►
From YouTube: October 17, 2016 Ways & Means
Description
Minneapolis Ways & Means Committee Meeting
A
It
okay.
Well,
this
is
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
Ways
and
Means
Committee
and
I'm
joined
by
councilmember
yang,
don't
remember,
andrew
johnson,
osman,
bender
and
council
vice-president
elizabeth
clinton.
We
have
27
items
on
our
agenda
this
afternoon,
the
first
20
they're,
the
they're
26
that
are
on
our
consent
agenda.
Let's
go
through
those
items
first
and
then
we'll
beginning
our
presentation
on
our
2016
bond
sale.
So
the
first
items
come
from
the
attorney's
office.
We
have
an
agreement
with
amendment
with
the
state
of
Minnesota
for
Minnesota
Court
data
services.
A
We
also
have
an
authorizing
execution
of
a
joint
powers,
agreement
with
the
state
of
Minnesota
Department
of
Public
Safety
and
Bureau
of
Criminal
Apprehension
to
use
systems
and
tools
available
for
the
state
criminal
justice
data
communications
network.
We
have
a
grant
acceptance
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services,
the
substance,
abuse
and
mental
health
services,
administration,
resiliency
and
community.
After
stress
and
trauma
program.
That's
accepting
a
1
million
dollar
grant
from
that
department.
A
The
convention
center
brings
forward
for
items.
The
first
is
a
contract
amendment
with
construction
results.
Corporation,
a
contract
closeout
item
number
6
is
the
single
bid,
acceptance
by
ice
builders,
inc
for
target
centers
ice
replacement
project,
the
bid
for
rent
kohli
air
rentokil,
north
america
for
convention
center
artificial
plants
program
is
number
seven,
and
then
we
have
accepting
the
low
bid
of
messenger
construction
for
guard
station
replacement
at
the
convention.
Center
finance
and
property
services
brings
forward
three
items.
The
first
is
the
2016
property
tax
special
assessment.
A
This
is
the
delinquent
utility
charges
now
number
10
is
the
refunding
of
the
general
obligation,
tax,
increment
bonds
for
the
Midtown
exchange
series
2008,
and
they
refunding
of
general
obligation,
taxable
blacky
refunding
bonds
series
2005.
Both
those
items
I
think
we
can
talk
about
a
little
bit
during
the
presentation
on
bond
sings.
The
information
technology
department
is
a
contract
termination
with
ardent
technologies
due
to
some
contract
violations.
The
inner
government
relations
committee
brings
forward
the
vagary
of
BD
consulting
for
federal
representation
services.
A
The
public
safety,
civil
rights
and
emergency
management
committee
will
meet
on
Wednesday
of
this
week
to
take
up
the
seven
items
that
are
on
our
agenda
this
morning
for
action
for
this
afternoon
rather,
first
is
the
travel,
expense
donation,
acceptance
for
police
executive,
Research
Forum.
We
also
have
a
travel
expense
donation,
acceptance
from
the
Jewish
Community
Relations,
Council
travel,
expense,
donation,
acceptance
from
the
national
initiative
for
building
community
trust
and
justice.
We
have
memoranda
memorandum
of
understanding
with
the
arts
institutes
international
Minnesota.
A
We
have
a
grant
acceptance
from
the
Minnesota
Department
of
Public
Safety,
Homeland
Security
and
emergency
management
division
for
the
urban
area
security
initiative
grant
and
this
up
will
we
commonly
call
the
UIC
grant
is
in
the
amount
of
977
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
picant.
We
also
have
a
contract
authorization
with
foresight,
consulting
to
provide
some
Emergency
Operations
Center
exercise
services
and
the
funding
source
for
that
project
is
that
you
hace
grant
the
memorandum
of
understanding
with
the
Bureau
of
Alcohol,
Tobacco,
Firearms
and
Explosives.
A
That's
a
member
of
Memorandum
of
Understanding
between
the
police
department
and
ATF,
and
let's
see
we
haven't
several
items
here
from
transportation
and
Public
Works
Committee.
This
is
the
Metropolitan
Council
municipal
infiltration
inflow
grant
program
its
acceptance
grant
acceptance
agreement.
We
also
have
agreement
with
bassett
creek
main
stem
erosion,
repair
project.
That's
a
funding
agreement
of
nicollet
mall
Street
reconstruction
project.
It's
an
assessment
reduction,
peavey,
plaza
revitalization
project.
A
Actually,
there
was
two
more
items:
I
apologize,
there's
2017
through
the
20
Minneapolis
Public
Works
consulting
pool,
and
the
final
item
is
the
bid
for
the
fridley
softening
water
cone
expansion
joint
project.
So
those
with
those
26
items.
Are
there
any
questions
or
any
additional
comments
from
Council
members,
not
seeing
any
all
those
in
favor
of
those
items.
Please
say:
aye
opposed
those
items
are
brought
forward.
So
that
leaves
us
with
the
item.
A
B
So
for
this
particular
bond
sale,
we
issued
120
million
dollars
worth
of
bonds
about
forty
six
point.
Seven
million
of
it
was
for
new
projects
or
net
debt
bonds,
streets
parks,
roads,
traffic
signals,
etc.
Sort
of
the
typical
infrastructure
of
the
city
7.1
85
million
was
for
special
assessments
related
to
Street
projects,
and
then
the
other
items
that
were
new
capital
is
sanitary,
sewer
and
water.
You
can
see
the
amounts
there
and
then,
as
part
of
this,
we
had
two
series
of
bonds
that
were
refunded
the
series.
B
2009
bonds
had
a
parking
component
of
17.95
million
and
a
water
fund
component
of
eleven
and
a
half
million,
and
then
finally,
there
was
a
another
series
of
2009b
bonds
that
had
four
point:
four:
four
million
dollars
worth
of
special
assessments.
So
that's
what
makes
up
the
full
under
20
as
as
the
process
goes
for
us
this
was
a
competitive
sale.
B
B
The
maturities
are
in
each
of
those
ten
years
and
they
come
back
and
they
give
us
bits,
and
those
bids
are
basically
what
they're
willing
to
pay
for
that
120
million
dollars
worth
of
bonds
and
what
interest
rates
they
will
pay
on
those
bonds,
and
it
comes
down
to
something
that
looks
like
this,
which
basically
says
you
know
in
this
case:
Morgan
Stanley,
&
Company
is
the
winning
bidder.
They
were
willing
to
give
us
a
hundred
and
twenty
two
million
246,000
and
change
at
the
end
of
the
day.
B
That
would
result
in
net
interest
costs
for
the
city
over
time
of
6.4
million
and
a
one
point.
Four
five
percent
interest
rate
I
can
see
some
of
the
other
bidders
there.
It's
a
fairly
close
between
the
first
and
second
bidders,
but
as
you
move
down,
you
can
see
that
you
know.
In
total,
the
difference
is
greater
than
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
interest
costs
between
the
winning
bid
and
the
lost
are
the
highest
Chris
trade
bit
on
the
on
the
six
bids.
B
As
a
part
of
this,
you
know
we
issued
a
hundred
and
twenty
million
dollars
worth
of
bonds
right.
That's
what
we
bid
for,
but
we're
going
to
get
a
hundred
twenty
1
million
six
hundred
and
thirty
one
thousand
dollars
for
that
hundred
and
twenty
million,
and
actually
we
were
able
to
because
that's
a
premium.
We
were
able
to
reduce
the
size
of
the
bond
sale
by
six
hundred
and
five
thousand.
B
So
we
only
had
to
issue
190
million
three
hundred
ninety-five
thousand
of
bonds
to
get
enough
money
to
do
the
things
we
needed
to
do
to
refund
those
three
pieces
of
bonds.
So
I'll
go
through
the
refunding
statistics
in
a
minute,
but
basically
we're
able
to
use
that
refunding
premium
to
reduce
the
power
amount
of
bonds,
and
so
this
shows
what
we're
getting
in
total
is
121
million
631
399.
That
includes
the
premium
of
two
million
352
and
then
the
underwriters
compensation
of
116,000
and
change.
B
So
the
true
interest
rate
after
we
reduce
the
par
came
down
a
little
bit
to
one
point,
four
or
five
four
percent,
and
that
represents
total
interest,
expense
of
eight
million
576,
which
gets
offset
by
a
premium.
So
our
interest
cost
afterwards
is
six
million
339
and
change.
So
I
want
to
show
you
how
that
relates
to
the
bit
above.
Where
was
six
million
for
22?
So
as
a
result
of
reducing
par,
we
actually
will
end
up
with
less
total
interest,
expense
and
less
debt
outstanding.
B
So
we're
saving
about
10.5,
nine
percent
on
a
net
present
value
basis
on
that
refunded
principle,
and
then
for
the
water
bonds,
there's
11
and
a
half
million
dollars
that
we
set
out
to
refund.
We
were
able
to
do
that
with
11
million
to
45
of
bonds
so
again
being
able
to
issue
less
par,
so
there's
less
debt
outstanding
on
our
books
and
we're
done
with
this
and
that
particular
refunding
is
yielding
a
two
million.
B
Seventy
nine
thousand
dollar
net
present
value
gain
or
savings,
and
that's
eighteen
percent
on
the
principal
it's
going
to
go
through
one
more
before
I
sit
before
I
indicate
why
that
smaller
amount
generates
a
bigger
premium
but
or
present
value.
And
finally,
the
third
piece
was
the
special
assessment
bonds.
There.
We
had
four
million
four
hundred,
forty
thousand,
that's
exactly
what
we
issued
the
same
amount,
replacing
those
bonds
with
bonds
at
lower
interest
rates
and
that
save
the
city,
564
thousand
699
or
about
twelve
point,
seven
percent.
B
So
the
reason
that
there's
different
percentage
savings
has
to
do
with
the
structure
of
the
bonds
and
where
they
fall
in
the
you
know
between
2017
and
20
26.
So
that's
what
determines
whether
or
not
you
have
a
larger
interest?
Savings
or
smaller
depends
on
the
timing
of
where
those
bonds
fall
within
the
structure.
B
B
Okay,
in
terms
of
rating
agency
results,
we
had
very
good
calls
with
the
rating
agencies.
We
actually
had
Standard
&
Poor's
had
two
people
come
and
actually
visit
us
in
person,
and
we
went
on
a
walking
tour
of
the
city
and
they
were
very,
very
happy
to
see
all
the
buildings
that
are
going
up
in
the
city
and
the
trend
in
our
values
were
very
positive.
B
All
three
agencies
were
very
surprised
by
the
amount
of
recovery
we've
had
based
on.
You
know
the
great
recession
and
the
Fallen
values
that
have
happened
in
six,
seven
and
eight,
and
then
we've
come
out
of
it
and
really
are
doing
well,
not
only
with
existing
properties,
but
all
the
new
building
that's
going
on
here
and
how
our
economy
is
really
absorbing
the
unemployed
and
in
doing
other
things,
to
help
with
our
economic
activity.
B
Some
of
the
other
sort
of
general
comments
relate
to
moderating
liabilities
of
lower
debt
and
rapid
amortization.
Here
at
the
city,
we
don't
tend
to
issue
our
bonds
and
put
them
out
really
long.
We
try
to
manage
them
within
sort
of
a
mid-range
to
shorter
range
maturity
structure.
That
gets
us
lower
interest
rates
and
just
try
and
manage
it
that
way,
instead
of
going
along
with
our
bonds,
and
that
allows
us
to
have
a
more
rapid
amortization
or
pay
back
on
our
debt,
and
that
is
something
that
the
rating
agencies
look
favourably
upon.
B
So
that
helps
us.
We've
had
a
good
conversation
about
our
cash
positions
and
our
fund
balances
as
providing
you
know,
flexibility
for
us
to
do
things.
We
need
to
do
in
a
timely
basis
in
a
time
of
distress
having
those
reserves
and
those
cash
balances
really
helps
you
be
able
to
react
to
a
change
in
your
revenue
base
or
the
kinds
of
things
that
bring
in
revenue.
So
they
were
very
happy
with
that.
B
Those
liabilities
are
high,
but
where
they're
manageable,
and
they
all
sort
of
recognize
that
we
are
doing
the
things
we
need
to
do
to
fund
those
obligations
as
they
come
due
and
that
we
build
them
into
our
budget.
We
raise
the
revenues
to
be
able
to
handle
them,
and
they
were
very
pleased
with
that.
So
that's
about
all
I
have
I'm
going
to
invite
mark
up.
He's
got
some
additional
comments
on
the
rating
agency
stuff
and
if
you
want
loans,
thank.
C
Chair
members
of
the
committee,
Mr
cruft,
the
chief
financial
officer
on
the
two
loans
that
were
on
your
agenda
today.
These
are
smaller
bond
issues
which
are
have
been
and
we
expect
to
be
pre-paid
earlier
than
their
regular
maturity.
So
the
reason
we
chose
not
to
include
it
in
the
larger
bond
issue
is
these
inner
fun
loans,
give
us
more
flexibility
to
pay
off
bonds
that
we
have
revenues
to
pay
out
faster,
for
example,
the
water
bonds
that
were
refunded
at
mr.
Edlund
referred
to
are
expected
to
be
out
for
the
full
term.
We
don't.
C
We
are
trying
to
maximize
the
larger
bond
issue
to
reduce
our
interest
costs
for
those
kinds
of
obligations,
hence
refunding
in
a
large
bond
issue.
So
we
are
and
do
expect
in
the
future,
for
some
of
these
smaller
bond
issues
to
come
and
propose
these
inner
fun
loans
and
the
inner
fun
loans
means
we
take
money
from
another
part
of
the
city's
operation.
In
this
particular
case,
we
have
recommended
the
self-insurance
fund.
Those
will
be
fully
repaid
and,
in
fact,
should
be
repaid
at
an
interest
rate
better
than
what
we're
earning
on
our
investments.
C
So
we
consider
it
to
be
a
win-win
from
that
perspective,
but
obviously
we
don't
have
the
capacity
to
refund
forty
or
fifty
million
dollars
worth
of
dollars
where
dollar
amounts
only
wouldn't
want
it
out
that
long
of
a
term
anyway.
So
the
Midtown
exchange
by
bond
issue,
that's
being
refunded.
We
expect
to
pay
off
within
six
years
and
we
do
expect
still
some
savings
over
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
savings.
So
we
just
think
that's
good
financial
management
practices,
the
blocky
refinancing.
C
We
actually
expect
to
pay
off
within
a
year
and
a
half,
so
those
should
be
gone
fairly
quickly.
Second
of
all,
on
the
ratings
we
do
have
three
outstanding
ratings.
We
have
one
from
Fitch,
one
from
Standard,
&,
Poor's
and
one
from
Moody's.
They
all
have
different
approaches
and
number
one.
If
anyone
in
the
viewing
audience
is
interested.
We
have
these
rating
reports
on
our
website,
and
so
certainly
people
can
pull
them
up
and
read
them.
C
They
actually
are
not
as
technical
as
you
would
think
they
take
a
little
broader
brush
and
in
fact
the
Fitch
Ratings,
I
would
take
say,
take
the
most
broad
brush.
They
have
at
Fitch
their
own
model
economic
model
that
looks
at
major
metropolitan
areas
and
said,
says:
what
happens
if
the
GDP
gross
domestic
product
were
to
go
down
by
one
percent
with
our
region
have
a
higher
than
average
impact
or
lower
than
average,
and
their
model
shows.
A
C
But
that's
to
give
you
a
flavor
for
what
fitch
looks
at
standard
Poor's
tends
to
look
not
just
at
the
economics,
but
also
what
are
your
policies
is
a
council
and
what
are
your
practices
and
how
well
do
you
plan?
So
the
fact
that,
as
mr.
able
and
mentioned,
we
pay
off
over
eighty-five
percent
of
our
debt
within
ten
years.
That's
a
look,
there's
a
very
much
a
rating
positive.
The
fact
that
we
budget
conservatively
usually
see
surpluses
and,
probably
more
importantly,
that
we
don't
budget
for
operating
costs.
C
Long
term
using
reserves
is
a
major
factor
not
as
well
for
Standard
and
Poor's,
and
those
are
the
two
rating
agencies
that
we
have
triple
a's
from
Moody's,
I
would
say,
takes
a
more
narrow
view,
remembering
that
bond
ratings
are
not
an
indication
of
the
quality
of
a
community.
It's
the
rating
reports
and
rating
agencies
through
their
reports,
view
of
how
I
you
are
able,
as
a
city,
to
pay
for
your
obligations
and
it's
on
a
bell
curve
compared
to
other
places
around
the
country.
A
couple
of
highlights
of
Moody's.
C
They
tend
to
look
very
narrowly
at
debt
and
pension
obligations
with
eight
which
they
consider
to
be
fixed
costs,
so
money
that
you
don't
have
a
choice
about
paying
over
the
long
period
of
time.
They
look
in
the
report.
If
you
see
it,
it
shows
a
quote
of
over
thirty
percent
of
our
operating
expenses
are
fixed
costs,
but
they
only
look
at
it
from
the
general
fund
of
the
debt
service
fund
perspective,
the
other
rating
a
agencies
tend
to
look
at
it
at
a
broader-based
total
governmental
funds.
Okay,
so
that
number
Mason
alarming.
C
What
seemed
alarming,
when
you
look
at
the
Moody's
report,
but
I
would
say
we
have
it
have
to
put
it
into
context,
which
is
they
are
just
looking
at
very
narrowly.
What
are
your
very
basic
operations?
The
second
thing
about
Moody's
is
some:
what's
your
market
value
and
while
they
have
been
impressed
with
the
value
increases,
we
are
still
lower
than
many
of
our
peers
across
the
country
that
are
triple-a
in
terms
of
market
value
per
capita,
because
our
housing
stock
tends
to
be
more
affordable
than
many
other
metropolitan
areas.
B
C
The
last
thing
is
just
how
much
cash
do
we
have,
and
while
our
policy
of
seventeen
percent
is
a
is
a
healthy
policy
for
us.
Certainly
many
other
triple-a
cities
around
the
country
have
as
much
as
twenty
five
to
thirty
five
percent
of
their
general
fund
operations
and
reserves,
and
so
those
are
some
of
the
challenges.
C
Certainly
some
or
most
market
participants
would
say
that
having
3
ratings
does
not
get
you
a
better
interest
rate
than
2
ratings,
too,
is
all
that
is
required
for
most
fun
purchasers
and
so
I
think
we
have
to
look
at
it
both
from
a
cost
standpoint.
Ratings
are
becoming
more
and
more
expensive.
I
think
the
average
cost
of
a
rating
is
probably
around
forty
to
fifty
thousand
dollars
at
this
point
in
time
on
that's
each.
C
So
it's
a
substantial
amount
only
of
smaller
bond
issues,
it's
heavy
burden
on
cost
of
issuance,
and
then
the
last
thing
I
will
say
is
I.
You
know
we
can
focus
on
challenges
always,
but
it
is
unusual
for
a
city
to
have
a
triple-a
rating.
We
in
Minnesota
tend
to
have
more
than
what
is
typical
on
on
an
average
basis.
C
They
have
a
couple
of
dozen
cities
in
Minnesota
that
have
triple-a
ratings,
either
from
Moody's
and
Standard
&
Poor's,
but
nationally.
That
is
very
unusual,
and
so
the
fact
that
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
given
some
of
the
challenges
we've
described
and
given
some
of
discipline
that
we've
introduced
upon
ourselves
I
think,
should
be
proud
of
its
ratings.
I
think
it
does,
while
it's
not
a
measure
of
a
quality
of
life.
C
People
who
locate
here
do
take
that
into
consideration
in
terms
of
how
much
stability
or
they're
going
to
have
in
their
taxes
and
how
much
predictability
and
the
fact
that
you
have
a
arbitrary
third
party
being
Standard
&,
Poor's
or
a
Fitch
who
say
you
have
the
highest
possible
creditworthiness
and
say
awfully
nice
things
about
you
as
a
city,
policymaker,
board
and
and
committee,
I
think,
is
very,
very
admirable,
and
certainly
the
city
council
should
be
proud
of
itself
and
its
in
its
past
behaviors.
So
thank.
A
You
for
the
opportunity
to
address.
You
sure
appreciate
that
very
much.
Obviously
this
doesn't
happen
in
a
vacuum.
It
happens
over
a
long
period
of
time
so
that
the
staff
that's
worked
on.
This
issue
has
been
really
important
to
us.
Can
you
tell
describe
what
stable
means
and
what
other
rating
agencies
you
could
even
get
it?
You
know
double
A
one
and
not
be
stable.
I
think
stables
more
important
than
double
81.
C
Mr.
chair,
each
of
the
rating
agencies
tends
to
forecast
when
there's
going
to
be
a
downgrade
that
usually,
unless
there's
something
dramatic,
that
happens
well.
Oftentimes
say
if
these
factors
don't
improve,
whatever
these
factors
might
be,
but
it's
your
revenues
or
expense
increasing
dramatically.
If
they
say
these
factors
don't
improve
in
the
next
year,
there
may
be
a
downgrade,
and
so
they
will
put
you
on
a
negative
watch
or
an
outlook
which
is
a
negative
outlook.
C
Okay,
in
the
same
case
on
the
flip
side,
if
they
see
positive
factors,
but
were
they
want
to
see
if
those
factors
are
sustainable
on,
they
will
give
you
a
positive
outlook,
and
that
means
there's
a
reasonable
chance
of
an
upgrade
in
the
future.
So
certainly
in
the
past,
the
city
of
Minneapolis
has
had
a
negative
outlook.
I
know
from
fitch
back
in
the
early
2000s.
C
A
C
B
C
Percent
2.2%,
so
in
this
compressed
interest
rate
environment,
it's
not
huge
difference,
but
I
would
also
say
that,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
a
couple
of
dozen
cities
around
the
state
that
have
triple-a
rating
some
of
those
are
even
smaller
cities
like
Mendota,
Heights
and
Falcon
Heights.
You
we
as
a
city
of
Minneapolis,
will
get
a
better
interest
rate
for
our
triple-a
than
will
some
of
the
smaller
cities.
C
Just
because
we
are
viewed
as
Vermont
number
one,
a
more
recognizable
name
in
the
marketplace,
and
so
there's
not
a
long
history
and
story
that
needs
to
be
told
to
bond
holders.
And
two
is
you
know:
the
rating
agencies
have
had
their
own
challenges
over
the
last
decade
in
terms
of
how
much
people
questions,
sometimes
their
ability
to
predict
the
future,
and
so
the
fact
that
we
have
that
balanced
economy
also
will
bring
us
better
interest
rates.
C
I
think
in
the
long
term,
and
the
rating
in
that
case
is
just
a
secondary
look
to
make
sure
that
there
is
nothing
on
the
horizon.
That
is
a
challenge.
Certainly,
there
are
other
rating
agencies,
there's
a
firm
called
crawl,
KR
oll.
That
is
trying
to
be
a
napkin
up-and-coming
rating
firm,
but
building
up
that
reputation
is
hard
in
today's
marketplace.
C
So,
despite
the
challenges
that
those
major
rating
agencies
have
had,
they're
still
really
the
only
game
in
town
what
they've
been
seeing
a
part
of
the
reason
our
costs
are
going
up
as
they've
been
more
heavily
regulated
both
nationally
and
internationally,
especially
the
European
market
has
gone
after
the
rating
agency
sick
efficiently.
But
generally
we
get
about
as
good
at
interest
rate.
I
think
is
as
possible
and
remember
that
we
have
a
better
bond
rating,
then
the
federal
government
does.
C
I
think
the
federal
government
still
carries
a
double
A,
plus
from
Standard,
&,
Poor's
and
so
you'll
read
the
report
from
Standard
&
Poor's,
and
they
make
these
references
to
the
fact
that
the
city
is
better
than
the
sovereign
rating.
A
sovereign
rating
is
federal
government
rating
for
a
period
of
time.
C
The
rating
agencies
wondered,
should
we
give
even
better
ratings
than
what
the
federal
government
have
to
local
governments
and
the
fact
that
they
do
recognize
that
there
is
this
local
property
tax,
which
is
enforceable
in
a
court
of
law
and
depending
on
the
state
in
Minnesota.
We
have
very
strong
enforcement
for
bondholders
on
the
ability
to
recover
funds
compared
to
maybe
in
Michigan,
and
the
issues
that
you
read
about
in
Detroit
also
bring
us
very
good
interest
rate.
So
it's
not
just
about
the
rating
and
then
in
the
letters
on
the
rating.
A
Good,
thank
you
very
much.
Terrific
information
hope
everybody
has
an
opportunity
to
digest
it
a
little
bit
more
as
we
review
the
presentation
I
would
like.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
for
mr.
ruff
mr.
Edmund,
not
seeing
any?
Thank
you
like
to
move
to
receive
and
file
this
presentation
by
good
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
all
right
great.
Thank
you
not
seeing
anything
further
on
our
agenda,
so
we
are
technically
a
germ,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out.
We
have
the
upcoming
budget.
A
Some
subcommittee
meetings
on
october
20th
will
be
public
safety
day,
so
at
nine-thirty
we
have
begins
with
911,
followed
by
the
police
department,
and
then
emergency
management
at
one
o'clock
will
begin
the
fire
department
and
then
we'll
be
giving
with
coordinator
department
day,
beginning
at
nine
thirty
on
october,
twenty
eighth.
So
that
should.