►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
B
As
we
begin,
I
will
note
for
the
record
that
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
members
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13d.021
due
to
the
declared
local
public
health
emergency.
This
meeting
will
be
recorded
and
posted
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means.
C
B
B
D
B
E
B
B
All
right
the
motion
carries
and
the
agenda
is
adopted
and
the
december
minutes
are
accepted
next
door
of
business
is
acceptance
of
public
comments.
I
will
open
the
floor
and
invite
individuals,
I'm
sorry
invite
comments
from
the
community.
We
will
limit
the
public
comment
period
to
no
more
than
two
minutes
per
speaker.
B
Oh
just
star
six:
okay,
perfect
all
right,
so
we
will
limit
public
comment
period
to
no
more
than
two
minutes
per
speaker
and
you
want
to
press
star
six
to
unmute.
So
with
that,
are
there
any
community
members
on
the
line
who
wish
to
address
the
commission.
B
B
I
think
our
first
item
under
unfinished
business
is
the
no
knock
warrants
or
I
think
we've
also
been
trying
to
call
them
unannounced
warrants
and
my
understanding
is
christopher
band.
You
have
an
update
for
us
on
the
on
the
study.
C
C
You
know
the
questions
that
we
wanted
answered
and
then
the
results
are
broken
out
by
precinct,
so
we
have
a
comparison
of
the
quarter,
one
results
from
2020
and
then
compared
with
2021,
so
the
table
one
splits
them
out
by
precinct,
including
warrants
that
are
done
outside
of
minneapolis
table
two-
is
the
type
of
investigation.
So
this
is
the
number
of
warrants
where
they
cite
either
narcotics
firearms
or
gang
interdiction
when
they're
applying
for
the
warrant,
and
then
we
went
to
the
justification
for
unannounced
entry.
C
For
you
know
certain,
as
we
talked
about
previously,
certain
types
of
warrants
would
would
suggest
the
need
for
a
swat
team
to
be
deployed
to
do
the
unannounced
entry,
particularly
ones
involving
firearms
or
nightcaps.
So
search
runs
done
outside
the
hours
of
7am
to
8pm
table
3
has
whether
the
warrants
were
nightcapped,
the
whether
the
target
or
the
warrant
was
present
in
the
address,
and
then
if
evidence
was
recovered,
that
would
be
page
five.
They
would
call
over
such
one.
C
It's
not
always
on
page
five,
but
that's
the
part
that
gets
inventoried
and
lodged
with
the
court
and
then
the
final
item
we
looked
at
was
the
injuries
we
only
identified
within
the
sample
one
civilian
injury
and
one
law
enforcement
officer
injury.
C
I
would
need
to
clarify
this
with
ryan,
but
I
don't
believe
that
that
was
through
force
from
either
either
side
during
a
search
run.
I
believe
the
officer
was
a
full
injury
and
I
think
I
can't
remember
what
the
civilian
injury
was,
but
I
don't
believe
it
was
from
law
enforcement.
I
can
clarify
that.
C
C
Although
we
know
from
from
the
previous
talks
that
the
commission
has
received
from
various
groups
as
well,
as
you
know,
news
stories
across
the
country
that
when
things
go
wrong,
they
can
go
very
wrong.
Somebody
talked
about
previously,
you
know.
If
there
are
comments
about
policy
changes
that
the
commission
believes
could
be
made,
then
that
is
something
that
they
could,
that
you
know
could
certainly
be
attached.
B
Great
thanks
for
walking
us
through
this
chris.
It
looks
really
good.
Commissioner
crockett,
do
you
have
any
questions
or
commentary
on
this
as
we're
we're
looking
through
I'll
say.
For
my
part,
I
did
not
have
the
chance
to
look
at
this
earlier.
I
know
you
sent
it
out
this
morning,
but
I
haven't
been
able
to
read
through
it
yet.
C
Yeah-
and
I
mean
when
you,
when
you
have
the
opportunity
to
to
look
through
if
there
are
any
other
questions
that
this
raises
or
if
there
were
policy
recommendations
that
you
wanted
to
to
work
on
and
have
us
take
a
look
at
then
that
would
be
great
to
communicate
about
those
okay,
great.
E
Yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
chris.
For
for
doing
this.
It's
really
helpful.
I
haven't.
I
haven't,
looked
through
the
entirety
of
the
thing
yet
to
have
some
really
good
questions,
but
I
mean
it
is
really
really
interesting.
C
Yeah,
and
I
would
I
would
say
for
for
me
just
looking
at
it-
something
that
kind
of
I
guess
jumped
out
to
me
was
the
the
precinct
breakdown.
C
C
Yep
precinct
two
is
northeast
precinct
three
is
south
minneapolis
precinct,
four
is
north
minneapolis
and
precinct.
Five
is
like
the
southwest.
B
Great
well,
I
think
our
next
steps
on
that
are
just
to
read
through
it
a
little
bit
more.
We
can
reach
out
if
we
have
questions
and
then
maybe
at
the
next
meeting,
we
can
determine
if
we
want
to
to
move
forward
or
make
changes
or
whatever
does
that
sound,
pretty
accurate
or
am
I
on.
C
My
way
off
yep-
and
I
would,
I
would
just
remind
you
of
the
the
rubric
that
we
had
worked
on
previously
after
the
commission
had
received
a.
C
C
So
he
wanted
to
consult
that
for
any
policy
ideas
as
well.
I
think
that
would
be.
That
would
be
useful
great
reminder.
Thank.
B
B
All
right,
I
think
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
item
of
unfinished
business,
which
was
coaching
check
my
notes
from
our
last
meeting
here.
I
think
that
the
data
portal
was
still.
It
looks
like
at
that
time
that
we
were
still
waiting
to
see
if
that
data
portal
was
going
to
be
updated
with
any
additional
older
data
that
was
going
to
be
made
public,
and
I
think
that
was
an
action
item
from
mr
andrew
hawkins,
who
I
don't
think
is
on
today.
C
I'm
afraid
I
do
not
have
an
update
about
the
the
old
data
being,
not
new
data,
the
old
data
kind
of
being
reframed
in
the
way,
which
is
it's.
It's
it's
presented
and
more
information
being
provided
on
the
old
data.
I
I
don't
know
where
that
is
at
okay,.
B
A
I
can
certainly
forward
to
him
that
you
would
like
an
update
at
the
next
meeting.
B
B
Mr
commissioner,
crockett
do
you
have
anything
on
that
point.
B
Good
deal:
let's
move
on
to
the
arbitration
research
and
study.
B
I
think
that
those
arbitration
decisions
and
researching
them.
It
was
basically
something
that
chair
sarah
had
asked
us
to
look
into
sort
of
amongst
ourselves,
and
I
was
hoping
to
for
the
chance
to
discuss
it
with
chairpeda
today,
but
he
wasn't
able
to
join
so
maybe
we'll
end
up
tabling
that
one.
But
I.
C
B
Study,
if
you
will,
we
all
kind
of
look
through
them
in
our
available
time,
try
to
find
the
commonalities
of
why
some
of
those
arbitration
decisions
were
reached
if
any
of
it
is
in
the
the
purview
or
the
control
of
mpd
process-wise,
something
that
they
could
look
at,
focusing
on
to
make
sure
that
those
decisions
are.
B
I
guess
go
their
way
more
in
the
future,
but
yeah
it's
kind
of
tough
to
have
that
discussion
without
mr
pinot.
Here
I
think
I
was
hoping
to
talk
to
him
about
that.
So
I
don't
know
if
we'll
have
much
much
to
talk
about
there
and
that's
all
right,
mr
crockett,
anything
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
not
skipping
over
any
thoughts
that
you
might
have.
E
Now,
you're
good
you're
good
with
with
the
arbitration,
research
and
study
with
that
one
was
the
goal
essentially
to
do
another
like
specific
study
like
chris,
had
set
up
after
looking
at.
Like
the
case,
I.
B
Don't
think
so,
I
think
it
was
more
just
something
we
could
look
at
ourselves
and
not
do
a
probably
not
do
a
formal
study
and.
D
C
B
E
Yup,
okay,
I
do
I
do
remember
because
it
started
to
cross
over
into
not
being
as
much
of
us
looking
at
the
police
and
more
in
the
the
arbitration,
I
guess
was
yeah.
What
he
was
saying
was
a
no.
I
think.
B
B
It's
a
consequence
of
police
conduct
or
officer
conducts,
and
we
are
the
police
conduct
oversight
commission.
So
it's
a
little
more
black
and
white
in
in
my
view,
but
you
know
you
have
that
difference
of
opinion
so.
D
B
Maybe
we
can
table
that
for
our
next
meeting
and
let's
see
discipline,
research
and
study.
I
think
that
that
was
just
something:
we've
been
kicking
around
the
next.
The
last
item
I
had
here
on
the
unfinished
business
was
a
sort
of
a
disciplined
research
study.
We've
been
kicking
it
around
talking
about
it
just
kind
of
casually
the
last
couple
of
meetings.
D
B
Chatter,
that
it
wasn't
necessarily-
and
I
think
I
kind
of
ended
in
the
in
the
same
place
with
that
it
was
something
I
wanted
to
discuss
with
mr
p.
Now
it's
my
recollection
to
see
if
he
wanted
to
still
pursue
it.
I
was
getting
the
sense
that
we
were
not
going
to
get
access
to
a
lot
of
the
data
that
we
wanted
to
see
if
it
was
being
equitably
applied.
B
We
probably
weren't
going
to
get
much
more
access
than
we
have
now
to
the
discipline,
but
I
think
that
was
my
recollection,
at
least,
is
that
it
was
kind
of
in
his
court
to
see
if
he
wanted
to
pursue
it
or
not
or
if
it
was
even
feasible.
It
was
kind
of
sounding,
like
it
probably
wasn't
very
feasible,
is
that
is
that
kind
of
your
recollection
too,
commissioner,
crockett.
E
Yeah,
that
was
my
recollection
is
that
we
were
kind
of
waiting
to
connect
with
pinota
to
kind
of
see
where
his
direction
is
in
his
head
was
that.
B
Gotcha,
okay,
well
at
least
we're
on
the
same
page,
all
right.
Well,
that
takes
us
through
unfinished
business
as
long
as
we're
all
here
I
mean
I'd,
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
ask
krishna
crockett.
If
you
had
anything
else,
he
wanted
to
bring
up
or
discuss
anything
that
didn't
happen
to
make
it
onto
the
agenda.
I
I
don't
have
anything
on
my
end.
E
Yeah,
I
don't,
I
don't
have
anything
specific
on
my
end.
B
B
Great
okay!
Well
with
that,
we
have
concluded
all
all
items
on
our
agenda
for
this
meeting,
seeing
no
further
business
to
come
before
us
and
without
objection.
I
will
declare
the
meeting
adjourned.