►
Description
Metropolitan Policy Organization Committee Meeting 08/19/19
A
Good
afternoon,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
thank
you
for
joining
us
I'm,
calling
this
meeting
to
order.
This
is
the
Loretto
urban
transportation
study,
the
otherwise
known
as
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
MPO
policy
committee
at
today's
April,
the
19th
2019,
it's
1:30
and
5:00
p.m.
and
we're
meeting
here
at
city
council
chambers
in
Laredo,
Texas
11:10,
Houston
Street.
Thank
you
again
for
joining
us.
Can
I
have
a
roll
call.
Please.
A
B
A
A
A
No
amendments
or
changes
there's
a
motion
seconded
discussion,
none
heard
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
against
not
hurt
motion
carries
unanimously.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
a
received
public
testimony
and
approval
resolution
number
NPO,
20
1905
and
that's
adopting
the
2020
unified
planning
work
program.
You
pwp.
A
A
D
I
just
like
to
say
briefly
that
what
you
see
here
is
a
reflection
of
the
direction
we
want
to
go
where
we
want
to
bring
staff
and
expertise
on
board
and
use
consultants
less
for
the
planning
work
that
we're
doing
for
the
NPO.
That
will
allow
us
to
be
much
quicker
in
our
responses.
When
we
need
to
study
things
out,
it
will
also
get
a
greater
value
for
our
money.
D
It's
often
expensive,
to
bring
consultants
down
from
doe,
and
we
want
to
take
greater
ownership
of
the
projects
we
have
and
having
that
data
owning
that
data
creating
it
here
allows
us
to
do
so.
So
that's
the
intent
with
with
putting
more
into
the
regional
planning
and
admin
category.
So
we
can
hire
an
active
transportation
plan
or
a
regional
planner,
a
GIS,
planner
and
and
other
staff
that
it
will
allow
us
to
do
those
things.
Ok,.
A
D
C
D
C
E
No
I
think
mr.
Simons
upon
his
efforts
from
moving
to
the
right
direction.
This
1
million
dollars
is
a
contract
that
we
did
sign
with
the
city
of
Laredo.
It
is
money
that
comes
from
textile
or
MPO
concerns.
I
did
have
a
question
for
20
and
you
just
answer
that
question
and
you've
mentioned
hiring
three
skilled
persons
to
the
task.
But
you
kind
of
answered
that
the
rest
is.
He
will
be
picking
that
up
correct
mr.
Steinman.
Yes,.
D
There
we
appropriate
how
much
we're
spending
or
each
staff,
so
this
simply
means
there's
a
whole
mixture.
So
if
we
were
ever
to
use
some
of
these
people
for
City
business
than
we
could
appropriate
that
staff
time
that
month,
let's
say
the
joyous
person.
We
wanted
to
use
some
of
their
staff
time
for
say
stuff.
That
month,
we
could
say
20%
of
their
time
in
the
city
would
pay
for
it
and
then
that
money
would
then
accumulate
with
the
MPO
to
be
used
on
future
projects.
E
D
D
F
D
C
D
C
D
For
the
MPO
board,
that's
correct,
and,
and
there
are
well,
these
funds
are
very
stable
number
one,
but
also
number
two.
If
you
know
the
city
has
in
the
past
had
to
had
to
make
a
dentistry
that
can
happen
when
funds
aren't
there,
but
these
I
don't
want
you
to
to
worry.
These
are
funds
that
are
long-standing
and.
E
G
Things
just
are
on
this
very
protracted
long
bureaucratic.
You
know
space-time
continuum
and
with
qualified
personnel
in
key
places.
We
might
be
able
to
get
do
some
of
these
studies
in-house,
as
well
as
make
much
more
timely,
informed
decision
so
I
a
motion
to
approve
the
you
know:
2020
unified
planning
program.
H
D
D
You
mean
like
get
a
consultant
to
do
the
plan.
Yes,
yes,
yes,
we
could
okay
and
that's
what
I
don't
want
in
any
way
this
to
be
a
reflection
on
the
work
the
NPO
is
done
previously.
I
think
vanessa
has
done
a
fantastic
job,
and
so
this
is
not
in
any
way
a
mark
of
that,
but
I
come
in
with
a
different
set
of
skills.
I've
worked
in
over
100
cities
across
the
country
over
ten
years.
As
a
consultant.
Many
of
these
projects.
H
H
Against
550
appropriated
and
we're
spending
420
on
people
and
just
stop,
it
only
gives
us
what's
that:
math
130
and
there's
a
balance
of
all
core
to
them,
but
we
have
the
1.2
million
that
you're
saying
that
we
built
up.
So
you
feel
comfortable
that
we'll
have
enough
in
reserves.
The
kind
of
in
case
that
happens
we'll
be.
H
E
I
Okay,
good
I
mean
sorry,
I
got
a
text
on
and
peel
TP.
The
funding
that
is
allocated
is
based
on
on
the
first
on
the
population.
That's
how
they
determine
all
the
MPs
are
25
MPs.
We
have
so
based
on
that
and
for
Laredo
we
usually
get
like
550,000,
like
you
said,
however,
since
they
haven't
been
using
their
money
because
they
didn't
have
staff
and
all
that
money
has
been
accumulating
and
we've
been
carrying
it
forward.
So
that's
fine!
Now
you
have
a
million
93
or
whatever
that
is
so,
but
pretty
much.
D
D
You
provide
some
input.
This
is
if
we
were
fully-staffed
starting
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
We
would
use
all
of
that
staff.
This
is
if
we
contract
every
project.
That's
on
this
list,
which
we
may
not
nets.
If
every
project
the
consultant
charges
the
max
amount
we
could
give.
So
my
guess,
looking
at
this
will
probably
be
somewhere
sixty.
Seventy
percent
of
that
will
actually
use
this,
but
I
can't
I
can't
ask
for
sixty
percent.
If
we
needed
to
go
on
any
one
of
these.
C
H
So
there
is
going
to
be
a
cushion
matter,
I
understand,
but
you
can't
it.
In
my
humble
opinion,
you
can't
plan
so
tight.
If
you
do
that,
you
can
put
yourself
in
a
situation
where
the
worst
outcomes
happen
right
and
and
then
we're
scratching
our
hair
thinking
how
we
get
here
and
what
are
we
gonna
do
to
get
out
of
this
and
so
I'm
just
a
little
concerned
about
spending
a
million
ninety,
which
is
all
we
have
in
reserve
and
then
hoping
that
we
don't.
We
actually
don't
get
anything
accomplished.
H
That
seems
kind
of
backwards
right.
We
want
to
get
everything
accomplished
right,
but
we
want
to
whatever
we
want
to
fund.
We
want
to
get
accomplished.
We
don't
want
to
over.
You
know
over
stretch
ourselves
and
then
and
then
we're
too
thin.
Oh
we've
completely
were
too
thin,
so
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
that.
Just
I
think
that
we
should
leave
at
least
a
little
in
reserve
and
always
have
that
as
a
backup
in
case
another
project
pops
up,
they
may
be
really
beneficial
because
things
sometimes
happen
quickly.
H
A
C
F
I
D
I
H
G
Thousand
ninety
is
a
conservative
number,
one
million
I'm
says
million.
Ninety
I'm
sorry
is,
is
a
conservative
number
because
next
year
rolls
in
another
I
think
five.
Fifty
and
all
we
really
all
we
need
for.
As
far
as
from
a
staffing
standpoint
is
420.
That's
that's
a
hundred
and
thirty.
It's
like
20%
of
the
asked
in
in
in
reserve
as
I
see
it
well.
C
I
F
D
Very
succinctly
than
we
try
to
explain
again
where
we've
got
over
the
million
ninety
that
we
could
pull
from
that
has
a
community
previously.
There
is
also
a
risk
that,
if
we
don't
take
all
that's
there
in
a
rollover
that
can
go
away,
that's
not
that's
not
something
that
some
guaranteed
to
stay
with
us.
If
it's
monies
that
we're
not
using
I
mean
we
know
how
that
works
from
a
city
level
times
it'll
go
somewhere
else,
so
there's
a
risk.
If
we
store
up
too
big
a
cushion
and
don't
use
it.
That
also
goes
away.
D
So
we
have
projects
that
we
can
that
were
we
were
wanting
to
accomplish
that
doesn't
mean
next
year,
we'll
get
Consultants.
It
doesn't
mean
we'll
use
up
all
that
funding
next
fiscal
year
likely
a
project
would
extend
over
two
fiscal
years,
so
I'm
I'm
thinking
a
reality
situation
next
year,
based
on
time
it
takes
to
get
staff
and
how
and
when
these
projects
will
start
and
if
they
will
start
we're.
E
I
know
it's
a
city
concern,
but
I
would
be
cautious
about
that.
Now
there
is
federal
dollars
in
FHWA.
Gentlemen
is
here:
this
550
is
set
aside
for
the
impo
to
run
efficiently,
whatever
they
need,
for
example,
Vanessa
can
if
she
has
to
put
these
buggers
together,
chi
charges
against
this
this
budget-
that's
here
there
is
other
MPs
and
they
go
out
and
they
hire
a
impure
director
outside
of
the
city
and
outside
of
text.
That's
independent
that
works
well
and
that
that
salary
is
funded
out
of
this
550
budget.
G
E
C
C
No,
what
I'm
asking
right
here
so
we
adopt
this
that
you're
asking
us
to
adopt
so
all
sudden
now,
no
well
see
that's
not
good.
I
want
the
money,
income
mm-hmm!
Well,
you're,
saying
he
can
go
away
yeah!
If
it's
not
encumbered!
That's
why
I'm
asking
him?
Is
this
money
protected?
You
know
if
it's
better
to
go
ahead
and
fund
the
whole
thing
and
protect
the
money.
B
E
I
A
B
C
You
see
what
happens
now
once
you
transfer
that
money
and
say
they
haven't
used
it
then
you're
kind
of
like
okay.
Well
now
we
need
250,000
to
do
an
outside
consultant.
Can
they
can't
do
it?
Is
the
city
gonna
pony
up
and
say
all
right,
we're
going
to
return
this
money?
If
there's
not
enough
a
little.
D
More
insight,
it's
not
a
study
we
would
go
out
for,
but
small
portions,
very
technical
things
that
we
may
need
some
technology
for.
But
if
we're
really
interested
in
fiscal
responsibility
here
we
had
on
the
but
on
the
work
plan.
The
first
draft
250,000
set
aside
for
a
bicycle
master
plan
that
was
probably
two
or
three
times
what
it
should
cost.
D
If
we
went
to
a
consultant,
we
were
a
competitive
situation
and
that
would
be
like
five
times
what
it
would
cost
staff
time
to
have
a
full
time
staff
working
on
that
3/4
of
the
year
and
their
staff.
You
know
their
salary
benefits
are
75
and
50th,
that's
better.
So
in
other
words,
we
have
been
consistently
overpaying
for
the
work
that
we're
doing
one
because
of
our
geography
and
two,
because
maybe
a
lack
of
experience
of
someone
who
has
done
these
long-range
plans,
I've
completed
over
200
studies
in
over
100
different
cities.
D
G
My
in
my
you
know,
experience
the
having
been
on
the
MPO
now
for
about
four
years
is
the
paradigm
that
we
currently
have
of
30
days,
Pont
30
days,
Pont
30
days,
Pont
repeat
it
I
mean
it
hasn't
gotten
this
that
far,
only
because
you
know
a
dumb
luck
and
some
elbow
grease
from
TxDOT.
Recently,
you
have
we
kind
of
the
Seas
of
party
that
we
now
see
a
way
to
the
promised
land.
But
you
know
what
and
you
know
I
believe
in
trusting
the
experts.
G
J
That's
our
filter,
let's
breath
here
so
supposed
to
be
making
basically
I
mean.
Yes,
we
can
ask
all
these
technical
questions,
I'm,
not
saying
we
shouldn't
and
for
us
to
get
it.
You
know
to
us
to
get
familiar
educator
so
it,
but
that's
the
reason
what
the
technical
committees
for
the
techno
committee
I've
just
been
having
a
problem
with
the
Technical,
Committee
and
I,
don't
even
know
who's
on
there.
I've
already
found
out
a
couple
of
people,
but
I'm
not
having
to
do
that.
People
has
to
deal
with
what
they're
doing.
J
D
You
that
it
should
filter
down
so
that
that
you're
not
hearing
an
hour-long
presentation,
yes
about
how
we
engineer
this
specific
Road,
that's
something
for
a
technical
me,
but
these
questions,
you're
dealing
with
the
budget
and
expenses
I'm
glad
you're
asking
them.
These
are
more
political
questions,
and
this
is
a
more
of
a
political
committee
so
that
they
policy.
G
D
Policy
so
that
they
didn't
look
at
it
from
a
policy
political
perspective
that
we're
doing
here,
I
think
is
appropriate,
whereas
when
we
take
technical
things
there
that
are
much
more
detailed
and
analytical
and
we're
looking
at
the
engineering
of
it.
We're
looking
at
the
data
I
would
think.
We'd
spend
much
more
time
there
and
bring
you
a
concise,
more
formed
opinion,
and
then
you
vote
on
that
we
did
talk
about
it.
I
did
present
my
idea
of
why
I'm
shifting
more
into
admin
just
no
concerns
with
what
up
like
they
were
here.
F
C
I
D
So
I
can
rephrase
what
what
I'm
understanding
that
they're
asking
if
you,
if
you
take
all
of
our
previous
rollover
from
previous
years-
and
you
add
that
up
what
is
that
number
now
that
we
could
pull
from
of
this
birth,
the
the
amount
this
year
that
we
get
plus
all
the
previous
rollover.
What
is
that
total
number
currently
right
now,
whatever.
I
G
D
C
E
C
C
F
K
A
K
F
K
F
E
D
One
more
bit
of
information:
we
we
have
that
information
solder
tracks,
we
track
it
as
well.
We
don't
have
that
right.
Now
this
means,
but
the
the
draft
I
was
working
from
of
the
initial
UPW
DP
the
initial
work
plan
we
were
looking
to
spend
over
1.2
million
and
I
brought
that
down
from
what
was
originally
being
planned
to
spent
and
that
I'm,
assuming
is
a
number
that
had
been
checked,
that
that
would
be
our
rollover
amount,
plus
what
the
disbursement
we
would
get
and
I'm
asking
for
less
than
that.
I
shrunk
it
down.
G
G
We
can
be
versatile
in
that
and
I'd,
like
the
point
that,
even
if
you
were
to
ask
right
now
what
your
district
priority
funds
are,
the
you
know
upstairs
on
the
second
floor,
finance
department
can
only
give
you
a
balance
as
of
about
30
days
ago,
there's
a
there's
a
bit
of
a
lag
time
waiting
for
you
know,
invoicing,
POS,
etc
to
roll
in
to
give
you
that,
up
to
date,
and
by
the
time
you
get
that
up
to
date.
Well,
then
another
you
should
go
several.
C
H
K
What
we
do,
what
we
do
is
we
every
year
we
apportion
about
the
same
amount
of
funds
every
year
based
on
your
population
based
on
the
size
based
on
whether
or
not
your
non-attainment
or
attainment
status,
so
you're
going
to
be
I
want
to
say
guaranteed
that
money
every
year.
So
as
long
as
we
got
a
highway
bill,
we
have
a
reauthorization
bill.
That
money
is
guaranteed
money
every
year
and.
K
F
B
F
K
K
A
A
G
So
we
vote,
we've
all
I,
think
a
lot
of
us
at
least
council
members
have
been
getting
complaints
about
the
mowing
not
of
having
you
know
not
occurring
as
per
the
contract,
with
with
with
text
dot
and
I
was
hoping
that
next
thought
might
share
a
little
bit
of
light
on
the
street
sweeping
and
the
mowing
of
the
loop,
the
right
up,
the
sides
of
the
right
away.
I
know:
I've
got
a
two
big
cracks
on
my
windshield
to
go
from,
like
the
top
all
the
way
to
the
bottom
they're.
E
E
Some
good
news
so
recently
what
happened
is
the
next
next
Thursday
of
this
month
on
the
29th,
the
Transportation
Commission,
which
governs
our
UTP
funding
for
the
entire
state,
will
be
approving
the
tenure
UTP
plan
for
the
entire
state.
We
are
very
fortunate
this
year.
What
happened
is
with
the
good
help
of
the
mayor
here
in
Giordano,
and
a
lot
of
these
council
folks
were
able
to
work
toward
it
and
we
were
able
to
allocate
additional
funds
for
the
winema
of
us
59.
E
We
were
able
to
allocate
the
remaining
funding
for
the
loop
20
project
from
international
all
the
way
down
to
u.s.
59.
On
top
of
that,
we
were
able
to
get
additional
funding
for
two
additional
direct
connectors
at
the
shiloh
interchange,
and
on
top
of
that
we
were
able
to
get
the
much
near
funding
for
the
you
know
of
project
on
I-35
and
grand
total
about
two
hundred
and
twenty
million
dollars.
F
E
Great
news
for
the
city
of
Laredo
220
million
additional
problems
over
bringing
through
the
city
we're
gonna
hit.
It
pass
we're
getting
hit
hard
and
pretty
soon.
You're
gonna
see
the
people
complaining
about
the
traffic
controls,
but
we're
gonna
try
to
get
it
as
best
we
can
get
in
and
get
out
and
when
you
were
people
through
these
projects.
So
it's
great
and
useful
for
the
city
of
the
radon
have.
E
A
In
our
city
yeah,
but
it
yeah,
the
credit
goes
to
to
you
to
a
lot
of
people
that
have
been
pushing
for
these
these
projects.
The
fact
that
were
we
have
people
in
committees
or
in
Austin
we've
been,
you
know,
basically
participating
in
engaging
commissioners
and
other
people
that
that
know
our
needs
and
and
if
they
didn't
know
them
before
now
they
do
and
I
think
they've
recognized.
You
know,
I
can
finally
say:
we've
arrived
based
on
the
money
is
now
being
awarded.
I
think
they
do
recognize
their
City
Airport
as
a.
F
A
To
the
Texas
economy
and,
of
course,
our
nation,
so
thank
you,
you
know.
Thank
you
again,
there's
so
many
people
Jerry
at
trouble
deserves
a
lot
of
credit
too,
because
you
know
he's
been
at
it
for
years
and
years
participating
these
transportation
committees.
Rowley
Ortiz,
is
not
here,
but
he
also
deserves
a
lot
of
credit
and
and
all
the
other
people
that
have
participating
committees,
because
that's
that's
where
it's
at
plus
was
the
MPO
and
and
the
exchanges
that
we
have
here
and,
of
course
the
word
carries
to
to
Austin
in
other
places.
A
E
A
E
A
F
E
That
was
coming
up,
so
here's
here's
here's
six
years
to
terminate
no.
No,
no
here's
are
we
going
so
we
were,
we
were
working.
We
were.
We
were
working
on
the
because
we
got
development
authority,
we're
working
on
the
designs
of
the
plans,
but
we
have
areas,
contractors,
consultants
doing
various
portions
of
it,
so
what
staff
is
going
through
right
now,
so
we
can
base
best
face
this
work
and
get
into
consultants
together,
so
the
plants
can
match
up
because
we're
gonna
be
doing
lot
of
construction.
It's
gonna
be
a
little
bit
difficult.
E
We
don't
really
want
to
get
it
all
going
at
the
same
time,
because
we
still
got
to
work
our
traffic
through
there,
but
right
now,
currently,
staff
is
getting
together,
they're
working
with
the
consultants
that
are
doing
the
designs.
What
we're
gonna
do
outside
in
sight
and,
of
course,
there's
always
right
away
acquisition
that
we're
working
on
so
we'll
come
back
at
a
later
time,
with
definite
Nate's.
Once
we
find
out
how
we're
gonna
get
it
done.
These.
C
A
E
Million
or
so
there
was
a
lot
of
we're
currently
working
on
development
plan
from
our
post,
seven,
the
project
that's
coming
up
for
shiloh
interchange
and
the
railroad
all
the
way
up
to
milepost
28.
We
have
development
authority,
it
is
not
all
completely
funded,
but
we
did
want
to
fund
the
general
interchange,
which
is
really
going
right
now,
with
the
majestic
communion.
So
top
priority
was
getting
additional
forty
five
million
dollars
to
wrap
up
that
project
which
we
were
lacking.
So
this
money
here
is
gonna
be
allocated
for
that
area.
Okay,.
A
N
We're
doing
is
their
connector
number.
Three,
which
is
thousand
thirty-five,
is
to
look
20
and
the
other
one
is
if
you're
driving
from
the
rotary
bridge
going
east
and
up
22
South
will
be
missing
to
the
recommenders,
which
is
if
you're
gonna
loop
20
going
towards
the
bridge
going
west
to
one
north
on
35.
And
if
you
are
going
25
north
and
you
exit
to
make
a
ride,
to
look
20
and.
E
E
H
G
E
So
here's
what
it
is,
unfortunately,
mr.
Steinman
and
myself
I
I,
had
asked
the
policy
committee
to
strike
this
item
from
ujin,
based
on
the
mere
fact
that
the
MPO
is
created,
four
categories
and
Sam,
which
are
in
pure
dollars
federal
dollars.
Fortunately,
the
way
Tech's
are
they
set
up
our
maintenance
dollars
when
it
comes
to
sweeping
mowing
litter
pick
up
whatever
it
is.
It
comes
from
a
different
basket
and
it's
not
a
policy
that
takes
up
put
in
place.
It's
by
legislature.
F
E
I
will
address
the
concern
that
mr.
auger
brought
to
the
table.
So
basically
what
happens
is
we
have
approximately
about
fifteen
million
dollars
a
year
there?
This
text
I
can
utilize
for
Madison
wrote
later
when
I
say,
maintenance
I
mean
litter,
sweeping
landscaping,
mowing:
okay,
those
fifty
million
dollars.
So
there's
categories
within
the
state
system
classifications
one
through
five
there
we
can
use
federal
dollars.
E
We
can
use
MPO
dollars,
there's
classification,
six
roadways,
there
are
FM
roadways
that
are
less
traveled,
that
we
cannot
use
my
spend
on
dollars,
but
so
that
all
comes
with
state
funds,
this
basket
of
fifteen
million
dollars
that
I
have
to
maintain
the
entire
district,
which
encompasses
eight
counties,
includes
roadways
that
are
not
on
the
classification
one
through
five
okay,
para
minor
was
15
million
dollars.
I
have
to
dresser
cuz
I
have
to
address
some
construction
projects.
Then
I
cannot
address
the
federal
dollars
off
that
fifty
million
dollars
I
take
away
nine
million
dollars.
E
That
leaves
me
with
six
million
dollars
to
allocate
to
the
eight
counties
that
I
have
to
take
care
of.
Currently
in
fiscal
year.
Nineteen
for
Webb
County
and
the
city
Laredo
were
currently
allocated
1.4
million
dollars.
That
includes
litter,
sweeping
and
mowing
that's
basically
over
ten
percent
or
the
15
million
dollars.
We
do
our
best
to
balance
out
what
we
can
and
can't
do.
There
is
a
current
MMA
in
place
signed
in
1996,
which
allocates
that
takes
that
will
maintain
Interstate
Highways
when
it
comes
to
litter.
E
Sweeping
mowing
later
pick
up
and
you
break
anything
outside
of
an
interstate
or
not.
Control
axes
is
a
responsibility
of
the
city
and
we
will
discuss
when
we
can.
We
have
been
assisting
with
a
1.4
million
dollars
currently,
but
at
this
point
I
know
the
concern
is
I-35.
Currently
we
do
have
a
contract
where
we
are
sleeping
once
a
week.
I
will
be
happy
to
increase
that
to
twice
a
week
and
necessary,
but
at
the
same
time,
I
would
ask
that
some
of
these
are
the
roadways
that
we're
currently
doing,
such
as
per
400
u.s.
E
G
I
suppose
I
guess
what
I'm
being
told
by
our
city
staff
is
that
we
remember
the
the
dollar
amount
of
$220,000
being
in
the
mix
there
that
somehow
you
all
had
allocated
that
for
or
that
you
all
are
in
receipt
of
that
for
purposes
of
sweeping
and
mowing,
and
recently
there
was
some
sort
of
discussions
with
text
or
text
out.
Y'all
were
saying:
look
we've
been
doing
in
the
past,
but
city.
E
I
think
currently,
right
now
I
mean
we
are
assisting
the
city
best.
We
can.
We
know
we're
in
partnership
and
currently
right
now.
Our
sleeping
contracts
are
685,000
just
within
the
city
of
Laredo
a
year
and
that's
once
or
twice
a
month
that
we're
sweeping
within
the
city
Laredo
685,000,
that's
a
tall
order.
That's
just
we're
sweeping.
If
you're
alluding
to
the
interstate
35
sweeping
contractor
it
doesn't
all
contract.
E
E
Seventy
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
at
that
point
I
was
sweeping
the
entire
city
Laredo
at
that,
when
that
decision
was
made
for
about
twenty
eighty
six
thousand,
so
her
business
standpoint
from
a
business
sense,
it
didn't
make
sense
for
me
to
continue
sweeping
paying
three
hundred
thousand
and
sweep
seven
miles
when
I
was
sweeping
the
rest
of
the
city
for
two
hundred.
Eighty
six
thousand.
E
On
top
of
that,
because
of
the
current
Minmei
in
place,
the
full
responsibility
of
Interstate
35
rest
within
text
that
itself
and
that's
what
we
do,
because
it
is
in
our
control
actors,
and
we
took
that
back
over
if
it
is
if
it
continues
to
be
an
issue.
If
the
once
a
week
is
not
enough,
like
I,
said,
we'll,
be
happy
to
help
that
rate,
but
at
the
same
time
we'll
probably
need
assistance
on
the
other
system.
It's.
E
A
E
We
are
just
this
and
mowing
the
litter
pick
up.
We
like
to
assist
and
sweeping
and
otherwise
cleaning
the
payment,
and
we
are
to
assist
in
snow
and
ice
control,
which
we
don't
have
here.
So
basically
we're
here
to
assist.
We
have
been
assistant,
I
think
we
do
a
fine
job
of
balancing
a
balancing
act
and
we
try
to
get
as
much
as
we
can.
But
at
this
point
well,.
G
Just
you
know
the
the
reoccurring,
complaints,
it's
interesting
that
there's
some
actually
city
personnel
that
are
watching.
This
meeting
take
place
right
now,
and
so
my
phone
there's
like
blowing
up
as
we
speak,
and
they
suggested
that
perhaps
text
on
take
a
good,
close
look
at
I,
35
right
now,
and
that
I
35
remains
this
this
hazard.
Because
of
that
the
debris
that's
on
it
and
it's
an
on
system.
G
We
won't
have
those
problems
the
way
we
have
them
right
now,
but
right
now
they
remain
problem.
They
remain
big
problems.
I
know
that
I
think
we've
been
assisting
with
speaking
of
Gateway
of
the
Americas
I.
Think
we've
been
assisting
with
all
the
because
coming
the
mowing
and
maintenance
there
and
that's
been,
you
know,
I'm,
not
saying
this
is
your
fault,
but
it's
been,
you
know,
quote,
you
know
grossly
disregarded
by
TxDOT
over
the
years.
In
it
ya
know
it
looks
the
way
it
looks
because
no
one's
been
putting
any
attention
to
it
and
so.
A
E
Again
mayor,
you
know,
I
appreciated
his
comments
and
concerns
and
we
can
sit
down
too
busy
weather,
but
again
as
far
as
the
MPO
being
a
platform
for
this
type
of
discussion,
since
we
can't
allocate
impure
dollars
to
it,
I
think
there
may
be
a
meeting
besides,
it
would
be
good
for
us
I'd
be
happy
to
sit
down
and
visit
with
the
city.
Perhaps
we
can
step
up.
E
If
we
can
have
a,
maybe
we
can
do
systems
on
some
of
the
lower
other
highways
and
we
can
find
a
way
to
get
this
done.
One
last
note:
I
want
to
add
that
the
last
remains
agreement
that
was
signed
by
the
city.
Aredo
was
1996.
So
are
we
happy
to
give
mr.
Steinman
the
current
Lehman
minute
to
take
a
look
at
and
possible
for
future
signature.
A
A
A
G
Well,
then,
that's
fine
I
mean
I
was
gonna,
make
a
motion
to
you
know
direct
whatever
funds
are
available
to
be
able
to
have
techstop
fulfill
their
responsibilities,
but
what
we
can
do
is:
let's
just
have
this.
If
we
will
have
this
agenda
item
come
back
for
the
next
NPO
agenda
and
that
way
we
can
have
some
discussions
and
kind
of
take
a
look
at
that
a-and
and
figure
out
what
we're
gonna
do
mowing
forward.
E
My
firm
belief
that
the
impure
dollars
that
the
impure
has
to
deal
with
are,
of
course,
federal
highway
dollars
from
cats
having
a
cat
that
cannot
be
appropriated
for
the
maintenance
of
highways
due
to
legislature
and
the
way
that
the
funds
are
allocated
through
text
on
again
short
of
us
allocating
these
funds.
We
cannot
do
it.
We
just
cannot
do
that.
G
F
G
So
we're
number
two
but
we're
the
biggest
inland
port
and
with
the
trucking
capital
of
the
world
and
the
amount
of
commercial
vehicle
traffic
that
is
on
our
roads
is
a
unique
situation
and
it's
a
great
problem.
I'm
sure
many
other
cities
would
love
to
have
we
have
it
and
there
is
an
inordinate
amount
of
road
debris
and
that
it
comes
with
being
this
big
port.
And
so
it's
a
TxDOT
responsibility
and
it
requires
a
txdot
fix
and
so.
G
A
G
So
I
think
we
all
got
the
text.
Yesterday,
2:15
p.m.
from
our
fire
chief
chief
Lundin
responded
to
multi
vehicle
motor
vehicle
accident
at
the
5300
block
of
IH
35
at
1:00
p.m.
found
11
patients,
including
one
dead
on
scene,
female
front
passenger,
was
ejected
unrestrained,
57
year
old
male
unconscious,
unrestrained
taken
to
doctors,
hospital
for
other
occupants,
including
two
kids
of
the
same
vehicle
who
were
restrained
and
taken
to
LMC
for
evaluation.
G
G
Oh,
it's,
a
tech
stop
problem
is
no
longer
cutting
it
for,
for
me,
much
less
this
constituent
and
so
I
I,
don't
know
how
many
more
people
need
to
die
or
get
hurt
or
end
up
in
that
ditch
for
us
to
rethink
how
we
manage
traffic
there,
but
we
need
to
do
some
thing
other
than
just
looking
the
other
way,
and
so
I
don't
know.
If
we
have
anyone
here
from
textile
who
can
speak
to
any
proposed
solutions
to
this
problem,
anyone
know.
E
So
so
I
was
on
set
at
the
accident
and
the
incident
actually
was
on
thirty
five
and
we
have
reports
on
the
man
exit.
But
it's
on
the
downside,
this
accident,
fortunate
as
it
was,
and
it's
sad
to
say
that
some
people
did
it
was
before
you
get
to
the
exit
ramp.
It
was
on
the
main
lanes.
It
was
not
dude
because
of
the
Aster
ramp
or
the
air
that
we're
looking
up
concern
it's
unfortunate,
but
being
as
it
is,
but.
E
Where
the
street
mrs.
Esperanza
expensing?
Well,
we
did
an
accident
report,
the
majority.
The
incidents
are
happening
at
Esperanza
in
the
off
ramp,
once
you're
completely
off
at
35,
trying
to
make
that
right
turn
and
twist
pronounces
to
be
cutting
across
traffic.
We've
looked
at
scenarios
of
trying
to
continue
that
with
the
dividers
up
along,
but
then
you
run
into
the
issue
where
you're
shoving
the
problem
up
the
road,
because
there's
people
trying
to
get
into
that
turn
around.
E
We
have
looked
at
options
of
making
Esperanza
right
out
only
and
eliminating
the
turn
in,
which
is
seems
to
be
a
viable
solution
before
I
move
forward
that
option
I
would
like
to
have
division
come
down
and
see
that
they
can
see
something
that
I
can
see
your
we
can
see
and
perhaps
come
up
with
a
better
solution,
but
as
it
is
right
now,
what
looks
very
favorable
in
that
area
is
to
eliminate
the
right
turning.
You
only
have
a
right
turn
out,
which
will
levy
eight.
The
problem.
E
G
E
If
you
can
kind
of
picture
they're,
just
you
know
off
the
ramp
and
they're
making
that
lectern
cutting
contracts
I
mean
we
have
no
choice.
So
the
reason
we
have
look
that
provided
eliminators
where,
as
soon
as
they
come
off
the
ramp,
they
have
to
stay
there
where
they
can't
make
the
right
turn.
But
then
you
run
into
a
situation
where
the
people
coming
on
the
front
row
wanting
to
get
into
the
turnaround
so
you're
kind
of
pushing
the
problem
over
the
road.
But
what,
if
you.
H
What
if
you
leave
the
ramp
alone,
but
instead
of
putting
the
concrete
barriers
on
the
ramp-
and
you
go
more
if
you
put
a
divider
so
that
they
have
to
turn
right,
that's
right,
far
away
from
house
to
turn
right.
That
way,
you
can't
you
can't
go
all
the
way
across.
In
other
words,
you
you
put
the
divider
on
the
mixers
room
on
the
access
road.
So
then
we
can't
turn
right
there.
You.
E
E
A
E
E
E
G
A
Item
this
person
with
possible
action
in
the
River
Road
project
yeah.
Ever
since
we
did
activity
Kate
with
the
Shalford,
Muller
and
I
have
mr.
Joe
Medina
who's
been
kind
of
spearheading
this,
this
10-foot
of
landowners.
Would
you
come
up
please
in
a
minute
and
I
know:
I
can't
remember
all
so.
This
is
your.
A
A
First
of
all,
he
says:
there's
a
city
have
the
money.
The
answer
is,
there's
no,
but
we
can.
If
we
we
plan
accordingly
and
please
correct
me
if
you
think
I'm
off,
he
says
how
wide
will
the
wait
be?
It
should
be
at
least
four
lanes.
He
says
and
I
think
he's.
You
know
ideally
I
think
we
contemplating
that
four
lanes.
Mr.
Medina
I
know
you,
you
had
a
schematic
or
a
central
video
I.
Do.
O
O
Today,
either,
but
I
I
just
want
to
bring
that
back
to
speed
that
I
did
meet
with
mr.
Holguin
and
I
met
with
the
mayor
after
I
had
several
discussions
with
mr.
Albert
Mahler,
which
has
always
been
negative
about
moving
forth
on
this
rally
and
through
several
text,
messages
that
we
had,
he
say
he's
on
board.
100%
I
did
contact
IPOC
his
true
Reese,
Wilson
property
owner
mr.
O
Hein
and
everybody's
willing
to
give
us
a
letter
of
donation,
including
Emma,
which
part
of
the
only
thing
I
don't
have
anything
is
going
past
them
home,
because
I
really
don't
know
where
the
proposed
roads
gonna
be
so
I
could
find
out.
Who
would
be
back
in
to
pick
her
out
and
just
a
matter
of
finding
out
what
the
route
would
actually
go?.
A
O
A
A
G
O
J
E
G
What
about
the
fact
of
the
city,
essentially
through
this
River
Road,
is
addressing
text
dots
I'm
not
directing
this
at
you,
but
just
you
know
holistically
as
a
bureaucracy,
since
we're,
since
we're
taking
on
techstops
failure
to
fully
develop
1472
by
adding
extra
capacity
off
system
were
freeing
up
1472
by
taking.
You
know,
vehicles
off
of
it
and
giving
them
a
separate
ingress
and
egress.
If
you
will
there's
a
term
for
that
like
Oh,
parallel,
parallel,
basically
call
a
relief
route.
I
think
is
the
term.
E
E
A
Me
ask
you:
I
know
the
MPO
of
us
that
you
mentioned
are
committed
and
primarily,
if
a
memory
serves
me
correctly,
a
charge
routing
or
a
pit.
Oh,
that's!
That's!
In
the
next
four
years,
I
think
they
went
for
five
years.
I
think
pool
will
be
done
and
this
projects
gonna
take
at
least
that
long
thing
right
right.
So.
O
O
That's
something
that
maybe
somebody
has
to
start
looking
into
bigger
out
its
continued
to
be
very
heavily
traffic
again,
since
that
no
this
doesn't
belong
to
the
city
and
I,
don't
think
the
county
is
involved
in
it,
and
it's
going
to
be
a
problem
and
I'm
mentioning
this
because
we're
and
we're
rock
close
to
pick
around
we
ever
talked
to
developing.
Oh,
you
got
no
City
going
to
ask
me
to
pave
a
road
and
I
think
that
Pico
wrote
is
something
that
everybody
has
to
start
addressing.
Also,
okay,.
D
Is
we're
in
the
process
of
updating
our
project
list
that
future
funding
could
apply
to
and
the
River
Road
project
is
going
to
be
on
that
list
that
we're
updating
so
in
the
future
we
can
appropriating
pio
dollars
towards
it
because
it'll
be
proud
of
this.
We're
also
starting
this
fall
there'll,
be
having
public
meetings
to
update
our
our
thoroughfare
plan
with
the
city
so
that
from
the
city
side
we
have
it
as
a
part
of
our
planning.
A
L
C
C
And
I
was
just
gonna
say
also
if
I
wanted
to
add
to
that
is
you
know,
unfortunately,
the
RMA
is
is
still
headless,
but
you
know
this
is
something
again.
We
could
get
them
working
on
environmental
and
getting
them.
You
know
giving
these
plans
ready
to
where,
when
the
pot
of
money
does
come
available
or
they
want
to
do
it,
you
know.
A
The
question
here
it
says
that
will
the
city
help
with
paving
that
book
that
back
way
from
riverbank
wrote
to
molar
Memorial
Boulevard
for
private
use
and
I
bought
that
land
owners
only
yeah?
Well,
that's
it's
a
little
more
on,
but
I
guess
we'll
address
that
when
the
time
comes
in
another
over
that's
a
condition
to
yeah.
C
A
A
H
H
And
I
think
that's
the
way
these
things
are
supposed
to
work.
We're
Merriman
we're
supposed
to
use
a
regional
mobility
Authority,
as
well
as
the
MPO
and
planning
department,
as
well
as
City
Council,
all
collaborate
together.
So
we
can
move
these
things
forward.
We're
currently
trying
to
do
that
with
some
other
projects
as
well,
that
we've
already
pushed
towards
the
RMA,
and
we
did
that
removes
presidentÃs,
we're
doing
other
projects
as
out
that
we're
looking
at
night.
The
NPO
is
the
appropriate
place
to
have
that,
but
we
do
need
to
allocate
resources
towards
it.
H
A
M
Good
afternoon,
mr.
mayor
mr.
chairman
and
committee
members,
Luis
Perez
got
CEO
of
county
engineer,
for
the
record,
along
with
me
today
is
Vishnu
Bauer
Lopez,
who
is
the
project
manager
for
our
consultant
on
this
project?
He
has
a
short
presentation
that
he
would
like
to
present
to
you
and
we
can
ask
your
questions
during
or
after
the
presentation.
This.
P
So,
first
of
all,
let
me
just
mention
that
this
project
is
about
an
eight
point.
Two
mile
project
from
f/4
1472
road
to
I-35.
However,
for
matters
of
economics
and
construction,
wise
is
broken
into
pieces
phase,
one
which
is
from
Evan
1472
to
Beltway
Parkway
and
then
face
a
face.
One
I'm,
sorry,
a
phase
two
will
be
from
Bellway
Parkway
to
I-35
frontage
road.
P
Now
the
funding
for
that
project
comes
also
in
two
pieces:
a
30
million
dollars
from
txdot
well,
MPO
money,
category,
seven
for
the
first
phase
and
about
20
million
for
the
second
phase
Bowl,
and
this
face
is
the
phase
one
and
Phase
two
basically
is
to
build
the
frontage
road
as
an
overlay
corridor,
hopefully
concrete
very
hefty
section
that
will
carry
on
the
vehicles
and
hopefully
alleviate
some
of
the
congestion
problems
also
in
1472.
But
the
the
face
one
right
now
is
is
my
fixed
on
is
the
letting
date
that
they
have
identifies.
P
2021.
That's
construction!
That's
construction!
Yes!
Now,
currently,
what
we're
doing
we're
developing
the
advance
planning
phase,
which
is
basically
developing
the
environmental
document
and
disco
Mattox?
We
are
developing
two
schematics
one
for
the
face
one
and
the
second
one
is
for
the
ultimate
schematic.
P
So
we
are
trying
to
finish
or
move
this
project,
keep
in
mind
that
we
started
back
in
February
and
we
had
a
public
meeting
in
July,
but
right
now
we're
getting
ready
to
cement
a
very
important
milestone,
which
is
a
60%
schematic
and
environmental
document
for
techstops
review,
and
also
move
forward
to
try
to
finish
within
this
year,
hopefully
by
November
or
December
at
the
end
of
the
advanced
planning
development.
Of
course,
the
next
phase
before
construction
is
to
the
longer
the
full
psn
e7
plants.
As
you
can
see
on
the
screen,
you
know.
P
P
P
The
phase
1
&
2
basically
will
be
the
two
frontage
roads
that
will
give
the
needed
access
to
the
development
that
adjacent
development
that
has
been
looked
at
and
also
will
give
the
mobility
and
at
each
mobility
corridor
between
1472
and
I
35
the
ultimate
space.
Of
course,
you
will
include
it
can
be
built
all
the
way
to
about
a
six-lane
main
lane,
two
lanes
of
these
frontage
roads
and
you
will
have
as
a
minimum
three
overpasses.
P
That
will
end
two,
no
three
hydrological
of
bridges
that
are
needed
because
of
the
somebody
to
and
the
core
will
creeks.
So
that
is
basically
where
we're
here.
We're
at
this
is
the
runway
that
we're
trying
to
acquire
donated
for
this
project
is
basically
from
350
feet.
Minimum
to
500
feet
at
the
overpasses
typically
is,
will
be
ranging
between
350
and
400
rot
away
needed,
and
of
course
this
is
a
brand
new
vocation.
There's
no
development!
P
But
basically,
this
is
what
it
would
look
like
for
the
ultimate
section
and
phase
one
would
be
basically
just
the
frontage
roads,
that's
just
an
example
of
what
it
would
look
like,
but
it
will
have
all
the
necessary
elements
to
sustain
a
and
overweight
trucks
carrying
all
for
20
years
plus,
and
he
will
have
the
proper
radii
needed
for
the
trucks
and
the
accessibility
to
adjacent
land
course.
This
is
a
kind
of
hilly
terrain,
so
we
have
to
deal
also
with
the
geotechnical
portion.
P
A
P
E
Kearney
mayor
I,
know,
there's
been
a
discussion,
is
about
bringing
around
system
I'm,
not
aware
of
in
agreement.
We'll
have
to
look
at
it.
Go
back.
I
know
it
is
being
built
it
textile
standard,
fuel
dollars,
but
currently
there
is
no
agreement
that
takes
that
would
take
that
over
yeah.
A
certainty
is
open
for
discussion
in
the
future.
Mr.
M
Salas
and
if
you
would,
please
explain
to
us
some
of
the
steps
that
have
to
be
taken
to
get
to
that
point,
although
initially
it
will
be
City
of
Loretto
Webb
County
at
some
point,
we'd
like
to
transition
it
over,
so
that
it
can
be
on
system.
Can
you
discuss
at
this
time
some
of
the
procedure
that
needs
to
take
place
so.
E
The
process
would
take
some
time,
but
before
we
get
to
that
point,
I
think
we
wouldn't
you
just
sit
down
and
have
some
conversations
as
I
alluded
to
mr.
Aggarwal
ago.
As
far
as
the
turnback
program,
of
course,
we
just
we
just
had
a
great
topic
on
amount
of
money
that
I
have
to
maintain
some
of
these
projects
that
I
have
on
system
now,
bringing
on
more
miles
would
be
proved
to
be
more
difficult.
E
H
E
A
P
A
E
N
Right
and
and
going
back
to
the
the
allocations
that
you
get
for
the
if
you
want
to
construct
the
project
right
now
to
2019,
we
have
twenty
four
point:
four
million
dollars
that
we've
been
banking
throughout
the
years.
Then
we
get
about
six
million
dollars
every
year,
so
right
now
by
2021,
which
will
have
the
funding
to
do,
though,
construct
the
first
segment,
but.
P
B
F
M
Q
D
Sir
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
we've
been
being
with
him
regularly,
I've
met
with
him,
the
abrazo
partners
three
times
and
the
interim
of
last
time
and
we're
looking
at
different
configurations
of
that
design.
They
had
a
design,
they
showed
you
and
we're
looking
at
some
possibilities
of
with
that.
Maybe
maybe
taking
some
maybe
understand
the
desire
for
Tex
out
to
want
to
keep
the
same
number
of
lanes.
D
Maybe
we
move
some
of
those
in
so
that
we
can
move
some
that
green
space
to
the
outside,
because
we
have
the
same
concern
that
I
think
has
existed
there,
and
that
is:
does
that
space
really
ever
get
utilized
well
in
the
middle,
or
does
it
become
a
space
for
people
that
are
doing
maybe
activity?
That's
not
the
best.
D
So
we're
still
in
the
process
of
looking
through
that
I
just
want
to
be
clear
that
we,
we
definitely
see
the
value
of
beautification
there
and
we
also
see
an
opportunity
with
the
extra
right
away,
maybe
some
programming
on
the
side
of
the
middle.
Whatever
we
do,
we
want
to
work
very
closely
in
text
on.
We
want
to
bring
them
to
the
table.
The
last
meeting
we
had.
We
had
traffic
and
engineering
there
from
the
city
and
to
be
clear.
D
This
is
a
city
project,
it's
funded
by
the
city,
but
it
was
brought
to
the
mvo
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
working
with
the
policy
committee
and
working
in
the
tech
scott.
So,
as
this
is
ongoing,
we
can
you've
asked
to
leave
it
as
an
agenda
item
when
there
is
news
to
bring
all
I'll
update
you
with
it.
Okay
and
we'll
be
working
with
text
on.
E
Question
for
you
in
about
your
efforts
and
again
text
ideas
behind
me
to
find
in
downtown
area
this,
this
four
o'clock
boulevard
of
americas
project.
Is
this
part
of
a
bigger
encompassing
downtown
areas?
It
just
is
it's
just
localized
to
these
four
blocks
desert?
Is
there
a
master
plan
or
bigger
mess
behind
there
that
you're
working
on
there?
That's
a
great
question:
if.
D
You
look
at
the
work
plan
proposal
for
2020,
you'll,
see
a
downtown
traffic
study
and
that
your
question
is
great
because
it
gets
to
the
point
of
if
we're
looking
at
this
and
the
timing
of
these
intersections
and
these
lights
and
the
flow
of
this.
Do
we
want
to
do
that
in
a
bubble,
or
do
we
want
to
look
at
the
downtown
as
a
whole?
No
you're,
exactly
right.
We
do
and
that's
that
that's
the
plan
for
2020
is
to
look
at.
D
One
of
the
things
we
want
to
do
is
eliminate,
and
this
is
a
recommendation
from
our
comprehensive
plan-
is
changing
some
of
these
two
ways
than
one
of
these.
Some
of
these
one
ways
back
to
two
ways,
because
we
have
at
peak
times
in
the
afternoon
when
people
are
leaving
downtown,
we've
funneled
all
of
these
down
into
a
few
one
roads,
and
if
there's
it's
being
cut
off
because
of
the
train,
we
create
some
serious
traffic
problems,
downtown.
D
G
G
D
Both
of
those
issues
were
where
that
you
pointed
out
are
things
we're
talking
about?
Well
we're
still
looking
through
the
design
of
this
I'll
just
share
and
I've
shared
it
again
that
I
live
downtown,
I
work,
downtown
I
bike
by
bicycle,
80
or
90
percent
of
my
trips,
and
this
down
through
it
all
go
is
my
commute
home
okay
and
there
have
been
issues
I
can
as
told
who
uses
that
twice
a
day,
sometimes
more
bicycling
through
that
and
going
through
these
intersections.
D
There
are
some
serious
design
issues
with
how
it
currently
is,
and
people
that
are
unfamiliar
may
be
coming
from
us
from
Mexico
into
here.
Not
expecting
pedestrians
are
not
using
crosswalks
the
same
way,
so
we
are
definitely
looking
at
and
and
I
have
some
personal
data
to
put
in
the
in
the
process
of
design.
So
yeah.
N
Jacobs
consultant
that
we
hire
for
this
studies
right
now,
the
update
I
have
is
in
September,
10
and
11.
This
tentative
dates:
we're
gonna,
have
a
stakeholders
meeting
one
of
the
north
side
of
the
rate
of
one
on
the
south
side.
We're
gonna,
buy
the
property
owners,
the
serial
irate
over
county
perseveres
districts
to
see
another
input,
maybe
major
utility
companies
to
present
or
first
Ralph's.
You
know
first
alternatives
and
get
some
other
day
sure
you
are
very
concern
with
the
property
owners,
get
their
thing
right
now:
okay,
September
10
to
11.
N
N
E
Vegas
will
be
retiring
at
the
end
of
the
month.
This
is
his
last
appeal
meeting
he's.
Given
this
text
item
over
35
years
of
service
began
his
career
in
corpus.
He
is
a
native
of
Laredo,
very
well-known
in
they're,
very
instrumental.
All
that
tap
in
here
he's
actually
worked
on.
A
lot
of
the
major
projects
ended
in
the
area,
but
with
no
further
ado
I.
Mr.
Rodriguez
movie
will
have
a
few
words
to
say.
I
want
to
thank
you
personally
for
your
time
and
service
to
the
state
of
Texas
into.
Q
We,
you
all
been
elected
officials
in
different
capacities
before
before
I
start
with
the
projects
and
we've
worked
together
for
many
years,
there's
been
City,
Council
County
so
forth
whatever,
but
everybody
has
been
with
the
same
goal
in
mind:
basically
having
a
city
of
flow
rate
of
growth
and
I,
see
I
like
what
I
see
about
the
the
direction
we're
going
as
far
as
the
city,
the
MPO,
the
county
and
tech
stuff.
I
remember
comes
back.
That
was
not
the
case.
Those
were
that
times
now
we're
in
good
times
now.
Q
I
just
basically
want
to
make
sure
that
you
all
take
this
opportunity
and
there's
there's
funds
out
there,
there's
a
lot
of
work
and
that
everybody
works
together,
harmony,
there's
going
to
be
the
differences.
Of
course.
It's
always
gonna
be
the
case,
but
just
work
together
because
remember
we
represent
the
government
and
we're
working
out
there
for
the
traveling
public,
the
workers
out
there
yeah.
They
need
to
have
our
backing
so
they'll
be
working
a
day
or
night,
whatever
type
of
weather
condition.
A
Ok,
the
Commission
here
the
the
MPO.
Thank
you
so
much,
probably
because
that
you
know
you
you've
done
so
much
for
our
community
and
you've
been
here
years
and
years
yeah,
although
I've
been
married
the
two
years,
so
what
we
see
and
what's
been
designed
I
know,
you've
you've
been
very
much
order
that
and
so
your
footprints
or
throughout
our
city
as
well,
and
so
we
know
we
drink.
We're
very
grateful
for
that,
and
thank
you
also
for
your
philosophy
for
the
advice.
It's
it's.
A
Some
differences,
you
know
we
do
have
differences,
but
it's
how
we
approach
them
and
I
think
it's
partners
and
and
divvy
up
the
you
know
the
duties
and
responsibilities
that
that
come
to
each
each
entity.
So
again,
thank
you
for
that.
You
know
those
kind
words
and
we'll
miss
your
guts,
be
to
you.
Your
family,
I
think.
Q
Sir,
to
begin
with
was
possible
and
talk
about
is
the
one
outside
overall
face?
There's
a
Kansas,
City
railroad
Oscar
render
project
that
would
has
moved
forward.
Finally,
were
basically
saying
there
were,
but
99%
complete.
We
have
one
major
that
you
have
been
placed
or
you
have
been
brought
in.
The
poll
was
incorrect,
but
it's
taking
patent
manufacturers.
My
understanding
that
this
almost
here
so
we're
close
to
completion
and
that
project
the
other
one.
They
is
3559
overpass
the
ser
project
that
one
is
moving
very
fast.
The
work
is
85%.
Q
Next
particle
knows
talk
about
is
359
project
from
the
city
limits
from
outside
the
city
for
802
Duvall
County
line.
Basically,
that
is
energy
Columbia
project.
Sixty
percent,
complete
on
that
particular
one
I
had
talked
to
you
all
about
a
spot,
pace,
repair
and
then
go
back
and
do
an
overlay.
That's
what
this
the
project,
this
one
had
two
phases.
Q
You
had
one
and
eighty-three
sort
of
being
completed
this
one
here
on
359,
worried
that
the
repairs
the
spa
days
now
we're
we're
trying
to
continue
with
the
overlay
and
bring
them
to
conclusion
impatient
other
project
that
I
want
to
talk
to
you
all
about
is
a
u.s.
eighty-three
from
the
dead
meat
coming
line
to
three
point
four
miles:
south
of
44.
Q
Basically,
at
three
point
four
miles
south
of
44
s,
basically
for
the
checkpoint
is
that
in
83
on
that
one
right
there,
where
six
person
complete
that
project,
the
primary
thing
is
basically
shit'll
or
alignment
in
the
traffic
and
start
working
in
the
structures.
Once
you
have
your
structures
in
and
you
then
you
can
start,
though
you
wrote,
live
work
and
little
by
little
will
get
completed
estimated
completion.
Q
Q
If
you
go
to
Pilate
the
unibrow
you'll
notice,
what
there's
hot
mix
that
was
done
there
on
the
northbound
furniture
on
that
one
is
where
we
completed
that
we're
just
doing
the
metal,
beam,
guard
fence
or
structural
repairs
there,
and
the
next
thing
that's
going
to
be
part
of
this
project,
there's
going
to
be
on
255
from
14,
2002
columbia
bridge,
and
then
we
have
something
outside
of
a
red
oak
which
is
on
highway
16,
but
that's
collecting
material.
Pretty
keep
everything
within
the
city
limits.
Q
Q
Q
E
You
yeah
no
way
up
in
1338.
It
looks
like
a
nice
road
is
low
post
at
58,000
miles,
which
means
allows
for
a
lot
of
illegal
trucks
or
trucks
or
8,000
that
can't
travel
so
first
face
of
this
project
would
be
to
get
it
to
where
80,000
vehicles
can
travel
on
it.
This
is
a
first
phase
and
then
go
Metro
and
people
staff
they're
working
people
on
the
reticle
staff,
they're
working
on
in
the
future,
expanding
to
wider
hoardings.
A
C
A
B
A
D
Can
I
say
something
quickly
sure
we
did
differently
this
time
where
we
didn't
print
out
packets
and,
depending
on
your
feedback,
they'd
like
to
continue
that
it
saves
a
lot
of
staff
time
and
said,
we'll
e-mail,
you
a
link
where
you
can
find
the
packet
online
and
then
day
of
you
have
in
front
of
you
like
you.
Do
it
accounts.
B
D
The
second
thing
solder
shared
some
information
with
me.
We're
gonna
make
sure
we
have
this
exact
and
I
will
send
you
an
email
to
update
you
on
the
numbers,
but
the
fiscal
year,
2018
rollover
amount
was
1.8
million
all
of
that
this
year
and
then
and
and
we
got
five
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
so
that
brought
us
up
to
2.3
2.4
million
this
year-
we're
probably
gonna
use
about
four
hundred
thousand,
so
that
will
mean
for
fiscal
year.
20
we're
gonna
have
about
1.8
1.9
million.