►
From YouTube: March 24, 2021 Bicycle Advisory Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
welcome
everybody
to
the
march
24th
meeting
of
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
notice.
This
meeting
may
involve
the
remote
participation
by
members,
either
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
means
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency
novel
coronavirus
pandemic.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
statutes,
section
13
d
.021
welcome
everybody.
A
Let's
start
with
the
roll
call,
and
I'm
gonna
ask
that
we
do
the
adoption
of
agenda
and
acceptance
of
minutes
as
a
separate
action,
because
I
would
really
like
it
if,
as
part
of
roll
call,
folks
could
share
their
pronouns
and
their
seat
on
the
committee.
I'm
realizing
that
when
we
used
to
meet
in
person
we
still
have
name
tags
that
would
have
information
on
there.
That
would
help
us
figure
out
who
was
here
and
why
we
haven't
really
had
an
opportunity
to
do
that
as
a
group.
A
So
would
love
as
part
of
our
roll
call
process
for
the
next
couple
meetings.
People
could
identify
their
affiliation
with
their
seat
and
share
their
pronouns.
If
they're
comfortable
doing
that,
and
then
I
will
now
turn
it
over
to
millicent
to
call
the
roll
okay
aaron.
B
Hi
here
and
I'm
aaron
shafer
from
ward
8
and
use
he
him
pronouns.
C
A
Booty
breathe
talking,
I
can
see
on
video
but
bree.
We
don't
have
any
audio
for
you.
So
we'll
come
back
to
you
after
you
have
a
chance
to
troubleshoot
your
audio
okay.
C
E
Dan
booty
mpd
liaison,
I
use
he
him
pronouns.
A
C
G
Hi
tyler
patterson
minneapolis
park
board
person,
staff
member.
He
him.
I
Here,
jesse
thornson,
minnesota
department
of
transportation,
mndot
agency
rep.
He
him
pronouns
joy.
C
C
M
N
Hi
matthew
hendricks
from
word
six
and
I
use
he
him
pronouns.
O
I
sheikh
hi
maya,
shake
ward
11.
I
use
she
her
pronouns
thanks.
P
Phillip,
music,
philip
music,
ward,
2
bac
vice
chair.
He
him.
Q
C
R
C
S
Durham
west
durham,
he
him
minneapolis
community
planning
and
economic
development.
C
Me
millicent
flowers,
see
her
minneapolis
public
works
and
I'll
go
back
up
to
brie.
Are
you
there
yeah
hi.
A
That's
a
good
committee
today,
thanks
everybody.
Looking
for
a
motion
to,
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
and
accept
the
february
24th
minutes.
P
E
F
E
P
A
A
Any
discussion
or
amendments
to
the
minutes.
A
All
right
millicent,
if
you
could
call
the
roll
and
before
melissa,
calls
the
role
I
just
want
to.
Let
you
know
that
we're
going
to
have
no
we're
going
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
procedural
change.
In
terms
of
where
I
vote.
A
As
the
person
chairing
the
committee,
it
will
be
standard
practice
for
me
to
abstain
from
voting
while
I'm
chairing
the
committee,
unless
there's
a
tie,
so
my
name
will
go
to
the
bottom
of
the
roll
and
I
will
generally
not
be
voting
on
things
unless
there's
a
tie
or
a
need
for
me
to
vote
since
I'm
facilitating
the
meeting.
So
just
wanted
to
make
you
all
aware
that
my
name
is
going
to
drop
out
of
alphabetical
order
to
the
very
end.
A
E
C
E
C
You're
on
youtube:
okay,
heather.
C
C
G
V
C
K
T
M
N
P
Whoop,
yes,
kevin.
M
E
R
A
Awesome
with
that,
I
will
turn
it
over,
so
we
typically
do
our
discussion
and
then
our
reports,
we
have
done
our
discussion
and
mentor
reports
in
the
past.
We're
gonna
try
something
a
little
bit
different
today
and
do
our
committee
report
out
first
to
make
sure
that
those
get
the
discussion
time
that
they
deserve
and
we'll
see
how
that
goes.
So
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
brie
and
heather
for
the
five
e's
subcommittee.
U
Report
hi
everyone,
so
I
apologize
ahead
of
time.
I
have
been
not
really
participating
in
the
world
in
the
past
week.
As
probably
most
of
you
know,
there
was
a
mass
shooting
in
atlanta
of
six
asian
women
and
it
is
very
difficult
to
function
in
this
world
as
a
woman
of
color,
sometimes
but
yeah.
U
We
did
have
a
meeting
way
before
then,
and
the
first
part
of
the
five
is
that
was
the
first
meeting
that
heather
and
I
were
running
and
we
had
ethan
foley
come
and
talk
about
the
street
design
guide,
which
is
a
big
website
that
the
city
came
out
with
with
a
lot
of
information.
So
it
is
interesting
to
go
through
and
yeah
ethan
did
a
thorough
job
of
explaining
how
that
website
looks.
U
Then
alyssa
was
kind
enough
to
report
on
last
year
and
what
happened
and
that
went
really
smoothly
and
then
poor
chris.
We
didn't
give
him
a
lot
of
time
to
go
over
the
cip
resolution
for
the
prep,
but
I
know
in
the
executive
committee
that
was
talked
about
and
a
resolution
will
be
coming
up
for
the
entire
group
today
and
at
the
very
end
robin
brought
in.
U
Yes,
I
have
to
talk
about
parking
minimums
and
travel
demand
management
just
to
kind
of
get
us
all
in
the
loop,
and
that
was
very
informative
and
you
don't
have
to
do
anything
just
yet,
but
yeah
that's
moving
forward
and
then
also
it
was
announced
that
robert
hutchinson
is
no
longer
with
us
in
the
sense
that
she's
in
the
biden
administration
now
and
that
alyssa
and
some
other
folks
around
town,
put
together
a
petition
to
make
sure
that
the
mayor
will
do
a
broad
national
search
for
that
position.
U
So
hopefully
folks
can
look
at
that
and
decide
if
they'd
like
to
sign
on
to
that
if
they
haven't
seen
it.
Yet.
I
believe
alyssa
said
I
didn't
know
so
that
was
the
meeting
and
just
a
heads
up
for
folks
heather
and
I
will
be
sending
out
a
survey
to
everyone
on
the
bac
just
so
we
can
learn
more
about
where
people
are
at
in
the
5es
and
what,
if
you
want
to
participate
in
that,
so
that
will
be
coming
out.
U
It's
just
like
a
15-20
minute
survey
and
it'd
be
very
helpful
to
us.
If
you
can
participate
in
that,
and
last
thing
is
that
we
have
decided
to
make
the
meeting
two
hours
long,
just
because
it
seems
like
there's
a
lot
of
information
and
because
we're
all
online
it
just
takes
longer
and
we're
going
over
pretty
regularly.
So
I
just
want
to
be
respectful
of
people's
time
and
actually
present
it
in
a
way
that
is
more
realistic
and
I'll.
U
Try
to
you
know,
get
everything
moving
forward
and
if
we
get
two
we'll
get
to
leave
early
and
also
there'll
be
a
five
minute
break,
because
I
just
need
that
as
well,
so
that
should
give
us
a
little
bit
more
breathing
room
and
time
for
conversation.
A
Yeah
I
was
curious.
Chris
did
you
have
a
resolution
on
the
cip
to
bring
forth
for
to
be
passed
today,
based
on
that
discussion.
T
Yeah
well
so
a
couple
things
first,
just
really
quickly.
On
the
two
hour
thing,
just
a
little
bit
of
context
of
it's
been
pretty
normal.
That
subcommittees
there's
an
option
to
go
to
two
hours,
so
I
just
want
to
kind
of.
Let
folks
know
that
that's
not
out
of
the
realm
of
what's
been
been
done
in
this
more
just
to
kind
of
as
brie
said,
communicate
more
fairly
to
you
all
about
the
the
time
that
we'll
be
taking
for
those
and
then
yeah.
T
As
far
as
the
resolution,
I
think,
actually
technically
a
member
should
should
move
that.
I
I
can't
move
it
as
staff,
but
millicent,
I
believe,
included
that
in
the
the
most
recent
gov
delivery
that
was
sent
out,
and
so,
if
somebody
wants
to
to
move
that,
then
we
we
can
pull
that
up
and
and
edit
as
if
needed,.
A
Q
P
Oh,
oh,
I
would
do
it.
This
is
philip.
Can
you
enlarge
the?
Can
you
enlarge
it?
On
screen
resolution
of
on
public
works?
Cips,
the
minneapolis
bike
advisory
committee
joins
the
city
of
minneapolis
in
envisioning,
a
future
where
people
of
all
ages
and
abilities
can
easily
walk
roll
bike
or
use
transit
as
they
navigate.
The
city.
P
Minneapolis
has
a
host
of
policies,
plans
and
declarations,
complete
streets,
climate
action
plan,
vision,
zero
minneapolis,
2040,
climate
emergency
declaration,
ada
transition
plan
and
the
predecessors
of
the
transportation
action
plan
that
have
been
routinely
ignored
or
deprioritized
in
favor
of
the
status
quo.
This
is
incredibly
damaging,
given
that
the
infrastructure
we
fund
and
build
now
will
shape
how
people
get
around
for
decades
to
come
to
achieve
our
goals.
P
Ten
years
from
now,
the
city
must
have
already
accomplished
a
massive
shift
in
how
we
approach
transportation
to
meet
our
climate
goals.
Every
year
we
delay
makes
the
coming
necessary
transition
more
abrupt
and
more
difficult.
It
makes
our
climate
less
stable,
proposed
transportation.
Investments
from
the
public
works
from
public
works
should
only
be
for
programs
that
radically
improve
conditions
for
people,
walking,
rolling
biking
and
using
transit,
and
all
investments
should
aggressively
reduce
vehicle
miles.
Traveled
vmt,
the
2021
26
cbr
requests
for
street
paving
alone
were
553
million,
an
average
of
92
million
a
year.
P
This
is
an
increase
of
50
percent
over
the
average
annual
request
of
65
million
from
the
last
cycle.
At
a
time
when
we
urgently
need
to
be
minimizing,
investments
in
car,
focused
infrastructure
and
decreasing
driving
public
works
is
proposing
sinking
even
more
money
into
cars.
Disappointingly,
the
dedicated
funding
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian
related
programming
continues
to
be
a
small
fraction
of
the
level
of
paving
funding,
with
only
49
million
in
funding
proposed,
while
some
resurfacing
and
reconstruction
projects
included
biking
and
walking
elements.
P
This
misalignment
in
proposed
projects
is
a
decided
investment
in
the
status
quo
and
will
not
result
in
the
changes.
People
in
our
city
need
to
that
end.
The
minneapolis
bike
advisory
committee
makes
the
following
recommendations
to
minneapolis
public
works
regarding
the
2022-27
capital
improvements
program.
P
P
However,
minneapolis
cannot
afford
to
wait
to
secure
funding
to
begin
aggressively,
implementing
division
allied
in
tap
and
must
lead
by
example,
with
this
commitment.
Even
waiting.
One
budget
cycle
is
too
late
because
neighborhood
greenways
and
are
visionary
examples
that
also
directly
contribute
to
vmt
reduction
and
help
people
understand
the
benefits
of
people-centered
street
design.
We
asked
the
city
to
prioritize,
creating
and
proposing
2022-27
capital
budget
requests
to
fund
all
neighborhood,
greenways
and
bikeways
on
the
all
ages
and
abilities
network
identified
in
the
tap
in
the
next
five
years.
P
That
include
include
a
design
that
represents
significant
improvements
for
walking,
rolling
biking
and
transit
use,
ensure
parkway,
paving
programs
include
more
options
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian
enhancements,
not
just
street
repaving
and
add
flexibility
to
add
enhancements.
P
South
first
avenue
staff,
blaisdell
avenue
south
dunwardy
boulevard,
hennepin
avenue
and
lauren
bikeway
gap,
defund
capital
expenses
related
to
the
minneapolis
police
department.
In
view
of
the
city
council's
intent
to
amend
the
city
charter
on
the
21
budget,
a
ballot
regarding
policing
and
community
safety
click
recommends
that
a
pause
be
placed
on
all
investments.
A
T
P
Okay,
so
what
we
really
instead
of
click,
it
should
be
bac,
recommends
that
he
possibly
placed
on
all
investments
in
physical
infrastructure
for
the
minneapolis
police
department.
These
include
capital
investments
in
police
precincts
one
three,
four
and
five.
This
delay
should
await
the
outcome
of
the
city's
reimagining
policing
and
of
current
litigation
against
the
city
regarding
the
sufficiency
of
policing
for
our
residents.
P
Both
outcomes
may
dramatically
affect
where,
when
and
to
what
extent,
there
will
be
policing
in
minneapolis
requiring
precinct
facilities
if
at
all,
other
defund
items,
20
20
through
2024
cbrs
cprs,
are
our
capital.
P
Requests,
oh
capital,
yeah,
okay,
right,
yeah,
yeah,
capital
budget
request.
Cbr
is
of
1.07
billion
2021
through
2026
cbrs
of
1.41
billion
two
more
paragraphs.
We
also
encourage
public
works
to
explore
scope,
changes
for
existing
projects
funded
through
the
regional
solicitation
in
order
to
align
these
projects
so
that
people
walking
rolling
biking
and
using
transit
are
fully
prioritized,
especially
given
that
these
shifts
will
not
affect
many
key
considerations
of
the
projects.
P
A
P
A
All
right
discussion
and
as
we
launch
into
discussion,
I
want
to
invite
the
five
e's
co-chairs,
as
probably
the
folks
who
have
looked
at
this
previously
to
kick
us
off
in
the.
A
Conversation
chris,
I
see
ahead
and
raised
from
you.
T
Thanks
so
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
explain
some
of
the
thought
process
behind
how
we
were
planning
to
to
bring
this
forward.
So,
as
you
can
see
specifically
for
the
the
defund
bullet,
there
there's
some
language
there
that
actually
comes
from
a
click,
a
click
resolution.
T
From
previous
years,
we
as
brie
said
we
got
sort
of
cut
off
in
our
subcommittee
on
how
much
time
we
could
spend
on
this,
and
so
it
was
a
little
bit
of
a
a
little
rougher
around
the
edges
coming
out
of
that
in
a
few
places.
So,
specifically,
if
there's
any
language
that
people
would
like
to
to
move
to,
amend
just
as
a
friendly
amendment,
if
that's
accepted
for
the
for
that
bullet,
feel
free
to
use
any
of
that
kind
of
italicized
language
there,
and
we
can
just
remove
anything
else.
T
T
Now
would
be
the
time
to
kind
of
raise
that
we
basically
took
everyone's
ideas
and
didn't
cut
any
ideas
from
our
our
session
in
in
the
subcommittee,
and
so,
if
now
would
be
the
time
to
discussion
to
to
remove
things,
we
were
hoping
that
by
now
everyone
would
have
added
items
if
they
have
them,
but
it
is
an
open
motion
and
if
you
do
want
to
do
that,
you
you
still
can
do
that
at
that
time
as
at
this
time
as
well.
So
I
hope
that
makes
sense.
T
L
A
I
guess
one
question
I
have
for
staff,
which
chris
I
think
I
raised
to
you
in
an
email
also,
I'm
not
seeing
any
other
raised
hands,
so
I'm
gonna
jump
in
with
my
question,
but
if
other
folks
have
questions,
my
understanding
is
that
the
audience
like
when
we
pass
a
resolution.
We
typically
have
one
sort
of
like
person
or
body
that
the
resolution
is
going
to
right,
and
so,
in
this
case,
understanding
that
the
the
vast
majority
of
the
resolution
here
has
a
focused
audience
of
public.
A
The
public
works
department
and
I'm
curious
if
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
bri
you
brought
up
in
the
five
e's
meeting
right.
This
is
about
there's
sort
of
a
larger
comment
about
balancing
our
full
budget
priorities
across
the
departments,
which
I
think
relates
to
the
section
on
mpd
and
that
that
resolution
has
a
different
audience.
A
Public
works
doesn't
have
control
over
the
portion
of
the
capital
budget
that
relates
to
this,
and
so
it
seems
to
me
that
that
is
potentially
a
separate
resolution
just
because
the
audience
is
a
different
audience.
So
I
just
wanted
to
like
raise
that
up
as
a
question.
I
think
first
for
staff
to
clarify.
T
T
Matthew
feel
free
to
to
jump
in
as
well.
I
I
guess
I
would
say
like.
Ultimately
it's
it's
your
call
in
that
like
if
you
want
a
resolution
to
have
more
than
one
audience
like
you
can
have
a
resolution.
That
does
that.
I
guess
the
only
place
I
really
feel
like
I
can.
What
I
can
say
is,
is
you
are
correct
in
saying
that
everything
related
to
the
mpd
capital
expenses
here
is
outside
of
public
works
arena
like
we
don't
have
any
jurisdiction
over
that
part
of
the
budget.
A
Thanks,
I
guess
so
I
will
just
close
with
a
comment
of
if
it
is
a
different
audience
right
like
if
our
audience
is,
for
example,
the
mayor
or
the
council
right.
I
think,
then,
that
resolution
potentially
has
a
different
timing
need
than
the
resolution
we're
trying
to
put
in
front
of
public
works
right
now,
I'm
not
sure
what
that
timing
need.
Is
that
isn't
to
say
we
couldn't
pass
something
now
and
pass
something
again
later,
but
that
would
be
a
consideration
as
well
turn
it
over
to
tyler
and
then
debris.
G
U
U
I
have
interacted
with
the
police
while
on
my
bicycle
numerous
times,
and
I
think
it
aligns
with
our
equity
stance
as
well,
and
I
think
it
can
be
and
and
right
like
we
include
it
here
and
we
do
resolution
for
them
here
in
the
city
council
as
well,
hey-
and
I
mean
I
wasn't
clear-
that
that
that
this
resolution
would
only
be
for
public
works.
J
I
I
guess,
I'd
like
to
clarify
that.
I
actually
do
think
that,
like
like
the
audience
of
the
resolution
like
all
the
time
is
mayor
council
in
public
works,
that
that's
been
my
understanding
since
I've
been
on
the
committee,
and
I
mean
I,
I
can
see
how
like
primary
audience,
may
change
depending
on
what
it
says,
but
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
say,
like
yeah.
I
guess
I
wouldn't
say
like
any
particular
resolution
is
specifically
only
for
public
works.
U
O
Yeah,
I
would
just
like
to
agree
with
brie,
I
think,
there's
not
really
a
harm
in
including
it
I
don't.
At
least
I
don't
think
there
is,
and
if
we're
all
here
to
try
and
make
biking
walking
and
rolling
better
for
everyone.
Q
So
it
most
of
the
rest
of
it
is
talking
about
the
kinds
of
so
so
just
like
the
way
that
the
capital
program
works
is
that
the
departments
come
up
with
these
cbrs,
these
capital
budget
requests
and
they
put
them
forward
through
click,
the
capital
long-range
improvement
committee
and
and
then
it
gets
into
the
mayor's
proposed
capital
budget,
and
then
that
gets
voted
on
by
the
council.
Q
The
the
rest
of
the
stuff
in
the
bulleted
list
is
talking
about
how
public
works
comes
up
with
its
initial
requests
for
capital
dollars,
and
then
this
last
one
isn't
really
talking
to
the
police
department
and
asking
them
to
like
to
change
the
way
that
they
make
requests
for
capital
dollars.
It's
it's
talking
to
the
rest
of
those
decision,
makers,
click,
the
mayor
and
and
the
council,
so
at
least
separating
it
out
from
the
rest
of
the
list.
I
think
would
just
make
the
whole
thing
more
legible,
because
it's
it's
like
that.
V
Q
Give
the
capital
to
at
the
end
of
the
process
after
all,
the
cbrs
have
come
in.
So
at
least,
I
think
we
need
to
be
clear
that,
like
we
understand
that
those
are
different
things
and
that
we're
asking
different
actors
in
the
system
for
something.
A
Q
That
would
be
one
way
to
do
it
or
or
we
could
come
up
with
a
different,
a
different
bulleted
list.
That's
that's
more
specifically
targeted
just
to
mpd
type
stuff.
I
mean
it
so
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
that
the
city
spends
capital
on
that's,
not
transportation,
related
we're
spending,
all
kinds
of
money
on
like
sewer
pipes
and
water
pipes
and
stuff
like
that,
and
so
so
up
until
that
point,
we've
treated
the
amount
of
money
that
we're
spending
on
transportation
as
kind
of
one
big
pie,
and
we've
said
that
public
works
change.
Q
What
you're
doing
with
that
pie
and
then
in
the
last
few
bullets
about
the
mpd,
we're
like
oh
and
this
other
part
of
the
pie
over
here,
is
important
to
us
too,
and
you
should
just
put
all
that
into
transportation
and
and
it's
just
it,
it
comes
across
in
a
confusing
way.
Q
A
Confusing
thanks
robin
aaron
had
a
hand
up,
but
that
went
away.
Oh.
B
I
just
I
just
took
it
down,
but
I
still
have,
I
was
gonna
say
something
than
more.
I
think
more
eloquently
said
what
I
was
kind
of
thinking,
but
that
line
caught
my
attention
reading
it
until
hearing
the
last
couple
people
I
didn't
know.
Why
necessarily
because
I
do
support
that.
B
But
what
I,
what
I
was
thinking
to
kind
of
bridge,
what
tyler
was
saying
and
what
some
other
people
were
saying
would
be
to
maybe
move
it
to
another
separate
paragraph
and
restate
that,
as
more
of
like
a
like,
what
I
wrote
just
as
kind
of
a
mock
mock-up
of
words
was:
should
allocation
of
fun
or
should
reallocation
of
funding
for
mpd
take
place,
allocate
some
of
those
dollars
toward
non-motorized
transportation
and
achieving
stated
goals
of
the
transportation
action
plan,
and
have
that
be
your
new,
like
start
of
the
paragraph,
and
then
maybe
have
some
of
those
other
sub
bullets
under
that,
and
I
don't
know
exactly
how
you'd
configure
the
whole
thing.
B
But
but
if
you
pulled
that
particular
darker
bullet
out
and
switched
it
to
some
version
of
that
wording,
it
might
help
with
with
that
problem
that
robin
was.
A
Just
talking
about
thanks,
aaron
aaron
phillip
and
then
I'm
gonna
make
some
suggestions
about
how
we
move
forward
because
we're
40
minutes
into
the
meeting
on
our
first
motion.
P
Yeah,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
how
you
know.
A
long
resolution
gets
viewed
by
public
works,
but
I'm
just
wondering-
or
I
would
raise
the
question
of-
would
it
be
useful
to
say
sort
of
pick
our
like
at
the
very
least
like
if
you
do
nothing
else
and
for
for
me,
I
was
looking
at
fund
all
the
tap
proposed
bikeways
greenways
in
five
years.
But
again
I
don't.
I
don't
know
whether
it
weakens
the
entire
list
to
emphasize
one
thing,
but
that
jumped
out
at
me.
P
The
proposed
change
would
be
sort
of
at
the
very
least
fund,
all
tap
bikeways
and
greenways
in
five
years.
In
addition,
bsc
recommends
and
then
we,
so
it's
it's
picking
one
as
the
priority
as
the.
If
you
do
nothing
else,
you
rip
up
the
sheet
of
paper.
Do
this
one
thing,
I'm
not
sure.
If
that's
the
best
thing
again,
I
defer
to
others.
A
Thanks
phillip
and
then
chris,
let
me
ask
you
before
we
dive
into
discussion,
it's
pretty
important
that
we
pass
this
resolution
today.
There's
a
timing
right,
there's
a
timing,
concern
with
passing
the
resolution
in
march
because
of
when
public
works
bring
forth
their
cbrs.
A
Okay,
so
I
I
think
what
I
would
propose
is
you
know,
philip.
If
you
have
a
specific
way
that
you
would
suggest
we
amend
this
first
section
moving
that
forward
and
then
to
robin's
point
about
how
do
we
differentiate
between
comments
that
are
about
the
list
of
things
we
want
public
works
to
do
versus
the
list
of
things
we
want
counsel
to
do.
A
I've
sent
some
like
draft
framing
over
email
to
millicent
and
or
chris
that,
if
you
could
maybe
share
via
email,
if
you
could
maybe
share
the
screen,
and
I
could
read
that
I
would
suggest
that
we
pass
the
other
thing
as
a
separate
motion,
so
that
that's
very
clear,
I
don't
think
it
in
any
way
hurts
what
we're
asking
for
to
separate
those
two
things
and,
in
fact,
could
to
robin's
point
strengthen
our
case
on
both
of
them.
A
So
I
would
frame
the
budget,
the
motion
that
we
all
just
looked
at
right,
that
I
believe
that
was
titled
motion
on
public
works,
cbrs
or
something
to
that
effect,
and
then
I
would
make
a
separate
motion
on
capital
budgeting,
which
goes
more
or
less
as
follows.
We
need
to
build
a
city
where
everyone
can
thrive.
Transportation
is
a
major
component
of
that,
but
with
a
limited
capital
resource
pool,
we
need
to
be
deliberate
about
where
we
put
the
money.
A
We're
also
going
to
see
more
demands
on
essential
sewer
and
stormwater
infrastructure,
which
is
really
important
not
only
for
our
survival
but
to
people
walking
and
biking,
especially
in
winter.
When
drains
don't
drain,
sidewalks
and
streets
get
covered
in
ice
or
deep
water.
We
have
to
put
our
resources
here
in
in
walking
biking
and
transportation
and
not
in
decades
lasting
infrastructure
for
cars
or
police
that
we
can't
afford
to
be
relying
on
because
of
climate
and
racial
justice.
A
A
So
that's
a
proposed
path
forward
and
would
love
to
hear
what
the
five
e's
chairs.
Think
of
that
as
and
I
think
maybe
there's
a
hand
raised.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
clicking
back
and
forth
here.
F
Yeah,
I
you
know
when
I
read
this
and
looked
at
it.
I
realized
that
there's
sort
of
some
cut
and
paste
from
last
year-
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
the
figures
that
are
in
the
first
part
of
the
document,
the
dollar
figures
and
that
stuff,
if
those
are
still
accurate,.
A
F
Very
good,
and
then
this
is
you
want
to
pass
a
resolution
today
and
because
this
is
due
in
march,
am
I
correct.
F
Yeah
yeah,
I
would
just
in
looking
at
it
in
general.
I
I
just.
F
I
wonder
if
there
are
some
things
that
could
be
cut
or
trimmed
down
a
little
bit
from
what
was
in
it
in
their
last
year,
not
terribly,
but
there
just
seems
to
be
a
little
bit
of
repeat,
maybe
some
stuff,
that's
no
longer
applicable
as
an
example.
The
protected
bikeways
sort
of
what
phil
was
saying
about,
trying
to
slim
the
thing
down
a
little
bit.
A
Q
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
understand
you're
pulling
this
out
as
a
separate
motion.
A
That
is
my
proposal
to
the
five
e's
chairs.
If
they
are
amenable
to
that,
okay.
T
What
you
would
be
suggesting
is
that
that,
after
like,
if
we
if
we
strike
the
whatever
we
do
with
with
the
first
motion,
that's
on
the
table,
we
need
to
figure
that
out
now
and
I
think
what
you're
suggesting
is
that
we
strike
the
mpd
portion
from
that
first
motion
and
propose
that
then
the
next
motion
would
be
the
one
you
just
read
with
the
language
from
that.
First
motion
would
be
kind
of
appended
to
that.
I
A
So,
like
the
paragraph
that
is
stricken
with
the
intent
to
move
as
a
separate
motion.
T
So
I'm
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
showing
the
motion
on
the
table
then,
because
I
do
think
that
we
should
close
that
out
first
and
then
and
then
we
would
move
that
we
could
move
that.
Second
motion
that
alyssa's
kind
of
packaging
in
the
in
the
discussion
portion.
A
A
To
dan
miller's
point,
I
would
also
support
striking
the
paragraph
about
regional
solicitation
scope
changes.
I
think
we'll
pass
the
window
for
regional
solicitation
scope
changes
it's
the
very
second
to.
P
P
T
A
A
All
right,
I
would
phillip,
do
you
have
any
specific
language
that
you
would
want
to
change
in
that
first
section,
do
you
have
a
proposed
solution
for
your
comment?
Otherwise
I
think
we've
kind
of
addressed
what
we
can
address.
P
Right
I'll
send
I
sent
emailed
it
to
you
and
melissa,
and
chris
the
bse
recommends
as
a
first
priority
that
all
tap
delineated,
greenways
and
bikeways
be
fully
funded
within
five
years.
P
Yeah,
let's
see,
I
know
I
was
changing
it
as
I
was
thinking
about.
It
here
recommends
as
a
first
priority
that
all
transportation
action
plan
delineated.
If
that's
the
right
word,
greenways
and
bikeways
be
fully
funded
within
five.
P
J
A
Let
me
jump
in
I'm
sorry,
so
I'm
that's
that
and
then
I'm
gonna
re-read
bullet
point
two,
which
I
think
is
maybe
either
duplicative
and
should
be
struck
or
maybe
could
replace
that
as
a
primary
bullet
point.
So
it
says,
because
neighborhood
greenways
are
visionary
examples
that
also
directly
contribute
to
vmt
reduction
and
help
people
understand
the
benefits
of
people-centered
street
design.
A
J
P
Well,
you
know
we
talked
about
constructing
all
protected
bikeways,
and
then
we
talked
about
bikeways
and
greenways.
I
I'm
not
again,
I'm
not
sort
of
sure
what
I'm
sort
of
my
sense
is
to
put
in
something
upfront
as
a
priority
that
feels
like.
I
don't
know
if
we
can
do
all
the
rest
of
the
stuff,
but
oh,
we
could
seriously
consider
but
you're
right
moving
from
10
to
5.
I
see
the
problem
here
right.
It's
well,
but.
P
T
Either
way
this
year
we're
going
to
work
really
hard
on
making
sure
we
can
fund
the
transportation
action
plan
within
10
years,
but
I
think
I
mean
I
think
this
makes
it
clear.
You
all
want
that
faster,
but
we
aren't
currently
at
a
place
where
we
do
fund
enough
of
this
work
to
do
it
in
10
years
I'll,
say
it
that
way.
P
A
So
maybe
can
I
suggest
that
we
take
the
other
sub
the
longer
sub
bullet
and
replace
and
replace
philips
amendment
with
that
longer
some
bullet
at
the
very
top
of
the
list,
and
then
would
really
like
to
call
the
role
on
this
on
this.
So
we
can
at
least
get
this
portion
of
the
motion
passed
before
the
hour
and
also
thank
you
to
everybody
for
contributing
comments.
This
is
a
very,
very
long
resolution.
Thank
you
to
philip
for
reading
it
aloud.
This
is
one
of
the
most
important
resolutions.
D
L
G
I
M
C
C
V
C
M
C
L
M
C
R
A
Chris,
do
you
want
to
bring
up
the
secondary
motion
now,
and
I
would
suggest
that
it's
still
in
pretty
draft
stage
and
so.
A
Let's
see
I
just
took
notes
and
sent
those,
and
so
would
support
somebody
making
that
motion
and
also
sort
of
editing
as
they
verbally
make
the
motion,
because
there's
some
I
don't
know
exactly
what
the
procedure
should
be
around
this,
because
it
needs
some
pretty
heavy
editing.
Would
it
make
sense,
rather
than
to
try
to
do
this
in
real
time
to
maybe
send
this
draft
motion
to
a
committee
member
like
to
come
back
to
it
later
in
our
agenda?
I
don't
I'm
not
want
to
make
good
use
of
our
time.
T
T
Yeah
I
I
can,
I
can
do
that
and
I'll
just
let
you
know
when
it's
ready
by
typing
something
in
the
in
the
chat.
A
That
would
be
great,
so
I
would
say:
let's
move
on
and
I'm
sorry
seeing
some
hands
dan
and
brie.
Do
you
have
comments
or
thoughts.
U
T
T
A
So
yeah
thanks
bri.
I
appreciate
that
so
we
will
transition
over
to
the
engineering
subcommittee
report
and
then
brie.
If
you
would
let
us
know
in
the
chat
sort
of
when
you're
ready,
I'm
hoping
we'll
just
do
the
entire
engineering
subcommittee
report
and
then
plug
this
in
before
discussion
on
other
items.
P
Do
we
have
a
resolution
about
parking,
minimums
and
tdm?
I
believe
oh.
A
That's
a
great
question
robin
I
think,
was
the
discussion
later
on
that.
P
H
Was
a
tm
motion
enclosed
in
the
there
there
a
document
that
was
sent
to
us
with
the
meeting
notice.
That
said
draft
resolutions,
and
there
was
a
tdm
resolution
that
was
the
last
one
on
that
list.
Your
people
are
looking
for.
It.
A
A
Phillip,
as
with
the
previous
motion,
we
do
have
to
read
them
all
aloud.
All.
P
Right
rice,
okay,
tdm
parking,
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
strongly
supports
the
parking
loading
and
mobility
zoning
code
text.
Amendment
specifically,
the
bac
strongly
supports
many
of
the
details
of
the
policy
as
proposed
removing
vehicle
parking
minimums,
reducing
vehicle
parking,
maximums,
increasing
bicycle
parking,
minimums,
increasing
the
required
provision
of
bicycle
storage,
lockers
and
shower
facilities
and
creating
a
travel
demand
management
regulatory
system
that
will
incentivize
what
we
actually
want,
which
is
reducing
trips
by
car
period,
so
moved.
A
And
I
should
add,
this
is
a
follow-up,
so
we
did
review.
We
did
have
a
presentation
from
joe
at
5es
last
month.
That
was
a
follow-up
presentation
to
a
to
a
conversation
he
brought
to
us
a
couple
months
ago.
So
this
is
getting
near
the
end
of
its
cycle
and
is,
I
think,
going
to
the
planning
commission
in
about
some
time,
within
the
month
dan
miller,.
F
Yeah,
just
the
abbreviation:
what
does
tdm
stand
for
and
is
it
worth
us?
You
know,
spelling
that
out
in
the
top.
A
A
It
has
already
been
moved
and
seconded
robin.
Do
you
have
anything
you
want
to
add
otherwise
we're
about
to
call
the
roll.
M
E
C
M
C
V
L
M
M
L
P
C
R
E
B
A
All
right,
I
also
abstain.
Thanks
millicent,
I
call
you
eventually
it's
fine.
I
usually
go
right
after
dan
miller.
It's
a
big
change
all
right,
so
I
think
that
is
it
for
the
5v
subcommittee
report
for
now.
So
let's
go
over
to
the
engineering
subcommittee
report
and
then
we
will
come
back
to
that
tabled
motion.
A
Start
dan
dan
looks
like
he's
saying
yes,
but
he's
on
you.
F
Is
that
you
marty
and
if
yes
start,
you
can
go
ahead
and
start.
X
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
start
with
the
first
one.
We
had
a
presentation
from
the
minneapolis
public
works
on
the
hennepin
avenue
reconstruction
and
it's
only
at
15
percent,
becca
hughes.
Was
there
adam
how
y'all?
I
hope
I
said
that
right,
alan
klugman,
amy,
morgan,
all
of
minneapolis
public
works
and
there
was
a
slideshow
with
this.
It
was
in
our
notes.
What
did
we
say
as
far
as
the
notes?
Dan?
Are
we
gonna
with
the
links.
F
X
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
we
were
basically
given
two
options
and
anybody
that
was
at
the
meeting.
Please
chime
in
the
first
option,
had
a
two-way
curb,
protected
bike
facility
on
the
east
side
and
without
bike
lanes,
moves
off
of
hennepin
and
onto
a
nearby
street
like
bryan
avenue.
So
basically
they
wanted
to
move
the
bike
lane
over
to
an
adjacent
street
because
of
hennepin
being,
I
don't
know
busy
or
some
construction
constraints.
X
So
we
discussed
that
a
little
bit
and,
of
course
that
was
no.
We
that
was
totally
unworkable.
We
all
agreed
on
that
option.
Two
we
have
drafted
a
resolution
with
and
dan
can
you
help
me
with
this
part.
F
Certainly
millicent,
if
you
could
pull
up
the
resolution
for
the
hennepin
avenue
reconstruction
project,
all
right.
F
This
is
a
resolution
that
was
prepared
by
matthew,
hendricks
and
matthew.
Would
you
like
to
read
it
or
should
I
read
it,
go
ahead
thanks
then,
okay,
hennepin
avenue
south
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
supports
option
one
for
the
hennepin
avenue
reconstruction,
including
a
physically
protected
bikeway
continuously
from
lake
street.
To
franklin,
the
bac
would
oppose
option
two
or
leaving
any
section
of
hennepin
without
a
protected
bikeway.
H
F
All
right,
so
we've
got.
J
Just
for
I
can
we
say
the
bac
opposes
option
two.
Instead
of
would
oppose.
J
F
All
right-
and
we
have
up
next
to
wes.
S
I
just
wanted.
I
have
some
concern
about
this
second
portion
on
transit
approach
lanes
and
we
didn't
really
get
to
discuss
it
in
depth
in
the
engineering
meeting.
But
to
me
this
seems
like
something
that
would
be
harming
and
I
understand
the
intent
of
it.
S
That
was
explained
in
the
engineering
subcommittee
of
shorter
crossing
space
for
pedestrians
and
that
kind
of
thing
creating
a
safer
environment,
but
it
seems
to
be
coming
off
that
we
are
supporting
the
weakening,
as
I
understand
it,
of
what
is
like
the
biggest
kind
of
space
that
we've
dedicated
to
tran,
that
we're
gonna
have
dedicated
to
transit
in
the
city.
So
I
have
some
pretty
strong
reservations
about
this.
F
P
Philip
yeah
yeah
two
points
I
would
leave
in
the
transit
approach
lane's
language,
but
I
would
want
very
specifically
maybe
put
this
in
the
minutes
that,
when
this
gets
back
to
us
for
discussion,
that
we
really
make
sure
that
they've
done
a
headway
analysis
because
with
with
brt
and
with
I
don't
know,
it's
five
or
six
regular
bus
routes
yeah
I
do
we
have
some
concerns
about
it,
but
at
least
we're
we're
wondering
if
it
could
work
to
do
rather
than
continuous,
but
so
I
would
leave
it
there
and
the
other
thing
is.
P
We
never
really
were
clear
about
east
east
side,
two-way
bike
facility
or
one
way,
each
way
do
we
want
to
leave
that.
F
Okay,
we're
gonna
just
go
through
this
and
we'll
get
back
to
both
wes's
concerns
and
yours
in
a
minute.
Cadence.
L
B
It
was
either
marty.
It.
X
F
And
we
have
matthew
hendricks.
P
F
N
Yeah,
so
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
transit
approach
lanes
and
I,
I
think
west's
comments
are
really
important
and
valid
and
and
so
wanted
to
respond
some
to
that
as
well.
So
the
the
concern
I
had
about
dedicating
that
space
to
transit
was
essentially
twofold.
The
first
is
that
I'm
not
sure
that
operationally
it
will
be
really
purely
used
by
transit.
N
I'm
not
sure
that
the
the
con
continuity
of
the
lanes
is
actually
an
advantage,
because
that
may
invite
more
use
of
that
space
by
general
motor
vehicles.
N
There
have
been
a
number
of
articles
about
how
these
things
work
in
practice,
and
I
know
we
have
some
data
from
a
pilot
here
as
well,
and
it's
not
it's
not
all
100
positive.
We
could
just
say
there
say
that
the
the
other
thing
is
that
it
does
also
make
the
corridor
feel
wider
to
motorists.
Even
if
motorists
are
not
encroaching
on
those
lanes,
it's
it's
a
wider
envelope
to
drive
in
and
so
speeds
will
likely
be
significantly
faster
than
they
would
be
otherwise
and
in
a
corridor.
N
N
It's
a
big
impingement
on
all
other
uses,
including
pedestrian
space,
including
widening
crossings,
and
so
part
of
it,
from
my
perspective,
is
about
balancing
the
the
benefits
to
transit
users
before
they
get
on
the
bus
and
after
they
get
off
with
the
benefit
of
speed
on
the
bus.
N
So
it's
it's
trying
to
get
to
sort
of
an
a
level
transit
experience
both
on
the
bus
and
and
while
walking,
and
then
I'd
also
say
I
think,
by
by
using
signal
timing
strategically
so
by
giving
buses
a
separate
way
to
approach
major
intersections
and
then
giving
them
the
first
green
and
then
also
a
lagging
green.
N
It
could
potentially
allow
buses
to
operate
very
similarly
to
how
they
would
operate
with
a
continuous
lane
in
terms
of
being
able
to
bypass
traffic,
that's
congesting
at
red
lights,
so
I
think
we
may
be
able
to
get.
You
know:
90
95,
of
the
benefit
using
roughly
half
the
space.
So
that's
that's
why?
I
think
it's
worth
at
least
exploring.
N
I
think
it
requires
a
little
more
analysis
to
know
if
if
we
can
get
that
level
of
benefit,
but
I
think
it's
worth
taking
a
close
look
at
so
that's
the
thinking
behind
that
happy
to
to
answer
any
other
specific
questions
about.
Why
why
that
was
in
the
motion.
F
I'd
like
to
just
interject
here
briefly
that
in
the
minutes
there
is
a
justification
and
some
recommendations
that
matthew
added
to
this
motion
just
some
of
his
thinking,
along
with
an
illustration,
and
if
you
haven't
seen
that
that
may
be
worth
taking
a
look
at
in
the
few
minutes
that
we
will
continue
to
have
this
conversation
and
try
to
resolve
this
issue.
There's
also
some
additional
special
feedback
items
there
that
are
worth
reviewing,
which
I
kind
of
thought
we
might
want
to
add
to
this
motion
with
that.
F
I
will
turn
it
over
to
alyssa.
A
Yeah,
so
I
think
my
only
additional
comment:
this
did
come
up
at
the
meeting.
I
think
aaron
brought
it
up.
First
is
29th
street
to
lake
street
even
on
option.
One
has
four
or
five
travel
lanes
for
cars.
They
remove
the
dedicated
bus
lanes,
and
so
I
would
be
interested
in
aaron
if
you
have
thoughts
but
just
adding
a
sentence.
That
also
says
we
oppose
the
removal
of
dedicated
bus
lanes
between
29th
and
lake.
B
Yeah
yeah
I
and
kind
of
during
the
meeting.
I
realized
too
that
they
had
part
of
that.
They
had
added
a
second
through
lane,
even
though
they're
for
vehicles,
while
removing
the
bus
lane,
I'm
not
sure
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me
what
we
were
saying
but
having
like.
B
I
think
I
think
at
some
point
I
was
saying
like
a
a
one
through
lane,
and
then
they
had
an
argument
for
keeping
a
right
turn
lane,
but
making
one
of
those
the
bus
lane
and
having
a
through
lane
and
a
a
bus
lane
through
lagoon
because
there's
nobody
turning
on
to
that
section
besides
buses
and
then
between
lagoon
and
lake.
I
think
it
gets
a
little
bit
more
complicated,
but
still
keeping
only
one
through
lane
would
be
what
I
what
I
would
propose
and
I
need
to
find
what
dan
had.
F
Okay,
this
is
a
question
to
matthew
deardahl,
just
how
time-sensitive
is
a
resolution
on
this.
J
It
feels
important,
I
don't
think
things
are
moving
slowly
so
yeah
it
is.
It
feels
important.
J
Correct
yep,
I
I
feel
like
it's
important
for
that
purpose.
Okay,
I
feel
like
it's
important,
because
you
know
there's
like
there's
a
decision.
Kind
of
I
mean
not
not
explicitly
like
when
that
is
gonna
be
made,
but
you
know
right
now:
public
works
is
wrestling
with
the
options
and
we're
moving
towards
a
layout.
You
know,
so
it's
not
like
urgent.
It's
not
like
a
major
major
decision
is
gonna
happen
in
the
next
month,
but
it
feels
helpful.
M
F
So
I
would
I'd
like
to
ask
if
I
could
read
to
the
group
or
show
to
the
group
the
the
additional
special
feedback
items
which
may
help
with
this
second
paragraph
and
may
be
important
to
include
into
the
resolution,
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
pull
it
up
on
the
screen.
F
You'll
find
it
in
the
engineering
subcommittee
minutes
and
it
will
be,
it
will
start
on
the
second
page
at
the
end,
just
after
the
illustration.
B
F
I
I
think
it
rounded
out
some
of
the
items
that
that
were
on
there
and
they're
they're.
Nice
bullet
points
that
the
group
brought
up
during
the
meeting.
Part
of
this
is
it's
a.
This
is
a
complicated
project.
That's
been
going
on
for
well
over
a
year.
F
I
think
we
saw
it
about
a
year
ago
and
the
two
lane
or
the
lane
on
each
side
was
dropped
because
the
it
just
wasn't
workable,
and
so
it
came
down
to
having
the
the
bike
lanes
either
on
one
side
or
diverting
it
to
bryant
avenue
or
another
alternative
and
so
yeah.
I
will
try
to
read
these
items
off
scroll
down
there.
F
There
you
go
there,
you
go
all
right,
I'm
going
to
start
with
the
additional
special
feedback
includes,
and
I
would
propose
adding
these
just
to
beneath
the
second
paragraph
number
one
reducing
general
traffic
lanes
at
lake
and
lagoon
to
prioritize
pedestrian
safety.
F
Number
three
hennepin
is
a
key
connector
between
the
greenway
and
downtown,
both
important
destinations
and
sources
of
bike
traffic
and
number
four
counterflow
bike.
Lane
additions
should
be
made
to
emerson
gerard,
colfax
and
potentially
other
one-way
streets
to
accommodate
key
connections
for
bicyclists
and
number
five,
wherever
possible.
At
crosswalks,
the
median
should
include
a
protected
pedestrian
refuge
area.
This
would
reinforce
the
left,
turn
prohibition
where
that
exists
and
would
be
especially
helpful
at
the
east
west
ped
crossing
on
the
north
side
of
franklin
avenue.
F
So
I
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
to
do
this,
but
I'm
going
to
just
move
that
this
be
included
in
the
motion
and
see,
if
that's
gosh,
can
I
do
that
alyssa,
I'm
the
chair.
Should
I
step
down
and
have
marty,
take
care.
F
Report
all
right,
so
if,
if
we
want
to
include
this,
we'll
need
a
we'll
need
a
motion
or
we'll
need
a
second,
I'm
sorry.
F
And
dan
made
the
motion
cadence
is
there
any?
Are
you
agreeable
to
that
matthew.
J
Dan
may
I
suggest
to
millicent.
I
think
I
think
you
need
to
also
bring
forward
the
additional
special
feedback
with
the
colon
to
tee
up
the
list.
Yep.
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
looking
at
number
three
and
wondering
if
that
should
go
somehow
in
the
upper
paragraph,
the
rest
of
them
sound
like
recommendations,
and
that
one
is
like
an
emphasis
point.
H
A
F
Very
good
deanna.
W
Yeah,
I
I've
been
hearing
a
lot
of
chatter
this
past
weekend
about
the
loss
of
parking
spaces
along
here
along
hennepin
and
the
businesses
are
up
in
arms
a
bit,
and
I
was
wondering
if
we
should
put
in
a
line
kind
of
similar
to
the
one
we
just
did
that
basically
says
that
bryant
is
not
an
alternative
to
hennepin,
which
is
kind
of
what
their
recommendation
was.
W
If
we
take
the
bike
path
off
of
hennepin,
just
as
a
way
to
strengthen
why
it
is
we
would
we
would
oppose
option
two,
not
that
option.
Two.
Actually
gate
left
the
parking
spaces
by
the
way
it
didn't
leave
the
parking
spaces.
But
I
can
see
that
as
they
begin
to
look
at
the
competing
interests
along
hennepin,
that
there
would
be
some
motivation
to
not
have
the
bike
lane
at
all
on
this
road.
J
Deanna
I
I
appreciate
that
sentence
and
and
and
may
may
also
add
to
it
that,
as
we
say,
bryant
is
not
an
alternative
to
transportation.
I
would
like
to
know
why,
which
is
it
is
also
identified
on
the
aaa
network.
J
So
it's
it's
a
it's
a
rope
that
we
intend
to
be.
You
know
a
bike
way
anyway,
regardless
of
what
we
do
on
hennepin.
A
So
I
believe
the
suggestion
was
at
the
end
of
the
second
paragraph
around
oh
sorry,
end
of
that
paragraph
was
to
say
what
bryant
avenue
is
not
a
viable
alternative
to
putting
a
bike
path
on
hennepin
was
that
the
sorry.
J
J
H
H
J
T
To
your
point,
janice,
I
think
the
the
audience
is
our
our
public
works
staff.
So
I
I
I
do
think
that
they
would
get
that
if
you
wanted
to
clarify,
you
could
say
something
like
it's
also
identified
as
its
as
it's
as
its
own
as
a
corridor
in
its
own
right
or
something
like
that
in
tap.
But
but
I
do
think
generally
that
the
project
staff
probably
would
understand
the
sentence
as
as
written.
T
M
J
That's
the
thing
like,
I
think
people
do
think
like
reasonably
they're
like
why
here,
why
not
just
right
over
there?
And
the
point
is:
we've
we've
said
through
our
policy,
that
it's
not
one
or
the
other.
It's
both
they're.
Both
we
intend
to
make
both
of
them
bike
bikeways
for
all
for
people
of
all
ages
and
abilities.
H
V
S
One
I'll
be
pretty
quick,
so
I
am
realizing
so
I'm
not
getting
the
gov
delivery
emails
and
there's
way
more
in
there
than
I
realized.
Apparently
I
thought
it
was
mostly
on
limbs,
and
so
I
hadn't
worried
about
it
last
month
or
so.
I'm
just
looking
for
brief
clarification
on
this
transit
approach.
Lane
thing,
because
not
I
I'm
aware
I've
read
articles
that
transit
only
lanes
like
curbside,
have
all
these
issues
and
that
kind
of
thing
I
read
this
as
taking
space
away
from
transit.
S
I
don't
I'm
just
looking
for
some
clarification
on
if
there
are
clear
and
known
effects
on
transit
level
of
service
for
this
transit
lane
approach
versus
the
full
transit
lane
and
whether
we
want
that
in
because
of
that,
because
I'm
not
hearing
a
lot
of
other
people
react
to
it
in
the
same
way
that
I
am.
A
I
wonder
if
wes,
what
would
you
think
and
matthew
hendricks?
What
would
you
think
about
for
the
second
paragraph,
changing
it
to
read
the
bac
request
that
staff
explore
transit
approach,
lanes
and
report
back,
because
I
believe
they're
coming
back
to
the
bac
again
dan
miller?
Is
that
correct
yeah?
So
maybe
we
just
request
that
they
explore
those
and
report
back
to
us
on
what
they
found.
A
So
millicent
this
change
would
be
everything
after
the
word
lanes,
so
that
the
rest
of
that
line
removed
the
rest
of
the
second
line
removed
and
then
kept
where
it
says
and
returned
to.
The
bac
like
keep
those
last
10
words
or
so.
P
Yeah
again
I
this
is
philip.
I
think
that
sort
of
a
headway
analysis
I
mean
if
we
have
buses
every
30
seconds,
if
that's
the,
if
that's
what
they're
thinking
that'll
happen
in
five
years,
then
that
that
really
changes.
My
thinking
as
opposed
to,
if
we're
only
gonna,
have
a
bus.
Every
three
minutes-
and
I
just
don't
know
I
I
think
it'll
be
fairly
frequent,
but
they
were
not
clear
when
they
talk
to
us.
So
we
just
need
to
hear
more.
E
C
C
C
V
M
C
D
C
G
D
C
K
C
L
C
M
L
P
L
B
C
E
V
F
Okay,
moving
right
along
millicent,
if
you
can
queue
up
the
franklin
west
action
I'll
go
through
the
notes,
as
you
do,
that
the
franklin
west
project
is
between
hennepin
and
lindale,
it's
at
30,
and
it
won't
be
coming
back
before
the
bac
it'll
be
going
to
council
or
to
the
t,
transportation
and
public
works
committee.
Shortly,
it's
a
fairly
similar
design
to
what
was
presented
at
the
december
2020
bac.
F
It
includes
six
foot,
sidewalks
five
foot
bike
lanes
on
each
side
of
the
street,
boulevards,
stop
improvements
and
and
one
inset
parking
bay
and
the
following
improvements
have
been
made,
and
these
were
actually
as
a
result
of
somewhat
a
result
of
coming
to
that
december.
Bac
meeting
there's
a
larger
median
at
bro
at
the
bryant
crossing.
This
is
the
bike.
Boulevard
crossing
with
no
vehicle
left
turns
at
that
corner,
going
south
yeah,
and
then
there's
raised
crossings
at
bryant
and
aldrich
that
are
being
proposed.
F
If
that
doesn't
pass
final
engineering,
zebra
crossings
will
still
be
considered.
F
The
both
the
northwest
and
southwest
lindale
corners
are
going
to
be
rebuilt
as
part
of
this
project
and
the
hennepin
avenue
corners
will
be
redone
in
conjunction
with
the
hennepin
avenue
project
the
yeah.
So
let's
see
the
discussions,
and
we
also
robin
brought
up
the
discussion
that
the
possibility
that
we
have
a
better
connection
on
the
north
side.
Q
So
right,
right
after
this,
they
brought
up
this
trail
condition
thing
on
the
to
the
west
of
all
of
the
buildings
east
of
the
freeway
on
ramp.
Should
we
change
this
to
reflect
any
of
that
matthew.
J
Yes,
sorry
so
so,
right
now
it
says,
explore
one
block
segment,
east-west
but
maybe
say,
and
also
extending
north
of
franklin
to
connect
to
brian
as
well.
J
Q
J
B
Q
Both
so
to
explore
one
block
segment
between.
F
F
M
F
Okay,
maybe
we
should
put
that
down
and
that
between
hennepin
and
bryant
or
a
preferred
trail
connection
north
of
franklin
that
connects
to
the
loring
green
lauren,
greenway
bridge.
F
Yeah,
okay,
I
see
no
questions
or
comments.
I'm
going
to
put
this
to
a
vote.
If
I
don't
hear
anything
so
millicent,
if
you
can
call
the
rule.
C
M
C
M
C
G
C
I
C
K
C
L
M
M
C
Q
R
F
Sorry
alyssa,
the
last
project
that
was
presented
at
the
meeting
was
the
lindale
avenue
south
meeting
project
at
the
intersections
of
25th
street
and
27th
street.
This
is
at
15,
presented
by
jason,
stable
and
marimon.
Nanaki
of
hennepin
county
and
kelsey
phot
of
minneapolis
public
works
as
a
result
of
the
death
that
occurred
in
that
area.
F
This
past
year
they
put
up
temporary
delineators
and
to
see
how
that
would
work,
and
they
have
moved
forward
to
replace
those
temporary
delineators
with
12
foot
wide,
concrete
medians
that
will
prevent
left
turn
vehicles
at
those
two
intersections.
F
There
can
also
include
rectangular,
rapid
flashing
beacons
and
additional
street
lighting,
and
again
this
should
be
installed
by
fall
of
2021.
This
is
being
done
in
conjunction
well,
it's
being
done
with
so
it.
If
and
when
the
a
four
to
three
a
pilot.
Four
to
three
lane
conversion
happens.
It
will
work
with
that
and
the
rfbs,
the
beacons
that
are
there
will
have
six
beacons
between
the
sides
of
the
intersections
and
the
center
median.
F
F
F
B
A
You
did,
I
would
just
suggest
so
I
had
to
jump
off
this
call,
but
I
think
adding
parking
is
a
move.
I
wonder
if
we
can
say
consider
relocating
parking
near
intersections.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
have
lots
of
parking
everywhere
and
then
second
would
just
request
that
for
all
of
our
sakes
that
are
rffb
either
can
we
I
forget
what
that
stands
for.
Can
we
spell
it
out.
F
X
I
I
I
think
the
I
think
the
the
original
intention
for
that
piece
was
to
provide
separate
pass-throughs
for
bikes
and
not
have
a
combined
pet
and
bike
crossing
through
the
median
I
mean
that's,
probably
dependent
on
maintenance
and
how
they
can
clear
those
separate
ones
for
bikes
and
how
how
wide
those
would
have
to
be,
but
trying
not
to
have
to
combine
that
pet
and
bike
cross
through
at
the
same
point.
S
J
S
K
Yeah,
I
I
just
want
to
ask
about
the
bullet
number
two
about
relocating
parking.
Can
you
clarify
what
that
means?
Exactly?
Are
you
talking
about
parking
on
lindale,
because
my
read
of
the
concept
would
be
that
there
is
just
not
enough
space
to
have
two
travel
lanes,
a
parking
lane
and
the
12-foot
median
in
the
middle
of
the
roadway.
F
Matthew
hendricks,
could
you
explain
the
reasoning
on
that?
I
believe.
S
B
E
B
B
There
is
almost
like
a
half
block,
long
approach
to
that
median
and
so
the
the
thinking
where
they
had
removed
parking,
which
normally
would
be
great,
but
we
had
suggested
that
they
moved
parking
closer
in
to
tighten
up
that
approach
so
that
it's
more
drastic
and
gives
the
illusion
of
a
chicken
to
encourage
slower
driving
speeds
on
window.
K
I
would
maybe
then
recommend
rephrasing
that
just
to
say,
like.
K
F
So
if
we
could
say
maintain
parking
to
the
approaches
of
the
intersections
to
create
a
sheet
cane
effect,.
K
Yeah,
and
maybe
you
need
to
say
something
about
the
that
would
change
the
taper.
You
know
where
it
transitions
through
that
parking
lane.
Next,
to
the
curb
that
outside
lane
so
maintain
parking
approaching
the
intersection
by
I
don't
know
what
the
right
word
would
be
sticking
into
the
paper.
T
A
I
just
want
to
interject,
I
see.
Wes
has
a
hand
up
and
would
love
to
close
comments
on
this.
We'd
still
have
to
come
back
to
the
table.
Five
e's
motion
and
are
probably
gonna
have
to
table
some
the
additional
discussion
for
our
agenda
today,
because
we're
down
to
nine
minutes
so
we'd
love
to
end
discussion
after
wes's
comment
and
then
go
back
to
finishing
out
five
e's.
S
I'll
be
very
brief,
just
on
the
fifth
bullet,
my
intention,
when
I
made
that
recommendation
was
in
addition
to
so.
How
would
I
edit
it
locate
the
in
addition
to,
but
at
the
very
end
of
the
sentence,
say
in
addition
to
buttons
on
the
corner
for
pedestrian
access.
C
You
say
that
one
more
time,
so
that
would
be
helpful.
S
J
S
You
mean
cosplay
crosswalk
for
pedestrians,
yeah
yeah
instead
of
sidewalk.
V
F
Okay,
I
think
we're
ready
for
a
roll
call.
C
Hey
hold
on
one
second,
okay,
aaron.
B
C
M
V
M
C
S
C
H
C
O
C
M
C
N
C
L
P
C
Q
C
N
C
A
All
right,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
over
to
brie
and
with
the
note
that
I
know
we're
going
to
probably
cross
over
the
hour.
If
you
need
to
leave,
it
would
be
helpful
if
you
put
a
note
in
the
chat,
so
we
can
make
sure
millicent
is
calling
the
role
appropriately
and
then
also
with
the
lesson
that
clearly,
we
have
two
hours
of
subcommittee
report
material.
A
U
Cool
with
a
limited
capital
resource
pool,
the
city
needs
to
be
more
deliberate
about
where
we
allocate
these
funds
to
meet
our
transportation
goals
and
other
public
works
infrastructure
that
affects
our
ability
to
move
within
the
city.
This
means
that
we
must
stop
funding
projects
and
departments
that
do
not
serve
our
climate,
racial
justice,
etcetera
goals
such
as
infrastructure
for
cars
and
police.
U
U
In
view
of
the
city
council's
intent
to
amend
the
city
charter
on
the
2021
ballot
regarding
policing
and
community
safety,
bac
recommends
that
a
pause
be
placed
on
all
investments
in
physical
infrastructure
for
the
minneapolis
police
department.
These
include
capital
investments
in
police
precincts
one
three,
four
and
five.
This
delay
should
await
the
outcomes
of
the
city's
reimagining
policing
and
of
current
litigation
against
the
city
regarding
the
sufficiency
of
policing
for
residents.
U
Both
outcomes
may
dramatically
affect
where,
when
and
to
what
extent,
there
will
be
policing
in
minneapolis
requiring
precinct
facilities.
If
at
all
2001
to
2026.,
can
you
scroll
down
please
well
crbs
for
1.41
billion
and
I
think
there
was
another
one?
Wasn't
they.
T
A
U
Oh,
it's
just
one
thing
that
would
be
added
to
the
cip
before
the
last
week.
A
So
I
think
we
had
discussed
just
passionate
passing
this
as
a
separate
motion
to
strengthen
the
case
like
we'll
we'll
send
it,
along
as
the
same
in
the
same
package
of
resolutions.
B
Gonna
propose
that
I
I
was
thinking
if
you
remove
that,
then
keep
that
keep
the
paragraphs
below
it
and
then
my
proposal,
then,
would
be
at
the
end
of
that
second
paragraph.
We
had
here.
T
B
Then,
at
the
end
of
that
second
paragraph,
what
I
would
propose
as
we
award
something
on
the
lines
of
and
allocate
some
of
those
dollars
toward
non-motorized
transportation.
M
B
Don't
allocate
some
of
those
dollars
a
portion
of
some
something
along
those
lines
toward
non-motorized
transportation.
A
A
A
All
right
going
once
going
twice
we're
right
on
the
hour.
So
unless
I
see
anything
I
will
ask
nelson
to
oh
maya
and
then
after
you
comment,
we'll
call
the
roll.
O
Okay,
sorry,
sorry,
sorry,
I
would
could
we
maybe
add
an
add,
a
and
after
affordably
in
between
sustainably
and
then
is
the
room.
Sorry,
in
the
first
paragraph.
O
Yep
yeah,
that's
great,
is
there
space
to
say
like
we
all
want
a
city
where
we,
where
people
feel
confident
getting
around
safely
affordably
and
sustainably,
or
is
that
too,
like?
I
think
it's
fine
actually
strike.
My
last.
O
A
Okay,
seeing
no
other
hands
raised,
I'm
gonna
ask
millicent
to
call
the
roll
and
then
we'll
do
we'll
pivot
to
announcements.
T
C
V
C
E
L
G
H
P
C
A
All
right
thanks,
everybody
that
was
a
very
full
agenda
with
a
lot
of
really
really
important
motions,
and
I'm
glad
that
we
made
the
space
for
them
that
they
needed
chris.
If
you
could
turn
off
screen
sharing
so
that
folks
can
see
each
other.
That
would
be
great
so
a
couple
of
things
so
the
items
we
had
for
discussion,
I'm
just
gonna
like
verbally,
we
had
talked
about
doing
some
overview
of
guidance
for
remote
meetings.
A
I
think
we'll
probably
just
table
that
to
either
the
next
five
meeting
or
the
next
full
meeting
just
so
that
folks
can
all
be
on
the
same
page,
about
sort
of
the
ongoing
drip
of
guidance
from
the
city
clerk's
office.
We
had
also
had
on
the
agenda
two
resolutions
around
the
public
works
director
national
search
letter,
so
that
was
something
I
had
sent
out.
I
had
mentioned
in
five
e's
and
announcements.
I
think
a
good
number
of
the
members
have
signed
on
individually.
A
Could
consider
signing
on
to
that
if
folks
want
to
stick
around
for
an
extra
10
minutes
and
call
the
roll,
but
then
for
the
20-year
streets
funding
plan
resolution
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
longer
discussion,
matthew
deardahl.
Do
you
think
we're?
Okay?
If
I
table
that
until
april.
R
P
A
Yeah,
so
if
folks
have
five
more
minutes,
we'd
love
to
get
that
passed
because
that's
timely,
but
if
folks
don't
have
five
more
minutes,
please
like
raise
your
hand
now,
because
if
we're
gonna
drop
past
quorum
at
some
point
in
the
middle
of
the
vote,
then
I
don't
want
to
do
it
all
right,
I'm
seeing
some
thumbs
up.
I
did
send
a
one
sentence:
resolution
draft
to
millicent
millicent.
Do
you
think
you
could
pull
that
up.
H
Alyssa
I
just
had
one
question:
I
had
to
leave
that
meeting
early
and
I'd
like
to
know
how
I
can
sign
on
to
the
letter.
A
I
will
forward
it
to
you
via
email,
okay.
It
should
also
be
an
attachment
that
went
out.
I
hope,
with
this
resolution.
I.
A
P
P
All
right
the
attachment
was
sent
out
to
you
all
that
would
be
included
as
when
the
resolution
is
formally
sent
from
the
bac.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
before
millicent
takes
the
role?
P
Calls
the
role
scene?
None,
let's
call
the
roll
one.
Last
time
yeehaw
hold
on
one
second,
one
last
time,
there's
a
clue.
M
E
C
C
C
L
M
C
J
I
kind
of
feel
like
this
is
like
the
only
one
that
I'll
ever
vote,
I'm
saying
someone
abstained.
It's
like
my
boss's
boss's
boss.
Yes,.
C
And
alyssa,
can
you
vote
at
all
or
anything?
Do
you
need
me
well,
no.
A
Thanks
everybody,
this
is,
was
a
very,
very,
very
full
meeting.
I
appreciate
you
all.
I
think
that
concludes
the
business
portion
of
our
meeting.
So
folks
need
to
drop
off.
Please
do
that,
but
otherwise
I
will
open
the
floor
for.
T
I
just
wanted
to
say
a
quick
thanks
for
all
the
work
that
everyone
put
in
on
the
cip
resolution.
I
know
it
was
a
little
bit
different
than
some
years
and
it
took
a
little
bit
extra
time
today
to
get
through
some
of
that.
But
thank
you
all
for
that
and
appreciate
the
work
that
you
all
do
and
nice
job
coming
into
your
chair
role,
bree
and
thanks
for
your
help.
A
Too,
I
have
an
announcement
next
wednesday
march.
31St
is
the
annual
I've
mentioned
before
the
annual
bac,
pac
joint
presentation
to
the
transportation
and
public
works
committee
of
city
council.
I
think
it's
at
1
30
1
o'clock.
I
should
know
the
time
because
I'm
doing
the
presentation,
but
it
is
posted
on
limbs.
If
you
all
would
like
to
join.
You
are
more
than
welcome.
You
can
see
me
and
abigail
the
chair
of
the
pedestrian
advisory
committee
talking
about
how
the
city
needs
to
do
a
lot
and
more
and
faster.
H
Alyssa,
just
in
regard
to
that,
I
think
you
should
send
an
email
to
all
of
us
to
tell
us
specifically
the
time
because,
usually
we're
you
know,
we
get
an
email
inviting
us
to
to
come
with
the
information.
A
A
Announcements
all
right,
seeing
no
hands
raised
and
no
folks
coming
off
of
mute.
Thank
you
again,
everybody.
This
was
a
great
meeting.
I'm
really
excited
to
be
working
with
you
all
and
I
hope
you
get
to
be
outside
when
it
is
not
rainy.
Sometime
this
week.