►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 11/7/2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
and
welcome
this
is
a
public
hearing
of
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals
of
the
city
of
Evanston.
The
zoning
ordinance
directs
this
body
to
hear
applications
for
major
variations,
special
uses
and
appeals
from
decisions
of
the
Zoning
Administrator.
Depending
on
the
type
of
matter.
The
board
will
either
make
a
final
determination
or
send
its
recommendation
to
City
Council
Melissa.
Will
you
call
the
roll.
C
A
Seven
people
here
we
have
a
quorum
tonight
also
present
tonight
our
zoning
planner
Melissa
Klotz
and
Planning
and
Zoning
Administrator
Scott
Mangum.
This
is
a
formal
meeting
and
there
are
rules
that
govern
our
proceedings.
Most
importantly,
only
one
person
speaks
at
a
time
so
that
all
testimony
may
be
accurately
recorded.
Anyone
who
wishes
to
address
the
board
regarding
any
matter
on
the
agenda
will
have
the
opportunity
to
do
so
at
the
appropriate
time.
A
Our
procedure
is
to
hear
from
staff
on
the
documents
on
file
and
then
receive
testimony
and
other
evidence
from
the
applicant
or
appellant
next.
Persons
who
wish
to
make
a
statement
regarding
the
matter
may
do
so
at
that
time,
any
person
with
a
legal
interest
in
property
located
within
500
feet
of
the
subject.
Property
may
present
evidence
reasonably
question
witnesses
or
seek
a
continuance
of
the
hearing.
When
all
supporting
and
opposing
testimony
and
statements
have
been
heard,
the
applicant
or
appellant
will
be
given
the
opportunity
for
rebuttal
or
a
closing
statement.
A
Then
the
board
will
close
the
record
and
begin
deliberations
while
testimony
will
be
under
oath,
although
we
do
not
apply
the
strict
rules
of
evidence.
Please
limit
your
testimony
or
statement
to
your
personal
knowledge
when
you
address
the
board,
please
state
your
name
and
address
and
sign
in
on
the
provided
sheet.
Our
meetings
are
audio
and
video
recorded.
Please
make
sure
that
you
are
in
a
microphone
when
asking
questions
or
making
statements,
so
they
can
be
properly
recorded.
All
proceedings
are
subject
to
broadcast
at
a
later
date.
A
Any
manner
not
concluded
at
tonight's
hearing
will
be
continued
to
our
next
regularly
scheduled
meeting.
There
are
two
items
on
the
agenda
this
evening
is
14:02
Lincoln,
Street
here
and
10:15
McDaniel
great
everybody's
here.
So
the
first
thing
we
will
do
on
our
agenda
is
to
review
and
approve
the
meeting
minutes
23
motions
because
there
were
different
people
at
different
meetings.
Yes,.
D
A
A
A
A
Moved
and
seconded
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
those
not
voting,
we're
not
present,
which
again
was
stopped
all
right.
So
now
we're
moving
on
to
new
business,
which
is
14:02
Lincoln
Street
and
before
we
do
that
anybody
who's
going
to
speak
at
tonight's
meeting.
Can
you
raise
your
right
hand
and
say
anybody
speak?
Do
you
swear
or
affirm,
to
tell
the
truth
throughout
the
course
of
these
proceedings?
B
Brennan
property
owner
applies
for
major
zoning
relief
to
locate
a
previously
constructed
solar
house
single-family
residence
in
the
r1
single-family
residential
district.
The
applicant
requests
a
10-foot
front
yard
setback
where
27
feet
is
required.
Zoning
code
section
6,
8
to
8
a
1,
a
26
point;
4
foot,
rear
yard
setback
where
30
feet
is
required.
Zoning
code,
section
6,
8
to
8
a
4
and
47%
impervious
surface
coverage
where
45%
is
permitted
from
input
section
6
eight
to
ten.
The
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals
is
the
determining
body
for
this
case.
B
Documents
included
as
part
of
the
record
include
variation
application,
submitted,
October,
9th
2017
zoning
analysis,
plat
of
survey,
site
plan,
elevation,
renderings,
image
of
property,
aerial
view
of
property,
zoning
map
of
property
and
dappered
draft
meeting
minutes
excerpt
of
October
25th
2017.
It's.
G
Thanks
everyone.
For
your
time,
my
name
is
Gerald
Brennan
I
own
the
property
at
1402,
Lincoln
Street,
it's
a
95
or
96
year
old
house,
currently
that's
under
deconstruction
by
the
evidence
and
rebuilding
warehouse,
and
my
hope
is
to
replace
it
with
the
house
by
Northwestern
solar
house,
as
Melissa
gesture
read
due
to
the
unique
shape
of
the
house.
It
does,
as
you
see
here,
exceed
the
allotment
for
setback
in
the
front.
One
item
for
consideration
for
the
board
is
that
my
lot
is
somewhat
unusual
in
that
it's
not
easily
accessible.
G
G
The
plan
is
to
have
the
house
available
for
educational
programming,
both
for
northwestern
students
and
Evanston
School
District
students,
I,
don't
know
if
that
would
be
considered
a
factor
for
your
consideration.
But
it's
something
that's
important
to
me.
I
have
two
neighbors
here:
two
in
support
timber
le
at
1405
Lincoln
I
held
a
meeting
at
my
house
about
two
months
ago
with
alderman
Revell,
seventh
Ward
Alderman,
and
we
had
about
15
neighbors
come
to
the
house
and
professor
ko
walked
them
through
the
whole
project.
G
We
had
unanimous
support
of
all
the
neighbors
who
attended,
including
my
neighbors,
immediately
surrounding
my
house.
They
may
be
coming
here.
They
weren't
sure
if
they
could
get
here
or
not,
but
that's
Carol
build
and
Barb
Gary.
They
live
immediately
adjacent
to
my
house
and
our
supportive
of
the
project.
H
G
H
G
House
there's
one
other
house
on
Wesley
and
Lincoln:
it's
1,400,
Wesley,
barb,
Gary's
house
and
Barb's
house
is
actually
closer
to
Wesley
than
what
we're
proposing
here
with
the
solar
house.
It
would
be
considered
her
side
yard
because
her
house
faces
Lincoln
she's,
a
big
front
yard
coming
up
to
Lincoln
and
did.
H
H
H
G
It's
really
great,
that's
like
I,
said
an
unusual
lot
and
then
it
doesn't
have
the
traditional
neighbor
set
up
for
most
blocks
in
the
city.
D
H
A
I
have
a
question
about
the
plan.
Is
there
somebody
who
can
actually
answer
that
question
so
the
concern
I
have
is,
and
there
are
four
steps
to
get
up
at
the
front
of
the
house
and
there's
only
one
step
into
the
rear
entry,
so
either
the
grade
must
pitch
up
or
you
guys
are
gonna
end
up
making
some
changes
in
the
back.
A
G
G
A
G
A
My
concern
is
right,
if
you
have
to,
if
you
move
those
steps
to
the
outside,
we're
now
talking
about
more
impervious
surface
coverage
right,
because
now
you
have
a
landing
and
more
steps
and
that
whole
deal
there
seems
to
be
space
on
the
inside,
where
you
could
take
care
of
that.
Can
you
agree
to
take
care
of
that
on
the
inside,
so
that
we're
not
changing
or
increasing
any
of
the
things
that
you're
applying
for
tonight?
Sure.
A
G
G
G
G
C
G
G
Currently
there,
the
house
was
positioned
on
this
lot
before
the
current
city
code
and
the
sewer
runs
between
my
neighbor's
house,
my
houses
and
that's
no
longer
acceptable,
so
Toberman.
In
addition
to
surveying
the
new
drainage
recommendation,
is
providing
a
survey
and
design
for
the
sewer
line
and
within
that
they're,
taking
into
consideration
the
drainage
for
the
whole
lot
the
whole
site
to
accommodate
it,
training
into
a
new
sewer
line
on
Leslie.
C
C
Iii
think
that
it's
I
mean
I
did
read
through
the
entire
packet
and
I
think
that
it's
I
would
love
for
people
to
see
a
totally
solar
house
placed
in
Evanston
successfully.
So
I
can
understand
that,
but
I
know
that
sometimes
there
are
concerns.
Zoning
concerns
in
our
one
district
to
you
have
kind
of
public
events,
I.
Think
on
an
informal
basis,
though
I
can't
imagine
that
anyone
would
object.
G
E
A
G
A
A
I
I
I
Say:
hi
I'm,
Sonia
Nord,
all
I
live
at
one
507,
Colfax
and
I'm
literally
about
to
three
houses
away
and
I,
walk
by
that
beautiful
lot.
All
the
time
and
envy
it
dearly
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
fantastic
for
the
neighborhood
and
I
have
not
heard
anyone
say
anything
except
for
yay.
We
can't
wait
to
see
it
so
I
haven't
heard
one
one
whisper
of
like
what's
happening,
except
for
we
can't
wait
to
see
it
great.
E
F
Think
having
a
model
home
in
Evanston,
that's
based
on
sustainable
energy,
is
great
not
only
for
the
neighborhood,
but
also
for
the
city.
It's
a
good
example
also
of
the
interaction
between
the
University
and
and
residents
of
the
city
and
I
appreciate
the
lengths
that
the
applicant
has
gone
to
to
this
point
to.
F
Make
this
the
least
deviation
necessary
from
the
zoning
ordinance
requirements
in
terms
of
eliminating
what
otherwise
would
have
been
a
very
nice
sunroom
in
the
interest
of
decreasing
the
lot
coverage
and
impervious
surface
requests
in
in
the
case
of
lot
coverage.
There's
no
request
and
the
property
is
somewhat
unique,
and
this
I
think
is
a
it's
unique
in
the
way
it
faces,
and
it's
also
unique
in
its
size
and
that
it
only
has
a
certain
amount
of
buildable
space
on
the
lot
to
begin
with
so
I'm
completely
in
favor
of
the
project.
H
I
echo
many
of
Scott's
statements.
This
is
the
first
time
I've
seen
this
lot.
You
know,
I
haven't
come
upon
it
and
I
was
instantly
taken
by
its
orientation
to
the
park
and
when
I
was
there
evidenced
in
rebuilding
warehouse,
was
there
deconstructing
the
the
current
physical
meaning
of
the
current
structure,
so
I
appreciate
sort
of
the
environmental
consideration
of
you
know
reusing
we're
using
those
materials,
and
you
know
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
showcase
you
know
an
interesting
and
innovative
design
of
northwestern
and
I
think
it's
a
really
exciting
project
and
I
I
echo.
J
A
A
You
have
found
another
another
path
that
requires
the
least
deviation.
However,
I
do
think
that
the
public
benefit
of
this
particular
house
ways
that,
in
this
particular
instance,
and
in
this
in
this
location,
I
think
the
benefit
of
having
a
I
Scott
said
a
a
model
house
that
is
truly
sustainable
in
our
community,
which
values
that
sustainability
is
a
good
thing
and
I
think
there's
definitely
a
public
benefit
to
that.
So
with
that,
we
will
now
go
through
the
seven
standards
of
major
variations
and
your
goth
can.
H
I
just
add
a
point:
absolutely
will
not
pertinent
to
our
zoning
request
and
I
haven't
approached
the
lot
from
the
park.
It
would
be
interesting
if
they
could
include
if
northwestern,
could
include
some
sort
of
placard
or
something
that
tells
the
story
of
this
house
so
that
you
know,
as
people
are
appreciating
it
from
the
park
that
there's
some.
You
know
that
it
extends
educational
benefit.
H
D
A
Is
not
include
the
park,
though
right
it's
a
golf
course,
so
we
don't
really
have
the
rights
to
that
I
do
want.
Yes,
that's
right
since
I
do
have
somebody
from
Northwestern
here
who
worked
on
the
project.
I
would
love
it
for
next
year's
house.
If
you'd
work
with
zoning
to
try
and
get
a
module
that
fits
on
our
Lots,
so
we
don't
have
to
keep
redoing
this.
It's
in
our
interest,
it's
in
your
interest
to
try
and
get
it
to
fit
on
an
Evanston
lot,
so
we
don't
have
to
keep
redoing
variances
and.
A
Absolutely
all
right
now
we'll
go
back
to
standards
or
major
variations.
It's
number
one.
The
requested
variation
will
not
have
a
substantial
adverse
impact
on
the
used,
enjoyment
or
property
values
of
adjoining
properties.
It
certainly
will
not
I
think
that
it
will
increase
the
values
of
joining
properties,
given
that
it's
a
a
very
modern
and
award-winning
design,
and
that
is
substantially
more
so
architecturally
significant
than
the
existing
house
on
the
site.
So
I
do
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
Number
two:
the
requested
variation
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
A
Okay,
so
there's
only
who
introduced
wants
you
to
be
able
to
improve
your
property
and
and
I'm
gonna
go
a
little
bit
left
here
and
say.
The
comprehensive
plan
is
an
interest
in
these
sorts
of
sustainable
projects,
and
so
it's
certainly
within
the
keeping
of
that
comprehensive
plan
and
thereby
the
zoning
ordinance.
So
I
do
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
Number
three,
the
alleged
hardship
or
practical
difficulty
is
peculiar
to
this
property.
A
A
The
other
peculiarities
related
to
the
public
benefit
of
using
this.
This
house
that
this
award-winning
house
that
has
that's
already
been
built
is
that
it's
been
built,
and
so
the
modifications
that
have
been
made
to
it
have
been
made
as
much
as
they
can
so.
I
do
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
A
A
If,
if
we
apply
all
of
the
zoning,
the
front
yard
side,
yard,
rear
yard,
lock
coverages,
this
unique
house
could
not
be
located
on
nearly
any
lot
in
Evanston
as
I
understand
it
from
many
other
Lots
were
looked
at
and
it
was
very
difficult
to
find
a
spot
that
had
the
correct
orientation
to
the
Sun
as
well
as
the
least
number
of
variants
is
necessary
to
make
it
work.
So
I
do
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
Number
five.
A
The
purpose
of
the
variation
is
not
based
exclusively
upon
a
desire
to
extract
additional
income
from
the
property
or
there's
a
public
benefit
and
I'm
going
with
public
benefit
on
here,
though,
I
don't
believe
you're
you're
in
it
to
flip
it
and
make
some
cash,
but
that
do
you
believe
the
public
benefit
standard
applies
here,
because
there
is
a
benefit
to
having
this
sort
of
development
happen
in
evanston
in
a
community
that
clearly
supports
this
kind
of
this
kind
of
development.
So
I
do
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
A
Number
six,
the
alleged
difficulty
or
hardship,
has
not
been
created
by
any
person
having
an
interest
in
the
property.
This
is
a
my
guess,
close
to
100
year
old
house,
on
a
lot
that
was
located
on
the
lot
before
current
zoning
regulations
were
in
place,
so
I
do
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
Number
seven.
The
requested
variation
requires
the
least
deviation
from
the
applicable
regulation
among
the
feasible
options
identified
before
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals.
A
Although
the
applicant
admitted
that
there
could
be
a
way
to
do
this
without
any
variances
I
do
believe
that
this
particular
scope.
This
particular
project
does
reduce
the
degree
of
nonconformity
of
the
existing
house
on
the
lot.
So
what
we
get
rid
of
the
good
things
we
that
happen
from
a
zoning
perspective
are
we
get
rid
of
a
detached
front?
Ker-Rah,
a
detached
garage
in
the
front
yard.
We
get
a
rear
yard,
that's
closer
to
a
compliant
location.
A
F
H
F
D
A
B
David
and
Robin,
so
property
owners
appeal
the
zoning
administrators
decision
to
partially
deny
minor
zoning
relief
case
number
17,
ZM
and
B
0
0
7
6
to
construct
a
2
car
detached
garage
in
the
r2
single-family
residential
district.
The
appellant
was
granted
minor
zoning
relief
to
construct
a
1
car
detached
garage
with
a
maximum
building
footprint
of
12
feet
by
22
feet
in
compliance
with
all
required
setbacks
and
subject
to
the
removal
of
the
north,
concrete,
walk
within
the
front
and
side
yards
for
a
maximum
building.
B
Lot
coverage
of
43.8%
an
impervious
surface
coverage
of
50
6.8%.
The
appellant
was
denied
minor
zoning
relief
for
a
twenty
by
twenty
two-foot
garage
with
49.7%
building
lot
coverage
where
a
maximum
forty
percent
is
permitted.
Zoning
code
section
six
836,
65.5%
impervious
surface
coverage,
where
a
maximum
55
percent
is
permitted.
Zoning
code
Section
six,
eight
three,
nine
forty
eight
point:
nine
percent
of
the
rear
yard
occupied
by
an
accessory
structure
where
a
maximum
forty
percent
is
permitted.
B
Zoning
code
section
six,
four:
six:
three:
a
two
foot:
south
interior
side,
yard
setback
where
three
feet
is
required,
so
Code,
section,
6,
837
and
a
1
foot,
south
interior
side
yard
setback
for
an
EVE
yard
obstruction
where
an
EVE
may
extend
10%
or
6
inches
into
a
setback.
Zoning
Code,
section
6,
4,
1
9,
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals,
is
the
determining
body
for
this
case.
A
A
K
So,
as
Melissa
said,
we
initially
proposed-
or
our
builder
proposed
a
2-1
T
by
22
foot
garage
to
allow
us
to
park
two
cars
inside
you
know
the
the
main
hardship
is
our
property
is
very
narrow
and
small.
It
was
built
in,
like
the
house
was
built
in
1960,
it's
actually.
My
parent
grandparent
bought
the
house.
K
K
K
You
know
limit
the
variations,
but
I
think
that's
been
small
as
a
two-car
garage
can
be.
We
did
also
suggest
that
we
can
remove
some
of
the
walkway
that
goes
from
the
back
of
the
house
to
the
alley,
since
we
wouldn't
need
an
area
to
shovel
to
get
to
the
alley
in
the
garbage
cans
afore
you
so
that
will
help
reduce
the
impermeable
surface
and
I
think
that's
pretty
much.
All
I
can
think.
H
E
C
You
have
noted
that
the
homes
on
your
block
that
have
the
two-car
garages
generally
have
larger
Lots,
so
I
think
that
one
of
the
problems
I'm
having
with
this
is
that
the
Zoning
Administrator
has
has
given
you
the
option
that
Falls
is
still
requires.
Some
deviation
from
zoning,
but
not
quite
as
egregiously
as
you
are
hoping
to
get
with
a
two-car
garage.
So
it
sounds
as
though
you
may
be
inherited
this
from
your
grandmother.
We.
L
He
wanted
a
garage
he
had
his
way.
We'd
have,
he
said,
might
actually
be
somewhere
else
where
he
could
have.
You
know
like
a
three-car
garage
and
so
one
of
the
kind
of
concessions
I
wanted
to
be
in
Evanston
I
liked
neither
city
I
liked
Evanston
was
you
know
this
is
the
first
improvement,
we're
actually
making
in
the
house
so
right
and
also
what
he
didn't
mention
is
I'm
disabled,
and
so
we
do
have
two
cars
and
it
is
a
problem,
especially
in
the
winter
or
I'm.
L
Basically,
my
body
sleeps
until
the
afternoon,
so
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
my
car
will
get
plowed
in
unless
he
takes
care
of
both
cars
shovels.
One
of
our
neighbors
is
elderly,
so
he'll
help
with
there.
So
it's
in
the
winter,
it's
a
hardship,
and
you
know
it
was
kind
of
annoying
to
have
my
car
in
the
public
way
if
it's
not
where
it
should
be,
but.
F
K
H
And
do
you
plan
to
help
me
understand,
what's
happening
with
the
car
that
doesn't
have
an
engine?
Are
you
actively
working
on
that
car,
and
so
ultimately,
it
will
be
actively
used
and
therefore
can
be
parked
on
the
street?
Do
you
plan
on
selling
and
disposing
of
it
what's
happening
with
that?
Car
is.
K
L
L
Two
houses
adjacent
that
don't
have
garages,
they
don't
have
plans
of
I
think
they
were
worried
about
setting
a
precedent.
This
was
previously
discussed
and
one
definitely
has
no
plans
to
make
the
garage
and
the
other.
It
would
be
something
that
fit
in
code
just
slightly
larger
than
shed
it's
a
big
motorcycle.
So.
A
The
generic
you,
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
very
much.
Does
anybody
need
to
hear
from
the
Zoning
Administrator
we
have
questions
for
him.
Anybody
anybody,
okay,
all
right!
So
what
we're
gonna
start
with
is
we're
going
to
start
with
affirming
or
denying
the
decision
of
the
Zoning
Administrator
and
then
based
on
that
we'll
see
where
we
go
with
this
so
tell
me,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
gonna,
close
the
record.
Tell
me
what
your
thoughts
are.
C
You
know,
I
would
hope
that
maybe
you
can
I
would
think
that
a
one
car
garage
would
be
much
less
to
construct
than
a
two-car
garage
and
that
maybe
that
opens
the
possibility
for
you
to
rent
a
garage
nearby
in
the
neighborhood
for
the
project
car
and
still
just
have
one
on
the
street.
But
I.
Don't
I,
don't
see
how
we
override
the
zoning
administrator's
finding,
because
it
is
it's
consistent
with
the
zoning
they're
trying
to
make
allowances
for
the
one
car
garage.
A
As
well,
I
just
like
to
emphasize
the
open
space
as
well,
so
with
a
two-car
garage.
It's
only
ten
feet.
I
mean
it's
just
over
ten
feet,
which
is
the
minimum
allowable
between
the
between
the
house
and
an
accessory
structure
and
a
10
foot
backyard
as
open
space
doesn't
really
fit
with
the
neighborhood
and
the
way
that
Evanston's
housing
stock
is
so
I
agree
to
affirm
the
Zoning
Administrator
as
well.
A
E
I
went
over
there
and
it
is
so
small
back
there
that
I
really
can't
even
imagine
that
you
could
safely
fit
a
two-car
garage,
I'm
sure
you
could
figure
it
out
with
design
and
I
know
that
almost
everybody
on
your
blog
does
have
a
garage,
and
there
was
nothing
in
a
very
small
patch
of
grass
when
I
went
over
there
to
look
at
it.
But
I
also
feel
like
that.
The
Zoning
administrators
decision
was
the
best
choice.
You.
J
A
lot
too
and
you're
right
by
the
way
the
neighboring
Lots
they
are
not
not
too
large,
I
would
say,
but
they
are
larger
than
this
one.
And
it's
true
that
on
the
perpendicular
street
and
al-adel
there
are
two
car
garages.
They
still
seem
a
little
bit
overloading
to
the
place,
but
they
have
large
a
lot,
although
once
again,
not
so
much
larger,
so
in
your
case,
I
would
I
would
stay
with
the
Zoning
Administrator
I
believe
that
his
decision
is
right.
J
It
is,
you
will
be
really
overloading
you
a
lot
and
I
would
say
the
neighborhood
with
a
two-car
garage.
It's
it's
really
too
much
and
the
space
between
the
garage
and
the
building
becomes
really
small.
It's
ten
feet,
I
believe
by
memory.
It's
really
nothing.
Unfortunately,
your
building
is
a
kind
of
a
larger
than
the
rest
buildings,
the
rest
of
the
buildings,
and
it
is
almost
small
a
lot,
and
this
brings
all
these
parameters
that
actually
cannot
be
kept,
and
we
cannot
I.
J
M
M
N
F
A
A
B
C
A
All
right
so
with
that
is
very
good,
yeah
all
right,
so
there
are
five
standards
for
a
minor
variance,
and
the
first
is
that
the
practical
difficulty
is
not
self-created.
This
is
an
existing
house
that
was
built
according
to
the
owners
in
the
1960s,
and
the
house
has
obviously
been
there.
The
zoning
was
long
before
cars
owning
rules,
so
that
standard
has
been
met.
The
requested
variation
will
not
have
a
substantial
adverse
impact
on
the
used
enjoyment
or
property
values
of
adjoining
properties.
A
I
do
believe
it
will
have
a
substantial
impact,
given
the
huge
mass
relative
to
the
size
of
a
lot
and
the
size
of
the
house
of
the
existing
house
on
the
lot
by
decree.
That's
so
much
a
bulk
on
the
property
given
the
size
of
the
property
and
the
loss
of
open
space
in
green
space
I
think
that's
a
detriment,
so
I
don't
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
I
would.
E
A
Burn
I'm,
looking
at
you
cuz,
you
got
a
you
got
a
disagree
with
me
one
one
of
these.
The
requested
variation
is
in
keeping
with
the
comprehensive
general
plan
and
these
zoning
ordinance
the
proposed
the
variation
isn't
in
keeping
with
the
zoning
ordinance
it,
since
it
would
increase
the
bulk
of
the
property
beyond
what
is
what
is
typical
for
that
neighborhood.
It
would
also
create
overcrowding
of
structures
by
having
them
be
so
close
and
so
large
on
the
lot.
So
I
do
not
believe
that
that
standard
has
been
met.
A
Number
four:
the
requested
variation
is
consistent
with
the
preservation
policies
set
forth
in
the
comprehensive
general
plan.
The
proposed
variation
is
for
a
house
outside
of
the
historic
district
so
and
it's
not
the
landmark
property
so
that
standard
has
been
met
and
number
five.
The
requested
variation
requires
the
least
deviation
from
the
applicable
regulation
among
the
feasible
options
identified
before
the
Zoning
Administrator.