►
From YouTube: Gov Hol CC 20210503
Description
Hollister City Council Meeting May 3, 2021
D
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Yes,
if
the
city
council
so
moves,
it
will
go
into
closed
session
to
discuss
the
item.
Agendas
for
closed
session
discussion,
which
is
item
number
one
conference,
the
legal
council,
existing
litigation
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54956.98.
The
title
of
that
case
is
williams
versus
city
of
hollister.
D
E
B
You
is
there
any
comments
from
the
public.
B
F
E
E
I
G
G
J
G
K
J
L
E
D
B
I
K
E
A
B
Okay,
sir,
do
we
have
any
speaker
cards
on
this
item.
M
M
M
I
J
E
I
I
My
understanding
of
the
claim
is
for
a
tire
and
a
rim
that
were
damaged
that
they
had
verifiable
documentable
costs
to
repair
in
the
mid
400
range,
as
I
recall,
and
I'm
just
wondering
why,
in
in
case
of
cases
like
this,
do
we
it
feels
like
that
it
feels
like
it
may
be,
a
routine
denial
and
I'd
like
to
know
I'd
like
to
better
understand.
Why?
Because
it
seems
like
a
reasonable
request
to
me
mayor.
L
B
I
think
to
to
expand
on
that.
One
of
the
other
reasons
is,
as
you
give
these
more
time
to
be
investigated
through
the
insurance
companies.
You
can
find
other
mistakes
that
can
happen
like
this
on
some
of
the
other
claims
where
it
turns
out.
Maybe
it's
the
county
fault,
maybe
it's
the
state's
fault,
maybe
it's
a
property
owner's
fault
before
we
agree
to
pay.
If
we
agreed
to
pay
up
front
and
then
found
out
later
it
was
not
our
fault
it'd
be
much
harder
to
come
back
and
take
that
back.
B
N
I
K
I
I
E
B
Thank
you.
We
will
now
go
to
public
input.
This
is
the
time
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
item
not
on
the
agenda
and
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
council.
Speaker
cards
are
available
in
the
lobby
and
are
to
be
completed
and
given
to
the
city
clerk.
Before
speaking
when
the
city
clerk
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
city
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
city
council.
Each
speaker
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes
with
the
maximum
of
30
minutes
per
subject.
B
O
P
Good
evening,
mr
mayor
and
members
of
the
city
council,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
sir
yeah.
My
name
is
david
huboy
holster.
P
P
P
P
P
G
Q
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
I
would
like
first
to
again
voice
my
I
guess,
concern
as
to
why
the
mayor
and
councilman
resendez
continue
to
not
be
at
the
dice.
Q
We
want
to
see
your
face.
We
want
to
make
sure
you're
paying
attention,
it's
part
of
being
a
council
member
that
we
know
where
you
are
and
that
if
we
see
your
face,
we
know
that
you're
paying
attention
to
your
constituents
when
we're
when
we're
speaking
both
mayor,
you
have
been
a
very
outspoken
advocate
in
the
health
of
this
community.
When
it
came,
comes
to
covid
you've
been
doing
your
videos,
you've
been
doing
notices
for
everybody
to
comply
and
be
safe
out
there.
Q
Yet
both
you
and
council
member
resendez
continue
to
participate
in
large
group
gatherings.
I
know
you're
wearing
your
mask,
but
yet,
when
you,
when
it
comes
to
city
council
meetings,
you
don't
show
up
and
if
you're
you're
safer
at
the
city
council,
meaning
that
you're
out
of
the
public,
so
I
really
would
like
for
you
guys
to
I've,
been
saying
this
for
more
than
a
year.
Please
show
up
to
the
dias.
Q
On
april
the
19th
at
the
city
council
meeting,
the
discussion
was
brought
up
with
regards
to
the
motorcycle
rally
for
2021,
and
there
is
no
contract
with
the
promoter,
and
yet
the
promoter
put
out
on
on
social
media
that
the
rally
was
being
cancelled.
Well,
the
rally
was
not
cancelled.
There
is
no.
There
was
not
enough
time
to
negotiate
a
new
contract
and
it
was
the
concerns
of
chip
reynoso
that
also
the
liability
that
it
puts
the
city
in
that
having
to
gather
or
have
enough
law
enforcement
in
preparation.
Q
For
this
event,
there's
just
not
enough
time
and
mayor
velasquez.
You
were
quoted
in
the
benito
link
after
after
this
april
19th
meeting
that
you
were
welcoming
that
there
was
no
there's,
no
sanction
for
motorcycle
rally
in
hollister
this
year,
but
the
bikers
are
rally
are
the
bikers
are
welcome
during
the
fourth
of
july
weekend
and
you're,
hoping
that
that
thousands
may
still
come
down
it's
it's.
Q
I
I
just
it's
mind-boggling
that
you've
been
an
outspoken
advocate
in
favor
of
compliance
with
covet
protocols,
yet
we
are
still
in
covet
we're
not
out
of
it
we're
still
going
through
this,
and
I
don't
understand
why
you
would
you
would
go
out
there
and
invite
thousands
of
people
to
come
to
our
community
and
put
us
in
some
type
of
a
super
spreader.
So
thank
you
for
taking
my
time.
Please
let
me
speak.
L
R
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
members
of
the
city
council,
good
evening,
abraham
prado
development
services,
department,
planning
manager
and
interim
director.
The
item
before
you
is
ordinance
1201.
It's
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
development
agreement
buying
between
the
the
city
of
hollister
and
development,
known
as
west
of
fairview.
If
you
recall,
at
the
last
regular
city
council
meeting
of
april
19
2021,
the
city
council
approved
the
first
reading
of
this
ordinance
with
with
changes
very
briefly,
the
changes
included
as
follows:
they're
three-fold
one.
R
R
So
that
was
the
second
change
that
was
occurred.
City
council
approved
the
first
reading
eliminating
that
building
allocation
requirement.
The
third
change
was
that
the
original
proposal
from
award
homes
was
to
eliminate
the
33
small
lot
single-family
home
for
affordable
housing
and
replace
that
with
50
apartment
units.
The
city
council
approved
the
first
reading,
with
not
only
keeping
the
33
small
single-family
homes
as
affordable,
but
also
adding
100
apartment
units.
R
The
city
council
approved
the
first
reading
on
april
19th
and
director
staff
to
bring
the
second
rating
for
tonight
may
3rd
in
consulting
with
the
city
attorney.
It
was
advised
that
the
changes
that
occurred
during
the
april
19th
meeting
should
have
been
trivial
or
minor
and
that
the
changes
were
actually
significant
enough
to
actually
bring
it
back
for
today
as
a
first
reading
instead
of
the
second
reading.
R
So
therefore,
tonight
we
recommend
that
the
changes
that
occurred,
along
with
the
entire
ordinance
be
read
again
for
the
first
reading
and
then
be
brought
back
on
the
next
regular
meeting
of
may
17th
for
the
second
reading,
the
fourth
change
that
occurred
for
the
development
agreement.
It
wasn't
a
change.
R
It
was
already
agreed
upon
since
the
very
beginning,
which
was
that
the
cfd
2
and
the
lighting
and
landscaping
district
annexation
requirement
currently
required
in
the
development
agreement
were
to
be
removed
and
replaced
with
annexation
into
cfd,
four
and
cfd
five
police
and
fire,
and
that
was
a
very
significant
change
to
the
original
requirement.
R
That
and
I'll
indicate
the
the
the
specific
number
specific
number
indicated
that
the
annual
amount
with
this
change
would
be
of
seven
hundred
and
two
thousand
seventy
six
dollars
and
29
cents,
with
this
change
from
cfd
to
enlightened
landscaping,
district
to
annex
into
cfd4
and
cfd5,
and
so
that
that
that
has
not
changed.
That
remains.
That
remains
the
same.
So
with
the
adoption
of
this
ordinance.
That
would
remain
the
same
where
we
would
still
require
them
to
annex
into
cfd4
and
cfd5.
R
So
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
city
council
hold
a
public
hearing,
read
by
title,
only
wait
full
reading
and
introduce
ordinance,
1201
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
hollister
to
amend
the
development
agreement
buy-in
between
the
city
of
hollister
and
the
development
known
as
west
of
fairview
and
schedule.
A
second
reading
of
the
ordinance
for
the
next
regular
meeting
of
the
city
council
on
may
17
2021.
B
I
Mr
prado,
thank
you
for
your
presentation.
I'm
not
sure
that
maybe
my
first
question
might
not
be
better
answered
by
mr
epperson,
and
so,
but
if
you're,
if
you're
qualified
and
if
you
have
the
information
I'd,
welcome
it,
regardless
of
the
source.
I
So
I
guess
my
first
question
would
be
what
clearly
defines
trivial.
Is
there
a
legal
definition,
because
I
I
want
to
just
preface
this
by?
I
can't
tell
you
how
frustrated
I
am
by
the
fact
that
we've
gone
through
this
exercise
and
now
we're
back
to
where
we
were,
and
my
greatest
fear
is
when
we
were
full
council.
I
This
thing
went
through
on
a
3-2
vote,
and,
and
so
I
would
have
thought
that
if
those
changes
were
significant,
it
would
have
been
brought
forward
during
the
council
meeting
and
would
have
been
addressed
or
it
would
have
been
addressed
in
anticipation
of
it
being
brought
to
council.
But
yet
here
we
sit
now
with
a
less
than
full
council,
and
so
this
trivial
thing
really
has
me
puzzled.
D
Council
member
burns
there's
a
a
huge
gray
area
as
to
what's
trivial
and
what's
not,
however,
usually
you're.
Looking
at
types
of
changes
that
would
not
require
going
back
would
be
typographical
errors,
stylistic
errors,
maybe
perhaps
a
renumbering
of
something,
but
where
the
substance
provisions
have
not
changed
here.
What
was
proposed
at
the
last
city
council
meeting
was,
in
my
opinion,
substantive
enough
that
if
it
were
challenged
in
the
future,
it
could
be
viewed
as
a
procedural
error
for
the
city
council
to
have
proceeded
without
having
come
back
for
a
first
reading.
I
So,
mr
epperson
is
there
actually
case
law
that
would
define.
I
I've
heard
what
you
say.
That
is
a
hugely
gray
area
and
I
absolutely
understand
trivial
from
significant.
But
again
it's
not
like
this
was
just
all
presented
at
the
diocese
at
that
moment.
In
time
I
mean
the
applicant
had
certain
specific
recommendations
that
I'm
hearing
you
say,
and
I
don't
necessarily
disagree
were
significant,
but
it
should
have
been
brought
up
two
weeks
ago,
not
two
weeks
after
the
fact,
when
we
have
less
than
a
full
council.
M
I
This
project
has
been
on
on
the
council's
agenda
off
and
on
now
for
over
20
years,
it's
it's
in
development
and
construction
as
we
speak,
and
clearly
the
only
change
that
I
recall
from
from
two
weeks
ago
and
four
weeks
ago,
or
whenever
the
first
time
they
came
before
us,
was
they
compromised
and
they
they
went
from
50,
affordable
unit
housing
units
to
100,
and
then
they
further
compromised
during
the
meeting
to
add
the
33
residential
units
in
as
well
as
affordable
and
really
all
the
other.
I
Things
were
known
well
in
advance
at
the
city
council
meeting.
So
it's
not
new
information.
There
were.
There
were
very
few
changes
that
happened
during
that
meeting,
and
so
I
guess
I'm
just
really
frustrated
by
the
fact
that
this
thing
just
keeps
coming
back
and
my
greatest
fear
is-
and
this
is
probably
a
question-
if
we
don't
move
forward
with
this
tonight,
where
do
we
stand
in
regards
to
this
project
and
and
and
mr
prado?
I
welcome
your
comments
as
well.
D
D
If
the
council
chooses
not
to
move
forward
with
this
second
amendment
to
the
developer
agreement,
then
essentially
the
original
developer
agreement
will
remain
intact
for
the
next
year.
Unless
the
council
changes
his
mind
in
the
future.
R
It
was
agendas,
and
so,
when
they
spoke
to
me,
they
they
thought
that
they
that
this
item
was
going
to
be
removed
from
the
agenda,
but
it
couldn't.
It
was
already
too
late
for
them
for
them
to.
So
I
told
them
that
we
would
have
to
present
it
and
they
indicated
that
you
know
they
weren't
even
going
to
be,
I'm
not
sure.
If
they
are
here.
R
They
indicated
that
they
weren't
even
going
to
be
on
the
call
for
tonight
that
it
really
just
depended
on
the
council
that
if
they
wanted
to
move
forward,
that
would
be
great.
But
they
did
express
that
frustration
as
well.
I
I
Also
going
to
lose
about
100,
affordable
housing,
rental
units
is
that
correct.
I
I
L
O
K
Questions
or
comments
from
council
yeah,
I
got
a
comment,
question
yeah,
so
I
I
too
am
frustrated.
You
know
what
it's
council
council
made
it
it's
its
decision
and
now
there's
a
potential
for
that
to
go
backwards,
and
it's
like
you
know
what
that's
just
wrong.
I'm
this
is
wrong.
So
how
do
we
in
in
future
situations
similar
situations?
I
mean
so
while
this
was
going
on
during
this
meeting.
K
You
know
what
I
guess.
It's
a
lot
of
information
for
mr
epperson
to
to
figure
out
everything,
and
you
know
like
hindsight's,
20
20,
and
you
get
to
go
to
your
room
to
your
desk
and
re-look
at
everything
and
say:
okay,
well,
whoa!
We
got
to
step
on
the
brakes.
I
get
that,
but
isn't
there
a
process
or
a
way
that
we
can
assure
ourselves
that
we're
not
going
to
run
into
this
situation
again
I
mean.
D
Council
member
perez
we've
certainly
run
into
this
situation
in
the
past,
as
we
did
this
time,
as
as
councils
regularly
do
anytime,
the
public
has
been
noticed
and
an
agreement
or
a
proposed
agreement
comes
before
the
council.
If
there
are
significant
changes,
something
beyond
mere
typological
changes
or
or
corrections
that
sort
of
thing,
it
typically
needs
to
come
back
as
if
that
was
not
the
first
reading.
So
the
only
option
there
would
be
to
not
make
any
significant
changes
or
not
propose
any
significant
changes,
which
is
a
difficult
position
for
a
council
to
be.
K
In
I
understand,
thank
you,
though,
and
for
the
applicant,
but
I
mean
wouldn't
shouldn't
we
be
able
to
know
before
that
meeting
before
that
topic
is
done,
that
hey
there's
this
might
be
a
potential
stretch,
so
we
might
need
to
bring
it
back
to
be
informed
instead
of
being
surprised,
you
know,
that's
it's.
I
feel.
K
I
don't
know
it's
like
it's
just
wrong
with
what's
happening
to
the
to
this
to
this
group
and
it's
like,
especially
if
it
doesn't
pass
tonight,
it's
it's.
It's
just
not
right,
and
I
so
I'd
like
to
know
I'd
like
to
for
in
the
future.
Maybe
we
can
you
can
really
concentrate
or
or
put
some
more
attention
to
something
when
it's
like
this
happens,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
come
to
the
situation.
K
So
you,
if
you
can
advise
us
quicker
or
more
informed,
especially
myself,
I'm
still
new,
I'm
learning
a
lot
still
and
unfortunately,
sometimes
it's
not
a
good
thing,
but
but
I
am
learning,
and
so
my
I
guess
my
comment
would
be
hopefully
in
the
future
that
we'd
be
able
to
when
a
situation
like
this
comes
up
that
we'd
be
able
to
get
information
from
staff
telling
us
there
is
a
potential
roadblock
where
we
might
have
to
bring
it
back,
or
that
would
be
really
great
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
K
J
Sir,
thank
you,
mr
prado.
You
said
there
was
one
two
three
four
changes
and
then
number
two
you
said:
eliminate
building
allocation
requirement.
Can
you
explain
what
that
is?
I.
R
Yes,
yes,
thank
you.
Councilmember
resendez,
the
development
agreement
and
settlement
agreement
of
the
of
the
development
agreement
has
a
stipulation
that
the
667
units
that
were
approved
and
entitled
for
board
homes
be
developed
at
a
at
a
ratio
of
allow
to
be
allowed.
The
220
unit
220
units
be
built
first
with
without
any
restrictions
of
of
when
award
homes
can
pull
the
building
permits
from
the
city
of
hollister
and
after
the
220th.
R
Then
there
is
a
regulation
that
no
more
than
75
building
permits
a
year
all
the
way
until
it
gets
to
the
667th
unit
can
be
issued,
and
so
that
that
would
that
occurred
during
the
time
that
the
award
homes
entitlements
when,
when
award
homes
received
the
entitlements.
At
that
time,
there
was
a
building
allocation
requirement.
R
There
was
there
was
a
restriction
on
the
number
of
units
that
that
can
be
that
can
be
allowed,
and
so
that
was
that
was
embedded
in
the
development
agreement
and
the
settlement
agreement,
and
so
the
applicant
basically
said
that,
in
order
for
them
to
not
be
able
to
take
10
years
to
develop
the
entire
project-
and
you
know
they
should
be
able
to
do
it
with
them-
five,
that
that
stipulation
would
need
to
be
removed
of
of
the
220
and
75
per
year.
And
so
that
was
one
of
the
changes
that
occurred.
R
R
J
That
helps
you
welcome
I'm
a
little
bit
confused,
so
I
I'm
confused
because
I
thought
the
applicant
sent
us
an
email
and
asked
to
get
off
the
agenda,
but
why,
like,
what's
their
rationale,
that
they
wanted
to
get
off
the
agenda?
So
my
understanding
was
that,
like
they
changed
their
mind
and
they
didn't
want
to
move
forward
with
this
agreement.
Is
that
correct?
Or
am
I
confused
about
that?
Thank.
R
You
for
that
council
members
send
this
so
once
once
I
called
them,
and
I
let
them
know
that
the
opinion
was
that
they
had
to
come
back
for
a
second
first
reading
tonight,
instead
of
tonight
being
the
second
reading.
They
they
had
at
that
time
already
basically
had
talked
to
their
their
attorney,
their
their
their
team,
and
they
feel
that
at
this
point
they
really
don't
need
the
the
extension
of
of
the
time
limits.
R
But
at
that
point
they
they
expressed
frustration
on
coming
back
for
another
for
another
first
reading,
instead
of
this
being
the
second
reading,
and
they
basically
said
that
they
would
be
at
this
time
able
to
meet
the
requirements
to
have
all
the
six
phases
in
and
finalized
by
their
current
development
agreement
deadline.
So
so
they
basically
said
at
this
point.
You
know
instead
of
going
back
and
starting
over
with
the
first
reading.
R
We
just
we
just
want
to
withdraw
at
this
point,
and
so
it
was
already
too
late
that
the
item
was
already
in,
and
so
their
last
correspondence
to
staff
was
look.
If
the
city
council
approves
it,
we
would
be
willing
to
go
with
it.
If,
if
they
don't,
then
it's
fine,
they
indicated
that
they
weren't.
They
were
not
going
to
be
here
tonight,
regardless
that
it
they
basically
left
it
in
the
council's
hands.
K
R
The
time
limit
extension
remains
at
at
2022,
so
if
the
current
da
expires
on
may
1st
2022,
however,
they
feel
that
they
are
able
to
get
their
final
maps
completed
and
and
by
the
by
the
submitted
and
completed
before
that
dates,
so
that
that
is
correct.
Yes,.
B
Q
Hi
good
evening,
I
can
understand,
award
homes,
frustration.
We
know
this
has
been
going
on
for
actually
more
than
20
years
councilman
burns,
but
has
been
coming
before
city
council
for
20
years.
Here's
a
problem,
the
opinion,
I
guess
it's
a
legal
opinion
and
they
decided
now.
This
is
a
typical
atypical
occurrence
from
our
city
attorney.
Q
This
is
not.
This
is
not
the
first
time
that
he
has
not
done
his
homework
and
you
ask
him
a
question
and
he'll
tell
you
he
will
answer
that
he's
not
prepared
to
have
that.
Not
that
answer,
even
though
he
knew
what
was
on
the
agenda.
This
is
his
job.
This
is
why
the
city
attorney
is
paid
the
amount
of
money
every
month
by
the
city
of
hollister
to
do
his
job
and
his
job
was
to
be
prepared
and
that
this
should
have
occurred.
Q
This
should
have
been
brought
up
at
the
last
city
council
meeting
the
the
march
1st
meeting
when
this
happened.
You
know
exactly
what
it
is
that
they
wanted.
They
want
to
not
be
limited
because
of
the
moratorium
to
those
75
homes
per
year.
It's
ridiculous
to
continue
to
have
award
homes,
a
buy
bio
on
a
settlement
agreement
or
a
development
agreement
that
happened
in
the
19,
late
90s
or
the
2.
What
is
it
the
2000s
because
of
the
more
it's
volumes
like
I'm
just
so
frustrated?
Q
This
should
never
have
happened.
This
is
not
the
first
time
that
something
like
this
happens
where
the
city,
the
city
attorney,
is
not
prepared.
This
is
go.
This
is
going
to
cost
the
city.
I
would
urge
police
and
it's
it's
the
mayor
and
councilman
resendez.
You
voted
no
on
this
on
the
last
time.
I
encourage
you
to
please
pass
this
through
approve
it
as
the
first
reading,
because
it's
going
to
cost
the
city,
not
as
it
it'll
cost
the
city.
Q
If
you
don't
get
the
cfds
okay
and
if
a
war
award
homes
has
a
lawsuit,
that's
what
they've
got.
That's.
Why
they've
already
spoken
to
their
legal
counsel
because
they
know
what
the
next
step
is,
and
the
next
step
is
is
to
choose
the
city
of
hauser
up
and
spit
it
out,
because
the
city
attorney
has
failed
to
do
his
duty,
a
negligence
on
his
part
to
put
the
city
in
liability
for
a
lawsuit,
because
he
has
failed
one
more
time
to
do
his
job.
B
K
Actually,
just
one
real
quick,
so
if
this
was
approved,
the
stage
one
b
would
be
the
the
affordable
apartments
coming
in.
Is
that
correct
dude?
Does
it
my
memory
serve
me
right
so.
M
R
Customer
press,
thank
you
for
that
question.
So
at
an
ordinance
requires
requires
two
readings.
The
first
reading
was
was
officially
april
19th,
however,
because
because
there
was,
there
was
changes
to
the
to
that
first
reading,
the
opinion
was
that
it,
it
should
come
back
again
today
as
the
first
reading,
as
opposed
to
the
second
reading.
R
If
if
that
was
not
the
requirement,
then
if,
if
the
first
reading
was
approved,
what
those
changes
without
them
being
considered
to
be
significant,
then
today
would
have
been
the
second
reading
and
what
the
what
the
positive
vote?
Yes,
a
majority
of
yes
today,
if
there
was
a
second
reading,
then
the
ordinance
were
to
be
approved.
K
Was
is
maybe
you
answered
it,
but
as
far
as
the
when
the
build
starts,
and
I'm
thinking
optimistic
that
part
of
phase
one
that
was
phase
one
and
a
and
b,
that
the
actual
construction
of
the
apartment
units
was
going
to
be
one
and
b.
It's
part
of
the
first
phase,
though,.
F
R
So
those
phases
remain
the
same
yeah.
Those
do
not
change
the
only
thing.
That's
that's
in
question
today
would
be
the
the
first
reading
of
the
ordinance
for
the
changes
to
be
for
the
changes
as
discussed
this
evening.
Thank.
I
I
I
J
Have
foreseen
all
of
the
changes
that
that
were
talked
about
and
that
were
worked
out
right,
so
I
just
want
to
be
very
clear.
This
project
is
going
to
get
built
out
regardless
either
way
it's
already
been
approved,
they're
saying
now
that
they're
willing
to
do
it
within
the
time
that
was
originally
agreed
upon,
and
if
that's
what
happens,
if
it's
tonight
tonight
they're
going
to
do
that,
but
we
will
miss
out
on
the
cfd.
J
We
will
miss
out
on
the
additional
apartment
units
we
will
miss
out
on
well
and
then
we're
gonna
grant
them
five
more
years,
regardless
of
what
we
do.
This
project's
gonna
get
approved,
but
it
sounds
to
me
that
if
we
approve
this
project
tonight,
the
developer
is
actually
going
to
have
to
do
more
than
what
they
would
in
the
original
agreement.
Can
that
be
altered
or
changed
in
the
future
abraham?
If
we're
not
here,.
R
The
affordable
housing
units
and
the
cfds,
and
the
only
way
that
that
can
be
altered
in
the
future
would
be
if
they
come
back
before
the
council
again
to
request
an
amendment
to
what
to
that
established
development
agreement
that
that
would
be
the
only
way
unless
there's
other
ways
legally,
but
through
this
process
it
would
be
if
they
come
back
again
and
through
a
public
hearing
like
we're
doing
tonight,
want
to
make
additional
changes
at
that
time.
Those
changes
that
would
need
to
be
what
need
to
be
considered
publicly.
J
R
There
there
is
a
possibility,
but
they
would
have
to
go
through
through
a
public
hearing
process
as
we're
doing
today,
and
it
is
my
understanding
that,
with
with
this
change,
they
would
just
proceed
with
with
the
change
as
as
stated
now,.
B
You
like
to
give
my
opinion
on
on
this
project
and
I'm
I'm
extremely
disappointed.
Hearing
the
public,
member
and
accusations
of
the
city
attorney
doing
a
horrible
job
and
reasons
why
we
he
shouldn't
be.
There
are
different
things
just
absolutely
disappointing
that
that
language
is
being
used
or
thrown
about
as
again.
The
conspiracy
theories
and
all
the
other
things
they
get
thrown
about
city
attorney
did
absolutely
the
right
thing.
B
There
were
major
changes
here
and
the
public
needed
to
know
about
it.
These
are
not
minor
changes.
This
is
part
of
the
law.
This
is
what
you
do
to
make
sure
you're,
covering
your
bases
correctly,
so
you
don't
get
sued
from
one
side
or
the
other.
So
city
attorney
did
the
right
thing
here
and
I
think
the
public
needs
to
understand
that,
and
unfortunately,
there
are
those
that
would
continue
to
throw
out
misinformation.
B
I'll
tell
you
my
feeling
about
this
project.
I've
made
this
clear
for
many
many
years.
This
is
one
of
those
stinker
of
a
project
that
should
never
have
been
approved
in
the
first
place
and
mistake
after
mistake
or
opportunity
after
opportunity
was
made
with
this
this
project,
you
know
to
say
the
unfair
to
the
developer,
absolutely
incorrect,
absolutely
correct.
B
The
developer
could
have
started
doing
that
work
in
2008,
but
they
didn't
they
held
off,
and
the
council
in
2011
are
the
ones
that
could
have
stopped
this
thing
and
asked
for
a
much
better
project,
but
they
granted
this
group
another
10
years,
and
here
we
are
again
10
years
later
talking
about
this
project
and
what
should
have
happened,
and
yet
I'm
hearing
people
blame
the
city
and
how
hard
it
was
for
the
developer.
Absolutely
incorrect.
B
The
developer
made
it
hard
on
themselves.
No
one
else
was
at
fault.
A
lot
of
things
would
have
should
have
been
changed
at
the
the
last
meeting.
In
my
opinion,
much
much
more
should
have
been
asked
for
them.
Council,
member
recentes
is
absolutely
correct
in
that
this
project
is
going
to
be
built,
no
matter
what,
because
that's
what's
happened,
and,
quite
frankly,
the
council,
at
the
last
meeting
at
3-2
vote
basically
solidified
that
with
their
vote
on
on
the
project.
B
I
don't
that's
what
the
decision
was
by
the
council,
I'm
hoping
in
the
future.
We
learned
from
this
project,
so
we
don't
continue
to
make
the
same
mistakes
again
or
ever
again.
We
should
never
have
had
a
20-year
project
or
a
project
that
was
designed
in
the
late
90s
being
built
in
the
2021.
B
As
I
said,
I
would
have
asked
for
much
much
more
and
I
would
have
kept
the
10-year
time
frame
to
smooth
out
the
traffic
issues
we're
going
to
experience
from
this
and
the
issues
with
the
impacts
on
our
schools
we're
going
to
experience
from
this.
But
that
is
a
decision
the
council
made
at
the
last
meeting.
I
don't
like
that.
It
was
rushed
in
in
hopes
that
it
would
be
taken
care
of
before
the
other
council
member
left.
B
B
B
You
have
to
read
it.
You
have
to
read
the
line,
the
read
by
title:
only
that.
I
Section
there
read
that
all
right
mayor,
thank
you,
move
to
approve
resolution
number
2021-73,
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
hollister,
declaring
the
condition
of
certain
properties.
Sorry,.
I
I
Okay,
let
me
just
start
again:
I
am
now
thoroughly
confused,
but
again
this
is
part
of
my.
I
I
apologize
to
everybody
viewing
my
ignorance
recommendation
to
hold
a
public
hearing
read
by
title,
only
wave
full
reading
and
introduce
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
hollister
to
amend
the
development
agreement
by
and
between
the
city
of
hollister
and
the
development
known
as
west
of
fairview.
B
You're
just
read
the
again,
the
very,
very
top
ordinance
number
okay.
I
E
S
Hi
this
is
charlie.
Can
you
guys
hear
me?
Yes,
charlie,
you
guys?
Okay!
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council
members.
This
is
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
hollister,
declaring
a
condition
of
certain
properties
to
constitute
a
public
nuisance
and
ordering
the
abatement
of
weeds
they're
in
conducting
a
hearing
for
the
the
the
receipt
of
objection
to
the
proposed
baby
to
fire.
Oh
by
the
way,
this
is
charlie,
bedola,
the
occupied
chief.
S
I'm
sorry,
this
public
hearing
is
to
hear
objections
to
the
proposed
abatement
of
the
weeds
and
other
flower
materials
existing
on
said
properties.
S
So
this
is
our
second
reading
now,
we've
had
the
month
long
and
now
after
today,
if
people
haven't
mitigated
their
weeds,
we'll
send
in
our
lawnmower
guy
to
go,
take
care
of
the
problem.
No.
B
No,
do
we
have
any
speaker
cards
I'll,
open
public
hearing.
Q
Thank
you
just
for
the
record
sheep.
Would
you
please
tell
the
public
what
the
fines
will
be
with
regards
to
what's
the
penalty
when
they
fail
to
abate
their
weeds
or
when
you
have
to
send
somebody
in
there
there
there's
this,
the
city
will
send
them
a
bill
and
also
there's
a
fine.
Thank
you.
S
Q
G
S
Go
ahead
and
I'll
go
mr
mayor
I'll,
go
ahead
and
answer
that
real,
quick,
it's
we
don't
find
it,
but
we
do
go
ahead
and
go
take
care
of
the
weeds
and
a
lot
of
the
times
the
the
people
that
own
the
property
will
say.
You
know
what
go
ahead
and
go
ahead
and
mow
it
and
then
send
us
the
bill.
I
You
mayor
chief,
do
we
actually
charge
our
aren't
actual
true
cost
recovery
fees
for
staff,
time
allocated
to
processing
the
abatement
and
or
if
there
are
liens
necessary?
Do
we
capture
the
cost
of
staff
time
for
that
as
well?.
S
I
believe
there
is
an
administrative
cost
on
there
too.
We
do
a
contractor,
so
it's
minimal,
I
mean
it's
our
regular
staff,
time
staff
duties
of
our
prevention
bureau
and
office
bureau
that
takes
care
of
that,
and
then
we
do
everything
else
like
the
the
the
cruising
of
the
lots
just
to
patrolling
the
lots
just
to
find
them,
and
they
we
do
that
on
duty
also,
so
we
do
have
a
little
administrative
fee
in
there
also
and
this
this
one
we
don't
do
after
hours.
S
So
it's
within
that
our
scope
and
our
scope
of
work.
I
Thank
you
chief.
I
appreciate
that
at
some
point
I
think
we
probably
should
move
to
have
further
conversations
about
fines
and
penalties,
because
otherwise
it
seems
like
we're
simply
providing
the
property
owners
who
are
not
caring
for
their
own
properties.
We
provide
them
with
a
mowing
service
and
and
as
long
as
we
can
do
it
for
them
at
an
affordable
rate,
I
don't
think
they'll
ever
stop
having
us
do
it.
So.
Thank
you
chief.
I
appreciate
that.
S
Yeah,
just
just
you
know,
this
is
just
the
empty
lots.
We
do
have
lots
that
have
properties
on
them.
That
goes
through
code
enforcement
and
I
believe
we
do
start
off
at
250
a
fine
on
up
to
the
leaning
of
the
property
also,
so
we
do
do
some
fines,
in
conjunction
with
code
enforcement.
Also.
B
I
would
I
would
agree
with
mr
burns,
I
think
sometimes
it's
clearly
it's
easier
for
some
of
these
property
owners
to
ignore
it
and
just
receive
the
bill
and
pay
for
it
than
it
is
for
them
to
take
the
time
to
do
it
on
their
own,
and
we
we
do
need
to
come
up
with
some
type
of
policy
to
make
it
much
more
expensive.
So
it's
not
our
responsibility
to
go
around
and
tell
them
to
mow
their
lawn
or
mow
their
weeds.
So
it's
just
for
the
future.
We
have
other
things.
E
B
B
I
T
Tonight
staff
is
recommending
that
the
city
council
hold
a
public
hearing,
hear
the
appellant
statement
in
motion
to
either
overturn
or
uphold
the
city.
Manager's
action
to
revoke
the
cannabis
regulatory
permit
to
operate
a
cannabis
manufacturing
facility
that
was
issued
to
nicolas
and
joseph
maxwell
with
llxp
corporation
staff
is
also
here
president.
To
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you
good
evening,
so
the
section
5.542.10
I
know
the
violation
is
unknown
other
than
it's,
because
it's
in
the
better,
it's
for
the
the
health
and
the
safety
and
the
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
hollister.
Q
What
exactly
are
the
violations,
because
that
is
very
vague,
and
I
think
the
public
is
entitled
to
know
what
the
violation
were
if
it's
for
the
safety,
the
health
and
the
welfare
of
the
community,
this
of
all
cannabis
licenses.
This
business
has
absolutely
no
neighbors.
It
is
at
the
airport,
it
is
on
airway.
It
is
at
the
furthest
end
it
used
to
be.
Where
spark
was.
I
think
that
was
the
name
of
it
where
they
did.
Those
seat
belt
spark
things
that
not
the
seat
belts
but
the
airbags.
Q
U
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
mayor
and
members
of
the
city
council.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
you
regarding
items
e3
through
five
on
behalf
of
lxp
and
I'd
like
to
speak,
not
necessarily
as
a
as
a
matter
of
public
comment,
as
I'm
here,
representing
as
legal
counsel
for
the
perma-t
lxp
and
I'm
accompanied
by
lsp's
sole
shareholder
joseph
maxwell.
U
So
I'm
here
to
speak
to
this
item
on
behalf
of
the
permatease
rather
than
as
simply
a
member
of
the
public.
So
presumably
my
comments
and
and
statements
would
not
be
limited
to
three
minutes
so
procedurally
king,
just
let
me
know,
can
I
speak
to
this
item
on
behalf
of
the
permanently
rather
than
in
comment.
B
At
this
time,
we're
in
public
comment
that
should
that
should
have
been
pointed
out
before
we
started
public
comments.
Do
you
get
a
major
comments,
see
attorney
in
your
advice
on
this.
D
B
Thank
you,
sir
sir.
Would
you
like
to
wait
till
we
see
any
of
the
speakers
and
then
we
can
make
a
decision
on
that
once
we
close
public
comment.
U
Yes,
and
of
course,
if
the
council
is
going
to
decide
that
we
cannot
come
back
and
speak,
then
there
would
be,
we
would
want
to
assert
our
objections,
of
course
to
that.
But
yes,
I
think
speak
when
the
item's
actually
being
considered.
B
J
Thank
you
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
if
we
choose
to
deny
it
we're
going
to
set
it
for
an
uphill
or
an
appeal
hearing,
is
that
correct
city
attorney.
J
J
A
J
Okay,
then,
yes,
I
will
would
like
to
hear
what
the
attorney's
saying
thank
you.
B
A
C
U
First
lxp
requests
that
these
three
matters
be
considered
in
closed
session
rather
than
an
open
session,
as
your
council
may
recall,
in
2018
lxp
previously
appealed
a
recommendation,
a
recommended,
revocation
of
lxp's
permits
at
that
time,
and
the
city
of
hollister
police
department
intended
to
present
information
related
to
the
proposed
permit,
revocation
and
the
city
required
that
that
information
be
disclosed
only
in
closed
session,
because
it
was
confidential
information.
U
U
Lxp
is
also
concerned
that
such
public
disclosure
could
potentially
release
confidential
or
private
information
and
would
deny
llx
the
opportunity
to
seek
a
protective
order
that
may
be
appropriate.
We're
particularly
concerned
that
the
information
may
be
erroneous
has
occurred
on
the
last
occasion
and
that
it
may
unnecessarily
disparage
lxp.
As
I
indicated,
we're
also
concerned
that
this
apparent
plan
to
surprise
lxp
at
this
public
hearing
appears
somewhat
retaliatory
and
improper
and
may
violate
lxp's
rights
to
due
process
equal
protection
among
other
rights.
U
Therefore,
we
object
to
the
proposed
disclosure
in
open
session
and
requested
all
proceedings
be
held
in
closed
session,
as
was
the
city's
prior
practice.
We
request
that
no
information
be
disclosed
outside
of
closed
session.
The
city
has
intentionally
withheld
from
lsp
the
facts
on
which
it
is
basing
its
recommendation.
U
Lxp
may
be
entitled
to
protect
the
confidentiality
of
this
information
and
to
seek
some
protection
against
the
disparagement.
We
further
object
to
the
city
manager
purporting
to
take
this
action
to
revoke
lxp's
permits
without
notice
and
without
an
opportunity
heard.
I
requested
the
city
manager
confidentially,
provide
llxp
a
detailed
explanation
of
the
basis
of
its
proposed
actions,
as
we
previously
requested,
as
your
council
may
have
noticed,
the
purported
administrative
decision
that
lxp
received
fails
to
provide
any
explanation
of
the
basis
for
the
administrative
decision.
U
U
Given
the
manner
in
which
the
city
manager
issued
its
administrative
decision,
it
appears
to
violate
lxp's
rights
of
due
process
and
equal
protection,
among
others,
and
it
may
be
unconstitutionally
arbitrary
and
capricious
llxp
further
contends
respectfully
that
the
city's
appeal
process
itself
violates
lxp's
constitutional
rights
of
due
process
and
equal
protection,
among
others,
in
this
case
the
city
intentionally
withholds
information
regarding
the
facts
in
which
it
proposes
to
base
its
administrative
decision
to
revoke
the
permits,
the
city
intentionally
ignored,
llsp's,
multiple
written
requests
for
documents
and
information
supporting
the
proposed
action,
so
lxp
could
consider
whether
an
appeal
was
appropriate.
U
If
the
city's
contentions
indicate
a
mistake
of
fact,
a
misunderstanding
of
fact
or
law,
or
a
lack
of
evidence
supporting
that
finding
the
findings
therein,
then
the
decision
should
properly
be
appealed
as
being
an
abuse
of
discretion
or
being
clearly
erroneous
or
for
being
arbitrating.
The
precious
as
I
indicated.
U
However,
if
a
person
agrees
with
the
basis
for
the
proposed
decision,
then
there
there'd
be
no
need
to
appeal,
since
it's
the
city's
practice
to
withhold
all
information
regarding
its
decision
from
the
appellant.
It
appears
that
the
appellant
is
deprived
of
the
appellant's
due
process
rights
to
a
fair
hearing
and
the
right
to
seek
redress
of
grievances,
equal
protection
and
of
their
other
rights.
So
those
are
all
concerns
for
us.
U
Therefore,
we
would
request
that
we'd
be
provided
the
grounds
for
the
recommended
revocation
and
we
would
request
a
continuance
of
this
hearing
and
that
we
would
request
that
your
council
instruct
the
city
manager
to
confidentially
provide
lxp
a
detailed
explanation
of
the
basis
for
the
recommendation,
all
facts
and
law
in
which
it
is
based
and
all
supporting
documents.
So
alpha
may
investigate
the
matter
and
consider
whether
appeal
is
advisable
and
to
prepare
its
appeal,
and
we
would
request
that
once
the
city
does
provide
all
the
requested
information.
U
That
lxp
would
give
in
10
days
to
decide
whether
to
appeal
the
recommended,
revocation
and
if
llxp
decides
not
to
appeal.
At
that
point,
we
would
request
that
the
city
refund
the
fees
that
it
required
us
to
to
pay
for
an
appeal
without
having
any
any
information
regarding
the
basis
or
the
nature
of
the
revocation,
because
lxp
having
to
pay
fees
without
giving
any
real
opportunity
to
consider
whether
an
appeal
is
appropriate
seems
procedurally
improper.
U
If
lxp
decides
to
appeal,
we
would
request
that
this
matter
be
continued
until
august,
2nd
2021
or
the
city's
next
available
hearing
date
thereafter.
This
would
allow
the
city
45
days
to
provide
the
relevant
documents
and
information
10
days
for
llxp
to
decide
whether
to
appeal
and
30
days
for
lxp
to
investigate
and
prepare
its
appeal.
U
We
would
like
to
place
on
the
record
our
objection
to
the
city.
Manager's
reported,
revocation
of
llxp's
permits,
without
notice
of
the
basis
for
the
action
and
without
a
hearing
prior
to
taking
that
action
in
violation
of
lxp's
due
process
and
equal
protection
and
other
rights.
U
B
Thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
questions
from
council.
I
Mayor
velazquez
tim
burns
bye,
mr
burns.
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
guess
my
first
thought
is
I've
heard
what
the
appellant's
attorney
has
said,
and
so
my
first
questions
would
be
to
mr
epperson
to
to
better
understand
what
you've
heard
and
I've
heard
that
they
want
to
continue
this
until
late
august.
D
Council
member
burns,
I'm
not
familiar
with
what
did
or
did
not
happen
in
2018
when
this
apparently
came
or
allegedly
came
before
the
council
before
I
don't
know
what
the
basis
would
have
been
for
hearing
that
in
closed
session,
we're
very
limited
in
terms
of
what
we
can
hold
a
closed
session
session
on.
D
D
Now,
if
the
council
wants
a
delay
nonetheless,
for
some
reason,
that's
up
that's
a
policy
decision
that
the
council
is
allowed
to
make
tonight
if
it
would
like
to,
but
otherwise
it
appears
to
me
that
staff
has
followed
the
the
hollister
municipal
code
and
bringing
this
before
the
council.
I
Thank
you,
mr
everson.
I
guess
my
other
question
would
be
at
some
point
before
we,
unless
we
choose
to
take
this
a
closed
session
and
I'm
not
convinced
that
that's
appropriate.
I
I,
I
think
miss
salinas
raised
a
good
question
as
in
what
are
the
actual
specific
violations
as
they
relate,
and
I
I
presume
our
police
department
will
have
somebody
here
to
present
that
information,
and
so
at
some
point,
I'd
like
to
hear
that
if
we
choose
to
go
forward
if
it's
deemed
appropriate
at
this
time,
and
thank
you
mayor,
those
are
my
thoughts,
questions
and
comments.
B
I
I
personally
have
I
can
understand
the
request
to
be
in
closed
session
to
go
through
the
matters
I
I
can
understand
a
company
not
want
something
to
be
public.
That
could
turn
out
to
be
inaccurate.
B
We
did,
I
remember,
holding
one
in
the
past
in
closed
session.
I
thought
that
did
work
out
well
and
then
I
think
eventually
was
in
in
public,
but
that
would
be
as
far
as
what
the
the
council
would
would
want
to
do
as
a
council,
but
I
I
would
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
covering
everything
and
checking
everything
before
we
do
move
forward,
and
I
do
agree
that
august
august
would
be
too
much
of
a
time
span.
K
I
agree
august
is
way
too
far
out
it's
way
too
far
out
the
home.
I
I
vaguely
remember
this,
but
I
I
wouldn't
mind
seeing
the
facts
and
everything
before
we
can
move
forward.
M
D
K
D
At
this
point,
I
don't
have
any
idea
what
what
the
basis
would
be
for
doing
this
in
closed
session.
That
doesn't
mean
it
can't
be
done
in
closed
session,
but
we
certainly
can't
do
it
immediately
in
closed
session.
We'd
have
to
continue
to
another
date
and
require
a
review
of
it
to
determine
whether
or
not
that's
appropriate
and.
B
Mr
city
manager,
I
know
you
weren't
a
city
manager
at
the
time
of
the
the
previous,
maybe
police
minister,
and
also
could
give
us
an
idea
in
the
past
why
it
was
in
closed
session
with
those
conversations,
and
I
believe
afterwards
it
was
public,
but
I
do
think
on
some
of
these
matters.
It
might
be
an
issue
we
want
to
discuss
closed
session
because
of
potential
lawsuits
and
then
come
back
if
the
council
chooses
to
in
a
public
session
if
they
choose
to
proceed.
J
Thank
you.
I
don't
see
why
it
should
be
a
closed
session
either.
I
know
that
we've
done
this
in
the
past
before,
but
I
do
definitely
support
you,
questioning
it
and
and
council
member
burns
questioning
it
as
well.
So
I
would
just
suggest
that
we
could
probably
just
to
get
some
more
information
on
it.
Maybe
just
table
the
item
until
the
next
meeting.
J
T
Mayor
this
is
maria.
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment
or
if
I
may
clarify
a
little
bit.
A
T
Reason
thanks
the
reason
why,
in
the
past
or
back
in
2018,
we
brought
the
the
appeal
in
closed
session
was
because
at
the
time,
the
the
live
scans
that
we
did
for
the
applicants
weren't
done
or
approved
by
the
police
department
prior
to
the
approval
of
their
license.
T
So
the
the
live
scan
was
not
approved
by
the
police
department.
In
because
of
you
know
the
personal
information
there
we
couldn't
disclos
discuss
it
in
a
public
hearing.
That's
why
I
was
in
closed
session
exclusively.
That
was
the
reason
why
this
is
for
it's
my
understanding.
It's
not
regarding
live
schemes.
B
You
any
comments
or
questions
from
council.
B
V
B
V
Also,
to
add
to
what
what
just
said
my
staff
is
informed
me.
The
closed
session
was
not
an
appeal.
It
was
one
of
the
first
times
the
city
had
addressed
any
of
these
issues.
They
heard
the
reasons
for
the
closed
sessions,
but
then
it
was
actually
kicked
out
into
public
sessions.
There
was
no
decision
made
in
closed
session
at
that
time.
V
Yeah.
We
also
have
our
officer
chris
wells
here.
Cannabis
officer
he's
well
informed
about
the
details
of
this
case
and
is
prepared
to
present
on
the
reasons
for
that,
but
we'll
we'll
wait
for
the
council
stitches
decision,
whether
you
want
to
proceed
or
not,
but
he
has
some
more
information
to
provide.
V
I
I
Because
again,
I
wouldn't
be
opposed
to
continuing
this
for
two
or
four
weeks,
absolutely
no
way
in
my
mind
august,
but
if
it
would
give
them
a
better
opportunity
to
know
what
they
were
accused
of
not
performing
or
violating
or
not
being
in
compliance
with
to
better
defend
themselves.
I
would
I
would
support
that,
but
if
they've,
if
they've
had
ample
notice-
and
this
is
a
hail
mary-
I
have
a
whole
different
opinion.
Thank
you
mayor.
That's
that's.
K
What
that's
what
I'm,
if
I
may
all
right.
O
K
President,
you
know
what
I
I
trust,
our
hollister
police
department
and
all
its
different
aspects,
and
you
know
there
is
no
department
or
people
that
are
perfect,
but
you
know
it
seems
to
me
that
from
my
remember
there
was
like
numerous
violations,
maybe
officer
wells.
You
can
speak
to
that.
W
For
agripharma,
okay,.
B
Maybe
before
he
gives
that
information,
that's
kind
of
one
of
the
the
conversations
is,
shall
we
give
the
applica
or
the
the
company
more
time
to
understand
what
the
I
don't
see,
charges,
accusations
or
issues
are,
as
was
pointed
out,
would
it
be
something
the
council
would
like
to
maybe
table
and
bring
back
to
the
first
meeting
of
june?
Would
that
be
what
I'm
hearing
from
council
make
sure
everyone
has
the
information
clear.
J
I
don't
think
that's
unreasonable,
I'm
prepared
to
go
either
way
and
but
I
don't
think
it's
unreasonable.
Mr.
M
I
K
When
we're
talking
about
appropriately
notified
of
these
allegations
or
just
revoke
revocation
process,
were
they
not
informed
of
all
these
violations
before.
L
Yeah
they
were
received
a
letter
based
on
the
police,
chief's
recommendations.
W
W
W
D
K
D
B
W
We
can't
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
share
the
specific
reports,
but
we
could
share
information
that
we
gleaned
from
those
reports
and
just
like
we
did
with
the
agropharma
appeal
that
was
held
in
open
session,
the
first
set
of
appeals
back
in
2018
that
keeps
getting
referenced.
We
first
heard
those
in
closed
session
and
then
of
the
three
appeals
at
that
time,
two
were
overturned
and
the
one
that
was
held.
W
They
were
given
the
opportunity
to
hold
an
actual
appeal
in
open
court
or
I'm
sorry,
an
open
council,
and
they
requested
not
to
have
that
done,
so
they
didn't
want
what
was
said
in
enclosed
session
to
be
out
in
the
open.
Here
I
it's
up
to
the
council.
If
they
want
to
hear
in
in
closed
session
or
an
open
session,
I'm
open
for
whatever
the
will
of
the
council
is.
B
I
I
would,
if
council
all
right
says
I
would
recommend
we
do
table
this
to
the
first
meeting
of
june,
have
a
closed
session
and
a
and
the
item
in
the
open
session.
Also,
would
that.
D
B
Possible,
mr
city
attorney.
D
Yes,
it
would
be,
mr
mayor,
but
before
anyone
takes
that
action,
if
the
appellant's
attorney,
I
assume
he's
still
on
the
line,
if
if
he
could
state
publicly
whether
or
not
if
that's
the
case,
if
it's
continued
until
the
first
council
meeting
in
june
2021,
he
would
be
willing
to
waive
any
other
notice
of
that
appeal.
Hearing.
U
Thank
you
it's
procedurally.
This
is
quite
difficult
because
I'm
muted,
I'm
not.
I
have
no
ability
to
speak
to
correct
the
record
for
the
representation
of
the
representation
that
have
been
made.
So
procedurally,
this
is
problematic,
so
in
the
future,
I'll,
hopefully
I'll
be
allowed
to
attend
in
person.
So
I
can
address
your
counsel
directly.
U
I'm
unclear
what
notice
he's
to
which
council
is
referring
he's
requesting
a
waiver.
So
since
I'm
unclear
on
the
request,
I
cannot
agree
to
it.
I
think
what
is
very
important
here
is
that
and
the
representation
I've
made
to
your
council
is
that
lxp
has
not
received
any
information
from
the
city
or
from
the
police
department
regarding
the
basis
for
the
proposed
revocation
or
the
alleged
violations
of
the
hollister
municipal
code.
D
Understood,
mr
morales,
the
only
question
that
I'm
getting
at
is
whether
or
not
you
will
agree
that
that
the
that
a
council
motion
tonight
to
continue
this
until
the
first
meeting
in
june
2021
would
be
sufficient
notice
for
you
to
appear
at
that
meeting
and
that
you
wouldn't
have
any
objection
as
to
continuing
it
to
that
date.
That's
all
I'm
asking.
U
So
I
would
maintain
the
same
objections
that
I've
placed
on
the
record,
so
I
wouldn't
waive
any
of
those.
So
if
the
council
is
planning
to
hold
the
appeal
hearing
on
that
date
without
giving
us
information
regarding
the
basis
of
the
of
the
proposed
revocation,
so
we
would
not
be
able
to
actually
assert
any
appellate
arguments
that
would
be
problematic.
So
I
can't
wave
that
sort
of
notice.
If
that's
what
you're
requesting
mr.
D
B
B
U
Is
your
counsel
going
to
request
staff
to
provide
us
information
regarding
the
revocation
so
that
we
can
prepare.
B
U
All
right,
all
we
would
request
is
that
we
give
be
given
reasonable
a
reasonable
opportunity
to
prepare
for
the
hearing
whenever
the
city
does
actually
provide
us,
the
information.
So
if
they
do
it
on
the
eve
of
the
hearing
that
may
be
unreasonable,
so
we're
requesting
reasonable
notice
and
that
we're
doing.
B
U
B
B
I
So
again,
I
I'm
not
sure
who
this
is
for
whether
it's
for
chief
renoso
or
for
mr
epperson
or
city
manager
miller,
but
typically
when
there's
a
cannabis
violation,
I'm
going
to
speak
in
terms
I'm
familiar
with.
Do
when
somebody's
in
violation
of
our
municipal
code.
Do
they
receive
either
a
notice
of
violation
or
notice
and
order
making
them
aware
of
the
violation.
W
It
depends
on
the
violation.
Many
of
your
minor
violations
are
dealt
with
a
verbal
warning.
If
they're
corrected
immediately,
then
we
don't
have
another
issue.
If
it's
a
moderate
to
major,
they
are
given
either
a
notice
to
comply
or
a
notice
of
warning.
W
They
are
made
aware
of
violations
as
they
come
up.
I
can
attest
that
the
maxwell's
none
of
the
information
that
we're
going
to
provide
is
new
to
them,
but
we
do
have
a
I
hate
to
say
progressive
discipline,
but
I
can't
think
of
a
better
term
for
it.
They
do
get
verbal
warnings
on
on
minors,
a
moderate
to
majors,
get
a
written
warning
and
then,
if
the
violations
aren't
corrected,
then
we
move
into
issuing
administrative
citations
or
revocation
suspensions
of
their
licenses.
I
B
A
E
T
Remember
again,
with
the
this
is
also
an
appeal
for
one
of
the
maxwell's.
B
Ms
mendez
there's
backfeed
going
on
your
microphone.
Can
you
try
to
adjust
your
microphone?
If
you
can?
L
Matter
if
I
could
probably
the
next
two
items
are
with
the
same
in
individuals,
so
they
probably
should
be
continued,
like
the
the
one
we
just
talked
about.
B
M
L
B
J
And
if
I
can
suggest,
if
you
have
this
meeting
plane
on
on
another
device,
you
need
to
mute
or
lower
the
volume
on
that
device.
A
G
C
B
Is
at
this
time
is
there
questions
from
council?
Q
You
good
evening,
okay,
so
as
of
early
2019
for
two
years
now
I
have
come
before
the
council
on
numerous
occasions
and
I've
and
I
know
the
council,
there
is
new,
but
I
did
state
that
the
under
section
of
542.10
or
5.420,
which
is
just
the
general
officer
wells,
has
drafted
what
is
called
a
quote:
cannabis,
hollister
police
department,
cannabis
safety
plan.
Unquote,
this
safety
plan
are
is
a
list
of
what
chris
wells
officer
wells
has
decided
are,
can
be
violations
for
cannabis
and
you
can
be
cited.
Q
You
can
get
your
license
revoked.
I
have
stated
numerous
times
that
the
this
policy,
this
safety
plan,
these
rules
that
he's
going
by
and
citing
citing
people
for,
has
never
ever
gone
through
and
been
approved
by
city
council.
Q
Q
You
have
a
whole
list
of
what
he
has
on
his
own
stated
that
these
are
rules
that,
if
you
break,
I
have
the
power
to
write
you
a
ticket
or
to
take
your
business
away.
These
cannabis
companies
spend
hundreds
of
thousands,
if
not
millions,
of
dollars
that
are
going
through
this
process,
building
out
everything
that
they
go
through
and
this
man
has,
the
authority
has
given
himself.
The
authority
doesn't
have
the
authority
by
city
council
because
it
has
not
been
authorized.
Q
It's
it's
a
revocation
of
permit
and
has
it
has
never
come
before
the
city
council
to
be
brought
as
a
city
as
part
of
the
city
ordinance.
So
again,
city
attorney
jason,
epperson.
You
are
quite
aware
of
this
and
you
have,
in
my
opinion,
because
I
did
have
a
hearing
with
chris
wells
and
you
did
not
represent
chris
wells.
Nor
did
you
return
chris
walsh's
phone
calls
to
to
to
represent
him.
E
E
T
You
this
item
is
also
related
to
the
two
first
items,
and
this
is
for
one
of
their
additional
licenses
that
they
have-
and
I
presume
that
we'll
be
tabling
this
item
for
the
june
7th
meeting
as
well
and
is
a
a
resolution
to
of
the
city
council,
the
city
of
hollister,
revoking
and
approved
cannabis
distribution.
Q
You
good
evening,
okay,
so
I
had
to
go
back
and
I
had
to
read
5.42
5.42.07
the
ordinance
for
cannabis
and
that
this
is
what
you're
using
to
go
to
file
something
against
or
to
revoke
the
licenses
for
the
for
the
maxwells,
not
one
of
you
up
there.
Even
the
city
attorney
would
ever
approve
to
show
up
to
court
or
to
a
meeting
because
you're
being
accused
of
something,
but
you
don't
even
know
what
you're
being
accused
of.
Let
me
remind
to
remind
the
council
that
the
attorney
morales
is
asking
for
the
august
2nd.
Q
Not
one
of
you
would
approve
that
if
it
was
happening
to
you,
they
deserve
due
process
and
they
must
be
given
the
reasons
why
and
they
must
be
given
the
evidence
and
for
officer
wells
to
say
now
that
he's
mentioned
that
something
has
happened
either
with
santa
cruz
county
or
whatever
another
agency
or
whatever
it
was.
I
don't
even
know
what
he
said
that
that
should
give
him
that
should
give
him
a
clue.
Well,
not
one
of
you
up.
Q
Q
I
have
no
idea
what
I'm
going
to
defend
myself
and
you're
going
to
give
it
to
me
right
now,
and
I'm
only
going
to
have
tonight
and
I'm
going
to
have
20
minutes
or
half
an
hour
and
my
everything
that
all
the
money
that
I
put
into
this
business
you're,
giving
me
15
minutes
or
20
minutes
to
defend
myself
without
knowing
what's
going
on.
You
know
that
due
process
is
required
and
do
not
set
up
the
city
of
hollister
for
lawsuits.
Again.
I
don't
know
why
this
has
come
forward.
Q
This
way
that
the
chris
wells
and
the
city
manager
should
have
gone
to
epperson
and
epperson.
You
should
have
done
your
research
that
this
is
not
the
way
due
process
works,
sir.
You
know
that
you're
an
attorney
this
please
do
not
put
the
city
in
liability
if
they
want
an
august.
Second
date,
there's
no
meetings
in
the
month
of
july.
So
if
you're
going
to
come
back
in
june
and
you're
june,
seven
and
you're
gonna
then
give
them
the
evidence.
Q
B
G
J
L
Thank
you
mayor.
The
council
of
san
benito
county
governments
or
cog
will
give
a
presentation,
updating
the
city
of
hollister
city
council
or
give
a
presentation
updating
the
council.
Sorry
on
the
measure
g
projects
staff
recommends
that
the
city
council
receive
the
presentation
on
measure
g
activities
from
the
council
of
governments
and
approve
the
measure
g
master
programs.
N
Sorry
about
that,
okay,
so
yeah,
I
just
have
a
a
couple
slides
to
go
through
with
you
guys
tonight
so
good
evening,
thanks
for
having
us
here.
I
let
me
just
give
me
a
second
sorry
to
get
the
slideshow
going,
but
we
just
wanted
to
give
you
an
update
tonight
on
some
cog
activities
and
the
what
we're
doing
with
measure
g.
So
I
will
just
walk
through
that
real
quickly.
I
have
some
good
news
this
evening.
I
wanted
to.
N
Let
folks
know
that
the
highway
156
project
from
hall
or
san
juan
batista
to
hollister
is
moving
ahead.
After
decades
of
planning,
we
have
a
fall.
N
2021
construction
start
date
with
caltrans,
so
the
project
is
fully
funded
thanks
to
the
state,
as
well
as
the
the
council,
governments
and
our
regional
traffic
impact
mitigation
fee
program
are
funding
this
project,
so
claude
will
be
working
with
caltrans
on
public
outreach,
and
so
we
want
to
be
a
resource
there
and
letting
folks
know
about
what
to
expect
with
the
project.
N
It
is
going
to
be
a
couple
of
years
of
construction,
but
we
anticipate
that
there
should
not
be
too
much
impact
to
traffic
outside
of
the
normal
tropic.
That's
that's
that
we
experience
on
heavy
156
now
also
on
measure
g.
So
again
before
you
tonight,
you
have
a
measure.
G
master
funding,
fund,
transfer
agreement
and
measure
g
has
three
tiers
of
projects.
The
first
is
the
highway
25
widening.
N
We
are
happy
to
report
that
we've
secured
five
million
dollars
in
state
funding
for
the
project
and
that's
matching
measure.
G
tax
dollars
and
we've
also
put
in
a
request
and
congressman
panetta's
office
is
helping
us
with
that
request
for
10
million
dollars
of
federal
funds,
and
so
that
will
be
getting
us
to
the
to
the
point
of
being
able
to
finish
the
environmental
document
and
the
design
of
the
final
design
of
the
project,
as
well
as
doing
property
acquisitions
for
it.
N
So
we're
excited
to
to
have
that
moving
along.
We
are
kicking
off
the
environmental
study
this
summer,
thanks
to
a
lot
of
the
the
hard
work
that
the
council
government's
board
of
directors
has
done
over
the
past
year,
and
also
I
wanted
to
report
that
the
I
understand
that
caltrans
is
working
with
the
city
of
hollister
on
a
landscaping
agreement
to
be
able
to
manage
the
the
landscaping
along
the
highway
25
bypass.
So
I
was
glad
to
hear
that
that
is
happening.
N
As
I
know,
that's
something
that
the
community
has
been
concerned
about.
N
So
just
quickly
wanted
to
update
on
the
revenues
for
measure
g
like
most
or
like
the
city
of
hollister,
I
know
is
I'm
experiencing.
We've
had
we've
had
greater
revenues
than,
and
we
did
last
year
on
the
coming
through
from
measure
g
and
we've
received
17
million
dollars
since
the
the
measure
went
into
again
being
collected.
But
we
are
at
14
over
this
time
last
year.
So
we're
glad
to
report
that
we're
not
sure
how
future
impacts
will
be.
N
But
we
will
be
monitoring
that
and
we're
doing
some
updates
to
our
financial
planning.
For
that,
and
as
you
can
see
here,
the
city
pollster
will
be
receiving
about
5.2
million
dollars
that
money
is
available
to
the
city.
N
Now
for
your
projects
as
you
as
you
get
started
on
your
your
local
roads,
projects
that
are
funded
with
measure
g
and
we
did
want
to
let
the
public
know
that
we
have
a
new
measure
g
website,
so
staff
worked
hard
on
putting
this
together
and
we
have
updates
we'll
have
project
updates
available
here,
as
well
as
an
interactive
map
and
other
information,
and
that
will
be
updated
regularly
for
the
public.
N
So
that's
all
I
had
tonight.
I
think
unless
you
have
any
questions
and
our
contact
information
is
here.
My
staff,
veronica
lozama,
our
transportation,
planner
and
norma
rivera
administrative
service
specialists
are
always
available
to
answer
questions
as
well.
That's
awesome.
B
B
I
Thank
you
mayor,
ms
gilbert,
can.
Can
you
confirm
that
your
oversight
committees
had
an
opportunity
to
review
the
report
and,
if
so,
did
they
have
any
comments
or
concerns
that
they
expressed
in
the
review
of
the
report.
N
Yes,
thank
you
for
that.
I,
that
was
in
my
notes
to
mention
so
yeah
and
the
oversight
committee
did
review
this
a
full
report
of
measure
g
activities
and
they
did
not
have
any
issues
or
concerns.
The
audit
that
was
last
completed
was
there
were
no
findings
in
the
audit
and
we
are
putting
together
our
measure
g
annual
report.
N
So
we've
got
a
subcommittee
from
the
oversight
committee,
that's
working
with
cog
on
putting
that
together
and
that
will
be
going
out
to
the
public
soon,
and
I
should
mention
too
that
you
know
expect
to
see
a
postcard
in
the
mail
we're
trying
to
make
sure
we
get
information
out
to
the
public
and
we're
working
on
some
different
outreach
strategies
right
now
so
to
let
folks
know
about
what
we're
working
on
at
cog.
I
Thank
you
and
I'd
just
like
to
congratulate
the
members
of
cog
for
the
great
progress
that's
been
made
in
in
the
recent
years
and
also
like
to
thank
congressman
panetta
for
his
commitment
to
the
project
as
well.
I
think
it
just
speaks
to
the
quality
of
the
elected
and
appointed
officials.
We
have
in
their
commitment
to
improve
the
traffic
flow
in
this
region.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you.
I
do.
I
want
to
thank
the
college
staff.
They
have
been
doing
an
incredible
job.
It's
been
a
long
haul
to
get
through
this
get
measure
g
going.
I
finally
got
that
approved.
Thank
you
all
the
voters,
and
now
that
work
is
getting
done
so
we're
what
started
off
slowly
is
ramping
up
quite
quickly
and
have
complete
confidence.
We're
going
to
start
seeing
some
major
things
happening
here
rather
quickly.
So
thank
you.
Staff
cog
with
that
is
there
a
this
is
a
resolution.
M
B
F
L
X
Would
this
help
I'm
so
sorry?
Okay,
okay,
so
I'm
here
tonight
requesting
city
council
approval
for
a
change
and
the
bylaws
for
the
airport
advisory
commission,
which
would
reduce
the
number
of
commissioners
from
seven
to
five
and
the
reason
that
we
are
asking
for.
That
is
because
we
incurred
a
number
of
vacancies
on
the
commission.
And
it
got
to
the
point
where
we
had
to
cancel
meetings,
because
we
didn't
have
enough
commissioners
at
some
times
to
hold
an
official
meeting.
X
X
Thank
you
reduce
the
number
of
commissioners
to
five.
What
happens
is
we
have
five
city
residents
and
that
eliminates
our
county
seats?
However,
we
have
one
seat
that
was
currently
filled
by
a
commissioner
that
residing
in
the
county
and
this
council
at
their
march
15th
meeting
decided
by
consensus
to
allow
him
to
finish
his
term.
So
we
currently
have
four
city
council.
X
Excuse
me,
four
city
residents
and
one
county
resident.
The
bylaw
change
was
introduced
at
the
airport
advisory
commission
meeting
of
march
24th.
It
was
unanimously
adopted
at
the
next
meeting
on
august
28th,
and
now
I'm
asking
city
council
to
consider
approving
resolution
2021-78
for
ratification,
which
would
finalize
the
change.
M
K
I
E
Y
The
grant
application
will
not
exceed
one
million
one
hundred
fifty
dollars,
eight
hundred
and
one
million
one
hundred
fifty
thousand
eight
hundred
and
seventy
two
dollars.
This
will
include
the
funding
allocated
to
the
city
of
hollister
in
the
amount
of
five
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
one
hundred
and
twenty
dollars.
Y
The
funding
will
go
towards
public
services
for
the
homeless,
shelter,
which
shall
include
the
operation
of
the
homeless,
shelter,
emergency,
hotel
vouchers,
outreach
services,
housing
navigation,
case
management,
rapid
housing
activities,
support
services
and
the
establishing
and
establishing
a
homeless
encampment
program.
This
portion
of
the
grant
will
be
eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
eight
hundred
and
seventy
two
dollars,
and
also,
if
awarded
the
remaining
three
hundred
thousand,
will
go
towards
public
facility
for
homeless
shelter
improvements.
Y
Unfortunately,
the
city-
we
don't
have
the
staffing
available
to
run
this
type
of
program
and
there
was
just
not
enough
time
to
to
procure
a
consultant
to
run
the
program
for
us
staff
recommends
the
city
council
approve
resolution,
2021-79
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
execute
the
mou
and
approve
the
city's
partition.
Participation
in
the
cdbg
cv2
and
cv3
grant.
I
Mayor
velasquez
tim
burns:
oh
hey,
mr
burns.
Thank
you
mayor.
I've
heard
the
presentation.
I
100
support
pushing
money
towards
supporting
our
homeless
community,
but
I
have
to
wonder
what
about
our
business
community
and
I
understand,
and
I've
heard
that
we
don't
have
the
staff
to
do
it.
My
recollection
was
there
was
a
direction
from
previous
council
in
march
to
move
forward
to
to
push
those
funds
towards
business.
I
M
Y
Okay,
well,
we
did
reach
out
to
the
edc
and
they
were
unable
to
help
us.
We
spoke
with
our
consultant
and
what
we
were
being
told
was
that
there's
other
funding,
there's
so
much
funding
out
there
for
business
assistance
and
that
the
cdbg
funding
just
comes
with
too
many
ties,
and
so
a
lot
of
consultants
didn't
really
want
to
work
with
that
type
of
funding.
B
I
do
want
to
point
out.
I
I
think
we've
been
making
progress
with
the
homeless.
I
am
concerned,
I
that
we
need
more
room
in
that
shelter
and
I'm
going
to
stress
this
ask
the
county
here.
I've
asked
many
many
of
times
one
of
the
best
ways
we
can
add
beds
into
that
shelter
is
by
the
county,
allowing
the
conference
center
in
their
and
the
homeless
shelter
to
be
used
for
additional
beds.
B
This
could
make
a
major
impact
as
far
as
getting
our
homeless
off
the
street,
and
I
I'm
very
concerned
that
there's
a
reluctance
by
the
county
to
to
not
add
those
beds,
and
rather
than
in
bed,
just
the
preserving
of
their
conference
room.
I
think
it's
incredibly
important
this
time
to
to
add
those
beds
in
that
conference.
Room
so
get
more
people
off
the
street
and
I'm
requesting
that
the
county
and
madison
county.
B
Please
please
help
us
get
the
homeless
off
the
streets,
it's
a
temporary
basis
until
we
move
to
the
next
stages
of
working
on
the
shelter
or
expanding
shelter
services.
But
at
this
time
it's
critical
that
we
work
to
get
the
people
off
the
street.
That
should
be
our
number
one
priority,
get
them
off
the
street
and
get
them
the
help
that
they
need.
Otherwise
we're
going
to
see
this
issue
expand.
B
Mr
burns
asked
a
very
good
question
and
cdbg
funds
are
very
difficult
to
use
and
we
all
know
it's.
There's
years
we
don't
even
get
the
the
grant,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
other
funds
we'll
be
working
with
through
the
state
and
feds
for
more
business
help.
So
I'm
looking
forward
to
that,
but
if
you
can
ask
the
county
or
let
them
know
that
nope
and
to
be
very
clear
that
we're
asking
them
to
add
beds
into
that
conference
room
give
up
that
space
right
now
in
the
shelter
to
accommodate
more
homeless.
K
E
B
O
I
Thank
you
mayor.
So
in
a
previous
report
we
heard
that
cog
there
there
were
projected
funds
that
they've
received.
If
I
recall
right,
was
about
14
more
than
they
anticipated,
and
so,
as
I
recall
that
that
led
to
about
five
million
dollars
that
the
city's
going
to
receive,
give
or
take
a
little,
and
so
my
my
question
is:
could
part
of
that
money
or
would
part
of
that
money?
If
we
approve
this,
then
be
part
of
that
20
would
be
part
of
that.
I
L
B
B
I
do
want
to
make
a
couple
comments
and
again
I
I
I
don't
disagree
that
the
alleys
have
to
be
worked
on,
but
I
do
want
to
make
sure
we're
clear
about
measure
g
funding,
because
the
portion
we're
going
to
get
from
measure
g
for
city
streets
is
basically
limited
to
the
next
four
years.
After
that
all
the
money
will
be
going
towards
highway
25..
B
If
we
don't
find
a
way
to
get
four
million
dollars
into
our
budget
every
year
from
our
general
fund,
we
will
never
keep
up
to
where
we
need
to
be
with
the
streets,
and
our
main
priority
has
to
be
to
find
that
money
before
the
measure
g
money
dries
up,
because
we're
going
to
get
right
back
to
where
we
were
and
as
it
is,
we've
had
the
problems
in
the
past
because
of
the
constant
you
know
a
street
being
done
in
one
district,
a
street
being
done
in
another
district,
another
one
and
so
on,
where
we
weren't
getting
the
efficiencies.
B
B
B
I
think
one
of
the
things
I
heard
from
some
of
these
contractors
that
worked
on
the
roads
was
we'd,
be
better
off
pulverizing
the
alleys
hiring
a
company
come
out,
pulverize
it
and
use
our
staff
to
grade
this
and
create
a
surface
error
that
would
be
much
cheaper
than
trying
to
contract
out,
because
it's
a
lot
of
work
for
the
it's.
Let
me
rephrase
that
it's
not
a
big
project
for
the
contractors
and
it's
enough
of
a
headache-
that's
not
worth
it
for
them,
but
their
their
recommendations
seem
to
be
get
the
surveyors
out.
B
There
shoot
it
see
which
way
the
slopes
are.
If
there
is
a
fall
enough
of
a
fall
to
get
the
water
out,
pulverize
the
alleys
resurface,
and
you
can
get
much
more
bang
out
of
your
buck
by
having
staff.
Do
it
I'm
totally
for
that.
I
think
we
need
to
do
it,
but
I
cannot
get
back
to
a
situation
personally
where
we're
allocating
20
percent
dollars
to
one
item,
even
though
we
know
there's
so
many
streets
that
still
need
to
be
repaired.
B
I'm
I'm
going
to
stick
with
my
view
of
getting
the
surveys
done,
picking
the
grids
that
we
want
to
work
on,
getting
everything
within
those
grids
repaired
and
then
moving
on
to
the
next
section
as
we
get
more
funds.
But
I'm
going
to
reiterate
the
most
important
thing
we
could
do
as
a
council
is
find
a
way
to
make
a
true
budget
item
for
our
roads
and
that's
gonna
find
a
way
to
find
four
million
dollars
a
year.
B
We
get
about
900
000
in
gas
tax
a
bit
more
with
sb1
right
now,
but
we
need
to.
We
need
to
find
a
way
to
find
the
other
three
million
dollars
over
the
next
few
years,
because
that
measure
g
money
will
be
gone
in
four
years
and
we're
going
to
be
right
back
in
the
same
position.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody
really
clearly
understands
that.
Y
I
I
really
couldn't
tell
you
that,
but
I
could
find
out
and
let
you
know.
K
K
Eight
to
ten
years
ago,
four-
and
that
was
probably
one
audi-
oh
you
know
I
just
I
just
you
know
what
I
I
I
keep
hearing
people
talk
about,
how
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
attack
this
and
and
this
issue,
and
yet
it's
never
done,
and
so
I
just
I
just
I'm
going
to
reiterate
and
I'm
not
going
to
let
this
die
it's.
We
need
to
do
something
about
our
alleys,
not
just
talk
about
it.
K
We
need
to
do
something
about
it
and
whether
it's
one
a
year
something,
but
something
has
to
be
done
and
that's
why
that's
why
I
had
this
written
up
and
wrote
and
figured
it
figured.
It
was
coming
out
this
way
anyways,
but
you
know
what
for
all
for
everyone
in
my
district,
I
am
not
going
to
give
up.
K
We
are
going
to
get
these
alleys
done.
It's
not
going
to
happen
overnight,
but
I
am
not
going
to
let
this
issue
die.
I
will
bring
it
up
and
I
will
bring
it
up
and
I
will
bring
it
up
until
we
get
something
done
and
because
street
and
alley
allocation
is
also
streets
and
alleys.
It's
not
just
street
grids,
because
those
grids
keep
be
it's.
K
It's
interesting
how
those
grids
keep
getting
pushed
around
to
where
you
want
them,
where
the
mayor
wants
them
to
go
instead
of
starting
at
one
spot
and
working
our
way
around
the
city
or
it's
that's,
that's
how
I
see
it
but
anyways.
That's
all
I
got
to
say.
I
L
Sorry,
I'm
trying
to
remember
from
the
presentation
we
had
about
eight
eight
million
dollars,
but
I
mean
a
lot
of
that
was
earmarked,
but
I
can
bring
that
back
for
you
or
do
it
as
part
of
our
budget
meetings.
Upcoming.
I
Okay
yeah,
I
I
think
that
could
be
helpful
because
I
agree
with
council
member
perez
and
I
also
agree
with
the
mayor
that
I
wouldn't
want
to
see
us
unnecessarily
dip
into
measure
g
money
knowing
that
that's
going
to
in
in
four
or
five
years.
I
But
we
need
to
make
a
commitment
to
our
alleys
they're
a
mess,
there's
no
good
way
of
saying
anything
kinder
than
that
and
and
they
they
are
expensive
to
repair.
I
And
so
maybe
maybe
a
compromise
would
be
to
pull
this
item
and
and
further
discuss
it
once
the
assessment
comes
in
and
and
then
in
conjunction
with
the
proposed
fiscal
budget
for
next
year,
and
so
that
we
can
make
an
educated
commitment.
But
as
councilmember
perez
has
said,
that
he's
not
going
to
forget
about
allies
and-
and
nor
will
I
and
so-
but
I
would
like
to
find
a
systematic
and
and
good
way
to
begin
the
work
and.
G
I
Know:
okay,
the
road
to
alleys
are
paved
with
good
intentions,
but
unfortunately
those
good
intentions
haven't
come
to
be
a
reality
for
a
number
of
years,
and
so
I
don't
want
this
to
go
away,
but
maybe
today
isn't
the
right
time
to
really
commit
to
this
process.
Until
we
have
more
clear
information
and
once
we
do,
we
can
make
a
wiser
decision.
That
completes
my
comments.
Thank
you
mayor.
I
have.
K
B
Thank
you.
I
do
want
to
go
back
and
point
out
something
again
that
the
the
process
of
fixing
roads
and
alleys
you
know
for
years.
We
know
this,
but
we
go
look
around
our
city
right
now
was
put
off
because
of
this
issue
of
well,
we'll
bundle,
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars,
and
after
so
many
years,
we'll
try
to
do
a
few
projects
and
those
projects
were
spread
throughout
the
city,
so
we
weren't
getting
the
bang
for
our
buck.
B
This
process
here
will
allow
us
to
really
understand
it
and
the
reality
is
we're
going
to
need
a
bond,
or
I
would
recommend
that
we
look
into
bonding
a
project-
that's
upwards
of
15,
to
20
million
dollars
to
really
have
a
good
impact,
and
again
this
is
not
picking
and
choosing
the
grids
based
on.
On
my
opinion,
this
is
picking
a
an
area
based
on
the
experts.
Opinions
work
from
that
point,
work
spread
from
there
each
year
as
we
keep
doing
more
projects,
but
it's
gonna.
B
B
But
in
the
meantime
again,
looking
at
some
of
the
recommendations
that
were
made
by
some
of
these
general
contractors
or
engineering
is
about
understanding
your
slopes
on
the
alley
looking
into
pulverizing,
what's
there
and
then
bringing
back
your
own
equipment
to
take
some
of
these
take
care
of
these
things
earlier,
rather
than
waiting
around,
so
I
mean
that's
still
an
option
and
something
we
need
to
be
working
for
so
there's.
B
I
You
mayor,
I've
heard
you
say
a
number
of
times
now
about
pulverizing
alleys.
I
am
by
no
means
an
expert
in
road
repair
or
maintenance,
but
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
ask
city
staff
to
bring
back
a
report
specifically
on
the
alleyways
and
what
that
really
looks
like
and
what
the
cost
would
be
for
staff
to
actually
start
doing.
Some
of
that,
if
it
makes
sense
after
they've
done
the
review.
I
Because
again
maybe
it's
not
a
long-term
solution,
but
it
might
be
a
temporary
solution
so
that
when
we
end
up
heading
back
into
next
winter,
assuming
we're
going
to
see
rain
at
some
point
in
the
next
decade,
we
don't
want
properties
and
garages
and
residences
flooding
if
it
can
be
prevented,
and
sometimes
maybe
an
ounce
of
prevention
would
be
worthwhile
in
this
case,
and
so
I'd
really
like
to
hear
more
about
what
that
really
means.
I
I
can
visualize
it
in
my
mind,
but
I'm
not
convinced
I'm
correct.
B
Yeah-
and
I
I
fully
agree
with
you-
I
I
would
say
fully
agree
and
I
think
basically
just
so
real
quick
understanding.
Polarizing
is
basically
means
getting
rid
of
the
breaking
it
all
up,
getting
it
out.
So
you
have
the
the
dirt
underneath
to
recompact
that
dirt
to
do
this
correctly
and
then
understanding
your
slopes,
so
you
can
understand
the
fall.
B
If
there's
enough
fall
to
take
the
water
out
or
is
there
has
to
be
a
drainage
system
installed
different
options
that
can
come
from
it
and
I
definitely
think
we
can
have
some
of
the
local
engineers
looking
at
this.
So
we
understand
those
slopes
and
what
we
can
do
from
that.
So
I
would
love
to
hear
that
also
from
our
our
staff
and
give
us
some.
L
K
Agree,
you
know
what
I
I
I
I
truly
trust
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
to
come
to
a
solution
to
the
to
our
alley
situation,
and
you
know
what
I
I
totally
understand
that
we
still
need
to
maintain
our
streets,
because
I
mean
we
don't
want
them
to
look
like
our
alleys
and
but
you
know,
I
look
forward
to
the
council
coming
together,
so
we
can
have
good
input
from
everybody
and
feed
off
everybody
kind
of
brainstorm,
and
I
trust
in
our
our
city
staff
and
the
engineers
to
to
help
us
come
up
with
an
idea
and
so
yeah.
B
Mr
burns,
your
your
comment,
I
think,
basically,
would
be
to
withdraw
this
item.
B
Q
You
know
get
to
the
very
bottom,
but
in
this
study,
because
a
majority
of
the
the
alleys
that
are
in
the
central
part
of
town,
which
is
fifth
street
to
sixth
street
and
all
that
area
fourth
street,
there's
a
fault
line
there,
so
is
that
part
of
the
you
know
is
that
included
into
the
study
as
to
because
they
are
in
the
fault,
in
the
area
of
the
fault
line,
the
adjustments
of
the
movement
of
the
earth.
Q
Also,
I
realized
that
the
main
thoroughfares
are
the
ones
that
get
the
most
attention
and
mayor
velasquez.
It
was
actually
you
that
threw
out
the
number
you
know
what
what's?
What
did
you
want?
20?
You
asked
councilman
perez.
What
do
you
want?
You
want
20
and
you're
like
yeah
councilman
president,
yes
I'll
take
20,
you
threw
out
the
20
if
you're
saying
that
20
you
want
it,
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
you
you
know:
you're
gonna
come
back
and
you're
gonna
with
this
agenda
item.
Q
You
want
to
table
it,
but
what
percentage
would
be
would
satisfy
you
mayor,
mayor
velasquez,
because
it
needs
to
happen
the
people
that
that,
obviously,
that
live
in
alleyways,
because
we
don't
have
alleys
any
longer,
those
are
the
those
are
the
homes.
Those
are
the
communities
that
have
been
here
the
longest.
Q
So
let's
not
neglect
them
and
let's,
let's
show
them
some
kind
of
respect
and
give
some
money
towards
getting
those
alleys
done,
because,
just
like
the
people
who
live
on
the
main
thoroughfares,
the
people
who
live
near
the
alleys
that
have
been
here
for
decades
and
generations,
because
families
have
had
those
properties
for
generations,
they've
been
paying
their
taxes,
their
tax
fair
share
for
a
long
time.
So
you
may
want
to
table
this,
but
I
am
very
interested
in
knowing
whether
this
study
of
the
streets
and
the
alleys
does.
Q
B
Thank
you.
Let
me
yeah.
I
can
answer
that.
The
study
tells
us
the
conditions
of
the
roads,
whether
they're
at
30,
30,
40,
50
upwards
of
70,
where
it's
deemed
somewhat
a
good
average
condition
80s,
where
it's
conditioned
more
on
the
excellent
side,
90
100,
that's
what
the
study
tells
us,
then
from
that
point
the
engineers
go
back.
Look
at
the
roads.
Is
it
is
it
crack
filling?
Is
it
slurry?
Is
it
reconstruction
of
a
road?
B
So
in
the
alleys
I
can
say,
most
of
those
alleys
are:
are
full
reconstruction
or
pulverizing
to
get
the
get
back
to
the
base,
make
sure
it's
compacted
correctly
and
then
the
slope,
the
problem
with
the
alleys
in
the
past
and
some
of
our
roads
is
when
we
do
patching
or
just
knickknacking
through
we're,
not
we're
not
solving
the
problem.
The
alleys
needed
a
drain
system
and
I
think
most
people
would.
B
They
would
agree
that
without
getting
the
water
out,
we're
just
really
creating
the
same
problem
over
and
over
again,
so
obviously
when
they
were
first
built
that
wasn't
a
consideration
which
is
leading
to
some
of
these
problems.
Of
course,
they've
been
neglected,
like
many
many
of
our
roads,
it's
not
because
nobody
wants
to
get
the
alleys
done.
It's
the
same
reason
we
have
this
situation
with
our
roads.
B
Is
the
lack
of
funds
or
lack
of
commitment
to
making
sure
the
funds
are
there
and
I'm
hearing
a
council
that
is
committed
to
fixing
the
roads
and
fixing
the
alleys
and
to
do
that.
Your
first
step
is
always
understanding
your
conditions,
then
picking
the
areas
you're
going
to
be
working
through
to
get
to
maximize
it
and
I'll
repeat
the
same
thing.
I've
said
earlier
when
you
pick
a
grid
you're,
not
picking
to
ignore
something,
you're
picking
a
grid
to
finish
the
grid.
B
Whatever
is
it
is
in
that
grid,
whether
it's
a
street
or
an
alley?
It's
time
to
get
this
thing
fixed,
that's
a
whole
point
of
a
grid
system.
You've
got
equipment
out
there,
so
you
can
make
sure
you're
taking
care
of
all
the
items
within
that
grid
before
moving
on
to
the
next
grid
and
so
on,
and
so
on.
B
This
way
you
have
a
focus
area
which
would
be
much
more
cost
efficient
for
us
and
it
gets
us
the
work
done
rather
than
doing
a
street
in
each
district,
as
was
done
in
the
past,
which
wasn't
very
efficient
and
led
to
what
we're.
Seeing
now,
we've
made
progress.
In
the
last
few
years
there
was
a
three
million
dollar
program
a
few
years
back
that
fixed
quite
a
few
streets.
We
just
proved
another
one
that
was
approved
a
couple
years
ago
to
go
under
to
go
for
bid.
B
That's
gonna
fix
several
more
streets,
and
this
will
be
the
next
phase.
But
my
point
was
the
reality.
Is
we
have
to
do
a
a
major
project?
It's
not
going
to
be
a
5
million
project.
We
need
to
be
looking
again
upwards
15
to
20
million,
which
would
require
bonding,
but
it
would
take
care
quite
a
bit
of
the
city.
Whatever
portion
we
choose
to
attack.
So
that's
that's
a
process.
B
I
think
we're
gonna
see
that's
gonna
work
pretty
well
and
it's
gonna
be
much
more
efficient
with
our
dollars
and
much
quicker
to
get
done.
Any
other
questions
or
comments
from
council.
K
Yeah,
so
the
because,
before
with
the
our
conversation
we
had
about
streets
analogies
before
we
were
talking
about
separating
the
streets
and
alleys,
can
you
refresh
my
memory
on
what
you
were
talking
about
then?
Because
I'm
because
now
that
we're
talking
streets
and
alleys
and
we're
going
to
do
it
in
a
grid?
When
I
thought
we
were
talking
about
that
streets
and
alleys
should
be
separate.
K
B
The
again,
the
study
is
going
to
do
analysis
on
all
the
streets,
all
the
alleys
that
will
come
back
and
tell
us
conditions
of
each
item.
One
of
the
recommendations
that
contractors
were
making
was
that
you
might
want
to
look
at
the
alleys,
an
opportunity
there
to
pulverize
and
use
your
staff
shoot
the
the
level
figure
out
what
your
slopes
are
see
if
your
staff
could
handle
some
of
those
things.
That's
one
option.
The
other
option,
of
course,
is
you
just
pay
the
contractors
to
do
it.
B
So
it's
it
really
comes
out
to
us
what
our
staff
can
do
or
not
do
how
much
money
we
have
and
again
everything
within
the
grid
should
be
fixed.
So
if
there's
alleys
within
that
grid
and
they're,
not
in
good
condition,
they
need
to
be
fixed
if
their
streets
are
not
good
condition,
they
need
to
be
fixed.
If
it's
just
slurry,
it's
slurry,
if
it's
crack
fuel,
it's
crack
fill
if
it's
a
full
reconditioned,
that's
what
we
need
to
be
doing.
B
K
G
AA
Good
evening,
mayor
and
city
council
before
you
tonight
is
resolution
2021-81
in
which
we
are
seeking
your
approval
on
a
policy
for
dedication,
plaques
for
public
facilities
and
grounds.
The
city
currently
does
not
have
a
policy
that
provides
guidelines
on
dedication,
plaques
for
public
facilities
and
grounds,
and
by
approving
the
proposed
policy.
AA
AA
That
I
am
aware
of
right
now.
This
is
just
for
the
policy.
I
don't
know
of
installations
being
done.
City
manager.
L
Yeah,
well,
we
I
mean
like,
like
you
said,
this
is
just
a
policy
to
establish
basically
who's
going
to
be
on
the
plaque,
but
we
would
bring
it
to
council
when
we
adopt
whatever
plaque
we're
going
to
put
up
at
a
park
or
on
a.
B
B
Ascendant
go
ahead,
can
you
please
your
volume
seems
kind
of
low?
Oh
sorry
about.
J
That
can
you
hear
me
better
now:
yes,
okay,
who's,
talking
about
daisy.
Did
you
get
this
because
I
know
sometimes
we
borrow
policies.
Did
we
get
this
from
another
city
and
if
so,
did
we
change
anything
from
the
other
city.
AA
AA
Sunnyvale
and
the
only
change
I
believe
that
we
made
was
on
number
five.
If
you
have
access
to
that
policy,
yeah.
AA
J
That
was
confusing
to
me
I'll,
be
honest
with
you,
so
I'm
just
thinking,
okay,
if
they
budgeted
this
a
while
ago
we're
gonna
have
like
25,
I
mean
we
can
have
a
whole
lot
of
council
members.
So
I'm
curious
as
to
what
that
language
said
and
if
maybe
we
can
look
at
just
revisiting
that.
So
that
is
the
question
I
was
going
at.
It
looked
a
little
bit
different
like
depending
on
how
far
ago
it
was
budgeted.
J
We're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
people
on
that
plaque,
so
I
think
we
should
put
like
a
time
limit.
Maybe
you
know
what
I
mean.
I
don't
know
it's
just
a
suggestion,
but
it
looked
a
little
bit
bizarre
to
me
and
I
wanted
to
ask
those
questions
so.
L
You
know
sometimes
we
have
a
two-year
budget
or
a
one-year
budget
if
the
council
changes
in
between
the
budget
cycle
that
that's
where
that
would
be
applicable.
So
I
mean
yeah
projects
are
thought
about
10
years
ago
and
it
might
take
a
lot
of
planning
some,
like
our
current
river
trail,
that
we
just
opened
up.
It's
a
to
try
to
get
grants,
but
the
budgeting
of
that
project.
We're
like
this
year
was
only
one
year
budget,
but
sometimes
I
could
say
it
could
take
two
years.
Yes,.
J
K
K
I
don't
need
my
name
on
it
and
I
I
don't
think
we
need
any
council
names
or
anyone
else's
names
and
if
it
was
in
memory
of
someone
because
of
a
certain
situation
happened,
I
think
we,
I
can't
remember
the
city
employee's
name,
that's
out
front
vargas,
george
vegas,
you
know
what
those
those
are.
Those
are
special
things
this
in
this
in
river
parkway.
K
Awesome
great,
I
was
you
know
it's
great.
How
price
mayor
recently
came
up
with
the
idea
to
pass
out
bicycles
and
for
the
raffle
and
all
that
stuff,
that's
great,
because
that's
for
the
community.
Personally,
I
just
I
just
I.
I
don't
see
that
for
me.
That's
why
I
can't
go
forward
with
this,
but
thank
you.
Q
Thank
you.
It's
not
so
much
for
you
personally
super
I
mean
councilman
perez
and
each
individual
member.
You
know
there
are
former
council
members
who
have
passed.
Q
There
are
mayors
who
you
know,
people
who
have
served
as
as
mayors
and
something
someone
decides
that
they
want
to
name
a
park
or
they
put
them
put
it
on
a
plaque.
There's
for
many
reasons.
Q
I
can
see
you
abstaining,
but
I,
but
it's
not
because
if
you
say
yes
that
you're
being
you
know,
you're
you're
wanting
to
be
recognized
for
something
this
is
just
for.
I'm
just
gonna,
you
know.
Maybe
somebody
wants
to
do
something
and
I
know
there's
some
kind
of
a
scholarship
under
marty.
Richmond's
name.
You
know
something
like
that
or
you
know
there
are
ideas.
You
know
I
mean
you
know
that
mayor
velasquez
has
been
around
for
a
long
time.
Q
You
know
and
he's
a
very
popular
mayor-
and
maybe
somebody
wants
to
you
know,
do
something
for
him.
I
think
that
it's
not,
I
think,
it's
just
a
recognition
of
the
the
individual
person
who's
being
named,
that
they've
done
something,
but
it's
not
because
they
want
you're
going
to
say
yes
and
you're
going
to
say.
Oh
my
name's
going
to
go
on
a
plan,
I
mean
when
they
open
up
a
new
park.
Q
There's
a
dedication
when
you,
when
you
open
up,
I
can
only
think
of
parks
right
now,
because
I
know
that
there's
been
a
couple
of
them
where
they
have
plaques
and
you
know
of
who
the
council
members
were
at
the
time
that
that
that
it
passed
or
whatever.
So
it's
not
it's
not
for
yourself
glorification,
but
it's
for
it's
for
acknowledging
those
members
of
the
community.
Q
J
Mayor
go
ahead,
sir,
thank
you.
So
I
can
see
some
problems
with
us,
not
having
a
policy
number
one.
Well,
we're
gonna
have
to
bring
every
single
plaque
for
every
park
up
to
the
council
and
we're
gonna
have
to
just
decide
on
individual
individual
basis.
J
J
I
do
understand-
and
I've
heard
this
same
sentiment
coming
from
the
from
councilmember
burns
as
well,
and
if
that
were
the
case,
that
you
don't
want
your
names
to
go
on
there
and
you
feel
like
you,
don't
need
that,
then
I
would
suggest
that
we
name
we
put
another
number
on
this
policy
and
that
we
allow
for
council
members
that
wish
not
to
be
on
the
plaque
to
have
their
names,
not
on
the
plaque.
J
J
I
do
think
that
that
that's
important,
so
I
would
suggest
if
you
don't
want
your
name
to
go
on.
There
then
add
or
amend
the
policy,
but
by
not
adopting
a
policy.
I
think
where
it's
going
to
cause
more
problems
for
us
and
that's
why
these
policies
exist.
Thank
you.
I
Mayor
velasquez
tim
burns,
mr
burns
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
vice
mayor.
I
appreciate
you
expressing
your
thoughts
in
regards
to
my
concerns
and
you're
spot
on
and
and
certainly
I
as
the
policy
is
currently
written.
I
I
can't
support
it
for
the
reasons
that
have
already
been
stated,
but
if
there
was
a
friendly
amendment
made
to
include
language
that
vice
mayor
rosendes
proposed,
I
would
support
that
and
and
for
me
it
just
I'm
in
it
for
public
service,
and
I
understand-
and
I
have
no
problem
with
city
employees
being
recognized
because
at
the
end
of
the
day
they
do
all
the
work
or
they
contract
with
others
that
do
the
work
at
their
supervision,
and
so
for
me,
it
just
seems
it
just
goes
against
my
core
values,
and
so
for
that
reason
I
can't
support
it
as
proposed,
and
I
recognize
that
it's
a
policy
and
I
under
absolutely
understand
the
difference
between
a
policy
and
the
implementation
of
a
policy.
I
But
again
I'd
like
to
see
some
real
numbers
in
place.
I
mean:
are
we
talking
100
bucks
or
less?
Are
we
talking
several
hundred
dollars
and
for
those
reasons,
I
can't
support
it
tonight
as
proposed,
but
I'm
open
to
influence
and
persuasion.
Thank
you,
mayor.
B
Thank
you
any
other
questions
comments.
Mr
ascendants,
would
you
like
to
make
a
motion
with
the
friendly
amendments
that
mr
burns
was
talking
about.
J
Yeah,
so
I
guess
I
will
make
a
motion
to
adopt
resolution
number
2021-81
with
the
friendly
amendment,
adding
to
the
policy
number
nine.
If-
and
we
can
put
this,
however
you'd
like,
but
if
a
council
member
would
like
to
not
have
their
name
on
there,
then
they
can
choose
not
to
have
their
name
on
there,
and
I
would
also
like
for
staff
to
bring
back
to,
I
would
say,
the
next
council
meeting
what
the
cost
of
these
plaques
are
and
what
the
upkeep
of
the
plaques
would
be.
Thank
you.
K
B
Now
that
the
policy
would
be,
as
was
mentioned,
what
mr
sanders
is
asking
is
just
so
we
know
in
the
future.
What
are
the
costs
of
the
we're,
bringing
it
back?
Fine
yeah,
but
not
that
wouldn't
be
an
action.
It
would
just
be
an
informational
item.
This
would
be
the
action
item
for
the
policy.
Oh
no
was
that
I'm
sorry,
you
call.
G
I
Like
to
ask
the
city
attorney
for
a
point
of
clarification,
so
as
I
understand
it,
if,
if
if
we
vote,
if
I
vote
no
in
essence,
the
council
will
take
no
current
action
and-
and
I
apologize
because
we've
had
this
conversation
before-
and
I
I
don't
want
this-
I
don't
want
to
kill
this
item,
but
I
would
like
to
know
the
numbers
prior
to
saying
yes
to
it,
and
so,
if
I
say
no
now
and
the
bottom
line
is
frankly
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
move
forward.
D
Almost
council
member
burns,
I
think
what
you're
referring
to
perhaps
is
emotion
for
consideration,
and
if
this
does
not
pass
tonight,
if,
if
four
people
vote
against
it
or
three
people
vote
against
it,
then
it's
just
dead.
D
If,
if
it's,
for
instance,
a
2-2,
that's
essentially
no
decision,
and
I
would
expect
that
it
would
come
back
on
the
next
agenda,
along
with
the
numbers
in
the
numbers,
considering
that
that
was
seems
to
have
been
direction
given
to
staff
correct
yeah.
That's
what
I
would
expect.
L
Mayor,
if
you
don't
mind,
the
problem
is
by
saying
a
number:
we
don't
know
what
kind
of
plaque
is
going
to
be
put
up.
Is
it
going
to
be
a
plain
just
a
piece
of
metal
plaque
put
it
put
on,
or
is
it
going
to
be
a
monument
plaque
just
because,
depending
on
what,
if
it's
a
building
or
maybe
the
design
for
the
park
has
has
a
monument,
and
so
that's
kind
of
the
issue?
Is
we
just
don't
know
what
the
what
those
costs
are
going
to
be
right.
I
And
I
understand
that-
and
so
I
guess
maybe
my
my
and
and
mayor
by
all
means
shut
me
down
if
I'm
out
of
order
or
if
it's
inappropriate.
But
my
understanding
is
we're
if
we
vote
in
the
affirmative
tonight
that
this
puts
this
policy
in
place
with
the
friendly
amendment
that
vice
mayor
resendez
proposed.
I
G
B
I
B
B
I
B
I
think,
as
the
city
manager
pointed
out,
every
packing
different,
but
let
me
put.
K
D
That's
been
made
so
if
we
either
need
to
continue
with
that
vote
or
we
can
or
if
council
member
resendez
would
like
to,
he
could
withdraw
his
motion.
We
continue
the
conversation
and
then
you
could
decide
whether.
B
J
What
what
are
you
asking
me
to
amend,
I'm
not
clear.
J
I
thought
I
had
amended
it
to
address
both
of
your
concerns,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
I'm
missing
out
here.
J
I
Again,
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
torn
because
I,
like
vice
mayor,
resendez's,
friendly
amendments.
I
have,
I
have
no
option.
My
only
concern
is
the
dollar
number
and
I
don't
have
a
clear
idea
of
a
plaque
and
what
the
costs
are
and
if
I
were
to
say
no
more
than
five
hundred
dollars
and
the
average
plaque
cost
five
hundred
and
one
dollars
we
would.
We
were
just
we're
going
in
a
circle
here,
but
I
mean
I
I
don't
want
to
kick.
I
This
can
down
the
road,
but
I
would
like
a
clear
understanding
of
dollars
to
be
expended
and-
and
I
and
frankly
I
don't
think
it
needs
account
or
vice
mayor
rosendes-
gave
me
the
out
that
I
needed
to
say.
Yes,
it's
the
dollar
amount.
That
still
gives
me
pause
for
concern,
and
so
I'm
I
can.
I
can
make
that
friendly
amendment
to
a
dollar
amount
not
to
exceed
500,
and
I
I
suppose
then,
if,
if
we
find
that
that's
an
insignificant
amount
of
money
that
we
bring
it
back
to
council
for
a
text
amendment.
L
Correct,
that's
what
I
was
going
to
add.
I
mean
this
is
the
policy.
It
can
be
changed.
You
know
in
by
future
council
meetings
and
if
we
find
that
it's
kind
of
a
nuisance
at
500
that
we
can
bring
that
back
to
council
to
say
you
know
that
500
was
too
too
low.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
I'd
like
to
make
the
friendly
minute
for
for
plaques
not
to
exceed
500,
and
I
can
I
can
move
forward
and
say
yes
at
that
point.
D
And
I'm
sorry
because
the
voting
has
already
started
on
that.
Ms
black,
can
you
tell
me
who
made
the
motion
to
begin
with
and
who
made
the
second.
C
C
Council
member,
our
vice
mayor
rosendes,
made
a
motion
to
adopt
with
adding
policy
number
nine
with
an
amendment
adding
policy
number
nine.
If
a
council
member
chooses
not
to
have
their
name,
then
they
can
then
that
their
name
does
not
have
to
be
on
it
and
then
requested
that
staff
bring
back
cost.
D
All
right,
what
I'm
going
to
recommend
is
that
we
complete
the
vote
as
it
originally
stood
since
we
had
already
started
voting
and
or
that
vice
mayor
rend,
resendez
excuse
me
and
mayor
velasquez
withdraw
it
and
we
just
start
over
from
scratch.
I
I
AA
Thank
you
resolution
2021-82
is
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
hollister,
establishing
a
policy
on
flag
display.
This
policy
is
to
establish
a
clear
guidelines
with
respect
to
protocols
and
procedures
of
the
flag
display
at
all
buildings
and
facilities
owned
and
controlled
by
the
city
of
hollister.
AA
A
staff
and
city
council
recognize
that
it's
important
to
establish
clear
guidelines
with
respect
to
protocols
and
procedures
of
a
flag
display,
and
for
that
reason
we're
asking
that
the
city
council
adopt
a
resolution
for
a
flag
for
a
policy
on
flag
display.
I
Mayor
velazquez
tim
burns.
Oh
mr
burns,
thank
you
mayor.
I've
read
it
I
like
it.
I
support
it
100.
I
have
one
question
and
that's
in
reference
to
on
the
staff
and
the
council
packet
on
page
244
under
policy
3b,
it
says
that
there
will
be
signa.
Signatures
will
be
required.
I
think
it
said
about
100
and
that
my
question
is:
will
those
signatures
be
verified
and
if
so,
by.
L
Whom
the
main
reason
we
put
this
on
here
was
to
just
prevent
from
becoming
more
of
a
frivolous
just
one
person
coming
in
and
just
saying
they
want
to
fly
different
flags
all
the
time.
I
would
have
to
ask
the
city
clerk
how
hard
it
is
to
verify
a
signature.
K
L
C
Currently
for
block
parties,
we
request-
and
this
is
the
only
experience
I
have
with
me
verifying
signatures.
C
Is
we
request
that
if
someone
wants
to
close
down
a
street,
I'm
just
going
off
of
this
because
that's
all
I
have
to
reference,
we
have
to
have
the
majority
of
the
neighbors
agree
to
it
and
sign
their
block
party
request,
and
I
don't
think
we
verify
that
that
hap
that
that's
their
neighbors.
We
check
the
addresses.
C
We
see
that
it's
all
on
the
street.
We
maybe
look
it
up
on
on
google
maps,
but
I
don't
verify
that
that
is
I
mean
I
can
see
that
the
you
can
tell
if
the
signature's
the
same
person
and
they're
not
so
they
seem
legit,
but
I
do
not
physically
verify
that
you
signed
this
or
check
it
with
the
county
register,
which
would
be
the
only
other
way
you
could
do.
C
I
But
again
I
would
like
to
have
some
formal
process
to
verify
that
the
signatures
are
correct
and-
and
I
recognize
there
could
be
a
cost
for
this
and
possibly
that
could
become
a
requester's
fee
that
could
be
a
pass
pass-through
fee.
I
I
would
think,
but
again
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
what
other
cities
have
done
and
I
don't
know
necessarily
how
this
policy
was
created
if
it
was
if
it
was
taken
from
a
neighboring
city,
but
and
maybe
I'm
worrying
about
things
that
are
not
necessary
and
we
could
go
back
and
deal
with
it.
But
overall
I
thought
the
policy
was
was
well
thought
out
and
I
think
it
speaks
to
many
needs
and-
and
I
support
it,
I
just
had
my
reservations
about
the
signature
element
of
it.
Thank
you,
council.
C
Member
burns
I'm
going
to
apologize
because
I
didn't
read
the
policy
and
I
I
know
that
we've
kind
of
the
city
manager
and
I
have
discussed
that
I'll-
probably
be
taking
this
on,
because
we
I
do
do
the
banner
permits
and
the
public
assembly
permits.
But
perhaps
if
we
I
don't
know
if
it
has
the
language
and
they're
not
if
we
say
that
they
have
to
be
a
registered
voter
in
the
city
of
hollister.
If
it
says
that
then
I
could
have
them
verified
by
the
county.
Registrar
of
voters.
C
A
cost-
and
maybe
I
could
find
out
what
the
if,
if
they
are,
if
it
could
be
a
not
to
exceed
amount
and
maybe
collect
a
fee
from
someone
who
wants
to
raise
the
flag
to
pay
for
that
cost.
K
Yeah,
I
have
one
that's.
What
I
was
wondering
is:
is
there
a
process?
Is
there
a
fee
for
this
process?
The
also
again
you
know,
I
I
think
it's
it's
really
great.
It
talks
about
back
on
244
actually
right
before
it
was
a
verse
or
verse.
I'm
over
here
doing
verses,
chapter
six,
verse,
three,
no,
the
3a
on
244!
K
It's
it's
that
you
can't
request
for
a
flag
to
be
done
more
than
12
months
in
advance.
The
is
there
a
minimum.
I
mean:
can
they
come
up
the
day
before
and
say,
hey,
there's
no
flag
going
up
today
or
tomorrow
this
weekend.
Can
we
put
this
one
up?
I
got
100
signatures
should
do
we
need
something
like
that
and
also
I
guess
to
me.
It's
like.
F
K
My
biggest
thing
is:
if
we
have
12
months
and
we
got
12
organizations-
that's
that
we're
done
for
the
year,
which
would
make
it
easier
on
christine
on
checking
those
100
signatures,
but
at
the
same
time
is
if
we're,
if
we're
doing
this
as
unity
and-
and
I
always
like
to
call
it
community
poll-
come
in
unity.
So
when
we
come
together
in
unity
at
this
poll
that
and
supporting
each
each
and
and
everybody
that
we
have
more
than
just
12.
K
so,
like
you
know
what
maybe
a
week
so
organization
a
comes
in
january
and
says
hey,
we
want
to
put
up
a
flag
for
30
days
and
you
say:
okay,
no
one
else
is
here.
You
know
at
the
time
of
they
submit
their
application
and
their
signatures.
K
But
then,
a
week
later,
organization
b
comes
and
says:
hey
we'd
like
to
do
this
also.
I
know
this
talks
about
first
come
first
serve,
but
wouldn't
it
be
more
inclusive
if
we
said
okay,
so
now
you
know
now
we
got
two
organizations
for
the
month
of
january,
so
we'll
split
that
month
up
and
then
we
get
three
organization.
Three
comes
in
and
says:
hey,
oh,
you
know
what
we're
we're
putting
it
in
the
timeline
and
we
got
100
signatures.
K
You
know
what
how
about
we
come
up
with
something
that
whatever,
however
many
flags
are,
are
put
in
for
that
month,
that
it's
spread
to
an
equal
time.
So
if
it's
three
three
organizations,
then
it's
like
ten
days
each
four
organizations
one
week
each
I
mean
we
get
208
organizations
in
a
year.
I
doubt
it
it'd
be
kind
of
cool,
but
you
know
what
I
and
if
there's
no
one
else
for
that
month,
then
you
know
they
get
the
whole
month
to
me.
That
just
seems
kind
of
fair.
K
Instead
of
first
come
first
serve
just
that's
I
mean
fair.
Is
first
come
first
serve
yeah.
I
get
that
that's
fair,
but
it's
like
you
know.
What
do
we
want
to
be
inclusive
or
it's
like
me?
First,
so
that's
that's
the
only
thing
I
would
suggest
with
that.
The
and
the
other
real
main
thing
is:
whenever
are
we
gonna?
I
don't
know
if
this
is
addressed
to
henry
or
or
brett
the
are
we
getting?
Are
we
getting
our
flags
lit
up
that
are
up
they're
flying
for
24
hours
a
day?
G
K
They're
at
okay,
good
awesome-
that's
that's
really
important
to
me,
but
yeah.
I
would
like
to
see
something
more
inclusive,
instead
of
just
12
organizations
to
open
it,
that
it
can
there's
a
possibility
that
it
can
just
stay
12
or
that
there,
if
there's
more
organizations
out
there
that
want
to
fly
their
flag,
that
they
have
the
opportunity,
that's
it,
but
it's
other
than
that.
From
what
I
read
it's
I
like
it
seems
good.
J
Two
things
number
one:
I
disagree
with
you
councilmember
burns.
I
think
mickey
mouse
is
around
us
at
all
times
the
magic
of
disney
isn't
here
in
hollister
and
everywhere.
So
I'm
sorry,
but
I
disagree
with
you
and
then
number
two.
Just
like
my
question
for
the
last
policy
we
discussed
did
we
borrow
this
from
somebody
and
if
so,
did
we
change
anything
and
if
so,
what
did
we
change?
Thank
you.
AA
To
answer
your
question
council
member
rosendis,
we
did
borrow
this
from
the
city
of
vermont,
pretty
much.
It
stayed
consistent
to
theirs.
The
only
thing
that
we
did
add
was
the
100
signatures.
AA
They
also
had
a
24
hour
to
a
one
month,
maximum
a
year
to
fly
the
flag,
and
we
also
added
that
they
are
not
allowed
to
reserve
with
more
than
12
months
in
advance.
J
B
Thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
councils
at
this
time,
we'll
any
speaker
cards.
Q
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sure
you
guys
are
tired
of
hearing
my
name.
Okay.
So
please
forgive
me
because
I
didn't
go
to
the
agenda
packet
on
this
one.
So
are
we
talking
about
that
plea
clarify
that
each
applicant
is
for
one
month.
First
of
all
is
for
one
month
I
mean.
Maybe
somebody
wants
to
come.
Do
it
for
one
week
or
last
year,
councilman
resendez.
Q
I
know
this
year
is
for
the
month
of
june,
but
last
year
was
for
one
day,
so
here's
the
thing
raising
the
flag,
councilman
resendez,
did
not
bring
this
forward
because
he
wanted
the
city
to
make
money.
So
this
is
not
any
kind
of
an
item
that
the
city
is
going
to
make
money.
What
it
is
is
pre
is
you
guys
are
talking
about
getting
reimbursement
for
the
cost
of
raising
this
play.
Q
That
being
said,
I
would
like
for
someone
to
please
make
a
friendly
amendment
to
this,
because
this
is
a
great
idea.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
for
one
month,
but
I
would
like
it
to
be.
I
think
it's
it's
a
registered
registered
voters.
Q
Anybody
can
go
out
and
get
signatures
and
I
can
see
a
really
odd
group
getting
a
hundred
signatures
for
a
flag.
That
is
totally
unacceptable
and
I
know
that
it
still
has
to
be
approved
by
the
city
council.
I
would
hope
not
just
because
you
got
100
signatures
and
I
think
100
signatures
is
actually
and
christine.
This
is
probably
a
lot
of
work
on
your
part,
but
if
you're
going
to
charge
for
them
to
do
it,
then
they're
going
to
have
to
come
up
with
some
legitimate
signatures.
Q
What
is
the
population
we?
Just?
We
just
had
our
senses.
What
is
the
population
of
hollister?
Now
the
city
hollister?
I
think
you,
I
think
you
should
require
more
than
a
hundred
signatures.
Councilman
resendez.
I
know
that
raising
the
flag
for
the
month
of
june
you're
definitely
gonna
get
again
more
than
100
signatures
and
people
are
there's
a
lot
of
support
for
this
more
than
there
is
non
support
for
this.
Q
So
I
think,
if
you
were
to
ask
for
registered
voters
and
for
a
certain
percentage
of
the
set
of
the
population
of
the
city,
it
would
weed
out
those
nut
jobs
that
are
out
there
they're
going
to
want
and
put
some
kind
of
outrageous
flag
that
we
don't
even
want
to.
I
don't
even
want
to
mention
what
would
come
up.
They
would
come
up
with,
but
you
guys
get
the
idea,
but
definitely
this
is
a
great
idea.
Q
We're
not
it's
not
here
to
big
make
money
and
it's
only
you're
only
bringing
this
policy
up,
because
actually
there
was
more
it
was.
It
was
more
of
a
conflict
because
councilman
resendez
wanted
something
that
I
think
is
great
to
happen
and
now
you're
going
to
make
a
policy
out
of
it.
So
I
think
I
think
it's
good
to
get
a
percentage
of
the
population
of
the
city
and
in
by
increasing
it
to
registered
voters
and
and
the
a
percentage
of
the
population
and
I'm
getting
tired
guys.
L
Mary
don't
mind
one
thing
I
would
like
to
bring
to
the
council's
attention.
I
item
three
does
say:
approval
of
the
special
flags
shall
state
the
duration
of
the
display
from
a
minimum
of
24
hours
to
a
maximum
of
one
calendar
month.
So
it
would
be
up
to
the
person
that
is
making
that
request,
because
maybe
they
just
want
to
have
it
for
a
day.
B
So
we'll
go
back
to
council
council
member
perez
go
ahead,
sir!
So.
K
On
page
244,
the
infamous
page,
the
under
policy
and
procedure,
says
the
following
policy
and
procedure
applied
to
all
buildings
and
facilities
owned
or
controlled
by
the
city
of
hollister.
L
K
Also
again,
I
you
know,
I
think
it's
great
I'd
like
to
make
that
as
a
special
amendment
and
also
to
amend
that,
if
there's
more
than
one
organization
to
time
the
days
be
split.
Equally,
that's
that's
what
I
would
like,
because
I
I
would
like
for
as
many
people
to
fly
their
flags
as
possible,
and
I
don't
expect
us
to
make
any
money
I
just,
but
you
know
what
I
I
do
see
where
it's
like.
You
know.
K
We
can
spend
ten
thousand
here
five
thousand
here
five
hundred
years
here
here
here
here,
you
know
what
me
I
like
to
save
my
money.
You
know
I,
like
I
save
my
pennies
and
I
go
buy
big
jet
skis.
You
know
that's
what
I
do,
but
but
I,
but
you
know
what
I
I
saved
my
money
and
and
if
a
lot
of
times
I
see
what
I
personally
see
going
on
here
is
like
we.
K
We
have
no,
it's
no
problem
to
spend
ten
thousand
here
twenty
thousand
here
and
then
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
check
out
the
way
we
spend
our
money.
K
I
don't
know-
maybe
maybe
I'm
just
not
used
to
this
big
budgeting
thing,
but
every
time
I
hear
that
we're
gonna
spend
ten
thousand
here
twenty
thousand
here,
it's
like
I'm
going
to
ching
chi
ching
ching,
and
yet
so
you
know
for
us
to
not
necessarily
make
money
off
of
a
flag,
because
I
don't
know
what
I'm
saying,
but
I
mean
a
processing
fee.
I
mean
it
takes
time
if,
if
you're
going
to
have,
if
christine's
going
to
have
to
check
100
signatures,
you
know.
K
K
And
and
and
and
I
mean-
and
I
mean
it's,
could
there
even
be
something
in
there,
so
I
don't
know
if
maybe
the
city
could
actually
donate
part
of
that
money
that
600
or
whatever,
that
is
to
cancer
awareness
month.
You
know
I'd,
say:
hey
well,
we'll
pitch
in
fifty
bucks
a
hundred
bucks,
yeah.
B
I
think
does
that,
mr
president,
you
know
what
I'm
having
to
say.
I
think
I
think
we're
going
off
topic
on
the
item.
This
item
is
about
the
policy
and
we're
discussing.
I
was.
B
Yeah,
but
we're
we're
going
back
and
forth
with
numbers.
So
if
you
want
to
clarify
just
what
you're
saying
that'd
be
appropriate,
but
I
don't
think
we
can
go
back
and
forth
on
discussing
dollar
values
and
so
on.
K
I
think
that
we
should
pass
this,
but
there's
some
special
amendments
that
need
to
be
made.
One
is
the
the
verbiage
talking
about
applying
to
all
buildings
and
I'd
like
also
to
split
the
month,
the
the
month,
the
days
in
the
month
to
all
organizations
that
apply
for
that
month
and
if
there's
no
other
organizations
that
apply
for
that
month,
then
they
get
the
whole
month.
J
Thank
you.
Well,
I
just
want
to
say,
first
and
foremost
like
I'm,
not
real
happy
about
the
policy.
I'll
be
honest.
I
think
if
I
didn't
ask
to
have
the
flag
raised,
we
wouldn't
be
discussing
it
and
if
it
was
that
important,
I
think
we
should
have
brought
it
up
at
a
at
a
different
time.
It
didn't
have
to
be
because
of
the
the
lgbtq
flag,
so
I'm
honestly
I'm
a
little
bit
hurt
over
it.
J
I
think
I
mentioned
that
last
meeting
and
I'm
really
sad
that
you
know
that
we're
having
to
go
down
this
route.
So
I'm
not
happy
about
the
policy,
but
I
understand
that
we
do
need
a
policy,
so
I'm
willing
to
support
it,
but
there
are
some
things
that
I
do
and
don't
like
that.
I've
heard
of
this
discussion
so
number
one
100
signatures.
I
think
that's
fine,
but
I
don't
like
the
idea
of
them
being
registered
voters.
J
I
think
we
represent
everybody
so
as
long
as
they
live
within
the
just
within
the
city
limits.
That's
totally!
Okay
with
me.
I
don't
think
we
should
charge
people
money.
The
these
people
that
are
asking
for
these
things,
like
I,
don't
think
that
it's
right
to
charge
them
money
over
it.
I
wrote
some
things
down.
I
don't
even
know
what
I
wrote.
I'm
sorry,
oh
the
buildings.
I
think
why
I
think
we
should
allow
like
you
guys
want
to
have
a
flag
policy.
J
Let
them
hang
it
on
all
the
buildings
if
they
want.
That
should
be
part
of
the
application
process.
Why
not?
If
they
want
to
hang
flags,
you
know
and
the
police,
you
know
police
department
or
fire
department
or
whatever
like.
Why
not
go
ahead?
You
guys
won't
have
a
flag
policy.
Then
let's
open
it
up
to
to
all
the
buildings,
they're
public
buildings,
and
they
should
be
allowed
to
do
that
and
then
split.
J
Oh,
I
don't
think
that
we
should
split.
I
I
like
what
I
think,
there's
language
in
there,
that
if
there's
two
competing,
then
the
city
manager
can
go
ahead
and
use
his.
You
know
basically
decide
which
one
goes
where,
but
if
we're
gonna
split
it
like,
then
we
might
split
like
black
history
month.
If
somebody,
if
the
whole
point
of
doing
the
black
history
month,
is
to
celebrate
the
whole
month,
the
hope
the
point
of
celebrating
lgbtq
pride
month
is
celebrate
the
whole
month.
J
So
I
think
that
could
cause
some
problems
for
us
in
the
future.
You
know,
if
you
guys,
won't,
have
a
policy,
then,
let's
open
it
up
to
everybody
and
it's.
This
is
a
good
start.
I
don't
see,
I
think,
we're
over
complicating
it
and
I'm
I'm
just
having
flashbacks
of
our
last
discussion.
So
I
like
it
and
those
are
the
things
that
I
would
support.
Thank
you
thank.
K
Mr
perez
is
that
go
ahead,
sir.
I
thought
we're
this.
What
this
was
pertaining
to
the
community
poll?
Basically,
I
mean
we
are
doing
a
policy
for
the
city,
but
the
the
whole
thing
that
started.
It
was
the
community
poll
and
so
now
we're
going
to
open
it
up
to
citywide
flying
displaying
our
flags
all
over
it's.
K
I
thought
this
was
specifically
for
the
unity
poll
as
far
as
all
the
organizations
as
far
as
the
state
and
the
american
flag,
I
thought
those
were
already
covered
that
this
was
specifically
for
the
community
poll.
If
my
unless
I
was
wrong,
I
mean
sorry,
it's.
B
B
I
know
there's
the
conversation
about
the
length
of
time
that
length
of
time
maybe
should
be
based
on
the
organization's
declaration
is,
if
it's
you
know
the
whatever
group
you
know
fly
their
flag
for
the
week
or
whatever,
maybe
their
their
group
is
flying
it
for
the
day
or
maybe
it's
the
month,
the
nationwide
group
or
what
we're
seeing
across
the
country.
That
would
be
one
way
to
handle
it.
B
So
we
can
just
look
at
the
addresses
we
don't
have
to
go
through
a
whole
process
of
verifying
signatures,
but
obviously,
if
we're
seeing
names
that
it's
just
not
making
sense
or
might
be
an
issue
there,
but
that
could
be
taken
care
of
with
the
wording
on
the
petition
yeah
as
an
affidavit.
So
people
are
swearing
that
that's
who
they
are
where
they
live
that
can
be
handled.
I
think
the
idea
of
trying
to
collect
money
it
does
just
make
things
complicated.
B
I
don't
think
we
need
to
go
there.
I
think
we
just
need
to.
There
are
some
good
good
ideas
here,
I'm
okay
with
most
of
them,
and
I
think
again,
if
we
simplify
the,
is
it
the
month
depending
on
the
organization?
Is
it
the
week
depending
on
the
organization
or
maybe
it's
a
day?
A
lot
of
groups
just
want
to
fly
a
flag
for
a
day,
so
they
can
bring
everybody
out
and
celebrate
it
together.
B
K
Yeah
I
I
totally
agree
that
you
know
you
shouldn't
have
to
be
a
registered
voter
to
to
to
sign
the
f
with
it
affidavit's
signature.
K
But
but
again
this
policy
was
for
the
community
poll,
and
this
is
talking
about
all
buildings
and
that's
two
different
issues:
we're
mixing
oranges
and
apples
here
for
for
the
community
poll.
Definitely
all
this
applies
and-
and
you
know
I'm
I'm
not
I'm
not
saying
that
we
need
to
charge
for
raising
this
flag.
K
I
know
that
there's
expenses,
that
the
city
pays
for
things,
but
you
know
I
just
think
that
it's
something
an
issue
and
I
don't
want
to
go
down
a
rabbit
trail,
but
it's
like,
I
think
we
as
representatives
elected
officials
and
representing
our
districts.
We
also
have
to
watch
how
we
spend
our
money.
It's
not
just
the
big
money
on
alleys
or
streets,
but
it's
all
the
the
nickels
and
dimes
and
the
quarters
and
stuff
here
and
there.
So,
but
it's
do
we
do
I'm
just
saying
that.
That's
why
I
brought
that
up.
K
But
I
love
the
that
you
don't
have
to
be
a
voter
and
there's
nothing.
There's
no
verbiage
in
here
about
that.
The
other
thing
is
it.
This
has
to
be
changed
that
this
is
not
to
all
buildings.
This
is
for
our
community
pool
and
besides
that,
I'm
all
in.
B
J
You,
it
doesn't
say
it's
for
the
community
poll.
It
says
city
of
hollister,
establishing
a
policy
on
flag
display
and
yeah.
It
does
say
all
buildings.
I
think
we
can
get
ourselves
in
some
real
trouble
by
just
limiting
it
to
the
community
poll
or
if
we
are,
then
it
needs
to
come
back
as
a
separate
item
this
the
way
I
read
this
policy
or
this
item
is
for
it
to
be
open
to
as
a
flag
policy
for
the
city,
so
you
wanted
a
flag
policy
there.
You
go.
K
K
It
does
cover
the
whole
city
because
it's
a
policy
but
yeah
as
far
as
putting
displaying
all
these
all
these
other
flags
all
over
the
other
city,
all
over
the
city.
It's
it's.
I
don't
think
so.
I
mean
I
don't
care
what
flag
it
is.
You
know
what
there's
we
have
community
poll
that
we've
approved
and
and
that's
this
is
what
this
was.
This
was
about,
and
also
I
guess
that's
where
it
kind
of
gets
really
great.
K
Is
that
you're
we
we
planned
it
for
the
for
the
community
poll
and
now
it's
going
to
all
the
buildings,
and
that's
that's
that's
a
problem.
K
So
again,
if
we
want
to
amend
it
to
the
community
paul,
then
I
think
it's
great
and
any
other
flagpoles
that
we
want
to
raise
at
esperanza
center
or
wherever
you
know.
If,
then,
we
can
always
add
those
into
this.
Can
we
wouldn't
we
be
able
to
do
that.
B
I
came
on
a
second
everyone,
we're
going
all
over
the
place
here.
Are
you
done,
mr
perez.
B
For
now,
you're
done,
okay
go
ahead
and
mr
resendez
I'm.
J
Just
wondering
I
think
we're
going
down
like
the
language
to
me
is
that
we're
gonna,
just
we're
gonna
establish
a
policy
for
the
city.
Jason
am
I
am
I
not
interpreting
this
correctly.
I
mean.
If
we're
going
to
allow
flags
and
we're
going
to
adopt
a
policy
to
hang,
then
it
needs
to
be
for
all
public
owned
buildings.
It
might
not
unless
it
was
unless
it
was
presented
differently
or
if
there
was
an
amendment
that
was
adopted,
I
think,
but
to
me
it
reads
that
it's
for
all
public
buildings
or
the
city-owned
buildings
correct.
D
The
city
council
can
decide
whether
it
wants
this
to
apply
to
all
public
buildings
or
only
to
the
unity
poll
that's
been
proposed.
I
I
do
agree.
However,
whichever
way
the
city
council
decides
to
go,
if
it
wants
to
approve
this
at
all,
it's
worth
clarifying
that
in
the
flag
policy
does
it
apply
to
all
public
buildings
or
only
to
the
unity
poll,
and
that's
a
policy
decision
for
the
council
to
make.
B
B
I
So
I
do
like
the
idea
that
we
clarify
it.
I
know
that
there
that
the
lgbtq
plus
conversation
brought
this
to
the
forefront,
and
it
was
my
understanding
that
the
commitment
was
to
fly,
that
flag
in
front
of
city
hall
and-
and
I
support
that-
and
I
will
support
that
forever.
But
but
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
clean
us
up
here
and
now,
and
so
I
would
support
that.
I
Those
flags
only
be
flown
from
the
unity
or
the
community
poll
in
front
of
city
hall
and
and-
and
I
support
the
policy
as
written
and
I
believe
time
will
tell
if
we
need
to
come
back
and
and
and
tweak
this.
Some
and-
and
my
sense
is
if
the
if
the
city,
where
we
borrowed
this
from,
had
had
any
challenges,
they
would
have
already
amended
this.
So
so
again,
I
think
experience
will
dictate
what
what
we
need
to
do
in
regards
to
this.
I
But
I
do
like
the
idea-
and
I
do
think
the
appropriate
place
for
these
flags
for
our
community
to
be
flown
is
absolutely
in
front
of
city
hall.
I
think
that
sends
the
clearest
most
direct
message
that
we
could
versus
other
city
buildings.
Those
are
my
comments
mayor,
thank
you,
and
I
will
support
this.
C
They
have
it
for
two
weeks,
there's
150
fee
to
put
the
banner
up,
but
of
course,
that
that
involves
taking
that
box
to
get
the
banner
across
san
benito
street,
a
certificate
of
insurance
and
a
waiver
liability.
K
Okay,
I
think
that's
true,
thank
you
for
the
information,
but
I
I
think
for
our
for
our
community
poll.
I
don't.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
get
that
extreme,
but
I
I
think
do
need.
I
do
think
that
it
needs
to
be
just
confined
to
our
community
poll
and,
if
we're
not
going
to
charge,
then
that's
just
a
cost
that
the
city
can
incur
occur.
B
B
They
don't
have
to
be
registered
voters.
These
have
to
live
in
the
city
of
hollister.
I
guess
one
question
would
be:
do
they
have
to
be
of
any
age?
Does
the
council
feel
is
18
and
over
16
and
over
what
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
high
school
kids
that
would
love
to
be
part
of
this
program,
so
I
think
it's
I
would
recommend
not
having
an
age
deal
because
I
think
sometimes
even
the
littlest
kids
will
see
this
as
a
lesson
in
life.
That's
really
a
memorable
experience.
J
I
Thank
you.
I
I
I
concur
with
everything
you've
said.
I
do
want
to
just
confirm,
though,
for
city
staff,
that
the
flags
will
be
flown
only
in
front
of
city
hall
and
just
to
clarify
the
policy
so
that
there's
no
confusion
as
opposed
to
other
city
buildings,
and-
and
I
just
would
like
to
get
clarity
on
that
and
then
I
think
we
can
move
forward
and.
B
That
could
be
your
motion,
sir.
Your
motion
can
clarify
all
the
items
we
just
talked
about.
If,
if
we're
all
done,
if
somebody
would
make
a
motion
and
clarify
the
language
we
just
all
talked
about,
is
there
emotion?
I.
K
I
C
I
Oh,
I'm
sorry,
the
mayor
had
a
great
idea.
It's
with
an
affidavit,
I
think,
with
an
affidavit
and-
and
so
I
don't
do
this
part,
I
believe
that
that
was
the
extent
of
it.
Mr.
B
I
B
K
G
E
B
We
will
now
move
to
item
f7,
I'm
sorry
we're
at
10
o'clock.
I
need
a
consensus
for
the
council
to
continue.
O
C
C
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
council
item
f7,
which
I
am
desperately
searching
for
right
now,
is
for
the
united
way
of
san
benito
county
211
services.
In
the
past,
the
city
has
provided
an
appropriation
in
the
amount
of
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
in
fiscal
year.
2021
are
in
2019
and
2020
no
20
the
past
two
years.
They
did
it
and
so
they're
requesting
again
the
appropriation
of
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
for
fiscal
year,
2021
and
2022
to
support
the
united
way
of
san
benito
county's
two-on-one
services.
C
C
The
city
of
hollister
has
now
received
another
request
to
once
again
provide
support
to
the
organization.
United
way
is
seeking
a
commitment
of
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
for
current
fiscal
year,
2021,
which
is
already
budgeted
in
fund
101
1100
749001
and
is
requesting
an
amount
of
2
500
for
fiscal
year.
2021
2022.
B
J
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
have
any
data
to
if
we
can
see
some
data,
I'm
not
I'm
not
gonna,
not
support
it.
But
I'd
like
to
see
some
data
about
how
frequent
the?
U
is.
Are
they
using
the
211
number
line?
Is
that
something
that's
still
being
utilized
or
if
there
is
data
I'd
like
to
see
it?
If
not,
that's
fine
either
way,
but
I'm
just
wondering
I
think
it's
it's
it's.
It's
a
noble
cause,
it's
good,
but.
C
I'm
just
wondering:
are
we
using
it
desires?
I
could
withdraw
this
item
and
come
back
at
another
date
with
someone
from
united
way
to
be
able
to
provide
you.
Those
numbers.
J
I
don't
know
if
that's
necessary,
like
I,
I
definitely
would
support
it.
I
think
I
don't
want
to
stop
it,
giving
them
support,
but
I'd
like
to
see
something
in
the
future.
Maybe
they
could
just
email
us
something.
I'd
appreciate.
K
That
I
concur
that
we
need
to
see
how
much
it's
being
used,
and
you
know
what
why
let's
not
stop
this
now.
B
K
J
Go
answer.
Thank
you.
I'm
just
wondering
with
like
with
things
changing,
I
wonder
if
they're
doing
anything
different
aside
from
the
phone
number
are
there?
Is
there
like
a
social
media
presence?
Is
there
a
website,
I'm
just
wondering
what
other
services
if
they
can
include
that
as
well
christine
thank.
J
B
Thank
you
I
would
say
in
the
past
they
have
made
a
presentation,
given
this
update
on
the
usage,
the
number
of
phone
calls.
They
do
use
social
media
and
different
resources
to
get
the
the
word
out
about
the
services
they
offer,
but
I
would
agree.
I
think
we
need
to
either
have
a
quick
presentation
to
bring
us
up
to
date
on,
what's
going
on,
every
call
to
2-1-1
saves
us
money
from
the
9-1-1
call.
B
So
that's
that's
important
for
everyone
to
know
and
it
provides
the
services
for
the
community,
but
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
get
a
quick
update
from
them.
Also
any
other
questions
from
council.
M
G
E
E
C
C
This
item
is
ordinance
number
1202,
an
ordinance
of
city
of
hollister
repealing
and
replacing
hollister
municipal
code,
title
ii,
administration,
personnel,
chapter
2.04,
city
council,
and
this
is
a
second
reading,
so
staff
requests
that
we
hold
read,
it
says,
hold
a
public
hearing,
but
we
don't
need
to
do
a
public
hearing.
This
time
read
by
title,
only
way:
full
reading
and
adopt
ordinance,
1202
of
the
city
of
hollister
to
repeal
and
replace
title
ii,
administration
and
personnel.
Chapter
2.04
city
council.
Q
Thank
you,
so
I
would
my
comment
is
with
regards
to
the
language
that
I
would
request
for
an
amendment.
It
is
the
paragraph
right
after
2.04.05.15,
which
is
conduct
at
public
meetings
and
the
pair,
and
then
it's
2.04.051
5.6,
there's
a
paragraph
between
the
two
quote
for
ease
of
reference
to
the
term.
Unquote.
Member
close
quote
refer
refers
to
the
member
of
the
city,
hollister,
council,
comma
city,
treasurer,
comma
city,
clerk,
comma
or
city
boards,
comic
committees
or
commissions
established
by
city,
ordinance
or
council
policy.
Q
Q
Therefore,
when
it
members
are
all
mentioned
in
here,
it
also
includes
the
mayor
because
at
this
moment,
what
the
way
it's
read
the
mayor
is
not
included
the
word
because
he
is
an
elected.
It
is
a
separate.
I'm
sorry
not
he,
but
it
is
a
position
that
is
is
an
elected
position.
It
is
completely
separate
of
the
city
council.
It
is
a
part
of
the
city
council,
so
I
request
that
that
you
guys
consider
changing
the
language
to
add
that
to
it.
Otherwise,.
Q
2.04.015.7
communication
would
allow
would
claim
that
all
members
and
they'd
reframe
the
mayor
would
be
the
only
one
that
would
not
be
refrained.
If
he's
not
added
to
that
language,
that
he
would
be
the
only
one
allowed
or
the
mayor.
I'm
sorry
because
it
could
be
a
she.
The
mayor
would
be
the
only
the
only
individual
allowed
to
adjudicate
to
receive
information
outside
of
a
public
meeting,
and
that
would
that
would
give
the
mayor.
Q
That
is
not
a
strong
mayor,
a
position
because
he,
the
mayor
the
mayor
position,
represents
the
entire
city.
Therefore,
the
mayor
would
be
able
to
actually
meet
because
he
has
jurisdiction
over
the
entire
city,
giving
the
mayor
position
the
only
individual
being
able
to
speak
to
anybody
outside
public
hearings.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
C
We
have
no
more
speakers,
but
if
I
may
say
that
of
this
hollister
municipal
code,
section
2.04.040
implementation
states
that
this
stock,
the
hollister
municipal
code,
is
intended
to
be
self-enforcing
and
is
an
expression
of
the
standards
of
conduct
for
members
expected
by
the
city.
It's
therefore
becomes
most
effective
when
members
are
thoroughly
familiar
with
it
and
embrace
its
provisions.
C
Members
entering
office
shall
sign
a
statement
and
there's
an
example
that
I
affirm
that
I
have
read
and
understand
the
city
of
hollister
municipal
code,
chapter
2.04
in
its
entirety
for
elected
and
appointed
officials,
which
we
would
all
sign.
G
I
Question
for
mr
epperson,
it's
my
presumption
and,
of
course,
I'm
not
an
attorney.
But
when
we
talk
about
the
council
as
a
whole,
is
the
mayor
considered
to
be
part
of
the
council
or
is
it
something
where
we
would
need
to
include
the
word
mayor?
I'm
comfortable
with
the
city
council
as
a
whole,
and
the
mayor
is
obviously
part
of
the
city
council
and
is
simply
tasked
with
running
the
meetings
and
other
mayor
duties.
D
I
I'll,
I
will
move
to
approve.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
do
this
right,
this
time
read
by
title,
only
wave
full
reading
and
adopt
ordinance
number
1202
of
the
city
of
hollister
to
repeal
and
replace
title
ii,
administration
and
personnel
chapter
204
of
the
city
council.
I
A
E
E
B
Thank
you
we'll
now
move
to
item
g1
reports
from
your
committees,
council
member
burns,.
I
I
I
would
like
to
ask
city
staff
what
the
status
is
on
proclamations
for
former
city
employees
or
city
employees
deserving
of
recognition.
I
know
that
we
talked
about
this
in
the
past
and
I
know
that
it
was
delayed
for
a
little
over
a
year
due
to
coveted
restrictions
and
precautions,
but
I
do
want
to
move
forward
with
that.
I'd
also
like
to
recommend
that
council
discuss
moving
forward
in
the
future
with
a
conversation
to
ask
the
art
and
culture
commission
to
work
to
create
a
city
of
hollister
flag.
I
I
think
council,
member
perez's
idea
was
great
and
I
think
it
would
be
a
great
way
to
launch
that
commission
and
the
community
could
absolutely
benefit
from
that.
I'd
also
like
to
ask
staff
the
city
manager
where
we
are
at
in
the
chief
of
police
recruitment
process.
It's
been
approximately
28
days
since
we
last
spoke
and
that's
a
very
important
issue
for
our
community
and
finally,
I'd
like
to
encourage
the
residents
of
san
benito
county,
including
the
residents
within
the
city,
to
volunteer
to
be
a
member
of
the
san
benito
county,
civil
grand
jury.
I
It's
a
amazing
experience,
a
valuable
experience,
and
I
can
tell
you
firsthand
that
I
sat
on
the
committee
in
2016
or
the
grand
jury
in
20
civil
grand
jury
in
2016,
and
we
are
all
about
volunteers.
We
would
not
be
who
we
are
as
a
community
without
the
great
volunteerism
that
we
read
about
on
a
daily
and
weekly
basis.
So
please
step
up
and
and
join
that
you'll
find
it's
a
worthwhile
experience
mayor.
That
concludes
my
comments.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
K
I
wanted
to
thank
our
our
city,
crew
street
workers,
all
the
city
staff.
K
It
seems
I
don't
know,
maybe
it's
just
because
I
live
in
the
older
district
and
we
do
have
a
fault
line
going
through
there,
and
you
know
we
got
fourth
street
that's
closed
down
because
of
a
pipe
that's
been
recently
fixed,
but
I
went
out
there
and
seen
in
the
sake
it's
definitely
not
by
any
by
the
employees,
messing
up
anything
or
nothing,
it's
the
ground
moving
and
so
for
district,
one
and
all
of
hollister
you
know
bear
with
them.
They
are
on
it.
They
they
are
johnny
on
the
spot.
K
They
are
all
over
the
place.
I
noticed
they
were
over
in
was
it
hillcrest
in
25
or
industrial
yeah
industrial?
It's
like
you
know
they
have
another
break
over
there.
These
guys.
I
I
see
you
guys
out
there,
you
know,
and
maybe
because
I'm
in
the
older
district
we
got
a
lot
of.
We
need
a
lot
of
maintenance,
though
in
the
older
district,
but
you
know
what
I
I
appreciate
all
the
city
workers
out
there
doing
their
job
and
it's
not
just
the
ones
out
there
with
the
jackhammer
and
the
backhoe.
K
It's
it's
the
secretary
up
there,
you
know
just
everyone
does
their
part,
and
you
know
what
I
I
really
appreciate
you
guys
for
what
you
do
out
there
and
you
know
just
like
when
we
bring
up
a
resolution
or
we
ask
our
staff
here
to
to
follow
up
on
on
on
giving
some
the
staff
direction.
It's
like.
I
truly
appreciate
renee
for
just
help,
trying
to
help
out
with
the
20
alleys
all
the
work
that
you
do
christine
paul.
Wake
up.
K
K
You
know
I
just
I
I
see
it
and
I
I
really
appreciate
it
speaking
of
that.
How
about
that
river
parkway?
That
was
that
celebration
was
really
awesome
that
the
ribbon
cutting.
It
was
great
to
see
all
the
community
response,
seeing
the
kids
faces
when
they,
when
you
call
their
names
and
say
that
was
really
awesome,
come
running
up
there
to
get
their
bikes.
There
was
a
great
suggestion
about
the
bike
giveaway
of
vice
mayor.
K
J
Councilmember
sandes.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
just
want
to
echo
some
of
the
sentiments
that
councilmember
perez
had
said
about
the
park
river
park
trail
opening
it
was.
J
It
was
a
beautiful
occasion
and-
and
I
think
our
staff,
you
know
they
did
such
a
great
job,
getting
that
together
just
kudos
to
everybody
that
was
out
there.
You
know
those
are
the
types
of
events
that
I
really
enjoy
going
to.
Those
are
the
people
that
we
represent.
You
know
it's
pretty
evident
and
just
to
get
out
there
and
get
to
mingle
with
them,
and
you
know
hear
about
different
things
that
are
going
on
in
our
districts.
Like
that's
my
favorite
part
about
the
job,
I
absolutely
loved
it.
J
So
I
can't
thank
the
staff
enough.
You
know
when
you
guys
do
things
like
this.
It
really
helps
us
and
we
really
appreciate
that
that
was
just
it
was
just
a
great
day,
all
around
good
time
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
more
more
events
like
that.
I
hope
I
don't
mess
this
up,
but
I
had
a
constituent
call
me
and
mention
and
he's
right.
J
I
believe
that
next
year
is
the
150th
anniversary
of
of
hollister,
so
I
looked
it
up
and
it's
actually
called
a
squench
or
hang
on
one
second
sequential
other
than
a
bicentennial,
that's
200
years
150th
anniversary,
and
this
is
going
to
be
hard.
But
anyhow,
the
point
is
that
next
year
we're
going
to
be
150
years
old
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
start
and
he
was
hoping
that
we
can
start
talking
to
our
community
partners
and
look
at
really
just
celebrating
that.
J
B
Thank
you
very
much,
an
excellent,
excellent
idea.
Maybe
city
clerk,
you
can
give
us
the
exact
date
the
city
was
incorporated,
so
we
have
that
which,
throughout
the
150
year
celebration
of
course,
I
do
also
want
to
thank
everyone
involved
with
the
the
new
river
park
trail
just
really
great,
to
see
so
many
people
in
our
community
out
there
enjoying
it
all
the
hard
work
for
everybody
that
put
into
it
to
make
it
happen
and
exciting,
and
it's
time
to
move
to
the
next
steps.
So
a
city
manager.
B
If
we
can
start
looking
at
the
next
idea
of
finishing
that
loop
around
our
existing
ponds,
how
we
can
do
that
and
also
how
we
can
look
at
using
the
the
ponds
in
the
end,
for
maybe
a
fish
and
pond
and
some
recreational
activities
on
the
the
ponds
that
are
not
being
used
and
what
we
can
do
to
start
moving
forward
on
that.
I
think
we're
at
that
point
that
the
community
is
really
enjoying
their
their
community
and
exciting
exciting
to
see
it
happen.
B
The
other
update
I
wanted
to
get
was.
Where
are
we
at
with
the
progress
on
the
cannery?
I
I
saw
they're
out
there
they're
still
pumping
sludge
out,
which
is
great,
want
to
make
sure
that
we
had
the
storm
drains
checked
clean.
When
are
we
going
to
start
priming
the
ponds,
usually
it's
at
least
a
month
ahead
of
the
season,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get
a
jump
start
on
the
priming
of
the
pond,
so
we
don't
have
any
of
the
odors.
B
That
plays
a
very,
very
important
role
to
keep
the
odors
down
and
the
the
last
item
I
wanted
to
bring
out
was
now
that
we
are-
and
mr
burns
brought
this
up
earlier-
about
helping
our
businesses.
The
funds
will
be
coming
through,
but
we've
had
major
major
success
with
our
downtown
parklet
program.
B
More
restaurants
are
interested
in
in
beantown
downtown.
Can
we
look
into
finding
a
way
to
help
some
of
the
building
owners,
install
kitchen
equipment,
hood
vents
and
some
of
the
other
things
that
have
seemed
to
stall
some
of
the
other
potential
clients?
What
we
can
do
to
get
more
restaurants
to
the
downtown?
I
think
many
of
them
would
love
to
be
in
downtown
if
they
could
find
a
location
that
had
hoods
and
I'm
sure
some
of
the
building
owners
would
appreciate
having
a
longer
term
client.
B
So
we
can
start
looking
into
that
as
our
next
phase
of
the
downtown
parkland
program.
Maybe,
as
mr
resendez
pointed
out
the
150
year
celebration,
we
could
look
into
a
a
sign
that
crosses
over
the
street
point
out.
This
is
hollister
and
the
year
we
were
founded,
so
that
would
be
a
a
great
addition
to
our
our
downtown
and
now
it's
the
time
to
start
moving
forward
on
some
of
those
ideas.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
pass
it
over
to
now
city
manager,.
L
Thank
you,
mayor,
I'd
like
to
echo
everybody's
the
gratitude,
as
I
would
like
to
really
thank
tina
and
her
staff,
they
did
a
great
job.
I
also
want
to
thank
the
sponsors
that
that
donated
the
bicycles
that
was
really
a
good
touch:
the
status
of
the
police
chief.
We
had
interviews
on
friday
for
our
first
interviews
and
we'll
be
telling
up
the
scores
and
then
hopefully
doing
second
interviews
either
later
this
week
or
beginning
of
next
week
and
but
we're
moving
forward
as
quickly
as
we
can.
L
It
is
an
important
position
with
the
150
years.
I
will
tell
you
both
your
chamber
and
hda
have
been
talking
to
me
and
coming
up
with
ideas.
We
just
need
to
start
sitting
down
and
and
planning
that
out.
The
big
issue
was
just
kind
of
getting
over
cobin,
but
I've
been
hearing
a
lot
of
great
ideas
of
what
we
could
do
or
what
items
they've
done
in
the
past
to
celebrate
culture,
birthdays
in
the
past
and
speaking
of
hda.
L
V
Chief,
yes,
ms
mayor,
thank
you
just
want
to
inform
the
city
council
in
case
they
weren't,
aware
of
it.
Already
last
week
I
was
attending
a
zoom
conference
with
the
california
police
chiefs
association,
but
my
attention
was
drawn
to
the
san
diego
county
board
of
supervisors,
where
they
were
discussing
the
closing
of
nash
road
at
the
high
school.
V
The
information
was
being
passed
on
or
they
were
going
to
vote
on,
closing
the
street
of
additional
hours
until
10
pm,
and
there
was
a
little
misinformation
on
on
the
being
discussed
along
the
lines
of
chief
del
campo,
being
okay
with
it
being
closed
monday
through
friday,
from
7
a.m,
to
10
p.m.
So
I
did
speak
on
at
the
board
of
supervisors
and
luckily,
chief
del
campo
was
able
to
do
the
same
from
out
of
state,
but
it
was
clarified
that
we
were
okay
with
it
being
closed
until
10.
V
Only
if
there's
a
specific
event
like
a
dance
or
a
large
gathering
of
people
not
to
be
closed
monday
through
friday
till
10,
just
because
it's
monday
through
friday-
and
I
think
the
message
was
clear-
my
understanding
is
that
they
did
not
vote
on
on
the
on
the
item.
But
I
just
wanted
the
council
to
be
aware
of
of
that
discussion
other
than
that
we
did
meet
with
the
police
departments
that
are
our
fellow
in
our
group
for
ambassador
for
insurance.
V
V
So,
unfortunately,
we've
had
a
lot
of
police
officers
this
year
across
the
nation
killed
in
the
line
of
duty,
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
that
we're
going
to
be
having
that
may
15th
is
coming
up
and
we're
going
to
be
celebrating
that
recognition
of
national
police
memorial
day
and
and
the
week.
Thank
you.
AB
This
is
dear
and
close
to
my
heart,
this
presentation.
When
I
first
started
working
for
the
city,
I
was
a
managed
worker.
One
got
in
the
water
department
and
I
started
reading
meters.
When
we
were
reading
meters,
we
walked
to
every
single
house
lifted.
The
lid
up
wrote
down
their
reading.
We
did
that
for
probably
seven
eight
years
when
I.
AB
AC
AC
AC
Right
perfect,
thank
henry.
Thank
you
for
that
intro,
I'm
adam
revlow,
I'm
the
solution
specialist
for
ferguson
water
works.
We
are
the
neptune
distributor
for
the
state
of
california,
matt
emsley
from
neptune's.
Also
on
on
this
meeting
as
well
I'll.
Let
him
introduce
himself
kind
of
after
his
presentation
during
the
when
the
next
speaker
can
go
kind
of
thing
he's
actually
a
resident
of
hollister,
so
you
guys
have
any
questions.
You
can
always
bug
him
as
well
a
little
bit
about
this.
What
the
city
is
doing.
AC
I'm
gonna
be
throwing
out
here.
Amr
and
ami
amr
stands
for
automated
meter
reading,
and
that
is
what
you
can
think
of
that,
as
is
a
drive-by
leader.
That's
what
the
city
is
currently
using
now
so
in
this
little
diagram
here
you
can
see
someone
would
drive
around
pick
up.
The
meter
reads:
bring
those
reads
back
to
the
city
and
transfer
everything
over
the
building
with
ami
or
the
advanced
metering
infrastructure.
AC
City,
those
meters
would
transmit
readings
over
to
the
collectors
that
would
get
trans
transmitted
via
the
cloud
back
to
a
web
app,
and
so
it
would
even
be
able
to
use
now
the
main
difference
between
these
two
systems,
with
the
drive
by
you're
going
out
once
a
month.
Getting
your
billing
leads
you're
getting
12
monthly
billing
reads
per
year
per
meter
with
ami.
Those
meters
are
transmitting
24
7.
AC
So
that's
really
where
the
power
of
an
ami
system
comes
into
play
and
we'll
get
into
that
a
little
bit
more
here
in
a
couple
slides.
AC
Main
this
is
based
on
a
study
from
2018.
These
are
some
of
the
main
concerns
that
utilities
have
when
going
over
to
ami
one
of
those
is
going
to
be
battery
life
of
the
meters,
so
those
radios,
those
transmitters.
They
require
battery
they're
in
a
meter,
meter,
box
or
meter
pit,
there's
no
no
way
to
power
them
other
than
battery
neptune
meters.
You
guys
have
been
utilizing
them
through
amr
systems
for
quite
some
time.
We
actually
the
typical
life
of
a
meter,
is
for
one
of
these
radios.
It's
going
to
be
20
years.
AC
You
guys
actually
have
a
couple
meters
that
have
been
running
since
the
early
2000s,
so
we're
holding
up
to
that
20-year
lifespan.
You
guys
have
quite
a
few
registers
and
radios
that
are
much.
C
AC
The
city
was
actually
really
smart,
but
you
guys
the
way
you
guys
installed
your
amr
meters
they're
ready
to
go
for
ami,
so
the
only
real
investment
you
need
to
go
to
ami
is
to
set
up
the
infrastructure.
AC
We
will
talk
a
little
bit
about
upgrading
some
of
the
radios,
but
that's
more
just
because
of
that
older
technology.
So
getting
into
that
technical
obsolescence,
we
can.
AC
All
those
radios,
those
radios
I
talked
about
that
were
from
the
early
2000s.
We
can
still
read
those
radios.
The
main
reason
you're
gonna
have
to
upgrade.
Some
of
your
registers
will
be
for
the
distance
those
can
transmit.
So
obviously,
as
technologies
progress,
our
newer
registers
can
transmit
over
a
much
further
distance
than
some
of
those
older
ones.
So
we
are
still
able
to
read
the
older
registers
but
for
cost
cost.
AC
Cost
effective
to
put
up
to
upgrade
some
of
those
older
registers
to
the
the
newer,
more
powerful
ones
than
to
put
up
additional
collectors
around
the
city
vendor
support.
I
I
myself
have
been
working
with
henry
since
2017
previous
to
being
a
solution:
specialist,
a
salesperson
for
ferguson.
AC
So
I've
worked
with
providing
support
for
all
of
the
hardware
and
software
related
to
the
reading
systems,
compatibility
with
existing
systems.
We
are
your
existing
system
compatibility
with
billing.
We
work
closely
with
tyler
technologies
across
a
bunch
of
different
utilities,
obviously
we're
working
with
them
now
with
you
guys
to
get
your
current
meter,
reading
system
up
and
running
and
then
ease
of
ease
of
installation
and
maintenance.
This
is
a
this
is
a
big
piece
too,
because
you
guys
are
already
very
familiar
with
our
meters.
AC
AC
Through
some
of
these
slides
just
in
the
interest
of
time,
but
the
no
barriers
philosophy
of
neptune,
like
I
said
we
are
backwards
compatible
on
all
our
radios,
so
you
guys
aren't
wasting
assets
in
the
ground,
we're
still
able
to
read
all
of
your
your
old
radios
that
are
already
there.
AC
Than
some
of
those
older
ones,
those
older
radios,
have
this
100
milliwatt
signal
and
I
transmitted
every
14
seconds.
These
newer
radios
transmit
a
one
watt
burst
every
seven
and
a
half
minutes
so
same
battery
life,
but
they're
able
to
transmit
a
one
watt
burst
that
travels
much
further.
That's
why
upgrading
some
of
those
registers
allows
us
to
put
less
collectors
into
the
system.
AC
AC
What
you're
curious
about
is
going
to
be
the
benefits
of
an
ami
system
so,
as
I
said,
there's
you're
looking
at
almost
9
000
data
points
per
meter
versus
12..
So
there's
a
lot
more.
You
can
do
with
that
data
from
a
customer
service
perspective,
you're
able
to
proactively
notify
customers
and
potential
leaks,
so
you
can
actually
get
automated
reports
basically,
each
day,
that'll
say:
hey!
AC
Here's
your
list
of
meters
with
potential
leaks,
it'll,
tell
you
how
long
those
leaks
have
or
that
leak
flag
has
been
activated,
and
then
you
can
actually
also
run
a
report
that
will
compare
the
consumption
of
the
meter
since
that
leaked
flag's
been
activated
versus
what
it
was
before.
So
it's
really
easy
to
determine.
AC
You
know
how
bad
a
potential
leak
is,
so
you
can
notify
customers
things
of
that
nature,
get
ahead
of
what
what
could
be
potentially
high
bill
disputes
things
of
that
nature,
and
then
you
can
provide
customers
with
that
actual
detailed
data
as
well
with
billing
inquiries.
So
when
someone
calls
in
with
a
high
bill
complaint,
you
have
all
that
hourly
data,
you
can
say
hey,
you
know
they
can
say
hey.
Why
is
my
bill
way
higher
this.
AC
Well,
we
noticed
usage
spikes
on
tuesday,
thursday
nights
from
this
time.
You
start
irrigating
things
of
that
nature,
so
it
really
helps
with
the
customer
service
aspect
as
well,
because
there's
like
I
said
the
key
here
is
there's
a
lot
more
data
for
you
guys
to
look
at
and
analyze
that
there
is
with
just
getting
those
monthly
reads:
utility
operations
you
can
reduce
and
eliminate
truck
rules
for
increased
efficiency,
so
some
of
those
things
would
be
off
cycle
reads.
AC
Outs
instead
of
sending
someone
out
there,
so
you
have
to
collect
those
reads
during
a
non-normal
billing
cycle,
you
can
just
log
into
the
ami
system
pull
that
read
and
get
that
the
move
about.
We
also
offer
things
like
virtual
disconnect.
So
if
there's
properties
you
know
or
vacant-
or
you
know
things
of
that
nature-
and
you
don't
want
to
for
whatever
reason
shut
off
the
water
actually
shut
off
the
water
physically,
you
can
get
notified
of
usage
on
properties
where
you're
not
expecting
it
and
there's.
AC
Reports
that
you
can
use
for
analytics
I'm
going
to
try
and
keep
it
a
little
bit
high
level
here,
but
if
you
guys
want
any
more
information
on
some
of
that
stuff,
let
henry
know-
and
I
can
send
over
all
that
information
for
him
to
distribute
to
you
guys,
revenue
enhancement,
so
obviously
you're
reducing
your
cycle
reading
time.
Instead
of
someone
coming
out
going
out
and
driving
all
those
routes,
it's
all
coming
in
automatically
via
those
fixed-based
collectors,
identify
sources
of
lost
revenue
water.
AC
So
there
is
a
lot
of
ability
in
here
to
do
consumption
by
air
group
to
run
consumption
reports
by
what
we
call
groups.
So
you
can
group
leaders
together
by
areas
by
if
there's
a
like
a
meter,
feeding
an
area.
You
can
group
all
the
meters
under
that
into
one
group
to
run
a
report,
so
you
can
kind
of
look
a
little
bit
at
what
you're
billing
or
what
your
meters
are
reading.
AC
That's
what
you're
going
to
build
versus
what
you're
pumping
so
it
makes
that
a
little
bit
easier
as
well,
and
then
conservation.
You
know
those
there's
usage,
reportings
and
then
reverse
flower
lids.
So
if
you
get
you'll
see
in
it
in
here
as
well,
there's
also
a
automated
reverse
flow
alert
that
you
can
get.
That
can
help.
Do
things,
like,
I
admit,
identify
if
there's
a
line
break.
So
if,
if
something
were
to
happen,
if
the
line
were
to
break
you'd,
see
a
bunch
of
reverse
flows
trigger
around
where
that
brake
was.
O
AC
We
offer
is
api
compatibility,
so
we
have
the
ability
to
interface
with
third-party
applications,
like
customer
portals
work
order,
management
systems.
So
if
there's
anything
the
city
decides
they
want
to
add
in
later,
it's
really
easy.
We
can
work
with
those
different
applications
to
have
them,
pull
our
consumption
data
into
them.
N
AC
Bit
about
what
you
guys
would
be
looking
at
as
a
system,
so
we'd
be
looking
at
seven
collectors,
for
you
guys
to
capture
the
whole
system.
What
we
call
98.5
percent
of
reads,
that's
kind
of
the
industry
standard,
and
then
this
right
here
would
be
if
we
didn't
upgrade
any
of
our
registers.
This
would
be
worst
case.
AC
Scenario
on
the
whole
city
was
that
our
older
red,
older
versions,
without
that
one
block
burst
with
the
number
of
collectors
we're
looking
at
putting
up
we'd,
be
able
to
get
85
of
the
system
and
then
once
we
upgrade
some
of
those
registers
you'll
be
getting
up
to
that
98.5
of
the
system.
AC
So
this
is
just
kind
of
what
that
would
look
like
for
that
coverage
map.
So
this
is
with
the
v4
coverage,
which
is
those
registers
with
the
one
watt
burst
versus
the
v3.
So
you
can
see
just
a
little
bit
of
a
visual
visualization
on
how
much
that
extra
one
watt
transmission
helps
helps
those
registers
reach.
We
also
offer
a
lot
of
fill-in
things,
so
you
can
see
there's
some
registers
out
here
that
aren't
covered
by
the
system.
AC
So
a
little
bit
about
that
cost
to
go
ami,
so
we're
looking
at
conservative,
we're
looking
at
about
270
000
for
upgrading
the
registers
and
about
140
000
to
install
for
purchasing
and
installing
the
infrastructure
that
infrastructure
cost
is
a
one-time
cost
that
you
you
pay
to
install
that
infrastructure
and
that
would
be
good
for
but
like.
AC
That
meter
and
register
replacement-
one
thing
you
guys
would
be
able
to
do
is
kind
of.
Instead
of
having
to
pay
that
upfront,
you
could
kind
of
pay
that,
as
you
go
so.
M
O
AC
Percent
of
the
city
would
call
in
through
that
ami
system,
the
rest
of
it
anything
that
didn't
call
in.
You
can
continue
reading
about
that
drive
by
route
and
then
it
you
could
upgrade
the
registers
as
we
go
or
as
you
are
able
to
budgetarily
or
just
with
resources
for
installing
those
meters.
So
it's
something
where
you
can
set
up
that
infrastructure
now
and
then
work
your
way
up
to
that
98
and
a
half
percent.
AC
Brief
pretty
brief
presentation
here,
trying
to
keep
it
a
little
bit
high
level.
If
you
guys
have
more
questions,
we
can
definitely
go
into
some
more
detail.
I
can
get
into
kind
of
how
that
data
resentment
would
look
as
well
in
the
software,
so.
AC
And
if
you
have
any
questions
anything
like
that,
please
let
me
know
I'm
more.
B
AD
AC
I
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
appreciate
it
very
much
with
regard
to
the
fixed
based
system,
or
I
think
you
refer
to
it
as
a
ami
and
the.
I
That
you
put
up
with
relation
to
the
installation
of
that
equipment.
My
presumption
is
I'm
looking
at
traffic
lights
and
poles,
so
my
question
is,
is
is,
and
I'm
I'm
very
uneducated,
maybe
ignorant
in
regards
to
this.
So
would
there
be
any
cost
for
the
city
to
acquire
the
property,
or
is
this
all
going
to
be
put
on
city
currently
owned
infrastructure?
I
I
AC
Yes,
so
we
would
be
looking
at
city-owned
infrastructure.
What
our
big
candidate
here
would
be
that
water
tank
up
on
the
hill
that
actually
just
that
tank
itself
gets
a
very
large
percentage
of
the
of
the
meters
of
the
city.
We
also
like
to
build
in
a
little
redundant
so
that
if,
if
a
collector
goes
down,
we're
not
losing
huge
swaths
of
of
the
the
leaders
as
well,
so
we
do.
AC
To
install
light
poles,
this
is
just
kind
of
an
example
of
that.
It's
all
pretty
streamlined
here.
There's
the
two:
this
is
the
collector
itself.
The
power
supply
which
taps
into
that
that
same
power
supplies
the
light
and
then
the
antenna
at
the
top,
and
then
our
policy
typically
is
to
install
at
least
eight
feet
typically
about
ten
feet
off
the
ground.
Just
so
that
your
average
passer
by
on
the
street
would
not.
I
I
O
I
If
I
may,
and
then
that
way,
thank
you
so,
mr
gonzalez,
can
you
have
you
taken
a
look
at
what
the
cost
is,
which
which
I
hear,
if
I
added
correctly,
is
about
410
000.
I
If
you
take
a
look
at
the
cost
of
what
the
installation
is
versus
the
time
savings
cost
for
staff,
so
my
point
is:
if,
if
we
now
use
one
or
two
people
to
do
this
every
day
of
the
year
and
we're
not
going
to
need
that
number
of
people
whatever
that
may
be,
I
would
see
that
as
a
cost
saving.
So
in
my
mind
that
would
that
it's
a
no-brainer
if
there's
a
cost
savings
to
the
city
and
staff,
time
and
resources.
AB
AB
Now
we
drive
around
in
a
vehicle,
picking
up
all
the
information
that
these
towers
would
be
collecting
the
problem
with
what
we
have
if
we
have
a
bad
meter
or
something
like
that,
we
have
to
go
back
out
and
find
it,
and
you
know
and
repair
that
with
this
this
is
gonna,
be
you
know,
instantaneously,
you're
gonna
get,
you
know,
live
information
when
we
have
leaks
people
say
I
I
don't
have
a
leak
with
this
type
of
technology.
We
can
pull
up
the
day
the
hour
you
did
have
a
leak.
AB
We
have
people
that
will
you
know,
sometimes
they
break
a
sprinkler
or
the
most
common
thing
is
toilet
leaks.
Honestly,
they
say.
Well,
you
know,
I
don't
there's
no
leaks
in
my
house
this
and
that
their
bill
is
an
extra
500
and
they're
blaming
us
they're
saying
our
meters
are
inaccurate
or
you
know
we're
lying
or
you
know
then
they're
in
disbelief
of
how
much
a
toilet
it
can
actually
cost
in
a
leak.
AB
I
L
Correct
you
know
yeah
well,
because
we'd
have
to
look
at
what
the
cost
of
meters
are
compared
to
what
we
set
the
impact
fee
for,
but
to
kind
of
add
on
the
cost
of
staff.
The
one
part
that's
it's
probably
we
probably
can't
quantify
is
just
the
times.
Staff
is
on
the
phone
over
in
the
the
payment
center
about
people
complaining
about
leaks
and
we're
kind
of
working
on
a
system
also
where
it
actually
will.
You
can
look
at
your.
L
You
can
pick
this
stuff
up
on
your
phone
and
be
notified
if
the
system
thinks
you
have
a
leak.
So,
like
I
said
I
mean
this
is
the
future
where,
instead
of
having
water
loss,
because
people
didn't
know
about
a
leak
be
and
from
month
to
month,
this
is
you
know
within
hours
that
you
can
start
telling
that
you
have
a
leak,
so
it's
beneficial
just
to
in
staff
time
and
then
just
water
loss,
the
you
know
water
is
becoming
very
precious.
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
main
reasons
for
it.
I
Right
and
and
and
your
last
comment
was
my
last
question
and
I
think
you've
answered
it,
but
if
we're
if
we're
headed
into
yet
another
drought
year,
I
presume
this
system
would
also
allow
us
to
better
understand
the
individual
uses
so
that
we
could
have
those
proactive
conversations
to
re,
reduce
excessive
water
usage
by
the
customer
base.
Yeah.
I
G
K
K
So
I
am,
I
come
from
property
management,
and
so
my
last
property
I
was
managing,
they
had
a
hundred
units
and
they
we
were
getting
notices
from
the
city
that
they're
going
to
start
finding
us
because
we're
using
excessive
water.
K
AC
K
K
So
it
was
worth
it
for
us
to
go
change,
change
out
the
whole
valve
system
for
100
units,
which
is
two
bathrooms,
each
one
200
units
of
fixing
bathrooms
just
just
the
toilets,
and
we
saved
a
quarter
million
gallons
of
water
a
month
a
month.
It's
incredible!
So
so
a
system
like
this,
we
were
able
to
trace
it
down
and
and
and
and
repair
what
was
going
on.
So
I
I
love
this
system.
I
think
it's
a
great
system.
My
only
question
was
so
on.
K
You
were
talking
about
the
radios
and
that
they'd
be.
We
wouldn't
have
to
update
them
yet,
but.
AB
So
what
adam
was
speaking
on
was
the
meters
themselves,
so
you
have
a
mechanical
part
and
you
have
a
digital
part
of
the
meter
right,
so
the
lifespan
of
the
those
are
10
to
15
years
for
the
power
source.
So
we
turn
over
meters
around
every
eight
to
ten
years,
because
they
do
become
a
little
less
efficient.
AB
AB
And
then,
if
you
were
able
to
put
a
number
quantitative
how
much
you
lost
with
three
total,
we
have
just
over
eight
thousand
accounts,
so
the
cost
savings
there
was.
I
mean
it
would
multiply.
AC
AC
Yeah,
so
there's
a
couple
different
ways
we
can
handle
that
neptune
is
releasing
their
own
customer
portal
to
go
along
with
the
to
go
along
with
their
head
end
site
right
now.
So
that's
something
I
I'd
have
to
get
you
some
dates
on
when
that
would
be
released.
We
also
offer
that
api
integration
with
different
different
other
customers
or
not
customers-
sorry
different
other
customer
portals.
So
we
can.
N
AC
I
will
say
with
the
customer
portals
they
do
kind
of
vary
a
lot
in
price,
depending
on
how
many
bells
and
whistles
you
do
run,
but
it's
definitely
something
that
integrates
easily
with
our
system
neptune's
going
to
be
releasing
our
own
here
shortly
and
then
you
also
have
the
ability
to
easily.
AC
K
AB
B
My
common
question
would
be
for
me
to
really
support.
This
would
have
to
be
a
system
that
could
notify
the
resident
and
the
city
at
the
same
time
of
the
unusual
use,
because
that
that's
really
the
whole
point,
I
don't
wanna,
I
don't
wanna
have
a
system
where
it
depends
on
the
city
to
notify
them.
You
know
the
data
out
there
nowadays.
Obviously,
we
have
pretty
much.
B
Everything
relies
on
that
now,
notifying
the
customer
instantaneously,
when
they're
seeing
a
difference
in
the
pattern
of
usage
because,
as
was
mentioned,
sometimes
they
feel
it
might
be,
the
city's
fault
and
they're
not
going
to
do
anything
about
it,
but
they're
being
notified
and
then
the
city's
being
notified
about
it,
then
we're
making
sure
it's
being
taken
care
of
before
it
becomes
a
three
four
hundred
dollar
water
bill
and
then
the
fighting
starts
about
the
the
bill.
So
is
that
system
in
place
now
ready
to
go.
AC
So
that
would
be
something
we'd
have
to
we
would
integrate
in.
So
that
would
be
kind
of
a
separate
piece
from
that
infrastructure
piece
of
it,
so
that
infrastructure
will
get
you
that
hourly
data.
All
of
that,
so
that
you
could
implement
that
third-party
customer
portal
or
that
customer
portal,
whether
that's
waiting
for
the
neptune
one
to
be
released
or
going
with
a
third-party
one,
we
could
integrate
a
third-party
one.
Now
that
cost
of
like
a
third-party
portal
compared
to
the
total
cost
of
this
project,
is
pretty
small
yeah.
L
We've
had
conversations
in
the
past
as
this
technology
was
coming
out
probably
a
year
ago,
and
I
believe
our
current
software
system
that
we
use
tyler.
Actually
it
has
that
third
party
portal
that
would
integrate
with
our
billing
system
and
if
I
remember
correct,
it's
been
like,
say
it's
been
a
year,
they
had
it
had
a
way
to
notify
individuals
if
they
did
sign
up
to
have
a
text
message
or
a
email
sent
to
them.
AC
AC
So
for
the
customer
portal
we'd
have
to
get
into
that
with.
If
you
wanted
to
go
with,
tyler
we'd
have
to
get
into
that
with
them
a
little
bit.
We
were
planning
on
running
kind
of
what
we
call
pilot
for
the
ami
system
itself,
so
this
wouldn't
be
the
customer
notification
side
of
it,
but
we
have
a
portable
gateway
that
we
were
going
to
set
up.
That's
it's
like
on
our
trailer
that
we're
going
to
set
up.
O
AC
By
the
those
water
tanks
on
the
hill
to
just
kind
of
show,
you
just
kind
of
do
a
proof
of
concept
of
the
ami
system
that
wouldn't
include
the
customer
portal
aspect
now
as
part
of
that,
but
we
could
look
into
if
you
guys
wanted
to
do
that,
I
we
could
speak
with
tyler,
maybe
setting
something
up
in
concert
with
that.
B
Thank
you
any
other
questions.
Comments
from
council.
K
Oh
yeah,
just
one
more
so
when
I
know
the
system
that
I
was
using,
it
was
a
it
gave
data
because
it
was
the
system
that
you've
been
using
for
years.
So
now.
I
know
that
it's
going
to
take
time
for
us
to
get
data
safe
from.
K
That
the
water's
I
got
a
leak,
someplace.
AC
K
Is
there
anything
in
there
that
if
it
I
mean,
is
it
just
the
data?
That's
that
can
be
saved.
That's
going
to
tell
me
whether
I'm
using
it
in
my
normal
usage
or
is.
Is
there
a
ballpark,
a
certain
number
that
we
can
use
for
our
first
year
to
as
a
gauge
to
how
much.
AC
So
is
that
that's
going
to
really
depend
on
what
kind
of
customer
portal
you
go
with
in
terms
of
that
kind
of
notification
so
for
ours,
for
the
neptune
software,
how
we
identify
leaks
is
based
on
usage
over
time.
So
we
look
at
15,
minute
windows
and
say
hey.
You
know
like
over.
O
AC
For
a
continuous
leak
over
a
24-hour
period,
there
should
be
at
least
one
15-minute
window
in
there
where,
where
there's
no
water
running
for
different
customer
portals,
they
do
things
differently
in
terms
of
how
they
determine
those
will
you.
B
Thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
speakers
speaker
cards.
AD
Yeah
yeah
good
evening
council
and
mayor
velasquez,
this
is
matt
ensley,
I'm
the
territory
manager
for
neptune
on
the
manufacturing
side.
I
just
wanted
to
introduce
myself
as
the
representative
for
neptune
working
closely
in
tangent,
with
ferguson
for
our
partnering
utilities,
so
city
hollister
being
a
long
time
partner
as
henry
was
able
to
kind
of
share
with
you
guys
kind
of
going
through
the
iterations
with
the
system
and
kind
of
taking
the
next
steps
forward.
AD
We
see
it
as
a
exciting
step,
which
kind
of
adds
a
good
amount
of
granularity
and
action
that
you
could
take
with
some
of
this
data,
so
so
yeah
if
there's
any
kind
of
other
additional
questions,
happy
to
kind
of
expand
on
any
of
those
or
work
with
adam,
given
any
resources
kind
of
funneling
it
through
henry,
so
just
wanted
to
kind
of
put
that
out
there
as
kind
of
an
additional
team
member
to
this
project.
Thank
you.
Q
Good
evening,
so
it's
very
impressive
report:
8760
hours
for
27
24
7
operating,
I
was
looking
at
it
as
an
employee.
It's
2080
hours
a
week,
40
40-hour
work
week
is
2080
hours
a
year
and
then
henry
mentioned
that
they're
spending
actually
10
hours
a
week
right
now,
a
month
a
month
a
month,
yeah
that's
even
a
month,
which
is
so
the
work
is
being
spent.
The
hours
are
being
sent
on
some
other
things,
it's
very
impressive,
the
bill,
the
the
four
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars.
Q
Thank
you,
mr
mr
councilman
burns,
because
I'm
doing
the
math
over
here
too
and
I
was
looking
at
it-
that's
almost
a
half
a
million
dollars
and
henry
mentioned
that
it
it'll
be
a
discussion
between
he
and
the
city
manager.
How
they're
going
to
work
this
out?
Well,
it's
going
to
work
out
where
the
consumer
is
going
to
get
it
and
it's
going
to
go
it's
going
to
come
out
of
our
pockets.
I
mean
it's
already
expensive,
the
monthly
water
bills-
and
I
know
grocery
outlet
round
table
that
that
shopping
center.
Q
They
had
a
big
water
issue
recently
and
I
don't
even
know
if
it's
been
resolved
yet
completely
or
not.
So
I
don't
know
how
this
is
going
to
just
it's
going
to
increase
our
fees,
and
I
think
this
is
really
great.
Obviously,
technology
is
better
in
the
long
run.
We
save
money,
but
I
was
concerned
with
a
couple
of
code
words
that
came
up
and
one
was
it's
a
pilot
program
and
the
other
one
was
neptune
has
been
a
long-term
partner
with
the
city
of
hollister.
Q
There
are
other
companies
out
there,
so
this
is
a
presentation
from
one
company.
So
is
this
going
to
go
out
for
an
rfp
or
just
because
we've
had
a
long-term
relationship
with
this
company
we're
not
just
going
to
approve
you're
gonna,
you
know
approve
some
kind
of
a
contract
and
I
am
curious
as
to
how
long
have
we
had
this
contract
with
neptune?
I'm
not
disputing
any
of
the
work
that's
been
going
on.
I
just
think
that
an
rfp
should
be.
Q
You
know
should
be
put
in
place
if
this
is
something
that
the
city
is
considering
to
do
and
when
he
said
pilot
program,
so
this
am,
I
are,
you
is,
is
neptune
not
doing
it
yet?
This
is
something
that
they're
just
getting
into
and
they're
willing
to
do
a
pilot
program
with
hollister.
B
Okay:
let's
go
back
to
real,
quick,
any
more
questions
or
comments
from
council
just
to
clarify.
I
believe
the
comment
about
the
pilot
program
would
be
set
up
in
a
location
in
the
city.
Show
that
how
it
could
work
is
that
correct.
AC
Sorry,
just
real
quick
yeah,
so
that
would
be
more
of
just
a
kind
of
proof
of
concept,
for
you
guys
to
show
you
how
the
system
would
work
we'd
be
setting
up
our
own
infrastructure
there
with
this,
what
portable
gateway,
so
there
wouldn't
be
any
cost
of
the
city.
For
that
and,
like
I
said,
your
your
meters
are
all
set
up
there.
Additionally,
you
guys
are
not
the
first
ami
system.
We
have
a
bunch
of
ami
systems
throughout
california
throughout
the
country.
AC
If
you
needed
references
anything
like
that
more
than
happy
to
provide
that
as
well.
I
won't
speak
to
the
rfp
or
the
other
manufacturers.
There
are
other
manufacturers
out
there
for
a
cost
perspective.
You
guys
would
have
to
replace
meters
registers.
B
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
if
there's
no
other
questions
or
comments
from
city
council,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
and
maybe
you
can
forward
some
of
the
information
we
talked
about
tonight.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Z
Good
evening,
mayor
council,
my
name
is
mark
falgo,
I'm
the
acting
city
engineer.
This
item
is
an
informational
report
to
the
council
to
provide
information
regarding
speed,
cushions
and
their
use
or
potential
use
in
the
public.
Right-Of-Way
frederick
venter,
who
is
on
will
be
present
doing
the
presentation
and
he
can
either
share
his
screen
or
you
can
share
the
presentation
that
was.
AE
AE
Great,
can
everybody
see
my
screen
and
can
you
hear
me.
E
E
AE
B
AE
Great
okay,
great
I'm
gonna,
start
the
presentation
good
evening,
everybody.
This
is
a
quick
10
minute
presentation
on
on
speed
cushions,
as
I
think
most
of
you
are
aware.
We
are
currently
conducting
a
couple
of
street
traffic.
Calming
programs,
and
the
question
keeps
coming
up
about
what
about
the
installation
of
speedups
to
slow
down
the
traffic.
AE
So
I'm
gonna
just
go
through
a
couple
of
the
presentations
here
for
some
of
the
newer
council
members.
You
know,
traffic
calming
is
just
a
it's.
An
implementation
of
measures
that
will
reduce
cut
through
traffic,
reduce
speed,
improve
noise,
improve
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
create
safer
streets.
For
you
know,
people
to
bike
and
walk
and
children
to
play
in.
AE
There
are
basically
four
types
of
measures
for
traffic
copy
measures.
There's
horizontal
shifts
in
your
roadway
vertical
shifts,
which
is
specifically
what
we're
going
to
look
at
tonight,
and
then
you
can
do
street
closures
and
just
implement
measures
that
could
change
the
behavior
of
drivers
so,
specifically
looking
at
vertical
shifts.
AE
You
know
we
we're
going
to
talk
a
lot
about
what
we
call
these
cushions
or
speed,
humps
and
speed
race
tables,
and
you
know
so,
on
the
left
hand
side
here,
you
can
see
what
that's
what
we're
looking
at
tonight
is
called
speed
cushions
and
you
can
see
it's
basically
almost
like
a
square
or
a
rectangle,
and
it
has
these
gaps
in
the
middle
and
the
purpose
of
those
gaps
are
not
to
impact
these
response
times
for
fire
trucks,
and
the
one
in
the
middle
is
called
a
raised
intersection
and
that's
just
a
big
old
speedup.
AE
Looking
at
speed
cushions.
You
know
it
could
be
two
or
three
or
more
speed
these
sort
of
cushions
and
that
that's
implemented
on
the
roadway.
AE
AE
The
the
placement
of
these
can
be
such
that
you
would
do
it
in
a
manner
that
would
allow
for
trucks
and
buses
to
traverse
the
speed
arms,
but
vehicles
would
not
be
able
to
to
to
try
to
avoid
them.
A
vehicle
that
would
have
one
wheel
go
on.
The
gap
would
have
the
other
other
wheel,
go
on
the
actual
pump.
AE
This
is
a
typical
picture.
You
know
of
a
fire
truck
and
the
installation
thereof.
We
can
have
two
types
of
these
speed
cushions
and
the
one
that
you
see
on
the
picture
are
ones
that
are
rubberized
and
they
are
actually
dialed
into
your
blacktop
and
they
can
be
removed
and
maintained.
AE
AE
You
could
get
up
to
about
10
speed,
reduction
from
these
vertical
deflections
for
vehicular
traffic,
you
know
and
the
way
in
which
they
are
positioned.
I
said
minimum
impact
on
bicycles
and
parking
and
storm
water.
AE
Ambulances
cannot
avoid
them,
so
ambulances
would
continue
to
drive
over
the
actual
hump,
because
the
real
base
width
of
the
ambulances
are
or
less
and
probably
a
little
closer
to
to
vehicles
or
big
pickup
trucks.
They
could
cause,
depending
on
how
you
design
them.
Potentially
some
increase
in
noise
because
of
the
deceleration
acceleration
also
actually
going
over
the
hump.
AE
AE
If
you
want
to
do
a
speed
hump
that
runs
across
the
cross
section
of
the
road.
Those
would
impact
the
response
time
about
by
about
10
seconds
per
hump.
So
you
know
if,
if
a
fire
truck
needs
to
go
down
the
road,
when
there's
three
or
four
of
those
you
know
you,
you
could
see
a
a
substantial
reduction
in
response
time,
but
because
we
do
these
cushions
with
the
fire
truck
galaxy
straddle
the
the
cushions.
AE
I
did
talk
about
the
three
to
ten
seconds,
the
humps
you
know
and
how
it
would
delay
vehicles
versus
the
one
on
the
right
that
has
only
a
slight
reduction
about
two
seconds.
So
that's,
usually
that's
that's
going
to
be
insignificant
to
the
overall
response
time
of
the
fire
trucks.
AE
This
is
an
example
in
the
city
of
seaside,
where
you
can
see
what
they
actually
did.
Is
they
straddled
them
in
in
various
ways
across
the
road,
because
the
road
is
so
wide
now
what
you
will
see?
What
they
typically
do
here
is
the
the
fire
truck
will
actually
take
the
middle
of
the
road
and
also
straddle
the
the
center
line.
It
is
illegal
for
vehicles
to
actually
do
that,
but
vehicles
do
do
it.
AE
If
there's
no
other
traffic
vehicles
actually
do
cross
the
the
center
line
and
then
try
to
straddle
the
the
the
cushion
but
one
way
on
top
and
one
wheel
in
the
gutter
and
we're
in
that
gap
between
the
two
two
cushions
you
know,
but
this
is
also
a
typical
placement.
You
can
see
that
I
think
this
little
median
treatment
seaside
as
well.
You
know
to
prevent
people
from
actually
using
that
and
actually
just
going
straight
through.
AE
That
was
the
last
of
the
slides.
So
I
think
so
you
know
my
understanding
is
that
the
the
discussion
for
tonight
is
in
the
past
the
outreach
that
we've
done.
We
have
told
the
residents
that
the
city
is
not
in
favor
of
actually.
AE
Speed
humps
or
these
speed
cushions,
and
I
believe
we
are
back
here
tonight
to
look
at
the
option
of
potentially
using
them
for
the
traffic
calming
that
we
want
to
implement
on
the
on
the
streets
that
we're
studying
right
now.
B
Thank
you
for
the
update
questions
from
council.
I
You
mayor,
as
I
recall,
we
asked
for
this
to
be
brought
forward
by
the
chief
of
police
and
the
fire
chief,
and
it
was
in
specific
regards
to
the
challenges,
if
I
recall
on
lad
lane,
and
so
I'm
encouraged
by
what
we've
seen
and
heard
here,
I'm
not
I'm
too
new
to
clearly
know
what
the
challenges
are
on
lad
lane,
but
I
would
like
to
see
the
current
proposal
that
we
tabled
with
a
proposal
for
lad
lane
using
the
speed
cushions
to
see
the
cost,
the
savings,
and
if
we
accomplish
the
goal
for
it,
costs
more
well,
then
I
might
not
be
so
supportive,
but
if
we
can
accomplish
the
same
goal
for
equal
or
less
money
and
it
it
doesn't
create
major
challenges
for
our
police
and
fire
department.
I
I
would
be
supportive
of
that.
I'd
also
like
to
maybe
have
the
fire
chief
when
he
is
present,
or
maybe
just
in
a
comment
to
the
city
manager
then,
provided
the
council
weigh
in
on
it
as
well
as
our
chief
of
police.
Because,
again,
I
think
our
biggest
concern
is
public
safety
and
trying
to
accomplish
a
goal
at
her
at
a
reasonable
expense
and-
and
this
seems
like
it
could
be
a
viable
alternative
to
me.
That
concludes
my
comments.
Mayor.
Thank
you.
K
Go
ahead,
so
these
are
pretty
much
what
we're
talking
about
like
for
the
lat
lane
ones
or
if
we
went
forth
as
a
pilot
programmed
so
to
speak,
the
when
it
comes
time
to
to
repave
these
roads.
Are
these
removable
and
being
able
to
replace
them
with
the
same
one
or
do
we
have
to
use
get
by
new
ones?
Z
G
O
Z
AE
AE
Rubber,
thank
you,
but
many
cities
are
going
for
rubber
because
it's
cheaper
and
you
have
the
option
of
of
you
know
if
you
need
to
remove
them
or
change
them
or
or
you
do
a
repayment
job
that
you
can
pull
the
dials
out
and
take
them
out.
A
B
You
for
mayor
go
ahead,
councilman
resendez!
Thank
you.
J
I
cannot
tell
you
how
many
requests
I've
gotten
for
speed
humps
in
spanish
they're
called
topes
top
estop
estopas,
because
there's
so
much
speeding,
in
particular
on
the
west
side
on
central
avenue
in
buena
vista,
and
it's
been
years
that
they've
been
asking
for
speed
hum.
So
I'm
very
happy
to
see
that
we're
discussing
this
item.
I
would
I
like
that
they
go
with
the
roundabouts,
and
I
know
that
we
adopted
a
policy
that
that
is
allowing
us
to
essentially
that
we're
going
to
adopt
roundabouts
within
the
city
limits.
J
I
would
like
to
adopt
a
policy
that
says
if
it's
okay
with
the
council,
that
we're
gonna
adopt
these
types
of
speed,
humps
to
go
with
the
roundabouts
or
to
complement
them
or
just
so.
We
know
that
we're
gonna,
you
know
you
can
either
have
both
these
options
or
one
or
the
other,
and
then
I'd
like
to
go
back
and
look
at
some
of
the
roads.
You
know:
can
we
re-stripe
them?
And
I
I
know
the
mayor
has
talked
about
this.
J
Quite
a
bit
protected
bike
lanes
restriping
these
types
of
speed
humps
like
I,
I'm
really
glad
to
see
that
the
city
is
open
to
the
idea
because,
as
the
engineer
had
mentioned
before,
my
understanding
was
that
the
it
was
too
impactful
to
the
response
time.
But
I'm
glad
that
we
found
something
that
I
think
they
do
support
and
I
would
love
to
go
back
and
look
at
some
of
the
streets
and
see
how
we
can
add
some
of
these
in
in
our
existing
neighborhoods
that
have
a
little
bit
of
trouble
with
speeders
and
whatnot.
B
Thank
you,
and
that
would
be
all
the
neighborhoods
right.
We
have
too
many
meters
around.
This
is
why
we're
having
these
conversations,
I
do
want
to
thank
the
chief.
I
I
went
to
go
see
an
example
of
one
that
they're
doing
in
a
in
a
brand
new
neighborhood
in
los
banos.
The
new
development
is
having
to
lay
these
things
down,
houses
aren't
even
built
yet,
and
they
have
them
down
on
the
ground,
which
is
obviously
a
being
very
proactive.
B
I
looked
into
some
of
the
pricing
on
these.
I
noticed
there
they
probably
averaged
about
700
per
mat
and
which
is
very
reasonable
when
you
consider
the
the
cost
of
trying
to
build
these
things
down
there
and
the
ability
to
remove
them
when
you're
going
to
repave.
B
Now,
how
long
would
it
take
to
get
this
thing
going
and
can
we
have
our
own
staff
install
these
with
the
training?
I'm
sure
that
would
save
quite
a
bit
of
time
and
and
money
to
get
these
things
out
there
and
how
many
would
you
need
per
block
and
again,
there's
so
many
streets
that
are
having
problems
now
with
speeders?
It's
just
it's
just
getting
outrageous.
AE
So
some
great
questions
so
so
the
spacing
of
these
are
usually
depending
on
the
but
obviously
mid
block
right,
but
you
don't
want
them
further
than
four
or
500
feet
apart.
Otherwise,
you
know
there's
just
speeding
in
between
them.
AE
Usually
we
look
at
the
at
the
actual
length
of
the
street,
so
we're
currently
looking
at
sally
street
in
bueno
vista
and
we're
going
to
come
back
with
a
plan.
We
actually
this
tonight's
decision.
AE
Is
we
almost
ready
to
come
back
to
those
two
communities
real
fast
with
their
potential
layouts
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks?
You
know
to
illustrate
what
this
could
look
like
on
on
those
two
corridors
that
we're
currently
looking
at
on
on
installation
from
the
city.
I'm
sure
one
can
check
with
the
vendors
you
know
and
and
look
at
if
the
city
can
install
them.
I
you
know
you
know,
there's
not.
AE
This
is
not
rocket
science,
you
lay
them
down
and
you
put
the
dell
in
into
the
black
top
and
that's
it.
B
B
AE
Not
do
you
see
I'm
sharing
my
screen.
Do
you
see
this.
AE
That's
the
one
to
do
this,
but
these
I
have
not
seen
these
being
done
with
the
rubberized
yeah,
because
it's
just
so
so
it's
a
pretty
substantial
area
that
you
cover.
Typically,
these
race
intersections
are
done
by
asphalt
or
you
could
do
pavers
as
well
right.
So
you
just
build
the
ramp
up,
put
your
pavers
down
ramp
down
the
other
side
and
that's
going
to
make
it
a
lot
more
difficult
to
make
donuts
and
intersections,
but
this
would
potentially
slow
down
fire
right.
The
fire
truck
as
far
as
time.
B
Is
this
something
we
would
test
on
several
streets,
or
is
this
something
we
if
we,
as
the
council,
agreed
to
move
forward
with
this
the
speed
cushions
that
we
could
start
to
put
a
policy
together
to
find
out
which
neighborhoods
want
them,
which
neighborhoods
don't
want
them
and
just
move
forward
on
this?
How
would
that
work,
city
manager.
L
B
I'm
sure,
probably
the
police
department
might
maybe
chief
can
answer
that
if
he's
still
there
are
there
certain
streets
that
you
just
get
a
ton
of
complaints
about
that
you'd
want
to
see
them
installed.
First.
V
Well,
we
get
a
ton
of
complaints
about
buena
vista
road,
but
I'm
not
sure
what
the
status
is
of
the
construction
that's
going
around
in
there.
It
would
be
premature
to
put
something
in
there
if
it's
going
to
be
torn
out
councilman
vice
mayor
rosendes
mentions
central
avenue.
That
is
a
long
thoroughfare
that
people
can
get
a
lot
of
speed
on
that
one.
V
By
placing
these,
so
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
benefits
with
placing
these
they're
not
going
to
slow
down
the
fire
department,
they
will
slightly
slow
down
police
and
ambulances,
but
our
vehicles
are
a
lot
less
heavy
than
a
fire
engine
and
a
little
bit
more
powerful.
So
we
can
make
up
that
that
speed
when
the
when
there
is
an
emergency.
V
So,
but
I
think
that
residential
street
central
is
a
good
example.
You
mentioned
mr
mayor
sally
street
between
third
and
santa
ana
is
a
really
wide
roadway
and
when
they're
extremely
wide,
like
that,
people
have
a
tendency
to
speed,
even
if
they're
not
realizing,
they're
doing
it
because
of
the
perception
but
yeah.
B
V
Could
be
a
really
good
test
street
to
see
see
these
items
installed
and
see
how
the
council,
how
the
neighborhood
likes
it
and
that
the
council
excuse
me
approves
of
them
and
then
just
install
them
in
more
locations.
B
Well,
I
think
I
guess
what
I'm
I'm,
and
I
appreciate
that.
I
I
think
we
can
get
to
these
residential
streets
quickly
and
and
moving
and
slow
traffic
down,
because
they
have
become
speedways,
even
the
more
narrow
streets.
I
know
I'm
sure
rick
councilmember
perez
get
a
lot
of
these
complaints
about
west
street
and
and.
B
Street
and
so
yeah
right,
it's
it's
just
amazing!
I
I
guess
I
I
did.
Maybe
this
would
be
a
conversation
for
the
council
different
different
medium,
but
it
would
be
how
many
of
these
can
we
order
and
how
soon
can
we
get
going
on
this,
because
this
would
really
help
drive
down
some
of
those
complaints
that
we're
all
getting?
B
Mr
mayor,
yes,
go
ahead,
sir.
J
Typically,
I'm
in
favor
of
getting
public
input,
but
I
think
this
is
pretty
critical.
I
think
we
need
to,
like
you
said,
get
the
conversation
going
order
these
and
get
them
going,
get
them
installed.
I
like
that
you
can
put
them
down
and
then
remove
them,
so
I
would
be
in
favor
of
putting
them
on
buena
vista,
because
that
is
such
a
troubled
area.
Buena
vista
central
sally
street,
lad
lane.
J
B
B
Mr
perez
knows
a
bunch
of
streets
in
his
district
as
as
do
all
of
you.
Maybe
we
can
make
a
a
list
of
five
streets
in
each
district
that
we
can
test
these
things
on.
If
that's
something
we
can
have
a
larger
conversation
about
actually.
K
I'd
like
to
have,
if
we're
gonna,
do
it
that
way.
Maybe
I
can
pick
five
streets
that
I
don't
need
them
on,
but.
K
Great
idea,
because
yeah
to
space
them
out
to
each
district
and
of
course
then,
let's
just
say,
I'm
wondering
how
do
we
pick
those
streets?
I
mean
the
most
popular
speeding
ones.
I
You
mayor
so
for
our
city
engineer,
I'm
looking
at
the
the
pictures
in
the
presentation
and-
and
I
clearly
see
the
street
markings
that
are
on
the
on
the
cushions,
but
I'm
also
wondering
at
night
time.
Is
it
important
to
place
these
in
proximity
to
some
sort
of
street
light
so
that
people
actually
get
to
see
them
before
they
go
skipping
over
them
and
is
there
additional
signage
that
should
be
put
up
to?
I
Z
Yeah,
so
there
are,
you
can
see
in
the
picture
on
the
right
hand,
side
there's
a
that
sign,
that
yellow
sign
is
actually
a
speed,
hump,
warning
sign
and-
and
I've
also
seen
speed,
humps
ahead
type
of
signs,
so
that
that
warning
sign
is
important.
Z
Z
I
Thank
you,
I
was
also
wondering
have
have
you
heard
anything
positive
or
negative
from
the
city
of
seaside
or
other
jurisdictions
that
have
chosen
this
path.
AE
The
so
a
couple
of
the
negative
items
are
so
the
rule
is
that
a
vehicle
that
can
fit
in
a
residential
vehicle
that
can
fit
in
a
part
in
the
garage
right
can
actually
they
can
only
drive
with
one
wheel
in
the
gap
and
the
other
wheel
will
go
over
the
hump
if
vehicles
get
wider
right,
so
it's
usually.
These
are
placed
approximately
six
or
seven
feet
apart.
The
gap
is
about
six
or
seven
feet
to
accommodate
the
fire
truck.
AE
So
there
are
a
couple
of
the
real
big
pickups
that
we
find
nowadays
that
can
maybe
straddle
it
as
well.
But
you
know
those
are
only
a
few.
It's
not
like
it's.
I
don't
think
even
think
it's
more
than
one
percent
of
the
total
vehicle
fleet,
those
are
probably
the
bigger
ones
that
I've
heard
of
not
much
else
right
and
then
these
people,
actually
some
people,
will
actually
go
over.
They
will,
as
they
drive
in
their
lane.
AE
If
you
place
this
one
over
the
center
line,
they
will
actually
drive
in
the
wrong
direction
so
because
they
will
try
to
avoid
at
least
one
of
their
wheels.
Those
are
the
only
negative
ones.
The
big
benefits
are
for
bikes,
no
impact
storm
ordinary
impact.
So
it's
a
big
cost
saving.
K
K
Okay,
I'll
move
on,
but
anyway
seriously
on
the
it
has
a
sign.
It
says
traffic
calming
ahead,
prepared,
prepare
to
be
mindful.
I
think
some
of
those
signs
around
the
city
once
we
start
doing
some
more
of
these
would
be
you
know
it
doesn't
have
to
be
that
exact
wording,
but
something
like
that
this
is
a
traffic
calming
city
be
mindful
of
of
speed.
Humps.
AE
You
do
get
three
signs
that
are
in
the
mit
cd
for
for
residential
streets
that
we
can
put
up
as
well.
So
there
are
very
specific
signs
that
help
set
the
messages
that
you
need
to
change.
Your
attitude
as
you
drive
down
a
residential
street.
Exactly
thank.
Q
Thank
you,
okay,
so
just
everybody
slow
down
a
little
bit,
because
my
concern
is
where's.
This
money.
Coming
from
all
of
a
sudden,
you
guys
don't
have
a
problem
spending
all
this
money,
but
you
want
to
save
money
for
the
roads,
so
where's
the
funds
going
to
come
from
is
this
money
that
could
go
to
alleys.
Let
me
remind
you
that
it's
I'm
going
to
quote
here
from
kimberly
horn.
It
says
several
agencies
have
established
policies
which
do
not
allow
traffic
calming
devices
on
arterial
roadways
or
routes
frequently
used
by
emergency
responders.
Q
I
have
not
heard,
and
I
don't
know
whether
chipadoya
is
on
is
in
this
meeting
or
not
tonight.
I
think
we
should
be
hearing
from
the
fire
department.
I
know
we
heard
from
the
from
chief
reynoso
regardless,
I
know
fire
and
firefighters
and
police
officers
the
drivers,
the
engineers
they
do
not
like
speed
humps.
Q
They
don't
like
even
these
speed
cushions.
So
I
would
really
like
to
hear
from
them
because
they're
the
ones
that
are
going
to
have
to
go
through
these,
and
not
only
that
I'm
just
imagining
you
know
many
yeah
they're,
the
only
ones
that
are
going
to
actually
be
able
to
cut
right
through
between
those.
You
know
those
those.
Q
What
you
call
mats,
I
think,
is
what
you
call
them,
but
so,
if,
if
we
don't,
I
believe
we
should
hear
from
the
fire
chief,
but
if
that
is
so
that
fire
fire
trucks,
this
is
going
to
be
delayed
and
you're,
saying
that
they
can
go
through
it,
but
they
still
have
to
slow
down
they're
going
to
have
to
slow
down
to
be
able
to
maneuver
the
wheels
between
the
mats.
Q
So
I
would
I
hear
you
guys
are
all
excited,
and
you
guys
all
want
these,
and
I
realize
that
there
is
a
lot
of
speeding
going
on
throughout
everywhere.
Just
not
here.
So
I
would
start
with
sally
street
because
it
is
a
wide
street.
But
it's
really
only
us
that
have
been
around
a
long
time
know
about
sally
street
and
nobody.
You
know
it's.
So
it's
not
really
that
high
traffic,
where
you
could
use
it
and
but
sally
street,
is
used
by
the
fire
department
as
a
main
thoroughfare
to
get
to
emergencies.
Q
So
I
think
we
need
to
might
be
mindful
of
slowing
down
first
responders
with
these.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you
mayor.
If
I
can
make
a
comment
to
those
real
quick,
I
mean
the
acting
fire
chief
has
been
involved
with
this.
The
actually
kimberly
horn
actually
measured
our
fire
trucks
to
make
sure
that
they
would
fit,
and
with
that
plan,
part
of
the
funding
would
be
hopefully
saving
money
from
the
the
traffic
calming
projects
that
we've
already
discussed
in
past
that
have
been
very
expensive
and
it's
so,
I
believe
a
lot
of
the
concerns
have
been
addressed.
L
B
You're
right,
sir,
the
fire
chief
was
involved
in
these
conversations
and
it
was
the
two
chiefs
that
actually
started
talking
together
to
come
up
with
some
solutions
that
looked
at
this.
So
this
is
you're
absolutely
right.
There
could
be
a
considerable
amount
of
savings
from
the
traffic
coming
in
a
way
that
really
fits
the
neighborhoods.
You
know
we
don't
know
what
the
what
street.
Obviously
we
want
to
put
together
a
policy.
B
Obviously
we
want
to
get
information
from
the
police
department
on
the
most
complaints,
different
areas
and,
of
course
we
want
to
hear
from
the
council
members
on
the
districts
they
get
the
streets,
they
get
the
most
complaints
on
and
then
understand
what
the
costs
would
be.
So
we
start
implementing
a
program
and
then
see
what
kind
of
success
we're
having
and
we
could
expand
that
program.
B
L
C
AF
Of
course,
it's
me
good
evening,
council.
I
waited
a
long
time
to
speak
with
you
I'll
just
be
quick.
I
know
you
know
I'm
concerned
with
the
scene
on
sabonino
street,
so
I
just
want
to
respectfully
request
that
you
give
every
consideration
you
can
for
the
street.
I
just
feel
like
the
800
block
is
the
beginning
of
the
quarter
mile
and
it's
not
just
my
block.
It's
proceeding
all
the
way
down
san
benito
street,
but
I
think
the
800
block
is
part
of
the
downtown
commercial.
Mixed
use
really
should
get.
AF
Some
consideration
got
a
heck
of
a
lot
of
pedestrians
out
there.
I'm
in
my
yard
a
lot.
So
I
see
a
lot
of
crazy
things
out
there.
I
just
want
something:
please
done
before
we
have
the
pedestrian
hit.
You
know
you're
going
to
have
the
hda
is
going
to
have
events
their
wine
and
beer
stroll
comes
on
down
to
hawkins
street.
You
really
need
to
do
something
at
least
to
hawkins,
preferably
to
hayden,
but
as
part
of
a
commercial
district.
AF
Here
I
think
you
could
really
do
some
justice
with
the
residents
that
the
few
that
are
on
this
block,
but
also
as
we
transform
into
downtown
mixed
use,
you're
going
to
have
even
more
folks,
maybe
living
downtown.
So
I
know
you're
getting
a
lot
of
folks
that
want
that.
I
just
want
to
keep
asking
to
give
some
consideration.
I
I
really
need
a
break
also.
AF
I
want
you
to
remember
that
on
east
street,
when
you
rerouted
the
downtown,
I'm
sure
you're
aware
that
e
street
is
very
very
busy
now,
and
you
also
have
the
cannery
that's
going
to
shut
sally
street
down
again
so
then
even
more
on
east
street
and
the
thing
I
would
ask
on
east
street
slightly
off
top,
because
maybe
we
don't
have
commercial
vehicles
parked
out
there
that
really
should
be
on
a
private
property
or
or
a
side
street
other
than
east
street
you're
really
bogging
it
down
there,
and
then
the
counter
is
going
to
start
right
behind
me
and
boy.
AF
If
you
ever
want
to
see
something
hair
raising
just
go
through
there,
it's
not
good.
But
again,
please
give
me
every
consideration
us
on
san
benito
street
some
consideration
as
being
your
older
downtown,
a
lot
of
people
traversing
this
road,
it's
not
just
your
normal
residential
road.
It's
also
supporting
your
commercial
business
downtown.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
very
much
and
hope
we
can
talk
about
this
more
in
the
near
future
and
thank
you
so
much
for
seeing
me
to
want
to
push
it
along
quicker
than
government
usually
works.
B
L
I
mean
I
did
like
the
idea
of
maybe
each
council
member
suggesting
a
road
for
us
to
do
a
cen
sample
on.
B
Okay,
if
they
can
submit
that
to
you
and
then
we
can
come
back
at
a
future
meeting,
hopefully
sooner
rather
than
later,
we
can
get
an
idea
of
what
the
cost
would
be
and
then
see.
If
we
can
get
approval,
would
that
work
for
council.
I
E
R
R
I
know
that
we've
we've
we're
going
to
have
a
special
meeting
regarding
the
update
of
the
general
plan
coming
soon
in
june,
but
there
there
will
be
consideration
of
of
the
potential
of
up
upsides
in
the
downtown
due
to
the
need
of
of
multi-family
housing
that
that
we
have
in
our
city
so
wanted
to
bring
that
to
your
attention.
R
The
downtown
entertainment
district
would
establish
regulations
and
standards
to
promote
one
live
music,
two
performing
arts
and
three
night
time,
entertainment
that
would
apply
to
private
and
public
properties
within
the
entire
downtown
mix,
use
zoning
district
regulations
and
standards
of
the
entertainment
district
can
include,
but
don't
necessarily
have
to
be
limited
to
establishing
geographic
boundaries
providing
for
allowable
uses.
What
can
what
kind
of
uses
do
we
want
to
see
in
our
downtown
entertainment
district?
R
What
kind
of
uses
we
do
not
want
to
see
in
our
downtown
potential
for
extended
hours
for
entertainment
types
of
uses,
very
importantly,
include
the
potential
for
specific
noise
standards
right
now,
for
example,
the
noise
standard
requires
requirements
are
at
a
decibel
of
55
55
decibels
is,
is
what's
permitted,
that's
really
just
a
normal
conversation.
Actually
me
speaking
through
this
microphone
is
probably
more
than
55
decibels.
So
those
are
the
things
that
would
be.
R
We
would
be
looking
into
and
also
requirements
for,
potentially
alcohol
consumption
in
the
downtown
amongst,
amongst
others,
to
to
be
considered
with
this
entertainment,
district
city
of
hollister's,
pre-qualified
consultant
for
planning
and
environmental
services.
Kimberly
horn
has
provided
a
proposal
outlining
all
these
details
in
attachment
number
one
as
part
of
this
transmittal
to
assist
the
city
of
hollister
in
the
preparation
of
a
downtown
entertainment,
district,
ordinance
and
related
compliance
documents
pursuant
to
the
california
environmental
quality
act.
This
is
a
very
important
aspect
of
it.
This
ordinance
would
require
this
review.
R
Currently,
in
our
update
of
the
general
plan,
we
are
going
to
be
doing
an
environmental
impact
report
and
entertainment
district
will
be
folded
in.
However,
as
you
know,
the
the
process
for
the
update
of
the
general
plan
will
likely
you
know
it's
it's
progressing
and
it's
continuing
its
course.
But
more
than
likely,
we
won't
see
a
public
hearing
for
the
update
of
the
general
plans
adoption
until
more
than
likely
the
summer
time
or
fall
of
2022.
R
So
this
is
a
request
that
if
the
council
is
interested,
we
can
actually
begin
this
process
of
an
entertainment
district
prior
to
that
the
entire
process
for
the
preparation
of
an
ordinance,
including
all
work
associated
with
the
california
environmental
quality
act,
as
included
in
the
attachment
attachment.
One
of
the
transmittal
is
approximately
22
weeks
from
the
notice
to
proceed
and
the
total
cost
estimate
for
the
consultant
to
assist
the
city
of
hollister
in
the
preparation.
R
Not
only
the
district
ordinance
but
also
the
sql
work
is
pertaining
to
the
work
would
be:
seventy
six
thousand
one
hundred
and
fifty
dollars,
as
indicated
in
the
proposal
included
in
attachment
1..
This
is
just
informational
for
you
to
consider
what
this
staff
recommends
the
council
to
receive
the
report
and
provide
staff
with
direction
as
to
whether
to
proceed
with
the
ordinance.
This
concludes
the
report.
I
would
be
glad
to
respond
to
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
I
I
That's
been
done
because
it-
and
maybe
it's
already
been
factored
in-
I
don't
know,
but
that
just
seems
like
a
lot
of
money,
and
I
know
that
those
types
of
reports
cost
a
lot
of
money,
but
but
I
kind
of
lost
my
mind
a
little
bit
when
I
saw
that
dollar
number
for
what
we're
asking
and
then
the
second
part
of
my
question
or
second
question
I'd
have
with
you
would
be
I'm
sure
that
our
police
department
have
some
impact
in
in
consideration
in
this,
and
I
don't
know
the
current
placement
of
cameras,
but
I'm
not
convinced
that
if
we're
gonna
make
that
a
true
entertainment
district,
that
additional
cameras
would
probably
be
as
something
that
we
would
benefit
from
just
recognizing
the
successfulness
of
the
cameras
currently
downtown.
R
Thank
you,
councilmember
tim.
Yes,
absolutely.
The
first
part
of
your
question
regarding
to
the
update
of
the
general
plan.
Currently
the
city
of
hollister,
just
at
its
last
planning
commission
meeting
of
this
last
month
in
april
and
april,
had
a
notice
of
preparation
april
22nd,
before
the
planning
commission
notice
the
preparation
public
hearing
for
the
environmental
impact
report.
That
will
be
done
for
the
update
of
the
general
plan
and
the
hope
for
that.
R
Update
of
the
general
plan
will
be
not
only
to
serve
as
helping
us
with
with,
for
example,
this
item
of
the
of
the
internet
entertainment
district.
R
That
has
been
discussed
previously
as
an
interest
for
for
the
update
of
the
general
plan
and
and
for
the
potential
of
being
adopted
as
an
ordinance
for
the
city
of
hollister,
but
also
various
aspects
of
where,
where
we
can
tier,
for
example,
if
if
a
potentially
an
industrial
industrial
land
use
wants
to
come
in
where
we
would
be
able
to
actually
tear
from
from
this
eir
and
not
necessarily
have
to
create
a
whole.
R
You
know
new
one
and
saves
us
in
in
cost
and
and
time
and
so
definitely
to
to
respond
to
your
first
part.
R
The
first
part
of
the
question,
the
the
entertainment
district
policy
is,
is
going
to
be
contemplated
in
the
update
of
the
general
plan,
and
so
the
preparation
of
the
eir
for
the
update
of
the
general
plan
is
anticipated
also
to
be
kind
of
working
concurrently
with
the
act
with
the
update
of
the
general
plan
that
is
anticipated
to
be
brought
before
the
council
sometime
in
the
summer
time,
or
maybe
the
fall
of
2022
so
so
cost-wise
there
could
potentially
be
some
cost
savings
there.
R
Time-Wise
is
where,
though
it
would,
it
would
be
until
until
then
and
then
and
then,
once
the
environmental
impact
report
is
done.
That's
when
we
can
start
getting
into
the
the
details
in
regards
to
the
ordinance
it
really
has
to
be
approved
prior
to
the
adoption
of
the
ordinance
or
or
concurrently
and
so
cost
wise.
I
can
see
some
cost
savings
there
because
of
the
cost
that's
been
implemented
already
or
geared
towards
the
general
plan
update.
R
But
time
wise
is
where
that
that
may
that
may
stall
a
little
bit
in
regards
to
your
second
question
and
the
possibility
of
adding
cameras
to
certain
sections
of
our
downtown
as
part
of
the
entertainment
district.
Certainly,
I
think
that
that's
one
thing
that
we
can
work
with.
R
If,
if
you
get
you
give
us
the
the
the
green
light
to
move
forward
with
with
now,
we
can,
you
know,
as
part
of
the
plan
and
detailed
in
in
the
proposal
we
hope
to
have
a
community
output
have
a
meeting
either
as
part
of
a
you
know,
city
council,
meeting
where
we
would
be
able
to
get
input
from
the
community
and
including
you
know,
police
fire
in
regards
to
what
should
be
implemented
in
in
this
district.
B
Abraham,
I
do
have
questions
for
you
the
to
create
an
entertainment
district,
you're
saying
we
do
need
an
eir
first.
R
Yeah,
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
an
eir.
I
think
that
once
we
do
an
initial
study
of
the
of
the
of
the
project
we
can
we
can
see
if,
if
we
feel
that
there
are
significant
unavoidable
impacts
that
that
may
be
considered,
you
know,
such
as
with
noise
or
something
to
that
effect.
Then
then,
that's
when
an
eir
specifically
for
this
item
would
be
required.
R
Yeah,
I
know
that
that
would
be
definitely
one
thing
that
we
would
be
embarking
on
with
what
the
up
with
this
ordinance.
If,
if
we
move
forward
now
individually
or
what
the
update
of
the
general
plan,
but
I
have
and
staff,
we
have
looked
at
others-
other
cities,
for
example,
santana
row
and
san
jose,
very
similar
to
what
we're
doing
we're
looking
into
doing
here.
It
is
a
mixed-use
land
use
development
with
commercial,
existing
commercial,
existing
high-density
residential
and
they
do
have
these
establishment
established.
R
I
don't
think
I
think
they
call
it
a
little
bit
different
than
the
than
an
entertainment
district,
but
certainly
addressing
noise
live
entertainment,
things
of
that
nature,
for
that
particular
district,
and
also
we've
seen
the
city
of
we've
napa
napa
valley.
They
also
do
have
a
similar
ordinance
in
place
for
for
their
land
uses
in
in
their
in
their
town.
Great.
B
If
we're
going
to
really
create
a
an
area
where
we're
restaurants
are
really
interested
in
going
to
place
in
downtown,
I
think
it
help
it's
helpful
to
let
them
know.
This
is
an
entertainment
district
and
you
can
have
music.
You
know
we
want
four
restaurants.
We
want
the
the
cameras,
especially
we
definitely
want
the
cameras.
B
I
you
know
one
of
these
things
popped
up,
because
I
was
having
a
conversation
with
the
owner
of
the
running
rooster
and
I
was
complimenting
him
on
his
new
setup,
and
I
said
it's
gonna
be
great
when
you
have
bands
out
here
and
you
can
have
a
lot
of
customers
and
his
reply
was,
I'm
not
allowed
to
have
bands
or
music
outside,
and
I
thought,
oh,
my
god,
this
is
gonna
really
hurt.
This
is
such
a
great
setup.
B
So
this
is
one
of
the
reasons
I
brought
up
the
entertainment
district
again
to
see
what
we
can
do
and
again
it
incentivizes
some
of
the
restaurant
owners
to
go
and
move
to
downtown
where
they
know
where
they
can
do
some
of
these
other
activities.
So
that
that's
great
thank
you
for
the
update,
councilman
perez.
You
had
a
question
yeah.
K
This
is
definitely
an
issue
we
need
to
to
address
because
also
downtown
you
got
houses.
You
got
people
that
live
there.
You
know
I
just
say
I'd,
you
know
what
I'm
not
against
entertainment
and
stuff,
but
it's
like.
I
live
on
seven
streets
between
western
monterey.
I
can
hear
the
football
game
I
like
football.
Thanks
guys,
I
love
the
balers.
Yes,
but
also
you
know
what
I
also
hear
the
music
coming
down
from
from
san
benito
street.
You
know,
and
does
it
bother
me
that
much
no,
my
my
house
is
insulated.
K
K
K
L
Well,
I
mean
I
know
personally,
I
have
it
on
my
phone,
you
can
have
a
decimal
meter
and
then
also
code
enforcement
would
be
the
one
that's
enforcing
it.
Okay,
I
mean.
R
K
K
R
And
speaking
about
housing,
we
do
have
in
the
pipeline
either
either
under
construction
or
in
the
pipeline,
as
in
being
processed
a
total
of
89
multi-family
unit
apartments
in
the
and
what's
considered
our
downtown
right
now,
either
being
constructed
or
in
the
pipeline
of
getting
entitlements
with
the
city
of
hollister.
And
these
are
new
new
applications
that
are
in.
G
L
Yeah,
I
guess
that's
what
we
would
ask
for
is
direction.
Does
the
council
want
us
to
continue
to
moving
forward
we're
not
asking
for
acceptance
of
the
of
kiwihorns
task
order,
but
as
we
do
the
budget,
that's
something
we
probably
would
start
looking
at
has
how
do
we
incorporate
it?
If
that's
something
you
want
us
to
continue
to
look
forward
to.
B
I
would
agree
to
move
forward.
I
I
was
just
going
to
say
absolutely,
I
think
it
it's
time
so.
Okay.
B
Is
there
a
consensus,
mr
perez
and
mr.
C
G
C
Staff
is
going
to
recommend.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
discuss
it,
that
city
council
have
a
discussion
and
recommend
that
if
the
city
hollister
chooses
to
approve
by
a
consensus
that
we
approve,
with
the
caveat
that
all
events
must
comply
with
the
state
of
california,
department
of
public
health
guidance
for
events
and
applicants
must
agree
that
any
public
assembly
permit
block
party
and
parades
may
be
subject
to
revocation
at
any
time,
prior
to
the
event
date
dependent
on
the
state
of
california's
blueprint
for
a
safer
economy,
activity
and
business.
Tears.
B
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
questions
from
council.
B
I
do
want
to
I
I'm
very
supportive
of
moving
forward
and
I
do
want
to
let
everyone
know.
Seminole
county
is
going
to
be
moving
to
the
yellow
tier
in
the
next
few
days,
so
we're
we
are
making
progress,
keep
getting
those
vaccinations
and
we'll
make
a
lot
more
progress,
but
I'm
I'm
in
support
of
moving
forward
with
this.
As
with
the
requirements,
as
you
mentioned,
any
other
input
from
council
members.
I
B
B
C
Thank
you,
mr
mayor
council.
Item
g7
staff
is
requesting
city
council
review.
Oh
nope,
this
one's
abrahams.
R
Thank
you,
mr
merry.
Members
of
city
council
staff
is
requesting
the
city
council
review
composition
in
terms
of
of
the
historic
preservation
commission.
It's
been
discussed
in
in
the
past
to
bring
an
item.
This
item
up,
the
city
of
hollister
has
adopted
ordinance
number
1067,
which
basically
has
a
composition
of
of
a
historic
resources.
Commission,
however,
staff
does
want
to
bring
up
to
to
the
council
that
currently,
even
though
there
is
not
an
a
historic
preservation
commission
established,
we
do.
We
do
still
follow
a
staff.
R
The
secretary
of
the
interior
standards
for
historic
preservation,
any
type
of
work,
that's
being
done
in
our
two
existing
districts,
the
monterey
street
monterey,
monterey,
historic,
district
or
downtown
historic
district
has
to
comply
with
the
regulations
of
the
secretary
of
interior
standards
for
historic
preservation
or
historic
restoration
depending
on
the
project,
and
so
so
we
follow
that
to
a
t
with
the
planning
commission.
We
do
have
a
planning,
commissioner,
who
has
a
background
in
architecture.
R
Mr
mr
david,
hugh
boy
and
is,
is
really
is
really
knowledgeable
about
historical
preservation,
but
but
we
make
sure
that
everything
is
being
followed
to
a
t
when
it
comes
to
that,
and
so,
if
it
is
the
the
desire
of
the
the
city
council
to
to
to
form
a
historic
preservation
commission
on
on
its
own,
we
we
do
have
the
the
language.
R
However,
in
consulting
with
the
city
manager,
staff
staff
did
want
to
bring
up
the
fact
that
planning
commission
the
planning
department
currently
is
focusing
all
of
its
energies
and
efforts
in
the
general
plan
update
all
hands
on
deck.
With
the
general
plan
update,
plus
all
the
different
projects,
policies
that
we
are
working
on
in
the
city
of
hollister,
I
I'm
gonna
have
my
staff
meeting
with
the
planners
tomorrow,
there's
two
two
planners
for
the
city
of
hollister.
R
I
assist
as
well,
but
now
with
my
new
role
as
interim,
I'm
I'm
spread
thin
with
all
the
different
departments,
in
particular
with
code
enforcement,
but
you
know
there.
I
know
that
there
is
at
least
30
projects
that
we
have
going
on
right
now
for
entitlements
that
we
are
processing
throughout
the
city
of
hollister,
first
staff
of
two
planners.
We
have
a
third
one,
currently
she's
in
family
leave,
which
is
great.
We
definitely
support
that
as
well.
So
the
request
would
be
that
we
would
move
forward
and
no
in
there
is.
R
There
is
no
attempt
to
to
divert
work
or
anything
like
that
where
we
have
a
staff,
who's,
dedicated
and
willing,
but
the
the
hope
would
be
that
if,
if
possible,
you
know
anything
that
needs
to
be
done
in
regards
to
historic
preservation,
we
can
still
handle
it
in
the
form
of
planning,
commission
or
city
council.
We
can
bring
that
before
you
if
there
was
to
be
a
formation
of
a
district,
for
example.
We
can
still
do
that.
We
don't
necessarily
need
a
historic
resources
commission
for
that
we
we
can
still
prevent
move
forward.
R
With
with
that,
I
do
want
to
say
that
I
did
have
a
brief
conversation
with
council
member
resendez
on
friday.
You
know
with
authorization
from
the
city
manager
because
he
was
the
one
who
was
mainly
pushing
for
this
vice
mayor
said
this,
but
it
is
up
to
the
council
if
we
want
to
move
forward
with
the
now
or
at
the
request
of
staff,
if
it
would
be
okay
to
bring
it
before
you
at
at
least
until
we
get
the
update
of
the
general
plan
approved.
R
You
know
before
you
and
we
have
a
really
good
schedule
with
that.
So
it
is
up
to
the
council.
I
You
mayor,
mr
prado:
does
the
city
currently
have
a
qualified,
dedicated
historical
preservation
officer.
R
That's
a
really
good
question
council
member
tim,
so
the
city
of
hollister
does
not
have
an
actual
qualified
historic
preservation
officer
on
staff,
but
we
do
have
our
extension
of
staff
and
kimberly
horn.
R
You
know
if,
if
needed,
we
can,
we
can
retain
the
services
of
a
historic
preservation
officer
to
review
any
any
project
that
comes
in
within
any
of
our
historic
districts
and
also
want
to
mention
that,
even
if
it's
not
within
a
historic
district,
but
it
has
the
attributes
of
a
potential
historic
property
rule
of
thumb.
One
of
them
is
if
it's
50
years
older.
R
If
there
is
somebody
who
lived
on
that
property
who
may
be
recognized
as
a
historic
figure,
then
then
we
we
make
sure
that
the
standards
of
the
secretary
of
the
interior
apply
to
that
as
well.
R
Thank
you
for
that
council,
member
tim.
Yes,
so
david
earley,
our
consultant
for
the
general
plan
update,
would
be
the
first
to
tell
you
that
you
know
the
plans
for
updates
of
the
general
plan
can
be,
can
be
really
strict
and-
and
you
know
straightforward,
like,
for
example,
the
one
that
we
have
right
now
is
very
rigid
and
very
comprehensive,
and
it's
expected.
R
We
expect
to
be
before
you
with
what
the
public
hearing
for
the
adoption
in
this
in
the
summer
of
of
2022.
he's
the
first
one
to
tell
you
that
he's
processed
various
throughout
the
state
of
california-
and
that
doesn't
necessarily
happen.
I
mean
san
diego
county-
is
one
example.
I
believe
it
took
like
an
eight
year
process.
Don't
call
me
on
that,
but
that's
apparently
more
or
less
what
occurred
we.
R
We
are
very
confident
that
the
gpac
has
done
a
tremendous
job
in
its
recommendations
and
we'll
see
that
in
our
special
meeting
that
we
have
tentatively
with
the
city
council
on
june
22nd,
with
all
the
recommendations
with
other
policy-
and
I
think
that's
going
to
give
us
a
really
good
direction
as
to
where,
if,
if
the
the
council
agrees
to
move
forward,
that
we
should
really
hopefully
have
the
gpac,
the
general
plan
advisory
general
plan
update
done
by
the
summer
of
2022.
R
O
M
I
Thanks
so
so,
basically,
what
I'm
hearing
you
say
is
summer
of
2022,
which
is
about
14
15
months
from
now,
and-
and
I
could
certainly
support
that-
I
appreciate
the
quality
and
the
work
that
your
staff
does.
Thank
you.
My
only
concern
is,
I
don't
want
this
to
fall
off
the
radar
and
so
I'll
defer
to
my
my
colleagues
for
final
comments,
but
I
absolutely
understand
the
challenges
that
you're
facing.
Thank
you,
sir,
for
your
answers.
B
I
will
there's
no
question.
You
can
ask
your
question
after
if
you'd
like.
J
And
I
know
it's
getting
late
I'll
try
to
wrap
this
up,
so
I
feel
partly
responsible,
I'm
so
sorry
for
bringing
this
up,
because,
as
a
member
of
the
g-pack,
they
had
mentioned
that
a
lot
of
cities
have
historic
preservation
commissions,
and
I
thought
well,
that's
something
we
can
do.
We
just
did
an
arts
and
culture
commission,
so
I
was
like
I
thought
I
would
bring
that
up
and
then
come
to
find
out.
We
have
one
established
already
christine
was
kind
enough
to
pull
up
this
information.
J
I
don't
necessarily
agree
with
every
like
all
the
requirements
and
everything
that
this
that
the
current
one
has
it
seems
like
we
probably
should.
If
we
do
adopt
it,
we
should
probably
make
it
look
a
little
bit
more
reflective
to
the
other
commissions
that
we
have,
and
then
the
one
thing
that
I
noticed-
or
I
heard
in
speaking
to
abraham
and
and
to
the
staff,
is
that
this
one
meets.
J
I
think,
every
three
months
so
quarterly,
which
I
don't
think
is
completely
unreasonable
and-
and
I
do
have
completely
you
know-
either
way
whatever.
J
I
think
the
majority
of
the
council
decides
I'm
okay
with,
but
I
know
that
there
are
some
people,
particularly
within
my
district,
that
are
very
passionate
about
this,
and
I
I
think
that
creating
the
arts
and
culture
commission
and
creating
this
or
helping
to
resurrect
this
commission
is,
if
there's
people
within
our
and
within
our
community
that
are
passionate
about
those
things
and
they're
willing
to
help
out
and
volunteer
their
time.
J
Then
why
not
have
them
jump
on
board
and
and
help
us
out,
because
I
think
they're
already
doing
the
work
and
they're
just
not
like
an
official
partner.
J
J
If
they
need
to
have
a
special
meeting,
then
they
can
have
a
special
meeting
and
yeah.
I
think
that's
my
position
again,
but
I'm
kind
of
caught
in
the
middle.
I
didn't
have
a
conversation
with
abraham
about
this.
At
all
until
friday
afternoon,
and
then
we
had
a
pretty
busy
weekend
and
stuff
and
I
didn't
get
it
back
to
him
today,
so
I
apologize,
but
I
have.
N
J
About
it
I
talked
to
the
city
manager.
I
talked
to
the
to
the
mayor
about
it
and
I
think
that's
where
I'm
at,
but
I
think
I'm
going
to
go
with
the
majority
of
the
council,
but
I
think
yeah
either
way
is
fine
with
me.
Thank
you.
B
I
you
know
going
back
to
the.
If
I
don't
see
any
questions
or
comments,
the
the
committee,
I
I
think
maybe
it
was
brought
the
the
the
rules
seem
pretty
stringent
in
here.
I
think
maybe
we
can
loosen
that
up.
So
it's
not
a
a
group.
That's
really
doing
such
heavy
work
but
more
recommendations.
B
I
can
see
this
group
helping
us
with
some
of
the
inventory
of
some
of
the
homes
along
some
of
the
other
streets
and
maybe
helping
us
find
leads
on
the
grants
or
helping
the
homeowners
or
building
owners
find
ways
to
finance
renovations
in
the
the
projects
are
giving
us
a
history
behind
some
of
these
stories
because
we
have,
if
you
visited
the
museum,
you
see
all
kinds
of
treasures
in
there
articles
and
stories
about
a
lot
of
what
we
have
here
and
I
think
that's
what
I
see
this
group
doing
not
so
much
a
group
to
really
call
out
as
far
as
you
can't
touch
that
building
for
this
reason,
or
that
reason,
but
more
of
hey.
B
If
you
wanted
to
there's
some
funding
here
for
you,
because
you
qualify
in
this
direction,
I
think
we
can
start
moving
towards
that.
Hopefully,
sooner
than
later,
we
can
find
a
way
to
really
incentivize
the
restoration,
a
lot
of
these,
these
beautiful
older
homes
in
our
downtown
area
and
make
it
a
point
of
pride
on.
I
think
sometimes
some
of
these
homeowners
don't
realize
the
jewel
they
have
in
some
of
these
homes
until
it's
pointed
out
to
them
the
history
of
them.
B
I
was
lucky
enough
to
live
in
one
on
monterey
street
and
had
really
rich
history
there
and
I
think,
there's
several
more
that
could
really
be
brought
back
to
life.
So
I'd
like
to
see
a
group-
that's
not
so
stringent
but
meeting
to
kind
of
discuss
some
of
their
ideas.
As
mr
assanders
point
out,
these
people
that
are
involved
have
a
lot
of
experience
with
the
history
of
our
community
and
I'd
like
to
see
them
going
to
work
sooner
rather
than
later.
B
I
Thank
you
mayor,
mr
prado,
when,
when
somebody
comes
in
to
pull
a
permit
to
do
a
remodel
or
an
update
or
a
demo
and
the
house
is
50
or
more
years
older,
does
the
building
department
reach
out
to
you
before
they
issue
those
permits
to
ensure
they
that
we're
not
knocking
down
things
that
we're
just
naive
or
ignorant
about?
Thank
you,
council,
member
tim.
That
is
correct.
They
do
if
anybody
goes
into
the
building
department.
Try
to
pull
a
pyramid.
I
The
the
the
building
department
does
refer
them
to
the
planning
department
to
see,
if
there's
any
type
of
planning
requirements
that
that
will
be
needed
and
then
that's
when
we
we
get
involved,
and
if
the
property
is
50
years
old
or
older,
or
has
any
type
of
significant
historic
fabric
to
it
or
contribution
to
it,
then
then
we
start
with
that
process
first
before
before,
building
permit
entitlements.
I
Thank
you,
mr
proud
mayor.
I
think
that
I'm
open
to
whatever
the
council's
will
is.
I
think
it
also
kind
of
coincides
nicely
with
our
150-year
anniversary,
to
really
refocus
and
recognize
historical
properties
for
the
gems
and
values
they
are.
Thank
you
mayor
absolutely,
and
I
think
you're
absolutely
right
with
that.
I
The
150th
is
going
to
be
important
date,
so
I
I
personally
would
like
to
see
us
move
forward
on
this
and
again
how
we
do
it
in
a
way
that
doesn't
stress
the
the
staff
but
really
lets
the
committee
kind
of
work
together
to
again
complement
the
staff
rather
than
more
more
work
on
on
to
you
guys,
mr
mayor
glen,
sir.
Thank
you
very
briefly.
My
other
concern
was
as
councilmember
burns
had
brought
up.
Is
that
we're
probably
not
going
to
remember
in
a
year
from
now
or
two
years
from
now
and
say?
I
Oh
we've
got
to
do
that
historical
society.
So
that's
one
thing
that
I
wanted
to
to
see
if
we
can
get
it
going
and
maybe
not
right
now,
but
we
can
do
the
first
meeting
in
three
months
and
then
just
so
you
know
the
person
who
brought
up
that
fact
to
me
and
called
me
that
it
was
150
year
anniversary
was
the
president
of
the
current
historical
society
and
he's
got
a
lot
of
vested
interests
and
seen
this
commission
be
resurrected.
I
I
So
am
I
hearing
from
the
counselors
or
consensus
to
go
ahead
and
move
forward
with
this
and
then
work
to
see
how
we,
the
committee,
can
be
formed
to
not
really
put
a
burden
on
the
staff,
but
really
complement
the
staff
and
hopefully
focus
in
on
the
150th
year
anniversary
we
have
coming
up.
I
That
would
certainly
be
my
position,
mr
perez,
mr
burns.
How
do
you
feel.
I
Mayor
tim
burns,
I
support
that
concept
or
thought
as
well.
Thank
you,
sir
okay.
Mr
perez
yeah,
I
I
support
that
also
yeah.
I
think
I
think
our
staff
is
needs
a
little
bit
of
break.
It's
like
I
mean
you're
you're
still
carrying
two
positions.
It's
like
there's
a
lot
of
people
carrying
too
many
positions
and
I
think
it's
an
initiative.
Another
issue
we
need
to
address
is
our
staffing.
We
need
some
people
to
get
to
work,
so
we
can
get
things
done,
but
it's
a
great
thing
experience.
I
How
did
you
say
vice
mayor?
Yes,
is
this
going
to
you
know?
That's
how
I
repeat
that
I
already
closed
that
tab.
We're
going
to
have
you
announce
it
every
time,
mr
perez
yeah,
but
yeah.
You
know
I
don't.
I
don't
want
to
overwork
you
guys
either,
because
I
know
you
guys
are.
I
mean
some
of
you
guys
are
working
till
12,
15
12
16
in
the
morning
today,
so
I
I
do
hear
a
consensus
then
to
keep
moving
forward.
I
Yes,
correct,
okay,
mr
members
of
the
council,
thank
you
and
I
think
one
of
the
ways
that
to
approach
this,
if,
if
I
may,
is
because
one
of
the
one
of
the
concerns
that
staff
was
was
was
having
when
they
talked
to
me,
and
they
designated
me
to
be
the
the
speaker
to
to
first
council
member
vice
mayor
recently,
since
he
was
the
one
that
brought
this
up
and
then
not
to
the
council.
I
Is,
is
the
concern
that
potentially,
like
all
all
of
these
great
plans
of
of
potentially
having
having
these
these
surveys
done
or
or
working
for
grants
that
that
that
that
staff
would
be
the
ones
who
would
be
directed
by
this
historical
commission
to
to
do
and
perform?
Which
is
great.
I
mean
we.
We
can
do
that.
I
But
if,
if
I'm
hearing
the
council
correctly
we're
hoping
that
that
we
can
actually
maybe
work
and
rewriting
or
including
some
language
in
this
ordinance
that
actually
and
working
together
with
with
the
members
of
the
historical
resources
commission
that
that
are
ultimately
elected
for
for
them
to
be
like
the
working
body
to
to
working
together
with
staff
to
create
these.
These
these
surveys,
or
this
this
these
grants,
research
and
so
forth
and
so
on.
This
is
what
I'm
hearing
is.
That
is
that
is
that
correct?
I
That
was
my
feeling
towards
it,
and
I
think
all
our
committees
really
is
that's
where
we
want
to
get
them,
is
to
really
be
participating
in
in
doing
a
lot
of
the
work,
because
otherwise
the
staff
should
be
given
guidance
and
some
expertise,
but
the
committee
should
be
coming
up
with
the
ideas
concepts
following
up
with
them
very
well.
I
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
We'll
now
move
to
item
g8
you,
mr
mayor,
the
art
and
culture
commission
is
almost
completely
established.
We
are
missing
district
4
representative
and
I'm
hoping
that
council
member
district
4
10
burns
will
appoint
amanda
ciardo
a
district
4
resident.
Although
we
did
receive
other
applications,
he
wanted
to
wait
for
a
district
4
resident
and
we
have
that,
and
so
I
will
turn
it
to
mr
burns.
I
Thank
you
city
clerk
mayor.
I
would
move
to
ask
for
consensus
to
appoint
amanda
chado
to
represent
district
4
on
the
art
and
culture
commission.
I
If
you've
had
chance
to
look
at
the
council,
packets-
and
I
know
you
all-
have
she's
exceptionally
qualified
and
I
think
she'll
be
a
terrific
addition
to
the
commission
and
the
timing's
actually
good,
so
she
can
get
in
on
the
ground
floor
and
share
her
wealth
of
experience
and
education,
and
so
I'd
ask
for
council
consensus
to
move
that
forward
and
I
believe
she's.
Is
she
still
on
the
line
as
well
or
she?
No,
she
yeah.
I
think
she
probably
had
a
curfew
so
but
anyway,
that
would
be
my
request
of
counsel.
I
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
sir
excellent.
Any
comments
or
questions
from
council.
Do
we
have
any
speaker
cards
speaker
cards,
mr
mayor?
None,
I
think.
Is
there
a
consensus?
Yes,
I'm
I'm
fine!
Yes,
thank
you.
There's
a
consensus
for
your
appointment.
We
will
now
move
to
item
g9
hi.
Mr
mayor
council
members,
the
city
clerk's
office
received
a
resignation
letter
from
district
3
council
member
honor.
Spencer
staff
is
seeking
direction
on
whether
council
would
like
to
appoint
or
hold
a
special
election
to
fill
the
vacancy
government
code.
I
If
the
council
calls
a
special
election,
the
special
election
shall
be
held
on
the
next
regularly
established
election
date,
not
less
than
114
days
after
the
call
for
elections
code,
section,
1000,
established
election
dates.
The
next
regularly
established
election
date
available
for
the
city
of
hollister
is
november,
2nd
2021.
I
I
I
It
seems
to
me
like
either
way,
then
we
would
just
simply
move
to
a
a
special
election
in
november,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
there's
a
value
and
a
benefit
to
seeing
what
the
interest
is
in
the
community,
but
I'm
also
somewhat
torn,
because
I
also
would
like
somebody
that's
truly
going
to
be
a
person
that
district
3
has
chosen
to
represent
them,
even
though,
by
the
time
this
happens
really
it'll
be
an
elected
position,
if
I'm
not
mistaken
for
about
a
year,
and
so
I'd
just
like
to
hear
what
mirror
your
position
is
on
this,
as
well
as
vice
mayors
being
new
to
the
game.
I
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
I've.
I've
always
I
speak
for
myself.
I've
always
felt
personally
that
it
should
be
elected,
not
appointed.
I
think
if
it's
a
really
short
term
type
of
deal,
you
can
maybe
maybe
work
at
an
appointment,
but
I
I'm
more
of
a
believer
that
the
voters
decide
not
to
counsel,
because
I
just
don't
think
that
is
fair
to
the
residents
that
live
in
that
district.
I
That's
my
personal
view.
Go
ahead,
mr
sentence.
Thank
you.
I
I
agree.
Each
one
of
us
ran
a
campaign.
We
worked
really
hard
to
get
here
to
earn
our
seats
and
I
think
that
the
people
of
district
3
have
they
deserve
the
right
to
choose
their
person
and
just
let's
leave
it
up
to
the
voters
right.
May
the
best
person
win.
Thank
you
mayor
velazquez.
I
Yes,
sir.
Thank
you.
I
I
support
both
yours
and
vice
mayor's
position,
and-
and
I
guess
actually
the
nice
thing
about
this
is-
and
the
city
clerk
can
confirm
this
for
me.
So
if
we,
if
we
as
a
council,
move
to
go
to
a
special
election
for
this
in
essence,
by
the
time
we
get
it
announced,
it
will
actually
give
the
candidate
about
the
same
amount
of
time
that
we
had
as
candidates
running
for
the
elected
office.
I
Is
that
correct,
actually,
district
three
was
seat
was
up
in
2022,
so
if,
if
we
have
an
election
and
someone's
elected
in
november,
they
would
be
sworn
in
in
december
once
we
have
certification
of
the
election
results
and
they
would
start
in
january
very
similar
to
how
your
term
and
they
would
serve
until
december
of
2022
when
that
seat's
up
again.
Thank
you,
but
I
guess
my
further
question
would
be
if
we
decide
tonight
that
we
want
to
move
to
special
election
at
what
point.
Typically
as
a
candidate.
I
I
Although
there
may
be
some
restrictions
on
where
they,
when
they
can
put
signs
up
and
where,
of
course,
they
can
put
signs
up-
and
I
am
I
have
not
even-
I
didn't
even
want
to
look
until
you
guys
decided
on
what
my
nomination
period
would
be,
and
also
please
note
that
if
you
had
decided
to
appoint
and
there's
a
code
that
says
if
the
council
seeks
to
fill
the
position
by
appointment,
but
does
not
do
so
within
60
days
of
the
vacancy,
the
special
election
must
be
held
on
the
next
regularly
established
election
date,
which
would
have
been
november
2nd
2021..
I
Thank
you,
city
clerk.
Thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments.
No,
just
real
quick.
I
I
think
the
district
3
should
appoint
their
own
representative.
I
I
If
you
all
feel
that
vacancies
must
go
by
special
elections,
why
did
you
even
include
it?
In
the
newly
approved
municipal
code
sections
jim
gileo
was
assigned
was
appointed
after?
I
can't
even
remember
the
young
man's
name.
He
was
only
there
for
three
months
and
then
carol.
Lenoir
was
appointed
after
unfortunately,
ray
friend
had
to
leave
to
to
help
threesons
and
move
up
and
be
closer
to
his
daughter.
I
So
there's
a
reason
why
previous
council
members
have
this
section
for
vacancies,
because
these
things
do
happen
and
it
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community,
for
it
not
to
be
a
cost
to
the
city.
So
I
don't
I.
I
would
think
that
you
guys
would
want
to
save
money,
and
you
would
want
to
follow
the
own
rules
that
you
guys
just
approved.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
I
We
have
no
more
speakers,
mr
mayor,
thank
you
so
I
heard
from
the
council.
Is
there
any
other
questions
or
comments?
I
think
I
heard
a
consensus
to
move
to
an
election
at
the
november,
probably
november
2nd,
as
you
pointed
out
so
with
that
direction.
I
would
come
back
to
the
next
council
meeting
with
a
resolution
requesting
a
consolidated
municipal
election
or
I'm
sorry
consolidated
election
with
the
county.
I
I
I
Can
we
at
least
put
out
a
small
press
release
saying
those
two
things
to
the
local
newspapers
is
that
okay,
sure
I
think
I'm
looking
at
jason,
but
I
think
we
can
do
that
yeah,
I'm
sorry
I
couldn't
tell
I
didn't,
have
my
glasses
on,
I
didn't
realize
you
were
looking.
Yes,
there's!
No
reason
the
city
can't
do
that.
Can
we
also
put
it
out
on
the
social
media
as
well?
Please
correct
we'll
we'll
do
that.
Thank
you!
I
G10,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
and
council,
so
with
d3's
vacancy
we
have
some
council
committees
to
f
to
fill
so
the
first
one
would
be
the
association
of
the
association
of
monterey
bay
area
governments
ambag.
The
current
member
is
district,
one
rick
perez
and
council
member
spencer
was
the
alternate.
So
I'm
requesting
we
select
a
new
alternate
or
member,
and
I
I
have
a
list.
So
if
I
can
go
through
them,
okay,
so
the
first
one
is
ambag.
I
just
need.
I
I
could
be
the
alternative
that
that
works.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Next
one
governance
committee.
Currently,
the
members
are
council,
member
prez
and
tim
burns,
and
councilmember
spencer
was
the
alternate
for
that
that
meets
in
the
day
or
what
does
that
mean?.
I
I
I
I
I
I
No,
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
do
that,
but
you
know
I.
I
did
notice
that
vice
mayor
recently
said
you
know
what
I
don't
see
your
name
up
here.
A
lot
would
you
be
willing
to
volunteer
for
me
sure
awesome.
I
So,
are
you
saying
you
don't
want
to
be
the
alternate
for
that
one
either
you're
the
alternate
current
I'll
stay
I'll
I'll
stay,
I
mean
as
alternative
yeah
I
just
I
just
I
got
way
too
many.
It's
like
I'm
I'd
like
I'd
like
to
share
some
of
the
committee
with
everybody.
I
And
this
isn't
all
of
the
lists
just
so
you
know
these
are
just
the
ones
that
council,
member
spencer,
okay,
I
got
mine
right
here.
The
oversight
committee
of
the
former
redevelopment
agency,
current
member
is
tim
burns
and
the
alternate
was
honor.
I've
done
that
one
before
I
can
be
the
alternate.
Mr
mayor.
Okay,
thank
you,
sir.
I
I'd
be
happy
to
do
it,
mr
mayor,
let's
what
who
was
she
the
acting
member
or
the?
She
was
the
alternate
she
was
alternate
yeah,
so
miss?
Who
is
the
acting
member?
Mr
perez?
I
Okay,
so
mr
resendez
said
he'll
be
the
alternate
sure:
okay
3ce
central
coast,
community
energy,
current
member
was
honor
and
her
alternate
was
rick.
I
Okay,
I'll
take
it
well,
I
think
they
meet.
I
got
a
question
too
so,
once
the
election
comes
through,
then
we're
going
to
be
spreading
these
out
again
correct.
Yes,
absolutely
so
I'll
I'll
take
3ce,
okay,
you'll
say
on
that
all
right,
yeah
and
the
alternate.
Then
I
could
be
alternate.
Thank
you
roland.
I
I
I
You
christine
the
department
of
liaison
yes
department,
liaison
honor
was
the
department
liaison
for
airport
community
services
and
information
systems.
Oh
that's
perfect.
I
don't
mind
doing
that
either
all
of
them
yeah.
I
can
do
both.
There's
three
airports:
airport
community
services
and
information
systems.
Yeah!
That's
fine!
I
Thank
you
said
it.
Yes,
we're
done.
The
council
is
good
with
that
yep
consensus
on
that.
Thank
you
h.
I
j
and
k.
There's
no
business.
You
know.
Okay!
Is
there
a
motion
to
adjourn
it's
getting
late
here,
so
moved?
Second,
the
motion
in
the
second
roll
call
vote.
Please,
council,
member
perez.
Yes
councilmember
burns.
Yes,
vice
mayor
recently,
yeah
mayor
velazquez,
yes,
motion
passes
4-0
good
night.