►
From YouTube: 05-03-19 Technical Review Ad-Hoc Committee
Description
05-03-19 Technical Review Ad-Hoc Committee
B
C
E
No,
it's
a
bear
yeah
out
of
consideration
for
all
attendees
from
the
city
of
Laredo
technical
review
board
ad-hoc
committee
meetings.
Please
turn
off
all
some
of
your
phone
and
pages
and
pages
or
based
on
inaudible
signal.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
Pursuant
to
the
Texas
Penal
Code
chest
pacify
holder
of
license
to
carry
a
handgun,
a
person
licensed
under
subchapter
H
chapter
4
11
government
code
may
not
enter
into
the
City
Hall
first
floor
conference.
Room
of
committee
is
in
session
with
a
concealed
or
openly
carried
hangar
number
2,
roko
roko.
Yes,.
F
A
F
E
G
E
F
To
one
I
knew,
it
was
I
know
mr.
Bluebird
ready
something
that
was
marked
absent
on
it.
But
if
you
see
your
attache
minutes,
it
is
corrected.
Thank
You,
mr.
racer,
so
if
you
see
anything,
I
would
like
to
mention
again
I
thought
we
mentioned
it
before.
Try
to
limit
the
conversation
to
one
person
talking.
F
This
recording
does
give
me
words,
so
that
I
can
provide
their
documentation
as
to
you,
you
say
what
who
motion
what
so,
when
that
being
said,
if
you
remember
anything,
is
specifically
that
it's
not
on
these
minutes,
I
have
all
available
here
in
words.
What
I
can
change
it
and
say
no
for
the
record.
Does.
F
F
For
the
record
we
met
with
the
councilmember,
the
ability
is,
will
present
it
to
size
of
at
City
Council
for
this
committee
to
look
at
the
setback
formats
or
the
setback
section
of
the
organs
and
with
a
discussion
fire
fire.
Mr.
president,
city
managers
were
suppressing
votes
in
their
planning
director
building
director,
the
fire
marshal
and
staff
also
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
Chairman.
Mr.
F
president-
and
there
was
some
discussion
on
this
item
to
clarify,
and
so
because
there
was
backdrop
a
little
bit
further.
We
presented
designer
to
the
planet
Zoning
Commission
last
meeting
and
again
they
team
will
do
because
they
want
they
wanted
a
workshop
in
figuring
out
what
the
economical
impact
was
or
other
impacts
that
they
said.
Horace's
would
do.
F
My
reply
to
the
committee
was
I,
don't
feel
I
mean
the
economical
impact
I'm.
Not
an
economist
and
I
explained
to
them
that
I'm
not
in
the
position
to
say
what
is
you
know
if
you
want
to
talk
about
codes
I'm
at
the
building
department
and
I
would
be
more
than
happy
to
talk
about
that,
and
so
that
being
the
case,
they
tabled
it
and
therefore.
F
The
council,
member
and
city
management
directed
us
to
put
this
as
we
had
discussed
last
meeting.
If
you
remember
didn't
matter
what
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
was
going
to
do,
we're
going
to
present
it
to
City
Council.
So
it's
moving
forward.
It
is
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
City
Council,
so
I
believe,
is
it's
a
introductory
ordinance
so
this
as
proposed
right
now
by
this
board.
It's
moving
forward
with
exceptions
of
a
couple
of
things
that
we
need
to
discuss.
A
vote
on
has
to
be
read
upon
in
that
meeting
and.
F
I
just
wanted
to
tell
the
ones
that
weren't
that
mean
was
called
by
mr.
mr.
Bertoni
notice,
the
director
building
as
to
get
away
together
and
get
on
the
same
page
with
the
councilmember,
and
so
it
was.
It
was
an
organized
effort
with
with
city
managers
as
well
to
to
find
out,
because
the
planning
zoning
commission
did
not
have
an
issue
with
it.
F
Cork
boards,
at
all
they
there
their
status,
was
if
you
would
have
brought
us
three
separate
ordinances,
one
for
the
car
porters,
one
for
the
front,
Senate
back
some
one
for
the
rear
setbacks,
the
carport
would
have
gone
in
and
the
front
was
moral,
maybe
and
the
rear
was
moral.
They
didn't
for
whatever
reason
so,
and
we
were
more
like
the
rears
more
like
we
would
want
to
the
front
we
might
not
want
to
staff
and
and
staff,
had
no
issue
with
it
with
car
parts.
F
So
that
being
the
case,
legal
departments
there
as
well,
and
so
they
they're
trying
to
figure
out
the
logistics
and
I
just
want
to
bring
it
up
to
you
guys
and
say
you
know.
In
light
of
that
meeting,
I
know
mr.
Royce
was
there
and
saying
this:
was
there
so
I
just
want
to
give
you
that
information,
so
you
guys
could
have
a
little
more
information
and
make
your
decisions
today.
B
E
E
Currently,
you
can
build
it
all
the
way
up
to
two
and
a
half
foot
and
to
the
site
setbacks,
and
we
had
proposed
just
doing
a
five
foot
set
by
side
setback
for
anything
whether
it
was
a
house
accessory
dwelling,
an
addition
at
the
end
and
everybody
there
at
the
meeting
ended,
including
pnz,
the
councilmen
fire
tended
to
kind
of
all
be
on
the
same
page
thinking.
Why
are
we
doing
it?
I
thought.
B
E
E
Well,
one
of
the
things
we're
thinking
about
was
voting
on
high
by
avoiding
an
item-by-item
just
to
see.
If
we're
all
in
agreement,
I
know
that
the
City
Councilman
is
he
expressed
what
his
motion
was
going
to
be,
and
it
was
going
to
be
to
take
off
the
that
2-minute
here
that
5-foot
you'll
go
back
to
the
old
way
he
agreed
with
with
the
PNC
and
everybody
else,
or
whoever
else
was
there
and
the
other
one
was
expanding.
E
The
ordinance
for
the
front
said
that
to
include
old
flats
as
well
as
new
plans
for
a
while
there
we
said
well
in
the
in
the
park
that
already
on
the
plan
on
that
we
didn't
want
to,
we
didn't
want
to
approve
the
committee
voted
on.
The
majority
of
the
committee
voted
out
of
not
approving
front
lot
additions.
E
E
A
I
just
had
a
question
on
that.
So
at
this
point
you
know
it's
too
late
to
change
what
we
sent
to
him,
because
it's
already
in
the
agenda
as
is
or
if
whatever
we
I
mean
we
can
vote
on
it
today,
ought
to
be
something
that
shows
support
for
the
changes
that
he's
looking
at,
but
the
other
side
of
it
I
mean.
Is
it's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
change
it.
A
F
F
Was
what
if
they
don't
want
to
do
any
rear
living
area?
They
just
want
to
do
up
a
lot,
but
they
have
to
be
five
feet
away
now,
where
there's
new
orders,
why
can't
we
leave
it
at
the
two
and
a
half
feet
so
that
he
can
enjoy
his
backyard
and
put
a
little
further
closer
to
the
proper
night,
like
you're?
Restricting
that
guy
just
wanted
the
malapa
at
two
and
a
half
feet
and
that's
what
he
was.
E
D
E
Like
if
you
have
an
easement
in
your
backyard,
yep
I
respect
every
other
than
that
you
can
go
up
to
290.
Like
you
have
a
front
life
oldschool
like
in
the
older
part
of
town
where
they
had
everybody
had
overhead
lines,
you
don't
have
an
easement
in
your
backyard.
You
can
build
it
all
the
way
to
that
way.
E
B
E
It's
a
two,
so
it's
been
like
that
forever
and
we
were
kind
of
as
part
of
this
other
thing
we're
getting
a
little
more
aggressive
with
setbacks
in
general.
So
we
scaled
that
back
a
little
bit,
but
nobody
seemed
to
understand
why
we
we
would
have
done
that
when
the
whole
purpose
of
this
is
to
use
more
of
your
land
and
then
you
know
we're
restricting
that
part.
So
so
the.
B
C
H
F
Mr.
West,
this
is
a
would
exist
to
get
what
a
half
feet
from
the
back
of
the
property
line,
the
accessory
enclosed
building.
So
the
the
proposed
ordinance
there
be
changes
to
fight
people.
So
it
didn't
matter
if
it
was
accessory
or
lady,
and
so
the
deal
was
why,
if
anybody
wants
to
do
an
accessory
is
defined
as
not
the
primary
meaning.
E
E
I
E
I
E
I
B
E
You
can
build
them
all
the
way
up
to
two
and
a
half
foot
from
your
property
line
right
that
I've
had
since
82,
and
this
new
ordinance
from
we
wanted
to
have
everything.
Five
foot
you
know
uniform,
including
the
accessories
whether
after
meeting
that
we
had
today
was
over
that
for
pnz
and
the
councilmember
they
kind
of
suggested.
Hey
we're
all
changing
that
when
the
whole
point
is
to
make
more.
You
see
your
land.
What,
if
somebody
doesn't
want
to
add
any
more
to
the
backyard,
to
still
want
to
do
it?
E
F
B
E
H
G
B
E
E
H
B
E
H
E
I
E
E
A
A
No,
the
visibility,
I
think
I
mean
I,
I,
haven't
gone
up
to
a
site
and
set
a
state
tip,
beat
and
try
to
see
if
I
felt
comfortable
with
that,
and
that
might
a
big
good
idea,
but
no
I
think
it's
some
records
are
our
initial
discussion
and
concern
on
that
was
more
aesthetics.
I
thought
right
about
what
everybody
would.
H
E
E
C
D
C
E
I
E
C
H
I
He
didn't
and
I
asked
him
the
question.
As
a
you
mind,
if
somebody
builds,
you
know
the
living
area
of
five
feet
from
the
property
line,
no,
and
then
for
many
of
the
people
that
have
asked
nobody's
really
been
I
haven't
had
one
that
you
know
that
has
argued
against
the
one
person
going.
Oh
look,
the
reality
of
it
is
they're
allowed
to
do
it.
Most
people
are
not
going
to
do
it
anyway,
yeah,
but
at
least
give
people
an
opportunity.
There
were
those
who
watched.
E
I
D
E
E
G
I
G
B
E
But
I
guess
the
point:
I
guess
the
point
where
that
is:
there's
only
they've
been
rebuild
a
thousand
homes
a
year
in
Laredo
and
there's
probably
150
like
that,
maybe
total
and
in
the
past
few
years
so
is
I.
Think
it's
the
same
thing
as
like
right
now.
Everybody
can
build
up
on
operand
accessory
building
or
a
pop
up
on
the
back
yard
two
and
a
half
foot.
How
many
people
have
cut
off
us,
10%,
15%
I
think
it
could
be
the
same
thing
here.
In
other
words,
we're
just
glad
we're
letting
people
have.
E
D
G
B
B
I
I
D
C
I
Go
ahead:
oh
yeah,
maximize
that
and
say:
okay,
here's!
Your
here's!
Your
lot,
so
you're
gonna
you've
got
another.
You
know.
You've
got
another
property
here
and
then
see.
You've
got
one
two
three
four
I
got
you.
So
that
was
a
black
love
concept.
Yeah
under
the
issue
that
they
had
over
there
is
that
these
driveways
were
24
feet.
Why
only
yeah.
B
I
D
E
D
I
E
E
Like
well,
I
mean
I,
don't
in
the
question
there
was
whether
or
not
city
policy
should
be
micromanaging.
The
way
that
you
live
your
life
and
whether
or
not
you
have
children
or
if
you
play
in
the
backyard
or
if
you
want
to
barbecue
in
a
certain
spot,
I
think
wait,
wait,
Big,
Brother
it
too
much
and
we
start
thinking.
Okay.
What's
the
bargain
now
he's
going
to
take
his
barbecue
pit
to
the
front?
No,
we
don't
you
barbecue
to
the
front
or
the
other
back
apartment
and.
F
F
E
E
B
E
Don't
know
how
that
works,
but
for
fifty
seven
hundred
square
foot
category
that
attend
foot
in
the
back,
Corpus
Christi
for
forty
five
hundred
square
foot
Lots
and
for
six
thousand
they
had
five
foot
and
five
foot
in
the
back:
the
valley,
both
Danny
Berg
and
McAllen,
and
illegal
ten
foot
in
the
back
down.
That's
for
a
5,000
square
foot
lot
as
a
five
foot
setback
in
the
back
and
then
it
just
kind
of
depends
and
they
have
different
sizes
for
different
setbacks.
What.
I
E
I
I
B
H
I
B
I
G
A
G
I
B
B
D
E
I
A
I
agree
with
you,
my
only
statement
on
that
was
a
my
discussion
on.
It
was
more
of
aesthetics
than
anything
else.
Yes,
that
was
the
only
reason
why
I
was
thinking
of
and
like
we
thought,
you
know,
maybe
a
copper
we
I
was
thinking
in
my
mind,
kind
of
as
a
compromise.
So
at
this
point,
if
the
councilman
is
kind
of
gauge
his
constituents
and
their
thought
is
to
take
advantage
of
the
front
and
they're.
E
D
D
E
A
I
I
I
F
Bring
something
up,
I
didn't
put
it
on
the
agenda,
but
I
didn't
want
to
have
a
staff
communication
in
something
you
might
not
know,
which
one
was
that
I
do
there
to
coordination
and
I
had
a
meeting
with
all
the
engineers.
As
far
as
you
got
to
go
through
the
kid
coordination
process
and
not
manigott
purpose
anymore,
one.
F
F
This
is
gonna,
be
a
continuation
of
this
because,
again
the
front
lot
setbacks.
You
still
have
to
respect
these
myths
and
they're
in
a
these
going
to
be
in
the
flooding.
So
this
is
the
way
it's
going
on
new
locks
for
front
of
all
utilities,
and
so
whether
you're
gonna
put
the
carport
all
the
way
to
the
edge
of
the
easement.
You
need
to
make
sure
that
you're,
you
know
protecting
the
I
think.
E
The
good
compromise
on
that
I
don't
think
we
ever
gonna
fix
that
part
of
it,
but
if
a
piece
can
end
up
going
in
the
front
on
new
subdivisions,
folks,
probably
not
going
to
be
able
to
build
their
carport.
But
theoretically,
if
you
have
a
5-foot
deal
now
in
the
back,
you
push
the
house
back
a
little
bit
more,
so
you
can
get
a
full
carport,
because
now
your
backyard,
you
can
build
all
the
way
up
to
that
easement
or
you
have
a
swimming
pool.
Now
you
do
all
kinds
of
stuff.
You
don't
have.
F
E
E
F
B
F
B
A
A
In
front
lot,
setback
I
mean
my
mom
utilities,
I'm,
sorry,
private
duties
and
I
mean
it
was
ten
years
ago,
but
the
discussion
back
then
was
I,
don't
think
IEP
is
allowed
to
be
in
the
right-of-way
underground
there.
We
have
it's
like
part
of
their
code,
so
you
have
to
be,
they
have
to
be
in
your
property
and
then
and
then
you've
got
everybody
else.
C
A
G
A
D
E
F
F
H
F
E
A
We
have
some
issues
with
that
on
that
project
of
the.
Why
is
the
sewer
wise?
You
know
you
cannot
put
your
standard
sewer.
Why,
when
you
start
to
look
in
a
space
of
how
a
contractor
builds
the?
Why
into
the
street
and
then
does
that
it
doesn't
clear
you
enough
for
the
transformer,
because
the
transformer
cannot
be
on
the
lot
line.
He
wants
a
transformer
to
be
100
feet
on
one
side
or
on
the
other
side,
so
yeah
I
mean
when
the
water
could
you
can
mix
well,
yeah
sure
see.
B
F
Meeting
mr.
mr.
Garza
said
does
that
he
wants
this
kind
of
and
I
guess
we're
trying
to
figure
out
what
is
the
best
way,
because
they
have
test
to
make
sure
that
all
the
construction
that
in
this
you
know
I,
want
to
protect
senator
point.
It's
ap
everybody's
universe
structure,
up
task
for
that
and
as
for
to
the
coat-
and
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
mention-
is
that
I've.
F
E
E
B
I
I
I
F
B
E
I
F
I
I
E
I
I
Thought
the
purpose
today
was
that
we
can
happen
the
ordinance
already.
In
other
words,
if
you
wants
to
vote
on
it,
okay,
yes,
that
most
of
us
it's
already
it's
kind
of
like
what
we've
done
when
in
the
previous.
In
the
previous
times,
we've
had
pnz,
make
a
make
a
recommendation,
and
then
TR
b
concurred
with
the
recommendation.
I
F
A
F
B
G
I
I
B
I
The
two
of
previous
motions,
which
was
a
five
and
a
half
feet
and
the
ten
feet-
I
mean
the
two
and
a
half
feet
and
the
techniques
for
those
two
changes
and
to
correct
this
tackle,
so
that
when
when,
when
the
staff
goes
to
the
council,
they
say
okay.
Well,
this
is
what
we're
original
it
was
submitted.
But
there
was
a
meeting
that
was
had
and
the
GRB
concurs
with
a
discussion.
E
I
A
E
B
D
A
A
B
D
C
E
I
ever
seen
in
my
life
and
the
one
right
next
door,
which
ones
they
didn't
follow
them.
Well,
the
champions
over
there
on
st.
James
for
one-story
at
any
okay.
They
bought
it
and
then
sued.
Everybody
thought
because
they
couldn't
build
the
more
gets
deal
and
then
they
end
up
just
following
whatever
the
rules
were,
which
would
turn
out
to
be
those
one-story
jobs.
F
Alright
Sam
is
multi-family
residential
goals
uses
permitted
in
our
as
suburb.
Some
perfect
districts
are
permitted,
but
I.
Don't,
however,
that
all
single-family
do
not
on
the
show
meet
or
exceed
the
minimum
lot
way
of
square
footage
setback
requirements,
VRS,
suburban
district,
so
it's
already
defined
already.
F
G
A
A
E
E
E
I
I
I
D
B
I
F
B
I
F
I
A
E
I
E
B
B
B
E
I
E
B
C
B
I
I
E
B
I
E
A
C
C
B
I
I
E
B
A
E
E
D
A
B
A
D
A
E
We
all
agree
on
the
intention
there
I,
don't
know
if
it's
possible
on
that
end
of
it
there,
oh
yeah
you're
in
your
neck,
so
I
assume
we
just
scratch
her.
It
says
front
yard
setback,
the
very
first
focus
you
have
to
scratch
it
and
you
have
to
put
a
new
number
next
to
it.
It
gets
too
clunky
like
we
did
down
there
with.