►
From YouTube: April 23, 2021 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
The
broadcast
of
the
regular
meeting
of
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization
will
now
begin
good
morning.
Welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minister
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d
021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
A
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
For
the
record,
my
name
is
neil
anderson
and
I
am
the
chair
of
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization.
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order.
The
open
meeting
law
requires
a
roll
call
vote
be
conducted
during
a
virtual
meeting
and
a
certification
form
will
be
completed
for
each
local
board.
Meeting.
This
initial
roll
call
will
allow
the
city
assessor
to
complete
the
certification
form
on
behalf
of
the
board
members
with
a
verbal
signature.
C
D
C
C
A
A
A
We
we
ask
that
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
case
or
your
appeal
to
the
board.
There
are
two
cases
where
the
assessor
staff
will
present
a
report,
they'll
be
given
five
minutes.
Finally,
the
board
will
have
five
minutes
to
ask
questions
and
discuss
the
case.
The
board
will
consider
and
take
action
on
each
case
as
they
are
presented.
A
E
E
We
do
continue
to
receive
appeals
and
the
board
will
accept
appeals
until
it
adjourns
when
the
board
adjourns
the
appeal
process
has
closed
and
we
will
no
longer
accept
appeal
applications.
The
assessor's
office
staff
is
monitoring
incoming
appeals
and
will
notify
the
board
of
all
appeals
received
before
the
board
adjourns
this
afternoon.
Thank
you.
E
So,
moving
into
our
first
appeal,
it
is
item
number
three
on
the
agenda
case
number
two
1-0-2-6-9.
It
is
3231
pure
street
northeast
the
property
owner
is
gail
bonneville
and
I
believe
miss
bonneville
is
on
the
line.
You
just
need
to
press
star
6
to
unmute
yourself,
and
you
can
go
ahead
and
present
to
the
board.
F
Yes,
my
name
is
gayle
bonneville
3231
peer
street
northeast.
I
received
the
valuation
notice
indicating
that
my
value
had
increased
20
the
estimated
market
value
increased
20
percent
or
44
000
over
last
year,
and
taxable
market
value
increased
24
percent
or
nearly
48
000
over
last
year.
I
want
to
make
it
clear
that
no
improvements,
upgrades
or
renovations
have
been
made
to
this
house
garage
or
property
since
2015,
and
in
fact
I
feel
that
the
property
in
the
house
has
fallen
backwards
has
not
even
maintained
a
status
quo
due
to
deferred
maintenance.
F
I've
lost
the
basement
heating
unit
in
may
2020,
due
to
carbon
monoxide
and
being
red
tagged.
A
major
shade
tree
in
the
back
backyard
was
removed
in
2018
with
causing
energy
efficiency
problems.
The
sale
price
potential
I
feel
has
diminished
due
to
what
would
be
needed.
Repairs
before
sale,
including
the
basement
heating
source
chimney
tuck
pointing
garage
foundation.
Stabilization
is
needed,
uneven,
dangerous,
alleyway
stairs
nearly
all
of
the
75
year.
Old
windows
are
still
present
little
to
no
exterior
wall,
insulation
and
central
air
conditioning
system
is
at
least
35
years
old.
F
I
initially
thought,
maybe
all
properties
had
gone
up
substantially,
but
I
did
a
search
of
38
adjacent
properties
on
my
block
and
the
adjacent
half
block
across
the
alley
and
found
that
only
three
properties,
including
mine
and
one
that
turned
into
a
rental
property
last
year,
went
up
an
assessed
value
of
20
percent,
which
is
the
highest
amount
of
the
parcels
in
this
batch
of
38
and
I've
included
the
list
below
on
the
document
that
I
sent
in.
So
hopefully
you
have
that,
in
addition,
some
parcels
are
lot
and
a
half
or
two
lots.
F
Mine
is
a
single
lot,
40
foot
lot
and,
according
to
the
city's
search
tool,
the
house
next
door
sold
for
under
8.5
000
under
last
year's
assessed
value,
and
this
this
year
the
city
and
county
website
shows
the
estimated
market
value
and
taxable
market
value
at
both
at
twenty
two,
twenty
eight
thousand
two
hundred
twenty
eight
thousand,
an
increase
of
only
nine
percent.
F
Most
of
the
properties
have
gone
up
in
the
single
digits
or
low
double
digits,
not
the
20
percent,
so
the
assessor's
office
would
also
notice
the
weight
park
neighborhood,
where
I'm
located
increased
about
10
to
11
percent.
On
average
zillow
says
that
estimated
properties
in
the
neighborhood
increased
around
9.7
percent
over
the
past
12
months.
Again,
no
new
amenities
have
been
added
to
the
the
general
community
nearby.
F
In
fact,
we've
had
added
blight
due
to
an
8
acre
parking
lot
for
overseas
shipping
containers
and
associated
new
semi-truck
diesel
traffic,
bringing
extra
pollution,
noise
and
blight
to
this
area.
So
I
am
baffled
as
to
why
this
house,
without
any
reservation
renovations
in
the
past
five
years,
would
have
increased
in
value
twenty
and
twenty
four
percent
over
the
past
year,
and
especially
in
comparison
to
the
neighborhood
properties.
F
F
Many
of
those
were
not
actually
comparables
because
there's
quite
a
demarcation
line
in
this
neighborhood
when
you
go
west
of
johnson
street
towards
central
avenue,
where
I
am
the
properties
I
feel,
are
quite
a
bit
different
and
older,
probably
not
as
much
invested
in
as
they
are,
as
you
get
towards
the
suburb
of
saint
anthony's
village.
So
that's
the
opposite
direction
of
where
I
am
so.
F
I
did
find
a
few
sales
very
few
sales
in
my
immediate
area
and
I've
got
that
in
my
document
too
and
bottom
line
is
I've
found
that
those
that
are
comparable
to
mine
are
assessed
at
a
lower
value
and
the
others
are
not
comparable
because
they're,
the
lots
are
bigger.
They
have
four
bedrooms
or
etc,
but
and
most,
if
not
all,
have
had
substantial,
substantial
renovation
done
to
them.
Remodeling
inside,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
photos
on
that
are
still
on
the
internet
for
what
from
when
they
did
sell.
So.
F
What
comparables
the
the
city
is
looking
at
that
actually
are
comparable
because
the
the
neighborhood
does
change
substantially,
so
they
need
to
be
looking
around
closer
to
around
this
house
and.
F
I
think
that's
about
all.
I
have
to
say
just
that.
I
would
I'm
just
baffled
as
to
why
this
has
gone
up
with
without
any
renovations
needed
improvements
on
the
house.
If
it
were
to
sell,
I
would
have
to
put
in
you
know
thousands
of
dollars
worth
of
work.
I
think
to
to
get
it
the
the
fair
price
for
it.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
You've
met
your
time
requirement,
just
a
note
to
begin
with,
I
think,
as
a
realtor
and
speaking
for
other
realtors,
we're
all
baffled
at
the
price
increases
we've
seen
this
year
last
year
and
this
year
I
am
we'll
ask
the
board
if
they
have
any
questions
or
comments
regarding
this
property
at
3231
peers.
G
Good
morning,
cherry
anderson
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
matt
banker,
I'm
a
residential
assessor
with
the
city
of
minneapolis,
I'm
presenting
case
number
21-0269
pertaining
to
the
property
located
at
3231
pierce
street
northeast
in
the
waite
park.
Neighborhood
of
minneapolis,
the
january
2nd
2021
estimated
market
value
of
the
property
is
262
000.
G
G
The
subject
was
built
in
1946
and
is
a
1.2
story.
Single-Family
home
in
an
area
consisting
primarily
of
other
single-family
homes
and
features
1
245
square
feet
above
grade.
The
main
floor
consists
of
five
rooms,
including
two
bedrooms,
and
one
full
bathroom.
A
bedroom
comprises
the
entirety
of
the
second
floor.
The
basement
is
comprised
primarily
of
finished
square
footage,
largely
a
living
room
and
three-quarter
bathroom.
G
The
subject.
Property
also
includes
a
detached
two-car
garage.
The
garage
can
be
accessed
from
the
alleyway
bordering
the
subject
to
the
east.
The
current
owner
purchased
the
property
for
one
hundred
and
five
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
on
october
27
1995,
I
relied
on
the
sales
comparison
approach.
For
this
analysis.
All
five
of
the
comparable
sales
used
are
1.2
story
homes
within
a
half
mile
of
the
subject,
each
within
the
weight
park,
neighborhood
and
west
of
johnson
street
northeast
comparable
one
at
3521,
polk
street
northeast
sold
for
288
thousand
dollars
in
august
of
2020.
G
comparable
one
is
located,
five
blocks
northwest
of
the
subject
and
like
the
subject
comparable
one
is
three
bedrooms
and
one
bathroom
above
grade
with
another
below
comparable
one
is
similar
in
construction
quality
and
condition,
as
well
as
nearly
identical
and
square
footage
above
grade
comparable
ones.
Lot
is
slightly
larger,
has
slightly
less
basement
finish
and
just
one
garage
stall,
comparable.
Two
at
3246,
lincoln
street
sold
for
277
500
in
october
of
2020.,
comparable
2
is
located.
2
blocks
east
of
the
subject
like
the
subject.
G
Comparable
2
has
3
bedrooms
and
1
bathroom
above
grade,
but,
unlike
the
subject,
does
not
contain
a
basement.
Bathroom
comparable
2
is
also
similar
in
quality
and
condition,
but
is
slightly
smaller
than
the
subject
both
above
grade
and
regarding
its
finished
basement
area.
Comparable
two's
lot
is
similar
to
the
subjects
but
contains
just
one
garage
style,
comparable
three
at
3345
taylor
street
sold
for
three
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
in
june
of
twenty
twenty
located
three
blocks
northwest
of
the
subject.
Comparable
three
is
slightly
superior
in
construction
quality,
but
is
similar
in
condition.
G
Bedroom
count
bathroom
count
and
is
equal
to
the
subject
and
quantity
of
garage
sales.
Comparable
3
is
slightly
larger
than
the
subject
and
additionally
contains
a
porch
but
has
less
finished,
basement
square
footage
than
the
subject
comparable.
4
at
3538
pierce
street
sold
for
270
thousand
dollars
in
october
of
2020
situated
three
blocks
north
of
the
subject
comparable
floor
is
slightly
superior
in
construction
quality,
but
is
similar
in
condition
and
bedroom
count.
G
Comparable
4
is
slightly
larger
and
has
one
above
grade
bathroom
like
the
subject,
but
has
much
less
basement
finish
and
does
not
contain
a
basement.
Bathroom
comparable
4
is
situated
on
a
larger
lot,
but
has
just
one
garage
stall,
comparable
5
at
3415,
pier
street
northeast
sold
for
239
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
in
october
and
august
of
2020.
G
My
apology,
comparable
five,
is
located
two
blocks
north
of
the
subject
and
is
similar
in
construction
quality
and
style,
but
is
inferior
in
size
and
condition,
while
comparable
five
has
a
porch
and
is
located
adjacent
to
a
neighborhood
park.
It
lacks
both
the
central
air
conditioning
and
finished
basement
of
the
subject.
G
After
the
adjustments
were
made
on
the
comparable
sales,
the
values
range
from
two
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
to
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
comparables
one
two
and
three
were
given
the
most
weight
of
my
analysis,
as
these
properties
are
most
similar
to
the
subject.
Comparable
four
was
also
given
substantial
weight
due
to
the
recency
of
its
channel.
Comparable
5
received
the
least
amount
of
weight
in
my
analysis
and
served
primarily
to
indicate
the
features
of
a
property
value
valued
in
the
range
of
230
to
250
000.
G
A
A
H
Mr
chair,
having
shown
a
lot
of
properties
in
the
northeast
area
over
the
last
year,
so
it
seems
to
me
that
the
value
that
the
city
is
placing
on
it
is
reasonable.
There
is
the
homeowner
is,
I
think,
asking
for
a
evaluation
of
234.
I
believe
was
that
correct
and
there's
virtually.
I
H
Yeah,
there's
virtually
nothing
decent
for
for
that
price.
In
the
area
the
prices
have
gone
up
dramatically.
Buyers
would
be
beat
out
on
a
numerous
occasions,
even
after
they
would
offer
much
higher
than
asking
price
in
that
price
range.
So
again,
based
on
my
experience
throughout
2020
in
that
area
of
town,
I
would
probably
support
the
valuation
that
the
appraiser
has
placed
on
it.
A
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
all
of
those
comments.
This
last
year
has
seen
tremendous
growth
in
price
in
every
sector
of
minneapolis.
A
And
even
even
with
condominiums
and
townhouses
in
downtown
minneapolis.
Finally,
taking
a
turn
at
the
beginning
of
this
year
to
increase
the
valuation
of
the
the
assessor
is
at
262..
A
A
If
there's
not
any
other
discussion,
I
we
will
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
3231.
Peers
may
have
a
motion.
C
I
A
It
has
been
moved
by
buderitha
seconded
by
bland
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
262
000.
J
A
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
item
number
four.
E
K
Board,
thank
you
rebecca.
This
is
rosemary,
mcmonagle
rebecca.
I
appreciate
you
leaving
me
a
voicemail
after
we
closed
yesterday,
because
our
office
filter
had
caught
your
email.
Matt
banker
has
spoken
with
me
and
I've
emailed
him
information
as
follow-up
before
this
meeting.
Matt
did
explain
to
me
that
it
wouldn't
matter
to
any
of
you
that
the
value
increased
over
72
percent
in
one
year,
but
it
does
matter
greatly
to
us.
There's
a
couple
of
challenges
on
the
property.
The
rear
property
width
is
31
feet,
which
is
very
small.
K
The
north
property
is
99
feet,
which
is
also
very
small.
After
we
purchased
the
lot,
the
zoning
department
increased
the
setbacks
from
five
to
seven
feet,
which
has
made
it
difficult
to
fit
on
the
property.
An
example
would
be,
the
rear
property
went
from
being
21
foot
buildable
to
17
foot
buildable.
When
you
look
at
the
setbacks,
and
that
means
the
difference
of
whether
a
garage
fits
or
not.
K
K
A
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
staff
report
on
this.
K
G
Sure,
good
morning,
chair
anderson
members
of
the
board,
my
name
remains
matt
banker
and
I'm
a
residential
assessor
with
the
city
of
minneapolis,
I'm
presenting
case
number
21-0290,
which
is
located
at
2835
brighton
avenue
northeast
in
the
white
park.
Neighborhood
of
minneapolis,
I
completed
a
desktop
review
of
this
property
with
the
appellant
over
the
phone
on
april
13th
2021,
the
january
2nd
2021
estimated
market
value
for
the
property
is
78
000.
G
A
subsequent
analysis
of
the
subject
indicates
a
value
of
90
000.
The
subject
is
a
vacant
residentially
zoned
lot
spanning
4847
square
feet.
The
lot
is
slightly
trapezoidal
in
shape
and
borders,
developed,
single-family
dwellings
to
the
north
and
east,
with
brighton
avenue
to
the
west
and
an
alley
comprising
the
entirety
of
the
southern
border.
The
current
owner
purchased
the
property
as
a
vacant
lot
for
75
000.
in
2015.,
I
relied
on
the
sales
comparison
approach.
G
Comparable
one
is
located
half
a
mile
west
of
the
subject
in
the
adjacent
audubon
park
neighborhood
and
the
subject
is
similarly
sized
and
like
the
subject
is
located.
One
block
from
saint
anthony
parkway,
comparable
one
is
deemed
inferior
in
topography.
Due
to
the
moderate
sloping
which,
from
an
interview
with
the
buyer
in
december,
has
made
designing
a
suitable
single-family
home
somewhat
complicated,
comparable
to
at
3543
pierce
street
sold
for
80
000
in
july
of
2020.
G
Comparable
2
is
located
1.25
miles
northwest
of
the
subject
in
the
lake
park.
Neighborhood
comparable
2
is
also
similarly
sized
to
the
subject.
An
adjustment
was
made
to
account
for
comparable
to
slightly
inferior
location,
both
observationally
due
to
its
proximity
to
nearby
railroad
tracks
and
confirmed
by
referencing.
Our
office's
study
of
land
values,
comparable
3
at
3410
wilshire
place
sold
for
184
thousand
seven
hundred
dollars
in
november
of
twenty
twenty
comparable
three
is
located
one
mile
north
of
the
subject
in
the
white
park.
G
Neighborhood
comparable
three
is
notably
larger
than
the
subject
and
an
additional
adjustment
was
made
for
the
shape
of
comparable
through,
namely,
its
superior
width
to
both
the
subject
and
other
comparables
comparable
four
at
five
nine,
five,
thirty
six
and
a
half
avenue
northeast
sold
for
fifty
six
thousand.
Fifty
eight
dollars
in
december
of
2019.
G
G
Adjustments
were
also
made
for
comparable
floors,
location
again
referencing
our
office's
study
of
land
valuation
after
adjustments
were
made
to
each
of
the
comparable
sales,
the
range
from
which
to
evaluate
the
price
per
square
foot
for
the
property
landed
between
fourteen
dollars
and
twenty
two
cents
and
twenty
two
dollars
and
seven
cents
per
square
foot.
The
selection
of
comparables
were
weighted
in
descending
order,
with
comparable
one
receiving
the
most
weight
towards
similar
size
and
location
to
the
subject.
G
My
analysis
concludes
that
from
an
indicated,
eighteen
dollars
and
sixteen
cents
per
square
foot,
the
overall
indicated
value
for
the
subject.
Lot
is
ninety
thousand
dollars.
Based
on
this
indication,
I
recommended
the
board
sustain
the
original
2021
estimated
market
value
of
78
thousand
dollars.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
open
myself
to
your
questions.
A
Thank
you
just
a
couple
comments
and
and
a
question.
I
was
the
listing
agent
of
595
36
and
a
half
street
that
was
a
distress
sale.
The
owners
needed
to
sell
it
immediately.
There
were
some
personal
issues
that
they
were
dealing
with,
and
so
that
is
really
a
lower
cop
dollar
wise.
They
were.
A
The
joining
lot
was
equal
size,
smaller
lot
and
they
were
able
to
build
a
rather
large
two-story
there.
I
and
I
don't
think
they
needed
a
variance
on
it.
G
G
A
A
Hearing
none,
we
will
not
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
2835
brighton
avenue
north
may.
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
K
C
D
A
C
C
A
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
item
number
five.
E
E
This
is
a
residential
case
at
20
or
sorry
1024
irvine
avenue
north
it
is
the
property
owner,
is
mark
langmaid,
and
you
heard
from
mr
langmaid
yesterday
he
had
a
series
of
cases
and
chose
to
have
you
sustain
the
value
so
that
he
could
continue
to
work
with
our
appraisal
staff,
and
I
spoke
with
mr
langmade
via
email,
and
he
has
elected
not
to
call
in
today
on
the
cases
that
were
on
the
agenda
for
today
and
just
asked
again
that
you
sustain
the
value
so
that
he
can
continue
the
appeal
process,
so
that
is
case
21.0432,
and
so
the
board
can
take
action
on
that
case.
A
Okay
case
number
21-0432,
1024
irving
avenue
north
being
that
there
will
be
no
discussion
on
this.
I
will
call
for
a
motion.
H
I
moved
to
sustain
the
value
for
20
or
pardon
me:
1024
irving,
avenue
north
at
169,
000.
A
Thank
you
is
there.
A
second
second
been
moved
by
bland
second
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
169
thousand
dollars.
With
no
no
discussion
on
the
motion,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
C
E
Yes,
yes,
chair
anderson.
The
next
case
following
that
21-0-4-3-3
on
page
279
at
190
johnson
street
northeast,
is
one
of
the
cases
where
they
did
not
respond
to
the
staff
request
to
schedule
a
phone-in
or
write-in
hearing.
So
it's
a
non-confirmed
case
similar
to
some
cases
that
we
have
had
over
the
course
of
the
week.
A
Okay,
with
no
one
to
provide
any
additional
information,
I
will
ask
the
board
for
a
motion.
H
All
right,
thank
you.
I
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
at
250,
000.
A
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second.
D
A
It
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
250
thousand
dollars.
Since
there's
no
discussion
on
the
motion,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
her
all.
C
E
Yes,
chair
anderson
and
board
members,
it
does
appear
that
we
have
our
caller
our
first
caller
in
as
a
phone
in,
so
we
can
move
back
up
to
page
42
of
your
pdf
document,
which
is
case
21-0423.
L
A
Hello,
please
proceed
with
identify
yourself
and
the
property,
and
then
please
proceed
with
your
appeal.
M
What
I'm
hoping
for
today
is
that
you
can
provide
me
with
a
brief
explanation
of
how
the
market
value
percentages
are
increased
or
decreased.
When
I
look
on
my
whole
block,
only
30
percent
of
the
homes
are
getting
increases
above
one
percent,
whereas
seventy
percent
are
getting
increases
of
one
percent
are
flat.
M
I've
noticed
that
it
seems
to
have
been
a
pattern
over
the
last
three
years
and
I
guess
I
need
some
help
in
understanding
the
process.
What
am
I
missing
with
this
pattern?
I
know
that
connie
ferguson
reviewed
my
home
back
in
2018.
She
submitted
the
home
as
average.
M
M
Clearly,
you
know
if
this
house
ever
went
on
the
market,
I
guess
based
on
the
condition
of
the
property,
that
of
my
property,
as
well
as
the
sales
that
I've
looked
at
in
my
neighborhood
and
the
condition
I'm
asking
that
the
market
value
stay
at
three
hundred
and
ten
thousand.
M
Dollars
I
have
attached
some
exhibits
that
go
through
my
findings,
as
well
as
the
historical
on
my
market
values
that
I've
had.
As
you
can
see,
I've
you
know
gone
through
a
few
periods
of
double
digits
and
in
the
comparables
that
I
use
it's
obviously
a
challenge
given
the
square
footage
of
my
property,
and
I
have
a
three
bedroom
one
bath
home
and
it's
kind
of
a
challenge
to
find
the
comparables
in
this
area.
For
this
type
of
property.
A
E
E
Dr
anderson
board
members
and
mr
welch,
I
can
tell
you
that
we
utilize
a
computer,
aided
mass
appraisal
model.
We
model
residential
values,
we
use
the
key
characteristics
of
properties
and
factors
to
create
this
model,
and
so
it
two
properties
next
door
to
each
other
that
have
different
characteristics.
Different
information
about
them
will
receive
different
increases
or
decreases.
M
I
think
there's
something
wrong
with
the
model
in
in
my
neighborhood,
as
I
said,
I
know,
of
homes
that
have
you
know,
there's
one
that
had
a
a
gut
renovation
in
their
kitchen,
there's
one
that
you
know
put
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
addition
for
a
kitchen
as
well
as
other
upgrades.
You
know
in
the
surrounding
area
and
they
have
consistently
not
gotten
in
increases
on
a
percentage
basis.
E
Okay,
so
mr
belch,
regardless
of
what
the
board
decides
here
today,
just
know,
you
still
have
the
opportunity
to
continue
your
appeal.
You'll
work
with
our
staff
appraiser
assigned
to
this
property.
E
I
believe
it's
brian
nelson,
I'm
not
exactly
sure
on
that,
but
you
can
continue
to
work
with
the
appraiser
assigned
to
this
property
and
they
can
explain
and
go
into
all
of
the
details
about
what
is
happening
in
your
neighborhood,
on
your
block
with
you
and
provide
comparable
sales.
M
I
appreciate
that,
like
I
said
you
know,
I
had
done
some
on
my
own.
I've
been
keeping
track
of
the
area.
I
know
the
market
is
changing
all
the
time
so,
based
on
my
analysis,
that's
why
I'm
asking
the
market
value
to
stay
at
310,
where,
where
it's
at.
A
This
is
chair
anderson
as
a
realtor.
I
look.
I
look
at
your
history
of
valuations
and
know
definitively
that
the
market
there
has
increased
at
a
much
higher
rate
than
what
your
taxes
of
tax
valuation
has
done
over
the
last
five
years,
but
and
that
is
separate
from
any
analysis
that
this
this
city
does
but
I'll
open
it
up
to
board
members
for
questions
and
comments
here,
board
members.
H
Mr
chair
anderson,
I'm
quite
familiar
with
the
area
having
having
been
growing
up
not
far
from
there,
and
I
guess
there
may
be
some
argument
here
for
an
adjusted
value.
But
I
don't
think
there
is
information
provided
for
us
to
be
able
to
determine
that.
Based
on
that,
I
would
probably
vote
to
sustain
the
value
and
encourage
the
homeowner
to
go
on
to
the
next
step,
where
perhaps
they
can
get
a
little
deeper
into
the
the
yeses
and
no's,
and
the
ups
and
downs.
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
A
A
M
Well,
I
understand
you
want
me
to
go
through
the
next
process,
but
you
do
realize
that
I
actually
left
someone
in
my
home
in
2018
and
did
an
evaluation.
So
I'm
not
sure
what
what
the
next
process
is.
A
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
The
next
case
rebecca.
E
L
Hi
hi,
my
name
is
jared.
We
purchased
our
property
in
2017.
L
At
270
thousand
dollars
and
it's
currently
showing
a
market
value
of
it's
a
one
bedroom
one
bath
condominium.
I
assume
you
can
see
my
information
and
the
there's
two
property
ids
attached
to
our
ownership
here
in
our
building,
there's
the
condo
unit
and
then
there's
a
parking
stall
and
combined
they
roll
up
to
304
400.
L
L
So
that's
one
thing:
I'd
like
your
your
team
there
to
maybe
provide
an
understanding
to
me
if
they're,
combined
or
not
combined
so
anyhow,
the
the
parking
spot
and
the
condo
are
inseparable
in
sale
for
the
covenants
of
the
building.
L
Homeowners
can
trade
parking
spots,
but
they
cannot
ever
sell
a
parking
spot
without
their
unit,
so
they
do
need
to
roll
together
for
emd
for
2021.,
so
taking
that
304
400
into
consideration.
L
A
Thank
you,
mr
shower.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
board.
H
Yes,
I
have
a
question:
what
is
the
view
from
your
condo.
A
Thank
you.
One
question
for
the
assessors
department:
are
the
the
tax
amount
here?
The
indicated
value
of
287?
Is
that
just
for
the
condominium,
or
does
that
include
the
parking
stalls.
E
Jerry
anderson
board
members
and
to
the
owner,
I
will
say
that
condom,
condo
buildings
and
garages
and
storage
units
do
add
complexity
to
the
valuation
process.
E
We
may
have
a
building
where
our
property,
where
all
the
garage
units
are
included
in
one
parcel
number
with
the
with
the
unit
the
unit
and
the
garage
style,
are
one
parcel
number
within
that
same
building.
They
property
owners
may
have
divided
off
a
garage
stall,
and
so
we
may
have,
in
the
exact
same
building,
have
a
property
id
for
the
unit
and
a
property
id
for
the
garage.
E
So
it
does
definitely
adds
complexity
when
we
value
condo
properties,
we
have
to
do
it
very
carefully,
very
methodically
to
be
sure
that
we
are
capturing
like
when
a
property
sells.
Typically,
they
will
sell
for
the
unit
and
all
the
garage
doors
will
sell
as
one
very
rarely
do.
We
have
well
not
very
rarely,
but
we
do
have
situations
again
where
the
garage
doll
is
divided
off
and
sold
independently,
but
I
will
say
just
to
the
owner's
point
that
it
does
add
complexity
when
we
value
condominium
properties.
C
Yes,
mr
chair,
I
have
a
question.
I
don't
know
the
building
at
all,
and
I
see
all
the
unit
numbers
here
for
the
building
that
are
for
sale
or
have
sold
are
any
of
those
exactly
like
your
unit
or
a
stacked
above
or
below,
or
have
the
exact
same
number
of
square
feet.
L
There,
the
square
footage
would
be
very
similar,
we're
all
right
around
950
for
one
bedroom,
950
square
feet
for
one
bedroom
and
on
my
list
of
sales
of
in
our
building.
I've
excluded
any
two
bedroom
two
bath
units
because
they're
quite
a
bit
larger
and
more
expensive.
L
So
if
you
as,
I
can't
remember
the
name
of
the
nice
woman
who
just
talked
about
combining
the
parking
along
with
the
unit,
if
you
go
into
the
tax
system
online,
you'll
you'll
see
for
each
of
our
units
in
our
building
for
every
address.
There's
two.
L
Property
ids
and
every
unit,
whether
it's
a
two
bedroom
or
more,
they
all
have
exactly
the
same
assessment
for
the
parking
stall.
I
mean
seventeen
thousand
four
hundred
now
in
my
stack
stack,
meaning
condos
on
top
of
each
other
in
our
building
in,
in
my
stack,
we
all
have
the
exact
same
square,
footage
and
and
similar
content.
L
Not
to
affect
my
my
neighbors,
who
I
know
and
love
in
my
stack,
but
our
emv
for
the
condo
only
is
60
to
70
thousand
dollars
more
than
any
other
unit
in
the
stack.
L
But
I
do
not
want
my
statement
to
affect
my
neighbor's
property
values.
Please,
I'm
just.
A
Thanks
so
you're
you're,
requesting
that
we
don't
increase
all
the
neighbors
to
meet
your
your
level.
L
H
I
mentioned
here
I
have
a
question:
how
many
stories
are
in
that
building.
L
A
Okay,
if
there
are
no
other
questions,
we
will
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
28.85
knox,
7
south
number.
708.
May
I
have
a
motion.
A
E
A
E
Is
rebecca?
Can
I
just
get
confirmation
again?
I
I
believe
mr
dertha
asked
this
question
of
mr
sauer,
but
the
comparable
sales
provided
on
page
59
of
your
packet
in
the
same
building
it
doesn't
look
like
any
of
those
units
are
the
exact
same
unit.
Is
that
correct
they're,
not
in
the
same
stack.
L
L
E
E
The
sale
prices
that
you
indicate
here,
those
are
the
listing
or
sale
prices,
including
the
garage
stalls.
L
H
Miss
malnquist
when,
when
condos
sell
that
have
separate
pids
for
the
garage
dolls,
we
never
indicate
separate
prices,
it's
always
one
price,
and
so
when
we
do
look
for
comparables,
we
we
look
for
whether
or
not
a
condo
unit
has
one
or
two
or
perhaps
no
garage,
and
that
will
affect
the
overall
price
but
for
purposes
of
what
things
sell
for
it
always
is
includes
whether
or
not
it
has
a
garage
stall
or
parking
space.
That's
correct.
A
D
C
A
Second,
that
thank
you
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
borderthe
to
decrease
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
270
thousand
dollars.
C
E
Chair
anderson
and
board
members,
the
next
case
is
case
21-0425
at
three:
zero:
zero,
six
ulysses
street
north
east.
It's
on
page
60
in
your
packet.
However,
I
do
not
see
the
phone
number
listed
for
this
property
on
our
call
can
is
the
property
owner
the
vulnera
family
trust
are
if
you're
on
the
call
please
press
star,
6
and
state
your
name
and.
E
E
O
A
I
believe
so
I
I
know
I
have.
I
can't
speak
for
the
board
members,
but
please
proceed
with
your
appeal.
O
Sure,
okay,
the
appeal
is
based
on.
We
are
in
the
midst
of
the
construction
for
the
southwest
light
rail.
It
is
right
behind
the
house.
We
have
spoken
with
five
other
realtors
that
are
residents
or
experts
in
the
cedar,
islesd
neighborhood,
which
I
have
resided
in
since
1959.
O
We
have
successfully
appealed
the
increases
in
our
property
value
for
the
last
three
times
that
they've
been
proposed
to
be
raised
based
on
no
one
knows,
including
the
city
assessor,
that
first
looked
at
it
in
2017
what
the
impact
is
really
going
to
be
on
the
marketable
value
of
the
building.
Once
the
light
rail
is
running,
the
light
rail
now
has
been
pushed
back
to
2024
at
a
minimum
to
be
operational
and
we've
been
told.
If
we
sell
it
before
people
can
see
it
feel
it
experience
it.
O
We
are
going
to
take
a
pretty
serious
bath
on
the
value
of
the
home,
so
we
proposed-
and
I
didn't
realize
the
first
time
we
proposed
it-
that
you
cannot
just
have
a
blanket
statement
and
say
freeze
it
until
the
light
rail
is
operational,
so
people
can
experience
it
and
make
a
judgment
call
on
whether
they
believe
it
is
impacting
the
livability
there.
So
we
have
to
do
this
annually,
although
I
believe
in
2018
it
was
skipped
so
it's
2017,
2019,
2020
and
now
we're
going
for
the
2021
tax
year.
O
A
Okay,
so
so
you
haven't
lost
any
income
due
to
the
light
rail.
At
this
point,.
O
No,
but
what
I've
said
in
my
document
is
that
we've
frozen
the
rent,
it
is
unrealistically
low
anyway,
it's
twelve
hundred
dollars
a
month
for
a
two
bedroom
plus
den,
but
we've
kept
it
at
1200,
including
utilities,
because
we
know
that
they're
on
the
cusp
of
leaving,
just
because
of
the
construction,
and,
as
I
said
in
the
document,
I
don't
know
you
know
during
the
middle
of
the
construction.
We
don't
know
if
we
lose
our
tenants
if
we're
even
going
to
be
able
to
rent
it.
O
We
really
do
not
know
the
rent
at
twelve
hundred
dollars
a
month
with
utilities
included
is
probably
three
to
five
hundred
dollars
lower
than
it
should
be
for
the
market.
But
that
said
what
we
had
in
the
back
and
what
we
have
in
the
back
now,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photos
that
are
provided
in
the
document,
there's
a
whole
other
animal.
It's
not
the
way
it
was.
H
Mr
chair,
this
there
is
a
significant
impact
with
the
light
rail
construction.
Burnham
road
is
a
pretty
nice
address.
I've
always
loved
that
street
in
the
homes
on
it,
but
they
have
been
significantly
impacted
by
loss
of
trees
by
the
noise
by
the
construction
and
and
since,
as
the
homeowner
pointed
out,
any
new
buyer
would
certainly
take
into
account
what
that
it's
not
exactly
sure
what
how
it's
going
to
end
up,
and
it's
too
far
down
the
road.
H
So
I
would
more
than
likely
move
to
reduce
the
assessed
value.
H
A
A
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
hearing
none
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
B
E
P
Good
morning,
chair
anderson
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
michael
revell.
I
am
the
homeowner
at
5200,
knox,
avenue
south
and
my
case
is
based
on
a
number
of
variables.
The
first
is
a
recent
appraisal
from
a
refinance
that
we
undertook
this
past
year
and
also
the
fact
that
our
assessment
has
gone
up
roughly
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
since
purchasing
the
home
in
2018..
P
But
I
would
just
note
that
our
residence
is
a
two
bed
two
bath
and
on
the
main
level
we
have
roughly
1270
square
feet
of
finished
space
and
while
the
basement
is
appears
to
be
finished,
it's
not
heated
or
cooled,
and
so
it's
it's
not
usable.
Q
P
In
the
winter
months,
so
that
is
that's
all
I
have
to
present
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
based
on
the
appraisal
that
I
submitted.
A
Thank
you.
I've
reviewed
the
appraisal.
I
also
just
wanted
to
reconfirm
that
there's
an
unfinished
expansion
in
the
property.
A
A
A
Board
members
will
have
to
unmute
their
their
microphone
in
order
to.
A
H
Mr
chair,
this
is
a
house
I'm
somewhat
familiar
with
from
years
past.
It's
a
very
handsome
all-brick
home
on
the
corner,
52nd
and
knox.
H
Given
that
it
is
a
two-bedroom,
just
although
it
does
have
an
expansion,
what's
interesting
to
me-
is
that
over
the
years
that
no
one
has
finished,
that
expansion,
which
would
which
is
of
interest-
and
it
may
well
have
to
do
with
the
access
to
it.
H
Given
that
it's
a
it's
a
two
bedroom,
I
would
suggest
that
the
current
value
is
perhaps
too
high
for
what
is
there
knowing
the
neighborhood
quite
well,
I
would
probably
move
for
somewhat
of
a
reduction
in
the
value.
Excuse
me.
A
Thank
you
well
with
the
appraisal
coming
in
in
march
of
2020
at
479
and
comparables,
and
I
believe,
was
491
on
a
on
a
cost
approach.
A
You
know
and
there's
been
some
appreciation
since
then,
so
I
would
think
that
somewhere
in
the
500
range
would
be
appropriate
495
to
5
500.
Any
other
comments.
A
A
E
Moving
on
to
cases
moving
on
to
case
21-0428,
located
at
4552,
harriet
avenue,
page
112
in
your
pdf
packet,
the
property
owner
is
on
the
line.
You
may
go
ahead
and
press
star
six
to
unmute
and
present
your
case
to
the
board.
Please
state
your
name
and
address,
and
you
have
five
minutes
or
less.
Thank
you,
hello.
N
N
N
Appraisal
for
20
december
2018
was
380,
but
the
2019
taxes
were
higher
and
also
the
february
20
value
was
500
from
the
mortgage
bank
because
I
had
the
moral
case
I
boarded
and
did
the
audition,
but
then
I
had
to
borrow
a
game
because
I
put
the
money
into
health
stuff
and
then
I
had
to
borrow
again.
I
didn't
finish
the
audition,
because
I
I
got
sick
2019.
If
I
had
to
restore
it
over
february,
2020
cyborg
and
the
appraisal
was
at
500.
A
Thank
you
very
much
board
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
or.
A
Board
members,
do
you
have
any
questions
or
comments.
A
I
agree
the
the
two
appraisals,
the
one
is
dated,
but
the
february
2020
of
500
might
be
a
little
low
and
we
have
seen
some
appreciation
since
then
close
to
10
percent.
So
I
think
something
in
the
560
580
range
might
be
appropriate.
Other
comments
from
board
members.
C
Mr
chair,
this
looks
to
be
kind
of
a
unique
property.
In
a
sense
it
looks.
Apparently
there
was
a
large
edition
or
an
addition
put
on
several
years
ago,
and
so
maybe
that
edition
doesn't
didn't
add
the
contributory
value
to
the
property,
as
maybe
originally
thought
is
what
I'm
guessing
it.
It's
a
property.
I
don't
know
what
the
original
size
was,
but
obviously
a
large
edition,
because
it
was
quite
a
new,
a
large
new
improvement
made
back
in
2019,
which
would
have
been
probably
built
in
2018.
C
So
it's
my
only
comment
that
that
this
large
edition
has
affected
the
value.
Obviously,
and
maybe
comps
are
maybe
comps
are
hard
to
find
that
when
you
got
half
I
don't
know
if
it's
half
the
house
is
new
and
half
as
old.
I
really
don't
know
it
might
have
been
affected.
The
appraisal
a
little
bit
or
in
all
cases.
H
Board,
member
bergirtha:
I
note
that
the
value
went
up
dramatically
between
from
one
year
to
the
next,
and
I
think
that
indicates
what
you're
talking
about
it
was
218
and
the
next
year
it
was
up
in
the
sixes
so
that
work
obviously
made
the
difference.
So
there
you
know,
that's
that's
a
good
explanation
for
why
the
value
is
as
high
as
it
is.
A
D
A
D
A
A
That
carries
and
the
motion
is
adopted
rebecca
next
case.
E
Yes,
the
next
case
is
21-0-4-2-9
located
a
residential
case
located
at
1155.
Cedar
view
drive
it's
on
page
184
in
your
pdf
packet,
the
property
owners,
the
simpsons
are
on
the
line.
You
may
please
press
star
six
to
unmute
state.
Your
name
and
address
present
your
case
to
the
board.
You
have
five
minutes
or
less.
Thank
you.
J
Sure
it's
patrick
simpson
and
the
address
is
1155.
Cedarview
drive
my
wife
and
I
we
recently
purchased
the
property
last
friday
and
the
our
lender
had
an
appraisal
done
and
they
compared
to
kind
of.
I
think
it
was
like
55
different
properties
in
the
neighborhood
and
identified
six
as
being
kind
of
relevant
to
to
this
purchase,
and
they
did
that
appraisal
in
march
of
this
year
and
the
the
appraised
value
came
in
pretty
significantly
under
what
the
the
county
assessor
has
in.
A
J
It
it
was
not,
it
was
not
listed,
my
my
uncle
sold
it
and
we
figured.
We
would
save
some
some
transaction
costs
by
not
hiring
a
realtor.
A
H
Mr
chair,
I
too
have
reviewed
the
appraisal
it
is.
There
were
good
comps
I
I
would
take
in
mind.
However,
the
fact
that
it
was
not
on
the
open
market
and
perhaps
not
a
arm's
length
transaction
based
on
that
an
appraisal
for
a
sale
will
be
reflected
it.
It
reflects
the
price
so,
for
example,
if
the
appraiser
actually
was
coming
up
with
a
figure
of
660
is
what
this
is.
They
wouldn't
put
660
on
the
appraisal.
H
They
would
certainly
sustain
the
the
sale
price
based
on
that
the
585
is
maybe
a
little
low
for
this
property
in
that
neighborhood.
Maybe
mr
chow
could
comment
on
appraisals
done
for
purchases
and
refunds.
D
Sure,
well,
the
appraiser
is
supposed
to
appraise
a
property,
regardless
of
what
the
contract
price
is.
So
it's
not
supposed
to
have
any
influence
on
the
appraiser,
but
I
I
work
more
in
the
commercial
field
than
the
residential
field,
but
my
understanding
that
I
mean
it's
all
appraisers
are
supposed
to
find
the
best
comparables
and
try
to
establish
a
fair
market
value
assuming
proper
exposure
to
the
market
and
all
the
things
that
go
up
in
arms
like
sale.
So
thank.
D
I
found
the
appraisal
to
be
in
order,
so
I
I
moved
to
revise
the
value
to
the
appraised
value.
I
think
it
was
585
000
dollars.
H
A
Has
been
moved
by
seconded
by
bland
to
decrease
the
estimate,
2021
estimated
market
value
to
585
thousand
dollars.
C
D
A
You're
welcome
rebecca
next
item.
E
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
There
was
a
an
appraisal
done
in
2018
for
650
000
that
the
owner
submitted
the
owner
is
requesting
a
valuation
of
655
000.
I
believe
we've
had
a
fair
amount
of
appreciation
in
that
area.
Since
then,.
H
A
A
C
C
A
Carries
and
the
motion
is
adopted
rebecca
case
number
13.
E
Yes
case:
number
21-0431
is
a
condominium
located
at
one
one:
two:
zero
second
street
south
number,
601
it's
on
page
266
in
your
packet,
the
property
owners,
stephen
and
cheryl
lang
are
on
the
call
property
owners.
Please
press
star,
6
to
unmute
to
state
your
name
and
property
address,
and
you
have
five
minutes
to
present
to
the
board.
I
Okay,
I'm
cheryl
lang
at
1120,
south
second
street
number
601,
and
we
received
our
information.
They
assessed
the
value
at
572.,
we're
not
we're
not
talking
about
the
garage,
and
I
talked
to
my
realtor.
I
No
that's,
but
if
I
want
to
sell
it,
she
said
I
I'm
gonna
have
trouble
if
I
ask
over
six.
So
if
you
take
a
look
at
540
plus
the
garage
stalls,
595
would
seem
to
be
what
we
should
be
getting
instead
of
you
have
it
at
6,
27.
A
There
are
no
sales
comps
to
review
here,
so
really,
all
that
we
have
is
just
based
on
the
comments
provided
the
change
in
view.
I
see
that
the
assessed
value
has
decreased
from
711
000
in
2018
to
665
in
2019
to
572
last
year.
A
I
Sales
costs
with
with
you
there
are,
if
you
take
a
look
at
the
other
sales
in
the
buildings,
they've
gone
down
and
what's
with
the
unrest
in
the
city
right
now,
obviously
our
properties
are
not
worth
what
they
once
were.
A
I
can't
addre-
or
I
don't
don't-
have
the
ability
to
address
that
here.
We
really
need
to
be
provided
with
some
concrete
information
of
other
sales
that
are
similar
to
your
property.
That
would
justify
a
decrease.
C
That,
mr
chair,
I
I
agree
with
with
you
on
that.
I
I
need
to
see
sales.
Anecdotal
information
is
fine,
but
I
I
prefer
to
have
sales
to
look
at
in
situations
like
this.
I
A
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
There
is
a
process.
This
is
the
first
step
in
a
process.
If
we
sustain
the
value
here,
you
can
take
it
to
another
step
and
work
with
the
city,
assessor,
to
adjust
your
value
and
or
take
it
on
to
the
county
for
a
further
opinion
where
you
can
provide
more
information.
A
A
Thank
you
any
other
questions
from
board
members.
A
A
C
D
D
E
Chair
anderson
and
board
members,
we
have
addressed
item
number
14
and
15,
so
we
would
move
on
to
item
number
16.
and
that
is
case
21-0434
residential
case
located
at
88
7th
avenue
northeast.
This
is
on
page
304
in
your
packet.
This
is
a
another
property
where
the
property
owner
did
not
respond
and
confirm
that
they
wanted
you
to
reveal
their
case
in
over
the
phone
or
in
writing.
So
the
board
can
go
ahead
and
take
action
on
this
case.
E
A
A
So
personally,
and
the
without
comparables,
it's
really
hard
to
make
any
sort
of
changes
or
adjustments
do
any
of
the
other
board.
Members
have
questions
or
comments.
H
Mr
chair,
I
would
certainly
agree
with
you
what
the
information
provided
doesn't
give
us
any
real
information.
There
are
no
real
comparables
so,
based
on
that,
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
sustain
the
value
for
88
7th
street
northeast
at
396.
000.
A
C
J
E
21-0435
is
the
case
number
residential
property
located
at
2434
james
avenue
north.
This
is
another
property
owned
by
mr
lang,
maid
and,
as
you
recall,
from
our
earlier
conversation,
mr
lang
may
chose
to
not
appear
today
and
have
his
value
sustained
so
that
he
could
move
forward
in
the
next
step
of
the
process.
The
board
can
go
ahead
and
take
action.
A
D
C
C
E
Jerry
anderson
and
board
members
we
are
going
to
back
up
because
there
was
one
case
where
the
property
owner
was
supposed
to
call
in
and
didn't
so
we
just
need
you
to
take
action
on
that
case.
It's
backing
up
the
case
agenda
item
number
seven
case,
two
one
21-0425
a
residential
case
at
3006
ulysses
street
north
east
page
60
in
your
packet,
so
the
property
owner
didn't
call
in
you
can
review
what
was
provided
or
you
can
sustain
the
value
and
move
them
forward
in
the
next
step
of
the
appeal
process.
A
Thank
you
reviewing
it
quickly.
The
sales
comps
did
not
supply
any
content.
Real
content.
That's
helpful,
though
the
pictures
are
compelling.
I'd
recommend
the
owners
move
on
to
the
next
level
being
that
they're
on
not
here
today
to.
A
Bleed
their
case.
So
unless
there's
any
questions,
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
board,
I
will
ask
for
a
motion.
H
A
Appreciate
that
it
has
been
moved
by
bland
second
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
308
thousand
dollars.
C
C
E
Chair
anderson
and
board
members,
we
are
moving
down
to
our
10
45
to
12
p.m.
Hearing
session,
I
will
tell
you
that
it
appears
that
the
first
three
cases
here
were
moved
out
of
order.
E
So
I'm
going
to
give
you
your
packet
number
when
we
do
each
of
these
cases
during
this
session
we
actually
only
have
one
person
calling
in,
but
they
are
presenting
on
a
number
of
properties
in
a
co-op
building,
but
we
will
first
start
with
its
agenda.
Item
should
be
number
18,
but
I
didn't
write
it
down.
I
apologize.
The
case
number
is
210392.
E
A
There
just
a
brief
paragraph
summary
from
the
owner,
which.
A
C
Yes,
mr
chair,
I
noted
on
the
field
card.
There
was
quite
a
large
new
improvement
for
this
property
this
year,
which
the
appellant
didn't
mention,
I
think
in
his
narrative.
But
there
appears
to
be
from
what
I
show
there.
The
value
had
gone
up
quite
a
bit
from
69
500
to
259
000,
and
it
appears
to
be
in
regard
to
the
new
improvement,
but
he
made
no
mention
they
made
no
mention
of
it
in
their
narrative.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Any
other
questions
or
comments
from
board.
A
A
C
H
E
A
Thank
you,
there's
a
a
purchase,
last
fall
and
an
appraisal
done
then
october
2020,
the
appraisal
shows
a
value
of
380
000..
A
H
I
would
note,
mr
chair,
that
this
property
was
on
the
market
for
some
time
initially.
I
think
it
was
priced
about
four
and
a
quarter
and
was
on
the
market
for
some
time
and
the
price
was
reduced
and
the
current
owners
finally
bought
it
for
three
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
now,
I'm
not
sure
what
that
reflects
exactly,
but
clearly
424
was
not
the
price,
because
this
is
a
very
desirable
neighborhood
and.
A
A
H
Mr
chair,
I
would
move
that
we
reduced
the
value
of
5320
knox
avenue
south
from
449
000
to
380
000.
A
Thank
you
is
there
a
second
sorry
I
didn't
hear
who
made
the
second.
A
Okay,
thank
you
has
been
moved
by
bland
second
by
chow
to
reduce
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
380
000
dollars.
There's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
allows
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
I
D
A
Thank
you
that
carries
the
motion
is
adopted,
rebecca.
E
Chair
anderson
board
members,
we
have
one
more
case
before
we
move
to
the
cooperative
property
case,
21-0394
residential
property
located
at
3321,
18th
avenue
south
this
property
owner
did
not
respond
to
the
staff's
request
to
schedule
a
phone
in
or
write
an
appeal,
so
you
can
go
ahead
and
take
action
on
this
case.
It
is
page
488
in
your
packet.
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
board
members
on
this
property.
H
Mr
chair,
I
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
of
335
000
for
3321
18th
avenue
south
there's.
No
helpful
information
provided.
A
C
E
E
It
begins
with
case
21-0334,
which
I
believe
is
the
master
parcel
for
this
cooperative
and
then
moves
through
another,
the
entire
series,
and
we
will
have
to
take
action
individually,
but
I
think
we
can
go
ahead
and
let
miss
peterson
go
ahead
and
present
on
these
cases.
So
if
you
would
please
press
star
sex
to
unmute
state
your
name
and
then
the
property
address,
and
you
can
go
ahead
and
present
to
the
board.
Q
Just
a
little
bit
of
a
general
background
on
our
property.
It's
a
building
that
was
built
in
1922,
so
it's
a
100
year
old
building,
it's
a
three-story
brownstone
building.
We
don't
have
any
elevators,
it's
strictly
walk-ups,
it's
a
residential
co-op
and
it's
comprised
of
18
units
within
those
units.
We
have
two
separate
floor
plans.
Q
We
do
not
have
any
off
street
parking,
we're
located
near
downtown
in
a
congested
neighborhood
and
being
that
it's
a
building
with
no
elevator.
We
don't
have.
You
know
much
amenities
to
speak
of
that.
Q
Q
Q
Q
The
parcel
id
that
ends
in
0146
also
a
corner
unit
that
one
was
in
below
average
condition
it's
in
an
average
location
in
the
building
and
that
one
was
actually
foreclosed
on
by
the
association.
So
the
sales
price
for
that
one
in
december
was
60
000
and
then
parcel
id
0139.
Q
That
one
was
an
above
average
condition,
also
a
corner
unit
sold
in
december
as
well
for
130
as
well.
So
we
have
had
some
other
additional
sales
within
within
the
last
few
years.
For
example,
my
unit
I
purchased
in
2018.
Q
Q
They
tend
to
attract
people
who
have
a
more
lengthy
tenure,
because
those
properties
are
a
little
less,
have
a
little
less
appreciation
because
they're
smaller
units
and
they're
not
on
the
corner,
so
people
tend
to
stay
in
those
units
longer
as
they
don't
have
as
much
to
gain
from
selling
it.
Q
Q
Just
to
kind
of
summarize
a
little
bit,
we
don't
have
you
know
a
lot
of
amenities
in
our
building.
We
don't
have
an
elevator.
We
don't
have
any
unit
laundry,
no
off
street
parking,
central
air,
no
zone,
controlled
heating.
Q
H
Mr
chair,
I
have
a
question:
when
the
units
sell,
do
they
normally
sell
with
cash,
or
is
there
financing
available.
Q
Sure
great
question
they
typically
sell
with
you
know
a
cooperative
mortgage.
That's
what
most
people
have
purchased
with.
H
Cooperatives
in
this
part
of
the
country
are
a
strange
animal
they're,
not
they're,
they're,
quite
common
on
the
east
and
what
especially
on
the
east
coast
and
people
understand
them,
but
here
they
don't
understand
them.
I
believe
that
the
applicant
has
a
very
good
case
for
adjustment
of
values
in
this
building.
H
However,
we
are
really
not
equipped
to
compare
each
unit
and
do
the
necessary
work
to
determine
what
the
what
the
prices
should
be
or
what
the
values
should
be
with
it's.
You
truly
are
lacking
the
kinds
of
amenities
that
bring
people
in,
particularly
particularly
the
lack
of
parking
in
this
neighborhood
in
the
whittier
neighborhood,
where
parking
is
at
such
a
premium
that
really
rules
out
a
number
of
people
who
might
be
interested
in
the
unit.
Otherwise.
H
So
again,
I
would
strongly
suggest
that
you
have
a
case.
We
are
not
prepared
to
deal
with
it
here.
I
suggest
that
we
move
quickly
through
these
to
sustain
the
values
and
encourage
you
to
move
on
to
the
next
step,
where
you
can,
these
units
can
be
looked
at
individually
and
and
values
be
assessed
in
a
in
a
fair,
equitable
way.
H
A
C
I
guess
mr
chair
I'd
like
to
ask
the
property
representative:
are
these
types
of
units
marketed
in
the
same
way
as
a
normal
house?
I
mean
a
realtor's
involved
and
it's
listed
on
mls,
or
is
there
some
kind
of
a
waiting
list
or
how
is
it
marketed.
Q
H
I
have
a
question
regarding
that:
your
screening
process.
May
I
assume
that
your
screening
process
has
simply
to
do
with
the
ability
of
the
person
to
financially
take
on
on
the
ownership
of
the
unit.
Q
Correct
yeah,
a
lot
of
it
has
to
do
with
finances
as
well.
As
you
know,
since
the
cooperative
is
unique
and
a
lot
of
people
aren't
familiar
with
it,
just
making
sure
they
understand
kind
of
what
they're
getting
into
with
the
co-op
situation.
Q
We
have
a
screening
process
that
does
review
financials
to
make
sure
that
they're
right
able
to
meet
the
needs
yep.
A
Before
we
move
on,
I
have
one
one
question
for
the
assessor
there's:
this
valuation
indicated
value
of
this
parcel
at
one
million
eight
hundred
seventy
three
thousand
dollars
and
then
each
other,
an
individual
parcel
is
valued.
You
know
somewhere
around
100,
000
or
or
more.
R
Chair
anderson
members
of
the
board,
that
is,
our
master
parcel
for
the
cooperative
and
is
a
total
of
the
cooperative
units.
So
in
most
cases
the
master
parcel
is
reported
as
zero.
This
is
just
a
cover
sheet,
so
at
this
point
we
just
want
to
sustain
the
master,
co-op
total
value
and
we
make
sure
that
it
adds
up.
A
Thank
you
for
that
clarification
with
that.
We'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
2309
grand
avenue
south
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
H
A
Thank
you
and
again
the
first
one
will
be
that
we'll
act
on
is
is
the
the
total
as
a
whole
for
the
appeal
for
2309
grand
avenue
south.
May
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
A
I
think
that'll
be
cleared
up
on
the
next
level.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
rebecca.
E
That's
correct,
chair
anderson,
it's
like
nancy,
said
the
actual
value
that
we
carry
on,
that
master
parcel
is
zero
dollars,
so
you
are
actually
just
sustaining
the
original
2020
value,
2021
value
of
each
property.
R
Here,
rebecca
and
chair
anderson
and
board
members
as
a
master
parcel,
I
think
you
can
add
to
the
record
that
you
are
sustaining
the
master
parcel
total
value
of
all
units
in
common
area,
and
that
would
clarify
in
the
minutes
that
we've
recorded
the
total
of
all
cooperative
units
in
all
common
area
included
rebecca.
If
you
want
to
comment
no.
E
I
think
for
the
record
that
clarifies
it.
I
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
a
question,
however,
nancy,
about
that.
The
value
that's
being
reflected
on
that
cover
sheet
of
the
master
parcel.
Is
that
the
true
total
value?
So
maybe
they
should
just
move
through
each
of
the
unit
values
for
now
sustain
those
values.
Then
we
can
circle
back
after
staff
has
reviewed
that
master
parcel.
E
E
A
A
H
A
C
D
A
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted
next
case
number
210374
2309
grand
avenue
south
number,
two
same
situation.
We
can
move
right
to
a
motion.
D
A
C
A
A
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Item
number
24
is
case.
Number
21-0375
property
address,
2309
grand
avenue
south
number
three.
Is
there
a
motion.
A
You
is
there
a
second
second:
it
has
been
moved
by
chao
seconded
by
boderta
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
133
000.
There's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
C
A
Let's
see,
where
am
I
case
number
two:
two
one
dash
zero
three
six
property
address:
2309
grand
eleven
south
number.
Four,
I
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
A
You
is
there
a
second
second
move
by
but
eartha
seconded
by
chow,
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
133
000.
With
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
C
D
D
A
A
L
A
Case
number
two,
one
dash
three
zero:
three,
seven,
eight
2309
grand
avenue
south
number
six
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
A
C
A
D
A
It
has
been
moved
by
buderitha
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
147
000.
C
A
21-0381
property
address
2309
grand
avenue
south
number
23
and
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
H
A
A
H
C
A
C
A
A
C
A
Thank
you
that
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Case
number.
H
A
D
A
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted
case
number
21-0384,
2309
grand
avenue
number
26
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
D
A
Has
been
moved
by
borders
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
147
thousand
dollars?
There's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
C
A
That
carries
the
motion
is
adopted
case
number
21-0385,
2309
grand
avenue
south
number
31..
Is
there
a
motion
on
this
property.
A
C
C
L
C
A
That
carries
them.
The
motion
is
adopted
case
number
21-0387
2309
grand
avenue
number
33
may
have
a
motion.
D
A
C
I
A
C
D
A
I'm
running
out
of
breath
here:
21-0
389,
2309
grand
avenue
south
number
35
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
A
C
A
D
A
That
carries
the
motion
is
adopted
rebecca.
What
do
we
have
next
year?.
E
E
Is
ms
peterson
still
with
us?
Yes,
I'm
still
here
was
that
your
intention
yeah
okay,
so
we
will
add
that
appeal
and
add
that
case
number
the
case
number
is
going
to
be
out
of
sequence.
So
if
it
is
your
intention
to
also
add
that
appeal.
E
staff
can
add
the
actual
case
number,
but
I
would
ask
the
board
to
also
sustain
this
value
so
that
we
can
keep
this
parcel
as
an
active
appeal
and
staff
can
work
on
it
as
well
to
keep
equity
within
the
building.
So
I'm
asking
the
board
to
sustain
the
value
for
parcel
number.
Three:
four:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four:
two:
two
zero
one:
five,
three
value
of
100.
E
A
E
The
property
id
number
was
fine.
I
read
that
another.
H
In
that
case,
I
would
move
to
sustain
the
value
of
138
000
of
the
property,
with
the
parcel
number
already
right
into
the
record.
A
L
A
E
Jer
anderson
and
board
members,
then,
if
we
go
back
to
that
master
parcel
once
we
sum
up
the
total
of
all
units.
Now
we
the
master
parcel
value,
is
2.7
million
dollars.
E
Yep
that
case
number
was
21-0-3-3-4.
A
Okay
case
number
21-0334,
the
master
parcel
for
2309
grand
avenue
may
have
a
motion.
H
I'm
mr
chair,
I
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
for
the
parcel
at
2309
grand
at
its
current
value.
A
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second
second,
it
has
been
moved
by
land
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
2.7
million
dollars.
C
C
E
Very
good
board
members.
We
were
scheduled
to
go
until
12
o'clock,
so
if
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
use
of
our
time
rather
than
to
save
it
for
the
afternoon
would
be
to.
R
E
To
valuation
changes
being
brought
by
the
city
assessor's
office
to
the
board
for
your
action,
and
that
would
be
on
key
sorry,
page
number
894..
This
is
similar
to
the
list
of
properties.
I
read
to
you
where
it
was
an
appeal
that
was
settled
less
than
10
days
before
the
convening
of
the
board,
so
I
just
need
to
again
read
to
you
the
property
id
number,
the
original
estimated
value
and
the
indicated
value.
If
it's
the
pleasure
of
the
board,
I
can.
I
will
proceed
with
these.
E
Seventy
thousand
dollars,
two:
two:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four
one:
three:
zero
one:
zero
five
one
original
value:
six
hundred
one
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
indicated
value
five
hundred
nineteen
thousand
two
hundred
dollars.
Then
we
have
a
personal
property
account
number
one:
zero.
Two
one:
four
original
value,
507
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value
four
hundred
thousand
dollars,
one
seven
zero,
two,
eight
two,
four
three:
four
zero
one:
eight
five
original
value:
five
hundred
fifty
nine
thousand
dollars,
indicated
value
five
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars;
one
five
zero.
E
Two
eight
two,
four:
three:
one:
zero:
zero:
four:
zero
original
value:
six
hundred
sixty
six
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Six
hundred
thirty
thousand
dollars;
two
nine
zero;
two,
nine
two,
four
three:
four
zero:
four
one:
eight
original
value,
five
hundred
fifty
two
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
E
Five
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
zero;
one
zero;
two,
nine
two,
four
one:
one:
zero
one:
zero:
four
original
value:
one
million
five
hundred
twenty
two
thousand
dollars
indicated
value:
one
million
two
hundred
ninety
thousand
dollars,
one
six:
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four:
three:
two:
zero:
zero:
five:
five
original
value.
Four
hundred
ninety
one
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
H
Yes,
miss
monquist.
Thank
you
for
once
again
revealing
your
superpowers.
You
did
a
great
job
as
always,
I'm
amazed,
and
I
would
move
that
we
adopt
what
you
have
just
read
into
the
record.
D
A
Has
been
moved
by
bland
second
by
chow
to
adopt
the
items
as
read,
there's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
H
C
C
A
Thank
you.
Where
are
we
at
rebecca.
E
H
E
Thank
you
vice
chair
blend,
so
we
are
moving
to
page
895
in
your
packet
board
members.
E
This
is
a
list
of
again
indicated
values,
but
the
where
these
are
no
change
being
brought
by
the
city
assessor,
and
we
really
need
to
just
have
you
approve
this
list,
so
we
preserve
these
people's
right
to
appeal
to
the
county
board
and
you
can
approve
this
list
as
one
total
list.
So
looking
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
indicated
value
of
no
change
brought
by
the
city,
assessor
to
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization,.
D
C
C
C
A
I
think
the
motion
passes
that
it
is
adapted.
E
Chair
anderson
and
board
members
that
concludes
our
business.
For
this
morning.
We
just
need
to
recess
until
we
reconvene
at
1pm.
I
will
just
again
mention
we
have
a
fairly
full
plate
for
this
afternoon.
E
H
E
Will
leave
this
meeting
chair
our
vice
chair
bland
and
you
will
join
the
teams
link
that
you
received
for
the
next
time.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
the
vice
chair,
bland.
I
am
available
this
afternoon.
A
Okay,
the
meeting
is
recess
until
one
o'clock.