►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (8/15/2023)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Thank
you.
The
board
of
adjustment
meetings
are
quasi-judicial
in
nature.
All
decisions
of
the
board
will
be
based
on
competent,
substantial
evidence,
including
testimony
provided
in
this
meeting.
Any
person
who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
who
wishes
to
speak
will
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
clerk
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
them
into
the
clerk.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
on
each
item
once
we
open
the
public
hearing,
please
refrain
from
speaking
from
the
audience
and
Applause
or
cheering
will
not
be
allowed.
A
Lastly,
please
silence
your
cell
phones
before
we
move
on
to
approval
of
minutes.
I
just
want
to
let
any
of
the
applicants
or
agents
in
the
audience.
A
A
You
would
be,
you
would
have
the
majority
of
three
to
two
like.
As
long
as
you
got
three
to
two
votes,
your
measure
would
pass
with
four
members.
Only
three
of
us
would
have
to
vote
Yes
for
your
request
to
pass.
A
A
F
A
Then
we
will
continue
our
schedule
moving
on
to
approval
of
minutes.
Our
last
minutes
are
from
the
July
18th
meeting.
If
everyone's
had
a
chance
to
review,
I
would
entertain
a
motion.
I.
A
The
new
consecutive
any
discussion,
all
in
favor,
aye,
okay
minutes
from
July
18th
any
correspondence,
no
okay
and
see
no
old
business
on
the
agenda
can
I.
Please
call
the
first
item
of
new
business
board.
A
I
Yeah
I
sold
the
property
and
I
have
a
pool
permit
that
didn't
get
closer
in
2018.
I
widened
the
driveway
with
papers
by
three
feet
and
did
a
little
walkway
around
that
trash
can,
and
they
put
me
over
lock,
covers
by
three
percent.
I'd
already
had
approval
to
45
and
I'm
going
to
buy
the
three
so
there's
money
held
in
escrow
based
on
sale
until
I
get
either
lock
coverage
approved
to
48
or
get
it.
You
know,
maybe
down
to
45
foreign.
A
Zoning
District,
where
the
minimum
lot
size
is
10,
000
square
feet
and
your
home
is
just
right
at
65
or
your
property
is
just
drive
6500
square
feet,
so
it
is,
it
might
be
relative
to
the
other
homes
on
the
Block,
but
for
your
zoning
District,
it's
unrecise.
Okay,
can
you
tell
us
about
the
parking
situation
at
your
property?
How
much
parking
did
you
have
before
you
ride
in
the
driveway
and
how
much
do
you
have
now.
I
A
You
can
be
seated
and
I
will
now
we'll
be
in
a
public
hearing.
Do
we
have
any
speakers
cards?
We
have
one
speaker
card,
Nancy,
Martin,
it's
333,
Isabella,.
H
F
Around
the
corner
go
ahead:
okay,
I
I
just
wanted
to
check
on
a
couple
of
things,
because
the
way
that
the
permit
was
written
it
said
existing
proposed
so
I
wanted
to
confirm
that
they're
not
asking
to
add
more
papers
and
or
change
anything
like
that,
the
the
and
then
the
survey
that
they
presented
is
what
it
is
now
and
it's
not
going
to
change.
J
C
So
we
can't
answer
that
question,
but.
F
F
F
when
the
builders
were
originally
submitting
the
permit
and
then
in
2015
the
zoning
changed
to
rs2,
because
none
of
our
lives
are
a
minimum
of
ten
thousand
feet.
They're
minimum
rs2
is
minimum
of
seven
thousand
five
hundred
feet,
so
the
zoning
is
different
than
what
you've
got
on
the
paperwork.
If
the
zoning
has
changed
and
I
checked
with
the
city
of
Jacksonville,
the
Property
Appraiser's
office,
and
they
said
that
they
had
changed
in
2015.
F
F
F
A
Anyone
else
in
the
audience
who
has
not
put
out
a
speaker's
car
who
wishes
to
speak
on
this
item,
and
if
so,
can
you
please
fill
out
a
card
before
you
leave
hearing
none
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
on
this
item.
Usually
I'm.
Sorry,
no,
you
can
turn
it
in
yeah
and
if
the
applicant
would
care
to
come
up
and
address
any
of
the
comments
made
during
the
public
hearing.
I
C
A
A
A
That
being
said,
if
it
is
in
fact
rs2,
the
lot
is
still
undersized
by
about
a
thousand
square
feet
per
code,
it
might
be
similarly
sized
to
neighboring
homes,
but
it's
about
a
thousand
square
feet
less
than
the
minimum
lot.
A
Says
yes,
it
is
it's
undersized
in
width
at
52
feet,
it's
significantly
undersized!
Oh
well,
there's
a
90
feet,
minimum
required
in
rs1,
which
is
what's
in
the
staff
report.
What
is
the
minimum
width
in
rs2
75?
Okay,
so
again
it's
it's
Underside,
five
less,
but
still
pretty
significantly
undersized.
A
A
And
before
we
call
the
next
case,
I
seem
to
have
broken
my
little
clock
here,
recording
the
time
when
our
whenever
the
public
came
to
speak,
but
I'm
happy
to
keep
the
time
on
my
own
watch.
If
you
can't
figure
it
out,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
being
fair.
G
Property
address
4035
Duval
Drive.
The
motion
to
consider
34-336
e1e
for
lot
coverage.
38
we'll
do
a
35
maximum
to
allow
for
stepping
stones
at
existing
single
families.
11.
A
Thank
you
as
a
reminder,
each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
once
we
open
the
public
hearing.
Does
any
board
member
have
expert
a
communication
on
this
item
and
I've
had
none
with
the
applicant
please
step
forward
and
be
sworn
in
to
give
your
testimony
and
I'm
happy
to
keep
the
time
on
my
own
blog.
Please.
H
K
K
K
A
Thank
you
and
I
also
understand
from
the
staff
report
that
your
lot
is
undersized
and
width
and,
unusually
deep,
the
need
of
your
property
to
work
ability
to
kind
of
Traverse
that
yeah
I.
K
C
A
L
That
is
true,
but
we
also
have
a
minimum
size
for
the
actual
Stepping
Stones,
which
is
number
one.
These
are
rather
large
and
custom
made
for
the
property,
so
they're
they're,
quite
bigger
than
that.
Okay,.
E
A
K
E
K
A
A
A
Footage,
though
it
is
undersized,
lit
and
then
has
uniqueness
to
it
and
how
deep
it
is,
but
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
IT
addresses
the
the
criteria.
Five.
Granting
of
variance
is
the
minimum
required
so
by
requesting
stepping
stones.
That
said,
more
minimal
requests
and
a
more
minimally
invasive
on
the
property
requests
than
just
Paving
a
sidewalk
any
further.
E
Discussion
of
a
different
interpretation
of
those
points,
I
don't
see
the
width
as
a
factor
or
variable
than
what
the
request
is,
which
is
access
from
the
rear
to
the
front
of
the
property
and
the
request
being
related
to
percent
coverage.
E
The
applicant
spoke
to
building
the
home,
so
they
had
access
to
decide
how
large
that
home
and
driveway
and
other
access
points
would
be
at
that
time
and
Max
the
35
percent
and
then,
in
terms
of
minimum
requests
to
my
earlier
comment,
requesting
the
applicants
to
be
toward
whether
or
not
it
was
necessary
to
have
both
North
and
South
pavers.
If
the.
E
If
the
issue
is
being
accessed
from
the
back
of
the
yard
to
the
front
of
the
yard,
it
seems
intuitive
to
me
that
that
could
be
minimally
achieved
by
having
one
side
of
the
home
with
favors
and
then
to
the
no
form
staff.
If
there
are
alternative
papers
available,
it
would
still
allow
them
to
achieve
the
objective
of
having
the
access
point
without
increasing
the
lawn
coverage
and
there's
no
other
reason
provided
that
they
would
need
these
custom
pavers
designed
for
this
home.
G
A
C
A
H
N
F
A
N
N
E
N
Patio
of
the
papers,
we
are
adding
square
footage
to
the
house,
but
we
are
not
impacting
the
square
footage
of
the
permeability
space
and
this
came
up
this
year
when
I
went
to
pull
this
permit.
I
don't
believe,
he's
had
any
neighbors
that
have
been
playing
since
2011
about
what
cover
key
currently
has
and
there's
currently
a
shed.
N
N
Any
homeowners
or
anybody
with
what's
existing
and
when
we
applied
to
to
build
this,
extend
this
master
bathroom
overall,
ready
permeable
space.
It
came
up
that
there
was
a
non-conformity,
so
we're
here,
I
from.
N
N
Are
there,
if
you
do,
the
calculation
would
be
with
35
percent
if.
N
Which
were
done
after
the
pool
so
I'm
here,
hoping
that
you
guys
would
say
is
if
everything
is
as
it
was
and
no
one's
upset
about
it.
Then
we
just
continue
on
and
allow
the
the
variance
for
us
to
just
finish
the
cool
or
the
the
master
bathrooms
there.
C
A
You
had
no
inclination
from
your
builders
that
you
were
going
over
the
lot
coverage
or
there
was
no
discussion
of
that
in
the
permitting
process.
No
at.
M
M
We
put
that
you
can
see
in
the
back
left
corner,
because
all
there
is
is
just
a
flat,
basically
Stadium
for
the
or
base
for
the
for
the
shed,
which
we
are
getting
rid
of
that
so
that'll
save
some
of
it,
but
we
put
the
Pavilion
in
a
buddy
and
I
built
it
so
anyway,
and
we
did
then
we
started
down
this
process
and
you
know
we
saw
that
we
were
overlapping,
so
I'm
like
I,
don't
know
how
that
would
be
because
alone
the
pool
would
have
put
so
a
little
High
Country.
M
So
I
don't
think
the
city
would
have
been.
You
know
too
appreciative
of
that
or
anything
would
have
been
allowed.
You
know
if
they,
you
know
if
they
haven't
done
so
I'm,
just
hoping
that
if,
if
you
could
find
a
way
to
maybe
give
us
an
exception
kind
of
given
that
we're
not
actually
increasing
any
at
all,
it's
going
to
remain
basically
the
same
as
it
already
was,
and.
M
A
J
M
See
it's
if
you're
looking
at
the
pool
to
the
right,
it's
a
it's
a
pavilion
looking
food.
M
M
E
A
N
C
N
Triangle
right:
there
is
a
huge
portion
that
we
would
have
to
take
out
to
get
us
down
and
that's
where
I
believe
that
there's
no
way
that
that
was
existing
as
Hungary
before
Decatur
did
it.
So
he
says
it
didn't
change
any
square
footage
there.
So
to
kind
of
been
able
to
put
the
pool
in
back
in
2011,
I
don't
like
I
mean
it
is
their
way
for
you
to
check
to
see
if
the
pool
was
permitted.
Yeah.
L
It
was
the
chair,
the
coolest
apartment
in
2011
and
based
on
the
significant
site
plan
which
does
match
the
existing
is
calculating
the
35
percent
and
it
I
mean
verbatim
matches
that
they
have
there
as
the
proposed
site
plan.
So
I
think
the
city
reviewed
it
and
probably
at
the
time,
didn't
verify
the
square
footage.
But
it
was
listed
as
a
35
which
was
permitted
to
look
like
that,
but
in
a
big
41
and
some
change
when
they
were
done
or
whatever
but
I
remember.
It
was
in
the
recording.
E
C
N
A
N
That,
where
we
did
the
spring
enclosure
right,
we
bring
it
down.
I,
don't
have
that
compilation
right
in
front
of
me,
though,
because
we
in
order
to
get
the
building
permit,
we
signed
an
agreement
that,
if
you
guys
voted
us
know
we
would
we
could
conform
by
removing
those
papers
that
Pavilion
that
shed
to
get
us
down
to
that
35
percent.
N
N
I
guess,
if
you
guys
tell
us
we
need
to
take
the
Pavilion
too.
It's
a
wooden,
Pavilion,
yeah
structure
that
has
like
my
smoker.
M
A
N
B
N
N
A
M
A
M
A
Hearing
none,
you
can
be
seated
for
now
and
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
Okay,
thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
speakers
Parts.
A
By
the
pool
should
that
be
determined,
would
this
would
approving
this
kind
of
handle
the
the
non-permitting
factor
of
the
pergola?
That's
there
yeah.
L
It
would
depend
on
the
structure
and
the
size
whether
it
would
require
a
permit
or
not.
If
it
did,
then
it
would
be
through
the
building
department.
I
think
we
would
assume
be
relatively
simple
department,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
they
would
require
one
or
not
or
something
like
that.
Nothing
that
we
would
do
would
make
it
compliant
with
what
you
could
have
enough.
So
you're,
not
sorry
about
that
question.
A
C
J
H
D
G
Well,
we
are
requesting
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
30
feet
to
17
feet
and
increase
the
maximum
amount
coverage
from
35
to
42
percent,
because
the
width
of
the
property
is
substandard
right
now
she
just
doesn't
have
any
way
to
enjoy
her
backyard.
G
J
G
J
L
D
Gave
you
a
letter
from
one
of
them
which
I
turned.
A
C
A
G
A
I'm
asking
yeah
so
with
the
the
width
being
non-conforming,
you
know
the
hardship.
I
guess
is
that
they.
A
Go
but
fat
or
you
know
when
four
is
on
the
property,
which
then
creates
the
need
for
the
year.
We
are
set
back
and
it
does
seem
like
a
minimal
amount
of
extra
coverage
while
still
leaving
what
looks
to
be
a
decent
amount
of
yard
space
left
undeveloped.
C
G
A
J
A
H
C
A
N
C
N
Through
the
building
process,
the
rear
setback
does
it
meet
current
good
morning
rules
and
there
was
a
shed
in
the
back
that
we're
looking
to
remove
and
we're
looking
to
replace
it
with
a
smaller
shed
that
we
wanted
to
put
on
the
left
side
of
the
property
on
some
other
station.
There
you
go
and
then
we
wanted
to
reconfigure
where
there.
N
Maybe
there's
two
things
being
said:
I
think
Brian
I
mentioned
it.
He's
already
talked
to
the
client
to
to
the
left,
where
the
shed
is
closest
to
their
property,
and
the
one
thing
they
requested
is
a
US.
Add
a
gutter
put
aside
their
property
side
and
bringing
the
water
back
onto
our
property,
which
is
fine.
O
I
mean
it's
a
good
idea,
a
good
request
so
and
just
to
clarified
that
little
the
extension
that
pushes
it
to
15
feet
in
the
back
I
think
was
in
1963.
extension.
So
you
know
50
years
ago,
so
we're
not
proposing
to
change
the
footprint
of
the
house.
It's
just
really
kind
of
clean
up
the
sidewalk
that
goes
around
that
or
upper
right
side,
which
is
which
is
sunk
and
it's
not
dysfunctional.
So
we're
just
going
to
take
that
out
and
then
clean.
O
A
A
G
A
Hood
and
the
applicant
didn't
mention
this,
but
as
per
our
staff
report,
the
lottery
is
only
7
500
square
feet,
so
it's
undersized
by
about
2500
square
feet.
So
the
fact
that
they're
asking
for
actually
a
reduction
of-
what's
there
already,
even
though
it's
over
to
35
percent,
given
the
hardship
of
their
their
size,
I,
think
it's
more
than
reasonable
any
other
discussion.
C
A
H
J
H
P
C
P
You
know
I
think
we
moved
it
out
a
little
bit
also,
so
we
don't
have
a
clear
walkway
in
regards
to
the
two
foot
closer
to
property
line,
so
we
want
to
run
pavers
there.
Our
neighbor
up
to
our
rear,
has
sent
in
a
email
saying
that
he
has
no
problem
with
the
papers
coming
up
to
that
fence
line.
That
fence
line
is
actually
one
point
six
feet
inside
I
would
really
I,
don't
know
if
it
was
exact
number,
but
actually
on
our
property
by
a
foot
and
another
change.
P
He
said
an
email
saying
he
was
okay
with
that.
We
just
want
to
be
able
to
enjoy
our
pool
Surfside
built
our
pool,
which
was
a
Endeavor,
to
say
the
least,
with
search
data.
So
we
just
want
to
be
able
to
to
get
all
the
way
around
our
pools.
We're
not
going
to
put
anything
on
the
west
side
of
that
pool,
because
we
can't
because
there's
nothing.
It's
allowed
to
be
built
there
due
to
that
previous
setback
And
in
regards
to
the
38.
P
If
there's
some
concerned
about
back
to
the
board,
I'd
be
happy
to
say
the
stove
and
catch
Space,
Center
and
drywall
of
some
sort
of
big
catch
catch,
an
even
more
water
than
needed,
if
that's
a
necessity,
as
far
as
the
30
foot
set
back
in
the
back,
you
buy
a
corner
lot
at
Jack's
Beach
and
due
to
all
the
setbacks,
you
you
restricted
as
a
you
can't
build
anything
on
it.
P
P
Some
concern
about
the
egress
between
the
right-handed
shed
there
in
the
corner
and
the
end
of
our
stairwell
of
a
proposed
Edition
being
less
than
five
people.
It
was
actually
five
foot
four
I
believe
that
the
five
foot
was
minimum.
P
Is
the
pool
in
that
waiting
that
that
great
waiting
Pathways
in
between
in
order
to
allow
us
to
put
in
the
decking
and
payers
back
left
hand
registered
part
of
the
patio
is
also
going
to
come
out
and
we'll
place
with
decades?.
D
P
P
Removing
things
that
are
there
now
and
because
the
wood
is
less,
is
more
permeable
than
the
the
the
pathway
that's
there,
so
our
our
project
has
calculated
that
changing
into
the
decade
would
would
end
up
with
38
percent,
even
though
we're
increasing
the
area
of
coverage
in
that
area.
They're.
Moving
of
that,
that
particular
helps
us
out
a
great
deal.
A
We
can't
consider
that
I
mean
you're,
welcome
to
tell
us,
but
we're
we're
not
allowed
to
power
that
into
our
decision.
It.
P
We
have
family
strewn
from
South
Florida
to
Georgia,
to
Jersey
to
Arizona
and
we're
having
a
kid
soon
and
hopefully,
and
then
we
just
want
some
more
of
our
family
to
be
able
to
come
in
and
but.
D
Also
to
be
able
to
enjoy
our
backyard
because
it's
not
it's
just
not
there's
no
continuity
back.
There
there's
no
way
that
there's
grass
and
then
there's
pool
so
there's
no
paid
verse,
there's
no
nothing
back
there.
Currently,
so
you
don't
have
any
decking
or
anything
we
just
did
the
coping
around
the
pool.
So
it's.
P
Let's
say
about
property
was
considered
a
front
yard
I
guess
it
was
a
society
line
which
is
right
there.
Where
that
fence
is
we
had
to
bring
a
pool
in
20
feet
in
order
to
not
be
a
permanent
structure
inside
that
setback
we
haven't
changed
the
designer
pull.
We
had
to
change
where
we
put
it
and
we
went
coping.
Only
I
was
I
originally
deciding
to
build
the
addition
and
not
have
it
encumbered
with
all
the
permeables
and
stuff
in
the
deck
and
I
think
they
said.
No.
When
you
come,
you
just
tell
us
everything.
P
A
P
Was
attached
to
this
shaped
a
great
Cafe
because
it
was
part
of
the
original
home
and
our
previous
tool
design
mirrored
that
Circle
and
I
was
going
to
build
a
deck
on
this
side
on
the
south
side
of
that
wave
evacuated,
matched
that
same
curve
like
a
zero
blue
Miyagi
deck.
You
know
it
was
going
to
be
really
nice,
but
that
all
went
out
the
window
when
we
had
to
change
the
design
of
the
pool
and
put
it
in.
P
G
P
P
E
E
P
Neighbors
kind
of
split
in
front
of
our
house:
these
folks
are
fine
with
it.
We're
really
good
friends
with
these
folks,
the
people
that
are
immediately
West
I
cut
down
a
cheerleader
jar
of
actually
what
I
found
it
was
gold
and
ever
since
then,
and
Frank
the
rear
neighbor
behind
us
started.
Sending
the
letter
said
he
was
okay.
A
Any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
again,
all
right
do
you
can
be
seated
and
I
will
now
open
a
public
hearing,
no
speaker's
card.
A
G
A
special
condition
and
Circumstance
but
I
think
the
applicant
had
a
Justified
explanation
for
that
being
an
order
law
in
the
setbacks
that
are
required.
I
do
note
that
he
is
removing
some
of
the
existing
impervous
surface.
So
again,
it's
not
a
All
In
All
Out
grab
for
Warlock
coverages
seems
to
be
somewhat.
A
Restrained
yeah
and
I
would
add,
too
that
hearing
the
applicants
describe
the
nature
of
their
property,
but
also
the
existing
factors
that
that
they
kind
of
inherited
when
they
purchased
it
understanding
why
they
built
the
pool
the
way
that
they
did
and
because
obviously
having
it
where
it
is
on
the
property
line
requires
them
to
add
a
little
bit
more
Paving
to
get
that
link
from
the
structure
of
their
home
to
the
pool.
But
it
helps
to
understand
the
reason
that
they
built
it.
A
G
A
L
It's
five
or
six
days,
it's
very
nice
hearing,
so
that
should
be
another
good
one
and
we
are
still
not
scheduled.
The
next
round
of
hearings
on
the
Land
Development
code,
confident
update,
although
we
have
gotten
the
first
round
of
data
analysis
from
the
consultant
number
of
the
processor
reviewing
that
now
so,
hopefully
that's
in
the
works,
but
it's
just
taking
a
long
time.
This
is
really
the
hard
part
was
actually
doing
the
writing.
So
once
we
have
those
dates,
we
will
get
them
to
you
with.
A
Okay
and
I
believe
the
next
meeting,
because
it's
the
first
week
in
September
what
we
meet
on
a
Wednesday
because
it'll
be
Labor,
Day
I,
believe
that's
correct.
Okay,
anything
else.