►
From YouTube: May 13, 2015 Taxes
Description
Minneapolis Taxes Committee Meeting
A
A
Good
morning,
I'll
call
to
order
this
meeting
of
the
taxes
committee
for
Wednesday
May
13
2015.
My
name
is
Abdul
awesome
and
I'm.
The
chair
of
the
committee
with
me
at
Dyess,
our
council
members,
Gordon,
colonel
Reich,
ben
de
blonde,
yang
Quincy,
good
Quincy,
glidden,
Goodman,
fry
and
Palmisano
I.
Do.
C
D
A
Colleagues,
we
have
a
single
discussion
item
on
our
agenda
today,
and
that
is
the
report
of
our
board
of
Appeal
and
equalization.
As
you
know,
this
special
board
is
established
under
local
authority
for
the
purpose
of
arbitrating
disputes
related
to
the
classification
and
market
assessment
of
properties
within
the
city.
A
The
board
has
the
authority
to
decrease
sustained
or
increase
the
market
value
of
a
property
and
to
make
those
recommendations
to
the
to
this
council
for
final
action
in
accordance
with
the
city
policy,
the
mem,
the
membership
of
the
bodily
appeals
and
equalization
consists
of
as
licensed
realtor
as
certified
appraiser
and
a
freeholder
or
property
owner
staff
has
provided
a
report
that
details
the
work
of
this
year's
board
of
Appeal
and
equalization,
which
is
linked
from
the
agenda
for
this
meeting
here.
To
present
the
report
is
our
City
Clerk
Casey
car
there's.
E
Morning,
good
morning,
mr.
chairman,
and
may
it
please
the
committee
I'm
here
to
present
the
2015
report
at
the
Minneapolis
Board
of
appealing
equalization,
as
required
pursuant
to
the
city
charter
in
various
state
laws
accompanying
the
RCA.
Are
the
proceedings
of
the
board
from
its
meetings
on
april,
twenty
seventh
and
may
first
of
this
year.
A
synopsis
of
final
actions
and
recommendations
of
the
board
of
appeal
and
equalization
is
also
provided
in
a
table
listed
as
attachment
see
with
your
agenda.
E
Packets,
attachment
d
lists
those
properties
where
a
concurrence
was
reached
between
the
city,
assessor
and
the
property
owner
attachment
e
list,
those
properties
that
were
read
into
the
record
at
the
city
level
and
are
now
therefore
eligible
for
a
hearing
at
the
hennepin
county
level,
with
no
further
action
required
by
the
city
of
minneapolis.
This
year
a
total
of
739
appeals
were
filed.
That
was
an
increase
of
approximately
thirty-six
percent
in
volume
compared
to
last
year.
E
The
board
has
specifically
recommended
changes
in
487
assessments
on
properties
within
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
which
requires
the
confirmation
by
formal
action
of
the
City
Council
of
the
739
total
appeals.
191
were
filed
after
the
filing
deadline
or
inspections
were
unable
to
be
completed
before
the
board's
hearing
commenced.
That's
roughly.
Twenty-Six
percent
of
the
total
volume
of
Appeals
that
were
received
those
properties
are
included
in
the
list
found
in
attachment.
E
E
and
those
property
owners
do
have
the
ability,
as
provided
under
state
law,
to
appeal
at
the
county
level,
the
hennepin
county
board
will
meet
in
june
of
the
739
total
appeals.
471
property
owners
reached
concurrence
with
the
city
assessors
office
on
a
lowered
valuation
prior
to
this
year's
hearings
before
the
board
of
appeal
and
equalization
that
reflects
approximately
sixty-four
percent
of
all.
E
The
total
appeals
were
filed
with
the
clerk's
office,
and
these
are
included
in
the
lists
shown
on
attachment
d
in
your
briefing
materials
not
including
those
that
were
concurred
in
and
the
late
filings
already
described.
The
city's
Board
heard
a
total
of
twenty-three
appeals.
This
year,
pursuant
to
notice
the
board
convened
an
open
session
on
Monday
April
27
were
duly
sworn
and
impaneled,
and
over
the
course
of
two
days,
the
board
received
and
considered
these
23
qualified
appeals
and
adjourned
at
253
p.m.
E
on
may
first
having
completed
its
work,
the
disposition
of
those
23
qualified
appeals
is
reflected
in
table
2
on
the
front
of
your
RCA.
As
you
can
see,
nine
of
those
appeals
have
been
recommended
by
the
board
to
be
sustained
at
their
current
value.
A
total
of
four
hundred
eighty
four
properties
were
recommended
to
have
reduced
values,
which
has
a
potential
total
impact
of
just
under
twelve
percent,
or
the
difference
of
just
over
two
million
dollars.
E
Three
properties
have
been
recommended
for
an
increase
with
a
potential
impact
of
eight
point:
six
percent
or
roughly
twenty
seven
thousand
five
hundred
dollar
twenty
seven
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
The
remaining
685
properties
are
eligible
for
an
appeal
hearing
before
the
Hampden
County
Board
of
Appeals.
This
committee
is
requested
to
upon
the
recommendations
submitted
in
the
board's
2015
report.
E
To
restate
that
would
be
to
concur
in
the
recommendation
to
sustain
the
current
value
of
the
nine
subject
properties
to
reduce
the
value
on
a
total
of
four
hundred
eighty-four,
subject,
properties
and
to
increase
the
value
of
three
subject
properties
all
as
detailed
in
these
materials
that
accompanied
the
RCA
on
behalf
of
the
city.
I
would
like
to
express
our
sincere
appreciation
to
the
members
of
the
city's
Board
of
Appeal
in
Equalization.
E
They
included
Ted
mera
knack
sandy
leisure
and
Earl
net
wall
I
also
AM
grateful
for
the
leadership
of
Julie
Johnson
from
the
clerk's
office,
who
is
here
today.
She
administers
this
appeals
process.
Every
year
this
year,
due
to
her
leadership,
we
were
able
to
work
with
the
city
of
suckers
office
and
the
city
coordinators
office
through
a
business
process,
improvement
project
to
improve
and
streamline
this
process,
not
just
internally,
but
also
to
improve
our
service
to
those
who
are
appealing
their
property,
valuations
and
classifications.
E
To
make
that
process
better
for
those
who
live
in
Minneapolis
and
working
with
Julie
Johnson
is
Cathy
Barton,
a
temporary
worker
who
usually
provides
seasonal
support
to
our
elections
team.
This
year
we
were
able
to
bring
her
on
board
to
help
provide
the
the
front
end
of
this
process
to
our
citizens.
She
worked
with
miss
Johnson
in
terms
of
processing,
all
of
the
appeals,
scheduling
them
getting
the
board
on
up
to
speed,
training
them
and
attended
all
of
the
appeals
in
order
to
provide
the
support
for
that
board.
E
F
Good
morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
Patrick
Todd,
Minneapolis,
City,
Assessor
I,
would
just
want
to
echo
what
the
city
clerk
set
up
as
far
as
the
process
of
improvement.
This
was
probably
our
best
year
ever
as
far
as
providing
great
taxpayer
customer
service
and
as
well
as
reducing
the
amount
of
stress
that
is
involved
in
this.
F
In
this
process,
we
used
to
run
like
a
dual
system
where
property
owners
would
start
with
our
department.
We
would
mail
out
applications.
We
would
try
to
to
get
these
appeals,
taken
care
of
and
then
up
to
a
certain
point.
If
we
were
not
going
to
be
able
to
resolve
all
the
cases,
we'd
have
to
flip
them
over
to
the
city
clerk
or
switch
them
to
a
city
clerk
Board
of
Equalization
application.
F
They
were
into
the
system
and
we
handled
on
the
back
side
completely
seamlessly
and
without
any
inconvenience
to
the
taxpayer.
So
anyway,
just
before
I
want
to
start
I
thought
that
was
tremendous
and
probably
worthy
of
a
star
or
diff.
If
anyone
asks
me
so,
but
just
in
my
presentation,
I
get
the
pleasure
of
putting
just
some
graphs
and
charts
together
to
talk
about.
Little
really,
maybe
add
some
perspective
from
what
Casey
said,
because
most
of
the
numbers
that
he
was
saying
you
know
it,
you
can
see
it
in
a
little
bit
of
context.
F
It
makes
more
sense.
You
know
the
the
board
of
equalization
is
a
lot
of
the
lot
of
the
volume
that
we
deal
with.
Oftentimes
is
a
correlation
to
what
we're
doing
with
the
assessed
values,
and
so
on
your
very
first
page.
It
shows
where
we
change
values
in
Minneapolis
for
january.
Second
2014,
you
know
our
commercial
tax
base
went
up.
Fourteen
percent
are
industrial
dropped
by
twenty
six
percent,
and
that's
not
a
bad
thing.
F
The
reason
why
we
drop
the
the
industrial
property
bays
are
dropping
is
because
many
of
those
industrial
buildings
are
being
converted
to
residential
purpose,
they're
being
converted
to
apartments
multi-family,
housing
or
single-family
homes.
So
it's
not
that
the
industrial
values
are
declining,
it's
just
a
transition.
These
are
the
highest
and
best
use
is
not
industrial
in
any
apples,
and
it's
residential.
In
some
of
these
older
buildings
residential,
we
saw
an
overall
citywide
increase
of
six
percent
apartments,
twenty-eight
percent,
which
is
a
significant
increase.
F
F
So
just
to
give
you
a
historical
perspective,
we're
up.
We
did
have
739
appeals
in
2015,
which
is
up
like
what
mr.
Carlson
was
saying
or
KC.
Carr
was
hanging
from
504.
It
does
seem
like
we're
trending
up,
but
whenever
we
increase
property
values,
that's
just
going
to
have
to
have
that,
just
as
it
comes
with
the
territory
for
the
most
part,
so,
but
definitely
within
a
manageable
number.
F
It
to
the
next
page,
this
is
appealed
by
word.
I
always
thought
that
the
council
members
would
be
interested
to
see
how
their
Ward
compared
on,
against
other
words
on
their
number
of
Appeals.
Collins.
Remember,
Palmisano
leads
the
list
with
138,
but
it
is
down
in
an
overall
number
of
Appeals.
You
have
seen
some
of
the
other
neighborhoods
going
up,
but
there's
not
any
significant
Ward
that
I
would
say,
jumped
out
it
jumped
out
at
me
as
far
as
any
particular
volume.
As
far
as
we
were
concerned,
these
are.
F
F
We
come
back,
we
do
our
analysis
and
we
sit
down
with
the
property
owner
or
the
phone
we'll
sit
down,
we'll
talk
with
them
and
we'll
say
we
think
the
value
is
fine
and
here's
why
here's
sale
number
one
here,
sale
number
two
number
three
or
maybe
in
a
built
in
a
situation
of
an
apartment,
building,
here's
the
income
and
things
like
that
they
agreed
and
they
dismissed.
So
they
were.
They
just
needed
to
have
some
confirmation
that
we
take
a
second
look
at
it.
The
concurrence
is
prior
to
the
board.
F
There
were
four
hundred
and
seventy
one
of
those,
so
these
are
people
that
we've
been
out
took
a
look
said.
You
write
your
values
too
high.
We
think
that
it's
more
fair
and
reasonable
and
they
agreed-
and
so
we
were
able
to
get
them
taken
care
of
and
there
were
471
more
decisions.
These
are
people.
We
took
a
look
at
the
offer
we
made
to
them.
They
just
felt
it
was
not
the
right,
fair
value.
So
then
they
continued
on
to
the
board,
which
is
their
option,
their
appeal
option,
and
then
we
did
have
I.
F
F
Are
people
after
we
had
the
filing
deadline?
They
just
they
just
turned
in
their
application
too
late.
They
do
not
lose
their
appeal
option.
They
just
don't
get
to
be
heard
before
the
local
board.
They
are
allowed
to
go
to
the
county
board
and
my
staff
are
setting
up
appointments
with
these
individuals
at
this
point,
hoping
that
we
can
get
out
to
the
properties
do
the
appraisal.
F
So
therefore,
we
have
an
agreement
with
the
property
owner
that,
in
order
for
us
to
do
it
fairly
and
accurately
that
we'll
just
move
them
to
the
county
and
then
we'll
continue
to
work
with
them,
and
that's
that's
really
the
everything
on
that
appeals
by
property
type
again,
just
kind
of
nice
to
know
you
saw
you
know:
apartments
went
almost
doubled
from
48
up
to
90
and
again
when
we
move
property
values
up,
twenty-eight
percent,
it's
just
a
normal,
corresponding
increase.
There
really
wasn't
off
a
lot
of
other
change.
F
Condominiums
did
go
from
16
to
94,
but
we
did
see
kind
of
medium
to
go
up
a
significant
amount
over
last
year
too.
So
last
but
not
least,
on
my
slides,
this
is
nice
to
know
just
to
we
take
a
look
at
this
statistic:
to
try
to
figure
out.
Is
there
one
segment
of
the
market
that
is
being
maybe
overly
valued
or
there's
just
something
else
going
on
that
we
might
be
harming
a
property
owner
by
you
know,
maybe
in
a
certain
segment
of
the
market,
this
might
be
entry,
level,
values
or
values.
F
Within
that
you
know
middle
income
or
upper
bracket,
and
in
this
case
on
the
very
bottom,
the
two
largest
sections
are
actually
property
values
at
250,000
on
up,
and
so
a
number
of
those,
though,
would
be
apartment
buildings.
The
ones
that
really
made
the
most
significant
difference
is
that
our
partner
buildings
are
sitting
at
values
greater
than
250
and
so
I
think
that's
a
lot
of
right
there.
F
Besides
the
apartment,
then
we
would
have
the
single-family
I
did
kind
of
look
through
the
list
and
when
I
slaughtered
them
by
value
apartments,
definitely
led
number
one
followed
by
the
residential
and
condominiums
after
that.
So
that's
all
I
have
every
year,
House
member
Goodman
asks
me
for
a
list
of
all
the
applicants
by
award
so
that
she
can
take
a
look
at
who,
in
her
ward,
has
have
appealed
and
what
type
of
result
state
received.
F
I
had
my
staff
prepare
that
and
I
hope
that
you
have
that
in
your
mailbox
as
we
speak,
and
if
it's
not
there
it'll
be
there
shortly
after
this
meeting.
It
was
ready
to
go
this
morning,
but
it
is
all
the
people
in
your
Ward's
that
appeal,
then
it'll
say
there
was
concurred,
a
board
case
late
applicant
or
whatever
the
case
may
be.
Some
and
it'll
also
give
you
a
before
value
and
an
after
value.
So
with
that
I'll
stand
for
questions.
A
B
Think
mr.
Todd,
looking
at
this
list
of
the
board
actions,
there
are
a
couple
that
jump
out
of
people
who
really
were
was
what
I
want
to
say
over,
but
you
know
overvalued.
One
is
almost
a
hundred
thousand
of
actually
hundred
thousand
dollars
plus
and
another
one
of
sixty
thousand
dollars.
What
what
do
you
do
in
you
when
you
find
something?
That's
that
out
of
whack?
Do
we
look
at
how
we
got
into
that
situation
or
there's.
F
To
the
chair,
kulta
President,
Johnson
I'm
not
really
knowledgeable,
and
that
usually
it's
a
data
issue.
Usually
the
condition
of
the
data
is
wrong
on
the
information
and
we
get
into
it.
We
go
you're
right,
it's
not
an
average
plus
it's
in
fair
condition
and
we'll
go
back
and
we'll
go
reduce
today,
because
of
that
Barry.
It's
seldom
because
of
square
footage
is
our
square
footage
is,
are
fairly
rock
solid,
they
can
the
quality
of
construction.
We
have
well,
it's
usually
condition,
but.
B
F
That
one
on
the
river
road
is
that
we
can't
yep.
Okay,
that
particular
case
is
a
little
bit
more
unique
and
in
that
we
evaluated
we
appraise
it
is
its
highest
and
best
use
is
as
an
owner
occupied
unit,
because
it's
on
the
river
road,
it's
on
a
15,000
square
foot
lot.
It's
got
a
view
of
the
river.
The
board
felt
that
it
was
more
of
a
should
have
been
more
properly
valued
as
income
producing
property.
F
Where
we
differ
is
that
the
rents
generally
don't
go
up
with
the
more
yard
you
have
and
with
them
on
a
view
that
you
have,
and
we
felt
that
the
by
the
typical
buyer
will
pay
more
for
a
view
more
for
a
lot.
So
therefore,
we
valued
it
that
way,
they
had
a
very
different
approach
and
they
said
if
the
rents
can't
support
it,
the
value
has
to
go
down,
and
so
that
was
a
differences
of
opinion
when
it
sells
we'll
know
which
way
the
buyer
was
all
right.
Thank.
G
G
So
I
guess
in
the
future,
I'd
be
also
interested
in
seeing
how
many
properties
that
we
assess
fall
into
each
category,
because
really
the
only
way
to
know
if
these
higher-end
properties
are
targeted
is
this
is
the
percentage
of
people
that
are
appealing
compared
to
how
many
of
the
properties
there
are,
and
so
that
might
be
good
information
to
have
I
looked
at
that
list.
There
were
quite
a
few
in
my
ward,
almost
everyone
that
was
appealed.
G
The
valuation
was
dropped,
some
of
them
substantially
and
one
of
the
most
notable
ones
was
kept
the
same
in
the
board
process,
so
I'd
be
interested
to
know
if,
in
fact,
properties
at
250,000
are
being
targeted
for
higher
valuations
or
not,
and
I
could
only
know
that
if
I
get
the
percentage
of
Appeals
compared
to
the
percentage
of
those
numbers
of
properties
and
maybe
next
year,
we
can
consider
that
I
don't
need
to
have
it
for
this
year.
Okay,.
A
C
You
mr.
chair
I'm,
noticing
that
for
condos
there
was
an
probably
a
sevenfold
increase
in
the
number
of
Appeals
granted.
The
number
of
condos
have
gone
up,
but
do
we
have
a
reason,
for
that
is
valuation
increasing
dramatically
or
is
this
is?
Is
the
value
downtown
going
up
or
what
it
would?
What
exactly
be
a
tribute
to
that
seven
is
a
seven
folding,
because
I
don't
see
that
if
not
even
collateral,
even
see
the
twofold
increase
on
anything
else,.
F
The
chair
councilmember
fry,
I
would
I
would
expect
that
condominiums
are
on
the
the
rebound
as
far
as
values
go,
that
we
did
increase
property
values
in
the
in
the
economy.
I
couldn't
tell
you
if
it
was
downtown
or
if
it
was
in
the
neighborhood
condominiums,
but
it's
just
statistically
any
kind
of
getting
back
to
the
council
member
Goodman.
It's
even
though
it's
up
Sevenfold,
it's
still
such
a
small
percentage
of
the
total.
Again,
when
one
point
five
percent
of
the
city,
it
doesn't
appeal
their
value.
F
Can't
exactly
give
you
an
answer
for
why
that
would
be,
but
statistically
were
we're
down
to
a
fairly
acceptable
range
of
when
you're
doing
130,000
values
a
year
and
you're
only
we're
missing
on
four
hundred
and
some
and
again
when
we
go
through
and
we
can
get
those
things
corrected,
I
think
again,
I
can
check
into
it,
but
I
think
it's
just
going
to
be
the
raised
values
and
some
of
the
more
expensive
one
downtown
were
probably
moved
up
to
be
competitive
with
what
things
are
sewing.
Foreign.
C
Instance
have
invoked
from
some
very
good
points
and
I,
don't
question
the
your
reasoning
at
all.
I
just
want
to
make
a
broader
point
about
out
broadly
on
the
council.
Right
now,
we've
been
encouraging
people
to
live
in
a
dense
environment
where
we're
trying
to
grow
the
city
were
wanting
people
to
move
downtown
and
trying
to
double
to
double
the
downtown
residential
population
and
when
I
mean
and
simultaneously,
however,
we're
seeing
the
prices,
the
values
and
thus
the
property
tax.
These
condos
go
up
dramatically,
not
just
a
little
bit.
C
I
mean
dramatically
combined
with
you
know:
nicoletis
s,
nicollet
mall
assessments,
combined
with
assessments
for
for
street
cleaning,
and
we've
got
businesses
that
are
playing
the
ID
fees.
I
mean
they're,
getting
hit
about
15,
different
ways
right
now
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
general
point
sure.
F
And
just
one
comment
to
the
chair
is
that
we
follow
the
market
at
this
point.
So
I
agree.
That
is
if
these
sales
are
occurring
and
they're
escalating,
that
my
fat,
my
staff
are
following
it.
We're
absolutely
not
leading
the
market
mean
that
we
aren't
in
any
way
shape
or
form
trying
to
anticipate
where
the
market
is
it's
only
after.
We
take
a
look
at
the
last
12
months,
we'll
say:
where
are
we
where
you
know
when
this
building
sells
for
this
unit
cells
for
700?
F
Where
was
where
was
our
assessed
value
nuh
for
it
sitting
at
550,
and
where
does
a
consistent
ratio
there
that
we?
We
need
to
be
up
closer
to
that
92
105?
We
have
to
move
it
to
wherever
we
can
be
more
competitive,
and
if
we
have
to
go
back
and
look
historically
and
go
last
year
we
were
at
you
know,
85-percent.
Before
that
we
were
at
eighty-seven
percent.
F
You
can
truly
trend
that
we're
chasing
the
market
as
market
goes
up,
so
we
I
I
completely
agree
that
the
taxes
are
a
significant
part
of
people's
decision-making,
going
downtown
and
actually
goes
for
any
part
of
Minneapolis
for
that
matter,
but
we're
we
were
very
historical
and
we
only
move
values
up
when
the
market
has
told
us
that
we
need
to
move
it
up
to
be
consistent
in
to
be
within
statutes.
So
thank.
D
You
mr.
chair
mr.
Todd
I
appreciate
the
difficulty
of
this
exercise.
They
have
a
question
regarding
to
the
single-family
homes
aspect
of
the
appeals
by
value
range
in
southwest
Minneapolis.
There
are
massive
amounts
of
new
construction
in
there
are
homes
built
with
purchased
in
that
range
and
then
torn
down
to
build
new,
much
more
much
higher
priced
homes.
D
Does
that
play
into
this
223
number
and
the
250
to
500
thousand
dollar
range?
Is
it
because
one
of
the
market
difficulties
in
southwest
Minneapolis
is
that
people
sell
homes
in
that
range
to
be
torn
down,
and
thus
we
are
overvaluing
the
homes
that
are
in
that
range
or
I'm,
just
wondering
if
you
could
comment
on
that
as
it
pertains
to
Southwest
Minneapolis
sure.
F
Through
the
chair,
councilmember
Palmisano,
the
the
land
Bay
and
when
we
assess
properties
is
we
value
the
overall
property?
First
we
subtract
out
the
land
value
and
then
the
remainder,
the
remainder
is
the
building
value.
So,
first
and
foremost
we
say
what
is
it
worth?
It's
worth,
five
hundred
thousand
so
now,
what's
land
worth
well
and
your
maybe
your
particular
area
land
might
be
worth
200.
So
then
will
attribute
the
difference
300
of
the
buildings.
So
we
don't
it's
not
a
it's,
not
an
accumulative
evaluation
process
and
me
put
it
that
way.
F
F
We
actually
say:
what's
the
building
were
first
subtract
out,
but
we
think
the
land
is
worth
and
that
just
attributes
the
difference
to
the
building
so
I
would
not
say
that,
because
your
land
days
are
going
up
that
that's
artificially
increasing
the
proper
days,
but
we
would
say
that
the
people
that
are
buying
these
buildings
are
actually
giving
us
a
better
read
on
what
land
is
worth
when
we
appropriate
or
a
portion
the
land
to
building
ratio.
That
makes
sense.
Okay,
councilman.
C
One
more
point
and
I
forgot
to
mention
before
is
I-
wanted
to
refute
the
myth
that
everybody
who
owns
a
condo
is
loaded.
I
mean
there
and
I
know.
You
don't
believe
that,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
this
out
loud,
a
lot
of
the
condos
that
are
downtown
or
people
who
are
quite
old,
who
are
on
a
fixed
income
that
have
not
had
any
money
for
quite
some
time
and
simultaneously
the
property
taxes
are
going
up
dramatically.
C
In
fact,
we
just
voted
on
one
item
of
an
individual
that
was
that
was
having
a
really
rough
time,
paying
nicollet
mall
assessments,
and
we
had
to
expand
it
over
20
years
and
I'll
tell
you.
It
was
a
very
small
amount
of
money,
but
we
still
not
with
notwithstanding
that
we
still
had
to
do
it
to
just
allow
him
to
get
by
so
these
these
valuate.
H
You
mr.
chair
I
was
going
to
ship
topics
a
bit
and
this
isn't
really
probably
a
simple
question,
but
I
was
curious
since
you
talked
about
how
we
have
a
nine
percent
increase
in
our
total
assessed
value
of
landed
property
in
the
city.
Do
you
know
how
that
compares
to
other
adjacent
communities
in
our
region.
F
To
the
chair
comes
by
our
vendor,
I
don't
have
I,
think
I
could
acquire
that
information.
I
needed
to
I
can
call
a
hennepin
county
assessor
and
they
have
their
assessments
broken
out
by
my
cities,
and
so
we
could
compare
a
Diana
and
even
prayer
insta.
It
might
be
more
valuable
to
compare
Minneapolis
with
ramsey
county
or
hennepin
county
as
a
whole
versus
the
smaller
cities.
But
if
you
like
it,
if
you
could,
let
me
know
what
level
if
city
to
city
is
fine.
F
H
A
Thank
you
any
other
questions.
Seeing
no
questions.
I
will
move
acceptance
of
the
2015
report
of
the
board
of
appeals
and
equalization
and
to
approve
all
recommendations
submitted
for
those
appeal
presented
this
year.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye,
those
opposed
say
no,
the
eyes
have
it,
and
the
2015
report
of
the
City
Board
of
Appeals
and
equalization
is
hereby
approved
that
I.
A
That
item
will
be
forwarded
for
the
final
consideration
by
the
City
Council
at
is
regular
meeting
this
Friday
before
we
adjourn
I
would
like
to
thank
Patrick,
Todd,
City,
Assessor,
Rebecca,
malkriss,
director
of
assessments
and
their
staff,
as
well
as
mr.
call
our
city
clerk
and
his
staff,
and
in
particular
Kathy
Bartman
and
unity
Johnson
for
the
world.
None
of
this
report.
Thank
you
very
much
and
seeing
no
further
business
before
the
committee.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.