►
Description
Minneapolis Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
B
Afternoon,
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
sections
13
d
0
to
1
rendered
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic
for
the
record,
my
name
is
Neil
Anderson
and
I
am
chair
of
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
Equalization
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order.
The
open
meeting
law
requires
a
roll
call
vote
to
be
conducted
during
a
virtual
meeting,
and
the
certification
form
will
be
completed
for
each
local
board
meeting.
B
E
B
F
B
F
F
It
was
in
very
tough
shape
at
the
time
it
was
actually
one
of
the
original
three
buildings
I
believe
the
trigger,
at
the
whole
spirit,
serve
all
of
revocations
more
than
10
years
ago.
So
we've
been
working
through
that
and
fixing
the
building
up.
We've
done
a
lot
of
the
common
area,
work,
the
roof
things
of
that
nature,
just
to
stabilize
it.
F
A
F
F
Additionally,
there's
also
that
comp
over
thirty
four
twenty
rulings
in
a
venir-
that's
several
blocks
to
the
west
of
there,
which
sugar
sales
from
last
April
that
one
was
106
666
of
units,
but
was
definitely
in
better
shape
at
the
time
of
sale
and
what
I
would
say.
37
25
is
as
a
whole
at
the
moment.
G
F
Most
of
that
is
based
on
what
I
think
are
some
very
relevant
comp,
they're.
Actually,
two
of
them
they're
couple
blocks
away:
one
is
at
30
30,
29th,
Avenue
and
the
other
is
30
18
30th,
Avenue
South,
both
1960s
all
one
other
rooms
and
they
sold
October
of
last
year
who
sold
as
a
pair
to
the
same
buyer.
But
it's
20
percent
total
between
the
two
buildings
very
similar
condition
and
those
sold
for
two
point:
three:
eight
million
103
for
78
per
unit,
which
is
very
close
to
that
estimate.
I
have
a
1
million
755.
F
There
is
another
table,
10
blocks
to
the
south.
Is
there
it
did
not
close
until
January
of
this
year,
but
it
was
under
contract
in
December,
one
that
we
look
at
at
36,
20,
42nd,
Street,
East,
another
1960s
member
--tz--,
23
minutes.
That's
all
for
a
hundred
and
fourteen
760
per
unit.
However,
half
of
the
units
are
two
bedrooms
and
I
also
think
it's
a
it's
a
little
bit
better
location
than
the
object.
F
B
H
F
D
F
F
It's
become
kind
of
an
issue
of
our
leasing
there
in
the
spring
and
summer
always
seems
quite
strong,
and
then
we
get
to
wintertime
and
the
parking
becomes
a
big
issue
again,
and
it's
gotten
to
the
point
past
two
years
where
we
have
actually
seen
a
complete,
stop
and
rent
growth
at
that
building
and
we've
got
a
big
concession
of
$50
a
month
for
the
first
six
months
on
Annelise
just
to
rerun
units
when
the
parking
is
so
bad.
Like
that
the
other
issue
that's
going
to
come
up
is
the
vacancy
at
the
old
building.
F
There
I
think
it's
been
preaching
almost
two
years
now
and
we've
seen
kind
of
an
uptick
in
in
vandalism
that
break-ins
in
our
buildings
had
extra
security
measures,
but
it's
definitely
made
it
tougher
to
operate
on
that
corner.
As
far
as
comps
go.
There
is
one
reader
on
the
corner
to
the
northwest
just
slightly
at
1907
Lyndale
Avenue,
which
is
a
12
unit
property,
similar
vintage
1920
style.
It
sold
August
of
18
for
a
hundred
and
two
thousand
per
unit,
I
think
our
building
sleeps,
better
location
totally
given
the
time
of
the
sale.
B
A
J
I
F
F
Behind
them
is
rent
as
well
and
I,
think
you
know
getting
evicted
from
the
property
and
now
there's
just
just
an
available
manner
on
the
property,
but
I
have
not
heard
of
it.
You
know
anything
going
in
or
I
think
that
the
site
itself
is
a
little
too
small
to
really
support
a
new
development,
so
I
feel
like
the
highest
and
best
use
is
still
some
kind
of
a
restaurant
tenant,
given
the
size
of
the
site
and
given,
what's.
B
Okay
items
number
29
and
item
30:
the
applicants
did
not
respond
to
the
Collin,
so
item
number
31,
26:17
third
Avenue
South
case
number,
2,
0,
B,
H,
0,
0
to
5.
The
applicant
is
Jim
Auslan
representative
of
ESB
3,
LLC,
I'm
sure
you're,
tired
of
this.
But
please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
peel
to
the
board.
James.
F
David
Aswan
Baker
Management,
Group,
308,
West,
22nd,
Street,
101,
B
Minneapolis,
so
the
26
17
and
26
for
the
next
one
I
won't
speak
to,
but
they're
they're,
both
six
unit
buildings
side
by
side
between
buildings
that
are
a
little
different
in
that
they're.
Predominantly
three
bedrooms
I
think
I
three-bedroom
units
of
one
Q
bedroom
in
each
of
the
buildings.
F
There
they're
a
little
bit
tougher
to
run
to
that
goes
with
the
territory
is
even
more
usually
it's
more
roommates
who
want
to
get
into
them.
But,
like
I,
said,
a
rent
growth
is
kind
of
flam,
doubt
I,
look
for
Compton
and
I
found
a
couple
one
one,
that's
maybe
not
quite
as
relevant,
which
is
2015
Avenue,
that's
old
August
of
last
year
for
eighty-nine
thousand
twenty
five
units.
F
Now
that
one
is
for
one
bedrooms
and
three
Studios
seven
unit,
so
you'd
have
to
do
some
pretty
pretty
big
adjustments,
I
think
to
get
it.
You
know
comparable
to
the
subject
here.
The
other
one,
though
that
maybe
is
a
little
easier
to
adjust,
is
26
23rd,
Avenue
South,
which
is
directly
across
the
street.
D
F
B
B
F
F
G
B
B
F
B
Well,
let's
move
on
to
item
number
34
two
zero
one:
eight
36th
Avenue
South,
our
36th
Avenue
Northeast
case
number,
two
0bh
0,
0
9.
The
applicant
is
ivan
chairman.
Please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
You'll
have
five
minutes
to
present
go
ahead.
Mr.
chairman.
G
Hi,
this
is
Ivan
Tramel
for
the
property
owner
of
the
property
of
2018
36th
Avenue
Northeast
I
purchased
this
property
in
November,
we're
closing
in
December,
14,
62
and
$60,000
the
property
1
on
the
market
last
summer
for
I
believe
two
hundred
eighty
nine
thousand
and
then,
by
the
end
of
summer
the
sellers
reduced
it
to
two
hundred.
Sixty
nine
thousand
I
came
aware
of
the
property.
G
The
last
few
days
in
October
I
made
an
offer
of
250,000
that
that
time,
I
thought
was
maybe
high,
then
I
made
I
was
being
aware
that
there
was
another
bidder,
so
not
wanting
to
lose
the
property
I
made
my
offer
to
60.
It
was
immediately
accepted
indicating
that
the
other
bidder
was
lower
now
I
see,
that
is,
the
property
was
assessed,
2019
at
two
hundred,
eighty
seven
thousand
five
hundred
and
two
thousand
twenty
two
three
hundred
and
sixteen
thousand
five
hundred
and
then
coming
in
2021
at
three
hundred
twenty
six
thousand
dollars.
G
B
G
B
B
B
K
B
E
Yeah
I
have
the
same
comments
on
these
Auslan
Appeals
that
I
did
on
the
sella
ones:
lack
of
income,
lack
of
detail
the
income
information
on
these
makes
it
really
hard
for
us
to
make
decisions
on
these
generally
speaking,
yeah
that
the
I
don't
get
enough
detail
on
these
comparable
sales
there's
only
a
couple
per
per
property,
including
some,
where
I
think
he
applied
a
70%
upward
adjustment
which
which
would
really
not
even
be
a
insightful
comp
but
again,
not
not
saying
he's.
His
appeals
here
are
unwarranted
by
any
stretch
of
the
imagination.
E
D
Well,
I
certainly
agree
with
mr.
tinker
again
on
nearly
all
of
these
from
mr.
Auslan.
He
obviously
did
some
work
looking
at
comps
and
making
adjustments,
but
the
without
a
real
income
analysis.
We're
kind
of
in
the
dark
and
I
would
hope
that
he
would
proceed
on
to
the
county
and
perhaps
get
some
relief
there,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
the
information.
We
need
to
make
a
informed
decision.
L
Concur
with
both
a
tinker
and
bland
on
this,
however
I
would
I
would
like
to
have
some
sort
of
a
notation
that
we
are
making
this
decision
to
leave
it
the
same
or
to
sustain
the
value
so
that
they
can
move
forward
instead
of
just
us
not
doing
our
job
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
to
do
that
or
not
thank
you.
I
believe.
M
B
You
I
also
had
a
thought
on
this.
The
servoz
grounds
properties
were
extremely
rundown
and
I'm.
Sure
there's
a
would
be
a
compelling
argument
there
with
additional
information
when
providing
comparables
having
photographs
and
some
more
detailed
analytical
information
regarding
rents
and
those
things.
So
it
was
extremely
helpful.
D
J
D
B
D
Comments
that
have
been
made
about
you
know
whether
or
not
we
can
make
a
decision
and
we'd
like
to
see
them
go
ahead
to
the
to
the
County
process.
What
is
the
information
given
to
the
applicant
after
this
procedure
about
moving
on
and
will
they
be
I?
Think
we
remember
having
a
couple
of
times
that
said
you
know,
can
we
note
to
them
that
we
think
they
might
have
a
case,
but
we
couldn't
decide.
So
what
is
the
procedure
going
forward
and
how
are
they
informed
about
what
they
can
do.
J
Chair
Anderson
and
we
remember
bland.
We
do
reach
out
and
send
notification
to
every
case
that
you
act
on.
They
get
paper
notification
of
the
decision
of
the
board,
along
with
the
information
about
scheduling
with
Hennepin
County
and
what
they
need
to
do
there.
Everybody
that
is
that
you
that
you're
hearing
from
also
has
an
email
from
me
that
outlines
how
to
contact
the
county.
J
Now
I
have
had
conversation
with
our
county
partners
and
they
are
working
with
the
auditor's
office
who
administered,
who
administers
their
board
meetings
about
being
able
to
provide
these
the
income
and
expense
information
that
Assessors
are
not
able
to
they're
working
on
a
process
to
be
able
to
provide
the
board
members
at
the
county.
The
information
that
they
need
to
be
able
to
make
decisions.
Does
that
answer.
Your
question.
D
Kind
of,
let
me
restate
I,
think
what
the
concern
here
is:
is
it
communicated
to
these
applicants
in
any
way
that
we
said
we
think
they
might
have
a
case
here,
but
we
do
not
have
the
information
to
go
forward.
J
Chair
Andersen
and
board
member
bland.
That
is
not
part
of
the
letter
that
we
send
out.
If
people
are
watching
the
meeting,
they
will
hear.
You
say
that
if
there
is
something
that
the
board
specifically
wants
communicated
to
specific
cases,
that
is
something
that
we
would
need
to
work
with:
the
City
Clerk's
office
on
other
than
the
standard
language
that
is
used
to
notify
property
owners
after
you
have
acted
on
their
appeal.
J
Chair
Anderson
a
board
member
tinker.
Yes,
as
soon
as
somebody
calls
Hennepin
County
and
says
that
they
want
to
be
added
to
the
hearing
list
there,
then
our
staff
will
contact
them
and
begin
working
with
them
on
doing
the
desktop
review
and
coming
up
with
comparables
the
exact
same
way
they
would
during
the
local
hearing
process.
So.
L
Yes,
I
think
you
know
not
to
be
redundant,
but
going
back
to
board
member
blends
initial
question.
We
would
like
to
probably
have
some
sort
of
a
bracketed
type
comment
saying
that,
because
of
the
new
koba
19
process
here,
we
were
not
given
the
information
that
we
needed
to
make
the
decision
on
whether
it
should
be
the
same
or
or
lowered
so
I
I
think
we
just
would
as
a
board
I'm
just
saying
we
would
maybe
want
to
go
on
record
saying
that
we
didn't
have
the
information
needed
because
of
the
new
format.
L
Would
agree,
I
think
that
what
board
member
tinker
brought
forward
to
us
and
then
what
was
explained
to
us
on
why
we're
getting
redacted
information
I
think
there
should
be
some
sort
of
a
some
sort
of
a
disclosure
saying.
You
know
we
made
the
decision
to
retain
the
event
of
the
the
value
but
based
on
lack
of
information
to
make
any
other
decision.
I
would
be
my
suggestion.
B
B
D
D
D
M
D
B
D
M
B
B
D
Really
struggled
with
this
one,
they
do
have
a
appraisal
that
says
420
as
opposed
to
the
462
5
for
the
evaluation.
I
looked
at
the
cops
and
score
footages
were
somewhat
similar,
I'm,
not
sure
about
adjustments
made
for
some
of
the
other
qualities
of
the
Louis
I.
Think
5601
free
line.
Is
it
really
handsome
property
I've
I've
admired
it
on
more
than
one
occasion,
nice,
brick,
big
story
and
a
half
so
I,
don't
know
how
what
did
others
feel
about
that.
B
I
looked
at
it
the
same
way,
the
appraisal,
really
the
comparables
weren't
of
the
same
caliber.
If
you
look
at
the
property
and
floorplan,
it
is
functions
more
as
a
two-story
Switzerland
city
is
1
and
3/4
and
all
the
bedrooms
are
upstairs.
So
it's
very
unlike
some
of
the
one
and
a
half
stories
that
were
it
was
compared
to
anyone
else
have
comments
regarding
56
or
1/3
month.
J
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Do
I
have
a
second
having.
Second,
second,
anybody
have
it.
It
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
having
to
sustain
the
2020
estimated
market
value
at
four
hundred.
Sixty
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
I
will
call
the
clerk
Kurt
Clerk.
Do
it
and
call
the
roll
on
the
motion
Boyd
member.
E
B
D
Mr.
chair,
the
only
information
provided
by
the
homeowner
was
what
he
paid
for
it:
the
contract
that
he
put
together,
which
may
or
may
not
have
relevance
with
regard
to
the
overall
picture
and
based
on
that
I
would
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
at
841
thousand
for
the
property
at
32:29,
East,
bday,
McCusker,
Parkway,
okay,
Reid.
B
B
L
L
J
L
J
Chair
Anderson
and
board
member
havoc,
we
are
frequently
either
above
or
below
the
sale
price,
and
so,
in
this
case
I,
don't
remember
what
the
sale
that
was.
But
if
we
would
have
handled
this
case,
the
proper
earthy
appraiser
would
have
taken
the
sale
price
into
consideration
in
their
revaluation
of
the
property
that.
L
J
J
D
Well,
the
contract
for
this
property
was
drawn
up
on
the
4th
of
April.
We
already
know
what
was
happening
by
the
4th
of
April,
which
I
think
has
had
a
effect
on
on
the
value.
So
perhaps
this
might
apply
more
readily
to
next
year's
evaluation,
but
based
on
the
fact
that
we're
looking
at
what
values
were
last
year,
I'm
not
sure
that
the
purchase
price
of
April
4th
applies.
J
B
M
B
E
B
M
B
D
D
D
M
B
B
E
C
E
B
B
E
B
C
D
M
B
B
B
D
Second
in
the
motion,
in
order
to
open
it
to
discussion
and
I'd
like
to
speak
first
against
the
motion
and
here's,
why
I
happen
to
have
an
opinion
on
this
one,
because
I'm
quite
familiar
with
the
area?
I
live
nearby
beginning
a
couple
of
years
ago,
that
corner
started
to
have
all
kinds
of
difficulties
with
regard
to
not
only
parking
but
just
getting
through
that
area.
D
The
we
talked
about
Franklin
and
lyndale,
so
begin
by
the
southeast
corner,
where
they
tore
down
a
building
and
or
and
or
raised
a
high-rise,
so
that
really
limited
parking
even
more
and
even
driving
through
the
next
thing.
That
happened
was
directly
across
the
street.
So
now
we're
talking
about
kitty
corner
from
Rudolph's
another
one
is
going
up
at
this
time
which
restricts
traffic
and
lanes
and
takes
away
from
parking.
D
What
happened
with
that
is
that
a
parking
lot
that
was
being
used
by
Rudolf's,
which
was
no
longer
open
anyway,
was
taken
away
for
that
high-rise.
We've
already
discussed:
what's
happened
yet
Rudolph's,
who
knows
what'll
happen
to
that
property,
but
the
property
that
was
vision,
loss,
resources
on
the
north
west
corner
has
been
sold,
no
longer
is
occupied
by
vision,
loss
and
there
is
going
to
be
a
high-rise
going
in
there.
D
So
that
is
going
to
further
restrict
traffic
and
parking
for
some
time
to
come,
and
the
building
at
610
Franklin
lost
what
parking
it
did
have
and
they've
suffered
a
great
deal
because
of
that
and
will
continue
going
forward,
but
looking
backward,
my
opinion
would
be
to
to
adjust
the
value
to
I
would
adjust
to
five
hundred
five
five
million
five
hundred
thousand.
That's
my
opinion.
I'd
be
happy
to
hear
what
others
have
to
say.
D
D
B
D
B
B
B
B
M
E
B
D
M
B
B
B
New
business
for
this
afternoon,
we
have
nine
appeals
scheduled
from
2:30
to
3:30,
we'll
proceed
in
case
order,
as
listed
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
is
called,
the
applicant
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
the
appeal
the
board
will
consider
and
take
action
after
these
hearing
these
cases
time
time
allows
or
at
the
end
of
the
day,
after
all,
hearing
after
hearing
all
cases,
if
your
phone
is
muted,
please
press
star
six
to
unmute
property
owners
will
be
notified
of
the
decision
by
mail
after
the
board
is
adjourned.
Item
number
35,
33
twice.
B
Okay,
I
was
unaware
that
he
was
gonna
be
present
today,
I
didn't
know:
number
35,
33,
26
26
Street
East
case
number,
2
0,
B,
H,
0,
0,
3
0.
The
applicant
is
Craig
Hoffman,
please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
He'll
have
five
minutes
go
ahead.
Mr.
Hoffman.
B
B
B
F
F
I
could
agree
with
that,
but
this
year
I
think
it's
went
for
the
top,
and
so
this
CMA
you're,
looking
at
here,
if
you're
able
to
look
at
it,
show
some
valuations,
comparing
basically
all
the
property
that's
sold
in
the
past
year
in
within
a
half
mile
of
the
top,
my
house
basically
for
buildings
that
were
within
20%
of
the
same
size
on
billion
square
foot
and
highlighted
in
yellow
up
in
the
upper
right.
It's
basically
gives
you
an
average
first
footage
price
per
square
footage.
F
Dollars
per
square
foot
for
the
total
buildings
were
threats
and
that's
what
I
used
to
come
up
with
this
valuation
that
comes
up
to
369.
This
evaluation
I
could
come
up
with
based
on
this,
but
it
left
text
on
the
report
for
that.
Basically,
how
that
works,
comparing
it
to
all
the
properties
in
the
neighborhood
that's
sold
that
excludes,
however,
the
properties
that
are
on
the
River
Road,
which
aren't
really
comparable
because
they're
on
the.
F
And
our
fancy
nice
houses
and
it
also
excluded
a
few
of
the
houses
that
are
sold
for
much
below
their
market
value,
must
have
been
something
wrong
with
those
I
don't
want
to
include
those
year.
I
want
to
be
fair
and
exclude
the
ones
that
are
not
comfortable
high
and
not
comparable.
Well,
so
I
got
rid
of
those
two
when
I
created
this
report
and
I
think.
N
J
F
F
I
J
F
Just
there
for
ahead
and
support
for
what
I
would
say,
the
value
which
is
Norfolk,
3-3,
60-ish,
neighborhood
and
I
just
like
to
mention
also,
but
there
are,
our
house
is
not
in
perfect
condition.
It's
got
lots
of
little
problems
and
a
few
big
problems.
I've
had
contractors
out
looking
at
our
bathrooms
and
they
said
if
you
start
touching
this
bathroom,
it's
going
to
cost
you
$25,000.
We
got
two
bathrooms.
They
said
the
same
about
both
of
them.
F
F
F
Value
of
the
house
is
definitely
not
here
that
four
hundred
thousand
I've
included
a
couple.
Pictures
I
couldn't
get
any
great
pictures
of
you
know
water
damage
and
mold
things
like
that,
and
what
else
would
I
say
and
I
be
willing
to
have
an
appraiser
come
out
with,
except
I'm,
not
really
excited
about
having
people
coming
into.
F
Right
now,
but
I
like
to
have
an
appraiser
come
out
and
do
an
appraisal,
it's
hard
to
do
current
circumstances
and
time
with
us
and
stuff,
and
you
guys
all
know
all
that
I'm
sure,
but
I
would
be
willing
to
do
that
too.
I
also
mentioned
in
her
I
sent
along
with
this.
That
I
know
some
of
the
value
increases.
The
last
couple
years
are
because
you
increased
the
building
size.
F
You
had
an
appraiser
come
on,
look
and
redid
the
measurements
and
increase
the
building,
size
and
I
know
that
happened,
but
I
think
that
got
factored
in
over
the
past.
He
has
two
years
not
this
year,
they've
gone
up.
Another
Jensen
sense
based
on
what
I
think
I
did
a
fair
amount
of
research
and
trying
to
be
fair
and
comparing.
I
F
C
F
F
Yeah
I'm,
sorry,
yes
and
I
always
confuse
the
terms
but
yeah.
They
looked
at
it
and
walk
through
the
house
and
you
know
whatever
they
did
and
they
didn't
change
it.
You
know
I
said
it
was
delivering.
Then
oh,
you
did
finish
the
room
in
our
basement,
but
it
doesn't
have
an
egress
window.
So
that's
not
thank.
C
B
F
B
I
B
B
B
K
N
Okay
I'm
doing
ours
and
I
am
me
and
the
owner
of
17:17
LLC-
and
this
is
a
this-
is
a
property
that
I
purchased
about
Tom
a
year
and
a
half
ago.
I
think
I.
Think
part
of
the
issue
here
is
that
it
was
owned
by
a
non-profit,
and
so
we
have
a
0
value
for
for
taxes.
So
there
wasn't
really
any
kind
of
record
to
go
by
there
and
I.
Think
in
in
front
of
you.
I
do
have
some
comps
I
have
towards
the
realtor.
N
That
kind
of
helped
me
out
with
with
some
of
these,
and
there
are
six
comps
that
she
had.
There
is
one
know
that
on
December
5
on
that
list,
201
Lowrey
Avenue,
if
you
know,
remember,
that's
the
old
little
jacks
building
that
one
I
think
is
ready
to
be
tore
down
and
so
I.
Don't
think
that
one
is
a
very
good
comp,
and
so,
if
you
were
to
take
that
one
out
and
$23
a
square
for
the
average
price
per
square
foot,
it's
about
$85
and.
N
You
know
taking
that
to
times
of
the
square
foot
of
the
building,
the
full
value
or
the
full
square
foot
it's
forty
six
hundred
and
seventy
three
and
that
comes
out
to
less
than
four
hundred
thousand,
but
the
the
basement
of
this
building
is
basically
unusable,
as
if
leaks,
that's
got
a
lot
of
water.
In
fact,
it's
been,
it's
been
tried
to
remedy
that.
In
the
past
there
was
two
sub
pumps
in
there.
There's
trousers
have
been
that
have
been
built
in
the
out
floor
of
the
basement
to
try
to
litigate.
N
Some
of
that,
and
that's
just
quite
honest.
They
haven't
worked.
I've
tried
to
to
fill
some
of
those
cracks
and
holes
and
we've
got
you
know.
I
tried
to
get
some
of
the
water
outside
the
building.
Well,
now
I
got
a
neighbor
who's,
complaining
that
I
get
to
putting
some
of
the
water
on
his
property,
and
so
it
still
has
become
a
problem.
It's
a
it's
a
87
year
old,
building
built
built
in
1933,
and
the
problem
of
that
is
the
foundation
of
the
87
years
old
as
well.
N
It
used
to
you
know:
I
had
artists
in
there.
We
had
to
change
the
the
stones
over
the
first
four
months.
I
had
there
was
no
tenants
in
there
and
you
know
crying
obviously
had
12
to
10
as
well.
You
can
kind
of
budget
7075
hundred
dollars,
maybe
and
some
property
taxes.
Well.
When
it
came
back
to
be
19,
it
was
like
huge
surprise.
They
couldn't
afford
it,
and
so
they've
been
that
moving
out.
N
The
property
is
vacant
right
now,
and
it
just
seems
to
Westie
who
has
someone
to
comps
all
the
other
five
comps
I
have
are
our
commercial
properties
in
Northeast
Minneapolis?
You
know,
there's
no
perfect
calm
to
this
and
when
I,
when
I
look
at
the
average
per
square
foot
of
compare
97,000,
if
you
use
the
average
and
that's
the
height,
that's
a
higher
average,
then
what
is
written
there,
because
I
took
off
for
$23
one
at
little
Jack.
N
So
that's
I
said
this:
man
is
not
a
real
good
cop
and
but
even
even
worse
is
if
you
do
take
out
the
basement
square
footage
of
thousand
three
or
four
hundred.
You
know
the
first
floor
is
treat
the
house
125
and
if
you
do,
you
know
the
math
on
that
it's
you
know
two
hundred
and
sixty-five
thousand
dollars.
J
N
N
N
They
have
informed
me
they
were
going
to
leave
about
two
months
ago,
so
they've
been
in
the
process
of
taking
things
out.
They
pulled
me
rent
from
last
year,
my
taxes
that
show
and
pretty
good
loss
from
last
year.
It's
just
you
know.
Quite
honestly,
it
has
been
a
good
property
for
me
I,
you
know,
I
see
down
the
road,
you
know.
Hopefully
it
will
be
at
some
point.
N
F
C
I
N
Don't
have
to
you
know,
cut
the
rent,
you
know
I,
quite
honestly,
I
paid
too
much
for
it
again.
You
probably
have
heard
that
a
lot,
but
you
know
a
little
bit
more
get
caught
up
in
that,
and
so
it
was
higher
than
Oh
mr.
price,
and
what's
the
tax
is
way
higher
than
we
thought
they
were
going
to
be
it's
kind
of
a
double-edged
sword
who
really
makes
it
hard
to
be
profitable
or
you
know,
with
decent
holding
there.
Thank.
B
You
are
there
any
other
questions
from
board
members.
B
B
H
This
is
Matthew
Lloyd,
the
one
of
the
owners
of
the
property
111
22,
West,
53rd,
Street,
Minneapolis,
I,
guess
the
meat
of
our
argument
is,
we
purchased
the
property
for
five
hundred
and
ten
thousand
and
I.
Don't
have
the
tax
amount
to
hand,
but
it's
somewhere
in
the
region
of
sixty
to
eighty
thousand
I
believe
more
than
that,
so
the
meat
of
it
is
we
bought
it
for
five
hundred
and
ten
thousand
I
did
a
couple
of
the
most
relevant
comps
on
the
properties
that
we
also
viewed
as
we
were
looking
at
this
one.
B
B
B
F
F
F
I
F
One
gentleman
earlier
said
that
he
had
handed
you
some
comparable
building.
Yes,
as
a
yeah,
so
I
didn't
really
know
the
gist
of
of
what
went
on
in
this
title
of
a
meeting.
So
I
I
didn't
get
that
to
you,
but
I
know
though,
but
the
closest
excuse
me
buildings
that
I
could
find
were
not
really
of
that
square
footage,
and
so
they
were
well
one
of
those.
F
Our
building
is
three
thousand
square
feet.
I
guess
one
was
pretty
close
at
2500
square
feet,
but
it
was
its
valuation
was
way
below
ours,
I
think
it
was
somewhere
between
150
and
170,
and
so
I'm
I'm
thinking
that
well
I'm,
not
on
the
one
hand,
of
course,
that
might
be
a
good
indication
of
its
value
that
there
are
no
others
nearby
like
that
size.
But
on
the
other
hand,
it's
maybe
indicates
that
it's
a
little
too
big
or
something
for
in
Husum
buddy
want
to
put
toward
that
that
building,
okay.
B
B
D
F
Almost
two
years
ago
and
then,
while
the
circumstances
allowed
them
to
pay,
you
know
and
then
tried
it,
they
were
trying
to
catch
up.
So
I
was
you
know.
I
was
just
trying
to
be
the
nice
guy
about
it,
because
they'd
always
been
pretty
good
in
the
past.
But
I
came
to
a
point
where
well
now
I'm
trying
to
get
rid
of
them
and
of
course
they
don't
want
to
pay
anything.
You
know
in
background
and
they
don't
move
either,
but
I
do
have
a
notification
into
them
that
they
have
to
move
so.
D
F
It's
just
been
drawn
my
attention
that
I
cannot
get
a
carrier
that
will
handle
an
increase
in
my
insurance,
because
I
also
need
to
increase
my
share
insurance
as
I
found
out.
I
was
paying
way
too
little
on
a
you
know,
a
rebuild
for
that
type
of
building,
and
but
now
I
can't
get
a
carrier.
As
to
your
question,
I
guess
I
could
accommodate
to.
If
I
built
another
wall,
maybe
in
there
I
could
accommodate
I.
F
B
F
B
A
A
It
was
cancelled,
then
put
back
on
the
market
of
nine
twenty
three
at
three
forty
nine
nine
I
was
on
the
market
for
42
days
and
did
not
sell,
and
then
it
was
put
back
on
the
market
at
410
of
this
year
and
was
on
the
market
for
fifteen
days
and
then
I
bought
it
for
305
I.
Guess
my
feeling
is
I.
Didn't
I
get'em
wasn't
aware
how
this
work
I
don't
have
put
together
any
comps
on
it.
A
I
A
A
B
K
B
E
B
C
B
E
B
C
B
B
B
E
B
E
B
C
M
B
B
D
D
B
I
B
You
and
I
would
remind
property
owners
that
they
can't
appeal
at
the
county
and
I
would
say
just
providing
more
information,
but
it
has
been
moved
by
a
bland
and
second
by
Reid
to
sustain
the
2020
estimated
market
value
at
three
hundred
twenty-six
thousand
dollars.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll
on
the
motion.
Remember.
C
B
B
B
D
Analysis
that
was
provided
words
mainly
on
square
footage,
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it
closely,
but
there's
so
much
more
to
a
house
than
square
footage,
and
in
this
case
we
have
of
the
properties
listed
the
highest
one
is
190
a
square
foot
in
the
lowest.
One
is
212
square
foot,
hardly
comparable.
The
subject.
Property
has
two
bedrooms.
M
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Are
there
comments,
or
would
someone
be
willing
to
put
forward
a
motion.
B
K
L
M
B
M
B
B
B
D
Yes,
this
was
a
an
appraisal
for
a
refi
I
believe
we
established
that
and
I
guess
I.
Would
the
comment
I
would
make?
Is
that
often
on
a
refi
they're
not
asking
for
the
full
value,
so
the
value
gets
adjusted
to
whatever
the
the
applicant
is
asking
for.
So
whether
or
not
this
is
a
an
appraisal,
that's
helpful
or
not
I,
don't
know,
but
I'd
certainly
be
more
than
willing
to
listen
to
other
people's
opinions,
but
the
cops
do
seem
to
be
from
what
I
can
see
fairly
comparable.
Shall
we
say
thank.
B
M
E
B
E
Yeah
I
pulled
the
listing
of
this
from
just
last
year
when
I
think
he
bought
it
for
five.
Ninety
five,
it's
assessed
at
five.
Seventy
two
and
there
were
multiple
bidders
I
think
willing
to
pay
at
or
around
that
it
looked
like
a
really
nice
property
to
me
so
wondering
if
anyone
else
has
any
opinions.
I.
B
E
572
I
didn't
find
these
comparables
real
helpful
either
to
be
honest,
but
but
you
know
strong
emphasis
on
what
he
just
paid
for
it
last
year,
which
is
higher
than
the
assessed
value.
So
I
understand
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
problem
when
you're
buying
a
property,
that's
not
assessed
because
it's
owned
by
a
non-profit
cuz.
You
have
to
kind
of
guess
what
you
think
the
taxes
are
gonna
be,
but
most
people
in
that
case
estimate
their
taxes
to
be
consistent
to
what
they
pay
for
it.
E
L
B
D
M
B
D
This
is
a
really
nice
property
and
they
provided
a
couple
of
comparables
which
do
not
measure
up
quality
wise
or
at
least
update
wise
to
this
property.
One
of
them
wasn't
a
state
and
fairly
dated
the
other.
One
was
somewhat
dated,
although
not
in
a
state.
Neither
one
of
them
had
the
the
subject
has
a
newly
updated
kitchen
granite,
stainless
blah
blah
blah,
neither
of
the
others
do
one
had
been
updated
sometime
ago,
I
believe
one
of
the
ones
we
had
the
seventies
update
and
we
had
a
lot
lots
of
upstairs
lots
of
wallpaper.
D
You
know
flowered
wallpaper,
I'm
familiar
with
these
all
three
of
these
houses
and
the
subject.
Property
also
is
a
walk
out
in
a
neighborhood
where
walk
outs
are
not
that
common,
although
it
does
the
lot
dais
sloped
down
to
the
creek
behind
this
property
is
Miniato
Parkway
with
with
homes
on
that,
so
they
they
slopes
to
the
backyards
of
the
of
the
houses
behind.
But
this
particular
property
is,
in
my
opinion,
a
standout
and
I.
D
Don't
again
once
again,
it's
very
often
people
think
that
square
footage
is
all
that
matters
and
there's
a
whole
lot.
More
that
goes
into
it,
and
that
is
the
case
here.
It's
a
beautiful
property
very,
very
well
done.
B
B
B
C
B
B
E
B
B
D
D
Buyers
are
very
very
wary
of
that,
so
they
were
able
to
find
a
buyer
who
was
not
afraid
of
addressing
that
problem,
but
I
would
say
in
the
meantime,
you've
got
a
property
that
isn't
worth
what
they
were
asking
for
and
that's
pretty
clear
and
I
believe.
The
reason
is
that
it
had
a
rather
significant
foundation
problem.
It
was
not
just
a
little
crack.
It
was
a
pretty
major
looking
thing
so,
based
on
that,
I
would
probably
suggest
that
we
look
at
a
lower
value
than
423
I.
B
D
Well,
I
would
I
think
I
would
have
tribute
the
305
since
it
was
purchased
just
a
month
ago
or
less
than
that
that
that
probably
has
to
do
with
what's
going
on
currently
in
the
marketplace,
however,
there
there
is
still
a
gap,
I
think
a
huge
gap
between
what
the
what
the
value
would
be
again.
It
was
on
the
market
for
I,
think
three,
eighty
nine,
the
current
and
it
didn't,
sell
and
didn't
sell
till
they
really
got
it
down.
So
423
seems
to
be
really
quite
high.
D
M
B
B
E
E
J
J
K
B
E
L
J
K
B
E
B
M
B
B
B
D
E
B
D
M
B
J
Chair
Anderson
I
did
want
to
review
the
schedule
going
forward
and
ask
you
for
consideration
for
adding
an
additional
meeting
on
Wednesday
if
possible,
based
on
your
schedule.
So
tomorrow
you
are
scheduled
to
convene
from
or
excuse
me
10:00
a.m.
to
12:30
p.m.
and
on
Wednesday.
You
are
scheduled
to
convene
from
9:00
a.m.
until
12:30
p.m.
and
Thursday.
You
are
scheduled
to
convene
from
9:00
a.m.
an
AM
session
and
then
a
PM
session
until
3:30
p.m.
J
with
all
of
those
cases
being
scheduled.
There
are
still
remaining
57
cases
for
you
to
hear.
We
have
asked
if
you
would
give
consideration
to
adding
a
meeting
on
Wednesday
between
4:00
p.m.
to
7:30
p.m.
to
hear
some
other
additional
cases
in
addition
to
that
I'm
asking
if
there
are
any
other
times
that
we
can
add
into
here
anything
that
may
be
outstanding.
As
you
know,
there
are
still
some
occasions
where
people
choose
not
to
call
because
they're
not
available.
B
J
J
E
J
K
D
K
D
K
D
D
E
L
J
Members,
if
we
can
maybe
table
some
of
this
conversation
and
let
me
check
in
with
our
partners
at
the
Department
of
Revenue,
but
if
we
could
potentially
just
solidify
meeting
based
on
availability
for
Wednesday
afternoon
evening,
and
then
we
can
discuss
the
others
in
the
morning.
The
other
times
in
the
morning.
B
E
You
know
some
of
the
the
call
ends
can
go
pretty
long
and
I
know
it's
it's
hard
to
tell
someone
to
stop
talking
mid-thought
at
five
minutes.
Every
time
and
I,
don't
know
how
much
time
that
would
save,
but
sometimes
the
right
ends
can
go
quite
a
bit
quicker.
I,
don't
know
if
we
want
to
change
the
procedure
as
to
what
we
request
from
the
property
owners
just
based
on
time
constraints
and
maybe
do
some
writings
versus
phone
ones.
J
E
L
E
J
J
J
J
our
staff
will
work
this
afternoon
and
this
evening
to
contact
appellant
to
see
if
there's
any
desire
to
transition
their
appeal
to
a
write
in
and
we
will
continue
and
when
there
is
a
response
that
they
are
not
able
to
attend.
We
will
try
to
schedule
somebody
in
their
place
to
potentially
shift
up
a
bunch
of
cases.
As
you
know,
today
you
experienced
many
that
couldn't
attend
and
you
could
sustain
those
values
and
move
on
fairly
quickly.
J
E
D
D
Okay,
I
have
I
have
known
to
midnight
penciled
in.