►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 031623
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 031623
B
B
A
Thank
you
can
I
have
a
motion
to
excuse
those
that
aren't
presentation
make
a
motion.
D
A
If
members
clicking
on
paper
all
right
motion
carries,
can
we
stand
for
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America.
E
A
Carries
do
we
have
any
citizen
comments?
No
sir.
We
do
not
I'm
going
to
open
the
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
going
to
section
6A
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
of
San
Laredo
by
rezoni,
approximately
25.39
Acres
situated
in
person
14,
abstract,
56.
Jose
will
have
the
original
grantee
within
the
city
limits
of
Laredo
and
Webb
County
Texas
out
and
part
of
the
ND
Archer
Ranch
recorded
in
volume,
303
page
164,
Webb,
County,
Deeds,
Records,
located
south
of
Beltway
Parkway
and
west
of
Interstate
35
from
agriculture
to
M1.
My
manufacturing
District.
F
G
Chairman
Wayne
Nance
reporters
engineering.
We
we
concur
with
staff,
support
for
this
item
and
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
A
A
I
I
moved
to
close
public
comments
and
move
to.
A
Second,
that
you
have
a
second
from
commissioner
Garcia.
All
in
favor
against
motion
carries
moving
on
to
item
6B,
amended
The
Zone,
ordinance,
map
of
the
City
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
Lots,
one
two
and
three
block
1149
Eastern
Division,
located
2001
Guadalupe
Street
from
B3
community
business
district
to
B4,
Highway,
commercial
District,.
I
J
Crown
Ridge
Subdivision
base
one
located
at
414,
Shadow,
Drive,
Unit
7,
and
it's
a
20171
square
feet,
zone
change
and
it's
a
special
use
permit
for
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol
proposed
uses
for
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol
that
are
sent
44
inside
the
200
feet.
We
have
four
four
in
support
outside
200
feet.
We
have
nine
in
support
location
view,
aerial
view,
street
view,
zone
change,
signage,
zoning,
View,
future
land
use
map
and
the
recommendation
as
staff
does
not
support.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
L
M
M
K
B
So
her
restaurant's
currently
opened
okay,
she's
been
in
business
and
we
understand
the
parking
situation.
We
basically
try
to
stay
consistent
with
our
ordinances
and
let
you
know
what
should
be
what
what
they
should
do
to
stay
in
compliance
or
to
be
in
compliance
but
she's
open
and
that's
fine.
What
we
were.
We
were
told
that
next
door
to
this
restaurant
there's
a
church
recorded.
K
B
And
I
know
the
restaurant
very
well.
We
don't
really
have
a
problem
with
that.
It's
basically
a
recommendation
by
you
all
to
determine
because
I
you
know
this:
the
the
church
being
there
in
a
strip
center
kind
of
throws
things
off
and
and
maybe
our
our
ordinances
untreated.
B
We
have
to
kind
of
reconsider
the
ordinance
because
I
believe
the
ordinance
was
for
Standalone
churches,
but
now
we're
getting
churches
that
are
not
getting
into
strip
malls
and
stuff
like
that
and
I,
don't
think
we've
we've
really
adjusted
our
ordinance
lately
on
that
particular
note.
B
So
this
is
one
of
those
cases
where
you
know,
even
if
we
said,
okay,
the
parking's,
fine,
she
she's
open
she's,
doing
her
business,
but
we
have
a
church
next
door.
So
now,
what
do
we
do
so.
B
C
I
think
also
just
considering
this
restaurant
in
particular
it's
a
very
small
restaurant,
very
familiar
oriented.
There
will
be
no
music
outside
of
it
and
I
think
that
just
in
support
of
Small,
Business,
Development
I,
don't
see
why
why
we
would,
you
know
already
allow
neighboring
restaurants
to
some
serve
alcohol
and
not
this
restaurant,
so
I
am
in
favor
of
it.
Thank
you.
So.
A
A
This
is
a
public
hearing,
anybody
else
who
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
item.
A
N
A
So
we
have
the
first
one
all
in
favor
against
do.
A
Motion
carries
thank
you
for
moving
on
to
item
Six
B
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
city
Laredo
by
rezoning
approximately
1.82
Acres
out
of
the
called
a
call
20.182
Acres
designated
as
track
2
conveyed
to
Martinez
Land
Development
limited
liability
company
recorded
in
volume,
5042
Pages
272
to
277
Webb
County
official
public
records
situated
situated
in
position,
31
Jose,
Trevino,
original
grantee,
abstract
3116,
with
County
Texas,
located
North
State,
Highway,
359
and
west
west
of
Delfina
Avenue
from
R1
single
family
residential
district
to
B4
Highway,
commercial
District.
Thank.
J
You
thank
German
for
the
record.
We
have
the
applicant
Martinez
Land
Development
owner.
We
have
George
Martinez
as
applicant.
We
have
Ricardo
Villarreal
as
a
representative
property
location,
approximately
1.82
Acres
located
north
of
State
Highway,
359
and
west
of
divinity
Avenue.
We
have
zone
change
from
R1
to
B4
proposed
use,
is
commercial
and
the
applicant
did
not
identify
the
specific
proposed
commercial
use.
Letter
sent
were
seven
and
we
have
none
four
and
none
against
location
view.
O
Yes,
good
evening,
Commissioners
Mr,
chairman
Manuel,
with
top
site
representing
the
applicant
this
item,
and
the
next
item
are
changes
that
we
are
requesting,
but
due
to
a
change
in
the
master
plan-
and
we
don't
have
a
specific
use
in
mind
yet
because
we're
still
very
early
on
the
planning
side,
but
getting
everything
papered
up,
as
you
would
say.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
I'm
here,
that's
the
reason
for
these
two.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
H
J
E
Sure
I'd
like
to
see
where,
where
it's
one,
where
we're
requesting
from.
O
So
the
R1
to
B4
is
because
of
a
change
in
our
buffer
for
the
future
commercial,
so
we're
entitling
the
land
with
the
B4
early
in
the
in
the
process
as
we
master
plan.
So
there
was
a
change
in
the
master
plan,
so
we
slid
some
of
the
commercial
and
the
residential
across
the
line.
So
we're
we're
swapping
it
back
to.
B
O
I
E
P
B
A
O
B
O
See
so
so,
initially
the
the
line
on
the
on
the
North
side
North
would
be
up
in
this.
In
this
picture,
the
line
was
the
the
edge
of
the
where
the
housing
and
the
commercials
swapped.
That
line
has
been
moved
further
south
and
so
that
that
little
wedge
piece
is
what
we're
going
to
convert
to
housing.
J
A
A
Motion
carries:
do
we
read
out
60
6,
you
just
go
ahead
and
go
to
motion.
We
already
read
it.
So
can
I
have
a
motion
for
item
60,
no.
A
All
the
paper
against
carries
moving
on
to
item
6f,
how
many
there's
only
ordinance
map,
let's
see,
Laredo
by
rezoni,
approximately
1.56
acre
track
of
land
situated
in
portion
38,
abstract
472,
but
laude
Sanchez
original
grantee
portion,
21,
abstract
49,
Leonardo
Garcia
original
grantee,
City
of
Laredo
Webb,
County,
Texas
being
out
of
355.725
acre
track
owned
by
Lindo
limited,
as
recorded
in
volume,
650
pages
703-706
of
the
Webb
County
deed
records,
Texas
located
south
of
Seattle,
Boulevard
and
west
of
portuguientos
road
from
r1a
single
family
residential
reduced
District
to
B3
community
business
district.
A
J
B
Mr
chairman,
just
for
the
record
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
it,
it
looks
like
the
the
site
is
shifted
down,
so
it
kind
of
looks
awkward,
but
it
shifted
down,
but
that's
that
there's
a
right
away
there,
so
they
are
on
the
corner.
They're,
not
it
just
looks
awkward.
Let's
shift
is
into
the
lesson
yeah.
A
E
J
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
We
have
applicant
Maria
aguera.
As
the
owner
applicants.
We
have
property
location
East,
one
half
of
lot.
Three
and
West
one
have
a
block:
four
block:
122
Western
Division,
located
at
1812
Houston
Street,
where
the
zone
change
request
from
a
conditional
use
permit
for
plant
nursery.
This
is
for
retail
sales
and
outside
storage.
J
The
proposed
use
is
for
plant
nursery
for
retail
sales
and
outside
storage
that
are
sent.
We
have
23,
we
have
inside
the
200
feet
notice.
We
have
zero
four
and
zero
against
outside
200
feet.
We
have
two
in
support
and
we
have
zero
against
foreign.
I
I
think
all
right
I
was
surprised
today
that
I
might
be
required.
It
was
seven
foot
tense.
I've
got
a
six
foot,
of
course
offenses
for
talking
to
me,
but
I
think
I've
got
a
six
foot
fence,
East
I
believe
it's
six.
It
may
be
a
little
bit
shorter.
I
The
Western
is
it's
six
foot
and
then
behind
me
is
an
old
brick
wall
fence,
a
clay,
brick
fence,
it's
probably
about
five
five,
something
in
height.
Is
that
something
that
that
you
can
look
at,
and
we
can
surprise
me
and
what
I.
I
Know
well,
it
contains
litter
and
I
mean
it's
it's
all.
If
there's
anyone
on
my
property,
it
stays
all
right.
No
other
questions,
no
questions.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
H
C
Not
what
are
the
questions
I'd
like
to
motion
to
approve
this
item
with
the
change
on
staff
suggestion
number
five:
how
should
we,
where
did
Mr
November.
I
C
Variance
of
one
foot
to
the
seven
feet:
that's
specified
yes,.
B
C
C
Is
less
okay,
then
motion
to
approve,
subject
to
amending
staff
condition
number
five
to
your
change
from
seven
feet,
to
a
variance
of
should
we
just
say
five
feet?
Sorry,.
A
All
in
favor
against
motion
carries
for
now
moving
on
to
the
review
and
consideration
of
the
following
master
plan:
item
7A
review
and
consideration
of
the
codes
at
win,
Winfield
master
plan.
The
attempt
is
residential,
commercial
and
institutional.
E
E
P
P
Their
work
on
the
engineering
components
of
our
project
and
Mr
chairman
Ford,
thank
you
all
for
your
service.
I,
really
appreciate
that.
So
we
have
a
I
guess,
I'll
start
with
the
easy
ones
the
ones
we
agree
with.
So
regarding
we're,
okay
with
items
two
from
the
planning,
Commons
we're
okay
with
items,
two
three
four
item:
seven,
as
shown
on
the
notes,
it
should
be
six,
but
it's
like
probably
a
little
typo
item.
P
Eight
and
nine
should
be
addressed
in
the
planning
phase
of
the
development
and
then
we're
okay
with
10
11,
12
and
13.
on
the
traffic
Commons.
We're
also
okay,
with
all
those
comments
as
well.
I'd
like
to
go
back
to
can
I
get
control,
I'd
like
to
go
back
to
items
one
and
four.
O
A
P
So
I'd
like
to
take
you
all
back
to
the
beginning,
because
this
is
now
the
third
time
we've
submitted
this
exact
same
master
plan
to
the
City
of
Laredo
and
to
three
different
commissions.
So
everybody's
new
and
I
understand
that
we've
got
new
staff
on
planning
and
zoning,
but
we've
already
done
some
improvements
out
there
right
for
uisd.
P
So
back
in
2007
we
did
a
development
called
Shiloh's.
Crossing.
Just
give
me
a
little
bit
of
time
and
it'll
all
kind
of
fit
into
place.
Shiloh
Crossing
was
a
typical
development
of
City
Standard
24
20
foot
front
set
back
five
foot
side,
setbacks,
20-foot
rear,
set
packs
when
we
finished
the
development-
and
this
keep
in
mind
was
in
2007.
We
finished
the
development
in
2009,
Mr
Killam
drove
out
there
and
came
back
into
my
office
and
basically
said
you
know,
rolly.
P
We
need
to
do
a
little
better
job
of
our
developments,
yeah
the
homes
kind
of
look
like
barracks
right.
You
just
have
this
long
row
of
homes,
20
everything's
right
at
the
20-foot
setback
line.
So
about
that
time,
I
received
this
book.
It's
called
preferbia.
It
was
a
gentleman
by
the
name
of
Rick
Harrison
he's
a
a
designer
of
what
they
call
the
coving
design,
which
is
what
we
came
up
with.
P
He
does
work
all
over
the
United
States.
He
has
a
project.
A
couple
of
projects
in
the
Rio
Grande
Valley
he's
got
several
in
San
Antonio,
some
in
Austin,
but
he's
actually
from
Minneapolis.
P
So
in
2009
we
submitted
our
first
code
master
plan
and
you
can
see
here.
The
roads
are
a
little
windy
and
curvy
we
had
uisd
at
the
time
was
going
out
for
a
bond
election,
so
they
had
three
School
sites
out
here
that
failed
and
so
Keith
sellman
at
the
time
was
the
planning
zoning
director.
He
he
approved
this
plan
and
he
actually
told
us
you
confront
arterials
with
this
type
of
design,
because
we
know
it's
not
going
to
be
a
very
typical
design.
P
He
also
said
you
can
do
bar
ditches,
which
the
city
doesn't
allow
us
to
do
because
of
the
codes,
but
thanks
to
that
effect,
so
so
this
plant
expired
feel
like
Monty
Python.
So
in
2014
we
come
back
in
uisd
passes
or
bond
election
they're
excited
to
get
started,
so
we
have
to
go
back
and
re-submit
our
master
plan.
P
P
P
P
Oops,
so
in
2014,
this
is
the
master
plan
we
got
approved
by
the
city
and,
as
you
can
see,
it's
the
same
pattern
of
Cove
roads.
Kind
of
wine,
deep
with
Nathan
asked
us
to
do,
was
to
place
the
lots
that
are
going
to
face
the
collectors,
and
you
can
see
them
there
right
and
at
no
time
were.
We
asked
to
actually
put
Lots
on
faces
on
the
all
the
other
phases,
because
it's
a
master
plan.
P
P
P
2023,
the
cities
now
plan
is,
and
let
me
go
back
real,
quick
and
you
can
see
we
have
this
two
mile
diameter
hike
and
bike
trail.
That
kind
of
touches
all
the
different
School
sites
and
the
idea
was
to
get
people
to
get
on
the
jogging
Trail
or
the
bike
trail,
and
you
can
go
to
a
school
or
you
can
exercise
at
night
or
or
to
use
it
to
for
Mobility.
P
The
circle
yeah
I'm,
sorry
because
I'm
kind
of
showing
it
here,
but
it's
up
there,
it's
the
circle.
Yes,
it's
the
two
mile
diameter,
linear
Park,
really
the
circular
Park
I
should
say
so.
P
P
We
also
Drew
in
all
the
lots
and
I
wish.
I
could
tell
you
that's
exactly
the
way
they're
going
to
be
built
in
five
to
eight
years,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
so,
but
what's
important
is
the
legend
is
at
the
maximum
density.
How
many
Lots
can
you
put
in
those
phases
right?
Because
Mr
Garcia
needs
to
know
that
so
when
you're
building
your
water
lines
and
your
sewer
lines,
You're
Building
enough
capacity?
P
P
It
still
has
to
get
annexed,
but
we
went
ahead
and
included
it
into
our
master
plan.
Just
so,
everybody
can
see
what's
happening
and
what's
going
to
be
going
on,
so
that's
kind
of
what
we're
looking
at.
So,
if
we're
asking
for
y'all
to
approve
the
master
plan
by
removing
item
one
and
if
you
remove
item
one,
it
automatically
defaults
item
number
five
which
talks
about
you
can't
be
renting
collectors
or
arterials
right.
P
So
you
asked
me
well,
rolly
I
mean
there's
probably
some
concern
with
regards
to
fronting
a
collector,
so
this
program,
or
this
master
plan
and
the
designer
contemplates
those
exact
same
issues.
P
These
50
Lots,
which
you've
already
preliminarily
approved,
which
we're
going
through
the
One-Stop
shop,
shows
the
driveways
to
have
what
we
call
Hammerheads
right.
So
you're
back
out
of
your
garage,
you
kind
of
reverse
into
a
part,
paved
area,
and
then
you
drive
forward.
We
will
have
that
in
our
covenants
conditions
and
restrictions.
P
We
look
at
every
plant
that
is
built
here
and
approve
it
as
the
decrement
of
the
subdivision
right.
So,
as
you
can
see
here,
you'll
have
this
vehicle
back
up
and
they're
driving
straight
into
it.
In
addition
to
that,
we're
not
building
20-foot
setbacks,
we're
not
requiring
a
20-foot
setback.
The
smallest
setback
we're
actually
requiring
in
these
50
Lots
is
30
feet,
so
you
can
have
that
room
to
do
that
that
most
of
these
Lots
As
you
move
towards.
P
So
we
went
back
to
that.
So
it
are
actually
setbacks
that
are
greater
than
60
feet.
So
you've
got
a
long
driveway
right,
I
have
a
I
had
a
house
in
Del
Marcy
that
my
house
was
up
front
and
I
had
a
long
driveway
to
the
backyard
where
my
carport
was,
and
so
nine
times
out
of
ten
I
would
back
up
into
Chevy
Chase,
but
you
could
I
had
enough
concrete
back
there
to
where
I
could
usually
back
up
and
then
drive
straight
through
right.
P
So
and
that's
the
concept
of
this
and
that's
how
you're
able
to
to
circumvent
the
limited
restriction
that
the
city
imposes
right,
that
is
20-foot
minimum
set
back,
which
is
what
most
people
do.
In
fact,
most
of
these
lots
are
11
000
square
feet.
P
That's
the
average,
and
most
of
the
subdivisions
coming
in
are
probably
a
little
smaller
than
that.
So
we're
trying
to
do
something
a
little
more
robust,
hopefully
Mr
Killen
will
be
happy
about
it,
so
it
can
still
have
a
job,
but
so
those
are
the
variants
that
we've
discussed
with
prior
boards
that
have
approved
and
prior
PNG
staff
and
directors.
P
So
I'll
get
off
my
soapbox
here,
but
we're
trying
to
create
a
more
livable
environment
for
our
customers.
As
you
can
see,
we've
got
these
two.
What
we're
calling
the
olymp
the
two
Olympic
rings,
not
all
of
them,
but
it's
it's
something
that
you
know
people
want
to.
We
want
them
to
feel
comfortable
in
that
community.
P
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
two
Olympic
ranks
will
create
a
very
walkable
and
hikable
subdivision
for
the
residents
of
the
coves
biggest
challenge.
We
have
is
trying
to
get
this
development
off
the
ground
living
within
the
restrictions
that
the
city
is
imposing
right
and
we
hope
that
you
all
will
see
the
enhancement
of
this
development
and-
and
we
hope
that
you
will
approve
it
subject
to
those
two
comments.
A
P
A
P
You
know
what
I
didn't
mention
about
this
design.
Is
it's
a
it's
a
coven
design
right?
It's
it's!
It's
designed
to
front
these
collectors
if,
in
addition
to
the
benefits
of
that
is-
and
you
know,
you
can
go
back
to
the
rectangle
minimums
right,
I
mean
we
probably
get
more
Lots
per
acre.
P
P
It
uses
30
percent,
less
asphalt,
so
it's
good
for
the
environment,
there's
a
lot
of
green
space.
So
our
our
hope
is
that
we
try
to
keep
as
much
natural
vegetation
as
possible
on
this
track
on
this
property,
where,
when
we
develop
Shiloh
or
when
we
develop
any
of
these
subdivisions,
you
go
in
there
and
you
wipe
everything
out
clear
out
the
vegetation
and
then
you
start
to
rebuild,
and
then
you
come
in
with
oak
trees
and
cedar
tree
whatever.
P
It
is
right
and
you
replant
everything,
so
we
hope
I
mean
so
by
using
natural
vegetation
in
some
of
the
right-of-ways.
The
idea
is
to
is,
to
hopefully
save
water
as
well,
so
it's
a
big
part
of
the
design
of
this,
and
and
hence
that's
why
we
were
able
to
get
it
approved
the
last
two
times
and
in
fact,
the
last
time
the
PMZ
director
Nathan
Bratton
insisted
that
we
show
them
on
there
so
that
everybody
knew
these
roads
were
going
to
be
fronted.
B
We
have-
and
you
know
we
do
know
that
this
is
this-
is
the
first
ters
or
the
second
curves
I
guess
you'd,
say
but
first
terms
with
a
private
company
to
try
to
do
something
they're
trying
to
be
creative
for
the
most
part,
their
designs
work
for
us
I
mean
we
they
do.
This
was
kind
of
the
only
thing
that
we
want
to
bring
here
because
of
the
curves.
But
that
being
said,
when
we
were
reviewing
this
case
this
street,
this
road
that
we're
talking
about
was
a
collector
and
he
showed
you.
B
It
was
a
collector
somewhere.
It
changed
to
an
our
arterial.
B
We're
not
sure
why,
so
he
had
it
as
a
collector.
It's
always
been
a
collector,
they
front
the
Lots,
no
problem
and
then
I
come
in
and
I
see
it
says
arterial
and
everybody's
like
well.
We
don't
remember
why
or
how
it
got
like
that.
You
know
so
that's
where
some
of
the
confusion
came
in,
but
this
is
where,
when
there's
I
guess
a
disagreement
or
you
know
the
fact
that
I'm
new
coming
in
fairly
new
and
he's
saying,
look
I
already
went
through
two
through
two
directors.
B
Now
I
have
to
go
again
and
and
I
get.
The
frustration.
I
know
he's
frustrated,
but
we
bring
it
here
to
you
all
so
that
we
can
get.
We
can
get
this
cleared.
You
know
that
way.
We
could
just
move
forward
on
this
now.
Do
they
have
to
the
the
construction
side
of
this
they'll
deal
with
that
when
it
when
they
go
to
One-Stop
shop
and
they
deal
with
the
traffic
department,
all
those
people,
so
they
still
have
the
design
to
worry
about.
Okay,.
H
B
Just
want
permission
to
front
the
road,
and
so
that
so
the
concerns
you
might
have
you
know
by
doing
the
driveways,
putting
that
as
a
restriction
that
it
has
to
be
put
in
there
helps
it's
going
to
be
a
recorded
document,
and
people
must
follow
that
I
think
we
can.
We
can
work
with
it,
but
it'd
be
really
nice
if,
if
we
can
straighten
this
out
so
that
we
can
move
forward
and
move
Beyond
this,
so
he
can
get
going
with
his
his
projects.
B
C
I
think
you're.
Is
there
a
chance
to
amend
the
future,
throw
away
FAIR
Plan
that's
coming
up
at
Council
on
Monday,
so
that
it
no
longer
reads
minor
arterial
and
goes
back
to
collector
yeah.
B
That's
a
good
question,
so
what's
going
forward
is
already
on
the
agenda,
but
what
I'm
proposing
to
do
is
after
we've
done
that
bring
it
back
around
and
make
that
change
to
a
collector.
I.
Don't
want
that
to
impact
him
today,
because
it's
going
to
take
me
a
while
to
do
that.
There's
a
process
to
it.
So
you
know
I
can
do
that,
but
I
I'm
just
concerned
that
it
might
take
it.
It
took
us
six
months
to
work
on
their
food
plan
and
I'd
hate
to
say,
yeah,
we're
gonna.
B
P
And
so,
commissioner,
Portillo
to
to
help
clarify
that
the
long-range
thoroughfare
plan
is
literally
just
sad.
It's
a
plan,
it
shows
you
where
these
arterials
and
these
collectors
should
end
up.
They
don't
have
to
end
up
exactly
because
you
know
what
there's
no
latitude
and
longitude.
In
our
case,
we
had
already
had
the
master
plan,
and
you
know
sometimes
you
wonder
why.
Why
wouldn't
they
have
just
continued
it
as
a
collector
or
was
there
something
you
know
like
I
mean
you
know,
you're
just
kind
of
like
we
had
already
built
a
section
of
it
and.
P
And-
and
there
was
already
I
mean,
there's
going
to
be
an
arterial
a
little
further
east
right,
it's
so
it's
my
position
that
you
can
say:
well,
no,
that
should
be
a
collector.
The
arterial
is
going
to
be
further
east
and,
in
my
opinion,
doesn't
have
to
go
back
to
city
council
I
mean
they
could
go
back
and
clean
it
up.
P
But
to
me,
that's
a
that's
a
cleanup.
It's
not
necessarily
something
that's
set
in
stone
because
even
the
arterial,
whether
there's
a
huge
creep
there,
I'm
not
going
to
put
an
arterial
in
the
creek
I
mean
so
you
move
it
back
and
forth
right
right,
I
think
you
have
leeway
of
half
a
mile
one
way
or
the
other
and
and
I'll
give
you
another
example.
This
thoroughfare
plan
shows
Shiloh
going
over
Loop
20
or
going
through
Luke
20.
as
a
major
arterial.
P
P
Don't
think
I
mean
it's
a
guide,
it's
not
something
set
in
stone.
That's
a
frustration.
I've
really
had
with
staff.
It's
guys
this
can
be
moved
and,
and
it's
not
even
the
right-of-way
width
right.
It's
I,
don't
want
it
from
an
arterial
right,
even
though
Mr
Selman
said
you
could
I'd
rather
not
do
that.
I'd
rather
make
sure
that
Pro
that
road
gets
from
point
A
to
point.
B
I
want
to
front
The
Collector.
C
Willing
to
make
a
motion
I
liked,
emotion,
to
approve
and
as
well
as
amending
the
comments
to
remove
planning,
comment,
one
and
five
and
I
think
that's.
A
So
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
by
commissioner
Garcia.
Yes,
all
in
favor,
aye
aye
against.
A
E
A
E
E
A
A
A
Can
I
have
a
motion
to
hear
items
9A
the
C
and
D?
If
no
one
objects
to
that
so
move.
R
Yes,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
The
item
says:
9A
final
consideration
of
the
replay
of
track.
One
and
60.48
Acres
subtract,
2,
Las
Blanca
subdivision
into
lot
one
block,
one
Gizmo
subdivision.
R
Final
consideration
of
the
read
plot
of
lot:
14
block
11
Las,
Museum,
subdivision
unit
3
and
2
lot:
14a
block
11,
Las,
Museum,
subdivision
unit.
Three,
the
intent
is
to
abandon
a
10-foot
drainage
Eastman
and
dedicate
a
15-foot
utility,
Eastman
and
15-foot
drainage.
Easement
final
consideration
of
the
replant
of
Southern
development,
Industrial
Park
unit
1
and
20.71
Acres
of
unemplotted
track
into
Southern
development
unit,
one
Midtown
commercial
Plaza.
The
intend
is
commercial.
R
Final
consideration
of
the
plot
of
Lot
1
block
1
Manila
sub
development,
subdivision
phase
three:
the
intent
is
commercial.
A
Thanks
item
antenna,
which
is
consideration
of
model
division,
compliance
considerational
model
subdivision
rule
compliance
of
the
replied
of
blog
eight
Oak
Ridge
Subdivision
into
block
eight
Lots,
one
through
nine
and
blocks
nine
Lots
one
through
fourteen
aren't
what
Estates
the
attempt
is.
Residential
I
have
a
proposed
promotion,
promotion
for
proposition.
I
H
M
B
Just
just
to
let
you
know
what
this
is,
this
is
a
model
rule,
so
there's
a
there's,
a
a
law
that
requires
that
we
guarantee
the
residential
development
30
years
of
water
right.
So
the
utilities
director
has
to
has
to
approve
that
and
then
it
has
to
come
here
as
a
formality,
so
that
we
agree
on
these
developments
that
we
we
can
service
them
for
the
next
30
Years
and
and
that's
a
that's,
a
federal
law
that
was
put
in
place
in
order
to
help
with
the
Colonia
situation.
B
So
that's
why
you're
seeing
this
it's
moral
rules,
so
it
goes
through
the
whole
process.
They
they
construct.
They
actually
are
done.
The
construction
is
done
already
so
they're
coming
in
for
the
final
just
to
to
cure.
So
you'll
see
this
coming
into
it.
Oh,
it's
a
formality
that
we've
we've
already
agreed
with
them.
Utilities
has
cleared
it.
Thank
you.
M
A
Motion
queries
before
we
adjourn.
Do
you
have
any
directive
comments.
B
Not
at
this
time
we
just
just
let
you
know
our
One-Stop
shop,
we
had
Miss
Teresa
Esparza
that
had
been
with
around
for
25
years,
maybe
and
she
just
retired
and
she
used
to
she
worked
in
engineering.
She
would
review
those
plans
tomorrow,
who's
with
utilities,
he'd
been
with
the
city
for
20
plus
years,
also
he's
retiring,
so
we're
we're
yeah.
It's
been
a
bit
a
while
some
of
the
engineers
have
worked
with
them.
Some
might
jump
up
and
down
and
cheer
that's
a
whole
different
story,
but
we
are.
B
We
are
getting
a
new
staff
coming
in,
so
that's
something
that
we're
going
to
be
on
top
of
because
they're
new
they're
coming
in
and
we're
going
to
have
to
make
sure
that
they
learn
the
process
so,
but
we
thank
them
for
their
service
to
the
community.
Yes,
thank
you
wish
him
the.