►
From YouTube: 10-03-18 Technical Review Board Ad-Hoc Committee
Description
10-03-18 Technical Review Board Ad-Hoc Committee
B
C
A
F
B
E
A
B
A
I
B
A
B
And
absolutely
the
the
actual
obvious
at
first
I'm
going
to
ask
this
committee:
that's
when
we
elected
officers-
and
we
spoke-
the
recording-
is
not
very
narrow,
even
though
it
was,
it
was
recording
a
reported
static,
something
to
do
with
the
formatting,
so
I
guess
we
could
go
back
and
look
at
the
of
the
agenda.
I
have
some
notes,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
I
capture
everything
I
realize
a
lot
on
the
video
and
now
that
they're
all
the
videos
are
now
online.
B
Still
working
on
this
with
this
work
last
me
we
have
one
was
going
to
be
the
last
meeting.
We
then
look
at
the
irrigation,
so
it
turns
out
that
this
is
the
last
video
we're
going
to
look
at
the
irrigation.
You
wanted
irrigate
errs
here
to
decide.
Finally,
what
it
was,
so
that
would
be
the
first
item
to
try
to
lower
you.
B
That's
what
it's
a
communication
from
from
staff
I
know.
One
of
the
items
that
we're
going
to
discuss
is
the
setbacks
and
easements,
which
would
be
506.
I
know
that
city
management
was
looking
into
revamping
and
hiring
a
firm
to
redo
the
entire
land
development
code.
So
I
know
that
this
is
a
something
that
the
committee
wanted
to
look
at
as
far
as
setbacks,
and
maybe
easiness
and
things
like
that.
But
I
don't
know
if
any
changes
that
you
guys
want
to
look
at
is.
E
Personally,
I
think
these
recommended
changes
will
go
a
long
ways
to
helping
them
when
they,
when
prevent
the,
when
they
revamp
the
ordinance,
and
they
can.
You
know
if
that
tendon
takes
them
or
okay.
Yes,
because
I
think
the
changes
that
were
suggesting
suggesting
are
consistent
with
some
of
the
items
and
the
current
comprehensive
code
when
it
comes
to
real
access
and
that
kind
of
well.
B
One
of
the
things
that
that
this
committee
discussed
was
what
was
the
border
had
just
been
looking
at
as
far
as
and
I'm
still
working
on
those
minutes.
What
was
the
border,
but
just
been
looking
at
as
far
as
what
are
they're
proving
where
they
are
proving
that
is
kind
of
not
allowed
by
the
lab
development
code?
You
wanted
that
information
so
that
you
you've
been
doing.
What
is
it
that
that
the
border
is
open
was
looking
at?
That
is
something
that
I
still
need
to
bring
as
far
as
present
to
this
committee.
E
I
said
generally
in
the
and
the
word
of
a
distance
at
the
same
time,
mm-hmm
when
we
said
that
the
Board
of
Adjustment
so
many
instances
where
we
allowed
for
getting
closer
to
the
rear
setbacks,
and
there
was
getting
good
to
10
feet
on
the
setbacks
in
certain
circles,
in
other
words,
to
be
willing
to
come
in
and
I
remember
a
case.
In
particular,
it
was
mr.
Espinosa.
E
I
Know
the
one
I
see
a
whole
watch,
you
know
and
there's
no,
you
know
our
set
of
these
and
you
go
more
than
the
variance
is
people
building
car
ports.
You
know
and
I
think
we
were
all
in
agreement
when
we
had
an
initial
discussion
here,
I
don't
think
if
I
think
there's
only
a
few
issues
that
we're
all
concerned
about
I
know
a
piece
of
both
wants.
I
J
B
J
B
The
distances,
what
is
a
lattice,
or
maybe
if
it's
a
storage
room
or
is
it
something
that's
a
liveable
very,
is
very
no
right
now
in.
Is
it
going
to
be
for
any
luck
or
is
it
going
to
be
for
future
Rob
because
there's
a
lot
of
lots
of
honey's
mints
or
there's
a
lot
of
lots
that
already
planning
and
it's
not
allowed.
That
kind
of
thing
is
what.
B
So
item
six
is
open.
We
need
to
leave
out
the
then
you
ended
up
discussion
with
possible
action
regarding
the
city
related
development
code,
chapter
24,
article
singer
and
article
five
for
the
purposes
of
realizing
the
dimensional
standards
setback
requirements
in
any
other
matters.
Incident
there
too.
So
now
that
we
have
that
and
maybe
I
guess,
I
could
put
up
the.
E
H
A
A
J
E
F
B
C
E
G
L
E
C
E
So
then,
based
on
whatever
gets
approved
here,
then
we
can
just
make
it
change
this
to
your
to
your
document.
Basically
in
there,
when
you
look
at
the
top
I
just
put
some
examples
within
our
current
code,
our
dimensional
standards,
our
leather
building
code
has
many
areas
where
10
feet.
Setbacks
are
allowed,
and
it
has
instances
like
for
the
in
certain
areas
to
where
it's
less
than
8
feet
left
in
the
commercial
business
commercial
business
district.
L
E
E
E
G
E
E
Its
all
Lots
and
when
I
say
all
because
this
is
one
of
the
things
when
I
talk
to
my
Eagle
might
even
think
at
one
time
he
said
you
should
have.
You
should
focus
on
maximum
setbacks
he
used.
The
word
makes
it
makes
women
setbacks
and
our
current
code
does
not
allow
us
to
put
buildings
to
the
front
and
then
put
parking
in
the
rear.
So
maybe,
if
I
can
just
read
this
real
quick,
it
doesn't
nobody
in
the
25
foot,
building
setback
on
commercial
buildings
right.
N
G
E
E
E
Code
you'll
see
minute
instances
or
attempt
at
10-foot
setback
is
allowed,
or
you
have
to
ask
for
permission.
I
suspect
that
hardly
anyone
has
because
something
more
onerous
is
his
active
return
or
the
addition
and
the
additional
time
involved.
So
even
though
it's
they
give
you
permission,
it's
like
okay.
Well
we're
going
to
give
up
to
get
permission.
You
know
so
that
people
that
don't
even
go
through
the
process.
My
comments
are
in
the
setback
should
be
reduced
to
ten
P
front
right
foot
by
foot
rerun
residential
as
a
standard
work.
E
Driveway
access
is
at
front
in
the
reverse,
when
axis
is
in
the
rear,
alleys
access
has
a
10-foot
rear
setback
and,
if
I
put
front
setback,
add
a
note
that
the
site,
visibility,
parking
and
utility
setbacks
are
any
force
at
the
building
permit
state.
So,
basically,
what
we're
or
what
I'm
suggesting
is
that
we
allow
the
families
of
the
business
owners
to
have
more
flexibility
on
their
on
their
own
or
they
place
their
their
buildings,
but
that
at
the
building
permit
stage
that
you
know
the
issues
of
site
visibility.
Are
we
in
a
corner?
E
Can
we
not
see?
Do
we
have
any
issues
with
utility
setbacks
that
those
you
know
and
the
parking?
You
know
that
that
the
if
it's
a
two-car
garages,
that
2
car
garage
be
set
back,
20
20
feet
and
then
those
are
enforced
at
the
building
permit
stage,
not
as
a
blanket.
Every
locked
has
to
have
20
foot
front
setbacks,
20
foot,
rear
setbacks
on
commercial,
which
has
changed
from
the
current
25
feet
front
to
10
foot
like
the
residential
II
additionally
on
site
and
rear
setback.
E
We
should
change
this
by
feet
on
instances
where
a
sprinkler
system
is
installed
same
plant
note
for
both
parking
etc.
There
should
be
an
additional
exception
by
agreement
between
two
landowners
on
commercial
that
by
agreement
they
can
have
a
zero
lot
line
and
attach
the
building's
kind
of
like
in
the
I
believe
this
or
I
used
to
see
this
in
McAllen,
where
all
of
a
sudden
there
was
a
strip
center
and
like
all
of
a
sudden,
people
were
attaching
attaching
their
units
and
the
evident
that
attached.
E
Learning
to
this
for
very,
very
brief
strip,
centers
can
be
individually
owned
without
the
need
to
do
a
commercial
condominium.
They
just
need
an
agreement
between
parties.
Typically
when
you're
trying
to
sell-
and
it
said,
they're
a
condominium
regime-
you
know
all
the
Nationalists
kind
of
like
you
know.
We
don't
want
the.
We
don't
want
condominiums.
C
E
Approves
it
changes,
it
will
shift
more
decision-making
to
the
landowner
as
how
to
improve
their
land
and
will
increase
the
tax
base
per
square
foot.
It's
a
win-win
scenario
for
all
involved,
including
the
utility
companies
and
when
I,
say
utility
companies,
because
you
know
the
the
utility
companies
you
know
don't
have
to
run
lines
as
as
long.
You
know
it
saves
them.
Also.
E
Also
money
may
be
there
anymore
transformers,
but
you
know
all
the
trenching
all
the
maintaining
of
lines
and
all
the
other
stuff
it
should
should
help
reduce
their
cost
to
them
and
then
Johnny
added
I
think
we
should
also
address
a
minimum
lot
size
for
duplex.
The
formula
for
a
multi-family
is
1,200
square
feet
of
mud
area
for
one
bedroom,
additional
400
square
feet
of
land
needed
for
additional,
then
the
minimum
lot
size
for
a
duplex
is
6,000
square
feet.
I
agree
with
that.
That's
that's!
E
G
E
You
know
and
all
the
all
the
all
the
areas
I
know
that
council
people
are
concerned
with
setbacks
and
I
think
it
became
a
very
evident
to
the
council
people
when
that
Montini
guy,
rather
remember
what
what
guided
the
architects
but
in
a
consultant-
and
he
talked
about
you-
know
the
land,
use
and
all
of
the
stuff
and
and
were
the
urban
sprawl
you
know
was
tossing
the
city
a
lot
more
money.
Where
then.
I
A
A
I
Q
B
C
M
E
G
G
E
A
weather
when
they
in
others
give
an
opportunity
to
the
landowner
to
use
the
their
land
that
they're
paid
for
you
know
sacrifice
to
pay
for
to
their
the
maximum
you
so
long
as
they
allow
access
for
utility
so
long
as
they're,
not
parking
on
the
street
and
so
long
as
there's
no
visibility
concerns
and
those
get
dealt
with
when
they
come
into
play
for
a
building
permit
and
there's
at
that
point
you're
looking
at,
is
they
okay?
Well
I'm,
sorry,
I
know
if
I
put
rear
setback
but
ap.
I
From
the
inter
up
real
quick
of
the
victors
of
issue,
this
started
Arnold
John
reserve
of
over
four
months
ago.
I
was
having
lunch
with
councilman
Rodriguez
and
his
concern
was:
what
do
we
do
about
the
problem
that
happens
right
now
with,
and
you
know
where
would
you
keep
it
for
good
on
the
future?
So
if
the
city
has
you
know
a
side
easement
or
something
like
that
and
a
little
you've
probably
heard
it
directly
from
the
councilmen
also
yeah.
N
I
heard
when
I
spoke
to
the
council
member
before
before
the
item
came
up
on
the
on
the
council
meeting
pretty
much
the
issues
that
he's
seen
on
his
district
thought
that
I've
had
that
communication
with
them.
It's
been
many,
the
clock,
ports
I
mean
people
wanting
to
do
their
car
ports
and
then,
when
it
comes
for
the
rear
and
trying
to
do
an
addition
and
a
palapa
component.
B
B
And
then
they
end
up
getting
fined
or
things
like
that
and
in
some
cases
they're
building,
all
of
our
start
up
as
a
palapa
and
then
they
later
on,
make
it
into
a
full
fledge
living
area
and
then
you've
got
issues
and
so
I
mean
I
get
emails.
All
the
time
saying
a
book
I
mean
review
from
a
he's
saying:
look
they
build
something.
N
Than
a
floor,
and
the
only
comment
just
to
payment
of
just
perspective
view
I,
know
we'll
discuss
it
more
when
it
comes
to
the
front
work,
we're
more
looking
on
the
open
structure
and
not
now
than
because
we
still
want
to
keep
that
twin.
But
if
it's
that
carport
or
such
when
to
be
blessed
one
that
when
it
comes
to
the
rear,
the
only
thing
that
would
concern
this
is
just
really
the
easements
and
the
separation
on
the
fire.
So
that's
kind
of
just
the
angles.
From
from
our
angle,
I
mean.
S
That's
one
of
the
reasons
why
work
we've
been
promoting
pretty
hard
to
go
from
construction
going
forward
and
if
this
is
going
to
benefit
or
the
promotion
of
proper
construction
out
being
improvement,
because
I
would
love
to
put
our
facilities
in
the
front
in
the
knees,
myth
and
the
setback
adjacent
to
the
right
away.
It's
got
to
be
in
an
easement,
not
in
the
right-of-way
yeah,
so
Louise
in
the
back.
They
let
him
do
what
he
needs
to
do.
The
poles
yeah.
S
Alright,
now,
let's
see
right
now,
if
he's
looking
at
we've
addressed
transmission
line,
rule
of
encroachments,
temporary
restraining
orders,
injunctions
where
we
have
a
customer
removing
profile
on
transmission,
we
haven't
done
that
yet
for
distribution!
That's
what
we're
coming
to
you
guys
right
to
help
us
with
those
encroachments
on
a
distribution
and
I
want
a
piece
getting
ready
to
take
a
stronger
spend
on
this
tribution
easements.
Well,
we
may
be
filing
temporary
restraining
orders,
our
customers
to
remove
those
encroachments,
because.
C
S
E
E
If
we
exactly
you
know
so
they
don't
apply
the
to
the
so
if
we
allow
them
more
control
over
the
improvements
of
their
property
and
that
they
know
that
that
to
come,
that
they
have
a
higher
potential
of
saying
getting
a
blessing
from
the
city,
and
then
at
that
point
you
know
they
come
to
you
with
a
this.
Is
my
plan
and
he's?
Oh
no,
but
we've
got
a
power
line
here.
You
know
you
can
do
it,
but
you
know
go
back.
You
know
an
extra
three
or
four
feet.
You
know.
I
Thousand
watts
in
my
own
or
subdivisions
people
weren't
even
aware
that
there
was
a
river
back.
It's
not
that
and
then,
when
they,
the
few
that
were
of
going
get
denied
or
then
or
they
get
denied
for
a
carport
and
everybody
on
their
blocks
got
a
car.
For
so
I
mean
we
I
think
we
address
the
future
issue
that
issues
and
whatever
we
do.
But
I
was
people.
A
P
P
N
N
G
N
N
S
K
E
I
Some
Heinen
subdivisions
I've
seen
them
work,
but
the
numbers
don't
work,
you
know,
and
here
we
are
our
number
one
problem
is
affordability.
We
were
in
priced
at
least
70%
of
right
out
of
the
front
motive,
we'll
probably
up
to
a
few
hundred
Lots
already
another
couple
hundred
on
the
agenda
and
the
thing
I
love
about
it.
It's
zero
capital
contributions.
G
G
B
S
Long
as
there's
no
obstructions
in
that
five-foot
silo
easement
like
an
air
conditioning
unit
or
cleanouts,
or
anything
because
we
have
these
little
mini
Derrick's
that
we
can
take
into
the
back
to
allow
us
to
move
the
Transformers,
if
not
work,
having
to
hire
a
crane
to
go
over
the
house
many
times.
Imagine.
I
A
S
You
look
at
the
ordinance
the
the
first
piece
of
equipment
than
the
ordinance
right
now
forefront
of
our
construction
is
a
be
independent,
and
then
you
have
a
teen
teen
Time
Warner
behind
us.
If
we
could
do
our
own
easement,
don't
work,
I
mean
our
own
trench.
That
will
work
and
that's
what
we
want
to
go,
because
we
don't
know
a
way.
That
makes
me
a
cheater
more.
S
N
C
T
T
A
T
On
it-
and
so
you're
doing
this
facing
this,
where
you
can
open
the
door,
you
know
this
year
and
go
from
here
and
what
vice
or
something
this
size
here.
But
you
know
with
with
the
fence
being
on
this
side,
you
can
afford
county,
where
you
are
three
feet
on
that
side
alone.
So,
but
you
do
burn
on
the
open
side
of
the
transformer
tension.
H
A
S
N
Everybody
spoke
their
mind
on
the
different
perspectives.
I
think
the
point
that
has
the
most
differences
on
the
front
I
think
the
only
exercises,
if
possible,
with
all
the
heads,
if
we're
able
to
develop
pretty
much
of
it,
I,
don't
have
to
call
it
a
cross-section
where,
in
theory
you
know
we
have
the
utilities.
N
You
know
what
this
is,
what
we
can
do
with
carports
butter
or
the
addition
or
with
easements,
and
can
kind
of
have
that
perspective
that
all
are,
you
could
say
all
pans
are
kind
of
like
you
know
what
this
work
we're
all
moving
in
the
middle
and
so
I
don't
know
we
want
to
do
this
exercise
right
now.
I'm
just.
A
I
B
Q
N
A
P
P
G
P
B
P
N
M
T
G
P
P
Probably
stopped
would
support
this.
The
threshold
for
her
adjustment
is
our
main.
What
we
mainly
look
at
is,
is
there
can
a
lot
being
reasonably
you
for
its
intended
use?
Matt
is
so
if,
if
a
lot
can
be
used,
which
for
its
intended
use
and
is
I
mean
there
are
instances
where
a
chance
together,
you
know
just
a
crazy
example,
but
let's
say
there's
a
creek
in
the
bag
that
takes
up
half
of
a
lot
well,.
C
P
E
E
A
E
M
E
J
S
Not
in
the
right
at
this
is
Pamela,
the
Eastman
is
not
in
the
right
away
because
they
eat
is
not
installed
in
the
ground.
Primary
facilities
inside
the
right
away
that
are
parallel
to
the
right-of-way
will
only
install
primary
facilities
in
an
easement
parallel
to
the
ground
across
perpendicularly,
but
not
parallel,
because
there's
too
many
people
digging
in
the
right.
A
G
I
K
S
N
N
We
wanted
to
put
like
that
route
drainage
to
the
back,
not
just
on
the
flat
concert,
but
on
the
plan
itself
because
and
that's
been
useful,
actually
it
just
just
for
as
a
pat
on
the
back
for
everybody,
you
know
now
our
resident
Massey's
honor
gets
to
see
a
lot.
One
gets
ran
to
the
back.
We
are
able
to
catch
it
there,
and
so,
if
there's
something
on
the
planet,
self
work
for
the
newer
subdivisions.
A
I
The
AP
is
the
backlog
of
more
pretty
stuff.
Like
that
most
of
times
we
already
have
a
what
we've
already
been
the
pilot
plan,
approval
and
we're,
and
we
we
execute
the
easement
agreement
set
for
final
plan.
Oh
I
see
a
vision,
more
cookie
cutters,
but
you
guys
have
always
the
two
eight
easements
you
know
special
with
over
110
foot
standard
rather
than
a
six
foot.
That's
that's
a
current.
E
E
E
G
G
S
S
I
Came
back
on
because
they
remember
that
mean
they
did
it:
they,
they
weren't,
allowed
in
front
loaded,
lots
of
r1
and
we'll
go
through
these
issues
and
you
were
there
and
and
if
what
we
talked
about
exactly
how
the
pencils
needed
to
be
placed
in
space
in
in
house,
you
know
new
depths
and
all
that
type
of
stuff
solar
clean.
All
of
that.
So
let
me
just
understand
him.
So
on
that,
what
do
you
do
if.
J
J
E
A
J
E
S
E
E
So
you'd
be
at
the
template
like
this,
but
you
don't
submit
me
so
then,
whatever
AEE
needs
as
far
as
the
distance
requirements,
those
are
communicated
either
being
the
plat
or
via
can
be
communicated
via
ordinance
so
that
when
building
comes
out
and
reviews,
a
permit
they'll
say:
oh
okay!
Yes,
you
can
go
over
it
up
to
the
ten,
but
you've
got
a
side
foot
Eastman
here.
So
your
structure
needs
to
be
five
feet
away
from
here,
because
you're
your
you're
getting
because.
S
E
E
To
improve
their
property,
it's
a
very
simple!
You
know
you
know,
Stewart
I
will
go
to
the
old-time
door.
Give
me
all
the
instruments
for
this.
You
know
for
this
property.
If
it
neatly
right,
there
said
you're
concerned
with
a
nice
mint.
That
is,
that
is
not
part
of
the
plan.
It's
a
simple
business
concern.
E
But
you're
giving
the
consumer
an
opportunity
to
expand
this
property,
so
the
only
thing
he
needs
to
do
is
instead
of
submitting
getting
denied
going
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
Is
it
all
okay,
current
existing
subdivision
and
you
want
to
go
to
the
front
10
feet?
Okay,
go
to
new
title
will
go
to
sewer
title
and
get
all
the
Eastman's
that
are
required
or
give
me
a
survey
of
your
property
like
whenever
I
build
on
an
on
your
left
that
I'm
building
in
the
eastern
Western
Division,
you
know
I
can
be
in
South
Laredo.
E
The
first
thing
that
communicate
to
my
consumer
is
this
going
anywhere
from
seven
hundred
to
a
thousand
dollars
depending
on
you
know,
we've
set
it
up
for
bids
depending
on
whether
they
have
a
base
on
that
property
to
do
a
survey
before
we
even
do
anything
else
flying
because
there
are
some
streets,
there
are
some
houses
that
are
being
built
on
the
street
that
are
built
on
the
streets
right
now.
So
if
you
just
require
a
survey
on
an
existing
property
ie,
some
of.
N
N
That
I
saw
on
a
survey
and
and
I
ain't
worked
with
those
Raiders
above
this
notation.
It
was
one
survey
that
I
that
I
saw
that
that
pretty
much
they
made
a
notation
and
they
would
say
in
any
separate
instruments.
Not
you
know,
you
know
not
shown,
and
you
know,
and
so
they
have
it
the
disclaimer.
They.
A
G
F
G
D
E
E
E
A
N
Issue
yeah
connect
me,
but
I
think
about
their
comment.
One
of
the
reasons
I
was
bringing
up
about
the
councilman
the
concerns
that
we
usually
see.
I,
don't
like
from
what
might
my
experience
and
I
was
just
asking
and
being
like
I'm
on
this
period,
also
that
we've
never
really
had
an
issue
of
people
trying
to
do
additions
on
the
front.
N
E
E
N
Reason
I'm
saying
that,
because
when
I
see
residential
I'm
talking
a
standard
home,
usually
the
one
that's
on
the
front,
it's
the
garage
and
it's
a
bedroom,
and
then
you
have
your
hallway
to
the
to
the
inside.
So
it's
really
we're
focusing
this.
This
one
item
on
this
one
bedroom
that
there's
a
good
chance
not
to
get
exactly
there's
expansion
that
we've
seen
it
from
our
experience,
it's
more
because
either
the
living
room
or
the
master
bedroom
or
an
additional
room,
and
that's
more
on
the
back
part
like
when
it
comes
to
the
front.
M
I
M
A
I
mean
you
talk
about
a
seven
foot,
a
little
bit
Lenny,
but
we
could
Eddie,
who
you
know
what
I
was
gonna
say,
maybe
in
the
front
lot
one.
This
is
just
my
opinion.
I,
don't
think
the
front
lot
deal
should
be
a
blanket
deal.
I
think
it
should
just
be
only
a
new
planned
subdivision
so
like
if
the
setback
is
on
the
plan
existing.
Well,
then,
maybe
that's
the
only
way
you
consider
that
ten
foot
front
setback,
but
it's
on
the
plaque.
So
that
way
you
can
control
all
these
issues.
A
G
C
N
S
H
L
K
I
A
N
O
You
and
what
they
were
asked
to
do
by
complimented
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
the
councilman
might
have,
because
I
hear
lots
of
those
moral
adjustments.
If
people
coming
in
and
wanting
put
a
car
up
to
the
front,
I
think
the
idea
of
a
building
is
going
to
with
the
proper
exit
path
to
get
as
much
as
you
can
up
in
front
is
awesome.
O
E
J
S
You're
gonna
get
some
opposition
to
front
up
construction
from
some
of
the
higher-end
builders,
the
ones
that
build
up,
but
they're,
probably
a
lot
fewer.
You
know
you
got.
You
know
the
representation
of
the
bulk
of
that
how
the
affordable
house
it
can
be
built
here
with
with
them
here,
because
that's
what
they're
looking
at
the
try
to
build
an
affordable
house
for
somebody
starting
out
so
front,
lock
construction
by
minimizing
any
cost
of
developer,
has
to
pay
towards
the
electrical
infrastructure.
It's
gonna
benefit
the
halogen.
N
E
A
A
I
E
Simple
have
issues
mark
you're
gonna
have
issues
on
new
subdivision
with
trying
to
push
their
carport
all
the
way
to
the
front
like
you
all
were
suggesting
because
we
have
it.
We
have
a
10
foot
utility
easement
now
so
you
know,
there's
a
new
subdivisions
that
are
front-loaded,
you're
still
going
to
have
to
maintain
your
structure.
10
feet
10
feet
backwards,
which
is
the
existing
ordinance
today.
E
So
in
new
subdivisions
that
we're
building
that
have
front-loaded
utilities,
you
can't
get
any
further
than
10
feet,
but
on
existing
subdivisions,
if
you
give
power
to
the
people
to
be
able
to
utilize
their
lot,
they're
going
to
come
for
their
applications
and
you're
going
to
be
able
to
help
them.
So
then
I'll
make
a
mistake
today,
we're
doing
it
in
the
shadows
on
the
weekend.
C
Of
developers
a
lot
like
to
develop
a
lot,
you
know
a
subdivision
that
we
need
to
give
the
homeowner.
The
ability
to
be
able
to
utilize
is
probably
to
the
maximum
yeah
and
I.
Think
that
that
you
entice
the
developer,
if
it's
enticing
playing
I
think
he's
going
to
have
any
of
those
objectives
to
VM
each
being
in
the
front.
No.
D
G
K
C
C
U
S
What
we're
not
installing
overhead
car
lights
come
back
to
back
where
Bobby's
been
sending
me,
you
every
stop
that
practice,
but
that's
a
practice
that
we've
done
for
years
in
the
past,
and
you
have
that
scenario
pretty
much
everywhere
when
it's
a
problem.
When
you
come
in
HiPower
one
on
a
five-foot
side,
lot
easement
and
you
build
up
two-story
house,
then
we've
got
a
big
problem.
Yeah
right
and
it
happens.
It's.
G
L
T
N
K
A
A
E
Q
C
B
O
N
Just
want
to
want
to
make
one
last
comment
just
for
the
record.
The
one
thing
that
is
happening,
though,
is
let's
say
all
these
polish
I'm
talking
like
way
in
the
future.
Everybody
does
their
additions
and
such
what
could
happen.
I'm,
not
saying
that
it
will
happen.
What
happen
is
you're,
adding
more
bedrooms
to
a
residential
right.
So
in
essence,.
N
A
This
part
of
the
rail
post-
this
is
the
same
thing
as
r1
to
be
whenever
we
pass
that
our
would
be
everybody
every
everybody
thought
that
every
Levin
in
town
was
gonna,
be
a
35
foot
light.
It's
not
the
case,
there's
only
a
few
inches
greater
than
that,
but
he's
done
some
and
Danny
has
an
everybody's
done
a
little
bit,
but
there's
only
been
like
150
large,
probably
on
the
market
and
same
thing
there,
not
everybody's
gonna,
I'm,
not
gonna,
add
any
more
to
my
backyard
yeah.
N
Further
war
in
the
and
the
sword,
it's
like
one
of
the
some
some
locations
now
I'm,
not
saying
that.
There's
a
well
actually
there's
issues
like
that
on
that
on
the
eastern
division,
there's
a
lot
of
our
threes
until
Karina
or
like
in
our
one
just
house.
It's
just
one
one
single
family
until
what's
happening
the
trend
with
that
area
and
especially
with
the
Nez
and
everything
people
are
making
know
if
they
found
me,
which
is
good
yeah,.
C
K
N
G
B
Commercial
lots
were
down
on
commercial
rocks,
limine,
we
just
drop,
checking
it
and
we're
all
supposed
to
be
commercial
offices
and
shops,
and
then
you're
allowed
to
put
in
commercial
multifamily.
Well,
the
housing
crisis
came,
and
you
know
what
the
lake
can
afford.
Houses
is
build
apartments
and
man
apartments
blew
up
and
guess
what
there's
eminent
soon
enough.
B
Decisions
that
are
made
now
can
make
it
strips
already
there,
the
sooner
they're
wise
right
now
you
have,
we
know,
beefed
up
all
that
and
at
what
cost,
because
the
developers
gone
now
the
city
is
inherited
it.
So
you
know
how
do
we
you
know?
How
do
we
need?
You
know
that
that's
one
of
the
things
that
Victor
is
point
out
that
we
tries.
E
I'm
saying
that
is
that
you
know
you're
you're,
putting
a
major
he's,
putting
a
five
million
dollar
structure.
You
know
that's
bringing
tax
revenues
to
the
city
that
weren't
there.
Surely
you
can
take
three
or
four
years
of
that
tax
base
or
five
years
of
that
tax
base
and
put
it
on
a
horse
named.
You
know,
put
it
on
something:
no.
E
I
We
were
on
when
we
promise
we'll
make
our
they
test
the
paving
ordinance.
We
would
promise
them
that
City
Council.
We
would
have
a
resolution
they
and
they
they've
got
Victor
up
to
the
stand
and
said
you
bring
back
in
the
next
30
days
and
we
were
in
screwing
with
the
irrigation
of
ordinance
for
six
months,
and
this
is
going
to
go
on
and
on
today
we're
not
going
to
resolve
anything.
Oh,
we.
E
I
M
A
M
F
A
E
G
F
S
E
A
very
permit
issue,
in
other
words,
whatever
requirements.
Aep
me
as
far
as
setbacks
when
there's
power
poles,
you
know
when
there's
rear,
rear
lot,
easements
I
think
if
you
can
send
us
a
communication,
would
you
need
as
far
as
accessibility,
when
there
is
a
you
know,
when
there
is
a
power
pole
in
the
backyard
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
so
we
can
incorporate
that
and
it
becomes
a
building
permit
issue
when
somebody
goes
in
a
place
for
the
perfect
okay?
Well,
it's
there
and
of
this
I'm
going
to
stay
chefs
so.
U
J
A
L
B
B
F
L
B
C
B
C
E
B
B
Certification
by
irrigate
irrigation,
contractor
a
document
prepared
by
the
irrigation
contractor
and
submitted
to
the
city
Laredo
at
the
request.
All
the
final
inspection
certifying
that
the
irrigation
system
was
installed,
tested
and
conforms
to
the
irrigation
design
submitted
with
the
irrigation
permit
application
and
that
the
system
complies
in
all
aspects
for
the
city
of
Laredo,
chapter
25,
plumbing
requirements,
so
that
was.
U
G
Q
E
B
I
J
B
A
G
J
E
M
M
B
Of
the
things
that
we
I
want
to
note
here
is
that
draw
drawing
the
actual
light
or
property
line
in
showing
if
the
irrigation
system
is
in
the
right
way,
because
a
lot
of
times
they
come
in
with
hand
drawings
of
irrigation
class
and
we're
having
a,
is
it
in
the
right?
Is
it
not
in
the
right
away
so.
R
B
I
B
U
E
B
D
E
E
B
A
Did
ready
make
a
quick
comment
when,
when
we
were
actually
doing
this?
Yes,
we
were
in
a
much
better
position
to
make
a
decision
on
this
stuff
than
today,
so
I
vote
whatever
it
is
that
we
change
or
I
can't
vote,
but
I
would
entertain
a
motion
that
whatever
it
is,
that
we
changed
at
that
time
that
we
have
no.