►
From YouTube: Hol CC 010822 Special
Description
Hollister City Council Special meeting January 8, 2022
A
B
A
D
B
B
B
C
B
C
C
F
C
C
F
C
Other
option
would
be
is
I
could
leave
a
blank
saying
that
council
adopted
plan
blank
and
then
whatever
you
guys,
adopt
we'll
just
fill
in
that
blank
and
attach
that
map.
That's
another
thing
I
was
thinking
because
I
need
to
place
that
on
the
agenda
for
the
public
to
see,
and
so
I
would
probably
place
all
four
of
the
plans
and
then
say:
council
will
decide
on
one
of
them.
F
F
F
F
F
F
Now.
The
main
reason
that
we're
here
is
that
the
district
boundaries
need
to
be
relatively
equal
in
population
size,
your
total
district
population,
your
total
city
council
city,
boundary
population,
is
41
934,
so
one
fourth
of
that
is
10
484.,
that's
what
we're
aiming
for
for
each
council
district,
but
we
have
some
leeway
and
the
difference
between
the
smallest
and
the
largest
council
district
can
be
up
to
1048
persons.
F
F
F
One
of
the
features
of
that
is
that
district
four
becomes
relatively
large
at
five
point:
four
percent,
one
of
the
nice
things
about
this
plan
is
that
it
goes
all
the
district
4's
boundaries
on
memorial
drive.
So
it's
a
very
clear,
distinct
boundary
in
all
the
plans
that
we're
presenting
council
district
1
is
goes
along,
hillcrest
road
in
the
south
side.
So
that's
another
nice
boundary
here,
district,
two
and
one
boundary
goes
along
line
street
and
then
jogs
to
west
side
and
then
down
powell
street.
F
So
that
was
district.
That
was
plan
one
and
it
has
a
deviation
of
seven
point:
five
percent
and
here's
a
zoomed
in
map
of
plan.
One
and
here
are
the
population
percentages
it
provides.
These
tables
provide
the
race,
ethnicity,
distribution
of
different
different
measures,
total
population
18
and
over
citizens
voting
age
population,
and
then
we
have
some
data
on
registered
and
actual
voters.
We
have
if
they
have
a
spanish
surname
or
an
asian
surname.
F
F
F
F
F
F
And
then
district
four
was
developed
at
the
last
meeting
again
districts.
One
and
two
are
the
same,
and
now
we
have
fairly
identifiable
or
more
clearly
identifiable
boundaries
between
three
and
four
goes
along
airline
highway,
then
valley
view
drive
jogs
over
to
memorial
drive
and
that
is
a
very
clean
boundary.
F
F
D
Thank
you
good
morning.
My
question
is
more
towards
the
actual
I
was
playing
around
with
the
website
itself
and
I
couldn't
only
through
the
help
of
the
staff.
I
was
able
to
finally
navigate
my
way
to
the
current
map,
and
but
when
I
would
adjust
it,
I
wasn't
getting
the
the
calculations
weren't
getting
being
updated.
D
D
D
F
D
D
B
C
D
H
D
I
C
C
B
I
Thanks
for
the
clarification,
one
of
my
concerns
is
a
last-second
rush
for
additional
maps
being
brought
forth
by
the
community.
So
I
I
wonder
if
we
need
to
have
a
formally
recognized
hard
stop,
because
one
of
the
things
I
would
like
the
opportunity
to
have
is
time
to
actually
study
and
analyze
review
and
question
any
thoughts
I
had
on
it,
and
I
don't
want
to
rush
through
this
process
recognizing
this
process
once
we
once
we
adopt
whatever
the
new
council
districts
will
be.
As
I
understand
it,
that's
for
a
10-year
period.
Is
that
correct
that.
I
I
C
We
could
do
another
advertisement
and
place
on
our
website
a
hard
stop
date
of
january
26th,
which
would
be
after
our
fourth
public
hearing,
and
that
we
would
have
the
ability
to
submit
a
good
map
for
the
seventh.
However,
then
yeah
then
on
the
seventh,
you
would
make
your
selection.
We
could
introduce
it.
C
I
F
E
E
So
if
staff
or
the
contractors
are
requesting
to
look
at
that,
then
it
should
be
a
couple
days
before
that,
in
my
opinion,
and
then
also
christine,
I'm
just
wondering
because
last
time
we
met,
we
said
we
were
gonna,
advertise
it
more
to
try
to
get
more
maps
and
try
to
get
more
public
involvement.
Did
you
do
all
of
that?
This
last
from
this
last
meeting
to
this
meeting.
E
We're
gonna,
I
think,
that's
sufficient
enough
in
my
opinion,
if
we
do
another
round
of
advertising-
and
we
do
a
hard
stop
a
few
days
before
the
18
to
allow
the
contractors
to
look
at
it,
I
think
that
we're
abiding
by
the
not
only
the
regulations
but
we're
we're
doing
our
due
diligence.
That's
my
those
are
my
thoughts.
Thank
you.
C
As
it
is,
we
missed
the
deadline
to
advertise
for
the
18th,
because
the
freelance
only
publishes
once
a
week.
So
if
I
were
to
be
able
to
submit
a
public
notice
on
the
the
14th,
they
would
not
be
able
to
advertise
that
till
the
21st
that
wouldn't
go
in
the
paper
until
the
21st
and
we
would
miss
our
18th
deadline.
So
at
this
point
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
put
it
in
the
newspaper.
If
we
upped
that
deadline
to
the
18th.
F
The
fair
maps
act
says
to
it:
wants
you
to
encourage
once
to
encourage
public
participation
and
they
make
several
suggestions
there's,
but
it
is
not
that
specific
so
and
you
have
done
a
lot
of
outreach
already,
I
think
perhaps
the
lack
of
public
participation
is
because
the
plans
are
available.
They
are
very
straightforward
anyway.
I
I
guess
I
shouldn't
speculate.
Why
why
there
isn't
public
participation,
but
you
have
done
your
due
diligence
in
terms
of
encouraging
public
participation.
A
H
H
We
have
the
districts,
but
then
to
highlight
all
the
other
requirements
that
we
have
so
that
we
can
see
from
a
glance
the
various
requirements
and
we
can
properly
analyze
the
information
instead
of
going
back
and
forth.
I
think
we
need
to
make
this
process
simple,
easy
to
understand
and
for
people
to
be
able
to
easily
identify
the
areas
that
are
required,
but
then
also
the
best
interest
for
our
community
members,
so
that
it's
simplified.
A
B
A
A
I
think
what
we
see
often
is
a
last-minute
rush
for
whatever
reason
to
change
things
that
we've
worked
on
for
a
while.
This
has
been
out
there.
I
think
the
information
is,
I
don't
want
to
say
simple
to
understand,
but
it
is
very.
If
you
spend
a
few
minutes
five
ten
minutes,
you
can
understand
the
information
of
what
is
happening
here.
The
lines
are
very
clean.
I
really
think
the
job
that
was
done
by
everyone
here
has
made
it
easy
to
understand.
A
A
Yes,
it
does
and
I
think
the
by
putting
it
off
putting
it
off
we're
going
to
start
having
the
same
things
that
happen
on
some
of
the
other
important
means
we
had
in
the
past,
where
no
one
participated,
and
at
the
very
last
minute
everybody
jumped
in
saying
how
we're
not
being
open
to
the
public.
It's
like.
No,
we
we
were
open
to
the
public
and
the
end
result
was.
A
A
A
C
A
Right,
I
think
if
we
probably
stick
to
the
idea
of
the
14th
to
submit
all
final
plans
and
it's
a
again
if
the
public
wants
to
be
involved,
that's
great
to
submit
those
plans
and
then
we
can
kind
of
move
forward.
It
gives
you
time
to
review
them
by
the
18th.
We
can
discuss
it
and
start
moving
forward.
I
I
just
think
it
might
be
a
mistake
to
keep
putting
it
off
and
put
it
off.
C
F
C
A
A
A
Because
you
needed
seven
days
anyways
and
which
we
want
that's
fair,
correct
yeah.
We
just
want
to
follow
the
rules,
but
I
think
we
there's
a
point
where
we
we
move
forward
and
we
don't
just
keep
extending
extended,
extending,
as
I
said,
we've
seen
that
in
the
past
and
all
we
found
in
the
end
was
really
very
little
participation
from
those
that
were
wanting
to
be
involved
but
really
never
participated.
So
hopefully
we
get
some
more.
I
think
there's
been
an
effort
to
get
that
the
word
out.
F
And
I
can't
remember:
are
these
plans
specifically
put
on
your
website
like
stated
plan,
one
two,
three
and
four
that
is
correct.
The
website
yeah,
that's
ideal,
I
mean
that's
what
people
are
doing
like
a
section
draft
plans
or
plans
on
being
reviewed
and
then
they're
listed
on
the
website,
and
that
is
how,
in
my
mind,
that's
how
most
people
are
reviewing
plans,
not
from
the
newspaper
whatever
people
are
going
to
the
website
and
the
fair
maps
act
really
stresses
the
website.
E
E
I
was
just
wondering
because
christina
it
seems
like
you're
very
interested
in
getting
the
freelance,
and
I
would
too,
if
it's
possible,
if
we
cut
it
off,
if
we
do
a
hard
stop,
as
the
mayor
suggested,
the
14th,
which
is
friday
january
the
14th,
would
you
then
have
enough
time
to
put
it
in
the
freelance?
As
you
would
like
to
do
all
the
maps
it
doesn't
have
to
come
before
us
you're.
E
And
and
either
way,
I
think
that
there's
no
specifics.
Let's
say
we
have
to
put
the
paper
we've
advertised
it
more
than
every
meeting
we've
asked
for
more
than
enough
advertisement,
so
I
don't
understand.
I
say:
I'm
gonna
go
with
the
contractor
on
this
hard
stop
a
few
days
before,
so
that
they
can
have
time
to
review
it.
We'll
have
all
the
maps
on
the
18th,
so
we
can
review
them
and
then
we
can
adopt
at
the
next
regular
scheduled
meeting
for
city
council
is
what
I
would
suggest.
Thank
you.
A
I
I
I
would
say
paul:
do
we
have
an
ability
to
track
the
number
of
hits
on
the
website
to
see
it?
How
many
people
have
actually
gone
on
to
this?
To
look
at
this
because
again,
I
think
we
can
only
do
so
much.
We've
made
more
than
a
good
faith
effort,
and-
and
so
I'm
curious
about
that-
and
then
finally,
I'd
like
to
hear
mr
epperson's
thoughts
on
the
city's
efforts
to
this
point
in
regards
to
this
process.
Thank
you,
mayor.
B
I
C
D
I
D
I
G
G
It
doesn't
mean
that
more
can't
be
done,
that's
up
to
the
discretion
of
the
council,
but
if,
as
I
understood
your
question,
whether
or
not
we've
satisfied
the
requirements,
I
think
we've
satisfied
those
requirements
and
even
gone
somewhat
above
those
it's
always
up
to
the
discretion
again
of
the
council.
If
it
wants
to
do
more.
I
I
C
I
Right
well,
and
for
me
I
think
you
know
we
have
rules
for
a
reason
or
guidelines,
but
but
in
some
cases
there
must
there
has
to
be
an
exception.
I
mean
this
wouldn't
be
the
first
agenda
packet
we
didn't
get
on
wednesday
and
and
matter
of
fact
recently.
I
think
we
got
one
on
a
friday
or
a
saturday
I
don't
recall,
and
and
so
this
is
important
and
if,
if
we
have
to
extend
there,
I
would
certainly
support
that.
I
can't
speak
for
the
rest
of
the
council,
but
I
certainly
would
recognizing.
B
B
Mayor
can
I
make
a
compromise
here
because
our
our
meeting
is
on
a
tuesday
this
on
in
january,
to
a
point,
then,
you
know
if
it
was
on
monday.
We
would
get
the
agenda
out
on
wednesday,
because
it's
a
tuesday
we
could
get
out
on
thursday.
If
we
made
the
deadline,
the
13th,
then
we
could,
we
could
meet
it's
kind
of
a
semi-compromise.
C
A
Yeah,
if
I
can
city
clerk,
I
I
think
really.
The
agenda
should
be
posted
on
friday.
I
don't
want
the
public
to
come
back
and
say:
look
at
they're
pulling
a
fast
one
on
us.
They
didn't
post
it
till
saturday
and
the
weekend
when
they
know
know
what's
around.
I
think
if
we
could
do
this
by
the
12th
it'll
give
us
time
to
post
by
that
friday,
and
I
think
that
would
give
the
public
the
chance
to
to
see
the
agenda
posted
and
then
we
go
from
there,
I'm
quite
frankly,
I'm
kind
of
disappointed.
A
A
Right
and
that's
why
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
posted
by
that
friday
last
minute,
but
I
can
tell
you:
I
had
zero
people
contact
me
either
through
phone
calls
emails
anything
asking
me
about
using
the
program
or
even
about
this
whole
process
we're
going
through.
So
we
made
the
effort
and
we,
I
know
the
staff
has
worked
hard
to
get
the
information
out
there
and
some
of
the
council
members.
So,
mr
recently,
I
see
your
hand
up
go
ahead,
sir.
Thank
you.
I
was
just.
A
F
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
there's.
It
can
take
us
some
time
to
analyze
the
plan,
especially
to
make
the
map
of
the
formal
map.
But
what
would
happen
by
if
you
have
a
deadline
on
the
12th
you'd
at
least
know
is
a
plan
coming
and
when
they
submit
a
plan,
they'll
submit
some
materials
for
it.
It's
just
that
our
materials
may
not
be
available
for
the
agenda,
but
we
could.
Then
your
staff
could
post
to
the
website
the
plan
as
soon
as
we
have
it
analyzed.
C
G
B
G
It
can
be,
it
can
be
done
on
the
agenda
and
it
can
be
considered
as
as
broadly
defined,
a
part
of
the
subject.
That's
being
discussed,
been
considered
by
the
council
that
that
evening
now,
whether
or
not
the
council
thinks
that
that's
a
wise
idea
and
how
the
public
will
react
to
it.
That's
that's
a
decision
for
the
council.
A
Right-
and
I
would
caution
against
that,
because
something
as
important
as
this,
what
we
don't
want
again
is
somebody
come
back
later
and
say:
well,
you
know
you,
you
slipped
it
into
the
agenda
where
we
couldn't
see
it
as
a
public,
and
that
was
the
last
minute
deal,
and
this
is
what
we
don't
want.
We
want
to
make
sure-
and
this
is
again
I
mean
the
reality
is
by
today.
We
should
have
seen
any
other
plans
and
we
should
be
talking
about
just
moving
forward
with
the
four
plans,
but
I
think
we
all
agree.
A
Let's
give
it
a
few
more
days,
the
12th
it
gives
you
time
to
review
it,
so
it
can
be
posted
properly
on
friday,
so
the
public
can
say:
okay.
Well,
it
was
up.
We
can
say
it
was
up
on
friday
for
the
public
to
see
the
agenda.
Posted
here
are
the
plans,
and
so
there's
no
way
to
later
on.
Somebody
would
make
the
claim
of
we
were
hiding
something
because
we
we
worked
so
hard
on
this.
We've
all
been
so
open
about
this,
and
I'm
just
surprised
it's.
Unfortunately,
nobody
else
submitted
plans.
A
D
I
D
H
So
my
comments
are
slightly
different
than
everyone
else's.
While
I
understand
that
we
want
to
move
forward
in
terms
of
trying
to
meet
various
deadlines
for
complete
transparency,
community
input,
if
things
are
going
to
come
in
at
whatever
time,
I
think
we
need
to
have
the
the
four
public
meetings
and
then
be
able
to
analyze
the
maps
and
then
bring
it
to
council
so
that
it
doesn't
seem
like
we're,
rushing
or
pushing
through
something
without
fully
involving
our
community
or
clearly
following
the
rules
that
were
set
forth.
H
If
council
member
burns
stated
that
we
have
community
members
thinking
about
submitting
maps,
I
just
know
from
our
community
that
kovet
had
a
lot
of
families
this
holiday
season.
A
lot
of
people
had
a
lot
of
deaths,
so
redistricting
really
isn't
on
people's
minds
right
now.
I
think
they're
dealing
with
with
a
lot
of
emergencies,
health
and
deaths
in
their
families.
So
I
think
we
just
need
to
follow
the
process
and
allow
our
community
to
to
deal
with
community
issues,
but
also
have
an
opportunity
to
fully
participate
in
the
process.
E
A
E
C
That
is
correct,
so
we
will
instead
of
adopting
something
on
the
18th.
We
are
going
to
wait
and
do
that
on
the
seventh
I
mean
introducing
we'll
introduce
on
the
seventh
will
adopt
on
the
22nd,
and
then
it
will
not
be
effective
until
march
22nd,
which
is
a
little
later
than
we
had
wanted,
but
we'll
still
meet
the
april
17th
17
deadline,
yeah.
I
I
I
I
mean
I
got
reached
out
to
on
monday
and
it's
saturday
and
I've
not
seen
anything
or
heard
anything
further,
and
I
very
much
would
prefer
for
this
to
be
a
public
process
which
it
is,
but
with
a
higher
level
of
public
engagement,
which
it
doesn't
appear
to
be,
and
I'm
I'm
already
probably
a
pessimist
in
the
number
of
hits
we've
actually
even
gotten
on
the
website.
I'll
be
I'll,
be
amazed
if
that's
I'm
not
going
to
put
a
number
out
there,
but
I'm
already
disappointed.
So
thank
you
mayor
for
humoring
me.