
you're
taking
this
money
and
you
deliver
the
services
with
the
agencies.
So
are
there
any
questions
from
the
committee?
Because
what
we
are
going
to
request
from
the
committee
is
your
is
a
vote
to
approve
this
recommendation
so
that
we
can
get
it
to
city
council
at
the
special
city
council
meeting
on
the
20th
of
september.
A
So
we
can
get
this
money
into
use
promptly
by
the
way
we
just
got
access
to
our
2021
funding,
our
our
three
entitlement
grants
at
the
very
end
of
august.
If
we
had
had
it
earlier,
we
would
have.
I
don't
know
what
we
would
have
done
gone
straight
to
council,
but
so
it's
it's
a
it's
a
weird
situation,
but
any
questions.
Anyone.
B
Yeah
sarah
I've
got
a
few
here.
I
was
trying
to
read
through
the
document
that
was
sent
ahead
of
time,
that
details
more
of
this
and
then
as
well
as
just
trying
to
pick
up
on
some
details,
as
you
were
speaking
so,
the
I'll
start
from
the
bottom.
Actually,
the
city
of
evanston,
seven
point
five
percent
of
administration
fee
it's
about
what
twelve
thousand
dollars.
What
does
that
actually
pay
for.
A
We
also
have
a
lot
of
other
reporting
and
things
that
come
up
not
all
the
time,
but,
for
example,
this
year
earlier
in
june,
we
were
monitored
by
hud
on
esg,
and
so
we
spent
quite
a
number
of
hours
going
through
all
the
paperwork-
and
you
know
hud
does
very
detailed
monitorings.
You
know
we
have.
We
literally
have
to
get
files
that
they
can
review,
and
you
know
make
sure
that
income
certifications
are
being
done
correctly.
A
It
also
allows
for
staff
time
that
is
used
for
the
esg
portion
of
preparing
the
action
plan
and
doing
a
lot
of
other
related
things.
All
three
of
our
hud
entitlement
grants
are
covered
by
a
five-year
consolidated
plan,
and
then
each
year
we
develop
an
action
plan
and
even
though
it
sounds
like
it's
again,
it's
very
sort
of
formulaic,
but
it's
there's
an
awful
lot
of
time
on
all
this
stuff
and
also
jessica.
We
don't
wait
for
hud
to
monitor.
A
We
do
regular
monitoring
and
follow
up
with
our
providers,
and
we
have
to
make
sure
that
when
we
we
pay,
this
is
paid
on
a
reimbursement.
We
have
to
go
through
all
the
invoicing
and
make
sure
things
match
up
and
one
of
the
really
challenging
things.
Each
year
we
get
esg
money
and
we
have
up
to
two
years
to
spend
it
from
when
we
actually
receive
it
and
depending
on
timing.
A
B
Yeah,
thank
you
for
that.
Sir.
That's
really
helpful.
I
think,
just
as
a
tangent
off
of
that
just
sort
of
two.
The
two-part
question
here
is:
do
we
know
how
much
of
the
remaining
money
going
towards
connections
for
the
homeless
in
the
ywca
would
be
then
spent
on
their
administrative
costs
and
then
is
there
an
overall
estimate
of
how
many
people
this
would
actually
impact
and
help.
A
They
don't
actually
spend
it
on
their
administrative
costs
they
spend.
It
connections
uses
it
for
staff
for
direct
program
providers.
Street
outreach
workers,
some
of
their
case
managers.
They
actually
spend
generally
a
very
small
proportion
of
it
on
staffing,
with
the
exception
of
some
of
the
street
outreach,
where
much
of
the
work
is
staffing
most
of
it
is
spent
in
prevention
and
rapid
rehousing.
A
A
There
is
a
100
match
requirement,
so
we
also
have
to
prove
that
the
people
we
are
working
with
the
agencies
we
are
working
with
and
and
or
the
city
are
putting
in
a
hundred
percent
on
our
of
our
own
money
to
the
same
activities
and
and
work,
and
so
what
usually
happens
is
connections,
for
example,
uses
a
large
proportion
of
its
staffing
that
is
funded.
I
believe,
most
of
the
time
through
the
illinois
department
of
public
health
or
one
of
the
other
state
agencies,
and
that
is
used
as
the
match.
A
A
So
in
a
normal
year
jessica.
Maybe
you
can
do
better
on
this.
I
think
that
many
of
the
times
are
during
the
pandemic.
We
have
been
giving
people
much
longer
periods
of
rent
assistance,
because
many
people
didn't
regain
any
income,
but
let's
try
to
give
if
you
can
go
back
to
a
normal
year
and
maybe
estimate
the
number
of
people
or
households.
That
would
be
helpful
with.
H
Prevention
usually
serves
about
five
to
seven
households
and
rapidly
housing,
as
sarah
mentioned
earlier,
because
we're
following
the
housing
first
model.
So
so,
we've
we've
put
more
funds
traditionally
into
rapid
rehousing
that
serves
about
10
households
and
that
can
vary
based
on
household
size.
So
a
household
can
be
an
individual
or
a
person
of
one
or
it
can
be
a
family
of
three
or
four
and,
as
we
know,
in
evanston,
rents
for
families
are
much
more
expensive
and
and
take
a
a
much
bigger
subsidy
than
rents
for
individuals.
A
And
with
the
shelters
are
our
normal
pre
having
the
much
expanded,
shelter
capacity
that
we
have
right
now
because
of
the
karate
funding
we
were.
Probably
our
esg
program
was
probably
serving
250
to
300
homeless
people
in
shelters
between
the
ywca
and
the
connection
for
the
homeless
and
street
outreach.
A
A
lot
of
times
they're
working
with
a
pretty
consistent
group-
it's
not
you
know,
we
don't
have
the
we
didn't,
have
the
levels
of
influx,
but
that
was
generally
probably
150
or
so
individuals
that
were
supported
through
street
outreaching.
Here,
if
I
recall
correctly,
so
it
actually
can
serve
a
lot
of
people,
it
doesn't
cover
anywhere
near
all
the
costs
for
any
of
those
programs,
of
course,
so.
A
H
A
B
H
A
A
The
meeting
schedule,
because
you
have
to
improve
your
meeting
schedule,
but
what
jessica
and
I
are
proposing
doing,
is
having
a
special
meeting,
thursday
september
23rd,
to
make
allocations
of
our
primary
funding
responsibilities,
which
is
the
cdbg
public
services
funding
and
the
human
services
funding.
That
is
city
funding
that
has
historically
been
called
mental
health
board
funding,
and
we
really
are
anxious
to
get
that
allocated
to
the
agencies
and
we
are
excited
to
be
able
to.
We
hope,
have
a
full
committee
member,
a
full
meeting
of
all
committee
members
on
september
23rd.
A
If
that
will
meet
committee
members
schedules.
This
is
something
that
traditionally
we
have
in
person.
We
would
reserve
city
council
chambers,
but
it
probably
could
be
a
hybrid
or
virtual.
We
can
work
that
out.
You
know
it's.
A
lot
of
us
aren't
anxious
to
be
in
large
rooms
full
of
people,
but
so
we're
at.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
everybody
is
going
to
be
able
to
absolutely
check
their
calendars.
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
can
do
a
follow-up
check
and
actually
confirm
and
just
to
confirm
a
special
meeting
later
on,
but
we
did
want
to
bring
it
up
and
see
if
we
at
least
initially
look
like
we
could
get
most
of
our
members
or
all
of
our
members.
J
A
J
All
right,
all
right
and,
and
then
also
so
I
do
want
to
make
a
one
follow-up
just
point
of
clearly
I
I
do
certainly
appreciate
miss
flex.
You
lead
in
the
meeting.
I
wonder
if
we
can,
after
this
motion,
appoints
one
of
the
residents
as
just
a
temporary
chair.
So
if
there
is
a
chair-like
decision
that
has
to
be
made,
it
is
made
by
some.
You
can
continue.
I
think
you're
doing
a
great
job,
but
if
we
can,
you
know,
I.
G
J
G
J
I
G
A
Yes-
and
I
think,
that's
appropriate-
I
didn't
even
think
of
that
council
member
reid.
I
appreciate
that
I
should
have
thought
that
earlier
I
can
go,
but
we
actually
have
those
are
the
action
items
that
are
required,
so
the
remaining
things
are.
If
we
want
to
ask
for
anyone
else,
giving
another
opportunity
for
public
comment
so
that
our
audience,
members,
questions
or
information
is
put
into
the
public
record,
and
then
we
have
a
staff
sort
of
presentation
just
to
walk
everyone
through
the
next
steps
on
the
allocation
process.
A
I
G
A
A
They
can,
if
it's
the
families
if
they
are
in
a
family
in
a
household,
rapid,
rehousing
and
prevention,
are
not
generally
used
just
for
independent
students
because
they're,
not
they,
wouldn't.
It
wouldn't
be
appropriate
to
house
them
independently,
but
they
can
be
used
for
the
families
of
students
in
the
schools
and-
and
they
frequently
are.
A
I
H
H
B
H
B
H
H
The
main
social
services
that
the
city
offers
include
basic
basic
needs
like
food
and
housing
supports
that
increase
self-sufficiency
like
education
and
employment
assistance
and
supports
for
youth.
So
this
is
our
summer
youth,
employment
program
and
our
enrichment
programs,
and
these
services
are
not
just
the
services
that
we
fund
externally,
but
there
are
also
services
that
are
offered
by
internal
city
programs.
H
The
findings
of
that
study
in
2018
were
inconclusive.
What
we
did
learned
that
our
biggest
challenge
is
inconsistent
collection
of
data
and
our
biggest
shortcoming
was
that
people
had
difficulty
finding
appropriate
services
when
they
needed
them.
So
in
2019
council
also
directed
staff
to
build
racial
equity
into
our
provision
of
services.
H
The
city
believes
that
equity
is
about
offering
more
to
those
who
need
more.
It's
not
about
equality,
and
we
can
talk
about
that
if
there
are
any
questions,
but
we
recognize
that
government
can't
be
all
things
to
all
people,
but
government
should
be
a
central
point
of
contact
that
connects
residents
to
the
resources
needed
to
address
harms
caused
by
systemic
racism
and
historically
racist
practices,
so
that
equity
work
again
is
foundational
to
our
restructuring
of
the
allocation
process
and
to
the
structuring
of
our
committees.
H
G
H
H
The
new
process
may
focus
more
resources
on
fewer
households,
but
those
households
will
gain
self-sufficiency
as
an
outcome,
so
our
new
process
bear
with
me.
This
might
be
review
for
some,
but
it
might
be
new
for
others,
so
it
starts
through
funding,
case
management,
services
and
specifically
holistic
case
management
services.
So
what
does
that
mean?
And
why
is
it
the
focus?
H
Most
social
services
have
a
case
management
component,
but
holistic
case
management
is
able
to
address
all
of
the
needs.
A
household
may
have
whether
those
needs
include
housing,
workforce
development,
assistance
with
transportation,
access
to
medical
and
mental
health
care,
support
for
young
children
or
school-aged
youth.
H
H
H
So
it's
important
to
consider
the
number
of
evanston
residents
that
the
program
serves
and
the
number
of
evanston
residents
that
the
agency
would
be
able
to
enroll
if
awarded
funding.
This
would
include
referrals
from
city
staff
and
safety
net
providers,
so
the
key
is
when
people
in
need
are
identified.
H
H
That's
the
critical
component
in
safetynet
services,
and
for
that
we
use
the
but
four
rule
to
define
safety
net
services
so,
but
for
the
service,
the
stability
or
well-being
of
the
individual
or
household
would
be
threatened.
So
when
applied,
it
defines
services
that
have
an
immediate
measurable
impact.
So,
for
example,
we
can
tell
that
you
know
a
defined
number
of
meals
were
provided
or
a
defined
number
of
people
or
households
were
housed
expanding
on
those
examples.
H
This
is
an
example
of
a
safety
net
service
that
can
also
connect
people
to
deeper
case
management
services
and
more
holistic
services,
but
that's
not
a
requirement
of
safety
net
services.
Sometimes,
safety
net
services
are
just
the
provision
of
the
specific
item
that
that
will
prevent
a
household
or
individual
from
falling
into
destabilization.
H
Okay,
we
also
want
to
look
at
support
services.
No,
we
have
not.
We.
The
applications
have
only
been
open
for
case
management
and
safety
net
services.
We,
we
have
not
had
the
opportunity
to
explore
support
support
services,
but
support
services
are
critical
for
clients
in
case
management.
This
is
the
second
component
of
our
new
client
client
centered
service
delivery
process,
and
this
is
where
the
voices
of
people
in
need
of
services
or
accessing
services
are
really
able
to
come
out
and
define,
define
the
services
that
they
receive.
H
So
services
can
be
provided
more
immediately
if
they're
paid
for
on
perhaps
a
fee-for-service
basis
and
individual
client's
needs
will
vary.
So
we
want
to
have
flexibility
with
this
funding.
We,
the
goal
is
to
hear
from
case
management
providers
what
services
their
clients
need
to
be
able
to
reach
self-sufficiency,
and
then,
whether
those
services
are
job
training
or
education
programs,
child
care,
health
care-
you
know
whatever
they
may
be
and
then
determine
what
agencies
are
providing
those
services.
H
Another
option
for
support
services
is
to
provide
like
flexible
funds
for
immediate
or
urgent
needs
that
aren't
addressed
by
safety
net
services,
so
examples
can
be
transportation
whether
it's
bus
or
train
passes.
It
could
also
be
helping
people
or
helping
households
with
parking
tickets
so
that
they
don't
lose
their
car
and
lose
their
form
of
transportation
or
provide
immediate
emergency
car
repairs.
H
H
H
This
slide
is
a
review
of
how
we've
we've
funded
services
in
the
past.
So
historically,
you
can
see
that
when
the
city
funds
agencies,
it's
been
primarily
for
supportive
services,
we're
pretty
supportive
services
heavy
and
that
again
goes
back
to
giving
agencies
money
for
the
good
work
that
they
were
doing.
H
H
Okay,
so
agencies
have
applied,
as
we've
said,
for
case
management
through
for
case
management
and
for
safety
net
services.
The
agencies
in
blue,
we
feel
are
our
case
management
services
or
our
case
management
applicants,
and
then
we
also
have
our
safety
net
applicants
and
those
are
in
orange,
based
on
the
way
agencies
applied.
We
do
believe
that
there
are
some
that
fall
under
sort
of
this
category
of
supplemental
services,
so
they're
not
quite
holistic
case
management
and
and
for
various
reasons.
They
don't
quite
fall
under
our
safety
net
category.
B
H
A
One
of
the
things
that
jessica
pointed
out
is
some
of
the
applications,
for
that
were
in
case
management
are
not
really
don't
meet
the
what
the
the
requirements
to
be
the
robust
case
management.
They
are
case
management
primarily
around
a
specific
limited
type
of
service,
and
so
we've
for
purposes
of
this
chart
showed
where
we
we,
as
staff,
feel
they
really
fall
more
into
what
how
the
how
the
service
works-
and
this
is
something
that
actually
will
be
a
discussion.
A
I
mean
something
that
we
we,
we
believe,
needs
to
be
discussed
more
in
detail
by
the
committee,
because
it
doesn't
mean
they
aren't
something
that
is
worthy
of
funding
and
isn't
needed
in
the
community,
but
it
doesn't
they
do
based
on
their
application.
In
our
assessment
they
don't
really
meet
that
case
management
goal,
and
that
doesn't
mean
we
can't
work
with
agencies
if
they
want
to
grow
and
expand
their
services
to
do
that.
Those
are
the
types
of
things.
A
I
think
that
we
need
to
work
out
with
the
committee
and
then
staff
can
work
with
the
providers
to
direct
them
or
work
with
them
to
find
out
which
category
they
really
do
fit
in.
We
asked
a
lot
of
our
agencies
to
apply
in
a
whole
new
system
during
a
pandemic,
and
they
responded
incredibly
well,
but
it
is.
It
is
a
process
and
I
think
we're
going
to
see
some
agencies
or
some
programs
say
and
going
from
one
category
to
another
in
the
way.
A
I
think
we
want
to
track
and
evaluate
them,
because
we
don't
want
to
put
something
in
in
a
category
where
they're
not
going
to
meet
the
measures,
because
then
we're
going
to
be
measuring
them
as
not
effective
at
that,
but
they
may
be
very
effective
at
dealing
with
a
specific
need.
Does
that
make
sense?
A
That
could
be
possible
and
or
another
thing
would
be
to
say
if
these
are
supplemental
services,
that
are
our
people
are
being
referred
to
or
and
actually
getting.
We
can
work
out
a
fee
for
services,
agreement
and
and
pay.
You
know,
get
an
up
to
amount
or
something
like
that
that
we
then
reimburse
them
on
a
service
by
service.
Provided
those
are
things,
and
you
know
we
may
not
be
able
to
move
to
that
in
one
year.
A
These
are
the
types
of
things
we
want
to
show
the
committee,
because
we
think
this
is
what
we
ultimately
believe.
We
need
to
get
to
to
fully
implement
the
model,
but
we
may
not
get
there.
In
one
year
we
may
just
to
a
certain
extent,
say:
hey.
We
need
to
fund
agencies
because
in
essence,
especially
with
our
cdbg,
the
cdbg
has
to
be
expended
in
our
our
fiscal
year.
A
2021,
that's
a
requirement
of
the
federal
government,
so
we
are
going
to
be
looking
with
the
cdbg
and
saying
the
agencies
are
going
to
report
on
work
that
they've
been
doing
this
year
and
we
will
fit
into
those
categories.
So
I
don't
think
any
of
us
ever
thought
we
would
have
such
a
complex
transition.
A
We
recommend
that
we
work
with
the
agencies
and
refine
the
allocations
based.
You
know
and
do
2022
allocations,
hopefully
in
maybe
beginning
of
the
second
quarter
in
2022,
based
on
how
progress
is
moving
and
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
what
one
of
the
other
benefits
of
this
combined
funding
is
that
we
can
start
funding
certain
things
with
local
funding,
so
that
not
some
agencies
who
historically
have
been
funded
exclusively
with
cdt,
got
all
their
funding
basically
paid
in
the
last
quarter
of
all
the
work
they've
done
earlier
in
the
year
too.
A
So
it's
a
cash
flow
thing
and
that's
one
of
the
things
we're
very
sensitive
to
is
is
a
challenge
with
our
different
funds,
and
we
sadly
do
not
control
that,
because
the
federal
government
it
releases
funding
when
the
federal
government
decides
to
release
funding
so
yeah.
There
are
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things
that
have
to
be
worked
out
to,
I
believe,
to
get
to
what
we
envisioned
would
be
able
to
happen
with
this.
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
realize
I'd
left
myself
off
of
a
visual.
A
We
don't
want
to
necessarily
put
money
into
programs
that
run
for
a
year
or
two
and
then
just
vanish
again.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
to
work,
to
support
them
longer
term
without
having
arpa
they.
We
have
to
figure
out
another
more
sort
of
long-going,
sustaining
method
of
sustaining
those
services.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
of,
I
think,
really
really
important
and
exciting
work
for
this
committee
to
do.
A
We
will
provide
just
information
that
is
supplemental
to
that,
including
how
agencies
have
done
with
compliance
and
reporting
and
and
and
also
how
they've
met
objectives
before,
because
even
you
know,
in
other
words,
were
they
every
every
agency
has
in
their
sub-recipient
agreement
their
goals
and
measures.
You
know
how
many
people
they're
going
to
serve
what
the
what
they're
going
to
do,
in
other
words
similar
to
what
jessica
was
talking
about.
It's
not
just,
are
we
going
to
serve
them,
but
what
services
are
they
going
to
get?
A
A
One
of
the
things
the
social
services
core
committee
recommended
and
as
part
of
this
recommendation
is
that
we
really
look
at
at
those
outcomes
and
how
programs
are
progressing
and
if
they
are
not
delivering,
then
we
have
to
talk
and
figure
out
what
what's
going
on,
and
there
can
be
an
awful
lot
of
reasons
I
mean
we've
had
situations
where
an
agency
or
a
program
might
not
need
its
goals,
but
may
have
lost
significant
other
source
of
funding
or
something
like
that.
We
won't
ding
people
for
stuff
that
is
beyond
their
control.
A
A
But
but
this
was
also
one
of
the
challenges
getting
our
committee
up
and
running
is
to
give
not
just
the
part
of
the
purpose
of
jessica
going
through.
This
is
not
just
for
the
members
of
the
committee,
because
many
of
you
went
through
this
whole
transition
with
us
being
on
commit
on
on
one
of
the
two
committees
that
that
were
merged
into
this,
but
also
so
the
public
has
a
better
understanding
of
what
what
is
happening
and
the
agencies
are
very
anxious,
they're,
hoping
very
much
that
we
will
have
a
interim
committee
meeting.
A
H
Thank
you
so
much
because
I
did
not
mean
to
gloss
over
all
of
the
agencies
did
submit
phenomenal
applications
and
we
know
that
they
do
excellent
work
and
it
is
just
a
matter
of
working
with
them
to
see
how
agencies
fit
into
holistic
case
management
safety,
net
services.
And
then
our
our
support
services
and
all
are
needed.