►
From YouTube: Gov Hol PC 20200827venue
Description
Hollister Planning Commission Meeting August 27, 2020
B
D
E
E
F
F
D
D
A
H
D
E
E
F
Thank
you,
communication
from
the
public
on
items
not
listed
on
the
agenda.
This
is
a
time
for
any
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
of
the
items
not
on
the
agenda
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
planning
commission,
when
the
planning
commission
calls
your
name,
please
come
to
the
podium
state,
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
speak
to
the
commission.
Each
speaker
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
Please
note
that
the
state
law
prohibits
the
planning
commission
from
discussing
or
taking
action
on
any
of
the
items
not
on
the
agenda.
F
J
Thank
you,
so
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
start
an
architectural
approval
to
demolish
the
existing
3
344
square
foot.
Restaurant
building.
This
building
is
currently
known
as
jerry's
or
hooligans,
and
they
are
looking
to
construct
a
new
200
square
foot
drive
through
cafe
with
outdoor
seating
on
a
32
422
square
foot
lot
at
111
san
felipe
located
east
of
san
felipe
and
north
of
santa
ana
road
and
the
north
gateway
zoning
district
of
the
city
of
hollister.
J
The
proposed
drive-through
cafe
with
outdoor
seating
will
operate
seven
days
a
week
between
the
hours
of
3
30
a.m.
To
midnight
there
will
be
a
single
12
foot
drive
through
lane
that
will
have
the
ability
to
cue
up
to
10
vehicles
in
total.
This
exceeds
the
requirement
of
sufficient
stacking
area
to
accommodate
a
minimum
of
six
vehicles
per
section
17.22.090.
J
051-020-2
the
applicant
has
provided
shared
access
driveways
to
the
east
and
to
the
north
to
accommodate
for
future
connections
between
the
adjacent
properties
condition.
84
has
been
drafted
to
require
that
the
applicant
temporarily
install
ballards
at
these
access
points.
The
ballards
will
remain
in
place
until
such
a
time
that
the
adjacent
neighboring
property
develops
upon
the
neighboring
properties
entitlements.
The
bollards
will
be
removed.
J
Per
section
1718.060
fast
food
counter
service
requires
five
spaces
or
plus
one
space
for
every
three
seats
in
the
dining
area,
or
one
space
for
each
100
gross
square
feet
of
the
area.
Whichever
is
greater,
the
total
square
footage
of
the
building
is
2
200
and
square
feet,
which
equates
to
22
parking
spaces.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
install
a
total
of
31
spaces
which
meets
and
exceeds
the
on-site
parking
requirements
and
for
the
bicycle
parking
per
table,
17.18-1
off-street
parking
and
bicycles
required
by
the
land
use
types
of
the
hollister
municipal
code.
J
Fast
food
counter
service
requires
that
the
applicant
provide
five
percent
of
the
required
number
of
vehicle
spaces
as
parking.
The
applicant
is
required
to
provide
a
total
of
22
parking
spaces.
Five
percent
of
those
spaces
equates
to
1.1.
The
applicant
is
required
to
provide
a
minimum
of
one
parking
space
they
meet
and
exceed
this.
By
providing
a
bike
parking
loop,
the
rack
will
provide
at
least
two
spaces.
J
The
elevations
of
the
project,
the
main
body
of
the
building,
will
be
finished
in
two
different
types
of
sighting.
The
lower
half
of
the
building
will
be
finished
in
a
thin
brick
veneer.
The
upper
portion
of
the
building
is
finished
in
a
beige
stucco,
a
black
steel
metal
canopy
separates
the
two
finishes
and
will
wrap
around
the
building.
The
roof
line
will
be
finished
with
an
aluminum
pear
cap.
J
The
western
elevation
of
the
building
will
face
san
felipe
and
is
the
side
of
the
building
where
the
drive-through
pickup
window
will
be
located
towards
the
center
of
the
elevation
will
be
a
22-foot
tower,
which
articulately
defines
the
location
of
the
pickup
window.
The
tower
will
be
finished
in
a
carbon
metal
side.
Paneling,
an
aluminum
storefront
window
will
be
featured
on
the
right
side
of
the
elevation.
A
channel
letter
sign
will
be
placed
above
the
window
on
the
canopy.
J
J
J
J
The
landscaping
consists
of
trees,
shrubs
or
mental
grasses
and
ground
cover,
and
then
they're
proposed
throughout
the
perimeter
of
the
site
and
shall
be
provided
within
the
medians
and
in
caps
throughout
the
parking
lot.
The
applicant
is
proposing
his
landscape
6999
square
feet,
which
is
equivalent
of
21.95
percent
of
the
32
422
000
square
foot
of
the
parcel
the
table,
17.8-3
commercial
district
development
regulations,
the
applicant
meets
and
exceeds
the
5
landscape
requirement.
J
And
with
that
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review,
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
and
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion:
one
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
and
architectural
review
2019-8
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution.
Are
there
any
questions
for
staffed?
The
applicants
are
also
on
the
line.
If
you
have
any
questions
for
them
as
well,.
H
Mr,
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
and
I
just
keep
this
in
terms
of
general
questions
for
now,
and
the
first
question
I
have
is
the
site
circulation.
I
noticed
that
at
the
east
we
have
a
cross
access
driveway,
which
is
currently
now
that
cross-access
driveway
the
eastern
access
is
it's
just
a
field
or
it's
just
open
space,
and
then
also
the
one
that
is
proposed
on
the
north
is
is
currently
looks
like
a
wooded
area.
H
J
J
There
is
easements
that
are
taken
into
account,
as
well
as
as
mentioned
with
the
bollards
making
sure
there's
those
cross-access
agreements
at
one
point
are
at
such
point:
where
there's
development
on
either
of
those
sides,
not
only
will
those
be
removed
for
the
continuation
to
the
north
into
the
east.
I
believe
there's
also.
So
if
you
look
along
the
eastern
line
right
now,
there's
what
they're,
showing
in
their
landscape
is
a
boundary
with
some
landscape,
but
as
the
future
sites
continue,
there
is
the
possibility
of
removing
that.
H
E
H
B
And
and
just
to
add
to
that
thanks
amber
the
general
plan
also
requires
that
there
is
internal
circulation
as
amber
was
indicating
as
well.
So
then,
the
hope
is
that
when
mr
shaheenian
or
or
if
they
end
up
working
out
with
the
potential
developer
and
developing
that
site,
then
we
would
look
at
that
site
to
make
sure
that
there
is
that
continual
inner
circulation
between
between
the
properties,
as
indicated
by
the
general
plan.
H
Thank
you,
and
the
other
question
I
had
is
on
the
traffic
report
for
the
section
intersection
of
4th
and
san
benito.
The
mitigation
is
to
modify
quote,
modify
signal
timing
on
quote,
to
provide
southbound
right,
turn
overlap,
phase,
and
it
says
the
project
will
contribute
concerning
this
mitigation
will
contribute
its
fair
share
of
mitigation
costs.
So
can
you
just
clarify
on
how
that
contribution
to
mitigation
costs
will
come
about?
K
H
B
L
H
A
A
B
B
M
N
H
A
H
That's
correct:
okay,
they'll
be
inside
as
well.
Okay,
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
clear
to
me
yeah,
sometimes
if
we
don't
focus
in
on
these
issues
like
how
the
buildings
are
going
to
be
cooled
and
I
drive
by
and
I
see,
equipment
on
the
roof
without
roof
screens,
and
I
think
that
you
know
we're
remiss
not
to
get
that
clarification.
I
appreciate.
A
M
B
B
A
A
That
obviously,
would
be
the
satisfaction
of
the
city
engineer,
but
if
we
can
come
up
with
an
acceptable
alternative
right
now
that
we've
currently
written
this
is
that
we
would
need
to
come
back
to
the
planning
commission,
even
if
the
city
engineer
agreed
with
our
modifications,
but
we
would
like
them
somehow
to
modify
it
so
that,
if
you
know
we
come
to
a
resolution
that
the
traffic
engineer
in
the
city
engineer
is
acceptable
to
them.
That
we
would
be
able
to
do
that
to
create
something
either
kind
of
u-turn
or
left-turn
into
the
site.
A
E
O
Both
to
the
north
and
the
east,
it's
all
the
empty
land
there
in
that
walk,
and
we
have
some
concerns
about
the
entrances
onto
our
property
and
the
instruments
which
would
accompany
those
we
have
been
as
mark.
In
himself
noted,
we've
been
in
discussions
with
the
mark
and
his
development
team
and
had
some
discussions
with
this
with
the
with
the
city.
We
obviously
this
time
do
not
know
what
the
future
developers
of
our
property
would
want
to
do.
The
property's
currently
on
the
market,
actually
rudy
silverberg,
is
representing
it.
O
Been
decided
about
these
months,
we
have
we've
requested
certain
information,
preliminary
title
report
and
and
other
information
which
would
help
so
we've
gotten
some
of
it
from
mark,
but
we're
lacking
much
of
it
still
and
we've
been
promised
that
information,
but
it's
not
yet
appeared,
and
then
mike
harry
price.
Our
real
estate
attorney
has
authorization
to
review
that
material
and
make
some
recommendations.
O
The
the
questions
that
the
planning
commissioner
raise
are
the
same
ones.
We
have
what
are
the
future
implications
for
our
property,
for
example,
while
mark
says,
there's
flexibility,
those
the
sites
of
those
two
entrances
are
pretty
well
fixed
because
of
the
drive
through
nature,
which
is
which
is
great
and
but
that
that
can't
be
easily
altered.
So
that
is
where
those
two
entrances
will
be,
whether
those
would
be
appropriate
entrances
for
future
development.
Is
we
can't
say
at
this
point?
O
Obviously,
so
one
of
our
concerns
is
if,
if
it
was
not
compatible
with
a
future
development,
would
we
be
able
to
set
aside
those
easements
for
entrance
and
exit
and
and
with
the
city
of
trump
setting
them
aside?
If
we
did
wish
to
set
them
aside,
would
the
city
say
well,
you
know
we're
sorry,
but
we
didn't
give
you
either
once
the
ancients.
Thank
you
and
his
group
gave
you
easements.
You
decided
not
to
take
them.
That's
going
to
cut
down
on
these,
which
we
can
give
you
elsewhere.
O
We
can't
just
give
you
easements
anywhere.
You
want
we're
trying
to
reduce
number
of
curb
cuts,
and
so,
if
you
want
more
drinks
as
well
san
felipe,
we
might
give
you
one,
but
we're
going
to
be
that's
going
to
be
a
tough
call
and
as
far
as
our
property
goes
all
the
way
back
to
sally.
It
goes
over
to
to
maple
that
goes
over
santa
ana,
and
you
know
we're
obviously
going
to
watch
multiple
entrances.
O
These
might
be
great,
they
might
be
perfect.
People
might
love
to
be
able
to
access
the
starbucks
easily
and
it
might
work
both
ways
in
and
out,
but
it's
unknown
at
this
point
and
again
we
share
the
the
planning
commissioner's
concerns
about
what
implications
that
has
for
our
property
in
the
future,
and
that
has
not
by
any
means
been.
D
O
All,
but
I
would
like
some
resp
I
mean
I
mean
well,
let
me
put
it
this
way.
I
don't
know
what
the
implications
are,
but
I
would
be
reluctant
to
see
this
approved,
as
is
without
getting
suddenly
back
from
the
city
in
terms
of
what
are
the
implications.
If
this
is
approved
for
those
entrance,
where
the
reasons
would
be,
if
we
can't
use
them
in
the
future,
can
we
can
we
marcus?
Mark
angstrom
is
finally
that
he
says
lee
will
close
him
off.
If
you
can't
do.
G
Mr
shaheen,
thanks
for
taking
the
call
you
as
your
project
progresses
forward
to
coming
to
the
city
for
review,
we're
going
to
do
a
full-scale
analysis
of
how
your
site
accesses
san
felipe
road
and
in
a
perfect
world.
You
know
we
wouldn't
want
people
to
go
through
starbucks.
To
get
your
get
to
your
property.
We
would
want
to
make
sure
that
your
property
is
safe
for
the
residents
or
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
in
that
property.
G
Emergency
services-
and
so
you
know
starbucks,
is-
is
at
the
table
here
and
we
need
to
accommodate
how
to
access
that
property.
I
think
we've
gone
we've
gone
above
and
beyond
to
make
sure
that
other
access
points
are
on
the
property
in
into
your
property,
and
so
at
this
point
we're
doing
everything
we
can
for
starbucks.
When
your
property
comes
to
the
table,
we'll
make
sure
that
you
have
those
acts.
Those
access
points
that
you
need
to
have
your
property
be
successful
as
well,
so.
O
So
by
my
going
back
to
my
question:
if
those
those
two
easements
entrances
on
the
east
and
on
the
north
are
not
compatible
with
our
planned
development
or
with
our
developers
plan
development,
is
it
okay
to
close
those
off?
Will
it
be?
Will
it
be
any
question
we'll
be
able
to
close
them
out
without
without
any
negative
consequences
for
us.
G
That
that's
the
point
of
what
we're
doing
we're
we're
planning
as
best
as
we
can,
and
so
we
we
have
no
clue
what
your
use
will
be
on
your
property,
so
we're
taking
the
extra
step
to
forecast
how
these
easements
might
work
with
your
property.
But
when
you
come
to
the
table
and
you
submit
a
development
application,
mr
shaheen
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
how
your
property
is
accessed
and
having
its
own
access
points
and
making
sure
that
your
property
is
getting
the
benefit
of
the
san
felipe
road,
santa
ana.
G
So
when
your
site
is
ready,
we
will
be
analyzing
your
your
property
list,
just
like
we're,
analyzing
starbucks,
your
property
might
be
subdivided
in
the
future
where
there
might
be
one
owner
on
the
north
end
and
one
owner
on
the
south
end,
and
so,
if
the
south
end
goes
first,
eventually
we're
going
to
want
to
make
sure
those
act.
Those
easements
go
into
the
north
property.
So
this
is
just
the
planning
exercise
that
we're
doing
to
make
sure
that
you
know
the
unknown.
K
O
O
H
Situation,
well,
I
guess
I'm
the
one
who
brought
it
up.
The
concern
that
I
have
is
that
without
a
master
plan
of
his
property
on
what
he's
going
to
be
doing
with
it
there's
a
reason
I
brought
that
up
and
I
think
brian
you've
answered
it
to
a
certain
extent
that
the
eastman
is
not
on
his
property.
It's
on
the
starbucks
side.
K
K
What
the
future
configuration
of
that
site
is
is
totally
unknown.
This
is
the
best
possible
outcome
for
the
starbucks
property
to
have
access
points
to
the
property
line.
At
the
time
mr
shahanian
gets
ready
to
develop
or
if
he
sells
the
property
10
years
in
the
future,
they
will
come
up
with
a
layout
and
the
city
will
address
it
at
that
time.
H
I
think
that's
what
brian
is
trying
to
say.
I
I
agree
it's
the
question
mark
is
that
if
those
access
points
will
not
be
compatible
in
the
future,
with
his
future
plans
with
mr
fenini
in
his
planning,
I'm
just
wondering
how
that
would?
How
would
you
carry
that
forward
and
in
negotiating
that,
with
his
future
plans.
K
H
I
Comments,
commissioner,
this
is
roxanne
stevens.
I
I'm
just
just
going
to
say
that
I'm
having
some
trouble,
I'm
hearing
all
the
comments
and
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
because
individuals
have
a
mascot
or,
if
you're,
not
speaking,
right
in
to
the
speaker,
but
it
is
it's
I'm
having
a
little
bit
of
trouble.
I
I
It
seems
like
there's
a
lot
of
different
interest,
entrances
and
exits
into
the
starbucks
property
or
the
the
plan
for
the
starbucks
property.
Would
this
glad
this
one
that
faces
north?
Is
that
absolutely
necessary?
Would
that
highly
impact
the
project?
Would
it
would
it
be
detrimental
to
the
project
in
any
way?
If,
for
some
reason,
that
was
just
closed
off
and.
L
J
So
this
is
amber,
and
hopefully
you
can
hear
me
so.
The
point
of
asking
for
these
particular
cross
access
driveways
is
to
be
consistent
with
our
general
plan.
We
have
to
look
for
circulation
throughout
sites
and
neighboring
adjacent
sites.
There
was
a
lot
of
thought
that
was
put
into
where
these
were
going
to
be
located.
J
J
O
It
was
earlier
stated
that
those
events
have
been
approved
by
the
adjacent
property
owners.
That
is
not
true.
Now
I
understand,
on
the
one
hand,
you've
told
us
that
the
easements
are
there
and
you've
asked
for
our
written
approval
of
these
ones.
At
that
point,
you
suggested
we
or
we
mutually
agree-
that
legal
reveal,
which
is
currently
underway
and
not
being
held
up
by
by
on
our
side,
but
by
a
lack
of
documents
to
which
we
were
promised.
So
anyway
we're
happy
to
review
it
and
so
forth.
O
The
only
thing
is
I
I
again
I
go
back
to
the
commissioner's
concerns.
What
if
I
mean
those
we
mean,
we
may
love
those
accesses.
They
may
be
perfect
for
future
development.
They,
so
I
don't
want
to
preclude
them.
On
the
other
hand,
if
they're
incompatible
with
what
people
want
to
do
in
a
major
way,
then
we
want
the
right
to
just
say
these
don't
work,
I
I
I
don't
think
it's
a
complicated
request.
O
F
G
G
If
we
don't
do
that,
then
we're
not
abiding
to
the
general
plan
of
inter
interconnectivity
and
we're
just
creating
a
box,
so
we're
going
to
create
boxes
rather
than
have
a
broader
sense
of
planning
to
say
in
the
future.
We
don't
know
what
this
is
going
to
be,
but
let's
put
let's
let's
plan
this
right
now,
that's
what's
going
on
yeah.
K
O
G
H
H
That
is
a
well-founded
idea
and
it
certainly
goes
and
complies
with
the
general
plan
concept
of
interconnectivity,
and
I
do
I
I
sometimes
you
have
a-
and
I
don't
know
if,
when
I
went
through
drc,
were
there
any
comments
from
fire
department
for
for
the
function
of
some
of
these
are
those
the
northern
egress
and
the
eastern
egress?
Was
there
a
comment
for
fire
truck
maneuverability
or
any
function,
functional
concern?
If
you
will.
B
Yes,
commissioner,
fibo
absolutely
that's
one
of
the
top
priorities
from
the
fire
department,
making
sure
that
there's
full
access
to
the
site
and
as
danny
was
mentioning
earlier.
We
also
look
at
future
development
when,
when
future
development
comes
in,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
have
that
future
access
as
well.
If
you
take
a
look
at
the
sheet
c3
of
your
packets
there's,
actually
an
access
easement
right
now
on
on
the
starbucks
property
that
traverses
the
site
and
and
ends
up.
B
B
When,
when
mr
shaheen
comes
in
at
a
later
time,
to
develop
his
side
his
proposal,
we
would
be
more
than
happy
to
work
with
him
as
well
as
brian
was
alluding
to
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
to
be
able
to
have
that
full
access.
And
going
back
to
your
question,
mr
mr
hugh
boy,
fire
department
will
definitely
be
able
to
chime
in
to
make
sure
that,
there's
that
proper
accessibility
for
for
emergency
purposes
and
and
so
forth,
as
well.
H
If
you
just
take
the
site
plan
and
focus
in
on
it
in
terms
of
site
circulation,
it's
a
well-designed
site
plan.
I
don't
see
how
you
can
you
do
any
better
than
what
they've
done
here
and,
and
the
reason
I
brought
it
up
was.
I
was
just
curious
how
that
came
about
because
of
the
accesses
with
the
adjoining
property,
which
are
undeveloped,
so
it's
just,
but
in
the
best
of
all
worlds
you
come
up
with
a
good
site
plan.
It
has
good
interconnectivity.
L
F
H
H
E
H
I
I
know,
for
you
know
that
there
were
people
that
from
city
hall
you
know
our
city
manager
was
used
to
go
down
there
online,
but-
and
you
know,
there's
I've
heard
a
lot
of
good
words
about
that
restaurant.
It
had
the
art
deco
sign,
jerry's.
You
know
that's
going
to
be
sad
to
see
that
go
too,
but
sometimes
progress
comes
up
with
shiny
new
things
that
are
have
more
excitement.
You
know
out.
H
H
H
It's
always
wondering
how
we
can
mitigate.
That
goes
a
little
bit
beyond
the
my
comprehension
with
the
traffic
science
and
what
they
can
do
with
these
signal.
Signalization
event
make
it
more.
You
know
useful
and
functional
high-tech.
If
you
will
space-age,
you
know,
ideas
how
we
can
signalization
can
help
mitigate
the
traffic
concerns,
but
all
in
all
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
good
project.
H
H
Well,
I
think
it'll
do
nicely
there
in
the
north
gateway,
and
you
know
I
I
think
you
guys
can
work
that
out
with
mr
shanani
shenanigan
in
the
future,
with
once
he
decides
what
he
wants
to
do,
and
I
don't
think
that
I
think
there's
enough
avenues,
potential
avenues
in
terms
of
site
circulation.
What
he's
going
to
do
with
his
property
that
I
think
it
could
be
worked
out.
F
H
B
B
F
I
Q
B
H
F
E
R
Good
evening,
commissioners,
the
applicant
is
requesting
approval
of
site
and
architectural
review
2020-7
for
the
conversion
of
an
existing
2315
square
foot
commercial
office
building
into
a
complex
excuse
me
into
a
duplex
on
the
northwest
corner
of
west
and
4th
street,
and
the
applicant
is
also
requesting
approval
of
conditional
use
permit
to
approve
a
variation
in
the
setback.
The
project
is
excuse
me.
R
R
The
duplex
will
consist
of
three
bedrooms.
Excuse
me
will
consist
of
two
units
which
are
three
bedrooms:
two
bathrooms
unit,
one
is
facing
fourth
street
and
a
total
of
991
square
feet
and
unit
two
is
facing
west
street
and
is
a
total
of
one
1266
square
feet.
The
remaining
square
feet
will
be
for
a
shared
laundry
room
for
a
total
of
2
315
square
feet.
R
R
R
The
northern
elevation
has
an
entrance
to
the
shared
laundry
room
and
the
western
elevation
faces
the
rear
of
the
property
and
the
interior
portion
of
the
lot.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
paint
the
exterior
of
the
house
in
earth
tone
colors
and
will
be
consistent
with
the
old
town
district
appeal.
The
exterior
body
is
proposed
to
be
fitzgerald
smoke
with
the
daisy
white
accent
color
for
the
trim.
R
For
landscaping,
the
project
proposes
removing
the
existing
landscaping
in
the
front
yard
to
create
a
more
suitable
front
yard
space
for
residential
use.
The
proposed
landscape
includes
bark
ground
cover
benches
and
a
paved
walkway
surrounding
the
building,
and
a
three
foot
wide
excuse
me,
a
three
foot
white
picket
fence,
with
the
gate
at
each
walkway.
The
applicant
will
be
removing
the
existing
iv
and
aggregate
in
the
planter
strips
along
the
frontage
of
the
property
to
be
landscaped
and
will
include
street
trees
consistent
with
city
requirements.
R
The
project
requires
1
000
square
feet
of
open
space,
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
provide
at
least
250
square
feet
of
private
open
space
at
ground
level
for
each
unit.
The
applicants
are
proposing
a
total
of
528
square
feet
of
private
space
for
both
units
and
have
a
requirement
to
provide
at
least
472
square
feet
of
common
open
space.
The
applicant
is
proposing
585
square
feet
of
common
open
space
on
the
northwest
side
of
the
property.
R
R
The
applicant
is
also
requesting
approval
of
conditional
use,
permit
2020-1
for
variation
in
the
front
and
rear
yard
setbacks.
The
front
yard
setback
is
approximately
13
feet
and
the
rear
yard
setback
is
approximately
5
feet.
The
conditional
use
permit
would
approve
the
variation
with
the
reason
that
the
proposed
project
is
revitalizing.
The
vacant
building
and
the
proposed
use
is
consistent
with
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
density
requirement
of
the
district.
Additionally,
the
existing
setbacks
are
constrained
by
the
existing
building.
B
P
We
just
want
to
take
a
moment
and
thank
abraham
and
for
all
of
their
assistance
through
this
process.
If
there's
any
questions,
we're
more
than
happy
to
address
them
now,
but
we're
just
looking
to
take
this
vacant.
Building
that
has
been
that
hasn't
been
used
actually
can
provide
a
low
impact,
residential
use
to
it
and
sort
of
revive
the
building.
F
B
H
H
The
only
concern
I
have
is
that
five
foot
setback
to
the
property
line-
I
there
is
a
there
may
be,
and
it
may
not
may
be
just
fine.
It
depends
on
the
unprotected
openings
on
that
on
that
wall.
If
it
was
a
historic
building
not
having
to
do
an
exterior
change
may
have
to
do
a
little
tweaking
with
the
windows
within
the
proximity
of
the
five
feet.
L
B
B
A
H
F
H
C
B
F
P
To
the
city,
and
as
you
guys
know,
they
do
need
housing,
so
we're
just
sort
of
looking
to
revive
the
existing
building.
It's
benefiting
there
we'll
probably
solve
balance,
and
I
you
know
it
needs
to
be
damped
up.
Not
only
that
we've
actually
been
having
an
issue
of
sort
of
a
public
homelessness.
We've
been
having
a
lot
of
homeless
people
camping
out
there.
So
we're
sort
of
just
hoping
to
revive
the
theme-
and
you
know,
sort
of
put
it
to
use
for
our
community
and
generally
generation
housing.
F
Q
C
H
F
B
Sure
thank
you,
mr
chair.
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
of
a
tentative
map
and
set
an
architectural
review
to
subdivide
a
1.7
acre
site
into
six
lots
at
2001
memorial
drive
located
at
the
southern
terminus
of
memorial
drive
and
also
at
the
southern
terminus
of
hermosaway
in
the
r3,
medium
density,
residential
zoning,
district
of
the
city
of
hollister.
B
B
As
part
of
the
subdivision,
the
south
terminus
of
memorial
drive
would
extend
and
loop
onto
her
muscle
way
lot.
One
and
lot
two,
as
indicated
on
the
tender
map
and
to
the
north
of
the
new
road
would
indic
would
have
a
duplex
and
two
adus
on
each
of
the
lots
and
lot
three.
Four
five
and
six
would
be
located
on
the
southern
side
of
the
new
road
extension
and
they
would
each
have
a
triplex
with
two
attached
adus
lot.
One
would
consist
of
7928
square
feet
lot.
B
B
Each
duplex
and
triplex
would
each
have
three
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms
and
each
adu
would
consist
of
one
bedroom
and
one
bathroom.
There
is
a
government
code
law
that
requires
that
the
adu
is
no
bigger
or
no
larger
than
50
percent
of
the
size
of
the
main
unit
that
it
is
attached
to
and
all
12
adu
units
that
are
being
proposed
meet
that
requirement
and
that's
that's
for
the
creation
of
variation
of
of
homes.
B
As
mentioned,
the
development
proposes
to
loop
memorial
drive
east
to
hermos
away.
The
new
road
would
have
a
60
foot
wide
dedication
with
2
220
foot
wide
road
lanes
per
table,
17.18-1
up
section
17-1806
over
the
hollister
municipal
code.
Multi-Family
housing
requires
two
parking
spaces
for
each
unit,
that
has
three
bedrooms
or
more
also
for
section
65852.2dx
of
the
california
government
code.
B
Each
parking
requirements
for
accessory
drilling
units
should
not
exceed
one
parking
space
per
accessory
drilling
unit
or
per
bedroom.
Whichever
is
less
lots.
One
and
two
on
the
north
side
of
the
new
road
extension
have
a
duplex
building
with
three
bedrooms
on
each
unit,
plus
two
adus,
which
require
a
total
of
six
parking
spaces
on
each
of
lot.
One
and
each
of
lot
two
and
six
parking
spaces
are
proposed
on
each
of
lot
one
and
each
of
lot.
Two.
B
B
Bicycle
parking
spaces
are
depicted
on
the
site
plan
on
near
lot.
Lot
number
five
on
the
on
the
screen.
A
trash
enclosure
would
be
located
north
of
the
new
road
between
lots,
1
and
lots
2
to
serve
those
those
units
and
another
trash
enclosure
would
be
located
on
the
northern
side
of
la
3
to
serve
lots.
3,
4,
5
and
6.
B
There
will
be
another
light
post
on
the
northern
side
of
lot
five,
another
light
post
on
the
I'm
sorry
on
the
southern
side
of
northern
side
of
la
five
and
then
another
light
post
on
the
southern
lot
side
of
lot.
Six,
there
will
be
multiple
light
posts
along
the
new
street
edition
as
well,
along
with
multiple
wall
mount
lighting
on
the
facade
of
each
of
the
buildings.
B
The
condition
of
approval
also
requires
reciprocal
access
and
parking
agreements
for
lots
three
through
six.
We
want
to
make
sure
that,
even
though
there's
going
to
be
separate
lots
that
vehicles
are
going
to
be
able
to
access
all
the
different
lots
as
they
go
as
they're
going
southbound,
I'm
sorry
northbound
and
we
would
require
that
to
be
final
prior
to
a
final
map
which
or
prior
to
issuance
of
the
first
building
permit.
Whichever
occurs
first.
B
Also,
we
would
require
a
condition.
There
is
a
condition
of
approval
that
requires
continuous
maintenance
and
management
of
the
multi-family
buildings
to
include,
but
not
be
limited
to
paved
surfaces,
utilities
open
space
areas
such
as
in
the
form
of
codes,
covenants
and
restrictions,
the
ccnr's
that
are
referred
to
or
in
the
form
of
a
rental
contract,
and
that
should
be
recorded
on
each
lot
as
well.
B
The
front
south
elevations
of
the
proposed
duplexes,
with
the
attach
of
the
use,
consists
of
mostly
horizontal
siding
with
some
stucco,
as
it
transitions
to
the
second
story
and
along
the
bottom
portion
of
each
garage.
The
front
of
each
duplex
unit
would
consist
of
one
entry
door,
one
garage
door,
one
slider
and
one
slider
window
on
the
second
floor
of
each
of
the
units,
each
with
an
awning.
B
The
front
elevations
of
the
proposed
triflex
buildings,
with
the
attach
adus,
consist
of
stucco
exterior
on
the
first
floor
and
horizontal
siding
on
the
second
floor.
The
first
floor
of
the
triplex
consists
of
four
double
hung:
windows
and
the
second
floor
consists
of
four
slider
rectangular
windows.
The
front
elevation
of
each
of
the
adus
consists
of
a
stucco
exterior
with
one
door
and
one
rectangular
window.
B
There
is
an
existing
single
family
residential
unit
on
the
property
that
is
proposed
to
be
demolished.
A
condition
of
approval
requires
that
the
property
owner
provide
the
noticing
the
proper
noticing
requirement
by
state
law
to
the
tenant
prior
to
that
removal
of
the
existing
unit.
There
are
also
various
oak
trees
on
the
sites
that
shall
remain
on
the
site
in
a
condition
of
approval
requires
that
the
oak
trees
be
protected
at
all
times
during
construction.
B
The
private
open
space
requirements
consist
of
a
minimum
of
250
square
feet
with
minimum
dimensions
of
10
feet
if
provided
at
ground
level
or
64
square
feet
minimum.
If
provided
at
in
the
form
of
a
balcony,
there
are
no
balconies
proposed.
There
are
all
going
to
be
private
ground
level,
open
space
requirements,
each
multi-family
residential
unit
would
have
between
500
and
651
square
feet
of
private
open
space.
B
B
Since
2015,
as
indicated
in
the
staff
report,
there
have
been
only
13
multi-family
market
rate
units
built
in
hollister
they're,
actually
been
a
little
bit
more
affordable
housing
units,
which
is
also
good,
and
it's
also
needed,
including
49,
affordable
housing
units
on
line
street
that
the
commission
approved
and
are
now
constructed
and
are
occupied
and
including
80,
affordable
housing
units
along
4th
street
west
of
miller.
Those
both
of
those
each
of
those
projects
are
considered
special
needs,
housing.
B
B
The
condition
reads:
the
owner
shall
install
a
backflow
prevention
device
on
the
existing
sewer,
lateral
between
the
building
and
the
city.
Sanitary
sewer
main
the
device
should
be
maintained
and
operated
by
the
owners
and
shall
periodically
test
tested
by
the
owners
to
ensure
the
device
is
working
properly.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
language
is
added
for
city
of
hollister
requirements
and
also
on
the
tentative
map
conditions,
number
31
and
32
page
9
of
16.
B
condition.
Number
31
talks
about
a
six
requirement
of
a
six
feet:
pue
and
a
10
foot
tree
planning
and
maintenance,
easement
and
condition.
Number
32
requires
a
10
foot
public
utility
easement.
So
all
we
want
to
do
is
remove
condition.
Number
31,
keep
condition
number
32,
which
indicates
that
10
foot
public
utility
easement,
which
would
serve
both
conditions
so
again,
once
again
just
want
to
close
by
reiterating
that
the
market
rate
duplexes,
triplexes
and
adus
proposed
what
this
development
will
offer.
B
Some
very
much
needed
market
rate
rental
housing
in
the
community
and
what
that
staff
recommends.
The
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
receive
all
written
oral
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
the
following
motion:
number
one:
adopt
a
resolution
approving
tenant
map
number
2020-1,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
draft
resolution
and
number
two
adopt
the
resolution
of
proven
saturn
architectural
review
number
2020-9,
subject
to
the
findings
and
conditions
contained
in
the
drive
resolution.
B
D
You
thank
you
for
enabling
me
to
utilize
this
technology
that
I'm
not
accustomed
to.
My
name
is
clifford
cardoza
with
my
wife,
claudia
p,
cardoza
our
residents
and
owners
of
a
single
family
dwelling
at
1921
hermosa
way
in
hollister.
This
residence
has
been
our
family
home
for
54
years
since
june
1
1966..
D
The
logistics
of
the
residence
and
cars
that
would
be
living
at
the
new
dwelling
units
would
be
a
considerable
impact
to
the
overall
neighborhoods
of
all
present
streets
in
the
location
area
promotes
away
and
memorial
drive
the
main
and
real
problem
to
the
proposed
development
on
an
area
of
70
052
square
feet.
That's
1.7
acres
is
the
conservative
estimate
of
100
residents
that
live
at
the
apartments
and
have
80
cars
to
park.
D
D
D
This
project
is
proposed
for
two
duplexes
and
third
triflexes
on
six
lots
with
a
square
foot
of
sixty
thousand
three
hundred
and
sixteen
square
feet
revealed
a
total
of
six
thousand
four
hundred
and
fifty
two
square
feet
for
twelve
adus
note.
The
average
size
of
an
adu
in
square
feet
is
537.7
square
feet
for
a
drilling
unit.
That
would
be
within
this
project.
D
Complex.
Tell
me:
how
does
this
new
adu
requirement
relate
to
hollister's
outdated
general
plan
before
years
is
in
need
of
updating
density
of
more
building
projects
that
add
citizens
to
our
city's
population
solve
the
problem?
I'm
sorry.
No
all
things
considered.
We
have
more
problems
to
address
in
the
category
of
roads,
jobs,
schools
and
survival
of
our
local
economy.
D
F
G
E
S
S
S
My
name
is
marty
miller.
I
am
the
developer
for
the
twin
oaks
project
next
door
and
in
looking
over
the
plans.
The
one
concern
that
we
have
is
that
there
are.
The
project,
proposes
two-story
dwelling
units
with
windows
on
the
second
floor,
looking
down
on
our
project,
which
is
all
one
story
and
all
the
bedrooms,
all
the
master
bedrooms
and
all
the
family
rooms
are
in
the
rear
of
the
pro
or
in
the
rear
of
the
house,
and
so
without
any
screening
at
all.
G
T
My
name
is
co
cooper.
I've
been
a
resident
of
san
benito
county
for
the
last
47
years
and
I
have
worked
with
this
project
to
get
it
this
far
and
as
an
infill
project
that
would
provide
this
kind
of
housing.
I
just
want
to
support
or
express
my
support
for
it
that
it.
I
can't
see
a
better
use
of
this
parcel
than
what's
been
proposed
here.
It's
going
to
provide
some
housing,
the
parking
issue
that
was
brought
up.
We've
we've
met
with
our
city
engineer.
L
L
L
The
connection
has
been
identified
for
a
while,
in
fact,
silver
oaks
started
those
extensions
as
part
of
their
project,
and
this
project
completes
it
the
connection
through
the
king
property,
which
will
allow
for
better
connectivity
and
fire
response.
Let's
see
the
there
are
two
story,
portions
to
this
project.
The
edus
are
one
story.
The
two-story
portion
in
most
cases,
is
15
to
20
feet
away
from
the
property
line.
L
However,
the
applicant
I
mean
the
applicant
has
no
issue
with
providing
landscaping
screening
along
the
property
line,
that's
understandable,
so
we
don't
have
an
issue
doing
that.
The
landscape
plan
that
we've
submitted
generally
addressed
the
front
yard
landscaping,
because
that's
all
the
city
is
usually
controlling
the
backyard.
Landscaping
is
something
the
landlord
that
goes
on
during
the
construction
housing,
but
we
don't
have
an
issue
with
that
requirement.
F
H
Triplex
yeah
that
that
one
there
okay,
you
know-
I
know
a
lot
of
work-
has
gone
into
this.
I
really
appreciate
it
it
it's
there's
quite
a
bit
of
of
labor,
that's
involved
here,
I'm
just
you
have
the
rear
elevation
at
the
bottom
of
the
sheet
that
has
no
window
trim.
It's
just
the
the
bare
aluminum
trim
with
without
any
trim
there,
and
then
the
upper
elevation
does
have
trim.
H
B
H
E
H
B
B
H
B
H
H
I
think
that
sometimes
this
may
can
be
a
bit
of
a
significant
task
where
you-
and
I
know
I
worked
on
an
apartment
project
where
I
had
to
actually
bump
a
wall
out,
but
I
think
in
this
situation
that
we're
looking
at
the
floor
plans
that
are
going
to
have
some
massaging
to
be
done
for
accessibility
reasons
down
down
the
line
there.
I
I
think
it's
minor
enough.
I
can
look
at
it.
I
don't
see
anything
other
than
moving
a
wall
here
and
there.
E
H
I
know
when
carol
lenore
was
on
the
planning
commission.
She
was
very
very
concerned
about
privacy
issues
and
I
learned
a
lot
from
carolyn
norbly,
so
I
I
totally
agree
with
that.
I
think
I
that
you
know
you
can
add
some
and
even
on
those
southern
elevations
deciduous
trees
are
really
good
to,
for
those
windows
are
facing
west.
E
H
F
F
F
H
C
H
I
H
In
the
microphone
that
might
be
part
of
it,
I'm
sorry
I
was.
I
was
commenting
on
the
rear
elevation
that
that
rear
elevation
for
the
triplex
on
lot,
one
is
facing
west
without
any
shading.
Now
you
can
have.
We
are
going
to
get
some
improvements
to
the
landscape
plan
for
privacy
reasons.
We
can.
We
can
add
that
for
that
lot,
one
where
those
units
are
facing
west,
because
you're
going
to
get
a
lot
of
late
afternoon
heat
without
any
shading
and
those
windows
and
sliding
glass
doors.
H
These
are
these
are
suggestions,
I'm
not
I'm
not
saying
that
should
be
etched
in
stone,
but
I'm
saying
that
this
I
think
that
would
improve
the
elevation
if
they
had
window
trim.
Carry
that
window
trim
on
the
other
elevations
make
it
consistent
and
then
add
a
shading
element
such
as
a
you
know,
a
window
with
some
knee
braces
to
go
to
provide
the
shading
from
afternoon
sun
for
that
wall
that
faces
west.
F
I'm
going
to
have
to
say
that
what
mr
miller
had
brought
up
is
something
that
I
think
is
important
is
to
to
put
some
type
of
green
belt
just
for
the
privacy
between
the
two
neighbors
ones,
being
a
two-story
and
the
other
one's
single
stories
behind
the
the
project.
So
I
think
that's
something
that's
important.
I
agree
with
that.
H
H
B
H
B
C
C
C
N
Yeah,
because
I'm
speaking
directly
into
the
microphone-
and
you
know
the
microphones-
we
have
here
on
the
dyess
they're
not
meant
to
project
over
zoom,
so
we
have
one
microphone
in
the
middle
of
the
room
to
capture
what
is
coming
over
the
speakers
and
we're.
You
know,
that's
pretty
much
the
best
we
can
do
considering
that
council
chambers
isn't
meant
to
be
remote,
it's
meant
for
every.
N
You
know
all
the
audio
and
video
to
be
done
here
in
the
room,
so
we're
doing
the
best
that
we
can.
My
suggestion
is
those
who
are
on
the
dyess
speak
directly
and
and
loud
into
the
microphone.
We
can't
put
the
microphones
too
loud,
it'll
they'll
feed
back
here
in
the
chambers,
so
I
just
my
suggestion
is
just
to
project
a
little
bit
more
into
the
microphones
at
the
dios.
N
You
know
a
little
bit
louder
so
that
people
can
can
hear
I'm
monitoring
the
zoom
on
the
the
youtube,
and
I
can
hear
everything
that's
going
on.
I
I
do
understand
that
there's
some
that's
a
little
bit
more
muffled
than
others,
but
I
am
able
to
hear
you
know
actual
conversation.
So
I
I
apologize
for
you
for
ever.
You
know
to
everyone,
that's
on
the
zoom,
but
you
know
there's
only
so
much
we
can
do
here.
N
U
This
sign
is
intended
to
contain
the
fuel
prices
and
other
required
information
for
the
existing
chevron
gas
station
that
just
went
in,
and
this
sign
will
replace
an
existing
pole.
Sign.
That's
in
the
same
location,
the
the
replacement
pole
is
approximately
it's
going
to
have
approximately
10
square
feet
less
of
new
signage,
it's
about
53
and
a
half
square
feet,
and
the
current
pole
sign
with
its
various
signage,
has
about
64
square
feet
of
signage.
U
The
sign
is
also
not
in
compliance
with
requirements
from
section
172050
requiring
that
freestanding
signs,
be
a
low-scale
monument
type
sign,
as
opposed
to
a
pole
sign
which
is
being
proposed.
There
are
a
few
reasons
for
this.
One
is
a
potential
site
hazard,
distance
or
issues
for
vehicles.
This
is
located
at
the
corner
of
7th
and
san
benito,
and
it
is
right
on
the
corner,
as
you
can
see,
within
that
existing
triangle,
so
potentially
having
a
low
scale.
U
Monument
sign
that
meets
the
requirements
of
the
size
and
lighting,
and
things
like
that
for
a
gas
station
sign
could
be
an
issue
as
well
as
it
physically
would
not
fit.
A
monument
sign
would
not
fit
in
this
tiny
triangle
that's
available
and
it
would
be
even
closer
to
the
streets
than
is
being
proposed,
so
an
even
lesser
setback
than
a
poll
would
be
so.
For
these
reasons,
the
master
sign
program
would
allow
exceptions
to
this
setback
and
the
monument
type
requirements
for
the
installation
of
this
sign
and
in
accordance
with
section
1720
o4oh1.
U
The
square
footage
of
signage
permitted
in
the
downtown
mixed
use
is
one
square
foot
of
signage
per
linear
foot
of
frontage,
and
this
property
has
about
195
linear
feet
of
frontage
and
with
the
freestanding
sign
proposed
at
about
53
square
feet
of
sign
and
then
three
additional
signs
that
are
in
existence.
On
the
current
chevron
canopy,
there
is
a
total
of
about
98
square
feet
of
signage
on
the
site,
which
is
well
within
the
requirements
with
the
195
being
the
maximum
allowed.
U
There
is
a
condition
of
approval
that,
prior
to
issuance
of
the
building
permit,
for
the
freestanding
pole,
sign
that
the
property
owner
bring
the
window
signage
on
the
building
that
exists
into
conformance,
there's
more
than
25
percent
of
windows
covered
on
that
shop,
the
commercial
shop,
and
so
that's
a
requirement
of
this
project
to
bring
the
building
into
conformance
with
the
code
and
then
there's
also
another
condition
on
the
master
sign
program.
Regarding
landscaping,
all
of
our
freestanding
signs
are
required
to
be
located
in
a
landscaped
area.
It's
a
very
small
area.
U
So
it's
a
staff
is
going
to
work
with
the
applicant
on
whether
or
not
it
needs
to
go
through
our
water
efficiency
landscape
ordinance.
If
it's
subject
to
those
requirements,
it's
maybe
30
square
feet
of
area.
If
that,
but
we'll
be
working
with
them
to
make
sure
that
there's
some
kind
of
landscaping
or
or
something
in
that
area,
I
have
provided
the
specific
two
code,
sections
that
are
being
requested
for
exceptions,
but
I
won't
read
them
for
you
but
c4b.
U
U
That
will
conclude
my
presentation
and
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
review
the
applicant's
request
receive
the
oral
and
written
testimony
regarding
the
proposal
and
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
approving
site
architectural
review
2020-11
for
a
master
sign
program,
subject
to
findings
and
conditions
in
our
draft
resolution.
Thank
you.
F
H
F
H
F
A
B
Just
want
to
thank
commissioner
kerry
johnson
for
all
her
service
as
a
district
2
planning.
Commissioner,
she
has
indicated
that
is
no
longer
going
to
be
serving
the
commission
we're
going
to
miss
her
a
lot.
Thank
you
for
her
help.
Staff
is
going
to
be
working
with
district
city
council
member
roland
mercedes
district
number
two
to
hopefully
have
somebody
on
board
fairly
soon,
and
we
will
notify
the
commission
of
that.
F
H
I
guess
I
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
say
that
on
june
4th,
I
believe
we
had
our
kickoff
meeting
for
the
general
plan
update
and
I
thought
it
went
very
well
and
I'm
looking
forward.
I
know
you've
had
some
public
visioning
workshops
that
the
gpac
committee
was
not
required
to
attend,
but
I
I've
been
reading
all
the
public
comments
and
it
looks
like
we've
got
some
good
input
there
I'll
be
ready
to
go
for
our
next
gpac
2,
but
with
the
time
and
date
that
we
we
haven't.