►
From YouTube: December 2, 2016 Budget Markup – Part 2
Description
Minneapolis Ways & Means Budget Subcommittee Budget Markup
B
A
Then
I
think
so,
let's,
let's
have
a
quick
boat,
then
on
the
motion
to
remove
from
table
the
previous
items
of
which
we
have
a
quorum
present
all
those
in
favor
of
removing
from
the
table.
They
say
I
hi
that
passes
all
those
let's.
So
we
can
go
to
the
next
thing,
so
councilman,
Paul
masama.
You
still
have
the
floor
so.
B
A
That
item
passes
so
on
to
the
amendment
proposed
by
a
council
member
andrew
johnson,
all
those
in
favor
of
that
amendment
as
presented,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed
no
okay.
That
item
fails,
which
I
think
returns
us
to
the
main
motion
which
was
presented
by
bender
Palmisano,
glidden,
Gordon
and
worse
ami.
So
that's
the
correct
authors
that
forgive
me
if
I
put
them
in
the
wrong
order,
and
we
can
continue
with
motion
erica
debate
on
that
amendment.
A
B
B
You
mr.
chair
I'd
like
to
point
to
the
new
fresh
markup
in
front
of
you
an
improved
paper
thanks
to
cuts
member
bender.
This
motion
also
adds
councilmember.
Warsaw
me
is
an
author
to
it
of
what
is
the
only
thing
that's
changed
on
this
is
that
we've
cleared
cleared
up
the
typo
that
this
is
on
a
one-time
basis
and
to
speak
to
that
motion.
I
want
to
mention
a
couple
of
things,
some
of
which
have
been
mentioned
before
as
council
vice-president
wouldn't
mention
this
is
one-time
money.
B
Also,
as
I
think
was
mentioned,
this
is
a
small
portion
of
the
LED
acceleration
money.
That's
proposed
for
this
year,
there's
currently
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
standing
in
our
capital
budget
for
LED
conversions.
What
accelerated
the
conversion
this
year
in
the
mayor's
proposed
budget
was
an
additional
three
hundred
and
twenty-five
thousand
dollars,
so
the
mayor's
proposed
budget
for
2017
says
we
would
spend
four
hundred
and
seventy-five
thousand
dollars
total
in
2017
in
LED
conversions.
B
This
plan
reduces
it
to
three
hundred
and
twenty-five
thousand
dollars
of
acceleration
money
for
that
program
next
year
and
as
I
think
we
all
commonly
acknowledged.
These
are
about
difficult
choices.
This
certainly
isn't
a
great
choice
to
be
making,
but
this
is
just
something
that
is
speaking
to
amongst
all
of
our
priorities.
Where
are
those
priorities?
I
want
to
mention
that
at
least
two
of
the
three
programs
here
that
are
associated
with
our
domestic
abuse?
Prevention
are
definitely
eligible
to
use
recast
money
for
in
the
future.
B
This
is
one-time
money,
but
we
do
think
that,
after
the
that
that
recast
strategy
is
socialized
and
after
that
strategy
is
set
the
in
future
years,
we
could
very
likely
use
that
recast
grant
money
that
we're
receiving
that
could
make
this
into
five
years
of
funding
for
this
kind
of
a
program
after
which
we
can
see
the
results
and
examine
it.
Based
on
that
also
I.
B
As
council
vice-president
glidden
mentioned
the
CDBG
money
that
currently
goes
to
this
kind
of
money
fluctuates
year
to
year
and
over
the
past
three
years,
dab
funding
has
gone
down
for
this
important
work,
with
a
little
bit
of
that
additional
clarity
and
additional
understanding,
I
just
point
to
the
fact
that
these
are
tough
choices
but,
as
we've
all
been
discussing,
you
seem
like
very
worthwhile
strategies
to
pursue
and
I
urge
support
for
it.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
very
much
council
member
I
think
our
queue
is
restarted.
So,
if
there's
any
other
questions
on
our
comments
on
this
item,
not
seeing
any
I
just
did
want
to
give
the
opportunity
to
miss
green,
to
follow
up
on
councilmember
canos
question
on
the
funding
and
total
amount,
and
so
miss
green.
If
you
could
do
that
really
quickly,
I'd
appreciate
it
chairman.
C
A
A
E
C
C
E
A
F
You
mr.
chair
I
believe
there's
a
motion
being
passed
out
right
now.
This
is
a
staff
direction.
I
know
I
sent
an
email
out
to
colleagues
on
this
around
having
the
public
works
department.
Look
at
our
fleet
as
it
comes
to
Citi
vehicles
and
looking
at
how
we
can
ultimately
and
what
the
recommendation
that
they
would
have
would
be
towards
phasing
out
fossil
fuel
vehicles
from
the
city
fleet.
This
staff
direction
is
supported
by
staff.
I
appreciate
my
colleagues
right,
Ken
Gordon
working
with
me
on
this.
G
You
mr.
chair
and
I
think
my
colleague,
I,
come
from
her
Johnson
aptly
described
the
motivation
behind
this
and
I
believe
we
got
this
tied
to
our
existing
fleet
policies,
so
it's
just
really
incorporate
in
there,
but
it
really
expands
on
it
and
drills
down
with
a
data-driven
approach
to
getting
some
cost-benefit
analysis
to
how
we
could
maybe
not
only
do
it
and
do
it
right,
but
maybe
even
accelerate
our
intentions
on
this
matter.
So
I
think
it
teases
up
for
some
good
work
to
come.
Thank.
D
You
mr.
chair,
I,
wonder
if
the
the
leaders
of
this
of
this
staff
direction
could
explain
why
September
first,
that
seems
like
a
long
time
to
do
this.
I,
don't
know
we
want
to
plug
feasibility
study
analysis,
internal
analysis,
I'm,
just
curious
about
the
timing.
If
there's
a
component
about
tying
this,
to
inform
the
budget
or
to
review
budgetary
impact,
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
little
bit
more
time
to
hear
back
before
anything
gets
put
into
our
program
into
our
budget
for
next
year.
D
G
Mr.
chair,
the
timing
of
this
was
derived
in
consultation
with
staff
and
the
type
of
analysis
being
called
upon
the
scope
of
the
material
and
equipment
that
we'd
be
reviewing,
and
we
also
wanted
to
take
the
time
to
make
sure
that
our
look
wasn't
just
internally
or
regionally.
But
we
want
to
have
an
international
sort
of
compendium
of
best
practices
and
have
a
solid
cost-benefit
analysis
of
each
and
every
one
plus
an
implementation
package.
G
A
H
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I
like
to
bring
a
motion
to
amend
the
2017
mayor's
recommended
budget
to
the
department's
of
departments
of
office
of
city
clerk
and
community
patting
economic
development
on
an
ongoing
basis
by
decreasing
office
of
City
Clerk
by
118,000
202
dollars,
and
one
FTE,
and
increasing
the
community
planning
and
economic
development
department
by
118,000
202
dollars
and
one
FTE
for
the
purpose
of
programming
and
outreach
at
the
Cedar
Riverside
Opportunity,
Center
and
I
like
to
know.
If.
A
H
You,
mr.
chair,
this
is
for
the
opportunity
center
that
I've
been
without
we've,
been
working
on
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
years
and,
as
you
might
be
aware,
the
opportunity
center
has
you
know
has
we
had.
We
have
found
the
funding
to
open
the
center,
but
there
was
one
position
that
was
missing,
which
was
for
a
navigator
or
a
program
program
manager
at
the
center
that
was
going
to
be
housed
with
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
thanks
to
the
City
Clerk's
office,
and
especially
thanks
to
a
director
case
o'clock
call
arm.
H
We
were
able
to
find
a
one
one
FTE
that
we
could
utilize
and
and
I've
also
spoken
and
I
like
to
appreciate
and
give
thanks
to
director
craig
taylor
for
for
helping
us
with
this
move.
So
basically,
what
it
is
is
just
moving
one
FTE
from
one
department,
the
City
Clerk's
to
the
sea,
pad
for
the
for
the
Navigator
role
at
the
opportunity
center.
A
I
I
just
give
that
background
to
say
that
city
staff
has
been
involved
in
partnerships
before
on
how
that
we
can
leverage
our
support
of
immigrant
communities.
This
motion
directs
the
city
coordinators
office.
Does
that
designate
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
of
one-time
budget
resources
within
their
budget
to
be
allocated
for
the
purpose
of
funding
support
services
for
immigrant
families?
I
This
is
further
directing
staff
from
the
city
coordinator
departments,
including
intergovernmental
relations,
neighborhood,
community
relations
and
I've
just
had
a
request
from
the
coordinators
office
to
add
civil
rights
to
this
list
to
work
with
community
stakeholder
organizations
such
as
the
immigrant
law
center
of
Minnesota
and
others
to
clarify
priority
needs
for
immigrant
community
services
and
research
potential.
Additional
financial
and
in-kind
support
from
private
and
other
public
agency
sources.
I
Staff
will
report
to
the
intergovernmental
relations
committee
with
a
proposed
plan
no
later
than
March
31st
2017,
and
if
I
could
just
make
a
couple
comments
on
this,
as
we
all
know
and
have
heard
from
our
constituents.
This
is
a
time
of
great
fear
and
uncertainty
within
immigrant
communities
about
what
might
be
federal
policy
changes,
and
this
is
really
just
to
allow
our
staff
to
do
work
that
they
have
done
before
to
partner
with
some
outside
organizations
on
what
might
be
a
coordinated
response.
I
I
will
say:
one
idea
I
personally
have
had
is
whether
we
might
do
something
kind
of
similar
to
what
we
do
are
ready.
Today,
with
tenant
services,
we
have
a
contract,
RFP
contract
with
home
line
and
then
for
a
set
amount
of
money,
and
then
they
are
they're
as
the
entity
that
provides
legal
advice
and
other
types
of
support
services
to
tenants.
I
There
are
numerous
nonprofit
organizations
that
provide
legal
advice
and
support
services
for
immigrant
community
and
I
think
we're
going
to
need
to
find
how
do
we
partner
to
support
our
residents
and
a
time
of
uncertainty?
This
is
really
just
a
small
amount
of
money
to
be
a
stake
in
working
with
other
outside
partners.
I
have
talked
about
it
with
the
staff
groups
listed
here
and
I've
also
talked
with
the
city
coordinators
office
and
due
to
some
reductions
in
partnership
funds
that
we
know
are
coming
in
the
in
20
what's
next
year,
2017.
A
J
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I,
just
very
supportive
of
this
glad
to
see
the
initiative
coming
forward
and
we're
doing
this
I've
heard
about
some
help.
Centers
that
have
opened
in
other
cities
and
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
people
show
up
it's
more
than
expected.
I,
don't
think
we
really
know
yet
how
many
people
are
worried.
Frightened
scared,
uncertain
about
what
to
do
and
want
to
seek
some
kind
of
advice
and
I
think
it's
totally
appropriate.
J
In
fact,
I
think
it's
an
obligation
that
we
have
as
the
city
government
to
help
facilitate
that
and
provide
those
resources
for
that.
So
I
would
say
that
I
don't
know
that
this
35,000
is
going
to
be
enough,
but
obviously
this
is
teeing
up
more.
What
can
we
leverage?
What
other
partners
can
we
bring
in?
What
will
it
look
like?
There
may
need
to
be
open
houses
and
centers
where
people
can
go
at
certain
times.
J
I
think
hope,
hopefully,
will
be
nimble
enough
so
that
if
there's
some
startling
news
and
things
a
greater
concern
before
march
31st
will
be
ready
to
respond
and
spend
the
money.
If
we
have
to
but
I
appreciate
that
that's
in
the
way
we
usually
set
dates
for
these
things,
that's
a
pretty
early
day
too.
So
we
should
have
some
good
information
coming
out
and
near
the
end
of
the
first
quarter
on
this,
and
I
am
very
supportive.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward.
J
H
D
I
I
So,
within
the
coordinators
budget,
I
mean
they
get
a
budget
amount,
and
so
it's
not
that
all
of
their
activities
are
earmarked.
I
have
talked
with
the
coordinators
office
and
I
know
that
there
are
some
reductions
coming
in
some
of
the
things
that
they
fund
through
their
department.
One
of
those
is
they
fund
many
of
the
city's
partnerships
with
boards
outside
boards.
That
city
members
sit
on,
and
we
do
know
already
of
at
least
two
those
boards
where
there
will
be
some
significant
reductions
in
our
obligations
from
2016
to
2017.
I
D
I
That
sounds
like
a
very
good
amendment
and
I'll
just
kind
of
respond
as
well
to
other
council
members
who
have
identified
that
this
is
a
source
that
we
wish
was
more
and
if
there
are
other
ideas
on
that,
I
will
say.
Maybe
there
might
be
opportunities
off
also
after
the
staff
reports
back
on
a
proposal
in
a
plan
to
the
intergovernmental
relations
committee,
which
again
is
kind
of
similar
to
how
this
worked
in
2015
and
to
come
summer.
Cano
I
I
apologize
I.
I
D
A
Thank
you
rather
than
taking
a
separate
vote
on
the
amendment.
I
think
that
will
can
conclude
that
all
coordinators
departments,
including
communications,
would
be
a
part
of
the
staff
direction.
So
all
those
in
favor
of
council
vice-president
glidden's
staff
direction,
as
proposed,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
at
item,
carries
thank
you
very
much.
I
A
Thank
you.
I
saw
a
very
interesting
session
at
the
National
League
of
Cities
on
this
topic
and,
of
course,
participatory
budgeting
is
included
within
this
year's
budget
and
I
think
it's
appropriate
to
add
some
structure
around
that
through
this
staff
direction,
especially
putting
a
time
deadline
to
come
back
to
Ways
and
Means
Committee.
So
I'm
very
excited
about
that.
There's
any
other
questions
comments
on
this
staff
direction,
not
seeing
any.
Although
I'm
sorry,
my
apologies,
councilmember
fry.
K
K
I
Councilmember
fried
there
is
some
funding
in
the
finance
departments
budget
in
the
mayor's
proposed
budget
within
the
finance
department.
That's
a
designated
to
exploratory
budgeting,
and
so
I
think
this
is
to
do
exactly
what
you're
asking
is
to
put
together
information
for
us
as
a
council
to
consider
this
as
a
process
and
then
be
able
to
see
if
we
are
able
to
agree
that
we
could
incorporate
it
into
our
budgeting
process.
Moving
forward,
participatory
budgeting
is
a
process
that
I
will
just
say
is:
is
used
around
the
world.
I
L
G
F
I
Of
ways
in
certain
portions
of
their
budget
I
know
other
council
members
here
have
visited
other
cities
around
the
United
States,
where
those
cities
are
trying
to
use
participatory
budgeting
kind
of
in
general.
This
is
a
theory
where
you're
taking
some
portion
of
your
budget
and
seeking
some
direct
input
from
residents
on
how
to
allocate
those
dollars.
Some
cities
use
a
very
small
discretionary
pot
of
money.
I
Others
do
different
kinds
of
things:
it's
really
very
flexible,
it's
kind
of
how
we
would
try
to
decide
how
did
how
to
utilize
it
I'll
give
one
example:
the
mayor
of
Boston
had
identified
a
certain
amount
of
money.
I
think
it
was
a
million
dollars
and
he
used
it
to
for
a
seeking
youth
input
on
how
to
designate
that
money
for
youth
related
purposes,
and
I
think
that
the
upper
end
of
who
could
vote.
I
We
had
to
be
24
years
old
or
younger,
and
so
he
was
trying
to
again
it's
a
mechanism
for
encouraging
direct
participation,
increasing
participation
and
faith
and
how
government
works,
and
also,
just
frankly,
understanding
and
transparency
with
public
members
of
the
public
around
how
the
budget
works.
Also
just
note
that
click
had
a
specific
mission
of
using
participatory
budgeting
in
the
report
that
they
provided
to
us.
It's
one
of
the
official
comments
within
the
click
report
and
I
know
that
the
NCE
see
also
took
some
sort
of
emotion,
supporting
that
statement.
I
K
Generally
speaking,
and
thank
you
for
that
analysis
that
was
very
helpful
in
just
providing
a
general
framework.
Do
cities,
cities
usually
allocate
a
certain
portion
of
money
to
it,
and
then
they
say
it's
not
like
the
entire
budget
is
done
through
participatory
budgeting.
It's
we
will
here's
$500,000,
let's
figure
out
how
best
to
spend
it.
Given
the
community's
desires.
I
I
have
not
seen
a
city
in
united
states
where
they
have
used
their
money.
That
way,
I
think
again,
they've
looked
for
different
kinds
of
ways
that
it
makes
sense.
The
City
of
Oakland
I
know
just
recently
worked
with
a
major
foundation.
I
think
the
California
foundation
on
a
partnership
on
how
they
might
decide
how
to
use
their
CDBG
funds
using
participatory
budgeting,
so
I
think
there's
again,
it's
kind
of
how
we
as
a
city
would
try
to
identify.
Where
would
be
an
appropriate
type
of
place
within
our
budget?
I
J
J
Commission
I
also
want
to
note
that
I
actually
think
that
Minneapolis
was
probably
on
the
blue
edge
of
this
in
the
past,
because
this
is
very
much
like
the
old
neighborhood
revitalization
program
which
actually
took
some
revenue
and
let
participation
process
from
the
community
help
determine
how
it
was
spent,
so
it
it
wasn't
called
that
then
so
this
might
be
a
new
term
sort
of
for
something
that
could
be
similar
well
I'm.
Not
this
definitely
wouldn't
necessarily
repeat
that
repeat
well
and
that
I'm
so
I
couldn't
thank.
J
L
J
Good,
thank
you.
Okay,
so
probably
it's
probably
the
parallel
to
that
would
come
up
anyway.
I
mean
I.
Don't
know
why
we'd
want
to
hide
the
fact
that
we
have
had
some
history
of
using
tools,
kind
of
like
this
in
the
past,
so
I'll
try
not
to
bring
it
up
again
if
people
would
prefer
that,
but
I
just
think
that's
I
mean
there's
probably
other
ways
that
it's
been
done.
It's
very
interesting
in
some
cities
that
you
look
at
that
have
done
this.
J
Actually,
the
wards
and
the
council
offices
have
a
large
capital
budget
that
they
have
discretion
over
and
so
in
Chicago
and
somewhere
else.
That's
how
it's
done
so
its
controls
in
many
different
ways,
many
different
areas,
and
it's
almost
always
just
a
portion
of
the
budget.
If
people
want
to
learn
more
I'm,
true
to
just
Google
participatory
budgeting
and
you'll
find
a
whole
lot
of
information
about
it
too,
because
it's
definitely
out
there.
So
people
can
look
at
that.
Oh
ok,
so
we've
it's
something!
J
M
Appreciate
your
explanation:
councilmember
glidden
I
didn't
really
know
anything
about
this,
but
it
sounds
a
lot
like
what
we
did
with
the
Public
Health
Advisory
Committee,
making
decisions
with
regard
to
CDBG
funding.
They
were
the
ones
that
actually
moved
us
in
the
direction
of
focusing
on
seniors
and
youth
violence
and
then
figured
out
how
to
use
that
money
which
broke
the
log
jam
of
nonprofits
that
we're
all
asking
us
for
money.
So
if
it's
something
like
that
and
or
something
like
click
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
thing.
M
I
I,
don't
know
that
we
want
to
leave
out
there.
The
idea
that
20
million
dollars
per
year
for
20
years
would
be
allocated
through
a
participatory
budgeting
process
as
a
first
step
and
I
just
want
to
clarify
in
your
time
and
you're,
not
suggesting
we
do
this
next
year,
you're
suggesting
we
study
it
next
year
to
implement
in
20s
that
18.
I
So
just
to
respond
to
council
member
Goodman
correct
this
is
I
mean
it
would
completely
fail
if
we
try
to
do
it
next
year,
because
we
haven't
spent
no
time
trying
to
design
and
decide
what
do
we
agree
upon
and
then
work
with
community
members
on
how
what
do
we
design
a
process?
The
whole
point
is
that
you're
engaging
in
designing
something
that
can
find
support.
A
A
This
is
a
staff
direction
by
myself
for
the
convention,
center,
fun,
use
and
downtown
asset
analysis,
and
what
the
staff
direction
does
essentially
is
to
create
a
staff
committee
it'll
operate
similar
to
our
facility
space
and
management
committee
that
will
be
led
by
our
city
coordinator
and
it'll,
really
evaluate
the
operational
needs
and
make
recommendations
on
the
capital
investments
that
will
need
to
make
over
the
next
number
of
years
for
our
downtown
assets,
which
I've
outlined
as
in
item
number.
Three
of
that
is
really
beyond
just
the
convention
center.
A
It
also
includes
target
center,
includes
peavey,
plaza
the
commons.
We
could
extend
that
and
include
the
hennepin,
theater
trust
and
other
assets
that
are
within
the
downtown
zone.
That
are
really
part
of
our
economic
vitality,
not
just
for
the
work
that
they
do,
but
also
for
the
sales
taxes
that
they
generate.
So
that's
the
basis
of
the
staff
direction
is
to
what
was
used
as
the
convention
center
fund,
which
could
be
controversial.
A
So
those
are
my
comments
on
that
and
on
the
staff
direction.
I
invite
any
other
comments
or
questions
on
that
staff
direction,
not
seeing
anyone.
Thank
you
very
much.
All
those
in
favor
of
the
staff
direction
as
presented,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed.
That
item
carries.
Thank
you
with
that.
Colleagues.
I.
Think
we've
concluded
the
consideration
of
the
amendments
and
staff
directions
for
the
proposed
2017
budget.
At
this
time.
A
We
expect
additional
amendments
to
be
considered
at
the
council
meeting
prior
to
its
final
adoption,
so
with
that
I'd
like
to
move
approval
of
the
proposed
2017
budget
as
submitted
by
premier
Hodges
and
is
further
amended
by
this
subcommittee
this
today
with
a
rocket
recommendation
for
adoption
by
the
full
city
council
at
its
adjourn
session
on
wednesday
december
7th,
2017,
I
hope
I
got
that
date
correct,
thank
you
and
that
begins
at
six.
Oh
five!
Is
there
any
discussion
on
that
motion?
I
have
councilmember
Johnson
Council
President
Johnson.
Thank
you.
I.
E
L
A
It
doesn't
do
anything
with
the
funds
as
presented,
but
it
really
sets
of
a
staff
direction
that
has
the
committee
that
will
say
make
recommended
uses
for
those
funds
in
the
coming
year
and
and
beyond,
but
that
report
would
be
doing
back
in
March
of
17,
but
I
think
the
intent
is
obviously
saying
that
these
these
funds
are
will
not
be
spent
as
part
of
the
budget
process
this
year
until
that
recommendation
and
full-throated
analysis
has
been
provided
to
the
council
as
through
the
Ways
and
Means
Committee.
Thank
you.
A
Council
president,
did
you
want
to
do
that
after
we
took
the
vote
on
this
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear?
Okay,
but
before
adjournment,
thank
you
on
the
motion
as
presented
all
those
in
favor.
Please
signify
by
saying
aye
opposed
that
item.
It
does
carry.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
work
council
by
council
president
johnson,
a.
E
Pink
mr.
chair
I
just
have
been
disturbed.
I
guess
I
would
say
by
a
communication
that
went
out
to
members
of
list.
I
guess
from
one
of
my
colleagues
that
reported
that
last
year,
on
the
day
of
the
final
budget
boat,
I
was
given
a
few
hours
notice
that
councilmember
belonging
and
barb
Johnson
planned
to
make
a
motion
to
invest
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
expand
the
4th
precinct
and
I
just
want
to
make
it
very
clear.
Our
motion
was
not
at
the
time
to
expand
the
4th
precinct.
E
It
was
to
deal
with
the
property
damage
that
had
been
created,
and
so
I
hesitate
to
do
this,
but
when
I'm
called
out,
I
really
want
to
clarify
about
what
actually
happened.
So
councilmember,
yang
and
I
did
not
attend
to
expand
the
fourth
Precinct.
The
other
thing
I
will
point
out
the
city's
budget
from
this
communication.
E
A
You
for
the
comments,
okay,
well,
thank
you
very
much.
Everyone
and
I
do
need
to
take
a
second
just
to
thank
the
finance
staff.
All
who
have
been
assembled
here
but
more
were
assembled
upstairs,
who
have
done
so
much
work
on
this
presentation,
as
well
as
mayor
Hodges,
for
initiating
the
budget
recommendation
back
in
August
and
for
all
of
my
colleagues.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
through
their
budget
hearings
and
for
this
meeting
today
for
a
complete,
robust
conversation,
seeing
we
have
no
further
business
before
us
today.
This
subcommittee
is
adjourned.