►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting (4/24/2023)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening,
I'd
like
to
call
the
April
24th
meeting
of
the
city
of
Jacksonville,
Beach
Planning
Commission,
to
order
I
believe
we
just
had
an
oath
of
office.
B
A
A
So
so,
just
before
we
begin,
we
basically
to
look
at
each
project
that
comes
before
us
looking
at
the
Quasi
judicial,
the
information
and
we
extend
a
period
of
three
minutes
to
members
of
the
public
who
want
to
address
us
on
any
academic
development
of
environment.
So
with
that,
if
we
can
begin
new
business,
PC,
1023,
okay,.
D
E
Good
evening,
members
of
the
commission,
Sandra
Robinson
City
attorney
as
Mr
partly
indicated.
Pc
10-23
is
the
proposed
amendments
to
the
text
of
the
LDC,
or
particularly,
to
section
34
348
of
the
LDC.
F
E
E
If
you've
had
a
chance
to
review
the
agenda
packet
or
you
will
see
our
two
potential
areas
where
the
text
wouldn't
change
and
it's
in
a
very
limited
capacity
at
348,
I
and
348j2,
and
what
we
are
proposing
with
this
new
text
is
simply
to
change
out
the
standards
that
currently
exists
and
would
be
applied
for
an
applicant
for
for
a
PUD
designing
and
to
swap
that
out
for
the
standards
that
are
in
34
to
11..
If
I
hadn't
already
said
it,
the
current
standards
are
those
that
are
set
forth
in
348.
E
the
history.
Behind
our
our
request
is
this:
back
in
2018,
the
city
council
was
presented
with
similar
proposed
amendments
to
session
347,
that's
where
the
Redevelopment
of
zoning
and,
if
you've
had
a
chance
to
look
at
both
347
and
348.
What
you
see
are
the
similarities
in
language.
E
So
one
piece
proposed
amendment
as
I
said:
there's
just
this
small
change
at
348i
and
348
J2,
just
wrapping
out
the
standards
in
348
for
the
standards
of
211..
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer
them
for
you,
but
my
office,
the
city
attorney's
office,
is
recommending
that
you
approve
those
changes
and
also
recommend
that
you
see
more
that
approval
to
the
city
council.
G
Yeah
I
just.
F
E
And
if
you
have
that
in
front
of
you,
I
is
at
the
very
top
and
it
would
be
action
by
the
Planning.
Commission
and
J2
is
under
action
by
the
city
council.
E
Well,
the
way
the
codes
are
are
more
sometimes
are
a
little
bit
confusing,
but
this
the
subtle
kind
of
excuse
me,
content
of
the
changes-
are
contained
at
six
of
eight.
E
G
E
Had
said
that
in
347,
the
city
council
could
not
apply
the
standards
of
211
to
an
application
which
had
been
noticed
in
the
code
as
being
under
the
standards
of
347..
If
that
makes
any
sense
to
you,
so
that's
that's
the
history
of
it
yeah.
No,
this
is
for
the.
There
was
a
lawsuit
that
prompted
the
change
back
in
2018
of
347.,
and
so
the
council
addressed
that
deficiency
by
changing
347,
but
we
failed
to
change
348.
E
Only
those
Provisions,
but
historically
there
was
that
utilization.
We
had
just
not
been
if,
for
a
lack
of
a
better
term,
made
to
defend
that
in
view
of
the
lbc's
actual
language.
C
E
Yes,
yes
and
the
standards
are
different,
so
if
you
look
at
them,
so
348
is
right
there,
it's
a
part
of
your
agenda
pack
and
we
connected
the
actual
current
language.
The
considerations
are
not
as
broad
and
they
are
more
technical
in
in
terms
of
being
limited
to
the
site
and
the
development
of
a
specific
site.
When
you
look
at
the
considerations
that
are
set
forth
into
11,
a
lot
more
can
be
taken
into
consideration.
E
It
doesn't
have
to
be
as
hard
it
doesn't
have
to
be
as
Technical
and
discretion
plays
a
lot
into
those
types
of
analyzes.
E
We
weren't
able
to
tap
into
that
and
I
don't
have
any
idea
as
to
the
ultimate
effect
us
to
utilizing.
11
verses
348,
but
the
process
will
be
is,
is
a
lot
more
narrow
in
things
that
might
have
been
of
factors
that
could
have
been
validly
considered
with
211,
as
the
standards
were
taken
off
the
table,
and
so
obviously
the
fewer
factors
that
need
to
be
reviewed
or
considered
operates
through
operates
usually
as
a
benefit
to
the
applicant.
C
F
F
F
B
B
D
So
your
next
meeting
is
going
to
be
May
8th.
We
have
one
case
for
that
meeting.
Also,
we
have
a
scheduled
the
joint
workshop
with
Planning
Commission,
Land
Development
I'm.
Sorry.