►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (11/1/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
You,
the
board
of
adjustment
meetings,
are
quasi-judicial
in
nature.
All
decisions
of
the
board
will
be
based
on
confident,
substantial
evidence,
including
testimony
provided
in
this
meeting.
Any
person
who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
who
wishes
to
speak
will
be
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
them
into
the
park.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
on
each
item.
Please
refrain
from
speaking
from
the
audience
and
Applause
or
cheering
will
not
be
allowed,
and
lastly,
please
silence
your
cell
phones.
A
We
do
not
have
approval
of
minutes
for
this
meeting.
There
are
not
minutes
available
from
I
guess
the
most
previous
meeting
or
the
most
recent
meeting.
We
do,
however,
have
an
item
of
old
business
that
was
supposed
to
be
on
the
agenda,
but
was
left
off,
so
we
will
need
to
amend
the
agenda
to
add
that
old
business
at
this.
A
D
Through
the
chair,
this
item
came
for
you
on
September
20th,
you've
held
a
full
public
hearing.
That
was
even
a
discussion
on
several
motions.
D
A
Thank
you.
Could
you
tell
us
any
advancements
you've
made
in
the
way
of
parking
agreements,
since
you
were
last
before
this
board
absolutely.
E
For
an
extension
of
time,
the
events
that
occurred
since
the
last
time
was
that
was
coming
from
a
place
of
absolute,
no
experience
in
doing
this,
you
guys
got
into
some
very
technical
conversations
and
that
big
Christian
spotted
that
it
was
a
little
over
my
head,
so
I
think
he
spoke
about
an
offered
to
meet
with
me.
There
was
time
invested
in
getting
a
meeting
with
Christian.
That
was
also
impacted
by
Hurricane
Ian
by
the
time
that
I
met
with
Mr,
Republic
and
discussed.
E
What
the
path
forward
would
look
like
is
what
the
time
it's
going
to
take
to
get
that
Passover
accomplished
about
communication
to
him
about.
It
was
probably
taking
a
little
bit
more
possible
supportive
to
me
at
that
time.
So
his
suggestion
was
that
after
I
was
going
to
ask
you
guys
on
before
an
extension
of
time
to
be
able
to.
E
I
am
a
CPA,
so
things
kick
off
in
January
I
mean
I
mean
if
Austin,
if
I
was
afforded
to
live
after
tax
season,
so
that
I
can
afford
it.
The
amount
of
time
that
it's
going
to
take,
because
the
task
at
hand
is
a
fairly
sizable
one,
because
it's
going
to
involve
neighboring
businesses
and
asking
for
like
parking
arrangements
and
I
want
to
do
so
in
a
manner.
That's
gentleman-like,
so
I
feel
like
dealing
with
that
banana.
E
That's
a
piece
that
a
Cadence
that
isn't
something
that
sounds
urgent
or
rushed,
or
that
kind
of
stuff
I'd.
Be
very
gracious
for
that.
If
that's
not
an
option
to
you,
perhaps
if
we
could
get
as
close
to
the
end
of
the
year
as
possible,
because
the
holidays
coming
up
and
I'm
going
to
be
traveling
closing
for
Christmas
again
at
the
risk
of
putting
self-interest
in
front
of
the
board,
I
just
want
to
put
all
the
facts
on
the
table
as
well.
So
so.
E
E
E
No,
the
request
again
is
just
trying
to
figure
out
a
solution
for
capacity
we'd
be
very
blessed
as
missing
Jacksonville
Beach
for
25
years
now,
and
we're
grown
to
a
place
where
the
Border
elements
is
no
longer
something
that's
available
to
us.
So
one
of
the
considerations
that
we're
trying
to
figure
out,
if
potentially
building
upwards
and
then
that's
how
the
parking
solution
presents
itself
right.
E
Lost
permission
or
not
having
their
ability
or
whatever
blessing
I
need
from
you
guys
you
guys
to
be
able
to
report
the
product
like
magnitude
and
if
I
don't
know
if
the
end
of
May
is
possible
or
beginning
of
June
or
older,
because
the
tax
deadline
is
April
15th
as
it
stands,
and
so
that
having
that
period
to
kind
of
revisit
all
of
that,
it's
just
something
such
important
thing
for
my
life
and
the
life
of
my
employees
that
have
been
there
in
some
circumstances,
for
over
decades,
some
clients
that
have
been
there
for
a
quarter
of
a
century,
because
I
have
to
communicate
we're
going
to
be
moving
away
from
what
is
a
big
appeal
for
this
business
and
that's
being
on
this
side
of
the
pitch.
E
You
know,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
everything
right
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that's
done
thoroughly.
I
want
to
do
it
and
maybe
the
reflect
what
my
heart
is
about.
The
passion
of
this
project
and
I
just
feel
like.
If
I
don't
request
that,
then
it's
essentially
the
Russian
referencing
here
and
I'll
pay
for
exactly
before
Columbus,
okay,.
D
Do
the
Jericho
cucumbers
might
be
helpful,
one
the
entire
project
would
require
apartment,
we
wouldn't
issued
without
variants.
So
in
essence,
nothing
will
happen
until
the
sport
makes
a
decision
question
for
the
attorney.
Would
it
make
sense
if
the
board
hasn't
rendered
a
decision
basically
to
withdraw
this
application
and
bring
it
back
re-advertise
to
re-noticed
or
just
continue.
A
And
sorry
Sandy
at
one
more
point
of
order.
So
once
should
we
plan
to
open
the
public
hearing
this
evening
or
we
we
don't
need
to.
G
G
A
C
D
See
the
chair:
we
should
make
it
specific
to
the
meeting
date.
We
can
go
a
second
to
pull
up
those
dates.
A
C
I
moved
to
amend
the
motion,
so
the
motion
would
be
to
continue
boa
22-100092
until
June
6
of
2023..
Second.
H
A
A
H
A
J
J
J
and
I
want
to
have
it
back
backyard
patio
and
one
extend
it
out.
Fourth
foot
the
existing
patios
already
at
25
feet,
I
believe,
and
we
want
to
extend
it
and
cover
it.
Another
four
feet.
J
Maybe
talk
to
your
neighbors,
yes,
I
have
some
neighbors
here
and
they
that
lived
next
door
and
they
approve
it.
I've
talked
with
several
of
the
other
neighbors
and
they
said
good
for
me.
I
hope
you
enjoy
it.
B
I
C
We
have
one
other
speaker
card.
We
have
looks
like
Paul
Mendes
who's.
The
general
contractor
wishes
to
address
the
board
if
needed,.
B
G
A
A
C
A
Very
minimal-
and
it's
certainly
worth
noting
the
shape
up,
a
lot
which
makes
compliance
difficult
as
well
as
the
fact
that
he
doesn't
have
any
neighbors
directly
to
the
rear.
That
would
be
directly
impacted
any
other
discussion.
C
C
Motion
to
consider
34-337
e1e
for
lot
coverage
of
49
into
a
35
maximum
34-337
e1g
for
an
accessory
structural
setback
with
zero
beat
in
lieu
of
five
heat
minimum
from
the
Westerly
side
yard
and
34-373
D
for
a
driveway
setback
of
two
feet.
A
little
five
feet:
minimum
from
the
Westerly
side
yard
to
allow
for
addition
of
an
extended
driveway,
walkway
and
swimming
pool
paver
deck
at
a
newly
constructed
single
family
weapon.
A
F
A
Had
none
I
spoke
to
a
friend
who
lives
in
the
area,
but
the
extent
of
the
conversation
was
her
seeing
the
signposted,
the
property
asking
me
if
this
was
coming
before
the
board.
That
I
was
a
part
of,
and
I
said
yes,
and
that
was
it.
B
M
Here's
a
lifelong
resident
of
the
beach
and
last
year
we
made
a
decision
to
tear
down
the
house
and
rebuild
it
rather
than
trying
to
buy
a
larger
house
and
I'm
here,
because
I'm,
a
mom
of
a
disabled
child.
My
child
was
born
of
a
lifelong
disability
that
sometimes
leaves
her
unable
to
walk,
and
so
around
six
years
ago,
I
had
put
a
wheelchair
ramp
and
widened
my
front
door,
so
that
I
was
able
to
get
her
two
and
one
of
the
car.
So.
H
M
Driveway
that
I'm
able
to
push
a
wheelchair
on
a
ramp.
To
my
you
know
up
to
my
house
and
also
to
be
able
to
navigate
around
in
the
backyard
so
I'm
just
asking
that
we'd
be
able
to
do
the
same
things
we
were
able
to
do
before,
and
we'd
still
be
able
to
do
it
today
and
my
Builder's
here
to
help
explain
it
better
than
I
can.
A
Would
you
like
the
Builder
to
come
up
and
speak
on
it?
He
can
come
up
and
and
speak
along
with
you
as
long
as
he's,
okay,
with
being
sworn
in.
Thank.
M
B
H
K
Us
a
project,
no
I
mean
if
there's
any
technical
questions,
I'd
be
more
than
glad
to
answer
them.
You
know
just
I'd
be
building
a
new
home
or
the
feed
family
and
as
she
she
has
already
stated
that
the
conditions
she's
hoping
to
get
this
various
for
is
to
accommodate.
They
need
to
catch
up
and
we'll
be
originally
applied,
and
we
looked
at
doing
some
Turf
in
the
back
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
really
going
to
be
able
to
work
out
for
Mobility
purposes.
So
it's
a
who's
looking
to
put
I'll
show.
F
You
technically
Our
Land
Development
code
specifically
prohibits
a
illness
or
disability
as
a
reason
for
making
variants.
But
if
you
do
have
a
substantive
mind,
yes,
and
if
this
was
to
be
a
standard
lot
but
we'll
be
asking
for
120
lock
coverage,
it
was
the
standard
lot.
But
it's
not
so
it's
going
to
have
to
be
higher
than
that.
K
N
A
C
Cards
from
the
applicant
and
from
the
world
that
I
just
spoke,
there
is
a
Hugh
and
Michelle
worker.
Yes,.
B
O
P
Okay,
so
we
had
a
lot
of
conversations
with
our
neighbors.
We
are
because
of
the
way,
we're
safe
right,
not
right
next
door,
but
we
are
to
the
side.
When
we
look
out,
we
see
the
house,
which
is
very
large,
but
we
have
spoke
with
Mike
and
Cindy
about
it,
and
we
are
just
concerned
about
a
drainage
issue
that
they
resolved
it
and
we've
met
with
a
contractor
as
well.
So
we
are
just
here
to
say
you
know,
there's
issues.
H
O
C
B
Q
Here
in
Jacksonville,
Beach
I've
been
to
that
house
since
1994,
so
but
the
problem
we
have
here,
you
can
see
the
size
of
the
house.
Okay,
the
amount
of
property.
That's
already
taken
up
the
pavers
there,
as
stated,
would
be
a
problem
with
the
two
houses
behind
it
would
go
over
actually
to
the
side
of
the
West.
There's
two
houses
that
walk
right
up
to
that
property.
I
understand
that
a
lot
of
the.
Q
What
would
you
might
call
100
blocks?
They
are
the
lots
that
were
there
and
when
the
house
was
built
okay,
this
should
have
all
been
taken
into
consideration,
but
they
do
need
a
driveway.
They
chose
to
keep
the
pool,
make
sure
to
keep
these
things
and
they'd
help.
Another
reason
why
they're
putting
the
cameras
along
besides
they
have
another
garage
on
the
side
of
the
house
for
I,
guess
a
golf
course,
so
they
wanted
to
have
a
driveway
there
for
that.
Q
So
we're
increasing
our
coverage
there,
specifically
with
us
here
now,
as
I
said
when
they
built
the
house
and
they
got
the
permits
they
knew
they
had
this
issue
already.
It
was
already
there,
but
they
went
ahead.
They
approved
this
house
to
be
built
there.
You
can
see
that's
pushed
to
the
one
side,
so
they
already
knew
they
were
going
to
want
to
have
these
things
here
and
I
have
a
feeling
of
what's
happened
because
they
figured
they
got
permits
and
then
they
just
come
back,
because
you
guys
would
give
them
a
variant
signal.
Q
That's
how
I
see
it
I
don't
know
if
that's
correct,
but
that's
just
how
I
feel
it
it's
the
house.
Is
it
takes
up
a
lot
of
space.
The
roof
is
going
to
produce
a
lot
of
water
coming
down,
where's
it
going
to
there's
no
yard
left
there.
Q
So
that's
what
I
had
to
say
about
it.
I
hope
you
guys
rule
in
the
favor
of
not
expending
this
much.
They
can
have
a
driveway,
so
they
can
get
their
handicapped
child
or
not.
I
think
that's
fine,
but
to
increase
it
all
the
way
around
like
that
and
what
they
want
to
do.
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
much
okay!
You
have
to
see
the
roof
footprint
to
understand
what
I'm
talking
about.
Okay,
the
pool
is
covered
by
the
roof,
so
so
yeah.
Thank
you
for
locking
the
speaks.
Thank
you.
C
We
have
no
more
speaker
cars,
but
we
do
have
an
email
from
Rhonda
Johnson
I
would
like
for
this
variance
to
be
denied
49.
A
lot
of
coverage
is
too
much
for
this
neighborhood
and
being
a
structure,
a
new
structure.
This
could
have
been
addressed
when
planning
and
designed
for
what
was
going
to
be
needed
before
it
was
constructed.
If
the
lot
wasn't
big
enough
for
what
was
needed
in
the
first
place,
then
it
should
have
been
built
in
the
hopes
of
the
bearings.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Rhonda
Johnson.
A
Okay,
would
the
applicant
or
agent
like
to
come
back
and
address
any
of
the
comments
made
during
the
public
hearing.
K
So
I
just
like
to
maybe
address
the
group
runoff
question
that
came
up
earlier:
there's
going
to
be
gutters
on
the
house
to
direct
the
water
where
it's
not
going
to
flood
the
neighbor
so
to
speak,
but
and
I
and
I.
Believe
it's
a
fair
request.
I
mean
what
we're
asking
for
I
mean
it's.
It's
a
unique
smaller
lot
I
understand,
but
we
would
like
to
afford
to
consider
it
to
improve
our
question
because.
K
So
one
area
you
know
it'll
come
out
to
their
front
yard
is
where
the
the
gutters
will
be
set
up
and
then
the
backyard
is
one
of
the
neighbors
talked
about.
There's
you
know
the
pavers
are
not
going
to
run
all
the
way
to
the
sideline
they're
going
to
come
off
and
then
there's
still
a
pretty
good
size
area
behind
the
pool
into
the
side
of
it.
H
K
K
To
the
as
you're
looking
at
this
site
plan
to
the
left-hand
side,
which
was
where
the
one
of
the
neighbors
was
talking
about
earlier,
we're
going
to
not
go
to
the
property,
I
was
going
to
come
back
home
quickly
because
they
used
to
go
to
the
property
owners
and
pull
that
back,
and
so
it's
I
mean
it's
a
very.
The
pool
actually
takes
up
about.
85
percent
of
that
I
mean
it's.
It's
a
very
small
area
of
pavers,
adding
back
there.
M
We're
going
to
make
it
better
than
it
was
before.
There's
going
to
be
less
concrete
that
pairs
than
there
was
before
it
did
used
to
go
right
up
to
the
fence,
and
it's
not
going
to
and
I
I'm,
not
even
sure
we're
gonna
put
pavers
in
I.
Think
it's
just
going
to
go
around
the
pool
and
underneath
the
Awning
or
underneath
the
bed.
K
And
then
secondly,
I
mean
you
guys,
wouldn't
know
this,
the
kind
of
fact
that
I'm
Sydney
off
the
house,
the
pool
was
there.
There
was
a
solid
surface
deck
around
the
full
bin
paper
somewhere
to
put
paper.
On
top
of
that,
that's
we've
taken
all
that
up
now.
So
when
the
pavers
go
in,
you
know
to
be
able
to
drain
a
lot
better
than
previously
when
before
she
you
know,
started
new
construction
on
the
house,
they
were
just
looking
so
they're
an
impervious
service,
though
so.
K
A
K
D
K
Then
the
new
ones
that
she,
what
they
were
looking
at
actually
even
goes
beyond
that
beyond
the
50,
but
it's
definitely
going
to
be
a
minimum.
50
percent.
F
D
Correctly
I
believe
say:
yes,
sir
I'll
do
the
chair.
If
I
can
ask
that
question
right
now,
the
request
is
written
up
as
a
zero
setback,
basically
for
the
for
the
pool
area
here
since
they're
gonna
have
to
important
to
look
like
a
foot
specific,
you
know
what
that
distance
is
going
to
be.
It's
gonna,
be
one
foot
or
two
foot
along.
H
H
D
K
Pool
is
just
the
other
side,
that's
what
people
says
ever
talk
about.
The
first
speaker
was
right
and
that's
where
we
decided
we've
discussed
with
them
and
not
friends
that
they've
always,
which
is
what
it
was
done
before,
we're
going
back
it
off,
though,
and
put
like
a
planer
there,
you
can
run
for
you.
Do
the.
D
A
L
K
K
So
when
we
was
originally
looking
at
it,
that's
one
of
the
things
we
did
not
take
into
consideration
was
the
accessibility
and
I
know.
Someone
said
earlier
that
a
handicap
doesn't
play
into
that,
but
that's
not
something
we
do
is
taken
into
consideration.
K
A
H
C
The
lot
coverage
issues
they've
said
that
they
don't
need
the
accessory
structure
set
back
of
zero
feet.
I
do
feel
that
they
are
trying
to
accommodate
the
code.
A
D
D
So
they
currently
the
structure
itself
meets
all
the
required
setbacks.
The
original
driveway
was
straight
directly,
so
the
additional
drawing
wasn't
considered
the
pool
deck
was
proposed
as
being
tariffs
that
it
doesn't
have
a
setback
So.
Currently,
as
it's
permitted,
it's
compliant.
These
changes,
weren't
Americans.
A
I
was
mainly
asking
in
reference
to
the
letter
that
came
from
Ms
Johnson
referencing
the
size
of
the
home,
not
necessarily
necessary,
but
oh.
D
I
see
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
yeah
as
long
as
they're
at
or
below
the
35
foot
maximum,
then
it's
permanent.
Whatever
stories
there.
Okay.
A
Yeah
and
I
would
like
to
reiterate
what
what
John
is
that
that
we
are
specifically
barred
from
considering
personal
challenges
or
any
sort
of
exceptions
that
are
not
specific
to
anything.
That's,
you
know
explicitly
stated
in
the
code
we've.
This
is
not
the
first
time
that
we've
had
somebody
with
you
know.
Maybe.
A
Overarching
circumstance
and
that's
why
they
need
to
add
on
to
their
house,
but
it
isn't
something
that
we
are
allowed
to
consider
when
we're
reviewing
the
criteria.
A
Any
other
discussion
can
we
have
a
roll
follow
up.
Please.
C
C
Forecast
boa
22-100120
property
address
312
First
Avenue
board
commission
to
consider
34-339
e3c2
for
Westerly
side
yard
of
zero
feet
and
an
easterly
sideways
setback
of
five
feet
below
10
feet
required
for
each
side.
Each
side
yard
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
new
two
unit,
multi-family
structure.
A
Thank
you.
As
a
reminder,
each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
when
we
open
public
hearing.
Does
any
board
member
have
expertise.
Communication
on
this
item
I've
had
none,
none,
none
I've
had
enough.
Would
the
applicant
or
agent
please
come
forward
to
be
scoring
with
your
testimony.
B
R
R
Right
so
this
lot
here
is
a
subfoundland
abroad.
It
was
splattered
in
1924,
which
is
a
25
B
wide,
and
it
does
not
need
any
any
of
the
current
flood
requirements
either,
which
is
defined
in
the
roller
print
curve.
So
the
reason
we
are
here
today
with
this
God
is
because
there
is
existing
structure
which
is
house
and
was
destroyed
by
fire
and
because
it
was
destroyed
by
fire.
The
the
zoning
doesn't
allow
those
that
needs
to
be
done
by
their
names,
because
it's
a
commercial
zoning,
so
we
had
to
re.
R
We
had
to
start
from
scratch.
We
figure
out
a
way
to
do
the
property
which
is
not
existing.
You
should
put
something
new,
so
we
went
to
the
plan
information
for
a
conditional
use
approval
for
a
new
black
because
that's
the
least
intensive
commercial
use
we
can
get
and
we
can
get
all
the
parking
requirement
now.
So
we
we
were
approved
in
the
last
year
right.
We
are
here
today
because
of
the
10
feet,
setback
requirements
on
each
side
on
the
side
yard
on
25
feet.
R
If
not,
that
is
5p
so
that
doesn't
do
anything
for
construction,
and
you
also
want
to
meet
the
Land.
Development
quotes
minimum
residential
unit
requirement
that
notifications
has
to
be
a
certain
size
for
it
to
be
compliant
with
them
before.
So
we
are
requesting
the
setback
we
are
in
speakers.
We
can
build
something
which
meets
all
the
other
core
Land
Development
code
requires,
and
we
don't
have
to
get
any
of
the
variances
except
the
ER
side
yard.
We
got
enough
parking,
we
got
front
and
back
set
up
that
we
can.
R
F
R
No,
the
fire
structure
of
District
around
the
previous
owner
was
there
Dave,
but
there
was
the
reason
it
was
not
dry
deposit
in
because
there's
a
requirement
for
utilities
has
to
be
on
for
the
building
to
be
to
be
gone
by
the
head,
and
there
was
something
happened
that
the
utilities
were
on
for
more
than
six
months
if
they
took
it
off
and
when
we
when
I
bought
it,
but
the
reason
I
bought.
It
is
my
son
and
I,
like
Boomer
Beach
and.
A
You
mentioned
the
the
minimum
square
footage
as
required
by
code
for
the
home.
Do
you
know
if
I
see
it
in
the
staff
report?
Do
you
know
the
square
footage.
R
I
don't
know
about
yet,
but
it
is
a
Christian.
Christian
has
reviewed
that
reportedly
proposed
because
I
building
and
we
met
that
guideline.
D
A
D
From
the
it
I
didn't
change
it
when
I
think
it
was
that
recorded.
So
what
was
advertised?
What
was
noticed
is
basically
the
side
yard
setbacks,
because
this
is
a
multi-family
dwelling,
so
it
gets
65
a
lot
of
coverage.
A
C
Charts
we
have
several
the
first
one
is
Zane
I
can't
pass
arrest
him.
A
Oh
I
apologize
does
any
board
member
have
expertise.
Communication
on
this
item;
okay,
none!
None!
Yeah!
Sorry
about
that!.
B
S
Name
is
angels:
I
I
lived
in
782,
8th,
Avenue,
South,
Jacksonville,
Beach
I
owned
the
property
across
this
week
for
that
one
331,
First
Avenue
North
and
that's
the
caffeinated
gaps.
I
was
one
of
the
people
that
was
interested
in
Dubai
that
building
that
got
destroyed
by
fire
I
reached
out
there
and
it
was
residential
and
this
one
was
grown
up
University.
So
far,
it
just
happened.
Didn't
pass
a
six
months
period
after
six
months,
I
reached
out
to
the
city
in
his
own
English,
commercial
and
I
knew
I
couldn't
do
anything
there.
S
So
I
just
thought
to
the
way
it
is
because
I
feel
like
it
needs
to
be
commercial
and
I
was
interested
in
it
just
as
Jonah
right
here
into
a
duplex
or
a
single
family
home,
but
I
think
that's
because
knowing
that
it
should
be
commercial
and
the
whole
Avenue
is
all
commercial,
so
personal
reason
to
begin
with,
when
he
pushes
the
property,
it
was
commercial
and
it
was
obvious
that
he
was
going
to
a
commercial
project,
not
not
a
residential
project
and
as
the
neighbors
and
even
the
neighborhood
property
next
to
mine
are
the
cool
cars
that
the
car
dealership
in
the
corner.
S
They
do
agree
with
me
as
well
Mr
Donald,
but
he's
not
here
today.
It
needs
to
be
commercial,
I
mean
the
property
that
I
have
is
a
restaurant
and
a
cafe
and
having
Neighbors
in
residential
property
Chris
across
from
ours
is
going
to
affect
me.
So
one
man's
gain
is
is
going
to
be
tough
on
other
existed,
neighbors,
knowing
that
the
property
is
commercial
and
going
to
that
project
is
commercial
with
not
having
enough
due
diligence.
S
Knowing
that
it's
commercial,
then
you
know,
there's
there's
not
even
anything
to
begin
with
here,
especially
the
parking
will
be
an
issue
as
well.
It
could
be
an
office,
it
could
be,
a
retail
could
be
anything
the
structure
it
is
now
needs
to
be:
it's
condemned,
it's
not
it's
inhabitable,
so
it
needs
to
be
demolished
and
it
needs
to
be
there's
a
lot
of
homeless
people
right
there.
S
I
think
the
pressure
is
happening
right
here
is
he's
trying
to
pull
something
commercial
residential
again
out
of
it
by
leaving
the
way
it
is,
but
it
needs
to
be
kind
of
standard.
It
needs
to
be
all
taken
out,
for
instance,
there's
no
homeless
people
there,
and
then
we
can
discuss
if
they
use
at
the
property
which,
which
is
a
commercial
property.
So
it's
going
to
affect
the
whole
Avenue
and
I
feel
like
all
the
properties
that
happen
is
all
commercial.
So
there's
no
there's
no.
F
A
F
C
The
next
one
is
Willard.
K
C
K
H
B
K
K
I
live
in
Neptune
Beach,
but
my
business
is
trying
to
put
his
father
development
on
there
I
addressed
there
is
380,
First
Avenue
North
run
repair
shop.
There
been
there
since
1980,
and
just
a
couple
things
I
mean
I
know
something
needs
to
be
done
with
that
property.
It's
a
very
small
piece
of
property,
but
he's
trying
to
put
a
very
large
structure
on
this
thing.
That's
really
not
going
to
fit
the
area
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
that
whole
area
is
very
low
there.
K
I,
occasionally
don't
have
to
be
a
hurricane
I
have
gotten
water
through
my
front
office
door
to
some
cars
driving
by
I
think
the
way
the
structure
is
now
it's
going
to
be
very
large.
It's
going
to
take
out
quite
a
bit
of
the
land
that
it's
already
setting
on
that
water's
got
nowhere
to
go
other
than
the
property
next
to
it
or
into
the
city
drainage
system,
which
is
already
over
taxed
most
of
the
time.
K
I
just
personally
feel
like
it's
not
going
to
be
a
good
fit
for
our
area.
Like
the
other
gentleman
said,
it
is
commercial
property
should
be
that
or
possibly
maybe
just
downsize.
The
structure
I
know
he's
trying
to
get
two
different
multi-family
units
going
there.
I
personally
think
you
know
one
single
family
is
what
belongs
there
or
small
office
building
or
something
of
that
type.
K
B
K
K
K
A
lot
of
State
because
I
just
have
more
questions
the
structure
of
the
building.
We
don't
know
what
that's
going
to
be
yet
looks
like
container
type
building
five
feet
on
our
side
of
the
property:
you're,
dropping
that
limitation
down
75
from
the
10
feet
on
either
side.
I
didn't
can't
build
a
question:
five
foot
piece
of
property,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
on
the
lot
for
the
owners
on
the
west
side
of
the
building
of
the
properties
and
I
question.
K
What
is
that
going
to
affect
them
as
far
as
constructing
anything
if
they
choose
to
do
something
with
their
property
down
the
road?
You
know,
in
our
standpoint,
being
in
business,
we're
going
to
have
to
look
at
the
liability
of
this,
the
cars,
the
parking,
the
people.
If
it's
got
five
bedrooms,
you
know
you're
gonna
have
five
cars.
K
That
would
be
my
thought.
I'm
just
you
know.
These
are
all
questions
that
I
have
and
we
deal
a
lot
with
we'll
call
it
Insurance
situations
and
if
somebody
we
sell
glass,
somebody
farts
on
my
lot.
You
know
exceptional
piece
of
glass.
We
could
be
along
with
a
lot
of
things,
so
there's
a
there's
issues
there
from
us,
and
you
know
you
handle
those
as
they
come
up,
but
yet
you
know
that
concerns
us
with
a
liability
standpoint
is
a
bill.
K
Is
a
is
sizeable
as
this
is
you
know
what
is
because
what
is
the
means,
construction
of
the
building?
What
is
it
going
to
be?
What's
the
roof
going
to
look
like
I?
Don't
have
we
don't
have
any
of
that
information
to
know
whether
what
that
is
I
think
it's
too
big
for
the
property
it's
taking
up
too
much
of
the
property.
There
is
something
that
maybe
can
be
built
there,
but
but
I
think
this
is
just
too
large
yeah.
K
Is
there
any
study
been
done
or
assessments
of
what
the
water
runoff
will
be.
If
this
much
of
the
property
is
is
covered,
it
looks
like
it's
there's
variances
being
asked
for
a
bunch
of
different
things
that
are
part
of
the
economy,
begin
the
statutes
of
the
or
the
the
code
is
and
all
those
sort
of
things,
but
looking
at
it
from
our
standpoint,
we
look
at
a
liability
but
look
at
the
size
of
the
structure.
What's
it
going
to
be,
you
know
a
lot
of
people
from
our
property.
K
H
K
Know
mine
are
more
questions
whether
we
don't
know
what
this
is
going
to
be,
what
it's
going
to
look
like
once,
it's
structured
once
it's
built
about
a
year
ago.
We
had
it
was
I,
have
something
in
here
with
and
we
went
through
all
of
this
and
the
board
tried
their
best
to
try
to
figure
out
what
to
do
with
that.
He
couldn't
come
up
with
anything
himself,
so
it
was
interesting
to
come
back
with
this.
This.
K
B
A
And
you
can
speak
into
the
microphone.
T
I
am
the
owner
of
the
commercial
properties
of
316,
318,
abetting
312
or
70
north.
As
you
know,
I
submitted
an
opposition
letter
and
I
wish
to
send
her
to
hearing
reference
like
the
massage
and
the
leaves
my
family
has
owned
this
property
for
many
decades.
Mr
mccale's
application
fails
to
meet
with
six
required
findings
for
variance
approval.
I
shall
highlight
some
key
deficiencies.
Can
you
hear
me
finding
number
two
states
special
circumstances
or
conditions
do
not
result
from
the
applicant's
actions
to
the.
T
P
T
To
in
May
22,
the
applicant
requested
initial
use
for
rn1
summoning
Mr
McGill
now
seeks
to
place
a
2700
square
foot
five
bedroom
duplex
on
a
grossly
undersized
law
to
the
Judgment
of
adjacent
Property
Owners.
This
proposed
overbuilding
on
a
25
foot
wide
lock,
is
a
direct
result
of
the
applicant's
actions.
M
T
Minimal
variance
for
reasonable
use
of
the
land.
To
the
contrary,
this
variance
is
not
the
minimum
to
afford
relief
to
the
applicant.
The
rm1
standard
requires
requires
20
feet
as
the
minimum
side
yard
setup
10
feet.
Mr
bakill
wants
a
total
of
five
feet,
which
is
zero
feet.
Aboveting
my
property
and
only
five
feet
of
Buddy
Mr
leaves
this
is
25
of
the
required
minimum.
T
T
T
A
H
T
T
H
A
C
Have
no
more
speaker
Parts,
but
we
do
have
a
letter
from
Lisa
Johnson
cook
1209
Salt,
Creek,
Island,
Drive,
Ponte,
Vedra,
Beach,
Florida,
32082,
deer
city
of
Jacksonville.
Beach
I
received
the
public
notice
in
regard
to
the
application
to
reduce.
C
Setbacks
for
the
property
at
312,
First,
Avenue,
North
I
have
a
home
within
300
feet
of
this
property.
I
am
strongly
against
allowing
the
owner
to
reduce
the
setbacks.
The
setbacks
are
in
place
for
a
reason,
and
the
owner
should
have
been
well
aware
of
Land
Development
over
the
time
of
purchase.
This
partial
is
only
in
.06
acres
to
build
a
multi-family
home
on
this
site.
It's
just
pure
greed.
The
street
is
president
of
Duval
County
and
St.
John's
County
as
well,
and
the
variances
like
this
should
be
should
not
be
permitted.
B
L
Driver
to
to
61
Aaron
Street
Atlantic,
Beach,
Florida
32233.
L
L
The
parking
was
a
challenge,
a
traditional
commercial
building.
You
need
at
least
two
parking
one
handicap
and
one
regular
parking.
The
lot
is
not
wide
enough
to
accommodate
that.
So
that
is
how
we
ended
up
going
with
the
duplex
with
Mr
repeal
bought
the
property.
He
did
not
expect
to
not
be
able
to
build
a
single
family
home.
L
So
here
we
are
with
the
some
of
the
questions
here,
so
it's
a
flat
roof
the
slide
shed
we'll
Scupper
it
out
and
get
a
gutter
system
to
go
to
a
planter
box
and
make
sure
we're
keeping
all
of
our
our
water
on
the
property.
We
have
parking
adequate
for
what
we're
planning
to
do
and
I
feel
we've
done
the
absolute
best.
We
could
to
fit
something
tasteful
on
this
property
right
now,
if
you
go
by
there's,
you
know
a
disaster
so.
R
I
want
to
go
back
to
what
we
are
asking
today
and
take
out
all
the
knowledge
that
was
made
in
public
hearing.
We
are
asking
for
a
rare
units
on
a
side
side
yard.
We
are
not
asking
for
a
Guardians
on
a
parking.
We
are
not
asking
for
variance
in
a
building.
We
are
meeting
all
the
existing
code
requirements
because
it's
yet
because
it's
a
commercials
only
we
cannot
do
single
camera.
R
You
have
one
of
the
board
members
stated
and
any
kind
of
commercial
use
would
require
parking
which
this
property
does
not
have
space
to
build.
So
building
a
duplex
is
the
only
thing
we
can
do
with
this
property,
which
meets
99
of
the
Land
Development
report
requirement.
Instead
of
trying
to
you're
trying
to
come
up
with
a
solution
they
spend.
Like
I
said
you
spend
two
years
trying
to
come
up
with
a
solution
and
we've
been
able
to
come
up
with
it.
Ryan
is
our
architect.
R
He
can
address
the
issues
about
the
runoff
which
he
said
that
you
will
be
keeping
it.
You
know
responded
property
normally
going
to
the
nearest
York
and
as
far
as
I
I.
Don't
if
you
have
any
specific
questions,
I'll
be
having
to
answer
those
but
I
think
most
of
the
discussion
about
the
public,
and
it
was
what
we
are
using
the
property
for.
But
according
to.
L
I
did
want
to
add
that
I
think
the
house
that
was
there.
It
was
only
three
feet
off
of
the
property
line
on
the
main
case
side
and
it
was
really
close
to
the
other
side.
So
almost.
R
Three
feet
on
each
existing
start
from
six
to
three
feet
away
on
each
side
and
the
reason
we
are
moving
for
a
bigger
setback
on
one
side
and
two
on
the
other
side
is
because
right
now
the
landscaper
cannot
fit
their
equipment
in
three
feet
days
to
go
in
the
backyard
and
clean
it
up.
So
if
you
have
a
little
bit
wider
space
on
one
side
and
and
so
splitting
it
on
two
ways,
we
try
to
think
we
can
do
it
on
one
side
and
not
do
it
on
the
other
side.
L
A
And
can
you
speak
to
so
I
understand
why
it
was
important
to
have
five
feet
on
one
side,
even
though
right
now
it's
split
evenly
with
the
current
structure,
just
in
the
design
process,
it
was
there.
No,
there
was
nothing
that
could
be
done
to
mitigate
the
zero
yeah.
L
H
L
Going
to
look
there,
basically,
if
you
wanted
to
do
a
commercial
building,
traditionally
you
need
two
parking
spaces.
An
88
parking
space
is
12
feet
wide
and
offloading
for
the
Ada
is
five
feet
wide
17
feet.
You
only
have
eight
feet
left
both
nine
feet
to
the
minimum
regular
parking,
we're
already
not
able
to
put
traditional
parking
for
traditional
commercial
distance.
D
Let's
get
the
chair,
they
can
add
a
little
bit
of
clarity
so
for
residential
uses.
You
can
have
back
out
into
the
right-of-way
parking
and
you
can
double
stack
cars
as
well,
so
commercial
uses
are
required
to
have
turning
into
new
room
space
and
drive
aisles.
So
even
if
they
were
able
to
fit
two
parking
spaces,
the
proportional
use
would
still
require
variance
for
the
backing
requirement.
D
A
C
A
It's
been
moved
and
seconded.
Is
there
any
discussions
and
before
we
get
into
discussion,
I
actually
have
a
question
for
staff
so
as
just
so
that
that
we
are
considering
the
criteria
And
discussing
the
most
relevant
points,
the
use
of
the
property.
We
have
no
say
in
that.
It's
already.
H
H
D
I
mean
so
much
as
if
the
variance
isn't
granted,
they
can
still
do
that
use
if
they
value
pay.
The.
A
A
D
A
Okay,
so
I
mean
that's
kind
of
my
main
takeaway,
we're
obviously
a
little
bit
hamstrung
by
what
the
cleaning
commission
has
decided
to
do
here,
but
that's
wasn't
up
to
us
and
we
have
no
way
of
changing
that
at
this
point.
So
all
we
can
do
is
look
at
the
actual
application.
A
It's
not
up
for
us
to
decide
whether
a
residential
structure
belongs
there
or
not.
It's
whether
the
request
in
front
of
us
is
reasonable
and
needs
the
six
criteria
and
the
main
issue
that
I'm,
having
is
the
zero
foot
setback
I
mean
I.
Think
it's.
If
they've
been
if
they've
had
residential
structure,
that's
three
feet
set
back
on
either
side.
A
Now,
if
it
were,
you
know
three
feet
or
five
feet
on
either
side
I
would
understand,
but
a
zero
foot
setback
in
that
area,
just
seems,
seems
like
it
would
be
in
conflict
with
at
least
one
of
the
criteria.
D
Do
the
sheriff's
house
the
board,
you
need
the
it's.
The
minimum
width
allow
the
code
for
well,
not
the
middle,
but
the
Practical
limit
for
town
homes
that
are
interior
units
in
a
capital
project
that
minimum
lot
size
is
15
feet
wide.
So
if
you
were
to
think
about
this
as
a
single
town
home,
it
is
practically
possible
to
build
something
that
is
15
feet
wide
for
Resident
construction.
D
Units
not
double
but
I
would
say
it
is
possible
to
do
with
the
narrower
project.
D
N
D
The
request
is
the
minimum
with
regards
to
intensity
when
it
comes
to
the
slew
of
uses
that
we
looked
at
when
we
were
talking
about
this
project,
anything
commercial
is
going
to
require
setback
reduction
is
potentially
parking
reductions.
So
in
that
sense,
this
the
minimum
of
intensity.
A
H
A
Decision,
at
least
for
the
time
being,
but
I
will
certainly
be
factoring
in
that
you
know
there
is
the
potential
for
another
type
of
structure
to
be
built
here
that
doesn't
have
a
zero
flip
set
back
on
one
side.
I,
just
don't
think
that's,
that's!
Never
a
good
idea.
F
D
Yeah
too
Jared
one
thing
I
actually
have
written
down
to
address,
so
this
is
specifically
a
two
unit:
multi-family,
not
a
two-family
dwelling.
So
two
family
values
are
treated
differently
in
the
zoning
code
for
whatever
reason
and
are
maxed
out
at
35
lot
coverage
as
a
multi-family.
They
get
up
to
65,
but
for
any
other
commercial
use
they
get
85
percent.
So
in
that
sense,
if
they
went
to
a
commercial
use,
they
would
have
even
more
lock
covering
entitlement.
A
And
as
far
as
the
rear
yard,
what's
been
proposed,
I
mean
I
know
this
is
just
surrendering,
but
they
they're,
obviously
not
asking
for
any
sort
of
rear
yard
variants,
so
they
could
also
if
they
wanted
to,
they
could
go
further
back.
You
know,
so
they
never
write
that
30
feet
right
now.
Oh
okay!
A
D
That's
right
so
for
a
commercial
use,
your
front
yard
would
be
10,
you
don't
have
a
rear
yard
and
your
side
yards
would
be
zero,
except
if
it
were
a
quarter
watt.
C
D
Last
week
for
the
mental
health
Dakota
playing
commission
update,
we
do
have
one
this
Thursday
and
it's
geared
towards
business
owners
and
developers,
but
you
were
welcome
to
attend
and
kind
of
see
what
you
missed,
as
I
have
explained
to
Mr
Moreland
on
the
website.
There
is
actually
a
fillable
Forum
that
are
the
questions
that
were
asked
to
that
hearing
and
the
PowerPoint
that
Michelle
is
also
available.
So
if
you
want
to
go
back
through,
you
can
review
the
PowerPoint,
and
so
like
a
format.
A
As
well,
it
was
you
know,
a
few
of
us
up
here
were
able
to
attend
last
Thursday's
meeting
and
I
certainly
felt
like
I
got
a
lot
out
of
it.
I
thought
the
way
that
they
structured
the
questions
and
pose
different.
You
know,
ideas
to
the
members
in
attendance
was
really
constructive
and
would
certainly
recommend
anybody
who
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
attend
one
of
the
sessions
to
definitely
do
so,
but.
A
They
will
be
in
six
o'clock
Thursday
in
this
room.
A
Okay,
anything
else.
H
A
It
okay:
is
there
a
question
to
return?
Second,
all
in.