►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
A
B
A
A
B
A
Of
Columbus
number
six
pence
number,
seven
darlissa
Davis
have
all
paid
their
fees
and
therefore
I,
and
there
are
no
complaints
on
any
of
them,
so
I
move.
We
approve
the
renewals
of
these
conditional
uses,
seven
favors.
Second,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
aye
pose
no.
They
are
approved
and
on
the
agenda
number
two
and
number
four
number:
two
James
girl,
eight
twenty
nine
hundred
Wilson
Avenue
conditional
use
permit
for
tobacco
packaging
facility
and
number
four
laser
command
LLC.
That's
an
indoor
family,
entertainment
center,
3000,
North
Shunpike.
A
As
of
the
meeting,
they
have
not
paid
their
renewal
fees,
but
they're
are
no
complaints.
Therefore,
I
move
that
we
instruct
our
attorney
to
send
them.
The
usual
letter
that
they
are
conditional
use
permits
have
expired,
however,
if
they
wish
to
continue
in
business
and
they
pay
all
their
fees
by
our
next
regular
meeting.
Their
permits
will
be
renewed.
A
D
E
A
F
A
That
is
correct,
then
you
requested
tabling
so
that
you
could
do
some
more
research
and
whatnot,
and
you
have
submitted
to
the
board
a
set
of
House
Rules,
which
was
a
concern.
I
know
the
board
and
over
the
neighbors
and
frankly,
I'm
quite
impressed
with
your
rules.
I
wish
they
were
all
that
clear
drugs.
Drug
usage
will
get
you
evicted.
A
A
A
A
Well,
it's
very
clear:
it'll
be
monthly
rentals
only.
Would
you
I'd
like
personally
to
see
that
in
the
your
statement
of
rules.
F
H
Time,
I
think
the
last
time
we
had
this.
We
talked
about
a
quiet
time.
There
was
mentioned,
like
that.
You'd
had
in
other
rules
that
had
been
with
the
Airbnb.
A
H
A
Well,
if
there's
some
violation
or
something
that
you
complain,
you
just
go
to
the
staff
and
they
will
direct
your
complaint
to
the
appropriate
person,
because
there
is
an
enforcement
mechanism
in
Madison.
There
are
well
you.
You
could
actually
tell
me
right
now,
Joe,
who
would
go
out
and
deal
with
any
complaint.
A
A
I
will
just
make
a
brief
summary
of
this
time
of
what
each
one
of
these
is.
For
the
sake
of
time,
if
any
of
you
in
the
audience
are
interested,
we
have
a
Criterion
for
conditional
uses.
There
are
nine
items
that
have
to
be
answered
affirmatively
and
if
you're
interested,
you
can
always
go
to
staff
and
they'll
be
glad
to
print
you
out
a
copy.
A
E
Yeah
I
see
it
fitting
well
as
well.
I
think
it's
meeting
a
need
of
our
community
Mrs.
A
A
This
one
is
design,
maintain
harmonious,
appropriate
and
appearance
with
the
existing
or
intended
character
of
the
general
area.
Mr
Acosta.
A
G
A
The
general
vicinity
are
very
large
houses
and
so
forth.
I
I
think
that
one's
met
number
four
hazardous,
her
disturbing
to
existing
or
future
neighboring
uses
Mr
Acosta.
E
Yeah
I
think
now
that
we
have
a
set
of
House
Rules
there
there
shouldn't
be
any
any
major
issues.
A
C
Issue
obviously,
already
existing
structure.
G
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
Mrs
Burkhart
and
utilizing
these
buildings
helps
to
preserve
them,
so
I
think
that
one's
met
so
I
move.
We
approve
this
conditional
use
permit
for
a
period
of
one
year,
with
the
condition
that
the
house
rules
be
followed
and
with
the
second
condition
that
the
house
rules,
the
amended
first
to
say
no
leases
monthly
rental.
Only.
C
A
E
B
A
D
A
And
I
do
note
that
it
is.
The
building
is
right
across
from
the
High
School's
football
field
and
it's
right
next
door
to
what
appears
to
be
the
Madison
High
School's
bus
barn
for
their
bus
school.
D
A
C
A
A
Well,
if
they're
known,
One,
Last
Time
board
members,
okay,
this
is
a
conditional
use.
Permit,
it's
use
number
641
in
our
schedule
of
uses
section
seven
and
once
again
we
will
go
through
the
findings
of
fact.
I'll.
Just
I
won't
read
them
out
this
time
since
I
did
before
the
first
one.
Is
this
a
schedule
approved
Mr
Acosta.
C
E
I
agree
as
well:
I
think
it
fits
in
with
the
the
overall
comprehensive
plan
Mrs.
C
A
E
Those
those
services
are
already
in
existence
and
being
provided.
E
Yeah
I
think
it'll
be
a
positive
move
for
the
business
owner
and
good
for
our
community
Mrs.
A
A
E
Yeah
I,
don't
think
anything
excessive
I
think
it's
it'll
just
blend
right
in
and
a
lot
of
people
may
not
even
know
that.
There's
a
change
change
in
occupants
Mrs.
A
Burkhart
Mr
Ferris
put
it
very
well,
nobody
will
even
know
you're
there
and
you're
farther
away
from
any
residences
than
you
were
in
the
old
location
because
you
had
houses
right
across
the
street
and
the
old
one,
and
here
you're
off
back
off
the
road.
A
I
think
this
is
actually
an
improvement.
Number
eight
interference
with
traffic
Mr
Acosta.
G
A
A
Next
on
the
agenda,
Regina
erlawine,
929,
West,
2nd.
This
is
a
variance
from
developmental
standards
to
build
a
two-story
deck
in
the
place
of
an
existing
single
story
deck.
This
is
requesting
a
zero
lot
line.
This
variance
is
for
a
zero
line
on
the
North
property
line
that
abuts
the
south
side
of
929
West
2nd.
So
our
variance
concerns
simply
one
zero
lot
line,
downtown
property
and
I
hope.
I
got
your
name
right.
Yes,.
I
The
property
I'm
Regina
Earlywine.
I
There
were
two
different
Decks
that
abutted
right
at
the
second
one
was
right
up
against
the
back
of
my
neighbor's
house
and
we
tore
that
deck
off
and
we're
just
replacing
it
with
a
stone
patio
and
I
guess
the
rules
have
changed
and
they
now
have
a
three
foot,
inset
or
setback,
and
so
we
were
just
wanting
to
put
it
back
where
it
was,
and
I
also
have
a
letter
from
the
neighbor.
Who
has
the
adjoining
house
saying
she
has
no
issue
with
me:
putting
the
deck
or
the
patio
back
in
the
same
place.
I
I
A
A
The
three
foot
yards
are
a
function
of
the
zoning
ordinance
and
we
run
up
against
that.
An
awful
lot
downtown
yeah.
I
A
I
G
I
A
E
Don't
see
any
reason
to
believe
it
will
be
either
I
think
you
know,
the
applicant
has
already
sought
the
approval
of
adjoining
landowners
and
sounds
like
they've
worked
it
out
amongst
themselves.
So.
A
And
this,
since
this
was
a
request
for
a
zero
lot
line,
which,
frankly,
you
can't
even
see
it's
replacing
something
that
was
there
I
see
I've
seen
no
damage
of
at
all.
In
this
regard,
number
one
number
two:
this
is
use
and
value
be
affected
on
an
adverse,
merry
manner
of
adjacent
property,
Mr,
Acosta,
I.
E
Yeah
I
think
it's
an
improvement.
I
think
it's
a
win-win
for
for
both
the
applicant
and
the
neighbor.
A
E
A
C
A
I'd
only
kept
my
mouth
shut:
oh
well,
Mr
viturno,
Mark
by
Turner
524,
Walnut,
Street
varians
from
developmental
standards
to
allow
for
construction
of
single
family
residents;
zero
lot
lines.
A
And
we'll
go
with
that
anyway,
you're
asking
for
zero
lot
lines,
build
rebuild
a
new
home
on
the
lot.
So
if
you
could
state
your
name
and
address
and
explain
what
you're
doing
why
you
need
this
variance,
what's
peculiar
about
the
property?
That's
always
that's
always
the
reason
for
a
variance,
there's
some
peculiarity
about
this
property
that
can't
really
follow
the
zoning
ordinance.
So
if
you
could
address
these
yes.
J
Mark
viturna
it's
under
my
company
name,
Madison,
unlimited
LLC,
but
I'm
representing
524,
Walnut
Street
and
yes,
Mr
Baldwin.
It
is
quite
peculiar.
Yes,
most
of
these.
Probably
these
meetings
revolve
around
downtown.
So
yes,
and
for
those
that
aren't
familiar
with
this
property,
it
was
actually
demolished.
Oh
I
want
to
say
three
or
four
months
ago,
just
a
complete
loss,
dilapidated
structure
and
the
previous
owners
had
it
taken
down.
It's
been
wonderful
that
they
took
the
initiative
to
do
so
been
a
lot
of
light.
J
Elimination
on
Walnut
Street
and
it's
really
come
along-
turns
out
that
that
property
owner
at
522
is
going
to
be
leaving
Madison.
So
he
asked
me
if
I
want
to
purchase
the
property
and
I
actually
own
524,
which
is
on
the
North
side,
so
I
purchased
the
property
about
a
month
and
a
half
ago
and
to
clarify
on
the
the
application.
Originally
I
had
requested
an
East
setback
variants,
but
as
I
was
working
with
Joe,
Patterson
I,
don't
think
that'll
be
necessary.
J
So
we
actually
made
an
amendment
to
the
application
online
and
it
maybe
it
did
not
propagate
through
to
the
system
or
wherever
we've
got
that
so
we're
not
going
to
be
needing
anything
on
the
east
side,
which
is
for
the
east
side,
which
is
the
rear
of
the
property.
So
if
you
were
facing
we're
on
Walnut
Street
and
facing
towards
saddle
Tree
Lane,
you
know
the
front
is
on
Walnut
and
then
saddle
tree
Lanes,
where
the
backyard
is
no
setback.
Variances
are
required,
however,
on
the
left
and
right,
which
is
the
north
and
south
side.
J
We
would
like
to
request
one
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
needed
one
for
the
west
side,
because
that's
right
up
to
the
sidewalk
I
think
in
the
current
zoning
ordinance.
We
may
not
need
that
downtown,
but
we
asked
for
it
just
to
be
on
the
safe
side,
because
that's
what
all
those
row
houses
there
come
right
up
to
the
sidewalk
and
the
reason
we're
asking
for
a
zero
foot.
J
Setback
is
because
the
existing
structure
that
was
on
there
was
quite
small
I
think
the
the
entire
lot
size
is
22
feet
and
the
older
structure
was
right
at
like
16
feet
or
17
feet.
It
was.
J
For
two
story,
so
I
think
just
for
nothing
else
to
capitalize
on
the
space
and
probably
for
a
little
bit
of
stability.
Add
those
extra
couple
of
feet
and
I
think.
J
J
For
HDR,
okay,
in
our
site
plan,
we
specified
22
feet
again.
If
we
don't
get
the
variance,
we
probably
won't
build,
so
it
won't
matter
so
we
kind
of
ballparked
it
most
two
stories
or
between
20
and
30
feet.
I
think
we're
well
below
that
45,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
in
case.
That
was
something
that
we
needed
to
reapply.
J
A
A
water
tower
you'd
have
to
apply
for
a
variance
about
that
too,
but
I
don't
think
that
would.
But
this
one
is
about
a.
J
J
J
Have
not
what
I
have
done
and,
with
your
permission,
Mr
Baldwin
I
have
a
handout
with
some
rough
photographs
that
might
kind
of
help
illustrate
some
of
those
lines
a
little
better.
More
recent.
J
Or
if
we
have
any
questions,
I
wanted
to
kind
of
get
the
feedback
from
the
board,
and
if
it's
something
we
need
a
table,
pinning
I
can
certainly
do
that.
But
on
the
second
page,
there's
actually
some
that
kind
of
show
based
on
Google
street
imagery,
as
well
as
what
I've
actually
actually
taped
it
off
today,
because,
according
to
the
recorder's
office,
it
is
22
feet
across
and
giving
the
historical
evidence
and
where
the
Fasteners
were
for
the
fence.
I
I
can
kind
of
give
you
a
rough
outline
of
what
it
would
be.
J
J
Problem
and
I've
spoke
with
the
owner
of
522,
which
is
that
one
on
the
right
there
and
I
think
we
would
like
to
Abate
that
tree
I.E
cut
it
down,
because
on
the
third
page
you
can
see
where
those
tree
that
tree
is
actually
sitting
on
top
of
my
property
there
on
5
26..
It's
oh.
J
J
And
on
the
bottom
right
that
tree
was
that
photo
was
taken
from
Google's
street
view
about
2013,
so
you
can
see
it's
actually
grown.
Quite
a
bit.
Top
left
is
a
is
a
more
accurate
depiction
of
it.
So
the
property
line,
kind
of
goes
through
the
middle
of
that
tree,
and
you
can
see
on
the
second
photo
in
the
top
right.
That
perspective
gives
you
a
little
bit
better
understanding
of
how
the
property
line
goes
down.
So
it's
a
it's
a
good
six
or
seven
feet
from
that
property.
J
A
A
J
Sure,
and
the
only
reason,
I
feel
somewhat
confident
in
my
approximation
is
just
because
of
how
the
recorder
puts
down
those
plots.
So
we
have
established
lot
lines
for
526
and
then
you
know
we're
on
the
old-fashioned
meets
and
bounce
system.
So
you
know
you
take
22
Paces
down
South
and
that's
your
lot
line
according
to
the
recorder's
office,
so
I.
Imagine
that
that's
partly
what
the
surveyors
go
off
of
as
well.
A
Surveyors
go
off
of
definite
marks,
because
this
was
all
laid
out
by
the
Congressional
Township
system
1795.,
so
they
start
with
well
frequently.
They
start
with
pins
or
railroad
spikes
or
something
that's
somewhere,
and
they
measure
off
of
that
from
a
a
detailed
description
which
I've
read
some
of
them.
J
A
Purchase
about
how
close
would
you
be
to
your
house
just
north
like
about
three
feet
from
that
or
so
because
I
notice
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
of
a
concrete
scooped
out
drain.
Looking
thing
there
on
the
sidewalk
and
there's
a
course
on
the
house
to
the
north,
there's
the
gas
meter
and
in
the
back
there's
a
unit
for
an
air
conditioner
which
you
might
be
tearing
out.
I
don't
know.
J
Yeah
I
mean
we're
we're
probably
about
four
feet
and
again:
I
was
less
concerned
on
that
side
because
I
own
the
property,
I'm
gonna
they're
they're
long-term
rentals
they're
not
going
to
be
sold
in
my
lifetime.
So
it's
going
to
be
one
of
those
things
where
I
kind
of
Drive
some
of
those
decisions
and
yeah.
We
may
not
end
up
at
22
feet
because
once
we
actually
do
the
location
of
the
utilities
and
for
whatever
reason
we
have
to
work
within
that
tree,
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
even
build.
J
A
J
Oh,
we
would
never
build
without
the
survey,
but
no
I
was
just
you
know
if
it's
something
that.
J
C
What
you
could
that
be
a
condition
of
the
approval?
Well,
if
we
got
to
that
point.
J
I
guess
the
only
thing
I
would
ask
is:
if
we've
set
some
sort
of
timeline
like
I,
don't
know
what
would
be
people
are
pretty
busy
these
days
like
if
it
was
six
months
or
less.
That
should
be
plenty
of
time.
I.
Think
most
of
them
are
about
three
months
ahead.
At
least
that
was
rezo
and
pettit's
folks
for
about
three.
A
Months
well,
the
reason
I'm
dwelling
on
this
is
because
one
of
the
criteria
is
was
affect
substantially
adversely
adjacent
properties.
This
is
a
at
least
for
my
thinking.
This
is
having
a
survey
to
know
exactly
where
the
lot
line
is
protects,
the
adjacent
properties
in
cases
of
future
sales
and
whatever
would.
A
J
A
He
had
a
very
large
front
yard
and
he
wanted
to
build
a
fence
right
up
near
the
road
which
was
his
front
yard.
Well,
he
didn't
necessarily
own
that
and
you
can't
go
building
fences
and
stuff
and
public
right-of-way
of
roads
and
so
forth,
as
you
well
know,
so
that
one
ended
up.
The
gentleman
actually
I
think
he
just
withdrew
the
application.
J
Yeah,
the
only
thing
that
makes
this
one
a
little
bit
unique
or
interesting
is
you
know,
because
I
own
526,
I
guess
my
thought
process
was.
You
know
the
lot
I
purchased
about
for
15,
000
or
so
in
a
surveys.
Ten
percent
of
the
cost
of
the
lot
I
wanted
to
see
if
it's
even
something
feasible
to
get
that
beforehand,
because
if
there
were
any
other
issues,
I
could
just
say
now:
it's
a
yard.
The
rental
you.
J
Fix
I
didn't
necessarily
buy
this.
You
know,
wouldn't
have
been
a
big
deal
if
I
couldn't
build
on
it
right,
because
I
do
own.
The
adjacent
lot
I
could
have
just
then
said:
okay
now,
whoever
rents,
it
now
has
a
nice
big
lot,
but
yeah,
it's
a
valid
point
absolutely,
and
it's
something
that
you
know
when
I'm
investing
that
kind
of
money.
G
J
Actually
they've
yelled
at
me
a
lot
the
residents
there
for
just
parking,
not
near
my
house
so,
but
that
would
involve
the
street
department
and
see
if
there's
a
way
that
we
could
accommodate
that.
So
this
is
the
first
step
I've
taken
actually
so
there's
quite
a
bit
of
variables,
so
I
mean
if
it's
not
the
right
timing
to
request
it
now
we
can
do
it
later
on
too,
that's
also
an
option.
Well.
A
J
J
A
A
A
Variance
from
development
standards-
and
we
will
just
say
that
this
is
for
zero
lot
line
on
the
north
side,
zero
online
on
the
south
side
and
zero
line
on
the
west.
We'll
just
include
that,
but
nothing
about
the
East
which
in
his
case
is
his
backyard
number
one.
Will
approval
of
this
be
injurious
public
health
safety,
morals,
General,
Welfare,
Mr,
Acosta,.
A
C
No
they'll
be
they'll,
be
improved
and,
to
your
point,
the
what
you're
requesting
is
fits
with
so
many
other
houses
and
lots
in
that
same
neighborhood.
So.
E
Yeah
I
think
you
know
worst
case
scenario.
He
buys
a
lot,
doesn't
build
and
just
adds
Green
Space.
So
it's
it's
an
improvement
to
the
neighborhood
either
way.
Yeah.
A
There
was
a
house
there
for
years
and
years
and
years,
another
house
is
just
going
back
to
what
it
was
only
a
better
house,
practical
difficulties
in
the
use
of
the
property.
That's
the
big
one,
of
course,
always
forbearance.
Mr,
Acosta,
yeah,.
A
A
It
and
I
agree
narrow
a
lot
22
foot
lot,
six
feet,
total
setbacks,
North
and
South
leaves
a
15
foot
wide
house.
Mobile
homes
are
bigger,
so
we've
gone
through
our
findings
of
fact,
I
move.
We
approve
this
variance
contingent
upon
the
applicant
obtaining
a
survey
of
the
lot
and
adhering
to
the
lot
lines
established
by
the
survey.