►
From YouTube: 05-08-19 Building and Standards Commission
Description
05-08-19 Building and Standards Commission
A
C
C
B
B
C
C
D
A
We
only
need
four
to
have
a
quorum,
so
I
guess
chairman,
we
do
have
a
quorum,
so
we
can
proceed
with
a
meeting
first
item.
One
on
this
is
citizen
comments
and
it
seems
like
we
don't
have
any
citizens
here
to
come
in.
So
we
can
move
on
to
item
number
four
considerate,
patient
fuel
in
the
minutes
for
the
last
regular
meeting
of
September
they're
up
2018.
If
you
have
an
update
on
most
of
these
properties
that
we
probably
are
going
to
see
some
again
motion.
C
D
A
A
There
is
seven
properties
that
I
listed
to
to
update.
You
number
wanted
to
be
they
all
of
these
have
been
recommended
for
demolition
already,
and
one
or
two
just
need
signatures
from
the
chairman
in
all.
Seven
all
need
actually
actually
number
5
does
not
mean
it
needs
to
get
a
demolition
order,
but
we
updated
to
last
time,
and
so
we
recommend
you
know.
That's
the
first
item
on
this
on
this
next
item.
A
After
this
we
were
actually
looking
at
see.
The
other
ones
need
to
just
be
signed
by
the
same
secretaries,
to
process
and
to
post
them
in
the
newspaper,
and
so
just
wanted.
To
recap:
I
put
someone
on
your.
If
you
go
through
it,
there's
a
paintable
work
on
all
of
its
women
budget.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
guys
have
all
that
information
in
front
of
you
to
make
your
decisions
so
924
Delfeayo,
just
to
recap:
music
property
that
was
already
recommended
by
this
war
to
demolish
these
foundation.
A
There's
just
walls
in
a
in
a
in
a
roof.
There
is
nobody-
that's
been
living
here
for
the
last
five
years
that
I
know
of
and
the
flood
zone.
So
in
order
for
that
property
to
actually
be
built
in
being
compliance
with
the
code,
it
needs
to
be
raised
to
the
to
the
to
the
above
the
flood
zone
plate.
So
the
owner
has
not
contacted
us
and
telling
us
that
they're
willing
to
do
anything
to
repair
whatever
is
there,
so
this
committee
voted
to
to
demolish
that
already,
so
it
just
needs
a
signature.
A
7:12
independence
drive-
that
is
a
mobile
home
that
is,
is
been
neglected
in
vacant
for
two
years
and
there
is
a
different
owner
on
the
lot
than
it
is
on
the
property.
So
it's
sometimes
hard
to
to
get
the
mobile
home
owner
to
come
in
and
comply.
Ultimately,
the
owner
of
the
lock
is
required
to
his
lot
and
therefore
we're
recommending
for
that
to
be
again
that
just
needs
a
signature
from
the
Chairman
to
move
forward
and
send
it
to
City
secretaries
to
to
process
and
be
published
in
the
newspaper,
both
in
English
and
Spanish.
E
A
To
process
send
it
to
see
secretaries
and
say
these
are
ready
to
be
demolished
and
then
once
it's
posted
you
know
and
then
we're
going
to
have
some
demolition
orders
for
to
be
process
again.
1920
Scott
is
we
have
me
in
your
packet,
drawing
that
the
demolition
work
sign,
that
is,
a
warehouse
that
is
already
burnt.
A
Half
of
the
bricks
are
in
the
right
away,
actually
there's
just
Street
there
and
there's
a
big
cup
lanes
and
we
haven't
moved
on
it
and
so
on
I'm
putting
it
on
the
list
to
get
to
get
it
good
water.
Soon
we
can
number
five
I'm
going
to
skip
bail.
That's
going
to
be
literally
on
the
next
public
hearing
that
actually
hasn't
exactly
a
demolition
order.
A
Six
and
seven,
as
you
remember,
number
seven,
it's
open,
there's
two!
So
our
number
six,
it's
only
two
structures
on
Springfield
we're
on
referring
to
the
back
side.
The
rear
structure
would
be
a
really
old
little
house.
This
is
almost
halfway
on
the
students
of
Saunders
I.
Don't
know
if
you
got
your
image
right.
Let's.
A
A
Signed
all
secular,
first,
two
and
then
the
last
one
906
Fremont
Valley,
we
struggle
it's
been
like
four
years
and
this
two
more
again.
This
one
is
because
towards
the
order
they
had
get
the
property
back
to
Medicaid
because
that
he
qualified,
so
it
was
like
you
were
the
owner
for
a
while.
That's
who
addressing
you
so
again,
that
was
an
update.
A
That
really
was
doing
all
the
work
to
the
to
this,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
them.
But
what
mr.
Patroni
wasn't
available
to
the
building
official?
He
were
worth
going
through
the
proper
maintenance
and
even
everybody
certified
to
have
more
people
to
be
able
to
have
a
little
if
City
Council
wants
us
to
get
into
this.
A
A
A
A
A
A
This
just
mentioned
before
in
here
to
try
to
get
a
demolition
permit
and
actually
I
believe
updating
the
permit
is
that
right,
mr.
Orozco,
if
she
did,
she
got
a
revelation
permit
again
following
protocol
and
they'll
send
all
these
notices.
People
start
replying
tools,
so
in
essence
what
staff
is
doing
is
coming
through.
So
at
this
point
the
committee
can
have.
A
A
E
C
A
C
B
D
B
D
A
A
C
A
Moving
on
a
consideration
of
possible
action,
this
isn't
open.
This
is
a
public
hearing,
so
more
the
consideration
of
possible
action
on
the
property
of
time
in
that
is
RC
arrow
I'm,
a
beretta
whose
legal
description
is
not
12
block
355
mr.
division
subdivision
commonly
known
as
420
of
these
line
staff
declare
this
property
as
a
nuisance
and
a
20
with
deterring
adopted
one.
A
This
2013
Oh
0
to
5
article
1,
section
24,
1.4
of
chapter
16
sections
sixty
two
point:
fifty
five
to
one
section:
16
155,
to
to
section
6,
2015
5
to
3
in
section
point,
55
to
3
B,
section
155
to
22h
I,
section
point
35
to
3
to
R
and
section
60
point
55
to
3
to
you.
Staff
recommends
of
your
structure.
A
B
Structure
was
has
been
like
this
for
the
last
15
17
years.
They
built
a
structure
we
mixed
with
us
cinderblock,
so
you
have
a
section,
it's
rental,
so
we
have
a
section
that
is
sturdy
and
sound,
and
then
you
have
this
one
that
is
falling
apart,
so
it
can
be
demolished
without
affecting
the
new
structure.
I
went
and
I
cooked
it
many
many
moons
ago
how
about
the
men
demolition
from
only
that
place?
It's
not
good
cinder
block
and.
B
A
A
B
A
C
B
A
D
C
A
This
is
this
one,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
as
my
meter
said,
do
you
wear
this
for
a
while?
At
one
point
this
came
into
the
wort
and,
as
I
said,
was
a
a
structure
that
looks
solid,
I
just
wanted
to
recently
staff
came
out
again.
This
is
a
a
structure
that
was
tagged
many
years
ago
and
now
the
about
me.
This
I.
B
Again,
there
were
obsolete,
it
was
a
nobody,
brother
and
sister
there.
She
was
at
the
time
future
anyway.
This
it
remain
like
that
they
lived
like
that
until
they
passed
away
mr.
Doyle's
promoting
issue,
but
we
went
out
there
yesterday
he
came,
he
came
over,
he
said
ma'am,
please
do
something!
This
has
been
make
this
work
over
15
years.
This
it
was
sold
to
be
people
from
Walternate.
B
A
B
C
D
D
A
D
A
Of
rocha-perez,
oh
and
you
know
more
Rocha
deceased,
whose
legal
description
is
lot.
Eight
block
54
Western
Division
subdivision
company,
known
as
a
4-12
santosa
staff
to
clear
this
property
as
a
nuisance.
In
accordance
with
the
current
adopted
shortness
of
2013
for
0:25
part
and
one
section,
24
1.4
of
chapter
16
sections.
A
1655
one
section
16
point:
55
to
Tula
section
point
16:
point:
55
to
28
section:
16
155
to
three
week,
section
416:
point
55
to
3
2
H
and
I
Section
16
point
55
to
the
3
to
R
and
section
16
point
55
3
view
staff
recommends
demolition
of
these
structures
for
this
public
hearing
I
wanted
to
advised
the
committee.
These
there's
true
actual
properties
I
mean
to
actual
structures
in
this
property.
B
E
A
A
B
A
C
D
A
A
D
A
B
A
See
also,
there
is
CDBG
planning
committee
development
that
in
blighted
areas
and
they
could
use
that
that
they
still
requiring
the
CDBG
I
mean
a
CDBG,
is,
is
controlled
by
Community
Development
and
it's.
The
central
business
sector
can
downtown
in
certain
blighted
areas
where
they
can
actually
use
these
funds.
But
these
are
state
and
federal
funds,
but
there's
no
process
that
needs
to
be
followed.
The
threshold,
and
the
third
option
would
be
that
this
committee,
through
this
and
the
city,
can
find
financing
and
I've
been
advised
that
they're
worried
about
the
funds
process
and.
A
E
E
E
C
D
C
A
E
E
B
C
E
A
A
C
C
B
Up
and
it's
right
under
your
nose
regards
from
I
deliver
tracks,
so
this
this
property
in
essence
and
the
property's
next
door
do
not
have
an
Eastman
or
they
don't
have
a
public
way
to
get
in
and
out
of
the
house.
Now
it's
a
shame
to
say,
because
once
they
demolish
this
house,
that
lot
will
be
available.
E
B
C
B
C
D
D
A
C
A
A
C
C
A
B
A
B
B
B
C
C
B
C
D
A
A
A
A
B
D
A
A
A
D
A
B
C
B
B
A
E
A
Is
that
everywhere
we
will
need
to
go
in
there
inspector
to
make
sure
that
it
is
in
compliance
with
the
code
as
far
as
liveable
right
so
and
then
they
would
have
to
get
a
permit
to
very
willing
to
be
get
a
permit
in
our
existing
property
owner
is
trying
to
sell
it.
It
may
be
in
limbo
in
actual
sell,
because
only
the
property
owner
you
come
in
and
get
the
permit.
So.
D
E
A
B
A
Can
commotion
for
to
draw
vote
illegal
and
get
a
warrant
inspection
is
that
is
that
the
process
went
on
before
resourceful
yes,
okay,
so
so
there's
a
there's
actual.
We
could.
We
could
go
to
the
Justice
of
the
Peace
and
ask
for
a
an
inspection
warrant
to
go
in
there
and
see
if
it
is
irreparable
on
the
inside,
which
is
a
whole,
it
could
be
a
whole
lot
different
if
it
is
in
good
shape
or
matching
we
catch
up
from
the
inside
another
thing
that.
C
D
A
It's
a
nuisance
in
accordance
with
the
adopted
ordinance,
2013
Oh
0:25
article
1,
section,
24,
1.4
of
chapter
16,
section
16,
point
55,
one
section,
16
point:
55,
section,
16
point:
55,
3,
a
section
16
point:
35
3,
B,
section,
16,
point:
55,
3,
hi6,
2.6,
55
minutes
3
are
bad
section,
16
point
55,
3,
2
years
staff
recommends
the
demolition
of
the
structure.
Some
of
the
things
I
do
want
to
point
out
what
this
property
is.
A
A
So
this
email
is
basically
this
person,
not
the
property
owner,
currently
he's
trying
to
obtain
this
property
and
they're
willing
to
repair
I,
don't
know
if
they
can
repair
it.
To
what
extent
I
mean
I
guess
you
can
repair
anything
if
you
want,
if
you
put
enough
money
into
it,
but
they
wouldn't
have
to
go
through
the
historical
board
and
you
have
to
exterior
needs
to
be
stopped
or
disagreed
in
two
main
agreements
with
what
you
know
trying
to
do
so
to
be
in
compliance,
and
so
mr.
D
A
B
B
A
The
thing
is
when
it
went
to
the
board
all
there's
several
property
owners
and
there
were
in
all
in
agreeance
in
so
the
state
court
said
you
can't
get.
Everybody
agreed,
don't
demolish
it.
It's
a
historical
building
pencil
when
mr.
Garcia,
the
community
of
element,
took
it
to
the
board.
The
state
said
no,
because
they
were
not.
Everybody
was
an
agreeing
since
he
could.
A
D
A
A
C
D
A
A
A
It
because
of
a
safety
issue
that
trumps
any
historical.
It
Trump's
it.
Yes,
the
at
that
point,
the
historical
part
could
go
back
last
time,
I
went
it
got
denied.
There
was
one
death
and
since
then,
there's
been
another
one,
so
we
don't
want
to
know
what
you
know
there's
going
to
be
more
there
if
and
all
that
the
city's
not
do
anything
about
it.
The
city
may
or
may
not,
I,
don't
know
if
there
would
be,
but
just
bring
it
up
to
the
committee.
All
the
information
is
up
to
you
guys.
So,
yes,.