►
From YouTube: April 6, 2022 Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Hi
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
minneapolis
pedestrian
advisory
full
committee
meeting
of
april
6
2022,
just
to
notice
that
members
of
the
board
may
participate
remotely
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
means
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency
declared
on
march
16
2020.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
statute,
section
13d021.
A
Hi
everybody
and
welcome
the
first
thing
we'll
do
today
is:
do
the
roll
call
see
who's
here.
C
D
Here,
but
is
anybody
else
getting
a
lot
of
echo
we're
getting
a
weird
echo,
but
I'm
here
melissa.
B
E
B
B
B
B
G
B
F
E
A
All
right,
thank
you
yeah!
I
don't
know
what
happened.
I
lost
audio
but
you're
all
back
now
for
me.
So
great,
then,
up
next
as
usual
on
the
agenda
is
to
accept
the
minutes
from
the
last
meeting
of
march
9th
2022.
So
we'll
do
a
roll
call
vote
for
pac
members.
A
I
guess
I'll
move
the
minutes.
First
and
foremost,
you
as
attached
to
the
agenda
for
today
now
we'll
do
a
roll
call
vote
for
approval.
Okay,
abigail!
Yes,.
B
C
B
E
F
A
Thank
you
millicent,
as
always
appreciated
great,
so
we're
going
to
dive
right
into
our
reports
and
then
we
do
have
quite
a
few
discussion
items
coming
up
after
that,
but
I
think
we
don't
have
any
resolutions
to
to
pass
today
if
I'm
not
mistaken.
So
these
should
be
nice
and
short
and
sweet
reports
who
would
like
to
take
it
from
infrastructure
and
engineering.
D
I'll
jump
in
on
that
there
was
one
item
on
the
docket:
it
was
the
2nd
street
south
improvement
project,
specifically
between
2nd
avenue
south
to
13th
avenue
south.
It
was
a
0
presentation
by
dan
edgerton
from
zan
associates.
D
Those
the
scope
will
hopefully
further
the
goals
of
the
project,
which
are
specifically
including
safety,
mobility
for
all
modes,
creating
all
ages
and
abilities,
bicycle
facility
and
accommodate
access
for
residents,
businesses
and
visitors,
while
maintaining
traffic
operations.
The
timeline
for
that
is
they're,
doing
community
outreach
and
and
and
design
process.
Right
now,
the
design
recommendation
will
be
in
july
of
22
and
then
construction
in
the
spring
and
summer
of
next
year.
D
The
existing
conditions
are,
if
you
know,
an
area,
basically
a
sidewalk,
a
striped
bike
lane
a
through
lane
and
some
parking
on
each
side
and
then
at
10th
and
park.
There's
additional
they've
added
some
bollard
medians,
like
they
have
on
like
around
lindell,
for
example.
If
you
know
that
area
the
to
you
know
further
the
goals
they're
focusing
they
want
intersection
improvements
on
park,
3,
10th
and
11th,
and
then
improve
the
protected
bikeway,
because
right
now
it's
just
pain
in
the
ground.
D
They're
talking
about
adding
additional
paint
and
delineated
posts,
perhaps
a
floating
curve.
But
that
was
some
some
time
in
the
distance.
The
number
of
bikeway
connections
that
they
want
to
to
to
improve,
including
second
third,
fifth
portland
park,
11th
and
13th
bicycles,
access
and
safety,
appeared
to
be
an
important
goal
of
this
of
this
project.
D
D
The
discussion
regarding
the
use
of
potential
use
of
textured
paint
in
the
project
for
additional
delineation
there's
also
a
suggestion
of
to
definitely
include
wayfinding
resources
that
are
lacking
the.
U
of
m
input
was
discussed
because
of
the
engagement
needed
due
to
the
location
of
the
project,
and
additionally,
this
has
a
separate
budget
from
the
the
from
the
pavement
improvement
and
the
ada
ramp
improvements.
D
It
was
unclear
whether
what
the
amount
that
was
budgeted
yet,
but
it
was
mentioned
a
couple
times
that
the
amount
of
the
budget
will
factor
into
the
extent
of
what
can
be
undertaken,
and
I
took
that
as
it
will
not
be
a
robust
improvement
but
we'll
focus
on
things
like
payton
bollards
for
a
cycleway
rather
than
a
protected
bike
lane.
So
that's
it
in
a
nutshell.
Does
anybody
have
any
questions?
Would
you
like
me
to
expand
on
anything.
F
Yeah
christopher
I've
taken
neal's
place
today
and
write
minutes
and
maybe
in
the
minutes
of
the
subcommittee.
But
would
you
go
over
the
component
of
that
again
yeah.
D
The
and
I
I
forget
the
gentleman
that
joined
us
on
the
phone
today,
but
there
was
a
u
of
m.
I
I
didn't
catch
his
name
representative
that
suggested
let
the
community
outreach
be
certain
to
include
the
u
of
m
due
to
the
location
of
the
project
being
closer
to
you.
E
This
is
eric
bauer,
I
was
the
attendee
at
the
sub
committee
meeting
and
made
that
and
that
comment
my
specific
comment
was
that
I
just
introduced
myself
to
thank
him
first
time
and
noted
that
I'd
be
following
up
with
him
via
email.
The
university
of
minnesota
does
have
adjacent
property
and
we
do
typically
when
we
have
adjacent
property
to
a
city
project
like
this.
We
do
typically
coordinate
in
reviewing
the
design,
but
also
we
have
a
different
process
for
city
of
minneapolis
assessments
as
a
public
agency.
D
Terrific
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
Eric.
E
Yeah-
and
specifically
I
mean
there
is
you
know:
well,
I
won't
wade
into
the
details
here,
but
it
sounds
like
they'll
be
coming
back
to
you
at
30
or
potentially
60.
Is
that
correct.
D
E
So
the
university
might
have
a
chance
to
put
some
comments
in
about
what
the
scope
looks
like
there
is.
There
are
some
existing
sidewalk
gaps
on
13th
avenue
south
that
the
project
is
very
close
to
it's
not
already
touching.
E
D
F
D
It
was
these
these
sort
of
safe
what
I
would
call
safety
improvements,
including
the
the
bike
lane
improvements,
the
signage
improvements,
this
kind
of
thing
that
is
in
a
separate
budget,
from
the
the
bricks
and
mortar,
the
concrete,
the
resurfacing
and
ada
curb
cuts.
Thank
you
and
sorry.
If
this
is
in
your
minutes,
no,
no,
that's
it's
good!.
F
Clarification.
I've
noticed
that,
on
the
just
as
an
aside,
there's
a
project
in
my
neighborhood,
that's
from
the
park
board
that
also
has
a
set
of
improvements
that
they
have
designated
as
like.
F
budget
budget
allows,
which
are,
of
course,
those
are
in
the
not
in
the
car
category
or
the
link
category
they're
in
the
bike
and
the
pedestrian
categories.
So
it's
that's
not
a
you
know,
a
trend
or
whatever.
D
Yeah
I
was,
I
was
kind
of
shocked
that
you
know
the
budget
carves
out
these
sort
of
they're,
not
amenities,
they're
safety
functions
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists.
It
seems
like
that
would
be
have
to
be
the
starting
point
of
a
project
and
in
the
larger
budget.
But
that's
for
another
discussion.
I
guess
so.
C
I
have
a
question:
actually,
if
you
don't
mind
yeah,
perhaps
our
university
friend
can
answer
this
one,
it's
really
just
out
of
curiosity
or
if
it
was
discussed
at
your
meeting.
So
when
there
are
sidewalk
gaps
on
university-owned
property,
who
becomes
responsible
for
filling
those
gaps?
Is
that
something
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
would
be
expected
to
do,
or
is
that
something
you
does
or
is
it
partnership
like
help
me
understand
that
if
you
can.
D
Regarding
the
that
did
not
come
up,
I
actually,
I
don't
believe,
there's
any
discussion
regarding
sidewalk
gaps
on
13th.
I
did
not
know
about
them,
so
nothing's
included
in
the
minute.
So
I
cannot
answer
your
question.
Austin.
E
This
is
eric
from
the
university.
I
also
cannot
answer
your
question.
We
have
a
team
in
planning
space
and
real
estate,
who
might
be
better
prepared
to
address
a
question
about
how
those
things
are
handled.
I
perhaps
waited
into
a
detail.
I
was
just
sharing
an
observation
there.
There
is
a
sidewalk
gap
and
that's
something
that
I
at
least
intend
to
ask
about,
but
this
project
is
just
getting
off
the
ground.
H
Austin,
this
is
chris,
I
will
say
I
don't
know
specifically
with
the:
u
of
m,
there's
a
chance
that
that's
different,
but
we
did
develop
a
sidewalk
gap
program
specifically
targeted
at
other
institutional
land
uses
like
such
as
like
parks
or
like
cemeteries,
and
things
like
that.
It's
kind
of
a
different
process.
So
we
put
aside
funds
specifically
for
those
types
of
things.
I
can't
answer
for
sure
if
that
would
be
something
that
the
u
land
would
be
included
in,
but
it
could
be.
E
And
to
clarify
I'm
pretty
sure
that
the
street
jurisdiction
for
this
project
is
all
inside
cities,
minneapolis,
right-of-way,
the
university's
adjacent
property
owner,
but
my
knowledge,
the
initial
scoping
of
this
project,
is
not
on
university.
It's
a
little
bit
different
than
than
the
you
know.
The
discussions
you've
had
in
the
past
about
a
min
dot,
highway,
interchange.
I
A
Thanks
christopher
then,
up
next
on
the
agenda
is
the
report
from
programs
and
policies.
J
All
righty
that'll,
be
me
julia,
so
I
think
we've
got
just
about
everybody.
Who's
here
was
also
in
that
meeting.
So
I'll
go
over
this
fairly
quickly,
mostly
for
some
of
our
agency
members,
we
talked
a
bit
about
the
internal
processes
that
have
that
happen
within
pnp
and
what
we
have
brought
forward.
J
Our
systems
we've
tried
to
think
about
and
implement
like
things
like
timelines,
that
we
are
keeping
track
of
when
click
click
is
coming
up
or
new
member
recruitments
that
we
can
be
doing
things
without
feeling
like
we're
playing
catch-up,
some
checklists
that
have
been
that
we
worked
with
chris
and
and
matthew
when
he
was
here
to
pull
together
to
help
presenters
know
what
kind
of
information
we'll
be
looking
for
and
to
guide
them
in
providing
us
presentations
that
help
us
give
them
the
best
feedback
that
we
can
share.
J
J
Looking
at
processes
looking
at
onboarding
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
make
the
pack
function
more
smoothly
and
externalize,
some
of
the
processes
that
may
just
be
internal
to
people's
memories
or
or
some
of
the
staff
knowledge
that
we
don't
always
remember
quite
as
well
since
we're
not
in
it
every
single
day.
So
that
was
that
discussion
and
just
a
reminder
that
we
encourage
people
to
if
they're,
noticing
things
where
it
seems
like
that
stuff
could
be
helpful
like
that,
would
be
great
to
bring
up
for
conversations.
J
One
of
the
ones
that
is
recurring
is
the
possible
glossary
for
some
of
the
terms
and
abbreviations
that
get
used,
and
also
just
the
reminder
from
austin
that
also
just
saying
those
things
and
avoiding
using
jargon
and
acronyms
as
much
as
possible
is
helpful,
since
we
do
invite
people
it's
open
to
the
public
and
we
want
it
to
be
as
accessible
as
possible
to
everybody.
J
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
annual
report,
which
is
coming
up
on
april
21st
and
since
abigail
won't
be
in
town,
and
since
it
is
in
person
neil,
it
will
be
the
one
presenting
this.
I
think
we're
also
talking
about
this
a
little
later
in
the
in
this
meeting.
J
There's
the
reappointment
information
from
chris,
which
is
just
that's,
coming
up
on
april
15th
and
reminder
to
paul
barb
and
abigail,
and
then
neil
is
not
here
as
the
people
who
are
needing
to
renew
to
stay
on
the
committee,
and
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
return
to
in-person
meetings.
What
that
might
be
like
and
a
little
bit
we
got
a
little
bit
into
some
of
the
accessibility
concerns
that
shift
within
person
compared
to
remote.
But
most
of
this
is
governed
at
the
state
level
as
interpreted
by
the
city
clerk.
J
F
Thanks
julia,
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
a
previous
month's
meeting
because
we're
going
to
follow
on
with
the
in-person
council
member
meetings
that
could
be
zoomer
in
person
we'll
get
working
on
that
people
are
signing
up.
I
think
we'll
work
on
that
post
presentation
to
the
to
our
infrastructure
committee
of
the
city
council.
We
can
work
out
a
talking
points
based
on
that,
so
we'll
follow
follow
up
on
that.
A
Great
just
make
sure
no
one
has
any
questions
or
thoughts.
I
know
some
of
those
things
we'll
cover
again
in
the
discussion
section.
A
All
right,
yes,
so
now
we're
on
to
discussion!
These
things
seem
a
little
disorderly,
first
and
foremost,
I'd
love
to
introduce,
if
they're,
here
the
new
mndot
member.
So
I'm
going
to
take
him
a
little
out
of
order
and
do
number
seven
first,
the
new
mndot
member,
if
you're
here,
would
you
like
to
introduce
yourself.
K
Hi,
my
name
is
sarah
dunlap
and
I
work
in
mndot's
metro
district
for
multimodal
planning.
I
specifically
work
on
ada
planning
and
policies,
and
things
like
that.
I'm
new
to
mndot
metro,
I've
been
with
mndot
for
about
12
years,
but
new
to
the
district
and
I'm
taking
over
for
mackenzie
turner.
Bargain.
A
No
yeah,
thank
you.
We're
we're
so
happy
that
you're
here
and
that
you're
a
new
agency
rep.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
for
sarah.
J
I'm
curious
about,
if
there's
any
more,
you
can
share
about
the
ada
focus
of
your
work
and
where
that
might
intersect,
with
what
we
do.
So
we
know
what
questions
to
bring
towards
you.
K
I
specifically
look
for
in
projects
at
curb
ramps
and
sidewalks
and
and
accessible
pedestrian
signals,
and
things
like
that.
So
but
again,
those
are
things
that
are
within
mid
dot's
right
of
way,
so
I
can't
answer
to
things
that
are
on
you
know
the
city
or
county
lines,
but
for
projects
within
midnight
right
of
way.
I
can,
I
can
generally
or
or
ask
point
a
point
to
direction
to
to
questions
like
that.
A
Great
thanks:
well,
thanks
for
letting
us
put
you
on
the
spot
and
welcome
to
you
often
in
our
meetings.
Yeah
happy
to
be
here.
Thank
you.
Welcome
welcome
great
so
in
welcoming
our
new
mndot
member
I'd
love
to
start
talking
about,
because
the
next
thing
that's
happening
under
the
discussions
list
is
actually,
I
think
chris
would
have
announcements
about
returning
to
in-person
meetings
and
so
I'd
love
to
discuss
that,
and
then
we
can
discuss
what
happens
after
that,
which
is
when
new
pac
members
will
be
coming
and
things
will
be
turning
over.
H
So
we
did
get
word
from
the
clerk's
office
that
we
are
going
to
be
transitioning
back
to
in-person
meetings.
The
city
council
is
actually
doing
that
within
a
matter
of
a
couple
weeks,
so
I
believe
the
april
21st
meeting
will
be
in
person
and
they're
still
figuring
out
exactly
what
that
means,
as
far
as
regular
just
general
public
attendance
and
how
many
people
will
be
allowed
and
all
that
sort
of
stuff.
H
So
that
means
that
next
month's
full
meeting
will
be
our
first
meeting
back
and
first
in
person
for
the
pack.
I
believe-
and
we
have
the
new
office
building
conference
room
on
the
first
floor
of
the
new
office
building
downtown
reserved
for
our
full
meetings.
It's
a
nice
big
space
brand
new
pretty
large.
H
H
I
I
haven't
been
in
there
myself,
but
I
can
take
some
time
this
month
to
get
in
there
and
scope
things
out
beforehand
and
then
also
an
another
thing
that
we
brought
up
is
just
the
idea
of
how
this
committee
wants
to
handle,
masking
that
the
city
does
not
have
a
masking
policy
in
effect
anymore.
So
I
personally
a
staff
can't
force
or
yeah.
H
I
can't
force
this
committee
to
take
any
stance
on
that
one
way
or
the
other,
but
that
said
you
know,
I've
talked
with,
I
think
the
exec
committee
about
the
the
potential
to
just
kind
of
get
this
group
together
and
talk
about
kind
of
the
shared
values
around
masking
and
and
policy
for
that.
So
I
want
to
set
the
stage
for
that
conversation,
and
maybe
abigail
can
step
in
after
I'm
done
with
this,
but
then
just
one
last
piece
on
the
rooms,
the
subcommittees.
H
As
of
now,
we're
planning
to
also
have
in
the
new
office
building
and
those
will
be
on
the
fourth
floor
in
a
conference
room
and
the
fourth
floor
is
where
staff
from
my
division
is
located,
but
there's
a
public
space
with
public
access
rooms.
So
that's
the
plan
for
now
and
yeah
abigail.
If
you
wanna
jump
in
go
ahead.
A
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
so
when
you
say
transition
back
as
of
may
2nd,
we
cannot
even
come
in
online
like
either
you
come
to
the
meeting
in
person
or
you
don't
attend.
The
meeting
is
what
you're
saying
correct.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everybody.
E
H
Of
now,
there
is
no
option
for
any
sort
of
split
in
person
and
virtual
meeting
it'll
be
entirely
in
person
and
and
so
even
members
of
the
public.
If
they
wanted
to
come
join,
they
would
have
to
join
by
coming
to
the
actual
room
itself
like
we
did
before.
H
The
clerk's
office
is
exploring
if
they're
going
to
be
new
technologies
or
different
ways
of
setting
up
the
potential
to
be
able
to
at
least
broadcast
our
meetings
in
the
future,
so
that
people
can
attend
more
easily,
who
aren't
members
and
can
still
kind
of
see,
what's
going
on
and
potentially
even
interact,
but
we
don't
have
that
ability
now
and
state
law
precludes
the
option
of
being
able
to
have
members
be
remote.
So
as
of
now
with
that
law
in
place,
we
are
entirely
in
person
for
members.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
clarity.
I
also
think
I
think
you
said
an
email
will
be
going
out
to
everyone
who
attends
pac
meetings
regularly
or
all
agency
members
all
pac
members
with
this
information,
so
that
if
anybody
isn't
here,
they
know
that
and
that
it's
like
solid,
so
just
be
looking
forward
for
that
email
with
information.
A
As
to
that,
I
think
we
do
want
to
kind
of
have
a
quick
discussion
about
what
kind
of
expectations
we
want
to
have.
If
we
want
to
have
any
as
the
pac
and
again
we
know
the
states
and
the
city's
rules,
and
it
seems
that
there
are,
there
are
really
none.
So
we
can
set
our
own
kind
of
expectations,
but
again
there
are
only
expectations.
A
We
can't
set
any
like
hard
and
fast
rules,
so
I
think
we
can
have
that
discussion,
but
so,
if
you
have
any
thoughts
or
ideas,
you
can
raise
your
hands
and
I
see
julia
your
hand
went
up
first.
J
I
so
not
on
that
specifically,
but
on
ventilation,
that's
chris,
do
you
have
any
more
information
about
what
the
ventilation
is
like.
H
The
the
clerks
we
had
our
regular
meeting
of
all
the
staff
of
all
the
57
boards
and
commissions
today
and
the
clerk's
office
staff
weren't.
Aware
of
that
so
I'll
have
to
try
and
follow
up
with
facilities
to
see
if
we
have
those
numbers
or
not.
G
And-
and
chris
I
can,
this
is
ratana.
I
can
answer
that.
I
asked
that
same
question
like
last
summer
as
staff
about
like
the
hvac
system,
but
but
the
or
the
response
I
got
was
like
everything
is
up
to
date
and
in
terms
of
the
ventilation
and
there
shouldn't
I,
as
staff,
we
shouldn't
be
concerned.
J
That's
not
super
reassuring,
given
what
we've
seen
from
cdc
and
minnesota
department
of
health.
Do
you
know
either
of
you.
I
know
that
we're
starting
to
see
more
push
at
the
national
level
for
actually
addressing
ventilation,
so
I'm
assuming
that
might
shift
like
to
understand
if
the
air
is
being
recirculated.
J
What
kind
of
soldiers
we're
looking
at
what
the
air
exchange
rate
is
up
to
date
without
it
being
up
to
date,
specifically
around
colbit
and
looking
at
airborne
disease
spread,
doesn't
feel
at
all
reassuring,
but
thank
you
for
for
bringing
that
up
with
tom.
A
L
Hi
thanks,
I
know
at
the
council,
we've
probably
been
having
very
similar
discussions
relating
to
this
with
all
of
our
committees.
One
thing
I
was
curious
about
that.
L
I
had
just
heard
about
for
the
first
time
today
in
one
of
our
meetings,
so
we
have
a
transportation
accessibility,
advisory
committee,
where
a
certain
number
of
members
are
required
to
be
people
with
disabilities
to
represent
disability
community
and
in
their
discussion
today
at
least
that
committee
would
have
the
option
to
request
a
reasonable
accommodation
under
the
ada
if
they
had
health
concerns,
disability
concerns
that
would
affect
their
ability
to
participate
in
person,
and
so
I
was
just
curious
if
minneapolis
has
had
any
discussions
about
that,
because
that's
really
kind
of
separate
from
the
open
meeting
law
issue
and
it
would
not
the
way
it
was
explained
to
that
committee-
would
not
be
subject
to
that
having
to
disclose
a
location
at
a
non-public
location
stuff,
because
that
would
it's
just
kind
of
different
from
the
open
meeting
law
consideration
and
we
have
not
had
that
discussion
as
far
as
it
applying
to
other
committees
at
the
council.
L
H
Yeah
thanks
heidi,
it
has
come
up.
It
actually
came
up
at
that
same
meeting
today,
and
I
know
that
the
clerk's
office
is
going
to
look
into
it
and
talk
to
both
our
public
health
and
attorneys
to
kind
of
figure
out
what's
possible
there
and
that
our
ada
specialist
folks
are
involved
in
that
conversation.
H
There
haven't
been
any
decisions
or
anything
put
forward
aside
from
bringing
that
point
forward,
which
I
think
is
a
really
good
point
personally,
and
so
I
I
will
continue
to
keep
tabs
on
that
and
I
I'll
I'll
bring
forward
the
fact
that
it's
come
up
with
the
met
council.
I
think
that
our
our
folks
would
be
interested
to
to
hear
that
as
well.
L
Yeah
I'll
throw
a
link
in
the
chat
with
the
recording
of
that
meeting
today
and
I'm
going
to
follow
up
with
the
staff
person
on
that
just
as
far
as
application
on
some
of
our
other
committees.
So
let
me
know
if
I
can
give
any
help
making
connections
between
our
agencies.
A
Great
thanks
for
the
info,
I
see
another
hand,
went
up.
That's
julia
again,.
J
Yeah,
I
wasn't
seeing
other
people,
so
if
we're
talking
about
the
math,
I
would
love
for
us
to
be
encouraging
n95
and
maybe,
if
we
can
provide
some
for
people
who
might
have
forgotten
them.
But
I
also
do
have
some
concerns
around
how
those
might
make
the
meeting
harder
to
hear
and
what
kind
of
things
we
can
do
around
accommodations
that
can
balance
what
were
disease
spread
versus
people
being
able
to
hear
one
another.
J
I
know
for
myself
that
when,
when
we're
at
higher
rates
of
covet,
I'm
wearing
p100,
which
is
fairly
hard
to
hear
through,
but
you
know,
if
we're
being
forced
to
be
in
person
during
surges
like
I
am
not
if
we
know
that
that
females
are,
it
appears
possibly
three
times
more
likely
to
get
long
covered.
So
there's
just
some
equity
concerns
around
that
and
then
around
how
we
accommodate,
given
that
masks
do
introduce
barriers
that
are
not
there
with
online
meetings.
F
Insights
post
our
first
meeting,
but
I
don't
just
have
to
go
see
what
the
physicist
in
terms
of
the
hearing
question
right.
Exactly
that's
so
I'm
not,
but
anyway,
yeah.
No,
what's
foreshadow
anything
I'll.
Just
I'm
looking
forward
to
maybe
we'll
see
what
happens.
Yeah
see
how
it
goes
and
it's
encouraging
to
hear
heidi's
notes
on
you
know
the
possible.
You
know
impact
of
a
reasonable
comedy.
J
Point
I
am
fairly
muffled
and
it's
hard
for
people
to
hear
me.
I
assume
that
back
within
the
realm,
like
that,
what
leads
to
it
might
be
different
than
in
other
situations,
but
what
kind
of
accommodations
would
there
be
for
heavier
masking
so
that
we
can
do
that?
Like?
Could
I
type
up
what
I'm
saying
and
we
read
it?
What
can
we
do
if
our
we're
having
our
ability
to
communicate
impacted
since
we
also
know
that
we
don't
all
necessarily
communicate?
J
I
mean
I
assume
these
things
are
in
place
for
people
who
are
deaf
or
ways
that
we've
worked
to
make
sure
things
work
for
people
with
visual
impairments,
and
I
just
I'm
curious
how
we
can
proactively
figure
out
what
we
need
to
have
in
place
so
that
our
meetings
run
smoothly
and
so
we're
not
making
any
of
this
a
barrier
to
participation
or
making
feel
people
feel
like
they
shouldn't
be
taking
the
steps
they
feel
they
need
to.
Since
we
made
this
an
individual
issue
instead
of
a
public
health
issue,.
A
Yeah
good
question
chris,
I
know
you're
going
to
be
visiting
the
room
chris
at
least
the
full
committee
room.
Can
you
look
to
see
if
it's
like
wired
for
microphones
or
like
what
the
options
are
for
like
like
audio
support
and
then
maybe
report
back.
H
I
can
say
pretty
confidently
right
now
that
there
there
won't
be
like
microphones
right
in
front
of
each
person.
I
I
don't
believe
that
those
conference
rooms
are
set
up
for
that
they.
They
are
all
video
conference
ready,
but
I
I
don't
know
if
that
necessarily
helps
us,
because
the
mics
are
all
in
the
rooms
like
on
the
ceiling
and
it's
meant
to
project
a
computer
to
elsewhere.
H
If
that
sound
was
then
projected
back
into
the
room,
my
assumption
is
that
it
would
feedback,
and
so
I
I
don't
know
that
the
video
conferencing
technology
would
necessarily
help.
It
did
come
up
today
that
the
city
does
have
some
devices
like
that
would
be
available
on
individual
use
to
help
with
hearing.
H
But
I
I
don't
know
that
they'd
be
better
necessarily
than
a
given
person's
kind
of
personal
hearing
aid,
but
we
could
take
that
kind
of
individual
individual
action
and
I'd
be
happy
to
work
with
anyone
that
comes
forward
to
try
and
accommodate
that
to
the
best
that
we
can.
A
L
H
Really
really
quickly
julia.
I
I
just
want
to
be
up
front
like
this
is
not
something
that
like
like
there's
going
to
be
like.
I
don't
know
it's,
it's
not
necessarily
going
to
be
an
easy
transition
like
we're.
Not
all
gonna
we're,
not
gonna.
Have
every
single
piece
of
this
figured
out
like
it
is
a
new
thing
to
go
back
to
in
person
with
mass
when
we
switched
the
reverse
way
to
online.
H
You
know
we
were
off
for
three
months
and
obviously
that's
not
ideal
and
we're
working
it
as
fast
as
we
can
to
handle
these,
and
these
are
all
good
questions,
but
I
I
can't
promise
that
yeah.
I
hear
that
I
don't
have
it
set
up
in
a
way
that,
like
a
muffled
mask,
person
is
able
to
be
heard
by
by
everyone,
and
I
I
realized.
J
Yeah
and
that's
not,
I
don't
think
that
that's
not
a
pandemic
issue
aside
from
them,
like
people,
have
different
abilities
to
speak
in
in
ways
that
are
clearly
articulated
enough
for
others
to
understand.
So
I
think
the
the
overarching
issue
is
a
broader
accessibility,
one
not
just
for
the
pandemic,
but
it
because
it
comes
more
into
play
in
a
pandemic,
but
thanks
chris,
I
didn't
I'm
not.
I
understand,
there's
a
lot
to
be
juggling.
F
Yeah
number
b
is
coming
forward,
then
chris
yeah,
I
just
the
more
I
talk
about
it.
I've
kind
of
bounced
around
a
few
last
meetings,
but
it's
like
it
does
not
like
the
greatest
use
of
our
time,
but
a
full
meeting
to
figure
this
stuff
out.
F
If
we
can
at
all
spend
a
half
hour
an
hour
in
in
person
just
kind
of
seeing
what
the
lay
of
the
land
is
there,
then
I
can
so
if
you're
saying
someone
come
forward
and
we
can
make
spend
some
time
and
yeah
and
just
kind
of
spend
some
driving
that
conference
market
see
where
the
what
the
accommodations
are,
if
there's
any
technology
hookups
that
work
with
or
without
my
equipment,
and
if
somebody
has
someone
to
show
up
with
that
n100
mask
and
you
could
test
that
out
too.
That
would
be.
H
Absolutely
and
if
you
and
or
anyone
else
want
to
schedule
some
time
with
me
to
to
look
at
a
conference
room
and
and
do
that
before
that
first
meeting,
we
we
can
do
that.
Otherwise,
if
you
want
to
show
up
early
to
the
first
meeting
more
than
happy
to
try
and
figure
out
as
much
as
we
can
prior
to.
A
Great
and
yeah
my
hand
is
up
because
I
think
I
think
peter
makes
a
good
point.
I
think
it'll
come
down.
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
these
questions
will
only
be
answered
once
we
return
in
person,
but
one
of
the
questions
is
what
we
need
to
really
cover
is
what
will
make
us
most
comfortable
so
that
the
majority
of
us
can
return
in
person.
Now
it
does
sound
like
that.
A
Everyone
that
certain
members
of
the
committee
would
be
most
comfortable
if
everyone
was
wearing
a
mask,
particularly
a
medical
grade,
mask
again
that
can't
be
a
rule,
but
it
could
be
something
that
we
as
the
pack
are
considering
like.
A
We
will
just
make
it
our
best
attempt
to
do
and
then
once
we
are
in
person
and
once
in
the
room
together,
that
can
be
a
topic
of
discussion
getting
through
that
first
meeting
discussing
any
issues
that
come
up
with
masking
any
issues
that
come
up
with
being
present
together,
because
the
reality
is
we're
going
to
be
together
in
person
and
not
online.
So
our
only
options
are
to
just
keep
each
other
safe
but
or
or
not
attend.
A
So
so
I
do
think
it
really
will
come
down
to
making
sure
we
schedule,
maybe
a
good
half
an
hour
on
the
next
agenda,
to
just
almost
to
be
like
a
welcome
back,
meet
and
greet
everyone
can
go
around
and
say
a
thing
or
two
and
then
we
can
discuss
you
know
comfort
level
there.
So
I
think
that
might
be
a
good
topic
for
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
for
may.
A
A
L
L
A
Sounds
good,
I
see
barb
yeah.
M
My
only
comment
is
that
I,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
I
just
wanted
to
excuse
me
support
you
in
that
we
can't
solve
problems
that
we
don't
understand
and
we.
J
M
Really
fully
get
them
until
we're
there
and
maybe
we'll
have
more
information
about
the
ventilation,
and
I
hope
that
would
be
the
case,
but
if
not
we'll
just
have
to
do
what
we
need
to
do
and
each
person
will
have
to
take
some
responsibility
for
that
sorry,
I've
got
a
frog
in
my
throat
hard
to
hear
me.
A
No
thank
you
for
that
yeah.
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
so
good.
I
think
it'll
be
a
good
plan
and
then
also
a
good
chance
to
do
a
meet
and
greet
so.
Our
first
meeting
is
just
very
casual.
First
back
together
is
very
casual.
Yeah,
julia.
J
I
think
that
sounds
pretty
good
and
I'm
speaking
through
p100
right
now,
just
to
illustrate
that
I
would
love
to
know
what
accessibility
options
are
that
that
we
might
be
able
to
rely
on
if
we
need
them.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
information
that
the
clerk
might
have
for
us
for
that
meeting,
but
yeah
and
I
can't
wait
to
see
everyone
in
person.
I
mean
I'm
nervous
about
how
it's
flying
about,
but
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
seeing
all
of
you.
H
A
long
people
also,
I
I
mean
I
I
can
say
pretty
definitively-
that
we
don't
have
any
other
extra
like
technical
devices.
The
clerks
made
that
pretty
clear
like
that.
That's
that's
part
of
like
why
we
can't
do
a
split
in
person
virtual
and
hybrid,
and
things
like
that.
So
for
this
first
one
I
I
don't
necessarily
expect
more
based
on
what
I've
heard
from
the
clerk's
office.
A
Okay,
thanks
yeah,
hopefully
it'll
all
get
sorted
after
the
first
meeting
in
person,
kind
of
comes
through
and
people
kind
of
process
it
together.
Does
anyone
have
any
last
comments
or
questions
or
thoughts
on
this
idea
of
returning
to
in
person
peter.
F
H
A
Thanks
chris
now
heidi
go
ahead.
L
Okay,
I
guess
thank
you.
I
guess
this
is
a
question
for
chris
again,
I'm
just
kind
of
curious.
I
know
this
is
something
I've
asked
internally
at
the
council
and
then
also
a
st
paul
resident
who's
on
a
committee
there.
I
know
we're
working
with
the
realities
of
what
the
open
meeting
law
is
today,
but
laws
can
also
change,
and
so
I
was
just
curious
if
there's
been
any
discussion
within
the
city
as
far
as
being
heard
at
the
legislature
and
giving
feedback
on.
L
L
I
know
what
I've
asked
this
within
the
council.
I've
been
told
it's
not
part
of
our
legislative
agenda.
I
don't
know
if
that's
changed
since
I
asked,
but
I
was
just
curious
if
minneapolis
has
had
any
conversations
along
that
line.
H
I
I
have
raised
that
at
our
meetings
with
the
clerk's
office
and
other
boards
and
commissions,
it
doesn't
sound
like
it's
currently
a
priority,
but
I
I'll
continue
to
raise
it
because
I
think
members
on
this
committee
and
the
bac-
I
don't
expect
you.
F
H
Stop
raising
it
and
frankly,
you
know
we
yeah
we've
all
seen
the
benefits
of
expanding
access
through
virtual.
I
I
also
like
the
more
we
bring
up
the
issues
that
we
inevitably
will
face
in
person.
There
will
be
changes
and
there
will
be
things
that
we
need
to
work
through.
H
You
know
the
more
we
can
kind
of
advocate
that,
so
that
was
like
the
one
update
to
the
law
based
on
covid
and
the
pandemic,
and
it
was
pretty
sweeping
and
you
know,
I
would
hope
that
the
legislature
would
be
willing
to
fine-tune
that,
but
I
obviously
can't
promise
anything
but
yeah.
I
appreciate
that
comment
and
we'll
continue
to
raise
that.
A
Thanks
heidi
barb
yeah.
M
Hopefully
it
can
be
heard
better.
My
question
is,
and
chris
I
don't
think
you
probably
have
the
answer
to
this,
but
I
don't
fully
understand
why
it
was
determined.
Was
it
across
the
board
that
all
boards
and
advisory
committees
had
to
go
back
to
in
person
or
is
I
don't
understand
why
we
all
have
to
do
the
same
thing?
Is
it
just
easier
for
the
clerk's
office
or
what's
the
reasoning
behind
that
if
we
chose
to
stay
remote,
what
would
be
the
problem.
H
Yeah,
it
is
actually
in
the
state
statute
that
that
all
advisory
committee,
like
basically
all
committees
with
the
powers
that
we
have
that
come
from
a
city
councilor.
H
I
I'm
not
a
lawyer
and
I
don't
know
exactly
how
it's
phrased,
but
our
type
of
committee
is
expressly
named
in
that,
and
so
it's
not
the
clerk's
office
decision
and
that
that's
my
understanding
at
least
and
and
the
reason
that
we've
been
allowed
to
be
remote,
is
because
there's
been
an
emergency
order
in
place,
and
so
the
idea
is
that,
once
that
ends
then
we'd
be
going
back
to
in
person.
H
The
clerk's
office
has
also
or
the
attorney's
office
has
also
said
that,
because
the
city
council
decided
to
go
back,
that
means
that
all
the
boards
and
commissions
also
need
to
because
they
are
essentially
a
part
of
the
city
council,
and
so
that's
why
it's
happening
right
now,
even
though
technically
we
do
still
have
an
emergency
order.
In
effect,.
M
H
M
A
We're
talking
about
returning
to
in-person
meetings,
we
just
actually
finished
the
conversation,
because
you
know
they
return.
May
the
full
meeting
in
may
will
be
the
first
full
meeting
back
in
person
and
you'll
be
getting.
Everyone
will
be
getting
an
email
with
all
of
the
information
about
that
soon
from
chris,
so
yeah
right.
I
know
people
are
kind
of
excited.
I
think
peter
your
hand's
still
up
or
was
that
from
before
just
wanna
make
sure.
A
Okay,
awesome
all
right.
Well,
I'm
happy
neil
is
here
just
to
roll
in
a
few
things.
A
So
the
last
things
on
our
agenda
are
the
discussion
about
pac,
member
renewals
and
recruitment
and
executive
committee
roles
for
next
term
those
kind
of
go
hand
in
hand
because
it
rolls
over
the
beginning
of
july,
and
in
addition
to
that,
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
the
fact
that
I'm
not
in
person
in
minneapolis
right
now-
and
I
won't
be
so
this
kind
of
also
ties
to
returning
to
in
person
one
the
presentation
to
the
public
works
and
infrastructure
subcommittee
of
city
council.
A
A
Okay,
yeah
and
we'll
send
out
an
email
with
details,
but
on
the
april
21st
at
about
one
o'clock
in
person,
because
I
won't
be
there
and
much
of
the
executive
committee
is
also
not
readily
available
for
the
short
timeline.
The
mechanic
had
to
create
this.
Presenting
with
the
chair
of
the
bicycle
advisory
committee,
alyssa
will
be
our
secretary
neil.
A
Yay,
so
neil
will
be
there
in
person.
I
think
they're
still
figuring
out
the
logistics
that
if
attendees
can
appear
in
person
or
maybe
they'll,
be
in
a
side,
room
or
maybe
they'll
have
to
watch
online.
You
can
also
always
watch
online
chris.
I
think
you
and
I
just
need
to
put
our
heads
together
and
send
an
email
out
once
we
know
if
people
can
attend.
The
pack
usually
always
has
a
very
strong
in-person
turnout
when
they
were
in
person,
which
is
always
very
fun
yeah.
A
We
were
always
like
the
biggest
group,
so
you
know,
if
only
we
could
do
that
again
this
year,
but
anyway,
that's
april
21st,
so
mark
that
on
your
calendars
in
the
afternoon,
I
know
it's
a
work
day.
So
thank
you,
neil
for
stepping.
In
and
neil
we
have
a
lot
of
stuff
coming
and
practice
to
do
so.
I'm
excited.
A
A
A
So
if
reyna
and
I
both
can't
run
the
june
full
committee
meeting,
we
need
somebody
to
run
that
I
know
I
have
christopher
hoffer
on
the
docket
if
he
needs
to
run
it,
but
one
option
could
also
be
if
we
discuss
as
a
pac,
if
there's
any
interest
in
executive
committee
roles
for
next
term,
because
again,
I'm
just
not
in
person
enough
in
minneapolis
right
now.
I
can't
renew
to
be
on
the
pack
because
it
doesn't
feel
right
to
like
miss.
You
know
every
other
meeting,
especially
the
next
two,
so
I
can't
stay
chair.
A
So
we
need
to
talk
about
moving
around
the
executive
committee
roles
for
next
term.
How
many
of
people
are
still
interested?
What
part?
What
role
you
might
be
interested
in
and
that's
a
discussion
that
we
can
have
today
and
then
potentially
for
the
june
meeting?
If,
if
someone
from
the
exec
committee
or
someone
from
the
pack
is
interested
in
maybe
being
the
chair,
they
could
maybe
help
run
the
june
meeting
as
practice.
Maybe
they
run
it
with
christopher
hopper
because
he's
run
meetings
before
that
might
just
be
a
good
opportunity.
A
So
that's
a
discussion
that
I
think
the
executive
committee
or
future
executive
committee
might
want
to
have,
but
I
wanted
to
open
the
door
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
executive
committee
for
next
year,
as
well
as
member
renewal
and
recruitment,
and
maybe
chris
has
some
numbers
on
on
any
the
number
of
applications
we've
gotten
so
far
and
this
and
that
so
that's
kind
of
our
next
steps
for
the
rest
of
this
meeting.
If
anybody
has
anything.
D
Yeah
chris
already
said
this,
but
chris,
could
you
remind
me
who
is
up
for
renewal?
I
just
didn't
quite
catch
all
that.
H
Yes,
abigail
christopher
ross
and
donna
hemp,
paul,
saint
martin,
christopher
hoffer
and
barb
olsen
and
baxter.
Is
there
anyone
that
I
listed
that
didn't
think
they
were
up,
or
vice
versa.
Anyone
that
I
didn't
list
that
thinks
they're
up
just
want
to
check,
give
a
moment
for
questions
if
there
are
any
peter
you've
got
your
hand
up.
I
don't
know
if
that
was
before
do.
F
I
still
it
just
so
happens.
I
do
have
a
question.
I
just
look
at
reviewing
the
membership
today,
oh
yeah,
at
libs
or
whatever
donna
hemp's
name
is
not
listed
and
there's
oh
there's
one
vacancy.
J
Okay,
just
to
confirm
that's
different
than
what
we
have
on
the
minutes
from
pmp
for
who's
up
for
renewing,
where
we
have
paul
neil
barb
and
abigail
on
that,
and
this
is
a
slightly
different
work.
So
I
just
want
to
confirm
so.
J
H
Wasn't
expecting
that
question
so
so
I
did.
I
didn't
look
that
up
beforehand.
Sorry,
if
that's
something
that
matthew
usually
has
for
this-
I'm
usually
not
involved
in
this
process,
but
I
I
can.
I
can
get
that
for
our
next
meeting
update.
It
might
it'll
probably
be
closed
by
that,
but
I
can
look
into
that.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
to
know
yeah,
because
I
think
we
want
to
discuss
like
if
anybody
on
the
pack
that
isn't
in
an
exec
committee
role,
that's
interested
in
one.
You
know
this
is
a
good
opportunity
to
reach
out
to
an
exec
committee
member
or
to
have
that
discussion
or,
if
you're,
if
you
feel
bold
enough
to
like
chat
about
it
now.
I
think
this
is
a.
This
might
be
a
good
time
to
start
marinating
on
it.
A
I
know
we
still
have
several
months
until
the
july
elections,
but
it
you
know
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
consider
if
you're
interested
in
taking
on
a
different
role
within
the
pack,
christopher.
D
Yes,
I
just
want
to
state
that
you
know
I've
spent
this
winter
out
of
minneapolis
and,
frankly,
I
I
hope
to
do
the
same
next
winter,
which
puts
me
in
a
position
to
the
concerns
that
abigail
raised.
You
know
with
it's
been.
The
silver
lining
for
me
is
that
these
four
meetings,
or
whatever
that
I've
been
in
california,
I've
been
able
to
attend
through
zoom.
D
That
will
not
exist
anymore
and
at
some
point
it
becomes
missing.
A
meeting
with
missing
four
is
a
different
thing,
so
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there.
I'm
gonna
do
some
some
scheming
and
thinking
and
figuring,
but
I
would
guess
as
of
right
now
that
my
inclination
is
not
to
renew
just
because
I'll
be
gone
at
least
four
plus
meetings.
D
So,
but
that's
something
that
you
know
chris.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
that
a
couple
weeks
ago,
but
I
just
want
to
put
that
up
so
we're
more
focused.
But
people
are
thinking
about
officer
roles
that
would
necessitate
a
need
for
another
co-chair
for
engineering
subcommittee,
and
I
was
hoping
aaron
would
be
here
because
I'm
keeping
his
seat
warm
because
he
was
such
a
good
co-chair.
So
we'll
have
to
put
a
call
into
air.
J
Two
things
on
that.
The
first
is,
I
christopher.
I
hear
what
you're
saying,
and
it
also
makes
me
think
of
I
mean
I
don't
know
what
your
your
conditions
are,
that
california
seem
better
than
minnesota
at
certain
times
of
the
year,
but
I'm
assuming
that
it
is
similar
to
to
what
still
faces
and
that
our
city
is
not
accessible,
and
so
there's
a
part
of
me.
J
Those
there's
there's
a
parallel
there
that
I
just
I
I
hope,
you're
considering
it
seriously
from
that
broader
lens,
and
I
respect
whatever
you
choose
and
I
hope
we
all
are
considering
what
it
means
to
have
meetings
where
people
can't
attend
because
of
the
thing
we're
trying
to
fix.
That
said,
I
feel
like
I
would
love
to
just
be
back
in
person
before
I
even
have
more
thoughts
on
how
exact
committee
and
all
of
that
goes.
J
It's
such
a
different
field
to
do
zoom
versus
being
in
person,
and
maybe
hopefully,
at
our
next
meeting.
J
We
could
maybe
go
over
what
have
traditionally
been
the
responsibilities
of
each
role,
and
I
know
abigail
you're,
you
won't
be
able
well,
you
won't
be
able
to
be
there,
but
I
don't
know
what
we
can
do,
maybe
if
you
can
send
out
an
email
describing
your
experience
as
the
person
who's
held
this
for
a
couple
of
years,
most
recently
and
your
observations
like
just
the
more
information
we
have
to
be
able
to
share
internally
and
then
also
with
incoming
members,
hopefully
before
they
even
attend
a
first
meeting,
so
that
everyone
knows
what
we're
signing
up
for
when
at
least
a
lot
of
our
returning
members
don't
haven't,
had
an
in-person
meeting
too.
A
Yeah,
those
are
good
ideas.
Julia,
I
think,
you're
right,
I
think
also
too,
I
think
in
the
orientation
matthew
usually
give
gave
a
brief
overview
of
like
what
each
chair
vice
chair
co-chairs,
what
each
role
kind
of
was,
and
then
everybody
had
an
opportunity
to
speak,
so
it
might
be
a
good
idea,
maybe
as
the
executive,
when
we
put
together
the
agenda
for
may,
that
should
be
another
byline
is
like
exec
committee
roles
and
functions
so
that
people
can
kind
of
get
wrap
their
head
around.
J
We
could
also
put
it
on
pnp
so
that
we,
because
that'll
be
our
last
recorded
meeting
our
death
or
our
last
definitely
recorded
meeting
that
would
be
accessible.
So
if
we,
whatever
we
do
to
kind
of
go
over,
that
in
pnp,
is
something
that
would
be
shareable
with
video
of
whoever
can
make
it
describing.
What
our
view
of
each
of.
A
What's
my
role
in
the
pack,
if
I'm
staying
on
the
pack
am
I
gonna
join
the
executive
committee,
they
can
kind
of
go
back
into
person
and
also
feel
out
the
in-person
aspect,
because
I
think
you're
right,
julia
it'll,
really
change
kind
of
how
everyone's
got
enough
feeling
sentimentally
about
everything.
So
thanks
for
those
does
anyone
else
have
any
thoughts
or
questions
on
recruitment
or
and
renewals,
or
on
the
exact
committee
of
any
kind.
I
Just
really
quickly-
and
I
know
I
said
this
at
our
exact
meeting
abigail,
but
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you.
First
of
all,
I'm
absolutely
devastated
that
you're
not
going
to
be
the
chair
and
I've.
I've
been
kind
of
in
a
fantastic
position,
as
vice
chair
to
just
sort
of
sit
back
and
learn
a
lot
from
you.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you.
J
N
A
Everybody
I
promise,
when
I'm
in
minneapolis
in
july
august,
that
I
will
100
be
at
at
a
pac
meeting
or
at
the
end
of
a
pack
meeting
when
you
know
if
everybody
feels
good
and
there's
outdoor
seating
somewhere,
that
we're
all
sitting
outside
together,
enjoying
enjoying
a
snack
or
a
drink
or
something.
A
Obviously
so
great,
I
think
this
is.
This
is
a
lot
of
information.
I
know
we
get
to
talk
about
it
because
it's
fun
we're
going
back
in
person
a
lot.
It
comes
with
that
and
then
we're
going
to
be.
You
know
a
lot
is
going
to
be
rolling
over
with
the
new
appointments,
so
I
think
it's
gearing
up
to
kind
of
be
an
eventful
and
eventful
next
few
months.
I
also
think
that
on
an
agenda,
maybe
on
pnp,
we
can
discuss
what
does
orientation
look
like.
So
what
will
the
july
meeting
look
like?
A
I
know
over
the
last
two
years
matthew
and
I
have
worked
closely
on
making
sure
that
there's
like
a
more
a
more
full
orientation
that
starts
that
like
kicks
off
the
july
meeting
before
there
is
the
elections,
everyone
gets
to
go
around
and
introduce
themselves,
so
maybe
that's
something
that
can
go
on.
The
agenda
is
like
kind
of
a
planning
stage
process
for
new
members
when
they
join.
I
also
know
that
I
reached
out
to
new
members
when
they
were
appointed
in
gearing
up
for
their
first
meeting.
A
A
F
A
C
A
Yes,
good
question:
what
I
was
hearing
was:
anyone
who
spoke
up
it
seems
that
more
people
will
be
comfortable
if
everyone
was
wearing
one
so
to
bring
it
and
then
I
think,
and
then
I
think
during
the
meeting
the
discussion
can
be
had
maybe.
A
Around
people's
desires
to
maintain
or
loosen
that
policy,
I
think,
does
that
sound
cle?
Does
that
sound
right
to
everybody?
I
just
want
to
make
sure
because
I
think
we're
kind
of
going
with
the
the
pers
as
long
as
it's
not
a
barrier
for
someone
who
wouldn't
come,
I
wouldn't
want
anyone,
you
know,
and
I
don't
want
to
call
anyone
out
to
be
like
well.
J
I
would
this
might
be
for
later,
but
figuring
out
what,
if
we
can
be
looking
at
wastewater
or
if
we
set
our
own
metrics,
so
it
isn't
just
mask
not
mask.
Maybe
there's
a
way
that
we
look
at
nuance
within
that,
so
that
we
ask
people
to
mask
100
of
the
time
in
x
context.
J
But
I
I
do
really
like
and
appreciate
the
idea
of
encouraging
more
masking,
especially
I
I
just
I
personally
was
not
as
aware
as
I
wish.
I
had
been
of
how
much
people
movement
who
are
immunocompromised
or
have
young
infants
who
are
at
risk
for
rsv
have
have
already
been
making
choices
of
limiting
themselves
in
public.
So
I
really
hope
we
continue
to
be
masking
more
around
one
another
as
appropriate
in
the
future,
so
that
we
can
increase
participation
and
more
discussion
about
that.
Going
forward
seems
great
with
default
masks
for
now,
if
possible,.
D
Yes,
I'll
be
wearing
a
mask,
I
would
request
each
of
you
to
wear
a
mask
and
I
would
request
that
we
revisit
this
in
the
august
meeting.
Having
set
an
example
for
the
new
on
board
members
in
july
that
at
least
the
the
culture
is
to
wear
a
mask
and
we
can
have
a
more
you
know,
we
can
have
a
discussion
down
the
road
and
if
there
is
something
that
comes
up
in
the
intervening
whatever
that
is
three
four
months,
then
we
can
adjust
it
earlier.
But
my
request
is
threefold.
D
A
Thank
you
both
yeah,
so
it
seems
like
and
that's
the
that's
the
request
and
again
it
that's
not.
We
can't
set
down
any
rules,
but
you
know
we
often
run
by
consensus
here
at
the
pack
and
I
think-
and
I
think
we
all
really
respect
and
appreciate
each
other.
So
I
think
that's
kind
of
where
we've
landed.
F
N
Doing
well,
I
didn't
tell
everybody
why
I
was
late.
I
pulled
a
muscle
in
my
left
leg
yesterday
at
noon
and
to
turn
into
a
real
thing
I
was
I
went.
I
went
over
just
now
to
get
a
blood
clot
test
which
apparently
earned
it
negative,
but
that's
what
I
was
doing.
So
it
was
lots
of
fun.
I
love
going
to
the
university
hospital
they're
good
people
over
there
lots
of
fun,
even
if
you're
dying
of
that
awful
disease
they
make
make.
You
feel
like
it's
a
wonderful
journey.
N
You
love
dying
of
cancer.
It's
a
lot
of
fun,
my
mom's
really
enjoying
it.
A
I
think
that's
a
really
great
segue
towards
announcements.
If
anybody
has
any
other
announcements
that
they'd
like
to
share
before
we
close.