►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (3/7/2023)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
E
Thank
you.
The
board
of
adjustment
meetings
are
quasi-judicial
in
nature.
All
decisions
of
the
board
will
be
based
on
competent,
substantial
evidence,
including
testimony
provided
in
this
meeting.
Any
person
who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
who
wishes
to
speak
will
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
them
into
the
clerk.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
on
each
item.
E
No
minutes
this
time
any
correspondence.
F
Board
calls
boa
23-10006
property
address,
824
18th
Avenue
North
motion
to
consider
34-336
E1
C2
for
an
easterly
side;
yard
setback
of
9.4
feet
to
the
Westerly
side,
where
it's
set
back
of
7.9
feet,
both
in
a
little
10
feet.
Minimum
34-336
e1d
for
no
garage
and
one
car
garage
required
in
a
living
area
of
a
1564
square
feet
in
lieu
of
1600
square
feet
required
and
34-336
e1e
for
lock
coverage
for
47
percent
below
35
maximum
to
allow
for
the
enclosure
of
an
existing
one-car
garage
and
directed
by
existing
non-conformities
and.
E
G
E
Had
none
I've
had
none
and
I've
had
none
well
the
applicant
or
agent.
Please
come
forward
to
be
sworn
in
and
give
your
testimony.
H
I
Andrea
Lambert
450,
Poplar,
Point,
Drive
I
am
representing
the
homeowners,
David
and
Trina
Middleton,
and
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
here
is
to
build
a
second
story
over
their
existing
garage.
It
will
use
a
portion
of
that
garage
and
the
Second
Story
above
it
to
create
more
living
space.
So
technically
it
takes
away
that
full
full
garage
space.
The
homeowners
do
have
a
very
long
driveway
with
plenty
ample
parking
for
cars
to
so
they
won't
be
on
the
street
or
anything,
and
even
though
it
doesn't
technically
conform.
I
I
J
B
E
You
can
you
tell
us
the
nature
of
the
hardships
of
this
property
that
wouldn't
necessitate
this.
I
Variance
okay,
so
the
hardships
is
for
the
family
specifically,
so
they
had
a
family
situation
where
they
had
to
adopt
three
more
children
from
family
members
and
so
now
they're
looking
to
build
on.
So
they
have
more
bedroom
space
for
the
kids
to
live.
E
And
I
understand
from
the
staff
report
that,
in
terms
of
hardships
on
the
property
itself,
that
there
are
hardships,
including
that
the
overall
area,
the
property
is
undersized.
Yes,.
I
So
what
we
have
is
based
on
who
it
would
take
it.
The
living
area
from
1564
and
in
lieu
of
the
1600
square
feet
required.
I
I
We
actually
have
the
homeowner
is
here
to
speak
and
as
well
as
one
of
the
neighbors,
but
all
of
the
neighbors
are
facing
government
as
most
of
them
already
have.
This
change,
like
I've,
had
pictures
of
them,
maybe
they're
like
converted
their
garages
or
they
don't
have
a
garage,
and
they
only
have
a
car
border
or
something.
E
K
I
D
Nope
sure,
as
hell,
if
you're
not
really
covering
more
areas,
how
it
jumps
from
35
to
47
percent.
Is
that
something
that's
previously?
Oh,
that's!
Pretty
existing
yeah,
that's
pretty
existing
in
the
backyard.
F
E
H
L
Name
and
your
address
at
Karina,
Middleton
and
824-18th
Avenue
North,
so
yeah,
my
husband
and
I
I'm.
E
Sorry,
you
were
the
homeowner,
yes
ma'am,
okay,
so
we
won't
consider
this
actually
part
of
the
public
hearing.
So
it's
because
you're,
the
homeowner
we
just
won't
hold
you
to
the
three-minute.
Finally
you'll
just
be
able
to
tell
us
okay,
why
you're
requesting
yep.
L
So
my
husband
and
I
moved
here
almost
11
years
ago
and
purchased
at
home
just
the
way.
It
is
pretty
much
done
some
interior
and
remodeling
and
things,
but
as
Miss
Lambert
said,
we
adopted
three
children
and
so
in
a
three
bedroom
one
and
a
half
bath.
It's
just
been
really
tight.
Obviously,
knowing
that
our
property
is
small,
already
going
out
anymore
was
not
an
option.
L
The
garage
in
our
like
dining
area
are
the
only
two
areas
of
the
home
that
have
a
flat
roof,
so
it
made
sense
to
just
go
up
there,
put
two
bedrooms
and
a
bathroom
upstairs
for
our
good
girls
and
be
able
to
convert
an
actual
laundry
room
and
half
bath
downstairs
for
more
living
space
for
the
kiddos.
L
So
for
us
looking
at
how
it
would
least
impact
the
imprint
of
the
current
square
footage
of
the
yard
in
the
home.
We
felt
like
that
was
kind
of
the
best
option,
our
neighbors
to
the
well.
Actually,
our
neighbors
on
each
side
to
the
west
and
the
east
of
us
are
the
only
two
on
our
two
block:
regions
that
have
carports
every
other
home
from
8th
to
tenth,
has
converted
their
garage
and
has
no
garage
or
parkour
no
garage
door
or
anything.
L
So
it
won't
change
the
exterior
look
of
our
home,
we'll
still
have
about
I'm,
not
sure,
but
the
actual
square
footage,
but
maybe
10
feet.
Deep
of
garage
was
fully
use
for
storage
and
keep
a
garage
door
there
on
the
front,
but
it
we've
never
used
it
as
a
car
garage
because
it's
so
narrow
anyway,
but
that's
Library.
K
One
question:
it
would
be:
okay,
if
it
was
approved,
we
can
connect
it
to
the
existing
structure
and
approval.
What
means
if
the
approval
would
happen,
just
an
existing
structure
if
Something's
Happened
down
the
road
and
the
structure
was
these
applications
that
only
apply
to
this
existing
structure
in.
K
B
E
B
F
G
F
J
E
I
know
that
I'm
sure
we
certainly
empathize
with
the
personal
situation
of
the
applicant,
but,
as
we
know,
our
findings
of
facts
cannot
be
based
on.
You
know
personal
circumstances,
so
taking
that
aside,
I
do
think
that
the
fact
that
the
home
is
already
as
small
as
it
is,
and
even
making
these
additions
will
still
make
it
a
relatively
small
home
in
terms
of
square
footage
and,
as
you
mentioned,
they're,
not
increasing.
The
walk
coverage.
Certainly
you
know
makes
this
adhere
to
the
criteria
of
minimum
possible
request.
F
E
J
H
B
A
There's
a
there's,
an
existing
house,
that's
been
there
for
about
100
years
and
it's
an
attractive
house
to
the
front.
It's
kind
of
long
and
it
covers
much
of
a
lot,
and
so
that's
the
price.
That's
that's
currently
used
as
a
residence
that
would
stay
there.
Is
that
I'm?
Sorry,
you
asked
what
again
the.
A
The
hardship
is
that
we
have
that
building
is
important
to
us.
We
have
space
in
the
back
and
we
we're
gonna.
Our
plan
is
to
remove
those
two
smaller
buildings,
but
the
hardship
is
that
it
is
a
fairly
small
building
footprint
available
to
us
and
because
we're
trying
to
keep
the
nature
of
the
front
of
the
house
similar
to
the
way
it
is
now
which
is
a
you
know,
has
a
nice
Street
face
pedestrian
oriented
to
get
the
ability
to
park
for
cars
off
site.
We
need
to
accommodate
that
from
the
alley
side.
A
So
Our
intention
is
to
take
this.
You
know
CBD
district
house
and
basically
use
it
for
two
houses
and
so
to
be
able
to
build
a
second
primary
structure
at
the
rear
side
of
the
house
that
we're
requesting
some
relief
on
the
back
side.
Currently,
it's
I
think
it's
a
15-foot
rear
setback.
We
have
a
building.
A
That's
there
that
we're
going
to
remove
this
3.3
feet,
2
inches,
so
we're
not
trying
to
do
that
much,
but
we'd
like
to
maintain
about
a
space
of
10
feet
between
the
two
buildings,
so
that
there's
kind
of
a
comfortable
space
down
the
road
they're
going
to
probably
have
a
pool
in
that
area.
That's
left
over
this
sort
of
board
and
the
to
be
able
to
get
those
four
spaces
we
I
sort
of
did
the
math
backwards
to
be
able
to
get
four
cars
in
a
garage
if
I'm
five
feet
from
that
spot.
A
A
So
to
be
able
to
get
a
pool,
that's
just
going
to
be
basically
kind
of
like
a
a
nice
nice
yard
areas,
our
intent
so.
A
Thing
I
haven't
asked
but
I,
but
do
we
take
it
under
advisement?
Do
you
need
to
make
that
a
requirement
or.
K
K
A
D
A
D
D
A
The
the
yard
would
be
able
to
access
from
both
sides
so
from
the
alley
or
the
front.
So
you
where
the
pool
would
be
there's
still
going
to
be
a
gate.
There's
going
to
be
ability
to
to
walk
past
that
the
so
the
people,
the
family,
that
owns
the
property,
their
relatives
and
each
other,
so
they're
kind
of
using
the
outdoor
space
together.
K
A
Course,
basically,
the
four
spots
in
the
back
taking
care
of
the
requirement
of
the
house
to
the
front,
because
the
ones
that
are
in
the
right-of-way
don't
count
so
we're
just
dealing
with
that's
effectively.
That's
a
hardship
that
the
house
that's
existing
to
be
able
to
it
doesn't
have.
It
doesn't
have
a
garage
the
way
it
is
now.
A
22
foot
space
to
the
one
side
there
you
can
see
it
on
the
left
side
of
that
where
the
existing
house
is
so
the
thing
that
extends
out
would
probably
probably
would
be
removed
at
some
point,
but
there's
effectively
70
by
20
space
and
they
would
just
design
it
from
within
that
that
hasn't
been
designed,
but
we're
not
fighting
lock
coverage.
So.
M
N
The
software
to
me
on
this
image
on
the
back
side
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
everyone
can
see
at
the
top
there,
it
shows
the
five
foot
setback,
but
that
runs
into
the
back
of
those
sort
of
sort
of
the
backside.
Two
cars.
What
would
be
the
the
area
that
those
cars
are
parked
on?
Is
that
going
to
be
gravel
or
concrete
or
grass?
Is
that
area
going
to
be
paved
in
any
way?
There's.
A
Going
to
be
conditions
face
above
that,
so
there
would
be
columns,
so
it's
effectively
like
a
carport
and
I
would
imagine
it
would
be
paper
or
something
of
that
nature,
but
it
would
not,
but
it's
going
to
be
covered
by
a
building,
so
it
doesn't
have
bearing
insurance.
It's
going
to
be
impervious
space
based
on
that,
but
the
surface
would
be
something
ingorious,
though,.
E
A
And
that's
the
in
that
particular
drawing
where
it's
a
carport.
That
was
not
our
goal.
To
do
that
we
had.
That
was
one
of
the
initial
drawings
I
provided
and
then,
when
we
provide
our
application,
we
had
something
differently,
but
basically
our
intent
was
to
have
four
car
garage
and
then
not
have
that
cardboard.
A
The
way
that
particular
drawing
depicts,
but
if
you
have,
but
if
I
needed
to
and
I
had
to
go
that
route,
let's
say
if
I
had
not
the
full,
not
the
5
PM
requesting,
let's
say:
if
we
had
less
then
I
would
have
to
accommodate
it
differently,
because
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
get
two
cars
into
the
garage.
The
way
I'm
positioning.
A
E
M
B
E
D
E
That's
true
that
I
do
caution
the
board
against.
You
know
drifting
into
code
enforcement.
Your
point
is
certainly
taken
and
we
don't
want
to.
You
know,
create
potential
issues,
but
I
think
if
they're
proposing
a
parking
structure
that
staff
has
determined
meets
the
criteria
for
parking,
we
do
need
to
consider
it
as
that
and
I.
E
I
do
think
that
considering
I
mean
I
know
that
they
have
a
massive
amount
of
lot
coverage
that
they're
allowed
in
the
zoning
District.
But
I
do
think
that
reducing
the
setbacks
by
10
feet
in
the
rear,
when
you
back
up
to
an
alley
to
accommodate
more
parking,
is
certainly
minimal.
I
think
the
neighbors
would
probably
prefer
that
to
them.
E
K
N
N
B
E
M
At
a
minimum
that
would
be
typically
five
feet
before
they
would
have
to
fire
rate
everything.
So
we
know
if
they
did
Pull
It
Forward
the
odds
aren't
going
to
end
up
being
five
feet
between
the
two
structures,
so
you
still
have
the
rear
setback
of
10
instead
of
15,
unless
it
became
an
addition
onto
the
existing
structure
which,
given
the
age
of
that
building,
I,
don't
know
if
that
is
practical,
and
so
it
was
relatively
teens.
M
But
I
think
that
would
be
the
only
reasonable
way
to
meet
that
15-foot
setback
without
complete
redesigned
the
project
keep
in
mind
right
now.
They
have
no
outside
parking
and
they
do
have
two
legal
units
on
the
property.
J
E
O
P
Sure
we
designed
to
drive
up
ATM
it's
property
and
we
wanted
to
ensure
that
we
would
have
people
parking
on
the
property.
This
creates
in
some
ways
of
liability
for
the
client
and
owner
of
the
property,
and
we
think
potential.
P
P
P
P
Put
some
signage
on
it,
but
it's
it's
for
the
fact
that
in
some
ways
for
a
regular
requirement
that
we
are
vacating
the
beaches
branch
of
one-to-one
Financial
and
we
need
to
provide
another
location
for
the
customers
who
wants
to
One
Financial
at
the
beach.
Until
we
can
find
another
permanent
branch
location.
B
E
B
E
P
There
wouldn't
be
a
permanent
structure.
There
there'll
be
this
ATM.
We
do
have
an
option
that
we'll
work
through
it
right
now
to
have
another
walk-up
ATM
off
the
off
the
sidewalk,
not
on
the
property,
so
it
would
be
right
off
of
the
sidewalk
again.
We
still
don't
allow
parking
at
some
people
to
park
and
then
come
use
it
that
be
the
only
additional
change
we're
still
considering
with
in
terms
of
the
site
plan.
But
once
that
side
plan
is
fixed,
we
have
no
problem
with
the
variance
running.
G
P
We
take
a
service
about
the
customers
of
one-to-one
financial,
it's
a
safer
in
many
ways:
ATM
Department
and
if
we
get
traffic
off
the
road
pretty
quickly
and
on
his
site,
lots
of
room
to
cute
cars
on
property.
But
again
we
just
don't
want
people
hanging
out
there.
F
E
So
if
there's
anyone
who
wishes
to
speak-
and
it's
not
filled
out
a
speaker's
card,
please
make
sure
you
do
so
before
you
leave
sure.
Please.
H
O
Brit
Sanders
2029
3rd
Street,
North,
ioni,
building
adjacent
to
this
property
in
the
picture
there
on
Seagate.
My
question
for
the
applicant
was
the
the
dry
Pond
just
curious.
What
what
that
was
the
design
of
that
I
didn't
want
it
to
be
some
mosquito,
Bond,
so
I'm
assuming
try.
This
is
for
water
retention
and
the
other
question
was
on
the
lighting
for
it.
So
if
they
can
answer
that,
thank
you.
E
E
Okay,
would
the
agent
like
to
address
the
questions
made
during
public
comment.
P
Yeah
happy
to
the
dry
Pond,
as
you
know,
is
a
requirement
that
we
retain
our
impervious
services
on
site.
We
don't
want
to
create
an
open,
Pond,
I
think
it
has
problem
there
too.
So
we
do
have
a
dry
Pond,
which
basically
means
we'll
have
a
bio
square,
a
little
bit
of
depressed
area
that
will
capture
the
water
requirements
from
the
runoff
for
our
site.
It's
not
an
open
pond
and
to
the
second
question
about
lighting,
we
don't
have
side
lighting,
we're
not
going
to
have
big
poles
lighting
up
the
drive.
P
We
will
have
lighting
around
the
kiosk,
so
there's
safety
and
there's
some
visibility
to
it.
But
again
the
chaos
goes
very
low
and
it
won't
be
any
more
lighting
than
you
would
see
from
Indiana
kiosk,
that's
sitting
in
an
apartment.
There
is
a
the
kind
of
tall
Street
lighting
that
you
might
find
difficult.
E
You
guys
can
attempt
to
that
on
your
own
time.
Any
other
questions
of
the
agent
on
residence.
Okay,
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
the
item
back
to
the
board
for
discussion.
Is
there
a
motion?
I
make
a.
F
Based
on
testimony
evidence,
provided
the
request
has
met
all
the
standards
for
variance
is
outlined
in
section
34-286,
the
Land
Development
code,
and
that
the
motion
is
conditioned
or
the
approval
is
conditioned
on
the
plans
that
were
submitted.
Second.
N
Just
want
to
know
I
think
having
the
response
for
me
was
was
at
first
a
question
mark
around
seeing
people
at
ATMs
kind
of
dragging
if
you've
been
installing
on
traffic
but
as
the
African
indicated
and
as
I'm
looking
at
plans.
I
do
think
it's
nice
to
see
that
they
did
make
a
large
amount
look,
that
cars
can
be
Accu
to
the
ATM
and
as
cars
move
out,
but
it's
time
for
them
to
settle
themselves.
N
E
I
would
agree
and
piggybacking
off
of
that.
Not
only
do
I
think
having
the
structure
further
back
on
the
property
makes
it
better.
For
you
know,
customer
traffic
flow,
but
I
think
it
also
probably
makes
for
a
nice
or
nicer
line
of
sight
from
the
road
than
having
a
you
know,
big
metal,
kiosk
right
up
on
Third
Street.
This
will
be
a
little
bit
more
aesthetically
pleasing.
As
imagine.
C
E
E
And
I
said:
none
would
the
applicator
agent
please
be
sworn
in
and
give
your
testimony?
Yes,.
H
R
This
property
yeah,
it's
a
non-conforming
size
lot,
it's
6
300
feet
in
a
little
7
500.
and
and
it's
a
lot
that
Jack's
Beach
themselves
plotted
in
2006..
So.
R
So
the
pan
that
I
just
gave
you
doesn't
address
lot
coverage
because
light
coverage
is
easy.
That's
you
really
can't
depict
that,
but
it's
there's
the
front
of
the
house
and
I
wrote
Sunshine,
Court
and
Ponce
de
Leon,
so
we
can
tell
how
this
house
is
situated
and
then
the
little
pink
bastard
over
there
on
the
right
hand,
side
that
second
floor
bump
out
is
what's
going
to
be
10
feet
in
lieu
of
the
13.4
and
every
other.
R
So
the
first
floor
is
going
to
be
12
feet
instead
of
10
feet,
I'm,
not
sure
if
that
makes
sense,
but
from
a
line
of
sight
down
Ponce
de
Leon.
Every
other
house
is
exactly
10
feet
from
the
property
line,
so
this
will
keep
it
consistent.
It
will
even
be
further
away
from
this
from
the
corner
or
from
the
property
line,
because
where
our
10
feet
is
the
second
floor
and
it's
just
a
small
little
bump
out,
not
the
entire
plane
of
the
house,
if
that
makes
sense.
R
So
if
you
look
at
the
second
page,
I
drew
a
red
line
at
the
10
foot
mark
and
so
the
first
floor.
Footprint
of
the
house
is
actually
further
away
than
than
we're
asking
and
the
reason
that
we
are
asking
for
the
tend
to
be
the
reason.
The
second
floor
bump
out
counts,
as
as
setback
is
because
it's
walkable
square
footage.
The
other
bump
outs
are
our
window
seats
and
they
don't
go
down
to
the
floor,
but
they're
every
all
the
other
building
restriction
lines
are
are
in
line
with,
because
I
see.
R
K
R
R
K
E
I
think
the
reason
that
Mr
true
are
has
brought
this
up
is
that
if
we
are
to
consider
there's.
J
E
You
know
a
3200
square
foot
home
is
a
is
a
pretty
nice
sized
home,
and
if
this
were
a
standard
lot
versus
a
substandard
lot,
the
home
would
actually
be
over
the
minimum
or
the
maximum
lot
coverage.
So
I
think.
J
E
B
R
Oh
I
could
build
a
1600
square
foot
house,
which
is
which
is
the
minute
of
1200
square
foot
house,
which
is
the
minimum
for
rs2,
but
I
mean
no
one's
going
to
want
to
know.
What's
going
on,
hey
buy
that
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
understand
that
we're
basically
trying
to
build
according
to
to
the
market
and
and
I
understand
that
that
the
word
profit
is
is
not
allowed
to
be
thrown
out.
R
But
with
the
cost
of
the
lot
that
we
paid
the
city
for
and
the
cost
of
construction
and
any
anything
less
than
the
number
of
bedrooms
and
bathrooms
that
we've
got
in
here
would
not
be
a
salable
house,
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
not
sure,
I'm
understanding.
If.
R
J
R
The
the
problem
is
not
a
problem
because
we
bought
into
this,
but
one
of
the
stipulations
of
this
particular
lot
in
all
three
of
them.
That
are
the
other
two
coming
up.
We
had
six
months
to
get
this
done
from
the
Timeless
purchased
or
the
city
is
going
to
take
it
back
from
us.
So
if
and
I'm,
not
trying
to
say
anything
negative
about
what
you're
doing,
but
if
it
doesn't
get
approved,
I
have
to
give
the
lot
back
to
the
city
and
I
lose
about
thirty
thousand
dollars.
R
So
I'm
not
trying
to
say
you
have
to
approve
what
I've
asked
for,
but
it
sounds
like
if
I
would
have
asked
for
anything
over
35
percent
and
then
you
would
have
questioned
what
I'm
asking
for
so
I'm
just
trying
I'm
just
trying
to
you
know
I'm
trying
to
foresee
what
we
might
need
for
a
pool
and
amenities
in
the
backyard
and
in
a
full
driveway
I.
Most
of
it's
going
to
be
the
driveway
I'm.
E
B
R
Yes,
that
flies
in
the
face
of
every
everybody
who
comes
in
here
and
asks
for
variance
for
approval,
because
people
don't
have
to
build
a
pool,
they
don't
have
to
build
pavers
around
the
pool
they
could
put
mulch
around
the
pool,
so
I
mean
I'm
I've
been
building
in
Jax
Beach
for
almost
20
years.
Now
that
I've
come
to
various
meetings
on
my
free
time,
just
to
see
how
things
go
so
I'm
trying
I
mean
I've
seen
many
variances
approved
higher
than
50
percent
for
a
pool
and
a
cool
deck,
I
I
think.
F
What
what's
happened
here
is
that
you
had
submitted
some
rough
plans,
no
this
this,
for
this
is
not
rough
plans.
These
are
not
rough
plans.
What
we're
looking
extra
well
I
mean
I
suppose,
and
let
me
let
me
say
what
you've
seen
or
what's
been
approved
or
plans
that
are
very
specific
as
to
what
it
is
that
they
want
here's,
the
pool
that
I
want
here's
the
deck
that
I
want,
here's
the
shape
of
the
house
and
here's
how
much
you
know.
R
Have
some
Footprints
like
this?
The
floor
plans
are
done,
I
mean
the
floor.
Plans
are
done
and
for
this
for
this
particular
house
for
two
of
the
three
houses
the
floor
plans,
the
elevations
everything
is
done.
I
submitted
this
stuff
because
I
I
thought
and
apparently
it's
I
was
mistaken-
that
this
would
have
been
the
easiest
to
explain
what
what
we've
got
going
on.
D
F
B
R
I
don't
submit
through
permit
by
March
31st
I
have
to
give
a
lots
back
at
Jax
Beach
they're
going
to
take
them
back
within
that's
in
the
Deep.
That's
in
that's
written
in
the
deed,
so
I
have
no
I
have
no
extra
time.
But
if
we
rolled
it
to
the
next
hearing,
I
don't
have
that
much
I.
Don't
have
that
time.
I
mean
I
seriously.
Don't
have
that
time.
So.
K
R
K
E
Certainly,
there's
certainly
evidence
here
that
this
property
is
a
is
a
good
candidate
for
some
relief
from
code,
because
it
is
an
undersized
lot,
but
knowing
that
you
asked
for
50.
Basically
thinking
like
you
know,
I
want
to
have
as
much
as
I
possibly
can
to
know
what
I
have.
K
K
E
R
So
Jacksonville
Beach
had
an
opportunity
to
develop
these
laws
as
conforming
laws.
They
had
an
opportunity.
They
chose
in
2006
the
design,
lots
that
were
non-conforming,
that
was
their
choice
and
and
yes,
I
chose
to
buy
them
an
auction.
So
if
somebody
wants
to
say
well,
shame
on
you
for
buying
them,
then
then
I'd
I
will
eat
that.
R
F
K
M
So
if
we
were
based
on
the
limited
amount
of
information
that
we
have,
we
know
that
the
house
is
what
50
feet
wide,
because
you're
you've
got
a
67
foot
wide
lot,
you're
losing
5
feet
on
one
side,
12
feet
on
the
other
and
then
guessing
that
it
was
roughly
40
45
feet,
long
plus
the
driveway.
That's
about
37,
okay
and
then
the
Pavilion
would
have
taken
up
another.
You
know
200
square
feet
or
something
it
would
get
them
close
to
40..
Nothing
in
our
calculations
anticipated
in
pool
deck,
assumed.
R
R
It's
not
that
deep
I
mean
I
could
show
I
could
pull
it
by
my
phone
and
show
you
the
plan.
The
plans
are
done
so
and
and
it's
unfortunate
if
I
have
to
change
them,
because
we
were
on
such
a
time
constraint
that
it's
a
long
story
on
why
we
I
was
not
as
quick
as
Robert
Barnes.
R
It
was
out
of
my
control,
but
it
was
a
financial
thing
why
we
couldn't
start
as
soon
as
he
did
so
around
the
under
the
gun
to
design
the
homes
so
I
applied
for
the
variants
and
we've
designed
the
homes
based
on
maximizing
the
building
restriction
lines,
because
that's
going
to
get
us
the
square
footage
that
we
need.
It's,
not
it's,
not
a
large
home,
Robert
Barnes
next
door
to
me
is
a
bigger
house
than
ours.
Physically
square
footage.
Wise
is
a
bigger
house.
R
J
R
Just
don't
want
to
do
driveway
strips
so
I
want
to
do
a
full
driveway.
That's
the
bulk
of
it.
It's
20
20
by
16
20
by
18.,
and
then
the
Pavilion
in
the
back
is
literally
going
to
be
an
outdoor
kitchen
counter
with
a
roof
over
it.
It's
not
a
big
Pavilion
in
terms
of
like
you,
like
yeah,
like
so
far
right
now,
yeah.
R
So
the
back
of
the
square
footage
is,
is
the
house
in
the
driveway
and
the
sidewalk
to
the
front
door?
I
mean
I.
Do
this
for
a
living,
so
I
know
that
it's
it's
not.
J
B
R
An
air
conditioning
pad
there's
a
pool
equipment
pad,
there's
an
LP
gas
tank
pad.
So
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
that
gets
that
you
can't
see
that
gets,
eaten
up,
I
mean
if
I
mean
I'm,
shooting
myself
and
not
printing
out
the
full
set
of
plans.
Now,
but
I
thought
that
this
was
the
the
best
rendition
I
mean
this.
This
is
the
site
plan
is,
is
accurate
other
than
showing
sidewalks
well
yeah.
This
Cyclone
we're
just.
K
R
M
To
the
chair,
I
wouldn't
want
to
speculate
on
an
exact
number,
but
these
are
very
rough
numbers,
because
the
the
shape
of
a
lot
kind
of
includes
the
exact
measurements
and
even
the
cycling
that
he
gave
us
tonight
doesn't
have
measurements
on
this.
With
all
a
lot
of
supposition
that
I
would
kind
of
negotiate
on
so.
R
Definitely
did
not
expect
this.
This
I
don't
know
what
to
tell
you
I'm
asking
for
50,
because
ultimately
somebody
is
going
to
come
back
and
ask
for
more
that's
going
to
equal,
roughly
50
percent
and
I
understand
the
thought
that
okay,
if
you
give
him
50,
he's
going
to
design
right
after
that
very
bit,
that's
a
possibility,
but
I'm
everything
that
we
want
to
do
I
know
will
fit
within
50,
because
I've
done
it
before
on
on
a
lot
this
size-
and
this
is
a
smaller
lot
than
most
of
the
other
Lots.
E
R
R
I'm,
just
asking
what's
typical
for
for
the
people
that
have
been
approved,
I
mean
that's
all
I'm
doing
I
mean
I'm
I'm,
putting
out
almost
three
million
dollars
to
build
these
three
houses
and
and
I
mean
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say:
I
mean
everything,
everything
that
we're
doing
can
be
done
within
50
and
so
I'm
asking
for
50
percent
I
I
it
I,
don't
I,
don't
I,
just
don't
I
just
understand
the
hang
up
over,
say
two
percent
or
whatever.
It
is.
R
J
G
R
B
R
R
N
I
would
say
the
hardship
that
you've
defined
so
far
for
this
love
is
that
it
is
substandard
in
size.
The
standard
size
outlined
in
the
code
is
7,
500
square
foot,
your
large
6300
square
foot,
and
if
you
adjust
your
lock
to
a
standard
lock,
that's
84
roughly
that
35
divided
by
84
does
not
get
you
to
50,
which
means
that
this
is
a
full
body,
you're
asking
more
than
the
substandard,
and
even
if
that
was
the
case,
that's
not
necessarily
true,
but
that's
the
minimum
of
life.
N
Does
this
even
make
sense,
given
what
you've
identified
as
your
hardship
and
without
the
level
of
detail
that
we're
talking
about
of
knowing
exactly
what
you're
doing
and
being
able
to
understand
your
circumstance.
It's
difficult
to
see
this
as
the
minimum
viable
use
of
the
lot
that
you
recognize
when
you
purchase
the
lot
as
outlined
in
the
development
code,
because
your
hardship
is
such
that
you're,
asking
for
more
than
you
would
get
with
a
standard
line.
So
so.
R
R
D
K
May
not
know
what
we're
looking
at
you're.
Looking
at
the
morning's
point
of
view,
I'm
trying
to
explain
what
we
look
as
order,
we
have
information
that
seems
to
be
accurate
and
rely
on
recommendation
details
that
people
plan
yeah
I,
think
the
plans
are
great
I,
just
as
I
said,
I'm
just
a
challenge
for
some
thoughts
on
them.
I've
never
had
a
bill
to
come,
say
I
want
to
go
50
every
everything.
Every.
R
R
R
We'd
have
to
I'd
have
to
if
that's
what
you
want
to
approve,
but
what
what
my
point
is:
I,
don't
understand:
The
Hangout
between
48
and
50
percent.
It's
it's
almost
like
it's!
It's
like
and
I
don't
mean
this
disrespectfully,
but
it's
almost
like
the
little
kid
just
wants
to
get
his
way
because
I
said
so.
I
want
I
mean
it's.
If
I
just
said
50
would,
would
you
be
guys
be.
K
Throwing
around
50
that's
a
52
percent,
I
think
I
think
we're
using
your
feedback
to
try
to
help
you
through
this
process
and
ask
you
where
you
are
existing
today
right
now
and
we're
trying
to
get
you
to
some
kind
of
a
means
to
the
end.
I
mean
we're
not
sitting
there,
throwing
up
around
we're
trying
to
respect
all
of
your
hard
work
and
investment
in
this,
and
when
you
respect.
E
R
Trying
I'm
trying
to
head
all
that
off
of
the
past
I
appreciate
that
I'm
trying
to
yeah
yeah
so
I'm
trying
to
keep
a
home
run
from
coming
in
and
asking
for
53,
so
I'm
trying
to
build
what
somebody's
going
to
want
to
buy
I
mean
based
on
what
we
paid
for
the
lot
and
based
on
construction
costs,
plus
an
insanely
small
profit.
These
are
going
to
have
to
sell
for
1.5
million
and
I
know.
R
R
And
the
drive
the
the
whole
street
is
narrow,
as
it
is
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
know:
I'm
I
bumped
it
up
to
50
percent
to
try
to
keep
somebody
else
from
coming
in
asking
for
more
to
do
something
different,
because
I
want
to
build
something
that
no
one's
going
to
have
any
desire
to
do
anything
different.
R
That's
why
I
asked
for
50
percent
I
mean
if
it
doesn't
get
approved
and
I,
don't
know
whether
I
can
keep
going
forward
with
this
house
design.
Then
I've
got
to
give
all
three
locks
back
and
I
mean
I'll,
go
out
of
business
I'm,
not
saying
that
as
a
threat
I'm
just
saying
it
as
a
fact
I
mean
I
bet,
I
bet
the
farm
on
these
three
laws.
I
bet
the
farm
and
I'm
asking
for
I'm,
not
asking
for
any
more
than
anyone
else
has
ever
asked.
I
mean
it's
not
the
the
way.
R
E
The
appearing
none
I'll
ask
the
EBC
in
for
now,
and
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
Do
we
have
any
speakers,
of
course.
Q
E
K
E
M
Through
the
chair,
this
will
help
at
all
35
of
a
standard,
7
500
square
foot
lot
on.
This
lot
would
come
out
to
about
42
percent
the
house
just
based
on
meeting
the
setbacks
of
the
20
and
30
front
and
rear,
and
the
two
side
setbacks
is
roughly
50
by
45.,
plus
it's
assuming
about
350
square
feet
for
the
driveway
it
comes
out
to
about
42
percent,
so
the
housing
driveway
alone
would
take
up
roughly
what
35
percent
would
be
on
a
full-size
lot
without.
M
M
As
he
had
pointed
out,
there's
no
that
doesn't
necessarily
account
for
the
bump
out.
It
doesn't
account
for
air
conditioning
pads
pool
equipment
pad
those
kind
of
things
any
walkways.
So
without
that
information
you
can't
really
zero
in
on
that
a
specific
amount
over
that,
but
to
say
that
there's
probably
some
leeway
that
would
be
needed
reasonable.
J
E
K
M
Well,
that's
what
he
had
proposed
it
as
again.
The
cyclone
and
I
originally
had
to
work
off
of
was
the
the
highlight
it
was
so
I
think
we
operate
under
the
assumption
that
50
was
what
was
shown
because
there
would
have
a
bunches
on
the
Pavilion,
and
you
know,
obviously
the
ancillary
stuff
wasn't
shown.
M
Obviously
we're
trying
to
be
accommodating
to
know
the
timeline
and
considering
the
the
constraints
that
he
has,
but
yeah
I
think
looking
wrongly
on
my
part,
I
assumed
that
that
was
showing
50
I
didn't
realize
there
was
an
intent
for
other
feature.
Lock
cover
is
included
in
that.
B
E
The
existing
Lots
were
plotted
as
substandard,
which
I
know
happens
all
over
the
city
all
the
time,
but
seeing
as
this
was
slightly
more
recent,
do
you
know
if
this
was
done?
Any
anticipation
of
revisions
being
made
to
the
Land
Development
code.
B
M
These
were
done,
basically,
the
city,
because
this
is
part
of
the
South
District
CRA
had
acquired
these
lots
and
recognized
that
if
they
were
built,
all
the
driveways
would
exit
on
the
South
Beach
Parkway,
so
they
created
the
sunshine
Court
cul-de-sac
so
that
these
would
have
driveways
that
wouldn't
enter
onto
a
major
or
Fort
Wayne,
Road
and
they've
just
sat
being
at
this
the
whole
time.
So
the
CRA
and
the
city
got
together
to
say:
let's
auction
is
off
with
the
intent
that
they
would
be
built
a
single-family
homes.
M
So
there
wasn't
really
any
thought
process
to
Future
changes
in
the
code.
It
was
just.
This
is
the
space
we
have
once
you
take
the
road
out.
You
know
that
was
slightly
smaller
lot,
so
they
can
buy
them
with
wire
to
try
and
keep
the
square
footage
as
close
as
possible.
There's
a
15
by
125
watt
is
62
50
square
feet.
This
is
roughly
63
to
65
of
these
laws.
N
M
So
they're
normal
side
yard
requirements
are
combined
with
15
10
and
5,
basically
or
seven,
and
a
half
seven
and
a
half
with
a
quarter
side.
It's
20
of
the
width
of
property,
which
in
this
case
is
like
13
and
some
change,
so
that
setback
ends
up
being
three
and
a
half
or
so
feed
more
than
the
other
Watts
on
the
property.
G
F
J
J
K
H
E
N
Exit
I
think
my
question
or
concern
or
interest
interest
is
probably
a
better
word
around.
The
48
is,
if
our
biggest
contingency
on
the
50
is
lack
of
clarity
of
why
50
is
required.
I've
not
heard
anything
that
has
that
Clarity
to
sport,
48.
so
I
think
even
at
48.
You
end
up
with
the
same
question
mark
of.
Why
is
48
the
right
number
and
it
just
become
speculative,
so
I
I
don't
see
the
report
behind
48
that
lacks
behind
50
other
than
it's
just
a
smaller.
K
E
D
Or
something
we
didn't
have
mentions,
coverage
figured
out
for
the
worst
for
people,
I
have
an
air
blocked.
You
guys,
I
have
not
personally
seen
this
request
was
either
written
down
where
we
could
actually
see
it
on
paper.
If
this
is
what
he
needs
within
a
square
feet.
Okay,
we
don't
know,
that's
just
the
weirdest
thing.
K
E
Q
G
F
G
F
F
R
House
other
than
a
the
hand-drawn
footprint
is
not
in
a
further
along.
This
is
the
least
far
along
of
the
three,
which
is
why
all
I
have
is
that
front
front
elevation,
but
I
do
have
a
hand-drawn
footprint
and,
like
Chris,
was
saying
that
the
house
and
the
driveway
combined
on
all
these
first
two
take
up
roughly
42
percent
of
the
of
the
lock
coverage
of
the
House
of
the
of
the
lot.
R
R
But
I
know
everything
works
within
50,
because
it's
what
I
do
for
a
living
and
after
my
meeting
was
Christian
that
I
didn't
dream
that
there
would
be
this.
This
much
resistance.
R
R
K
J
R
J
K
R
Thing
because
when
we
I
didn't
have
any
design
done
whatsoever
for
any
of
these
houses,
when
I
met
with
Christian
and
the
the
the
coverage
was
assuming,
knowing
that
a
a
reasonable
Dimension
house,
the
building
restriction
lines
barely
make
it
so
there's
some
tight
quarters.
I
didn't
want
to
ask
for
a
rear
yard
variant,
so
they
didn't
want
people
behind
me
to
get
upset.
I
didn't
want
to
ask
for
side
yard
variants,
because
it's
rs2
and
it
says
not
10
and
10..
It
was
10
and
10
I.
R
The
width
is
good,
the
depth
is
pretty
shallow,
and
but
we've
made
it
work
all
all
three
bedrooms.
The
master
bedroom
is
on
the
second
floor
and
it's
it's
rare
in
Jax
Beach
to
find
a
house
with
a
master
on
the
first
floor.
So
that's
you
know
it
would
have
been
nice
to
have
gotten
I
mean
I
could
have
asked
for
more
square
footage
and
I
put
more
more
coverage.
I
could
have
asked
for
a
rear
yard
setback.
Rear
ends
in
order
to
get
the
master
on
the
first
floor.
But
we
didn't
do
that.
R
R
People
leave
out
sidewalks
and
get
the
CO,
and
then
they
put
the
sidewalk
in
when
it's
done
and
and
rarely
does
anybody
ever
come
by
and
notice
it
I'm
trying
to
head
it
off
in
the
past
and
I
build
I
build
my
spec
homes
to
where
there's
nothing
who
left
to
desire
for
the
buyer.
The
pool
is
going
to
go
in
they're
going
to
have
an
outdoor
kitchen.
They
literally
couldn't
even
dream
of
something
that
they
would
want.
That
would
require
more
lock
coverage
and
and
based
on
the
size
of
the
lot.
E
K
G
I
think
that
there
certainly
are
builders
who
have
grappled
with
do
I
put
this
in
or
do
I
put
this
in
and
and
they
give
up
to
the
illusion
of
being
able
to
have
the
perfect
design
and
I
think
that
he
blocks
himself
in
a
way,
because
he's
insisting
that
he
wants
to
have
a
perfect
design
as
and
I
think
there
are
some
hard
choices
that
he
can
make
and
still
have
a
desirable
product
s,
and
so
50
is
not
the
limit.
G
E
You
is
there
a
second
can
I,
second,
that
in
a
second,
though,
okay,
a
discussion
on
the
motion
to
amend
the
motion
on
the
floor
from
50
to
48
percent
I.
Think
we're
seeing
a
very
similar
I
I
certainly
do
value
Mr
McGinnis
feedback
about
the
fact
that
he's
only
asking
for
lot
coverage
without
encroaching
into
any
setbacks.
E
I
do
think
that
that
is
is
worthy
of
our
consideration,
but
I
do
still
see
where
the
fellow
board
members
are
coming
from
in
feeling
like
48
is
a
more
accurate
reflection
of
the
actual
minimum
of
what
can
we
achieve
a
lot?
So
any
other
discussion
on
the
motion
to
amend
the
promotion
on
the
floor.
G
E
D
F
R
This
is
an
extremely
difficult
lot
to
design
a
house
for,
and
you
can
see
the
front
page.
Those
little
pink
tick
marks
represent
the
different
brl
variances
that
I'm
asking
for
so
the
the
front
yard.
I'll
address
the
front
yard
on
the
next
page.
R
So
so
that's
the
the
actual
porch
comes
out
put
a
little
further
and
that's
just
we're
going
to
lose
the
applicant
from
the
microphone.
R
R
R
If
I
detest,
the
garage
I
could
put
it
five
foot
to
the
backyard,
but
we
I
don't
want
to
do
that.
So
I
pulled
it
10
feet
off
the
rear
yard
and
put
a
bedroom
over
that
and
it's
attached.
R
Yeah
and
and
then
to
the
South
with,
if
you're
looking
at
it
like
this
with
the
cul-de-sac
on
top
on
the
right
hand,
side,
that's
an
abandoned,
roadway,
Seminole
Road,
so
there's
25
30
feet
to
to
the
South
before
you
hit
the
fences
to
the
backyard
of
Riptide.
So
there's
no
money
to
the
South.
That
would
be
I'd
be
encroaching
on.
R
So
that's
where
we've,
where
we've
got
seven
instead
of
ten
on
that
side,
and
the
reason
we
ask
for
that
is
so
we
can
get
an
adequate
distance
off
off
the
the
you
can
see
a
little
vestibule
going
from
the
garage
into
this
like
a
mud
room,
a
little
itsy,
bitsy
mud
room
and
so
I'm
I'm,
going
to
ask
I'm
going
to
beg
you
for
50
on
this
one,
because
this
this
one
is
just
it's
an
animal
I,
don't
know
anything
other
to
say
it's.
It's.
K
R
D
M
R
The
20-foot
front
yard
and-
and
it's
like
I
said
it's
just
the
column
that
supports
the
roof
over
the
front
porch
that
that
gets
close
to
that
six
foot
mark.
R
R
A
walk
through
yeah,
it's
a
mud
room,
it's
a
I
mean
it's
probably
I.
Don't
have
the
dimensions
on
here,
but
it
might
be
seven
by
seven.
It's
small,
it's
enough
for
kids
to
put
their
backpacks
and
all
I
all
have
to
ask
and
bang
on
this
one.
Just
don't
don't
do
the
48
on
this
one,
I,
don't
I!
Don't
we
were
long
and
long
and
hard
to
figure
out
how
to
get
a
house
on
this
bit.
R
It's
got
a
small
little
flat,
shed
roof
on
it,
yeah
and
and
just
a
quick
I
know
the
other
ones
have
passed.
But
just
a
quick
note:
this
is
a
bigger
space
than
the
other
Pavilions
literally.
The
other
Pavilions
are
going
to
be.
R
Maybe
a
10
foot
outdoor
kitchen,
a
grill,
maybe
a
refrigerator
a
place
to
put
food,
and
then
it
might
be
four
feet
with
two
foot
more
overhang,
so
he
could
stay
out
of
the
Sun
but
they're,
basically
the
bare
minimum
that
we
can
get
a
covered
outdoor
cooking
area
and
we
thought
about
asking
for
rear
yard
variances
on
those.
So
we
could
get
it
attached
Pavilion,
but
we
said
forget
it
we'll
do
that
and
ask
for
50
percent
I'm
going
to
do
my
best
to
get
it
within
that.
R
But
this
this
one
and
I
apologize
for
not
having
the
exact
sport
footages
down,
but
again
we're
trying
to
design
these
three
houses
in
a
very
short
amount
of
time
that
I
don't
have
I.
Just
don't
have
this
I,
never
thought
that
there
would
be
this
come
to
this,
but
my.
F
Have
one
speaker
card,
but
they
do
not
wish
to
address
the
board.
You
do
want
to
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
Lisa.
Q
Okay,
first
of
all,
I
like
you
expected
to
see
a
survey
with
the
actual
plan
on
the
survey
with
the
dimensions
I
mean
when
I
built
my
pool
and
other
structures
that
I
had
Amber
variance
for
I
I
know
I
didn't
have
it
applied,
some
variance.
I
mean
this
is
ridiculous.
B
E
Since,
since
members
of
the
public
are
bound
by
the
three-minute
time,
limit,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
giving
your
time
to
speak.
Okay,
interrupted
so.
Q
So
I
understand
that
pretty
much
everybody's
getting
the
50
now
I
mean
that's
pretty
standard.
However,.
Q
Actually,
bigger
than
the
other
ones,
I
realize
the
cul-de-sac
comes
up
on
this
lot.
The
cul-de-sac
is
very,
very
small.
Trucks
cannot
even
turn
around
in
it.
I
mean
they
have
to
do.
10
point
turns
to
even
get
around
in
there.
I,
don't
know
how
the
construction
on
this
house
being
so
close
to
the
road
is
even
going
to
occur,
everything's
going
to
have
to
be
in
the
cul-de-sac.
There's
no
other
way.
R
Q
Garage
I
mean
why
can't
this
house
be
a
house
like
everybody
else's
house,
which
is
a
house
garages
underneath
I
assume
I,
don't
understand
having
attached
structures
which
forces
the
point
to
expand,
expand
the
borders
around
the
home,
so
my
property
lines
compromise
the
man
in
the
back.
It's
the
worst
for
him
because
he's
supposed
to
be
I
believe
30
feet,
there's
10
feet
from
the
garage
to
his
house.
So
that's
there's
so
many
things
that
aren't
more
than
just
coverage
of
this
property.
Q
J
Q
Q
Q
Has
43
coverage
on
both
his
homes
from
when
I
researched?
He
isn't
asking
for
a
pool.
He
hasn't
asked
for
anything
extra
than
that
he's
not
even
going
over
the
50.,
so
this
doesn't
match
any
of
the
other
plans
at
all.
This
is
a
whole
different
ballgame
here
and
I.
Just
I
disagree
with
that
and
my
neighbors
disagree
with
that.
The
neighbor
behind
me,
the
name
next
to
me,
Unfortunately
they
didn't
come,
but
I
have
spoken
to
the
neighbors
and
they
inbreed.
Q
This
is
just
it's
way
too
much
house
for
the
slot
and
I.
Don't
even
know
how
big
the
house
is
like
you,
you
give
a
plan
like
this
with
absolutely
no
dimensions
on
it.
I
have
no
idea.
I
I
I
could
stand
there.
Looking
at
the
property,
I
can't
picture
anything
because
I.
Q
E
Q
B
B
R
Yeah,
so
can
you
pull
up
the
the
thing
that
we
have
submitted
with
Christian
so
that
right
there
is
100
percent
identical
to
the
footprint
that
I
gave
you
that's
absolutely
identical,
it's
actually
that's
actually
bigger
than
what
I
gave
you.
If
you
look,
I
gave
her
my
copy,
so
I
don't
have
it
to
look
at.
R
So
the
house
I
mean
I.
Can
you
can't
put
the
garage
in
the
main
house
under
the
main
house,
because
it's
I
mean
you'd?
Have
a
thousand
square
foot
first
floor,
so
I
don't
know
where
she
lives.
Do
you
live
in
Riptide?
Yes,
okay,
so
the
house
is
no
closer
to
her
house
than
it
would
normally
be
it's
actually
further.
If
I
detached
the
garage
I
could
put
it,
I
could
readjust
everything
and
I
could
have
it
five
foot
from
the
southern
setback
and
five
foot
from
the
rear
setback.
R
It
would
be
15
foot
tall
structure
instead
of
a
22
foot
tall
structure
plus
the
road
and
the
road
is
still
there.
So
I've
got
the
entire
abandoned
row,
plus
her
backyard
so
and-
and
she
mentioned
that
the
house
is
10
feet
from
the
rear,
neighbor's
house-
that's
not
true.
It's
10
feet
from
his
rear
property
line,
but
it's
further
away.
Five
foot
further
away
than
it
could
be.
R
I
have
a
house
in
my
neighborhood
who,
who
got
approved,
to
have
his
garage
five
feet
from
the
rear
five
feet
from
the
side
and
two
stories
and
I
was
all
for
it.
This
beautiful
house
is
an
absolutely
beautiful
house,
that's
Way,
Way
Beyond,
what's
allowed
and
through
the
Planning
Development
code,
and
nobody
spoke
out
against
that.
R
The
only
thing
I
could
say
is:
is
these
houses
are
going
to
raise,
I
mean
they're
going
to
if
I
could
show
you
some
of
my
other
houses
you'd,
you
know,
give
it
a
while,
but
they're
gonna
they're
gonna
make
the
neighborhood
and
as
far
as
the
design,
the
footprint
is
pretty
much
all
I
mean
it
took
us
a
long
time
to
get
to
that
footprint.
R
The
only
thing
we
could
do
is
to
reduce
the
square
footage
of
the
house
and
make
a
second
floor
smaller
with
the
first.
The
first
floor
is
not
that
it's
not
that
big
of
a
house
they're
all
around
33
32
3300
square
feet
which
is
is,
can
you
live
in
smaller
yeah?
You
certainly
can,
but
that's
pretty
much
the
same
size
that
everyone's
building
right
now.
R
That's
what
people
want
you
know
we've
given
them
the
amenities
that
they
want,
and
somebody
mentioned,
or
she
mentioned
Robert
Barnes,
the
two,
the
guy
building
next
to
me
and
the
other
Lots.
The
reason
he
only
asked
for
43
is
because
he's
not
putting
a
pool
in
and
guess
what
I
guarantee
you
somebody's
going
to
come
back
and
ask
for
a
various
verbal.
Then
it's
probably
going
to
be
53
because
he's
maxing
out
everything
else
at
43
percent,
where
we
we
were
a
little
bit
below
that
so
anyway,
all
I've
been
asked.
R
Is
that
please
give
me
the
50
on
this
one
because
of
the
irregularity
of
the
lot
and
I
if
I
push
the
garage
further
back,
all
that
means
is
the
driveway
gets
longer,
which
means
more
lock
coverage.
The
garage
size
stays
the
same
other
than
the
other
driveways
on
the
street.
The
other
ones
are
only
20
feet
long.
R
R
It's
a
two-car
driveway,
it's
a
two-car,
wide
driveway
they're,
all
two
car
garages,
so
they're
two
side
by
side,
and
yes,
it
is
a
tight.
It's
a
tight
Road,
it's
the
same
size.
Road
is
pretty
much
any
all
the
other
roads
in
the
neighborhood
or
they
would
have
taken
more
out
of
the
front
yard
than
25
feet
and
I'm,
not
sure.
If
a
fire
truck
I
mean
you're
not
allowed
to
design
a
road,
you
can't
build
a
cul-de-sac
unless
a
fire
truck.
You
turn
around.
R
That's
one
of
the
first
coat
of
things,
but
fire
trucks
have
a
very
tight
turning
radius.
So
my
guess
is
a
fire
truck
could
turn
around
in
it.
Could
a
UPS
truck
I
don't
know,
I
have
no
idea.
My
truck
is
a
full-size
long.
Bed,
F350
and
I
can
turn
around
in
it
very
very
easily
I,
even
pull
it
20-foot
cargo
trailer
for
all
my
tools
and
I
can
I
have
no
problem.
Turning
around.
J
E
Ma'am
I'm
sorry,
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
meeting
has
been
closed,
but
questions
will
be
directed
to
the
applicant
or
to
staff
after
the
meeting.
So
is
there
a
motion?
I.
E
Right
this
is
Beyond
just
as
standard
or
sorry
the
audio
typical
substandard
lot,
where
it's
smaller
an
area
or
width.
It
also
has
some
pretty
unique
shading
issues
to
deal
with
and
I
do
appreciate
that
in
this,
in
this
case,
I
think
there
is.
L
E
That
he
made
an
effort
to
make
a
minimum
use
of
the
property
in
putting
in
an
attached
garage
that
would
prevent
him
from
building
into
smaller
setbacks.
So,
while.
M
Do
the
chair
is
to
clarify
a
few
things:
the
two
previous
houses
were
written
45,
a
lot
of
coverage
40
literally
the
two
from
the
other
Builder
were
granted
45
Lawn
Care
work
without
labor
amenities
and
the
cul-de-sac
is
40
feet
in
diameter,
which
is
a
standard
cul-de-sac
life.
If
you
still
40
feet
for
the
diameter.
H
B
To
cleaning
Department
reports.