►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
F
A
A
A
C
B
This
is
mandy.
I
also
wanted
to
say
that
the
difference
between
november,
where
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
and
then
february,
is
you'll
notice
that
there
was
an
action
item
listed
on
february's
minutes.
I
think
we
all
need
to
do
a
better
job
of
outlining
when
we
want
action
to
be
done
on
a
topic
and
to
be
explicit
when
we
want
that
included
in
the
minutes.
During
our
conversations,
I
think
that
will
help
staff
do
that.
A
A
A
F
Just
a
quick
comment,
since
I
probably
have
the
longest
length
longevity
of
being
on
the
committee
here
then
regarding
minutes
minutes
are
so
vitally
important
because
they
provide
historic
information
and
as
well
as
as
mandy
was
saying
action
items.
So
we
really
need
to
keep
our
minutes
up
to
date
and
and
accurate,
and
so
I'm
just
kind
of
putting
a
bug
in
and
nick
to
make
it
a
higher
priority
to
really
working
on
these.
Because
when
we're
long
gone,
the
committee
is
going
to
be
still
here.
F
B
B
I
know
what
I
do
in
the
meetings
when
there's
there's
something
of
meat,
sometimes
I'll
be
asked
to
send
that
information
directly
to
nick
via
email.
So
he
has
it.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
other
tools,
while
we're
using
this
system
to
make
it
more
accessible
and
inclusive
and
to
be
able
to
add
some
of
that
back
in
later.
B
A
C
C
C
H
H
We're
hoping
that
changes
to
these
regulations
are
going
to
have
a
strong
positive
impact
on
achieving
goals
in
these
plans
like
improving
housing,
affordability,
addressing
climate
change
and
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
while
getting
people
out
of
their
cars
when
possible
and
encouraging
transit
use.
Things
like
that.
H
First?
Is
that
the
cost
of
producing
parking
is
always
paid
for
by
residential
owners
and
renters,
whether
they
use
it
or
not?
This
has
shown
to
result
in
inflated
housing
costs
and
particularly
for
lower
income
households
providing
an
over
abundance
of
parking,
also
incentivizes
automobile
use
at
the
expense
of
more
efficient
and
environmentally
friendly
forms
of
transportation.
H
H
There's
also
concern
that
dedicating
large
portions
of
land
to
inactive
uses
such
as
parking
makes
it
difficult
for
people
to
get
what
they
need
their
daily
goods
in
a
small
geographic
footprint.
So
it
makes
it
harder
for
businesses
to
locate
in
the
city
and
it
makes
it
harder
for
people
to
get
their
goods
and
services
all
in
one
place.
H
Some
smaller
reasons
why
we're
pursuing
these
changes,
but
still
worth
mentioning,
is
that
some
of
this
can
be
considered.
Regulatory
relief
makes
it
easier
for
businesses
to
locate
in
the
city,
and
also
we
can
dedicate
staff
time
previously
used
to
enforce
our
parking
regulations
and
spend
that
staff
time
on
regulations
that
address
climate
change,
for
example,
okay,
so
the
specific
changes
that
we're
proposing
are
first,
the
easiest
one
to
understand
is
that
minimum
parking
requirements
are
proposed
for
elimination
city-wide.
H
H
H
H
We're
proposing
to
limit
surface
parking
lots
up
to
100
spaces
to
capture
just
unique
circumstances
where
a
lot
of
parking
is
still
allowed
with
bicycle
parking,
there
will
be
modest
increases
in
those
requirements,
citywide
and
larger
requirements,
or
larger
developments.
Excuse
me
will
have
much
higher
requirements
for
bike
parking,
so
think
large
office
developments
that
happen
downtown
will
have
much
higher
requirements
than
today.
H
H
H
If
a
development
provides
zero
vehicle
parking,
they
will
meet,
they
will
get
six
points
in
our
point
system
for
the
travel
demand
management
process
that
will
satisfy
the
requirement
as
an
example
for
most
smaller
projects,
which
will
not
will
be
required.
Smaller
projects
will
be
required
to
provide
four
or
six
points
from
our
tdm
strategies.
H
H
H
H
There
is
a
public
hearing
scheduled
in
front
of
the
planning
commission
on
april
12th,
where
they
will
consider
our
draft
ordinance
language
and
then
the
city
council
will
consider
this
item
at
their
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
on
may
4th
and
the
city
council
on
may
14th.
So
there's
still
plenty
of
time
to
get
thoughts.
Ideas,
comments
into
us
as
staff
before
we
finalize
our
recommendations
and,
of
course
time
to
get
comments
in
front
of
our
appointed
and
elected
officials
as
well.
A
A
In
including
the
needs
of
people
with
disabilities
in
parking,
you
know
currently
right
now,
disability
parking
is
required
only
when
there
is
parking
that's
offered
if
there's
no
parking
offered,
which
is
your
removal
of
minimals,
there's
no
parking
for
people
with
disabilities.
So
what
what
strategies
have
you
used,
or
what
have
you
done
to
include
people
with
disabilities
in
this
in
this
project?.
H
I
think
that's
that's
part
of
why
I'm
here
is
to
get
your
ideas
on
that
issue.
We,
I
think,
are
really
interested
in
knowing
how
we
can
improve
conditions
for
folks
that
aren't
using
a
vehicle.
We
know
that
there
will
always
be
people
that
need
to
use
cars,
and
that's
not
the
focus
of
this
amendment.
H
H
E
E
H
C
My
understanding
is
joe,
is
coming
to
present
about
a
proposed
ordinance
change
in
terms
of
if
a
development
is
submitting
plans
for-
and
this
is
residential,
it
might
correct
joe
or
just
develop
in
general
in
general
in
general-
that
they
have
the
option
to
either
include
parking
facilities
and
if
they
do,
they
are
bound
by
all
the
codes.
State
and
federal
nothing's
changed
there,
and
that
includes
clearance,
and
we
would
do
our
usual
review
of
that.
C
But
the
proposed
changes
is
if
the
facility
or
the
development
is
not
including
parking.
I
think
the
question
from
cpad
or
joe
here
is
what
are
if
it's
not
included,
what
are
ways
that
the
city
could
work
or
some
ideas
that
the
city
could
incorporate
to
make
sure
that
people
with
disabilities
are
served
are
included
in
this
new
strategy.
A
Yeah
so-
and
this
is
ken-
and
I
I
want
to
just
further
clarify
so
that
it's
really
clear
and
harvey-
you
understand
what
the
proposal
is
and
forgive
me
if
I
shortchange
it
in
any
way,
but
basically
what
the
proposal
is
that
entities
that
build
will
no
longer
be
required
to
provide
parking
in
fact,
they're
incentivized
not
to
provide
it
because
they
get
a
higher
score.
If
they
don't
have
it.
A
That
means
that
there
will
be
no
disability
parking.
Disability
parking
is
only
required
when
there
is
parking
offered.
If
there's
no
parking
offered,
then
there
will
be
no
disability
parking,
and
that
is
greatly
going
to
affect
the
community
of
people
with
disabilities
that
drive
and
need
to
drive.
A
C
H
B
What
this
is
going
to
result
in
for
you
is
that
I
will
be
making
a
motion
about
this
specific
proposal
so
that
this
specific
committee
and
encouraging
others
to
sign
on
with
us
to
say
no,
that
this
is
not
appropriate
and
you
have
to
come
up
with
a
different
solution
to
include
parking
minimums
to
ensure
that
the
state
and
federal
statutes
for
accessible
parking
are
maintained.
This
is
more
than
just
about
visitability.
B
B
So
when
I
looked
at
your
presentation,
I
wanted
to
wait
and
hear
you
out.
I
looked
at
page
nine
that
talks
about
some
of
the
scoring,
where
only
the
term
accessible
is
listed
twice
in
your
presentation
on
page
nine
and
not
in
a
favorable
way.
I
might
add
that
there
is
no
resolution
or
solution
to
what
you've
presented.
B
B
The
mayor's
going
to
be
hearing
from
me
and
whether
or
not
this
committee
chooses
to
accept
the
motion
that
is
coming
from
me
and
write
a
letter
in
opposition
to
this.
I'm
still
gonna
go
talk
about
it,
whether
I
can
represent
this
organization
or
not
this
committee.
That
remains
to
be
seen,
but
you
need
to
know
that
if
I'm
saying
this
to
you
now
there
will
be
others,
and
I
want
a
lot
of
what
you're
doing
to
be
successful
and
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
potential
in
what
you're
doing.
B
But
this
one
piece
undermines
the
current
statutes
that
are
available
to
provide
that
sense
of
equality
and
access
to
to
housing
and
again
visitability
it.
It
also
undermines
the
accessibility
of
those
who
are
making
deliveries
and
support
for
people
who
are
living
in
facilities,
whether
they
are
driving
or
not.
B
F
Yep
hi:
well,
I
no
longer
represent
the
state
council
on
disability,
so
you'll
have
to
get
what
they
would
want
to
do
directly
from
them,
but
definitely
I'm
just
kind
of
sitting
here
in
my
camera's
down
to
the
floor,
I'm
shocking
off.
I
mean
I've
on
this
committee
forever.
It
seems
like,
and
I've
never
had
heard
of
a
project
that
is
coming
before
the
committee,
where
it
is
really
putting
people
with
disabilities.
F
Well,
it's
not
even
putting
people
disabilities
out
we're
not
even
anywhere
on
the
plan
whatsoever.
You
know
we're
we're
listening
in
that
round
of
the
world
right
now
in
the
nation,
where
we're
looking
at
possible
voter
suppression.
Well,
I
think
this
ranks
right
up
there
with
suppressing
this
bully
community.
If
we
don't
even
have
access
to
businesses
to
be
able
to
live,
work
and
play
in
our
own
city
here
so
yeah.
So
I'm
appalled
and
absolutely
we'll
vote
against
this
and
right
with
you.
F
E
I
think
harvey
did
you
have
something
harvey
wanted
to
just
say.
Thank
you
for
mandy
and
what
you
said,
and
the
reason
for
bringing
that
up
too
about
the
parking
issues
and
not
being
able
to
see
it
and
have
it
visibility
and
having
it,
be
there
and
accessible
and
putting
it
out
in
that
hearing
language
and
that
way
for
people
to
understand.
A
A
A
You
were
right
it
it.
It
doesn't
directly
affect
ada,
but
the
fact
that
this
policy
has
not
been
viewed
with
an
equity
lens,
as
I
think
all
policies
within
the
city
should
be
viewed
through,
at
least
through
first
course,
to
to
see
what's
missing
here
is
completely
puts
the
disability
community
at
a
distinct
discriminatory
advantage,
and
that
alone
should
be
enough
to
stop
the
process
from
going
forward
and,
as
mandy
has
indicated,
unless
the
minimal
is
to
provide
at
least
if
no
public
parking
there
needs
to
be
disability
parking.
A
H
So
I
and
I
appreciate
that
it
was
acknowledged
that
I'm
somewhat
just
the
messenger
here,
but
I
think
that
context
is
important
so
that
when
you're
you're
you're
giving
feedback
to
us
that
it's
we
want
to
act
on
it
believe
me,
so
I
I'm
I'll
I'll,
leave
it
at
that
and
and
say
I'm
ready
to
to
hear
your
suggestions
in
more
detail.
I
and
I
I'm
sorry
that
I
have
another
meeting
that
I
have
to
present
at
at
5
30
this
evening.
H
B
Thank
you.
So
this
is
mandy
again
for
the
purpose
of
public
meeting
notice.
I
wanted
to
disclose
that
I
put
two
items
into
the
meeting
chat
to
read
aloud.
One
is
a
phonetic
spelling
for
the
interpreters
of
visibility.
Again,
that's
v,
I
s.
I
t
a
b,
I
l,
I
t
y
and
then
for
the
minutes
that
would
reference
this
term.
B
B
There
will
be
lawsuits,
we
can't
in
good
conscience.
Let
you
continue
without
bringing
that
up
and
bringing
that
to
the
attention
of
the
current
administration,
whether
we've
brought
it
up
before
or
not
makes
no
difference,
I'm
hoping
that
there
will
be
a
change
of
heart
or
common
sense
or
looking
at
new
case
law
to
tell
you
that
this
is
not
a
good
idea
and
that
something
has
to
change,
and
so
even
a
minimum
of
a
specific
number
of
stalls
that
would
could
be
used
as
a
reasonable
accommodation
can
trigger
this.
B
So
I
do
encourage
you
to
work
with
the
state
council
on
disability.
I
do
encourage
you
to
work
with
the
regional
ada
centers
and
the
united
states
access
board
and
to
look
at
the
case
law
we're
going
to
encourage
you
know
the
city
attorneys
to
do
the
same
before
we
get
into
a
situation
where
something
like
this
is
promote,
proposed,
voted
on
and
potentially
implemented,
where
it's
going
to
have
to
be
challenged
and
resolved
in
courts.
We
don't
want
that
to
happen.
B
I
think
that
there
can
be
a
compromise,
but
without
working
with
us
on
this
or
working
with
some
reputable
disability
community
for
engagement
and
just
talking
to
other
lawyers,
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
happen,
so
it
takes
more
than
just
us
here
and
more
than
coming
to
the
commission.
We're
not
going
to
approve
this.
That
was
never
probably
in
question,
but
I
think
how
we
help
you
navigate.
B
Sharing
this
information
back
to
the
decision
makers
is
what
you're
hoping
for
today
and
that
I
hope
that
this
feedback
tells
you
that
a
change
needs
to
be
made.
So
since
you
have
to
leave
soon
what
written
language
other
than
a
direct
letter
of
opposition
with
key
points
is
going
to
help.
You
what
other
information
can
we
provide.
C
Mandy
this
is
nick
and
thank
you
for
that
joe.
I
know
you
have
a
limited
time,
so,
how
about
I,
if
you
don't
mind
many,
let's
rephrase
it
this
way.
I
know
you
out
joe.
You
outlined
dates
for
public
comment.
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
here
to
maybe
work,
perhaps
a
little
bit
closer
directly
with
you
all
and
cpad
to
let's
say
check
where
to
manage
point.
There
could
be
a
compromise
within
the
changes.
A
Out
and
as
mandy
indicated,
I
think
the
the
biggest
problem
is
coming
to
us
too
late
in
the
process
and
one
other
legal
piece
and-
and
you
can
have
the
city
attorney
review
this,
but
I
believe
it's
illegal
for
a
municipality
to
create
a
policy
that
results
in
desperate
treatment
of
protected
class
citizens.
And
I
think
a
good
argument
could
be
made
that
that's
exactly
what
this
does.
B
This
is
mandy
real,
quick.
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
as
an
action
item
would
be
to
engage
the
minnesota
department
of
human
rights
in
the
ag's
office,
along
with
the
state
council
on
disability
directly
to
get
a
consultant,
and
maybe
there
could
be
maybe
we're
asking
the
wrong
question,
and
I
agree
with
nick-
maybe
we
just
say
we're
requesting
a
meeting
or
case
review
on
this
as
a
preemptive
action
prior
to
to
the
the
cycle
of
this
being
presented,
which
I
was
noting
was
the
public
hearing
on
april
12th.
B
A
A
H
No
thank
you
for
your
time.
I'm.
I
am
happy
to
have
additional
conversation
as
time
allows
like.
I
understand
this
is
a
quick
turnaround,
but
I
can
talk
with
nick
about
what
that
looks
like
if
we
were
to
talk
some
more
again.
You
all
have
my
contact,
information
or
nick
can
share
it
with
you.
Please
send
any
ideas
you
have
on
how
to
improve
this
ordinance
to
me
and
we'll
work
with
my
colleagues
to
incorporate
it
into
our
ordinance.
B
A
B
Sure,
okay,
so
I
think
at
this
point
my
motion
would
be
based
on
the
current
presentation
provided
in
today's
meeting
that
the
motion
would
be
to
have
macapod
formally
opposed
the
ordinance
change
as
written
and
that's
part
one
of
the
motion
and
then
the
connected
part
of
that
motion
sort
of
part.
Two
would
be
directing
ncr
to
engage
with
legal
consult
on
the
potential.
B
This
ordinance
would
have
on
the
disability
community
and
that
legal
consult
would
include
but
wouldn't
be
limited
to
the
following
entities:
minnesota
attorney
general's
office,
minnesota,
disability
law,
center
state
council
on
disability,
minnesota,
department
of
human
rights
and
federally
hud
would
need
to
be
included.
I
would
assume
as
well
their
disability
liaison
did
I
miss
anyone.
Ken.
B
B
So
I
would
definitely
take
that
as
a
friendly
amendment.
Do
you
also
believe
that
part
of
the
motion
should
include
a
letter
to
the
planning,
commission
and
city
council,
or
are
we
not
there
yet?
Is
that
something
the
planning
commission
is
meeting
in
april
before
our
next
meeting?
So
maybe
that's
an
order
in
the
motion
and
then
at
the
april
meeting
we
would
discuss
if
things
hadn't
changed
or
if
there
were
no
updates
to
write
a
letter
to
the
city
council
for
their
meeting.
A
A
E
B
B
A
Yeah,
I'm
also
happy
looking
at
it
and
editing,
but
the
first
draft
is
probably
not
quite
something
I
have
availability
for,
but
to
whoever
does
create
the
first
draft.
I
think
it's
really
important
to
include
the
word
disparate
treatment,
because
this
policy
is
a
policy
that
clearly
creates
as
its
outcome,
disparate
treatment,
and
that,
I
believe,
is
a
legal
component.
D
E
C
A
D
D
C
B
E
C
G
C
G
C
C
C
C
So
in
our
conversation
you
know
what
I
explained
to
it
is
the
components
that
they
haven't
need
to
have
in
place.
Is
that
structural
component
component
in
terms
of
heading
body
text
that
follows
that
linking
that
alternative
text
to
imagery
how
the
colors
play
out-
and
things
like
that?
So
they
have
that
on
hand,
and
we
are
fortunate
that
they
understand
it
because
they
have
worked
on
the
new
website
and
has
had
experience
in
that.
So
they
are
going
through
and
doing
that
formal
check
with
their
own
systems.
C
They
have
to
make
sure
that
information
is
readily
available
via
a
downloadable
format
or
something
in
terms
of
based
off
of
if
you
live
in.
This
ward
here
are
available
vaccination
clinics
and
subsequent
contact
information
and
so
on,
so
that
is
that
was
presented
to
them
and
they
are
very
well
that
was
received
very
well
by
them
as
well.
So
that
is
where
we
are
currently
on
this
particular
front.
A
A
A
F
B
I
do
so
first
off
ken
handled
what
I
was
going
to
say
very
eloquently,
because
too
often
we've
we've
even
offered,
but
it's
just
not
something
that
that
we
should
be
offering
anymore.
Do
we
need
to
have
a
motion
about
that
that
anytime
there's
a
a
request
for
compliance
checks
that
it
it
is
recommended,
or
you
know
that
that
the
position
of
makapod
is
that
this
needs
to
be
a
a
paid
function
and
included
in
part
of
their
their
budgeting
process
for
compliance
with
their
vendor.
A
B
I
know
I've
supplied
the
information
from
pete
p-e-a-t
on
this
before
and
other
organizations
that
that
talk
about
this.
So
I
know
for
the
sake
of
time,
this
might
not
be
the
best
way
to
do
it,
but
why
don't?
Maybe,
as
an
action
item
we
follow
up
to
see
if
ncr
or
the
city
has
any
documented
position
on
this?
C
B
C
B
Is
you
know,
one
ensuring
that
accessible
design
and
testing
is
included
as
part
of
that
procurement
process
and
in
that
budgeting
process,
so
whether
it's
an
internal
project
that
the
city's
gonna
have
to
pay
for
that
or
if
it's
through
an
external
vendor
that
that's
included
in
that
in
that
bid,
and
so
I
don't.
I
think
it's
premature
to
sort
of
make
a
motion
for
today
without
that
information.
C
No
problem,
so,
if
I'm,
if
I'm,
I
just
want
to
make
sure,
I
have
this
clear,
very
well,
sorry,
I'm
trying
to
take
notes
and
do
a
few
things,
at
least
on
the
vaccination
hub.
I
want
to
get
back
to
that
real
quick.
The
committee's
recommendation
is,
we
need
to
pay
for
user
testing
agreed,
that's
pretty
straightforward.
The
future
emotions
the.
A
A
Yeah,
so
I
I
mean,
I
think
that
looks
at
the
systemic
issue,
so
if
that
could
be
discovered,
then
we
might
be
able
to
recommend
how
that
could
be
avoided.
I
mean
if
any
department
could
vendor
out
or
contract
out
whenever
they
wanted
to,
without
any
type
of
gatekeeper,
that
that
could
that
could
create
a
lot
of
problems.
Moving.
A
G
One
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
about
the
the
screens
and
about
we
need
to
know
about
death
friendly
and
deaf-blind
screens,
so
if
they
have
an
interpreter
brought
in
for
something
or
a
person
to
get
their
vaccine,
even
though
it
they
could
be
only
there
for
half
an
hour,
but
it's
really
important
to
first
explain
to
them
while
explain
about
the
vaccine
exactly
what's
what
it's
used
for.
You
need
an
interpreter
because
with
masks
really,
we
can't
understand,
especially
if
you
know
something
happens.
G
I
know
there's
mass
and
you
can't
have
them,
because
they're
not
approved
to
have
certain
kinds
of
masks.
You
can't
really
have
the
clear
ones
because
they're
not
approved.
Is
that
what
we're
talking
about?
I
think
it's
important
that
if
the
there's
a
request
to
have
an
interpreter
available
for
the
clinic
or
the
center
for
a
deaf
deafblind
person
to
come.
A
G
A
G
A
G
B
So
this
is
mandy.
I
have
a
slightly
different
way
of
approaching
this
for
an
action
item
which
is
to
encourage
by
communicating
directly
with
heather
for
the
city
of
minneapolis,
to
partner
with
the
deaf
and
deaf-blind
community
to
host
a
specific
event
or
targeted
hours
at
the
convention
center
with
resources
and
services
for
the
deaf,
hard
of
hearing
and
deaf-blind
community.
A
B
To
do
that,
so
I
think
that's
a
that's
an
actual
recommendation
that
we
can
make
directly
to
minneapolis
department
of
health
and
they
they
can
also
decide
what
in
partners
that
they
want
to
engage
with
like
we
can
recommend
that
they
work
with
my
thor.
You
know
with
the
state
as
the
display
vaccination
coordinator,
who's
been
connecting
individuals
and
organizations
in
the
disability
community,
including
minneapolis,
to
help
get
vaccines.
We
can
advertise
in
places
like
vaccines
for
the
vulnerable
like.
A
A
C
C
No,
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
I'm
very
clear.
I
believe
I
am,
but
I
I
feel
like
there
was
three
potentials
kind
of
more
like
two
and
a
half
actions.
One
is
again
that
the
health
department
either
needs
to
check
back
with
the
vendor
or
pay
for
user
testing.
Accessibility,
accessibility,
user
testing,
the
second
one,
which
is
a
little
bit
outside
this
realm
in
terms
of
city
of
minneapolis,
particularly
the
health
department,
on
a
slowdown
to
partner
with
deaf
deafblind
organizations
and
services.
To
do
two
things.
C
G
A
A
A
You
know
and
I'll
give
you
an
example
from
the
state
we
do
have
in
our
contract
language
that
the
deliverable
has
to
be
accessible.
But
then
the
question
is,
and
that
got
omitted
from
the
policy
is
who
has
the
responsibility
to
ensure
the
accessibility,
and
that
often
includes
who
has
to
pay
for
that?
If
it
wasn't
included
in
the
first
deliverable?
So
just
learn
from
those
examples
that
those
are
areas
that
often
get
missed
in
policy,
but
are
really
important
to
have.
B
Right
so
this
is
mandy,
I'm
so
impressed
how
nick
is
multitasking
right
now,
because
I
was
just
sending
some
links
to
nick
and
I
accidentally
sent
it
to
everyone,
so
you
now
all
have
the
examples
about
accessible
procurement.
So
excuse
me
for
nerding
out
with
nick
so
there's
that
email.
I
also
wanted
to
say
that
you
know
if
we're
referring
this
to
vaccine
logistics.
B
C
C
A
C
So
yesterday
I
also
sent
out
kind
of
a
a
one-pager
with
links
and
information
to
where
folks
could
get
this
same
information
and
frequent
updates
as
well,
and
so
I
I'm
gonna
start
it
here,
where
I
want
to
give
a
very
universal
or
universe
of
approach
in
terms
of
painting
what's
happening,
and
then
we
could
kind
of.
I
know
that
there's
a
set
of
questions.
C
C
C
So
the
joint
information
system
is
a
again
multi-jurisdiction
effort
with
the
city
of
minneapolis,
hennepin,
county
and
different
departments
at
the
state
level
and
making
sure
that
we
are
able
to
one
absorb
questions,
concerns
issues
from
the
community
around
the
trial
and
trial
preparation,
as
well
as
provide
relevant
information
in
regards
to
any
types
of
service
updates
or
alterations
that
are
happening
around
the
trial.
So
a
good
example
of
that
right
now
is
around
government
center,
where
jury
selection
has
taken
place.
C
C
C
We
also
provide
information
in
different
languages
through
our
cultural
radio
shows
those
were
monthly.
Now
they
are
contracted
to
weekly
shows.
We
have
kmoj
at
89.9
fm
la
raza,
which
is
a
spanish
speaking
channel
at
95.7,
kali
k-a-l-y,
which
is
a
somali
station
and
then
wxk,
which
is
monk
as
well
operation
safety
net.
I'm
sorry,
real,
quick!
Let
me
switch
interpreters
d,
I'm
going
to
switch
to
you
right
now.
C
C
C
Yes
and
I
have
been
hounding
communications
and
they
have
been
putting
up
my
frequent
communications
or
messages
on
making
sure
that
I
get
all
the
up-to-date
information
about
where
the
press
conferences
are
happening.
So
at
first
they
were
not
they.
We
were
trying
to
move
to
a
static.
You
know
this
day
this
time,
this
location,
so
we
have
been
able
to
get
to
that
particular
cadence.
I
within
the
last
week,
so
mondays.
Well.
A
C
I've
I
have
not
tuned
in
via
our
local
channels,
but
I
think
at
least
with
friday's
press
conference,
that
that
was
a
special
event.
I
saw
that
one
streamed
through
wcco,
but
I
could
double
check,
but
I
I
I
don't
want
to
say
with
certainty,
but
I
would
think
wcco
and
a
few
of
the
other
local
channels,
like
kstp,
would
usually
stream
that
or
capture
it.
B
Hey
this
is
mandy,
so
I
was
looking
at
the
one.
I
guess
that
was
posted
nine
four
or
nine
hours
ago,
oh
hold
on
oh
gosh.
I
was
looking
at
it
and
it
started
playing.
So
I
don't
I'm
looking
at
it
on
facebook's
version.
You
know
the
there
isn't
any
live,
captioning!
That's!
Turning
on.
I
do
see
in
the
the
interpreter.
B
The
way
that
they've
designed
where
the
camera
is
the
interpreter
in
in
some
versions
is
in
front
of
a
flag
which
can
be
distracting
and
or
there's
someone
staged
behind
the
interpreter,
which
can
also
be
distracting
when
they're
moving
around.
There
needs
to
be
like
a
an
interpreter
zone
at
these
events,
where
it's
literally
the
floor
is
taped
off
blue
and
there
isn't
anything
in
the
camera
shot,
so
it
should
be
checked.
B
D
A
B
This
is
mandy
again.
If,
if
we're
not
talking
about
the
dissemination
of
information,
I
did
want
to
know
if
this
is
the
time
to
talk
about
accessible
path
of
travel
and
communicating
accessible
paths
of
travel
that
may
be
required
around
the
space
for
for
those
who
live
and
work
near
near
the
space.
Yes,.
C
C
B
So
sorry,
the
reason
why
I
mentioned
this
this
is
mandy
is
that
I
know
that
there
there's
an
individual
who
has
sent
requests
to
the
city
and
a
possible
lawsuit
pending,
which
I
believe
would
be
towards
hennepin
county
because
of
the
the
location,
not
the
city
necessarily,
but
the
city
might
be
a
party
based
on
lack
of
communication
of
accessible
path
of
travel.
So
it's
not
just
enough
to
have
the
accessible
path
of
travel
it's
to
communicate
where
it
is,
and
that's
more
than
just
signage.
B
So
it
also
needs
to
be
up
on
the
city
county.
The
the
partnerships,
the
operations
website,
on
how
to
request
a
reasonable
accommodation
to
access
that
to
live
work
or
play
or
engage
in
that
area
as
appropriate
play
is
a
little
bit
harder
to
say
because
they
they
can
actually
restrict.
Who
can
be
there
if
they
don't
have
official
business
work
or
are
trying
to
get
to
their
destination
like
where
they
live.
So
I've
seen
some
traffic
about
it.
B
We
can't
mandate
that
the
county
or
again
the
operation
do
that,
but
we
can
strongly
encourage
it
and
the
individual
who's
intending
to
sue
may
require
it.
But
that's
not
our
role.
Our
role
is
to
to
look
at
mitigating
the
risk
towards
the
city
and
promoting
accessibility
and
inclusion
in
the
city.
So
I
think
that
that
encompasses
that
and
I'll
end
there.
Thank
you.
B
C
A
C
C
A
A
I
think
it's
every
tuesday
morning
there
is
a
an
hour-long
program
being
offered
by
saint
cloud
state
in
their
one
of
their
disability
programs
and
they
bring
in
a
presenter
each
week
and
they've
been
so
the
last
two
weeks
they've
been
speaking
about
issues
within
the
deaf
community.
One
of
them
I
attended
was
related
to
vocational
rehabilitation,
but
now
I
understand
why
they
they
happen
all
this
month
and
they're.
They
all
have
a
a
topic
focus
of
of
interest
in
the
deaf
community.