►
From YouTube: April 7, 2021 Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Hi
everybody,
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee,
full
full
committee
meeting
on
wednesday
april
7th
4
pm,
and
I
just
want
to
notice
that
this
meeting
may
involve
the
remote
participation
by
members,
either
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
means
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency
of
the
novel
chronovirus
pandemic.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
statute,
section
13d
21.,
oh
hi,.
C
D
D
B
E
B
B
B
E
B
B
A
B
C
F
A
A
H
D
I
D
E
I
D
J
A
G
Well,
welcome
everyone
to
this
meeting.
It's
good
to
see
everyone
again,
there's
a
lot
that
happened
in
ine,
so
I'm
going
to
really
summarize
it
and
then
we'll
read
the
resolutions,
because
we
have
some
three
action
items
and
I
have
another
resolution
about
mndot
that
christopher
said
he
and
julia
worked
on
so
I'll,
ask
julia
or
chris
to
read
that
when
we're
dealing
with
it
because
that
pertains
to
our
meeting
as
well.
The
first
thing
that
came
up
on
our
meeting
was
the
hennepin
avenue
reconstruction
they're,
currently
at
15
percent.
G
They
will
be
coming
back
to
us
sometime
this
summer.
This
is
a
full
reconstruction
of
hennepin
avenue
from
douglas
to
lagoon.
They
said
we
asked
them
to
focus
on
there's
two
design
types
that
that
have
come
up.
We
asked
them
to
focus
on
design
one,
because
that
has
a
full
that
has
a
bike
lane.
The
other
design
does
not
have
a
bike
lane,
so
that
was
what
the
pack
asked
them
to
review,
although
they
did
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
both.
G
It
was
presented
by
becca,
hughes
and
and
also
joannette
kuno
of
kim
lee
horn,
which
is
the
design
group,
that's
helping
with
them,
and
there
were
several
other
people
from
minneapolis.
Public
works
there
as
well.
The
design
elements
are
green
space,
table,
crosswalks
and
corner
geography,
they're
still
working
on
designs,
hennepin
is
asking
they
want
it,
input
from
us
on
sidewalks
and
curb
cuts
and
bike
lanes
and
other
elements
of
design
that
really
severely
and
continuously
and
critically
impacted
pedestrians.
G
G
The
lane
width
had
expanded
to
four
or
five
lanes,
which
was
we
had
some
concerns
about
that
and
we
voiced
those
concerns.
We
also
talked
a
lot
about
curb
cuts
or
drive
for
places
that
had
parking
lots
when
they
had
maybe
another
access
to
that
parking
lot.
Could
they
close
those
curb
cuts
on
hennepin
avenue
to
reduce
difficulty
for
pedestrians?
G
Curb
cuts
and
left
turns
median
barrier;
they
they
were
going
to
put
up
a
median
bearer,
we
hope
a
barrier
in
an
attempt
to
calm
traffic
and
provide
a
little
bit
more
safety
for
pedestrians.
But
one
of
the
questions
we
had
was
to
reduce
the
size
of
that,
so
we
could
offer
more
space
to
pedestrians
on
the
sidewalk.
So
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
that.
We,
we
gave
a
lot
of
feedback.
G
This
discussion
went
on
for
quite
some
time
and
we
have
three
resolutions
related
one
one
resolution
related
to
that,
and
I
can
read
that
when
we're
done,
if
you
want
so
that
was
the
major
anyone
have
anything
else
that
they
want.
To
add
to
that,
I
think
that
was
a
major
input.
We
were.
We
have
a
lot
of
things
that
we
would
like
to
recommend
for
that
particular
that
particular
street,
but
they
will
be
back
to
us
before
they
go
to
the
transportation
and
public
works
committee
of
the
city.
G
G
So
here's
the
resolution
that
we
had
for
and
I've
got
a
copy
of
it
here-
that
I
can't
see
the
whole
thing,
but
I'll
read
what
I
have
you
can
scroll
it
up
when
I'm
done.
The
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
design
option
one
of
the
hennepin
avenue
south
reconstruction
project,
while
the
pac
has
reservations
and
recommendations
for
its
improvement
option,
one
alone
has,
within
its
reach
the
ability
to
measure
up
to
adopted
crucial
city
policies,
addressing
safety
mode
share,
shift,
accessibility,
equity
and
the
climate
crisis.
G
Hennepin
avenue
south
is
a
singular
street
distinguished
by
its
alignment,
history,
jurisdiction
and
desirability,
as
a
place
to
be
by
rebuilding,
to
serve
those
walking
biking
rolling
and
on
transit
for
its
entire
length.
Minneapolis
makes
clear.
Hennepin
avenue
is
a
community
space
and
route
for
people,
not
merely
a
passageway
for
cars.
The
pac
recognizes
this
is
a
generational
opportunity
to
transform
a
car-centric
corridor
demonstrating
for
future
projects
both
locally
and
statewide,
that
the
attainable
goal
of
equitably
serving
all
users
in
all
modes
is
the
appropriate
one.
G
Pursuant
to
the
above,
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
resoundingly
opposes
option
two
protected.
All
age
bike
lanes
are
non-negotiable.
Here
are
our
notes
to
the
specifics
of
option
one.
The
bike
lane
should
be
two-way
and
go
all
the
way
to
douglas
avenue.
Bus
lanes
should
be
24
hours
and
run
the
entire
length
of
the
corridor
within
the
project
area,
including
southbound,
between
douglas
and
franklin
and
in
both
directions.
G
South
of
the
uptown
transit
station,
the
intersections
of
hennepin
avenue
lake
lagoon
and
franklin
should
match
the
rest
of
the
corridor
and
not
expand
to
a
five-lane
cross
section.
All
curb
cuts
to
business
parking.
Lots
have
that
have
alternate
access
points
from
side
streets
should
be
closed
along
hennepin
reduce
as
many
curb
cuts
as
possible
into
parking
lots
along
the
corridor.
This
is
a
particular
concern
along
the
west
side
of
hennepin
center
medians.
G
G
Okay,
the
city
should
prioritize
working
with
mndot
to
gain
federal
funding
to
remove
the
redundant
secondary
highway
on
and
off
ramps
at
hennepin.
The
city
plans
do
not
currently
fill
the
sidewalk
gap
at
the
east
side
of
hennepin.
Between
douglas
and
franklin,
eight,
we
realize
it
is
not
within
city
purview
to
provide
benches,
which
are
the
most
basic
pedestrian
amenity.
G
We
request
that
the
city
prioritize
revisiting
this
its
policies
and
funding
in
order
to
ensure
basic
accessibility
and
equity
by
providing
public
benches
in
all
streets
within
the
transportation
action
plans,
pedestrian
priority
network.
Finally,
we
request
that
the
city
prioritize
the
protection
of
the
existing
mature
trees,
self-adjusting
year-round
pedestrian
amenities
on
this
corridor.
Even
if
this
decision
is
at
odds
with
any
city
forestry
policy
on
elementaries.
E
J
J
Okay,
so
the
the
adjacent
resolution-
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
give
context,
but
we
talked
about
that
both
in
the
irony
and
then
in
pnp,
and
it
addresses
what's
happening
currently
at
sort
of
at
the
city
level.
What
we
heard
from
robin
hutchinson
around
movement
to
remove
urban
highways,
what
we're
hearing
from
mndot
what
the
city
policies
in
2040
were.
So
here's
the
the
resolution
around
that
urban
freeways
are
inconsistent
with
minneapolis's
goals
contained
in
the
tap
vision,
zero,
complete
streets,
climate,
emergency
declaration,
social
cost
of
carbon
and
other
policy
statements.
J
Urban
freeways
add
public
health
costs
that
particularly
burden
lower
income
residents
and
renters
in
minneapolis
who
live
along
these
who
live
along
these
and
most
often
bear
the
brunt
of
these
environmental
injustices,
particularly
relevant
freeway.
Remediation
in
minneapolis,
is
expressly
recognized
by
the
city
in
its
minneapolis
2040
plan
as
a
goal
under
policy
48.
This
provision
states
freeway
remediation,
recover
and
repurpose
space
taken
by
construction
of
the
interstate
highway
system
in
minneapolis
and
use
it
to
reconnect
neighborhoods
and
provide
needed
housing,
employment,
greenspace,
clean
energy
and
other
amenities
consistent
with
city
goals.
J
Additionally,
the
on
off
ramps
of
hennepin
south
are
redundant
even
by
regional
vehicle
traffic
management
standards
and
planning,
given
two
immediately
located
ramp
sets
at
lindale
and
tennepin
north
the
confluence
of
city
policies,
city-only
jurisdiction,
the
climate
emergency
and
national
level.
Usdot
urban
highway
removal
momentum
create
a
unique
opportunity
for
the
city
of
minneapolis
to
begin
to
implement
freeway
remediation.
G
G
C
L
G
You
all
right.
Well,
let's
move
on
to
franklin
west,
then
we
had
a
discussion
about
that.
What
they're
they're,
improving
the
street
section
between
lindale
and
hennepin
avenue
and
franklin
and
they're
doing
they're
narrowing
the
lanes
to
10
feet,
they're,
also
adding
some
green
boulevards,
which
is
really
nice.
If
you
walk
there,
you
know
that
it's
a
lot
of
high-speed
traffic
people
going
from
franklin
to
and
getting
on
to
those
freeway
ramps
and
and
coming
off
the
freeway
on
lindale.
G
So
it
can
be
that
franklin
avenue
can
be
very
busy,
they're
they're,
eliminating
some
parking
spaces,
but
also
make
sure
that
there
are.
I
think
there
are
five
remaining
parking
spaces
on
that
street
in
response
to
residents
and
there's
a
couple
small
businesses
on
the
street,
I'm
looking.
If
there's
anything
else,
it
was
a
fairly
quick
discussion.
It
looks
like
a
an
improvement
from
where
it
is
it's.
It's
not
a
huge
project.
It's
not
full
reconstruction.
It's
just
trying
to
improve
that
that
particular
corridor.
G
G
Okay,
anything
okay,
then
we'll
move
on
to
lindale
avenue,
south
the
median
project
on
25th
street
and
27th
street.
They
have
been
with
us,
they've
been
to
ine
once
before
they
came
back
to
show
some
improvements.
They
had
made
some
small
improvements
which
people
had
feelings
about,
and
now
they're
going
to
do
more
temporary
improvements
and
including
some
hopefully,
some
striping,
and
also
some
bollards-
to
create
a
more
protected
path
for
bikers
and
to
curb
curb
extensions
at
both
25th
and
27th.
G
The
discussion
in
that
what
they
said,
what
they're
hoping
to
do
is
have
a
larger
reconstruction
process
coming
up
within
three
to
five
years,
so
we
urge
them
to
do
some
pretty
temporary,
especially
striping,
and
bring
the
street
down
from
four
lanes
to
three
lanes
currently
in
the
design
that
they
presented.
It's
still
two
lanes
going
each
direction.
G
We
also
asked
for
some
other
amenities
that
would
come
in
temporary
things
that
they
could
do
in
the
interim
before,
and
we
were
told
that
they
did
not
have
a
specific
timeline,
but
they
were
working
on
it
and
would
try
to
do
that
sometime
this
year,
maybe
in
the
fall.
I
think
that's
what
I
recall
this.
This
is
a
pretty
dangerous
site.
It's
it's.
G
A
really
dangerous
section
of
glendale
avenue
lindell
from
franklin
to
lake
street
is,
is
high
traffic
lots
of
lots
of
cars,
lots
of
speeding
cars
and
very
dangerous
across.
So
this
was
an
important
we
also
asked
about.
Would
there
be
some
conditions
met
on
29th
because
people
crossed
there
and
they
said
no,
they
couldn't
do
that.
They
would
be
adding
some
medians
temporarily
and
some
curb
extensions.
G
The
pedestrian
advisory
committee
supports
the
proposed
medians
at
25th
and
27th
street
on
lindale
avenue
south
with
reservations.
Maintaining
two
vehicle
travel
lanes
in
each
direction
is
concerning,
and
the
committee
advises
hennepin
county
to
pilot
a
4-3
conversion
on
lindell
avenue
south
from
franklin
to
lake
street
at
the
soonest
opportunity.
G
E
G
G
G
Nobody
wanted
to
cut
it
down,
so
they
came
back
with
a
redesign
to
preserve
this
beauty
and
we
all
thought
that
was
a
really
good
idea
and
that
design,
actually,
I
think,
improved
pedestrian
crossing
this
is
on
fairview
park
is
on
lindale
avenue
north
and
it's
a
it's
a
beautiful
park.
If
you've
never
been
there,
it's
it's
an
incredible
park,
but
it
had
a
lot
of
sidewalk
gaps.
There
were
a
lot
of
problems
with
walking
along
that
street.
G
I
G
I'm
sorry,
I
always
thought
you're
right.
It
is
part
of
you
and
there's
a
reason
for
it,
because
if
you've
ever
been
up
there
and
you
get
it
to
the
top
of
the
hill,
you
can
see
for
friggin
ever
so
it's
a
beautiful
park,
I'm
I
there
was
a
fair
view
too,
when
I
grew
up
over
north
across
from
the
cemetery
and
that's
in
my
head.
So
I
apologize
for
that.
G
Beautiful
part,
okay,
I
think
the
last
project
that
we
had
that
we
worked
on
was
of
the
lindelof
north
pedestrian
safety
project
and
chris
partheiser
presented
this.
This
is
a
really
high
speed
and
kind
of
a
dangerous
corridor,
a
lot
of
speeds,
sometimes
25
over
the
speed
limit.
I
think
that's
accurate
they're
they're,
currently
at
a
25
design
stage
homing
in
on
two
major
design
options
to
address.
First
and
foremost,
excessive
driver
speeds
having
been
very
high.
G
It's
a
high
injury
crash
network,
hot
spot
for
deaths
and
life
altering
injuries
option
one.
Each
intersection
is
a
on
an
s
curve
or
a
chicane
style
s-curve
achieved
by
bump
outs,
changing
curve
line
and
option
two
uses
s-curve
style
and
includes
medians
through
the
crosswalks.
Their
88
upgrades
are
included.
Budget
is
a
factor
in
this
less
than
full
reconstruction
project,
so
we're
striving
to
keep
changes
as
near
to
the
intersections
as
possible.
Final
design
and
budget
considerations
could
prevent
us
from
treating
each
corner
of
each
intersection
on
this
same
street
right
now.
G
That
lanes
are
13
inches
13
feet.
That
includes
two
feet
for
the
curb
pan
and
another.
It's
10
plus
one
plus
two,
if
that's
right
and
then
two
is
for
the
curved
pin,
this
design
has
shown
the
standard,
it's
the
lowest
that
we
can
do,
but
chris
said
to
ask
for
what
we
want.
So
I
think
we
have
a
resolution
to
address
that
we
would
like
as
narrow
streets
as
possible.
G
E
D
G
J
N
J
J
N
L
N
Well,
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
like
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to.
We
need
to
say
why
yeah
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
explain
why,
because
like
it's
even
more
than
just
to
protect
that
right,
it's
like
it's
also
to
slow
cars,
and
I,
I
think,
there's
just
there's
multiple
benefits
and
I
just
just
say
saying
that
you
want
it.
I
think
is
enough,
especially
since
I'm
not
I'm
the
audience,
and
I
know
what
you
want.
D
B
B
A
G
I
D
I
E
I
Hello,
one
and
all
covering
up
programs
and
policies
are
our
meeting
for
march
included
the
hennepin
avenue
reconstruction
project
covered
in
our
resolution,
just
passed,
as
well
as
the
cip,
a
resolution
where
and
wreck
a
resolution
of
recommendations
that
were
that
we
have
finished.
Is
this
being
re?
Shall
this
be
read
in
the
same
way?
That
is
this
is.
Are
we
voting
on
this
today.
C
I
J
Will
you
read
it
please
I
would
be
happy
to.
I
only
have
it
with
the
screen,
so
I
missed.
If
you
can
scroll
for
me,
that
would
be
great
when
that's
necessary,
so
pac
cip,
recommendations,
goals
of
the
pack
cip,
recommendations
for
minneapolis
to
meet
its
aggressive
vision,
zero
transportation
action
plan,
comprehensive
2040
plan
goals,
given
the
city's
climate,
emergency
and
racism,
public
health
crisis
declarations
and
the
social
cost
of
carbon.
J
All
street
projects
must
prioritize
people-oriented,
walkable
spaces
defined
below
prioritizing
the
pedestrian
experience
for
all
projects
will
create
the
necessary
behavior
change
and
strengthen
our
communities
as
laid
out
in
the
transportation
action
plan.
Modeshare
shift
needs
to
shift
rapidly.
Tap's
goal
is
sixty
percent
of
all
trips
made
by
walk
bike
transit
by
2030..
J
Only
by
funding
capital
projects,
programs
that
are
systems
wide
and
scale
can
we
make
this
happen.
The
pac
recommends
the
cip
increased
funding
for
pedestrian
bike
infrastructure
to
align
with
the
prioritization
of
modes
as
per
the
complete
streets
policy,
increasing
funding
and
walk
and
bike
programs
now
will
lower
costs
for
road
maintenance
for
the
future.
As
walking
and
biking
do
not
wear
out
streets
as
vehicles
do
pac
vision.
Minneapolis
is
the
best
walking
city
in
the
world
year
round
through
deliberate
collective
action.
J
Minneapolis
is
a
place
with
world-class
pedestrian
infrastructure
connecting
people
into
places
with
a
safe
and
engaging
public
realm
places
where
people
want
to
be.
Where
walking
is
the
culture
defining
a
walkable
street
to
paint
a
picture
of
what
we
mean
by
walkable
spaces
and
prioritizing
pedestrians?
J
J
If
your
hat
blows
off,
you
feel
safe
picking
it
up,
pedestrians
feel
safe
crossing
any
leg
of
an
intersection.
There
is
pedestrian
scale,
lighting
and
signs.
There
are
frequent
benches
gathering
spaces
and
green
spaces.
There
are
way
finding
signs
to
major
intersections
destinations
or
facilities.
The
street
is
safe
and
comfortable
for
all
modes.
J
People
on
foot
bikes,
scooter,
waiting
for
the
bus
or
in
a
car
corners
and
straightaways
have
unobstructed
views
for
safety
and
for
sunsets
there
are
frequent
public,
restrooms
and
water
fountains,
the
surfaces
are
walkable,
year-round,
snow
and
ice
are
cleared
down
to
the
concrete
on
all
sidewalks
and
corners
and
all
water
drains
off
walking
spaces.
So
it
does
not
ice
over
and
freeze
thaw
cycles.
J
People
of
all
ages
and
abilities
feel
comfortable
on
the
street
and
crossing
the
street
crossing.
The
street
is
automatic.
There
are
no
extensive
wait
times
to
get
across
under
60
seconds
the
sidewalks
allow
for
unobstructed
flow.
It
is
wide
enough
to
walk
next
to
someone
and
still
allow
another
to
pass
existing
programs.
The
pac
advocates
for
significant
and
continued
increases
to
funding
for
safe
routes
to
school.
Bp,
001
pedestrian
safety
program,
vp004,
defective
hazardous
sidewalks,
swk01
sidewalk,
yes,
swk02
and
division,
zero
program,
vza001,
cutting
or
underfunding.
J
J
Instead
of
laying
new
concrete,
see,
36th
street,
leading
to
bidet
makaska
as
an
example,
new
program
recommendations,
one
create
a
program
to
add
benches
public
restrooms
drinking
fountains
and
electric
wheelchair
charging
stations
in
busy
walking
areas
also
include
these
as
standard
features
on
all
stand-alone
reconstruction
projects
to
support
the
pedestrian
priority
network
and
mode
share
shift
goals
of
the
transportation
action
plan.
This
also
supports
equity
goals
related
to
gender
aging,
disability,
climate
resiliency,
community
health
and
vulnerable
populations.
J
These
improvements
must
prioritize
projects
that
grow
out
of
the
impacts
of
interrelated
crises
like
police
brutality
and
the
global
pandemic
projects
must
center
racial
justice
and
seek
to
address
or
repair
systemic
harm
against
marginalized
or
oppressed
community
members.
The
aim
is
to
specifically
meet
mode
share,
shift
and
community-led
changes
to
uses
of
right-of-way.
J
This
will
support
the
city's
declared
climate
emergency
goals
and
reduce
carbon
emissions.
This
will
support
the
transportation
action
plan's
goal
of
having
60
of
all
city
trips
made
by
transit,
walking,
rolling
and
biking.
This
will
allow
public
works
to
respond
to
community
needs
with
speed
and
skill.
J
J
This
takes
action
to
support
the
city's
approved,
complete
streets
policy,
four
create
a
program
to
improve
pedestrian
safety
and
experience
several
blocks
around
freeway.
On
and
off
ramps
traffic
calming
measures
will
support
vision,
zero
goals.
This
will
create
a
more
comfortable,
walking
and
biking
experience
near
freeways.
J
I'm
wondering
for
some
reason,
my
brain
thought
that
we
had
passed
this
and
I
forgot,
but
I'm
wondering
if
in
item
four,
where
we
talk
about
creating
a
program
to
improve
pedestrian
safety,
if
we
might
also
throw
in
start
examining
high
freeway
remediation
just
to
because
that
supports
our
other
requests
with
hennepin
and
regardless
of
what
happens
with
hennepin.
That's
something
that
is
part
of
the
city's
plans.
And
this
seems
to
be
the
right
time
to
get
the
conversation
going.
J
N
J
N
I'll
say
I'll
say
this:
I
obviously
it's
it's
all
it's
your
I'll
call!
If,
if
you
want
something
like
that
in
here
for
me
that
that
doesn't
seem
to
fit
super
cleanly
in
this
cip
resolution,
it
feels
it
feels
less
like
a
cip
programmatic
thing
and
more
like
a
direction.
You
want
the
city
to
go
and
and
before
we
even
do
any
money
towards
it.
J
In
the
city's
plans-
and
I
get
that
I
just
I
feel
like
we're,
on
the
one
hand
saying
we
want
to
remediate
freeways
and
start
looking
at
removing
these
ramps
and
then
on
the
other,
we're
saying
we
want
funding
to
make
them
better.
So
I
just
want
the
two
to
be
clear
that,
like
our
our
like,
we
want
the
city
to
examine
where
they
can
be
removed
and
absent
their
removal.
J
N
J
Do
is,
I
guess,
then.
My
question
is:
do
we
need
this
to
align
in
its
words
so
that
people
go
like?
Does
it
create
a
question
of
hey?
I
thought
they.
You
know.
I
thought
the
pack
was
wanting
us
to
look
at
removing
this
one,
but
really
we're
just
making
it
better.
Like
do
we
need
to
meet
in
this
document
explicit
that
this
is
a
subcategory
and
only
one
of
the
ways
to
improve
pedestrian
experience.
N
I
I
don't
think
I
I
don't
think
you
need
to
have
any
more
clarity
or
like
explain
that
anymore,
because
I
mean
also
for
me,
they're
they're,
two
different
things
right,
it's
like
even
if
we
do
decide
that
we're
going
to
start
removing
parts
of
freeways
and
on
and
off
ramps,
and
things
like
that,
there's
still
going
to
be
some
that
exist
in
the
city
and
and
so
that's.
What
kind
of
what
number
four
here
gets
at
is
making
those
places
safer
and
nicer,
which
is
just
kind
of
its
own
thing.
N
C
E
A
A
A
H
I
could
just
jump
into
you
for
a
second.
You
know
julian,
and
I
have
talked
about
going
sort
of
the
next
version
of
the
on
off
ramp
motion.
That's
been
passed
today
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
of
an
in-depth
and
broader
focused
document,
slash
motion
to
to
just
try
to
get
this.
This
conversation
going
and
spread
it
around.
H
L
Ahead:
okay,
sort
of
a
sidebar
conversation
with
chris
and
milson
real
quick,
I'm
curious.
So
what
why
why?
Why
are
we
looking
at
a
pdf
versus
word
document
and
like
could
we
can
ar?
Are
we
sure
that
this
was
the
final
one?
I'm
just
wondering
about
that
because
of
like
what
was
the
five
being
repeated
at
the
bottom?
L
N
To
answer
your
question
of,
if
it's
the
final,
I
I
I
think
it
all
looks
accurate
to
me
and
it's
just
that
that
last
one
was
left
on
there.
So
it's
just
that
deletion
and
then,
as
far
as
I,
I
think
the
reason
that
it's
a
pdf
is
just
the
online
one.
Is
it
I
don't
it's
easier
to
put
up
the
pdfs
and
then
like
it's
not
going
to
be
changed
by
folks
or
anything
like
that,
but
it
looked
like
nelson
had
a
word
but
milson.
C
C
E
N
L
D
D
N
N
E
N
L
E
J
I
I
was,
I
was
similarly
thrown
a
little
syntactically
by
number
four,
so
the
first
bullet
item
under
number
four
say
the
you
could
say:
traffic
calming
measures
here
will
support
division,
zero
goals-
I
I
guess
that
couldn't
be
more
quibbly,
but
that
it
just.
I
know
that
to
me
it
makes
it
did,
makes
it
looks
a
little
set
like
a
sentence
fragment
without
that
word.
In
that
first
bullet
item
under
under
program,
four
yeah.
J
D
J
E
C
E
C
E
J
J
J
A
A
A
N
A
J
J
E
A
J
E
I
K
H
C
D
A
A
Thanks
all
subcommittee
chairs,
then
next
up
on
the
agenda
is
the
summary
of
the
pack
and
back
annual
report
to
tpw,
which
matthew
and
I
and
alyssa
from
the
bicycle
advisory
committee
got
to
do
on
march
31st.
I
think
quite
a
few
of
you
got
to
log
in
and
watch.
Unfortunately,
it
was
sad
to
not
have
you
guys
there
in
person
and
afterwards
you
know
not
get
to
spend
a
little
time
together,
but
I
think
it
went
rather
well.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
a
summer.
H
I
B
I
E
J
I'll
echo,
all
that
I
thought
it
was
amazing.
I
was
disappointed
in
the
city
council
members
responses,
but
I
also
remembering
the
tone
has
shifted
in
the
past
three
years
significantly,
so
I'm
just
hoping
they're
sitting
with
it
and
re-watching
it,
but
you
and
alyssa
both
were
like
astounding
and
and
I'm
just
sorry.
We
weren't
there
to
be
in
person
giving
that
back
up
to
you.
A
Thanks
for
people
who
haven't
watched
it,
the
council
members
responses
really,
I
think
it
was
like
three
or
four
council
members
just
said
well,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
input.
We
love
to
be
pushed
on
these
topics,
we're
so
happy
to
know
that
you
want
us
to
follow
through
on
policy
and
then
none
of
them
ask
any
questions.
J
They
were
not
even
that
I
thought
they
they
did
like.
They
focused
on
weird,
not
things
what
you
just
summarized
would.
I
would
have
been
happier
if
they
had
said
that,
but
they
were
like,
but
there
are
some
people
who
don't
believe
in
climate
breakdown,
so
we
need.
What
can
we
do
we're
just
city
council
members,
you
are
the
pack,
you
hold
the
real
power,
bring
all
your
power
to
bear.
It
was
a
very
odd
sort
of
disconnect
response
from,
like
the
some
of
the
council
members,
I
expected
to
be
kind
of.
J
A
L
I
think
I
think
I
want
to
clarify.
I
think
it's
important
to
to
note
what
council,
member
gordon
and
council
president
bender
said
so
councilman
gordon
made
a
statement
questioning
whether
the
like
the
rest
of
minneapolis
is
where
or
I
don't
know
exactly
how
he
said
it,
but
but
he
he
referenced
like
where
other
people
in
minneapolis
were
and
that
maybe
they
aren't.
As
far
as
the
pack
is.
I
found
that
to
be
an
interesting
comment
and
then
the
council
president
bender
brought
up.
L
I
think
I
think
the
way
she
framed
it
was
brought
up
the
challenge
for
politicians,
I
guess
to
make
decisions,
if
there's
a
lot
of
like
opposition
and
I
believe,
referenced,
you
know
needing
to
build
support
for
the
types
of
things.
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
like
those
are
a
couple
points
that
I
heard
that
I
I
have
not.
E
E
C
J
I
would
disagree
neil.
I
was
out
recently
getting
comments
and
talking
to
people
about
hennepin
avenue
and
it
was
like
it
was
resounding
support
from
people
like
there
was
one
person
who
started
out
saying
well
what
about
parking
turned
out,
they
were
car,
free
and,
and
they
had
been
hit
by
a
driver,
and
they
were
super
like
they.
Their
their
initial
reaction
was
was
almost
like.
It
was
a
knee
jerk
sort
of
we.
We
were
so
car
cultured.
J
This
was
just
what
came
out
of
their
mouth,
but
the
discussion
was
there
and
you
know
even
like
talking
to
drivers.
Drivers
were
really
really.
You
know.
I
had
it's
really
stressful
experiences.
Long
have
been
so
I
think
the
people
who
volunteer
the
information
might
not
be
representative
of
where
people
are
at
if
they're
given
space
to
kind
of
share
information
about
their
experiences
or
things
along
those
lines,
and
it's
also,
I
think,
the
city's
responsibility
they've
got
a
communications
department.
J
They've
got
public
works
that
literally
like
goes
out
and
talks
to
people
so
the
if
there
isn't
that
education
happening
about
how
traffic
engineering
actually
works
or
what
climate
breakdown
means.
In
terms
of
city
policies,
I
I
it
was
weird
to
have
the
responsibility
flipped
back
on
a
volunteer
at
pedestrian
advisory
committee
with
zero
power
that
you
know
like
they
may
have
had
points,
but
that
their
city
council,
members.
J
E
Our
job
is
to
be
about
five
years
ahead
of
every
of
everybody
else.
Our
job
is
to
make
sure
the
city,
council
and
the
city
go
toward
the
where
we're
trying
to
get
to.
We
don't
have
to
give
a
damn
whatever
anybody
else
thinks,
and
I
personally
don't
because
they're
wrong
about
climate
change
and
tough
stuff.
You
know
you're
gonna
have
to
get
out
of
your
car
someday.
E
H
And
I
think
cam
acknowledged
that
when
he
said
it's
good
to
be
pushed
responding,
you
know
referring
to
the
city
council
and
I
think
that's
for
me
was
just
a
key
takeaway
that
that
is.
You
know,
like
neil
what
you
said.
I
mean
to
sort
of
illuminate
the
path
ahead,
even
if
you
know
everyone's
following
two
years
behind
and
to
keep
pushing
it
and
to
keep.
You
know
hacking
through
the
underbrush
and
just
to
keep
the
conversations
going
and
growing.
H
A
N
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna,
say
one
quick
thing
in
response
to
julia's
question
there
of
like
how
to
bring
this
forward.
I
I
just
want
to
re-highlight
we've
talked
about
this
recently,
but
two
upcoming
places
that
I
think
the
pac
can
like
bring
this
type
of
voice.
To
is
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
that
we've
been
having
discussions
about
revisiting
that
now
that
we've
passed
tap,
and
so
that
really
is
all
about.
Where
we're
putting
our
money,
which
really
gets
to.
I
think
the
core
of
the
presentation
that
abigail
and
alyssa
gave.
N
G
Thanks
my
response
was
to
neil's
saying
that
we're
the
you
know.
I
have
a
car
and
I'm
an
older
person,
and
I
use
a
car
because
I
have
issues
with.
I
did
have
issues
with
walking.
I'm
a
lot
better
now
and
I
just
bought
a
bike.
So
I'm
going
to
be
on
the
streets
doing
other
things,
but
people
there
are
a
lot
of
people.
G
The
more
we
keep
supporting
infrastructure
like
transit,
the
easier
it
will
be
for
people
to
make
the
decisions
to
let
go
of
their
car
because
letting
go
of
your
car
when
there
isn't
any
transit
really
readily
available,
especially
for
older
americans
and
older
minnesotans
is
hard.
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
push
to
make
that
an
easier
transition.
A
That's
not
you
know
contingent
on
traffic,
then
I
think
it
will
be
something
where
people
go.
Oh,
the
bus
is
actually
easier.
You
know
because
I
think
you're
right
barb.
It's
just
that.
If
people
have
a
system-wide
availability
for
cars,
you
can
go
anywhere
in
the
system.
It's
reliable
in
your
car
people
don't
feel
that
there's
a
reliable
system
for
everything
else,
so,
whether
it's
walking
biking
or
transit,
they
feel
like
there's
there's
holes
in
the
in
the
reliability
of
a
full
system-wide
thing.
A
B
J
Abigail
what
you
said,
I
know
we've
a
couple
of
times
pushed
the
city
usually
in
projects
around
having
like
trying
different
things.
If
you're
doing
reconstruction,
you
know
there's
going
to
be
disruption,
trying
things
that
help
people
make
that
mode
shift
on
a
longer
term
basis,
and
it
came
up
during
the
third
avenue
bridge
reconstruction.
The.
F
Hi-
and
I
just
want
to
put
in
a
word
for
minneapolis
and
hennepin
county
in
terms
of
that
central
bridge
project-
they
came
through
big.
Of
course
the
pandemic
came,
no
one
was
expecting
that,
but
but
all
the
planning
for
that
work
was
done
in
2019
and
they
came
through
big
time
in
terms
of
exclusive
transit
lanes
over
our
detour
route,
just
outstanding
support.
J
F
Well,
the
the
big
the
there
were
well:
okay,
there
are
a
couple
factors:
mndot
funded
15,
additional
traffic
control
agents,
the
deal
you
know
with
congestion,
and
you
know
okay,
this
is
2019.
No
one
knows
that
the
pandemic's
coming
okay
and
everyone
is
expecting.
It's
gonna
just
be
hosed.
On
that
end
of
downtown,
so
mndot
support
paid
for
15,
additional
transit,
con
or
traffic
control
agents.
We
were
gonna,
get
a
transit
only
lane
over
the
hennepin
bridges
inbound
in
the
morning
outbound
in
the
pm.
F
Now
that
hasn't
been
struck,
they
were
going
to
stripe
it,
but
then,
with
the
pandemic,
you
know
it
was
decided,
let's
wait
and
that,
and
we
went
to
detour
last
winter,
tough
to
put
down
red
paint
during
the
winter.
We
also
got
a
number
of
transit
signal
priorities.
You
know
left
left
turn
type
single
single
sig
signals.
Excuse
me
from
the
city
and
and
the
county
too.
So
I
I
just
there
was
great
support.
I
thought
for
transit
on
that
project.
F
I
just
feel
very
fortunate
as
a
transit
planner
that
I'm
working
in
minneapolis
because
of
the
support
we
get
from
city
staff
and-
and
I
know
you
know
we
ra-
we
I'm
saying
inclusive-
we
in
terms
of
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
raised
the
bar
pretty
high,
but
but
in
terms
of
transit.
I've
just
always
been
very
pleased
that
the
support
there-
you
know,
for
example,
you
know
with
the
closure
of
fourth
street
reconstruct
we
were
gonna,
get
a
third
street
contraflow
lane.
F
Well,
there's
been
a
number
of
things
that
came
up
since
that
in
relation
to
you
know
the
activity
downtown
in
relation
the
trial,
so
we
won't
have
it
immediately.
But
city
came
through
that
with
you
know
a
third.
You
know
contra
flow
lane
on
third
street
during
that
project.
So
I
just
yeah
it's
it's
tough,
not
to
say
enough
about
city
staff.
I
and,
in
my
perspective,
in
terms
of
their
support
for
transit.
C
L
I
mean
it
just
seems
like
we
just
got
done
with
this,
which
is
true
that
did
happen,
but
we
do
this.
Every
year,
the
pac,
just
as
a
reminder,
is
split
up.
So
roughly
half
the
membership
is,
is
up
every
year
for
appointment,
so
weirdly
in
the
odd
years,
there's
eight
vacancies
and
in
the
even
years
there's
seven
vacancies.
L
So
we
will
have
eight
spots
and
I
will
just
read
off
and
then
I'm
gonna
follow
up
with
an
email,
but
the
members
that
would
be
required
to
reapply
competitively
for
this,
for
the
seats
would
be
aaron,
adelaide,
matthew,
jim
julia,
sarah,
peter
and
tamir
and
I'll
note.
It
may
seem
a
little
strange
with
matthew
and
sarah,
but
they
were
filling
a
kind
of
a
midterm
spot.
So
you'll
have
to
actually
you
know
we'll
we'll
talk
I'll
email,
you
so
we'll.
L
L
So
we'll
do
that
as
well,
which
is
which
is,
I
think,
good,
because
we
got
a
lot
of
good
applications
in
the
last
round
and
then
finally,
I'll
give
you
a
little
insight
in
the
timeline.
So
the
applications
are
due
april
30th
and
then
we
are
going
to
target
the
probably
the
june
9th
tmpw
meeting
for
adoption
or
for,
like
you
know,
the
appointments
to
be
approved
by
city
council
and
then,
as
per
usual
on
a
typical
year.
The
new
cohort
will
start
in
july
for
the
july
full
committee
meeting.
J
L
That
is
up
to
you
all,
I
would
say
we
have.
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
good
good
people
already.
You
know
like
that,
had
applied
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
connecting
with
them
to
see
if
they're
still
interested.
We
also
like
you
know,
don't
know
if
we'll
have
any,
but
any
completely
empty
seats,
meaning
I
don't
know
if
incumbents
are,
are
planning
to
apply
or
not.
J
A
So
my
thought
was
maybe
matthew.
You
could
just
send
the
link
to
the
application
or
the
application
process
page
then
to
to
the
pack.
Then
I
think
we
could
take
it
amongst
ourselves
and
if
we
wanted
to
forward
it
to
organizations
or
groups
that
we
think
might
have
people
interested,
I
think
that
might
just
be.
You
know
we
can
just
do
it
on
our
own
pollution,
since
it
is
just
an
open
application.
J
And
it's
a
short
timeline.
The
other
thing,
if
it's
helpful,
is
that
we've
got
a
couple
of
previous
articles
that
different
members
have
written
about
their
own
experiences,
just
trying
to
lower
the
bar,
but
reaching
out
and
telling
people
what
what
it's
like
seems
to
be
helpful
and
sharing.
What
your
experiences
are
so
far
getting
involved
in
big
government
organizational
stuff
can
feel
intimidating
for
a
lot
of
people
or,
like
your
voice,
doesn't
isn't
wanted.
A
L
A
A
L
Oh,
I
I
guess,
referring
to
a
there's,
a
star
tribune
article
about
about
hennepin
that
and
there's
a
mention
of
the
the
block
between.
So
it's
not
it's
not
part
of
the
reconstruction
project
north
of
lake,
but
it's
as
part
of
the
I
guess.
So
it
was
reconstructed
I
think
a
couple
years
ago,
and
so
the
block
between
31st
street
and
lake
street
there's
discussion
about
adding
parking
back
to
that
block
and
which
would
impact
the
the
bike
lane.
A
L
L
E
A
D
L
C
D
A
But
anyway,
so
that
is
just
something
for
us
to
be
mindful
of
when
it
comes
to
hennepin,
being
reconstructed,
major
reconstructions
city
policy
in
general
city
policy
goals,
so
yeah,
I
did
not
read
that
article
I
was
just.
It
was
just
mentioned
to
me
as
something
that
actually
seems
that
it
was
like
a
decision
made
and
we
were
never
it
was.
I
don't
think
the
bac
even
got
to
consider
discussing
that
opinion
correct
for
that
change.
J
L
E
M
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
share
so
I'm
taking
on
a
new
role
at
the
county,
so
I
am
no
longer
going
to
be
attending
these
meetings.
Sadly,
but
jordan,
kosak
who's,
the
county's,
pedestrian
and
bicycle
coordinator,
he's
on
the
bac
he'll
be
attending
in
the
future,
so
he'll
be
in
good
hands,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I've
really
enjoyed
attending
these
meetings.
M
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
really
thoughtful
conversation
that
happens
here
and
hopefully
I'll
be
back
in
some
way
or
another,
I'm
working
more
on
the
capital
side
and
cip.
So
I
think
that
yeah
definitely
could
come
back
talking
about
that
at
another
time,
but
just
wanted
to
say
thanks
and
yeah
hope
to
talk
to
you
all
soon,
then,
who
are
you
the
hennepin
county
representative?
M
J
Just
as
a
reminder,
this
is
the
last
push
for
engagement
around
hennepin
avenue
before
the
comment
period
closes
april.
16Th
and
you
know
it's
one
of
those
streets
that
impacts
the
design
of
it
impacts
the
entire
city.
So
you
know
like
let
people
know
make
sure
you
wait
and
send
your
comments
called
there's
bunches
of
different
ways
to
do
it.
I
might
send
an
email
just
you
know.
J
This
is
kind
of
the
biggest
project
that
we've
seen
since
I've
been
on
the
pack
in
terms
of
where
it
meets
with
our
what
we've
been
tasked
with
as
an
advisory
committee
and
the
jurisdiction
of
it
being
the
cities
and
how
it'll
impact
the
entire
system
and
how
it
brings
in
all
these
pieces,
as
we
went
through
in
the
resolution.
Sorry,
I
care
a
lot
about
it.
That's
a
reminder
when
I'm
zipping
it.
E
K
Yes,
hi
everyone
I'm
attending
today
in
chen's
most
place,
but
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
all
know
that
if
you
weren't
aware
mndot's
statewide
pedestrian
system
plan
should
soon
be
a
finalized
and
approved
and
available
document.
If
anybody
would
wish
to
check
it
out
and
also,
if
there'd
be
interest
at
all
in
having
an
informational
presentation
of
any
kind
on
that,
I'm
sure
that
we
could
arrange
that
if,
if
so
desired
by
the
committee.