►
From YouTube: 08-16-18 Planning & Zoning Commission
Description
08-16-18 Planning & Zoning Commission
A
B
C
A
A
A
We
have
a
second
in
second,
all
those
in
favor
hi
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
public
hearings.
First
public
hearing
and
we
have
is
a
million
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Reuter
by
rezoning
approximately
nineteen
point,
one:
seven,
nine
acres
for
some
37
abstract
for
ten
people,
semi-auto
Chapter,
VI,
mosa,
two-track
fire
located
south
of
Soria
driving
east
of
us
highway,
83,
four,
more
three
two
are
one
a
this
is
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
who
wish
to
speak
in
favor
mr.
D
Chairman
Wayne
Anspaugh
resonance
engineering,
commissioner,
we're
here
in
favor
of
this
the
zone
change.
We
we
understand
that
the
the
existing
zoning
changes
is
r3
at
higher
higher
density,
but
we're
looking
at
something
that
will
match
the
areas
to
the
north
and
to
the
east
that
are
our
one,
a
buffer
down
to
the
bottom.
We
think
it's,
it's
a
really
good
fit
for
this
area.
It's
all
we're
surrounded
by
a
single-family
homes,
we'd
like
to
continue
that
on
this
side
of
the
channel,
and
we
hope
that
you
agree
with
us.
Thank
you.
Anybody.
A
E
I'm,
sorry
or
London
for
the
record,
just
to
reiterate
what
the
engineers
talking
about.
If,
if
you
could
look
at
this
this
design
on
one
side,
you
have
a
channel
on
the
bottom
side,
you
have
a
detention
pond
and
then
you
have
Sonia
towards
the
back
end.
You
have
mobile
homes.
So
what
we
did
was
we
buffered
this
development
so
that
it
doesn't,
he
doesn't
have
that
connection
to
the
mobile
home
to
the
north
of
it.
Those
are
houses
so
we're
trying
to
keep
it
the
same
pattern.
A
G
That
area
a
trainer
development.
Actually
what
with
the
engineer
mentioned
it
occurs
to
to
the
area
now
staff?
It's
even
though
they
don't
support
the
change
they
they
consider.
The
proposed
won't
change
appropriate.
So,
if
I
could
make
a
motion,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
this
one
change,
based
on
only
the
staff
noted
that
it,
the
proposed
change,
is
appropriate
for
that.
A
Emotion,
do
we
have
a
second
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
aye?
All
those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
No.
The
next
item
is
a
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance,
the
city
of
Reuter
by
rezoning
approximately
five
point:
two
six
acres
portion:
thirty-five
abstract
546,
close
same
DEA's,
original
located
west
of
Athena
drive
from
r1
to
r1
a
this
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
his
own
change
in
favor
of
his
own
change.
H
A
I
A
J
A
H
I
A
I
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye,
aye,
all
those
against
or
she
carries.
Thank
you
extend
and
then
we
have
is
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
to
the
city
lawyer
by
rezoning.
Some
only
one
point:
six,
four
three
two
acre
tract
or
some
31
abstract
31
16,
take
the
original
located
at
4200
high
missile,
but
the
Memorial
Highway
from
r3
to
B,
1
and
2
B,
3
and
2
B
for.
A
K
A
K
L
A
A
A
M
A
M
N
O
I
I
Next
to
it
now,
Vitas
has
those
prongs
kicking
off,
prohibit
you
from
turning
left
you're
gonna
put
in
a
beef
a
big
before
which
that
someday
can
turn
into
whatever
it
wants
to
turn
into
where
it
really
can't
turn
left,
which
would
be
east
northeast
on
I,
miss
apartheid
essentially
be
forced
to
be
like
a
one-way
traffic
seems
to
be
so
preoccupied
with
entrances
and
exits
near
intersections.
I
would
think
that
they'd
make
a
comment
about
this.
One.
P
P
P
I
Text
on
textiles,
but
you
already
have
an
entrance
since
that
it's
there
and
if
I'm
I
remember
how
the
last
time
I've
been
to
five
ethos,
which
was
fairly
recently.
That
stoplight
is
very
close
to
that
entrance
and
exit,
and
it
makes
it
a
difficult
left-hand
turn.
It
makes
it
essentially
where
you
can
only
go
right
well,.
P
I
P
It's
been
that
way
for
lights,
it's
been
state
property,
it's
a
state,
I
mean
the
state,
didn't
just
take
it
over.
It's
been
there
for
a
good
long,
while
probably
back
to
the
sixties,
maybe
probably
yeah
I
mean
I.
Think
that's
what's
gonna
end
up
happening
is
to
say
well,
I
had
thought
to
go
to
the
state.
It
discussed
that
with
them.
That's.
A
K
A
G
N
N
N
A
G
G
N
F
A
A
Probably
carry
too
many.
The
zoning
ordinance
met
both
the
city
lawyer
by
authorizing
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
children's
amusement
services
outdoors
a
lot
seven
and
eight
block
to
San
Jose
subdivision
located
at
62
321
and
63
23
Casa
de
alguna
Bart.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
zone,
change
in
favor
of
the
zone
of
the
conditionings
program.
Sorry.
C
L
C
C
A
A
C
G
C
C
C
G
P
G
R
A
S
S
R
T
G
G
G
A
P
N
P
Not
meeting
the
parking
permit
under
the
CEP,
then
after
the
CEP
expired,
he
gets
two
more
citations:
okay,
I'm,
sorry,
just
so
that
the
the
Commission
understands
our
office
did
send
him
by
certified
mail
and
regular
mail
on
June
30th
of
2017
a
letter.
It's
part
of
your
packet
advising
him
that
his
see
if
he
had
expired
thanks.
Okay,
so
we
did.
We
did
send
him.
Okay,
sir.
T
T
T
The
other
issue
and
I
think
it's
a
more
important
issue
is
the
fact
that
this
CEP
allows
him
to
operate
till
midnight
in
the
neighborhood
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
letters
or
one
of
the
complaints
talked
about
noise
pollution
or
something
so
yeah
I
think
I
would
be
more
comfortable
modifying
this
to
be
till
10
p.m.
with
the
understanding
that
he
has
to
come
into
compliance
with
the
parking
regulation.
And
if
you
can't
do
that,
well,
then
he's
not
going
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
CDP
and.
C
G
With
you,
what
happened
is
that
that
particular
institution
pools
and
and
it's
the
area
of
where
they
could
get
the
parkings
or
very
reduce,
actually
they've
got
no
place
to
grow
and
that's
the
way
it
was
created
from
the
beginning.
So,
if
I
feel
that,
if
we
grant
the
permit,
he
will
still
not
be
able
to
comply
with
the
requirement
so.
A
If
you
look
at
the
map
you
know
of
the
subdivisions,
every
lot
is
billed
out.
Okay
parking
requirement
has
to
be
willing,
1,000
feet
of
a
facility
to
be
to
be
effective.
So
if
you
look
at
the
map
right
now
and
the
way
everything
is
built
out,
there's
probably
nothing
within
1,000
feet
to
comply
with
the
requirement
of
parking.
T
Let
me
ask
this
question:
let's
say
I'm
not
familiar
with,
but
would
it
be
possible
for
him
to
find
parking?
Let's
say
not
in
the
neighborhood
but,
like
you
know,
close
enough
from
the
neighborhood
that
he
can
walk
to
it.
It
has
to
be
within
1,000
feet.
No
I
understand
that
I
understand
that's
the
requirement.
I
mean.
Obviously
it's
you
pee
is
you're
going
against
the
requirement,
some
of
the
requirements
right,
noise,
you're,
making
some
you're,
making
some
exceptions
right.
So
what
I'm
asking
is
to
look
at
it
more
conceptually?
T
G
It's
one
block
from
the
highway
highway.
59,
there's
no
parking
in
that
entrance.
They
can't
park
on
either
side
because
that's
actually
the
entrance,
the
English
language
now
inside
the
Saudi
Richmond
inside
the
subdivision,
there's
all
mobile
homes
and
there's
there's
a
lot
of
need
for
parking
as
it
is
right
now
without
them
having
the
party
place.
So
the
the
answer.
My
side
would
be
no
other
personal
area
where
they
could
park
other
than
where
right
adjacent
to
that
to
that
pool
area.
But
what
you're
thinking
is
correct?
I
mean
it's
been
there.
A
T
I
P
T
We
should
prove
it,
but
we
should
clearly
state
that
he's
prohibited
from
having
the
parking
be
in
the
neighborhood
and
if
you
can
find,
if
you
can
find
an
area,
that's
close
enough
like
in
that
unplanted
area,
I
mean
let's
do
it,
but
I
mean
we
put
the
onus
on
him
to
do
that.
But
under
no
circumstances
can
you
use
the
neighborhood.
T
A
P
B
T
S
T
C
T
F
A
T
A
motion
that
we
closed
public
comment
and
we
modified
the
proposed
CTP
to
require
that
he
only
operate
from
12:00
p.m.
I'm,
sorry
from
12
p.m.
to
10:00
p.m.
one
two
that
he's
prohibited
from
using
parking
in
the
neighborhood
three
that
the
Cu
P
is
only
for
a
six
month
period,
and
for
that
he
finds
an
alternate
parking
solution.
T
P
P
R
P
T
P
P
P
T
U
R
V
T
P
Not
an
offsite
parking,
that's
you're,
not
supposed
to
use
the
streets
for
commercial
endeavors,
which
includes
parking.
Okay.
What
I'm
saying
is,
as
a
practical
matter,
it's
very
difficult
to
enforce
that.
So
the
way
it's
done
is
car
spot
right.
You
don't
know,
you
know
whether
he's
the
person
that
parked
the
car
there
is
visiting
his
establishment
or
the
guy
across
the
street,
or
what
for
so,
the
way
we
get
her.
The
way
we
work
through
that
he's.
T
A
A
That
we
have
is
a
public
hearing
too
many
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
approximately
five
point:
three:
seven
acres
out
of
price
tracts
of
abstract
186,
the
Geo
H
Hall
original,
abstract,
648,
Jake,
W
Cody
original
than
abstract
660.
Did
these
Sanchez
original
located
east
of
us
over
the
road
in
south
and
lucia
court
for
more
one,
two
or
one
eight?
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
his
own
change
in
his
neighbor
of
his
own.
J
H
A
W
Present
and
property
owners
of
track
19
on
80209
casts
out
of
the
road.
We
respectfully
object
to
the
rezoning
to
residential
for
the
following
reason:
forty
years,
we
currently
do
utilize
it
for
agricultural
purposes.
We
do
have
animals
there
for
the
4-h
and
FFA
who
have
we've
been
using
that
for
that
purpose,
and
our
concern
is
that
if,
if
the
area
a
Mason,
it
is
going
to
be
used
for
residential,
which
I
know
occurring
it
already
is
we
just
have
concerns
about
if
it's
gonna
be
apartments
or
homes
how
people
neighborhood
had
the
animals
there?
W
A
J
O
A
A
H
next
item
that
we
have
is
public
hearing
amending
the
zone
in
order
to
the
city
Reuter
by
authorizing
a
conditional
use
permit
for
vehicle
truck
storage
and
business
storage.
A
lot
one
block
one
JDK
located
at
23,
9,
o
0
9
0
9
at
forms
of
market
1472.
This
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
conditional
use.
Permit
choose
anyone
who
is
in
favor.
X
A
We
have
a
motion.
We
have
a
second
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
are
games.
Motion
carries
next
item
that
we
have
is
a
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
or
incinerated
by
authorizing
a
special
use
permit
for
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol.
A
lot
11
block
573
Western
Division,
located
at
2601
some,
but
not,
though,
haven't
you.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
conditional
use
permit.
Y
So
when
I
just
first
got
this
very
strong
open
at
the
premise
of
the
city,
they
had
asked
me
for
12
additional
parking
I'm
actually
had
a
coalition
of
parkings
at
an
off-site,
but
two
blocks
down
mr.
Casas
and
just
on
Friday
I
was
notified
that
I
guess
I
bumped
up
to
30
and
I
managed
to
get
a
letter
from
him
as
well,
stating
that
he
granted
me
the
rest
of
the
party.
Y
A
G
Any
other
questions,
I'm
gonna
make
a
comment.
Mr.
chairman,
this
particular
instance,
it's
a
is
something
that
that
is
bringing
up
on
the
air
on
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
you
won't
have
like
a
like
a
restaurant
together
with
residential
and
people
being
able
to
park
in
the
street
and
walk
from
their
house
to
a
little
restaurant.
So
this
is
a
good
example
of
what
the
new
plan
operation
supplying.
Yes,.
A
V
Afternoon,
mr.
chairman
and
members
of
the
Commission,
my
name
is
Quan
Ramirez
and
I'm
here
speaking
on
behalf
of
my
father
hundred
meters
and
we're
here
in
support
of
the
conditional
use
permit
for
our
neighborhoods
across
the
street
and
we're
proud
that,
finally
we're
seeing
some
improvements
to
the
San
Bernardo
area
for
the
past
few
years,
it's
been
going
down,
so
we
go
ahead
and.
A
A
A
P
Q
A
G
A
C
A
T
A
A
Is
a
public
hearing
and
recommendation
voluntary
annexation,
the
initial
zoning
of
m1
an
attractive
lentil
in
14.3,
three
acres
and
known
as
annexation
tract
to
the
jo-ann,
but
is
track
north
of
FM,
1472
and
west
of
Pinto
I
Drive?
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
annexation
in
favor
of
the
annexation.
A
C
A
Hearing
and
recommendation
of
voluntary
annexation
and
initial
zoning
of
m1
or
attract
talent
total
in
four
point:
six:
five
acres,
also
known
as
annexation,
track
three,
the
head
out
of
the
Rodriguez
track,
north
of
FM,
1472
and
east
of
people
I
Drive.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
I
can't
in
favor
of
his
annexation.
A
Have
a
motion
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye,
all
those
against
motion
carries
with
the
recommendation
for
new
ones
all
right.
Yes,
this
is
a
public
hearing.
Addicts,
ation,
volunteer
annexation,
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land,
totaling,
two
point:
nine
four:
five
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
tract
for
modern
construction
tract,
and
this
is
north
of
fm14,
72
and
west
of
pintel
I
Drive.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
wishing
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
anybody
who
we
should
speak
against
the
annexation
against
the
annexation.
T
A
T
A
Second,
second,
all
those
in
favor,
aye,
aye
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
a
public
hearing
recommendation
of
voluntary
annexation,
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land,
totaling,
six
acres
more
or
less
and
known
as
annexation
track.
Five.
This
is
south
of
fm14,
72
and
west
of
pinto
light
drive
is:
is
a
public
hearing
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
anybody?
We
should
speak
against
the
annexation
against
the
annexation.
A
We
have
a
second
second
second
to
those
in
favor
aye
all
right
carries.
The
next
item
is
a
public
hearing
recommendation
of
volunteer
annexation,
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land,
totally
51.7,
seven
acres,
also
known
as
annexation,
track
six
rasam
track
located
north
of
FM
1472
and
he's
the
people
I.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
wish
to
speak
in
favour
in
favor.
A
Motion-
second,
second,
all
those
in
favor.
Well,
she
carries.
The
next
item
is
a
public
hearing
recommendation
voluntary
annexation,
an
initial
zoning
of
m1
tract
of
land,
3.75
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
tract
7
north
of
FM
1472?
Mr.
Pinto,
a
driver
is
required.
Okay,
this
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
anybody
who
would
speak
against
Gaines
the
annexation
in
that
mission,
option.
A
In
a
second
check
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye
aye
motion
carries
next
item.
Is
a
public
hearing
recommendation
of
a
volunteer
annexation,
an
initial
zoning
of
b1
on
a
tract
of
land,
totaling
50
point
to
4
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
tract
877
subdivision
track
north
of
the
intersection
of
fm14
72
and
77
Creek?
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
wish
to
speak
in
favour
in
favor.
A
Have
a
motion,
and
second
all
those
in
favor
carries.
The
next
item
is
a
public
hearing
recommendation
of
the
launcher,
annexation,
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land
total
in
1.7,
two
to
five
acres,
also
known
as
that
annexation
track
nine.
This
is
north
of
fm14
72
and
he's
definitely
met
over
the
public
hearing.
Anybody
wish
speak
in
favor
of
the
annexation
in
favor.
A
Z
A
Carries
it
was
a
public
hearing
and
volunteer
annexation,
the
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land
or
even
three
point,
one:
six,
nine,
nine
acres
more
or
less,
also
known
as
annexation
tract
10.
This
is
south
of
F
in
1472
and
west
of
silver
mine
Road.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
annexation
in
favor.
A
A
A
A
A
We
have
a
second
second
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries
next
item,
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
volunteer
annexation,
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land
totaling,
two
hundred
and
fifty
four
point:
zero
one,
seven
acres,
also
known
as
annexation,
track.
Thirteen.
This
is
the
herd
urban
development
track
east
of
I-35
in
north
of
bob
bullock,
loop
20.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
of
the
annexation.
A
F
A
A
N
B
B
A
Motion
and
when
ii
told
those
in
favor
aye
next
time
is
a
public
here
in
recommendation
of
a
volunteer
annexation.
Initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land,
totaling
13
point
6,
2
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
track
15.
This
is
north
of
south
of
state,
highway,
359
and
west
of
EG
ranch
road.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
wishes
favor
in
favor.
G
A
The
caring
and
recommendation
the
volunteer
annexation
on
the
initial
zoning
of
AG
on
the
track
of
land
total
in
seventeen
point
six,
one
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
track.
16
c
school
got
a
junior
track
north
of
state
highway
through
59
and
east
of
sun
capital
subdivision.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
annexation
in
favor.
A
A
We're
just
about
to
say
that
I
have
more
than
I
guess.
So
what
is
the
zoning
traffic
r18?
Okay,
Arwen
egg?
It's
a
single
family,
reduced
area
district
on
a
tract
of
land,
totally
an
eighty
six
point,
one
seven
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
track.
17
the
Martinez
track:
east,
the
Bob
Bullock
loop,
north
of
state,
highway,
359
public
hearing.
Anybody
wish
to
speak
in
favour
of
the
annexation
in
favor
of
the
annexation.
V
A
A
Yes,
second,
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries
next
item,
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
a
volunteer
annexation.
The
initial
zoning
of
m2
heavy
manufacturing
district
on
a
tract
of
land
total
in
two
hundred.
Ninety
eight
point:
four
two
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
track
18.
This
is
the
Killip
number
one
track
north
of
Bob,
Ehrlich,
Luke,
20
and
west
of
I-35
of
the
carrier.
AA
A
And
a
second
all
those
in
favor,
aye
aye
motion
carries
next
item.
Is
a
public
hearing
recommendation
of
volunteer
annexation,
an
initial
zoning
of
m2
on
a
tract
of
land,
thorry
140
point
95
acres,
all
Nonna's
annexation
tract
19
km
number
to
track
north
of
bob
bullock,
loop,
20
and
west
of
I-35?
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
wish
to
speak
in
favour
of
this
in
favor.
AA
A
A
The
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries
all
right.
The
next
item
we
have
is
luminary
request
of
a
replay
of
lot
nine
block,
three
subtlety
subdivision
into
lots,
9a
and
9b
about
three
separate
the
subdivision,
the
antennas
residential.
The
purpose
of
this
reap
light
is
to
create
two
smaller
Lots
from
one
larger
law.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
for
the
planning
department
and
watering
utilities
and
I
believe
a
notice
to
the
developer
from
planning.
The
engineer
of
record
is
tech.
A
Next
item
is
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plan
of
language
by
a7
the
antennas
residential
there's
a
twelve
point.
Three
five
acre
tract
is
located
west
of
cuatro,
Vientos,
Road
and
Luke
20
and
south
of
the
state
highway
359
and
Concord
Hill
subdivision
the
zoning
for
this
66
lot.
Development
is
our
1a.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
L
following
comments
from
planning
department,
water
utilities
and
they
noticed
a
developer.
Yes,
sir
hi.
A
Item
is
a
preliminary
consideration
of
the
replant
of
lot
two
and
three
block
one
I
miss
not
acres
into
Lots,
2a
and
3a
block
1a
me
stop
makers,
antennas,
commercial.
The
purpose
of
the
replied
is
reconfiguration
of
lot
lines.
This
is
a
two
point.
Three
seven
acre
tract
located
west
of
McPherson
road
in
south
of
Jackman
Road.
The
zoning
for
this
to
not
development
is
b3.
Proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning
and.
F
A
AA
F
AB
AB
High
volume
intersection
check-in
and
McPherson
Jackman
McPherson.
This
is
the
this
property
is
formerly
the
home,
run
derby,
okay,
okay,
I
see,
and
so
we
we're
not
comfortable
with
traffic
exiting
that
driveway
into
that
intersection
without
without
a
signal
signal,
ice
protection
and
we're
not
comfortable
operating
a
signal
for
that
driveway.
So.
F
A
G
AB
A
G
Z
My
road
is
for
the
record
with
foreign
commercial
risky
and
was
in
conversations
with
cutting
that
just
to
kind
of
get
an
update
and
print
out.
The
information
attendant
see
how
it
went
and
I
think
originally
the
beam
behind
it
was.
If
there
was
a
signal
requested,
an
impact
analysis
would
be
required.
In
this
case,
just
a
portion
of
the
property
is
going
to
be
developed,
so
they
were
planning
on
using
the
entrances
and
exits
as
they're
currently
being
used.
Z
A
L
A
Z
AC
Yeah
Roberts
traffic
department,
as
well
so
I,
wanted
to
point
something
out
real
quickly
and
kind
of
what
we're
thinking
behind
the
reason
for
this
as
well
is
understand
too,
if,
if,
if
it
is
signalized
to
be
able
to
exit
out
of
that
northern
exit,
whatever
allowances
we
give
for
that
exit,
especially
obviously
the
left
turns
coming
out
of
there.
You're
gonna
take
off
from
McPherson,
which
means
you're
gonna
impact
McPherson
Road
yeah.
AC
So
we
understand
right
now
the
conditions
of
McPherson
Road
and
because
of
this
business,
we're
trying
to
mitigate
that
and
by
doing
that,
we
allow
for
those
those
entrances.
You
can
be
coming
north
on
McPherson
or
south
and
the
fierson
and
turn
into
the
property.
But
you
can
enter
an
exit
from
the
southernmost
point,
because
in
that
way
we
don't
affect
McPherson
Road
as
a
whole,
because
you
will
have
that
immediate
impact.
AC
We
are
not
saying
as
well
that
when
it
is
fully
developed
because
there
was
conversations
about
property
extending
north
all
the
way
to
Fenwick
and
all
of
that
property,
including
this
one
here
being
developed
on
that
lower
scale.
At
that
time
we
were
considering
all
options
and-
and
that
may
make
some
sense,
but
some
other
improvements
would
have
to
be
considered
when
that
does
happen.
If
that
area
is
developed,
all
the
way
to
Fenwick,
you
might
have
some
except
deceleration
lanes
and
other
improvements
that
have
to
make
at
this
point
at
this
time.
AC
With
this
business,
it
only
makes
sense
to
us
for
for
what
we
have
here,
giving
providing
the
options
for
entrance
safe
entrance
and
exits.
That
is
it
because,
again,
if
you
all
remember
coming
out
of
whatever
was
Homer
and
Derby,
there
is
no
signal
and
so
operating
out
of
that,
even
though
it's
being
done
currently
is
not
something.
The
traffic
department
is
at
all
comfortable
with.
F
AC
AC
AC
Correct,
thank
you,
Miss
Brennan
and
so
we're
as
a
traffic
department,
we're
limited
and
and
what
we're
able
to
provide
the
signage
markings.
The
allowances
or
the
restrictions
without
physical
barriers
of
some
sort
to
impede
somebody
from
attempting
to
come
out
is
something
that
we
would.
We
would
definitely
recommend
being
addressed
because
we
can
foresee,
even
though
there
might
be
signs
saying
you
cannot
be
through
this
at
you
know,
exit
or
entrance
point.
AC
If
there's
no
vehicles,
people
will
attempt
this,
and
so
we
would
like
to
see
if
there
would
be
some
sort
of
physical
barrier
to
not
allow
for
that
exit
to
happen
as
well
mm-hmm,
and
we
can
work
with
the
developer
and
see
what
we
come
up
with
best.
But
if
you
only
allow
for
signage,
we
can
foresee
people
trying
to
get
out
of
there
without
having
some
Florida.
A
A
The
reason
I
ask
this
is
because
to
me,
if
we're
gonna
allow
them
to
make
a
left
turn
if
you're
going
northbound
and
you
can
make
a
left
into
that
property
or
if
you're
coming
southbound
and
you
can
make
a
right,
yeah
I
see
it
kind
of
difficult
to
put
some
kind
of
a
physical
barrier
that
would
allow
that
left.
I
mean
the
right
is
an
easy
one
right
and
all
right
in
is
an
easy
one,
but
that
left
turn
would
become
a
little
bit
more
difficult.
AC
P
In
the
right
lane
right
now,
it's
wide
enough
for
it
to
be
two
lanes.
Yes,
and
so
the
tendency
is
somebody
in
there
to
try
to
sneak
out
through
that
that
other
side,
so
you
you
can
do
it.
You
can
do
a
variety
of
things
you
can.
You
could
put
a
median
in
there
one
number
one
in
the
in
the
in
the
driveway,
so
that
folks
know
that
you
can
do.
P
You're
gonna:
do
you
get
stuck
in
there?
Well,
it
puts
my
height.
Do
the
median
okay,
if
it's
an
angle
median
and
it
pairs
it
down
to
where
you
can't
can't
come
back,
then
that's
fine.
You
know
which
is
offset
to
eliminate
that
full
lane
on
the
south
side
of
the
driveway.
Okay,
that's
one
thing
you
can
do
it.
P
You
can
do
a
curb
extension
going
up
north
and
smooth
it
out
so
that
it's
rounded
so
that
you
can
make
the
turn
in
it's
just
the
people
coming
in
this
Lane
can't
get
out
because
there's
a
curb
there,
that's
another
way
to
do
it.
Worst-Case
scenario:
if
you
can't
do
any
of
that
you
can
you
can
change
the
surface
of
the
pavement
with
raised.
You
know
the
diplom
things
so
at
least
when
people
are
driving
on
it,
they're
not
supposed
to
be
on
it
worst
case
scenario.
P
So
there's
there's
a
variety
of
things
that
can
be
done.
We
want
the
comment
there
so
that
the
that
the
developer
knows
that
he
needs
to
work
with
us
to
accomplish
that
sure,
because
I
think
we've
all
were
all
familiar
with
the
sands.
Where
it's
got
that
triangle
thing
and
it's
supposed
to
hurt
you
and
make
you
do
a
right
turn
onto
some,
but
not
a
little,
but
everybody
kind
of
just
goes
around
it
and
it
cuts
across
and
goes
left.
A
P
I,
don't
see
it's
completely
ineffective
yeah,
but
if
you
extend
that
curve
up
to
where
you've
narrow
that
lane,
so
people
can't
get
out,
it
may
be
wide
enough
for
fire
to
be
okay
with
it
also
wide
enough
to
accommodate
people
getting
in
it.
Just
it
just
frustrates
them.
Trying
to
get
out
they'll,
say
well,
there's
a
curve
there
I
got
to
go
down,
move,
you
know,
go
out
the
other
exit,
so
that's
all
we're
trying
to
do
so.
We
just
need
be
the
comment
to
to
provoke
that
that
discussion.
Okay,
okay.
P
A
A
Second,
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
a
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plan
of
lock
12
block,
2
D
and
J
Alexander
phase
15,
the
antennas
commercial
site
is
one
point.
Four
seven
acre
tract
located
southwest
of
the
intersection
of
Barnet
and
Sydney
Shelton
Drive
the
zoning
for
this
one.
A
lot
development
is
b3.
He
proposed
actually
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning
the
water
utilities.
L
P
U
P
A
Comments
second
and
second
tumbles
in
favor
aye
hi
motion-
carries
next
item.
Is
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plan
of
hip
in
heaven
subdivision
the
antennas
residential?
This
is
a
five
point:
six
six
acre
tract
located
south
of
shadow
Drive
and
adjacent
to
Shenandoah,
Valley
subdivision,
there's
only
four.
This
20
lakh
development
is
RSM
and
the
proposed
action
is
supposed
to
have
to
tell
following
Commerce
and
planning
from
fire
water
utilities
and
notice
the
developer.
A
A
We
have
motion
the
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
or
she
carries
the
next
item
amending
the
land
development
code,
article
4,
section,
24,
point
62,
zoning
districts
and
boundaries
to
delete
the
title
of
beep
for
zoning
classification,
highway
commercial
district
and
to
adopt,
in
lieu
thereof
a
new
title
and
text
which
new
title
is
high,
intense
community
business
district
and
creating
a
separate
zoning
district
from
the
highway
commercial
district
classification,
adding
a
new
title
in
text
which
new
title
is
v5
highway
commercial
district,
providing
for
publication
and
effective
date.
Mr.
P
U
Q
Z
R
R
G
I
have
is
that
if
we
have
members
of
the
community
that
own
business
or
home
me
Forge,
should
they
be
granted
a
defy
automatically
because
what's
gonna
happen,
looking
at
what
I
can
die
now,
they're
gonna
have
to
realize
so.
I
think
that
in
all
fairness,
whoever
has
a
big
fort
should
be
granted
up
if
I
automatically,
and
that
should
be
in
the
ordinance
because
some
of
the
and
whoever
comes
up
to
that
no.
L
G
P
T
T
They
say
you
mean,
let's
say:
okay,
so
let's
go
I,
decided
to
open
up
a
zoo.
What
Zoo,
let's
say,
I,
let's
say
I
already
have
a
zoo.
You
have
a
zoo,
okay
and
it's
in
before,
and
then
I
decided
to
sell
my
property
where
I
use
the
zoo,
okay,
the
new
person
buying
the
zoo
would
have
to
come
and
get
this
to
me
it'd
be
five
right.
T
What
what
do
they
want
it
to
change
it
from
a
zoo
to
horse
racing
facility?
Well,
then,
we'd
want
to
know
what
they're
gonna
do
with
the
animals
okay,
so
that
would
be
the
example
right
yeah.
That
would
be
the
example.
I
know
it's.
If
it's
a
different
business
under
B
five,
then
they
have
to
apply
for
the
B
five.
Under
your
proposal
they
could
go
from
zoo
to
horse-racing
without
having
to
come
here
right,
correct.
AB
P
So
what
basically
happens
is
you
have
a
B
for
use
right,
mm-hmm,
the
before
uses
for
an
outdoor
furniture
store
right,
which
is
not
going
to
go
into
b5?
Okay,
so
the
guy
wants
to
sell
this
property
and
he
sells
it
to
come
from
the
commissioner
who
got
me
question
is:
does
he
continue
using
the
virtual,
whatever
I
want
to
use
the
old
are
so
the
answer
is
the
answer.
Is
he
can
continue
to
do
that
because
he's
father
didn't
provided
dad?
Six
months
have
not
elapsed.
P
Right,
okay,
but
Commissioner
ooh,
there
being
business
oriented,
says:
I
really
want
to
bar
there
before
I
could
do
a
bar.
Can
I
do
a
bar
now,
and
the
answer
is
no,
he
has
to
come
and
get
a
beef
five
I
like
that,
and
do
that
now,
like
the
reason
that
we're
moving
these
things,
the
way
we're
moving
them
is
is
that
when
we
have
had
the
these
speculative
zoning
cases
come
before
you,
where
somebody
comes
in
to
attract
the
land,
and
they
say
we
want
this
to
be
a
beef
for
you.
P
Do
that
analysis
and
you
go
through
what
are
all
the
possible
uses
are
convene
there
before
you
make
your
recommendation
correct.
So
a
lot
of
those
uses,
there's
no
big
big
deal
about
them
being
there,
but
when
you
get
to
some
of
these
bars
monkey
meat,
the
sand,
all
that
there's
a
real
hesitation
to
allow
that
before
or
there's
a
struggle
with
it,
because
it's
like
well,
it's
you
know
right
next
to
these
neighborhoods
or
it's
just
that
or
the
other.
P
B
L
P
T
AA
F
P
P
P
And
logically,
that
kind
of
should
happen
too,
because
you
do
want
to
take
a
new
look
at
where
you're
locating
these
businesses,
because
conditions
change
now
they
always
come
in
with
before
is
along
the
highway.
There's
really
never
any
relation,
but
there
are
other
developers
and
there
are
other
landowners
out
there
that
don't,
and
if
you
change
all
of
the
uses
to
a
be
five
that
are
gonna
be
four
well,
then
you
just
recovered
the
whole
map.
You
know
because
of
the
potential
that
any
one
of
them
may
want
to
change
to
a
B.
Five.
G
Place
I
mean
if
we
grant
what
ever
has
before
granted
up
a
fight
and
whatever
comes
in,
and
they
need
to
require
to
apply
for
a
fee.
Five
who's,
not
fine,
but
why
not?
We
need
to
be
very
fair
with
the
community
and
provide
them
what
what
they
need
right
now
see
not
create
a
problem
for
them
to
make
business,
so
whoever
doesn't
have
a
before
they
need
to
come
and
apply
fine,
but
whoever
has
a
before
they
need
to
be
moving
to
a
B
five
with
that
before
I
am.
T
T
F
T
T
But
like
okay,
so
let
me
ask
you
a
question
though:
okay,
let's
say
you
have
a
scenario
where,
because
I
understand
the
role
and
issue
to
me,
the
role
and
issue
is
different,
because
you
have
no
use
right
now
right
as
opposed
to
an
existing
news
right,
which
then
affects
the
development
around
the
existing
news
right.
Okay,
so
let
me
give
an
example:
someone
invests
in
a
bar
and
I
think
that's
one
of
them
the
easier
ones,
because
that's
like
socialites,
entertainment,
right
and
so
then
people
start
to
develop
apartments.
T
Homes
shopping
around
like
an
entertainment,
district
or
an
entertainment
area
right,
but
then
the
either
the
economy
goes
bad.
The
developer,
the
guy,
who
did
the
bar
goes
bank
robbery,
Scott
to
sell
this
property,
and
so
someone
comes
in
that's
new
and
they're
willing
to
use
it
for
warehouse
and
storage
because
they
don't
have
the
kind
of
capital
to
be
able
to
operate
a
bar
or
to
to
develop
that
property
in
that
way
or
house.
But
they're
now
automatically
grandfathered
in
on
the
b5
and
there's
nothing.
T
We
can
do
to
stop
them
because
we
did
this
now,
but
what's
affected
is
all
of
the
development
around
that
area.
You
see
what
I
mean
so
couldn't
we
say:
let's
do
what
they're
proposing,
with
the
exception
that
if
it's
the
same
or
similar
to
what
exists,
there's
already
existing,
it
will
be
grandfathered
in.
But
if
it
is
somehow
different
like
from
bar
to
warehousing
or
something
like
that,
then
you
don't
get
grandfathered
and
it
has
to
come
before
the
Commission
or
maybe
they
both
have
to
come
before
the
Commission.
The
Commission
just
determines
yeah.
T
G
Community
memories
doesn't
have
to
be
an
investor,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
a
developer.
Some
some
federal
some
commit
some
community
members,
I
bought
property
at
the
highest
level
of
the
Sony,
decide
it
some
before
and
they're
waiting
on
it,
because
there's
gonna
be
some
development
in
the
area.
That's
some
changes
see
so
now
they
think
they
have
the
top
of
the
line.
Is
they
don't?
So?
What
are
we
doing
to
that?
Little
member
of
the
community
probably
been
drawing
one
of
them.
G
An
example
is
they
might
have
some
properties
it
now
you
need
to
come
back
because
you
can't
I
can't
buy
from
you,
because
that's
any
for
now
make
it
don't
be
fired
without
my
say
that
would
be
an
example
would
not
be.
What
would
that
be
this?
That
would
be
so.
Why
are
we
gonna
hurt
the
community
by
bringing
norden's
that
doesn't
make
any
sense?
Yes,.
F
AA
A
Would
be
three
before
part,
but
you
can
do
B
that
was
B
3
and
then
b3
got
changed
before
and
now
we're
going
before.
Toby
5
and
it's
like
okay
I
mean
it
seems
like
the
higher
used
in
tenses
with
your
changing
zones
and
I
know
what
you're
trying
to
do.
I
think
what
you're
trying
to
do
separate
have
more
zones
with
different
activities
and
I.
Think
that's
what
you're
trying
to
do
with
it
before
the
problem
that
I
see
that
a
lot
of
people
are
expressing
right
now
is
that
well.
AA
A
P
Mean
if
you've
got
a
piece
of
property
and
it's
undeveloped
and
it's
a
v4
I
mean
I,
think
and
and
and
there
is
a
change
like
that,
I
think
you
have
to
look
at
what
the
v4
has
in
it
and
determine
whether
or
not
that's
you
know,
gonna
work
for
for
what
your,
whatever
your
developments
going
to
do,
because
I
mean
we've
tried
to
keep
just
the
the
really
problematic
uses
in
the
b5
okay,
which
are
mostly
Mike
and
eat.
I
mean
they're.
P
There
I
mean
Oh,
we're
doing
is
creating
lucky:
meatus
bars
a
plant
nursery
okay
without
door;
sales,
Hague
grain
and
feed
stores.
Okay,
bulk
grain
veterinarian
outdoor
halfway
houses
tool,
rentals
outdoor
truck
heavy
equipment,
driving
schools,
recreational
vehicle
dealers,
mobile
home
dealers,
furniture
sales,
outdoor
major
appliance
sales,
outdoor
heavy
machinery,
sales,
outdoor
used,
merchandise,
furniture,
portable
chemical
toilet
leasing
and
storage,
imported
crafts,
retail
sale,
outdoor
display
truck
truck
trailer
rental,
auto
impound
yards
inoperable,
vehicle
holding
yards
auto.
A
P
And
comment
on
that
sure
and
bear
with
me:
these
are
the
things
that
are
only
allowed
in
a
b5,
okay
and
grant.
Now
it
doesn't
mean,
remember:
we've
got
a
cumulative
zone.
Audience
is
that
there,
so
everything
that's
allowed
in
b1,
b3
and
b4
are
also
going
to
be
allowed
there,
except
for
I,
think
housing,
single-family
house
and.
A
T
O
J
T
To
get
the
b5
designation
created
quickly
so
that
that
way,
as
future
requests
are
coming
in,
we
can
do
it.
So
the
way
to
do
it
is
to
do
what
he's
saying
now,
because
the
other
side
of
it
is
forget.
The
use
itself
necessarily
like
like
I,
have
a
zoo
here.
The
other
issues
of
marketability
of
the
property
right,
it's
a
B
for
as
it
exists
today,
has
a
certain
marketability
that
a
b3
doesn't
have
that's
correct
right,
and
so
it's
more
than
just
the
inherent
use
of
the
what's
actually
happening
there.
T
A
Think
what
we
need
to
do
is
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
think
we
need
a
little
bit
more
public
input.
I
think
it's
kind
of
new
to
a
lot
of
the
public
here
and
it's
you
know,
there's
only
one
individual,
really,
that's
looking
at
this
thing
right
now
and
I
think
we
need
better
community
awareness
that
this
is
being
proposed
so
that
there
might
be
more
people
here
to
comment
on
on
some
of
the
issues
that
may
come
up
that
we
haven't
even
heard.