►
From YouTube: 02-24-15 City of Inglewood Council Meeting
Description
All videos posted by The City of Inglewood are subject to copyright protection. Violation of copyright law will be pursued through any and all legal channels.
A
First
order
of
business
is
a
proclamation
declaring
march
2nd
2015
as
read
across
america
day,
whereas
read
across
america
day
was
started.
May
1997,
where
a
small
reading
task
force
at
the
national
education
association
came
up
with
this
idea
to
create
a
day
to
celebrate.
Reading
and
whereas
read
across
america
day
is
observed
in
the
united
states
on
march
2nd
of
each
year,
whose
nationwide
observance
coincides
with
the
birthday
of
dr
seuss.
A
Now,
therefore,
be
it
known
that
the
mayor
and
council
members
of
the
city
of
englewood
commend
inwood
high
school
faculty
staff
and
students
for
their
dedication
and
commitment
to
this
cause
and
to
hereby
proclaim
march
2nd
2015,
as
read
across
america
day
presented
this
24th
day
of
february
2015
to
gail
atlee
of
english
high
school
gail.
Are
you
here
applaud
for
gail.
D
E
A
Okay,
madam
clerk,
the
consent
calendar
items
one
through
17..
F
F
A
B
Staff
report
recommending
adoption
of
a
resolution
accepting
the
certification
of
the
city
clerk
as
to
the
sufficiency
of
the
initiative
petition
entitled
initiative
measure
regarding
the
per
pose
development
of
the
sport
and
entertainment
zone,
including
a
stadium
within
the
previously
approved
hollywood
park.
Misuse
mixed
use
development
also
identified
by
short
title,
the
city
of
champions,
revitalization,
initiative.
B
A
little
small
one,
if
I
may
yes
on
january,
2nd
2015
the
proponent
mr
melvin
m
roberts
jr,
submitted
a
notice
of
intent
to
inglewood
city
clerk's
office
to
circulate
an
initiative
petition
entitled
city
of
champion
revitalization
initiative
and
under
the
california
election
code.
The
election
officials
shall
immediately
transmit
a
copy
of
the
proposed
measure
to
the
city
attorney
and
for
the
purpose
of
this
resolution.
The
election
official
is
the
inglewood
city
clerk.
B
Pursuant
to
the
election
code,
section
9203,
the
city
attorney,
prepares
an
official
ballot
and
title
and
summary
for
the
proposed
initiative
petition,
which
was
provided
to
the
proponent
on
january
5th
2015.,
as
required
by
law.
The
proponent
must
submit
an
affidavit
of
publication
of
notice
of
intent
and
ballot
and
title
summary
and
under
the
election
code
were
allowed
180
days
to
gather
signatures.
B
If
the
petitions
are
filed
within
180
days
from
the
report
of
the
ballot
title
and
summary
and
are
determined
to
have
been
signed
by
at
least
15
percent
of
the
registered
voters
in
the
city
of
in
the
city,
I
am
required
to
certify
the
results
to
the
city
council
at
the
next
regular
meeting.
Being
that
this
is
the
next
regular
scheduled
meeting,
I
present
to
you
my
certification
of
sufficient
sufficiency.
A
A
G
G
G
We
will
then
introduce
miss
debbie
kern
of
kaiser
marston
associates
to
present
their
peer
review,
economic
prayer,
review
and
fiscal
peer
review
and
then
introduce
mr
lewis
atwell,
who
is
the
public
works
director
who
will
present
david
schender
of
linscott
law
and
greenspan
to
discuss
the
traffic
related
impacts,
as
it
relates
to
the
authorization
section
9212
of
california
elections
code
authorizes
the
city
council
to
order
a
study
on
any
initiative.
A
city
council
approved
funding
for
the
921
to
study.
G
G
Agricultural
lands,
open
space,
traffic,
congestions
business
districts
as
well
as
develop
areas
designations
for
revitalization
and
any
other
matters
that
this
legislative
body
requests
relative
to
our
9212
report.
The
city
contracted
with
kaja
environmental
services,
who
prepared,
who
also
prepared
the
eir
for
the
project
in
2009.
G
kaiser
marston
associates,
was
also
contracted,
who
peer
reviewed,
the
fiscal
and
economic
analysis
prepared
by
hr
and
a
advisors.
Inc
place
works
the
consulting
firm
that
peer
reviewed,
the
environmental
for
the
form
and
the
2014
addendum
for
the
hollywood
park
specific
plan.
G
We
have
also
seven
other
technical
consultants
who
were
utilized
to
prepare
the
report
or
do
an
evaluation
of
the
report.
Those
include
hall
and
foreman
who
did
the
dry
and
wet
utilities
group
delta,
con
consultants,
who
did
the
geology
and
seismic
impacts
aviation
systems
inc?
Who
did
looked
at
the
federal
aviation
administration
impacts
charles
m
salter
and
associates?
Who
did
the
acoustical
modeling
hr
and
a
advisors
inc?
Who
I
previously
mentioned?
Who
did
the
economic
and
fiscal
impacts
of
stetson
engineers
inc?
G
Kaiser
kma
place
works
and
the
city
staff
reviewed
the
technical
studies
and
the
initiative
texts
and
perform
the
ballots
of
the
analysis?
The
9212
report
is
in
question
and
answer
format
and
compares
the
initiative
to
the
existing
project
would
note
that
the
report
is
explicitly
not
in
a
california
environmental
quality
act
document.
The
report
is
intended
to
provide
information
to
this
council
and
the
voters
of
the
city
of
inglewood,
while
facilitating
the
constitutional
rights
for
the
initiative
to
proceed
in
a
timely
fashion.
G
The
topics
could
to
be
considered
overlap
sql
in
some
cases,
but
also
include
non-physical
impacts
such
as
economic
and
fiscal
impacts.
Now,
moving
on
to
the
initiative
itself,.
G
The
initiative
looked
to
modify
several
aspects
of
codes
associated
with
the
city
of
inglewood,
in
particular
they're
the
areas
of
the
general
plan,
the
areas
of
the
municipal
code
as
well
as
others
that
I'll
discuss.
Briefly,
as
it
relates
to
the
general
plan,
the
initiative
would
amend
the
land
use
element.
It
would
change
the
combined
298-acre
site
to
a
major
mixed-use
designation.
G
It
would
authorize
sports
and
entertainment
uses
in
that
major
mixed-use
amendment
land
use
element
and
then
it
would
add
floor
area
ratio,
height
limitations
in
the
text
that
also
describe
the
site,
as
it
relates
to
the
housing
element.
It
would
acknowledge
the
two
different
alternative
projects
could
proceed
under
the
initiative.
G
It
would
affect
a
reduction
in
the
housing
units
for
this
project
from
2995
to
2500
units
which,
by
the
way,
still
exceeds
the
project's
housing
inventory
in
the
current
housing
element
of
1975
units.
It
would
modify
the
circulation
element.
It
reflects
the
potential
use
of
the
municipal
parking
lots
for
a
broader
range
of
purposes,
as
it
relates
to
the
municipal
code.
G
In
addition,
it
would
allow
banner
signs
in
the
public
right-of-way
it
would
provide
for
an
alternate
percent
for
art
program,
which
we'll
discuss
a
little
bit
more
detail
in
a
minute.
It
would
clarify
that
certain
actions
are
ministerial
in
nature.
It
would
cap
the
emissions
tap
tax
applicable
to
the
venues
of
22
000
patrons
or
greater
to
15
million
dollars
per
annum
as
adjusted
by
the
cpi
or
consumer
price
index.
It
would
exempt
sport
sporting
events
and
up
to
12
other
events
from
the
city's
noise
ordinance.
G
G
As
for
its
comparison
of
design,
it
would
add
that
sports
and
entertainment
category
it
would
expand
the
mixed-use
areas.
The
office
and
retail
entitlements
would
be
increased.
The
residential
uses
required
would
be
required
adjacent
to
the
existing
off-site
residential
uses.
It
would
identify
the
northern
parcel
to
be
developed
generally
to
surface
parking,
with
a
portion
being
used
for
the
stadium
development.
G
What
I've
done
is
I've
provided
a
couple
of
actual
graphs
or
or
charts
that
show
you
the
layout
of
the
of
the
existing
adopted
plan
and
how
it
would
be
compared
to
the
proposed
plan,
as
amended
by
the
initiative,
particularly
the
two
areas
that
I
would
point
out
is
really
the
increase
in
the
mixed
use
area
and
then,
obviously,
the
increase
or
the
addition
of
the
sports
and
entertainment
area
within
the
land
use
map.
G
Also
the
comparison
of
the
development
limitations
within
the
plan.
In
the
existing
plan
there
is
no
stadium,
a
stadium
on
of
up
to
80
000
seats
would
be
added.
There
is
in
the
existing
plan,
no
performance
venue,
a
performance
venue
of
up
to
6
000
seats
would
be
added
within
the
plan.
There
is
a
maximum,
as
I
previously
stated,
of
2995
units
that
would
be
decreased
by
495
units.
There
is
the
hotel
site
that
would
remain
essentially
the
same
with
the
number
of
rooms.
G
When
you
look
at
the
area
of
heights,
the
the
map
would
be
modified
to
allow
for
the
stadium
area
to
be
actually
developed.
In
this
case,
the
the
height
is
a
little
bit
different,
because
previously
it
was
all
dictated
on
from
ground
level
up
because
of
the
situation
of
the
height
of
the
stadium,
as
it
relates
to
the
air
pathway.
G
Also,
there
are
some
various
changes
of
building
setbacks,
largely
consistent
with
the
existing
project
and
then
the
changes
to
the
public
street
network
as
it
relates
to
the
public
parks.
There
were
in
the
original
existing
project,
four
public
parks
that
is
champion
park,
lake
park,
arroyo
park
and
bluff
park.
Those
parks
would
also
be
carried
over
into
the
new
layout,
as
amended
by
the
initiative,
with
modifications
to
their
situation
on
or
how
they're
situated
within
the
land
use
areas
on
the
land
use
map.
I
would
note
that
you'll
see
that
champion
park.
G
As
it
relates
to
the
hollywood
park
specific
plan,
there
will
be
key
changes
outside
the
sports
and
entertainment
zone.
The
residential,
the
casino,
the
mixed
use
design
guidelines
would
predominantly
be
consistent
with
the
existing
specific
plan,
while
accommodating
those
changes
to
the
land
use
plan
signage,
as
we
discussed
previously,
will
be
expanded.
There'll,
be
a
a
allowance
of
two
primary
identity
signs,
similar
to
what
we
have
at
the
form,
updated
street
sections
and
part
design
consistent
with
the
new
diagrams
there'll
be
also
some
key
changes
within
the
sports
and
entertainment
zone.
G
G
The
initiative
identifies
that
the
stadium
related
areas
would
be
able
to
go
directly
to
building
permit.
There
would
be
no
plot
plan
required
would
say
that
the
layout
of
the
existing
specific
plan
allows
you
to
requires
a
plot
plan
review
process
similar
to
our
site
plan
review
process
in
the
city.
The
map
identifies
in
numerix
number.
One
area,
which
would
be
predominantly
the
sports
and
entertainment
zone
would
be
able
to
go
directly
into
building
plan
check.
G
The
areas
identified
with
number
two
would
would
actually
go
along
the
same
lines
as
it
is
in
the
existing
specific
plan
with
most
of
the
site,
and
then
the
number
three
area
is
the
northern
parcel,
which
would
be
predominantly
the
parking
area
and,
as
we
said
specifically,
a
specific
plan
would
be
needed.
Amendment
would
be
needed
if
there
would
be
any
construction
above
and
beyond
parking
in
that
area.
G
When
we
look
at
the
changes
again
to
the
hollywood
park
specific
plan,
there
will
be
an
addition
of
a
lot
line.
Adjustment
that
would
be
allowed.
The
ministerial
lot
line
of
justice
would
be
in
accordance
with
the
state
subdivision.
Map
act
also
the
overview
of
the
development
agreement.
The
development
agreement
would
be
extended
to
25
years.
It
would
permit
additional
extensions
of
up
to
additional
30
years.
If
the
stadium
is
built
and
remains
operational,
it
would
add
the
60
acre
parcel
to
the
land
governed
by
the
agreement
and
the
development
of
the
northern.
G
G
As
it
relates
to
reimbursements
all
public
improvements
and
event,
public
services
must
be
privately
paid
for
public
improvements
and
event.
Public
services
can
be
reimbursed
if,
in
any
given
fiscal
year,
the
city
receives
more
than
25
million
dollars
as
adjusted
or
escalated
by
the
consumer
price
index.
In
the
fiscal
revenues
for
the
project,
only
the
funds
in
excess
of
the
25
million
threshold
can
be
used
for
reimbursement
and
unreimbursed
public
improvement
costs.
G
They
will
carry
over
or
can
carry
over
and
bear
interest
at
the
city's
cost
of
funds,
as
it
relates
within
the
development
agreement
for
the
event
management,
it
does
require
the
developer
to
provide
a
public
safety
management
and
parking
operations
planned
annually
to
the
city.
It
requires
a
land
order
to
pay
for
the
cost
of
police,
fire,
emergency
technicians
and
ambulance
presence,
and
then,
when
we
look
at
the
development
group
agreement,
it
also
institute
certain
alternative
mitigation
measures.
G
While
I
would
note
that
the
initiative
is
not
subject
to
sequa,
the
development
agreement
nevertheless
will
impose
mitigation
on
the
stadium
alternative
project,
then
based
on
mitigation
monitoring
and
reporting
program,
which
we
call
our
mmrp.
With
added
measures
for
lighting
for
noise
for
traffic,
among
others.
The
new
mitigation
is
based
either
on
the
studies
for
this
projects
for
traffic
or
best
practices
from
other
projects,
such
as
the
forum,
the
rose
bowl,
the
farmer
field
project
and
others
as
it
relates
to
the
public
benefits.
It
will
maintain
the
benefits
from
the
original
agreement.
G
G
It
would
permit
public
use
of
the
stadium
for
events
again
similar
to
the
form
it
would
require
stadium
signage
to
be
made
available
for
public
service
purposes,
such
as
public
service
announcements,
again
similar
to
the
form,
as
it
relates
to
our
public's
art
fees.
It
will
provide
for
an
alternate
means
of
complying
with
the
percent
for
art.
It
will
mandate
at
least
two
million
dollars
to
be
allocated
to
local
artists
selected
in
consultation
with
the
inglewood
arts
commission.
G
G
As
we
discussed
the
issues
related
to
the
impacts
of
the
initiative,
we
look
first
at
the
center,
the
city's
general
fund
and
the
job
creation,
as
I
stated
previously,
a
minimum
of
25
million
dollars
annually
in
new
general
fund
revenues
once
that
stadium
opens
by
year,
16
the
reimbursement
to
the
landowner.
Public
improvement
cost
is
projected
to
be
repaid,
by
which
time
the
reimbursement
will
only
be
for
operational
costs
by
year.
G
25,
the
city
is
estimated
to
receive
61
million
dollars
in
gross
general
fund
revenues
projected
the
project
is
projected
to
create
an
excess
of
22
000,
new
construction-related,
full
and
part-time
jobs,
and
then
also
to
projected
to
create
an
excess
of
10
000,
ongoing,
full
and
part-time
jobs
in
the
city
of
inglewood,
as
it
relates
to
impacts
concerning
traffic
and
parking.
These
studies
identified
that
there
is
no
new
significant
impacts
to
traffic.
G
It
should
remain
the
same
or
be
reduced
as
the
number
of
units
have
decreased
by
495
units.
The
landowner
still
is
required
to
pay
state
mandated
school
fees
as
it
relates
to
this
project
and,
as
previously
stated,
the
stadium
will
pay
for
a
1
million
dollar
over
five
year
period
after
school
program
for
youth
in
inglewood,
as
it
relates
to
parks
and
open
space,
all
of
the
parks
will
be
open
to
the
public
but
privately
built
and
maintained.
G
G
The
stadium
use
will
be
buffered
from
the
adjacent
residential
areas
on
the
site
and
situated
in
the
interior
of
the
site.
The
height
is
reduced
for
the
stadium
from
the
stadium
to
45
feet
at
the
edge
of
the
abutting
residential.
There
are
landscape
buffers
that
are
required
around
the
site.
The
initiative
would
require
that
the
initial
require
the
four
south
residential
units
adjacent
to
the
existing
single-family
residential
units
to
the
north
and
to
the
east.
G
It
also
will
identify
that
tailgating
will
not
be
permitted
in
residential
areas
or
immediately
adjacent
to
the
property
lines,
also
that
it
must
comply
with
the
regulations
to
minimize
any
nuisances
that
may
come.
Otherwise,
the
land
use
is
generally
consistent
between
the
existing
project
and
the
initiative.
G
Consistency
with
the
housing
element
and
policies
on
housing
are
maintained
as
a
result
of
the
initiative
when
we
get
to
the
area
of
signage
and
lighting
signage
is
expanded
with
new
mitigations
measures
imposed
within
the
sports
and
entertainment
zone.
To
kind
of
describe,
it
would
be
la
live
type
signage
allow.
The
medication
mitigation
is
imposed
on
light
spill
on
glare
on
and
the
refresh
rate
for
other
signs
are
reduced
to
are
added
to
reduce
the
impacts.
G
As
far
as
the
balance
of
the
site
is
concerned,
the
project
identity
size
are
allowed.
The
parking
interest
signs
are
allowed.
The
banners
on
the
light
post
along
the
project
are
also
allowed
similar
to
what
we
have
if
the
form
as
it
relates
to
noise
noise
levels
set
by
the
city,
ordinance
will
only
be
permitted
to
be
exceeded
by
sporting
events
within
the
stadium
and
up
to
12
other
events
per
year
event.
Noise
may
not
go
beyond
midnight.
G
It
is
expected
to
exceed
city
noise
limitation
levels
on
adjacent
property
properties.
Only
so
only
those
single
families
that
are
immediately
adjacent
to
the
site
will
be
impacted
above
what
the
noise
ordinance
currently
permits,
and
that's
at
the
property
line
and
again
directly
adjacent
to
the
property.
Generally,
noise
levels
will
be
comparable
to
other
la
venues
with
mitigation
compared
to
what
is
at
the
rose
bowl
as
it
relates
to
utility
infrastructure.
G
The
domestic
water
demand
remains
within
the
amount
reserved
for
the
project
in
the
2010
urban
water
management
plan.
The
recycled
water
is
available
to
the
project
and
required
to
be
used
for
irrigation.
Sufficient
sewer
capacity
exists
to
serve
the
project
on
both
an
average
and
peak
demand
day
basis,
as
it
relates
to.
G
As
it
relates
to
air
quality,
the
2009
eir
found
that
the
air
quality
impact
significant
were
significant
and
unavoidable.
With
mitigation,
the
2009
impacts
were
driven
by
traffic
impacts,
which
have
not
increased
initiative
includes
mitigations,
as
it
relates
to
seismic
technical
studies
show
that
the
potential
for
surface
fault,
rupture
at
the
site
is
considered
very
low
and
in
2009
mitigation
measures
will
enforce
the
no
bill
zone
on
the
part
of
the
site.
That
does
have
a
fault
and
require
all
building
to
conform
to
all
applicable
seismic
safety
standards.
G
A
That
hold
on
sir,
what
we're
going
to
do
council,
because
we're
going
to
have
to
change
this
dvd
in
about
30
minutes.
So
what
I
want
to
do
right
now,
if
any
of
you
have
your
questions
for
mr
jackson,
I'd
like
you
to
ask
him
now
and
then
we'll
take
a
break
and
go
to
our
next
presenter.
H
Thank
you,
mr
jackson.
Thank
you
for
for
the
report.
Obviously,
you
did
a
good
job
of
pointing
out
the
differences
between
the
two
projects.
My
question,
one
of
my
questions,
is,
regarding
you
mentioned
a
tailgating
code
of
conduct
which
which
some
of
the
residents
have
been
asking
about.
H
How
are
we
actually
going
to
make
sure
that
the
residents
the
visitors
adhere
to
the
alcohol
use
from
the
tailgating
or
the
stores
within
the
site,
and
how
are
we
going
to
maintain
that
control.
G
Well,
the
initiative
I
act,
it
does
not
supersede
the
regulations
that
are
already
established
through
the
state
department
of
alcoholic
beverage
and
control,
so
abc
abc
still
will
maintain
control
over
that
also.
But
the
initiative
does
limit
the
hours
of
where
alcohol
when
alcohol
can
be
served
and
where
it
can
be
served
and
then
tailgating,
as
you
mentioned,
is
only
in
designated
areas
within
the
sports
and
entertainment
zone
and
then
during
designated
tailgating
hours.
H
So
the
whole
thing
is
going
to
be:
the
enforcement
is
kind
of
what
it
what
I
wanted
to
get
to.
I
have
one
more
question,
and
this
goes
towards
our
one
percent
art
requirement.
The
developer
is
going
to
pay
the
one
percent
for
the
the
project
for
for
the
public
art,
which
will
probably
equate
to
about
20
million
dollars.
G
Yeah
and
the
initiative
maintains
the
percent
for
art
program,
with
some
modifications
you're
talking
about
a
two
billion
dollar
project
with
a
1.86
billion
dollar
stadium.
So
it's
already
previously
stated
about
almost
four
billion
dollars.
We're
talking
about
the
the
initiative
identifies
that
two
million
dollars
of
that
percent
for
art
has
to
go
to
inglewood,
artists,
local
englewood
artists,
and
with
that
there's
also
a
goal
of
working
with
the
youth
and
the
non-profit
organizations
within
the
city.
G
The
initiative
also
states
that
the
funds
should
be
used
to
honor
inglewood,
rich
our
rich
heritage
and
our
modern
identity
that
we're
developing
as
we're
moving
forward.
So
with
that
in
mind,
the
use
of
those
funds
to
augment
art
around
the
stations
for
those
individuals
who
are
going
to
be
visiting
coming
into
inglewood
would
be
able
to
be
used.
So
short
answer
is:
yes,
you
will
be
able
to
use
it.
I
H
F
Thanks
mayor
just
a
quick
question,
chris
first
off,
thank
you
for
the
presentation
very,
very
well
done
and
thought
out.
Obviously
you
put
some
time
and
effort,
and
we
appreciate
that
as
it
relates
to
this
presentation.
You've
done
for
us
what
other
presentations
have
have
occurred
throughout
the
city?
Are
you
can
you
kind
of
touch
on
that?
I
know
a
couple
of
the
folks
that
got
up
here
and
spoke.
I
F
G
Yeah
there
were
a
number
of
community
events
where
the
project
was
discussed.
The
initiative
was
discussed.
The
aspects
of
the
initiative
was
discussed.
Many
of
those
were
attended
by
city
staff
and
I
would
also
say
that,
as
it
relates
to
getting
the
information
out
as
in
the
same
fashion
as
we
used
with
all
of
our
staff
reports,
the
links
to
all
our
attachments,
the
there
were
information
that
was
put
out
across
the
board
to
make
sure
that
the
public
has
been
informed.
G
Absolutely
within
the
paper
on
our
website,
we
actually
created
a
drop-down
menu
adjacent
to
where
the
hollywood
park
specific
plan
was
on
the
planning
page
to
make
sure
some
of
those
documents
were
available
there.
There
were
documents
available
with
the
city
clerk
in
our
main
library,
so
we
we
really
went
all
the
way
out
to
make
sure
that
the
information
was
was
there.
But
I
would
say
to
your
point:
there
were
a
number
of
community
events
that
were
held
and
city
staff
was
in
attendance
with
many
many
of
those
great.
A
G
A
B
22
183
signatures
were
filed
with
the
city
on
january,
the
26th
county
evaluated
11
490
signatures
and
verified
8
500,
a
verification
rate
of
74
percent.
This
equates
to
more
than
16
400
signatures
in
support
of
the
initiative.
In
the
election
of
last
november,
the
total
was
fifteen
thousand
eight
hundred
thirty
one
people
that
voted.
A
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
I
have
a
question
for
is
the
police
chief
available.
J
A
Chief,
I
I'm
sorry
to
surprise
you
like
this,
but
back
here,
to
call
me
that
suit.
Okay,
if
the
stadium
will
know
when
the
stadium
is
built,
we're
going
to
have
significantly
more
people
coming
to
inglewood.
What
assurances
do
we
have
that
the
city
will
be
ready
to
accommodate
the
new
visitors
while
maintaining
public
safety.
J
The
initiative
requires
a
development
of
a
public
safety
management
plan
which
must
be
submitted
to
the
city
no
less
than
once
per
year.
This
will
include
an
interoperability
plan
to
ensure
communication
between
the
england
police
department,
l.a
county
fire
department
and
other
first
responders,
an
accounting
of
the
precise
number
of
personnel
that
will
give
required
to
ensure
safety
at
given
events
battling
a
cold.
Sorry
respect
that
fire
inspectors
are
signed
as
needed
in
preparation
for
major
events.
J
The
plan
will
require
the
construction
of
a
new
police
storefront
substation.
The
new
substation
would
be
built
at
the
expense
of
the
landowner
and
at
no
cost
to
the
taxpayers.
Finally,
the
landowner
would
be
required
to
regularly
consult
with
the
city
la
county,
fire
department
and
other
public
safety
personnel
in
order
to
continuously
improve
plans.
Based
on
the
experience
of
this
past
events,
I
think
that
would
more
than
adequately
cover
that
that
issue.
A
K
K
All
right
me
see:
oh
geez,
this
thing
is
a
little
different.
K
All
right,
we
were
retained
by
the
city
to
prepare
a
peer
review
analysis
of
the
fiscal
and
economic
analysis
that
was
prepared
by
hr
advisors
on
behalf
of
hollywood
park.
Land
company.
K
I
just
want
to
just
recap
just
quickly
the
the
development
program
that
is
permitted
under
the
initiative
and
the
analysis
that
was
was
undertaken
by
hrna
advisors
under
the
stadium
alternative.
Well,
under
the
initiative,
there
are
two
paths
that
the
developer
can
go
forward
with.
One
is
with
the
stadium
alternative.
The
other
is
with
the
existing
entitlements
that
are
in
place
and
under
the
under
the
stadium
alternative.
K
K
Under
with
the
full
entitlement
cap,
they
could
build
up
to
2995
residential
units,
620
000
square
feet
of
retail
75
000
square
feet
of
office,
300
hotel
rooms,
the
fiscal
and
economic
impact
analysis
that
was
done
on
behalf
of
of
hollywood
park,
assumed
a
slightly
lower,
build
out
for
the
under
the
no
stadium
alternative
with
the
maximum
residential
units.
But
with
the
retail
down
just
500
000
square
feet.
The
office
of
41
thousand
and
they
didn't
assume
that
a
hotel
would
be
built
under
those
entitlements.
K
A
key
metric
that
we've
that
you've
been
hearing
about
tonight
of
the
fiscal
impact
analysis,
is
that
the
city
will
retain
the
first
25
million
dollars
of
annual
tax
revenue
that
is
generated
by
the
project
and
to
provide
some
context
for
what
that
25
million
dollar
means
to
the
city
is
that
the
city's
general
fund
currently
has
a
budget
of
about
89
million
dollars,
so
25
million
dollars
of
additional
tax
revenue
it
exceeds
the
the
city's
current
general
fund
budget
by
in
excess
of
25
percent.
K
This
graph
shows
the
dotted
line
the
25
million
dollars
and
how
it
will
escalate
over
time
based
upon
the
the
consumer
price
index,
and
so,
as
you
can
see
in
year,
10
when
we
assume
that
build
out
will
be
achieved,
the
the
25
million
threshold
grows
to
actually
29.9
million
dollars
and
by
year
40
by
year.
25
is
anticipated
that
the
the
threshold
will
approximate
46.5
million
dollars.
So
it's
not
a
static,
25
million.
K
It
goes
up
over
time
with
the
cpi,
and
while
a
portion
of
the
25
million
dollars
will
be
used
to
fund
general
city
services
for
the
for
the
project,
excluding
the
services
that
that,
for
the
special
events,
as
you
can
see,
the
the
the
service
costs
are
in
red
and
the
green
area.
There
is
the
annual
surplus
that
is
projected
by
the
fiscal
impact
analysis
and,
as
you
can
see,
that
is
it's
a
significant
amount
of
surplus
that
is
anticipated
over
time.
K
K
Kaiser
marston
has
adjusted
that
gross
revenue
to
account
for
the
amount
of
revenue
that
the
property
currently
generates
to
the
city,
from
the
casino
and
property
tax
revenues
of
the
value
of
the
site
and
that's
approximately
1.1
million
dollars,
so
the
net
revenue
to
the
city,
the
net
new
that
we
anticipate
is
about
28.2
million
dollars.
K
You
subtract
from
that
the
cost
of
the
city
of
providing
municipal
services
for
the
commercial
components,
the
retail,
the
residential
and
that's
about
10.5
million
dollars
a
year
at
that
point
in
time
upon
full
build
out,
and
so
the
net
new
general
fund
revenues.
That's
anticipated
to
be
generated
by
this
project
is
17.7
million
dollars
that's
per
year
upon
build
out,
and
that
would
be
going
forward
and
that
amount
will
will
escalate
over
time
with
inflation.
K
If
we
bring
that
17.7
million
dollars
back
into
what
in
current
2015.,
that
net
surplus
is
about
13.2
million
dollars,
so
I
think
that
that,
in
our
opinion,
that's
that's
the
snapshot
of
what
this
project
will
generate
to
the
city
of
inglewood
on
a
stabilized
basis.
Going
forward
is
the
17.7
million
in
nominal
dollars,
13.2
in
current
dollars.
K
This
this
slide
compares
the
the
projection
under
the
stadium
alternative
to
the
the
surplus
or
the
impacts
under
the
existing
entitlements
and
the
as
you
can
see
in
this
chart.
The
existing
entitlement
project
is
also
projected
to
to
generate
a
surplus
to
the
city,
albeit
a
much
smaller
one.
That
surplus
is
estimated
to
be
about
4.9
million
dollars
a
year
and
with
after
in
current
dollars,
it's
about
3.3
million.
K
So
you
can
see
it's
it's
a
it's
just
a
fraction
of
what
the
stadium
is
anticipated
to
generate,
but
it
is
a
positive
and
therefore
natural.
We
come
to
the
opinion
that
there
really
isn't
a
a
financial
risk
to
the
city
on
an
operations
standpoint,
because
we're
projecting
positives
under
both
under
both
scenarios.
K
This
this
slide
is
to
illustrate
the
the
sources
of
revenue
that
will
be
that
will
generate
that
25
million
dollar
hurdle,
and
it
also
speaks
to
how
how
we
believe
that
that
25
million
dollar
hurdle
is
very
well
protected
and
that
the
city
can
have
confidence
that
it
will
in
fact
receive
this
25
million
dollars,
and
that
is
because
the
stadium
and
music
venue
on
its
own
is
generate
is
estimated
to
generate
revenues
to
reach
that
hurdle
point.
K
So
the
revenues
to
the
city
are
not
reliant
upon
the
phasing
of
the
balance
of
the
project.
If
the
retail
happens
or
doesn't
happen,
or
if
the
hotel
happens
or
doesn't
happen,
the
stadium
will
generate
revenues
to
meet
that
25
million
dollar
hurdle,
and
now
the
stadium
revenues
are
primarily
generated
because
of
the
city's
admissions
tax
that
it
passed.
That
applies
to
this
project.
It's
a
10
admissions
tax
on
all
of
the
the
ticket
sales,
and
that
will
generate
probably
approximately
18
million
out
of
the
25
million
is
from
the
admissions
tax.
K
Just
to
just
to
wrap
it
up
about
our
assessment
of
the
reasonableness
of
the
projections
that
hrna
prepared,
we
concur
with
them
that
the
project
will
reach
the
25
million
dollar
threshold
plus
inflation.
We
concur
with
their
expense
projection.
K
The
the
public
safety
will
will
be,
for
the
events
will
be
privately
funded
by
the
developer
and
it
will
be.
Those
costs
will
be
reimbursed
only
from
revenue,
that's
generated
above
25
million
dollars.
So
it's
a
contingent
obligation,
but
it
will
not
affect
that
base
25
million
dollars.
K
The
the
25
million
of
annual
revenue
is
well
protected
because
you
get
the
first
call
on
that
and
that
the
stadium
itself
will
generate
the
25
million,
and
you
also
have
the
potential
for
additional
revenues
beyond
the
25
million
dollars.
K
And
it
is
our
opinion,
however,
though,
that
because
the
first
call
on
those
revenues
beyond
the
25
million,
is
to
reimburse
the
developer
for
the
capital
costs
associated
with
public
improvements
and
then
also
to
reimburse
the
developer
the
land
over
for
the
cost
of
of
those
public
safety
for
the
the
special
events
that
there's
a
lot
more
uncertainty
with
those
upsides
with
that
pot
of
money
than
there
is
with
respect
to
that
base.
25
million
and
even
hrna
anticipates
that
that
upside.
K
It
really
amounts
to
approximately
10
percent
of
the
total
revenue
that
the
that
the
city
will
receive
over
the
25-year
study
period.
So
the
real
the
the
majority
of
the
city's
funds
will
come
from
the
revenues
under
that
25
million
dollar
cap,
and
we
are
very
confident
with
that.
With
that
revenue
source.
K
K
A
A
K
Yes,
but
yes
many
times
people
want
to
understand,
though
we
say
well,
we
already
have
the
1.1,
so
they
want
to
know
what
the
net
additional
that's
generated
by
the
project.
A
K
10.5
is
to
fund
the
cost
of
providing
all
of
the
city
services
to
the
to
the
project.
Accepting,
though
the
services
that
are
needed,
the
public
safety
services.
K
Will
be
paid
by
the
developer
so
for
the
residential
we
have.
The
city
has
a
police
standard
of
2.4
officers
per
thousand
residents.
That's
the
standard,
and
this
fiscal
analysis
was
based
upon
the
assumption
that
you
would
hire
that
level.
A
And-
and
this
is
why
I'm
saying
this-
I
want
to
make
this
clear
that,
with
any
development
of
this
stature,
there
will
be
ancillary
city
costs
that
increase
because
of
it
because
of
it
and
with
any
project.
It's
your
hope
that
everything
will
pencil
out
so
that
you'll
get
revenues
to
at
least
cover
the
increased
city
services.
But
in
this
case
we
end
up
with
a
bigger
police
department,
totally
financed
by
net
new
revenues.
A
K
L
K
We
do
not
know
of
any
financial
risks
that
are
the
project
presents
to
the
city,
because
100
percent
of
the
construction
costs
are
being
privately
funded.
The
developer
is,
is
advancing
all
of
the
funds,
so
the
city
will
not
have.
There
will
not
be
any
city
dollars
into
the
construction
costs
of
the
project
and
on
the
operations
side
there.
K
We
do
not
see
any
financial
risk,
because
the
the
revenues
that
the
city
will
get
under
that
25
million
dollar
cap,
as
we
can
see
by
that
chart
they're
far
in
excess
of
the
cost
of
municipal
services,
and
that
25
million
dollars
is
generated
just
by
the
stadium.
So
there's
not
a
lot
of
of
of
risk
associated
with
bringing
on
a
certain
amount
of
office,
space
or
retail
space.
It's
not
contingent
upon
that.
It
is
contingent
upon
the
stadium
being
successful
and
generating.
You
know
people
have
to
come.
That's
true.
K
You
have
to
have
people
in
that
in
those
seats
and-
and
it's
our
opinion
that
the
the
projections
of
attendance
are
are
consistent
with
what
other
stadiums
are
generating,
and
in
order
for
this
project
to
be
financed,
they
will
have
to
have
all
of
those
those
metrics
in
place.
With
the
projections
of
the
of
attendance,
you
have
to
have
those
you
know:
luxury
boxes
sold,
etc.
K
F
K
F
That
can
you
kind
of
go
over
how
that
number
increases?
What
is
it?
That's,
that's
going
to
attribute
the
increase
of
20
1000
21
million
dollars.
K
That
is,
that
is
purely
by
the
compounding
of
of
inflation
over
time.
K
If
that
by
year,
25
that
base
threshold
because
of
the
cpi
index
will
be
up
to
that
45
and
a
half
46.
A
A
F
F
You
did
the
you
know,
I
I
you
know
appreciate
your
analysis
and
you
and
it
was
very
thorough.
I
got
to
tell
you
I.
I
was
very
satisfied
with
with
the
work
you
produce.
Was
there
any
concerns
any?
I
guess
red
flags
that
came
up
for
you
during
your
analysis.
Was
there
anything
that
we
should
be
thinking
of.
K
K
The
only
the
only
areas
that
we
differ
is
really
on
the
way
that
we
qualify
those
revenues
beyond
that
hurdle
point:
okay,
that
we
look
at
them
as
being
of
greater
uncertainty
than
the
revenues
under
that
25
million.
That
goes
up
to
46.5
million
threshold.
So
great.
A
H
You've,
your
presentation,
thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
other
areas
where
the
city
may
receive
more
or
less
revenue
than
what
has
been
shown
in
the
slides.
K
Yes,
the
city
could
potentially
receive
more
revenue
because
the
prop
projects
anticipated
to
generate
more
revenue
above
that
threshold
and.
K
The
current
cost
estimates
are
about
92
million
dollars
and
that
will
inflate
over
time
with
there
will
be
carrying
costs,
to
the
extent
that
you
don't
have
enough
money
of
tax
revenue
beyond
the
threshold
to
pay
that
down
and
then
also
the
cost
of
providing
public
safety
for
the
special
events.
We
don't
know
what
the
staffing
requirements
are
going
to
be.
The
you
know,
police
department's,
not
certain
at
this
point,
they're
they're
investigating
that.
K
So
whatever
those
costs
will
be
is
what
they'll
be
and
the
developer
has
to
fund
those,
and
but
they
are,
they
are
eligible
for
reimbursement
of
those
from
those
additional
monies.
K
So
that's
why
we
say
that
that
is
the
amount
that
you're
going
to
get
beyond
that
that
growing
threshold
we
say:
there's
more
uncertainty
with
that,
but
on
the
flip
side
of
that
it's
it's
not
anticipated
that
that
I
mean
it's
it's
it's
a
small
portion
of
this
overall
package,
which
is
a
tremendous
amount
of
money
under
that
threshold,
and
but
it
could
be
higher
than
the
hra
has
projected
too,
because
they
haven't
included
some
of
the
revenues
that
are
are
key
revenues
to
a
project
such
as
media
contracts
and
things.
A
K
K
K
Is
derived
from
the
construction?
It's
construction
related
revenues.
There
are
the
the
construction
materials
generates,
use
tax
revenue
to
the
city.
The
city
also
has
a
construction
tax,
and
so
the
construction
itself
is
anticipated
to
generate
over
the
construction
period
about
55
million
dollars
of
tax
revenues
to
the
city
just
from
the
construction.
K
A
K
A
A
K
Effects,
you
know
you
go
out,
you
have
you
have
dinner
elsewhere
or
the
all
of
the
the
new
employees
and
their
expenditures
on
goods
and
services
within
inglewood
that
will
support
additional
jobs.
All
of
that
that
you
know
the
multiplier
effect
has
not
been
factored
into
these
revenue
projections.
These
are
solely
from
on-site
activities
and.
K
Well,
they
they
are
in
that.
Yes,
they
are
in
that
regard,
because
it
doesn't
include
the
multiplier,
but
it's
hard
to
count
on
those,
because
we
want
you
to
have.
You
know
a
a
very
a
high
degree
of
confidence
in
what
you
can
actually
count
on
and,
and
you
can
all
the
other
stuff
is
great.
And
but
you
need
to
know
for
budgeting
purposes.
What
money
is
real
and.
K
Okay,
now
we're
turning
to
economic
impacts,
and
so
fiscal
impacts
relate
to
tax
revenues
and
municipal
service
costs
and
economic
impacts
relate
to
jobs,
economic
activity,
salaries,
payroll,
it's
it's.
Those
are
the
kind
of
factors
that
are
economic
impacts
and
hra
measured.
The
economic
impacts
of
the
project,
both
during
the
construction
related
impacts,
as
well
as
ongoing,
impacts,
operational
impacts
after
the
project
is,
is
built,
and
it
is
estimated
that
the
project's
construction
alone
will
generate
about
22
hundred
seven
hundred
twenty
two
six.
K
Seventy
four
construction
jobs
and
those
construction
jobs
include
both
short-term
jobs,
full-time
jobs,
part-time
jobs
and
it's
not
throughout
the
whole
construction
period.
This
this
project's
anticipated
to
have
a
10-year
construction
period.
This
is
the
cumulative
number
of
construction
jobs
throughout
the
duration
from
start
to
finish
of
the
construction
of
the
project.
So
it's
a
little
bit,
it
can
be
misleading.
It's
not
you're
not
going
to
have
22
000
jobs
throughout
the
construction
period.
K
Construction
costs
are
estimated
to
be
3.7
billion
dollars,
so
that's
the
cost
of
building
the
stadium,
building,
the
the
retail,
the
music
center
etc
and
the
homes,
and
so
that
3.7
billion
a
large
portion
of
that
will
be
spent
on
on
payroll,
which
then
translates
into
expenditures
in
the
local
community.
K
Under
the
no
stadium
or
the
existing
entitlements.
The
construction
jobs
were
to
our
estimated
total
about
7
500
construction
jobs
and
the
economic
output
of
about
1.2
billion.
So
again
you
can
see
that
the
you
know
the
stadium
alternative
generates
a
significantly
larger
economic
impact
than
the
no
steam
alternative
now
moving
to
the
ongoing
impacts
of
operations-
and
this
is,
I
would
say,
more
important
because
this
is
going.
You
know
after
when
the
project's
built.
This
is
a
recurring
every
year
and
it
is
estimated
that
the
project
on-site
jobs-
these
are
not
again.
K
This
is
just
jobs.
People
employed
at
the
stadium
at
the
office
on
site
at
the
retail,
the
hotels
about
10
500.
New
jobs
will
be
created,
ongoing
jobs,
they're,
not
all
full-time
jobs,
some
they're,
full
and
part-time
jobs,
but
they're
permanent
jobs
that
will
be
newly
created
by
the
project.
Under
the
no
stadium
scenario,
the
job
count
is
estimated
to
be
about
2
100,
new
jobs
in
inglewood,
so
this
is
not
county-wide.
This
is
inglewood
jobs,
and
these
are
on-site
jobs
in
the
project,
the
businesses
that
will
be
on
site.
K
So
these
are
the
the
retailers
the
office
businesses,
the
stadium.
When
we
look
at
the
the
gross
receipts
of
those
businesses,
it's
estimated
to
be
approximately
876
million
dollars
of
gross
receipts
and
that
gross
receipts
is,
we
believe
is
is
conservative
because
it
does
not
include
those
other
large
revenue
sources
that
the
stadium
will
generate,
such
as
the
media
contracts
and
the
sponsorship
revenue.
So
it's
conservative,
but
some
of
those
revenues
will
leak
out
of
the
community
too.
K
So
we
think
that
this
is
a
balanced
number,
probably
somewhat
conservative,
but
that's
again,
876
million
dollars
per
year.
A
large
portion
of
that
will
go
towards
salaries
and
those
people
that
you
know
that
that
are
employed.
There
will
then
spend
money
on
goods
and
services
in
the
community
that
will
in
turn,
support
the
creation
of
additional
jobs.
As
you
as
the
money
trickles
through
the
economy,
the
no
stadium
will
support
economic
output
of
about
109
million
dollars
a
year.
K
Oh
and
that's
it
so
and
just
in
summary,
we
we
didn't
find
any
red
flags.
We
concur
with
the
revenue
projections,
the
economic
projections
and
happy
to
answer
any
additional
questions.
A
Is
that
all
the
questions
for
kaiser
martin,
thank
you
debbie?
Could
I
have
mr
spars,
our
chief
finance
officer
come
in
for
a
moment.
A
Thank
you,
mr
sparzer.
The
question
good
evening.
The
question
I
have
is
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
reimbursements
by
the
city
for
the
public
infrastructure
and
the
public
service
costs
that
the
developer
pays
up
front.
A
But
I
I
want
to
know
what
our
methodology
is
going
to
be
to
ensure
that
the
city
captures
all
and
records
all
of
the
taxes
that
are
generated
from
the
project
in
the
stadium,
so
that
we'll
know
what
the
pot
of
money
is
before
there's
reimbursement
can
we
can?
Can
we
be
assured
that
that
money
will
flow
to
the
city
first
so
that
we
can
make
an
accounting
of
it
before
it's
disbursed
to
the
developers.
I
I
absolutely,
and
the
way
that
it
is
currently
set
to
function
is
that
those
fees
and
and
taxes
would
come
to
the
city
for
accumulation
and
then
recording
and
to
which
we
would
then
reimburse
hollywood
park
and
the
stadium
project
based
upon
their
actual
expenses,
that
they
then
submit
to
the
to
the
city
which
would
be
verified.
A
I
Absolutely,
and-
and
that
would
be
the
the
safeguard
that
we
would
have
in
place
so
that
we
knew
that
you
know
all
the
invoices
or
any
reimbursement
costs
that
had
to
be
paid
were
substantiated
by
review
by
the
city.
A
All
right,
chris,
I
was
back
to
you.
M
Good
evening,
mayor
and
council
again,
my
name
is
lewis
atwell
and
I'm
the
public
works
director.
It
is
the
public
works
department's
role
to
assist
the
planning
department
in
reviewing
potential
impacts
associated
with
land
development
projects
such
as
this
one.
As
such
public
works,
engineering
staff
have
carefully
reviewed
the
submitted
initiative
studies
and
concurs
with
the
methodologies
and
results
presented.
M
As
chris
jackson
mentioned,
these
reports
include
impacts
on
existing
water,
sewer
and
storm
water
infrastructure.
In
addition,
a
traffic
study
to
determine
potential
impacts
of
the
development
on
existing
streets
and
roadways
was
also
submitted
in
response.
The
city
hired
wildan
engineering
to
review
it
based
on
wildan's
review.
The
public
works
department
also
concurs
with
the
methodologies
and
results
presented
in
the
study.
This
also
includes
the
mitigation
measures
to
provide
a
more
detailed
overview
of
the
traffic
study
traffic
engineer
david
shinder
of
linscott
law
and
greenspan
is
here
to
present.
Thank
you.
N
C
N
N
So,
as
I
mentioned,
we
did
the
traffic
study
for
the
approved
project
and
traffic
studies.
As
you
may
know,
what
we
do
is
we
look
at
the
impacts
to
intersections,
because
that
is
typically
on
the
street
system.
People
driving
around
in
the
wood.
It
is
at
intersections,
particularly
signalized,
intersections
that
people
will
see
the
most
delay.
N
Also,
we
look
at
the
operations
at
intersections
on
a
peak
hour
basis.
We
look
at
the
weekday
morning
commuter
peak
hour,
usually
around
7
30,
to
8,
30
or
8
to
9
o'clock.
We
look
at
the
weekday
p.m.
Peak
hour,
generally
about
five
to
six
o'clock
for
the
hollywood
park
specific
plan.
N
We
also
looked
at
a
saturday
midday
peak
hour
generally
around
one
to
two
or
two
to
three
on
a
saturday
in
part
because
of
the
heavy
traffic
on
century,
near
all
the
retail,
so
those
intersections
were
evaluated
for
those
three
peak
hours.
N
In
addition
in
in
that
2009
eir,
in
addition
to
looking
at
the
238
acre
project,
we
also
incorporated,
as
by
the
requirements,
the
traffic
from
other
projects
in
the
area.
Most
notably,
we
assumed
a
800
000
square
foot,
retail
development
on
the
60
acre
parks,
parcel
that
is
just
to
the
north
of
the
238
acres
and
now
is
subject
to
these
revised
project.
N
We
also
in
that
prior
study
considered
traffic
related
to
other
speculative
projects.
In
that
time
there
was
a
lot
of,
I
guess,
enthusiasm,
a
lot
of
projects
that
were
kind
of
put
up
there
and
one
of
those
included
this
inglewood
promenade
project
of
about
1.8
million
square
feet
and
that's
was
located
across
the
street
at
the
corner
of
prairie
and
century,
and
also
as
part
of
that
traffic
study.
We
incorporated
a
a
fairly
high
growth
rate.
So,
besides
incorporating
the
traffic
from
all
these
known
projects,
we
assumed
a
growth
rate.
N
I
guess
a
multiplier
effect.
If
you
want
to
call
it
just
regular
background
traffic,
so
it
was
a
very
high
amount
of
traffic
that
we
evaluated
in
the
prior
study.
We
identified
the
mitigation
measures
to
mitigate
that
traffic
and
those
were
incorporated
into
the
conditions
of
approval
for
the
specific
plan.
N
So
2014
we
did
the
addendum
for
the
hollywood
park
project
and,
as
part
of
that
addendum,
we
did.
Some
updated
traffic
counts
at
the
key
intersections
for
the
same
peak
hours
and
what
was
I
guess
not
surprising,
because
we
are
seeing
this
in
other
parts
of
los
angeles.
We
noticed
that
the
the
traffic
counts
comparing
2006
to
2014.
N
So
just
doing
that
straight
comparison,
the
increase
in
the
am
peaked
hour.
The
weekday
and
peak
hour
was
substantially
less
than
what
we
had
forecast.
We
only
saw
about
a
three
percent
increase
in
amp
hour
traffic
and
for
the
weekday
pm
and
for
the
saturday
peak
hours
we
noticed
actual
reductions
or
decreases
in
traffic
about
13
to
10
percent
respectively.
N
This
chart
presents
an
example.
This
is
the
prairie
avenue
century
boulevard
intersection
and
the
the
group
of-
and
I
hope
hopefully,
oh-
won't,
work.
Okay,
okay,
so
the
the
three
bars
to
the
left
are
the
am
peak
hour.
The
three
bars
in
the
middle
or
the
weekday
pm
peak
hour,
three
bars
to
the
right
are
the
saturday
peak
hour.
N
The
blue
represents
the
traffic
that
we
counted
at
prairie
and
century
in
2006
and
that's
5824
cars.
That's
basically,
in
that
one
hour
between
five
and
six
o'clock,
we
counted
5824
cars,
basically
coming
into
the
intersection.
In
that
one
period,
the
red
bar,
the
8
860.
N
That's
what
we
had
forecast
in
the
prior
study
to
what
would
be
traveling
through
that
intersection
today,
without
even
the
hollywood
park
project.
So
that
includes
the
traffic
from
all
the
the
speculative
related
projects,
as
well
as
the
ambient
growth.
N
N
But
when
we
did
the
the
counts
last
year,
2014
the
green
bar,
it
represents
the
actual
count.
So
what
we
saw
was
number
one
that
the
growth
did
not
happen
in
traffic
and
number
two
is
the
the
actual
count
is
is
less
slightly
less
than
what
we
observed
in
2006
and
again.
I
should
point
out
that
this
is
not
just
unique
to
inglewood
we're
seeing
it
in
traffic
studies
that
we're
doing
throughout
los
angeles.
N
N
So
in
doing
the
updated
traffic
study
for
the
stadium
alternative
project,
we
felt
that
it
was
appropriate
that
we
not
include
the
traffic
from
the
speculative
projects
that
have
been
withdrawn,
such
as
the
englewood
promenade
project,
and
also
utilize,
a
more
appropriate
growth
rate
and
updated
growth
rate.
That's
been
published
for
traffic
engineers
to
use
in
more
current
studies
and
also
in
doing
the
updated
traffic
study.
N
We
started
as
a
baseline,
using
all
the
approved
identified
mitigation
measures
related
to
the
approved
specific
plan
and
identified
additional
improvements
that
would
be
needed
to
handle
the
traffic
related
to
the
to
the
stadium
alternative
and
particularly
the
stadium
project
itself.
N
Trip
generation
is
a
a
key
element
of
a
traffic
study.
It's
basically
our
forecast,
our
estimate
of
of
how
many
cars
we
would
expect
to
enter
and
exit
the
site.
Again
during
the
peak
hours
that
we
have
discussed
traffic
engineers,
we
typically
rely
on
published
documents
for
typical
land
uses
like
residential
and
retail
and
hotels.
N
We
also
had
some
updated
information
related
to
the
new
stadium
in
santa
clara,
and
we
also
took
a
look
at
proposals
for
other
stadiums
in
southern
california,
such
as
farmer's
field,
so
for
the
weekday
a.m
and
p.m
commuter
peak
hours,
as
well
as
a
saturday
midday
peak
hour.
What
we
found
is
that
for
the
non-game
days,
so
this
is
kind
of
regular
day-to-day
traffic.
What
we
determined
is
the
stadium
alternative
project
would
actually
generate
fewer
peak
hour
trips
than
the
approved
specific
plan
in
combination
with
the
eight
hundred
thousand
square
feet
of
retail.
N
That
was
proposed
on
the
60
acres,
which
is
now
incorporated
into
the
project,
and
the
specific
numbers
that
we
have
found
here
is
15.
Fewer
am
peak
hour
trips,
23
fewer
weekday
pm
peak
hour
trips
and
30
percent
fewer
saturday
midday
peak
hour,
trips.
A
N
All
right,
but
but
just
regular
day-to-day
traffic
there
will
be
less
traffic
generated
by
what
is
now
a
300
acre
site.
A
N
Okay
for
the
sunday
football
games
which
we're
now
discussing
the
75
000
fans
that
we
estimated
the
traffic
coming
to
the
stadium
would
be
less
than
than
the
approved
project,
and
that's
in
part
because,
as
you
have
probably
read
in
the
in
the
documents,
there
will
be
about
9
000
parking
spaces
set
aside
on
site,
a
minimum
9000
at
all
times
for
stadium
events,
but
part
of
the
transportation
plan
includes
utilizing
existing
parking
resources
that
are
close
by
so
that
we
don't
have
to
build
acres
and
acres
of
parking
or
mega
parking
structures
and,
in
addition,
the
the
project
will
have.
N
As
you
know,
a
a
shuttle
program
to
shuttle
people
to
and
from
the
transit
station,
currently
the
green
line,
and
then
in
the
future.
It
will
also
be
to
to
the
future
crenshaw
line.
N
So
the
local
area,
traffic,
if
you
take
in
the
project
itself,
is
plus
the
people
utilizing
the
off-site
parking
lots
that
would
be
higher
than
what
was
forecast
for
the
prior
project.
But
that
again
is
limited
to
the
few
days
a
year
that
we
have
75
000
people
coming
to
an
event.
N
So
this
is
a
chart
that
kind
of
goes
through
all
the
math
of
how
we
analyze
trip
generation
for
the
various
land
uses
again
going
down
the
column
to
the
left.
You
can
see
the
the
the
the
components,
the
residential,
the
retail,
entertainment
and
and
so
forth,
and
then
going
across
are
the
various
different
peak
hours,
the
first
site,
access
total
row
that
you
see
about
three
quarters
of
the
way
down
the
chart.
N
N
If
our
forecasts
were
correct
during
the
weekday
a
in
peak
hour,
for
example,
you
would
count
2
272
cars
and
that's
a
total
of
ins
and
outs
that
that
we
would
see
and
then,
if
you
go
down
to
to
the
very
bottom
there,
what
you
see
are
the
numbers
that
were
part
of
the
approved
hollywood
park.
That
was
in
the
eir,
the
2009
eir
for
that
project,
and
you
can
see
in
the
am
peak
hour.
The
number
was
at
2676.
N
so
and
those
numbers
the
differences,
get
larger
as
you
go
across
the
page,
and
that
was
in
part
because
and
the
reason
we
highlighted
the
yellow
bar
there
about
the
800
000
square
foot,
retail.
That
was
a
very
high
generator
of
traffic
that
was
included
in
in
the
prior
traffic
analysis.
N
And
this
is
taking
that
data
that
you
saw
in
the
last
chart
and
and
putting
it
into
more
of
them.
You
know
pretty
colors,
I
guess
it
is
showing
the
blue
is
what
was
forecast
in
the
2009
eir.
N
The
red
is
what
we
project
for
the
stadium
alternative
and
the
last
two
sets
of
bars
are
the
sunday
pre-event
and
sunday
post
event
and
again,
what
you
see
is
if
you
measure
traffic
around
the
site,
even
for
an
event
with
75
000
people,
we
would
see
less
cars
coming
in
and
out
of
the
site
during
those
peak
hours
there
will
be
other
traffic,
that's
happening
at
the
off-site
parking
lots
and
that
has
been
accounted
for
in
the
traffic
study,
but
actually
cars
going
to
and
from
the
close
to
300
acre
site.
N
So
for
the
conclusions,
as
as
we've
said,
the
the
stadium
alternative
project,
we
we
project,
will
generate
fewer
site,
generator
chips
during
the
peak
hours
and
that's
again,
the
combination
of
the
approved
project
with
the
800
000
square
feet
to
the
north
and
during
the
pre
and
post
event,
traffic
on
sundays.
N
It
would
generate
more
traffic,
but
it
does
not
result
in
more
impacts
because-
and
we
will
go
through
some
of
the
points
here.
But
it's
a
combination
of
lower
traffic
counts,
a
more
realistic
forecast
of
future
traffic
as
well
as
there
is
a
significant
package
of
transportation
improvements
that
have
been
proposed.
In
addition
to
those
that
were
part
of
the
original
project.
A
A
N
N
All
right
so
to
kind
of
wrap
up
the
points
that
I
want
to
make
this
is,
I
guess,
kind
of
the
elevator
speech
that
I'll
make
going
from
the
ninth
fourth
back
down
to
the
first
four
here.
Here
are
the
four
points
again
to
just
kind
of
reiterate
number
one:
we've
demonstrated
that
actual
traffic
volumes
at
the
study
intersections
throughout
inglewood
and
into
los
angeles,
have
decreased
since
2006.
N
N
Number
three-
and
I
think
this
also
helps
to
explain
you
know
why
is
the
300-acre
project
generates
fewer
trips
than
what
was
previously
approved
and
considered?
That
is
you
have
to
think
about
that
the
60
acres
was
originally
going
to
be
at
800,
000
square
foot
shopping
center
shopping
mall,
and
now
you
have
you're
more
or
less
replacing
it
with
a
stadium
which,
during
the
weekday,
will
have
very
benign
activity.
N
You
know
there'll,
be
some
employees
going
there,
but
otherwise,
during
the
day,
we'll
have
a
very
few
trips
and
again,
except
for
the
rare
weeknight
football
game,
as
well
as
the
game
day
traffic
during
sundays,
the
traffic
around
the
site
will
be
less,
but
that
traffic
happens
in
the
late
sunday
mornings
and
early
sunday
evenings
when
overall
ambient
traffic
levels
are
lower
than
during
the
weekday
commuter
peak
hours.
N
And
finally,
as
I
said,
even
though
there
is
less
traffic,
we
did
in
working
with
the
applicant,
develop
a
very
substantial
transportation
plan
to
handle
stadium
traffic,
because
I
know
people
want
to
stay
in
shop,
but
it's
my
job
to
move
traffic
or
recommend
measures
to
move
traffic,
so
that
included
funding
for
additional
traffic,
signalization
synchronization
on
the
boulevards
leading
to
and
from
hollywood
park.
So
that
would
be
all
the
traffic
signals
along
corridors
such
as
crenshaw
and
and
manchester
and
century.
N
In
addition,
we
recommend
the
street
widening
around
the
property
on
century
and
prairie,
so
that
they'll
be
separate
turn
lanes
so
that
cars
will
be
able
to
pull
out
of
the
through
lanes
of
traffic
slow
down
and
make
their
turn
into
the
project
and
thereby
reduce
the
delay
to
people
who
are
not
coming
into
the
project.
N
That's
my
presentation
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
H
O
Thank
you
very
much.
I
want
to
address
and
if
I
can
bust
out
well
also
come
up,
we
can
talk
about
the
transportation
mitigator
measures
as
I'm
reading
the
report
there's
been
concerns
as
you
in
your
last
slide.
If
you
leave
it
up,
there
does
address
about
adjusting
addressing
these
issues
of
traffic
congestion
or
mitigations.
O
Currently,
we've
had
the
the
form
and
their
their
venue
we've
had
over
the
years.
The
hollywood
park
activities
occur
at
the
same
time
now
we're
talking
about
bringing
in
this
massive
stadium
and
or
some
sort
of
sports
venue.
What
avenues
are
we
taking
to
deal
with
that
intersection
of
cintra
and
prairie
that
we
haven't
already
done
before.
N
Well,
so
the
the
the
project
program
includes
street
widening
of
century
to
add,
turn
lanes
and
that's
already
part
of
the
approved
specific
plan.
So
so
that
will
happen.
You
know
with
this
project
or
not,
but
there
is
the
requirement
today
to
widen
century,
to
add
a
turn
lane,
so
cars
can
make
a
right
turn
going
westbound
century
to
go
north
on
prairie,
so
that
will
be
a
new
dedicated
right
turn.
Lane.
N
That
land
will
the
project
applicant
will
be
required
to
dedicate
property
to
the
city.
So
in
order
to
make
room
so
that
that
right
turn
lane
can
be
provided.
O
And
also,
I
think,
it's
critical
to
acknowledge
that
your
study
went
just
beyond
the
boundary
lines
of
the
city,
as
you've
indicated
that
we're
talking
about
on
and
off
ramps.
All
the
way
include
the
405
through
a
the
110
and
the
105,
which
means
it.
It
now
has
an
impact
of
the
traffic
flow
and
the
civilization
of
those
intersections
as
well
coming
coming
in
and
out
of
the
city
of
inglewood.
N
That's
correct
and
the
study
looked
at
all
those
freeway
interchanges,
as
you
mentioned,
along
those
the
three
freeways
and
the
synchronization
program
that
would
be
implemented
for
inglewood
can
tie
into
existing
synchronization
systems,
that
are
in
say,
like
the
city
of
los
angeles.
So
the
two
systems
will
talk
to
each
other,
and
so
that
will
ensure
smoother
flow
out
of
inglewood,
into
los
angeles
and
onto
the
freeways
and.
O
Then,
with
the
green
gas
emissions,
we
have
the
issue
of
trying
to
reduce
the
amount
of
vehicles
on
the
roadway,
and
so
that's
where
it's
good,
that
we
have
public
transit
and
so
with
the
light
rail
coming
into
the
city
of
ingwood,
the
relocation
of
the
bus
terminal.
That
will
become
a
win-win
for
us
to
move
that
as
well,
along
with
our
mayor
being
on
the
metro
board.
F
Yeah,
I
have
one
a
couple
of
years.
Thank
you
mayor,
mr
schindler,
first
off
having
had
law
enforcement
experience,
and
I
was
in
involved
in
our
traffic
session
at
the
department
where
I
worked
at.
I
appreciate
the
clarification
you've
given
in
in
the
presentation
about
traffic
flow
studies
and
where
we
were
in
2006
what
it
ended
up
being
in
2009
in
your
environmental
impact
report.
F
F
We
have
other
traffic
calming
measures
that
you've
talked
about
synchronized
traffic
lights,
so
traffic
will
flow
smoother
turning
lanes
at
key
intersections
so
that
it
won't
prevent
or
will
help
prevent
gridlock
widening
of
the
streets.
All
these
things
are
going
to
be
beneficial
to
everyone
coming
not
only
to
events
at
the
stadium
or
at
the
hollywood
park
project,
but
also
the
forum
and
any
other
areas
here
in
englewood.
So
I
thank
you
for
clarifying
that
to
mr
atwell
as
it
relates
to
the
infrastructure
you
know.
F
M
As
most
of
people
here
know,
we
have
a
robust
history
of
providing
traffic
control
and
moving
traffic
in
and
out
of
the
city,
especially
with
the
former
hollywood
park,
40
000
visitors
during
the
heyday,
and
also
the
form
as
well
back
in
those
days.
There
wasn't
alternative
measures
of
transportation,
it
was
primarily
by
vehicle
and
it
was
one
to
two
people
per
vehicle.
Nowadays
we
have
the
metro
rail,
which
the
mayor
is
is
fondly
involved
with
and
also
we
have
more
taxis.
We
had
now
have
uber.
We
now
have
off-site
parking.
M
We
have
a
lot
more
alternatives
with
that
said,
the
study
that
mr
schindler
put
together
included
49
intersections
we're
going
to
synchronize
29
of
them
and
we're
going
to
widen
the
streets
along
prairie
and
century
boulevard.
In
fact,
our
century
boulevard
design
plans
have
already
incorporated
or
will
incorporate
in
the
construction
the
dedicated
left-hand
turn
lanes
and
there's
the
right-hand
turn
lanes
along
sentry
as
well.
So
I'm
confident
that
this
project
will
be
able
to
handle
with
the
mitigation
measure
we'll
be
able
to
handle
the
additional
traffic.
H
Has
a
question
I
just
have
one
regarding
signage:
I
know
that
there
was
a
long
description
about
what
I
know
that
some
of
the
the
neighbors
have
been
asking
okay.
How
is
that
going
to
impact
us
in
terms
of
how
bright
they
are
and
everything
else?
We
know
the
forum
put
up
the
one
on
prairie
in
manchester,
which
is
fine,
but
you
know.
G
G
E
E
The
form
has
a
limit
of
two
foot
candles
at
its
property
line
and
closer
to
the
building
and
under
the
columns
at
the
forum.
The
lighting
is
more
like
five
to
ten
foot
candles,
so
the
amount
of
lighting
we're
talking
about
here
from
signage
and
other
lighting
is
much
less
than
what
you
would
see
at
the
exterior
of
the
forum.
E
In
addition,
the
three
foot
candle
limit
is
the
same
limit.
That's
been
imposed
from
the
staples
center
and
there
are
additional
stadium
alternative
mitigation
measures
that
have
been
provided
here
to
ask
for
things
like
shielding
and
make
sure
that
the
the
impacts
from
lighting
and
glare
don't
affect
the
adjacent
residences.
O
We
have
kasia
there.
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions,
particularly
with
the
sound
the
noise,
so
I
want
to
deal
with
the
in
reading
the
report.
There's
a
number
of
comments
raised
about
the
decimal
levels,
particularly
if
it's
a
football
game.
It's
in
the
40
46
to
50
range
when
you're
talking
about
concerts,
it's
at
the
65
to
69
decimal
range.
What
does
that
mean
to
us
as
residents
as
far
as
how
do
we
equate
that
to
sound,
whether
it
be
a
lawnmower
or
what
can
someone
elaborate.
P
Yeah,
my
name
is
rob
carnahan,
I'm
also
with
kaja
we're
kind
of
a
two-headed
beast
here
tonight.
The
as
you
noted,
the
events
at
the
stadium-
and
this
is
detailed
in
the
9212
report-
will
generate
additional
noise.
The
specifically
the
decibel
rating
is
it's
a
little
hard
to
kind
of
get
your
your
ears
around,
but
essentially
it
comes
down
to.
P
Bird
calls
are
about
40
to
50
decibels,
so
the
sound
levels
of
for
a
football
game
that
we've
in
the
acoustical
analysis
that
was
done
for
the
9212
report
would
be
about
equivalent
to
what
you
would
hear
from
bird
calls
in
a
neighborhood
at
the
and
again,
this
is
at
the
location
of
the
residences
near
the
stadium
or
nearest
to
the
stadium
property
line
concerts,
which
would
actually
be
louder
than
a
football
game
would
still
be
at
the
level
of
a
normal
conversation
that
you
would
be
having
with
somebody
and,
and
these
would
be
at
the
closest
residences
to
the
stadium.
O
And
that
was
my
concern
because
there's
a
gated
community,
immediate
adjacent
to
the
property
called
the
renaissance,
and
there
was
concerns
raised
with
the
investment
of
their
properties
and
the
impact
of
the
noise
that
may
occur
in
the
events
occurring.
That
there's
been
some
mitigation
done
to
help
address
those
areas
of
concern.
So
I
appreciate
that.
P
There
is
we've
identified
over
50
000
parking
spaces
that
are
available
potentially
available
to
serve
the
stadium
and
33
000
of
those
spaces
are
within
a
mile
of
the
projected
stadium
site,
so
for
the
stadium
itself,
an
event
at
the
stadium
would
need,
let's
see
over
just
over
21
000
spaces.
O
Franklin,
I
just
have
one
more
question
and
I
reach
out
to
chris
for
someone
to
speak
on
your
behalf.
There's
been
a
lot
of
discussions
in
the
presentation
we've
had
today
about
jobs,
jobs,
jobs,
we
as
the
city
have
been
promoting
job
job
jobs,
but
local
hiring.
So
who
can
speak
on
with
these
30
000
jobs?
They
keep
talking
about
during
construction
or
after
construction
that
we
have
a
level
of
confidence
that
these
local
jobs
actually
will
in
fact
be
made
available
for
an
opportunity
for
inglewood
residents
to
be
able
to
have
those
jobs.
D
Question
good
evening,
mayor
and
city
council
members,
it's
an
excellent
question
and
I
think
I
actually
would
like
to
answer
it.
There's
the
the
items
that
are
written
in
the
initiative,
the
35.
Once
we
have
a
stadium
built
the
30
mb
dbe.
You
know
local
hire
requirement
the
15
apprentices
and
those
are
all
numbers.
But
your
question
is
actually
how
do
we
actually
achieve
that?
D
We
actually
have
in
the
audience
our
workforce,
outreach
coordinator,
michelle
from
turner,
construction
and
right
now
on
the
existing
project,
we're
over
at
43
local
hires
and
that's
actually
verifiable
through
our
local
reporting.
That
is
available
to
you
as
a
citizen,
but
we
actually
have
a
very
robust
workforce,
outreach
program
itself
to
actually
achieve
those
goals,
and
I
want
to
actually
back
up
a
little
bit
before
when
we
did
just
minor
renovations
on
the
casino
we
had
a
63
efficiency
rate.
D
That's
actually
higher
than
most
things
that
occur
in
the
city
of
los
angeles,
so
much
so
that
we're
being
awarded
by
the
greater
los
angeles,
african-american
chamber,
of
commerce,
an
award
based
on
being
able
to
meet
our
local
requirements
and
also
our
requirements
for
mbdb
requirement
as
well.
I
think,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
think
we
we've
been
here
for
quite
some
time.
We
have
a
very
personal
responsibility
to
be
able
to
meet
those
numbers.
D
I
think
we've
gone
over
and
above
we've
got
job
fairs
that
are
required
by
the
agreement,
but
we
do
the
over
and
above
those
we're
at
every
job,
fair,
including
not
our
own,
we're
at
the
job
fairs
that
include
the
kaiser
hospital,
that's
being
built
in
the
martin
square
area,
the
airport
expansion
project,
the
metro
project.
We
are
actually
at
every
one
of
those
recruiting
asking
for
locals.
D
D
I
want
to
say
we
are
well
above
every
percentage
now
before
this
project
even
gets
started,
and
I
would
just
say
that,
with
the
increased
number
of
jobs
that
makes
it
our
opportunities
that
much
more
available
to
the
locals.
Thank
you.
L
D
D
H
And
just
briefly,
I
mean
since
since
obviously
you've
been
involved
in
this
the
changes
into
the
project
and
everything
else.
How
is
that
actually
going
to
be
impacted
today?
Currently,
you
have
a
group
out
there.
That's
currently
working
on
the
approved
plan,
and
if
this
changes,
what
kind
of
pace
will
we
see
kind
of
slow
down?
Are
you
prepared
to
move
forward?
How
what
kind
of
impact
is
that
going
to
have
on
a
changing
project.
D
D
Once
we
get
this
kind
of
move
forward
initiative
move
forward,
we
will
then
actually
add,
on
top
of
that,
an
accelerated
schedule
to
be
able
to
start
construction
sometime
in
december,
so
but
right
now
we're
strictly
on
the
infrastructure.
So
right
now,
there's
a
very
slim
window
for
us
to
be
able
to
to
you
know,
get
into
gear
for
the
next
project.
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
mccullen,
and
mayor
just
before
we
move
on.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
you
know
all
the
years
I've
actually
been
on
the
council,
and
a
lot
has
been
said
today,
but
when
the
city
has
the
kind
of
opportunity
that
we
have
today,
it's
it's
an
amazing
time
and
it's
because
of
partners
that
kind
of
stuck
around
you've
been
around
for
seven
eight
years
we
hit
the
economic
crisis
and
and
we're
still
here,
and
it
turns
out,
we've
gotten
better
choices
to
make.
H
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
think
thank
you
all
for
the
great
report
and
plus
all
the
documents
you
gave
us
throughout
the
week.
I
really
appreciate
it.
A
A
We
have
to
put
it
to
the
ballot
for
a
vote
on
june,
2nd
as
we
called
for,
or
we
have
to
adopt
it
as
is
without
modification,
but
before
we
get
to
that,
you
know
we
there's
some
realities
that
we
have
to
deal
with.
This
is
a
proposal
to
build
a
stadium.
A
The
debt
service
on
a
billion
dollars
is
50
million
dollars
a
year.
Our
general
fund
is
89
million
dollars,
so
it
wouldn't
be
possible
that
we
have
a
billion
dollars
in
debt
because
we
couldn't
even
make
the
interest
payments
on
it
all
right
and
to
add
further
clarification
to
that.
When,
when
I
took
office
we
were
some
eighteen
million
dollars
structurally
upside
down,
meaning
on
an
average
we
spent
fifty
thousand
dollars
more
a
day
than
we
were
taking
in
in
revenue.
A
A
Those
type
of
steps
combined
with
recording
madison
square
garden
to
come
to
the
forum
they
spent
over
100
million
dollars
to
renovate
the
farm
in
2014.
It
was
the
number
one
concert
venue
in
the
greater
los
angeles
area.
They
had
twice
as
many
concerts
as
the
staples
center
because
of
that
and
and
hollywood
park
tomorrow,
breaking
ground.
We
were
named
the
best
neighborhood
in
los
angeles,
for
2014,
by
curb
la
which
is
internet
magazine
on
real
estate.
A
A
Then,
when
fred
rogan
bless
his
heart
every
day
on
his
radio
station
said
no
they're,
the
ones
that
don't
understand.
This
is
a
great
deal
for
the
citizens
they
pipe
down.
With
that,
then
we
got
to.
We
were
trying
to
get
around
the
eir,
even
though
we're
in
complete
compliance
with
sql
law,
which
provides
the
alternative.
If
the
people
want
this
to
come
forward,
and
then
when
that
became
clear,
then
suddenly
campaign
donations
became
an
issue,
and
I
want
to
address
this
really
up
front.
A
A
So
I
mean
this
cute
story
really
starts
getting
weaker
and
weaker
when
you
add
the
truth
to
it.
Now,
let's
talk
about
when
they
did
donate
to
me
in
2013,
we
were
at
a
crossroads
here
we
had
two
people
to
the
left
of
me
that
we
were
going
nowhere
with
sitting
in
those
seats
and
I'm
going
to
be
honest
with
you,
oh
to
the
right.
A
The
only
time
they've
donated
to
me
for
my
race
was
when
I
ran
for
reelection
and
I
think
they
donated
15
000
if
I'm
right
or
wrong.
But
what
I'm
saying
is
so
when
you
look
at
the
story,
the
story
was
meant
to
craft
this
impression
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
mayor
james
butts
now.
Why
would
you
do
that?
You
know
why?
A
A
A
No
one
has
had
public
infrastructure
cost
pre-loaded
by
the
developer,
and
definitely
no
one
has
had
public
safety
and
maintenance
costs
that
would
be
on
the
city's
debt
burden
fronted
by
the
developer
until
they
made
25
million
in
a
given
year.
So
I
read
a
an
opinion
page
thing
in
in
a
local
paper,
and
here
was
their
suggestion
that
the
council
not
take
this
up.
A
A
A
We
have
common
sense,
there's
some
very
there's
a
businessman
on
the
corner,
some
very
educated
people
on
this
council
and
we
have
a
responsibility
to
the
to
what
amounts
to
about
16
000
people
that
doing
extrapolation
would
be
verified
signatures
more
people
than
voted
in
the
last
election,
which
I
had
13
000
some
votes
and
and
and
won
by
83
percent.
So
what
more
do
you
need
to
know?
H
A
F
A
A
B
Okay,
first,
I
want
to
give
thanks
to
my
office,
because
through
this
process
it
was
pretty
intense.
When
you
see
42
boxes
come
with
stacks
and
stacks
of
signatures,
22
000.
That
was
a
lot.
It
was
overwhelming
and
we
got
it
done
in
a
couple
of
hours,
and
I
also
want
to
thank
yakima
decatur,
because
I
called
her
and
I
asked
her:
could
she
come
down
and
help
and
she
she
said
yes
and
she
came
without
any
reservations
so,
and
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
miss
aisha,
phillips.
Congratulations.
L
We
get
all
this
credit
to
council,
but
we
have
a
staff
that
worked
harshly
to
give
us
information
that
we
need
to
get
these
jobs
done.
So
my
kudos
go
to
the
staff,
they
have
really
put
us
on
top
and
with
the
leadership
of
the
mayor
and
let's
back
him
up,
we
got
it
done,
and
I
think
this
is
one
for
the
history
books.