►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 03/18/2014
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
and
welcome
this
is
a
public
hearing
of
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals
of
the
city
of
Evanston.
The
zoning
ordinance
directs
this
body
to
hear
applications
for
major
variations,
special
uses
and
appeals
from
decisions
of
the
Zoning
Administrator,
depending
on
the
type
of
matter.
This
board
will
make
either
a
final
determination
or
send
its
recommendation
to
City
Council
present
tonight.
Our
board
members
Mary
Beth
burns
Beth
mclennan
Clara
Weinberg.
A
My
name
is
Matt
Rogers,
the
current
chairman
and
therefore
we
have
a
quorum
also
present
from
city
zoning
department
is
Melissa
clots
and
Mario
Treach
reto
from
the
city
legal
department.
This
is
a
formal
meeting
and
there
are
rules
that
govern
our
proceedings.
Most
important
only
one
person
speaks
at
a
time
to
accurately
record
the
proceedings.
Anyone
who
wishes
to
address
the
board
regarding
any
matter
on
the
agenda
will
have
the
opportunity
to
do
so
at
the
appropriate
time.
Our
normal
procedure
is
to
hear
from
the
staff
on
the
documents
on
file.
A
We
will
then
receive
testimony
and
other
evidence
from
the
applicant
or
appellant
after
hearing
from
the
applicant,
our
appellant
any
person
with
a
legal
interest
in
property
located
within
500
feet
of
the
subject.
Property
may
present
evidence
reasonably
question
witnesses
or
seek
a
continuance
of
the
hearing.
Next
others
who
wish
to
make
a
statement
regarding
the
matter
may
do
so
at
that
time.
When
all
opposing
testimony
and
other
statements
have
been
heard,
the
applicant
or
appellant
will
be
given
the
opportunity
for
rebuttal
or
closing
statement.
A
All
testimony
will
be
under
oath,
although
we
do
not
apply
the
strict
rules
of
evidence.
Please
limit
your
testimony
or
statement
to
your
personal
knowledge
when
you
testify
or
make
a
statement,
please
state
your
name
and
address
and
be
sure
to
sign
in
on
the
road
on
the
provided
sign-up
sheet.
We
are
audio
and
video
recorded
in
this
space.
Please
make
sure
you
are
at
a
microphone
when
asking
questions
or
making
statements
so
that
you
can
be
properly
recorded.
All
proceedings
are
subject
to
broadcast
at
a
later
date.
A
When
all
of
the
testimony
evidence
and
statements
have
been
received,
the
board
will
close
the
record
and
begin
its
deliberations.
We
usually
try
to
adjourn
by
a
PM.
Any
matter
not
concluded.
Its
night's
hearing
will
be
continued
to
our
next
regularly
scheduled
meeting.
We
do
have
three
items
on
the
agenda
this
evening.
A
A
A
B
C
A
Been
moved
and
seconded
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
all
right.
Therefore,
the
minutes
are
approved.
We
have
had
a
request
this
evening
since
our
first
matter
of
business,
the
applicant
is
not
present
at
now.
At
present,
I
will
go
ahead
and
we
had
been
asked
to
move
the
matter
for
620
to
Sheridan
square
to
the
beginning
of
our
agenda,
based
on
some
information
that
was
shared
with
us
through
an
email
from
staff.
Does
anyone
have
a
problem
with
doing
so
yep
with
that
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
that
matter
to
the
beginning?
A
D
Donnelly
Florida
architect
applies
for
major
zoning
relief
to
convert
a
one
unit
condominium
into
two
units
at
an
existing
multi-family
residential
residence.
The
applicant
requests
to
reestablish
a
total
of
thirty-one
units
in
a
legally
non-conforming
multifamily
residents
that
currently
consists
of
30
units
where
a
maximum
21
units
are
allowed.
Due
to
the
lot
size.
Zoning
code
section
687
4d,
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals,
is
the
determining
body
for
this
case.
D
Documents
included
as
part
of
the
record
our
variance
application
submitted.
February
18
2014
standards,
form
Zoning
analysis,
plat
of
survey,
dated
September
21st,
1976
site
plans,
image
of
property,
aerial
view
of
property,
zoning
map
of
property,
Historic
Preservation
memo
and
spark
meeting
minutes
of
March
5th
2014.
A
Thank
you
if
I
could
ask
that
anyone
who
would
be
giving
testimony
in
this
matter
or
speaking
on
this
matter
to
us
be
sworn
at
this
time.
By
raising
your
right
hand,
please
do
you
swear
or
affirm
to
tell
the
truth
throughout
the
course
of
these
proceedings.
Thank
you.
If
I
could
ask
Miss
litterer
to
come
up
to
the
lectern,
and
please
tell
us
about
your
project.
A
E
You
for
accommodating
my
clients
request
to
move
ahead
of
the
agenda.
The
building
was
built
in
1925
1923,
with
31
units
on
the
property.
That
is
the
size
that
it
is
in
2005.
My
client
and
his
wife
purchased
two
adjoining
units,
one
above
the
other
at
six
22
units
number
two
and
three
and
applied
for
a
permit
and
built
an
interior
stair
to
connect
those
two
units.
At
this
time
my
client
and
his
wife
are
divorced.
He
is
having
a
difficult
time
maintaining
the
existing
sized
unit
for
his
own
use.
E
He
has
been
given
advice
from
real
estate
agents
that
he
could
be
more
successful
if
he
were
to
take
out
the
stairs
and
return
them
to
the
existing
units,
as
they
were
originally
built.
Other
evidence
is
the
well.
The
units
still
have
two
legal
descriptions
to
pin
numbers
from
the
county.
He
pays
two
assessments
to
his
condo
association.
The
unit's
themselves
were
not
know,
exterior
work
was
done
to
the
units
and
they
both
maintain
their
existing
doors
to
common
space.
A
E
A
F
B
Just
had
one
question,
which
is:
how
do
you
respond
to
the
requirement?
One
of
the
one
of
the
kayaking
rooms
work
for
it,
one
of
the
standards,
which
is
that
the
the
project
isn't
solely
about
financial
gain,
because
it
seems
to
me
that
the
primary
reason,
one
of
the
primary
reasons
that
you
are
separating
the
two
units,
is
so
that
you
have
the
ability
to
sell
them.
It's.
B
A
The
question
one
of
the
standards
that
we
have
to
find
in
order
to
grant
any
zoning
relief
is
that
the
main
purpose
for
doing
whatever
is
being
requested
of
us
not
be
strictly
based
on
an
income
or
a
financial
basis,
and
so
I
think
that
what
the
question
is
is
kind
of
exploring
is
the
fact
that
the
separation
of
the
two
units
were
occur
so
that
one
could
be
sold.
The.
F
E
F
B
F
E
B
A
A
E
A
G
F
F
G
Well,
that's
that's
the
point
to
I
originally
came
thinking.
My
god
were
going
to
single
room.
Only
occupancy
I
mean
that.
Would
that
mean
that
I
can
take
mine
and
split
it
in
half
or
thirds,
or
something
like
this,
but
I'm
thinking
this
is
taking.
If
you
want
taking
it
back
to
what
it
was
originally
in
1923,
then
we've
come
it's
an
historical
district.
Your
building
has
been
designated
in
historical
building.
You
would
actually
probably
be
doing
our
neck
of
the
woods.
G
A
favor
by
bringing
it
back
to
the
separate
units
as
it
was
in
1923
I
would
agree.
So
that's
all
I
as
I
say
I
was
thinking
of
doing
it,
the
other
wet,
my
god.
You
know
we're
gonna
end
up
with,
like
you
know,
a
ton
of
little
tiny
little
things.
Everybody
has
tens
yeah
50
square
feet
or
something,
and
we
have
people,
no,
no
parking
or
anything
else.
But
I
think
this
is
fine.
The.
A
And
I'd,
just
to
sort
of
reiterate
the
reason
that
we're
here
is
because
obviously
zoning
law
in
1923
I
don't
think
think
it
existed
fully
yet
for
the
city
of
Evanston
probably
did
it
did
a
head
of
our
time,
and
so
the
fact
is
that
the
building
is
a
non-conforming
based
on
the
number
of
units
and
so
by
any
change
in
the
number
of
units.
Technically,
we
would
have
to
make
a
determination
on.
A
A
It
seems
to
me
that
there
seems
to
be
a
consensus
of
people
on
the
board
that
this
is
not
an
issue
because
of
the
fact
that
in
reality
we
are
restoring
something
to
a
preexisting
condition,
not
necessarily
creating
anything
additional,
and
it
doesn't
seem
that
there
will
be
much
change
to
the
physical
structure
of
the
building
other
than
simply
removing
a
stairwell
and
sort
of
restoring
part
of
a
bathroom
on
one
of
the
floors.
I
also
would
say
that
I'll
get
into
that.
Otherwise,
I
don't
have
anything
to
say
when
I
go
through
the
standards.
A
A
It
would
appear
that
to
most
people
outside
of
being
in
the
unit,
there
probably
would
be
no
appearance
whatsoever
that
these
units
are
joined
and
because
of
the
fact
that
we
are
not
making
substantial
changes
to
the
physical
structure
and
the
the
fact
that
we
would
be
having
two
properties
that
seemed
to
fit
in
with
a
number
of
the
other
properties
in
the
building.
I
believe
that
this
standard
has
been
met,
number
two:
the
requested
variation
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
A
It's
not
adding
an
undue
impact
on
to
the
neighborhood.
So
I
don't
believe
that
this
this
is
causing
any
problems
in
adhering
to
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance
number
three,
the
alleged
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
is
peculiar
to
the
property.
The
fact
that
two
properties
were
purchased
and
joined
through
a
common
stairwell
does
make
this
a
somewhat
unique
property
because
of
the
fact
that
it
also
maintains
two
separate
descriptions
and
pin
numbers.
A
Also
makes
it
a
little
easier
to
handle
the
difficulty
that's
created
here,
as
opposed
to
trying
to
separate
into
two
separate
pin
numbers
so
I
believe
this
standard
has
been
met.
Number
for
the
property
owner
would
suffer
a
particular
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
as
distinguished
from
a
mere
inconvenience.
A
If
the
strict
letter
of
the
alligator
are
other
regulations
were
to
be
carried
out,
we
have
heard
some
testimony
from
the
applicant
that
he
has
tried
to
sell
the
unit
in
and,
as
is
condition
and
has
been
unsuccessful
in
doing
so
so
to
force
him
to
to
sell
the
unit
in
that
condition,
without
looking
at
this,
at
least
as
an
option.
I
believe
would
cause
a
particular
hardship
to
him
and
therefore
the
standard
has
been
met.
Number
five.
A
This
is
a
little
bit
of
a
debatable
issue,
but
at
the
time
that
the
units
were
purchased
and
conjoined
I,
don't
think
anyone
would
have
necessarily
seen
the
real
estate
market
being
in
the
condition
that
it
is
in
today
and
although
we
have
seen
it
come
back
for
a
number
of
areas,
condos
and
multifamily
units
still
are
burying
the
the
slower
part
of
the
recovery,
and
so
I
believe
that
this
standard
has
been
met.
Number
seven.
The
requested
variation
requires
the
least
deviation
from
the
applicable
regulation
among
the
feasible
options
identified
before
the
ZBA
I.
A
Don't
think
we
can
get
a
lot
simpler
than
taking
out
a
stairway
and
adding
a
bathtub
our
entire
kitchen,
if
the
kitchen
is
what
was
being
added,
are
repaired.
So
I
think
that
this
is
definitely
one
of
the
more
minor
deviations
that
we've
seen
come
before
us
on
these
types
of
things,
so
I
believe
that
standard
has
been
met.
Is
everyone
in
agreement
with
my
findings?
Yes,.
C
A
B
D
Nick
Lawson
of
Lawson
properties
incorporated
property
owner
applies
for
major
zoning
relief
to
rehabilitate
a
single
family
residence
with
a
one-story
addition,
one
car
detached
garage,
front,
porch
and
front
yard
fence
the
applicant
requests,
a
rear
yard
setback
of
12
point
65
feet
where
30
feet
is
required.
Zoning
code,
section
6,
8,
47,
a
four
and
A
12.19
foot,
front
yard,
setback
for
a
roofed,
open
front,
porch
guard
obstruction
where
a
24-point
3
foot
setback
is
permitted.
Zoning
code
section
64,
19
b1.
A
Thank
you.
If,
at
this
point,
I
could
have
anyone
who
may
give
testimony
on
the
matter
for
1460.
Do
we
please
be
sworn
at
this
time
by
raising
your
right
hand,
do
you
swear
or
affirm,
to
tell
the
truth
throughout
the
course
of
these
proceedings?
I
do
thank
you
and
if
you
could,
please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
My.
H
H
I
just
want
to
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
the
house.
It
was
sort
of
delinquent
for
three
or
four
years.
The
two
feet
of
water
in
the
basement
and
full
of
termites
was
about
eight
hundred
square
foot.
Originally
when
it
was
built
in
the
the
serrated
lines,
there
were
two
little
add-ons
I
think
we'll
put
on
in
the
60s
and
it
was
built
with
wood
going
into
the
ground
so
that
enabled
the
termites
to
get
into
the
building
and
sort
of
chew
it
up.
So
we
took
those
off,
but
it's
so
small.
H
So
we
have
plans
with
submitter
to
excavate
the
basement
and
add
sort
of
double
the
square
footage
there,
but
we
really
couldn't
make
anything
work
without
sort
of
adding
a
small
addition
on
there,
which
would
be
the
master
bedroom.
So
I
didn't
really
want
to
impact
beyond
that,
but
because
the
building's
sort
of
squashed
into
them
into
the
the
northwest
corner
of
the
light,
it's
it's
just,
there's
really
no
backyard
and
there's
no
front
yard,
so
it
will
definitely
be
for
a
young
family.
It's
an
entry-level
home,
probably
in
the
mid
300s
every
single
house.
H
In
that
neighborhood
has
got
kids
so
I'm
sure
this
will
be
the
same
and
I
was
just
looking
to
create
a
secure
yard
space.
A
fenced
yard
space
without
visually,
impacting
on
on
everybody
around
us.
I
know
how
you
guys
feel
about
fences.
So
I
was
hoping
we
could
actually
was
looking
for
36
inches,
not
not
48
or
42
as
small
as
possible.
H
That
could
create
some
security
for
some
young
children
without
visually,
impacting
the
street
or
the
neighbors,
the
house
directly
south,
as
Mike
and
and
Carolyn's
place,
and
they
have
a
big
offense
and
so
I
thought
it
may
be
appropriate
to
match
that
and
I
have
a
picture.
Do
you
want
to
look
at
it.
A
That
was
easy
thing
to
do.
That's
fine!
I'm
going
to
ask
that
you
forward
that
to
melissa.
I
can
do
that,
but
let
us
see
it
as
well
just
so
we
have
something
in
the
record
to
show
what
you
are
showing
us.
Oh
yeah.
We
can
just
take
a
so
you
took
this
fixture.
I
did
and
when
did
you
take
the
picture
about
an
hour
ago
and
this
it's
gonna
sound
like
a
stupid
question,
but
does
this
accurately
represent
the
condition
of
the
property?
Pretty
much
all
right?
A
H
A
H
H
H
That
he's
a
very
thorough
guy,
so
he
took
he
did
the
right
way
so
anyway,
of
course,
Carolyn's
done
a
beautiful
job.
She
said
it
back
from
the
pathway
and
that
she's
planted
perennials
and
in
summer,
and
so
it
disappears
it's
very
nice,
so
I
was
hoping.
I
could
do
the
same
thing,
set
it
back
from
the
parkway
and
plant
it
out
so
that
you
couldn't
see
it
essentially
except
in
winter.
H
A
H
B
H
G
B
B
H
I
live
in
a
house
with
it
with
a
hedge
that
we
planted
in
1890
and
it's
a
it's
also
a
front
yard
I'm
step
back
from
Lake,
so
yeah
I
had
I
didn't
know
about
the
fence
rule
well,.
B
H
The
house
has
been
empty,
the
house
was
left,
there
was
nothing
done
to
it
for
years
and
years
and
years
and
years
and
years
it's
a
I,
saw
it's
a
problem
house
it's
by
far
the
worst
house
in
within
father
in
a
fit
of
the
direction.
So
no
one
wanted
to
touch
it
except
the
bugs,
and
it
was
probably
six
months
away
from
falling
completely
falling
apart.
So
I
decided
I
wanted
to
do
something
about
it,
because
I
have
a
vested
interest
in
my
community,
not
just
as
developer.
H
I
live
a
block
away
and
it'll
be
doing
kids
to
move
in
there
and
I've
had
a
kid
doing.
For
you
know,
12
years,
I've
got
three
kids
come
through
there,
so
I'm,
almost
our
landscaper
and
you
know
I
the
property
just
drives
me
nuts
I
Drive
about
every
day.
So
it's
got
to
be
used
for
something
it
is.
It
could
be.
You
know
that
the
house
is
not
in
the
middle
of
the
light.
It's
in
the
back
right
hand
corner,
so
it
does.
H
It
does
open
it
up
and
it
really
looks
nice
from
like
I
said
from
from
the
southeast.
It
could
be
really
pretty
who
wants
to
buy
it?
Why
not
create
an
entry-level
home
for
a
young
family
in
evanston?
There's,
hardly
any
you
know
it's
really
expensive.
So
I
think
this
is
a
girl
and
I
know
for
a
fact.
People
like
this.
This
is
a
great
opportunity
for
someone
with
the
young
child
or
children
to
access
to
do
a
district
for
not
much
so.
H
B
I
B
H
Want
to
be
closed
off
visually
at
all,
it's
purely
for
safety,
it's
purely
I've,
you
know
I've
had
kids
and
it
was
just
a
blessing
one
having
somewhere
for
them
to
run
around
summer
and
then
to
having
a
basement.
You
know,
so
I
do
not
want
a
visual
barrier
at
all
in
any
way
I
would
make
defense
could
but-
and
it
doesn't
need
to
be
closed
in
any
way,
I
think
the
rear
fence
is
a
different
matter.
H
H
B
H
B
H
H
H
So
that,
as
long
as
it
gives
you
know,
400
square
foot
for
a
kid
to
throw
a
ball,
do
we
thought
I
mean
you
know
what
I
mean
it's
if
I
return
it
back
to
the
house,
my
out
of
that
I
think
it's
too
small
I
would
probably
up
to
you,
know:
I,
don't
know
it's
been
four
thousand
dollars
in
planet
mature,
a
hedge,
but
if
you
returned
it
with
those
words
are
and
then
you
had
the
front
steps
open.
Ya
know,
it
looks,
that's
probably
better.
B
J
I
F
C
A
So
in
actuality,
the
proposal
that
is
before
us
on
our
description
includes
a
four
foot:
high
wood,
picket
fence
with
seventy
percent
opacity.
But
that
sounds
like
that
is
not
what
you're
proposing
at
this
point
based
off
of
the
image
that
we
have
seen
and
the
general
conversation
that
you've
been
having
with
us
cuz.
B
J
A
H
A
B
Yes,
sir,
do
you
only
have
to
be
the
only
place
that
I'm
you
guys
know
that
I
get
stuck
on
porches
right
because
of
what
they
can
be
in
the
future?
So
I
do
like
that.
It
makes
the
neighborhood
friendlier
I
do
like
that.
It
gets
people
outdoors
I
do
like
that.
It
actually
helps
with
the
elevation
of
this
house,
because
this
is
not
an
attractive
house.
B
What
I
would
like
to
do
is:
can
we
put
in
the
ordinance
that
you
can't
and
close
this
porch
in
the
future,
because
it
doubles
the
size
of
the
house
and
that's
no
longer
appropriate,
and
then
it's
no
longer
an
entry
level
and
an
entry?
And
that's
one
of
the
other
things
I
see
here
right
is
it's
not
exclusively
for
money,
because
I
think
it's
important
to
have
entry-level
homes
in
evanston,
which
is
one
of
my
key
points
about
all
these
giant
additions.
We
get.
B
G
J
A
Think
that
that's
perfectly
fine
for
us
to
do,
because
it's
one
of
the
things
can
we
often
get
s
at
a
later
date
to
enclose
a
porch
and
so
I
think
that
if
we
made
the
approval
that
we
give
on
this
conditional
on
the
fact
that
that
not
be
approved,
that
would
also
be
giving
direction
to
any
future
boards
who
may
hear
this
and
whereas
they
are
not
necessarily
duty
bound
to
it.
At
least.
They
know
where
our
thinking
was
and
when
we
approve
this
with
that
condition.
A
B
Board
the
only
thing
is
I'm,
also,
probably
the
only
one
who
had
a
problem
with
the
fence
and
again
just
because
I,
like
the
idea
of
trying
to
keep
as
much
of
the
front
yard,
open
that
porch
open
to
everything.
So
mr.
Lawson
was
amenable
to
moving
it
and
reducing
some
of
his.
What
he's
asking
for?
How
does
anybody
else
feel
about
that?
I.
A
Think
it's
sign
again
to
to
put
that
condition
in
as
well
as
making
it
on
the
condition
like
I
said
currently
before
us.
We
had
a
four
foot
high.
Seventy
percent,
opacity
and
I.
Think
a
lot
of
people
would
have
had
an
issue
with
that,
but
when
it's
being
shared
that
it
will
be
a
three-foot-high,
picket
fence,
I,
think
that
lessens
the
anxiety
of
the
board
and
finding
things
and,
of
course
anything
we
can
do
to
create
a
little
more
openness.
A
B
A
C
G
A
A
A
The
fact
that
this
had
been
somewhat
of
a
neglected
building
that
seemed
to
be
a
very
very
small
house
of
about
800
square
feet,
really
sort
of
made
it
not
very
practical
for
this
neighborhood
and
so
I
think
by
turning
it
into
a
a
starter
home
that
will
provide
the
space
that
a
typical
family
would
need
definitely
will
have
an
increase
on
the
joining
properties
in
terms
of
the
use
of
the
enjoyment.
Nothing
like
on
your
front
porch
and
having
to
look
at
a
neglected
building
across
the
street.
A
So
I
believe
that
this
standard
has
been
met.
Number
two:
the
requested
variation
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
The
zoning
ordinance
obviously
would
like
us
to
keep
a
wide
variety
of
homes
available
to
people
of
all
incomes
and
walks
of
life.
So
it
is
nice
to
see
that
there
is
interest
being
paid
here
in
making
a
starter
home
that
would
be
priced
and
built
to
accommodate
a
starting
family.
A
So
I
believe
that
this
standard
has
been
met.
Number
three,
the
alleged
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
is
peculiar
to
the
property.
When
we
look
at
the
fact
that
this
is
an
existing
structure
and
the
fact
that
it
is
on
a
fairly
small
lot,
it's
on
one
of
our
infamous
corner
lots
that
sort
of
is
is
not
the
typical
standard
lot
that
we
would
like
to
see.
I
believe
that
this
does
present
some
hardship
and
our
difficulty
based
on
the
layout
of
the
property
and
therefore
I,
believe
this
standard
has
been
met.
A
A
It
really
does
need
to
have
a
certain
level
of
amenities,
even
if
it
is
a
starter
home
and
obviously
trying
to
sell
this
property
in
the
condition
that
is
in
would
make
no
sense
and,
as
we
have
heard
and
I
mentioned
before,
the
property
did
sit
vacant
for
a
long
time.
So
obviously
there
were
a
number
of
people
who
did
not
have
an
interest
in
this
property,
so
I
believe
this
standard
has
been
met.
Number
five.
The
purpose
of
the
variation
is
not
based
exclusively
upon
a
desire
to
extract
additional
income
from
the
property.
A
I
believe
this
standard
has
been
met.
We
again
have
had
disc
about
whether
income
isn't
as
a
matter.
We
always
believe,
of
course,
that
people
should
be
able
to
make
a
profit
off
of
their
homes,
and
especially
people
who
are
in
the
business
of
developing
these
homes
provide
a
much-needed
benefit
to
the
neighborhood,
because
they
sometimes
can
do
things
that
I
property
owner
themselves
would
not
necessarily
want
to
do
by
buying
a
home
and
then
have
to
live
through
a
year
and
a
half
of
renovations.
A
So,
whereas
we
do
acknowledge
that
income
will
be
will
be
drawn
from
this,
we
don't
see
the
home
being
overly
a
grande
iced
or
anything
like
that.
So
I
believe
that
this
standard
has
been
met.
Number
six,
the
alleged
difficulty
or
hardship
has
not
been
created
by
any
person
having
an
interest
in
the
property.
The
the
applicant
purchased
the
property
in
the
condition
that
it
is
in
and
without
him
taking
some
action.
The
property
would
cease
to
exist,
probably
in
a
very
short
period
of
time.
A
B
A
B
The
applicant
also
applied
for
zoning
relief
to
construct
a
fence
and
or
I
move
to
approve
that
with
the
following
conditions:
that
the
fence
is
no
higher
than
3
feet
with
fifty
percent
opacity
and
that,
on
the
east
side
of
the
property,
the
fens
to
die
into
the
house
on
the
north
side
and
on
the
east
side.
Leaving
the
front
yard
in
front
of
the
house.
Open.
A
A
H
H
B
J
B
A
I
look
right
so
just
for
the
record
I
have
drawn
onto
the
little
print
out.
Melissa
has
given
me.
J
J
A
H
A
A
For
moved
and
seconded
to
continue
the
matter
for
1901
dumpster
to
our
meet
on
life.
First,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye
opposed
motion
carries.
Is
there
any
other
issues
to
be
brought
before
the
board?
This
evening?
I
will
just
say
that
the
peckish
pig
is
now
open
on
Howard,
which
is
our
new
little
brew
pub
down
in
my
neighborhood,
so
I
invite
everyone
to
come
down
and
enjoy
some
handcrafted
beers
and
some
very
good
food,
none
of
which
is
heart
healthy.
Where.