►
From YouTube: February 22, 2022 Planning Commission
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
B
B
I
would
like
to
note
for
record
that
this
meeting
has
the
remote
participation
of
the
members
of
the
city,
council
staff
and
commissioners
under
minnesota
statute,
section
13
d
.021
due
to
the
declared
local
public
health
emergency.
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
open,
minnesota,
open
meeting
law,
and
at
this
time
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role
so
that
we
can
verify
that
a
quorum
is
present
for
the
meeting.
D
C
C
B
B
B
D
D
B
B
I
would
read
through
the
agenda
numbers
and
addresses
and
will
state
whether
it's
slated
for
consent,
continuous
return,
withdrawal
and
so
forth
and
or
discussion.
I
will
also
briefly
what
that
means
say
what
that
means.
The
consent
items
are
those
that
will
be
passed
without
any
discussion
by
the
commission.
B
Whatever
conditions
and
statements
that
are
included
in
the
staff
reports
will
be
adhered
to,
the
ones
that
were
listed
under
recommended
motion
section,
and
if
you
agree
with
that
recommendation
for
an
item
to
be
on
consent,
you
don't
need
to
do
anything
and
the
commission
will
pass
it
as
is
otherwise.
I
ask
that
you
speak
up
and
say
that
you
would
like
that
item
to
be
discussed.
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
D
C
D
B
D
B
D
D
C
D
B
Next,
we
will
continue
to
our
two
items
that
are
going
to
be
continued.
One
cycle
to
the
march
7th
planning
commission
meeting
before
I
entertain
a
motion
to
continue
these
items.
One
cycle:
I
am
going
to
open
the
public
hearing
on
these
two
items
for
anyone
who
may
have
joined
the
meeting
tonight
to
speak
on
these
two
items.
B
You
can
certainly
call
in
on
march
7th
when
these
two
items
are
again
on
the
agenda
for
action.
Otherwise
you
can
also
use
this
moment
to
voice
your
comment
and
and
share
with
us
what
what
you
would
like
to
state
with
that.
I
am
now
opening
the
public
hearing
on
items
number
five
and
six.
Is
there
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak
on
those
two
items?
B
B
D
D
D
D
B
B
Commissioners
will
have
a
chance
to
ask
questions
and
then
we
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
this
item
for
anyone
who
is
who
would
like
to
call
in
or
has
called
in
to
speak
on
this
item
we
will
start
again
with
item
number:
four:
that's
4901
4905
49,
09,
49,
13,
49,
15,
49,
17
and
49
21,
france
avenue
south
and
staff
is
shanna.
Suther.
G
G
The
final
plot
is
a
consolidation
of
seven
parcels
which
are
currently
used
as
a
combination
of
single
and
two
family
dwellings
and
that's
to
allow
for
the
proposed
development
known
as
france
50..
That
project
was
approved
for
a
rezoning,
conditional
use,
permits,
cyclone
review
and
a
preliminary
plan.
An
administrative
height
increase
earlier
this
year
through
appeal,
so
that
was
final.
The
the
the
final
city
at
city,
council
action
was
on
january
27th
of
this
year.
G
G
The
final
plot
has
been
submitted
for
your
review
today,
so
the
property
lines
have
not
changed.
The
findings
are
the
same
as
the
preliminary
plat.
There
are
no
conditions
of
approval,
so
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
proposed
plat
for
consistency
with
the
the
findings
included
in
the
staff
report.
G
B
B
F
F
And
thank
you
first
of
all
chair.
I
appreciate
the
clarity
with
which
you've
gone
through
each
of
the
items
that
helps
to
really
keep
track
of
it,
and
then
this
remote
setting
is
it's
just
it's
very
helpful
and
and
and
also
please
extend
my
thanks
to
planners
other
shanna.
I
heard
her
say
that
she
received
my
email.
I
just
I
I
just
sent
a
letter
in
for
the
public
record
and
and
I
apologize
for
not
being
able
to
get
it
to
you
sooner.
Basically,
my
concerns.
F
Number
two:
you
know
a
community
comments
about
injuriousness
and
you
know
detrimental
effects
of
the
of
the
proposal
have
been
you
know
well
documented,
and
the
plat
approving
the
final
plat
is
just
part
of
that.
So
and
then
I
regarding
number
two
also
the
requirement
that
it
would
not
or
if
it's
a
requirement,
but
it
not
adds
substantially
to
congestion
in
the
public
streets,
and
I
want
to
note
that
the
traffic.
D
F
F
Based
on
that
alone
is,
it
is
similar
to
points
that
I
made
regarding
misrepresentation
and
the
architect
architectural
renderings
that
were
submitted
where
they
all
understated
under
report,
underrepresented,
deleterious
impacts
of
the
proposed
of
the
branch
50
proposal,
and
so
this
was
a
pretty
stark,
misrepresentation
and,
and
additionally,
I've
also
provided
some
information
from
the
city
of
edina
and
our
50th
in
france.
Small
area
plan
that
that,
without
being
a
professional
in
the
field,
but
using
the
data
that
was
provided
in
that.
F
It
as
the
estimate
in
the
50th
and
france
small
area
plan,
which
is
kind
of
similar,
would
be
like
approximately
twice
what
srf
projected.
So
I,
basically,
what
it
does
is
raise
some
real
concerns
about
the
integrity
of
the
trip
generation
review
prepared
by
srf
for
france,
50
and,
and
I
think
that
that
needs
to
be
addressed
before
the
final
flight
is
approved.
F
F
and
54
to
10
is
references
the
january
1
effective
date.
So
it
looks
to
me
like
the
stormwater.
It
needs
a
stormwater
management
plan
I
mean.
Obviously
france,
50
is
still
in
the
approval
process
and
whatever
permits
beyond
that
for
the
actual
land
disturbing
that
hasn't
even
occurred.
Yet
as
best
I
understand
and
then.
F
We
need
to
know
where
it's
at
it's
just
like.
I
can't
tell
that
there's
anything
based
on
based
on
planner
stutters
reports,
and
you
know
we'll
all
do
respect.
You
know
I
mean
she
does
a
lot
of
work
and
I'm
not
saying
I
don't
respect
her,
but
this
needs
to
be
resolved.
I
I
don't
see
it's
clear
either
as
the
storm
water
management
plan
or
what
the
developer
is
going
to
be
required
to
do
or
what
the
developer
is
actually
committing
to
do.
F
F
B
B
B
E
G
Thank
you,
commissioner,
ford,
so
to
the
high
level,
with
the
stormwater
management
orders
that
that
ordinance
is
applied
by
our
colleagues
in
public
works.
So,
as
the
staff
report
indicates,
they're
the
reviewing
authority
for
stormwater
management
and
that's
done
through
the
preliminary
development
review
application,
so
interpretation
and
application
of
chapter
54
would
would
fall
within
their
purview
permits
would
not
be
able
to
be
acquired
without
approval
of
pdr.
First,
so
essentially
it's
a
it's
a
sequential
review.
G
That's
that's
the
development
review
process.
I
believe
one
of
the
other
issues
identified
was
related
to
a
travel
demand
management
plan,
so
this
project
was
not
subject
to
a
travel
demand
management
plan,
so
the
applicant
actually
decided
to
produce
one
anyway,
and
so
that
was
included
in
the
public
record.
The
only
application
before
you
today
is
the
final
plat,
which
is
the
consolidation
of
the
parcels.
This
project
has
otherwise
been
approved
for
the
other
required
land
use
applications
to
allow
for
the
development.
G
I
believe,
it's
a
total
of
98
parking
spaces
within
two
levels
of
below-grade
parking
and
91
bicycle
parking
spaces
that
meet
the
long-term
requirement,
including
a
bicycle
room
on
the
first
floor.
So
as
far
as
whether
or
not
congestion
of
the
public
streets
etc.
Again,
we're
evaluating
that
specifically
today,
as
it
relates
to
the
combining
of
seven
parcels
into
one.
Typically,
we
would
do
this
administratively,
but
because
of
the
planning
development
application
that
was
required
of
a
plat
is
also
required,
and
it's
two
phases
for
a
pla
preliminary
and
final.
H
I
D
D
B
I
Thank
you,
president
smiley,
as
I
noted
in
my
email
earlier
today,
this
is
president
ismaili's
last
meeting
with
the
minneapolis
city
planning
commission
and
to
acknowledge
her
years
of
service
to
the
city.
As
a
part
of
this
commission,
I
believe
vice
president
olson
has
a
resolution
to
be
read
on
the
record.
H
I
do
all
right.
This
is
a
resolution
of
appreciation
for
raya
smiley
for
her
dedicated
service
to
the
minneapolis
city
planning
commission,
whereas
raya
has
served
on
the
city
of
minneapolis
city
planning,
commission
since
2020
and
whereas
raya
served
on
the
commission's
executive
committee
as
president
from
2021
to
2022
and
whereas
raya
has
participated
in
participated
in
over
41
planning.
H
H
Now,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
by
the
city,
planning,
commission
and
the
staff
of
the
city
planning
commission
of
minneapolis
that
we
thank
raya
smiley
for
her
faithful
and
constructive
service
in
extending
the
progress
of
this
city
and
in
promoting
the
welfare
of
its
people,
and
that
we
extend
her.
Our
best
wishes
for
good
health
and
happiness,
trusting
that
the
friendships
and
understanding
built
in
our
mutual
undertakings
will
be
with
us
always.
H
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
commissioner
olsen.
All
the
other
commissioners
kimberly
all
the
other
staff,
all
the
other
staff
who
are
working
tirelessly
behind
the
scenes
right
now,
with
all
this
online
situation
going
on.
Thank
you
very
much.
You
made
this
experience
a
very
valuable
one,
one
that
I
would
like
to
continue
at
a
later
time,
so
I
hope
to
see
you
oh
soon
ish.
B
B
H
Just
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everyone
for
thursday's
meeting
the
agenda
is
really
long,
so
if
everyone
could
do
a
good
read
ahead
of
time
and
then,
if
you
have
any
questions
that
you
can
get
answered
ahead
of
time,
maybe
reach
out
to
that
staff
person
for
that
project.
Otherwise
we're
going
to
be
in
that
meeting
all
night
long.
B
Yes,
thank
you.
That's
please.
I
do
encourage
everyone
to.
Please
come
prepared
to
ask
very
specific
questions
on
the
project
so
that
we
can
keep
things
moving
right.
Okay.
Well,
with
that,
we
have
completed
all
the
items
and
if
there
is
nothing
else,
I
without
end
without
an
objection.
I
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.