►
From YouTube: August 10, 2022 Public Health & Safety Committee
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
C
D
A
Thank
you.
I
would
just
note
that
council
member
ellison
is
out
for
today
and
let
me
know
that
he
would
be
out
in
advance.
Our
first
item
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
food
code
delegation
ordinance
related
to
amending
the
state
code
and
corporation
provision.
A
E
So
good
afternoon,
I'm
happy
to
be
here,
I'm
cindy
weckworth
and
I'm
the
director
of
environmental
health
with
the
health
department
before
you
in
this
public
hearing
is
a
minor
food
code
amendment
and
specifically
it's
for
an
amendment
to
the
city's
food
code
186.20,
and
it
relates
to
the
certification
of
food
protection
managers.
E
So
just
a
little
bit
of
background
that
might
be
helpful.
The
authority
to
license
and
inspect
food
establishments
in
the
city
of
minnesota
in
the
city
of
minneapolis
is
granted
through
two
delegation
agreements,
one
with
the
minnesota
department
of
health
and
the
other.
With
the
minnesota
department
of
agriculture
in
2019,
the
state
food
code,
minnesota
rule
4626
was
adopted
or
was
revised
and
adopted
by
the
state
and
through
our
delegation
agreement
we
adopted
it
by
reference.
E
What
we
found
out
in
an
audit
and
were
regularly
audited
by
both
state
agencies
was
that
when
we
adopted
it
by
reference,
there's
a
piece
in
there
that
we
should
have
excluded,
because
the
state
health
department
retains
that
authority
and
that's
specifically
for
the
certified
food
protection
manager.
So
in
the
state
of
minnesota,
virtually
all
food
establishments
are
required
to
have
a
certified
food
manager,
and
the
state
retains
that
the
the
program
to
mat
or
to
manage
the
program
to
identify
the
instructors,
the
material,
the
exams
they
collect
the
fee
and
the
registration.
A
Thank
you,
I'm
going
to
proceed
with
the
public
hearing
and
I'll
ask
the
clerk.
If
anyone
has
signed
up
to
speak,
if
you
did
not
sign
up
to
speak
yet
I
would
encourage
you
to
sign
up.
It
looks
like
we
have
one
person
signed
up
to
speak
howard
dotson.
F
F
A
A
A
There
are
three
items
on
today's
consent
agenda.
The
second
item
is
confirming
an
appointment
to
the
minneapolis
advising
advisory
committee
on
aging
item.
Three
is
approving
appointments
to
the
public
health
advisory
committee
and
item
4
is
unmanned
aerial
vehicle
use.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
these
items?
Oh
I'm
sorry.
Item
4
is
set
in
a
public
hearing
for
august
24th
to
receive
public
comment
on
the
proposed
use
of
unm
unmanned
aerial
vehicle
use.
Council,
councilmember,
payne.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
let
the
public
know
that
the
city's
posted
a
website
so
that
the
public
can
learn
more
about
about
this
particular
use
of
uav's
unmanned
aerial
vehicles,
also
known
as
drones,
and
just
inviting
the
public
to
check
that
out,
so
that
you
can
be
prepared
for
the
public
hearing.
G
Wansley,
thank
you,
chair
vita.
I
also
want
to
stay
for
the
public
record
that
I'm
also
voting
in
favor
of
this
public
hearing
on
the
use
of
unmanned
aerial
vehicles,
also
known
as
drones.
I
absolutely
think
you
know
this
type
of
you
know
proposal
we're
considering
requires
public
input.
G
Personally,
I
do
have
serious
concerns
about
giving
mpd
new
technologies
when
they've
been
documented,
as
failing
to
having
adhere
to
basic
compliance
with
other
technologies
that
they
currently
have
and
as
we've
seen
with
the
mdhr
report,
there's
been
a
demonstrated
pattern
of
racism,
misogyny
and
violence
and
there's
definitely
concerns
if
we
move
forward
with
this,
that
you
know,
there's
going
to
have
to
be
a
burden
of
proof
placed
on
mpd
to
explain
how
this
technology
will
not
be
part
of
them.
G
You
know
continuing
with
this
pattern
of
of
committing
harmful
and
discriminatory
discriminatory
practices.
You
know
in
regards
to
our
residents,
so
I
at
least
you
know,
support
having
this
public
hearing
as
a
initial
step
to
allow
residents
to
also
share
the
concerns
that
I
know
I
have
my
office
has
been
contacted
about
in
regards
to
this
specific
thing.
So
really
look
forward
to
this
next
step.
H
Member
palmisano.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
my
understanding
of
of
what
is
going
on
here
and
this
might
be
different
than
how
some
people,
typically
when
they
come
to
a
public
hearing.
They
might
be
lobbying
us
to
vote
a
certain
way
or
other
or
consider
certain
things,
and
I
want
to
make
it
clear
that,
based
on
state
statute
based
on
state
law,
we
aren't
making
a
decision
about
whether
or
not
we
proceed
with
the
use
of
this
technology.
That's
not
a
council
decision
that
we
will
make.
H
H
A
A
The
public
comment
period
is
open
for
folks
to
talk
to
us
about
their
concerns,
or
you
know
what
they
like
about
us
being
able
to
use
drones,
but
we
will
we're
going
to
be
using
drones
and
we're
going
to
be
using
them
in
a
specific
way,
but
we
will
not
be
taking
action
in
a
further
committee
meeting
or
voting
on
anything
related
to
this
matter.
That's
before
us
today,
council,
member
wansley.
G
Thank
you
just
a
couple
of
clarifications
for
the
public.
If
council
is
not
taking
action
on
this,
who
will
be
the
decision
maker
on
this
also
chair,
vital?
You
just
mentioned
that
we're
already
using
drones,
so
it
sounds
like
there
has
been
a
decision
for
us
to
implement
this
technology
already.
So
I
just
want
to
get
clarification
if
that's
the
case
and
also
related
to
council.
Vice
president's
comments
about
us.
Not
you
know
taking
this
item
up
for
a
vote.
Who
will
be
the
ultimate
decision
maker
on
this
item.
A
What
I
said
is
that
this
this
policy,
the
use
of
drones,
is
covered
under
state
statute
and
we're
just
opening
up
a
public
comment
period
and
we'll
talk
about
what
I'm
saying
is
mpd
can
talk
about
how
we're
going
to
use
drones
if
people
need
specifics,
but
there
is
no
action
being
taken,
because
state
statute
covers
this,
and
we
have
some
folks
here
from
mpd
if
you
want
to
come
up
and
just
kind
of
quickly
explain
the
process
that
we're
going
through
right
now
with
this
that'd
be
great.
G
If
council
vice
president,
unless
our
staff
can
also
share,
who
will,
if
it's
mpd
that's
making
the
decision
or
if
there's
other
city
leaders
who
gets
to
authorize
that.
I
Ultimately,
we
will
be
making
the
decision,
and
this
is
again
an
opportunity
for
public
comment.
It
was
posted
on
the
city
website
on
monday
and
so
we're
looking
forward
to
receiving
comment.
We
have
had
several
folks
that
have
taken
that
opportunity
and
we
look
forward
to
hearing
from
more
people
included
in
what
is
posted
online.
There
is
a
draft
policy,
so
we
are
looking
again
to
the
public
comment
to
see
if
there's
modifications
that
should
be
made
to
that
policy.
G
G
Well,
thank
you
for
that.
I
hope
our
constituents
take
that
into
consideration,
as
they
make
those
comments
about
kind
of
still
the
lack
of
clarity
around
who
is
the
wii
and
who
gets
to
make
that
decision,
if
also
who
they
can
work
with
in
changing
those
decisions.
I
C
You
ma'am
chair
deputy
chief
before
you
step
away.
Could
you
just
let
us
know
what
are
some
of
the
other
agencies
in
the
metro
area
that
use
drones?
Drone
technology?
Please.
A
I
A
Is
there
any
further
discussion
seeing
none?
I
will
move
for
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
I
I
those
opposed
say,
nay
that
carries
and
the
consent
agenda
is
approved.
Thank
you
so
very
much.
Thank
you.
Ma'am.
The
next
item
of
discussion
is
item.
Five:
it's
receiving
a
community
safety
and
gun
violence,
update
from
the
police
department
commander
jason
case
we'll
be
presenting
on
this
item
commander
case.
Thank
you
so
much
for
being
here
today,
good.
J
Afternoon,
chair
is
our
presentation
up.
J
J
Specifically,
today,
we're
gonna
be
talking
about
gun
violence
where
I'm
gonna
have
austin
rice
he's
a
crime
analyst,
as
well
as
thomas
bacon,
who's
a
crime
analyst
present
on
specifics
and
provide
kind
of
an
overview
on
the
gun,
violence
landscape,
I'm
going
to
speak
on
some
of
the
responses
and
strategies
that
mpd
has
been
using
in
collaboration
with
our
partners
and
then
thomas
is
going
to
be
talking
about
some
things
that
we're
looking
to
do
in
the
future.
J
Austin's
going
to
talk
specifically
about
the
stats
going
into
a
shooting
victim
analysis,
which
we
haven't
done
before
I'm
going
to
get
a
given
overview
of
my
area
of
command,
which
is
the
strategic
operations
division,
we're
going
to
talk,
metrics,
so
outcomes
that
we've
seen
from
some
of
our
activities
that
we've
been
engaged
in
over
the
course
of
this
year
and
then
again,
like
I
spoke
to
thomas,
is
going
to
talk
about
some
ongoing
work
that
we're
looking
at
doing
so.
K
The
invite
for
us
to
come
present
to
you
all
today
when
we
look
at
just
our
violent
crime
data
so
far
this
year
compared
to
2019
and
there's
a
reason
we
chose
2019.
So
2019
is
sort
of
the
last
year-to-date
metric
for
what
our
typical
crime
data
represented
prior
to
sharp
rise
in
violent
crime
data,
as
you'll
see
here
in
the
next
couple,
slides
so
compared
to
three
years
ago.
K
Today,
from
the
time
period
of
january
1st
to
august
8th,
we've
seen
a
166
percent
increase
in
homicides
near
doubling
of
gunshot
victims
carjackings
up
over
500
percent
person,
with
the
gun
calls,
which
are
often
called
in
by
communities
or
community
members
up
30
percent
guns
recovered
also
up
13
percent.
The
amount
of
dcc's
which
are
discharged,
cartridge
casings,
so
what's
left
behind
after
a
gun,
is
fired
up,
263
percent,
when
we
look,
though,
obviously
putting
that
in
context.
K
But
when
we
look
at
where
we
were
at
the
same
time
last
year,
some
of
these
numbers
tend
to
change
kind
of
indicating
somewhat
of
a
plateau
for
certain
variables,
so
homicide.
As
of
the
8th,
we
were
even
at
56.
gunshot
victims
were
actually
down
11
city
wide
carjacking
remains
elevated
up.
21
percent,
shooting
related
calls,
which
include
shot
spotter
activation,
sound
of
shots
fired
and
shootings
combined
are
down
nine
percent.
K
Those
persons
with
the
gun
calls
continue
to
go
up
overall
rounds
detected
by
shot
spotter
are
down,
but
there's
a
caveat
to
that
that
we'll
talk
about
here
in
a
moment
and
overall
discharge,
cartridge
casings
are
up
as
well.
I
wanted
to
point
out:
we
are
about
even
with
guns
recovered
as
well,
so
we're
continuing
to
make
great
inroads
in
recovering
a
lot
of
the
firearms
that
are
being
used
out
in
our
community.
K
What
I
wanted
to
talk
about
with
sort
of
our
shots
fired
analysis
is
the
emergence
of
fully
automatic
gunfire,
something
that
has
been
covered
quite
often,
as
you
can
see
here,
the
very
first
full
auto
shot
spotter
activation
that
we
detected
was
on
august
13th
of
2020.
It
was
a
four
round
shot
spotter
activation
at
37th
and
south
fifth
avenue.
K
Since
then,
this
trend
has
only
become
more
prevalent
across
the
city
and
we're
only
able
to
use
shot
spotter
coverage
areas
to
really
get
a
good
metric
of
how
this
trend
has
changed
over
time,
so,
at
least
in
the
shot,
spotter
coverage
areas,
I'm
sorry.
So
the
main
cause
of
this
are
auto
sears,
also
known
as
switches
that
are
installed
on
firearms
and
capable
of
being
3d
printed,
but
most
commonly
purchased
online.
K
From
the
comparative
period
of
january
1st
august,
8th
this
year,
we've
had
183
with
almost
2
000
rounds
fired,
which
is
up
266
percent
from
the
same
time
period
in
2021.
K
When
we
look
at
again
going
back
to
2019
and
sort
of
a
chronological
spread
of
our
shooting
victims,
at
least
so,
as
you
can
see
here,
the
two
accesses
are
the
months
of
a
year
and
the
days
of
the
months
the
colors
represent
the
count
of
shooting
victims
on
any
given
day,
so
zero
being
white
all
the
way
up
to
the
max
in
any
given
year,
which
is
nine
or
I'm
sorry
in
this
comparative
period.
K
K
Moving
on
to
2020,
you
can
see
a
very
definitive
line
drawn
in
the
end
of
june
when
we
saw
or
I'm
sorry
the
end
of
may,
when
we
saw
riots
and
civil
unrest
emerge
throughout
our
city
and
since
then
it
has
remained
steady
at
an
elevated
rate
of
shootings.
K
K
So
a
little
over
half
of
our
total
shooting
victims
actually
reside
in
minneapolis
same
with
the
arrestees
for
firearm
offenses
54
of
those
arrested
for
firearm
offenses
report
living
in
minneapolis,
that's
down
from
2019,
which
had
63
percent
of
those
arrested
populations
as
well,
so
we're
seeing
less
minneapolis
residents
being
shot
and
participating
in
gun
violence
from
the
greater
perversion.
K
When
we
look
at
demographics,
83
percent
of
our
shooting
victims
this
year
are
black
89
percent
of
our
shooting
suspects
described
as
black
in
cases
where
a
suspect
description
is
provided
in
2021.
To
put
this
in
context
with
census.
Data
from
his
reason
is
2020..
K
Then,
when
we
look
at
sorry
when
we
look
at
the
landscape
of
gun
violence
in
minneapolis,
we
see
common
recurring
places
that
this
violence
occurs.
So,
for
example,
the
jordan
neighborhood
broadway
avenue
corridor,
which
includes
broadway
lindale
as
a
long-standing
hot
spot
lowry
and
knox
27th
in
bloomington,
franklin
and
chicago,
and
the
nicollet
avenue
corridor
between
15th
and
19th.
K
So,
to
take
a
step,
I
wouldn't
say
sideways,
but
a
different
avenue
here
for
a
brief
moment
when
we
look
at
where
guns
come
from
in
our
community.
I
wanted
to
highlight
this
for
a
moment.
So
a
straw
purchase
is
when
someone
who
is
involved
when
someone
purchases
a
gun
for
someone
who
is
prohibited
by
law
from
doing
so
or
possessing
a
firearm
and
does
not
want
their
name
associated
with
the
transaction
straw.
Purchases
are
deemed
a
federal
crime
and
punishable
by
up
to
10
years
in
prison.
K
Most
of
our
guns
do
not
come
into
the
city
via
straw
purchasing.
However,
we
do
actively
track
metrics,
indicative
of
straw
purchasing
and
we'll
get
into
that
here.
In
a
moment,
straw
purchasing
highlight
with
ties
in
minneapolis,
for
example,
sergey
and
elwood
of
crystal
minnesota
was
federally
indicted
in
2021
for
straw
purchasing
admitted
to
purchasing
97
firearms
over
the
course
of
a
year.
62
of
those
were
just
in
one
month.
K
When
we
track
these
guns,
we
track
what
is
called
gun
traces
and
what
it
does
is
gun
trace,
tells
us
a
little
bit
about
who
purchased
the
gun
and
when
and
from
where
68
of
the
firearms
were
covered
in
2022,
so
far
were
originally
purchased
from
within
minnesota,
five
percent
were
purchased
from
wisconsin
and
the
remaining
states
are
at
or
under
two
percent
of
the
total.
K
In
the
last
five
years,
an
average
of
16.3
percent
of
guns
recovered
as
evidence
were
originally
purchased
by
minneapolis
residents,
which
that
number
really
has
not
changed.
As
of
today.
It
sits
at
16.7
percent
of
the
total
when
we
map
out
where
these
guns
come
from
at
the
national
scale,
it's
quite
impressive.
K
K
K
We
have
had
624
guns
recovered
so
far
this
year,
the
city
of
minneapolis,
which
is
as
a
few
days
back
a
three
percent
increase
from
the
same
time.
Last
year,
13
firearms
recovered
this
year
have
been
recovered
within
30
days
of
its
original
purchase.
30
firearms
recovered
within
90
days
of
its
original
purchase.
K
Another
way
that
these
guns
are
entering
our
community
is
from
firearms
that
are
being
stolen.
So,
from
january
1st,
to
august
8th
we've
had
282
firearms
reported
stolen
in
minneapolis
at
least
45
percent
of
these
are
stolen
from
vehicles,
often
times
left,
unlocked
and
unsecured.
J
I
just
want
to
say
there's
a
lot
of
information
that
we're
throwing
at
you
today.
So
if
there
are
questions
we
can
cover
those
at
the
end
or
if
you
do
have
questions
along
the
way
feel
free
to
just
ask.
What
I
want
to
do
is
provide
a
little
bit
of
an
overview
of
the
strategic
operations
division.
That's
the
division
that
I'm
the
commander
of
the
reason
I
want
to
put
that
onto
the
landscape.
J
J
J
We
want
to
facilitate
state
and
federal
criminal
investigations
and
then,
like
I
said
we
do
collaborate
with
outreach
and
advocacy
groups.
Office
of
violence.
Protect
prevention
is
somebody
that
we
do
collaborate
with.
We
provide
them
data
as
far
as
locations
of
known
gang
areas
and
then
we're
certainly
available
if
they
need
our
assistance.
J
So
a
quick,
a
quick
structure,
that's
what
we
look
like
the
gun
investigations
unit
as
part
of
my
team
and
then
also
the
strategic
analysis
unit,
which
is
the
unit
that
austin
and
thomas
are
part
of,
and
then
we
also
do
deal
with
firearms
release,
which
is
a
little
less
known.
Entity
of
the
division
strategies
are
simple
conduct.
Criminal
investigations,
collaborate
with
other
law
enforcement
agencies,
I'm
going
to
cover
the
2022,
greater
minneapolis,
violent
crimes
initiative.
J
Just
in
a
very
brief
overview.
We
use
data
and
analytics
forensics
information
to
drive
our
operations,
so
this
is
something
that
we've
evolved
over
the
past,
probably
five
to
ten
years
in
law
enforcement.
Many
people,
you
know
remember
days
where
we
would
just
saturate
an
area
without
any
real
intention.
J
So
I've
referenced
previously
a
focused
enforcement
detail
and
that's
a
specific
strategy
or
tactic
that
we
that
we
use-
and
it's
really
an
intentional
act
of
collecting
a
bunch
of
different
agencies
together
to
deploy
resources
in
a
very
specific
surgical
way,
and
so
it
involves
pre-surveillance
on
a
specific
area
or
groups.
We
try
to
plan
search
warrants
or
arrest
warrants
for
known
individuals.
J
J
So
far
this
year.
Basically
our
folks
enforcement
details
or
the
summer
initiatives
has
have
really
covered
from
the
first
part
of
may
until
now,
and
that
the
the
main
focus
has
been
under
the
umbrella
of
the
greater
minneapolis
violent
crimes
initiative.
That's
a
phrase
that
I've
used
to
help
put
into
context
the
group
of
all
the
different
agencies
working
in
collaboration,
the
bca
atf
henry
county
sheriff's
office,
the
u.s
attorney's
office,
hennepin
county
attorney's
office,
and
the
list
goes
on
without
their
support.
J
J
Again,
I
mentioned
briefly
who
who
participates
in
these
enforcement
details
of
the
cert
teams
from
the
individual
precincts.
The
first
precinct
still
has
a
community
response
team
and
then
the
fourth
precinct
has
a
community
response
team.
So
when
we
plan
these
details,
they
also
come
together
under
one
umbrella.
J
J
Forensic
lead
investigations
is
nothing
new
to
law
enforcement,
but
we're
trying
to
use
it
in
a
more
creative
way,
so
we
commonly
refer
to
it
as
nyman
hits.
But
it's
nibin
stands
for
the
national
integrated
ballistics
information
network.
In
essence,
it's
a
forensic
match
between
either
dccs
or
firearms,
which
links
them
to
different
crime
sites
or
scenes.
J
So
far
this
year
we've
entered
in
1100
or
roughly
1100
dccs.
Around
50
percent
of
those
have
come
back
to
a
hit
where
they're
matched
another
crime
scene
is
being
used
as
far
as
firearms
being
recovered.
569
firearms
have
been
entered
into
our
system,
our
niamin
system
and
112
or
roughly
20,
have
come
back
with
a
hit
to
another
crime
scene.
J
What
does
that
look
like?
When
I
see
it?
We
give
everything
a
gun
number
if
it
has
a
hit
or
a
match.
So
in
this
instance,
gun
number
4041
we
can
see,
has
been
used
for
a
couple
years.
These
are
the
different
incidents
that
it's
been
used
in
and
this
is
a
geolocation
of
where
they've
been
or
where
that
gun
has
been
used.
J
How
I
use
that
information
is,
I
try
to
coordinate
with
all
the
different
investigators
so
that
they
can
work
collectively
to
try
to
find
may
who
now
be
who
might
be
in
possession
of
the
firearm
currently
because
clearly,
although
it's
taken
a
bit
of
a
time
off
since
june,
it's
a
type
of
gun-
that's
used
in
the
most
violent
types
of
crimes,
so
I'm
going
to
have
austin
come
back
up.
My
apologies
for
it's
kind
of
a
dynamic
presentation,
but
he
did
the
work
on
a
lot
of
this
detail.
K
Thank
you
commander
case,
as
we've
highlighted
for
you
before
already
the
geographic
areas
that
violent
crime
and
gun
crime
specifically
exists,
are
really
hyper,
localized
in
a
few
key
places
and
densest
in
certain
pockets
of
our
city.
When
commander
case
said
that
these
focus
enforcement
details
were
driven
by
data
analytics
data
and
analytics,
he
wasn't
joking.
K
That
was
hennepin
avenue
from
roughly
washington
to
11th
lowering
park
to
15th
in
nicollet
area,
and
then
one
that
was
sort
of
an
audible
that
was
emerging
very
quickly.
Leading
up
to
these
focus
enforcement
details
was
the
northeast
section
of
whittier,
neighborhood,
chicago
and
franklin
on
bloomington
avenue,
from
25th
to
29th.
K
When
we
look
at
the
general
idea
of
disrupting
criminal
activity,
it's
nothing
new
from
what
research
tells
us
and
some
of
the
top
criminologists
going
back
to
routine
activities.
Theory
wrote
about
in
the
1970s
and
heavily
utilized
as
a
source
for
many
modern
day.
Criminological
theories,
there's
three
core
components
to
why
a
crime
happens.
That's
motivated
offender,
a
suitable
victim
or
target
lack
of
a
capable,
capable
guardian
or
deterrent
all
occurring
in
one
geographic
area.
K
So
when
we
look
at
the
ways
to
best
disrupt
violence,
we
want
to
intersect
those
connecting
lines
of
what
makes
a
crime
able
to
be
committed,
and
when
we
look
there
on
the
left,
we
can
see
the
totality
of
density
of
proactive
police
activity
during
these
focus
enforcement
details
overlapping
very
strongly
with
many
of
these
focus
zones.
K
When
we
look
on
the
right,
we
take
one
of
those
density
maps
on
the
left
and
compare
two
time
periods.
So
we
compared
the
three
days
prior
the
three
days
after
each
of
these
focus
enforcement
details
and
sum
them
up
into
one
grand
total
of
categories.
So,
three
days,
prior
to
three
days
after
in
general,
you
can
see
the
cooling
effect
from
most
significant
increase
in
dark
blue
to
no
change
and
clear
and
even
slight
increases
in
some
areas
outside
our
focus
zones.
K
When
we
look
at
the
south
and
downtown
focus
zones,
you
can
see
something
very
similar
so
on
the
left
is
our
the
density
of
our
proactive
activity
using
avl
gps
data
from
the
squad
cars.
So
we
were
able
to
map
down
to
the
minute
of
where
these
squad
cars
were
to
make
that
density
layer.
You
can
see
again
very
strong
overlap
of
officers
spending
time
in
the
areas
that
we
dictated
them
to
based
on
where
violent
crime
was
occurring.
K
I
will
note
the
one
anomaly
of
the
dead
bullseye
there
outside
the
focus
zone
would
be
the
hennepin
county
jail
as
they
took
people
to
jail.
Obviously
the
squad
car
was
at
the
jail.
So
that's
one
density
that
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
there
wasn't
proactive
policing
really
occurring
there.
It
was
more
of
a
overlap
of
a
common
area
that
squads
spent
time.
K
Now,
when
we
look
at
the
cooling
effect,
you
can
see
again
that
woodier
neighborhood
hitting
overlapping
with
loring
park
downtown
and
the
north
end
of
the
bloomington
avenue
corridor
in
franklin
chicago
here
we
come
with
statistics
again
hennepin
avenue
down.
35
percent
lowering
park,
15
decrease
northeast
north
east
whittier,
gun
crime
dropped
almost
in
half
franklin
chicago
down,
75
percent
bloomington
avenue
corridor
saw
no
change.
K
108
guns
were
recovered,
which
is
17
of
our
total
guns
recovered
for
the
year
occurring
on
just
five
percent
of
the
days.
So
far
this
year,
when
we
look
at
narcotics
recovered
in
these
focus
enforcement
details,
you
can
see
a
few
standout
metrics,
but
I
really
would
like
to
point
out
the
total
recovered
fentanyl
pills
and
the
estimated
street
value
being
between
seventy
thousand
and
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
value.
K
When
we
look
at
wider
scope,
how
these
trends
have
changed,
or
these
precincts
overall,
so
we
have
five
precincts
precinct,
one
which
is
downtown
year
to
date,
had
seen
the
highest
increase
or
one
of
the
highest
increase
increases
of
shooting
victims,
which
was
up
63
percent.
E
K
As
one
of
the
most
concentrated
areas
of
proactive
policing,
it's
a
five
percent
decrease
in
that
same
time,
period
precinct
two
is
about
even
which
is
northeast
minneapolis
precinct
three,
which
is
southeast
minneapolis,
a
23
percent
reduction,
year-to-date
precinct
four
28
percent,
again
a
standout
top
area
that
we
spent
the
most
proactive
time
since
may.
First,
just
since
may.
First
to
the
fifth
that
was
a
forty
percent
decrease
in
gunshot
wound,
victims
and
summer
is
usually
the
time
that
we
see
the
most
and
most
drastic
increases
and
changes
in
shooting
victims.
K
J
That
oh
yeah
just
jump
in
here,
real,
quick
and
then
I'll
introduce
thomas.
I
want
to
go
back
here
just
to
clarify
something
these
totals
these
metrics.
This
was
within
over
12
days,
so
it
wasn't
12
consecutive
days.
There
was
one
period
in
time
in
june
where
we
ran.
I
believe
it
was
four
or
five
consecutive
days,
so
this
isn't
there's
all
there's
more
of
this.
That's
been
taking
every
day
we
go
and
do
the
same
type
work.
So
these
metrics
are
specifically
from
focus
enforcement
details.
J
L
All
right,
thank
you,
so
I'm
going
to
talk
about
some
of
the
emerging
trends
that
we're
seeing
from
all
of
this
activity.
L
Analyzing
all
this
data
and
some
of
the
next
steps
we're
going
to
start
taking
going
forward
so
to
kind
of
give
a
verbal
high
level
overview
of
what
this
analysis
is
going
to
really
show
you.
Looking
at
these
predictive
or
dependent
variables
that
explain,
gun
violence,
so
shooting
calls
sounds
for
shots.
Fire
sounds
of
shots,
fired
calls
and
where
shot
spotter
technology
exists.
L
So
this
is
not
necessarily
a
shooting,
but
it's
somebody
calling
in
maybe
they
were
involved
in
a
shooting
personally,
as
a
victim
witness
or
somebody
disassociated
from
the
event
of
the
shooting
called
in
that's
what
we're
analyzing
here
is
these
computer-aided
dispatch
calls
for
service
describing
shootings,
and
so
the
top
neighborhoods
that
had
the
highest
volume
of
shooting
calls
from
may
11
to
july.
28Th
also
saw
the
highest
totals
of
fentanyl
being
recovered.
L
What
really
stood
out
here.
The
observations
that
I'm
taking
away
from
this
analysis
is
fentanyl
had
a
incredibly
high
significance,
and
so
several
different
models
were
ran
using
exploratory
regression,
and
this
by
far
was
the
most
reliable.
What
I'm
presenting
to
you
today,
but
also
what
should
be
noted,
is
there
were
81
000
trials
ran
of
this
particular
model,
so
being
that
it's
the
most
reliable.
L
So
a
100
percent
positive
relationship
means
that
when
fentanyl
is
going
up,
shooting
calls
are
also
going
up
in
these
same
neighborhoods,
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
it's
causing
these
phenomena,
but
it
is
100
percent
correlative
to
these
phenomena
that
we're
trying
to
explain,
and
then
I
wanted
to
leave
some
of
rounds
detected
in
here
as
kind
of
a
control
variable,
because,
given
the
caveat
that
shot,
spotter
technology
only
exists
in
certain
neighborhoods
of
minneapolis.
L
It's
still
what
we
would
expect.
So
when
citizens
are
calling
in
telling
us
that
they
heard
a
shooting,
they
saw
a
shooting.
We
would
also
expect
that
shot
spotter
available
in
those
neighborhoods
would
also
detect
some
level
of
rounds
being
fired.
So
when
we
see
nearly
100
percent
positive
relationship
that
just
kind
of
further
validates
the
model-
and
it
shows
us
that
these
are
variables
that
we
would
expect
to
explain
these
dependent
variables,
aka
shooting
calls
and
then
what
I
also
wanted
to
call
out
here.
L
One
of
the
more
critical
takeaways
for
me
was
the
proportion
of
home
ownership,
so
in
this
particular
model
we're
only
looking
at
these
three
variables,
but
I
wanted
to
just
call
out
that
there
were
several
other
variables
that
were
progressively
ran
through
these
models
and
through
these
trials,
and
so
it
wasn't
just
home
ownership.
L
We
also
looked
at
rent
proportion
of
renting
proportion
of
vacant
housing,
as
well
as
many
other
narcotic
values,
so
marijuana
heroin,
meth,
cocaine,
crack
none
of
those
were
nearly
as
significant
as
what
fentanyl
was,
but
specifically
going
back
to
the
proportion
of
home
ownership.
What
I
just
really
wanted
to
call
out
was,
while
it
was
only
56
significant
and
for
the
purposes
of
this
conversation
and
this
discussion,
we
can
essentially
think
of
the
significance
value
as
the
proportion
of
home
ownership
as
a
variable
when
explaining
shooting
calls
per
neighborhood.
L
It
was
essentially
present
in
these
passing
models
and
these
passing
trials
through
exploratory
regression,
but
then
I
wanted
to
call
out
that
96
percent
of
the
time
it
was
negative,
so
in
neighborhoods
that
have
higher
proportions
of
home
ownership.
What
that
speaks
to
is
they
tend
to
not
see
as
many
shooting
calls
in
this
same
time
period.
L
This
is
just
another
accessible
metric
that
is
present
in
almost
every
neighborhood
of
the
city
of
minneapolis,
whereas
shotspotter
again
giving
the
caveat
that
it
only
covers
certain
portions
of
minneapolis,
but
as
ro
as
models
and
trials
aren't
nearly
as
reliable
and
I'll
talk
about
that
in
a
second
compared
to
the
shooting
call
metrics.
I
did
want
to
call
out
that
these
explanatory
valuables
were
variables
when
predicting
these
dependent
variables
of
sound
of
shots,
fired
and
shot.
L
Spotter
activations
consistently
rose
to
the
top,
and
I
thought
that
they
were
pretty
noteworthy
in
the
sense
that
populations
of
young
individuals
of
the
citizens
of
citizens
of
minneapolis,
so
that
being
buckets
of
five
years
of
age,
so
zero
to
four
five
to
nine
and
ten
to
fourteen
years
of
age.
Neighborhoods
that
have
younger
individuals
in
a
higher
proportion.
L
Higher
population
total
also
significantly
saw
a
positive
relationship,
a
very
strong
positive
relationship
to
higher
proportions
and
higher
volumes
of
sound
of
shots,
fired
and
shot
spotter
rounds
being
detected
as
well
as
again
getting
back
to
these
ownership.
Demographics
of
the
renter
population
was
fairly
significant
in
being
a
positive,
correlating
value
and
home
ownership
being
a
negative
correlating
value.
L
So
what
I
wanted
to
just
briefly
wrap
up
here
with
these
explanatory
values,
especially
talking
about
population,
is
that
there
was
the
reason
why
we're
not
presenting
on
any
metrics
specifically
for
these
yet
and
we're
going
to
continue
testing
is.
There
is
a
lot
of
what's
called
multi-co-linearity,
and
that
means
that
these
values,
specifically
these
variables
specifically,
were
present
and
indicative
of
many
other
variables.
So
when
again,
we're
looking
at
fentanyl
heroin,
various
narcotics
guns
being
recovered
handguns
long
guns,
cash,
every
other
kind
of
call
for
service,
so
robbery
sound
of
shots
being
fired.
L
These
variables,
in
particular,
these
population
parameters
were
present
and
almost
better
predictors
than
any
other
one
of
those
given
variables.
So
I
hope
that
makes
sense
in
what
I'm
explaining
in
that.
These
variables
specifically,
are
incredibly
predictive
of
these
two
phenomena
being
sound
of
shots,
fired
and
shot
spotter
activations.
J
J
The
big
takeaway
for
me
was
some
of
the
work
that
thomas
did
and
this
these
variables
of
fentanyl
and
homeownership
et
cetera.
I
think
that's
going
to
give
an
opportunity
for
leadership
across
the
enterprise
to
look
at
gun
violence
in
creative
ways.
I
think
we
all
want
to
make
some
type
of
an
impact
with
gun
violence.
The
police
have
their
bucket.
J
J
A
You
that,
yes,
thank
you
for
that
presentation.
Thank
all
of
you
for
the
presentation,
council,
member
payne.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
started
writing
my
questions
down
as
you're
going
so
I'll.
Just
go
in
reverse
order,
starting
with
the
explanatory
variables
I'm
wondering
not
like
a
catalog
of
every
single
variable
you
tested,
but
can
you
just
give
me
a
sense
of
how
many
like
the
types
of
variables
you're
looking
at
how
many
you
modeled
and
that
these
were
this,
the
top
three
that
bubbled
up
and
if
you
know
you
tested
hundreds
or
you
know,
whatever
order
of
magnitude
you
tested?
D
J
I'm
going
to
try
to
answer
it
and,
if
there's
a
more
technical
response,
thomas
can
jump
in,
but
from
what
I
understand,
there's
in
excess
of
80
000
trials
that
were
conducted
using
these
variables
and
he's
looking
at
me
like.
He
should
probably
get
up
here
and
talk,
but
he
spoke
to
many
of
the
variables
we
used.
J
I
think
what
was
interesting
and
when
I
talked
to
him
to
try
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
it
was
fentanyl
was
by
and
large
the
standout
the
outlier,
so
he
compared
all
different
types
of
narcotics
that
we
tend
to
recover
during
these
focus
enforcement
details
in
general
and
that's
the
that's
the
standout.
I
think
historically,
we've
had
this
anecdotal
or
intrinsic
belief
that
narcotics,
the
illicit
drug
trade,
is
somehow
connected
to
violence,
and
we
know
that
to
be
true.
J
This
is
the
first
time
that
I've
looked
at
data
from
within
minneapolis,
where
there's
been
an
outlier
of
a
specific
type
of
drug.
That
is,
has
that's
the
strong
positive
relationship.
So,
in
my
mind,
that's
a
potential
path
forward
to
say
we
don't
have
unlimited
resources,
none
of
us
do
so.
What
can
we
focus
on
was
the
biggest
impact
and,
in
my
mind,
the
work
that
he
did
drives
us
towards
at
least
a
potential
path
for
high
impact
to
gun
violence,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
that
answers
your
questions
significantly
enough
thomas.
L
Yeah
I
mean
I
could
just
clarify
yeah
so
again,
like
commander
case
said,
I
analyzed
every
single
variable
that
was
given
to
me
that
was
available
to
me.
So
every
single
call
for
service
that
what
we
would
describe
as
gun
violence
related,
as
well
as
every
data
point
that
the
gun
team
tracks.
L
So
all
of
these
drug
variables,
these
narcotic
variables
fentanyl
by
far
stood
out
the
most
and
what
exploratory
regression
does
is
it
allows
you
to
start
defining
a
path
for
more
robust
statistics
and
more
robust
models,
and
so
there,
whatever
trial,
you're
running,
is
or
whatever
model
you're
running,
is
actually
a
subset
of
all
of
the
different
variables
that
you're
looking
at.
So
if
I
were
looking
at
50
different
variables,
it's
picking
it's
running,
81,
000
or
more
trials
of
different
combinations
of
those
variables,
and
so
there's
40
total.
L
Yeah,
no,
so
yes,
there
was
no
pims
data
per
se
analyzed
here.
It
was
all
calls
for
service
and
computer-aided
dispatch
as.
B
D
Okay
and
then
for
some
of
our
our
tracing,
I
have
two
kind
of
more
data
questions.
One
was
the
nibin
database
and
then
the
the
tracing
or
tracking
system.
I'm
curious
if
there
are
major
gaps,
because,
like
my
loose
understanding
of
some
of
our
federal
gun
in
for
like
gun
control
infrastructure,
it
seems
like
there's
quite
a
few
gaps
when
it
comes
to
tracking
and
tracing.
I'm
just
wondering
you
know
are:
are
there?
J
I
would
say
no
not
when,
in
terms
of
the
nyman
system,
it's
a
very
robust
system
and
it's
been
validated
over
and
over
as
having
a
high
percentage
of
accuracy,
and
we
have
a
great
relationship
with
the
atf,
especially
their
intel
center,
their
gun
crime
intelligence
center.
So
our
forensics
division
is
really
the
one
who
manages
our
nibin
program
in
cooperation
with
the
atf,
and
it's
been
an
incredibly
valuable
asset
to
us
and
nearly
always
accurate,
there's
been
some
times
where
you'll
get
a
false
positive.
D
D
J
D
And
then
last
question
is
we
started
the
presentation
with
just
kind
of
some
overall
statistics,
one
of
those
being
carjacking
and
I
feel
like
I
read
somewhere
that
we
didn't
historically
track
carjacking
as
an
independent
incident.
It
used
to
be
a
part
of
maybe
just
larceny.
If
I
recall
do
do
we
know
when
we
started
tracking
car
carjacking
and
is
there
so.
J
J
E
J
The
capacity
to
track
we've
always
looked
at
it,
but
we've
become
more
intentional
about
tracking
it.
We
made
an
actual
offense
code,
so
something
within
pims.
It's
not
a
it's,
not
a
change
in
state
law
or
anything
like
that.
As
far
as
a
carjacking
has
always
been
part
of
the
robbery
subset,
and
so
we've
just
been
more
intentional
with
with
coding
it
as
a
way
to
track
it,
but
we've
always
had
the
capacity
to
track
it.
D
J
K
K
Analysts
and
the
police
officers
so
what
it
is
pre
the
carjack
offense
code.
It
was
a
robbery
with
the
listed
property
lost
of
a
vehicle
being
stolen,
and
that
goes
back
as
far
as
we
can
with
rms.
Of
course,
when
we
start
a
new
rms,
there's
complications
with
that
of
inherent
just
not
quite
apples
to
apples
of
things,
officers
getting
used
to
filling
out
the
form
differently.
But
it's
a
pretty
simple
query:
it's
any
robbery,
code,
robbery
person
or
aggravated
robbery
with
the
listed
property
loss
of
a
vehicle.
That's
a
car
jacking!
So.
K
Away
from
something
that
would
be
an
auto
theft,
so
robbery
is
somebody
taking
it
by
force
or
with
a
weapon,
so
two
very
distinct
codes.
There
is
no
muddling
of
the
water
there
it.
I
am
very
confident
that,
prior
to
the
beginning
of
that
code,
I
was
able
to
query
it
with
high
confidence.
Okay,
thank
you.
G
Thank
you,
chair
vita,
and
I
just
want
to
say
also
thank
you
to
the
chairs
for
orchestrating
this
presentation
being
in
this
particular
moment
makes
me
think
of
specifically
the
war
on
drugs,
something
that
has
impacted
millions
and
millions
of,
as
even
your
data
show
african-american
households
where
I
think
we're
constantly
hearing
across
our
respective
wards.
G
Of
course,
the
concerns
around
public
safety
and
rising
crime,
and
I
think
of
the
war
of
drugs
that
took
20
plus
years
of
my
cousins
and
many
of
my
relatives
lives
for
lower
level
offenses
or
marijuana
related
offenses
under
this
guys
that
crime
was
rising
and
we
employed
a
huge
amount
of
resources
into
police
only
and
criminalizing
more.
You
know
related
policies
to
deal
with
that,
and
only
to
find
out
20
years
later
that
crime
was
not
data
show
that
that
those
things
were
not
to
be
true.
G
So
I'm
really
grateful
that
we
took
the
opportunity
today
to
really
honor
actual
data
that
can
help,
I
think,
influence
how
we
better
bring
solutions
forward,
as
opposed
to
just
one-stop
shop
police
only
and
making
sure
we
don't
replicate
the
failures
of
that
multi-decade
period
quote
unquote
the
war
on
crime,
but
a
couple
questions
that
I
had
is
related
to
fedenon.
Arrests
just
want
to
be
clear.
Are
those
arrests
also
taken
into
an
account
of
of
users?
G
Have
they
also
been
included
in
this
data
analysis,
or
are
we
not
arresting
users
if
you're
finding
fentanyl
on
you
know
those
who
have
substance
issues.
J
G
That's
good
to
know.
Second
question
you
also
talked
about
part
of
your
strategy
is,
and
you
said
this
is
you
know,
a
new
president
of
working
with
a
number
of
law
enforcement
agencies
and
coordinated.
You
know
some
of
these
details.
I
also
want
to
note
you
know
just
in
february.
We
also
saw
a
negative
consequence
of
that
that
coordination,
where
we
saw
the
use
of
that
search
warrant,
specifically
a
issuing
from
us
a
no
knock
warrant
that
led
to
the
shooting
and
killing
of
amir
lot.
G
So
can
you
share
kind
of
the
status
within
this
coordinated
body
of
like
compliance
with?
I
know
we
just
mayor
frye
issue,
a
new
ban
on
no
knock
warrants
this
spring,
just
the
status
of
compliance
with
that
amongst
this
entire
body.
J
Yeah,
so
any
agency
that
participates
in
a
focused
enforcement
detail
follows
their
own
set
of
policies
and
procedures.
So
minneapolis
we
have
our
set
policy
procedures.
We
follow
that
as
set
forth
by
the
chief
and
by
the
mayor,
any
other
participating
agency.
If
they
have
a
search
warrant,
they
follow
their
policy
for
that
search,
warrant.
Awesome.
G
And
then
last
question:
you
also
noted
we're
working
with
limited
resources.
I
know
part
of
the
dynamic
within
our
mpd
or
armed
public
safety
services.
You
know
that
component
we're
dealing
with
you
know
short
staff,
and
I
know
in
conversations
that
I've
had
with
law
enforcers
one
of
the
ways
in
which
we're
trying
to
mitigate
that-
and
I
think
I
saw
this
on
your
presentation-
is
using
some
of
the
other
non-armed
civilian
services
that
exist
across
the
enterprise
like
ovp.
G
Can
you
also
speak
to
if
you
know
those
decreases
that
we're
seeing
in
some
of
those
hot?
You
know
zones
or
hot
spots
across
minneapolis?
If
you
know
our
ovp
community
violence
interrupted
some
of
those
preventative
because,
from
my
understanding,
they're,
both
preventative
but
also
responsive
to
you
know
many
of
these
designated
areas.
Have
they
also
been
kind
of
complementary
to
some
of
these
efforts
and
in
decreasing
that
that
visibility
of
gun
violence.
J
Sure
I
know
staffing
is
something
that
always
comes
up,
but
I
think
me
personally,
I'm
not
at
the
point
of
exhaustion
about
talking
about
it.
I
think
everybody
is
in
that
space
where
they
just
want
to
be
able
to
get
back
to
getting
some
work
done.
We
have
what
we
have
and
I
think
one
of
the
creative
solutions
is
partnering
with
groups
like
ovp.
I
don't
have
specific
data
on
where
they've
been.
J
I
know
we've
communicated
different
areas
where
the
hotspot
is
for
gun
violence
and
we've
shared
that
with
the
director
of
ovp
or
the
prior
director
sasha
cotton,
and
I
know
we've
seen
them
alter
when
we've
been
on
our
details
in
the
broadway
lindell
area,
but
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
sure
the
metrics
as
far
as
how
much
time
they've
spent
there
and
what
type
of
coordination
they
would
be
planning
in
follow-up
to
our
focus
enforcement
details.
G
Yeah,
I
know
also
our
chairs
brought
a
presentation
from
our
ovp
team.
I
think
back
in
june,
where
they
presented
some
data
to
of
you
know,
interruptions
they
related
that
to
shootings
as
well
and
some
and
from
my
understanding,
the
way
that
the
program
is
set
up.
They
are
designated
to
somewhat
similar,
like
hot
zones
like
there's
a
north
minneapolis,
there's
a
south
side,
certain
areas
so
seeing
if
there
was
a
yes,
any
coordination
of
that
data
to
see.
G
Okay,
in
addition
to
you
know,
armed
details,
we're
also
devoting
some
of
these
other
non-armed
services
to
see
if
that
that
holistic
approach
is
leading
to
some
of
these
decreases
that
I
think
we
want
of
course
want
to
see,
but,
seeing
you
know,
there's
a
multi-pronged
approach
that
it
seems
like
the
city
is
employing
to
also
do
that
and
having
that
data
kind
of
capture
that
so
there's
any
way
to
connect
josh
or
some
of
that
data
and
correlate
that.
I
think
that
would
be
great.
J
No,
I
think
it's
a
great
point.
I
think
it's
something
that
we're
we're
trying
to
do.
We
don't
want
to
do
things
in
a
silo
because
it's
been
ineffective,
so
yeah
I
can
reach
out
to
josh,
and
you
know
we
can
definitely
do
a
better
job
or
improve
on
what
we're
doing
as
far
as
communicating
impact
and
what
we're
planning
to
do
in
the
future
and
what
we've
done
and.
G
Then,
just
knowing
too,
I
know
we
have
council
vice
president
palmistano
here,
I
know
you're
leading
the
charge
and
organizing
this
office
of
community
safety
study
group
that
it
sounds
like
also.
Our
new
commissioner
of
public
safety
should
probably
be
in
this
conversation
since
one
of
his
charges
helping
centralize
and
coordinate
you
know
all
these
different
services
to
get
to
you
know
the
share
standardized
like
data
analysis
too.
G
That's
guiding
our
public
safety
work,
so
we'll
love
to
see
that
also
be
a
place
where
we
can
have
you
and
some
of
our
other
partners.
The
commissioner
be
able
to
kind
of
dig
deep
in
how
we
can
strengthen,
strengthen
that.
So
just
knowing
that,
as
I
know,
council
vice
president
is
making
plans
for
that
study
session.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
commander.
I
I
realize
we're
getting
a
lot
of
help
from
the
federal
government
and
the
states,
the
atf
fbi
and
so
forth
with
a
carjacking.
Do
you
feel
that
their
efforts
are
starting
to
decrease
it?
Is
it
leveling
off
how?
Why
is
that
number
so,
bigger
than
last
time
last
year,.
J
J
J
So
we've
kind
of
corralled
different
investigative
entities
within
the
department
and
we've
worked
much
more
closely
with
the
county
attorney
and
the
u.s
attorney's
office
to
prosecute
the
people
that
we
can
and
to
seek
federal
charges
when
we
can,
which
historically
hadn't
necessarily
been
something
that
we
thought
of
doing,
or
that
was
you
know
a
common
occurrence.
So
I
I
think,
there's
probably
some
of
it
has
to
do
with
the
juvenile
population.
C
C
Thank
you
and
when
you
do
see
those
federal
and
state
authorities
and
and
the
county,
the
sheriff's
department
tell
them.
Thank
you
from
council
member
rainville.
I.
A
Will
do
that?
Sir?
Thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much
commander
case
for
this
presentation.
Thank
you,
austin
and,
thank
you
thomas.
You
know
you
all
have
been
so
gracious
working
with
the
ward
4
office
since
we
got
down
here
to
city
hall
and
educating
us
about.
What's
going
on
in
the
department
currently
and
future
plans,
we
were
fortunate
enough
to
attend
a
roll
call.
A
couple
months
ago,
myself
in
the
ward
4
team.
That
was
a
part
of
the
focus
enforcement
detail.
So
it
was
before
you
all
went
out.
A
So
we
got
an
opportunity
to
see
how
it's
coordinated,
what's
going
on,
got
details
about
hot
spots
and
why
they
are
hot
spots,
and
you
know
the
work
you
would
be
doing
and
going
out
to
those
hot
spots.
So
we're
grateful
for
that.
Thank
you.
A
I
just
want
to
say
at
my
ward
or
parts
of
most
of
north
I've
gotten
a
lot
of
positive
feedback
about
the
detailed
enforcement
people
really
appreciate
it,
especially
in
areas
like
36th
and
penn,
where
you
know,
we've
seen
a
decrease
of
just
people
hanging
out
in
some
of
those
spaces.
Laurie
avenue
the
gas
station
that
has
a
problem
has
always
been
a
problem.
You
know
I've
had
people
in
that
neighborhood
who
have
bullet
holes
in
their
houses.
A
Things
have
kids
going
to
the
store
and
they're
scared
reach
out
to
my
office
and
say
we
see
the
difference
since
this
operation
safe
summer
has
been
happening
in
in
this
area.
So,
thank
you
all
so
much
for
this,
and
in
particular
I
want
to
thank
austin
rice
for
the
data.
You
know
he
does
a
really
good
job
at
giving
us
the
actuals
like
what's
happening
where
it's
happening,
how
it's
happening.
A
I
know
council
member
weinsley
had
made
a
point
about
the
coordination
with
ovp
and
when
I
talked
to
ovp
leadership,
they
told
me
that
the
shot
spotter
activation
is
actually
what
they
use
to
deploy
folks
for
interrupters,
so
they
use
the
shot
spotter
activations
like
where
it's
most
active
at
and
that's
how
they
deploy
folks
out,
but
I'm
not
sure
like,
if
that's
the
only
way,
but
that
is
one
way
that
they
use
and
so
that
data
is
used
throughout
the
enterprise
for
people
to
respond
to
what's
going
on
in
different
communities.
A
So
again,
I
just
want
to
thank
you.
I
want
to
thank
all
the
agencies.
That's
been
a
part
of
this
work,
that's
helping
us
because
we
have
so
few
resources
in
our
city
right
now,
but
as
we
see
the
numbers
are
up,
you
know
way
up
and
some
of
these,
the
the
number
of
shootings,
the
number
of
carjackings,
the
number
of
robberies.
All
these
numbers
are
up.
A
We
have
fewer
officers,
we
have
fewer
resources,
and
so
I'm
grateful
that
these
other
agencies
have
partnered
with
you,
the
you
know,
mpd
and
in
helping
us
see
this
through.
I
just
a
quick
question
I
wanted
to
know
are
some
of
the
surrounding
suburbs,
seeing
the
same
things
like
the
the
connection
to
fentanyl
and
guns,
and
and
are
you
talking
to
someone
like
just
say,
first-tier
suburbs,
about
what
they're
seeing
in
crime,
spikes
or
drugs
spikes.
J
Expanded
frequency
of
these
types
of
crimes
in
those
communities,
mostly
with
brooklyn
parks,
brooklyn
center
we've
just
more
recently
started
partnering
with
st
paul
pd,
which
we
we
could
have
done
a
better
job,
historically
partnering
with
them.
So
we're
working
really
hard
to
partner
with
them
and
coordinate
our
activities
and
make
a
bigger
impact
because
we
are
seeing
cross
river
activity
as
something
that
is
continuing
to
be
a
problem
for
for
both
cities.
J
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
specific,
he
goes.
He
attends
some
of
the
regional
intel
meetings,
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
something
specific,
you
can
answer.
K
Sure
yeah,
so
I
regularly
attend
regional
meetings
with
other
crime
analysts
from
surrounding
suburbs,
and
one
thing
to
point
out
too
is
so
I
pointed
out
early
on
in
the
presentation
that
we've
seen
a
pretty
sharp
decrease
in
the
amount
of
gunshot
wound,
victims
and
perpetrators
of
gun
violence
that
are
here
from
here
in
minneapolis.
K
They
have
to
go
home
somewhere
and
that's
out
in
first
second
ring
suburbs,
so
we
have
more
people
coming
in.
K
So
it's
not
outside
the
realm
of
reason
to
believe
that
some
of
that
activity
occurs
where
they
reside
as
well
and
there's
things
that
we
even
do
outside
of
the
realm
of
violent
crime,
specifically
that
is
really
informative,
such
as
tracking
auto
thefts
and
where
cars
are
being
stolen
and
where
they're
recovered
and
where
cars
are
being
swapped
for
other
cars
out
in
western
suburbs,
like
minnetonka,
eden,
prairie
chain,
hassan
and
understanding
how
people
are
moving
as
they
commit
crimes
as
well,
and
we
share
that
openly
and
willingly
with
our
surrounding
agencies
and
vice
versa.
A
Come
back,
you
said
it
was
just
something
I
heard
you
say
that
there
was
no
activity
on
glenwood,
so
you
didn't
do
anything
there.
Does
that
mean?
There
was
just
nothing
happening
there.
K
Yeah,
so
you
know
part
of
these
focus
enforcement
details
is
being
the
most
impactful
with
what
the
data
is
telling
us
historically
and
in
real
time
and
leading
up
to
each
one
of
these
focus
enforcement
details.
The
area
of
pen
and
glenwood
really
was
not
very
active,
except
for
the
very
first
detail.
We
saw
a
lot
of
person
with
a
gun
calls.
I
put
it
up
on
the
screen.
K
They
spent
a
little
bit
of
time
there,
but
you
know,
as
we
continued
to
do,
these
other
areas
proved
to
be
more
dense
and
were
areas
where
we
could
be
more
impactful.
So
we
evaluated
that
in
real
time
and
we're
very
purposeful
with
how
we
were
deploying
resources
with
each
and
every
focus
of
horseman
details.
K
Before
each
and
every
detail-
and
I
present
that
information
before
each
roll
call.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
this
really
thorough
presentation.
When
we
asked
for
this
update,
you
know
I
wasn't,
you
know,
didn't
realize
that
we
were
going
to
get
such
a
deep
analysis
of
this
data,
and
I
think
it's
so
important
that
we
have
this
conversation
based
in
fact,
because
a
lot
of
our
public
safety
conversation
has
been
as
much
narrative
as
it
has
been
fact,
and
I
think
that
for
us
to
really
solve
this
problem,
we
really
need
to
be
data
driven
in
our
approach.
D
And
so
I
just
I'm
really
grateful
for
the
the
depth
and
thoroughness
of
this
presentation.
So
just
wanted
to
say
that
and
then
wondering
if
you
could
share
the
presentation
with
us
and
then
I
would
love
to
connect
with
you,
thomas
and
austin
offline,
to
maybe
get
a
little
bit
more
nerdy
about
the
data
analysis
and
I'd
like
to
maybe
just
maybe
just
kind
of
see
it
in
action
and
maybe
look
over
your
shoulder
and
just
kind
of
get
a
deeper
understanding
of
some
of
our
analytical
tools
so
that
we
can
continue
thinking
about
this.
A
J
Case
too,
I'm
great
I'm
very
proud
of
them.
I
mean
it
is
something
that
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
be
up
here
and
talk
about
the
successes
if
they
wouldn't
have
been
able
to
put
it
together
in
a
visual
sense
and
point
us
in
the
right
direction.
So
yeah,
I
definitely
them.
I
appreciate
them,
probably
more
than
I
ever
tell
them,
but.
A
You
just
told
them
I
did
on
tv.
I
appreciate
all
of
you.
Thank
you
for
this
presentation.
Thank
you
to
your
team.
You
know
who's
out
here
doing
this
work.
It
really
does
mean
a
great
deal
to
me
as
the
chair
of
this
committee,
that
we
get
to
witness
the
work
that
you're
doing
in
real
time.
So
keep
it
up.
Thank
you
all
so
very
much
seeing
no
further
discussion.
I
will
direct
the
clerk
to
receive
and
file
this
report,
seeing
no
further
business
before
us
and
without
objection.
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.