►
From YouTube: July 25, 2016 Health, Environment & Community Engagement
Description
Minneapolis Health, Environment & Community Engagement Committee Meeting
A
My
name
is
cam
Gordon
I'm
chair
the
committee
and
today
I'm
joined
by
andrew
johnson,
no
longer
Connell,
Jacob,
Frye
and
Elizabeth
glidden
Lisa
bender
won't
be
joining
us
today,
but
we
are
a
quorum
of
the
committee,
so
we
can
hold
the
committee
and
conduct
our
business
there's
two
items
on
our
agenda
today.
Both
our
discussion
items
coming
from
the
neighborhood
and
community
relations
department.
A
The
first
is
receiving
and
filing
a
presentation
on
the
process
to
update
the
city's
American
with
Disabilities
Act
transition
plan
to
be
released
for
a
30-day
public
comment
period
and
to
come
back
for
City
Council
adoption
in
October.
The
second
is
adopting
our
revised
community
participation
program
guidelines.
So
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
one
and
mr.
rubadoux
is
here
to
make
a
presentation.
Welcome
Thank.
B
Specifically,
the
request,
as
the
chair
has
mentioned
for
the
committee
today,
is
to
receive
and
file
the
draft
a
DA
action
plan
and
also
release
it
out
for
public
comment
with
the
idea
that
it
would
be
after
the
public
comment
period.
We
will
be
considering
those
comments
and
then
bringing
back
a
final,
revised
plan
later
in
September
for
council
approval
in
adoption.
B
The
things
that
a
overview
of
the
presentation
today
is
also
in
a
couple
of
minutes.
Just
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
ad,
a
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
and
the
role
of
NCR
and
their
process,
and
the
Nick
will
mr.
no
will
get
up
and
talk
about
the
evaluation
process
that
we
conducted
at
the
city
and
then
also,
what's
the
included
in
the
plan
and
the
components
of
the
plan,
to
go
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
on
that.
B
So
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
was
actually
passed
in
nineteen
ninety
and
is
actually
one
of
two
major
civil
rights
laws
that
really
affect
the
work
of
the
city.
The
second
is
the
limited
English
proficiency
plan,
which
the
City
Council
adopted
a
revised,
updated
version
of
that
just
a
few
months
ago,
or
actually
about
six
months
ago,
which
we
call
the
language
access
plan
yeah
when
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
was
first
passed
in
nineteen.
B
Ninety,
the
city
completed
an
evaluation
of
then
what
was
primarily
the
physical
inventory
of
the
city
properties,
basically
the
physical
space,
where
the
city
conducts
business
and
put
a
put
together
a
transition
plan
that
was
adopted
in
1993.
What
you
see
before
you
today
is
an
update
to
that
existing
plan
from
1993
to
do
a
revaluation
of
the
least
and
owned
properties
within
the
city.
B
But
in
addition
to
that,
it
includes
the
work
that
Public
Works
is
down
around
revaluation
of
the
cities
right
aways,
in
addition
to
programs
and
services
component
of
what
the
hell,
the
city
does
business
and
basically,
there's
been
so
many
changes
with
technology
and
improvements
around
accessibility.
Since
the
original
plan
was
adopted
in
1993
that
what
you
see
before
you,
even
though
it's
a
revision
of
the
original
plan,
is
actually
a
significant
update
to
our
work.
B
B
So
we
have
worked
together
to
put
together
this
revised
plan
that
you
see
before
you,
the
NCR
role,
just
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
specifically
about
that.
When
the
NCR
department
was
created
in
roughly
around
2010
the
responsibility
of
title
to
Americans,
with
Disabilities
Act
title
two
were
moved
into
our
department,
along
with
the
language
access
work,
the
limited
English
proficiency
plan,
it's
really
a
good
fit
for
us.
Our
our
mission
really
fits
with
the
overall
goals
of
a
DA,
which
is
about
removing
barriers
to
participation
in
public
access
to
our
programs
and
services.
B
We
also
because
we're
located
in
the
coordinator
Department
serve
a
really
special
role
of
being
able
to
work
with
many
city
departments
to
provide
the
resources
in
order
to
be
able
to
manage
a
DA
on
a
collective
citywide
basis.
And
since
our
inception,
in
working
with
on
the
ad
a
we
have
really
refocused
the
work
of
the
city's.
A
DA
work
to
be
more
systems
of
systems
based
and
really
improving
systems,
so
that
our
work
around
88
does
not
just
fall
upon
one
single
person
or
a
couple
people
that
we
build
improvements
within
our
enterprise.
B
Since
doing
that,
I
should
also
mention
on
the
overview
with
it,
with
the
NCR
department.
The
role
of
the
title
to
coordinator
every
city
is
required
to
have
a
ad
a
title
to
coordinator.
That
responsibility
rests
with
me
and
that
and
that's
part
of
my
one
of
my
roles
and
responsibilities
as
being
the
director
of
neighborhood
and
community
relations.
B
Since
we
have
taken
on
this
work
in
2010
we've
been
spending,
we
made
us
a
high
priority
and
in
spending
has
been
spending
a
great
deal
of
time
of
really
supporting
the
city's
improving
the
city's
a
DA
work.
We've
been
working
very
closely
with
the
Minneapolis
Advisory
Council
and
people
with
disabilities
have
a
great
working
relationship
with
them.
We've
enhanced
the
311
support
for
reporting
grievances.
B
We
were
before
believing
that
the
number
of
a
DA
related
grievances
coming
into
the
city
were
being
under
report
it
and
after
some
training
and
some
work
with
311
in
a
very
cooperative
setting,
we
were
able
to
get
the
reporting
mechanisms
and
the
understanding
it
was
actually
an
ad.
A
complaint
versus
a
different
type
of
information
inquiry
cleared
up
and
we
are
now
getting
regular
ad
a
related
complaints
or
concerns
into
our
department
and
working
directly
with
constituents
to
get
those
resolved.
B
We
have
also
been
able
to
do
establish,
what's
called
the
accessibility
network,
so
we
have
point
people
in
19.
Excuse
me,
18
of
the
city
departments,
there's
19
people
on
this
liaison
off
work.
These
are
our
point,
people
that
really
work
with
each
department
within
their
departments
to
really
address
88
concerns.
They
also
provide
the
language
access
support
for
those
departments
again.
The
idea
here
is
to
build
a
system
wide
approach,
to
really
be
able
to
support
a
DA
as
an
ongoing
consideration.
B
As
the
city
gold
does
its
program
and
service
development
and
delivery
in
those
in
that
liaison
Network.
We
have
been
meeting
quarterly
now,
where
we
do
trainings.
We
have
discussions
around
various
issues
and
stuff
that
are
going
on
within.
These
are
the
department's.
The
third
thing
that
we
we
have
completed
is
we've
been
doing
an
extensive
amount
of
training.
As
of
now,
I
think
we
have
a
little
over
90
people
that
have
been
trained
around
web
content.
B
Accessibility
guidelines,
which
is
an
ad
a
standard
as
well
as
accessible
document,
so
been
doing
a
lot
of
training
with
city
staff,
particularly
around
the
use
of
PDFs,
and
trying
to
use
PDS
in
a
more
accessible
way.
So
again,
these
are
systems
types
of
improvements.
We
also
completed
anniversary
celebration
last
summer
for
the
25th
year
of
the
88,
and
really
raised
awareness
around
that
also
so,
with
that
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
mr.
know
who's
going
to
talk
about.
B
In
addition
to
the
other
systems,
improvements
that
we've
been
doing
last
year,
we
were
able
to
conduct
an
extensive
evaluation
of
the
city's
program
and
service
delivery,
and
he
can
talk
about
the
results
of
that
evaluation,
and
that
would
lead
to
the
development
of
this
plan,
as
well
as
the
connections
with
Public
Works
and
property
services.
Jordan.
C
Afternoon,
Jack
Gordon,
council
members,
Thank
You,
director
rube
adored.
My
name
is
Nick
Nolan
I'm,
the
88
and
language
access
coordinator
for
the
neighborhood
and
community
relations
department.
Today,
I'll
be
walking
with
you
through
the
ad
a
action
plan
itself,
as
well
as
our
steps
to
developing
it
and
these
strategies
within
it.
C
So
what
the
plan
is,
as
director
Rupert
or
has
mentioned,
is
it's
an
update
to
the
1993
ad
a
transition
plan?
This
is
a
very
significant
body
of
work
and
I.
Think
it's
something
that
the
community
as
well
as
the
committee,
has
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
first
off,
it's
a
very
comprehensive
policy
document,
armed
with
components
to
comply
with
title
to
the
88.
The
legal
requirements
are
set
by
the
Department
of
Justice
and
within
our
plan
we
demonstrate
how
the
city
enterprise
itself
has
the
components
to
manage
those
legal
requirements.
C
Secondly,
it
has
the
enterprise
policies,
procedures
and
practices
for
inclusion
of
people
with
disabilities.
We
want
to
take
a
step
forward
in
making
sure
that
our
program
and
service
delivery,
as
well
as
decision-making
process,
is
accessible
to
everyone
and
then,
as
the
director
Rupert
door
has
mentioned,
the
plan
has
identified
enhancements
and
strategies
to
improve
our
programs
and
services
to
make
sure
that
it's
accessible
to
everyone.
C
Along
with
the,
along
with
the
system,
improvement
improvements
that
were
mentioned,
the
most
the
most
identifiable
one
is
RA
da
evaluation.
We
done
to
about
three
evaluations
within
the
last
five
years,
two
of
them
into
2015,
as
well
as
public
works
in
2012.
This
actually
is
a
proactive
approach
from
us
here
at
the
city.
It
shows
our
commitment
to
not
only
the
ATA
but
people
with
disabilities
very
quickly.
I
want
to
touch
on
property
services
and
public
works.
C
The
evaluation
that
NCR
did
this
last
year
is
around
programs
and
services.
From
the
very
beginning
we
hired
a
consultant
to
come
in
and
to
review
our
programs
and
services,
and
we
talked
or
we
breathe
the
council
members
early
summer
as
well
as
department
directors,
on
what
the
evaluation
process
is.
We've
worked
with
15
different
departments
to
really
review
what
their
program
and
service
delivery
models
are.
How
people
with
disabilities
are
included
with
that
and
then
steps
to
assuring
that
if
there
is
a
barrier,
what
they
do
to
accommodate
those
particular
deficiencies
from
that
work?
C
From
that
work,
what
Public,
Works
and
property
services
has
identified
as
a
ten
year
for
property
services
in
30
year
process
for
Public
Works
to
modify
and
improve
physical
deficiencies
under
what
we
own
here
at
the
city?
What
we
have
in
front
of
you
today
is
a
three
year
plan
to
enhance
our
strategy.
Our
program
and
service
delivery
enhance
strategies
as
well.
C
The
Riggin
admitted
enhancements
that
we
proposed
in
this
plan
really
touches
on
the
emerging
trends
as
directed
ruba
door
has
mentioned
in
terms
of
how
residents
kid
acts
as
program
of
services,
how
it's
effectively
delivered
to
them
and
how
they
can
participate
in
our
decision-making
processes
here
at
the
city.
First
off
is
through
information
gathering,
as
well
as
access
to
what
we
do
here
in
the
city
and
31
is
a
very
large
Department,
where
residents
contact
for
information
on
what
we
do
here,
as
well
as
issues
regarding
where
they
live
in
the
city.
C
Their
mobile
app
has
been
a
very
great
instrument
to
for
residents
to
utilize
as
a
resource.
However,
we
found
that
people
with
assistive
devices
or
software
isn't
able
to
access
them.
31
has
worked
tremendously
within
this
last
year
to
update
the
app
to
make
sure
that
it's
accessible
to
all
it's
very
rule
out
by
the
end
of
the
year.
C
Another
really
incredible
enhancement
is
with
communications,
ensuring
that
people
again,
people
that
are
hard
to
have
hardened
deaf
or
hearing
or
with
hearing
impairments,
are
able
to
participate
in
our
decision-making
processes
as
well
as
public
hearings.
Their
enhancement
is
around
captioning
of
public
hearings
and
meetings
that
are
streamed
online
through
our
services
and
then
with
the
Office
of
Emergency
Management.
Their
plan
is
around
how
to
effectively
engage
as
well
as
communicate
emergency
emergency
situations
that
the
city
faces
through
a
natural
as
well
as
man-made
disasters,
and
where
to
go
for
assistance
in
those
circumstances.
C
Another
large
improvement
is
with
our
digital
presence.
It
has
set
forth
a
very
robust
plan
and
how
to
improve
our
digital
content,
as
well
as
website
to
ensure
that
people
are
able
to
access
what
they
need
to
learn
to
understand
what
a
program
service
we
do
here.
The
city
is
and
then
how
to
participate
in
that
and
then
through
MCR
itself.
C
As
the
rector
rubra
door
has
mentioned,
we
do
a
lion's
share
of
making
sure
that
we
provide
the
support
to
other
departments
to
know
what
those
legal
requirements
are,
how
to
comply
and
how
to
effectively
engage
and
include
people
with
disabilities
within
their
programs
and
services.
And,
lastly,
with
regulatory
services.
C
A
D
C
Gordon
councilmembers,
the
s
director
roberto,
has
mentioned.
We
have
done
training
around,
what's
known
as
the
web
content.
Accessibility
guide.
That
is
a
very,
very
robust
standard
that
is
recognized
by
the
access
board
and
they
have
different
levels
of
compliance
and
accessibility
where
we
are
right
now,
with
our
compliance
level
indicates
that
people
utilizing
an
assistive
device
or
software
or
anyone
that
is
just
using
the
regular
program
components.
C
C
It
could
be
as
easy
as
just
regular
coding
to
make
sure
that
the
heading
level
is
a
primary
subject,
a
subject
line,
and
then
the
content
follows
it
or
it
could
be
a
matter
of
tagging,
the
images
to
ensure
that
people
know
what
the
image
is
about,
where
the
visuals,
with
graphing
or
or
visual
representation
of
data,
or
it
could
be
our
PDFs
that
those
are
not
accessible.
So
it's
a
number
of
grand
number
of
issues
that
could
have
that
falls
under
this
particular
digital
piece.
Yeah.
Okay,
thank
you.
C
E
Our
clients,
in
terms
of
giving
recommendations
and
advice
and
with
something
like
this,
what
is
our
relationship
with
the
park
board
so
clearly,
the
park
board
has
a
lot
of
its
own
funds,
a
lot
of
its
own
internal
functions.
However,
it
is
a
department
of
the
city
under
the
city
charter,
despite
the
fact
it
has
independent
leadership
by
an
elected
commission,
and
so
what's
our
responsibility
to
reach
out
to
the
park
board,
perform
the
same
type
of
a
DA
evaluation
and
consult
with
them
share.
C
Gorn
council,
by
spring
president
clinton,
the
park
board
actually
embarked
in
their
own
88
evaluation.
Within
this
last
year.
They
did
two
types:
evaluation,
one
of
their
physical
structures,
recreation,
centers
playgrounds
to
ensure
that
they
identify
the
physical
deficiencies
behind
them.
Secondly,
they
brought
on
the
same
consultant
to
review
their
programs
and
services,
and
it
will
be
concluding
that
work
relatively
soon.
C
We
we've
MCR
has
been
working
with
the
park
board
since
the
beginning
of
our
our
evaluation
process
to
understand
where
they
are
at
and
then
the
plans
that
they
will
be
developing
under
their
evaluation.
The
park
board
also
has
their
what's
their
access
and
outreach
manager
be
a
consistent
member
or
guest
at
the
advisory
committee
for
people
with
disabilities.
So
we
have
been
working
with
them
and
staying
abreast
of
what
they're
doing
under
their
ad
a
realm
as
well.
E
C
Gerry
byrne,
council,
vice
versa
and
glen-
I
am
not
quite
sure
of
the
details
of
what
format
or
medium
they'll
be
presenting
their
recommendations.
As
far
as
I
know
that
we
going
through
their
process
and
presenting
their
board
as
well,
there
are
a
few
overlapping
areas
where,
where
we
plan
to
work
on
it,
such
as
their
website
presence
and
then
creating
accessible
materials
as
well,
the
details
of
that
is
still
being
worked
on.
C
A
Don't
see
any
other
questions,
thank
you
shake
that
an
hour
action
here
is
just
to
receive
and
file
the
presentation
and
will
be
on
gathering
comment
now
for
30
days
and
we'll
come
back
to
the
to
the
committee
in
late-september
for
adoption,
hopefully
by
the
council
in
October.
So
I
will
move
we
receive
and
file
list.
Seeing
no
discussion
on
that.
A
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
aye,
NE
posed
at
motion,
carries
them
and
now
we're
ready
to
move
on
to
our
second
and
final
item
further
ready-
and
this
is
an
adoption
of
the
revised
community
servation
program
guidelines
and
mr.
Joseph,
the
deputy
director
for
neighbors
and
community
relations
will
be
making
that
report.
This
may
be
the
first
time
you've
reported
to
the
committee.
So
welcome
glad
to
have
you
here.
Thank.
F
You
good
afternoon,
mr.
chair
and
committee
members,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
My
name
is
Donald
Joseph
I'm,
the
deputy
director
of
the
NCR
department
within
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
and
today
I'm
going
to
present
to
you
the
revised
community
participating
participation,
participation
program
guidelines,
as
well
as
the
2017
to
2019
allocations.
F
Second,
we
are
implementing
publicly
accepted
standards
and
principles
that
are
not
pie
in
the
sky.
Things
that
we
came
out
of
nowhere,
they're,
not
transformational,
nature
they're,
actually
a
very
much
common
among
non-for-profits
across
the
United
States,
as
they
are
truly
operational
in
nature
and
third,
we
are.
We
now
can
say
that
we
have
the
ability
to
initiate
an
NCR
review
if
we
feel
there's
a
need
given
a
non
compliance
with
our
CPP
guidelines.
So
I'll
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
more
in
the
presentation,
so
taking
a
deeper
dive
into
the
major
policy
changes.
F
Moving
on
to
the
adoption
of
public
standards
and
principles,
this
again
is
something
that
we
feel
is
going
to
be
very
helpful
in
in
having
alignment
on
some
operational
matters
that
we
think
are
of
concern
to
all
our
neighborhoods
and
I'm.
Just
going
to
read
them
off
here.
The
Minnesota
Council
of
not-for-profits
principles
for
nonprofit
organizations
and
also
the
charitable
review
for
council
accountability
standards.
We
saw
some
natural
overlap
between
these
two
in
the
areas
of
financial
activity,
fundraising
and
governance,
to
name
a
few.
F
Go
moving
forward
to
the
next
item.
This
one
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
controversial,
given
the
fact
that
it's
going
to
compel
neighborhoods
to
actually
adjust
their
bylaws
moving
forward.
So
what
we
did
was
that
we
looked
at
the
many
neighborhood
organizations.
What
we
wanted
to
do
is
ensure
that
every
neighborhood
organization
actually
had
both
a
voter,
ID
ID
requirement
and
also
a
non
photo
ID
requirement
as
well.
They
actually
could
have
both
per
the
Minnesota
statute
for
non-for-profits.
F
F
F
So,
as
I
mentioned
before
committee,
the
NCR
initial
review
initiated
review,
allows
er,
allows
us
to
go
in
and
look
at
records
for
our
respective
neighborhoods,
whether
that's
their
financial
records
accounting
records,
their
minutes,
their
agendas
and
so
forth
eligible
use
of
funds,
as
we
are
responsible
for
title
2
of
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
federal
law.
Here,
because
we
provide
public
funds
to
neighborhoods,
we
are
mandated
federally
mandated
to
also
provide
education
and
training
awareness
to
our
neighborhoods,
so
they
could
actually
be
in
a
better
position
to
address
their
own
ad,
a
compliance
matters.
F
We
also
wanted
to
be
very
specific
that
they
could
use
their
CPP
funds
to
be
in
compliance
with
a
DA
I
think
you
all
have
copies
of
the
the
forward-looking
three-year
allocations
for
the
2017
to
2019
period.
What
we
did
for
the
revisions
is
that
we
put
in
an
actual
floor
going
forward
on
an
annual
basis.
No
neighborhood
would
receive
anything
less
than
a
twenty-five-thousand-dollar
annual
allocation
in
the
past
per
the
allocation
formula.
F
One
other
thing
as
it
relates
to
there
was
some.
There
were
several
challenges
related
to
having
a
group
policy
for
directors
and
officers
insurance.
Some
of
that
was
industry,
driven
some
of
that
was
due
to
lawsuit
risk.
We
felt
that
it
was
going
forward.
It
was
important
for
neighborhoods
to
take
out
their
own
individual
directors
in
an
officers
insurance.
F
F
Moving
on
to
the
clarified
and
improve
process
for
neighborhood
priority
plans,
we
do
feel
that
neighborhoods
are
critical
in
working
with
their
residents,
all
their
residents
to
address
those
specific
opportunities
and
issues
that
should
be
looked
at
in
earnest.
So
where
we
come
in,
we
work
with
neighborhoods
to
come
up
with
neighborhood
priority
plans.
This
is
going
to.
We
are
there
as
their
neighborhood
support
the
neighborhood
support
team
to
basically
say
okay,
if
this
is
what
you
want
to
do,
how
could
we
basically
bolster
your
efforts?
F
F
So,
just
to
give
you
a
quick
bird's
eye
view
of
the
CPP
allocations
for
the
next
three
year
period,
we're
in
the
ballpark
of
twelve
point.
Three.
Two
million
funds
are
allocated
on
a
need-based
formula.
If
you
were
to
look
at
it
and
see,
for
example,
that
for
the
weighting
system,
forty
percent
is
actually
allocated
to
underrepresented
communities
within
neighborhoods.
So
it
gets
at
that
equity,
piece
and
funds,
as
you
probably
all
know,
can
be
used
for
anything
from
community
outreach
to
communication,
newsletters
and
the
implementation
of
their
neighborhood
plans.
F
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
timeline
of
what
led
us
to
today.
In
January
in
February,
the
NCR
department
decided
to
review
the
guidelines
that
we
had
and
we
then
drafted
some
initial
changes
between.
During
the
march
april
timeframe,
we
received
some
initial
feedback,
not
only
from
neighborhood
organizations,
but
the
nce
see,
and
also
the
NRP
Policy
Board.
What
we
did
the
may
july
time
frame.
F
We
opened
up
a
45-day
review
period
that
closed
on
jun
20th,
where
we
gave
all
neighborhoods
the
opportunity
to
comment
and
actually
put
in
the
actual
document
their
changes.
We
met
with
the
nce,
see
on
jun
20th
to
review
those
changes,
and
last
week
we
met
with
the
NRP
policy
board.
We
are
now
in
the
process
we're
now
in
the
phase
of
the
process,
the
july-august
timeframe,
where
we
are
meeting
with
you
all
today
and
we're
in
the
approval
process
that
that
finalizes
with
city
council.
F
A
You
very
much
appreciate
the
presentation
and
all
the
information
and
a
very
supportive
of
the
changes
to
the
guidelines
to
I
did
have
a
question,
though,
about
the
allocations.
So
their
three-year
allocations
in
the
minimum
is
twenty-five
thousand
dollars
a
year,
but
there
were
two
neighborhoods
that
seem
to
get
less
than
that.
When
I
looked
at
the
allocation-
and
I
was
curious
about
why
that
might
have
happened
so
page
it
looks
like
page
is
getting
30,
9930
and
Hale
is
getting
68,000
and
I
was
expecting,
the
minimum
would
be
75
and
lots
are
getting
75.
A
F
A
B
Gordon
and
committee
members,
thank
you
just
to
clarify
its
seven
for
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
per
neighborhood
organization.
So,
in
the
case
of
help
page
Diamond
Lake,
it's
you
would
add
the
three
together
which
would
exceed
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
per
year.
So
it's
25
thousand
dollar
minimum
per
organization.
B
A
A
240
dota
squirt,
so
I
I,
don't
have
to
belabor
it
necessarily
here
and
now.
I'll
have
to
go
back
and
try
to
add
up
the
four
and
see
if
it
averages
to
75,
but
it
just
that
might
be
something
left
to
explain
to
page
inhale
when
they
come
back
in
and
saying
I
thought
it
was
25,000
and
we're
not
getting
that
for
our
for.
Are
they
in
neighborhood?
Are
they
a
neighborhood
organization?
It's
hail,
page
diamond.
Like
one
organization
chair.
B
Gordon
Hill
page
I'm
lake
is
one
organization,
so
you
would
take
the
three
neighborhood
allocations
together
and
that's
a
way
at
the
bottom,
where
it
says
HPD
L
would
be
the
total
for
that
organization.
So
the
minimum
floor
is
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
per
organization.
So,
where
you
have
multiple
neighborhood,
you
would
have
dado
three
together.
I.
B
A
B
A
D
Thank
You
mr.
chair
first
question
was
regard
to
the
neighborhood
election.
So
you
had
mentioned
that
there's
some
sort
of
federal
and
or
state
law
that
maybe
I
misheard
you,
but
that
that
that
states
that
neighborhoods
are
allowed
to
have
some
sort
of
voter
identification
required.
Along
with
the
ability
to
vote
council.
F
Member
fries,
so
if
I
wasn't
clear
on
I
apologize,
if
I
wasn't,
what
we
tried
to
do
was
ensure
that
we
were
aligned
to
the
Minnesota
not-for-profit
statute.
That
said,
a
neighborhood
organization
could
actually
have
a
voter
ID
requirement
as
long
as
they
also
have
a
non
photo
ID
option
as
well.
Well,.
F
D
F
G
B
So,
yes,
we
are
a
customer
fry.
We
are
making
this
and
compliance
with
state
law
basically
to
cut
to
the
chase
on
this.
Neighborhood
organization
cannot
have
just
a
photo
ID
way
of
verifying
eligibility
for
voting.
They
can
use
a
photo
ID
as
one
of
the
ways,
but
they
also
have
to
have
a
non
photo
ID
method
as
well,
and
what
we
did
in
the
end.
The
guidelines
is,
we
included
the
language
directly
from
the
state
law,
but
then
just
to
clarify
we
added
additional
sentence.
B
B
Gordon
and
councilmember
fry
yes,
if
you
do
not
have
a
photo
ID,
the
neighborhood
must
provide
a
different
way
for
you
to
verify
residency.
It
doesn't
require
a
photo
ID.
Okay,
whether
we
didn't
define
what
that
would
be.
We
left
that
up
to
the
neighborhoods,
but
it
could
be
a
utility
bill.
It
could
be
vouching
whatever
system
they
want
to
use
that
they
feel
is
appropriate,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
there
was
a
non
photo
ID
method
there,
which
is
what
the
state
law
states
needs
to
be
in
place.
So.
D
B
Garden
and
cons
mon-fri
we're
not
requiring
any
we're
not
specifying
any
space
non
photo
ID
method,
okay,
but
they
have
to
have
one
so
we're
going
to
leave
it
up
to
them
to
decide
what
that
is,
but
we're
not
going
to
work
because
we
don't
want
to
get
into
stating
you
have
to
do
bow
Qing.
Whatever
the
situation
is,
we
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
was
a
both.
Both
options
were
available.
B
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
if
you,
your
resin
in
the
neighborhood
and
you
didn't
bring
a
photo
ID,
you
could
still
vote,
but
they
have
to
under
under
meeting
notification,
identify
what
what
methods
are
using
to
establish
residency.
Okay,
and
so
you
would
know
that
in
advance,
so
whether
it's
a
utility
bill,
whether
it's
a
bow
chain
system,
whatever
they
use,
you
would
know
about
that
before
you
got
there
and
then
you
could
be
prepared
to
do
that
or
if
they
want
to
have
a
photo
ID.
D
Mean
so
the
issue
that
I'm
concerned
about
is
the
neighborhood
specifying
some
random
form
of
identification
that
many
people
don't
have
easy
access
to.
You
know
a
utility
bill
may
be
easy.
It
may
be
also
very
difficult
if,
if
that's
the
mechanism,
that
they're
definitively
saying
is
the
one
that
they're
choosing
so
you
know
my
concern
is
if
they're,
given
an
alternative
that
there's
probably
shouldn't
just
be
one
alternative,
there's
probably
should
be
several.
A
If
that's
what
you're
thinking
of
or
utility
bill
or
a
lease,
you
could
list
some
things
that
must
be
acceptable.
Maybe
I
mean
I
think
that
I'm
open
to
getting
this
right
so
I
appreciate
you
drilling
in
on
this
issue.
That
certainly
is
an
issue
that
we
hear
about,
and
we
and
I've
heard
about
that
neighborhood
organizations
as
they're
trying
to
figure
out
how
do
they?
Man
is
this.
The
situations
they're
dealing
with
it
and
elsewhere,
and
so.
D
B
Garden
and
Councilman
fry
that
requirement
was
actually
in
place
before
that.
If
you
showed
up
at
the
annual
meeting,
you
could
vote
so
that
that's
already
there.
What
we're
eliminating
at
this
point
is
putting
restrictions
on
board
eligibility.
So
if
you
wanted
to
run
for
a
board
member
or
being
on
a
board
of
an
organization
being
up
being
a
member
which
is
just
simply
being
a
resident
of
the
neighborhood
makes
you
eligible
to
run
for
the
board,
regardless
of
any
other
criteria.
G
F
Charity
warden
and
councilmember
Cano
the
purposes
behind
today's
conversation
was
not
to
address
anything
that
happens
through
2020,
but
that
is
something
that
we
in
my
last
conversation
with
David
rubra
door.
We
are
looking
to
work
with
not
only
state
coordinators
office
and
finance
on
determining
what
would
be
funding
streams
beyond
2020.
That's
something
that
we're
in
we're
thinking
about
where
we're
going
to
be
very
mindful
of
in
the
coming
days
weeks
months.
I,
don't
know
since.
A
B
Share
photos
of
every
kind
of
to
answer
your
question
directly
for
yours
are
left.
This
allocation
will
take
us
through
twenty
or
twenty
nineteen
and
then
there's
one
more
year,
funded
under
the
consolidated
tip,
which
is
not
covered
by
these
guidelines.
That
will
still
be
a
yet
to
address,
and
then
also
to
mr.
Joseph's
point
and
then
we'll
have
a
conversation
about
what
funding
continues.
That
for
that
particular
point.
But
this
will
cover
three
of
the
four
years
and.
B
Garden,
councilmember
Cano:
this
is
the
only
funding
stream
that
we
use
to
find
neighborhood
organizations.
Currently
we
still
a
number
neighborhood
still
have
in
our
P
funds
that
are
left
over,
but
that
fund
is
not
being
capitalized
anymore.
The
capitalization
of
that
program
stopped
in
2009,
but
some
of
them
do
have
funds
that
their
continued
to
spend
under
that.
But
as
far
as
current
active
funding,
this
is
the
this
is
the
only
program
from
the
city.
Thank.
G
D
D
Well,
States:
there
are
two
mechanisms
to
vote:
one
there
on
the
pre-existing
membership
list
or
two
at
a
meeting
of
the
neighborhood
organization
can
produce
a
Minnesota
driver's
license,
Minnesota
identification
card
or
some
form
of
residency
verification
that
indicates
the
individual
resides
within
the
geographic
boundaries
of
the
neighborhood.
So
so
far
we
haven't
stated
that
they
that
the
neighborhood
can
pick
one
of
those
options.
It
is
in
the
next
line,
however,
that
they
say
neighborhood
organizations
must
provide
a
non
photo
ID
method
by
saying
they
must
promote
a
non
photo,
ID
method.
D
F
D
A
A
Seeing
no
discussion
on
that
all
in
approval,
please
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
then,
on
the
plan
as
amended,
any
discussion
on
that
I
probably
not
actually
called
a
plan.
The
guidelines,
as
amended
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye.
Any
post
guidelines
are
then
a
proof
and
we'll
go
to
the
full
council
and
then
on.
The
allocation
of
the
funds
is
presented.
Any
discussion
on
that,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no.
E
A
Authorizing
appropriate
city
officials
to
enter
into
contracts
consistent,
okay,
I'll
move
that
authorization
line
of
appropriate
city
official
center
to
contract
consistent
with
the
approved
CPP
guidelines
seemed
no
discussion
on
that.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
host
Dana
and
that
motion
also
carries
so
then
I
believe
our
business
is
now
concluded
in
this
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.