►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 042023
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 042023
A
C
B
The
record
Mr
chairman
you
do
that
Forum.
Thank
you.
I
know
Mr,
commissioner,
on
the
contact
me
that
he
has
gonna
miss
today's
meeting
with
anybody
else.
Contact
or
at
Street
excuse
no.
Okay.
Can
we
have
a
motion
to
excuse
those
so
moved?
Second,
all
in
favor
and
let's
go
ahead
and
stand
for
the
pledge
allegiance,
I
pledge
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation
under
God
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all
foreign.
F
B
G
You
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
We
have
the
applicant
of
Vortex
properties
owner.
We
have
Nancy
Martinez.
As
a
representative,
we
have
property
location,
not
one
block.
1749
South
View
repat
phase
two
located
at
2901
Arden
Street.
We
have
a
zone
change
request
from
an
R1
to
an
R2
proposed
use
is
a
duplex
letter
sent
is
20
and
we
have
none
for
none
against
location
view,
aerial
view,
street
view,
zone
change,
signage,.
B
B
H
B
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
All
in
favor
against
motion
carries
moving
on
to
5c
amending
his
own
ordinance,
let's
see
in
related
by
rezoning
approximately
for
4115.56
square
feet,
track
of
land
being
all
that
track
of
land
described
in
volume,
5346,
page
871,
County,
official
public
records
at
Webb,
County,
Texas
and
being
the
east
of
18.52
feet
of
Lot
4
block
79
City
of
Laredo
Western
Division
and
the
West
18.52
feet
of
lot.
B
I
J
F
M
J
Victory
not
just
for
the
record
if
I
could
have
the
projector.
This
is
the
design
that
the
that
the
owner
has
for
this
lot
is
for
single
family
use.
It's
a
two
bedroom
one
bathroom
and,
and
we
do
have
to
meet
a
city
requirements
when
it
comes
to
parking
and
in
this
case
r1b
does
require
three
parking
spaces,
and,
and
so,
when
it
gets
to
the
building
permit,
we
should
be
complying
with
that
restriction
or
condition.
I
should
say
thanks
for
the
clarification
on
that.
D
It's
the
it's.
The
size
of
the
lot
was
smaller
than
okay,
so
there's
a
little
bit
of
History
here,
but
we
just
recently
adjusted
our
ordinance
to
where
we
we
allowed
for
a
smaller
lot
for
a
home
and
because,
before
this
was
so
small
it
it
wouldn't
our
our
ordinances
wouldn't
allow
for
anything
to
be
built
on
this
property.
We
since
changed
that
so
that
they
could
put
one
home
on
there,
and
so
that's
what
he's
doing.
B
B
Yeah
motion
a
second
all
in
favor
aye
against
motion,
carries
moving
on
to
item
5D
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map,
the
same
Operator
by
Arizona,
approximately
15.32
acre
track
of
land
being
out
of
called
what
were
called
19.833
acre
track
of
man
described
in
volume,
4573
page
469,
Webb,
County,
official
public
records,
wet
Pine
Texas
all
about
one
block.
One
Weatherford
subdivision
phase
one
as
shown
in
volume,
24,
page
48,
webcomicat
records
and
all
of
a
10
acre
track
track.
B
17,
recording
volume,
3813
page
212,
Webb,
County,
official
Public,
Records
West,
County
Texas,
and
of
a
called
4.84
acre
track
track.
18
recorded
in
volume,
1107
page
880,
Webb,
County,
official
public
records,
webcam
Texas
and
olive
called
5.00
Acres,
recording
the
volume
1142
page
71,
Webb,
County
official
public
records,
webcam
Texas
and
olive
called
theme
portion,
of
course,
here
on
32,
abstract,
296,
Antonio,
Trevino
original
t
with
Kai
Texas,
located
south
of
State
Highway
59
and
east
of
Old
Milwaukee
Road
from
r1a
single
family.
This
area
District
to
M1
light
manufacturing,
District.
I
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record
applications,
Services
LLC
owner
Francisco,
Ramos,
PE,
rpls,
applicant
and
representative
property
description,
location,
approximately
15.32,
Acres,
track
of
land
located
south
of
State
Highway,
359
and
east
of
ulna
Rocky
Road.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
an
r1a
to
an
M1,
and
the
proposed
use
is
industrial
warehousing
that
are
sent
at
13,
4-0,
Against,
One
location
view,
Ariel
real
street
view,
so
change
signage
donate
overview.
I
O
Good
evening,
Mr
chairman
member
of
the
board,
I
apologize
for
the
very
long
Preamble
that
I
wrote
last
effect
to
go
all
the
way
to
Target.
Whenever
I
read
the
legal
descriptions,
three
Frederick
Francisco
Ramos
Ramos
engineering,
we're
here
representing
the
owner,
we're
in
favor
of
the
zone.
Change.
If
you
guys
have
any
questions,
we'll
prepare
to
answer.
O
So
right
now
the
the
landowner
they
actually
own
a
lot
one
block,
one
of
Weatherford
of
the
winter
subdivision,
which
is
just
this
guy
up
here:
they're
going
they're
going
in
for
a
repat,
and
they
want
to
repat.
So
that
way
they
can
use
the
whole
land
and
expand
the
business
that
they
have.
There
already
I
think
the
the
purpose
of
of
the
repat
will
be
to
have
a
warehouse
in
there
with
parking
and
and
Warehouse.
P
D
D
That's
the
Laredo
landfill
so
up
to
EG
ranch,
we're
looking
at
you
know,
keeping
that
under
the
M1
and
not
putting
residential
right
there
well
I'm,
not
saying
keeping
your
M1
but
we'll
receive
applications
for
you
know
on
that,
but
only
up
to
that
point
because
of
the
the
landfill
on
the
other
side.
Okay,.
P
B
I
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record
sales
International
LTD
owner
Gonzalez
applicant
Cornerstone,
land
use,
Consulting,
LLC,
Daniel,
tahirina
junior
is
a
representative
property
location
description
is
lot
one
block
one.
Let's
floating
subdivision
phase,
one
located
at
102,
floral
Boulevard.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
a
B3
to
a
B4.
The
purple
is
used
to
call
Commercial.
The
applicant
did
not
identify
the
specific
proposed
commercial
use.
Letter
send
3540
against
zero
location
view
aerial
view
street
view
phone
change,
signage
zoning
overview
is
your
land
use
that
recommendation
staff
does
not
support
the
whole
zone.
C
N
C
C
From
the
dimensional
standpoint,
I
believe
a
B4
District
requires
10
000
square
feet.
We
have
something
like
86
000
square
feet.
It
also
requires
about
100
feet
in
width.
We
have
double
that
as
well
from
what
I
can
tell
it
meets
most
of
the
conditions
and
of
course,
it
also
has
a
frontage
on
three
59
right.
So
so
the
the
purpose
of
the
B4
zone
is
is
for
this
type
of
property.
Specifically
I
did
want
to
show
you
some
other
examples
of
some
B4
zones
on
three
59.
C
C
C
This
is
a
corner
of
Luke
20
in
Shiloh.
So
at
the
time
I
worked
for
the
property
owner
and
I
represented
them
on
the
Zone
case,
and
we
had
absolutely
no
issue
getting
before
right
next
to
Hole,
one
from
here's,
a
corner
of
Hillside
and
McPherson,
where
the
Chick-fil-A
is
and
Hot
Stuff,
B4
next
R1
same
thing
and
most
recently
I
did
a
zone
change
right
on
the
loop.
This
is
Alexander
Estates.
C
Bottom
line
is
they're
trying
to
get
the
highest
and
best
commercials
only
district
for
their
property,
as
I
think
anybody
would
I
mean,
based
on
staff's
recommendation
with
that
M1
Nixon
residential.
It
seems
very,
very
unfair
that
they
wouldn't
support
a
B4
next
to
on
R1,
especially
since
they
supported
an
M1
is
surrounded
by
residential,
which
is
very,
very
surprising,
but
I
mean
for
for
all
those
reasons.
I
I
was
a
little.
That's
that's
the
M1
that
staff
recommended
approval
on
and
you
can
see.
There's
r1b
here,
there's
residential
Louis.
L
O
C
Absolutely
you
know,
that's
that's
actually
a
great
point
now
to
your
to
your
point.
There
is
a
section
of
the
code
that
says
give
me
a
second
under
B4
Highway
commercial
District
under
Section,
so
subsection,
8
and
16
nightclubs,
bar
salums
Cantinas
bars
cannot
be
located
within
300
feet
of
an
of
a
residential
district.
So
technically
my
client
can
do
it
one
and
then
two
it's
the
same
thing
down
here
with
machinitas
as
well.
C
P
E
But
there's
no
residential
on
that
side.
There's
no
residential
across
the
street.
Is
there
no
Easter,
so
it's
a
beautiful
because
there's
no
residential
on
the
opposite
side,
there
is
residential,
correct!
That's
why
that's?
Why
I
believe
that
one
was
granted
and
that's
why,
then
my
only
thing
is
I'd
like
to
know
what's
going
to
be
built
there?
Let's
see
the
only
thing
interests
me:
I
have
a.
B
R
Exactly
what
we
mentioned
in
our
in
our
communication,
the
comprehensive
plan-
it's
not
in
concurrence
with
the
comprehensive
plans,
neighborhood
mixed
use,
designation
for
that
area.
We
noticed
that
there
were,
you,
know,
a
good
number
of
homes
right
there,
the
the
vagueness
or
the
unspecific
proposed
use.
We
were
concerned.
You
know
we
have
to
take
into
consideration.
R
Of
course,
all
the
uses
that
would
be
allowed
by
the
B4
so
that,
for
those
all
of
those
reasons
cited,
we
were
just
you
know-
thought
that
in
this
case
a
B3
allows
lighter
commercial
uses,
some
things
that
might
be
more
of
an
amenity
to
the
neighborhood
things
that
people
can
walk
to.
You
know
stores
restaurants,
convenience
stores,
things
like
that,
so
something
you
know
lighter
commercial
uses
that
would
serve
that
neighborhood.
R
B
Is
this
isn't
well,
first
of
all
games
to
do
the
foreign
against
and
also
this
I
mean
the
commission
gives
a
recommendation,
so
the
ultimate
decision
does
come
to
city
council.
So
basically
our
recommendation
is,
however,
you
all
see
fit,
but
definitely
we
can
definitely
go
forward
on.
However,
y'all
want
to
make
that
motion,
but
this
is
a
public
hearing.
So
let
me
continue
going
with
that
motion.
C
B
B
B
B
Q
G
F
G
F
G
A
Q
J
Marlin
is
pretty
much
where
it's
on
this
end,
where
my
palm
is
at
Del
Mars
on
on
this
end,
there
is
a
long
driveway
one
of
the
things
about
this
lot.
It
is
one
of
the
larger
Lots
on
in
acreage,
but
it's
it's
about
close
to
0.25,
Acres,
more
or
less,
and
it
does
have
access
and
parking
when
it
comes
to
the
driveway,
which
is
existing
right
now,
and
the
concept
is
to
extend
this
portion
and
provide
parking
aligned
along
Delmar
and
the
use
for
the
applicant.
It's
it's.
J
J
I
mean,
if
anything
would
have
what
the
owner
does
want
to
do.
Is
they
do
want
to
convert
pretty
much
the
the
house
into
an
office
space?
Do
they
do
want
to
do
an
addition
towards
towards
the
east
side,
but
the
the
addition
is
not
as
as
extensive
as
to
the
original
House.
The
structure
itself
is
it's.
It's
actually
a
large
a
large
home.
J
Q
Q
D
I
did
have
I
did
have
a
question
on
you
know
the
measurements
and
everything
to
make
sure
it
works.
My
main
concern
was
that
we
wanted
to
keep
the
Integrity
of
that
house.
You
know
we
don't
want
to
tear
it
down
and
put
it
with
two-story
building.
That's
why
we
recommended
an
RO
instead
of
a
B1
B1
would
have
given
them
the
opportunity
to
throw
it
down,
knock
it
down
right.
So
this
way
they
keep
it
and
well
it's
up
to
the
engineer
to
measure
property
to
make
sure
it
works
so
and.
J
B
Q
J
Q
Q
J
Just
in
case
on
a
different
perspective,
if
we
would
apply
for
the
permit,
this
is
conceptual
I.
I
know
when
it
comes
for
the
right-of-way
permit
a
driveway
permit.
They
won't
allow
us
to
tracks
it
from
this
point,
there's
currently
an
existing
intention
in
there,
but
we
won't
be
allowed
to
use
it
because
it's
really
close
to
to
that
driveway,
though
no
one
we're
speaking
of,
and
so
the
goal
is
to
to
get
that
that
easement
on
that
side
to
serve
as
a
secondary
exit.
J
G
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
We
have
applicant
EOG,
Resources,
Inc
property
location
is
approximately
4.93
Acres
located
west
of
Beltway
Park
Parkway
zone
change.
We
have
a
special
use
permit
for
oil
and
or
gas
extraction
extractions,
which
is
a
website
proposed,
use
oil
and
or
gas
extractions
for
our
website.
We
have
sent
letter
sent
for
and
we
have
none
for.
None
against.
G
We
have
a
background
so
for
the
site
status
on
February,
17
2023,
an
expection
was
conducted
and
revealed
the
following:
EOG
Resources
Inc
was
drained
for
natural
gas
inside
the
city
limits
without
a
special
use,
permit
a
stop
work
order
was
issued
and
a
citation
was
issued
for
failure
to
acquire
a
special
use
permit
for
the
oil
and
gas
extraction
and
production
is
in
violation
of
the
city,
Laredo
land
development
code
book
section
24-7-3.
We
have
the
current
site
status,
the
EOG
Resources
Inc
did
not
sub
Julian
and
are
still
driven
location
view.
T
T
Yeah,
so
we
just
like
to
say
thank
you
to
everybody.
That's
worked
with
us
on
this.
I
know
it's
kind
of
a
new
process,
so
I
just
hope
we
can
get
along
and
and
get
through
this.
You
know
beneficially
for
everyone.
So
if
there's
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
I'm
going
to
do
the
best
that
I
can.
P
T
H
I
was
going
to
ask
a
question
to
you,
sir.
Could
you
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
the
timeline
for
this
drill
like
its
life
cycle
and
if
there's
a
plan
to
also
close
it
out.
I
know
that
currently
in
the
state,
there
is
a
big
issue
with
sort
of
abandoned
Wells
throughout
the
state
causing
pollution
to
the
surrounding
areas.
So
I
wanted
to
know
a
little
bit
about
that.
Okay,.
T
So
so,
basically,
our
operations
as
soon
as
we
get
the
permit
we're
going
to
go
in
and
complete
the
well
that'll
take
a
couple
of
weeks
we'll
be
done,
then,
once
that
done
pretty
much
all
of
our
operations,
major
operations
will
be
over
as
far
as
abandoned
Wells.
Typically,
when
you
have
situations
like
that,
it's
from
a
I'd
say
a
lesser
operator.
T
I
Jimmy
for
the
record
Manatee
of
Laredo
Inc,
Incorporated
owners
applicant
and
then
as
Sherwood
is
a
representative
property
description.
Location
is
lot
three
block
355
Western
Division
located
at
1714,
Santa,
Anita
Avenue.
The
zone
change
request
is
an
R3
to
an
R1
beam.
The
proposed
use
is
residential.
A
single
family
dwelling
letter
sent
2840
against
zero
location
view
area,
Liam
street
view,
don't
change,
signage
overview
s,
staff
recommendation
staff
support
the
proposed
zone,
change
purpose,
motions.
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman.
V
Good
evening
everybody
I'm
Carol
Sherwood
I'm,
the
executive
director
for
Habitat
for
Humanity
and
our
we.
This
is
a
process
for
us
and
we're
learning
as
we
go,
but
we
demolish
three
houses
that
were
in
extremely
bad
condition
where
the
process
of
building
one
house
is
an
extremely
large
lot
and
we
plan
to
come
back
and
request
a
replat.
So
we
can
put
another
single
family,
affordable
home
in
the
neighborhood.
L
B
E
D
Mr
chairman,
if
it's
okay
with
you
and
and
the
applicant,
the
next
four
items
are
zone
changes,
okay
and
we'd
like
to
see,
if
maybe
we
can
open
all
of
them
together,
so
that
you
guys
can
see
the
the
bigger
picture,
because
it's
it's
kind
of
hard
to
just
see
one
at
a
time
and
then
after
you
can
determine
I
mean
you
could
vote
each
one
individually.
But
this
gives
you
a
chance
to
talk
about
the
whole
scope
in
one
shot.
This.
B
How
many?
The
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
City
of
Laredo
by
rezone,
approximately
13.00
Acres
situated
in
porscheon
22
Maria
de
Jesus
Sanchez
original
grantee,
abstract
277,
Webb,
County
Texas,
said
13.0036
Acres,
more
or
less
partially
out
of
a
track
of
land
called
to
contain
60.08
Acres
conveyed
to
Charcoal
van
sales,
limited
liability
company
as
recording
volume,
5403
Pages
95
to
100
official
public
records
of
Webb,
County,
Texas
and
partially
out
of
attractive
land
call
to
contain
20.00
Acres
conveyed
to
choco
land
sales.
B
B
Laredo
by
reasoning
approximately
31.1235
Acres
situated
in
parts
around
23
in
adelos,
Sanchez,
original
granteed,
abstract,
283
and
1424
to
Rubio
Rodriguez,
original
grantee,
abstract,
268,
West,
County
Texas,
said
31.1235,
Acres,
more
or
less
being
out
of
attractive
land
called
to
contain
200.68
Acres
conveyed
to
Draco
land
sales.
Limited
liability
company
has
recorded
in
volume,
5400
Pages
824
to
829
official
public
records
of
Will
County
Texas,
located
north
of
inspiration,
Parkway
and
east
of
public
loop
from
R1
single
family
residential
district
to
P3,
community
business
district.
I
For
the
record,
so
just
to
show
you
an
overview.
This
is
the
master
plan
for
the
clothes
at
Winfield
and
the
zone.
Changes
that
are
going
to
be
presented
are
our
ones
to
be
for
R1
to
R2
and
R1
to
B3.
So
if
you
notice
here,
this
would
be
the
first
one.
This
is
a
Zone
case.
49
it's
going
from
an
R1
to
an
R2.
I
E
B
U
P
I
do
have
a
statement.
I
need
gone.
We
saw
the
picture
where
the
we're
changing
the
r1s
to
b4s
and
I.
Think
that's
the
perfect
example
of
what
we
were
talking
about
earlier
with
changing
the
B3
to
B4.
It's
as
you
see,
the
development
is
a
budding
homes
too,
and
there's
no
is
the
staff
is
in
support
of
this
and
I
and
I'm
in
support
of
it.
But
the
issue
was
the
prior:
were
staff
is
not
in
support
of
B3
to
D4,
and
it
looks
very
similar
to
this
and
it's
just
a
comment.
D
P
B
E
B
B
A
K
Chairman
commission
members
for
the
record
Rudy
Santiam
from
pillow
Consulting.
We
concur
with
olive
staff
comments.
However,
we'd
like
to
request
removal
of
comment.
Number
three
which
reads:
coordinate
with
traffic
director
for
Tia
for
traffic
impact
analysis
just
to
see
if
we
can
impossible
to
move
it
to
preliminary
comments
so
that
in
One,
Stop
Shop,
we
can
address
anything
that
we
need
to
regarding
the
Tia,
but
we
can
remove
it
for,
for
today's
site.
Approval.
N
P
P
We've
had
private
problems
prior
to
that
development
behind
there
right,
yeah,
I'm,
talking
about
parking
and
an
emergency
vehicle
being
able
to
pass
because
there's
so
much
parking
on
the
street.
So,
okay
just
wanted
to
see
where
this
property
is.
This
is
going
to
be
on
the
corner
of
Escondido
159.
That.
S
D
K
Q
K
K
B
P
B
X
U
Good
evening
members
I'm
Daniel
Gomez
the
project
engineer
for
please
propose
flat
and
I
concur
on
most
of
the
comments.
I
do
wanna
I
do
have
one
request.
If
there's
a
way,
we
can
reconsider
one
of
the
common,
which
is
number
one,
the
right-of-way
dedication,
this
property
is
being
is
being
used
as
a
restaurant
business
for
about
30
years,
more
or
less
different
names,
but
the
use
is
being
induced
and
doing
the
dedication
right
now
is
is
probably
gonna
get
really
difficult
for
the
property
owner
to
do
it.
D
What
he's
requesting
is,
whenever
you're
doing
a
street
and
the
city
needs
the
space,
whatever
the
owner
dedicates
that
land
to
the
to
the
city
so
that
they
can
put
the
street
in
a
situation
like
this?
If
the
city
doesn't
have
the
money
or
we
don't
see
in
the
near
future,
that
we're
going
to
do
it,
it
might
be
five
years
from
now
10
years
from
now,
we'll
ask
for
the
reserve
so
that
we
could
that
land
will
be
there
for
us.
They
can't
build
on
it.
D
If
we
do
it
today
as
a
dedication,
they
would
build
a
street,
but
there's
no
real
reason
to
do
it,
because
we
haven't
really
bought
Colton
Road
to
widen
it.
What
have
you
so
if,
if
I
knew
that
we
had
money
or
something
like
that,
I
would
I
would
have
to
say
dedication
all
the
way,
but
in
this
case
I
don't
know
when
we're
going
to
do
it
so
I'd.
B
B
X
B
P
B
D
Sir
Mr
chairman,
you
might
have
heard
that
we've
been
doing
Town
Hall
meetings,
so
we've
I've
been
to
District
three
district,
seven
district,
five
and
I
think
we're
going
to
have
some
more
coming
soon
and
I
just
want
to
let
the
public
know
that
that
this
is
the
time
to
come
out
and
let
us
know
the
issues
that
they
have
the
compliments
they
might
have
if
they
haven't.
Let.
D
So
we've
done
that,
apart
from
that,
we
had
a
fact-finding
Mission
about
a
Del
Mar
overlay.
Most
of
you
might
have
heard
about
that.
What
we've
done
is
we've.
The
city
Laredo
has
hired
able
City
to
do
a
fact-finding
mission
to
see
if
the
citizens
have
on
the
corridor
on
Del
Mar
Boulevard
between
Andover,
Candlewood
and
Fenwick
for
potential
overlay.
D
D
D
We
could
finalize
how
we
want
to
do
this
because
it's
going
back
and
forth
and
we're
not
getting
email
anywhere
so
Mr
Oz
is
hoping
we
could
do
this
through
meetings
and
and
solve
this
before
we
go
to
council.
So
hopefully
we
can
do
that
and
then
we
can
bring
it
to
your
attention
at
the
next
meeting.
But
those
are
the
two
two
items
that
we
have
that
we
have
for
this
week.
E
D
For
it,
so
if
I
go
to
the
council,
the
council
would
like
me
to
make
changes
to
the
Land
Development
code
or
something
I
have
to
bring
it
through
the
process
and
the
process
is
to
bring
it
here
for
for
your
review
and
approval
before
it
goes
to
council,
so
I'm
trying
to
just
get
directed
from
them.
What
they
want
me
to
do,
they
might
say
not,
don't
do
anything
or
leave
it
the
way
it
is.
You
know,
depending
on
the
argument.
You
know
they
might
say.
No,
let
AEP
worry
about
it.
S
D
The
RNA,
not
the
RMA
mpo,
approve
the
funding
for
it
and
what
I
know
right
now
is
engineering
is
working
on
the
transfer
of
the
dedication
of
the
the
land
from
the
landowner
to
the
Sea.
So
that's
where
they
are
with
that
and
I'm,
not
sure
where
TxDOT
is
on,
that
we
should
be
having
a
meeting
the
17th
so
next
month
and
we'll
have
more
information
on
where
they
are
on
that.
But
it
is
moving
forward.
F
About
this
overlay
on
Del,
Mar,
Boulevard
and
stuff
I
read
about
it
on
Facebook,
and
you
know
it
made.
Maybe
for
able
City
you
could
contact
the
commission
members.
You
know
like
I,
live
in
that
area
and
I
write
about
it
on
Facebook,
I
didn't
know.
What's
going
on,
people
are
calling
me
and
asking
me
so
I
think
it
just
reach
out
to
let
us
know
where
they're
gonna,
you
know
when
those
kind
of
meetings
are
coming
up.
It
would
be
six
years
ago.
I
won't
have
to.
D
Call
you
hey
what's
going
on
right,
yes,
sir
yeah,
what
what
happened
was
when
Martin
Martinez
was
the
councilman
he
had
suggested
this
overlay.
His
thought
process
was
that
he
wanted
to
try
to
protect
the
Integrity
of
the
homes
that
are
there
and
he
wanted
to
kind
of
his
vision
was
maybe
an
antique
shop
or
or
some
kind
of
small
business
whatever
but
maintained
a
home
look
to
the
houses
right.
D
You
know
it
was
just
basically,
let's
explain
it
a
little
bit
and
see
if
they
would
like
it
and
if
they
do
we'd
move
forward.
If
they
don't,
then
we
wouldn't
do
anything.
So
that's
what
the
contract
was
with
able
city
was
to
go
out
there
and
do
that,
but
that
there's
different
overlays
that
that
are
out
there.
We
have
several.
We
have
a.