►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
the
regular
meeting
of
the
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
for
today,
which
is
october
20th
2020,
I'm
lisa
goodman
I'll,
be
chairing
the
committee
today.
As
we
begin
I'll
note
for
the
record.
This
meeting
has
remote
participation
from
members
of
the
city,
council
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13d
.021
as
a
result
of
the
declared
local
public
health
emergency
at
this
time,
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
the
meeting
house.
C
B
Present,
let
the
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum
the
agenda
for
days.
Today's
meeting
is
in
front
of
us
I'll
begin
with
the
consent
agenda,
which
includes
items
8
through
21
on
the
agenda
item
number:
eight:
are
the
liquor
license
approvals
and
item
number?
Nine?
Are
the
gambling
license
approvals
item?
10?
Are
business
operating
conditions
for
interstate
parking
at
126th
street
item
number.
12
is
two
projects
that
hennepin
county
redevelopment
authority
is
moving
forward
at
5637,
lindale
avenue,
south
and
143
19th
street
east.
B
This
is
granting
approval
for
the
authority
to
undertake
these
two
projects
in
the
city.
Item
number
13
is
a
long
list
of
applications
for
environmental
grant.
Funding
for
the
fall,
2020
brownfield
grant
round.
Item
number
14
is
grant
applications
for
the
met
councils,
livable
communities,
demonstration
account
program
and
there's
a
long
list
of
those
as
well
item.
15
is
a
similar
thing.
It's
a
great
streets
gap,
cap
financing,
I'm
sorry,
it's
not
similar.
B
It's
the
great
streets
gap,
fine
financing,
loan,
restructure
for
catalyst,
five
points
at
2119,
west
broadway
and
2310
and
2312
penn
avenue
item
13
is
an
alley
vacation
for
lake
street
developers.
For
a
project
at
514,
516
and
520
west
lake
street
item
17
are
revisions
to
our
4d,
affordable
housing
incentive
program.
This
is
essentially
to
allow
single
family
homes
to
be
enrolled.
B
In
the
program
item
number
18
is
an
mou
with
hennepin
county
and
the
public
housing
authority
and
the
public
schools
relating
to
stable
homes,
stable
schools,
initiative,
item
number
19
is
the
west
broadway
curve,
affordable
housing
project
bond
issuance
item
20
is
the
west
broadway
curve
tax,
increment
financing
plan
and
item
21
is
a
referral
to
staff
in
21.
1
21
2
has
been
removed
as
it
had
already
been
referred.
F
G
C
H
B
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
committee
members,
I'm
enrique
velazquez
manager
of
licenses
and
consumer
services
presenting
an
application
from
brother
justice,
whiskey
company
located
at
3300
fifth
street
northeast
in
ward
one.
This
report
was
prepared
by
inspector
christina
steester
the
applicants
requesting
an
on
sale
cocktail,
room,
limited
entertainment
with
sunday
sales
and
off
sale,
distilled
spirits
license
brother
justice.
Whiskey
company
will
be
moving
their
off
sales.
Spirits
license
from
451
taft
street
northeast
where
they've
been
operating
since
2017
to
the
new
location
at
3300
fifth
street
northeast.
I
The
proposed
hours
of
operation
are
both
interior
and
exterior
from
4
pm
to
10
pm
daily
they'll
have
indoor
seating
for
94
and
outdoor
seating
for
56
on
the
patio
private
patio
space
on
september,
28th,
six
public
hearing
notices
were
sent
to
residents
and
property
owners
within
600
feet
of
the
premises.
Notices
were
also
sent
to
the
columbia
park,
neighborhood
association,
the
northeast
chamber
of
commerce
and
councilmember
reich.
We
received
one
response
in
support
of
the
hours
of
operation.
I
This
responded
also
requested
that
the
business
direct
exiting
patron
traffic
away
from
the
residential
neighborhood
and
that
delivery
vehicles
are
also
diverted
away
from
the
rail
bridge
north
of
the
business.
Their
facility
will
be
housed
in
a
renovated
charter
school
located
in
an
industrial
area.
There
have
been
no
recent
police
calls
for
service
nor
311
complaints
regarding
this
area.
I
The
licenses
and
consumer
services
division
recommends
approval
for
non-sale
liquor,
cocktail,
room,
limited
entertainment
with
sunday
sales
and
off
sale,
distilled
spirits
license
for
brother
justice,
whiskey
company.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
at
this
time,
I'll
stand
for
any
comments
or
questions.
B
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
for
mr
velasquez
on
item
number
one
seeing
none
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
open
the
public
hearing
and
see
if
there
are
any
speakers
in
queue
I
see
the
applicant
is
in
queue.
That
would
be
mr
steger.
If
you're
on,
you
are
welcome
to
press
star
six
to
unmight
unmute
your
microphone
and.
J
Speak
hi:
everybody.
Can
you
hear
me?
We
can
sir
excellent
thank
you
councilmember
goodman,
council
and
committee
members.
I
appreciate
the
work
done
by
staff
in
working
with
us
to
prepare
our
applications
to
make
sure
that
they're,
complete
and
thorough
and
for
their
recommendation
for
approval.
Brother
justice
was
a
real
historical,
minnesota
monk.
He
believed
great
whiskey
could
help
good
people
in
hurting
communities,
make
it
through
hard
times
and
during
prohibition.
He
helped
minnesota
farmers
make
world-class
moonshine,
so
they
could
put
food
on
the
family
table.
J
K
J
And
always,
and
therefore
that's
why
I'm
here
today
to
make
sure
that
we
have
obtained
all
the
permits
and
licenses
to
operate
under
minnesota
and
minneapolis
distillery
law
we
have.
As
mentioned,
we
already
have
a
licensed
micro
distillery
and
we've
been
operating
in
our
literally
underground
but
legally
above
board,
a
mini
distillery
at
451
cass
street
in
ward,
one
for
five
years
and
we've
been
operating
under
our
official
license
for
three
years
and
we've
spent
that
time
and
done
it.
J
That
way,
so
we
could
master
our
whiskey
craft
and
really
and
innovate
new
ways
to
feature
minnesota
sourced
ingredients
like
white
oak,
from
todd
county
barrels
from
stearns,
county
and
pete
from
aitkin
county,
and
that's
because
our
dream
is
really
to
help
put
minnesota
whiskey
on
the
national
and
world
whiskey
map.
We've
also
used
this
time
to
find
ways
to
help
our
community
and
our
neighbors.
J
Although
we
have
been
minnesota's
smallest
micro
distillery
and
virtually
invisible,
because
we
don't
have
a
cocktail
room,
we
still
have
contributed
more
than
one
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
local
organizations
through
in-kind
contributions,
supporting
healthcare
housing
education
for
folks
who
are
struggling.
Our
in-kind
contributions
have
raised
over
raised
twenty
seven
thousand
dollars
at
live
action
for
habitat
for
humanity
in
2019,
for
example,
which
is.
F
J
Than
I'm
not,
you
know,
we
don't
brag
here,
but
more
than
offerings
donated
by
delta
and
polaris
so
and
when
cobit
hit,
we
partnered
with
tattersall
and
dunord
and
hyvee
london,
byerlys
and
others
to
make
all
hands
sanitizer
give
it
away
to
local
congress
care
communities
over
a
hundred
thousand
gallons
of
it
and
then
contribute
proceeds
to
second
harvest
heartland
and
through
it
all,
we
have
absolutely
remained
committed
to
growing
in
minneapolis
and
specifically
north
minneapolis,
and
we
have
gone
this.
J
I've
gone
on
despite
kovid,
to
push
to
open
our
new
micro
distillery
and
open
up
our
cocktail
open
up
a
cocktail
room
for
the
first
time
in
our
five
year
history,
the
industry
has
been
shut
down
and
burned
down
for
a
lot
of
folks
but
being
in
touch
with
other
distillers,
restaurateurs
cocktail.
Folks,
all
of
us
are
committed
to
working
together
to
build
something
just
and
humane.
In
its
ashes,
our
cocktail
room
is
going
to
be
accessible.
J
All
of
this
is
designed
not
because
we
think
you
know,
because
we
just
want
to
bring
the
best
of
excellence
in
our
communities,
to
many
politicians,
to
people
in
our
state
and
give
people
a
high
quality
moment
of
peace
and
respite
and
being
cared
for
in
our
cocktail
room.
Happy
to
answer
any
specific
questions
I
want
to.
Let
you
know
where
we're
coming
from
and
what
we're
intending.
J
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
in
moving
this
item
forward,
I
will
vouch
for
my
my
colleagues
that
not
only
clearly
from
the
testimony
are
they
committed
to
community
in
so
many
ways
and
very
intentionally
they
make
really
good
product,
so
I
can
vouch
for
that
and
in
addition,
they're
not
just
a
you
know,
makers
of
product,
I
know
they're
curators
of
experience
and
the
mindfulness
that
they
have
for
others
and
all
the
things
that
they
do.
D
B
Okay,
so
council
member
reich,
has
moved
approval
of
this
item.
I
do
want
to
note
that
council
member
gordon
is
present
for
the
record
and
would
like
to
vote
on
this
item
and
so
on.
Council
member
reich's
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role,
because.
F
C
L
H
M
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
you
have
before
you
a
request
to
pass
a
resolution
adopting
loving
and
adopting
the
assessment
role
for
pace
financing
in
the
amount
of
three
hundred
eighteen
thousand,
seven
hundred
and
seven
dollars
for
energy
efficiency,
improvements
and
equipment.
At
thirty
one,
thirty,
six
minnehaha
avenue
3136
minnehaha
is
a
new
construction,
18
unit
apartment,
complex
planning,
the
install
of
solar
panels,
energy
efficient
hvac
system,
upgraded
windows,
led
lighting
and
related
equipment.
The
total
cost
of
the
improvements
are
three
hundred
eighteen
thousand
seven
hundred
and
seven
dollars.
M
St
paul
port
authority
has
approved
financing
which
will
be
paid
back
over
a
term
of
15
years.
The
energy
efficiency
upgrades
will
result
in
an
estimated
20
year
utility
savings
of
337
40.,
and
do
you
have
any
questions
about
this
project?
Thank.
C
F
C
F
H
C
H
B
M
Next
request
before
you
is
for
the
passage
of
resolution
adopting
the
assessment,
levying
the
assessment
and
adopting
the
assessment
role
for
pace
energy
financing
in
the
amount
of
three
hundred
thirty
one
thousand
four
hundred.
Seventy
five
dollars
for
a
solar
project
for
minneapolis
stone,
arch
apartments
llc,
the
project
is
located
at
701
southeast
main
street
saint
paul
port
authority
has
approved
the
financing
for
the
solar
install
at
701
southeast
main
street,
and
they
will
be
paying
back
over
a
term
of
20
years,
starting
in
2021.
B
L
F
B
M
Final
pace
request
is
for
the
passage
of
resolution,
adopting
the
assessment,
levying
the
assessment
and
adopting
the
assessment
role
for
pace
energy
financing
in
the
amount
of
two
hundred
eighty
six
thousand
six
hundred
thirty
five
dollars
for
a
solar
project
for
minneapolis
stone,
arch
apartments
at
601,
southeast
main
street.
The
601
building
is
installing
an
additional
solar
rooftop
array.
Saint
paul
port
authority
has
approved
the
financing
and
install
at
601
southeast
main
street
of
286
thousand
six
hundred
thirty
five
dollars
to
be
paid
back
over
a
term
of
20
years,
starting
in
2021.
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I'm
happy
to
move
this
item
for
approval.
B
C
F
C
F
H
B
Six
eyes
that
carries
and
that
motion
is
approved,
but
I
do
want
to
thank
michael
for
all
of
her
work
on
these
items
and
bringing
them
forward
today.
I'll
then
move
on
to
item
number
five,
which
is
an
interim
use
permit
by
michael
noonan,
for
a
project
at
143
19th
street
east.
This
is
an
interim
use
permit
to
allow
an
intentional
community
cluster
within
the
existing
building
at
the
above
location,
ms
holleen,
I
would
invite
you
to
give
a
report.
O
Good
afternoon,
chair
goodman
and
committee
members,
the
application
before
you,
oh
I'll,
wait
for
the
presentation
there
we
go
the
application
before
you
is
an
intentional
community
cluster
development
proposed
by
the
hennepin
county
housing
redevelopment
authority.
O
O
You
can
go
one
more.
The
hennepin
county
housing
redevelopment
authority
is
proposing
an
intentional
community
cluster
development.
As
you
may
know,
this
is
a
relatively
new
use
in
the
zoning
code
and
the
only
use
category
that
currently
allows
for
individual
rooming
units.
This
is
a
use
that
was
allowed
through
a
text
amendment
in
2019
and
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
this
is
the
first
use
of
the
intentional
community
cluster
development
tool.
O
O
O
The
building
will
include
a
central
kitchen
for
the
use
of
all
residents
living
space
on
each
floor
and
storage
space
within
the
lower
level,
as
well
as
within
each
individual
rooming
unit
and
residents
will
have
individual
rooming
units
and
will
cooperatively
manage
the
building
next
slide.
Please,
I
think
the
remaining
slides
are
generally
just
pictures
of
the
building
that
I,
if
you
would
slowly
page
through,
as
I
finished
speaking
here,
that'd
be
great.
O
Intentional
community
cluster
developments
are
subject
to
20
specific
development
standards.
The
staff
was
able
to
do
an
analysis
of
all
20
specific
development
standards
with
the
materials
provided
by
the
applicant.
The
proposed
use
complies
with
all
of
those
specific
development
standards.
With
the
exception
of
the
bike
parking
requirement,
the
applicant
has
requested
an
exception
to
the
bike.
Parking
requirement
and
staff
is
recommending
that
we
partially
grant
that
exception,
with
a
condition
of
approval
related
to
providing
some
bike
parking
on
site
staff
was
able
to
make
all
of
the
required
conditional
use.
O
Permit
findings
that
apply
to
interim
use
permits
and
with
that
we
are
recommending
approval
with
the
stated
conditions
in
the
staff
report,
including
the
one
related
to
bike
parking.
I
believe
hennepin
county
has
j
michael
noonan,
registered
to
speak
today,
so
he
can
answer
any
questions,
and
I
will
also
stand
for
questions
at
this
time.
Thank.
B
You
very
much
for
your
report.
Miss
holleen,
we'll
see
if
there
are
any
questions
from
members
of
the
committee
on
this
item
number
five,
seeing
none,
I'm
going
to
proceed
to
open
the
public
hearing.
I
see
there
are
five
four
or
five
people
signed
up,
including
mr
noonan,
and
a
few
others
from
the
county,
we'll
see
if
any
of
them
would
like
to
speak.
Should
you
like
to
you
just
press
star
six
to
unmute
your.
B
P
I
just
will
introduce
myself
and
say
we
agree
with
the
presentation
and
the
conditions
and
we're
happy
to
advance
this
and
to
provide
for
much
needed
housing
for
a
dedicated
population.
Our
goal
is
to
conclude
the
transaction
with
volunteers
of
america
very
shortly
and
to
begin
to
house
individuals
before
the
end
of
the
year.
With
that
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
B
Q
Package,
but
I'm
actually
in
for
a
different
I'm
here
for
the
grand
street,
okay.
R
B
Okay
sing,
not
thank
you
for
being
on
the
call
today
miss
geffen,
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
call
on
councilmember
osman.
S
Oh,
thank
you,
tur
goodman.
I
wanted
to
mention
that
this
kind
of
project
is
very
important
for
here
in
minneapolis
in
ward
6..
S
I
do
want
to
thank
the
county
staff
and
that
are
really
taking
this
and
and
making
a
difference
for
people's
lives.
S
This
we
are
in
a
coveted
situation
as-
and
you
know,
people
that
are
that
are
that
have
affect
especially
homeless
population,
that
we
have
are
the
most
affected
populations
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
providing,
and
you
know
a
place
they
can
they
can
be,
and
if
we
have
this
space
for
it,
I
would
encourage
my
colleagues
and
everyone
to
really
take
apart
and
make
this
kind
of
process
easier
for
the
developers
and
the
county,
and
we
welcome
projects
like
this
in
our
world,
and
I
do
like
to
move
this
item
for
approval.
L
Well,
I'm
really
delighted
to
support
this
motion.
I
know,
madam
chair,
that
you
and
I
worked
on
the
intentional
communities
ordinance
quite
a
bit,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
county
and
I
think
also
the
city
staff
and
everybody
who
works
together
to
make
sure
we
can
find
a
pathway
forward
for
this
kind
of
project.
Here.
L
It's
interesting
that
when
you
look
at
it,
it
looks
a
little
bit
like
a
single
room,
occupancy
rooming
house
concept,
and
I
think
that
that
it
shows
how
those
concepts
could
work
and
and
not
every
every
use
is
going
to
qualify
as
an
intentional
community
either.
So
I
think
it's
important
that
we
create
more
tools
even
and
I'm.
This
is
going
to
be
a
great
model
for
us
to
look
at,
and
I
know
a
year
or
two
from
now
we're
going
to
look
back
and
say:
look,
it
was
100
successful.
L
It
had
the
right
number
of
partners
and
it's
been
managed
really
well,
and
so
I'm
delighted
to
see
it
coming
forward
and
that
we
are
able
to
have
the
rules
and
regulations
in
place
to
easily
approve
this,
because
it
fits
with
our
policies
and
all
the
regulations
that
we
have.
So.
Thank
you
so
much.
B
Thank
you,
councilmember
gordon.
I
concur
with
everything
you
said
and
I
will
note
the
bridge
for
youth
did
do
an
intentional
community,
maybe
not
a
cluster
development,
but
that
was
the
first
one
out
of
the
gate.
So
we're
really
happy
about
that
as
well.
Is
there
anyone
else
who
would
like
to
speak
to
council
member
osman's
motion
seeing
none
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
on
item
number
five.
F
C
F
C
F
H
B
That
item
carries
and
the
motion
is
approved,
we're
now
moving
on
to
our
quasi-judicial
public
hearing
portion
of
the
agenda.
There
are
two
items
on
our
agenda
this
morning.
Item
number
six
and
item
number:
seven
I'll
note
we'll
take
six
first,
but
I
do
want
to
note
because
I
know
there
are
a
number
of
people
on
the
call
that
item
number
seven
is
going
to
have
a
presentation
and
a
public
hearing.
But
the
intention
is
to
postpone
it
in
committee
today.
B
So
if
you
would
rather
speak
at
the
next
meeting
where
this
comes
up,
you
do
not
need
to
speak
today,
but
you
are
welcome
to
do
so
and
we'll
start
with
item
number
six,
which
is
a
variance
appeal
by
the
marshall
terrace
neighborhood
organization,
for
a
project
at
2911
grand
street
north
east,
and
I
will
ask
mr
crandall
to
give
his.
T
T
T
The
amendment
request
concerns
primarily
a
change
to
the
proposed
height
of
the
new
structure.
Under
the
original
applications,
the
applicant
had
been
proposing
a
two-story
structure.
Their
amended
request
includes
increasing
the
height
of
the
proposed
structure
to
three
stories,
which
necessitates
both
a
conditional
use
permit
to
exceed
the
maximum
height
for
a
cluster
development
in
the
r5
zoning
district,
from
2.5
stories
to
three
stories
and
an
additional
variance
to
the
rear
yard
setback
from
nine
feet
to
seven
feet
under
the
previous
application.
T
This
the
proposal
was
conforming
to
the
zoning
code
at
a
seven
foot
setback,
but
the
additional
height
is
what
necessitates
that
increase
from
seven
to
nine.
So
the
variance
before
you
primarily
concerns
that
rear
yard
setback.
We
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
and
one
more.
T
This
is
the
site
plan
showing
the
existing
duplex
on
the
site
and
then
the
proposed
new
structure
at
the
rear
of
the
site.
So
the
the
variance
that
we're
discussing
today
concerns
the
setback
between
the
new
proposed
structure
and
the
rear
property
line
and
again
that's
a
variance
to
reduce
that
setback
from
nine
feet
to
seven
feet
next
slide,
and
then
these
are
just
some
elevations
of
the
proposed
three-story
structure
under
the
revised
application.
T
B
Seeing
none
I'm
going
to
proceed
to
open
the
public
hearing
with
this
type
of
hearing
we
give
the
appellant
an
opportunity
to
make
their
case
first.
Is
there
a
representative
from
the
marshall
terrace
neighborhood
organization,
on
the
call
to
speak
to
this
appeal?
I
believe
mary
mcguire
is
on
the
call.
Q
Q
Any
of
the
meetings
had
we
known
about
this
request
to
rezone
from
the
r2b
to
the
r5
with
the
additional
units,
we
would
have
strongly
objected
and
we
would
have
been
on
this
a
lot
sooner.
So
our
letter
that
we
previously
sent
also
has
additional
concerns
regarding
the
parking,
a
lack
of
goods
and
services
corridor
and
the
water
and
sewer
issues.
B
U
Great
yeah,
so
I'm
the
I'm
the
manager
of
ckmj
holdings
too.
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
council,
member
goodman
and
the
rest
of
the
council,
members
and
staff
for
for
taking
the
the
time
and
for
considering
the
project
in
broader
context,
as
we
kind
of
sort
through
these
types
of
incremental
infill
developments
that
that
I'm
hoping
that
we
do
see
more
of
coming
out
of
the
the
new
comprehensive
plan.
So
I
I
think
peter
did
a
great
job
of
kind
of
speaking
to
some
of
the
specifics
on
the
site.
U
So
I'd
just
like
to,
in
terms
of
my
request
to
uphold
the
september
21st
planning
commission
decision
to
approve
the
the
height
condition,
use
permit
and
two-foot
rear
setback
variants
just
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
context
on
my
project
goals
and
how
I
think
it
aligns
with
the
city's
overall
objectives
and
the
community's
objectives,
as
it
relates
to
the
mini
the
comprehensive
plan
so
specifically
related
to
the
project
goals
that
we
have,
unlike
most
developers,
we're
not
exclusively
or
even
primarily,
focused
on
some
financial
return
for
this
project.
U
I'm
I'm
actually
very
personally
motivated
just
as
much
by
improving
the
urban
fabric
of
our
city,
I'm
a
really
strong
supporter
of
of
what
we're
doing
with
minneapolis
2040,
adding
incremental
density
in
a
way
that
blends
with
the
existing
neighborhood,
I
think,
is
really
is
important
and
valuable,
as
we
kind
of
shift
towards
addressing
the
overall
housing
shortage
that
we
have.
U
So
I
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
the
approach
that
we're
taking
with
this
proposed
project-
that's
now
kind
of
under
appeal-
is
explicitly
sacrificing
financial
return
to
accomplish
some
of
those
broader
share
goals
with
an
8
000,
roughly
8,
000
square
foot,
lot
designated
corridor
3
and
located
in
a
high
frequency
bus
line.
The
simplest
and
most
lucrative
thing
for
a
normal
developer
to
do
would
just
be
to
tear
down
the
duplex
and
build
kind
of
a
monolithic,
three-story
multi-family
building.
U
Keeping
the
duplex
will
also
reduce
the
carbon
footprint
of
the
project
overall
and
enhance
the
continuity
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
In
my
view,
and
so
on
that
first
point,
you
know,
the
embodied
carbon
in
the
construction
of
the
duplex
has
already
been
emitted.
It's
it's
already
accounted
for,
and
so
avoiding
demolishing
that
duplex
and
replacing
those
units
with
new
construction
significantly
reduces
the
per
unit
carbon
tally
of
my
overall
project.
U
Secondly,
related
to
enhancing
continuity
with
character,
the
neighborhood,
the
new
building
is
it's
of
a
similar
footprint
and
size
as
the
existing
duplex
and
finishes
as
well.
The
height
and
finishes
are,
are
nearly
the
same
and
it's
tucked
behind
the
existing
duplex.
So
the
new
building
really
will
be
not
more
than
barely
visible
from
any
of
the
surrounding
streets,
which
are
grand
29th
avenue
in
california
because
it
will
be
obstructed
by
the
existing
buildings
and
also
by
very
large
silver
maple
on
the
site
that
we're
going
to
preserve
as
part
of
this
project.
U
The
proposed
six
unit
building
is
designed
and
built
with
low
carbon
materials
into
a
very
high
energy
efficiency
standard
as
well-
and
I
think
it's
important
to
share
this
detail
because
the
the
site
is
located
in
a
designated
green
zone.
So
addition
and
beyond
those
details,
all
the
heating,
cooling
appliances,
everything
is
going
to
be
run
with
electricity,
the
building
will
be
exclusively
electrified
and
it
will
also
be
equipped
with
a
maximum
size,
solar
array
allowable
by
xl
energy.
So
it's
going
to
be
close
to
net
zero
operationally
once
it's
once
it's
built.
F
U
This
current
slab
on
grade
design
in,
in
my
view,
enhances
livability
and
equity
for
disabled
tenants
relative
to
that
two
and
a
half
story,
design
which
would
require
a
lift
on
the
exterior
and
kind
of
a
longer
and
separate
type
of
entrance
to
the
building.
And
you
know
I
think
the
last
key
thing
is
with
this
slab
on
grade
design.
It.
U
It
also
all
of
the
all
six
of
the
units
that
we're
adding
to
the
site
are
projected
to
rent
at
one
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
per
month
for
a
one
bed
which
is
less
than
the
maximum
deemed
affordable
at
sixty
percent
of
ami.
U
So
I
I
think,
in
terms
of
the
broader
land
use,
application
and
appeal
context.
You
know
I
wanted
to
let
let
all
of
you
know
in
the
community
as
well
know
why
we
kind
of
went
back
to
back
to
the
drawing
board
after
getting
an
initial
approval
for
a
two
and
a
half
story.
Building
that
is
basically
identical
to
this,
except
it's
a
half
story
sunk
into
the
ground,
so
that
original
building
that
it
was
two
and
a
half
stories.
U
U
This
also
has
other
benefits,
so
there's
the
carbon
reduction,
because
there's
not
a
full
basement,
so
there's
less
concrete,
which
is
the
most
carbon
intensive
material
in
construction
livability,
is
better
because
there's
no
basement
units
and
in
terms
of
equity
for
disabled
tenants,
there's
benefits
there
as
well.
That
I
already
mentioned.
B
U
U
U
U
Conclude,
yes,
I
I
appreciate
it
yep,
so
I
I
guess
you
know
in
some
in
terms
of
the
the
height
variance
there's
a
there's
nuance
here.
U
My
the
proposed
three-story
building
is
only
actually
three
feet
taller
than
the
original
two
and
a
half
story
design,
and
you
know,
in
terms
of
the
actual
setback
fully.
Twenty
percent
of
the
building
is
going
to
be
nine
feet
or
more
from
the
rear
lot
line,
and
only
the
southeast
corner
will
be
seven
feet
from
the
rear
lot
line,
which
is
why
the
variance
was
needed
and
it's
going
to
be
a
significant
increase
from
the
current
status
quo,
which
is
the
non-conforming
garage.
U
U
You
know
a
statement
to
that
to
that
end,
so
I
guess
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
share
a
bit
of
that
broader
context
with
you
and
the
marshall
terrace
community
organization,
and
would
it
be
happy
to
meet
with
them.
After
all,
this
is
over
as
well
to
talk
a
bit
more
about
the
project,
so
with
that
I'll
stop.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You,
mr
fisher
I'll,
now
open
the
public
hearing
to
other
members
of
the
public
who
would
like
to
speak
to
this
item.
I
see
there
are
a
number
of
people
signed
up.
I
would
ask
you
to
keep
your
comments
to
two
minutes.
The
clerk
will
have
a
buzzer
which
will
allow
you
to
know
when
your
two
minutes
is
up.
If
you
are
unable
to
have
it
timed
yourself,
we'll
start
with
jim
lindbergh.
F
I
am
on
the
line,
I
am
the
architect
for
the
project
with
cody
and
I
have
no
further
comments.
But
if
there's
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer.
B
V
Great,
I
live
at
3001
grand
street
less
than
a
block
from
this
property,
and
I
am
not
only
the
community
coordinator
for
marshall
terrace,
but
I'm
also
speaking
behalf
today
as
a
resident
and
kind
of
be
the
voice
for
some
of
the
surrounding
residents
at
this
property
that
cannot
attend
this
meeting.
V
I
want
to
make
a
few
comments
to
cody
fisher's
what
he
was
saying
when
he
took
a
seven
foot
variance
that
needs
to
be
approved,
he's
not
explaining
that
there's,
actually
a
telephone
line
that
where
the
seven
foot
variance
is
going
to
be,
which
includes
three
of
the
units.
Three
of
the
properties
that
have
electrical
running
from
this
line,
there's
also
a
street
lamp
on
there
and
so
moving.
V
This
back
to
a
seven
foot
is
really
going
to
impact
this
telephone
pole
and
based
on
the
windows
and
the
things
for
a
cluster
development
and
the
back
of
this
property
they're
going
to
be
looking
at
a
dead
set
of
garages
and
for
his
comment
about
the
the
middle
of
the
resident
directly
behind
there.
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
see
that
submit
metal
comment
letter,
because
I've
talked
to
all
the
residents
in
that
neighborhood,
and
I
know
that
the
neighbor
behind
him
is
not
in
favor
of
this
property.
V
There's
another
issue
that
I've
seen
that
the
september
21st
cpap
staff
report
was
not
included
in
today's
agenda
and
on
that
it
specifically
shows
that
the
setback,
the
the
dimensions
that
they're
asking
to
go
to
for
the
three
foot
also
is
widening
the
length
and
the
width
of
this
building,
and
it
now
is
also
lessening
the
lot
from
the
existing
building
to
the
new
building
from
9.9
down
to
7.9,
which
I
can't
even
believe
that
they
are
eliminating
adhd
and
the
handicap.
V
So
if
there
is
staircases
on
this
on
even
on
this
new
site
plan,
I
I
would
like
to
know
how
that
makes
that
accessible.
They
also
talk
about
their
the
trees
and
other
residents.
Other
areas
not
seeing
this
development.
Yes,
they
will,
they
will
see
it
out
for
29..
V
My
most
important
thing
is
when
you
look
at
the
minneapolis
zoning
code
536.20
for
cluster
development,
which
I
clearly
understand
is
new.
If
you
look
at
this
plan,
it
says
that
it's
not
supposed
to
have
less
than
40
percent
of
designated
common
space
for
the
benefit
of
the
residents
of
this
development.
V
If
you
look
at
this
plan,
it
cannot
include
half
of
their
driveway
their
bike,
their
bike
or
their
garage
enclosure,
and
so
my
concern
is
how
are
they
getting
40
feet
of
40
percent
of
common
space
for
this
property?
V
There's
no
safety
factors,
there's
a
driveway
to
this
property
that
I
understand
that
if
a
a
staircase
has
to
be
30
inches
to
have
to
have
a
railing,
there's
no
safety
factors,
lighting
handicap
accessibility,
railing
for
this
driveway,
which
is
their
main
access
to
this
cluster
unit,
and
my
other
maintenance.
B
V
Yep
I
if
I
got
one
more
thing-
and
I
know
this
isn't
pertaining
to
this,
but
ckmj
holding
has
been
the
current
owner
of
this
property
for
over
two
years.
The
owners
have
not
shown
they've
shown
an
unsightly
upkeep
of
this
property,
as
absentee
landlord.
I'm
concerned
that
the
deterioration
of
this
property
will
continue.
B
You
for
your
testimony
I
have
is
mr
logan
zink
zick
on
the
call
I
believe
he
sent
a
letter,
but
I
just
want
to
give
him
an
opportunity
if
he's
on
the
call
to
speak,
and
if
you
are
please
press
star,
six
we'll
also
see,
if
there's
anyone
else
that
hasn't
had
an
opportunity
to
speak.
That
is
on
the
call
that
would
like
to
testify.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
clearly
there's
a
lot
of
merit
to
the
project
proposal
and
a
fair
amount
of
thoughtfulness
in
terms
of
city
policy
objectives
that
have
been
baked
into
the
proposal,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
issues
and
concerns
that
that
have
not
been
worked
out
with
community
that,
I
think,
also
have
some
merit
and
certainly
could
have
been
explored
if
the
process
by
which
there's
a
an
iteration
and
presentation
with
community
and
stakeholders,
could
have
taken
place
in
advance
of
this
meeting,
I
appreciate
the
offer
of
the
developer
to
meet
with
neighbors
post-facto,
but
a
lot
of
the
utility
of
that
interface
will
be
lost
with
an
approved
project.
D
I
certainly
do
not
question
our
ability
to
do
cluster
developments,
I'm
very
much
in
favor
of
that,
and
certainly
it
serves
a
lot
of
our
newer
concepts
in
terms
of
homeless,
transitional
and
deeply
affordable
housing
concepts.
Actually,
our
previous
project
that
we
approved
in
this
meeting
certainly
underscores
that,
even
though
there
may
be
some
current
nods
to
energy
efficiency.
Potentially,
I
don't
know
if
we
have
a
measure
of
that
on
paper
in
terms
of
an
identifiable
third
party
standard.
D
So
we
don't
really
have
those
trade-offs,
and
I
know
because
I'm
in
the
work
group
with
my
other
colleagues
that
are
on
this
committee-
that
when
you
want
to
go
above
and
beyond,
what's
granted
by
wright,
there's
a
a
very
deep
policy
discussion
that
we're
currently
having
in
terms
of
how
we
implement
2040
moving
forward.
To
what
degree
do
we
want
to
have
cert
certainty
in
certain
other
policy
objectives
in
exchange
for
going
outside
of
what's
required
and
what
is
allowed
on
the
books?
D
And
so
with
that
I
know
you
could
definitely
get
to
yes
with
a
project
like
this
in
a
community
that
I
know
and
several
other
very
dense
and
supportive,
affordable
projects
that
they've
co-created
and
approved
that
we
could
get
there.
But
at
this
point
in
time
I
just
I'm
hesitant
to
to
in
advance
of
having
set
goals
of
what
trade-offs
we
can
expect
and
in
absence
of
community
involvement,
where
we
could
kind
of
tweak
these
little
issues
into
a
yes,
a
collective.
D
Yes,
at
this
point
in
time,
based
on
that
and
based
on
the
typical
notion
that
we
do
use
in
terms
of
when
you
have
a
large
sort
of
zoning
use
like
the
larger
apartment
across
the
street
and
it
steps
down
into
a
single
story,
sort
of
situation
that
we
typically
don't
go
up,
we
go
down.
D
B
So
council
member
reich
has
recommended
to
grant
the
appeal
I'll
call
on
council
member
schrader.
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
agree
with
council
member
reich
that
there's
a
lot
of
merits
to
this,
and
it
is
disappointing
that
the
that
many
of
the
issues
couldn't
be
worked
out.
I
will
be
supporting
council
member
reich's
motion,
but
I
this
was
something
I
saw
through
planning
commission
that
you
know
it
is
a
good
project
and
I
think
that
I
would
hope
that
we
can
work
more
proactively
to
make
sure
good
projects
get
through.
F
H
B
Also,
thank
you.
I
also
want
to
note
for
the
record
that
I
would
like
the
staff
to
make
findings
to
support
the
recommendation
to
grant
the
appeal.
Please.
O
I
just
yes
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
make
one
clarifying
comment
on
the
public
record.
While
we
have
members
of
the
neighborhood
and
other
interested
parties
on
the
call.
This
is
the
second
round
of
approvals
for
this
project.
So
the
original
round
of
approvals
that
went
to
the
city
planning
commission
in
june
were
approved
and
not
appealed,
and
so
those
approvals
for
the
two
and
a
half
story.
Version
of
this
project
are
final,
and
so
it
is
still
possible
for
that
version
of
this
project
to
be
constructed.
O
It's
the
denial
of
the
three-story
projects
before
you
today,
but
I
just
wanted
that
to
be
on
the
record,
so
it's
transparent
for
the
public.
B
B
I
am
going
to
ask
for
a
brief
presentation
and
we
are
going
to
open
the
public
hearing,
because
this
has
been
noticed
today,
but
I
do
want
to
note
for
members
of
the
public
who
have
signed
on
that
this
will
be
postponed
and
the
public
hearing
will
be
continued.
So
if
you
would
like
to
speak
today,
you
are
welcome
to
do
so.
If
you'd
like
to
hold
your
comments
until
this
comes
back,
you
are
welcome
to
do
that
as
well.
B
W
Good
afternoon,
chair
goodman,
so
this
is
2025
west
river
road,
north
also
known
as
the
broadway
pizza
site.
Next
slide,
please.
W
Currently
it's
zoned
c3a
and
it
has
three
overlay
districts:
the
mississippi
river
critical
area,
overlay
district,
the
po,
the
pedestrian
oriented
overlay
district,
the
shoreland
overlay
district
next
slide,
please
so
they
are.
The
applicant
has
has
proposed
a
seven-story
building
that
faces
the
mississippi
river
and
they
had
their
planning
commission
approvals
on
september
21st.
W
The
applicant
is
appealing
the
height
request,
as
well
as
a
site
plan,
review
application,
and-
and
I
am
just
going
to
leave
it
at
that-
I
think
the
applicant-
I
think,
okay,
I
think
the.
B
Thank
you,
miss
smith,
for
your
presentation.
I
am
going
to
proceed
to
open
the
public
hearing
because
we're
not
going
to
be
taking
this
item
up
today.
I
am
not
going
to
have
the
applicant
and
then
the
project
applicants
speak,
we'll
just
simply
open
the
public
hearing
and
if
either
of
those
parties
would
like
to
speak
first,
I'm
absolutely
open
to
that
we'll
see
if
natalya
is
on
the
call,
and
if
you
are,
we
would
invite
you
to
speak
first.
This
is
the
applicant
of
the
appeal.
B
Y
Tracking
excuse
me
yep
hi,
chair
goodman.
This
is
katie
anthony
with
schaefer
richardson.
I
am
with
the
developer
for
the
project
and
I'm
I'm
happy
to
speak
now
or
I
can
wait
until
after
public
comments.
B
B
Okay,
great,
so
I
see
that
there
are
a
number
of
people
from
the
committee
who
are
on
the
line
and
I
I
will
just
call
on
them
in
the
order
that
they've
been
presented
to
me-
and
you
are
welcome
to
speak
today
or
you
can
say
you're
on
the
call.
But
you'll
speak
next
time
as
well,
starting
with
the
esteemed
ms
bridges.
Welcome.
F
Z
Thank
you,
council,
member
goodman
and
counseling
committee
members.
I
am
dorothy
bridges
and
I've
lived
in
north
minneapolis
for
the
last
16
years
as
a
resident
and
homeowner
homeowner
of
hawthorne
neighborhood.
I
also
spent
an
additional
five
years
in
jordan
community,
so
I
know
north
minneapolis
very
well.
Z
I
definitely
support
affordable
housing,
but
one
that
includes
mixed
income
and
mixed
use.
I'm
seriously
concerned
with
the
ongoing
trend
of
requiring
less
for
developments
in
north
minneapolis
a
case
in
point:
the
broadway
pizza
project.
I
lived
just
two
blocks
from
the
site,
but
it
wasn't
contacted
by
the
developers.
Z
The
project
covers
the
unique
parcel
along
mississippi
river,
yet
does
nothing
creative
to
add
to
things
our
community
needs
the
most,
even
when
we
have
asked
for
it.
The
developers
are
seeking
variances
from
stringent
zoning
and
planning
rules
around
the
height
and
proximity
to
the
river
in
order
to
maximize
the
concentration
of
housing
on
the
site.
Z
Other
portable
projects
in
different
parts
of
the
city
are
required
to
include
market
rate
units,
along
with
community
accessible
amenities
like
coffee
shop
stores,
to
build
complete,
neighborhoods
and
even
full-service
restaurants.
This
development
replaces
the
only
sit-down
restaurant
in
our
neighborhood
the
rest
of
the
options
we
have
available
to
us
for
fast
food.
Z
The
developer
has
said
a
restaurant
would
not
work
in
this
space
and
if
a
riverside
property
could
not
accommodate
a
restaurant
or
as
something
like
a
rooftop
experience
for
the
public
intended
to
enjoy
to
enjoy,
I'm
not
sure
what
future
development
will
look
like
this
project
will
continue
to
concentrate
poverty
in
north
minneapolis.
There's
this
misconception
that
we're
building
it
for
the
people
in
north
minneapolis
when
in
fact
we're
building
it
for
all
affordable
housing,
allowing
this
development
of
heavily
subsidized,
affordable
housing
with
total
disregard
for
negative
long-term
impact.
Z
It's
just
wrong
and
I
complete
the
rest
of
my
time.
Thank
you
all
for
listening.
B
K
K
Okay,
this
is
susan
vixie
and
I
also
am
a
16-year
resident
of
the
hawthorne
neighborhood
and
I'll
just
skip
to
the
high
points.
Now,
I'm
really
concerned
about
the
height
of
this
proposed
project.
It
far
exceeds
the
current
shoreline
overlay
district
and
it's
twice
the
mississippi
river
corridor
critical
area
ordinance
in
the
urban
mix,
just
to
kind
of
clarify
the
area
north
of
plymouth
is
a
different,
critical
area
district.
K
Then
the
north
loop
in
downtown
and
does
have
different
height
restrictions
and
the
critical
area
we're
talking
about
on
the
broadway
pizza
site
is
very
narrow.
It's
from
the
river
to
second
street.
So
it's
only
two
blocks
and
it's
my
contention
that
the
developer
did
not
prove
that
it
really
satisfied
any
additional
requirements
that
would
justify
increasing
the
height
of
the
building
and
I'll
just
go
into
a
couple.
Now
the
developer
does
state
the
height
of
the
building
is
taller
than
others,
but
should
not
stand
out
should
not
stand
out,
but
it
will
stand
out.
K
The
tallest
building
in
this
area
on
the
riverfront
is
life
source,
which
is
40
feet.
The
developer
also
states.
The
conditional
use
permit
is
consistent
with
the
applicable
policy
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
But
to
me,
one
of
the
most
important
policies
is
goal:
nine,
the
complete
neighborhood
goal,
increasing
the
height
of
the
building,
does
not
provide
access
to
employment,
retail
services
or
healthy
food.
The
project
actually
makes
it
more
incomplete
by
it.
K
Existing
access
to
food,
as
dorothy
just
mentioned,
the
restaurant,
which
is
a
decades-long
gathering
place
for
north
minneapolis,
and
it's
not
replacing
it
with
any
other
impactful
amenity,
no
goods
or
services
and
the
site.
All
alone
is
not
a
complete
neighborhood,
it
does
have
access
to
parks,
walking
and
biking,
but
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
height.
The
building
could
be
one
story
or
three
stories,
and
it
would
remain
the
same.
B
F
B
B
B
Z
Z
I've
been
shocked
and
very
disappointed
in
the
limited
community
engagement
around
this
development
as
an
active
hawthorne
resident.
I
was
surprised
to
only
become
aware
of
this
project.
In
early
august
I
joined
a
special
board
meeting
of
harthorne
neighborhood
council
on
august
13th
to
have
the
developer
present
their
plan
as
an
interested
neighbor.
I
wanted
to
learn
more
about
the
project,
but
was
told
upon
joining
that
there
would
be
no
opportunity
to
speak
and
the
briefing
would
be
limited
to
15
minutes
by
the
developer.
Z
Shortly
afterwards,
the
hartford
neighborhood
council
drafted
a
letter
of
support
on
august
20th.
There
was
no
communication
or
soliciting
feedback
from
the
broader
neighborhood,
just
a
rubber
stamp
from
a
handful
of
individuals,
and
now
the
developer
will
try
to
stand
before
you
and
say
that
the
hardthorne
neighborhood
supports
this.
We
don't
here's
a
problem
with
this
proposal,
we're
repeating
again
what
we've
done
over
and
over
in
north
minneapolis,
concentrating
poverty
on
the
north
side,
which
will
not
lead
us
to
economic
stability.
Z
We
have
to
find
ways
to
engage
our
north
side
neighbors
more
meaningfully
in
order
to
bring
about
the
real
change.
We
need
allowing
our
neighbors
to
feel
and
be
a
part
of
what
happens
in
their
neighborhood
and
to
be
sure,
development
is
balanced
with
the
needs
of
the
community.
We
need
a
strong
equity
framework
when
developments
like
this
are
proposed,
so
that
north
minneapolis
does
not
continue
to
get
the
short
end
of
the
stick.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
today.
B
B
V
Thanks,
I,
I
represent
a
coalition
of
local
bird
conservation
groups
that
includes
the
audubon
chapter
of
minneapolis,
friends
of
robert's
bird
sanctuary
and
the
minnesota
citizens
for
the
protection
of
migratory
birds.
Our
group
believes
that
this
project
will
endanger
the
millions
of
migrating
birds
using
the
mississippi
flyweight
twice
a
year.
Last
year,
the
cornell
lab
of
ornithology
named
the
twin
cities,
one
of
the
worst
urban
areas
in
the
country
for
migrating
birds,
a
result
of
its
bright
nighttime
lights
and
location
in
a
flyway,
with
a
huge
volume
of
birds
pouring
through.
V
Yet,
despite
this
known
risk,
the
project
as
proposed,
would
increase
urban
hazards
to
birds
by
increasing
light
pollution
and
the
risk
of
bird
window
collisions.
For
example,
the
proposed
cantilever
illuminated
roof
feature
to
add
more
prominence
at
this
corner
of
the
intersection,
as
well
as
more
window
area,
are
not
only
unnecessary
in
this
location
and
wasteful
features
in
terms
of
energy
consumption,
but
would
increase
dangers
to
migrating
birds
in
the
mississippi
flyway.
Every
year,
up
to
a
billion
birds,
a
billion
birds
are
killed
by
glass,
collisions
in
the
u.s
and
canada.
V
Building
related
bird
deaths
are
largely
preventable
through
bird
friendly
building
design,
which
this
proposal
lacks
at
the
planning
commission
meeting
vague
mention
was
made
of
bird
safe
design
and
state
b3
guidelines,
but
without
any
specifics
or
commitment
to
bird
safety
without
specific
and
firm
mitigation
conditions,
including
requirements
to
use
bird-safe
glass
and
to
follow
international
dark
sky
guidelines
and
the
audubon
lights
out
program.
This
project
will
endanger
birds
and
increase
bird
mortality
in
the
core
of
the
mississippi
flyway.
V
We
urge
you
to
require
changes
to
this
proposal
that
will
ensure
bird-friendly
design
to
prevent
more
light
pollution
and
bird
glass
collisions
rather
than
increasing
threats
to
birds
in
the
core
of
the
mississippi
flyway,
which
has
international
significance
for
birds
and
other
wildlife.
Thank
you.
B
X
Thank
you,
chair
goodman
and
committee
members.
I'm
colleen
o'connor
toberman,
with
friends
of
the
mississippi
river
fmr,
is
not
party
to
this
appeal
and
we
do
not
agree
with
all
the
appellate
concerns,
but
I
do
have
some
comments
on
building
height.
Fmr
is
a
pro
density
organization
and
we
support
the
minneapolis
2040
plan.
We
also
believe
that
the
riverfront
is
a
special
asset.
It
comprises
a
tiny
percentage
of
our
city's
land
and
it
deserves
special
design.
Consideration.
X
Managing
building
heights
is
one
aspect
of
that:
well-managed
building
heights
tear
away
from
the
river.
This
creates
more
visibility
between
the
neighborhood
and
the
riverfront
and
promotes
additional
river
oriented
development
by
making
it
possible
for
for
building
further
back
to
still
see
the
river.
This
project
at
83
feet
is
over
twice
the
height
limit
set
for
this
site,
and
these
height
limits
are
not
hold
holdovers
from
prior
times
they
are
being
actively
affirmed
in
current
plans
and
policies.
X
In
fact,
the
forthcoming
mississippi
river
corridor
critical
area
ordinance
height
limit
of
42
feet
for
the
site
is
already
being
disregarded.
If
this
project
moved
forward,
as
is
the
height
limit,
is
intended
to
help
create
an
entire
river-oriented
neighborhood
to
disregard
it
at
the
first
opportunity
is
short-sighted,
and
it
sets
a
poor
precedent
when,
if
not
now,
will
the
city
hold
north
side
developers
to
the
same
design
standards
that
other
neighborhoods
enjoy?
X
X
Another
potential
mitigation
would
be
to
require
bird-safe
glass,
again
friends
of
the
mississippi
river
support,
sten's
development,
and
we
support
many
aspects
of
this
project,
but
a
project-
that's
twice.
The
height
limit
sets
a
poor
precedent
and
shortchanges
the
north
minneapolis
riverfront
from
high
quality
river
oriented
design.
Thank
you.
B
V
Hi,
chair
goodman,
this
is
dan
laflin.
Am
I
on
the
line
now.
B
V
Oh
thank
you
chair
goodman
and
committee
members,
anne
laughlin,
with
the
minnesota
citizens
for
the
protection
of
migratory
birds.
Our
coalition
of
bird
conservation
groups
believes
that
approval
of
this
project
is
inconsistent
with
the
city's
upcoming,
mississippi
river
corridor,
critical
area,
ordinance
or
mrcca
ordinance,
which
the
city
the
dnr
requires
the
city
to
implement,
to
ensure
quote
that
the
city's
land,
use
and
regulatory
framework
protects
the
natural
resources
in
the
mrcca.
V
The
mrcca
plan
that's
appended
to
the
2040
comp
plan,
recognizes
the
mississippi
flyway
as
a
natural
resource
requiring
protection,
and
our
coalition
has
worked
for
months
with
cped
staff
to
include
provisions
in
this
ordinance
to
protect
birds
and
other
wildlife
in
this
critical
corridor.
These
provisions
are
planned
to
take
effect
soon
and
should
be
considered
today.
V
Approval
of
this
project
is
also
inconsistent
with
policy
70,
ecology
and
habitat
in
the
minneapolis
2040
plan.
The
project
does
nothing
to
quote
design
and
manage
public
lands
for
their
highest
environmental
and
ecosystem
performance,
which
is
action,
step
f
or
to
quote
strive
for
interconnected
environmental
corridors
and
riparian
areas
as
habitat
corridors,
which
is
action
step
g.
Instead,
the
project
would
further
threaten
birds
and
damage
ecosystem
performance.
V
In
this
migratory
corridor,
approval
would
set
a
precedent
for
excessive
height
bulk
and
uses
that
would
impair
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
other
property
in
the
vicinity
and
would
likely
lead
to
other
applicants
seeking
the
same
or
even
greater
exceptions
to
zoning
requirements
for
other
sites
in
this
ecologically
sensitive,
mississippi,
flyway
and
the
mississippi
river
corridor
critical
area.
So
we
urge
you
to
require
changes
to
this
proposal
that
will
ensure
compliance
with
the
mrcca
ordinance
and
your
own
2040
plan.
Thank
you.
B
E
Well,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
appreciate
this
opportunity
to.
I
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
speak
before
this
commission
today.
E
I
come
with
a
slightly
different
opposition
to
this
project
for
reasons
which
go
back
more
than
50
years.
Let
me
be
very
specific.
I
own
property
in
north
minneapolis,
I'm
a
leader,
a
servant
leader
in
north
minneapolis.
I
run
the
north
job
creation
team,
which
is
committed
to
bringing
living
wage
jobs
to
north
minneapolis.
I
also
serve
on
the
upper
harbor
collaborative
planning
committee
and
I'm
very
concerned
that
this
project
has
re
not
had
the
community
engagement
they
need
to.
For
example,
there
are
five
north
minneapolis,
zip
codes.
F
E
E
Trust
me,
I
don't
like
to
make
threats.
We
would
think
that
you
would
be.
The
planning
commission
would
be
in
partnership
with
the
community,
but
if
necessary,
we'll
go
to
court
again.
I
stood
in
front
of
bulldozers
when
they
tried
to
do
heritage
property
because
there
was
not
enough,
affordable
housing.
I
will
stand
in
front
of
bulldozers
if
necessary,
because
this
is
stupid.
E
You
would
never
have
this
kind
of
density
and
if
it
takes
our
heights
up
beyond
whatever
you,
don't
give
those
kind
of
waivers
to
any
black
developer
in
this
town.
I
know
the
planning
commissions
work.
I
know
the
developers
I'm
very
active
in
north
minneapolis,
so
I'm
urging
you
reject
this
proposal.
You
are
left
flanking
the
best
development
of
40
acres
in
alpha
harbor,
with
this
many
build
this
many
units.
Now,
if
you
want
them,
forced
to
develop
to
put
mixed
use
housing
in
there.
E
B
B
So
with
that,
if
there
is
no
one
else
on
the
call
who
wanted
to
speak
today,
I
am
going
to
move
to
postpone
this
item
and
see
if
anyone
on
the
committee
well,
first
move
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
then
move
to
postpone
this
item
and
see.
If
there's
anyone
on
the
committee,
who
would
like
to
comment
on
my
motion
to
postpone.
B
C
P
B
Thank
you
that
emotion
does
pass,
and
this
item
has
been
postponed
in
this
cycle
with,
and
I
want
to
thank
everyone.
Who's
been
on
the
call
today
who
patiently
waited
to
speak.
We
will
then
move
to
our
two
remaining
discussion
items,
starting
with
item
number
22,
which
is
the
metropolitan
council's
livable
community's
housing
goals,
and
I
would
ask
staff
if
they
would
like
to
give
a
presentation.
AB
Thank
you,
chair
goodman,
and
the
committee
members
for
the
opportunity
to
provide
a
brief
overview
on
the
action
before
you
related
to
the
city's
participation
in
the
local
housing
incentives
account
program.
I'm
jamie
radel,
I'm
a
senior
project
coordinator
with
the
city
of
with
the
cped's
residential
finance.
Excuse
me
every
10
years
the
metropolitan
council
requires
that
cities
wishing
to
participate
in
its
grant
funding
programs
reaffirm
their
parts,
reaffirm.
B
F
B
Mute
their
mics
if
they
can
and
and
then,
if
we
need
to,
I
want
to
know
I'm
sorry
jamie
it's
hard
to
do
this
electronically
and
I'm
paying
very
close
attention.
B
Okay,
so
I
think
that
the
staff
will
discuss
amongst
themselves
with
council
member
ellison
what
the
date
will
be.
While
we
hear
the
presentation
from
jamie
and
we're
not
going
to
be
out
on
the
chat
function,
so
let's
just
have
our
staff
do
their
presentation
they've
waited
a
long
time.
This
is
a
pretty
important
item
on
22..
Go
ahead,
jamie.
AB
Thank
you
every
10
years
the
metropolitan
council
requires
that
cities
wishing
to
participate
in
its
grant
funding
programs
reaffirmed
their
participation
in
the
local
housing
incentives,
account
program
or
lhap
lhiap
to
participate.
Cities
must
negotiate
10-year,
affordable
and
life-cycle
housing
goals
with
the
metropolitan
council
submit
a
plan
as
to
how
their
intent
to
meet
those
goals
and
annually
budget
and
expend
funds
on
affordable
and
life
cycle
housing.
The
resolution
before
you
today
confirms
the
city's
participation
in
the
lh.
AB
Iap
accepts
the
affordable
and
life
cycle,
housing
goals
set
forward
or
provided
to
us
by
the
metropolitan
council,
and
acknowledges
that
the
city
will
submit
a
housing
action
plan
to
the
metropolitan
council.
Participating
in
the
lhiap
gives
cities
the
opportunity
to
apply
for
liberal
communities
account
grants,
including
tax
base.
Revitalization
account
livable
community
demonstration
account
and
local
housing
incentive
account
grants
over
the
last
10
years.
The
projects
with
projects
within
the
city
have
received
over
82.5
million
dollars
in
funding
from
these
lca
programs.
AB
Earlier
today,
on
the
consent
agenda,
my
colleague
kevin
carroll
brought
forward
a
resolution
to
allow
12
tbra
grant
applications
to
be
submitted
on
november.
2Nd
and
8
of
those
applications
are
for
affordable
housing
projects.
Almost
900
of
the
housing
units
included
in
the
project
seeking
brownfields
funds
are
affordable
to
households
at
sixty
percent.
AB
AB
In
addition,
last
week,
the
metropolitan
council
awarded
the
city,
another
two
million
dollars
in
lcda
tod
funding,
including
seven
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
for
the
american
indian
minneapolis
american
indians,
american
indian
center
expansion
and
1.25
million
dollars
for
the
agra,
affordable
housing
project.
B
B
Without
comment,
I
want
to
thank
you
jamie
for
your
work
on
this.
Making.
Some
very
bold
goals
is
a
big
deal,
and
while
we
can't
always
meet
the
goals,
it's
important
for
us
to
aim
high
as
it
pertains
to
affordable
housing.
I
will
move
item
number
22
forward
without
objection.
I
would
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role
councilmember.
C
P
C
L
B
That
item
is
approved,
we'll
move
on
to
our
last
item,
which
is
item
number
23.
This
is
a
huge
deal.
This
is
the
community
preference
policy
for
housing
from
housing
policy
and
development,
and
I'm
pretty
sure,
erica
are
going
to
give
this
report
I'll
ask
if
they
are
on
the
line
and
wait
for
them
to
sign
into
the
camera.
B
B
B
Losing
women
leaders
in
the
city,
especially
black
women
in
the
city,
is
very
hard
for
the
rest
of
us,
but
we
want
you
to
go
on
and
do
more
incredible
things,
and
so
on
behalf
of
all
of
the
women
who
have
had
the
opportunity
to
work
with
you,
as
well
as
all
of
the
employees
who
have
seen
your
brilliance
and
will
miss
you.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
everything.
You've
done
and
hope
that,
eventually
you
will
come
back
to
us,
perhaps
as
our
cped
director
in
a
number
of
years
or
in
another
major
role.
B
You
have
been
an
incredible
part
of
our
housing
team
and
this
policy
and
others
would
not
have
been
possible
without
your
leadership.
So
I'm
sorry
I
had
to
just
jump
in
before
you
gave
your
presentation
because
I
don't
want
you
to
leave,
but
I'm
very
proud
of
you
and
proud
to
know
you.
AC
Thank
you,
sarah
goodman
and
members
of
the
committee.
I
really
appreciate
that
and
katie
topinka
is
going
to
start.
AD
Thank
you,
chair
goodman
and
committee
members,
and
I
of
course
echo
congratulations
to
erica
and
the
that
we're
really
going
to
miss
her
being
part
of
our
team,
and
it
was
really
fun
to
get
to
work
with
her
on
this
policy.
So
I'm
just
going
to
do
a
brief
introduction
and
then
turn
it
over
to
her
to
go
over
the
details
because
she
really
led
the
development
of
this
policy.
So
we
are
here
today
to
present
on
a
new
policy
for
the
housing
division,
a
community
preference
policy.
AD
AD
AD
We
know
are
disproportionately
affected
by
involuntary
displacement
and
just
before
we
dig
into
this,
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
one
of
the
reasons
we're
bringing
this
policy
forward
is
because
it
was
a
recommendation
of
our
minneapolis-st
paul
anti-displacement
policy
network
team,
and
we
did
present
a
report
from
that
team
to
the
housing
policy
and
development
committee
last
fall
about
a
year
ago
and
just
as
a
brief
reminder,
we
minneapolis
and
st
paul
were
selected
by
policy
link
to
be
part
of
a
national
network
of
cities
focusing
on
coming
up
with
strategies
to
reduce
involuntary
displacement.
AD
So
our
team
had
city
council
members,
city
staff
and
representatives
of
community
organizations
from
both
minneapolis
and
st
paul.
The
minneapolis
city
council,
members
on
the
team
were
council,
member,
ellison
and
council.
Vice
president
jenkins.
We
also
had
staff
from
the
alliance
and
hope
community
in
minneapolis
and
then,
like
I
said,
staff
city,
council,
members
and
community
representatives
from
st
paul
as
well.
AD
So
I
do
want
to
just
thank
that
team
for
recommending
a
community
preference
policy
and
helping
us
get
to
this
point
today
and
so
erica
will
go
through
the
details.
In
a
moment,
but
essentially
a
preference
prop
preference
policy
provides
a
preference
for
housing
programs
for
residents
currently
residing
in
or
who
have
been
involuntarily
displaced
from
certain
geographies
within
the
city.
So
we'll
get
into
more
detail
about
what
those
geographies
are
in
a
moment
next
slide
please.
AD
So
I
I've
already
mentioned
the
recommendation
from
the
anti-displacement
policy
network
for
this
policy,
but
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
of
the
other
guiding
policies
that
were
the
foundation
for
this
work.
Minneapolis
2040
has
a
policy
goal
to
minimize
the
involuntary
displacement
of
people
of
color,
indigenous
people
and
vulnerable
populations
such
as
low-income
households,
the
elderly
and
people
with
disabilities
from
their
communities
as
the
city
grows
and
changes.
AD
AD
One
of
the
goals
under
that
plan
is
around
housing
and
specifically
to
reduce
involuntary
displacement
and
rental
housing
for
black
indigenous
people
of
color
and
immigrant
communities.
Earlier
this
year,
the
council
adopted
a
resolution
declaring
racism,
a
public
health
emergency
and
in
that
resolution,
housing
was
cited
as
a
factor
and
symptom
of
systemic
racism.
AD
In
addition
to
these
guiding
city
policies,
when
we
were
working
on
this
policy,
we
looked
at
studies
completed
by
the
university
of
minnesota
and
specifically
the
mapping
prejudice
project,
which
I
know
the
council
is
familiar
with,
but
that
project
digitally
recorded
and
mapped
racially
restrictive
covenants
in
minneapolis
and
those
covenants
were
really
a
foundation
for
many
of
the
racist
and
discriminatory
housing
policies
we
saw
during
the
20th
century
and
then
the
2018
gentrification
study
that
kira
completed
showed
us
that
gentrification
is
occurring
in
many
of
the
same
communities
that
you
see
mapped
in
the
mapping
prejudice
project.
AD
So
based
on
these
foundational
policies
and
the
recommendations
of
the
anti-displacement
policy
network,
we
worked
with
kira
to
do
help
us
do
analysis
for
this
policy
to
do
to
identify
geographies
in
minneapolis
for
a
community
preference
policy
meant
to
look
specifically
at
the
fair
housing
implications
of
implementing
a
community
preference
policy.
So
we'd
also
like
to
thank
ed,
getz
and
aaron
sepulveda
from
for
their
work
on
the
analysis.
AD
So
it's
part
of
the
report
which
is
before
you
as
part
of
our
staff
report.
Today
they
looked
at
community
preference
policies
in
five
cities
across
the
country,
san
francisco,
new
york,
austin,
seattle
and
portland,
and
a
summary
of
those
policies
are
included
in
the
report,
and
then
they
did
a
quantitative
analysis
to
support
a
city,
community
preference
policy
that
geographically
aligns
with
city
of
neighbor
city
of
minneapolis
neighborhood
stabilization
program,
target
areas
which
are
areas
that
were
previously
approved
by
hud
for
other
housing
programs.
AD
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
ms
coleman
to
talk
more
about
the.
Why
we
selected
those
geographies
and
then
the
details
of
the
policy
itself.
AC
Thank
you,
katie.
Thank
you,
chair
goodman,
members
of
the
committee.
So
in
july
of
this
year
the
city
council
passed
an
honorary
resolution
declaring
racism,
a
public
health
emergency.
AC
AC
Studies
and
projects
have
been
curated
about
these
historic
practices,
as
we
cannot
address
the
inequities
of
the
present
without
an
understanding,
reckoning
and
atoning
for
the
past,
disparities
in
education,
limit
income
and
wealth
building,
which
render
bypoc
residents
burdened
by
housing
costs.
Involuntary
displacement
represents
one
of
the
worst
outcomes
of
these
patterns.
AC
The
pressure
of
housing
costs
is
just
one
example
of
many
deep
rooted
disparities
in
wealth
opportunity,
housing,
safety
and
health
due
to
racism.
These
disparities
are
some
of
the
starkest
in
the
nation
and
they
manifest
in
consistent
geographic
patterns
because
of
racially
discriminatory
housing
practice
and
policy.
AC
The
recommendation
for
community
preference
policy,
specifically
in
housing,
has
been
a
common
theme
expressed
throughout
various
community
engagement
initiatives
held
by
multiple
city
departments
over
the
last
two
years
through
the
minneapolis
2040,
the
strategic,
racial
equity
and
action
plan
and
minneapolis
homes
engagements.
The
theme
was
expressed
with
the
focus
for
bipac
and
immigrant
communities
and
low
wealth
communities
in
minneapolis,
who
have
been
historically
marginalized
and
structurally
disenfranchised.
AC
In
addition
to
the
city
enterprise,
the
anti-displacement
policy
network
team
identified
the
development
of
community
preference
policy
as
a
priority,
as
outlined
in
its
report
presented
to
the
city
council
in
october
2019,
the
community
preference
policy
draft
was
posted
on
the
city
website
and
sent
to
all
minneapolis
neighborhood
organizations
for
public
comment
from
july
10.
Through
august
26
2020,
a
community
preference
policy
gives
residents
residing
within
certain
geographies
preference
to
receive
assistance
for
specific
city
programs
or
projects
based
on
findings.
AC
Based
on
findings
from
the
cure
studies,
staff
recommends
that
residents
residing
in
the
nsp
target
neighborhoods
are
eligible
for
preference
for
certain
city
housing
programs,
which
will
be
determined
on
a
program-by-program
basis.
Next
slide,
please
kira's
gentrification
study
identified
54
census,
tracts
within
minneapolis
vulnerable
to
gentrification,
21
of
which
gener
gentrified
between
2000
and
2015.,
most
of
the
identified
tracks,
both
vulnerable
to
and
that
did,
gentrify
fall
within
the
nsp
target
areas
in
which
people
of
color
are
represented
at
higher
rates
than
white
people
compared
to
city
to
the
citywide.
AC
AC
The
eligibility
areas
for
this
policy
will
apply
to
neighborhood
stabilization
program
target
areas.
As
seen
as
this
map,
these
two
contiguous
parts
tracks
are
parts
of
near
north
and
camden
communities,
as
well
as
most
of
the
northeast
community
and
the
southern
sectors
of
the
city,
which
includes
phillips
community
and
a
large
portion
of
the
powderhorn
community.
AC
These
targets,
these
target
areas,
are
made
of
a
large
percentage
of
bypoc
and
immigrant
residents
compared
to
citywide.
The
design
of
this
policy
allows
for
future
implementation
efforts
to
focus
on
geographic
areas
that
have
a
large
percentage
of
bypoc
residents,
which
are
at
risk
of
displacement.
AC
AC
The
rfp,
which
is
slated
to
be
released.
Fourth
quarter
of
2020,
so
this
year
would
be
using
income.
Eligibility
of
at
or
below,
80
area
mean
income
household
size,
involuntary
displacement,
involuntary
displacement
will
be
by
tax
forfeiture,
foreclosure
and
or
extreme
economic
forces
dating
back
to
july,
1,
2007
and
or
being
at
risk
of
involuntary
displacement
and
current
rental
status
criteria.
AC
In
applying
this,
we
cannot
exceed
50
percent
preference
due
to
fair
housing,
as
well
as
disparate
impact
rules.
So
that
is
the
reason
for
a
50
preference
on
the
programs
applied
in
the
in
the
program.
Excuse
me
if
all
the
selection
criteria
are
applied
and
there
are
still
multiple
applicants
for
a
housing
unit,
then
a
randomized
selection
will
be
conducted
with
all
eligible
applicants
present
the
community
preference
ownership.
Housing
policy
will
apply
to
city
ownership,
investments
under
the
minneapolis
homes
programs
during
the
development
request
for
proposals
processed
and
evaluated
next
slide.
AC
Staff
will
be
bringing
forward
recommendations
for
community
preference
in
rental
program
investments
in
by
fourth
quarter
of
2021,
and
so
to
recap,
we
will
be
applying
if
passed
and
approved
by
council
the
community
preference
policy
of
ownership
programs
to
the
minneapolis
homes
rfp
to
be
released
later
this
year.
AC
I
guess
we're
kind
of
in
fourth
quarter
already
right
and
then
next
year
by
the
fourth
quarter
of
next
year,
rental
program,
investments
recommendations
will
be
brought
forward
and
after
which,
after
at
least
two
to
three
rfp
processes,
because
we're
on
an
annual
rfp
process
with
minneapolis
homes,
we
would
provide
evaluation
of
how
the
program
is
going.
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.
B
L
Yeah,
I
wouldn't
mind,
jumping
in
a
little
bit
here.
I
think
this
is
really
fantastic
progress.
It's
great
to
see
this
kind
of
being
the
result.
I
really
appreciated
the
way
it
was
spelled
out
about
the
policy
work
and
including
that
displacement
policy
work
that
was
done
unnecessarily
not
by
the
city,
but
also
looking
back
at
how
our
policies,
including
the
comp
plan
and
our
racial
equity
action
plan,
all
kind
of
led
up
to
this
and
seeing
this
implementation
is
very
exciting.
L
I
really
appreciate
that.
We've
also
got
an
evaluation
plan.
What
I'll
just
note
and
am
expecting
is
each
year
as
we
go
out
with
the
next
rf
rfp,
I'm
sure
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
how
it
went
and
taking
many
evaluation
steps
along
the
way
to
say,
let's
see
if
we
can
refine
it
or
make
some
differences.
L
If
we
find
we
aren't
getting,
you
know
community
members
wanting
to
take
advantage
of
the
programs
or,
for
some
reason,
they're
not
getting
selected,
I'm
going
to
need
technical
assistance.
I
mean,
I
know
the
way
we
work
and
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize
for
us
all
here
and
the
public
that
there
will
be
ongoing
evaluations
and
ongoing
work
done
and
and
who
knows,
maybe
we'll
have
to
reach
out
to
bloomington
and
have
them
take
a
armed
sank.
Look
at
something.
U
B
This
has
been
a
really
incredible
outcome
and
it's
because
of
the
voice
of
so
many
people
like
council,
member
ellison
on
this
committee
and
others
who
really
made
this
a
priority,
that
this
is
going
to
see
very
unanimous
support
and
probably
a
lot
of
attention
from
others
who
would
like
to
do
the
same
thing.
So
on
the
motion
to
approve
the
staff
recommendation
and
a
hearty
thank
you
to
staff.
I'd.
Ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role
councilmember.
C
P
C
J
R
C
R
B
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
would
I'm
speaking
enough
to
say.
I
think
that
we
should
continue
it
to
november
2nd.
You
know,
I
think,
after
some
exchange
with
staff,
that
seems
like
the
best
option.
I
will
say
that
that's
a
tight
turnaround
for
me
to
go
and
have
conversations
with
community
members,
so
I'm
gonna
pursue
that,
and
I
think
it's
really
important
to
understand
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors,
and
so
I
might
be
in
a
position
where
I'll
want
to
continue
this
again
from
there.
N
But
for
now
in
the
in
the
hopes
that
we
can
resolve
everything
by
the
second
I'll
say:
let's
continue
this
till
november
2nd
and
go
from
there.
B
B
If
not,
perhaps
someone
on
the
housing
team
can
chime
in,
but
I
didn't
realize
that
approved
entitlements
were
a
requirement
for
brownfield
applications.
There's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about
well.
If
they
missed
that
november
2nd
deadline,
then
they
have
to
wait,
but
we
could
submit
the
project
without
approved
entitlements,
noting
that's
going
through
the
process.
Isn't
that
correct.
G
B
Okay,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
be
clear
because
I'm
hearing
from
planners
that
nope
gotta
have
the
entitlements
done
by
the
2nd
of
november
and
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
length
of
the
agenda
on
november,
2nd
with
a
number
of
other
land
use
items
on
the
day
before
the
election
and
asking
council
member
ellison
to
be
dealing
with
this
in
the
days
leading
up
to
the
election.
B
It
would
be
one
thing
if
they
couldn't
submit
the
project,
but
clearly
they
can
so
this
is
not
a
hurry
up
and
get
it
done,
or
we
won't
be
able
to
apply
for
a
grant.
There's
many
projects
on
these
lists.
I
would
urge
you
to
all
take
a
look
at
them
that
don't
have
any
zoning
approvals
at
all
and
we're
submitting
them.
So
that
seems
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
red
herring.
I
don't
want
to
put
pressure
on
council
member
allison.
You
were
all
on
this
public
hearing.
B
B
Seeing
none
I
I
will
take
it
as
a
motion
by
council
member
ellison
to
postpone
item
number
seven
until
november
second,
and
should
something
change.
He
would
let
the
clerk
and
staff,
as
well
as
members
of
the
committee,
know
I'll.
Ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
rule
on
that
motion
by
council
member
ellison
councilmember.