►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (2/22/2023)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
here
at
the
city
of
Jacksonville
Beach
Board
of
adjustments,
meeting
Board
of
adjustments,
our
meetings,
our
quasi-judicial
in
nature,
all
decisions-
the
board
will
be
based
on
competent,
substantial
evidence,
including
testimony
provided
in
this
meeting.
Every
person
who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
that
wishes
to
speak
will
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
then
turned
into
the
clerk.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
at
each
item.
A
A
Agenda
is
approval
of
minutes.
Can
I
hear
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
of
February
7th
2023.,
make
a
motion
improvements
for
February
7
2023.?
Second,
so
we
moved
and
seconded.
Do
we
have
a
just
a
voice
about
all
in
favor
aye
opposed
okay
correspondence?
Do
we
have
any
correspondence
today?
Oh
that's
right,
yeah,
just
the
one
that
was
on
your
diet.
She
came
in
for
the
first
case.
Okay,
great
all
right,
we're
going
out
to
Old
business.
A
Voa20-10037
African
Timothy
L,
Mountain
owners,
Source,
Properties,
LLC,
Timothy,
Melvin,
property
address,
121,
7th,
Court,
South
or
slide
8176052-0000
and
176050-0000
legal
description
is
South
half
of
lot
three.
Together
with
the
West
15
feet
of
the
South
25
feet
of
Lot
2
block
72
Pablo
Beach
South,
Kearns
learning,
rm2
motion
to
Center
34-340e3c1
for
front
yard,
setback
at
6.5
and
lose
20
feet.
Minimum.
A
C
A
Low
23
feet
required
three
four:
three:
seven
d
for
a
parking
loading
area
set
back
of
three
feet
below
five
feet
and
three
four:
three:
seven:
three
f
for
one
gravel
parking
spot,
a
little
of
required
painting
also
would
allow
for
a
new
two
two
unit,
multiple
family
dwelling
as
a
reminder
to
each
member
of
the
public,
we'll
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak.
When
we
open
the
hearing
to
the
public
for
the
board,
does
any
board
member
have
any
exported
communication?
I've
had
none
I've
had
none
I've
had
none.
C
A
And
I've
had
none
with
the
Apple
Head.
Please
come
forward
and
be
sworn
in
and
give
you
a
presentation.
Please.
E
E
E
Foreign
triplets
unit
on
the
property
what
mostly
family
they
live
in,
as
you
can
see,
the
setbacks.
E
Light
and
basically
is
landlocked
by
the
dimensions
of
what's
available
to
develop
and
under
the
new
Land
Development
code.
There's
no
way
impossible
that
it
could
ever
meet
the
new
development
requirements
and
we're
following
the
same
previous
footprint
of
the
previous
house,
that
we've
previously.
E
E
F
E
F
A
E
Results
will
be
actually
in
front
of
the
garage
right
there
and
also
I
thought
yes,
and
the
actual
payment
will
be.
The
fourth
part
in
the
space.
A
I
A
Okay,
any
more
questions:
okay,
sir
step
back
I'll
now
open
the
public
hearing.
Do
we
have
any
speaker
starts?
Yes,
we
do
has
sweeter
cars
and
I
said:
do
you
wish
to
approach
the
board?
Okay.
D
J
He
was
talking
about
the
previous
structure.
J
We've
lived
there,
we've
lived
there
a
good
period
of
time
and
I
don't
have
any
reflection
of
that
that
structure,
so
I
couldn't
really
speak
to
if
it
actually
followed
that
same
footprint.
What
he's
asking
for
so
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
that
unless
that's
checked,
we
don't
really
know
if
that's
factual
or
not
I'm
concerned
as
a
neighbor,
who
he's
asking
for
variances
to
go
out
in
all
four
directions,
to
the
very
limits
of
that
property.
J
I,
don't
know
how
the
75
percent
was
calculated,
but
if
you
by
my
map,
if
you
were
to
take
into
consideration,
moving
the
back
from
the
30
foot,
set
back
to
a
six
foot,
setback
moving
the
front
from
a
20-foot
setback
to
a
six
and
a
half
foot
setback
moving
the
side
pieces
from
a
10-foot
set
back
to
a
three
and
on
each
by
my
map.
That
gives
a
total
square
footage
for
that.
That
does
not
equate
to
even
75.
It
exceeds
the
75
with
those
numbers
that
he's
asking
for.
J
Own
he's
over
building
by
143
feet,
so
we're
exceeding
even
that
75.
I.
Don't
doubt
his
right
to
build
on
the
property,
but
I
think
he's
exceeding
what
could
be
tolerable
by
the
neighborhood
and
going
elbow
to
Elbow
on
all
four
sides
and
then
having
to
have
drivability
and
Mobility
down
that
very
limited
Alleyway.
It's
going
to
be
very
difficult
to
even
navigate
cars
in
and
out
of
the
three
spaces
that
he
shows
the
only
way
that
it
might
work
out.
J
K
A
Yeah,
do
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
be
sworn
in
and
then
fill
our
speakers?
Yes,
sir.
L
D
K
Address
sure
my
name
is
Steve
evanel
I'm,
one
Independent
Drive,
Suite,
1200
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
Outlook
and
I'm,
a
zoning
lawyer
and
I've
been
speaking
with
Mr
Malden
about
this
case
for
quite
some
time.
His
counsel,
Mr
Dempsey,
that
handled
the
litigation
of
the
city
is
here
as
well.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
the
board
that
this
night
I
went
to
court.
The
court
found
that
there
wasn't
confident
substantial
evidence
to
support
the
previous
decision.
That's
why
we're
back
here
today
the
staff
report
recommends
approval.
K
The
staff
report
is
competent,
substantial
evidence
to
support
the
decision
and
the
very
nice
lady
that
just
spoke.
Although
she
has
concerns
the
the
lock
coverages,
all
those
issues
were
covered
by
the
staff
if
they
have
concerns
about
it.
I
know
that
they'll
raise
it
here
at
the
time
afternoon,
but
we
feel
like
this.
The
application
complies
with
all
the
rules.
Our
application
and
the
staff
report
are
confident
substantial
evidence.
We
would
just
ask
that
you
follow
the
rules
that
are
in
place
based
on
the
evidence.
That's
been
provided
and
really
appreciate
your
time.
K
I
know
that
Mr
Mullen
has
been
working
on
this
for
quite
some
time.
I
know
he's
happy
to
answer
a
number
of
questions
you
may
have
this
evening,
but
I
just
wanted
to
remind
the
Lord
about
the
posture
where
we
came
from
and
where
we
are
today.
Nothing
has
changed
since
the
last
hearing.
There
still
is
no
competence,
substantial
evidence
to
support
the
denial
for
this
application.
Thank.
A
Coming
to
the
record
a
course
sponsor
received
to
the
city
Stephen
Redberry
received
on
February
17th
as.
A
Resident
Jack
speech
and
owner
of
adjacent
property,
757,
2nd
Street,
South
I
strongly
injected.
The
proposed
variance
area
is
already
very
tight
for
maneuver
I
personally
have
found
I
had
to
prepare
my
fence
when
I
lived
at
753
Second
Avenue
South
several
times,
because
the
dirt
road
is
very
narrow
and
trucks
aren't
able
to
maneuver
easily.
A
Seventh
Court
South
is
actually
a
thorough,
thorough,
unimproved
Road
between
first
and
second
Street
before
the
house
was
torn
down.
The
area
was
jammed
between
homes
on
two
little
property
and
cars
park,
as
catch
can
without
sufficient
parking.
It
was.
It
was
hazardous
to
drive
back
there
and
we'll
begin
with
experience
approved.
Please
stop
jamming
up
Jacksonville
Beach
neighborhood
Steve,
Redberry,
wheat,
berry,
1301,
First,
Street,
South
unit,
1207,
Jacksonville.
A
Okay,
would
the
advocate
like
to
address
any
of
the
comments
that
were
made
you
don't
have
to?
But
this
is
your
time.
Okay,.
E
C
E
E
E
Each
unit
approximately
square
footage
of
each
unit,
I
think
they're,
roughly.
E
E
E
The
total
square
footage
of
the
actual
footprint
structure
is
exactly
2200
square
feet
of
a
new
structure.
E
The
first
unit
is
roughly,
is
1600
square
feet.
The
second
unit
is
1870
square
feet.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
A
Based
on
testimony
Evans,
provided
the
request
has
met
all
the
standards,
for
our
variance
is
outlined
in
section
34-286
at
Land
Development
code.
Second,
okay,
the
motion
has
been
moved
and
seconded
any
discussion.
I
do
recognize.
Buildable
rights.
I
did
also
see
the
note
that
he's
actually
paying
the
city
or
contributing
the
city
for
paying
the
alleyway
too,
which
is
a
concern
us
on
some
of
the
communications.
A
He
was
super
oversized,
no,
but
they're
large.
That's
why
I'm
trying
to
understand
how
he
got
to
that
determination
without
knowing
the
project
needs.
A
I
Technically
he
couldn't
build
the
single-family
home
under
the
RS3
standards,
but
the
setbacks
are
virtually
the
same
for
a
single
family
as
they
would
be
fertility
family.
The
size
setbacks
would
actually
be
less
for
a
single
family.
You
could
do
seven
and
a
half
feet
on
either
side
and.
A
You
have
to
a
week
required
with
35
at
that
point.
Yes,
technically.
I
But
I
mean
just
from
a
practical
standpoint:
the
Lots
62
feet
deep
with
a
30
foot
front
or
30
foot
rear
and
a
20
foot
front.
You'd
have
12
feet
in
this
buildable
area
without
some
relief
in
there.
So
yeah.
G
C
I
So
the
federal
watt
size
for
a
two
unit-
multi-family,
is
5
000
square
feet,
so
they're
at
roughly
30.
F
Yeah
I
had
that
Alleyway
on
my
walking
route
many
times
and
I've
been
surprised.
The
fact
that
when
I'm
there
late
at
night
or
early
in
the
morning
before
many
people
are
off
to
work,
the
alleyway
is
generally
can
kept
fairly
open
Ed
by
people
who
live
there
are
parked
there.
My
only
concern
would
be
if,
on
a
Friday
night
to
the
neighbors,
who
are
drunk
I'm
driving
in
from
opposite
ends
of
the
alleyway
there's
nothing
wrong
within
the
past.
I
Only
in
so
much
that
that
would
be
more
of
a
worse
decision.
Sometimes
we
have
argue
over
with
this
board,
because
it's
strictly
on
private
property,
where
the
code
would
apply,
but
I
would
say
that
it's
the
same
problem
that
anyone
who
was
on
the
Alley
has
throughout
the
city.
So
it's
not
an
uncommon
circumstance.
There
are
other
moralities
that
have
access
for
garages.
A
B
A
D
A
Okay,
sir,
please
explain
your
hardship
and
receive
your
presentation.
M
Yeah
the
homeowner
purchased
the
home
in
the
90s
after
it
was
originally
built.
I
was
deals.
We
want
to
expand
the
property
and
they're
already
beyond
the
35
that
was
already
giving
you
know
to
the
original
Builder,
so
they're
putting
a
second
story
exactly
on
the
existing
structure.
M
So
the
structure
right
now
is
like
1400
and
some
odd
square
feet,
so
we're
literally
just
putting
a
second
story
completely
on
the
first
story:
we're
not
adding
any
other
square
footage
that
would
impact
the
lot
coverage,
except
for
on
the
back
of
the
property,
we're
putting
a
master
bedroom
on
that
second
story.
He
would
like
to
have
a
balcony
on
that
back
property
that
extends
beyond
the
setbacks.
M
A
concrete
patio,
that's
on
the
first
floor
of
the
property
and
then
so.
The
second
story
is
there's
not
going
to
be
any
footprint
of
the
house.
That's
going
to
be
on
top
of
that.
There's
just
going
to
be
a
balcony
above
that,
so
okay,
then
the
master
bedroom
is
going
where.
A
M
Is
I
mean
I?
What
I
was
told
initially
was
that,
even
though
it's
a
second
story
balcony,
it
does
count.
Okay,
you
know
so
that
that's
up
to
you
guys,
I,
don't
know
I.
I
Didn't
care
so
The,
Patio,
being
a
like
an
accessory
use,
doesn't
hold
the
same
setback
requirements
as
the
main
structure.
Someone
that
can't
leave
your
balcony
sticks
out.
It's
not
only
crushing
into
that
every
step
back.
M
Neighbors
about
your
plant,
the
homeowner
or
the
homeowner.
M
Has
spoken
to
a
couple
of
neighbors
I'm,
not
sure
if
anybody
has
any
injections,
obviously
they
had
to
sign
out
there
for
a
couple
weeks
to
knowing
that
this
was
going
to
happen.
So
I
don't
know
if
anybody's
completely
correspondent
support
is
here
today,
I,
don't
think
yeah
everybody
seems
to
be
okay
with
that.
There
are
other
side
of
the
story
like
on
that
same
street.
There's
three
houses
down,
there's
a
second
story
house,
so
it's
nothing
that
would
be.
M
It
looks
like
his
original
construction
yeah,
okay
because
of
the
siding
and
everything
looks
like
it's
original,
but
all
the
houses
that
are
Second
Story
in
that
block
looked
like
they
were
all
original
I,
don't
think
anybody's.
It
was
a
significant
cost.
Yeah.
Sorry,
so
I
don't
think
a
lot
of
people
have
done
that
or
anybody
that
can
be
your
idea.
A
Okay,
any
more
questions
for
the
applicant
I.
Have
none
I
have
none?
Okay,
sir.
Can
you
step
back
please.
A
I'll
now
open
the
public
hearing
to
even
speaker
starts,
and
we
did
not.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
is
not
going
to
let
a
speaker
card
that
wishes
to
speak?
A
No,
okay,
if
not
I'll,
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
it
back
to
the
board.
Is
there
a
promotion
you
can
motion
improve,
boa
23-10001
based
on
testimony
have
is
provided
the
request
has
met
all
the
standards
for
ovariance
has
outlined
in
section
34-286,
Blended
out
code,
second
screws
and
second
discussion
here.
A
Okay,
take
a
roll
call,
though
please.
A
Yes,
okay,
sir,
your
application
for
variance
has
been
approved.
We
called
it
takes
on
VOA
23-100.
C
A
This
property
address
zero,
Second,
Street,
South
and
motion
to
Center
34-342
e3a
for
Frontier
front
yard.
Setback
is
6.9
feet
in
the
lift
10
feet:
3
4-342
e3d
for
a
corner
yard;
setback
of
three
feet:
three
inches
in
a
little
10
T
minimum
to
allow
for
addition.
Second
third
floor,
cantilever,
balconies
and
proposed
new
commercial
office
structure.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
go
ahead
and
proceed
with
your
presentation
and
explain
your
Archer,
so
we
previously
talked
about
the.
H
Building
that
we're
building
here
we're
here
a
few
months
ago,
one
thing
that
we
failed
to
discuss
at
the
time
was
that
we
have
a
fountain
on
the
third
floor
that
extends
into
the
setback
and
we're
receiving
seeking
relief
on
that
matter.
If
it's
19
feet
above
grade
19
and
a
half
feet
above
gray,
so
we
have
discussed
with
the
fire
marshal
there's
plenty
of
access
there,
underneath
that
there's
a
a
misprint
on
the
case,
a
review
that
says
we
would
have
a
second
fourth
balcony.
F
H
Is
is
usable
space,
but
there
is
no
doubting
on
the
second.
H
Just
that's
the
corner
of
16
South.
H
North
side
of
the
property
where
there
is
no
balcony
is,
is
a
multi-family.
We're
at
the
townhouse
on
the
west
side
is
a
dry
cleaner,
but
there
are
no
balconies
on
the
west
side
of
North
Side.
The
doctors.
B
G
H
A
A
A
A
F
A
Discussion:
okay,
can
we
have
a
both
open?
Please.
B
A
A
-1003
applicant
Mitchell,
timewell
property
address,
1225,
15th,
Avenue,
North
promotion,
considered
34-336
e1c2
for
Easter
yards
side,
yard
setback,
nine
point
feet
and
a
western
side
guard
8.1
feet
below
10
feet:
no
34,
336
e1d
for
a
four
area
of
1136
feet,
1600
square
feet.
You
know,
there's
no
garage
removable,
one
car
garage
minimum
and
a
34-336
E1
for
a
locker
46.3
moved
to
maximum
Rectify
existing
non-conformies
into
allow
for
construction,
a
new
swimming
pool
and
pool
deck
attached
to
an
existing
single
family
dwelling.
A
Okay,
it's
a
reminder,
each
member
of
the
public
and
there's
so
many
of
them
out
there.
We
give
it
three
minutes
to
speak
when
we
open
the
public
hearings.
Does
the
board
have
any
Xbox
edition
I've
had
none
I've
had
none,
none
and
I've
had
done.
We'd
have
to
get
police
come
forward
to
be
sworn
in
and
get
their
presentation.
Please.
L
L
L
I
mean
everybody
off
of
Ty
Gordon.
The
hardship
that
we
are
experiencing
with
this
property
is
a
substandard
bot.
Size
standard
lot
size
for
the
zoning
District,
or
this
type
of
lot
is
10
000
square
feet.
The
lot
is
7560
square
feet
which
puts
us
in
a
situation
where
we're
asking
for
lock
coverage
variants
so
that
we
can
enjoy
the
property
in
the
same
manner
that
someone
would
be
able
to
enjoy
the
property
if
it
were
a
standard
lot
size,
10,
000
square
feet,
so.
L
L
So
that's
that's
really.
The
extent
of
my
my
request
is
based
on
the
based
on
the
lot
size,
so
I
have
no
other.
No
other
reason
for
for
the
variance,
except
for
that.
A
L
Discussed
with
The
Neighbors
on
either
side
I
was
that
their
intent
of
having
a
swimming
pool
a
deck
and
needing
to
have
some
extra
space,
both
neighbors,
that
they
actually
one
of
the
neighbors
behind
them,
have
swimming
pools,
enjoy
the
property
and
so
that
they
don't
have
any
issues
with
flooding
during
rain
or
any
any
of
the
properties
holding
holding
water
in
that
particular
area.
So
they
went
out
and
objection
to
to
the
lock
coverage.
A
I'll
now
open
public
hearing.
Anyone,
okay
do
we
have
any
speaker
starts.
We
have
one
and
if
there's
anybody
in
the
audience
who
has
not
been
allowed
to
speaker
store
that
wishes
to
speed,
please
do
so
now
seeing
none
I'll,
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
the
item
back
to
the
board.
For
is
there
a
motion
for
strike
I'd
make
a
motion
to
prove
boa-23-1003.
A
Attached
to
the
existing
structure
stated
based
on
testimony
evidence
provided
the
request
has
met
all
the
statements
for
our
variance
is
outlined
in
section
34-286,
Land
Development
code
second
book
consecutive,
any
discussion
and
I
said
as
attached
to
the
buildings
we
talked
about
last
week,
so
that
this
building
comes
renovator
changes.
Let's
go
back
to
the
order,
that's
what
we
outline.
I
And
do
the
Charities
to
address
the
the
question
or
the
comment
by
the
agent
aside
from
the
lock
coverage,
all
the
other
requests
are
in
systems,
looking
forward
movies
that
we
generally
try
and
catch
all
that,
so
they
only
have
to
go
to
the
process,
one
so
the
home
size,
the
garage
all
that
are
existing
conditions.
C
A
I
All
right,
so
our
next
meeting
is
going
to
be
March
7th,
which
is
a
Tuesday.
We
have
six
cases,
get
six
cases
scheduled
for
that
also
tomorrow,
in
this
room,
we're
having
a
workshop
with
City
Council
on
parking,
so
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
broadcast
or
not
we're
trying
to
figure
that
out,
but
we'll
and
then
I'll
have
audio
recordings.
But
you
guys
are
welcome
to
sit
in
the
audience.
If
you
want
to
5
30
yeah.
I
Screened
if
we
can
yes,
it
would
be
on
the
YouTube
channel,
but
we'll
know
in
the
morning.
So
if
you'd,
like
anything,
you
guys
an
email
can.
I
A
Probably
not
Christian
yeah.
That
should
be
here
all
right:
okay,
nothing
else,
courtesy
of
the
floor
to
visitors.
A
Okay,
entertain
a
motion
to
adjourn.