►
From YouTube: 10-17-18 Technical Review Board Ad Hoc Committee
Description
10-17-18 Technical Review Board Ad Hoc Committee
A
C
A
E
D
Now,
when
I
put
the
minutes
there
for
the
Tober,
were
we
that
they're
kind
of
long,
where
I
put
them
that
whole
document
era
for
just
record
purposes
of
that
whole
document
of
the
irrigation
ordinance?
And
that
was
a
fruit.
So
it
kind
of
looks
long,
but
just
the
clarification
purposes.
I
know
mr.
Ruiz
and
Oh
having
a
copy
and
there's
plenty
of
ended
up,
taking
a
copy,
so
just
for
documentary
purposes.
But
this
is
basically
everything
was
mostly
in
the
minutes
on
irrigation.
D
G
E
B
D
F
D
D
Green
and
three
yellows
is
agreed,
is
lip-read
ish,
my
green
ivory,
whatever
and
blue
three
little
is
starting
from
June
little
caffeine.
Come.
Are
you
here?
Are
you
starting
from
June
or
the
or
in
this
cane
I
did
send
you
guys
in
or
this
with
we're,
having
nothing
use
that
with
legal
department
and
committee,
everybody,
that's
in
committee
and
guiding
us
for
all
the
things
that
we
need
to
be
doing
so.
B
B
And
one
of
the
last
meetings
that
we
request
the
council
to
see
that
would
make
this
committee
of
permanent
committee
and
I
know
that
in
a
site
when,
when
I
spoke
to
councilman,
something
together
regarding
when
y'all
were
going
to
have
the
presentation
for
the
for
the
piece
he
mentioned,
that
he
wanted
this
committee
to,
he
says:
well
the
committee's
not
going
awaiting.
Basically
what
do
you?
What
do
you
communicate?
It,
though,
we'll
see
what
happens
within
you.
J
J
D
D
L
D
D
L
C
D
E
B
M
D
A
D
D
D
I
K
D
C
B
L
K
A
We
don't
have
enough
time
or
you
know
we
try
to
push
it
to
a
next
meeting,
we're
calling
a
special
meeting.
Maybe
instead
we
need
some
kind
of
a
workshop,
we're
less
than
a
form
a
tent,
but
it
still
gives
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
come.
It
didn't
have
to
be
the
same
notice
or
not,
but
because
there
won't
be
a
forum,
so
won't
be
it
just.
D
A
B
A
In
favor,
all
right
carries
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
discussion
with
possible
action
regarding
the
City
Lorado
development
code,
chapter
24,
article
4
and
5
for
the
purpose
of
revising
the
dimensional
standard
setback
requirements
and
any
other
matters.
Incident.
13
I
know
that
I'm.
During
our
last
meeting,
we
had
some
discussion
on
what
it
was
that
were
supposed
to
be
looking
at.
A
D
B
D
Camera
on
the
front
we
need
to.
First,
we
need
to
establish
what
type
of
art
is
it
residential
commercial
number
two.
We
need
to
establish
now
that
we're
trying
to
do
front
lot.
Utilities
ap
has
additional
easement
support
and
so
how's
it
already.
The
improvements
that
were
allowing
should
not
include
in
the
actual
business
right,
that's
correct,
and
so
they
should
come.
If
you
give,
you
add
an
extra
I,
don't
know
ten
feet
and
you
have
20
feet:
front
setback.
D
The
first
check
to
is
ATP,
so
you're,
basically
building
up
to
these,
and
so,
if
there's
issue
with
digging
or
any
infrastructures
or
anything
there,
that
is
the
dilemma.
Okay,
so,
but
again,
that's
only
on
new
lots
that
have
fun
a
lot
of
utilities.
We
need
to
address
every
single
type
of,
in
my
opinion
and
when
I've
talked
to
planning,
because
there's
all
kinda
mods.
Rather
they
have
rear.
A
Their
seasons,
if
everybody
agrees
I,
think
maybe
we
need
it.
We
should
have
the
rear
yard
setback
and
then
it
was
a
front
yard
setback
because
I
think
they
were
here.
It
said
back
most
folks
agree
that
needs
to
be
change.
I
think
the
steps
on
board
eighties
on
board
everybody's
upward,
and
we
need
to
find
that
and
we
can
get
a
vote
on
that
and
then
that
way
we
can
move
to
the
front
lot
and
at
least
going
to
got
that
one
yeah.
D
J
B
B
B
They
want
to
run
power
poles
in
front
of
residential
lots
linked
with
what
ended
up
happening
back
in
those
on
K.
This
subdivision.
They
have
all
those
power
poles
out
there
in
the
front
and
all
of
a
sudden
the
counselors
are
clinic.
What's
what
the
heck's
going
on?
How
do
you
stand
out
from
there?
They
move
all
the
power
poles
to
the
to
the
back
to
the
of
the
properties.
So
I,
don't
think
anybody
from
council
I
mean
there's
my
opinion.
B
K
F
B
L
L
B
D
F
F
K
J
C
D
It
will
be
ten
and
then
I
only
look
hard
to
another's
lower
back.
You
did
research.
There
was
no
permit
issue
there
and
it's
been
over
ten
years
and
there
people
living
in
that,
like
that
so
I,
do
the
earlier
I
found
that
it's
been
over
ten
years.
There
was
a
structure
that
I
don't
know.
If
there
was
it's
an
apartment
now
in
the
back
of
a
house,
but
there
is
no
permanent
that
was
ever
issued
there.
It's
only
one
electrical
meter,
and
so
so.
D
I
C
G
B
B
E
B
B
E
H
K
D
H
E
K
A
B
A
D
A
A
A
J
D
B
I
B
B
B
And
and
the
recommendations
that
we
make
that
all
those
items
will
be
like
a
building
permit
issue,
in
other
words,
when
the
person
codes
and
applies
for
a
permit
staff
will
have
requirements
that
says:
okay,
you
need
to
bring
in
your
survey,
you're
gonna
add
to
the
back
of
the
property.
You
neither
bring
in
a
survey
so
end
of.
E
D
G
K
B
B
I
L
B
I
B
B
J
G
B
D
Rotation,
they
don't
think
it's
eating
you.
They
think
it's
structure,
structure
and
I.
Think
that's
one
of
the
things
that
in
the
lab
demonaco,
we
need
to
baby
put
diagrams
so
that
we
can
explain
the
actual
separation
where
the
proper,
like
that
it's
easy,
even
and
kind
of
measure
it
to
kind
of
give
a
picture.
So
a
lot
of
times.
People
read
it
in
there,
no
entiendo!
Okay,
so
you
put
pictures.
G
M
B
B
B
E
B
To
the
rear
set
backs
to
by
feet,
including
accessory
buildings,
all
in
other
words,
all
structures
and
that
that
assume
that
that
building
setback
is
subject
to
you
know
any
fire
code.
You
know
Taney
of
easements
that
are
on
the
plaque
or
audio
description.
These
restrictions,
hoh-hoh,
you
know
anything
anything
affecting
the
use
of
that
some
picture,
anything
affecting
the
use
of
the
property
and.
F
F
Into
the
fight
foot
you're
restricting
the
Eastman
and
I
know
you
made
kind
of
such
a
Jew
so
but
that
kind
of
addresses
to
me
some
of
the
existing
homes
or
the
existing
Lots
right,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
how
how
would
we
put
that
in
a
new
subdivision
so
on
a
new
subdivision?
If
the
developer
decides
to
put
a
utility
eastman
on
the
back,
then
he's
going
to
show
whatever
AEP
or
AT&T
or
Time
Warner
requires
right.
B
Separate
and
that's
happening
today,
because
what
we
did,
for
example,
we
were
developed
right
there
in
front
of
kennel
and
we
headed
some
existing
power
poles.
It
was
a
commercial
development
because
they're
condominiums
and
in
there
there
used
to
be
a
6-foot
utility
eastman
in
the
back
and
then
that
got
increased.
So
a
20
foot
each
other
nice
mount
of
the
back
up
to
12
foot
utility
I,
don't
know
20
I
think
we
did
20
feet.
It
got
it.
K
B
A
L
J
F
F
A
F
But
but
the
Eastman
the
Eastman
gives
them
I
mean
the
Eastwood's
could
be
very
specific,
but
Eastman
skip,
give
them
the
right
to
be
there
with
what
they
have
and
what
they
can
do.
So
they
decide
to
go
from
underground
overhead
now,
you're
in
the
way
right
now
right,
yeah,
so
it
it's
it's
not
I
mean
you
can
make
an
Eastman
to
say.
You're
gonna,
be
here
at
this
time
with
this
infrastructure
in
that
city.
Are
you.
L
J
G
G
A
I
B
One
of
the
one
of
the
things
we
have
the
which
we
need
to
bring
up,
which
is
a
tree
for
the
preservation
ordinance
and
in
the
in
that
particular
ordinance.
It
only
addresses
commercial,
which
is
one
of
the
concerns
when
we
first
had
our
first
meeting
on
it,
I
said:
well,
it's
only
addressing
commercial
I
think
it
needs
to
address
some
of
the
some
of
the
residential
looks.
D
K
B
A
C
L
A
B
K
K
I
B
A
B
B
Is
what's
happening
right
now
on
the
front?
You
know
it's
when
there's
during
the
front
unit
utilities
they've
got
a
10,
a
10
foot,
utility
easement
that
runs
along
the
front
and
then,
where
all
the
pedestals
are,
then
they've
got
a
10
foot
utility
that
goes
up
to
the
20,
25
and
5
on
each
side.
So
all
the
pedestals
are
supposed
to
be
maintained
within
that
10
feet
and
then
anything,
that's
underground
gets
make
the
vertical
one
right
or.
B
B
B
G
D
G
L
G
E
B
B
M
B
Once
you
get
to
the
10
feet,
which
is
your
building
setback,
your
future
business
ooming
that
everybody
agrees
with
it,
then
once
you
back
up
your
car,
you
can
see
your
visibility
there,
because
you
have
20
feet
because
you
have
a
nine
and
a
half
feet
before
you
get
to
the
curve.
So
those
lines
that
I
dragged
the
draw
there
is
people
as
they're
backing
out.
They
should
be
able
to
see
way
back
because
you've
got
20
feet.
You're.
G
D
A
K
F
G
D
I
A
C
Wait
a
minute
block
away
from
the
house
and
we
all
have
you
know
proper
setbacks.
He
built
Clark
would
be
legal
to
the
front
and
then
the
guy
saw
the
house,
the
guy
that
moved
in
because
gate
closed.
It
and
I
have
a
a
ugly-looking
structure,
all
the
way
up
to
the
driveway
plumbing
up
to
the
property
line,
and
we.
G
C
C
C
E
B
B
B
J
B
G
B
G
A
E
I
That
opens
up
the
door
huge
for
using
more
of
their
land.
I
want
to
say
that
I
do
like
the
the
option
of
our
new
development,
doing
the
front
setback
to
ten
instead
of
twenty,
but
on
existing
homes
to
leave
it
for
now,
until
we
kind
of
find
a
better
way
of
addressing
the
existing
homes
and
then
see
what
what
the
community
comes
back
with
so.
E
B
B
M
L
L
L
B
D
F
A
F
I
A
I
J
D
G
B
M
G
F
B
A
state
allowing
the
cars
for
is
the
argument
is
at
stake,
I'm
in
favor
of
where
the
junkies,
but
if
the
argument
is
aesthetics
and
you're,
saying
the
carport,
the
overhang
of
the
carport,
to
extend
five
feet
from
the
property
length
and
you're
saying
no
to
ten
feet
from
the
property
line
for
a
building
structure.
Your
argument
and.
B
B
There
is
it
that's
why
that's
why,
when
I
was
in
the
board
of
existence,
it
was
all
before
I
get
be
driving
in
the
neighborhoods
or
anything.
Okay,
give
us
an
extra
go,
take
pictures
all
over
the
neighborhood.
So
if
your
neighbors
are
already
comfortable
with
it,
then
petition
when
you're
gonna
learn
with
this
one
look,
you
know:
I
went
around.
The
Rena
went
around
the
streets
and
look
Kara
all
the
here,
all
the
instances
where
people
already
had
their
you
know
they're
in
their
car
ports.
B
B
B
J
J
D
Same
as
this
staff
denies
inability
anybody
that
goes
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
or
the
plan
with
a
nice
carport,
they
get
there
and
they
get
the
variance.
So
doesn't
matter
what
the
city
says:
they're
gonna
get
the
variance
anyway
might
as
well
just
for
Carper.
So
that's
why
the
span
on
staff
is
a
carport
not
to
mention
councilman
or
every.
B
G
J
H
E
I
B
B
E
G
A
B
My
motion
is
that
we
allow
the
living
area
to
extend
ten
feet
or
so
the
building
setback,
supportive,
with
no
Fred
setback,
to
be
ten
ten
feet
on
the
living
area,
respecting
any
utility
easements,
respecting
the
parking
record,
the
twenty
foot,
building
setback
for
parking
and
those
any
parking
requirements
for
some.
Some
of
us
required
to
lots
two
cars.
Some
Lots
require
three
three
cards
on.
A
A
B
J
B
Whole
purpose
of
this
whole
thing
is
that
people
can
come
in
and
apply
so
what's
happening.
Right
now
is
that
people
don't
apply,
so
we
need
to
give
them
the
use
of
their.
You
know,
give
them
the
use
of
their
property
if
you're
sent
back
20
feet
from
the
property
line.
There's
no
issue
of
visibility
and
the
combat
on
that
thing
is
if
you're
going
to
an
existing
subdivision
I.
My
motion
is
that
they
get.
You
know
letters
from
their
from
their
neighbors.
That
says.
B
K
B
E
I
L
B
B
D
B
M
D
J
D
B
K
B
Eddakath
I'll
probably
end
to
keep
their
buildings
separate
it
from
from
each
other.
So
when
I
did
that
it
was
I,
went
from
the
curve
to
the
structure
20
feet
and
then-
and
it's
is
the
seventh
half
feet
from
from
side
to
side
and
I-
did
a
24
foot
concrete
Street
when
I
did
San
Giovanni?
What
I
did
was
I
still
kept
the
20
feet
from
the
structure
or
from
the
two
partner
right
now
who
have
two
car
garages
from
the
two-car
garage
to
the
back
of
curb.
B
There
was
20
feet
and
kept
the
seven,
but
what
I
did
was
that
in
a
31
back
to
back
street
I
went
to
asphalt
and
that
solution
the
new
one
that
I
did,
which
is
that
you
know
what
I
did
was
I
did
on
the
majority
of
a
lot.
There
was
some
that
I
had
some
some
because
I
15
foot
utilities
and
it
still
kept
like
three
or
four
of
them.
B
I
kept
the
20
feet,
but
the
majority
of
them
had
a
25
foot,
building
setback
from
the
back
of
the
from
the
back
of
the
curve
and
that
one
has
worked,
and
then
the
utility
ISA
or
the
right
away
ISA,
nor
that
easement
in
there
extends
snow.
You
still
have
like
a
50
foot
Eastman
in
there
to
be
able
to
run
the
utilities
to
be
able
to
run
all
those
setbacks
and
all
that
stuff.
So
to
most,
those
deals
have.
G
M
B
B
B
J
H
A
B
H
A
B
A
A
B
G
A
C
G
A
B
E
E
B
I'll
tell
you
is
that
to
further
their
purpose,
yeah
that
we
have
the
the
opposite,
which
was
on
their
comments
from
their
beginning.
So
where
there's
an
alley
that
the
setbacks
are
the
reverse,
you
know,
there's
a
front
setback
is
a
five
foot
building
setback
and
that's
we've
got
that
sense.
It
makes
sense,
meaning
can't.
F
I
D
G
A
H
F
My
opinion
is
I,
think,
there's
a
lot
of
our
discussions
that
we
have
that
can
be
had
in
a
workshop
setting
where
we
can
hash
out
a
lot
of
these
finite
details
and
for
that
matter
term,
not
waste
everybody's
time.
You
know
yeah
in
a
special
meeting,
because
now
now
with
the
as
critical
as
these
meetings
are
going
to
be
for
our
candidates
and
so
on.
Some
of
us
you.
E
F
A
G
K
F
H
C
E
B
E
J
H
A
B
B
B
G
M
B
G
D
B
L
F
A
F
G
A
B
L
G
I
B
J
B
D
G
F
In
the
railway
well,
I
know
you're
not,
but
I
mean
it
goes
back
to
me.
Some
of
the
concerns
that
I
have
even
with
moving
the
building
to
10-foot
or
moving
the
building
to
an
easement
line
is
then
they
have
to
come
in
and
repair
the
you
know:
I
mean
yeah
I'm,
going
back
to
rough
radius
build
one
before,
but
those.
F
They're
still
on
their
plate,
I'm
done
with
the
carport,
because
I
mean
for
I
think
we
need
to
put
something
in
the
books
that
eliminates
somebody
having
to
go
to
a
board
of
adjustments
and
get
approval
100%
of
the
time.
I
think
that's
part
of
our
whole.
Our
job
of
RI
being
on
this
committee
is
okay.
F
For
something
that
doesn't
make
sense
in
the
code
or
the
ornaments
and
they're
getting
approval
at
one
of
adjustments,
100%
of
the
time
yeah
sure,
then
that's
our
duty,
as
this
committee
I
think
to
rewrite
that
so
I'm.
Okay
with
that
idea,
I'm
just
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
some
of
the
details
of
how
we
approach
that.
Does
that
make
sense,
I
guess
I'm.
F
E
J
H
B
E
D
Driveway,
if
you
have
that
you
must
have
a
wide
enough
lot
and
if
you
have
the
room
that
makes
sense
it's
when
you
have
these
little
rods,
that
doesn't
make
sense
you're
trying
to
do
that
notation.
So
it
goes
with
the
geometric
of
the
Lots.
You
know,
because
if
you're
talking
about
a
4446
Eastern,
Western
Division
46
foot
wide
Lots.
A
F
F
I
B
B
A
H
A
C
B
L
A
I
J
D
C
A
B
M
J
A
A
E
B
B
D
D
B
Just
left
he
said
what
happens
is
these
are
things
you
get
a
brutal
bordering
distance.
I've
done
a
couple
of
instances
where
I've
built
homes
on
your
luck
and
the
city
arbitrarily
changed
the
zoning
all
along
I-35.
So
if
you
go
all
along
I-35
up
to
something
in
see
school,
it's
all
Zone
B,
something
and
all
you
have
on
something
that
sees
those
residential
homes.
So
what
do
you
have
to
do?
You
have
to
go
spend
money
because
you
want
to
be
able
to
get
five
feet
from
the
further
property
line
to
go
overboard.