►
From YouTube: May 19, 2020 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
Description
Minneapolis Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
A
B
Good
morning
welcome
to
the
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
sections
13
d
0
to
1,
declared
to
the
local
health
pandemic.
For
the
record,
my
name
is
Neil
Anderson
and
I'm.
Chair
of
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
Equalization
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order.
The
open
meeting
law
requires
a
roll
call
vote
to
be
conducted
during
a
virtual
meeting
and
a
certification
form
will
be
completed
for
each
local
board
meeting.
B
D
B
Let
the
record
reflect
that
quorum
of
the
board
is
present.
We
will
proceed
to
the
agenda,
copy
of
which
was
posted
for
public
access
to
the
city's
legislative
information
system,
which
is
available
at
L
IMS
minneapolis,
MN,
gov
members.
The
agendas
before
you
for
your
consideration
may
I
have
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda.
F
G
B
The
motion
passes
and
the
agenda
printed
is
adopted
new
business.
We
have
eight
appeals
scheduled
from
10:00
to
11:00
a.m.
we
will
proceed
in
case
order,
as
listed
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
is
called,
the
applicant
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
the
appeal.
The
board
will
consider
and
take
action
after
hearing
these
cases
and
if
time
allows
are
at
the
end
of
the
day.
After
hearing
all
cases,
if
your
phone
is
muted
press
star,
six
to
unmute
property
owners
will
be
notified
of
the
decision
by
mail
after
the
board
has
adjourned.
B
H
Good
morning,
Brian
case
number
2,
0
V,
8,
0,
0,
4,
8
property
address
1011,
Humboldt,
Avenue,
North
Minneapolis.
A
couple
quick
things
I'd
like
to
present
here
is
I.
Think
you
have
in
front
of
you
the
appeal
that
I
stated
along
with
charts
and
annual
Realtors
report.
The
city
assesses
reports
in
my
evaluation.
We
just
looked
1.1
economics.
H
If
we
look
at
Minneapolis
valuation
and
ax
increases,
we
kind
of
want
to
interchange,
those
is
they're.
Obviously
linked
primary
objective
is
going
to
be
tax
mitigation
from
valuation.
If
we
look
at
the
chart
presented,
we
can
see
that
the
tax
increase
per
annum
over
a
five-year
stretch
is
6.5
percent
for
animals
40.4%.
H
Just
a
couple
of
quick
points.
If
we
compare
the
annual
Assessors
report
with
the
annual
Minnesota
Realtors
report
on
2018,
we're
looking
at
an
Assessor
for
the
city
at
3:02,
547
valuation,
and
that
is
pulled
from
the
annual
Assessors
report
on
an
aggregate
median
and
if
we
compare
that
to
the
Minnesota
realtor
for
the
same
geographic
area,
we're
at
283
thousand.
So
Minneapolis
is
over
by
six
point:
nine
percent
versus
the
Minnesota
realtor
2019
same
numbers.
The
assess
of
the
Minnesota,
the
the
city
assessed,
is
reported.
H
H
Low
valued
navel
I
have
applied
at
six
point
three
percent
per
annum
valuation
from
the
twenty.
Sixteen
of
a
hundred
and
thirty
nine
thousand
dollar
valuation,
and
so
I
come
up
with
a
hundred
and
eighty
eight
thousand
six
hundred
and
sixty
versus
the
city.
Two
hundred
and
five
thousand
valuation
for
the
20/20
assessment
for
the
twenty
twenty
one
valuation
year.
Our
primary
goal
is
obviously
to
keep
the
tax
and
valuations
in
a
normal
situation.
If
we
get
out
of
alignment
with
that,
the
unfortunate
situation
in
Minneapolis
as
a
landlord,
you
know
two
things:
one.
H
We
have
space
availability
and
two
we'll
run
into
more
rent
increases
because
as
a
business
person,
if
we
look
at
these
numbers,
the
only
goal
is
to
pass
this
on.
If
we
look
at
cost
of
doing
business,
inflation
and
metrics-
and
we
compare
that
to
the
Minnesota
the
city
Assessors
report
on
single-family,
we
see
quite
a
skewed
price
point
difference
in
in
how
valuations
are
applied
to
single-family
vs.
triplex
in
just
in
terms
of
a
metric
number
and
so
we're
looking
at
about
a
nice.
Quite
a
variation.
H
So
that's
why
we're
petitioning
and
we're
really
hoping
to
keep
out
properties
in
these
lower
income,
these
fringe
neighborhoods
values
and
tax
rates
at
a
fair
and
reasonable
amount
to
keep
our
rents
in
alignment.
Otherwise,
the
rent
just
goes
up,
which
is
an
unfortunate
situation
for
obviously
the
end
user,
which
is
our
which
is
our
renters
okay,
so
that
that's
my
that's
my
case
for
ten
eleven
Humboldt
Avenue,
north
Minneapolis
I
think.
B
H
H
B
B
H
So
state
for
the
record
I'll
be
using
the
exact
same
metrics
that
I
used
on
k2
0
b,
h,
0,
0,
4,
8
and
property.
I
have
applied
the
same
metric
of
6.3%
annual
from
the
minute
set
of
realtor
and
if
we
base
the
value
in
2016-17
at
217,000
on
an
annualized
growth
rate
of
6.3%
come
up
with
a
hundred
ninety
four
thousand
five
hundred
valuation
versus
the
city
assessment
of
327,000,
factoring
when
all
the
aforementioned
and
spare
details.
That's,
however,
derived
that
valuation
and
that's
why
I
make
this
appeal?
Okay,.
B
B
H
Burnie
O'brien
case
number,
twenty
be
eight
zero,
zero
five,
zero
23:59,
McKinley
Street
Northeast
Minneapolis
once
again
will
spare
the
board,
with
your
permission,
all
of
the
the
metrics
that
I've
used
to
value
and
once
again,
I've
applied
the
six
point,
three
percent
per
annum
rate.
If
we
look
at
the
2016
for
2017
valuation,
thirty,
nine
thousand
five
hundred-
and
we
apply
that
metric
over
that
five
year
spins
we
arrive
at
three
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
and
sixty
six
dollars.
B
B
G
B
I
Good
morning,
everyone,
my
name-
is
John
neurosis
and
I'm
case
number,
20,
BH,
0,
0,
5,
1,
1606,
mount
curve,
Avenue,
yeah,
I,
guess
I,
don't
have
a
very
thorough
report
like
the
last
gentlemen,
but
I
purchased
the
price,
and
it's
kind
of
hard
to
talk
about
1606,
about
talking
about
1604,
which
is
the
next
case.
They're
bought
as
a
package,
and
they
are
one
16:04-
is
the
carriage
house
for
1606,
so
the
full
purchase
price
of
both
properties
was
a
million
fifty.
I
However,
on
paper
and
I
think
you
have
some
doctor
or
maybe
a
screen
shot.
Yes,
I
did
this
is
your
have
to
forgive
me.
This
is
my
first
time
doing
this,
but
because
of
financing
issues,
trying
to
get
a
jumbo
loan
on
to
PIDs
is
extremely
complicated,
so
the
purchase
price
for
1606
marker
was
actually
eight
hundred
thousand
and
1604
was
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
to
avoid
a
90-day
period,
and
you
know
possible
lenders
have
losing
investors
in
the
particular
loan.
What
we
did
was
we
got
creative.
J
J
B
I
B
I
John
no
recess
case
number
2,
0,
B,
H,
0,
0,
5,
1604,
mount
curve,
Avenue
and
again
just
appealing
the
evaluation
being
the
city.
Has
it
that's
four
hundred
and
forty
thousand
or
something
like
that
when
in
fact
the
you
know,
I
guess
the
record
shows
a
fifty
thousand
dollar
purchase
price.
But
obviously
that's
not.
You
know
fully.
G
I
B
I
B
B
B
I
B
K
A
So
the
big
thing
that's
unusual
about
our
property-
is
that
it's
it's
a
wonderful
house
that
the
neighborhood
is
like
the
average
home
value
in
our
in
our
zip
code
is
three
hundred
and
ten
thousand.
So
it's
definitely
unusual
when
it
comes
to
comparables,
like
the
closest
that
they
were
looking
at
to
compare-
and
this
has
been
the
case
most
times
that
we've
had
the
house
assess
when
we
first
were
moving
in
and
now
this
time.
A
So
that
they're
pulling
comparables
from
like
Lake
areas
when
we're
world
by
Lake
Nokomis
and
they're
pulling
comparables
from
st.
Paul,
but
because
there's
nothing
in
the
area,
so
it.
It
really
is
unusual
to
to
appraise
this
house,
because
it's
there's
nothing
else
like
it
in
the
area.
But
that's
that's
kind
of
it's
as
simple
as
that.
We
just
that
we
felt
like
okay
well.
This
doesn't
seem
fair
that
if
that's
what
they
appraise
it
at
for
the
bank,
that
that's
what
you
know,
we
should
be
paying
taxes
on.
B
G
G
B
A
B
B
L
L
Don't
have
the
case
number
in
front
of
me:
I'm
I'm
blind
going
to
be
a
little
okay.
Thank
you!
So
pretty
simply
we
purchased
this
townhome
in
August,
we
closed
on
August
9th
and
we
purchased
the
property
for
$380,000.
Even
our
recent
tax
assessed
value
that
just
came
was
for
four
hundred
and
forty
four
thousand
five
hundred,
so
sixty
four
thousand
dollars
difference
from
what
we
paid.
Just
a
few
months
ago,
the
house
was
on
the
market,
beginning
February
22nd.
L
L
Well,
we
just
think
that
we're
being
the
values
too
high
that
the
proposed
tax
value
was
too
high,
we
I
did
call
last
what,
after
we
closed
last
August
I
did
call
the
assessor's
office.
At
the
time
the
party
was
had
a
tax
assessed
value
of
four
hundred
and
eleven
thousand,
and
they
said
it
was
too
late
for
me
to
appeal
without
going
through
a
lengthy
process.
L
G
L
B
B
M
A
M
A
small
packet
in
front
of
you
or
for
you
to
review
the
property
owner
sold
to
parses
across
the
street
and
2019
for
3
million
dollars
or
approximately
eighty
three
dollars
a
square
foot.
The
assessment
per
square
foot
for
this
particular
parcel
is
96
dollars
and
89
cents.
So
we
just
took
that
sale,
price,
283
bucks,
a
square
foot
and
applied
it
to
the
square
footage,
and
we
came
up
with
a
value:
1
million
sixty-two
thousand
nine
hundred
and
fifty
one
dollars
you'll
notice
that
there
is
an
easement
value
that
I
said
in
consideration.
M
N
M
M
M
The
same
case,
however,
this
parcel
front
Hennepin
Avenue,
which
was
subject
to
an
easement
again.
The
two
parcels
across
Hawthorne
Avenue
were
sold
for
a
geologists
work,
but
this
parcels
using
that
sale,
price
per
square
foot
would
indicate
a
value
of
1
million.
Six
hundred
twelve
thousand
five
hundred
and
four
dollars,
however,
and
the
easement
would
impact
the
value
of
the
particle
because
there's
essentially.
M
Is
no
access
to
this
parcel
off
the
Tennison
Avenue
anymore
because
of
the
bus
line
that
was
put
in
the
heat.
It
would
surely
impact
the
value
of
the
parcel
overall,
but
we
did
what
I
did
was
I
alakay
today
easement
value
originally
across
the
four
parcels,
but
it
should
be
the
three
parcels
that
were
impacted
by
the
easement,
so
I
recalculated
it
real
quick.
While
we
were
on
the
phone
here-
and
that
means
an
additional
three
hundred
fifty
thousand
one
hundred
and
twenty
dollars.
M
B
B
B
M
B
M
G
M
We
are
requesting
eighty
three
dollars
square
foot,
which
would
indicate
a
value
of
three
million
four
hundred
two
thousand
one
hundred
and
sixty
six
dollars
again.
This
parcel
was
impacted
by
the
easement
put
in
the
new
bus
line,
long
Hennepin,
Avenue,
so
I
allocated
seven
hundred
and
thirty,
eight
thousand
seven
hundred
and
seven
dollars
did
it
to
the
duck
from
the
assessments
which
are
revised,
requested
value
would
be
two
million
six
hundred
and
sixty
three
dollars:
four
hundred
and
I'm
sorry,
two
million
six
hundred
and
fifty
three
four
hundred
fifty
nine
dollars.
B
B
So
we
will
be.
We
have
some
time
before
the
11:00
o'clock.
We
will
consider
an
act
on
those
appeals
from
the
10:00
to
11:00
time
period.
Item
number
three
is
appeal
for
1011
Humboldt
Avenue
North
case
number,
two
0bh
0
0
4
8.
Are
there
any
questions
or
discussions
from
board
members
related
to
this
property?
I.
E
B
F
B
B
C
B
D
B
C
G
B
E
O
E
J
B
The
discussion
from
the
applicant
the
way
that
it
was
worked
out,
he
was
that
fifty
thousand
was
paid
for
the
lot
cash
and
a
million
was
put
on
a
loan
for
the
the
main
property,
and
originally
he
paid
eight
hundred
thousand
for
the
structure
in
1606
and
250.
For
the
lot
its
are
the
carriage
house
at
1604,
but
had
to
rework
it
in
order
to
get
get
lending
on
it.
E
E
Well,
I
mean
I've
I'm,
familiar
with
the
property
and
I'm
familiar
with
the
street,
so
I
would
make
a
motion
to
reduce
the
taxes
on
on
both
pieces.
I,
don't
know
how
you
do
it
you
do
it
one
at
a
time,
one
one
at
a
time.
Okay,
so
I
guess
that
I
would
make
a
motion
for
1606
mile
curve
to
go
from
from
1
million
six
forty
eight
to
a
hundred
thousand
for
the
property
at
1606
mount
curve.
Avenue.
D
B
E
D
G
D
G
E
G
G
P
J
J
B
B
F
C
B
E
B
B
E
D
F
C
B
I'm
quite
familiar
with
area
I've
sold
several
properties
up
there
in
the
last
two
years,
probably
close
to
8
and
the
market
up.
There
is
very
brisk
so
a
property
sitting
on
the
market
for
that
length
of
time
up.
There
is
way
outside
the
norm
so
obviously
where
it
started
and
the
length
of
time
for
it
to
sell
I
believe
what
they
paid
for.
It
would
be
an
accurate
idea
of
what
the
property
is
worth
and.
E
B
F
B
B
G
D
E
E
B
E
B
B
C
B
B
B
F
C
B
F
C
B
B
We
will
proceed
in
case
order,
as
listed
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
is
called,
the
applicant
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
the
appeal
the
board
will
consider
and
take
action
after
hearing
these
cases
if
time
allows-
or
at
the
end
of
the
day
after
the
hearing,
all
the
cases,
if
you,
if
your
phone
is
muted,
please
press
star
six
to
unmute
property
owners
will
be
notified
of
our
decision
by
mail
after
the
board
has
adjourned
item
number.
14
is
444.
B
Q
Q
Q
Q
Will
just
kind
of
briefly
go
through
our
evidence
packet
that
we
presented
first
things
first,
as
I
want
to
give
a
short
description
of
the
property.
What
the
property
is
is
a
galvanizing
plant.
They
do
various
galvanizing
projects,
mainly
just
metal
coating
for
steel
fabrication,
and
so
the
if
you
ever
were
to
walk
inside
one
of
these
buildings.
The
buildings
are
there
more
of
like
an
accelerated
depreciated
type
building
because
of
the
work
that
goes
on
in
there.
There's
a
lot
of
wear
and
tear
that
occurs
at
these
buildings.
Q
You
can
kind
of
see
through
the
on
starting
up
page
for
there's
kind
of
a
map
overview
of
where
this
property
is
located
in
the
area
and
then
the
next
following
pages,
there's
just
a
couple
GIS
maps
to
kind
of
show
the
parcel
outline.
But
on
page
seven
we
present
a
cost
approach,
as
I
mentioned
before
the
improvements
are
fairly
low.
Q
So
we
don't
really
have
as
much
of
an
issue
with
the
improvement,
although
I
think
we
could
have
made
an
argument
that
the
improvements
are
probably
depreciate
it
beyond
this
value,
but
we're
really
focused
on
the
land
value.
For
this
particular
case,
page
eight
of
our
evidence
packet.
We
present
some
sales
and
that
believes
over
to
page
nine
there's
six
total
land
sales,
the
subject
property
is
land
value
is
just
over
five
dollars
and
five
dollars
and
20
cents.
A
square
foot.
Q
Q
Q
So
you
know
that
it's
a
pretty
simple
case
and
argument
on
from
the
taxpayer
standpoint
again,
we
feel,
like
the
land
is
probably
slightly
overvalued
and
given
the
land
sales
in
the
area,
we
feel
like
an
adjustment
can
be
made
on
the
landed
and
you
can
see
on
page
24
kind
of
our
requested
value
based
on
the
land
sales
and
an
adjustment
that
could
be
made
there,
and
that
kind
of
concludes
our
overview.
Our
evidence.
G
B
B
G
Q
Q
So
all
preference,
this
particular
peel
with
given
a
description
of
this
property
as
well.
This
particular
property
is
being
used
as
a
nursing
facility
at
the
licensed
nursing
facility.
So
even
though
it
looks
like
a
residential
property
and
it
is
technically
a
residential
property,
it's
being
used
as
a
nursing
facility,
mainly
for
elderly
care,
and
so
there
there's
a
small
group
of
elderly
individuals
that
live
in
the
home
and
there's
a
full-time
nursing
staff
that
takes
carry
them
in
these
homes,
and
this
is
a
licensed
nursing
home.
Q
So,
however,
given
the
fact
that
this
is
a
residential
property,
we
feel
like
the
best
way
to
come
to
a
conclusion
on
what
the
value
might
be
on.
This
property
is
to
look
at
the
sales
in
the
neighborhood,
because
technically
it's
a
business
operation
of
the
nursing
home
were
to
leave
this
facility,
and
this
kit
fairly
easily
be
converted
back
into
a
regular
residential
home
and
be
sold
as
such
and
and
likewise
many
of
the
homes
up
and
down
the
street.
Q
And
then
this
direct
neighborhood
could
be
converted
into
a
nursing
home
as
they
were
to
get
licensed
that
way.
So
we
feel
like
looking
at
the
sales
in
the
neighborhood
of
other
residential
properties
are
the
best
way
to
conclude
what
the
value
is.
I'll
skip
ahead
to
page
seven
of
our
evidence
packet.
Q
We
we
present
three
sales
of
residential
properties
in
the
neighborhood
that
have
occurred
over
the
last
year
or
so,
and
I
want
a
preference
on
page,
seven
sale
number
one
and
sale
number
two
are
our
residential
properties
that
are
two
doors.
Apart
from
the
subject:
property
on
both
sides,
so
sale
number
one
is
two
doors
down.
If
you're
staring
at
the
property
doors
down
to
the
left
and
then
sale
number
two
is
two
doors
down
to
the
right.
Q
Q
Again,
two
of
them
are
on
the
same
street
and
once
one
Street
over
so
there's
similar
properties,
same
neighborhood
and
then
page
15
of
our
packet
is
kind
of
the
summary
of
of
our
evidence.
Based
on
the
sales,
we
feel
like
a
value,
1
million
one
hundred
fifty
five
thousand
is
more
appropriate
for
for
this,
this
property
so
and
that's
kind
of
it.
In
conclusion,
thank
you
thank.
B
B
R
R
So
my
request
is
that
you
would
lower
the
amount
to
be
more
in
keeping
with
how
the
building
it
can
be
used.
I
purchased
the
building
in
2017
for
four
hundred
and
fifty
five
thousand
dollars.
It
was
valued
at
that
time,
four
hundred
four
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
given
the
real
estate
climate
at
that
time
and
how
long
it
was
on
the
market,
which
was
quite
a
long
time,
I
feel
like
that
was
a
very
reasonable
value
for
the
building
at
that
time.
R
Upon
purchasing
the
building
I
petitioned
to
the
city
to
continue
the
non-conforming
use
permit
for
the
building,
so
that
a
business
could
do
business
in
the
building
that
permit
has
been
granted
to
my
understanding
for
previous
tenants
as
well.
I
was
granted
the
permit
with
some
fairly
strict
stipulations
on
what
kind
of
business
and
how
many
people
we
could
have
in
and
out
of
the
building
in
2019
I
petitioned
to
have
the
building
valuation
lowered
back
to
a
more
reasonable
amount
that
had
been
raised
quite
significantly
and
I
was
granted.
R
That
petition
and
I
believe
this
building
just
requires
a
unique
consideration
given
that
I'm
being
taxed
commercially,
but
many
many
commercial
businesses
should
not
be
in
the
building
and
conform
to
the
non-conforming
use,
stipulation
so
I'm,
very
limited
on
to
whom
I
can
rent
inside
that
building
and
so
I
and
the
other
two
small
businesses
that
work
in
the
building
would
appreciate
your
support
of
our
businesses
and
understanding
and
lower
the
value
that
wouldn't
then
in
turn,
lower
our
tax
value
and
I.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
Thank.
J
R
The
building
currently
has
myself
I
work
in
the
building
and
two
other
tenants
within
the
building.
So
basically,
three
commercial
spaces
and
our
non-conforming
use
permit
requires
that
all
those
businesses
not
have
regular
foot
traffic
so
that
just
we're
very
limited
in
the
number
of
people
we
can
have
in
and
out
of
the
building
on
an
on
a
given
day.
R
R
Is
not
there's
no
retail
and
because,
because
of
this
limit,
I
could
have
rented
the
space
it's
not
empty
for
over
a
year,
one
of
the
unit's,
because
I
was
unable
to
rent
it,
and
so
many
people
wanted
to
rent
from
me,
but
they
had
too
much
in
and
out
fit.
You
know
they
bring
massage
therapists
that
had
people
in
out
or
psychologist.
You
know
anybody
that
had
regular
appointments
and
people
in
and
out
of
the
building
wouldn't
fit,
and
obviously
a
general
retail.
R
R
B
S
S
I've
had
a
realtor
Barry
Berg,
who
sells
a
lot
of
homes
in
this
area.
Look
at
this
home
and
he
sent
you
a
letter
indicating
a
fair
market
value
of
1
million
250
and
the
thing
about
our
house
is,
it
does
look
nice
on
the
outside,
but
it
needs,
as
he
put
in
his
letter,
would
inevitably
want
to
make
extensive
upgrades
to
the
home
and
then
I've
included
some
comparables
and
I
have
many
more
1
comparable
and
my
house
currently
is
I.
Think
you
have
it
at
a
million
for
3
or
something
like
that.
S
S
There's
a
comparable
at
the
end
of
the
block
that
sold
for
a
million
398,
but
that
house
is
on
the
rules.
Gardens
has
a
great
view
of
the
lake
and
had
a
major
addition
on
the
back
of
it,
but
done
by
T,
architects
and
I.
Think
I
included
that,
as
a
has
a
comp
and
I've
tried
to
get
comps.
Barry
Burke
had
some
comps
around,
but
I
tried
to
get
comps
at
or
right
right
bias.
S
So
here's
one
two
doors
away:
that's
on
the
market:
it's
it's
on
the
market
for
1
million
249
and
it's
maybe
it's
Steaua
800
square
feet
larger
than
ours
above
ground
for
square
feet.
It
hasn't
sold.
There's
a
house
on
that
I
mentioned
in
my
letter.
There's
a
house
on
the
it's
access
on
right
on
Lake
Harriet
is
doctored,
Megerian
house
old
house,
and
it
is
7,000
square
feet
and
it's
a
grand
home
sits
right
on
the
lake
there.
S
It
sold
for
a
million
for
in
2017
and
I
do
want
to
say
that
in
this
and
above
the
million
dollar
range,
these
houses
have
not
gone
up
in
value,
I
mean
I.
Had
it
I
had
an
appraisal
on
my
house
from
the
other
Hirsch
realtor
does
a
lot
of
things
in
this
area
at
night
in
2002
and
I
and
I
think
it
was.
You
know
in
the
same
range
that
I'm
talking
about
now,
so
there's
a
house
across
the
street
two
doors
down
it
sold.
S
Four
years
ago,
four
million
won
it's
probably
six
thousand
square
feet
so
an
hour,
but
the
main
thing
is
our
house:
it
hasn't
had
the
major
addition
and
that
all
these
house,
the
other
house
I'm
talking
to
you
all-
had
big
additions
and
there's
not
a
record
of
houses
on
our
block
selling
for
a
million
for
so
I
think
the
million
250
actually
I
think
is
high.
But
that's
I
think
what
Barry
Berg
has
stated
is
the
value
it
should
be,
and
that
would
be
on
the
high
side.
In
my
mind,.
B
E
S
E
S
G
S
That's
a
beautiful
and
I
don't
want
to
take
it.
You
know
this
is
one
of
the
most
beautiful
blocks
and
I'm.
Not
that's
why
I
live
here,
but
it's
it's
like
I
say
they
what
people
perceive
and
what
really
is
happening
are
two
different
things
and
I
certainly
couldn't
get
a
million
for
out
of
my
house
when
that
one
sold
for
nothing
in
398,
so
anyone
across
the
street
at
the
same
as
a
million
250
asking
price
in
the
city.
You
know
so
anka,
larger,
okay,
okay,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
the
other.
B
Item
number.
Thank
you
very
time.
Mr.
Erickson,
we'll
move
on
to
item
number
19
5115
Chicago
Avenue
case
number:
two
0bh
zero,
zero.
Six
six,
the
applicant
is
gay
masse.
Please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
you'll
have
five
minutes
to
present
your
appeal
to
the
board:
go
ahead:
press
star!
Six:
have
you
been
needed.
O
Thank
you.
The
property
is
a
duplex.
It's
a
two
side-by-side
units,
each
around
974
square
feet
each
2-bedroom
1-bath.
There
is
their
rooms
in
the
basement.
We
have
faded
a
laundry
room
down
there
and
there's
a
utility
room.
There
are
also
other
rooms
that
bathroom
and
bathroom
space
currently
not
used
and
needs
to
be
renovated.
O
I,
did
a
refinance
earlier
this
year
and
had
this
appraisal
that
she
has
done
where
it
and
it
sets
out
information
about
comparable
properties
in
the
area
and
it
assessed
the
appraised.
Value
of
the
property
is
six
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars
and
I
wanted
to
request
that
the
board
review
this
and
consider
lowering
the
20/20
assessments
I
think
the.
O
J
O
O
Wanted
to
answer
any
questions
you
had
about
that.
If
you
look
on
page
two
and
three
of
the
appraisal,
it
shows
the
comparison
with
the
other
similar
properties.
The
updating
we've
done
that
have
done
sense.
Purchase
was
around
electrical
problems
identified
in
the
infection
and
the
patient
of
a
nicer
laundry
room
in
the
basement,
and
then
things
like
paint
and
to
make
the
upstairs
space
things
look
nicer.
B
B
O
O
F
B
O
B
C
T
Was
a
single-family
house
that
was
chopped
up
and
not
as
desirable
as
true
for
flexes
are,
but
that
one
is
also
in
the
same
neighborhood.
The
other
unit
is
25
19
Lyndale
Avenue
South,
that's
a
five-unit
building,
which
is
again
a
slightly
smaller
square
footage
value,
but
it
does
have
an
extra
unit.
J
T
B
B
G
T
B
T
T
Because
of
that
bus
stop,
we
also
lost
a
lot
of
person
this
last
year,
her
penis,
especially
being
a
loud
bus.
Stop
makes
a
little
difficult
to
rent
for
those
minutes,
especially
long
space.
In
that
corner
there
to
sub
I
get
up
to
comps
one
thirty,
four
thirty
six
one
day,
I'll
have
myself
that's
also
brick
building
in
the
same
neighborhood
and
as
a
value
of
one
point,
one
more
for
taxes
payable
in
2020
and
one
point
180
for
taxes
payable
in
2021,
slightly
smaller
building
square
footage,
but
there's
more
room
for
square
footage.
T
T
The
comp
was
900
West,
25th
Street,
also
a
brick
building
and
the
same
neighborhood
as
an
assessed
value
of
one
point:
two
foot
taxes
payable
in
2020,
one
point:
two:
six
or
their
taxes
payable
in
2021,
like
I,
said
this.
One
also
has
slightly
smaller
square
footage,
there's
roughly
about
the
same
amount
of
runnable
square
feet
like
I,
said
my
property
as
some
wasted
space
in
the
basement.
T
T
B
T
J
B
T
T
T
B
G
B
E
B
F
B
E
B
E
B
F
C
B
E
G
B
D
B
N
We
see
that
the
person
representing
this
case
did
contact
us
in
the
time
when
we
asked
and
they
weren't
present
they
weren't.
Given
the
call
and
information
in
time.
I
would
just
ask
that
you
hold
off
on
acting
on
this
one
until
tomorrow
to
see
if
we
can
add
them
to
tomorrow's
schedule,
just
since
they
weren't,
given
the
call
of
information
in
time.
Okay,.
B
G
B
With
that
discussion
we
will
continue
4640
Ewing
Avenue
south
for
the
hearing
tomorrow
on
520
2024
case
number,
2,
0bh,
0,
0,
64.
Moving
on
to
item
number
18
appeal:
444,
20,
Fremont,
Avenue
South
case
number,
2,
0bh,
0,
0,
6
5.
Are
there
any
questions
or
discussions
from
board
members
related
to
this
property.
B
E
F
G
G
B
B
Have
shown
that
property
twice
before
was
sold,
so
I
can
verify
that
the
property
was
in
need
of
a
lot
of
updating.
It
sounds
like
the
property
purchaser
homeowner
has
done
limited
improvements
to
date
and
their
appraisal
of
six
hundred
fifteen
thousand
eight
I
believe
would
be
accurate
if
not
possibly
a
little
high.
Any
other
comments.
I.
E
B
B
E
This
is
having
I,
you
know,
I,
don't
know
what
the
condition
of
this
property
is,
but
the
wedge
has
been
having
good
success
in
sales,
and
if
this
is
a
single-family
home
rented
by
the
bedrooms,
we
don't
know
what
the
income
approach
is.
So
it's
it's
hard
to
make
it's
hard
for
me
to
make
a
decision
on
this.
B
D
G
E
D
B
F
F
G
B
B
B
F
F
B
You
we'll
continue
on
to
the
new
business.
We
have
four
people
scheduled
from
12:00
to
12:30.
My
understanding
is
that
those
collars
are
in
the
queue
right
now
and
we
will
proceed
in
case
order
as
listed
on
the
agenda
when
your
case
is
called,
the
applicant
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
the
appeal
the
board
will
consider
and
take
action
after
hearing
these
cases,
if
time
allows
read
at
the
end
of
the
day
after
hearing
all
cases,
if
your
phone
is
muted,
please
press,
pound
six
or
excuse
me
star.
B
Six
to
unmute
property
owners
will
be
notified
of
our
decision
by
mail
after
the
board
is
adjourned.
We're
starting
with
item
number
22
23:48
Seabury
Avenue
case
number,
2,
0,
bh
@
0,
0,
6
9,
the
applicant
is
Joseph
beer,
beer
or
neck.
Please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
K
K
Joseph
Yannick,
my
home,
is
a
23:48
Seabury
Avenue,
my
wife
and
I
just
purchased
this
as
our
first
home
back
in
November,
currently
the
city
for
2020
estimates.
The
value
of
the
house
is
six
hundred
seventy
six
thousand
dollars.
We
purchased
the
house
for
four
hundred
and
sixty
three
thousand
and
five
hundred
dollars.
K
So
there's
a
big
big
discrepancy
there.
If
you
look
at
the
appraisal
that
I've
included,
which
was
commissioned
as
part
of
the
mortgage
underwriting
on
the
page
that
says
uniformed
residential
appraisal
reports,
which
is
like
the
third
page
of
the
appraisal,
it
says
in
there
that
the
subject
was
listed
for
sale
on
October
4th
for
four
hundred
and
ninety
thousand
dollars
and
was
reduced
to
a
final
list,
price
of
four
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
and
sold
after
23
days.
So
they
initially
listed
it
for
four
hundred.
K
One
of
the
things
called
out
is
that
there's
no
shower
in
the
only
bathroom,
for
that
allows
you
to
bathe
in
it's
just
a
tub,
there's
a
hole
in
the
wall
behind
the
toilet
in
there
from
a
previous
leak,
it
looks
like
so
I
would
ask
the
board
to
simply
adjust
the
assessed
value
of
our
property
to
the
purchase
price
of
our
property
coming
back
in
November.
Thank
you.
B
K
K
B
Thank
you
for
your
time,
mr.
beinac
you'll
be
notified
in
writing
after
adjournment.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Item
number
23
2544
Aldrich
Avenue
South
case
number,
2,
0bh
0:07.
The
applicant
is
Renee
book
mode
book
mode.
Please
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
My.
U
U
We
are
currently
valued
at
7:15,
which
went
up
quite
a
bit
last
year.
I
did
make
an
appeal.
Last
year
and
Leo
Montez
came
out
and
looked
at
the
building.
We
went
through
this
whole
thing
and
now
again
this
year
it's
trying
to
go
up
to
seven
hundred
and
seventy
two
thousand.
This
is
an
older
four-plex,
we're
actually
grandfathered
in
on
music.
U
But
you
know
we
have
tenants
that
want
apartment
with
two
girls
who
are
working
in
a
restaurant
and
now
they're
moving
home.
A
couple
of
the
other
people
in
the
other
units.
One
is
working,
one
is
not
so
I'm,
not
quite
sure.
What's
really
gonna
happen
when
the
$600
a
week
runs
out
and
I
don't
understand
how
rental
property
could
be
going
up
that
much
right
now.
B
U
Yeah,
there's
two
on
each
side
and
they're
all
two
bedrooms
with
one
bathroom
they're
wood
floors,
the
kitchen
is
towards
the
by
the
back
door.
So
it's
not
open
floor
plan
which
people
seem
to
want
these
days
and
the
bedrooms
are
smaller,
the
dining
room,
the
living
room,
it's
just
one,
big
room,
okay,.
B
B
B
V
V
We've
been
involved
with
our
Linden
Hills
neighborhood
community,
helping
to
update
our
perks,
recommend,
stop
signs
for
problem
corners
and
maintain
our
property
when
the
city
expects
us
to
do
routine
maintenance,
removing
trees,
replacing
sidewalks
things
like
that,
we
feel
the
$50,000
annual
property
tax
increase
is
excessive.
Considering
our
100
year
old,
balloon
frame
home
has
not
gone
through.
A
major
remodel.
I
have
three
examples
why
we
would
like
to
have
an
adjustment
in
this?
The
first
two
are,
via
the
website,
Zillow
our
immediate
neighbor
at
four
five
zero.
V
Five
Washburn
has
completely
gutted
his
home
two
years
ago
and
added
a
16-foot
addition
that
covers
all
three
levels
installed
new
utilities
and
they
now
have
a
four
bedroom
three
bath
and
it's
listed
on
Zillow
for
eight
hundred
and
twenty
two
thousand
dollars.
My
other
neighbor
to
the
east
of
me
at
four
or
five
zero,
zero
Vincent
Avenue
South
has
not
gone
through
a
major
remodel
and
his
three
bedroom
one
and
a
half
bath.
It
is
listed
on
Zillow
for
five
hundred
and
seven
thousand
six
hundred
dollars.
V
V
We
are
also
aware
of
the
changes
coming
to
our
neighborhood
in
the
2040
plan
and
would
consider
help
in
reworking
our
property
to
accommodate
additional
City
residents.
But
our
concern
is
a
cumulative
effect
of
skewing.
The
taxable
value
of
our
home,
based
on
new
construction
in
the
neighborhood,
will
end
our
ability
to
age
in
place,
and
that's
all
that
I
have
to
say.
Okay.
B
V
V
Occupy
the
entire
house
and
we
have
not
rented
the
units
for
25
years,
our
our
daughters,
both
live
out
of
the
home
and
as
most
parents
know,
both
of
them
have
returned
to
live
with
us
twice.
While
they
get
back
on
their
feet
and
I
I,
don't
know
I'm
hoping
that
it
won't
happen
again,
but
things
are
not
looking
good
right
now
for
us.
So.
I
B
V
B
P
G
B
G
G
B
E
N
B
B
E
Have
a
comment:
while
we
were
listening
to
the
other
case,
I
did
look
it
up
online.
It's
a
it's,
a
very
nice
building
and
to
answer
your
question
chair
Anderson.
It
is
a
four
unit
up
down.
So
it's
a
it's!
It's
a
it's
a
four
flex.
It's
not
a
it's!
Not
a
house!
I
did
look
at
the
interior
photos.
It's
an
extremely
good
shape
and
rents
are
around
1,400.
So,
although
I
I
think
that
it's
it's
pushing
the
market
value
I
think
that
perhaps
it
will
sustain
the
new
value.
D
B
C
G
E
E
I
guess
that
I
have
a
comment
on
4501
Washburn,
Avenue
South,
based
on
the
location.
It
is
an
extremely
desirable
location,
he's
correct.
It's
it's.
A
wonderful
place
to
live.
I
do
know
that
the
sales
in
that
area
have
been
mostly
for
land
value.
He
does
have
a
duplex,
so
I
think
the
the
new
value
of
six
hundred
and
fifty-three
thousand
for
that
area
is
substantiated.
So
that's
just
a
comment
at
this
point.
Thank
you.
B
B
He
did
not
provide
overwhelming
evidence.
The
comparable
duplex
sale
over
on
Grand
Avenue
is
a
completely
different,
neighborhood
and
Kingfield.
On
the
other
side,
the
lake
and
quite
a
distance
away,
I
know
there's
other
sales
closer
by
that
could
have
been
better
suited
for
this
work
memory:
tour
Barbara
Sabich:
do
you
have
any
other
additional
comments
or
questions?
Well,.
D
E
F
G
N
Yes
sure
Anderson.
Thank
you
very
much
for
giving
me
this
time.
As
you
know,
we
have
been
discussing
the
scheduling
of
the
remaining
cases
we
have
scheduled
through
tomorrow.
You
have
two
sessions.
You
have
9:00
a.m.
until
12:30
tomorrow
morning,
and
then
you
have
from
4:00
to
7:00
p.m.
tomorrow
evening
at
the
conclusion
of
7:00
at
7:00
p.m.
tomorrow.
You
will
have
75
cases
remaining
by
my
count,
and
so
we
have
been
discussing
with
the
Department
of
Revenue
and
our
other
partners
and
staff
here
and
at
the
clerk's
office,
our
IT
resources
and
communications
resources.
N
How
to
best
accomplish
this,
and
so
state
statute
dictates
that
the
local
board
must
adjourn
by
May
31st,
due
to
next
week,
the
week
of
May
25th
being
a
council
City
Council
off
week.
The
local
board
is
not
able
to
reconvene
next
week
and
will
need
to
adjourn
by
May
24
by
May
21st.
So
that's
Thursday.
N
So
for
these
reasons,
we're
asking
the
board
for
something
action
as
to
how
you
would
like
to
handle
the
remaining
75
cases.
My
recommendation
at
this
point
after
discussing
with
the
Department
of
Revenue,
is
to
process
the
remaining
75
cases
as
write-ins
and
I.
We
could
notify
all
of
these
appellant
that,
rather
than
calling
in
they
will
be
heard
via
writing
all
the
materials
that
they've
already
provided
for
you
that
we
have
sent
out
to
you
and
then
they
would
be
notified
of
your
decision.
When
you
adjourn.
B
N
G
B
N
B
E
B
B
They
are
I
believe
residential
properties,
but
again
he
provided
no
comparable
sales,
just
a
general
overview
and
has
created
metrics
to
explain
why
his
properties
were
overvalued.
So
there's
a
general
lack
of
information
to
make
any
direct
comparisons
to
any
other
recent
sales
or
any
other
options.
Okay,.