►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 042122
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 042122
A
C
A
A
A
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record.
We
have
killing
ranch
property
owner
rockefeller
an
applicant,
and
we
have
rolando
ortiz,
representative
property
location,
approximately
147.94
acres,
located
west
of
babulak,
loop
and
south
of
university
boulevard.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
aj
to
a
b4
proposed
use,
is
commercial
letter
sent
51?
We
have
one
for
and
then
for
against
location
view,
aerial
view
street
view.
C
A
All
right
does
anybody
have
any
questions
for
mr
martinez
from
the
commission.
Thank
you
for
your
comments,
I'll
be
carrying
anybody
else.
Who
wishes
to
speak?
I'm
sorry
I'll,
wait
for
after
the
call.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Anybody
else
wish
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
zone,
change
in
favor
of
the
zone,
change.
A
G
H
D
D
Just
really
really
it's
just
the
the
transition
into
the
neighborhood
on
casa
verde.
As
far
as
I
know,
it
runs
from.
I
understand
all
the
the
frontage
off
the
loop
and
maybe
even
university,
but
it's
that
pocket
there
next
to
the
neighborhood
that
maybe
we
parking
in
the
street
as
far
as
whatever
uses
would
be
there
for
those
neighbors.
But
just
wondering
that's
why
I
was
wondering
all
right:
okay,.
A
A
The
next
item
is
a
minion
is
only
map
of
the
city
loreto
by
authorizing
divisions
of
special
use,
permit
for
restaurant
serving
alcohol
and
approximately
3.54
acres.
This
is
situated
in
fortune
25
of
one
garcia,
original
grantee,
abstract
fifties
in
louis
webb,
county
texas,
being
out
of
that
certain
1
450
acre
land
conveyed
to
the
finance
alexandria.
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
truman.
For
the
record,
we
have
emma
commercial
inc,
llc
owner,
we
have
ortega's
restaurant
llc
applicant
and
we
have
daniel
de
hedina's,
representative
property
location,
3.54,
acres,
located
south
of
del
mar
boulevard
and
west
of
john
b
alexander
parkway
suite
1,
and
the
square
footage
is
eight
thousand
three
hundred
and
eighty
three
feet.
C
We
have
the
zone
change
request,
which
is
a
special
use
permit
for
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol
proposed
use,
is
for
restaurant
serving
alcohol
letter
cents.
We
have
22
and
inside
the
200
feet
we
have
none
for
and
then
against
outside
the
200
feet.
Radius.
We
have
four
against
in
four
for
the
for
the
zone,
change
and
then
against.
C
B
Yes,
mr
chairman,
you
know
we
at
first
when
this
the
the
applicant
came
forward
with
this
item.
There
was
lit
very
little
information
that
was
supplied
to
us
there.
We
just
really
didn't
have
any
information.
Yesterday
morning
the
owner
came
in
with
his
representative
to
explain
the
project
to
show
us
what
they
were
going
to
do.
B
F
F
A
quick
overview
on
emami
plaza:
the
project
developer
is
rameen
emami.
He
has
built
hundreds
of
custom
homes
in
alexander
states.
He
has
secured
a
really
really
good
reputation,
as
a
quality
builder,
obviously
he's
very,
very
invested
in
alexander
because
he
has
a
contract
with
alexander
to
build
homes
there
and,
as
everybody
knows,
it's
pretty
difficult
to
get
lots
right
now
right,
so
obviously
he
would
never
develop
anything
that
would
hurt
right
alexander.
F
He
is
now
delving
into
full-scale
commercial,
real
estate
development.
Sorry,
so
the
vision
for
the
site
is
really
an
upscale
neighborhood
retail
center
34
000
square
feet.
The
proposed
occupants
are
traditional,
traditional
neighborhood
businesses
and
services
right
so
hair
salon,
financial
services
boutiques-
and
if
approved
this
one
restaurant
serving
alcohol
now
we
will
not
have
any
more
restaurants
at
this
site.
F
F
F
Okay,
so
very
quick
overview
on
the
suv.
The
proposed
operator
is
mr
ricardo
gisi.
He
is
the
owner
of
three
takosukisi
locations.
He
has
built
a
great
reputation
as
an
experienced
and
successful
restaurant
owner
operator.
Now
he
is
in
the
restaurant
business
and
that
is
his
intent.
His
intent
is
to
build
a
restaurant
that
is
complimented
with
alcohol.
Okay,
this
is
not
going
to
be
a
bar.
F
The
vision
is
upscale.
Restaurants
serving
steak
seafood
sushi
mexican
food
as
well
as
adult
beverages.
The
total
interior
square
footage
is
5
000
square
feet
of
that
2000
is
kitchen
and
prep.
So
it's
really
three
thousand
is
only
dining
area.
With
a
very
nice
outdoor
covered
patio
of
about
3
300
square
feet,.
F
So
it
will
not
have
live
music,
it
will
never
have
live
music,
and
that
has
been
confirmed
by
mr
kisi,
and
that
has
been
confirmed
by
the
owner
of
the
entire
retail
center.
It's
not
a
bar,
it's
not
a
cantina,
it's
not
a
nightclub.
This
is
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol
similar
to
border
foundry
republica
across
the
street
chiles
danny's.
F
F
J
J
K
B
L
A
F
M
K
M
M
I
M
M
We
only
have
undeveloped
land,
so
if
we
were
to
to
even
assume
that
that's
going
to
be
built
and
if
we
move
to
approve
or
even
deny
it
see,
we're
assuming
that
we're
making
a
a
motion
or
a
decision
on
something
that
is
not
existing,
because
the
permit
is
very
clear,
I
mean
the
description
of
the
special
news.
Permit
they're,
very
clear.
A
special
juice
permit
is
permitted
for
those
restaurants.
M
M
I
would
say
that
if
you,
if
you
bring
something
more
than
a
video
once
we
have
facts
that
we
can
even
prepare
to
protect
ourselves,
let
me
tell
you
and
I'll
be
I'll,
be
brief,
that
we
can
protect
this
board
again,
making
a
decision
against
the
ordinance,
because
if
we
approve
it
or
we
deny
it
we'll
be
going
against
the
ordinance,
because
the
order
is
very
clear.
He
talks
about
a
restaurant
that
it
already
exists,
yeah,
so
yeah,
that's
the
way.
I
see
it,
that's
the
way
I
read
it.
Thank
you.
A
We
don't
have
that
facility
in
place
right
now.
The
concept
is
great,
don't
get
us
wrong.
Everything
is
beautiful.
I
think
it's,
the
mechanics
that
we're
in
right
now
that's
a
problem
because
a
special
use
permit
has
to
be
issued
to
a
restaurant.
That's
in
existence.
We
don't
have
one
in
existence.
So
what.
A
B
E
If
I
may
I
mean
I'm,
I
am
in
favor
of
this
best
use
permit,
because
there
are
many
times
and
of
course,
you've
seen
it
more
than
I
have
here
on
the
commission
that
somebody
comes
to
apply
for
a
special
use
permit
and
once
it's
given
then
they're
able
to
pursue
opening
the
restaurant.
There
are
many
times
that
we
have
shell
commercial
buildings
that
says:
okay.
If
you
can
get
that
special
use
permit,
we
will
continue
with
our
lease
we
haven't.
We
have
an
intended
lease
and
it's
contingent
on.
E
L
L
M
We're
missing
the
point
here,
we're
missing
the
point
here,
commissioners,
we're
missing
the
point:
okay,
it's
not
about
mr
kisia.
I
know
mr
kisi
and
and
and
and
I
like
the
project.
The
point
is
that
we're
gonna
make
a
motion
against
the
ordinance.
The
restaurant
is
not
built.
It's
not
there's.
No,
nothing.
F
F
Is
already
planted,
the
construction
plans
are
already
at
the
building
department
and
I
expect
to
get
building
permit
for
the
entire
shell
within
a
week.
So
it's
everything's
already
pretty
much
been
reviewed.
We've
submitted
the
revision,
so
the
plans
are
a
building
already.
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
be
automatically
doing.
That
is
what
we're
going
to
do.
P
M
M
K
M
O
J
J
B
I
I
I
B
Then
might
lose
his
tenant,
he
might
lose
his
anchor
and
because
of
an
interpretation
and-
and
I
think
that's
that
is-
that
is
something
that
we
have
to
consider
when
you're.
Considering
this
I
mean
in
good
faith,
they
have
submitted
their
plans
for
the
building.
They
have
submitted
the
plans
you
can
see,
they
spent
money
on
what
the
concept
is
going
to
be.
B
This,
this
builder
is
building
houses
in
alexandria,
states
and
the
alexander
investment
group
chose
them
to
sell
this
property
to
them
because
they
see
the
work
that
they've
been
doing
so
there's
a
history
here
like
you're,
saying,
there's,
there's
a
history
here
to
this,
and
you
know
I
would
hate
to
see
investors
shy
away.
I
think
del
mar
boulevard
is
trending
to
be
very
nice
with
its
shops
and
everything-
and
this
is
just
a
continuation
of
that.
A
A
I
I
A
M
To
make
a
real
quick
comment,
mr
sherman,
and
I
don't
agree
with
the
commissioners-
I
don't
agree
and
in
orlando
navarro,
sir
you're
supposed
to
to
enforce
your
names
and
right
now
you
are
not
enforcing
the
ordinance
and-
and
I
don't
agree
with
that-
it
was
only
a
comment
because
I
read
it
came
before
us.
We
already
told
them
that
we
would
give
them
the
special
use
permit
and
if
anything,
it's
a
proof.
M
R
Right,
yes,
ma'am.
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
I
completely
understand
commissioner
dominguez
concerns
to
protect
the
ordinance,
and
I
also
believe
we
should
protect
the
ordinance.
But
I
think
that
this
commission
should
also
protect
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance
which
I
think
calls
for
the
the
public
to
be
protected,
which
I
think
we
are
ensuring
that
that
happens
by
adding
all
of
this
regulation
to
the
sup.
R
But
I
think,
like
there's
a
lot
more
to
lose
if
this
doesn't
move
forward,
because
this
is
a
great
project
that
I
think
it's
needed
and
will
totally
benefit
everyone
that
lives
around
it.
That
that's
that's
what
the
comprehensive
plan
calls
for
properties
that
can
that
can
provide
or
walk
to
services
walk
to
restaurants,
and
I
think
I
think
it's
a
perfect
location
for
this
kind
of
project.
So
I
think
like
whether
this
gets
approved
in
a
week
or
two.
I
think
the
protections
are
already
embedded
within
the
the
suv.
Okay,
all
right.
A
All
right,
let
me
continue
with
this
public
hearing.
Do
you
guys
have
anything
else
to
add
on
on
approval?
If
not,
I
want
to
thank
you
very
much
and
I'm
going
to
continue
with
the
public
hearing
all
right.
Thank
you
all
right.
This
is
the
public
hearing.
Anybody
else
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
in
favor
of
this
special
use.
Permit.
D
All
right,
yeah,
just
the
plan
of
the
patio-
that's
like
half
of
the
design
of
the
building
is
going
to
be
outside.
Is
that
what
I
was
seeing
danny
on
the
site
plan,
so
so
we're
going
to
have
how
many
tables
are
going
to
be
able
to
be
and
how
many
people
are
going
to
be
outside
if
it's
at
its
capacity.
K
D
D
E
B
What
happened
is
typically
yeah.
You
go
by
the
business
and
the
hours
of
the
business
somewhere
yeah.
So
right
we
went
by
the
square
footage
of
each
location
right
and
did
the
maximum
right.
So
they
come
up
short
40,
but
I
believe
that
because
we
hit
the
maximum
we're
over,
but
you
know
we're
gonna
have
to
you
know,
adjust
that
accordingly,
as
as.
B
D
B
M
A
A
A
The
next
item
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
directed
by
authorized
endangerment.
So
a
special
use
permit
for
restaurant
selling
alcohol
on
lots,
one
and
two
block
three:
the
lady
height
subdivision
units
three
and
lot
three
block
three
kalady
height
subdivision
unit,
two
located
3902
3910
and
3920
east
del
mar
boulevard,
respectively,
suites,
205
and
206..
S
Mr
chairman,
for
the
record
applicant
is
kalady
heights,
plaza
llc,
owner
enf,
entertainment
is
the
representative
and
the
applicant
and
property
location
is
lots.
One
and
two
block
three
collated
height
subdivision
unit.
Three
unlock
three
block:
three:
sorry
about
that.
Okay,
today
subdivision
unit
two
located
at
three
3902
3910
and
39
20
east
del
mar
boulevard,
respectively,
suites,
205
and
206.
Only
the
zone
change
request
is
a
special
use.
Premiere
for
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol.
S
A
T
T
We
are
going
to
be
serving
mexican
cuisine,
it's
going
to
be
monterrey,
guadalajara
style
of
restaurant,
that
has
upscale
service,
upscale
drinks
and
and
food
menu,
with
a
unique
dining
experience
to
laredo.
That
will
have
a
garden
in
the
patio
for
brunch
and
of
that
sort.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
this
picture
here,
but
let
me
try
to
get
a
better
one.
T
The
location
is
was
currently
and
previously
what
was
previously
another
restaurant,
that's
where
the
location
is
actually
at.
So
if
you're
familiar
with
that
area,
that's
that's
the
space
that
we're
moving
into
the
special
permit
will
be
able
to
open
up
this
restaurant
and
keep
serving
the
community.
A
E
A
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Here
we
have
the
monaco
self
storage,
which
are
the
owners
we
have
holland,
engineering,
which
is
applicant
and
representative.
We
have
the
property
location,
not
two
block.
Two
monaco
subdivision
located
at
9416
mcpherson
road
zone
change,
request
an
amendment
of
a
species
permit
for
many
storage,
proposed
uses
of
any
storage
letter
sent
14
and
then
four
none
against.
A
B
A
U
Mr
chairman,
commissioner,
jimenez
with
howling
engineering
representing
the
developer,
I
heard
you
had
a
question
on
the
floodplain.
As
I
remember
the
path,
there
is
no
it's
not
under
the
flip.
It's
almost
flipping
and
yeah.
Like
mr
navarro
said,
it's
basically
changing
from
outdoor
to
ac
condition
units
and
it's
gonna
look
exactly
like
the
building.
That's
existing
now
so,
and
we're
actually
gonna
add
more
landscape,
we're
going
to
add
more
lasting
landscape
to
the
existing
and
along
monaco
for
the
new
edition.
Okay,.
M
M
G
No
there's
no
way
go
ahead.
Yeah
excuse
me
in
the
previous
ordinance
the
site
plan
and
in
fact,
for
all
sups
and
crps.
The
site
plan
are
attached
right,
so
here
they
have
to
exactly
match
what
was
approved
on
the
site
plan
in
their
previous
site
plan.
It
showed
three
separate
buildings.
Now
the
site
plan
as
you'll
see
it's
one
large
indoor
building.
Well,
that's
why
they
have
to
come
back
and
get
them
changed.
G
S
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
applicant
is
victor
espinosa
he's
owner
and
the
applicant
a
proper
description
location
is
a
lot
three
block.
One
dcaf
mine's
road
subdivision
located
at
16,
101,
fm
1472.,
don't
choose
request,
is
a
b3
to
a
b4.
The
proposed
use
is
an
ac
mechanic
shot
letter
sent
for
22
four
zero
against
zero.
S
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
M
M
A
V
I
C
V
A
A
Mr
chairman,
okay,
we
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second?
Okay,
all
those
in
favor?
The
motion
signified
by
saying
aye
aye,
all
right,
those
against
ocean
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item,
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
a
voluntary
annexation,
an
initial
zoning
of
b4
on
track
of
land,
totaling
3.2910.
A
B
Q
A
Q
So,
first
of
all,
on
from
the
get-go
we
did
reach
out
to
the
county,
the
county
does
have
as
well
junkyard
screening
order.
Okay,
we
did
find
is
that
they
do
have
some
compliance
issues
with
the
county
so
from
the
get-go
coming
in.
They
already
have
some
compliances
with
the
city,
so
it
might
be
kind
of
advantageous
to
take
care
of
those.
First,
that's
one
thing,
and
then
number
two
is
on
the
initial
zoning,
which
we
couldn't
quite
understand.
Q
They
did
ask
for
a
b4,
but
for
the
initial
zone
at
least
an
m1
or
higher,
and
if
the
use
is
a
little
more
intensive,
they
would
need
a
special
use
from
it
as
well.
So
that's
kind
of
where
we
were
okay,
but
mostly
it's
an
issue
of
compliance
they're,
not
quite
in
compliance
at
this
time.
Okay,
and
that
you
are
correct.
There
are
a
lot
of
junkyards
on
yeah.
A
K
A
Q
A
A
A
A
B
J
B
A
A
A
We
do
this,
I
mean
that's
it's
very
important
for
us.
If
the
city
staff
engineers
are
here,
yes,
that
the
engineer
was
working
on,
the
project
represent
the
applicant,
it's
very
critical,
yes,
so
we'll
probably
be
adhering
to
that
rule
from
here
and
on
into
the
future.
Now
that
we're
back
in
person,
okay,
all
right!
Q
Q
A
A
J
O
A
And
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
those
against
promotion
carries
next
step.
Is
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
volunteer
annexation
and
initials
only
on
b3
on
a
tractor
land
total
in
5.03
acres,
more
or
less
known
as
the
annexation
track
4,
and
it
is
located
east
of
luke
20
and
bob
bullock,
loop
and
north
of
east
del
mar
boulevard.
Q
I
Q
A
A
O
O
O
A
I
G
A
Hi
all
right,
those
against
motion
carries
next
time,
is
public
hearing
recommendation
for
an
ordinance
for
a
volunteer
annexation,
an
initial
zoning
of
b4,
m1
and
m2
on
a
track
of
land,
totally
876.25
acres,
it's
described
by
meats
and
violence,
known
as
annexation
track,
five
located
west
of
interstate
35
and
south
of
us
highway
83,
and
I
believe
this.
This
was
known
as
a
twist
ranch.
If
I'm
a
mistaken,
that's
correct,
I
think
I
saw
it
somewhere.
A
Second,
motion
that
we
have-
second,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
hi
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Next
item
is
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
volunteer
annexation
and
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
the
track
of
land
total
in
288.2131
acres,
located
west
of
fm
1472
and
north
of
idaho
road.
Q
A
J
A
Second,
second
yep,
I'm
sorry
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
next
item.
We
have
is
a
review
consideration
of
the
following
master
plan
review
and
the
revision
of
the
pinnacle
industrial
center
master
plan,
the
antennas
industrial.
The
purpose
of
the
revision
is
to
realign
streets
and
increase
the
acreage
of
the
master
plan
by
adding
unit
13.
A
Sorry
you're
right,
you're,
absolutely
correct.
Let
me
back
up
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
with
voluntary
annexation
of
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
track
of
land,
totaling,
29.6653,
acres,
more
or
less
described,
by
meets
and
bounds
with
attachment,
a
known
as
annexation
track,
seven
guilt
and
track
located
west
of
fm
1472
and
north
of
illinois.
Road.
Q
Q
B
All
the
way
through
this
area
is
that,
yes,
in
fact,
yesterday
there
was
an
mpo
meeting
and
they
they
asked
the
mpo
to
pick
it
up
a
notch
as
far
as
getting
the
river
road
study
done.
Okay,
so
and
we'll
actually,
mr
gilpin's
been
very
helpful.
We're
getting
a
lot
of
the
landowners
to
participate
in
that
study
so
that
we
could
really
come
together
with
an
alignment
for
the
river
road.
W
I
W
All
right
again,
jack
gilpin
for
the
record.
I've
got
a
lot
of
time
invested
in
the
area,
including
riverbank
road
prior
to
even
being
working
in
this
immediate
area.
I
was
working
on
riverbank
road,
probably
15
or
20
years
ago.
I
have
a
lot
of
interest
in
it
and
I
ended
up
buying
a
property
out
there
and
I'm
very
interested
in
having
river
bank
road
operate
as
a
for
automobiles
only,
and
so
this
is
all
aimed
at
that
in
our
our
group.
W
I
W
I
W
I
would
say
roughly
about
50
of
the
of
the
total
length
of
it,
and
so
we're
committed
in
this
area
to
having
that
road
work
out
that
way
and
we're
understanding
through
the
planning
department
that
our
some
of
our
neighbors
further
towards
our
chief
have
some
pretty
big
stretches
are
also
committed.
So
I
think
we're
improving
the
chances
of
getting
that
done.
Someday
perfect.
Thank.
A
P
W
A
W
Well,
our
our
master
plan
has
a
total
of
seven
connecting
points
out
of
our
area
to
other
roads,
and
I
think
we
have
four
of
them
to
mines,
road
and
three
of
them
elsewhere.
So
that's
a
lot
more
connections
than
any
industrial
area
has
had
to
date.
So
we
have.
We
have
traffic
impact
analysis
that
we
do
as
we
go
along
and.
W
K
B
Well,
we
have.
We
have
two
overpasses,
if
you,
if
you
look
at
this
picture,
the
top
yellow
yeah,
that's
going
to
connect
connect
to
la
siendas
road
they're,
going
to
be
routeless
and
connect
that
with
an
overpass
heading
to
35
and
then
further
south,
the
the
purple.
I
call
it
purple,
which
is
number
five.
W
A
P
A
H
H
D
There
a
picture
of
the
old
master
plan,
then
the
new
one,
the
way
it's
changed,
but
I'm
asking
staff.
I'm
sorry,
do
you
have
a
copy
of
the
way
because
I'm
looking
at
you
said
face
15
right.
We
just
kind
of
this
whole
area.
Here
when
I'm
looking
on
my
map,
I
was
just
trying
to
see
how
the
new
residentials
went.
Is
it
a
whole
area?
Is
going
to
be
residential
now,
like.
M
O
A
O
P
X
B
A
B
C
A
To
approve
that
motion
we
have
a
second
second
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
all
right.
Next
item
is
preliminary
consideration
of
preliminary
plats
and
preliminary
response
glory
consideration
of
the
platinum,
lock,
one
block
two
alexander
commercial
subdivision:
phase:
15
intense
commercial.
P
I
H
A
A
I
A
P
Y
Y
Number
two:
it
says:
primary
access
for
the
proposed
load
4b
since
crescent
loop
is
38,
which
it
is
a
planet
lot.
So
I
don't
know
why
I
started,
but
I
what
right
now
the
way
I
was
proposing
the
replay
is:
I
had
a
24
interior
access,
easement
that
was
given
a
cross
access
to
both
lots
to
to
both
streets,
but
since
a
crescent
is,
is
only
a
38
feet
now
the
main
thing
is
for
lot
4b
and
if
you
could
go
to
that,
let
me
let
me
bring.
Y
Y
Access
to
to
the
arena
road
to
not
for
me
would
be
we're
going
to
increase
this
one
to
50,
and
we
can
do
that
and
we
actually,
you
know
the
lord
currently
has
31
with
the
exception
you
know
on
the
entrance
is
24,
but
from
there
it
opens
to
31
and
more
so
that
was
the
what
I
was
gonna.
We
will
concord
with
it
and
provide
the
15
for
the
access
easement,
but
also
we
would
like
to
have
the
variance
just
for
the
entrance.
A
Y
A
A
That's
what
I'm
saying
you
know,
I
mean
you
have
a
driveway
already
that's
working
yeah.
I
don't
see
a
need
to
increase
it.
I
mean
this
is
internal
circulation.
I
agree.
That's
all
that
is
that's.
There's
nothing
else
there
that
is
it
through
straight
in
the
future
or
anything
like
that.
It's
a
dead-end
plant.
B
A
Q
L
L
A
A
street
minimum
30
feet
the
way
the
ordinance
is
written.
It
requires
a
50
foot
right
away
because
I
really
don't
see
a
need
for
a
50
foot
right
away.
If
you
just
need
a
street,
I
mean
that's
the
way
I
see
it.
I
mean.
What
are
we
going
to
do?
Are
we
going
to
put
sidewalks
in
this
property?
No,
are
we
going
to
put
utilities?
A
No,
we
already
have
the
access
utility
eastman,
so
I
don't
see
the
need
for
a
50
foot
right
away.
I
don't
see
it.
I
see
the
need
for
the
30
foot
minimum
street
to
get
you
in
and
out.
I
would
recommend
that
we
just
say
30
feet
street
and
that's
the
end
of
that
yeah.
I
would
just
say
it
would
be
more
of
a
hazard
if
you
try
to
put
a
sidewalk
on
this
thing
within
an
existing.
A
I
I
Y
Z
Usually
if
you
had
to
go
over
transverse
or
drive
over
300
feet
in
a
commercial,
we
were
asking
for
hydrants
but,
as
you
know,
we
recently
adopted
the
2018
fire
code
and
to
address
this
particular
situation.
We
changed
our
amendment
to
read
on
new
private
and
new
public
streets,
so
in
this
instance
we
can
actually
strike
that
comment,
because
this
is
not
a
new
street.
It's
an
existing
street.
We
don't
want
people
tearing
up
streets
that
are
already
there.
So
in.
I
G
N
Mr
chairman,
commissioner
engineer,
I
know
we
discussed
this
item
originally
when
we
met
internally,
but
right
now
when
I
was
listening,
I
heard
about
the
access
easement
there's
a
section,
the
ordinance
that
that
talks
about
the
pavement
section.
So
if
there's
something
that's
already
developed,
if
you
label
it
as
an
access
easement,
they
may
need
to
comply
with
the
thickness
of
the
payment
and
the
base
requirements.
So
that's
something
I
just
want
to
make
the
commission
aware
I'll
have
to
look
at
that
section
of
the
organization.
J
Y
A
A
A
A
A
P
X
A
P
B
Inherited
or
excuse
me,
he
bought
this
property
and
I
know
he's
not
familiar
with
some
of
the
nightmares
out
there.
Yeah
we're
asking
staff
is
asking
to
consider
a
a
variance
to
the
entrance
at
30
feet
in
order
to
make
this
work
because
he's
dealing
with
issues
that
happen
in
the
early
80s,
and
so
we
thought
this
was
a
good
candidate
for
variants.
But
we
want
to
bring
that
to
your
attention
before
they.
A
Yeah,
because
that
was
going
to
be
one
of
my
questions
I
said
I
mean:
what's
the
access
point
coming
there
more,
is
it
coming
after
me?
It's
still
a
private
street.
So
you
know
this
becomes
an
issue.
That's
why
I
was.
I
can
see
a
connection
there
to
this
property.
I
think
that's
a
connection
or
maybe
a
lot.
C
X
Again,
my
name
is
ramirez.
I
work
for
christian
engineering.
I
am
representing
my
client,
dr
eliot
acevedo,
and
he
bought
this.
This
property
is
adjacent
to
you
know,
probably
to
the
west
and
there's
an
existing
30
foot.
Access
is
meant
at
the
moment
and
that's
where
that's
how
he
can
access.
He
can
access
his
breakfast,
the
neighbor
to
the
west.
Already,
you
know,
has
a
very
beautiful
home
and
he
has
you
know
a
fence,
a
vegetation,
and
you
know
it's
set
right
there
on
the
30
foot
width.
X
So
we
for
coming
number
two
dr
acevedo
is
willing
to
do
the
you
know
the
entrance
up
to
his
property
as
per
as
per
city
ordinance,
you
know,
or
as
much
as
it
would
allow
him
that
that
fence
that
you
see
there's
no
longer
there.
It's
a
very
you
know:
nice
block,
six
foot
fence
with
stucco
and
and
everything.
So
it's
it's
not
the
way
it's
shown
on
that
picture.
B
A
Well,
it
depends
on
how
the
property
is
situated.
I
mean
that
needed
they
have,
they
have
plenty,
they
can
do
a
roof
around
the
proper
properties.
Four
acres
right,
four
acres,
yeah
correct-
so
I
mean
it
just
depends
on
on
how
the
properties
develop.
You
might
be
able
to
just
do
a
ring
roll
around
it
or
whatever.
B
X
There's
an
existing
block
fence
through
there
and
that's
how
the
doctor
can
get
to
his
property
and
just
to
further
elaborate
on
this
he's
maintaining.
As
of
now
that
property
has
r1,
he
just
wants
to.
You
know
right
now,
like
a
demolished
home,
he
just
wants
to
build
down
at
home.
He's
not
you
know,
he's
not
going
to
generate
a
lot
of
traffic,
it's
just
to
access
his
rights,
and
he
right
now
is
granting
access
to
his
neighbor
on
the
east,
which
is
this
neighbor
through
there.
X
X
X
A
B
B
A
And
then
we're
okay
with
what
his
request
is
for
only
a
30
foot,
wide
pavement
section
and
no
30
foot
and
the
rest
you'll
deal
with
no
50
foot,
okay,
so
it'll
be
30.
Foot
eastman
and
road
up
to
the
edge
of
the
property
is
what
you're
asking
correct
to
the
edge
of
our
property,
the
entrance
to
the
property
right
now.
The
question
that
comes
up
is
what
you
mentioned.
You
mentioned
the
culver
sack
so
I'll.
Leave
it
up
to
them
to
to
to
reuben.
Is
here
ruben.
Z
A
O
R
A
A
A
A
A
I
B
One
last
note
before
adjournment,
I'd
like
to
introduce
luis
vasquez
he's
sitting
right
back
over
there
he's
our
new
planner
one.
I
failed
to
introduce
him
at
the
last
meeting,
so
he
comes
with
great
credentials
out
of
tamiyu
and
he's
now
on
board
with
us.
So
we
have
another
planner
welcome.
Welcome!
So
what
you're?
Seeing
there
is
a
good
portion
of
the
of
the
main
group.
B
B
D
Very
good,
thank
you,
mr
naughton.
I
know
part
of
the
ordinance
is
for
this
commission
to
do
a
few.
I
guess
hours
or
training
on.
I
guess
it's
pandemic
on
conferences
and
stuff.
So
I
know
we
have
a
texas
american
planning
association
conference
and
then
I
know,
there's
a
national
one
and
I
know
there's
a
law
conference
out
of
austin
also
for
planners,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
going
to
come
up
anytime
soon
or
but
I
know
it's
part
of
the
ordinance
I'll
go
at
least
two.
So.