►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
A
D
Maybe
just
I'll
just
share
my
screen
here.
This
is
to
help
with
this.
So
we've
been
kind
of
thinking
about
this
for
a
little
bit.
I
think
I
spoke
to
milson
today,
we'll
probably
change
four
to
five.
I
think
that's
what
we
intended,
but
here's
sort
of
our
approach
going
forward
is
just
to
have
quorum
of
of
five.
I
think
we're
still
going
to
stick
to
the
more
casual
attendance
introductions,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
at
least
acknowledge
that
we
have
the
the
quorum
of
five.
D
We
also
have
just
some.
You
know
names
chris
and
wilson
look
through
attendance,
and
so
I
think
we
have
like
five
people
that
that
regularly
show
up
in
case
in
case
that's
needed,
but
I
think
for
now
we'll
just
keep
it
simple
and
no
note
there
on
the
quorum
of
of
four
today
and
probably
five
going
forward
and
just
make
sure
that
we
have
that
and
see
how
that
works
for
us.
So.
E
D
D
D
D
G
G
D
D
F
F
D
D
D
So
I
think
my
understanding
was
we
wanted
to
talk
about
it
this
month
in
august
to
sort
of
look
ahead
at
the
the
coming
timeline
to
to
do
this.
So
what
it?
What
it
typically
involves,
a
typical
process
is
some
sort
of
introduction
to
the
process,
and
so
public
works
staff
on
our
our
cip
team.
The
folks
that
are
responsible
for
developing
the
cap,
we'll
will
come
meet
with
you
all
that
typically
takes
place
around
october
and
it
can
kind
of
vary
and
then
the
idea
is.
D
If
you've
developed
some
thoughts
and
then
sort
of
at
some
point
after
a
resolution
is
passed,
the
idea
is
I'll,
come
back
and
and
share
where
public
works
is
landing
on
recommendations
to
bring
to
click,
which
is
the
capital
long-range
improvement
committee.
It's
an
abc
like
you
that
makes
recommendations
on
the
cip,
so
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
or
what
I
have
in
terms
of
the
the
timeline.
I
think
I
I
think
I
forgot
to
give
the
end.
D
Typically,
the
final
resolution
will
happen
in
february
or
march,
along
with
a
presentation
from
our
staff
on
the
final
recommendation
after
that
or
around
that
time.
So,
yes,
thank
you.
Abc
lots
of
lots
of
acronyms
abc
appointed
boards
and
commissions.
The
city
has
maybe
like
50
51
of
them
all
similar.
I
guess
in
some
ways
to
you
all.
D
It
was
very
specific
and
I
think
there
was
a
challenge
in
that
where
we
we
ended
up
the
way
we
programmed
our
projects
wasn't
quite
aligning
with
it.
We
had
to
say
no
to
the
specifics
a
lot.
You
know
we
passed
a
protected
bikeway
within
that
time
and
started
working
towards
that
and
similar
to
the
ba
or
to
the
pac.
D
We
we
thought
it
made
sense
and
transitioned
as
a
committee
as
a
body
to
maybe
thinking
a
little
bit
more
big
picture
about
like
what
what
types
of
like
what
types
of
treatments
you'd
like
to
see
so
creating
a
protective
bikeway
fund
as
an
example
creating
a
vision,
zero.
Sorry,
I
meant
program,
not
fun,
creating
a
vision,
zero
program,
and
so
we
kind
of
went
to
the
program
side,
and
I
think
one
thing
that
we
are
wrestling
with
a
little
bit
is-
is
that
it's
now
expanding.
D
I
think
in
a
in
a
different
way,
which
I
think
is
totally
fine
and
reasonable,
and
I
want
to
get
your
take
on
it.
But
you
know:
there's
there's
a
lot
of
questions
about
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
and
how
we
allocate
money.
Overall,
you
know
we're
there's
a
little
bit
of
back
and
forth
about.
We
feel
like
we
can't
keep.
We
can't
necessarily
add
programs
like
keep
adding
unique
programs,
but
then
also
we
and
we
hear
that.
D
Maybe
programs
isn't
what
we
should
be
focusing
on
like
we
should
just
do
some
transformational
like
changes
and
what
we
fund
so
so
I
guess
I'm
gonna
try
to
stop
talking
fairly
soon
and
before
I
share
what
what
what
you
wrote,
what
you
wrote
this
past
year.
I
kind
of
want
to
have
this
discussion
a
little
bit
about
big
picture.
D
D
I
I
think,
I
think,
that's
a
good
question
and
I'm
gonna
take
some
of
my
own
notes.
One
of
the
things
that
chris
and
I
want
to
do
is
meet
up
with
our
cip,
folks
and
kind
of
have
a
similar
conversation
with
them
before
we
get
started
and
what
is
actually
effective
is
such
a
good
question
right
now,
because
I
think
I
think
my
answer
right
now
is
I
don't
necessarily
know
over
the
past
couple
years
I
felt
like
we
were.
D
We,
the
transition
from
projects
to
like
programs
and
big
picture
was,
was
really
effective
and
was
really
helpful
and
we've
kind
of
like
we've
done
some
of
that
and
and
actually
really
focused
on
that.
I
think
I
think
there
is
a
level
of
of
success
in
that,
because
you
know
we
created
a
vision,
zero
fund
for
temporary
quick,
build
treatments
and
funded
it
at
a
high
level
and
increased
funding.
I
think
that
was
a
fairly
direct.
D
You
know
tie
back
to
pacmbc
pushing
us
on
that
for
years
before
we
did
it.
I
think,
similarly,
with
protected
bikeways
a
couple
years,
a
couple
cycles
back
is
similar.
I
think
you
know
a
crosswalk
crosswalk
or
a
crossing
program
in
a
sidewalk
gap
program
on
the
pac.
So
those
are
examples,
but
I'm
I'm.
So
I'm
I'm
not
sure
that,
like
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
thought
that's
the
same,
I'm
not
sure
that's
where
everyone's
at
right
now
to
I
don't
know
how
many
more
programs
I
you
know.
F
F
It
does
feel
very
disconnected
from
the
reality
of
like
the
transportation
action
plan
and
the
climate
emergency
that
we're
all
living
in
right.
It's
it's
a
process
that
was
designed
as
a
process
many
years
ago
to
serve
us
a
particular
way
and
made
a
lot
of
assumptions
about
the
amount
of
time
we
have
to
redesign
our
streets,
which
I
don't
think
is
true
anymore.
F
F
The
idea
that
we
aren't,
we
aren't
really
like
thinking.
How
do
we
do
things
quickly,
right
we're
doing
things
at
the
same
pace,
with
sort
of
the
same
allocations
of
funding
that
we
have
always
done
when,
in
fact,
what
we
need
to
be
doing
as
a
city
is
questioning
whether
or
not
the
cip
is
even
the
right
process
to
get
us
where
we're
going.
I'm
not
I
I
don't.
You
know
knowing
that
vision,
zero
and
like
some
quick
build
has
been
built
into
the
cip
process,
is
a
great
step
forward.
F
That
is,
to
my
knowledge,
some
of
the
first
dedicated
funding
that
we've
had
that's
that
has
sort
of
built
in
with
intention.
This
idea
that
we
need
to
move
quickly,
but
that's
such
a
small
pot
of
money
compared
to
all
the
rest
of
the
money
right
and
we're
resting
a
lot
of
hopes
as
a
city
on
reconstruction
projects
which
we
like.
F
I
know
we
all
love,
because
that's
where
we
see
a
lot
of
the
really
big
changes
happen
on
our
streetscape
and
we
also
are
not
going
to
reconstruct
all
of
the
streets
in
our
city
in
the
next
10
years.
Right
we're
just
not
going
to
do
that,
and
so
I
guess
one
of
the
things
that
I
have
had
on
my
mind
as
we
pass
this
transportation
action
plan.
That
says
we
need
to
make
a
big
radical
change
and
we
have
to
do
it
pretty
quickly.
F
Is
that
the
cip
process
is
uniquely
unsuited
to
do
that.
And
so
that's
that's,
like
I
said,
a
partial
answer
to
some
of
the
questions,
but
it's
also
really
a
question
about.
Like
is
the
cip
process
even
useful,
for
where
we're
going
as
a
city,
I
would
love
to
hear
folks
thoughts
and
reactions
to
kind
of
some
of
the
ideas
that
I
have
posited
because,
like
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
how
to
make
the
cip
process
into
something
that
gets
us
to
the
outcomes
we've
agreed
upon
as
a
city.
A
A
And
I
you
know
talked
to
some
folks
about
that
whole
process,
because
I
know
some
folks
are
on
the
bac
or
the
pac
and
that
one,
but
unfortunately
andrew
johnson
doesn't
appoint
the
same
people
to
different
committees.
Apparently,
and
so
I
chose
the
bac,
which
I
think
was
the
correct
choice:
yay
everybody
but
yeah.
I
just
seem
like
talking
to
folks
click.
A
A
Like
an
another
step
that
isn't
really
needed,
but
because
it's
always
been
that
way-
and
I
agree
with
alyssa,
where
I
mean
nothing
gets
done
quickly
on
a
government
scale
except
funding
for
more
police.
It
feels
like
to
me
like
everything
else
is
like.
Oh,
it's
always
been
this
way
and
it's
going
to
take
forever
to
change
it,
and
we
know
like
it's
just
politics
and
the
lack
of
will
and
urgency
which.
A
B
B
You
know
I
was
over
on
the
north
side
yesterday
and
typically
when
I
go
there,
I'm
up
and
down
26th
avenue
or
lowry,
but
I
I
had
reason
to
go
down
broadway
on
the
entire
distance
and
I
go
down
to
plymouth
too,
but
for
some
reason
I
I
I
realized.
I
had
not
been
on
broadway
this
summer
and
I
was
amazed
at
how
ripped
up
everything
is.
I
mean
there
is
a
huge
housing
development
going
up.
B
B
B
B
Things
like
the
queen
bike
boulevard
is
the
one
I'm
watching
the
most,
but
you
know
it's
I'm
a
little
worried
about
that.
I
don't
know
how
to
talk
this
into
something
that's
coming
up,
but
I
think
public
works
and
what
I
heard
during
click
was
they're
a
little
overwhelmed.
I
mean
they
just
they
can't
get
boots
on
the
ground
to
get
stuff
in
and
they're
concerned
about
funding
sources,
and
I
think
that
we're
going
to
be
there
for
a
few
years.
B
B
B
You
know
you
see
it
one
day
and
then
the
next
day,
it's
not
there
and
the
the
database
for
the
the
website
with
the
changes
that
happened
in
this
last
spring
really
have
just
I
mean
it's
you're
blind,
I'm
blind,
I
I
could
tell
I
could
I
could
find
out
where
stuff
was
going
and
it's
really
really
kind
of
a
dark
dark
space.
Now,
where
things
are
getting
kind
of
changed
or
rearranged
that
you
are
having
trouble
following
so
being
on
click
and
you're.
B
D
Can
I
respond?
Oh
go
ahead.
Sorry,
okay,
real
quick!
I
I
appreciate
that
dan
and
one
thing
that
I
took
away
as
a
to
do
from
what
you
said
is
you
know,
think
about
the
the
funding
levels
and
projects
that
have
been
adjusted
and
think
about.
You
know
how
that
may
factor
into
the
upcoming
cycle.
So
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
good
observation.
A
So,
what's
the
point
of
this
whole
process
right?
How
alyssa
was
stating
it,
and
I
mean
I
think
we
see
this
in
tap
where,
like
you,
can
say
and
write
and
create
things,
but
if
they're
not
aligned
with
money,
it
means
nothing
like,
and
I
think
we
show
the
city
in
itself
shows
its
priorities
based
on
its
budget
correct
and
we
always
have
to
scrape
and
scrap
and
delay.
A
But
other
departments
don't
have
to
right
like,
for
example,
the
police.
You
know
so
I
just
don't
understand
how
we
can't
change
that,
especially
with
the
city
council,
who
seems
to
kind
of
be
on
board
to
allocate
money
differently
in
the
future,
and
I
know
the
mayor
and
the
chief
of
police
and
folks
aren't,
which
makes
sense
right
so
yeah
it'll
be
really
interesting
to
see
after
this
election
november.
If
anything
does
change
but
yeah,
I
think,
like
the
only
way.
B
Yeah
I
did
yeah
I
what
I
take
away
from
click
is.
Is
I
don't?
I
don't
think
anybody
intentionally
is
hiding
anything
here.
We
I
mean
we've
just
been
through
a
pandemic
and
and
still
going
through
it
and
we're
recovering
from
that
we've
been
through
a
racial
right,
we're
going
through
a
racial
reckoning.
B
There's
a
lot
of
things
on
the
table
that
people
are
just
hanging
under
the
seat
of
their
pants,
and
I
sense
that
adjustments
are
going
to
continue
to
happen,
and
it's
just
trying
to
be
aware
of
that
or
hear
about
it
and
try
not
to
be
just
totally
surprised
by
it
by
the
things
that
do
happen.
So
another
piece
that
I
I
we
should
be
thinking
a
little
bit
about
is
a
transportation
action
plan.
B
You
know,
we've
said
all
this
stuff
now
are
we
talking
about
it
before
we
are
scheduled
to
begin
it,
because
you'd
think
that
we
would
be
rather
than
we're,
going
to
look
at
something
in
three
years
and
wait
for
three
years
and
then
it's
going
to
take
another
three
years
to
have
something
come
out.
So
I
know
that
you
have
the
transportation
action
plan
on
the
schedule.
That's
a
great
piece
to
kind
of
go
through
and
take
a
look
at
some
of
those
timelines
and
ask
ourselves.
B
B
I
you
know
the
I'll
get
back
to
real,
simple
stuff.
I
mean
zebra
crossings
across
intersection,
like
bryant
avenue
and
franklin
avenue.
We've
brought
them
up.
We
talked
about
it.
There's
there's
a
certain
you
know
unless
it's
a
signalized
intersection,
you're,
not
gonna,
get
them
unless
it's
tabled
you're
not
going
to
get
them
well,
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
other
areas
there
that
are
suffering
like
saint
anthony
boulevard.
B
You
know
it
said
like
26th
avenue,
north
and
18th
avenue,
northeast
and
they're
not
going
to
get
a
table
intersection
and
yet-
and
it
comes
down
to-
and
I've
had
this
conversation
that
you
know
it's
really
about
money,
and
it's
really
about
intent
to
take
on
that
added
thing:
to
make
a
bike
system
or
make
a
trail
system
not
just
function
as
a
wide
sidewalk,
but
to
really
go
the
extra
steps
to
encourage
people
that
they
understand.
This
is
a
system,
and
so
I
I
think
going
forward
in
the
cips.
B
C
A
C
Cadence
yeah,
I
guess
I
just
also
want
us
to
consider
like
what
role
we
play
here
on
a
subcommittee
for
a
committee
to
the
city
and
how
the
city
functions
and
also
interacts
with
other
layers
of
government
such
as
nippon
county,
that
council
state
et
cetera,
other
agencies
that
impact
metro,
transit
and
like
if
there's
also
ways
that
we
can.
You
know,
leverage
partnerships
that
way
too,
to
put
more
pressure
on
things
like.
Why
isn't
this
project
been
funded,
who's
funding
it?
C
B
And
let
me
qualify,
it's
not
like
the
the
the
fee
were
taken
out
from
underneath
you
is
that
the
project
was
to
be
in
the
ground
or
to
start
three
years
from
now,
and
just
got
pushed
back
conditional
three
so
stuff
like
that.
It's
not
like
yeah
we're
planning
on
doing
it
this
year
and
now
we're
not
gonna.
Do
it,
but
it's
it's
more
long-term
is
what
I've
observed.
D
Cadence,
I'm
I'm
taking
notes
on
what
different
folks
say
and
can
you
just
what
was
the
main
point
I
heard
a
couple
things
about
is
the
main
point
you
know:
can
minneapolis
sorry
use
you
all
to
or
use
the
feedback
and
the
this
body
to
to
pressure.
Other
partners
like
hennepin
county,
mind
mprb,
like
that,
was
that
essential.
C
Yeah,
like
so
having
different
agencies
and
departments
like
leverage,
each
other's
resources,
basically,
because
not
all
of
these
projects
are
necessarily
like
able
to
be
funded
or
not.
All
of
the
funding
comes
from
just
one
agency
right,
and
so
you
need
everyone
kind
of
on
board
and
if
there's
someone
sort
of
maybe
not
ready
like,
should
they
delay
all
the
other
project
partners
on
a
particular
project
and
cool.
F
G
Thoughts,
I
can
jump
in.
I
was
just
like
looking
back
over
this
resolution
and
reading
the
part
where
it's
like
fun,
the
transportation
action
plan,
and
that
seems
right
to
me.
That
seems
you
know,
like
all
the
work
that
went
into
creating
a
plan
that
a
wide
range
of
people
like
and
love
yeah.
I
think
that
to
me
it
seems
like
that
is
the
next
step
is
to
fund
it.
I
I
can
maybe
chime
into
is
kind
of
listening
to
this
discussion,
and
really
you
know
some
of
those
things
really
resonate
with
the
fact
that
the
system
of
decision
making
doesn't
always
match
the
outcome
that
we're
trying
to
get
to,
and
I
think
something
that
I
have
learned
about
this
group
from
my
time
with
the
bac.
Is
that
there's
very
little
fear
from
this
group
of
saying.
I
Maybe
this
isn't
right,
and
so
I
think
I
would
want
to
see
us
land
someplace
in
between
that
is
really
true
to
our
values
of
saying
this
doesn't
feel
right,
but
also
leveraging
what
we
can
to
get
toward
the
goals
that
we
have.
So
there
are
going
to
be
probably
things
we
can
weave
in
that
are
new
and
also
some
things
that
we've
been
talking
about,
maybe
asking
for
things
like
continued
funding
for
some
things
or
elevated
funding
for
some
new
things.
I
I
liked
the
move
in
the
structure
away
from
requesting
money
for
specific
projects,
but
I
I'd
like
to
see
us,
maybe
focusing
on
trying
to
bring
in
some
of
the
other
elements
that
we
talk
about
related
to
the
way
that
funding
allocation
decisions
are
made.
Things
like
prioritizing
engagement
and
prioritizing
evaluation
on
both
ends.
A
A
Even
you
know,
the
draft
is
due,
so
we
can
at
least
start
have
a
starting
point
on
some
of
these
larger
issues
and
then,
when
public
works
comes
to
us
with
kind
of
more
targeted
things,
we
can
add
those
to
it,
but
yeah,
I
think
last
year,
especially,
was
very
hurried.
So
this
is
this
is
why
we're
having
this
conversation
now
and
we'll
just
continue
to
have
it?
Let's
see.
D
D
So
what
we
are
talking
about
sort
of
in,
like
a
real
practical,
just
like
straightforward
ways,
is
typically
this
process
is
about.
You
know
the
cip,
like
I
described
in
like
there's
a
process
that
we
go
through
to
write
capital
budget
requests,
which
is
how
you
get
in
the
cap.
So
it's
all
about
the
projects
and
I
think,
as
we
go
through
this
process
this
year,
thinking
even
more
about
like
when
we
talk
about
different
things.
D
Are
we
talking
about
is?
Is
this
outcome
going
to
lead
to
like
a
a
cbr,
a
capital
budget
request
that
goes
into
the
cip?
Or
is
it
also
maybe
a
bigger
picture
about
how
we
how
we
function
in
our
system?
Overall,
I
think
both
of
those
are
important
to
talk
about.
So
I
want
to
make
that
clear
as
well,
but
thinking
thinking
through
a
little
bit,
and
I
think
does
that
make
sense.
D
Or
should
we
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
more
because
I
think
I
think
what
what
our
cip
team,
like
their
job,
is
to
is
like,
from
a
to
b,
to
like
to
create
the
cip,
which
is
like
funding.
That's
going
to
build
stuff,
and
you
know
we
talk
about
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
which
guides
you
know
which
has
criteria
on
how
we
get
there.
You
know
talk
about.
Sometimes
we
talk
about
like
complete
streets
policy
issues.
There's
like
you
know,
we
talked
about
funding
in
the
police
department.
D
A
D
A
A
So
if
anyone
has
any
last
things
I
mean
last
for
today
not
last,
I
you
know
we'll
just
continue
to
talk
about
this.
I
think
this
will
be
a
good
to
add
to
our
agenda
ongoing
now,
so
people
will
be
able
to
you
know,
think
about
it,
mull
it
over
and
then
come
to
the
meeting
with
other
ideas
but
yeah.
Let's
anyone
else.
D
Well
also,
the
last
thing
I'll
say
is,
I
think,
next
month,
we
should
probably
put
together
like
a
fairly
clear
timeline
of
like
what
we
you
know
want
to
accomplish
each
month
and
like
talk
about.
When
should
we
invite
staff
in
and
how
many
iterations
make
sense,
and
hopefully,
in
between
now
and
next
month,
chris
and
I
can
talk
to
our
cip
team
and
kind
of
ask
the
same
questions
and
give
some
feedback
on
what
what
we
we've
heard
today.
A
J
I'm
here
hi,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
hi.
I
am
ready.
I
didn't
prepare
any
slides.
I
kind
of
just
wanted
to
just
talk
about
it
and
share
my
thoughts
on
it
and
some
like
guiding
questions.
So
I
took
section
strategy
one
and
strategy,
two
from
the
plan
should
I
link
it
somewhere.
I
can
link
it
somewhere.
A
J
D
D
J
J
And
then
a
new
term
for
me
was
something
called
like
low
stress
routes,
which
I
never
heard
never
heard
of
so
yeah.
I'd
love
to
maybe
talk
about
that
later
and
then
matthew.
If
you
could
go
to
strategy,
two
I'll
just
touch
on
it
and
then
I'll
share
my
like
overall
ideas
or
things
I
felt
were
missing
strategy,
two
kind
of
focused
more
on.
J
It
also
kind
of
talks
more
about
like
connecting
people
to
waterways
or
like
using
railroads
and
using
freeways
and
bridges
to
connect
people
to
these
waterways
or
to
get
across
them
or
use
them
for
biking
or
walking.
I
thought
that
was
kind
of
interesting
and
the
emphasis
on
like
using
stuff
that
is
already
there
and
repurposing
it
and
like
reconnecting
people
across
physical
barriers
specifically,
so
I
hope
that
was
an
all
right
summary
of
both
of
those
points.
I
would
love
to
hear
folks
perspectives
on.
J
J
It
kind
of
all
feels,
like
all
these
plans
are
taking
a
lot
of
time
and
money
and
years,
and
I
think
something
specific
that
could
have
maybe
focused
on
climate
would
be
talking
about
like
the
material
materials
used
in
these
like
projects
or
like
ongoing
projects
like
are
they
you
know,
climate
friendly
materials?
Are
they
climate
resistant
or
like
I
mean
I
guess
they
have
to
because
we're
minnesota,
but
are
they
going
to
work
across
organizations
to
preserve
like
native
wildlife
and
plants
and
trees
yeah?
J
A
Thanks
and
maya
those
on
the
phone
strategy,
one
is
complete.
The
all
ages
and
abilities
network
strategy.
Two
is
build:
bikeway
connections
that
overcome
significant
physical
barriers
during
the
build
out
of
the
all
ages
and
abilities
network.
So
it
looks
like
it's
building
off
of
strategy,
one
yeah.
Anyone
have
any
comments
or
questions
for
maya
or
just
to
get.
This
discussion
started.
D
D
Well,
I'm
gonna
answer
in
one
certain
way
and
then
let's
talk
about
it,
but
this
is
like
this
guides
our
work
in
public
works,
and
so
it's
it's.
It
should
be
full
buy-in
right.
So
that,
like
this,
is
our
our
goal
and
we-
or
this
is
our
plan
for
10
years,
our
action
plan.
We
we
talk
about
it
as
a
team
as
a
department.
D
All
the
time
now
you
know,
I
think,
there's
I've
heard
a
lot
of
opinions
that
I
frankly
share
in
terms
of,
like
you
know,
urgency.
You
know,
I
think,
like
urgency
is
a
very
important
thing,
but
this
is
not
not
intended
in
in
practice.
I
really
believe,
that's
not
something
that
that
public
works
is
like
kind
of
forgets
about,
or
something
like
that
like
this
is
like
you
know,
we
bring
it
up
all
the
time
and
it's
it's
guided
our
our
street
design,
guide,
work
and
and
just
everything.
D
So
it's
it's
everywhere
in
my
day-to-day
work
and
I
and
I
believe
that
across
the
the
department.
So
that's
like
the
a
very
rosy
answer,
but
I
I
also
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
means
it's
like
perfect.
You
know,
I
think
I
think
the
urgency
is
something
that
that
I
feel
and
and
I've
heard
from
you
as
what
you
have
collectively
today
as
well.
J
H
D
That
is
a
good
question.
I
may
direct
you
to
the
engagement
for
the
transportation
action
plan
section
so
under
menu,
that's
down
at
the
at
the
bottom.
There
was
several
several
multiple
rounds
of
engagement
and
it
was
delayed
as
well
a
little
bit
due
to
covid
and
that
type
of
that
type
of
thing.
So
I'll
just
I'll
just
say
we
yeah.
J
D
And
I
would
also
say,
like
you
know,
I'm
not
prepared
to
like
go
over
like
a
detailed
summary,
because
that's
just
not
something
that
I'm
like
off
the
top
of
my
head
prepared
to
do,
but
there's
a
lot
of
like
fairly
interesting
things,
just
different
dialogues.
You
know
in
the
community
yeah
just
I
mean
a
lot
there's
a
lot
here
is
basically
what
I'll?
What
else
end
with.
A
I
mean
I
just
again
feel
like
it's
very
interesting
that
tap
was
created
with
quantifiers.
You
know
like
81
miles
of
protected
bike
lanes,
51
miles
of
new
neighborhood
greenways
nine
miles
of
new
trails
like
there
had
to
be
some
sort
of
connection
with
money
right.
How?
But
within
the
tap
nothing's
connected
to
money,
correct.
F
F
D
D
F
I
think
the
question
of
how
we
pay
for
it
is
going
to
continue
to
be
the
reason
we
can't
do
nice
things
as
as
we
like
move
forward
and
try
to
unfold
the
work
that's
outlined
here,
and
so
it
does
actually
feel
pretty
urgent
for
us
to
figure
out
how
like,
if
the
city
cannot
pay
for
all
this
work.
That
we
know
needs
to
happen
on
its
own.
F
How
do
we
adjust
our
processes?
How
do
we
seek
funding
from
elsewhere?
How
do
we
like?
We
don't
really
know
what
we're
doing
yet
to
close
those
gaps
in
part,
because
we
haven't
identified
what
they
all
are,
but
we
know
it's
like
more
resources
than
are
currently
dedicated
to
this
work,
and
so
we
should
kind
of
be
throwing
everything
we
can
at
it.
K
Oh,
I
was
just
gonna
say
basically
like
yeah.
It's
that
whole
concept
of
you
kind
of
you'll
never
get
what
you
don't
what
you
don't
ask
for
kind
of
thing
of
like.
If
you
don't
say
we
need
these
are
the
things
we
need,
we'll
figure
out
the
rest
later,
like
then
yeah
yep.
That
makes
that
makes
sense,
but
that's
still
complicated
for
how
we
make
it
happen.
A
E
A
G
They
are
the
big
barriers
that
that
cut
us
off
from
being
able
to
reach
each
other,
walking
and
biking.
And
then,
if
you
have
a
path
across
where
you
have
to
deal
with
on
ramps
and
off
ramps,
so
I
just
you
know
I
I'm
a
big
fan
of
the
plan.
I
would
say,
and
I'm
a
big
fan
of
strategy,
two
overcoming
those
barriers
and
especially
thinking
about
highways,
and
then
I
guess
just
to
our
previous
conversation
and
thinking
about
partnerships
and
such
to
you
know
to
get
us
routes
across
across
these
barriers.
G
H
A
A
Yeah,
it's
a
dense
package
that
tap
so
hopefully
this
will
help
us
kind
of
get
a
better
understanding
about
it,
and
you
know
we're
not
going
to
have
all
the
answers
for
anything
quickly.
So
I
think
this
will
just
add
to
the
knowledge
we
have
and
hopefully
wrap
into
strategies
that
can
be
effective
on
making
changes.
We
want
to
see
in
our
city
anyone
else.
A
So.
Last
month
we
had
a
staff
member.
I
forget
who
was
talk
about
micro
mobility,
specifically
bike
share,
and
we
were
able
to
ask
questions
and
things.
However,
just
kind
of
chatting
during
to
plan
this
meeting,
it
didn't
seem
like
we
had
enough
information
or
a
consensus
to
like
create
a
resolution.
A
So
this
agenda
item
is
just
kind
of
opening
up
on
thoughts
about
micro
mobility
and
then,
hopefully
we
can,
you
know,
create
a
resolution
to
share
with
the
city.
You
know
in
regards
to
the
contract
yeah,
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
opinions
so
feel
free
to
share
yours
about
micro,
mobility
and
what
you
want
to
see
in
minneapolis.
If
anyone
has
any
thoughts
on
that,
you
know,
I
think
the
big
thing
is
like
with
the
contract
coming
up.
A
C
I
mean
I
know
that
I've
brought
this
up
at
past
meetings,
but
the
scooters,
the
scooter
placement,
if
they're
gonna
use
public
bike
racks
for
like
basically
a
privately
owned
and
operated
company
and
service
like
they
should
provide
their
own.
I
know
that
they
have
ones
that
are
designed.
We
have
a
company
local
to
the
twin
cities
that
can
manufacture
those.
It's
not
like
it's
an
issue
of
not
finding
a
vendor
like
all
of
those
resources.
C
All
of
those
dots
are
already
kind
of
connected,
and
it's
frustrating
to
go
use
even
like
bike
racks
that
are
provided
by
private
businesses
or
their
patrons
be
used
by
people
like
by
a
business
service
that
might
not
actually
be
contributing
to
their
patronage.
If
that
makes
sense,
so
I
would
like
to
see
if
you
know.
H
C
H
C
E
Janice
well,
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
I
think
that
having
one
company
for
the
bikes
has
made
our
city
a
lot
less
chaotic
than
some
cities
where
there
are
just
bikes
that
bike
share
everywhere,
but
I'm
not
someone
I
mean.
I
know
people
have
talked
I
mean
today.
I
went
by
an
ice
ride
rack
that
was
empty,
so
I
mean
people
have
been
talking
about.
E
They
haven't
been
recently
moving
bikes
as
much
and
that's
something
that
I
wouldn't
know,
but
I
think,
having
you
know,
having
a
controlled
control
over
the
companies
in
the
contracts
and
limited
number
of
companies,
I
think
has
worked
well
for
the
city
and
maybe
and
scooters
are
kind
of.
I
think
we
do.
How
many
did
you
have
two
of
two
companies?
Then
now
do
we
have
bird
and
the
lyft,
but
you
know
I'm
definitely
making
sure
the
companies
act
responsibly.
I
mean
users,
don't
always
act
responsibly.
E
I
do
see
bikes
left
sometimes
and
not
in
racks
too,
but
I
don't
know
I,
and
I
also
don't
know
what
the
city's
thinking
is
on
that.
I
thought
that
it
would
have
been
nice
to
have
gotten
more
information
on.
He
told
us.
The
city
is
going
to
review
the
contracts,
but
we
don't
know.
Are
they
leaning
towards
renewing
nice
ride?
Are
they
leaning
towards
renewing
a
different
company?
We
really
didn't
get.
I
think
a
read
on
what
was
their
thinking.
D
G
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate:
I
think
it
was.
Was
it
danielle
who's
booked.
It
with
us
said
that
in
the
rfp
they
were
going
to
ask
that
the
bike
share,
allows
people
16
and
up
and
that's
awesome-
we've
been
asking
that
for
a
long
time,
so
just
kind
of
reiterating,
I
think,
that's
great
the
city's
plan
for
including
that
in
the
rfp
and
I'm
very
appreciative
of
it-
and
I
you
know
there
may
be
other
things
that
we
would
want
to
also
see
in
the
rfp
that
we
could
think
about.
A
K
I
think
because
I
mean
I
I
recently
was
some
place
where
there
was
a
an
e-bike
that
was,
I
don't
know
what
this
type
of
lock
is
called,
but
it's
the
one.
That's
like
a
a
squiggle
of
parallel,
like
one
big
bar.
That's
that's
unhelpful
like
if,
if
you
went
up
and
down
with
your
finger
while
moving
it
to
the
side,
it
looks
like
that
like
multiple
staples
that
are
attached
to
each
other,
but
with
does
that
make
sense
kind
of
I
don't
know
anyway.
The
point
is.
K
H
K
Anyway,
the
point
is
if,
if
this
were
one
of
those
applications
that
had
like
a
you
know
the
white
board,
I
would
I
would
whiteboard
what
this
looked
like.
But
anyway,
the
point
is
that
it,
the
the
bike,
this
e-bike
from
lyft,
was
parked
across
this,
which
meant
that
no
one
could
like
it's
one
of
those
bike
racks
that
should
be
able
to
accommodate,
probably
between
three
and
six
bikes,
and
it
was
parked
horizontally
across
the
facility,
and
so
it
was
not
like
you
couldn't
put
any
bikes
in
because
of
it.
K
K
K
I
wish
that
I'm
never
gonna
read
no!
No,
I
was
gonna
just
add
really
quickly
related
to
that
comment
about
the
like,
banning
that
certain
type
of
bike
rack,
which
would
be
great
but
also
you
know
whatever,
but
I
wish
there
were
a
way
to
say:
hey
business
owner
if
you're
gonna
put
up
a
bike,
rack
don't
make
it
the
stupid
one.
That's
like
one
big
bar
across
the
top
and
lots
of
little
bars
in
the
middle.
Upright
those
you
know
the
stupid
ones
that
you
can
only
put
your
back
wheel
in,
but.
D
About
the
banning
side
of
it,
that's
an
interesting
idea
but
like
when
you
know
paul
kale
in
our
traffic
and
parking
services.
He
you
know
he
will
never
recommend
the
wave
rack
like
it's
like
the
very
simple,
like
hitch
and
post
style,
so
like
the
ones
that
we
actually
at
a
staff
level
recommend
to
businesses
are
good.
I
think
so,
I'm
not
sure
about
the
banning.
I
don't
know
about.
Oh
how.
A
D
A
A
Yeah,
so
it
sounds
like
everyone
wants
like
it
doesn't
seem
like
there's,
maybe
consensus
of
like
for
micro
mobility,
how
many
vendors
we
have.
However,
it
is
accessibility
and
not
cannibalizing
the
scarcity
of
parking
for
micro
mobility
that
we
have
so
I
mean
I've
traveled
to
a
lot
of
places
and
talked
to
a
lot
of
folks
that
manage
micro
mobility
and
there
are
pros
and
cons
for
having
you
know
several
vendors
one
vendor.
A
I
think
what
is
apparent
is
that
the
city,
in
my
opinion,
has
less
power
than
the
vendors
in
all
of
these
situations,
in
the
sense
of
like
lift
they've
got
way
more
money
than
the
city
of
minneapolis
will
ever
have,
and
they
will
have
a
ton
of
lawyers
more
well
prepared
for
it.
So
it's
been
interesting
to
see
like
cities
put
together
these
rfps,
but
then
how
do
you
as
a
city
hold
them
accountable?
A
Well,
some
didn't
and
they
just
you
know,
bike
bombed
everything
but
like
some
did,
and
then
they
went
out
of
business
right
like
in
theory,
metro
transit,
not
on
wood
will
never
go
out
of
business
right.
However,
you
know,
lyft
could
just
become
insolvent
and
be
gone
right,
and
then
we
wouldn't
have
a
bike
share
at
all.
D
A
So
yeah
I
mean,
and
then
I've
seen
other
cities
that
have
multiple
vendors
like
baltimore
for
scooters
in
particular,
they've
become
really
popular
with
folks,
and
it
just
means
that
there's
just
more
accessibility
in
general,
they
do
not
take
well
to
bike,
shares
a
lot
of
those
in
the
bay
and
probably
a
handful
of
scooters,
but
yeah.
It's
interesting
like
depending
on
what
said
you
are
what
people
really
gravitate
to.
A
I
mean
I
guess
that's
a
good
way
to
like
kind
of
figure
out
what
your
city
needs
in
a
sense
like,
I
think,
e-bikes
all
around
that'd
be
awesome,
and
I
do
think,
in
my
opinion,
the
kiosks
of
the
actual
nice
ride
stations.
The
green
ones
are
effective
because
you
always
know
you
should.
You
know,
find
at
least
one
there
and
I
think,
with
them
being
spread
around
like.
I
saw
one
parked
like
in
the
middle
of
hiawatha
once.
A
D
So
this
is
matthew,
real
quick.
If,
if
we're
going
to
go
for
a
resolution
in
talking
to
danielle
and
some
pac
members,
I
just
think
it
would
be
helpful.
Also
just
to
you
know,
assuming
you
all
believe
this-
that
to
articulate
that
you
think
bike
share
and
scooter
share
is
valuable
in
addition
to
recommendations
that
you
have
just
it's.
It's
always
helpful
to
get
that
like
don't
maybe
like
assume
that
yeah.
So
I
guess
maybe
just
helpful.
I
think
for
you
to
say
that.
A
H
A
G
H
E
Cool,
do
you
want
to?
I
mean
I
I
I
could
help
you,
but
I
was
going
to
say
if
you
want
to
sort
of
create
something,
and
what
was
the
list
is
still
here.
We
are
we're
allowed
to
email
a
few
of
us.
So
if
you
wanted
to
start
something
we
could
communicate
by
email
to
like.
If
you
write
something
we
could
write
comments
on
it,
but
we
could
communicate
by
email.
H
H
F
E
A
H
A
Well,
I
want
to
thank
maya
in
particular
for
walking
us
through
the
first
two
bits
of
the
bicycling
tap
chapter
thanks
maya
and
everyone.
We
had
a
really
good
conversation
lots
of
discussion,
so
please
keep
in
mind
between
meetings
about
the
cip,
tap
and
bike
share
one
for
micro
mobility
and
be
ready,
we'll
vote
on
that
resolution
at
the
next
full
meeting.