►
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
A
A
Item
seven
is
additional
community
development
block
grant
funding
for
628
franklin
avenue
item
eight
is
minnesota
project
funding
item
nine
is
metropolitan
council
livable
community
account
pre-development
grant
for
gema
river
item.
10
is
minnesota's
state
historic
preservation
office.
Certified
local
government
grant
for
washburn
fair
oak
historic
district
item.
11
is
rezoning
for
passim
sudbury,
2933
pleasant
avenue.
A
D
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
aware
that
the
city
is
engaged
in
litigation
regarding
the
process
used
to
adopt
its
comprehensive
plan,
minneapolis
2040
as
part
of
that
litigation
a
little
while
ago,
the
district
court
earlier
in
the
summer
issued
a
a
stay
which
prevented
the
city
from
engaging
in
many
activities
connected
to
implementation
of
that
comprehensive
plan,
and
certainly
rezonings
would
be
at
the
forefront
of
that
and
would
be
one
of
the
things
that
were
stayed
under
the
terms
of
the
district
court
order.
D
At
the
time,
however,
the
city
is
appealing
that
order
to
the
minnesota
state
court
of
appeals
and,
as
part
of
that
process
asked,
the
district
court
judge
filed
a
motion
to
to
for
him
to
stay
his
order
pending
the
appeal
and
that
was
granted
just
recently,
and
so,
at
least
during
the
pending
appeal
at
the
state
court
of
appeals.
D
Regarding
the
the
adoption
of
comprehensive
plan,
nothing,
the
city
is
under
no
restraints
or
constraints
regarding
moving
forward
with
any
of
these
minneapolis
2040
related
items
any
longer
and
rezoning
certainly
were
one
of
the
items
that
were
directly
affected
and
they
were
held
in
a
bands
while
the
stay
was
in
place.
But
now
that
the
state
has
been
lifted
through
the
judicial
process,
they're
able
to
move
forward.
A
C
C
E
Malt
shop
and
grill
owned
by
the
malt
shop
bar
and
grill
llc,
the
business
is
located
at
809
50th
street
west
in
ward
13..
The
applicant
is
requesting
an
on
sale
liquor
with
sunday.
Sales
with
limited
entertainment
proposed
hours
are
monday
through
sunday
11
a.m.
To
9
00
pm
on
the
interior.
There
is
no
exterior
on
july
18
2022
150
notices
were
sent
to
residents
and
property
owners
within
600
feet
of
the
premises.
E
Notices
were
also
sent
to
the
lynn,
hurst
neighborhood
association
and
council
member
paul
mozano.
We
received
two
responses
from
the
community
which
support
the
business
and
one
which
opposes
the
license.
Concerns
were
parking
and
patrons
disturbing
the
neighborhood.
There
have
been
no
complaints,
311
calls
or
police
calls
associated
with
the
business.
There
are
no
operating
conditions
or
other
licenses
licenses
and
consumer
services
division
recommends
approval
of
on-sale
liquor
license
with
sunday
sales
and
limited
entertainment.
E
A
F
F
that
business
has
been
there.
As
you
know,
for
50
years,
it's
a
family-owned
restaurant
we're
also
the
proprietors
of
tinto
kitchen.
I've
had
a
full
liquor
license
for
12
years
now.
Without
any
instances,
I've
had
no
complaints.
I
used
to
have
ben
weinbar
in
saint
paul,
then
tinto
kitchen.
F
I
have
a
very
responsible
staff.
That
is
very
that
ensures
that
minors
are
not
served
and
again
we're
excited
to
be
part
of
the
community
and
bulk
ending
the
lindhurst
neighborhood,
starting
with
tinto
on
one
side
and
the
mulch
up
on
the
other
and
the
neighborhood's
very
excited
for
us
to
be.
Here.
We
received
a
lot
of
support.
F
A
F
A
Is
there
any
any
other
speaker
and
see
no
further
speakers
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
call
on
council
member
allison
for
motion.
G
F
We
initially
we're
going
to
be
monday
through
sunday
11
to
nine,
and
my
staff
is
tired.
He
knows
what
you
saw.
We
just
decided
that
you
know
I
don't
want
to
overwork
my
stuff,
so
we're
just
taking.
E
G
Cool
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
that.
Thank
you
so
much
for
doing
business
in
the
city
and
really
excited
well,
I'm
sure
we'll
have
to
stop
by
I'm
happy
to
move
approval.
C
A
E
Thank
you,
chair
osman
and
committee
members.
Again,
I'm
amy
lingua
inner
manager
of
business
licensing,
I'm
presenting
an
application
for
sushi
train
owned
by
sushi
train
calhoun
incorporated
this
business
will
be
located
at
3236
west
lake
street
in
ward
7..
The
applicant
is
requesting
on
sale,
liquor
with
sunday
sales
and
no
live
entertainment
proposed
hours
of
operation
monday
through
thursday,
11
30
a.m,
to
10
p.m.
Friday,
through
saturday,
11
30
a.m
to
10,
30
p.m,
sunday,
12
p.m,
to
10
p.m.
E
There
are
no
exterior
hours
on
july,
18
2022,
350,
350
notices
were
sent
to
property
owners
within
600
feet
of
the
premises.
Notices
were
also
sent
to
cedar
isles
dean,
neighborhood
association
and
council
member
lisa
goodman
we've
received
one
response
from
the
community,
which
is
in
support
of
the
business.
There
have
been
no
complaints,
311
calls
or
police
calls
associated
with
the
business.
There
are
no
operating
conditions
or
other
issues.
E
A
H
We
have
another
sushi
train
on
a
1200
nickel,
mall
we've
been
there
since
2008
and
we
are
doing
very
good
on
the
location,
so
we're
having
our
second
location
at
32,
36
west
lake
street,
we're
going
to
serve
majority
of
our
business
is
going
to
be
going
to
be
sushi
and
about
90
90
of
the
business
is
going
to
be
sushi
and
we're
very
excited
to
have
our
second
location.
A
C
I
would
like
to
speak
in
support
of
this
effort.
I
I'll
let
councilmember
also
make
the
motion.
I
need
to
make
the
motion
I'll
move
to
approve
this,
but
again
my
heartfelt
thanks
for
investing
in
our
city.
I've
been
to
your
restaurant
downtown.
It's
wonderful!
I
wish
you
the
best
of
luck
on
lake
street,
but
you're
appreciated.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
ryanville
has
moved
approval,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
and
all
those
are
both
saying
a
eyes
have
it
and
the
motion
has
carried.
A
Our
next
item
is
quasa
judicial
hearing
on
appeal
on
decision
on
the
city
heritage
preservation.
Commission.
The
committee
has
been
provided
with
record
on
this
matter,
including
the
report
and
recommendation
of
heritage
preservation,
commission
certificate
of
appropriate
appeal
by
bridget
civilian
I'll.
Ask
his
staff
to
give
presentation.
I
John,
it's
moldy
good
afternoon,
mr
chair
members
of
the
committee.
My
name
is
john
smoly
and
I'm
very
pleased
to
be
before
you
this
afternoon
to
brief
you
on
an
appeal
of
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
construct
a
new
residence
on
the
lot
at
603
5th
street
southeast
in
the
5th
street
southeast
historic
district.
I
You
can
see
that
portion
of
yard
right
here
the
new
home,
would
sit
between
603
and
the
adjacent
home
at
605,
fifth,
both
of
which
are
contributing
resources
in
the
district,
but
the
new
home
would
be
located
on
the
same
parcel
as
603
5th
street
southeast,
the
van
cleave
home
depicted
here
in
yellow
composite
lap,
siding
corner
boards,
trim,
roof,
shingles
and
fiberglass
clad
wood
casement
windows
will
provide
a
level
of
detail
compatible
with
contributing
resources
in
this
historic
district,
the
front
door,
porch
ceilings,
porch,
guardrails,
porch,
stair,
handrail,
corbels
and
brackets
will
be
made
of
wood,
a
historic
material
milled
nearby
by
early
district
residents.
I
I
No
existing
trees
will
be
removed,
new
trees
and
plantings
will
be
added
to
the
home
to
make
it
feel
more
integrated
into
the
site
and
to
help
conceal
the
required
mechanical
equipment
and
venting
the
applicant
intends
to
apply
for
a
conditional
use
permit
through
the
city
planning
commission
to
develop.
This
is
a
cluster
development
in
terms
of
public
comments.
Staff
has
received
an
extra
comment
letter
since
the
request
for
committee
action
posting.
You
should
have
that
before
you.
I
In
making
its
determination,
the
commission
considered
the
appropriateness
of
placing
a
second
residence
on
the
existing
lot
and
compliance
with
the
adopted
design
guidelines
to
include
the
secretary
of
the
interior
standards
for
the
treatment
of
historic
properties,
which,
in
particular,
state
that
archaeological
resources
will
be
protected
and
preserved
in
place.
If
such
resources
must
be
disturbed
mitigation,
measure
measures
will
be
utilized.
I
These
issues
relate
directly
to
public
comments
expressed
in
writing
and
at
the
heritage
preservation
commission
hearing
I'll
note
that
the
residence
is
proposed
to
be
built
on
the
lawn
beside
the
vancleeve
residence
at
603
5th
street
southeast
during
the
early
years
of
san
antonio
minneapolis.
This
historic
district
remained
one
of
the
affluent
streets
of
residence.
I
Many
of
the
people
who
constructed
homes
and
resided
in
this
neighborhood
during
the
period
of
significance
were
early
residents
of
saint
anthony
and
minneapolis,
especially
millers,
who
chose
to
live
in
close
proximity
to
their
businesses,
clustered
at
the
falls
of
saint
anthony.
Given
the
age
of
the
district
and
its
proximity
to
the
mississippi
river
and
saint
anthony
falls
which
have
drawn
people
for
thousands
of
years.
The
owner
commissioned
an
archaeology
study
of
the
project
site.
I
Articles
and
past
studies
of
this
property
often
describe
how
general
van
cleef
buried
bessie
his
civil
war
war
horse
turned
driving
horse
and
beloved
pet
on
site,
but
these
sources
identify
the
burial
site
as
being
behin.
I'm
sorry
in
front
of
the
former
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
lot
behind
the
van
cleave
home,
not
in
this
project's
direct
area
of
potential
effect
and
again,
the
heritage
preservation
commission
approved
this
project,
as
proposed
at
their
hearing.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
could
you
explain
again
john
that
this
does
not
violate
any
rules
or
laws
that
we
have.
This
is
simply
approving
the
design
of
a
proposed
project.
A
J
Good
afternoon,
chairman
osman
and
members
of
the
of
the
committee,
I
want
you
to
know
that
I'm
a
30-year
resident
of
the
city-
I
wouldn't
live
anywhere
else,
and
I've
lived
in
most
neighborhoods
in
minneapolis
members.
The
commission
did
make
a
mistake:
the
mistake
that
they
made
they
actually
made
two
mistakes.
J
First,
they
were
under
the
impression
that
the
lot
could
be
divided
into
two
lots
and
therefore
anyone
can
build
on
a
on
an
empty
lot.
They
did
make
believe
that
they
actually,
but
in
fact,
this
lot
can't
be
divided
into.
Hence
that's
why
the
the
applicant
is
looking
for
a
variance
from
the
zoning
commission
to
create
a
cluster
development.
J
The
other
mistake
that
the
commission
made
is
that
it
wholly
forgot.
The
second
part
of
the
two-prong
part
for
determining
whether
or
not
this
is
an
appropriate
construction.
J
On
adjacent
sites
or
in
the
immediate
vicinity
within
the
preservation
district,
if
you
go
to
our
street,
if
you
go
to
this
block,
it's
a
beautiful
block,
it's
really
the
the
I
would
say
the
crown
jewel
of
the
fifth
street
southeast
district,
each
every
house
on
that
on
that
street
has
been
built
1900
or
earlier,
except
for
one
that
one
house
is
set
very
far
back
all
the
way
to
the
alley.
J
J
Also
what's
unique
about
this
block-
is
that
there
are
four
huge
houses
on
the
four
corners
they're
sort
of
they
anchor
this
neighborhood
and
they
all
have
oversized
lots.
Nothing
was
taken
into
consideration
at
the
hearing.
There
were
no
questions
about
it
and,
in
fact,
the
committee,
the
the
staff
itself,
had
no
fact
bait.
If
you
look
at
the
at
their
report,
there's
no
facts
about
this
at
all.
J
J
They
say
that
somehow
building
new
property,
a
new
construction
which
we
even
though
it
they
will
attempt
to
make
it
look
old,
it
will
look
new
that
this
new
property
will
somehow
not
impair
the
integrity
of
feeling
of
this
district.
I
don't
know
what
that
means,
so
the
commission
did
make
a
mistake.
There
was
no
com.
J
There
was
no
discussion
at
that
meeting
about
the
effect
that
this
new
construction
will
have
on
the
rest
of
the
properties
and
the
and
the
district
and
that
block-
and
in
fact,
if
you
look
at
the
van
cleef
house
itself,
that's
a
beautiful
lot.
It's
stately,
like
the
other
three
houses
and
the
other
three
lots
of
the
block,
so
you're
going
to
cram
in
a
house
on
a
really
beautiful
lot.
J
Originally,
the
van
cleef
house
was
part
of
a
a
condo
association,
the
van
cleef
condo
association,
the
applicant
asked
if
he
could,
but
he
said
he
wanted
to
buy
the
property
and
that
he
wanted
to
take
the
house
out
of
the
association.
J
J
If
I
came
up
with
an
idea,
I'd
want
to
defend
it,
and
hence
I
think
that's
why
the
commission's
rep,
the
staff
report
is
so
lacking
in
explaining
how
this
does
not
affect
the
integrity
of
the
district
and
especially
that
block
also,
we
were
only
able
to
speak
for
two
minutes
at
that
hearing,
but
mr
vanderbrook,
the
applicant,
has
been
working
with
the
cped
staff
for
over
two
years
and
finally,
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
what
extent
cped
staff
were
behind
this
idea
of
putting
this
house
right
here
and
whether
or
not
they
were
objective
in
the
in
the
review
of
it.
J
So
I
submitted
a
data
request
in
a
government
day.
Practice
date.
Government
practices,
data
request
over
six
weeks
ago,
and
I
haven't
heard
anything
from
the
city.
I
got
one
phone
call
two
weeks
ago
and
I've
called
that
person
back
nine
times
and
said
gave
give
them.
My
number
ask
them
to
call
me
back,
so
the
commission
did
make
a
mistake,
and
procedurally
this
has
been
very
unfair
to
the
rest
of
us
who
live
in
that
neighborhood.
A
K
My
name
is
jeremiah
battles,
I'm
with
the
casey
architects.
Thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
present
today,
I'm
working
with
leo
and
jody
vanderbilt
at
603
5th
street
southeast
we're
here
today
leo
would
like
to
speak
briefly
after
this
as
well.
K
They
currently
reside
in
the
van
cleef
house
and
have
lived
there
for
the
last
couple
years.
They've
been
fixing
it
up
and
updating
things
there.
Their
goal
for
this
project
is
to
produce
another
to
create
a
home
retirement
home
next
to
it
in
the
open
lot,
so
that
they
can
continue
to
live
on
site
and
care
for
the
van
cleef
house.
K
Let's
see
so,
I
wonder
I
was
preparing
for
a
little
longer
presentation,
so
I'm
going
to
go
through
this
a
little
quicker.
You
saw
some
of
these
images
here
of
the
existing
van
cleef
house
and
then
the
updates
that
have
been
happening
there
and
then
the
area
in
between
the
homes
for
some
additional
contacts.
Also
I'd
like
to
select.
You
know
that
I
used
to
live
in
this
neighborhood.
K
I
was,
I
lived,
a
block
away
so
and
then
I
also
lived
in
the
west
side
of
dikitone
for
several
years,
so
I'm
familiar
with
the
architecture
and
the
urban
fabric,
and
I
have
an
appreciation
for
that
as
well.
K
Overall,
so
we've
been
working
with
mr
small
and
mr
friends
from
the
planning
department
for
some
time
to
make
sure
we
comply
with
the
many
zoning
restrictions
and
historical
guidelines
to
create
a
home
that
fits
with
the
neighborhood.
Even
an
archaeological
study
was
done
to
help
us
decide
where
to
put
the
site.
K
One
comment
was
in
reaction
to
the
last
comment
made
here
was
that
the
actual
location
and
the
design
was
solely
mine,
the
city
had
nothing
to
do
with
that.
They
had
suggested
a
cluster
of
development
might
be
an
option
and
we
explored
that
and
that's
where
things
came
from,
so
the
specific
location
was
based
on
zoning
setbacks
and
meeting
the
guidelines
and
the
requirements
within
the
site,
as
well
as
some
aesthetic
considerations
which
I'll
go
through
shortly.
Here,
let's
say
so.
K
I
want
to
go
to
the
site
plan
here,
which
you've
seen
and
I'll
zoom
in
a
little
bit
more.
So
the
mid
shade
shaded
areas
are
the
existing
structure,
the
garage
in
this
corner,
and
then
the
house
over
here
existing
parking
here
and
then
the
new
proposed
structures
right
here.
So
as
we
were
designing
the
house,
we
tried
to
create
a
home
that
would
be
sensitive
to
the
site
and
complement
the
existing
historic
character
of
the
neighborhood.
K
K
We
kept
the
front
of
the
home
narrow
at
22
feet
and
several
feet
lower
than
the
existing
homes
to
minimize
shading
and
maximize
the
green
space
between
them.
So
this
lighter
area
here
the
proposed
common
space
is
part
of
the
cluster
development,
where
we
mandate
areas
that
are
shared
green
spaces
within
it.
K
The
home
front
of
the
home
is
aligned
up
with
the
front
of
the
adjacent
homes,
so
it
has
creates
that
uniformity,
but
it's
also
pushed
back
as
far
as
we
can
with
it,
with
the
garage
being
in
the
back.
There
there's
a
four
car
garage,
so
we're
sort
of
a
balancing
act,
we're
trying
to
make
it
narrow
from
the
front.
So
it
has
a
minimal
presence
from
the
street
also
allows
light
in
between
the
structures
and
so
that
that's
with
the
rectilinear
form
from
front
to
back
takes
there.
K
This
shows
the
heights
of
the
structure
and
how
the
what
it
would
look
like
in
actuality
for
the
actual
height
of
it.
Overall
there
is
a
similar
sized
home
two
blocks
to
the
north.
Of
this,
that's
two
feet
wider
and
similar
size.
You
know
a
lot
overall
for
reference.
K
We
did
this
in
response
to
the
concerns
that
there
wasn't
enough
space
there.
So,
hypothetically
speaking,
we
showed
if
the
lot
was
partitioned,
which
would
be
the
darker
blue.
It
would
be
larger
or
as
large
as
many
of
the
other
lots
in
the
area.
It
also
would
meet
the
typical
minimum
requirements
for
a
5
000
square
foot
lot
in
minneapolis.
K
We
have
no
intention
of
splitting
it,
and
that
was
never
the
intention
from
the
get-go
overall,
because
splitting
the
lot
would
actually
create
more
issues
with
parking.
Curb
cuts
drives,
and
things
like
that.
So
we
did
not
even
explore
that,
and
that
wasn't
anything
so
this
diagram
here,
I
think,
is
part
of
what
the
that
the
comment
from
the
hpc
about
you
know.
If
the
lot
was
split,
it
seems
like
there's
enough
space
with
the
the
comment
that
they
had
made
was
more
in
terms
of.
K
If
this
is
allowed
within
the
zoning
of
the
setbacks
in
their
space,
then
it
seems
like
it's
there's
no
reason
not
to
to
allow
it
basically
like
to
speak
in
terms
of
some
of
the
other
comments
that
were
given
and
some
of
the
other
concerns
a
lot
of
them
can
so
or
the
majority
of
them,
and
a
lot
of
them
seem
to
focus
on
just
the
idea
that
a
new
structure
could
be
built
in
a
historic
district
and
that
there's
room
for
it
to
fit
and
that
why
it
doesn't
match
one
of
the
existing
house
styles.
K
So
the
the
guidelines
in
the
fifth
street
historic
district
design
guidelines,
they
stayed
in
page
two
under
the
new
building
section
hpc
wishes
to
encourage
contemporary
design
that
is
compatible
with
the
nature
of
the
preservation
area.
My
interpretation
is
that,
is
they
don't
want
you
to
recreate
something
that
would
look
exactly
like.
Is
that
my
time
as.
K
I'll
just
I'll
make
this
previous
brief
here,
the
existing
homes
on
the
block
are
from
the
1920s,
so
it's
not
accurate
they're
from
the
1900s.
Some
of
them
are
but
majority
of
them
blocker
from
the
1920s.
K
L
L
They
had
to
get
a
variance
from
the
city
to
build
on
there
and
that's
why
they
ended
up
going
through
the
cluster
development
stuff,
and
it
was
my
understanding
that,
if
you're
building
under
the
cluster
development
agenda
that
you're
supposed
to
be
building
homes,
you
know
high
density
for
low
income
or
you
know,
income,
unstable
people
and
all
that-
and
this
is
all
it
is-
is
a
landlord
dwelling
for
the
van
cleef
house.
As
far
as
I
can
tell-
and
I
know
they
want
it
to
be
their
retirement
home.
L
L
L
The
variance
is
not
in
in
the
conservation
district,
they
have
a
a
statement
here
that
says
conservation
districts
are
designed
to
not
only
maintain,
but
also
to
expand
the
roster
of
building
structures
and
sites
that
contribute
to
the
visual
character
and
support
of
the
land,
use
and
activity
of
the
district.
To
me,
this
directly
reflects
the
land
use.
The
land
is
part
of
the
home.
It
should
not
be
subdivided
into
a
cluster
development.
L
A
M
M
So
what
I
would
say
is
this
action
of
building
a
new
home
in
that
will
set
a
precedence
that
will
change
everything
for
the
historic
district
and
whether
you're
familiar
with
the
area
or
not.
First,
the
first
neighborhood
of
minneapolis
is
this
street.
That
is
a
national
registered
house,
there's
three
of
them
in
southeast
total.
So
that's
how
important
it
is.
The
site
is
part
of
that.
M
Abiding
by
you
know,
pantone
colors
and
different
things
that
we've
requested
over
the
years,
hundreds
of
them
that
have
been
denied
by
the
way,
because
we
understand
what
is
important
and
we
want
that
to
be
a
place
for
people
to
say
this
is
first
minneapolis
we
underst
this
is
the
history.
It's
very
important
fan
cleave.
The
vancleave
house
is
part
of
that
and
I
also
feel
like
it'll
diminish
what
historic
preservation
means.
Cluster
developments
are
about
density,
that
is,
the
city's
charge
in
every
other
area.
Preservation
and
protection
is
counterintuitive
to
that
right.
M
We're
trying
to
protect
a
site
to
make
sure
that
it's
there
for
generations
to
see
people
regret
what
happened
on
washington
avenue
in
minneapolis.
They
protect
nicolas
island.
They
protect
ramsey
hill
neighborhoods.
We
need
to
protect
this
as
well.
There's
a
reason.
There
hasn't
been
a
new
build
like
this
in
this
neighborhood
since
1988,
when
something
burned
down,
people
have
been
protecting
it
and
that's
what
we
need
to
do
here
and
follow
through
with
what
we
understand.
Historic
preservation
and
planning
of
the
city
is
about.
So
thank
you
very
much.
N
N
I
lived
there
for
19
years,
we're
here
today
appealing
the
issuance
of
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
construction
in
the
historic
district,
and
I
want
to
read
from
the
5th
street
historic
district
guidelines,
the
5th
street
southeast
and
washburn
fair
oaks
preservation.
Districts
contain
a
concentration
of
structures,
lands
and
space
which
is
distinguished
by
past
historical
and
cultural
events,
etc.
N
That
inclusion
of
lands
and
space
would
lead
a
reasonable
person
to
think
that
actually,
preserving
the
space
adjacent
to
this
house
is
important
to
the
charge
of
the
heritage
preservation.
Commission.
The
commission
did
not
consider
these
important
aspects
of
the
district
guidelines
when
they
heard
this
case.
They
didn't.
They
actually
didn't
consider
anything
about
that.
They
were
concerned
about
whether
it
would
meet
zoning
code
and
all
of
these
other
technicalities
that
aren't
their
purview.
N
It
says
the
heritage
preservation
commission
must
consider
certain
aspects
of
each
type
of
permit
required
proposed
building
shall
not
materially
impair
the
architecture
or
historic
or
historic
value
of
buildings
on
adjacent
sites.
This
lawn
has
existed
between
those
two
homes.
N
The
van
cleave
home
is
on
the
national
register
of
historic
places,
the
adjacent
home
that
that
lawn
has
existed
for
106
years
well
before
the
district
guidelines
were
adopted
in
reading
the
district
guidelines,
there's
no
way
that
you
can
not
understand
that
the
protection
is
the
context
of
the
buildings
within
the
district,
not
simply
the
buildings
themselves,
and
by
doing
any
less
than
that,
it
begs
the
very
existence
of
the
historic
district.
If
it
exists
only
to
harass
existing
homeowners
from
doing
any
work
on
their
houses,
then
it
really
doesn't
serve
a
constructive
purpose.
A
Is
there
anyone
else
sen
center.
O
Hello,
I'm
sandra
decker
and
I
live
directly
across
the
street
in
the
frank,
jeff
leonard
historical
designated
house,
from
the
vancleave
house,
and
I've
lived
there
for
47
years.
O
And
before
historical
designation,
of
course,
the
current
building
proposal
is
essentially
to
squeeze
a
new
residential
structure
to
be
built
on
the
side
yard
of
the
vancleave
house.
If
you
and
I
live
right
across
the
street,
if
you
look
at
it,
there's
no
room
for
a
two-story
building
house,
and
it
just
is.
O
It
diminishes
the
validity
of
minneapolis
heritage
preservation,
commission's
program
to
preserve
and
protect,
of
course-
and
this
is
the
first
neighborhood
of
saint
anthony
minneapolis
and
of
course
the
proposal
goes
against
everything
we
homeowners
with
historical
designated
property
have
experienced
as
rules
and
protocol
regarding
any
changes
to
our
property.
We
have
complied
since
the
historical
designation
with
these
regulations
during
repairs,
restoration
and
replacement
projects,
and
this
is
just.
O
A
proposal
that
is
not
in
any
way
historical
can
be
conceived
as
historical
preservation.
It
thereby
holds
no
validity
as
far
as
and
and
it
would
seriously
diminish
the
validity
of
the
historical
preservation
commission.
Thank
you.
A
P
P
We
wanted
to
spend
some
time
here
and
sometime
there,
so
we
thought
it'd
be
a
good
idea
to
do
an
adu.
We
could
rent
out
the
main
residence.
We
could
invest
our
savings
and
also
spend
time
in
portland.
That's
the
main
reason
we
wanted
to
do
it.
We
love
the
neighborhood,
we're
going
to
build
a
really
nice
house,
and
I
guess
I
don't
see
where
the
complication
is.
To
tell
you
the
truth.
P
P
J
P
P
G
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
you
know
during
these
quasi-judicial
hearings.
It
can
be
tough
because
we've
got
to
look
at
the
evidence
and
assess
whether
we've
seen
that
anything,
unlawful
or
anything
you
know
untoward
has
happened
here.
G
I
think
that
this
project,
as
far
as
I
can
tell,
has
come
forward
in
a
manner
that
complies
with
with
with
the
rules
and
so
for
that
reason
I'm
gonna
be
moving
to
deny
the
appeal
and
and
again
these
decisions
aren't
based
on
whether
or
not
you
know
who
we
like
or
who
we
don't
like.
These
decisions
are
based
off
our
best
assessment
of
of
the
evidence
in
front
of
us,
and
so
and
so
yeah
just
wanted
to
say
that
and
that's
my
motion
is
to
deny
the
appeal.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
allison.
Before
I
call
the
clerk,
I
would
like
to
recognize
council
member
rainville.
C
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair
councilmember
rainville.
I
I
do
know
that
our
our
staff
report,
which
is
very
extensive
specifically
I
think,
addresses
that
factor.
I
believe
it's
on
page
seven,
even
although
I
would
invite
our
staff
to
address
it
a
little
more
closely.
D
I
believe
it
is
true
that
that
there
can
be
a
holistic
look
at
things,
but
I
believe
that
the
staff
report
in
this
item,
combined
with
the
research
that
was
done,
indicates
that
there
wouldn't
be
any
issue
with
regard
to
the
lawn
that's
existing
there
in
terms
of
impairing
any
historic
significance.
I
don't
want
to.
You
know,
speak
for
our
staff,
but
my
understanding
when
I
read
the
report
is
that
that's
the
conclusion
that
they
reached
and
it
seems
to
be
supported
by
the
evidence.
C
Thank
you.
So
I
and
I
do
have
a
couple
comments
here.
I
I
will
be
voting
to
uphold
the
appeal.
I
stand
with
the
residents,
and
my
suggestion
is
that,
as
this
moves
forward
to
the
planning
commission,
which
is
all
all
other
set
of
approvals,
that
the
applicants
reach
out
to
their
neighbors
and
try
to
understand
their
point
of
view,
if
you
plan
on
living
there,
it
seems
somewhat
counterintuitive
that
you
would
withdraw
from
a
condo
association
which
would
not
have
allowed
this.
C
A
C
B
A
Oh
thank
you
that
motion
passes
and
now
we're
moving
to
this
our
discussion
item
now
I
will
call
our
staff
hayley
kramer
to
give
a
presentation
for
enclosure,
zoning
and
world
report.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
I
Q
Back
one
izee
applies
to
both
rental
and
ownership
projects.
To
date
there
are
no
ownership
projects
subject
to
inclusionary
zoning,
so
the
remainder
of
the
presentation
will
focus
on
rental
projects
for
rental
projects.
There's
currently
one
temporary
exemption
related
to
small-scale
buildings.
Small
scale
is
defined
as
a
building
with
20
to
49
units.
These
projects
are
exempt
from
iz
until
six
months
after
the
first
500
units
are
approved
and
permitted
across
small-scale
projects.
Q
Q
Approval
attached
to
the
rca
is
the
2021
inclusionary
zoning
annual
report,
which
I
will
give
a
brief
overview
of
so
report.
Elements
include
background
of
the
policy
development
policy
requirements,
which
I
just
summarized
a
section
on
projects
that
were
issued
building
permits,
and
these
are
projects
that
have
finalized
their
iz
election
and
have
submitted
to
the
city
how
they
intend
to
comply
with
inclusionary
zoning
and
they
were
issued
a
building
permit.
Q
The
report
also
includes
a
summary
of
development
projects
that
are
in
the
pipeline.
These
are
projects
that
have
completed
a
land,
use
application
and
have
city
planning
commission
approval,
but
they
are
somewhere
in
the
permit
review
process
and
have
not
yet
been
issued.
A
building
permit
once
they
are
issued,
a
building
permit,
their
iz
election
will
be
counted.
Q
So
here
are
some
highlights
of
the
outcomes
in
2021,
so
there
were
21
rental
projects,
totaling
2
335
units
who
received
building
permits
and
were
subject
to
iz,
so
10
projects
were
large
scale,
market
rate
projects
and
seven
of
these
10
chose
to
provide
the
affordable
units
on
site
and
we'll
be
providing
a
total
of
55
units
at
60.
Ami
one
project
chose
the
off-site
option
and
will
produce
95,
affordable
units
at
another
site,
and
two
projects
chose
to
pay
an
in-lieu
fee
instead
of
providing
the
affordable
units.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
So
this
dashboard,
oh
hold
on
this
dashboard,
is
featured
on
the
city's
data
source
webpage
and
serves
as
a
resource
to
staff
the
development
community
and
the
general
public
about
this
work.
Though
my
report
today
focuses
on
2021,
you
can
filter
the
data
by
year
or
review
the
data
cumulatively
across
multiple
years
by
checking
these
boxes
here.
Q
Q
The
purple
section
shows
projects
that
are
in
the
development
pipeline,
so
these
projects
again
have
cpc
approval,
but
do
not
have
a
building
permit
issued,
so
we
don't
know
yet
how
they
plan
to
comply.
Once
these
projects
are
permitted,
they
will
move
up
to
either
the
blue
or
orange
sections
accordingly,
and
then
an
additional
feature
of
this
dashboard
is
a
geographic
summary.
Q
All
right,
so
in
terms
of
next
steps,
the
city's
unified
housing
policy
requires
that
cped
staff
review
the
inclusionary
zoning
policy
every
three
to
five
years.
Staff
will
therefore
complete
a
full
policy
review
between
2024
and
2026,
so
any
updates
or
changes
to
the
policy
will
be
recommended
to
the
council
at
that
time.
A
For
your
presentation
and
now
I
will
recognize
councilmember
rainville.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chair
haley.
That
was
a
great
report
very
thorough
and
I
understand
all
the
numbers,
but
why
do
you
think
ward
three
has
so
many
of
these
projects.
It's
it's
a
big
number
compared
to
the
other
awards.
C
S
Holling
manager
of
land
uses
item
preservation,
so
I'm
just
completely
kind
of
spitballing
here,
but
our
trends
over
the
last
several
years
have
shown
a
demand
for
higher
density
projects
in
and
around
downtown,
which
includes
much
of
the
third
ward,
and
so
we
have
been
seeing
several
of
those
continue
to
occur
and
it's
projects
over
50
units
that
are
currently
triggering
the
inclusionary
zoning.
So
it's
those
larger
scale
projects
and-
and
you
know
it's
just
general
market
demand.
G
Just
comment
to
thank
staff
for
this
presentation
and
for
this
policy.
I
think
that
you
know
yeah,
and
I
know
that
when
this
app,
I
think
this
policy
started
being
imagined
well
before
I
was
in
office,
but
and
council
members
at
the
time,
maybe
had
like
bigger
visions
for
how
much
we
can
impose
and
all
that
stuff.
But
I
think
the
truth
is
that
we're
seeing
affordable
units
come
online
that
wouldn't
have
existed
otherwise,
and
that
is,
I
think,
the
goal
of
the
policy
and
we're
achieving
that
goal.
G
I'm
excited
for
a
full
policy
review
and
excited
to
see
where
we
go
from
here.
So
thank
you.