►
From YouTube: Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting (9/26/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
First
thing:
I
need:
you
is
courtesy
of
Florida
visitors,
Richard
Landis,.
B
Come
on
down,
sir,
thank
you.
My
name
is
Richard
Landis
I,
look
at
736,
2nd,
Street
North,
that's
one
of
the
eight
homes
that
would
be
facing
the
west
side
of
the
dolphin
Depot
Redevelopment
project.
B
I
just
have
a
few
questions.
One
of
them
has
to
do
with
setbacks.
I've
seen
it
the
in
reading
the
application,
the
proposed
building
by
the
67
feet,
six
inches,
subject
to
the
required
setbacks.
On
page
four
I
see
that
that
is
two
feet
of
total
side
yard
setback
shall
be
provided
for
each
foot
of
the
primary
structure
exceed
35
feet
so
by
my
math.
B
That's
this
exceeds
by
32
and
a
quarter
feet
which
will
lead
to
64
and
1
8
of
a
foot
setback.
Now,
when
I
go
to
the
project
site,
I
don't
know.
If
you
need
me
to
approach
to
show
you
that
that
doesn't
have
a
page
number,
but
it
says
provado
at
the
bottom
and
it's
like
the
top
site
over
to
setback.
D
I
see
that
that
is
listed
as
60
feet,
as
I
said
by
my
calculations,
I
believe
that
set
that
should
be
64
and
1
8
feet.
B
So
I'm
wondering
if
my
math
is
right
or
if
I
measuring
on
that's
one
comment
that
I
have
foreign.
B
Okay,
the
other
is
I,
know,
I've,
seen
the
front
view
of
this,
but
as
I
live
along
the
west
side,
along
with
seven
other
homeowners,
I
would
like
to
see
a
side
architectural
view
of
this
project.
B
I
would
like
to
know
what
I'm
going
to
be
staring
out
at
what
I'm
going
to
be
looking
at
I'm
sure
the
architect
has
that
at
this
point
so
I'd
like
to
see
what
a
side
view
looks
like
the
Third
in
my
final
item
is
on
that
Travato
top
view
looking
down
over
by
where
the
existing
structure
is,
which
is
a
some
apartments.
B
I
see
what
appears
to
be
a
sideway
wrap
on
Second
Street,
which
is
right
where
my
property
is
and
I'd
like
to
know
what
that
is
I'd
like
to
know,
if
that's
a
automobile
ramp
is
that
a
trash
chute.
If
that's
a
trash
sheet,
that's
something
that
I
would
very
much
object
to
and
ask
that
any
trash
or
trash.
Pickup
you
put
over
on
the
east
side
like
first
street,
where
the
Margaritaville.
B
B
As
I
said,
where
Margaritaville
is
that
sort
of
right
over
there
is
some
of
their
trash
pickup
is
there
are
no
homes
there,
the
hotel
rooms
don't
start
until
the
third
or
fourth
floor.
So
if
I
had
a
request
to
locate
the
trash
or
not
ramp,
I
would
request
that
that
be
located
relocated
over
to
that
side.
B
It
would
have
to
be
if
it's
if
it's
a
trash,
chute
I
mean
I,
see
it
in
front
of
the
Margaritaville
Hotel.
It's
open
now,
there's
one
in
front
of
the
Metropolitan,
where
a
lot
of
times
that's
open
trucks
come
in
there
to
pick
up
the
trash.
It's
noisy!
It's
it's
smelly!
It's
it's
not
going
to
hold
water
should,
after
looking
at
if
it
can
be
quick
without
difficulty
on
the
other
side,
so
that
would
be.
B
E
B
Might
I
get
those
answers
with
those
be
at
another
meeting?
Well,.
A
A
Not
we'll
make
sure
so
much
more
is
that
get
to
hold
you
with
us.
Thank
you
very
much.
E
C
14Th
yeah,
okay
on
the
first
one,
the
August
17th
we
ran
into
this
before,
but
it's
a
workshop
at
a
meeting
and
it
had
a
confused
people
before
so
I
think
that
already
corrected,
and
that
will
be
the
same
thing
on
the
set
September
14th
Workshop.
Not
to
me
and
then
no
comments
on
the
meeting.
But
when
we
go
to
the
September
14th
Workshop
I,
don't
know
if
it
seems
to
me
for
the
records.
You
know
we
had
a
lot
of
discussion
on
the
lighting
planet.
C
Is
it
taking
years
and
years
and
years?
And
then
we
finally
did
something
on
it
and
it's
completely
different
and
find
out
that
you
can't
do
the
boardwalk
and
this
that
and
the
other
think
there
ought
to
be
a
reference
that
there
was
some
discussion
by
members
of
the
agency
and
questions
regarding
the
delay
in
a
change
in
orientation
and
then
maybe
a
brief
explanation
of
why
Beaches
Energy
can't
do
the
boardwalk
and
that
we
have
to
have
I.
C
A
A
F
Report,
yeah,
I'm,
sorry
so,
first
and
foremost
on
behalf
of
Dennis,
they
are
in
our
Public
Works
director
I've
got
to
let
you
guys
know
the
September
Public
Works
meeting
that
was
above
to
August
or
excuse
me
October
5th,
for
the
90
construction
documents
pending
what
is
to
come
next
week
in
the
aftermath
of
any
potential
events,
we
may
have
we'll
leave
it
in
that.
No
one
jinx
us
they
are
going
to
bump
that
back
to
the
earliest
October
12th,
potentially
October
the
19th.
F
They
want
to
be
sure
you
know
forbid
anything
any
issues,
but
they
won't
be
prepared
to
where
they're
not
focusing
on
trying
to
prep
for
a
meeting
they're
going
to
focus
on
making
sure
their
crews
are
where
they
need
to
be
next
week,
so
that
will
get
bumped
to
the
12th
or
19th
as
soon
as
Dennis
knows
he'll.
Let
me
know,
and
then,
as
long
as
everything
is
fine
next
week,
they'll
plan
to
start
getting
those
suppliers
out
and
I
want
to
know.
We
talked
about
with
you
guys
a
little
bit
before.
F
Documents
for
the
Pier
parking
lot
project.
We
want
to
try
and
get
that
out,
obviously
well
before
the
end
of
the
year,
but
we're
looking
at,
hopefully
getting
it
out.
Mid-October.
We
have
Ben's
Edge
review
in
November
and
we're
able
to
have
that
contract
awarded
to
a
contractor
long
before
the
temporary
construction
use
permit
for
spring
will
expires
so
when
they
are
done
and
out,
it
is
on
our
contractors,
whoever
we
select
to
get
in
there
tidy
up
and
build
out
that
parking
lot.
F
D
Can
you
just
refresh
my
memory
because
we
did
ask
d
and
c
and
city
council
wanted
to
address
the
city
of
Jacksonville
about
those
hundred
spots
and
if
we
can
move
them
across
the
street,
so
we
know
where
we're
going
forward.
We're
talking
about
doing
a
joints
meeting
with
them
right,
I
didn't
see.
Any
bullet
points
are
in
line
with
me
because
if
we
ever
come
up
with
a
conclusion
on
that.
F
G
D
C
Yes,
on
the
Pier
parking
lot,
you
know.
Looking
at
your
summary,
we
there's
talked
about
Dick's
height.
You
know
this
that
and
the
other
and
then
you're
mentioning
that
we're
going
to
get
working
on
the
project
and
getting
going
up
the
bids
it
sticks
tight,
is
still
involved.
So
that's
basically
parks
and
recreational.
F
C
F
And
then
just
another
FYI,
the
art
committee
has
plans
to
issue
a
call
for
artists
for
two
murals
and
that
roundabout
in
November
we
did
some
tweaking
and
finalized.
The
plans
were
called
artists.
We
did
figure
out
via
Florida
State
Statute
that
we
are
not
held
to
the
same
procurement
requirements
as
we
would
be
for
other
projects.
So
this
is
a
little
actually
easier
to
get
these
pieces
and
so
we'll
be
issuing
that
in
November
for
the
murals
and
the
roundabout
on
the
27th.
F
Tomorrow,
staff
is
sitting
down
with
half
to
discuss,
scope
and
feed.
This
will
be
the
first
round
of
session,
we'll
have
with
them
on
scope
and
fever.
Lakeland
Plaza
October,
the
3rd
I
know
I
put
this
in
the
email,
but
the
counselor
will
be
needing
to
approve
the
downtown
plan
Amendment,
which
is
that
maintenance
provision,
and
then
they
will
be
looking
at
the
facade
Grant
on
October,
the
10th.
Currently
on
October
17th,
we
tentatively
have
Council
looking
at
the
scope
and
fees
for
Lakeland
Plaza
approval.
F
If
we
receive
a
scope
and
fee
that
we
see
is,
you
know
sufficient
and
it's
a
good
dollar
amount
and
we
agree
with
it.
There
may
be
a
special
called
CRA
meeting
prior
to
that.
They'll
have
to
be
prior
to
going
to
council,
but
just
so
everyone's
kind
of
aware
I'll
make
sure
it
sends
out
email
so
to
notify
you
through
the
scope
and
fee
process
so
nobody's
caught
off
guard.
F
The
biggest
change
is
going
to
be
a
workshop
in
October.
We
are
going
to
be
having
a
workshop
on
20th
that
will
be
with
the
LDC
and
comp
plan,
Consultants
they're,
going
to
leave
that
Workshop.
They
are
meeting
with
the
different
boards
and
committees
and
then
Council
and
then
the
end
of
all
that
they're
going
to
be
the
staff.
To
recap
everything.
C
Quick
question:
yeah
yeah
only
I
noticed-
and
this
is
not
even
highlighted,
so
this
is
probably
an
older
thing,
just
refresh
my
memory,
if
you
would,
because
of
what
we
went
through
with
the
lighting
plan,
sure
the
way
finding
signage
says
you
anticipate
using
a
piggyback
contract
for
the
sign
s.
Yes,
have
we
seen
anything
recently
on
what
what
is
going
where
and
what
everything
is
looking
like,
those.
F
To
use
those
aren't
changing
and
if
you
remember
it's
not
specific
to
like
businesses,
it's
more
again
kind
of
directional
signage
into
areas.
To
be
honest,
we're
trying
to
get
through
the
bike,
racks
of
Ballers,
the
trash
cans,
kind
of
get
those
all
underneath
us,
and
then
we
plan
to
kind
of
go
after
this.
One.
C
F
C
It
possible
to
get
like
a
link
to
what
those
plans
are
because
I
don't
get
in
several
years.
I
know
I've
got
it
somewhere,
but
okay,
if
you've
got
it
online,
it
would
be
helpful
just
to
see
been
a
while,
since
anybody.
E
H
H
H
H
We've
talked
about
improvements
that
are
necessary
down
in
the
South
Beach
District
area
for
storm
water
that
and
the
remaining
projects
and
things
but
I'm,
just
not
clear
what
that
item
is
specifically,
and
my
last
question
I
think
is
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
any
further
update
on
The
Pedestrian
Crossing,
whether
you've
done
anything
from
from
Dennis
I.
Don't
have.
F
H
F
D
F
B
F
Yes,
so
this
just
kind
of
pigs
you
back
from
what
we
discussed
at
the
workshop
I
know.
David
was
not
here,
but
I
did
Circle
back
with
David
via
email.
We
kind
of
went
back
and
forth
and
David
wanted
to
also
Express.
He
agreed
with
the
consensus
of
the
agency
on
support
for
that
as
well,
and
so
this
is
just
a
formal
resolution
in
support
of
council
moving
forward
with
Jacob
one.
A
F
Often,
do
you
turn
this
one
over
China
director,
just
Heather
Anderson
thank.
G
You
Taylor
Mr
chair
I'm,
just
going
to
give
a
brief
staff
report
and
then
I'll
answer
any
questions
that
came
up
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
applicants
agent,
Mr
Diva,
now
to
provide
any
additional
additional
information
or
answers
for
you,
the
dolphin
Depot
project,
as
some
of
you
know,
because
I
know
several
of
you
were
here
when.
D
G
Was
originally
rezoned
in
2015
to
Rd
zoning
to
allow
for
a
hotel
and
multi-family
project
with
some
component
of
commercial?
It
was
re,
it
was.
The
zoning
was
amended.
Excuse
me
in
2017
to
change
a
couple
of
details
and
provide
a
different
elevation
and
architectural
style
food
project
and
the
new
owner
that's
going
to
actually
be
building.
This
project
wanted
to
make
a
few
other
small
tweaks
really
mostly
to
the
details
of
actually
what
the
commercial
space
would
entail.
G
It
was
a
little
bit
nebulous
in
the
original
applications
and
they've
really
nailed
down
exactly
what
they
want
to
do
on
the
commercial
piece
and
what
they
are
looking
to
do
is
a
4
000
square
foot
restaurant
to
be
part
of
the
hotel
around
a
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
space,
but
the
footprint
and
elevation
of
the
project
remain
mostly
unchanged
and
I
have
some
slides?
I
can
show
the
number
of
hotel
rooms
and
multi-family
Apartments
is
also
remaining
unchanged.
G
G
Plan
again,
relatively
the
same
as
before,
I
do
want
to
address
the
setbacks.
So
based
on
the
settlement
agreement
back
from
o4
when
the
height
was
capped
at
35
feet.
This
property
was
granted
68
feet
and
how
that
tabulated
is
based
on
the
side,
yard,
setbacks
so
they're
cumulative.
It's.
G
So,
in
this
case,
setback
B
I
believe
that
says,
is
59
feet,
but
you
add
to
that
the
setback
that's
on
First
Street,
which
is
actually
six
feet.
So
when
added,
when
you
add
those
together,
you
get
the
ability
to
do
the
67
and
a
half
feet.
I
know
it
can
be
kind
of
confusing
and
again
we
have
to
follow
the
settlement
agreement
in
the
way
that
it's
written
with
some
of
these
properties,
The
Way,
It,
Was
Written,
was
to
reflect
the
way
the
code
used
to
read
prior
to
the
height
cap
in
2004.
G
G
G
It
would
look
like
on
the
other
sides.
This
was
all
that
was
provided
in
the
application.
What's
shown
on
that
west
side
of
the
building,
there
is
a
dumpster
it's
going
to
get
a
little
quicker
to
work,
and
again
this
has
been
you
know,
pre-reviewed
by
by
public
works
as
far
as
being
able
to
access
this.
This
is
going
to
be
open.
The
building
stops
right
where
that
Green
Dot
is
sorry.
G
I
might
have
to
shake
you
today,
but
this
is
some
open
parking,
EV
charging
stations,
and
then
this
is
the
entrance
into
the
garage
and
the
covered
parking,
but
this
is
correctly
identified
as
a
registered
location.
I
certainly
can't
speak
for
the
applicant
and
the
agent
on
whether
they're
willing
to
move
that
or
whether
they
can
even
move
that
again,
it
would
require
discussions
with
Public
Works.
G
G
G
Covered
obviously
open
it
to
fill
it,
but
and
there's
certain
hours
that
they
pick
up
and.
G
With
the
one
across
the
street
at
Margaritaville,
pulling
it
out
and
trying
to
get
it
from
First
Street
so
again,
Public
Works
is
pretty
specific
about
where
a
dumpster
enclosure
can
be
and
the
concrete
underneath
it.
So
they
can
access
it
because
they
back
in
with
those
trucks
on
all
of
these
dumpsters
to
be
able
to
unload
them.
So
this
was
an
agreed
upon
location
that
worked
for
both
the
applicant
and
then
public
works.
C
My
question
on
that,
and
it
would
involve
the
setbacks
as
well:
I'm
envisioning
that
it
if
they
wanted
to-
and
it
was
legal
you
could
actually
build
part
of
the
building
over
it.
You
know
make
it
high
enough
that
the
trucks
can
back
up
open
the
doors,
and
so
when
it's
not
being
picked
up,
the
dumpster
is
actually
in
a
building,
but
that
would
take
require
going
up
to
pass
the
setback
on
that
side.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
even
a
possibility,
but
I
just.
C
C
D
Francis
so
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
this
block
because
I
won't
get
all
the
time,
but
my
mind
is
not
remembering
exactly
what's
on
six
I
think
there
was
interested
here,
I
guess.
The
question
is:
is
when
was
this
Public
Works
agreement
done
and
where?
When
did
those
places
across
the
street
residents
across
the
street,
get
built
in
relation
to
each
other?.
F
D
Yeah
so
I
guess
my
question
would
be:
would
the
what
would
be
the
process
to
request
a
review
of
this
residential
concern
with
the
new
owners
and
Public
Works
to
go
with
the
process?
We
did
that
because
I
I
personally
can
understand
if
that
decision
was
made
in
the
placement
prior
to
this
being
occupied,
it
might
be
something
to
consider
yeah.
G
I
will
certainly
obviously
I'm
willingness
to
have
that
discussion
defer
to
the
applicant's
agent,
but
when
we
have
a
project
like
this,
it
requires
a
pre-application
meeting.
So
that's
with
all
the
Departments
that
would
review
plans
when
they
come
in
and.
G
H
A
I
Thank
you,
Steve
and
I
wanted
to
drive
through
1200
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
of
Travato,
yeah
I.
Think
Heather
did
a
great
job
summarizing
the
limits
of
our
requests.
We're
really
focused
primarily
on
6th
Avenue
North
previously,
where
it
says
Sundries
beach,
near
retail
and
hotel
condo
Lobby.
That
was
all
storage
units
and
lockers.
So
there
was
no
activation
at
all
on
Sixth
Avenue
North.
It
was
just
going
to
be
a
blank
wall,
maybe
Windows,
maybe
not,
and
so
the
whole
purpose
of
this
rezoning
is
to
do
everything.
I
That's
in
the
yellow
and
kind
of
the
the
southeast
corner
of
the
building.
Everything
else
is
exactly
what
it
was
approved
in
two
thousand
15
and
17.,
so
the
location
of
the
dumpster
on
on
2nd
Street,
that's
already
approved
it's
not
even
really
a
part
of
the
application.
It
was
proven
15.
It
was
proven
17
and
there's
nothing
willing
to
cover
it
with
a
building
or
do
anything
else
as
you've
described.
E
I
Side
plan
wasn't
in
front
of
the
judge,
the
setbacks
and
all
the
other
characteristics
of
the
development
were,
and
so
we
consider
making
changes
to
the
site
plan
and
talk
with
staff
and
with
with
feathers
predecessor
about
the
limitations
of
changing
the
site
plan
and
the
elevation,
and
we
all
concluded
that
if
we
best
not
to
modify
it
dramatically
at
all,
so
the
setbacks
are
exactly
the
way
that
Heather
describes,
setback,
D
and
setback
C,
there's
a
total
of
66
feet.
That's
a
compliance
of
the
court
order.
I
Setback,
B,
plus
setback
a
is
in
compliance
to
the
court
order,
the
location
of
the
building
the
foot
front
of
the
building,
virtually
identical
within
a
foot
on
every
direction
from
what
was
approved
originally
and
so
without
wanting
to
risk
anything
running
a
valid
report's
order.
That's
why
we've
come
up
with
this,
so
the
whole
purpose
of
this
rezoning
is
just
to
accommodate
the
retail
that's
along
6th,
Avenue
North.
Everything
else
is
the
same
from
2015
and
2017.
I
in
terms
of
the
elevations.
We
don't
have
a
side
elevation,
so
I
don't
have
one
to
offer
and
I
don't
have
one
offer
for
probably
six
months,
but
the
building
the
front
elevation
which
we've
produced
is
consistent
with
the
building
elevation
that
was
approved
in
2017
and
also
discussed
in
2015.
and
so
I'm
not
trying
to
be
difficult.
I'm
just
trying
to
outline
the
limitations
that
we're
operating
under
and
again,
the
purpose
of
this
application
was
really
acting:
Sixth,
Avenue,
North
and
I've.
I
Just
not
had
it
be
just
a
blank
wall
with
no
doors,
no
activity.
D
D
D
D
Because,
back
when
this
was
discussed,
there
were
an
articles
there,
they
are
going
to
be
your
neighbors
and,
just
like
you
know,
other
locations,
I'm
just
kind
of
just
wondering
it
looks
like
there's
a
place
over
here.
That's
not
covered
as
well.
I
didn't
know,
I
didn't
know
if
it's
just
a
con
like
leaving
things
a
little
bit
just
making
certain
changes
is
something
that
might
be
concerned
about
anything
you
have
to
I'm.
Just
saying
that
that
was
a
concern
was
brought
up.
D
I
We
will
I
mean
again
we'll
look
at
it
between
now
and,
and
you
know
when
we
get
to
the
city
council,
but
the
challenges
are,
you
know
again
the
turning
radius
for
the
trucks.
You
can't
get
it
back
down
into
where
those
handicap
spaces
are.
Unless
you
give
up
parking
spaces
on
6th
Avenue,
North
I'm,
not
sure
that
you
know,
you
guys
want
to
do
that
and
there's
really
not
a
convenient
way
to
back
it
in
and
get
the
trash.
I
D
D
I
Yeah
the
trash
the
trash
room
location
also,
obviously
is
important
because
it's
an
approximity
to
wherever
the
dumpster
is
I
mean
just
eyeballing
it
the
trash
room
going
out
to
the
the
loading
area
where
it's
cross
hatched
up
on
Seventh.
You
know,
maybe
that's
a
possibility,
but
somebody's
gonna
have
a
dumpster
on
their
side.
It's
no
matter
where
we
get
it,
and
so
we'll
take
a
look
at
it.
If
there's
an
alternative,
we'll
we'll
we'll
we'll
talk
about
it,
but
frankly,
that's
already
improved.
I
C
I
Is
the
way
that
Miss
Ireland
described
it,
and
you
know
we're
available
to
answer
a
few
questions
that
you
may
have
Beyond
those
that
we've
discussed
already
but
focusing
on
6th
Avenue
North
is
really
the
purpose
of
the
application.
G
H
G
G
E
E
H
Well,
it
just
shows
up
in
the
document,
as
you
read
through
it,
that
they're
you're
changing
it
from
seven
and
a
half
to
two
and
a
half,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
again
I.
Don't
have
the
history
on
this
project,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
why
that
was
reduced.
Somehow
I
would
think
we'd
like
to
keep
it
at
least
seven
and
a
half
feet
for
a
larger
structure
and
that's
going
on
the
site.
G
H
We
are
now
creating
a
canyon
between
Margaritaville
and
this
project
that
I
I
just
have
a
real
difficult
time,
but
we've
pretty
much
eliminated
the
activity
along
the
First
Street,
which
is
what
we've
been
all
trying
to
develop
for
some
time,
because
First
Street
is
the
main
Corridor
for
retail
and
development
and
so
forth,
and
it
just
feels
like
we've
kind
of
turned
our
back
on
First
Street
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
this
project
activates
6th
Avenue
North,
which
is
a
retail
component,
that
we
wanted
to
to
encourage
in
the
way
of
development.
H
Above
that,
so
again,
that's
a
blank
wall,
placing
a
blank
wall,
a
Margaritaville
and
I
would
like
us
to
get
creative
and
try
to
figure
out
how
we
can
solve
it,
and
maybe
this
was
I'm
going
to
throw
this
out
there.
Maybe
this
is
an
opportunity
for
the
art
committee
to
take
a
look
at
something
that
goes
on
that
wall.
H
That
works
with
the
developer,
to
create
some
kind
of
an
artistic
element
that
goes
on
the
wall,
to
liven
that
that
whole
block
along
there,
because
right
now
there's
nothing
there
and
I
think
I
think
we
really
need
to
look
at
it
much
more
creatively.
I'd
love
for
all
of
us
to
sit
down
and
take
a
look
at
this
and
come
up
with
a
good
solution
that
makes
this
and
and
an
advantage
for
the
city
rather
than
what
I
think
right
now
is
going
to
be
a
disadvantage.
Well,.
G
If
I
could
clarify
and
I'm
sure,
Steve
will
have
something
to
add
to
several.
G
G
To
the
parking
garage,
but
this
side,
this
east
side
is
where
the
multi-family
residential
is
so
it
won't
be
a
blank
wall.
It
will
have
you
know
and
again,
I
haven't
seen
an
elevation,
but
going
to
this
is
the
South
there's
balconies,
so
hotel
rooms,
hotel
rooms,
it'll
be
very
similar,
I,
imagine
and
again
I'll.
Let
Mr
David
out
elaborate
on
it,
but
this
will
be
the
multi-family
side,
the
hotel
side
over
here
with
the
shared
amenities.
So
again
it
won't
be
a
blank
wall.
H
Feet
is
nothing
but
a
blank
wall,
That's
parking
for
the
first
two
levels,
yeah,
it
would
be
yeah
and
when
you
look
down
in
your
perspective
the
human's
perspective
as
you
look
down
through
there,
there's
only
two
to
three
stories
up.
So
what
they're
really
going
to
be
seeing
is
a
blank
wall
with
a
black
wall
on
the
opposite
side,
which
is
existing,
which
is
Margaritaville.
H
We
need
to
take
a
look
at
what
we're
going
to
do.
Maybe
it's
something
it's
nothing
more
than
some
neon
lighting
that
goes
along
there.
It
creates
an
artistic
element
that
could
spell
here.
We
are
coming
into
the
downtown
area.
You
know
this
is
a
unique
place
that
you're
coming
to,
and
we
can
do
it
with
some
some
kind
of
specialized
Lighting
on
that
on
that,
but
something
rather
than
because
I
don't
know
what
the
Finish
is
of
this,
but
it
may
be
nothing
more
than
a
painted
block
wall
along
their
it.
H
I
would
like
us
to
see
like
us
to
get
a
little
more
creative
and
reference,
and
otherwise
we
really
got
a
problem,
because
you
now
have
the
refinery
which
is
north
of
this
area,
and
it's
almost
becomes
like
an
island
in
itself,
separated
from
the
rest
of
the
retail
and
restaurants
and
things
that
we're
trying
to
develop
in
the
downtown
area
and
it'd
be
nice
to
tie
all
of
that
together.
In
some
way,
and
again,
maybe
it's
the
art
committee
that
has
a
solution
to
it,
but
hopefully.
I
We
can
look
at
it.
Oh
Mr,
Steve
again,
the
only
thing
I
can
say
is
we'll
again
we'll
take
a
look
at
that
as
well.
Yeah.
The
limitation
on
the
on
First
Street
is
one
that
you
know
that
we're
kind
of
stuck
with
there's
really
not
a
lot.
We
can
do
there.
It
won't
be
a
blank
call,
certainly,
though
at
least
the
open
spaces
between
the
borders,
where
the
where
the
cars
are
parked,
because
you
have
to
have
ventilation.
I
I
I,
I,
don't
really
know
what
I
really
don't
know.
What
else
to
say:
I
agree
with
you
if
the
site
can
be
designed
differently,
so
we
can
retail
wrapping
the
entire
block.
We
would
have
done
that,
but
there's
really
another
way
to
accommodate
everything
within
the
height
limit
that
was
previously
approved.
So
all
I
can
say
is
we'll
try
we'll
look
at
it.
We'll
try
out
there
with
good
heads.
H
And
a
lot
of
creative
people
sitting
down
and
putting
their
heads
together,
I
think
we
can
come
up
with
a
very
good
solution
and
I
think
it'll
be
a
win-win
for
everybody
and
that's
what
I
really
wanted
to
be
as
a
win-win
win
for
the
developer
win
for
the
city
that
we
can.
You
know
really
be
proud
of
in
the
way
this
project
moves
forward.
I'm,
not
against
this
project.
That
I
think
is
a
great
asset.
H
I
love
the
idea
of
the
mixed-use
development
that
it
is,
and
so
forth
I
mean
if
it
was
me
personally
I'd
be
willing
to
get
rid
of
the
parking
along
First
Street
that
segment
and
turn
the
head
into
retail
or
something
rather
than
requiring
additional
parking.
You
know
reduce
the
parking
down
a
little
bit
and
put
more
retail
in,
but
you
know
that's
a
much
bigger
discussion,
but
you
know
want
to
see
what
we
can
do,
because
I
think
we
can
come
up
with
a
solution
Francis.
Thank
you.
D
I
just
want
to
say:
I
am
very
happy
that
there's
a
street
side
being
activated
and
not
just
being
like
my
only
other
comment-
is
that
we
have
to
be
very
careful
on
the
sport.
I
mean
this
is
private
property,
and
if
we
can
help,
you
know
request,
you
know
certain
features
or
certain.
You
know
aspects
of
provide
our
our
concerns,
which
I
do
agree,
that
you
know
that
one
should
have
been
shared,
but
we're
just.
We
just
really
need
to
make
sure
that
we
say
you
know.
D
It's
not
a
wind
tunnel,
we
would
like
it
to
be
nice.
We
don't
think
our
client
is
going
to
not
make
it
nice
and
we
would
just
like
that
as
a
new
concern.
So
we
as
a
board
can't
dictate
what
you
do
necessarily
we
could
just
kind
of
request
hey.
This
is
our
vision.
This
would
like
you
to
consider,
and
could
you
be
a
good
neighbor
and
do
so
that's
kind.
D
Don't
know
if
we're
able
to
like
I
know
that
you're
talking
about
you
know
having
joint
names
and
whatnot
I
think
we
just
haven't
even
seen
what
they're
proposing.
So
we
are
in
a
disaster
Zone,
where
we
are
at
a
fault
at
this
point,
because
we
don't
even
know
if
their
side
view
really
looks
like
yet
so.
F
D
C
I
actually
like
this
a
lot,
the
way
it
was
changed
and
I
just
to
the
extent
that
you're
proposing
Gary
that
we
moved
some
of
this
over
First
Street
I
would
disagree
entirely,
because
that
would
make
that
an
island
of
retail
with
nothing
around
it.
There's
there's
vacant
office,
retail,
on
the
building
on
the
corner.
On
the
opposite
side,
they've
never
been
able
to
really
utilize
it
because
you
know
first
street
is
a
Transit
Street.
Our
Avenues
are
our
access
things
for
pedestrians
coming
to
the
beach
for
parking
and
whatnot.
C
So
this
actually
helps
activate
Sixth
Avenue
with
some
important
retail
core.
If
we
flip
things
around
to
the
other
side,
this
stuff
is
not
going
to
work
and
then
we'll
have
a
blank
wall
on
what's
supposed
to
be
a
core
I.
Think
well,
but
again,
I
like
what's
being
done
on
6th
Avenue,
North
I,
think
that's
important
because
for
what's
existing
across
the
street
and
what
may
end
up
being
developed
there
as
well.
So
I
like
this
person,
yeah
I'm,
just.
E
Gonna
go
with
more
of
what
he
just
said
is
that
you
know
when
I
look
at
this
plan
and
I
see
that
restaurant
on
the
corner
I
mean
you
know,
every
corner
is
now
occupied
by
something
in
the
Sixth
Avenue
and
First
Street
and
I.
Think
that
you
know
that
that's
going
to
draw
people
into
that
area
and
create
a
destination
spot.
E
So
when
I'm
thinking
about
looking
down
at
that
and
seeing
You
Know
Each
corner,
we've
got
the
Blanchard
here,
pass
them
out,
Marina
and
then
the
daily
Chrome
building
and
now
we've
got
a
nice.
You
know
restaurant
there's
a
that's
an
awesome,
little
block
right
there,
something
we
don't
have.
So
it
was
awesome.
Yeah.
H
Oh
just
to
respond
to
just
common
side,
I
agree
about
six
thousand.
You
North
and
I'm
not
asking
about
anything
to
change
so
long
since
that
Avenue
North
I
think
that
needs
to
stay.
It
strengthens
the
initial
Vision
plan.
What
I'm
just
trying
to
do
is
trying
to
avoid
a
black
wall
along
First
Street,
and
how
do
we
do
something?
That's
different
along
First
Street.
H
That
makes
that
an
interesting
Corridor
down
through
there,
particularly
with
again
the
blank
wall
across
the
street
and
again
it
could
be
something
along
the
lines
of
you
know
artwork
rather
than
you
know,
usual
along
there.
But
we
need
to
look
at
something.
A
A
Anybody
else
have
any
comments,
questions
or
concerns
about
your
girlfriend.
People.
G
D
G
It
gets
to
them
so
similar
how
the
Planning
Commission
looks
at
standards
for
rezoning.
The
CRA
is
looking
to
see
if
this
project
is
consistent
with
the
downtown
Redevelopment
plan,
considering
how
there's
very
little
change
this
actually
I.
Think
in
sassafunia
makes
it
more
consistent
with
the
downtown
Redevelopment
plan.
It's
already
been
approved,
so
it's
honestly
a
pretty
straightforward
thing,
but
what
we're
looking
for
is
your
recommendation
to
carry
forward,
so
the
only
changes
that
are
actually
before
are
sort.
A
G
If
we
could
take
a
vote
from
everyone
and
to
basically
formalize
that
you
find
it
consistent
with
the
downtown
Redevelopment
plan
for
the
Amendments
that
they're
making
to
the
existing
approved
Rd
zoning.
G
H
Well,
the
only
thing
I
would
add
is
that
the
recommendation
would
be
with
the
consideration
that
we,
both
put
as
Mr
devanauer,
said
that
we
would
look
at
the
trash
removal
aspect
and.
A
A
E
H
C
But
but
again
I
go
to
all
we're
dealing
with
is
the
yellow
we
can.
We
have
to
make
a
separate
recommendation
for
the
existing
plan,
so
they
go
back
and
take
a
look
at
it.
But
all
we're
asked
has
to
do.
Is.
A
F
To
word
it
because
I
don't.
G
G
You
guys
require
them
to
move
the
dumpster
or
require
them
to
act,
retail,
for
example,
or
art,
but
certainly
could
be
part
of
the
recommendation
from
the
CRA
that
the
the
property
owner
and
the
developer
at
least
look
into
those
items.
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
wrong
with
making
that
a
condition
of
approval.
H
Yeah
I
guess
I'm
a
little
confused
in
that
with
the
way
this
was
presented,
at
least
in
the
way
that
I've
read
all
this
documentation.
Is
that
we're
looking
at
this
whole
development
that
we're
making
an
approval
on
what
has
been
submitted
for
the
development,
not
just
the
stuff
in
yellow,
but
the
whole
thing
I
mean
that's
what
all
the
documentation
is
that
we
have
in
front
of
us.
It
doesn't
say
you
only
need
to
take
a
look
at
the
yellow
area,
so.
G
I'm
happy
to
clarify
so
really
what
they're
requesting
is.
As
mentioned,
the
change
in
this
Rd
rezoning
is
just
what's
reflected
in
yellow
everything
else
is
the
same:
the
setbacks,
the
amount
of
parking
spaces
to
meet
the
requirement,
the
the
dumpster
location,
the
height,
all
of
those
things
have
already
been
approved
and
they
were
actually
prepared
to
submit
building
permits
to
get
started
prior
to
making
some
some
small
adjustments
to
the
commercial
piece
and
just
really
hammering
down
what
they
actually
wanted
to
do.
So
again,
it's
it's
already
approved
project
with
an
approved
site
plan.
C
A
E
A
Is
there
anything
else,
I
feel
special,
that's
done.
Do
they
have
anything
else
to
talk
about.
F
Yeah,
we're
obviously
still
working
at
the
king
of
our
new
system,
all
right
all
right.
Next
meeting
we
have
that
Workshop.
You
said:
let's
move
to
the
fifth,
potentially
that
no
that's
the
90
construction
stuff
that
potentially
moves
the
12th.
Our
next
Workshop
is
not
until
October
the
20th
with
the
LDC
and
complaint
consultants
and
I'm
going
to
send
down
plenty
of
okay.
So
if
there's
nothing
else,
that's
coming
for
us
we're
adjourned.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Everybody.