►
From YouTube: Ethics Commission Meeting 022223
Description
Ethics Commission Meeting 022223
A
B
D
Thank
you
as
a
citizen
in
good
faith,
I
believe
Miss,
Alisa
and
Melissa,
and
the
date
of
January
the
24th.
Both
of
them
should
have
recused
himself
from
the
meeting
at
that
time,
but
in
different.
If
you
see
the
meeting
from
January,
the
24th
is
there
in
black
and
white,
where
they
participated,
they
can
attend
as
a
court
of
Ethics
States,
but
they
didn't
recuse
himself
of
making
any
public
comments
in
reference
to
what
they
thought
was
right
and
what
was
wrong
in
that
manner.
Melissa.
D
Demand
to
strike
down
or
after
the
results
of
a
health
y
health
study
from
in
the
third
party,
because
she
doesn't
like
the
results,
that's
what
shows
in
the
video
as
well
staff
Report
with
possible
action
regarding
Health,
Management
and
Association
Latino
Health
assessment
to
be
doing
the
streaming
showed
Melissa
what
she
says
because
I
agree
and
talk
talk
about
the
the
motion
and
states
that
she
definitely
wants
the
motion
not
to
be
made
in
Laredo
city
council.
It
was
a
special
meeting
on
January,
the
24th
and
as
well.
D
A
conflict
of
interest
that
was
a
company
of
interest
to
avoid
appearance
and
risk
of
property
of
official
or
employees
shall
not
take
an
action.
He
or
she
shows
it's
likely
to
affect
the
economic
interest
of
the
of
the
family.
He
saw
her
parent-child
spouse.
Dr
Sierra
was
also
as
well
here
and
also
he
made
also
a
public
Speech
as
well.
At
the
end,
up
towards
the
end
of
the
meeting
in
January,
the
24th
and
on
the
outside.
Also
sets
you
up
in
the
court
of
ethics
and
line
five
as
well.
D
D
F
F
A
A
G
C
G
G
G
G
A
Sure,
chairperson,
you
have
before
yes,
so
I
believe
there
was
a
three
minute
or
no.
This
on
on
next
on
the
agenda
is
going
to
be
the
presentation
of
legal
sufficiency
for
independent
Council,
which
is
acting
at
the
ethics
compliance
officer,
and
this
is
regarding
a
complaint
filed
by
Miss,
Tarina
Elizondo,
who
is
I
believe
present
here
today.
She
is
the
director
of
the
animal
control
services
department.
The
complaint
was
file,
January
11
2023.
A
F
F
So
again,
my
name
is
Karina
lisando
I'm
the
complainant
I
stand
before
you
today
to
implore
that
this
commission
truly
appoints
truly
a
point
and
experience
and
unbiased
outside
Council
ethics
compliance
officers.
Since
the
filing
of
my
complaint,
many
violations
have
evolved
on
the
handling
of
this
complaint
by
the
City
attorney
and
by
the
ITI
Council
section.
8.04
complaints
and
section
8.06
under
assessments
cost
for
a
study
to
determine
the
Justice,
the
jurisdiction
and
the
legal
sufficiency
prior
to
an
evidentiary
hearing.
Yet
this
was
not
done
on
February.
F
The
8th
2023,
the
city
attorney's
office,
in
conjunction
with
the
outside
Council
schedule,
and
eventually
hearing
without
notifying
me
of
such
setting,
no
proper
notice
or
service
was
executed,
as
required
under
Section
8.07
A1.
In
addition,
I
suspect
that
a
report
recommending
the
acceptance
or
rejection
was
unlawfully
submitted
to
the
commission
by
the
outside
Council,
constituting
a
violation
of
the
ethics
code.
Section
8.05
c.
This
section
clearly
stipulates
that
outside
Council
doesn't
have
the
legal
authority
to
recommend
the
exception.
F
The
acceptance
or
rejection,
as
this
must
be
done
by
the
commission
I,
can
only
assume
that
this
action
was
probably
done
to
negatively
influence
the
Commission.
In
addition
on
February
the
8th,
the
agenda
noted
that
a
report
of
findings
was
going
to
be
introduced
during
the
mvn
jury
hearing.
This
report
was
probably
done
without
contacting
me
or
any
of
my
witnesses
as
of
today.
I
have
not
heard
from
from
the
outside
Council,
as
required
on
that
section.
F
8.07
of
every
injury
rules,
in
addition,
I
believe
that
Minnesota
is
conflicted
as
she
and
Mr
Stone
were
business
partners
by
us.
Both
they
both
practice
together
in
the
lot
in
the
same
law
firm,
and
they
hold
a
friendship
supported
by
the
fact
that
I
was
never
was
notified
by
the
City
attorney,
who
he
had
appointed
outside
Council,
as
he
assured
he
immediately
will
notify
me
on
January
the
12th
a
day
after
I
filed
my
complaint,
I
was
advised.
I
had
advised
Mr
son
that
I
had
additional
materials
I
needed
to
introduce
to
this
person.
F
After
learning
about
the
agenda
item,
knowing
of
their
friendship,
I
took
a
chance
of
contacting
misoto
to
confirm
that
she
had
been
hired
by
Zone
to
service
at
that
time.
Council
and
she
confirmed
also
I,
took
that
time
to
review
the
minutes
from
prior
ethics.
Commission
meetings
available
at
the
City
of
Laredo
ethics
website
and
I
encourage
the
commission
to
look
at
them
too.
F
Simply
they
set
a
hearing
without
me,
thankfully,
I
learned
through
other
sources
that
a
setting
had
been
scheduled.
I
just
gave
birth
I'm
currently
on
maternity
leave
and
still
spend
it,
which
I
will
further.
This
further
explain
suspended
with
no
pay
and
I'll
further
This
Plane,
as
I
want
to
introduce.
F
F
As
per
what
I
know,
I
don't
think
Minnesota
has
ever
represented
a
municipal
party,
including
a
commissioner,
a
committee,
so
it
is
on
the
best
interest
of
that
commission
and
of
every
individual
that
intends
to
file
a
complaint,
or,
in
this
case
misoto
and
myself,
who
are
here
before
you
to
express,
are
at
the
our
allegations
on
ethics
by
on
ethics
violations
that
we
received.
What
other
individuals
before
us
have
received
in
the
past
outside
Council,
an
affiliate
of
a
Texas
Municipal
League?
F
In
addition,
I
made
copies
of
previous
meetings
and
agendas
for
your
reference
and,
like
I,
noted
earlier
that
first
sitting,
it's
always
an
assessment,
which
is
what
we're
doing
today,
not
what
they
intended
to
do
on
February,
the
8th
and
for
and
I
don't
know.
What's
the
justification
of
them,
setting
an
Evidence
you're
hearing
as
opposed
to
legal
sufficiency
and
jurisdiction.
Setting
so
with
all
be
without
being
said.
F
I
just
want
to
remind
this
commission
that
the
ethics
compliance
officer,
who
is
now
an
outside
Council,
it's
higher
because
there's
an
alleged
a
conflict
of
interest
whenever
an
individual
files
a
complained
against
a
city
manager,
the
city
council,
the
mayor
and
the
city
attorney's
office.
They
are
required
to
hire
outside
Council
and
this
just
to
ensure
that
it's
a
fair
process,
so
the
outside
Council
will
serve
as
a
will
serve
a
very
prominent
role
in
both
of
our
complaints.
F
It
will
serve
as
a
middle
person
between
the
ethics
commission
that
complainant
and
that
responded,
therefore,
I
implore
that
this
person
is
qualified,
experienced
and
unbiased.
Based
on
all
the
affirmation,
events,
it
is
clear
that
either
this
party,
it's
not
familiar
with
the
rules
and
or
is
not
acting
in
good
faith.
F
It
is
the
role
of
this
commission
to
ensure
that
our
Fair
review
process
is
given
to
all
of
those
who
appear
before
them
on
behalf
of
myself
and
so
many
city
employees
who
are
resistant
to
filing
campaigns
because
of
this
ongoing
refusal
by
persons
in
authority
to
follow
the
rules
adopted
by
the
people
in
2011
under
the
ethics
code,
that
I
pray
that
an
independent
on
biased
experience
and
qualified
member
of
the
Texas
Municipal
League
representative
is
appointed
as
the
outside
Council
and
ethics
compliance
officer.
Thank
you.
H
I'd
like
to
address
some
of
the
issues
that
we're
brought
up,
the
February
8th
meeting
was
intended
to
be
a
legal
sufficiency
meeting.
It
was
recalled
when
the
agenda
noted
that
it
was
an
evidential
hearing
which
was
incorrect.
It
was
never
intended
to
be
such
and
no
evidential
hearing
took
place
and
she
was
given
a
proper
notification
of
the
agenda.
H
H
B,
my
some
of
my
duties
are
to
review
the
complaints
for
legal
sufficiency
and
under
8.054
I
can
recommend
acceptance
or
rejection
of
that
complaint
and
I
would
like
to
address
the
issue
about
my
relationship
and
my
friendship
with
Mr
zonewind.
The
City
attorney
I
do
have
a
friendship
with
him.
I
have
a
friendship
with
more
than
one
attorney
here
in
town.
It's
a
small
Eagle
Community.
It
had
no
bearing
on
my
report
to
U.S
Wars
legal
sufficiency.
H
As
far
as
me,
not
being
a
tmla
approved
attorney,
there
happened
other
tmla
attorneys
that
have
been
before
the
ethics
commission.
That's
not
a
requirement
and
for
my
presentation,
I
would
like
to
ask
the
commission
if
they're
going
to
have
an
open
session
you
are
allowed.
This
is
going
to
be
dealing
with
Personnel
matters
or
you
might
need
to
seek
legal
counsel
from
me
to
do
it
in
an
open
session
or
do
it
in
an
executive
session
if
we're
seeking
a
legal
counsel
or
reverse.
F
I
have
the
floor.
Please
I
just
want
to
make
a
correction
on
the
ethics
code.
As
per
as
per
section
8.05
ethics
compliance
officer
go
on
undersea
outside
independent
Council.
It
states
an
independent
Auto
attorney,
who
does
not
otherwise
represent
the
city
shall
be
appointed
by
the
City
attorney.
With
the
same
Duty
and
Authority
Under,
section
8.05.
F
A1A283-86-87
and
88
ethics
compliance
officer
who
shall
be
entitled
to
respond
to
reasonable
compensation
to
perform
it's
for
his
duties
for
a
particular
case.
If
you'll
notice,
this
section
doesn't
make
reference
to
a
A4
and
A5,
and
if
you
go
back
to
to
section
805
ethics,
compliance
officer,
four
states
recommend
acceptance
or
rejection
of
complaints
made
by
the
ethics
commission.
F
Five
act
as
legal
counsel
to
the
ethics
Commission
on
matters
related
to
the
content
of
the
ethics
ordinance
as
legal
counsel
to
the
ethics
commission,
the
City
attorney
may
not
represent
any
person
or
party
in
proceedings
before
the
ethics
commission,
so
you
do
not
have
the
legal
authority
to
proceed
as
outside
Council
and
advise
our
commission
whether
they
accept
or
reject
my
complaint
and
the
setting
is
simply
to
Define
jurisdiction
and
if
there
was
to
have
there,
was
to
have
an
allegation
of
a
possible
violation
of
the
ethics
Court.
Yes,
or
not.
F
F
Mean
they're
not
following
the
rule.
That's
the
reason
why
I'm
here
today
to
report
this
and
now
outside
Council,
it's
making
same
violations,
not
not
the
same
section
that
I
reported
to
but
she's,
not
in
compliance
with
the
ethics
code.
That's
why
it's
important
that
we
hire
someone
that
has
done
this
in
the
past.
F
That's
a
fair
thing
to
do
for
me
and
for
for
the
other
Citizen
and
without
the
respect,
I
know
misoto,
but
I,
don't
think
it's
fair!
I
didn't
get
how
okay!
So
if
it
wasn't
by
ask
for
the
agenda
on
February
the
8th,
it
was
stipulated
there
that
there
was
a
report
of
findings.
I
mean
it
didn't,
say
whether
I
it
didn't
talk
about
legal
efficiency,
sufficiency
or
anything.
What
report
were
you
able
to
produce
without
contacting
me
or
any
of
the
witnesses
at
that
level?.
H
Well,
like
I
said
this
can
be
handled
through
executive
session.
It
can
be
held
in
an
open
session.
It's
going
to
deal
with
the
person
no
matter.
I
do
feel
that
I
am
authorized
to
proceed
in
giving
you
my
presentation
as
to
what
I
saw
as
far
as
legal
sufficiency,
I'm,
not
discussing
any
findings
I'm
only
here
as
far
as
the
agenda
today
to
discuss
the
legal
sufficiency
for
today's
purposes,
nothing
else.
H
A
C
C
C
C
D
F
A
Was
appointed
by
her
I
don't
represent
her
in
a
legal
capacity,
though
okay.
So
at
this
time,
I
would
like
to
call
the
meeting
back
in
session
6
24
we're
back
from
the
executive
session.
We've
discussed
whether
mesoto
had
the
authority
to
make
her
presentation
on
agenda
B.
Regarding
for
the
presentation
of
legal
sufficiency,
for
the
complaint
of
Miss
Karina
Elizondo
and
is,
is
there
a
emotion
to
hear
that
presentation
after
the
recommendation
and
executive
I.
A
H
Thank
you,
so
I
did
review
the
ethics
complaint
that
was
against
Rosario
Cabello.
At
that
time,
the
interim
city
manager,
the
documents
that
I
reviewed
were
her
complete
and
all
attached
evidence
and
attachments.
I
reviewed,
the
city,
ethics
code,
the
city,
Charter
and
city
ordinances
that
were
that
were
cited
therein.
H
The
particular
section
that
Miss
Elizondo
claimed
was
violated
was
section
2.02
of
the
city
ethics
code,
section,
which
is
titled
unfair
advancement
of
private
interest.
The
particular
private
interest
that
she
claimed
was
being
unfairly
Advanced
by
Miss
Cabello
was
to
have
her
terminated
from
from
employment,
I,
thoroughly
reviewed
everything.
There
were
no
other
private
interests
that
were
listed
in
the
complaint
other
than
the
one
that
she
felt
was
unfairly
targeting
her
as
a
basis
for
termination
from
the
City
of
Laredo
and
the
relevant
part
section
2.02
of
this
city
ethics
code.
H
It
states
that
a
city,
official
or
an
employee
shall
not
use
his
or
her
official
position
to
unfairly
Advance
or
impede
private
interests
or
to
Grant
her
security
or
attempt
any
considerations,
treatment,
exemption
or
Advantage
beyond
that
which
is
lawfully
available
to
other
persons.
In
this
case,
I
reviewed
the
definitions
under
the
city
ethics
code
and
under
section
one.
H
H
A
violation
of
section
2.02
for
an
unfair
investment
of
a
private
interest.
Like
I,
said
I'm.
We
are
allowed
to
look
at
other
cities,
code
sections
that
she
may
not
have
cited
because
she
only
cited
one
but
that
stuff
that
sub
section
2.02
is
directly
under
the
context
of
interest
that
only
deals
with
economic
interest.
It
doesn't
deal
with
anything
regarding
any
possible
issues
or
any
targeting
Miss
Elizondo
also
attached,
as
evidenced
the
harassment
policy
of
the
state
of
Laredo,
but
that's
not
a
Mystic
ethics
code
violation.
H
F
F
In
my
complaint,
I
reserve
the
right:
it
states
further
I
reserve
the
right
to
amend
and
supplement
this
complaint
drafted
quickly
due
to
recent
events
where
the
abuse
by
respondent
or
her
position
is
causing
irrelevant
damage
to
the
Animal
Care
Services
Department
and
my
health
I
have
not
submitted
all
the
documentation
and,
as
required
by
this
ethics
code
under
Section
8.07
evidentiary
hearing
I
have
three
days
prior
to
that
hearing.
To
submit
to
this
commission.
F
Witness
statements,
a
list
of
other
Witnesses
and
any
other
relevant
information,
as
per
the
section
that
I
am
claiming,
which
is
abuse
of
authority,
is
defining
specifically
our
financial
advancement.
Yet
this
hearing
needs
to
determine
whether
or
not
not
whether
it's
true
or
not.
What
I
alleged
on
my
complaint,
whether
or
not
this
will
constitute
an
Ethics
violation,
whether
or
not
my
complaint
constitutes
a
Netflix
violation
and
whether
or
not
you
guys
have
jurisdiction
so
as
the
fact
that
I
provided
a
copy
of
the
of
the
sexual
harassment.
F
That
was
just
an
attachment
of
all
the
documentation
that
I
had
submitted.
In
one
event,
I
listed
over
eight
Events
Minnesota
has
not
made
the
attempt
to
contact
me
to
see
if
I
have
any
other
documentation.
As
noted
on
my
complaint,
she
doesn't
make
any
reference
or
anything
I
just
want
to
remind
the
commission.
This
is
this
is
solely
to
determine
whether
there's
legal
sufficiency.
F
F
Events
have
evolved
after
the
falling
on
my
complaint,
involving
responded,
Rosario
Cabello,
acting
city
manager
and
people
acting
on
behalf,
including,
but
not
limited
to
City
of
Journey.
These
events
aggravated
injury
and
damages
to
my
complaint.
So
to
answer
your
question,
it
involves
Ms,
Cabello
and.
H
A
H
And
to
address
the
jurisdictional
issue,
you
do
have
the
authority
to
make
a
decision
today
under
Section
8.06
adjudicated
powers
of
the
commission.
If
you
look
at
that,
you
do
have
the
power
to
dispose
or
investigate
the
complaint
as
you
which
it's
you
do
after
jurisdiction.
Two
beside
that
and
you
have
the
authority
to
decide
whether
it's
as
the
allegations
that's
listed
in
her
complaint,
are
a
violation
of
City
ethics
code.
F
Foreign
asked
that
this
commission
moved
forward
with
allowing
this
the
evidentiary
to
take
place
in
that
evidentiary
hearing
will
have
the
opportunity
to
present
to
you
the
real
facts
of
every
single
allegation
that
he
has
been
made
on
my
campaign.
You
will
then
decide
whether
or
not
each
allegation
is
true
or
not
whether
or
not
it
has
a
substance
that
will
be
determined
of
the
voluntary
hearing.
F
I
think
that
it
is
the
right
thing
to
do
and
to
be
fair
to
allow
me
the
opportunity
to
present
to
you
my
facts,
my
true
on
Behavior
evidentiary
hearing.
This
is
the
right
thing
to
do
not
only
to
me
but
to
set
the
example
to
all
of
those
employees
who
are
scared
or
speaking
up
because
of
this
thing,
and
that's
exactly
why
I
implore
to
this
commission
that
you
hire
somebody
that
understands
the
rules.
I
did
not
question
whether
she
has
the
authority
to
to
fight
to
talk
about
legal
sufficiency.
F
E
Because
I'm
about
to
lose
everything,
I
can
suspended
after
I.
There
was
something
I'm
meeting
sat
here
on
February
the
8th
and
even
though
she
camps
I,
get
noticed,
I,
don't
and
I
challenge
her
to
give
me
proof
of
the
service
or
or
certified
mail
that
you
sent
to
me
claiming
to
this
commission
today
that
I
got
notified
of
the
city
in
February,
the
8th.
You
are
gonna
notification
that
it
was
canceled
I
didn't
I
have
just
given
birth
eight
days
prior
to
that
City
I
had
to
make
arrangements
to
be
here.
E
F
Media
was
here
they
approached
me.
They
asked
me
specifically.
There
were
individuals
that
made
that
attended
this
hearing,
that
they
were
told
that
the
meeting
was
canceled.
That
media
approached
me
and
asked
me,
is
there:
why
was
I
meeting,
Council
and
I
said
I,
don't
know,
I
did
not
receive
notice
of
this.
Setting
I
didn't
receive
notice
that
it
was
canceled
two
days.
E
F
Anything
outside
just
know
that
I
have
file
an
Ethics
complaint
for
abuse
of
authority
and
that
I
did
not
receive
notice
of
that
hearing
like
you
all
did,
and
that
of
that
and
I
did
not
receive
notice
of
the
cancellation
and
I
implore.
This
commission
to
give
me
the
right
to
present,
to
a
day
to
to
you
an
eventually
hearing
to
present
my
facts
and
to
go
through
the
whole
process.
C
I
I
What
we've
been
informed
is
elisondo
is
under
the
ethics
under
the
the
definition
that
are
provided.
The
definitions
that
are
provided
in
the
ethics
code,
based
on
your
complaint,
that
your
complaint,
based
on
the
the
definitions
provided
in
the
code,
does
not
meet
the
criteria
so
on
the
basis
of
the
issue
of
private
interest.
I
But
that
does
not
mean
that
you
did
not
have
other
avenues
to
explore
for
the
issues
that
that
you're,
voicing
which
sound
concerning,
in
my
opinion,
they
sound
concerning,
but
they
don't
appear
to
meet
the
standards
set
forth
by
the
ethics
code.
But
I
would
urge
you
I
would
urge
you
to
look
for
remedies.
Certainly
much
of
what
you're
alleging
falls
under
the
umbrella
of
Human
Resources
I
would
urge
you
to
seek
other
remedies.
F
Okay,
as
noted
on
my
complaint,
I
have
not
been
able
to
submit
all
of
the
information
that
that
belongs
to
my
complaint.
So
the
fact
that
it's
been
noted
that
it
doesn't
meet
that
criteria
based
on
that
particular
section,
which
is
truly
abuse
of
authority.
It's
I
never
claimed
that
it
was
Financial
interest
that
she
had
based
on
all
of
the
allegations
that
I
listed
there.
F
How
is
that
not
going
to
be
a
violation
of
authority
if
I
been
constantly
targeted
in
every
single
one
of
those
events
that
I
listed
and
the
ones
that
I
have
introduced
to
you
all
today
and
my
question
to
our
outside
Council
about
that?
The
information
that
was
submitted
today,
which
is
supplemental
to
my
complaint,
without
the
jurisdiction
of
that
commission
as
well.
H
F
It
to
us
today
then
I'll
I'll
humbly
asked
for
this
commission
to
reconsider
the
current
motion.
I,
don't
know
if
it
passed
or
not,
but
to
allow
me
the
opportunity
to
include
a
supplement
one,
as
noted
on
on
my
complaint,
to
introduce
this
this
events,
which
are
part
of
my
complaint,
because
all
of
those
events
took
place
after
I
filed
on
January,
the
11th
I
have
been
constantly
targeted,
as
listed
out
there.
So
I
can
properly
include
those
events
on
my
campaign.
I
I
F
A
A
C
I
I
I
A
I
H
And
this
and
I
did
make
a
mention
that
I
reviewed
all
the
city
or
the
city
code,
ethics
and
I
didn't
see
anything
that
triggered
any
violation
of
the
ethics
code,
not
just
2.0,
because
I
specifically
mentioned
that
one,
because
that's
the
one
she
listed
but
I
did
look
at
all
the
others.
And
there
was
nothing
that
to
me
triggered
an
ethical
violation.
F
H
Not
required
and
I
reviewed
your
complaint
thoroughly
and
I
I
mentioned
earlier.
I
also
know
you
and
I've
known,
hold
any
ill
welcome,
at
least
on
the
we
know,
each
other
I
reviewed
it
and
at
like
I've,
been
told
there
might
be
other
avenues
for
you
to
to
see.
You
can
file
another
ethics
complaint
with
the
information
you
provided
us
today,
but
as
far
as
you
presented,
I
didn't
see
any
ethical
violations,
and
that
was
my
presentation
to
the
Ethics
Committee
today.
A
C
F
A
Well
so,
everybody's
in
favor
and
that
agenda
item
is
now
the
motion
is
passed
on
that
particular
B
item
now.
The
next
item
to
be
reviewed
on
the
agenda
for
today
is
a
presentation
from
outside
Council,
acting
as
the
compliance
officer
regarding
an
Ethics
complaint
filed
by
Ms
Patrice
Patricia
Soto
on
February
9
2023,
alleging
violations
of
the
Laredo
ethics
code,
section
particularly
section
201,
which
is
titled
conflict
of
interest
and
section
202,
titled,
unfair
advancement
of
private
interest
and
any
other
matters
that
are
incident
there
too.
J
Mr,
chair
of
pro
tem
I'm,
going
to
abstain
from
participation
in
this
particular
item.
I,
don't
believe
that
I
am
legally
required
to
do
so
and
have
sought
a
council
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
However,
I
am
distantly
related
to
a
council
member
of
members
of
Seattle
and
although
I
am
not
prohibited
by
law,
I,
okay,.
A
A
G
So
under
8.06
that
this
commission
may
not
take
any
action
without
the
presence
of
a
quorum,
five
members
shall
constitute
a
quorum.
That's
8.06
of
the
ethic
code.
So,
due
to
the
abstention
and
the
non-participation
from
this
Lisa
fall,
then
we
do
not
have
a
quorum
and
we
cannot
go
forward
with
any
action
today.