►
Description
Minneapolis Community Development & Regulatory Services Committee Meeting
A
B
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
Community
Development
Committee
for
today,
which
is
the
26th
of
September
I've,
been
joined
by
councilmembers,
Quincey,
fry
and
Reich.
Who
I
will
thank
for
being
here
today
to
allow
for
us
to
have
a
quorum?
We
will
move
first
with
our
consent
agenda,
which
are
items
9
through
21
I.
Don't
know
if
there's
any
items
anyone
would
like
to
pull
off
the
consent
agenda.
They
include
our
business
and
license
operating
conditions,
our
regular
business
and
liquor
and
gambling
licenses,
and
a
number
of
other
administrative
items.
B
I
will
note
item.
15
is
the
appointment
of
faith,
yong
seat,
8
ward,
5
for
three
year
term
to
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority
other
than
that
item
I,
don't
believe
there
are
other
items
of
note
anyone
anything
anything.
Anyone
would
like
to
pull
say.
None
I'll,
move
the
consent
agenda
items
9
through
21,
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
those
items
are
approved.
Then
it
will
move
on
to
our
public
hearing
agenda,
which
is
items
1
through
8,
beginning
with
item
number
one.
Mr.
Ramadan
welcome.
C
Madam
chair
council
members
committee
members.
Our
first
item
is
2125
Aldrich
Avenue
North
for
the
sale
of
this
property
through
Minneapolis
homes,
with
policies
and
procedures
established
by
the
City
Council
on
December
11
2015.
This
property
was
acquired
on
June,
8th
2016
from
Hennepin
County
as
tax
forfeited
land
for
its
appraised
value
of
$1.
C
Previously
2125
Aldrich,
Avenue
Earth
was
sold
to
beneficial
investments,
but
they
would,
through
their
offer
last
year,
staff
remarket
and
reviewed
seven
applications
received
in
accordance
with
the
manual
and
recommends
the
sale
of
2125
Aldrich
Avenue
north
too
far
to
Muhammad
for
its
appraised
value
of
$10,000.
If
our
tune
Muhammad
fails
to
close
staff
recommends,
Asha
umma
has
the
alternate
purchaser.
As
we
mentioned,
this
property
was
constructed
in
1896
and
is
3803
square
feet:
seven
bedroom
two
flex
for
two
Muhammad
and
chance
to
rehabilitate
the
property
as
a
seven
bedroom.
C
Two
bath
duplex
home
by
investing
$130,000
to
live
in
as
the
owner
occupant
Basha
umma
intends
to
spend
one
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
six
hundred
to
rehab
the
property
as
a
seven
bedroom,
two
bath
for
bath,
duplex
or
converted
to
single-family
for
her
owner
occupancy.
If
the
budget
allows
for
Mohamed
is
recommended
as
a
purchaser
as
the
highest
growing
applicant
for
the
property
with
Oscar
Gomez,
the
second
highest
scoring
applicant,
the
Hawthorne
Neighborhood
Association
received
notification
on
May
10th
2017.
They
also
rank
the
proposals
from
far
tuned
Muhammed
and
Asha
luma.
C
B
D
My
name
is
Martin
Muhammad
Ali,
ba
7800
four
units,
Avenue
Brooklyn
back
I,
actually
tried
to
beat
the
house
because
I
have
I'm
the
single
mother.
I
have
three
kids
and
I
like
to
make
my
home
in
Minneapolis.
I
have
also
business
in
Minneapolis
and
I
work,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sweet
home
in
the
Minneapolis.
So
that's
why
well.
B
B
C
Item
number
two:
the
land
sale
of
30-27
du
Pont
Avenue
north.
This
property
was
acquired,
June,
22nd
2016
from
Hennepin
County
as
tax
forfeited
land
for
its
appraised,
value
of
$1,
the
staff
market
and
reviewed
six
applications
received
in
accordance
with
the,
and
we
recommend
the
sale
of
30-27
du
Pont
Aven
north
to
a
vision
LLC
for
its
appraised
value
of
$1000.
C
This
property
was
constructed
in
1900
and
is
a
two
thousand
three
hundred
seventy
square
foot,
four-bedroom
three-bath
single-family
home.
A
vision
LLC
intends
to
rehabilitate
the
properties
of
forbidden,
three-bath
single-family
home
by
investing
one
hundred
twenty
eight
thousand
five
hundred
to
be
sold
exclusively
to
owner
occupants.
A
vision
is
recommended
as
a
purchaser
for
scoring
higher
with
stronger
financing
or
more
complete
scope
of
work
and
more
experienced
at
completing
projects.
The
Hawthorne
Neighborhood
Association
received
notification
on
May
2
on
May
10
2017.
C
B
There
any
questions
for
mr.
ramadhan
on
item
number
2,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report,
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
the
land
sale
at
30,
27
to
Pont
Avenue
north
to
a
vision.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Please
step
forward
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
you're,
going
by
a
vision
now
same.
F
Put
it
in
your
own
name,
madam
chair
councilman,
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
before
you
again.
The
last
time
we
spoke,
my
address
is
2101
Emerson
Avenue
North,
which
it
was
a
reclaimed
property
from
this
very
program
when
I
first
went
into
the
property
after
onboarding
it
pursuant
to
closing
I,
wanted
to
give
it
back
to
you.
F
Instead,
I
moved
in
we're
kind
of
excited
about
the
property:
that's
a
30-27
du
Pont.
It
reminds
me
of
a
type
of
home
my
grandparents
have
over
in
Highland
Park
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
some
structural
issues
to
deal
with
and
it'll
I
think
turn
out
to
be
a
very,
very
fine
home
for
a
family
up
in
that
Lowery
corridor.
So
we're
pleased
to
have
the
opportunity
we're
glad
we
recommend
it.
Thank.
B
B
C
The
property
was
constructed
in
1900
as
a
2808
square-foot
3-bedroom
2bath
duplex
Easter
Gaeta
intends
to
rehabilitate
the
property
to
the
three
bedrooms:
two
bath
single-family
homes
by
investing
eighty
three
thousand
dollars
to
live
in
as
the
owner
occupant
Issa
Gaeta
is
recommended
as
a
purchaser
for
scoring
higher,
with
stronger
financing,
a
more
complete
scope
of
work
and
a
more
experienced
general
contractor.
The
Hawthorn
neighbor
Association
received
notification
on
May
10
2017
and
they
also
recommended
the
proposal
for
mr.
Issa
kidding.
Mr.
Gaeta
is
here
today
and
available
to
answer
any
questions
from
the
committee.
B
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Ramadan
on
item
number
3,
seeing
none
thank
you
for
your
report
will
open
up
the
public
hearing
and
item
number
3,
which
is
a
land
sale
at
21:27,
Aldrich
Avenue
north
to
a
Sogeti.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Please
step
forward
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
G
B
B
I
You,
madam
chair
item,
number
four
is
an
application
by
the
hill
Valley
Cafe
they're,
located
at
3301
Central
Avenue,
North,
East
and
they're,
seeking
an
on
sale
wine
with
strong
beer
licensed
Class
C
to
the
Hill
Valley
Cafe
has
been
housed
at
this
address
since
2014
previous
previous
to
that
this
was
the
home
of
the
Columbia
grounds.
Cafe
you'll
see
Hill
Valley
Cafe
has
interior
seating,
430
and
exterior
seating
for
25
generally
open
from
7
a.m.
to
7
p.m.
I
I
B
J
Shalhoub
me
and
my
wife
run
Hill
Valley
Cafe.
She
used
to
work
there
when
it
was
columbia
grounds.
He
knows
like
around
2005.
We
moved
back
to
Minneapolis
about
three
years
ago
and
we're
lucky
enough
to
acquire
the
cafe,
we've
gotten
to
know
the
neighborhood.
Since
we've
been
there
and
people
really
it
used
to
have
beer
and
wine.
J
It
was
Columbia
grounds
and
we
hear
from
a
lot
of
people
that
they
miss
those
days
and
what
the
cafe
was
back
then
they
still
enjoy
it
now,
but
beer
and
wine
is
something
that
we
hear
from
quite
a
few
people
in
neighborhood
that
they're
looking
forward
to
so
so
I
put
in
that
application
today.
Well.
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
agree
with
the
staff
recommendation.
I'll
move
the
item
and
I'll
just
note
that,
finally,
we
can
have
a
complete
cross-country
skiing
experience
at
the
Columbia
Golf
Course
across
the
way
after
you
have
a
nice
ski,
you
need
the
cool
refreshing
beer.
Thank
you.
Your
community
service
is
laudable.
B
I
Chair,
we
have
an
application
by
sphere,
LLC
I'm,
doing
business
as
sphere
restaurant
they're,
locating
at
100,
South,
5th
Street,
Suite,
150
they're,
seeking
an
on
sale,
liquor
license
Class,
E
and
there's
not
been
a
previous
on,
sell
alcohol
establishment
at
this
particular
location
in
the
past.
This
is
downtown
in
the
b4
zoning
district.
I
I
This
is
in
the
fifth
Street
tower
building
they
will
have
twenty
nine
hundred
and
fifty-six
gross
square
feet.
Public
hearing
is
required
for
this
application.
We
notified
all
residents
and
property
owners
within
450
feet,
also
the
downtown
Minneapolis
Neighborhood
Association
in
the
warehouse
district
business
association.
We
receive
one
response
from
that
notification
of
today's
public
hearing,
and
that
was
in
was
in
support
of
the
application.
I
find
the
application
meets
all
of
our
requirements
and
recommend
that
the
application
be
approved
are.
B
L
B
D
I
You,
madam
chair,
we
have
an
application
by
the
sprout
salad
LLC
doing
business
has
sprouts
salad
company
they're
at
309
here
on
Bulova
Boulevard
southeast.
They
are
seeking
an
on
sale,
wine
and
strong
beer,
Class
A
and
a
sidewalk
cafe
license.
They
currently
operate
as
a
plain
restaurant
at
this
site.
Today.
This
is
in
the
Prospect
Park
East
River,
Road
neighborhood
and
in
the
second
Ward
interior
seats
for
38
persons
and
exterior
seating
for
six
additional
generally
open
from
8
a.m.
to
10:00
p.m.
daily.
I
The
owners
are
Dimitri,
Canonsburg
and
Daniel
get
Savitch.
This
will
be
a
full-service
restaurant.
Therefore,
the
qualified
for
the
Ansell
wine
license
public
hearing
is
required.
We
notified
all
persons
and
property
owners
within
600
feet,
plus
the
Prospect
Park
East
River,
Road,
Neighborhood
Association
and
the
stadium
village
commercial
association.
We
receive
no
responses
for
or
against
the
application.
We
find
that
this
application
meets
all
of
our
requirements
and
recommend
that
the
application
be
approved.
B
N
Good
afternoon,
I'm
Dimitri
kenigsberg
one
of
the
owners
at
sprout
we're
a
local
concept
based
out
of
Neapolis.
We
have
three
locations,
locations
and
questions
are
most
current
one.
We
think
the
liquor
license
will
add
a
nice
complement
to
our
current
menu,
which
consists
of
salads
wraps
and
bowls
well,.
B
O
I
Chair
we
have
an
application
by
the
vending
company
LLC
doing
business
as
ven
brewing.
Their
new
address
will
be
three
five:
five
all
46th
Street
East
Suite
140.
They
are
seeking
an
on
sale,
liquor
license
with
Sunday
sales
for
a
taproom
class,
c-1,
entertainment
and
off
sell
malt
liquor,
growler
sales.
I
This
is
an
Erickson
neighborhood
in
this
in
the
12th
Ward
it
will
have
interior
seats
in
their
tap
room
for
102
persons
and
no
exterior
area.
At
this
time.
The
applicant
is
then
brewing.
Llc
a
Minnesota
company
formed
in
2016
principal
owners
are
Kyl
Cisco
and
Jed
Taylor,
and
some
other
minority
owners.
I
The
applicant
will
have
live
music,
I
haven't
applied
for
c1
entertainment
license,
which
allows
up
to
five
amplified
musicians,
and
the
zoning
district
supports
this
level
of
entertainment.
Public
hearing
is
required
because
it's
in
a
newly
built
building
notices
were
mailed
the
residents
and
property
owners
within
600
feet
of
this
property.
We
also
notified
the
standard
Spanish
Erickson
Neighborhood
Association
in
the
west
of
the
rail
Business
Association.
We
received
two
responses
from
that
notice
of
today's
public
hearing.
Both
were
and
supported
the
application.
B
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Wilson
on
item
number,
seven,
seeing
none
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number,
seven,
which
is
a
taproom
license
or
ven
brewing
at
35
5046,
Street
East.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Please
step
forward
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
I
think.
P
I'm
having
us
I'm,
Connie
Cisco,
this
is
my
husband
Kyle
Cisco.
We
are
owners
of
M
Brewing,
Company
I'm,
very
excited
about
putting
down
roots
in
south
Minneapolis.
We
want
to
be
a
family-friendly
brewery
taproom
at
the
corner
of
46
in
Hiawatha.
One
of
the
primary
objectives
for
us
is
to
become
a
part
of
the
surrounding
community,
then
means
friend
in
Norwegian,
and
we
intend
on
making
friends
with
our
neighbors.
P
B
M
B
A
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
councilmembers,
I'm
Kelley
regulatory
services.
I
have
a
technical
amendment
before
you
today
that
would
simplify
operations
and
reduce
confusion
in
our
administrative
hearing
program.
Current
ordinance
states
that
administrative
fines
need
to
be
either
paid
or
appealed
within
20
days.
However,
however,
late
fees
are
only
applied
at
425
days,
and
so
this
both
dates
are
on
the
notices.
This
creates
the
appearance
of
two
due
dates:
the
amended
language
before
you
thinks
the
dates
using
25
days
as
the
standard
are.
B
There
any
questions
for
Miss
Keller
on
this
administrative
change,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report,
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
8,
which
is
an
administrative
and
enforcement
hearing
process
change,
is
noted
by
Miss
Keller.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
anyone
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearing,
councilmember
fry
thank.
B
Q
G
Q
B
Q
M
O
O
At
that
July
20th
17
hearing
the
owner,
Glen
Bach
Roy
indicated
that
he
was
willing
to
work
with
the
city
to
complete
a
code
compliance
inspection
to
determine
the
extent
of
the
repairs
needed
to
bring
the
property
up
to
code.
The
matter
was
continued
until
August
mr.
Brockway
to
complete
the
compliance
ins.
Inspection
of
a
written
plan
in
place
demonstrated
financial
capabilities
of
the
plan
and
a
timeline
as
to
when
the
permits
would
be
pulled
and
the
project
completed
at
the
August
17th
2017
hearing
the
owner
indicated
that
he
had
not
completed
the
code.
O
Compliance
inspection
had
no
plan
in
place
for
rehabilitation
and
note
and
had
not
demonstrated
that
he
had
the
financial
capability
to
rehab
the
property,
the
property
located
at
3950
Sheridan
Avenue
north
as
a
single-family
dwelling
in
the
victory
neighborhood.
That
is
a
1.5
story
structure
that
was
built
in
1914.
The
building
is
1675
square
feet
and
sits
on
a
5122
square
foot
lot.
The
property
has
been
determined
to
be
substandard,
the
lab
potato
from
lack
of
maintenance
and
is
condemned
for
being
boarded
the
estimated
cost
to
rehab.
O
The
property
is
between
65,000
to
93
thousand
based
on
the
mean
square
footage
estimate.
In
2017,
the
assessed
value
of
the
property
was
66
thousand
dollars.
Cpec
contract
Fraser
is
determined
the
estimate
after
market
rehab
value,
the
property
be
145
thousand
dollars,
estimated
cost
to
demolish
structures
between
twelve
thousand
and
twenty
thousand
dollars.
The
victory
Neighborhood
Association
and
owners
of
the
property
within
350
feet
of
the
property
or
mailed
request
for
community
impact
statements.
Department
received
seven
responses
for
stated.
The
property
has
a
negative
impact
on
the
community
and
should
be
demolished.
O
Stu
stated
it
should
be
repaired
or
renovated,
and
one
was
concerned
about
the
safety
and
the
wildlife
that
is
attracted
to
the
property.
The
nuisance
condition
process
review
panel
recommends
the
building
located
at
3950
Sheridan
Avenue
north
be
demolished
so
that
it
no
longer
constitutes
a
nuisance
condition.
O
M
A
M
A
O
O
Q
Mr.
chair
mr.
Coss
I
just
might
add
quickly.
I
have
not
personally
been
involved
with
this
case
of
this
property.
I
see
that
there
was
some
assertion
of
a
defense
of
some
sort
of
in
an
eminent
domain.
I
would
note
that
this
ordinance
chapter
249,
the
nuisance
ordinance,
has
been
tested
by
the
Minnesota
courts
and
has
been,
and
has
what
stood
legal
scrutiny
and
I.
Don't
believe
that
eminent
domain
would
be
an
issue
in
this
matter
at
all.
Q
It
would
be
simply
an
exercise
of
your
ordinance
duties
to
determine
whether
this
fits
the
definition
definition
of
a
nuisance
property
I
would
submit
that
it's
pretty
indisputable,
that
it
does
on
multiple
grounds
and
then,
whether
what
and
then
your
option
at
that
time
is
whether
the
property
should
be
rehabilitated
or
raised.
It
appears
that
the
homeowner
has
been
given
multiple
opportunities
to
address
the
issues,
and
that
has
not
happened.
Therefore,
it's
just
a
straight
exercise
of
your
ordinance
Authority
in
terms
of
making
a
determination
as
to
what
should
happen
with
this
property
Thank
You.
Q
Q
Yes,
I
would
say
that
that's
that's
correct.
There
are
a
number
of
factors
that
the
ordinance
lists
in
terms
of
making
a
determination
as
to
whether
a
nuisance
property
should
be
raised
or
rehabilitated,
and
it
talks
about
specifically
the
structural
condition,
the
availability
of
funds
and
potential
for
rehabilitation
of
the
owner,
severity
and
history
of
lect,
and
it
goes
on.
That's
maybe
cause
of
rehabilitation,
obviously,
and
the
market
potential
for
the
property,
along
with
a
number
of
other
factors
which
have
all
been
addressed
in
the
findings
that
are
before
you
as
well.
Okay,.
M
Thank
You
mr.
fussy
Anna.
This
requires
a
public
hearing
in
the
normal
form
and
acknowledgement
at
the
beginning
applies.
Yes,
okay,
any
further
questions
for
staff.
At
this
point,
seeing
none
I
will
open
up
the
public
hearing
does
either
you
know
the
owner
or
the
representative
or
the
individual
looking
to
I
guess
purchase.
Are
they
available
today.
O
H
Till
I
was
19
years
old,
I've
been
probably
one
of
the
longest
people
and
living
there
in
the
block
got
married,
lived
a
few
mile
away
came
back
because
my
mother
got
sick
and
so
I
took
care
of
her
for
five
years
and
she
had
a
grant
once
so
that
I
put
the
electricity
and
brand-new
service
under
damn
so
I'm,
not
some
person
that
just
doesn't
care
I
didn't
have
a
contractor.
Put
it
in
I
put
it
in
the
furnace
was
okay,
it's
the
old
gravity
furnace.
H
Now
it's
been
replaced
by
the
Obama
Act
or
what?
If
you
want
to
call
it
because
they
gave
money
to
put
it
in,
so
it
functioned
reliably
and
economically.
So
the
house
is
not
a
junker.
It's
an
old
house
like
most
houses
in
Minneapolis.
Are
it's
not
the
oldest
one?
It's
not
the
newest
one,
but
the
problem
is
with
the
inspection
department
and
I
realize
these
guys.
H
I
have
a
job
and
the
neighbors
are
another
problem
because
they
don't
agree
with
me:
I,
like
maintenance
in
my
yard,
where
my
grass
is
about
that
high
and
laying
down
nice
and
green.
They
cut
their
lawn
every
so
often
and
wanted
like
a
cemetery
as
I
call
it.
That's
not
my
problem
as
long
as
I
keep
it
in
be
like
he
was
saying
about,
ordinances
were
that
everything
is
not
a
problem,
but
they
create
problems.
H
The
city
creates
problems
I'm,
not
here,
to
condemn
the
city,
totally
I'm,
saying
that
they
don't
work
with
me
that
first
committee
they
want
like
five
hundred
dollars
to
have
them.
Tell
me
what
to
do.
I
know
what
to
do,
but
they
broke
into
my
house
broke
the
door,
bore
it
all
up
without
even
having
any
hearing
nope
no
resolution
or
nothing.
You
got
to
do
this
because
we
got
complaints.
Their
neighbors
were
considering
you
problem
properly
because
of
complaints
that
don't
cut
it
I'm.
An
order
of
the
house.
H
I
run
my
house
and
if
I
got
it
cluttered
up
like
you're,
seeing
all
these
pictures,
these
people
that
came
in
there
destroyed
my
property.
It
threw
my
clothes
away,
I'm
wearing
all
second-hand
clothes.
What
am
I
supposed
to
do
live
in
a
city.
That's
dysfunctional,
not
me!
Because
of
I
I
collected
stuff
I
didn't
harm
anyone,
I
didn't
do
anything
damaging.
It
was
just
that
the
ordinance
wants
to
keep
order
in
the
city.
H
So,
let's
you
don't
have
problems
now
the
mice
got
in
there
because
I
don't
I,
bring
that
up,
because
I'm
not
hiding
nothing.
I
killed
every
single
one
of
those
mice
that
I
could
get
with
traps.
I
did
my
job
just
like
or
Orkin
would,
with
with
their
facilities
as
a
commercial
establishment,
but
when
they
broke
in
I
have
no
idea
what
they
found,
because
they
didn't
tell
me
my
daughter
tried
cooperating
with
them
to
get
the
problem
solved
and
they
just
they
told
her
at
beginning.
They
lied
to
her.
H
According
to
what
she
told
me,
they
wanted
to
find
out
what
they're
gonna
do
and
then
they're
not
paying
for
it,
but
they
did
who
paid
for
those
services
are
those
people
that
way
that
they
let
in
to
throw
all
my
goods
away.
They
saved
some
things,
but
junk
I
had
a
new
floor
that
I
had
to
be
put
in
the
back
porch,
because
my
dad
built
a
brand
new
facility
on
there
years
back.
It's
it's
a
solid
new
facility,
not
like
the
old
house
was.
This
thing
is
going
way
out
of
proportion.
H
New
people
here
are
representing
me
and
other
people
in
the
city.
Why
damage
people?
Why
not
work
with
them?
I
shouldn't
have
to
pay
$500,
but
I
already
know
what
I
have
to
do.
There's
a
hole,
the
ceiling
that
a
a
raccoon
musta
got
in
and
and
I
put,
the
new
I
did
put
a
new
roof
on
one
side
because
it
was
deteriorating.
I
did
my
job
but
paid
two
thousand
seven
dollars
for
those
contractors
to
come
out
there
and
replace
that
roughly
says.
There's
a
hole
up
here,
I
didn't
even
know
was
up
there.
H
H
If
this
house
has
ever
saved
I
will
not
bring
anything
into
that
house
unless
it's
observed
by
qualified
technicians,
but
the
point
is
I'm
not
trying
to
sit
there
and
and
get
something
against
the
ordinance
that
resolves
trying
to
keep
things
in
order
I'm
trying
to
get
things
in
order
and
I.
Had
this
bad
leg,
I
had
some
trouble
way
back
where
I
had
a
whooping
cough
cold
and
then
I
had
a
rash
and
I
had
a
pain
in
my
side,
I'm
getting
old,
but
I
hold
on
to
it
and
I'm
trying
to
resolve
this.
M
H
M
H
M
So
in
other
words,
the
piece
about
the
attorney
and
the
health
ailments,
while
I
fully
understand
how
frustrating
that
they
may
be
they're
they're
not
relevant
to
this
particular
instance.
So
are
there
any
additional
facts
that
you
seek
to
clarify
for
purposes
of
this
hearing
about
your
home
about
the
house.
H
See
I
just
want
to
get
it
resolved.
It's
my
house,
I
grew
up
there
and
I
took
care
of
my
mother
and
I
took
it
over
I'm
living
there
and
I'm
80
years
old
and
I.
Don't
want
to
go
on
assisted
living
apartments.
All
is
here
rigmarole.
It's
it's!
It's
a
house
that
I
put
my
life
into
I
did
my
job
all
through
the
years,
but
I
got
off
track
with
the
circumstance
of
being.
R
R
This
everything
that
there's
seen
a
substandard
I,
don't
know
what
they're
talking
about
a
wall
and
the
basement.
That's
not
up.
That's
because
there
was
an
addition
put
on.
They
made
him
put
a
post
on
there.
The
guy
came
in
and
inspected
it.
The
end
I
mean
the
outside
walls.
There's
nothing
wrong
with
the
outside
walls.
The
inside
walls
need
to
be
cleaned,
redone
everything's
needs
to
be
clean,
redone
patched
is
rough
for
the
water
was
leaking
the
week
after
he
had
the
roof
done.
They
boarded
his
house
up.
R
He
never
had
the
opportunity
to
you
know
they
don't
give
you
enough
time
to
do
anything,
and
then
we
were
told
in
the
beginning
completely
different
stuff
by
the
inspector
that
broke
in
his
house.
That
gave
no
warning
no
letter,
no
nothing
just
busted
in
and
boarded
up
and
then
when
the
crew
was
hired,
we
were
never
notified,
I
told
him
all
along.
There
was
money
in
that
house.
Nobody
gave
us
the
opportunity
to
go
in
and
get
it.
They
took
it
from
a
cupboard
that
was
perfect.
R
No
mice
$2,000
cash,
a
social
security
card,
his
Medicare
card
who
speaks
for
that,
the
city
hired
that
crew.
They
didn't
give
us
the
opportunity
to
do
the
right
thing.
Instead,
everything
nobody
wants
to
listen
to
nothing.
Everything
in
that
house
was
inspected
before
as
far
as
structural
goes,
so,
whatever
they're
writing
up
in
there
because
of
the
rough,
the
ex
electricity,
the
heating.
All
this
stuff
was
inspected
before
and
they're
trying
to
use.
That
is
the
reason
why
or
because
of
storing
paint.
R
There's
it's
not
even
nothing
flammable,
they
put
it
up
into
his
in
the
in
the
in
the
kitchen.
This
little
closet
thing,
it's
not
even
the
stuff
and
then,
as
far
as
the
nuisance
condition.
That's
because
the
constant
neighbors
that
have
been
calling
for
all
these
years,
they
vandalize
a
car
punching
his
tires
out
and
then
caused
the
inspector
that
went
out
for
years.
But
you
know
busting
his
taillights
on
calling
up
say
the
tires
are
flat
throwing
stuff
in
his
yard.
The
inspector
comes
out
charges.
R
R
B
Thank
you,
maybe
the
that
you
could
sit
down
for
a
moment
and
we
could
have
the
inspector
go
through
the
photographs
because
really
I
think
the
only
way
we
can
judge
whether
or
not
this
property
is
a
nuisance
and
there
should
be
a
social
service
intervention
is
by
looking
at
the.
It
sounds
like
five
tons
of
garbage
that
were
taken
out
of
it.
Please
don't
speak
up,
please
don't
speak
back
to
me.
M
That
you
you'll
you'll
have
another
chance
if
there's
anything
additional
to
clarify
so.
Q
Mr.
Gerron,
madam
chair
I,
do
want
to
add.
Maybe,
while
the
inspector
is
preparing
that
report
I
have
spoken
with
a
colleague
in
my
office.
Who's
worked
closely
on
this
case
and
I
believe
the
record
reflects
on
probably
understandably
so
that
it
has
not
just
been
the
regulatory
staff
of
the
city
that
has
been
involved
with
this
property
for
a
number
of
years,
but
certainly
social
service
agencies
have
been
contacted.
Q
We've
spoken
with
attorneys
and
representatives
for
their
families
for
months
and
years,
and
so
I
can
understand
that
that
that
inclination-
and
certainly
we
understand
that
there
a
greater
may
be
issues
or
factors
leading
into
this.
But
it's
it's
a
matter
that
I
think
the
record
reflects
has
gone
on
simply
for
too
long.
Mr.
M
Q
Vice
chair,
I
can't
again
I
haven't
been
intimately
involved
with
this
case,
I
believe
the
inspectors
may
be
able
to
speak
about
when
the
ich
individual
outstanding
orders
were
issued
and
again,
the
outstanding
orders
form
one
of
the
bases
in
which
of
this
clearly
classifies
as
a
nuisance
structure.
But
there
are
other
bases
as
well
in
which
this
classifies
as
a
nuisance
structure,
but
I'll
leave
that
to
mr.
B
Chair
mr.
fussy,
I,
don't
have
my
computer
in
front
of
me,
but
any
person
with
a
computer
can
pull
up
the
orders
record
and
perhaps
miss
Keller
can
do
that
and
put
that
on
the
screen.
So
we
can
also
see
it's
just
not
possible
that
the
neighbors
are
at
fault
here
for
calling
and
orders
given
the
number
of
orders
here.
That
would
be
all
they
do
instead
of
work.
B
If
well,
why
don't
we
get
a
list
of
the
order,
records
and
go
through
the
photographs,
and
we
can
make
a
determination
whether
or
not
we
believe
this
house
is
a
nuisance
and
it
sounds
like
perhaps
your
father
could
live
with
you
if
he
given
that
he's
unable
to
complete
the
renovation
on
any
kind
of
timeline,
this
wasn't
a
question
of
agreed
to
a
timeline
and
missed
it.
I.
M
E
E
M
Q
Mr.
vice
chair
it
in
it's
technically
not
a
public
hearing.
This
is
a
a
evidentiary
hearing
which
of
the
parties
can
speak.
Certainly,
the
neighbors
have
been
solicited
for
their
opinions
and
those
are
part
of
the
record.
Some
of
the
impact
statements.
The
testimony
should
be
limited
to
the
parties
and
the
parties.
Direct
representatives
understood
understood.
O
The
owner
was
required
to
get
a
CO
compliance
report
where
the
code
compliance
report-
okay,
they
send
out
for
inspectors
a
building
mechanical
plumbing
in
a
housing
inspector
and
they
put
together
report
of
what
needs
to
be
done
to
bring
the
house
back
to
the
current
codes.
Okay,
he
was
asked
to
do
that.
He
refused
to
do
that.
He
was
asked
to
come
forward
with
financing
proof
that
he
has
the
funds
to
do
it.
That
was
not
done.
H
M
M
You
know
this
is
this
is
obviously
a
difficult
situation
and
I
have
a
great
deal
of
sympathy
for
the
fact
that
the
owners
parents
grew
up
and
have
lived
in
the
home.
He
has
obviously
lived
in
the
home
and
there's
been
health
ailments
and
a
series
of
difficulties
that
had
led
to
the
present
circumstances,
but
we
have
to
deal
in
the
present
circumstances
by
law
and
under
the
law.
M
We
can
only
look
as
to
whether
the
property
is
a
nuisance
and
based
on
the
findings
that
we've
seen
based
on
the
hundred
sixty
nine
some
odd
orders
and
based
on
the
photographs
that
we've
been
looking
at
for
the
past
twenty
minutes.
Here
it
is
a
bit
of
a
health
hazard
and-
and
it
is
concerning
that
the
the
neighborhood
would
have
to
would
have
to
deal
with
this
and
and
and
so
I
I
would
move
the
staff
recommendation.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
this
item.