►
From YouTube: IURA Board Mtg.
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Here
is
here
so
I
told
me
to
order
at
8
33
the
IRA
board
meeting
October
27.
Are
there
any
additions,
deletions
changes
to
the
agenda?
A
Okay,
right
and
just
to
remind
everybody,
we
will
have
some
remote
participants
today,
who
are
just
here
for
presenting
some
information.
Therefore
the
speaker
on
the
table
is
really
important,
so
it's
helpful
I
think
if
you
also
use
the
mic
here
that
picks
up
and
then
it's
the
camera
should
circle
around
to
you,
if
you're
speaking
well,
so
to
get
used
to
this
different
technology
than
the
technology
like
Charles
and
is
there
any
public
time?
A
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
let's
move
into
the
economic
development
Community.
Then
first
item
is
Inlet
Island
urban
renewal
project.
You
have
a
resolution
in
your
packet
to
approve
next
to
forward
demograph
disposition
and
development
agreements,
and
we
review
this
with
the
economic
development
committee
as
well
as
to
developer
earlier
in
the
in
the
month.
So
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
couple
of
comments.
We
then
have
Jacob
from
when
I'm,
planning
and
design
where
things
can
give
the
board
a
quick
overview
of
some
of
the
changes
from
the
last
time.
A
You
look
at
this
and
then
we'll
open
it
up
for
discussion
so
really
quickly.
The
IRA
sent
the
development
team
English
development,
some
feedback
at
the
end
of
August
on
their
submission
earlier
that
month,
with
changes
and
recommendations
that
usually
before
before
authorized
agreement,
the
development
team
came
back
in
early
October
with
some
revisions.
We
reviewed
those
that
committee
and
found
them
basically
satisfactory
and
they
made
some
good
discussion
about
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
things
just
to
kind
of
make
Clarity.
A
But
we
made
no
changes.
I,
don't
think,
or
maybe
one
climate
change
related
to
the
Coast
Guard
deliveries
use
of
the
facilities.
So
that's
why
it's
Jacob
from
winning
planet's
title
with
you
today,
so
we
can
have
discussion
with
this
book.
B
Sure
thank
you
good
morning.
Everyone
so
I'll
run
through
this
fairly
quickly
and
then
leave
it
open
for
any
questions
you
might
have
so
I
I
expect
everyone
is
fairly
familiar
with
the
site.
B
The
inlet
Island,
with
the
old,
organic
Boulevard
running
down
the
length
of
it
out
towards
the
Boatyard
Grill
at
the
at
the
point
and
Lookout
Point
there,
as
well
as
the
boat
storage
sheds
of
Finger,
Lakes
boating
Center
and
the
the
large
parking
lot
areas
and
both
storage
areas
on
the
other
side.
These
are
the
existing
property
lines.
You
can
see
they're
a
little
out
of
date
based
on
previous
conditions
on
the
island
Before
the
Flood
Control
channel
was
constructed.
B
There
are
two
major
easements
running
across
the
island:
the
eec,
flood
control,
easement
on
the
inlet
side
and
the
NYSEG
easement
for
the
power
lines
that
cross
the
island
there's
also
existing
utility
poles,
which
helps
to
drive
our
layout
proposal,
based
on
on
some
that
that
can
be
moved,
and
some
that
cannot,
as
well
as
the
need
to
maintain
the
street
right
away
down
the
length
of
the
island.
B
B
There's
also
additional
areas
of
the
island
that
are
needed
for
just
emergency
access,
as
well
as
DEC,
has
rights
to
existing
parcel
up
here
at
this
end
for
Access
for
their
planned
dredging
efforts.
B
So
that
leaves
the
available
Development
Area
shown
here
in
purple,
and
this
is
the
plan
that
we
have
already
presented
to
the
EDC,
showing
all
of
the
elements
that
we
are
proposing.
B
At
the
south
end,
we
have
a
surface
parking
lot
to
accommodate
the
required
parking
quantity
that
was
called
for
in
the
RFP.
We
have
the
inhs
apartment
building,
which
will
be
one
of
the
two
buildings
we're
proposing
for
the
site
that
will
have
first
floor
parking
underneath
as
well.
C
B
A
private
amenity
space
on
the
water
facing
side,
we're
also
proposing
to
provide
a
public
playground
area,
a
food
truck
utility
Plaza
and
a
public
access
new
and
kayak
launch
ramp.
B
This
area
here
is
left
as
a
flexible
space
that
will
be
used
for
the
maneuvering
of
boats
during
the
all-in
all-out
season
and
we're
also
in
conversations
with
the
dec
making
this
available
to
them
for
their
dredging
work
as
well
to
alleviate
the
pressure
of
their
equipment
at
the
North
End
of
the
island.
B
You're
also
asked
to
provide
kayak
storage
on
the
site,
and
so
we
are
showing
that
outside
of
the
easement
line,
since
any
permanent
vertical
structure
is
not
allowable
within
that
30
feet
from
the
water's
edge,
we're
proposing
to
pave
and
expand
the
existing
spur
trail
that
connects
back
to
the
Cuba
Waterfront
Trail
along
the
west
side
of
the
island
and
have
that
connected
to
the
rest
to
decide
what
network
that
we
are
proposing
with
internal
pedestrian
circulation.
B
At
the
North
End
of
the
development
site,
we
have
the
Finger
Lakes
development
building,
which
will
be
a
long-term
Stay
Hotel
we've
dubbed
the
stays
temporarily
that
will
have
a
private
outdoor
amenity
space
for
tenants
and
and
users
of
the
hotel,
as
well
as
a
more
public
laws
of
space
at
the
North
End.
That
will
respond
to
an
interior,
lounge
and
Cafe
space
in
the
lobby
of
the
building.
B
We
also
have
shown
improved
extension
of
the
trail
out
to
Lookout
Point
and
we're
exploring
the
possibility
of
having
an
additional
floating
dock
at
that
end,
that
will
be
Public
Access,
as
well
as
making
the
existing
floating
dock
on
the
west
side
of
the
island,
which
is
currently
for
use
by
the
Coast
Guard
auxiliary,
only
we're
exploring
making
that
more
publicly
accessible
as
well
foreign.
B
We
have
several
diagrams
illustrating
the
breakdown
of
the
different
components
of
this
plan.
B
Basically
noting
here,
all
those
improvements
within
the
purple
boundary
are
those
which
the
development
itself
is
able
to
commit
to
providing
as
part
of
this
development
plan,
those
circled
in
the
pink
or
orange
salmon
color.
Here
we
will
make
our
best
effort
to
accommodate
and
accomplish,
but
they
will
require
significant
coordination
and
approval
with
mostly
the
dec,
but
also
for
the
kayak
launch
ramp.
B
B
We're
also
showing,
on
our
plans
future
proposed
improvements
that
we
understand
to
be
planned
in
the
near
future,
from
the
Boatyard
Grill
and
Finger
Lakes
development
groups.
B
Again
we
are
showing
these
and
how
our
plan
would
connect
and
and
and
work
with
these.
However,
we're
not
able
to
commit
to
these
portions
of
the
work
because
they
are
on
private
property.
That
is
a
separate
ownership.
B
And
we're
just
detailing
here
again
at
the
request
of
the
EDC,
a
clear
delineation
between
those
areas
of
the
site
which
would
be
open
to
the
public
and
those
areas
which
would
be
more
private
to
tenants
and
Residences
at
both
of
these
two
proposed
buildings.
Basically,
the
area
in
red
is
areas
that
would
be
private.
The
rest
of
the
site
would
be
public.
B
You
can
see
that
all
of
the
parking
spaces
on
the
site
are
shown
in
the
the
public
area.
It's
our
understanding
that
there
will
be
a
a
unified
parking
management
plan
in
order
to
allow
for
all
of
the
parking
spaces
on
the
island,
with
the
exception
of
a
few
that
are
necessary
for
inhs's
residences
to
be
publicly
available.
B
That
is
the
the
extent
of
the
presentation
that
I
have
prepared
for
you.
There's
some
additional
backup
information
and
building
program
in
the
the
agenda
package,
but
I
think
I'd
open
it
up
to
any
questions
you
might
have
foreign.
A
A
And
that,
if
they
needed
to
use
that
space
any
other
time,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
they
had
access
at
the
best
available
rate
that
the
hotel
offered
other
similar
users,
so
that
clarified
the
use
of
the
postcard
exhilarities.
As
we
recall
from
our
last
meeting
that
building
has
to
be
removed
due
to
dec's
requirements,
and
the
second
is
just
the
point
that
Jacob
made
is
that
there
are.
A
We
need
to
use
cooperation
to
do
some
of
the
things
that
are
in
this
plan,
so
that
floating
dock
at
the
top
point,
and
actually
he
also
referenced
that
the
other
doc
there
that
is
actually
in
the
flood
control
channel
that
exists
currently
to
make
that
Public
Access
requires
cooperation
DC
and
obviously
we
hope
that
they
will
be
amendable
to
that.
A
The
other
thing
that
he
called
out
Jacob
can
you
bring
up
the
slide
again?
That
has
a
private
uses
the
slide
before
this?
That's
not
the
problem
right,
it's
the
ones
where
you're
cooperating
with
other
property
owners
on
the
island.
So
we
have
some
discussion
here.
We
go
to
this
one.
You
know
these
are
modifications
here
that
could
be
completed
by
existing
Property
Owners.
A
We
left
it
at
the
business
owner's
discretion
and
yet
at
the
North
End,
it's
really
some
enhancements
for
transport
for
pedestrian
flow
around
the
Boatyard
Grill,
which
they
can
kind
of
zoom
in
there
there's
some
modifications
that
are
being
proposed
and
then
other
modifications
just
kind
of
open
up
the
families
development
space.
And
if
you
had
questions
about
those
Steve,
you
could
probably
address
both
of
those
more
adequately.
That
might
be
one
more
thing
before
we
open
it
up.
Nails.
D
Traging
and
all
of
that
sure
yeah
we've
had
some
really
good
negotiations.
D
Steve
has
been
involved
in
those
negotiations
in
terms
of
terms
for
acquiring
the
building
of
508
Organic
Gold
Boulevard,
which
is
licensed
by
the
Coast
Guard
auxiliary,
and
it's
turned
out
that
it's
been
a
timely
discussion,
because
DEC
is
exploiting
how
they
would
dredge
the
flood
control
Channel,
as
well
as
the
cube
Inlet,
and
it
turns
out
that
there
are
some
opportunities
here
to
facilitate
that
dredging
activity
in
in
part
of
this
negotiation.
So
we've
kind
of
got
to
a
preliminary
conceptual
agreement
about
how
this
could
work.
D
It
would
be
a
land
exchange,
From
dec's
perspective.
They
would
trade,
essentially
the
Coast
Guard
auxiliary
property
to
the
city,
which
we
would
then
convey
to
the
developer
at
Cost
at
the
city's
class
in
return
for
easements
permanent
easements.
That
would
facilitate
the
The
Dredge
activities
and
removal
of
encroachments
into
the
dec
permanent
easement.
So
the
flex
space
that
was
on
the
far
left
side
is
targeted
as
a
good
spot
for
dredge
based
facility
activities,
a
pump
and
equipment
in
that
area.
D
Right
next
to
the
Route
89
Bridge,
which
could
also
function
as
a
flex
space
for
boating
operations
and
also
they
also
seek
an
easement
to
the
canal.
The
I
guess
you
called
The
Q
Inlet
next
to
the
boat
launch
area
or
near
the
Boulevard
area.
Further
further
west
on
that
plan,
there's
a
little
easement
that
goes
through
through
to
connect
to
the
Waterfront,
so
they
want
to
have
an
ability
to
connect
to
both
waterways
from
the
island
and
so
they're.
D
Looking
at
the
flux
spaces
as
a
permanent
easement
location
in
return
for
conveyance
of
the
deed
of
their
DC
property
of
the
northern
part
of
the
island,
not
not
the
Lookout
Point,
but
the
Coast
Guard
auxiliary.
The
BC
is
also
requesting
removal
of
encroachments
into
the
easement.
You
can
see
that
there's
a
little
bump
out
right
where
that
line
is
going,
which
is
a
corner
of
the
quest
building,
as
well
as
a
foundation
from
the
former
egg
wave
field
building,
which
is
just
another
100
feet
or
so
to
the
left
on
this
plane.
D
D
You
know
compared
to
the
value
of
fair
market
value
of
the
land,
and
the
difference
would
be
the
purchase
price
if
there's
any
at
all,
in
which
case
the
city
we've
looked
at
the
developer,
to
pay
that
price,
so
it
would
be
neutral
to
the
to
the
city,
but
there
would
be
easements
permanent,
long-term
easements
put
on
property,
that's
currently
City
on
property,
and
that
would
be
part
of
the
negotiations
as
a
timing
to
make
sure
it's
it's
a
fair
exchange
and
we're
not
limiting
rights
of
the
city
prior
to
gaining
access
to
ownership
of
the
property.
D
But
it's
been
very
fruitful
and
they're,
very
supportive
of
the
public
access
and
the
docs.
You
know
in
in
that
area
and,
however,
everything
in
the
dec
easement
needs
a
permit
and
they
can't
pre-commit
approvals
of
permits
without
going
through
the
application
process.
E
D
Yes,
so
it
could
be
used
for
other
things.
It
would
other
activities
that
are
structures
or
buildings
would
require
a
permit
around
that
area
if
it's
part
of
the
flood
control
project
and
so
we're
looking
at
whether
there's
two
types
of
easements
one.
That's
part
of
the
flood
control,
which
is
pretty
restrictive
and
requires
DEC
approval
for
accidents,
another
one
will
be
an
access,
he's
meant
that
would
be
less
restrictive
and
that's
we're
hoping
to
maximize
the
less
restrictive,
easement
density,
property
and
minimize
the
more
restrictive
ones.
D
But
the
proposed
use
does
import
basically
with
this
plan,
because
that
flexority
is
designed
for
both.
You
know
temporary
and
storage
in
and
out
and
and
doesn't
appear
to
conflict
for
that
drudge
activities
where
the
Coast
Guard
auxiliary
property,
where
they
could
do
it
now
under
their
own
ownership.
It
creates
you
know
it's
a
pinch
point
up
there
there's
a
lot
of
activity,
it's
much
more
Scenic!
You
know
in
that
location
where
you're
further
away
from
the
highway.
D
So,
that's
why
we
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
pursue
the
negotiations
that
have
been
blessed
by
by
those
who
don't
have
the
final
decision.
Making
power.
E
G
Yeah
I'll
Echo,
the
thanks
to
yells,
also
thanks
to
the
developer
and
to
working
with
inhs
I
think
this
is
a
terrific
project.
If
you
have
a
question,
how
is
concern
of
mine
is
the
amount
of
surface
parking,
and
so
we
had
discussions
about
the
need
for
green
space
and
one
question
I
have
about
this
easement
the
flex
space
I
know
that
will
be
temporary
boat
storage
space
as
bugs
are
transitioning
seasonally,
but
how
much
Green
Space?
Will
there
still
be
available
for
public
use
in
that
Plex
space
triangle?.
H
I
would
anticipate
that
it
will
be
I'm.
Sorry,
okay,
I
would
anticipate
that
it's
going
to
have
to
be.
Let
me
get
Jake,
probably
knows
the
term,
but
they're
kind
of
hard
grease
grass
area.
So
it's
not
to
be
flat
and
unobstructed.
H
If
the
dec
is
not
down
there,
that
space
will
be
available
for
the
kayak
people
will
be
able
to
arrive
there
and
utilize
it
and
it's
across
from
where
we
would
anticipate
if
there
are
food
trucks
and
that
sort
of
activity,
so
I'm,
not
sure
there'd
be
any
definition
to
it.
You
know,
I,
don't
know
how
we
would
Define
it.
H
It
would
be
those
developers,
property
and
the
use
of
it
would
have
to
be
permitted,
even
so
because
the
BEC
will
have
a
permit
that
covers,
but
sorry
they
will
have
an
easement
that
covers
the
whole
lot
at
all
times,
so
any
activity
would
have
to
be
permitted,
but
it's
a
Flex
Pay,
so
it'll
be
available
other
than
in
the
fall
and
in
spring,
when
we
are
transitioning.
B
Boats
and
that's
a
good
thing,
yeah
and
I
think
the
term
would
be
reinforced
lawn,
so
it
would
be
a
pervious
surface,
but
still
drivable
in
the
intermittent
use
that
it
would
have
vehicles
moving
across
it
and
yes,
I
I
thought
was
that
it
responds
well
to
the
this
Food
Truck
Plaza
area
and
playground
space,
as
well
as
the
additional
public
lawn
on
this
side
of
the
anchor
building,
and
that
that
during
an
event,
it
provides
ample
spillover
room
for
activity,
but
obviously
impermanent
activity.
H
Carlos
I
have
a
couple
of
questions,
but
since
we're
on
the
this
section
of
the
development,
are
there
seating
areas
around
the
food
truck
parking
area,
so
otherwise
people
get
their
food
and.
B
Yes,
yes,
so
so
first
first
I
would
say
that
you
know
this.
This
is
a
preliminary
plan
for
the
development
and
the
site
plan
will
undoubtedly
change
as
it
goes
through.
B
The
planning
report
approval
process,
as
well
as
as
the
the
buildings
reach
a
higher
level
of
development
and
design,
but
our
thought
was,
you
know,
with
the
there's
going
to
be
some
grade
change
needed
on
the
site,
and
so
we
were
looking
to
build
in
these
seating
walls
all
along
the
the
Waterfront
side
that
would
allow
for
bench,
seating
style
all
along
here,
as
well
as
we're
showing
some
some
Boulder
seating.
B
Just
around
this
little
Dash
white
line
is
sort
of
where
the
we
entered
into
the
food
truck
might
Park.
So,
yes,
there
are
ample
seating
areas
that
are
all
within
the
public
realm.
This
space
here
is
sort
of
a
pulled
back
little
seating
Plaza,
trying
to
maximize
views
out
towards
the
water.
H
I
I'm,
sorry
I,
believe
Jacob
I
heard
you
say
that
improvements
to
the
trail
along
the
inlet
on
the
West
Side
may
happen
as
part
of
the
development
did
I
understand
you
correctly.
B
Yes,
so
because
they're
within
the
the
dec
easement,
they
would
need
the
approval
of
the
dec
to
be
put
in
now.
We
know
that
there
are
paved
trail
conditions
similar
to
this
throughout
ithaca's
Waterfront
and
in
other
locations
where
it
is
under
the
purview
of
the
dec.
So
we
expect
that
this
this
increased
Paving
here
will
be
something
they
will
allow,
but
we
don't
want
to
promise
something
that
we
can't
back
up
without
going
through
the
appropriate
process.
B
I
I
believe
this
property
would
also
still
remain
the
City's
property,
although
it'll
be
fully
within
the
dec
easement.
So
the
city
would
also
have
site
control
of
this.
In.
H
Conjunction
with
the
dec
and
and
related
to
that,
the
area
that's
shown
in
Blue
between
the
both
storage
shed
and
the
boat
yard.
You
can
make
your
way
around
that
to
the
north,
to
the
Lookout
Point.
H
So
again,
as
I
understood
you
to
say
that
the
owners
of
that
property
May
develop
the
trail
to
the
North
Point
or
the
Lookout
Point.
At
some
point.
B
So
yeah
so
there's
an
existing
sidewalk
here
on
this,
this
side
of
the
Boatyard
Grill
and
it
does
connect
back
up
to
the
the
parking
area
and
this
turnaround
concrete
area,
but
it's
a
little
bit
disjointed.
So
we
were
showing
proposed
improvements
in
this
section.
That
would
improve
that
connection,
but
we
are
offering
to
provide
a
connection
from
Lookout
Point
to
the
existing
sidewalk
at
the
property
line
at
the
Boatyard
girls
property
line.
B
So
it
would
we're
able
to
improve
that
connection
outside
of
the
the
private
parcel,
but
the
rest
of
the
connection
improvements
would
would
need
further
coordination
so
that
that
that's
really
all
that
is
is
there
is
a
connection,
but
it's
but
we're
proposing
improvements
to.
A
Yeah
I
would
just
say
also
that
you
know
we
talked
about
this
quite
a
bit
at
EDC
as
well.
There's
lots
of
interest
in
that
and,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
exact
circulation
patterns
right
are
going
to
be
different
about
the
plan
board
anyway
right,
so
there's
also
a
level
of
detail
of
like
where
exactly
you
know.
What
are
the
connections
you
know
are
probably
not
this
plan
if
I'm
not
the
plan
that
is
ultimately
eventually
thoughts
and
just
knowing
that
as
well.
H
A
Boatyard
property
yeah
agree
to
that
and
I
think
the
other
thing,
which
is
not
many
adults
here
just
to
make
a
small
opinion
point,
is
what
really
rejects
it.
Is
that
part
of
the
trail
on
the
89
bridge,
to
whatever
what
that
is
right,
which
is
on
sitting
property
I
believe,
is
probably
the
weakest
segment
of
all.
Actually
right,
and
so
you
know
I
already
might
want
to
Advocate
the
city
for
things
like
the
part
that
goes
in
part
of
islands.
Right
is
literally
a
narrow
footpath
there,
so
I
said
Tracy
and.
E
My
question
is
about
the
parking
all
of
the
parking
if
we're
under
the
anchor
correct.
B
E
E
B
So
the
the
number
of
spaces
was
actually
required
as
part
of
the
RFP
that
that
came
from
the
iura,
so
so
part
of
in
part.
All
of
the
parking
is
meeting
that
core
requirement
of
the
the
development
proposal.
As
far
as
the
specific
who
will
use
what
Steve.
Maybe
you
want
to
speak
to
that
you're
more
familiar
with
this
than
anyone
else.
D
In
that
the
IRA
required
80
parking
spaces
for
public
shared
use,
which
is
above
that
area
on
the
left-hand
side,
and
that
was
personally
to
support
the
other
businesses
on
the
island
on
both
sides
of
Route
89.
But
we're
expecting
this
to
be
all
shared
public
use
parking
at
dinner
hours.
So
what
your
grill
is
going
to,
you
know
spread
out
more
demand
during
live
music
X.
You
know
they're
going
to
be
a
different
Focus
during
January
work.
D
You
know,
Health
Club
demand
it'll,
be
focused
on
on
the
South
Side,
so
expect
that
we
can
get
the
most
use
with
the
least
number
of
parking
spaces
by
making
sure
they're
all
publicly
shared
spaces
and
and
that
that's
going
to
be
a
challenge
for
management
and
something
that
the
developer
is
discussing
with
the
city's
parking
division
and
how
best
to
manage
that.
D
D
We're
certainly
not
ruling
out
that
there
would
be
some
charge
for
parking.
It.
A
Right
and
just
Laura
and
I
would
also
just
talk
about
this
doing.
I
know
we
talked
about
the
center
prior
EDC
meeting.
You
guys
are
proposing.
You
know
some
sort
of
managing
at
all
as
one
piece
but
managed
by
the
development
Can
Be
Imagined
by
the
city,
who
would
be
managing
like
if
we
said,
went
to
an
added
based
approach
similar
to
what
we're
using
in
downtown
would
that
be
matched
by
the
city
and
would
be
the
same
system
would
be
managed
by
the
adult.
D
I
think
we
kind
of
decided
that's
really
more
of
an
issue
of
the
site
plan
review
stage
and
the
work
with
City
parking
and
Engineering,
because
there's
some
there's
quite
a
bit
of
parking
in
the
right-of-way
that
has
to
be
figured
out
how
that's
managed
you
know
who's
going
to
manage
it.
D
What's
going
to
be
authorized
in
that
area,
so
it's
not
just
a
private
development,
Private
School
site
that
will
be
open
for
public
parking,
so
I
think
it
needs
to
have
pretty
strong
engagement
with
the
with
the
cities,
the
division
of
parking
to
figure
out.
What's
the
best
approach
we
planted
essentially.
E
A
Yeah
Jacob,
can
you
bring
out
that
we
can
also
clarify?
This
is
easy,
so
there's
actually
two
answers.
That
is
the
part
that
comes
up
the
right
one.
So
the
part
that
is
the
current
road
right
away.
So
the
part
that
is
right
there,
that
is
highlighting,
is
city,
responsibility
and
then
the
part
on
the
other
side
of
those
trees
that
is
adjacent
to
that
is
actually
the
developer's
responsibility.
A
D
B
For
the
sake
of
completion
that
there
are
a
few
minor
improvements
that
we
are
proposing
as
part
of
this
development
in
the
city
right
of
way,
but
that
would
not
significantly
change
the
majority
of
the
existing
condition
of
teganic
Boulevard.
It's
a
we
do
want
to
provide
a
crosswalk
at
this
end
to
have
better
connectivity
to
the
other
spur
of
the
Waterfront
Trail
over
and
and
to
move
pedestrian
traffic
to
the
west
side
of
the
island,
so
that
it
has
less
less
foot
traffic
on
teganic
Boulevard.
A
Other
City
roadway
leads,
but
you
know
we'd
be
ashamed
to
kind
of
do
all
of
this
work
and
leave
that
current
condition
in
place.
I
I
want
to
add
that,
on
yesterday's
d,
slash
gave
me
a
tour
of
the
parcel
and
I
was
very
fortunate
to
be
there
with
the
phone
calls
and
operations
in
progress
which
I
found
fascinating
and
I
I
didn't
have
to
imagine.
I
could
really
see
the
kind
of
work
that
he's
talking
about
and
I
thought
all
along.
Since
I
was
in
Council
that
we're
the
city
is
asking
a
great
deal
of
the
developers.
We
have
conflicting
interests.
We
want
to
provide
affordable
housing.
We
want
to
have
access
to
the
water
department.
I
We
want
to
promote
tourism,
we
want
to
promote
green
space,
we
want
to
minimize
imperative
services,
and
so
we
have
to
be
really
clear
about
how
we're
going
to
prioritize
these
demands
without
making
it
impossible
for
this.
For
this
to
work,
I
think
this
is
what's
offered
as
a
great
compromise
among
competing
values.
I
think
and
I
certainly
hope
it
works
and
I
hope
that
the
vote
yard
remains
a
thriving
business.
I
mean
it's
Central
to
our
Waterfront
tourism
economy.
I
mean
I.
I
Think
we
need
to
recognize
that
that
there
already
is
tourism
there,
it's
already
bringing
in
dollars,
which
is
one
thing
that
we're
asking
for
I.
Think
that
we
need
to
keep
that
in
mind.
Thank
you.
J
Hey
Brother
thanks
so
now,
I
applaud
the
the
efforts
to
make
sure
there's
good
public
access
to
the
inlet
Island,
because
that
is
of
course
something
that
we've
always
been
interested
in.
I
do
have
a
question,
though
I
mean
I
know
we
had
some
early
conversations
about.
J
You
know
ground
use,
active
space
and
that
Pro
approved
difficult
to
Define,
but
but
in
the
con
and
I'm
happy
to
see
the
food
truck
space
there,
although
from
a
scale
perspective
and
I,
think
what
you
heard
it
sounds
like
it's
just
room
for
one
food
truck
and
probably
not
much
else
so
I
applaud
all
those
efforts.
I'm
curious,
like
especially
with
the
boat
ramp
near
the
bridge
and
the
floating
dock.
J
H
B
Well,
I'll
I'll
answer
the
the
food
truck
question.
You
know,
basically,
because
this
is
next
to
the
flex
space
in
the
event
that
there
is
a
demand
for
more
food
trucks
in
this
location.
B
You
know,
and
food
trucks
being
a
very
impermanent
fixture
that
can
can
be
relocated
if
there's
any
sort
of
conflict.
This
could
easily
expand
out
into
this
space.
If,
if
we
wanted
to
have
an
event
here
with
multiple
food
trucks
and
just
extend,
you
know,
the
utility
hookup
is
really
potable
water
and
electric
and
that's
that's
it
so
that
that
can
pretty
easily
be
extended
via
hoses
and
and
extension
cords.
B
H
No
I
mean
because
that,
because
it
will
be
subject
to
the
dec
easement,
which
will
allow
nothing
on
that
space.
Obviously,
there's
space
for
a
temporary,
you
know,
but
not
supported
Johns
and
an
event
of
some
sort
would.
B
H
Great
but
it's
a
an
internet,
permanent
structure
that
that
might
happen.
How
about
things
like
taking.
F
H
J
J
That's
great
for
people
who
have
their
own
colleagues-
oh
well,
I
mean
by
that
so
I
guess
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
handle
on.
How
would
it
invite
other
people
from
the
public
and
want
to
take.
H
Advantage
of
those
access
points
so
I
think
it's
drawn,
there's
a
little
block
there,
where
we
could
put
a
kayak
rack,
that's
drawn
in
there,
so
people
could
either
kayak
much
like
happens
at
the
treatment.
Marina
I
would
just
put
it
there
and
lock
it
up
and
then.
J
F
B
It's
off
screen
here,
but
it's
it's
not
far.
It's
just
off
screen
the
other
kayak
rental
location
that
is
existing
okay,.
A
They're
hard
to
tell
but
I
think
there
are
several
enhancements
that
can
be
some
people
who
do
own
kayaks
right
so
that
ramp,
that
is
now
in
this
plant
was
another
thing,
great
addition
and
then
the
wrap,
that's
located
to
that.
They've
also
made
some
adjustments
on
the
North
End
to
have
the
parking
circulation
work.
So
that's
a
little
easier
to
access
that
funding,
control,
Channel
there,
so
they're
kind
of
really
minor
but
I-
think
it's
a
little
bit
more
intentional
now,
I
would
say
in
terms
of
access
now.
A
What
I
would
say
is
certainly
in
the
city
in
general
compared
to
20
years
ago
around
here
the
ability
to
be
into
the
water
with
a
person
powered
watercraft
was
amazingly
better
than
it
was
from
years
ago,
and
that's
Investments.
E
F
K
A
H
Oh
sorry,
the
discussion
about
the
discussion
about
Transportation
will
city
buses
Circle
through
circulatory
yeah.
B
So
the
the
turnaround,
the
existing
turnaround
at
this
end,
I
I,
believe,
is
sized
for
the
fire
truck
turning
radius.
B
So
while,
while
we
have
not
had
conversations
with
tcat
yet
this,
this
would
accommodate
their
their
movements
on
the
site.
If
that's
something
that
they
they
find,
that
there's
demand
for.
A
And
otherwise
the
nearest
Stop
would
be
at
the
intersection
of
piano
bar
and
buffalo,
so
it'd
be
like
a
quarter
of
a
mile
or
something
finds
out.
The
nearest
permanent
stop
right
now
like
next
to
the
bank
right,
because
the
route
that
runs
all
the
89
bridge
is
the
park
suit,
which
only
runs
in
the
summer
when
he
goes
to
cast
the
mechanic
right.
The
permanently
the
West
Hill
Loop
runs
actually
up.
Stop
some
treatment
s
yeah.
G
I,
remember
asking
this
question
in
an
earlier
conversation
about
the
project
and
was
pointed
out
that
there
is
a
stop
right
at
the
start
of
the.
A
A
Okay,
we
have
a
second
resolution,
the
last
discussion
I
imagine
from
the
ABC.
So
so
it's
a
resolution
to
basically
close
out
the
small
business
resiliency
fund
that
was
set
up
during
code
19.,
so
you
have
a
number
of,
whereas
is
there
to
get
the
background
and
the
allocated
140
000
of
our
involved
income
to
capitalize
that
fund,
along
with
other
partners.
A
That
project
was
all
managed
by
Alternatives
Federal
Credit
Union
you'll,
see
here
that
there's
a
13
645
and
change
that
we
want
to
allocate
back
and
that's
a
result
of
some
vouchers
that
Alternatives
have
that
didn't
meet
our
requirements
for
complete
and
satisfactory
documentation,
in
which
we
would
need
to
then
also
justify
the
use
of
those
funds
to
help.
So
without
that
documentation,
we're
unable
to
allocate
those
funds
and
then
there's
a
small
balance
of
funds
for
delivery
fees.
We
create
allocated
to
Alternatives
that
State
and
use
literally
over
26.
A
So
so
we
would
like
and
I
will
move
this
as
written
to
just
allocate
those
funds
back
to
the
problem.
H
So
the
INR
committee
has
a
resolution
is
the
following
page
from
the
one
we
just
passed,
and
this
is
also
reprogramming
goes
to
cdbg
CD
funds,
funds
that
were
to
address
covet
related
issues
in
the
community,
and
you
remember
a
couple
of
months
ago,
I
think
in
July
or
August
we
also
reprogrammed
some
CD
funds.
H
We
have
approximately.
The
approximate
is
a
very
precise
number
for
approximately
26
785.48
and
CV
funds
to
that
were
not
expended
by
recipients
the
majority
of
that
money.
Twenty
thousand
three
hundred
dollars
is
from
a
St,
John's
shelter.
You
remember
they
were.
They
did
some
Renovations
to
the
the
shelter
related
to
covet.
H
They
were
unable
to
provide
proves,
as
it
were,
that
the
contractors
comply
with
David
speaking
regulations,
and
so
therefore
the
staff
had
to
let
them
know
that
we
could
not
disperse
the
funds,
the
other
monies,
the
other
larger
portion.
The
other
remainder
is
from
a
Catholic
Charities
to
security
deposits
program
and
then
a
small
amount
from
an
INF
High
NHS
project,
because
none
of
the
individual
funds
are
exceed
twenty
five
thousand
dollars.
You'll
see
the
the
second
to
last,
whereas
it's
not
considered
a
substantial
Amendment.
H
So
we
can
reprogram
the
funds
we,
the
committee,
considered
several
options:
should
we
open
up
again
and
some
try
to
get
applications
for
the
funds
when
we
reallocated
the
funds
in
July,
we
have
three
applicants
downtown
at
the
child
care
center,
Catholic,
Charities
and
oar.
H
All
of
the
funds
back
in
July
were
allocated
to
downtown
the
child
care
center,
as
we
considered
that
child
care
was
such
an
important
part
of
allowing
folks
to
get
back
to
work
important
part
of
the
covert
recovery.
So
we
had
two
applications
in
hand
from
that
weren't
funded
and
because
both
were
trusted
Partners
we
worked
with
staff,
would
work
with
us.
For
many
years
we
felt
comfortable
that
they
would
be
able
to
expend
the
funds
and
comply
with
all
the
requirements.
That
of
reporting
staff
was
approached
with
a
couple
of
other
ideas.
H
One
was
dealing
with
the
serious
problem
of
garbage
and
trash
in
the
jungle
and
all
its
various
locations.
The
other
was
perhaps
a
housing
Navigator.
Now
there
are
no.
These
were
I.
Think
informal
conversations
is
the
way
to
determine
them.
There
are
no
spot
project
sponsors.
H
So
if
we
wanted
to
go
with
either
those
two
options,
we
would
have
had
to
find
a
project
sponsored
the
funds
have
to
be
expended
by
July
of
next
year
and
again
that
the
committee
felt
that
that
pointed
towards
going
with
applications
are
already
had
in
hand
versus
opening
up
again
the
delay
that
that
would
take
perhaps
giving
the
funds
to
an
organization
that
was
not
familiar
with
to
us
with
the
process.
H
So
we
felt
that
we
would
consider
the
applications
at
hand
oer
and
Catholic
Charities
Catholic
Charities
for
the
Immigrant
Services
Program
oer,
for
the
workday
continue
to
do
supporting
their
clients,
several
of
perhaps
many
of
whom
are
unhoused.
H
The
Catholic
Charities
immigrant
Services
Program
works
with
new
immigrants,
as
we
all
know
to
the
community.
A
big
part
of
what
they
do
is
helping
immigrants,
educate
them,
helping
them
find
resources
around
covet
related
finding
where
to
get
your
shots.
Getting
PVE
just
is
something
that
they
stress
that
they
do
quite
often
for
their
clients.
Oar.
This
program
is
primarily
for
Staffing.
They
do
have
their
laundry
program,
they
provide
PPE.
They
provide
soap,
transportation
again
related
to
helping
people
recover
from
the
covet
pandemic.
H
H
So,
as
chair
of
the
committee
I'd
like
to
move
the
resolution.
H
I
will
say
that
that
most
of
the
recipients
of
the
CB
funds
have
well
actually
not
most
four
of
the
recipients
of
city
bus
fully
extended
the
money.
The
remainder
are
expected
to
expend
the
funds,
but,
of
course
we
won't
know-
and
again
this
is
the
second
reprogramming
of
CB
Billings.
A
A
Ourselves,
but
the
second
question
is,
they
said:
there's
no
requirement
that
this
is
directly
related
to
covet
right.
We
can
reprogram
them,
it
does
need
to
be
forced
recovery.
Yes,
okay
and
we're
comfortable
in
both
of
these
meet
that
criteria.
Yes,.
D
A
C
H
And
particularly
for
the
Immigrant
Services
Program,
you
know
they
are
they're,
seeing
some
immigrants
from
Ukraine.
You
can
imagine
a
full
range
of
folks
who
come
here
to
the
community
as
refugees
or
as
immigrants,
those
of
many
religions
and
so
and
they
serve
them
again
without
discrimination.
A
D
Think
I'll
start
and
then
it
can
weigh
in
as
the
newest
governance
Committee
Member
highlight
of
the
meeting
here
is
the
governance
because
you
said
come
forward:
this
is
the
2023
proposed
binary
budget.
You
should
have
a
resolution
pretty
detailed
budget
and
some
supporting
financial
analysis
materials.
Also
behind
that,
as
in
past
years,
the
Lion's
Share
of
our
budget
is
based
on
staff
costs,
salary
and
benefits.
It's
about
over
84
or
86
percent
of
our
budget
is.
D
We're
fortunate
to
be
able
to
make
use
of
City
facilities
for
office
space
and
not
most
many
technology
components.
So
this
really
our
budget
is
our
administrative
budget
is
driven
by
Staffing.
The
grants
and
project
activity
is
not
part
of
the
administrative
budget,
so
that
really
is
looking
at
operating
a
3.6
person
staff
and
continue
operations
and
and
hiring
the
many
contractors
like
legal
services
to
process
the
the
grant
agreement
and
comply
with
requirements
and
undertake
work
associated
with
urban
renewal
projects
like
internet,
so
we're
similarly
driven
by
Lewis.
D
The
staff
across
health
insurance
went
up
8.6,
but
we're
fortunate
that
two
of
our
members
have
elected
to
go
and
carry
their
own
insurance
and
where
so
that,
as
a
savings,
our
actual
health
insurance
class
is
going
to
go
down
one
percent
rather
than
up
compared
to
last
year,
the
agency
pays
75
percent
of
the
out-of-pocket
expense
of
employees
who
elect
to
carry
their
own
insurance
outside
of
the
IRA.
D
And
what's
one
of
the
difficult
choices
in
this
budget
is
trying
to
figure
out
what
is
an
equitable
and
appropriate
salary
increase.
We're
running
in
a
inflation
rate
approaching
eight
percent.
The
city's
collective
bargaining
agreement
is
frequently
a
a
benchmark.
We
look
at
cities,
CSEA
administrative
unit
signed
a
multi-year
contract
a
couple
of
years
ago
and
they
are
targeted
for
this
year
at
2.25.
For
2023.,
this
budget
is
proposing
a
four
percent
increase.
I
want
to
make
sure
we
can
continue
to
have
competitive
salaries
and
attract
staff.
D
We
know
throughout
the
city
and
everyone's
everywhere,
staff
vacancies
are
difficult
to
fill
and
I.
Don't
want
a
Creative
Steps
I
can
see
due
to
an
eight
by
non-competitive
salary
arrangement.
I
think
we're
reasonably
competitive,
but
I
don't
want
I
think
would
be
you
know.
Concerns
would
be
if
we
fall
behind
too
far,
so
a
four
percent
was
suggested
as
a
midpoint
between
those
those
two.
D
The
other
main
issue
here
is
that
we
have
a
good,
a
one-time
funding
of
covet
related
funds
coming
in
we're
working
through
those
those
funds.
As
we
implement
the
programs,
we
think
there'll
be
about
140
000,
additional
funding
from
our
typical
year
for
administrative
funding,
for
those
grants
to
be
billed
next
year
to
HUD.
D
So
we
have
a
proposed
budget
of
about
417
thousand
dollars
and
we
project
revenues
around
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
so
we're
in
a
good
spot
in
2023
2024,
we'll
have
less
available
we'll
be
we'll
be
basically
winding
down
those
those
coveted
funds
will
have.
Probably
fifty
thousand
dollars
left
and
that'll
be
pretty
much
a
break-even
point.
If
we
were
to
project
our
budget
going
forward
2025,
we
could
be
in
a
deficit
Arrangement.
If
we
don't
identify
new
funding
sources,
some
funding
sources
could
be.
D
You
know
whether
there's
increased
HUD
funding
through
the
federal
government,
which
is
our
primary
source
of
funding,
typically
about
44
of
our
budgets
based
on
cdbg
and
home
funds,
but
those
have
been
very
level
in
the
last
three
or
four
years
and
they
don't
seem
to
adjust
for
inflation.
So
that's
our
concern.
D
D
D
Some
areas
where
we
have
some
control
but
2025
is
going
to
be
a
place
where,
if
we
don't
identify
any
revenues
which
we
may
be
in
a
operating
deficit
scenario,
we
have
been
able
to
build
up
the
non-cdbg
or
the
local
fund
that
we
have
to
what
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
was
five
years
ago,
closer
to
250
000.
So
we
have
with
some
of
these
funds
we
haven't
had
to
draw
down
as
much
of
the
Hub
funding
due
to
some
of
these
additional
funding
coming
in
from
covert
related
expenses.
D
So
we
could
continue
to
draw
from
some
of
those
balances,
but
you
know
that's
not
long-term
strategy,
that's
that
would
carry
us
through
for
several
years,
but
it
would
eventually
mean
we
were
in
deficit.
Year
after
year,
we've
tried
to
structure
those
funds
to
make
loans
with
income
coming
back
in
and
we
had.
The
payoff
of
the
cubic
green
loan
project
came
back.
It
used
to
produce
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
US
and
manual
basis.
D
Now
it's
more
than
20
like
closer
to
twenty
two
thousand
dollars
because
they
paid
it
back
and
now
we
had
to
go
find
new
loans.
Those
loans
that
we
made
most
recently
were
to
inhs
for
the
Catholic
charity
buildings
and
the
sales
Titus
properties,
but
those
are
in
a
lower.
You
know
it
was
paid
six
percent
now
we're
at
two
percent
down
in
return.
D
A
And
you
have
a
question,
but
I
want
to
see
if
Donna
you
know
all
right
so
so.
I
know
that
we
are
still
exploring
a
potential
sale
of
the
last
property
and
again
to
Cherry
Street,
that
we
have
an
active
development.
Looking
at
that
beyond
that
parcel,
are
there
any
other
Ira
properties
that
we
could
be
selling
or
not.
D
There
is
really
no
other
Ira
over
the
property.
That's
got
a
market
value
that
I'm
aware.
E
D
On
specific
projects,
the
staff
time
is
is
reimbursed.
For
example,
the
East
Hill
fire
station
project
was
established.
Staff
costs
were
fully
reimbursed
for
that.
There's
a
series
of
projects
that
have
Ira
interest
and
City
interests
and
don't
necessarily
have
a
billing
account
to
go
to
yeah,
and
so-
and
you
know
it
could
be
City
facilities.
You
know
addressing
the
housed
working
in
a
number
of
Grant
applications
that
have
City
support,
parsiki,
no
Grand
funding.
The
city
does
authorize
the
agency
to
administer
the
city
region
home
fund.
D
So
that's
that's
a
choice.
The
city
makes
and
that's
that's
core
to
our
ability
to
survive
financially,
and
they
also
structured
that
loan
I
was
talking
about
Cuba
green,
that
the
garage
and
the
apartment
next
to
it.
That
was
at
one
time,
City
prep
and
transferred
to
the
IRA,
and
then
the
IRA
made
loans
and
the
city
we
split
the
loan
repayments.
So
when
that
property
was
sold
and
they
paid
off
the
loans,
a
large
chunk
go
into
the
City
and
a
smaller
chunk
went
to
the
IRA
to
reinvest
in
loans.
D
That
essentially
was
at
that
time
with
fifty
thousand
dollar
subsidy
or
forty
thousand
dollar
subsidy
that
wouldn't
have
had
otherwise
now
it's
kind
of
the
22
000
like
they
said
so
we're
you
know
it's
a
little
tighter
if
we
don't
find
other
funding
sources,
but
we
have
gone
through
the
chemical
the
best
when
there
is
a
need
to
express
the
issue
of
you
know
to
provide
the
contained
services
that
we
can
that
very
at
some
point
there
may
be
a
need
to
recognize
those
at
a
project
by
project
basis
or
or
look
at
something.
D
That's
more.
You
know
more
General
against
in
some
respects,
but
right
now
we're
in
a
reasonably
big
spot.
A
I
H
D
Is
actually
an
item
that
Carl
had
questioned
at
one
point
about
the
Ira's
policy
of
requiring
two
signatures
and
every
check
leadership
and
in
the
kind
of
delays
it
can
cause
in
issuing
those
checks.
So
this
is
a
resolution
that
would
set
a
threshold
where
two
signatures
would
be
needed.
It's
suggested
at
five
thousand
dollars
that
does
still
include
the
Lion's
Share
of
the
dollar
value
of
disbursements
or
checks
that
we
issue,
but
it
would
you
know,
but
the
pure
number.
We
have
over
300
checks
a
year.
D
Most
of
those
with
that
require
two
signatures.
They
still
have
a
robust.
You
know
checks
and
balances
system
of
reviews
of
every
issue
instead
of
a
chat
of
check
or
disbursement,
we're
also
interested
in
going
to
an
electronic
checking
process.
The
electronic
checking
process
makes
it
a
little
more
difficult
up
to
get
two
signatures.
So
at
a
transition
point,
if
this
goes
is
approved,
we
would
have
electronic
checks
for
checks
under
five
thousand
and
hard
copy.
Two
two
signature
checks
for
those
checks
issued
over
five
thousand
dollars.
D
We
did
check
with
Lucero
our
auditor
on
this.
They
are
very
supportive
of
establishing
a
reasonable
limit.
We
discuss
the
limit
with
them.
They
were
comfortable
going
up
as
high
as
ten
thousand.
We
think
we'd
like
to
try
a
little
lower
and
we're
going
to
see
how
it
works,
and
this
is
a
developed
with
me
from
the
consultation
of
our
account
Kim
cook,
who
did
the
analysis?
Okay,
and
it
is
supportive
of
the
recommendation.
The
community
did.
He
managed
to
recommend
approval
of
this
resolution.
D
D
Was
put
together
prior
to
the
governance
meeting
they
met
on
Tuesday
this
week.
They
had
it
reschedule.
So
this
is
a.
What
you
see
here
is
the
version
of
the
resolution
that
was
adopted
or
recommended.
H
D
Can
go
to
the
bank
with
anybody
who
authorized
with
your
signatures
chair
on
that
right,
so
it
could
be
any
member.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
a
particular
position
title,
but
we
have
to
go
through
the
bank
and
get
it
authorized
and
when
you
get
authorized
signature
at
the
bank,
you
have
to
reauthorize
everyone.
Who's
authorized,
it's
a
process.
Let's
put
it
there.
Yeah.
A
I
mean
if
it's
not
tied
to
Carl's
role
as
Vice
chair,
which
it
sounds
like
it's
not
right.
It
wouldn't
have
to
move
right,
because
if
we
did,
we
said
it
was
the
vice
chair.
Then,
if
we
wrote
to
the
vice
chair
and
then
we
would
have
to
change
regards
and
we
may
or
may
not
do
that
across
your
own
water
right,
whereas
and
then
so
I
guess,
we
should
call
out
that
it's.
E
E
D
Rich
find
a
hard
copy,
obviously
invest
earlier
Tuesday
afternoon
to
you
as
well.
We
had
the
vacancy
of
the
officers
on
the
governance
committee
and
at
the
meeting,
the
committee
elected
Captain
as
Vice
chair
again
and
nominated
wait.
F
D
F
D
D
Showing
a
few
slow
moving
projects
but
for
the
most
part,
expenditures
are
in
line
with
our
requirements.
The
career
at
the
bottom
of
that
grand
summary.
We
track
the
HUD
cdbg
required
to
spend
our
requirements,
which
is
1.5
percent
of
our
available
funds.
We
can't
have
more
than
1.5.
D
What's
the
ratio,
the
comparison
is
unexpected
funds
to
our
most
recent
Grant
award,
so
I
can't
exceed
1.5
we're
at
1.3,
but
if
the
snapshots
only
done
once
a
year
at
the
end
of
May,
so
we're
at
a
good
standing
at
the
moment,
but
we
usually
go
above
it
and
then
work
our
way
back
down.
When
we
get
closer.
D
I
just
want
to
keep
the
agency
up
to
date
on
the
restoring
your
grant
program
because
it
impacts
activities
at
the
agency
has
interested
in
the
past.
New
York
puts
out
a
opportunity
for
funding
periodically
they
put
out
a
double
year
application
for
restoring
your
grants.
Those
funds
are
targeted
for
buildings
that
are
vacant,
or
at
least
50
vacant,
and
a
really
focus
on
downtown
improvements
in
many
respects.
No
income
requirements
associated
with
that
program.
D
So
it's
an
unusual
program
for
opportunities
to
be
able
to
apply
for
the
first
round
six
first,
this
year
in
round
two
are
up
to
round
six.
The
city
submitted
an
application
for
renovating
the
corner
buildings
at
the
corner
on
South
kiwis
Street,
the
corner
of
property
at
QV,
green
and
the
next
building
up
where
the
Christian
Science
would
be
room
is
located
that
building
proposed
for
they've
done
a
lot
of
upper
story
office
vacancies
with
the
pandemic.
D
So
the
proposal
is
to
renovate
the
entire
building
to
make
an
energy
all
electric
buildings
and
renovate
and
convert
several
of
the
office
uses
to
residential
uses.
All
the
rental
units
will
be
at
least
at
rent,
affordable
to
households
of
80
area
income.
D
That's
a
two
million
dollar
Grant
application
that
was
submitted
and
is
waiting
for
the
state's
review
and
decision.
We
have
another
opportunity
for
around
seven,
which
is
needs
to
be
submitted
soon
and
well.
It
needs
to
be
identified.
The
intend
to
apply
needs
to
be
identified
soon
and
then
the
submission
would
be
due,
probably
in
July
in
January
and
that's
targeted
for
the
chainworks
project
site.
D
Building
24
is
a
building
a
hundred
thousand
square
foot
building
closest
to
the
street
on
Aurora
Street,
which
was
a
very
conventional
kind
of
Warehouse
building,
and
that's
the
target.
Preliminary
Target
we're
still
working
with
the
development
team
to
refine
that
and
bring
that
information
to
the
mayor
for
review
whether
it
still
still
continues
to
be
the
top
priority
project
for
the
city
just
invent
for
that
application.
Again.
That
would
be
a
two
million
dollar
application
for
a
complete
renovation
of
that
building
and
maybe
some
additional
components
of
a
project.
D
Satisfactory
completion
and
now
that
now
they
can
move
to
the
developmental
phase
of
that
project.
So
that's
those
are
some
large
projects
in
motion.
D
We
don't
know
actually,
usually
it's
relative,
pretty
quick
turnaround,
but
there
were
I.
Think
I
heard
there
were
there
were
300
applications.
D
E
D
D
The
Journal
building
previously
and
and
so
we're
hopeful
that
this
seems
to
to
align
with
the
scoring
scoring
evaluation
criteria
of
the
state.
D
You
come
up
with
a
very
interesting
package
to
support
affordable
housing
of
home
ownership,
which
is
a
rare
area
to
find
funding
for,
as
we
know,
exhibition
many
more
resources
available
for
rental
housing.
So
the
state's
putting
out
new
programs
for
affordable
home
ownership,
inhs
is
is
tracking
that
very
closely
as
I'm
sure
our
other
agencies,
but
this
could
be
a
very
strong
benefit
for
making
projects
pen
slope
that
we're
not
working
out
very
well.
D
The
Sears
Street
project
that
we've
provided
funding
for
personal
funding
for
in
this
program
year
is
likely
to
be
a
candidate
for
that
program
and
bring
in
an
additional
resources
to
make
that
work
out.
They
also
have
very
interesting
accessory
dwelling
unit
incentive
program
up
to
125
000
to
renovate
existing
accessory
dwelling
units
that
are
legal
or
to
create
new
accessory
drawing
units.
They
need
an
application.
They
need
to
work
in
partnership
with
the
city
for
an
application
for
those
funds
and
yeah
that's
been
explored
as
well
right
now.
So
some
interesting
programs
coming
up.
E
D
Yes,
I
think
it
can
be
a
four
tracker
and
not
for
property
agency,
but
there
are
some
incoming
restrictions
on
the.
E
D
I
think
they
do
it's
a
sliding
scale
of
assistance.
I
think
you
can
go
up
to
a
higher
level
and
get
what
we
might
call
moderate
or
Workforce
housing
components
into
that
program.
But
you
lose
some
of
the
grand
subsidies.
You
go
higher
income
with
the
home
buyer,
but
I
believe
that
it
is
designed
to
not
be
as
restrictive
if
the
home
buyers
can
be
in
terms
of
their
income
and.
D
They're
rolling
out
the
programs
to
have
different
deadlines
and
they'll
probably
have
more
than
one
application
process,
so
they
just
announced
this
in
the
last
three
weeks.
I
think
so
we'll
have
to
watch
and
see
where
it
goes,
but
it's
a
very
opportunity
to
make
progress
in
some
of
these.
E
D
I
have
some
of
the
basic
information
the
terms
here
I
can
share
with
anybody
who
wants
to
review
that
I'll.
Send
it
to
you
all.
You
can
take
a
look,
but
if
you
need
to
probably
work
with
an
agency
or
a
not-for-profit
developer
would
be
the
best
way
to
go
about
it
or
I
guess
for
for
private
developers
to
take
advantages
as
well.
It's
not
eligible
for
an
individual
homeowner
to
come
forward
and
say
I'd
like
to
you
know
give
especially
for
my
home
or
something
like.
F
J
D
It
is
it's:
a
homeowner
would
have
to
have
an
income,
not
it
not
above
100,
100
of
their
immune
income
to
be
eligible
for
the
program,
and
there
would
be
no
income
restrictions
or
rent
limit
restrictions.
The
ancestry
dwelling
away
so
it'd
be
a
load
documentation
model.
That
would
you
know,
and
that
put
a
lot
of
administrative
burden
on
the
homeowner
to
to
to
go
forward
with
that
program.
I
But
Rob
I
think
you
were
asking
if
the
property
had
to
be
owner
occupied,
is
that
right
according
to
the
currency,
is
not
what
does
anyway.
G
E
E
F
E
A
G
Animal
s
no
report
on
it,
then
October
is
budget
month
and
we
have
new
council
members.
So
there's
a
learning
curve.
There
have
been
two
public
hearings
already.
The
third
public
hearing
is
next
Wednesday
and
counter
Council
November,
2nd
I've
described
this
year's
budget
as
an
ambitious
budget,
and
the
priorities
identified
for
the
2023
budget
include
Staffing,
City,
Staffing
and
infrastructure,
two
areas
where
we
have
tremendous
need-
and
so
those
are
prioritized
in
the
2023
budget,
which
is
available
on
the
city
website.
For
anyone
who
cares
to
read.
E
G
Well,
but
what
I
will
point
out?
The
tax
rate
is
set
for
2023
at
the
same
level
as
2022
11.10,
but.
E
G
The
assessments
are
set
at
market
rate
that
has
increased,
and
that
means
that
the
actual
bill
that
Property
Owners
pay
increases,
as
many
of
us
are
aware
of
we're
still
working
through
the
budget.
So
I
I
don't
want
to
miss,
speak
and
give
Miss
information.
G
Well,
they're,
beginning
last
night,
and
we
will
continue
tonight,
we're
looking
at
council
member,
proposed
amendments
to
the
budget
and
and
that's
why
it's
unclear
right
now
and
we'll
be
unclear
until
next
week,
or
hopefully,
there's
Clarity.
G
Where
is
the
clarity
is
good?
We
will
strive
for
clarity
and,
to
you
know,
I
should
have
mentioned.
Your
comment.
Tracy
reminds
me
that
we
are
concerned
about
displacement
of
people
out
of
the
city
yeah.
We
we
need
affordable
housing,
we
need
senior
housing,
we
need
housing
in
general
and
a
goal
is
to
increase
the
amount
of
housing
that
is
within
the
city
that
would
increase
our
our
tax
base
to
make
more
livable
Vibrant
Community
in
the
city.
G
E
G
Yes,
absolutely
the
services
that
our
community
demands
continue
to
increase.
We
have
an
obligation
to
respond
to
Services
best
we
can,
but
the
city
is
strain
currently
specifically
around
ipd
having
the
necessary
Staffing
is,
is
a
challenge,
and
you
know-
and
else
referred
to
this-
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
recruiting
Staffing
to
City
positions.
We
want
to
retain
Staffing
in
City
positions.
G
E
F
J
If
anyone
wants
to
tune
in
reality,
TV
tonight
I'm
a
council
chamber,
it's
the
most
really
you'll
get
we'll
probably
go
on
for
several
hours
more
to
review
the
remaining,
and
it's
it's
a
interesting
because,
as
as
the
mayor
pointed
out,
we
have
several
new
members
of
council
and
until
recently
we
hadn't
been
face
to
face.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
things
to
learn
among
the
group
about
budget
and.
D
B
J
One
more
thing:
I
mean
I,
we
I,
if
you
as
one
person,
I
I'm,
sure
I,
have
colleagues
that
would
feel
the
same
really
appreciate
the
mayor's
commitment
to
people
and
in
particular
City
staff,
as
well
as
infrastructure
in
her
proposed
budget
and
to
her
Point.
You
know
we're
making
some
really
difficult
decisions
about
how
to
fund
how
to
maintain
our
commitment
to
Stefan,
but
at
the
same
time
manage
some
really
challenging
Financial
situations
by
recognizing
that
some
vacancies
might
not
get
filled
right
away.
D
Is
something
I
missed
in
the
staff
report?
I
did
want
to
point
your
attention
to
the
materials
at
the
very
end
of
the
packet
regarding
fair
market
rents.
Just
so,
you
had
that
that
database
of
where
the
current
market
rents
are
for
Ithaca
and
the
very
last
page
is
the
small
area,
fair
market
rents,
where
HUD
establishes
the
voluntary
framework
and
run
so
the
community
can
can
utilized
based
in
zip
code.
So
you
can
see
the
1485
number
for
a
two-bedroom
apartment.
There's
more
than
200
is
higher
than
the
county-wide
fair
market.
F
D
Just
documenting
the
fact
that
housing
in
Ithaca
is
more
expensive
than
the
surrounding
area
and
it's
a
substantial
amount.
So
it's
interesting
trend
line
to
watch
and
see
where
that
goes.
We
have
to
have
a
couple
of
agencies
that
administer
housing,
Choice
vouchers
dip
into
the
the
small
area
for
America
Rents,
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
which
I
think
is
good
to
allow
a
few
more
of
the
units
to
qualify
in
the
city
as
those
prices
escalate.
D
I'd
like
to
try
to
schedule
a
single
meeting
of
the
area
for
both
November
and
December,
is
our
next
meeting
with
normally
fall
on
Thanksgiving,
so
we're
looking
at
December
14th,
which
is
a
Wednesday
or
December
16th,
which
is
a
Friday
at
8
30.
In
the
morning,
several
of
you
have
been
able
to
provide
comment
to
me
that
I
think
the
16th
was
the
one
that
worked
for
most
people,
I,
don't
think
we
heard
from
me
yeah,
so
I
think
the
mayor's
schedule.