►
From YouTube: December 1, 2022 Public Works & Infrastructure Committee
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Good
afternoon,
everyone
welcome
to
the
regular
meeting
of
the
Public
Works
infrastructure
committee
for
December
1st
2022
I'm
Andrew
Johnson
I'm,
the
chair
of
this
committee.
I,
want
to
thank
everyone
as
well
for
being
with
us
here,
a
little
later
than
usual
with
our
start
time
because
of
budget
committee
and
getting
through
all
the
items
today.
We
appreciate
you
at
this
time.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
B
A
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum
and
I
expect
we'll
probably
have
the
other
two
council
members
here
momentarily
and
with
that
the
agenda
for
today's
meeting
is
before
us.
There
are
11
items
on
the
consent
agenda
and
one
receive
and
file
item
which
I
will
read
for
the
record.
The
first
item
is
authorizing
the
submittal
of
a
Grant
application
to
MnDOT
for
the
2023
active
transportation
funding.
The
second
item
is
authorizing
a
Cooperative
agreement
with
Hennepin
County
for
the
50th
Street
traffic
signal
and
pedestrian
Improvement
project.
A
The
third
item
is
authorizing
an
increase
to
the
appropriation
for
the
water
fund.
Fourth
item
is
authorizing
license
agreements
for
the
2023
shared
bike
and
scooter
program.
The
fifth
item
is
authorizing
an
amendment
to
the
contract
with
MnDOT
for
the
trunk
Highway
55
project
from
32nd
Street
to
Highway
62..
The
sixth
item
is
approving
the
City
of
Minneapolis
comments
related
to
the
F
line,
brt
draft
corridor
plan
for
submittal
to
Metro
Transit.
A
The
seventh
item
is
designating
the
37th
Ave
Northeast
Street
reconstruction
project
and
setting
an
assessment
public
hearing
for
February
16th
of
2023
item
number.
Eight
is
designating
the
Osseo
Road
Street
reconstruction
project
and
setting
an
assessment
public
hearing
for
February,
2nd
2023
item
number.
Nine
is
designating
the
upper
Harbor
Terminal
public
infrastructure,
Street
reconstruction
project
and
setting
an
assessment
public
hearing
for
February,
2nd
2023.
item
number
10
is
authorizing
an
amendment
to
the
easement
modification
agreement
with
Metro
Palatine
Council
for
the
Bassett
Creek
Tunnel
Culvert.
A
Item
number
11
is
adopting
revisions
to
the
Minneapolis,
Street
lighting
policy
and
actually
there's
a
a
well
we've
got
item
number
12
which
is
receiving
and
filing
the
first
second
and
third
quarter.
Reports
of
approved
and
implemented
traffic,
Zone
restrictions
and
control.
So
we'll
go
ahead
and
receive
and
file
that
as
well.
So
I
am
going
to
move
all
11
items
and
direct
the
clerk
to
do
that.
Receiving
file
as
well
I
will
see
if
there's
any
discussion
on
the
11
items.
I
see
councilmember
Vita.
Thank.
C
You
chair,
Johnson
I,
just
wanted
to
know
if
someone
could
provide
a
little
bit
more
context
about
the
33rd
Avenue
project
number
nine.
If
someone
could
just
provide
a
little
more
context
about
that
director.
D
Johnson
and
councilmember
Vita
I'm,
going
to
have
deputy
and
chief
engineer
Brian
Dodds
come
up
for
just
a
moment
here
and
give
a
little
context
on
that.
E
Chair
members,
good
to
talk
to
you
today
a
question
about
33rd.
Yes,
it's
part
of
the
upper
Harbor
Terminal
project
and
this
will
be
to
designate
and
set
a
public
hearing
for
that
project.
I
know
we
are
working
with
you
on
some
constituent
issues
nearby
and
that
will
continue
and
is
not
impacted
by
this
actions
day.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Ryan
thank.
F
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
line
items
six
and
seven.
This
is
the
F
line
down
Central
Avenue
and
the
37th
Avenue
reconstruction.
This
these
two
projects
combined
kind
of
reflect
some
of
the
most
sophisticated
or
complex
ways
that
we
fund
our
infrastructure
and
you
know
37th
Avenues
been
a
long
time
in
the
making.
It's
got
some
federal
dollars
tied
to
it.
We've
got
the
state
funding
associated
with
a
brt
expansion
and
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
there's
this
intersection
right
at
37th
and
Central.
F
That
is
really
complex
because
of
reservoir
Boulevard,
and
it
creates
a
really
kind
of
high
conflict,
Point
issue
with
Reservoir
Boulevard
coming
in
at
a
diagonal,
and
it's
just
want
to
say
it's
been
really
great
working
with
staff
to
be
able
to
highlight
that
issue
and
say
you
know,
because
it's
not
addressed
in
the
funding
for
the
37th
Avenue,
but
there
is
going
to
be
a
brt
stop
right
at
that
intersection
and
so
I
think
it's
just
that
reflection
of
when
we're
paying
attention
to
these
things
at
the
local
level.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
Payne,
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
committee
members.
Not
seeing
any
I
will
go
ahead
and
ask
that
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye,
as
opposed
to
say
eyes.
Have
it
in
the
consent
agenda
is
prove,
is
approved,
I
also
had
directed
receiving
and
filing
of
item
number
12,
the
traffic
zones,
restrictions
and
controls
quarterly
reports.
So
next
we'll
move
on
to
our
discussion
items.
Today
we
have
three
different
items.
D
Thank
you,
Mr
chair
today,
presenting
will
be
Kathleen,
mayles
supervisor,
Transportation,
Planning
and
programming,
and
her
colleague
Bria
fast
associate
Transportation
planner,
Transportation,
Planning
and
programming
and
I
just
I.
I
first
want
to
say
and
I.
These
two
have
led
a
team
and
have
done
some
really
amazing
work
and
I'm
very
much.
Looking
forward
to
this
presentation.
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
director
Kelleher
thanks,
Council
committee,
chair
and
council
members
happy
to
be
here
today
to
present
on
the
draft
racial
Equity
framework
for
transportation.
G
I'll
go
through
an
overview,
an
impetus
for
the
work,
what
we've
done
in
terms
of
Engagement
to
date
and
what
we
have
planned
and
we'll
go
through
what
is
included
in
the
draft
racial
Equity
framework,
big
picture,
the
transportation
action
plan,
which
was
passed
in
December
of
2020,
set
the
the
desire
to
want
to
complete
a
racial
Equity
framework
for
transportation.
We
spent
the
following
year
really
working
internally
to
develop
our
approach.
G
We
partnered
through
the
American
City's
climate
challenge
with
Nelson
Nygaard
and
the
national
resource
defense
Council
on
some
internal
approaches
and
work
there.
Earlier
this
year
we
partnered
with
the
cultural
Wellness
Center
based
out
of
South
Minneapolis
as
a
community
partner,
and
they
were
instrumental
in
US
convening
a
community
Equity
work
Group,
which
met
for
six
months
monthly
for
the
better
part
of
this
year
and
led
us
to
where
we
are
today
in
terms
of
having
a
draft
racial
Equity
framework.
So
some
of
that
is
covered
in
this
slide.
G
I'll
note
that
the
community
Equity
work
group
was
a
different
model
than
we
had
used
for
Community
engagement.
Previously,
we
had,
depending
on
the
meeting
five
to
Fifteen
different
community
members
representing
either
organizations
or
relationships
they
had
working
on
Equity
issues
within
Minneapolis
and
really
provided
a
good
foundation
for
this
work,
as
well
as
the
the
expertise
of
the
cultural,
Wellness,
Center
being
a
really
great
partner.
In
developing
this,
we
had
internal
working
teams
within
the
city
spanning
different
departments,
Beyond
Public,
Works
health
and
racial
Equity
inclusion
and
belonging
cped
Communications.
G
We
had
I.T
sorry,
not
Communications
I.T,
as
well
as
the
tap
steering
committee,
which
really
LED
and
helped
us
through
the
development
of
the
racial
Equity
framework
throughout
those
two
years
and
then
finally,
we
did
have
a
policy
advisory
committee
as
well.
That
is
still
active.
We've
met
twice
and
have
one
more
meeting
anticipated
for
early
next
year
after
we've
received
public
feedback
on
this
framework,
we've
engaged
with
our
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advisory
committees.
G
G
Looking
at
why
we're
doing
this
work,
there's
really
the
the
historic
and
current
inequities
that
persist
in
this
city
and
there's
the
policy
directive
really
high
level.
Looking
back,
we've
got
a
history
of
redlining.
We've
got
a
history
of
freeway
displacement
of
communities,
and
that
has
profound
impacts
on
where
people
live
and
how
they
move
around
in
this
city.
To
this
day,
what
sort
of
air
they
breathe?
G
How
much
pollution
is
in
that
there
are
a
whole
host
of
historical
decisions
made
by
government
and
others
that
have
led
to
a
lot
of
the
persistent
inequities.
We
see
in
our
transportation
system
that
these
two
slides
by
no
means
do
justice
to
that.
These
pictures
here
are
taken
from
the
human
toll
exhibit
35W,
showing
where
the
large
populations
of
black
people
were
living
in
the
Twin
Cities
in
the
1960s,
and
you
can
see
the
link
with
the
pink
lines
of
where
freeways
were
built
through
or
abutting
those
communities.
G
The
details
on
this
slide
really
frame
a
lot
of
the.
Why,
in
terms
of
now,
the
Twin
Cities
is
known
to
be
a
great
area,
great
outcomes
in
terms
of
employment,
home
ownership,
low
poverty
per
capita
income.
If
you
are
white,
if
you
are
a
resident
of
color,
some
of
the
worst
outcomes
in
terms
of
comparing
with
our
Nationwide
peers,
so
thinking
about
how
Transportation
ties
into
these
really
devastating
statistics
is
part
of
the
the
impetus
for
this
work.
G
Maybe
not
as
drastic
but
certainly
still
important,
average
commute
times
are
longer
in
the
city
for
residents.
If
you're
a
person
of
color
versus
a
white
resident,
there
are
more
households
of
color
that
do
not
have
access
to
a
car
versus
white
households
and
when
you
think
about
how
the
decisions
we
make
about
our
streets,
how
we
design
them
operate,
maintain
you
know
who
we're
building
those
for
are
things
and
themes
that
we
consider
with
this
work
and
what
we're
putting
forth
in
this
framework.
G
All
of
our
work
is
intended
to
fit
within
the
city's
goal
of
ensuring
that
our
outcomes
and
opportunities
are
not
predictable
by
race,
so
really
fitting
into
that.
City-Wide
definition
of
racial
equity
we're
building
upon
a
strong
Foundation
of
policy
that
the
city
has
adopted
within
recent
years,
coming
from
Minneapolis
2040,
the
Strategic
and
racial
Equity
action
plan,
the
transportation
action
plan
and
then
more
detailed
in
our
street
design
guide
and
our
vision,
zero
commitment.
G
The
tap
specifically
laid
out
in
progress
strategy
1
the
goal
of
implementing
a
racial
Equity
framework
for
transportation.
This
was
one
of
the
strategies
that
was
added
in
the
summer
of
2020
and
between
our
draft
and
final
of
this
document.
When
we
really
took
a
hard
look
at
what
this
plan
could
and
should
be
doing
for
Minneapolis.
H
So
in
subsequent
slides
I'll
go
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
about
what
the
ref
what
the
document
contains.
But
to
note
right
now
there
are
three
main
sections,
so
we
have
an
executive
summary,
the
main
document
itself
and
then
an
appendix
and
in
that
appendix
are
maps
some
of
the
data
that
we
use
to
create
the
score,
a
glossary
of
terms
and
other
supplemental
information
to
provide
more
background
and
context.
H
With
this
work,
we
have
four
different
goals.
These
four
goals,
as
I'll
talk
about
a
little
bit
later.
They
help
organize
our
strategies
and
actions,
but
they
are
also
a
really
big
part
of
our
engagement
process,
so
these
goals
and
their
development
they've
been
through
our
internal
work
groups,
the
community
Equity
work
group.
These
were
very
critical
in
in
the
engagement
that
we
have
been
doing
and
have
been
developed
by
a
lot
of
folks
along
the
way.
H
In
addition
to
the
transportation
Equity
commitment,
we
want
to
acknowledge
that
past
harm
has
been
done.
They're
a
government
supported
systems
and
decisions
that
have
excluded
harmed
and
overburdened
communities
of
color
in
Minneapolis,
especially
black
and
Indigenous
communities.
H
H
We
prioritize
investment
in
transportation
projects
in
the
city
in
a
lot
of
different
ways.
A
major
factor
in
this
prioritization
has
been
the
use
of
acp50
with
this
work,
we're
adjusting
from
using
acp50
and
moving
towards
what
you
see
here
on
the
screen,
the
tep
score,
so
the
transportation
Equity
priority
score.
H
This
is
with
guidance
from
the
Met
Council,
who
is
also
moving
away
from
using
acp50,
with
the
understanding
that
Equity
is
not
a
one-size-fits-all
term.
The
understanding
or
the
guidance
from
the
Met
Council
was
that
communities
should,
you
know,
develop
something
unique
that
is
relevant
and
specific
to
their
context
and
so
to
develop
this
score.
We
started
with
a
series
of
equity
data
from
the
Met
Council
and
again
through
that
engagement
process
came
to
what
what
the
eight
different
data
layers
that
I'll
show
you
just
coming
up.
H
So
this
is
what
the
transportation
Equity
priority
score
looks
like
those
Open
Circles,
underneath
each
are
the
data
that
I
was
referencing,
so
we
call
this
a
two
score
methodology.
There's
a
base
score
which
is
on
the
left
and
then
the
transfer.
Excuse
me,
the
equity
plus
score,
which
is
on
the
right,
so
the
base
score
includes
data
on
Race
as
well
as
income,
and
there
are
three
different
ways:
we
are
thinking
about
income
here,
a
lowest
income,
tier,
a
low
income
tier
and
then
thinking
about
areas
that
lack
concentrated
affluence.
H
The
acp50
map
is
on
the
left.
Our
transportation
Equity
priority
score
map
is
on
the
right.
The
darkest
areas,
the
darkest
purple
areas
are
the
areas
that
are
the
highest
priority,
whereas
the
lightest
areas
are
the
lowest
priority.
That
map
in
the
middle
shows
the
overlap
between
acp50
and
the
transportation
Equity
priority
score.
So,
as
you
can
see,
there's
there's
definite
overlap
in
between
these
two,
but
what
the
tep
score
does
is
expand
on
that
and
adds
more
Nuance
to
how
we
look
at
Equity
throughout
the
city,
foreign.
H
And
actions
are
a
really
really
important
part
of
the
racial
Equity
framework
for
transportation,
so
there
are
24
strategies,
there
are
64
actions
and
these
are
aligned
around
those
four
goals.
These
strategies
and
actions,
along
with
the
transportation
Equity
priority
score.
These
are
the
tangible
super,
tangible
ways
that
the
racial
Equity
framework
will
impact
Transportation
plans,
programs
and
projects.
H
These
are
framed
in
a
very
similar
fashion
to
the
way
that
the
tap
strategies
and
actions
are
but
again,
I.
Don't
you
know?
We
only
have
one
slide
on
this,
but
I
can't
emphasize
enough
that
these
strategies
and
actions
are
the
real
bulk
of
what
this
racial
Equity
framework
means.
Above
and
beyond
an
acknowledgment.
H
H
Progress
reporting
is
going
to
follow
the
tap
structure,
so
every
two
years
and
it'll
be
folded
into
that
two-year
report.
Back
from
the
tap
the
tap
score,
the
transportation
Equity
priority
score.
It
will
replace
acp50
in
the
your
city,
your
streets
report
back
annually,
so
you
can
see
in
the
bottom
right
corner
there.
You
know
you
were
all
here
for
your
city,
your
streets,
progress
report,
so
instead
of
acp50,
we
will
be
reporting
on
what
the
tap
score
will
be
so
Transportation
Equity
priority
scores.
H
Foreign
Equity
dashboard
is
a
web
page
and
it
shares
a
deeper,
more
detailed
story
about
the
work
that
we're
doing
with
the
racial
Equity
framework.
So
I
do
want
to
say
that
this
dashboard
is
not
necessarily
an
official
part
of
the
racial
Equity
framework
that
that
you
will
approve
it's
a
resource
and
it's
a
tool
and
for
residents
as
well
as
for
people
within
Public
Works.
The
dashboard
includes
five
separate
tabs,
there's
an
intro
sort
of
an
introduction
to
why
we're
doing
this
work.
Why
is
it
important?
H
C
H
G
One
last
word
on
engagement:
we
have
two
different
public
opportunities
next
week,
one
a
co-hosted
meeting
with
the
cultural
Wellness
Center
and
the
community
Equity
work
group
at
Midtown,
Global,
Market
and
then
a
virtual
open
house
next
week
as
well
as
Bria
mentioned,
there
are
opportunities
in
a
forum
to
fill
out
on
our
website
and
we'll
be
planning
to
return
early
in
the
new
year,
so
I
that
we're
done
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
any
great.
A
F
You
Mr
chair:
could
you
go
back
to
slide
nine.
F
So
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
I
want
to
approach
this,
but
you
know
I
I,
remember
the
first
time
I
learned
about
redlining
and
you
know
growing
up
black
in
America.
You
just
know
it's
racist
but,
like
you,
don't
have
Precision
in
talking
about
it
and
I.
Remember
the
first
time
I
learned
about
redlining
I,
don't
remember
how
old
I
was
at
probably
sometime
in
college,
maybe
even
as
late
as
in
my
30s
I.
F
Don't
remember,
but
I
mean
being
black
in
America
is
like
this
persistent
state
of
being
gaslit,
because
you
know
racism
exists.
You
know
it
in
your
bones,
but
sometimes
you
lack
the
words
to
describe
it.
You
know
we
get
to
the
we
arrive
at
places
like
systemic
racism,
and
that
feels
a
little
bit
more
precise,
but
even
that's
a
bit
too
academic
and
abstract
and
gets
undermined
and
discredited,
and
then
you
feel
Gaslight
again
as
people.
You
know
talk
about
critical
race
Theory
as
a
public
health
emergency
or
something.
F
But
when
you
look
at
this
map,
this
map
hit
me
the
same
way.
It
hit
me
when
I
first
learned
about
red
lightning.
When
you
look
at
the
curves
and
the
bends,
like
particularly
the
curve
in
35W
from
A
to
B
like
it
just
it-
is
such
a
tangible
and
profound
manifestation
of
what
we
mean
when
we
say
racist,
you
know
what
I
mean
and
I
just
think
this
is
so
powerful
and
I.
Yesterday
I
had
the
Fortune
of
spending
pretty
much
a
very
huge
chunk
of
my
day.
F
There
was
a
Mobility
Justice
Conference
yesterday
that
was
hosted
by
the
cultural
Wellness,
Center
moved
Minneapolis,
our
streets
move
Minnesota,
and
they,
the
topic
of
the
conference,
was
Mobility
justice,
meaning
it's
not
just
about
Transportation.
It's
not
just
about
our
infrastructure
spending.
It's
not
just
about
making
sure
that
we
have
bus
lanes.
It
is
much
more
profound,
the
the
intersections
you
know
at
Sea,
of
those
freeways
combining
the
way
it
twists
and
bends
to
make
sure
that
we
really
get
those
black
communities
that
are
coded
as
blighted.
F
Let's
just
get
those
torn
down
it
and
it's
like
I,
just
remembered
growing
up
in
my
own
Redline
community
in
Milwaukee,
the
most
segregated
city
in
the
country
and
just
accepting
the
my
material
conditions
as
just
this
is
just
the
way
it
is
when
you're
poor
you
grow
up
poor.
You
live
in
not
the
nicest
neighborhood
with
not
the
nicest
house,
or
not
the
nicest
things,
and
that's
just
life
and
you
kind
of
make
the
best
of
it
right.
But
when
you
connect
it
back
to
it's,
not
chance,
it's
not
arbitrary.
It's
not
random.
F
It's
not
just
the
chaos
of
the
universe.
You
know
unequally
Distributing
its
chaos
across
Humanity.
It's
look
at
how
intentional
these
choices
are.
This
is
like
this
is
a
gut
punch
when
I
saw
this
map
and
I
I.
Consider
myself
a
pretty
well-read
person
on
the
topic
of
race,
Equity
belonging
systemic
racism
planning,
but
this
like
there
is
no
Academia
here.
There
is
no
abstract
concept
here.
F
There
are
just
freeways
intentionally
curved
to
eradicate
black
communities,
and
it
is
I
just
want
to
highlight
this
because
it
just
hit
me
so
hard
personally,
so
thank
you
and
I'm
really
glad
that
as
a
city,
we
recognize
this.
We
we
recognize
this,
we
honor
it
and
it
becomes
part
of
our
formal
planning
documents
in
our
formal
planning
processes,
and
you
know-
and
this
is
the
challenge
that
I
raise
for
our
staff-
our
our
my
elected
colleagues
is
our
votes.
D
D
If
you
have
not
seen
the
exhibit
called
human
toll
35W,
it
is
a
very
profound
exhibit
I
visited
it
when
it
first
went
up
and
got
to
visit
with
one
of
its
main
researchers,
Dr
Ernest
Lloyd,
who
actually
was
a
veteran
of
MnDOT,
and
it
is
a
very
powerful,
exhibit
to
go
see
both
in
its
conveyance
of
the
information
that
we're
seeing
here,
the
storytelling
of
the
real
impact
on
people's
lives,
the
wealth
that
was
taken
from
Community,
because
land
was
taken
to
build
these
highways,
and
it's
it's
a
very
well
done
exhibit
so
I.
A
Thank
you
director,
any
other
discussion
or
questions
from
colleagues
not
seeing
any
I
want
to.
Thank
you
Ismail
this
fast
for
the
presentation,
very,
very
great
presentation
and
critical
work.
It's
really
important
so
really
appreciate
all
your
efforts
on
this,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
direct
the
clerk
to
receive
and
file
this
presentation,
and
we
will
move
on
to
our
second
discussion
item,
which
will
be
the
2021-2022
update
on
the
transportation
action
plan
and
I'll
turn
to
director
Anderson
Keller
to
see
we'll
be
presenting
today.
D
On
this,
thank
you
Mr
chair
again,
Ms
Kathleen
mail
will
be
presenting
on
this.
This
is
our
two-year
first
of
five
year,
five
presentations
that
will
happen
over
time
to
reflect
on
the
transportation
action
plan,
and
so
I
will
let
her
lead
lead.
The
presentation
for
us.
G
Back,
thank
you
chair.
Thank
you,
committee
members,
happy
to
be
back
and
really
just
want
to
say
happy
to
present
on
behalf
of
so
many
people
in
the
department
that
have
been
critical
to
what
I'm
going
to
show
on
these
slides
as
well
as
our
partners.
G
So
there
was
some
framing
that
we
knew
about
when
we
started
out
with
the
transportation
action
plan.
We
knew
it
was
an
ambitious
vision
for
10
years.
We
knew
that
it
was
not
fiscally
constrained
and
we
also
knew
we
couldn't
do
it.
Allow
alone
we
categorized
each
of
the
325
actions
as
either
do
or
support
meaning
for
the
ones
that
were
support.
G
There
were
an
unprecedented
number
of
challenges
that
we
didn't
know
about
when
we
passed
this
as
well
in
terms
of
the
impacts
right
of
covid
I
mean
we
did
know
about
covid.
We
did
know
about
the
murder
of
George
Floyd
when
we
passed
the
final
plan
and
the
civil
unrest
you
know,
and
then
the
just
the
cycling
through
of
the
Staffing
challenges
and
so
on
that
we're
all
very
familiar
with
and
then
the
impacts
that
that
has
had
upon
being
able
to
achieve
different
elements
and
actions
of
the
plan.
G
G
We
updated
our
Ada
transition
plan
for
Public
Works
in
the
early
part
of
2022
and
reported
back
progress
on
20
out
of
the
36
different
milestones
in
within
that
plan,
really
making
improvements
for
those
with
accessibility
needs
in
our
city.
G
G
For
so
many
ways
of
getting
around
Evie
car
share
is
another
initiative
where
Public,
Works
and
others
have
been
working
on.
There's
now
70
stations
throughout
Minneapolis
and
St
Paul,
which
provide
car
share
electric
car
share
and
included
some
of
the
stats
from
the
first
six
months,
which
show
really
tangible
benefits
to
people
living
in
the
Twin
Cities.
In
terms
of
creating
a
new
option
for
mobility
within
the
cities,
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
to
include
green
infrastructure
on
our
street
projects,
which
is
helping
us
meet
our
chapter
54
stormwater
ordinance.
G
Plymouth
Avenue
North
traffic
calming
green
infrastructure,
the
bike
ped
Trail
really
transformed
that
street
and,
as
a
result,
lowered
speeds
I
think
by
like
five
miles
per
hour
on
average
Grand,
Avenue
South,
similar
type
of
treatments,
downtown
east,
adding
green
infrastructure
into
this
landscape
and
a
bike
ped
Trail,
Avenue
South.
So
these
streets
are
becoming
you
know,
kind
of
the
influence
of
all
this
is
starting
to
show
up
in
our
built
environment,
4th
Street,
downtown.
G
And
then
our
vision
zero,
while
that's
its
own
program,
really
also
It
Works
hand
in
hand
with
the
tap
in
terms
of
the
goals
and
what
we're
attempting
to
do
here,
and
so
we've
seen
a
lot
of
quick,
build
projects
to
really
prioritize
pedestrian
and
bicyclist
safety,
especially
on
our
high
injury
streets.
Here's
an
example
of
a
four
to
three
conversion,
31st
Street
and
then
getting
to
the
10
different
tracking
indicators
and
metrics
that
we
wanted
to
report
on
and
again,
the
tracking
indicators
are
things
that
are
bigger
than
just
Transportation.
G
G
The
goal
that
we
set
out
in
the
tap
was
to
have
60
of
the
trips
taken
by
walking
biking
or
Transit
in
2019.
Our
number
was
at
32
2021
data
we
showed
at
31..
So
that's
a
one
percent
difference
again.
A
lot
of
things
happened
during
those
years.
In
terms
of
like
disruption
to
people's
normal
travel
patterns,
we'll
see
that
that
reflected
in
our
various
slides
coming
up
as
well,
notably
here
is
the
increase
in
walking
the
decrease
in
transit
right
as
Transit
service
was
suspended
or
people
felt
uncomfortable
writing
Transit.
G
Those
who
had
the
option
not
to
some
obviously
chose
not
to,
and
that
was
compensated
by
increases
in
walking
and
then
a
little
bit
and
driving
alone
as
well
in
terms
of
safety.
Again,
you
all
just
heard
a
presentation
on
this.
A
couple
weeks
back,
our
severe
injuries
have
remained
fairly
constant,
but
our
number
of
fatalities
have
increased
quite
dramatically
since
our
Baseline.
G
Greenhouse
gas
emissions,
the
goal
was
in
line
with
the
then
climate
action
plan
of
an
80
reduction
by
2050,
the
2006
Baseline
that
we're
measuring
from
we've
we've
seen
a
20
22
percent
reduction,
clearly
linked
to
covid
as
well
and
changes
in
travel
behaviors,
and
in
order
to
reach
that
2030
goal
of
the
tap,
we
need
to
get
to
a
37
reduction.
So
we
saw
a
slight
uptick
in
2021
and
we'll
see
what
happens.
You
know
in
the
coming
years,
but
this
is
where
we're
at
right
now.
G
So
little
jump
in
the
gun
on
the
orange
line
here,
but
thought
I
thought
it's
a
done.
Deal
we'll
have
six
percent
increase
within
that
five
minute:
walk
shed
and
seven
percent
increase
within
the
10-minute
walk
shed
and
more
planned
vehicle
mile
travel
reduction.
The
goal
was
to
have
500
million
less
vehicle
miles
traveled
each
year
by
2030.
G
G
If
we're
maintaining
these
trends
in
terms
of
the
key
metrics,
there
was
an
equity
metric
that
each
metric
progresses
on
at
least
the
same
rate
within
an
acp50
area
as
compared
to
city-wide
rates,
and
each
metric
means
the
next
coming,
four,
which
I'll
get
into
we're,
replacing
that
with
the
racial
Equity
framework
to
adhere
to
that
Transportation
Equity
priority
scoring.
So
we
don't
have
a
status
update
on
this
as
we're
changing
that
this
slide
looks
really
boring,
but
shows
a
ton
of
work.
G
So
we
have
completed
two
out
of
the
first
three
years
of
the
first
time
frame
of
the
transportation
action
plan,
the
2020
to
2023
or
near-term
projects,
and
there
are
222
actions
which
we
identified
as
near
term
of
those
67
of
them
are
either
complete,
ongoing
and
successfully
completed
to
date
or
in
progress.
So
that's
about
two-thirds,
which
is
two
out
of
our
three
years.
G
If
you
look
you
know,
and
then
you
can
see
the
columns
going
right,
near-term
actions
we're
at
almost
80
percent,
complete
ongoing
or
in
progress
and
the
do
actions
as
well.
So
I
highlighted
out
those
do
actions
that
the
city
has
more
control
over.
G
Foreign
improvements
we
set
out
with
a
goal
of
100
miles
of
pedestrian
realm
improvements
and
3
800
ped
intersection,
Corner
improvements
to
date,
we've
added
just
over
20
miles
of
pet
realm
improvements,
and
this
represents
sidewalk
replacement,
filling
gaps
or
with
new
Street
reconstruction
project
really
enhance
pedestrian
spaces.
So
some
examples
of
that
are
far
View
Park,
a
sidewalk,
Gap
installation.
You
know
Grand
Plymouth,
some
of
the
pictures
that
I
was
showing
earlier
and
then
in
terms
of
The
Pedestrian,
section
Corner
improvements.
G
G
In
terms
of
our
Triple
A
Network,
the
goal
was
to
build
this
network
by
2030.
started
at
146
miles
and
our
miles
to
date
are
160..
You
can
see
on
the
slide.
The
pink
are
totally
new,
AAA
Network
bicycle
facilities,
and
then
the
purple
are
ones
that
were
technically
considered
AAA
before,
but
we've
upgraded
them.
So,
for
example,
changed
paint.
You
know
Peyton
bollards
to
concrete
curves,
so
really
improving
safety
there
and
that's
why
you
know:
there's
a
14
mile
increase,
but
we
see
almost
18
miles
of
constructed
AAA
Network.
G
So
these
projects
tend
to
take
a
long
time,
some
of
them
so
to
highlight
the
Seventh
Street
Transit
priority
Lane
12th
Street
priority
both
which
I
showed
earlier,
and
then
progress
being
made
through
the
F
line
on
Central
Ave
and
through
the
blue
line
extension
on
West
Broadway
and
then
through
the
better
bus,
Pro,
better
bus
route
program
that
Metro
Transit
leads
the
Route
22
and
the
route
3
better
bus
route
project.
We
see
improvements
on
three
out
of
the
15
corridors
listed
locally
as
well.
G
F
Thank
you,
chair
Johnson,
thank
you
for
this.
This
is
excellent.
You
know,
I
think
the
foundational
tension
with
this
is
the
fact
that
it's
unfunded,
but
I
just
wanted
to
just
the
street
design
guide
is
so
such
a
great
resource
and
and
this
kind
of
intersection
of
the
tension
of
things
being
unfunded.
But
us
having
this
Rich
resource
in
the
street.
F
Design
guide
is
something
that
I
used
with
my
constituents,
who
have
been
very
organized
around
29th
Avenue
redesigned
getting
downgraded,
there's
a
lot
of
disappointment,
even
anger
about
you
know
that
real
Capital
decision
that
we
had
to
make
but
we've
been
able
to
I've,
been
able
to
share
that
a
street
design
guide
with
my
constituents
and
have
a
more
co-creative
approach
to
well.
F
G
A
Thank
you,
councilmember,
any
other
comments
or
questions
not
seeing
any
so
I
want
to
just
add
my
own
comment
that
I
really
appreciate
this
highlight
of
all
the
work
and
the
many
different
ways
it
touches
all
across
the
city
and
influences
so
many
countless
decisions.
I
thought
the
presentation
was
very
well
done
and,
and
it's
nice
to
actually
see
so
many
of
the
pictures
of
where
you
know
the
policy
meets
the
road
right
and
and
that's
it's
so
impactful.
So
thank
you
again.
Thank
you
with
that.
A
I
will
direct
our
clerk
to
receive
and
file
that
presentation
and
then
we'll
move
on
to
our
final
presentation
of
the
day
or
discussion
item
and
that's
receiving
and
filing
an
update
on
sidewalk,
snow
and
ice
and
I'll
turn
to
director
Anderson
Kelleher.
To
ask
who
will
be
presenting
on
this
item.
Thank.
D
You
Mr,
chair
and
committee
members,
Brett
jelly
deputy
director
will
be
giving
this
update
and
I
want
to
say
that
this
is
really
an
update
out
of
the
terrific
study
session
that
we
had
a
while
back
to
follow
up
and
and
be
able
to
give
you
some
more
information
and
also
I
think
really
firm
up
some
of
the
strategies
that
we
all
were
coming
together
around.
I
As
was
mentioned,
this
is
a
follow-up
presentation
from
our
October
19th
study
session
on
our
sidewalk
snow
and
ice
program.
A
study
session
was
a
deeper
dive
into
kind
of
the
history
of
the
program.
I
The
context
in
which
we're
operating
the
enforcement
process
and
a
lot
of
numbers
I
will
touch
on
briefly
some
of
that
for
a
newer
audience
and
then
go
into
the
follow-up
items
from
the
study
session
with
which
there
were
three.
So
one
of
the
items
we
talked
about
looking
forward
is
to
review
our
proactive
inspection
program.
I'll
have
an
update
on
that
reviewing
our
targeted,
Outreach
and
opportunities
for
targeted,
Outreach
and
finally
providing
an
estimate
on
if
we
were
to
move
forward
with
a
sidewalk,
snow
and
ice
ambassador
program
pilot.
I
What
that
might
look
like
I
do
want
to
recognize.
This
is
our
sidewalk
snow
and
ice
program,
which
really
is
you
know,
kind
of
kicked
off
and
fully
recently
is
a
team
effort
across
the
city
and
I.
Just
really
want
to
thank
311,
Communications,
neighborhood,
community
relations
and
Performance
Management
and
Innovation
for
their
support
of
this
program
and
then
also
within
the
department.
That
is
a
team
effort.
I
I
really
want
to
call
out
the
daily
work
from
the
Transportation
maintenance
and
repair
group
who
is
really
doing
this
on
a
daily
basis
this
time
of
year,
but
then
there's
also
support
from
all
the
transportation
business
lines,
as
well
as
the
administration
group
foreign.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
I
will
go
through
quickly.
Kind
of
the
broader
context
of
our
sidewalk
Network
in
the
city
give
an
overview
of
the
sidewalk
stolenized
rules
and
enforcement
and
then
we'll
hit
the
follow-up
items.
I
So
a
big
table
of
numbers
really
just
want
to
highlight
a
couple
of
things.
We
have
almost
2
000
miles
of
sidewalks
in
the
City
of
Minneapolis.
600
of
those
miles
are
on
The
Pedestrian
priority
Network
and
there's
almost
130
000
Parcels
in
the
city
that
average
number
of
snow
events
of
23
a
year.
That
is
any
precipitation
counts
as
a
snow
event.
I
This
graphic
kind
of
helps
understand
the
over
lapping
and
the
different
responsibilities
to
keep
our
pedestrian
system
operating
in
the
winter.
We
have
sidewalks
Corners
streets
and
all
of
these
elements
need
to
work
together.
This
is
a
graphic
of
Emerson,
Avenue,
North
and
Plymouth
Avenue
North
and
you
can
see
the
orange
areas
are
sidewalks
that
are
responsibility
of
the
adjoining
property
owner.
Blue
areas
include
the
streets
and
alleys
and
on
street
and
off
street
bike
lanes
that
we,
the
city,
are
responsible
for
and
then
also
you'll,
see.
I
There's
a
green
area
and
one
of
the
reasons
we
use
this
graphic
is
to
show
like
a
Metro
Transit
Transit
station.
They
are
responsible
for
keeping
that
clear
of
snow
and
then
the
red
circles,
just
it's
a
reality
of
moving
snow
around
in
the
winter
that
is
Corners
so
in
the
street
oftentimes
windrows
as
we're
pushing
snow
around.
We
have
wind
drills
at
those
locations
and
we
do.
I
If
you're
a
single
family,
home
or
a
duplex,
you
have
a
24
hours
from
when
the
snow
stops
to
clear
your
sidewalk
and
all
other
properties
have
four
daytime
hours
and
daytime
hours
from
eight
to
five
to
clear
the
sidewalk,
if
it
snows
at
some
point
in
that
window,
that
does
reset
the
the
clock
for
those
responsibilities.
I
If
we
get
to
a
point
where
there
is
a
complaint
on
a
property
in
Day
Zero,
we'll
just
call
that
the
when
the
snow
event
ends,
you
know
if
we
get
complaints
in
those
first
a
few
days.
There
is
a
process
for
complaints
coming
into
3-1-1.
I
We
will
mail,
the
property
owner
and
we've
made
some
adjustments
on
that
and
I'll
talk
about
that.
In
a
moment,
we'll
mail
Property
Owners
a
notification
that
they
it's
an
order
to
correct
and
kind
of
in
that
day,
four
to
five
range.
We
do
on-site
inspections
to
verify
and
if
it's
still
not
shovel
at
that
point,
we
do
send
work
orders
to
our
contractors,
who
will
go
out
and
clear
the
sidewalk.
Sometimes
we
show
up
it's
been
cleared,
so
we
cancel
that
cleanup
order.
I
This
slide
shows
numbers
from
November
2016
to
present
and
I
guess.
This
was
a
little
more
present
in
the
middle
of
October.
We're
probably
adding
to
these
totals
right
now,
but
this
is
just
an
illustration
that
kind
of
shows
the
flow
of
complaints.
So
we
have
complaints
that
come
into
3-1-1
and
then
we
also
have
our
proactive
sidewalk
inspections
that
totaled
about
40.
I
1
000,
almost
42
000
complaints
over
that
time
period.
Some
of
those
complaints
fall
off
about
5000
as
their
duplicates
or
for
some
other
reason,
but
in
this
case
36
000
plus
cases
were
created
almost
30
000
of
those
end
up
being
cleared
by
the
property
owner,
and
then
some
portion
does
move
through
more
of
the
enforcement
process.
I
But
this
is
you
know
this
is
an
important
slide
and
it
informs
the
next
few
items
I'm
going
to
cover.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
have
almost
130
000
Parcels
in
the
city
and
just
using
2021
as
an
example.
We
have
really
good
compliance
overall
as
a
percentage.
It's
a
good
percentage,
it's
an
a
and
but
we
do
have
you
know
four
and
a
half
thousand
four
thousand
five
hundred
people
who
are
not
compliant
and
that
that's.
That
is
a
big
number
as
well.
I
But
it
is
something
that
we've
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
focusing
on
that
group
of
Property
Owners
to
help
them
understand
the
rules
and
their
responsibilities.
And
if
we
need
to
fix
the
problem
as
quickly
as
possible
on
their
sidewalks.
I
So,
as
I
noted,
we
had
follow-up
items
from
that
study
session,
the
first
one
we
did
discuss
ing
our
proactive
inspection
program.
So
a
little
bit
of
background
in
the
2018-2019
season.
We
started
as
a
pilot,
and
now
it's
just
something
we
do
each
year
where
we
have
the
image
on
the
left,
really
kind
of
shows
the
grid
squares
around
the
city.
We
go
through
a
random
number
generator
and
we
randomly
select
quadrants
to
inspect.
I
If
there's
a
snowfall
of
over
one
inch,
and
so
today
we
sent
out
five
teams:
five
teams
we're
out
doing
this
random
inspection.
So
one
of
the
reasons
we
we're
doing
this
is
I.
I
was
personally
struggling
with.
How
are
we
doing?
We
were
hearing,
we
hear
complaints,
but
we
didn't
because
we're
complaint
based
system.
We
didn't
really
have
a
good
way
to
have
a
good
understanding
of
of
what
compliance
looked
like
and.
I
What
we
talked
about
at
the
study
session
is:
do
we
want
to
reallocate
those
resources
that
are
doing
the
proactive
inspections
of
some
other
approach
so
on
the
Right
image
is
just
an
example
of
The
Pedestrian
priority
Network,
so
you
could
theoretically
move
those
inspection
resources
to
a
more
focused
area,
and
since
the
study
session,
we
have
looked
at
this
and
we
met
with
nice.
I
Sorry
for
the
outdated,
Department
name,
the
Performance,
Management
Innovation
group
and
reviewed
both
our
methodology
and
the
goals
of
the
program,
and
we,
we
collectively
agreed
that
keeping
our
random
program
intact
for
sure
for
this
year
is
a
good
idea.
There's
a
just
a
lot
of
value
in
keeping
doing
this
the
same
way
over
time.
So
we
can
really
keep
a
good
track
of
the
trends
and
see
if
all
the
other
things
we're
doing
are
having
any
impact
and
on
the
right.
I
You'll
note
that
we
we
have
seen
Improvement
year
over
year
on
these
randomly
inspected
areas,
so
we're
about
95
and
a
half
percent.
As
of
last
season,.
I
Item
we
spent
a
good
amount
of
time.
Talking
about
is
targeted,
Outreach
again
just
some
big
numbers,
23
000
properties,
with
complaints,
since
2016.
kind
of
digging
down,
we
have
8
000
with
two
or
more
complaints.
When
we
dig
down
further,
we
can
find
properties
that
kind
of
have
repeated
complaints,
so
the
map
on
the
right
just
is
where
those
complaints
are
and
then
the
bigger
the
dot,
the
more
complaints
we
have
in
that
area.
I
Two
things
we
are
doing
this
year,
we've
reviewed
complaints
since
2018,
and
then
we
looked
for
properties
that
have
had
I
think
we
filtered
it
by
four
four
of
the
five
years.
Something's
come
up
on
that
property.
That
gets
us
to
a
nice,
manageable
number
of
385,
where
we
are
looking
at
those
and
focusing
on,
because
sometimes
a
property
owner
is
different
than
the
taxpayer.
I
If
it's
a
rental
property-
and
we
really
want
to
for
lack
of
a
better
word
kind
of
spam,
the
different
ways
of
being
in
contact
with
these
properties
to
make
sure
that
they
understand
the
responsibilities
and
you
know
potentially
even
doing
some
spot
checks
specifically
on
these
properties.
I
The
other
thing
we're
doing
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we've
learned
over
the
years
when
we
go
through
kind
of
the
enforcement
cycle,
and
we
hear
from
people
who
had
a
City
Contractor,
remove
the
smell
or
charging
them
for
it
and
we're
hearing
from
either
and
you've.
Had
residents
stand
here
during
committee
meetings
and
say
you
know,
I
didn't
know
it
was
my
responsibility.
I
We
are
in
addition
to
sending
the
letters
to
properties
that
the
address
is
on
file,
we're
using
door
hangers
to
in
trying
to
educate
both
whoever's
living
there,
who
that
it
is
the
property's
responsibility-
and
you
know
hopefully,
triggering
some
conversations,
maybe
between
tenants
and
their
landlords.
So
those
are
two
things
we
we'll
be
doing
on
the
targeted
Outreach
front
and
then
finally,
an
item
we
discussed
at
the
study
session
was
the
idea
of
a
snow
Ambassador
pilot
program.
I
This
would
be
something
that's
new.
This
would
dedicate
some
staff
to
an
area
or
linear
routes
to
just
Drive
the
routes
monitor
these
areas.
If
there
are
sidewalks
that
are
not
up
to
compliance,
we
would
put
together
some
protocols
for
how
we
you
know.
Maybe
we
we
put
them,
make
them
in
compliance.
The
first
time
we
knock
on
the
door.
We
talk
to
the
resident.
We
understand.
Is
this
a
a
confusion
over
who
is
responsible?
Is
there
some
reason
the
property
owners
are
physically
unable
to
shovel
sidewalks?
This
is
all
kind
of
information.
I
That'd
be
very
helpful
as
we
look
at
other
things.
We
need
to
do
the
nice
thing
about,
starting
with
a
small
pilot
in
this
case
is
we
could
track
costs?
We
could
track
some
of
the
abatement,
Trends
and,
and
the
other
nice
thing
is.
We
would
put
them
in
a
truck
with
a
plow
in
the
front
and
if
they
run
into
other
issues,
a
blocked,
Corner,
a
pedestrian
Refuge
Island
that
needs
to
be
cleared.
They
could
take
care
of
that.
I
Our
commitment
on
this
item
was
to
do
some
kind
of
preliminary
estimates.
As
I
mentioned,
this
would
be
a
one-person
crew.
So
two
two
people
in
a
vehicle,
so
we
have
ongoing
Staffing
costs
and
Fringe.
We
have
ongoing
vehicle
costs
and
replacement,
and
then
one
time
we
would
need
to
buy
equipment,
a
vehicle
and
some
equipment
to
go
with
that.
I
So
you're,
looking
at
you,
know
over
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
ongoing
I
think
on
the
lower
end
of
that,
and
then
some
one
time
in
the
forty
five
thousand
dollar
range
I
think
this
is
an
idea
that
is
going
to
isn't
going
away
once
I
step
away
from
the
podium,
because
we
do
have
plans
on
updating
our
pedestrian
and
bicycle
maintenance
study.
I
We
definitely
want
to
continue
to
work
through
some
of
these
options
to
kind
of
inform
our
future
plans,
because
it
really
I
can
I
can
say
because
I've
been
a
part
A
lot
of
these
conversations.
This
has
been
a
continuous
Improvement
project.
That's
been
going
on,
for
you
know
a
very
long
time
with
that.
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
F
Thank
you,
chair
Johnson,
so
it
is
not
lost
on
me
that
I
just
passed
an
amendment
today
that
you
know
sourced
from
our
service
level
ones
in
public
works
and
I.
Think
I
remember
a
very
early
conversation
we
had
once
you
were
sworn
in
was
let's
do
Municipal
snow
clearing
and
you
said,
love
to
just
find
the
budget
and
we'll
make
it
happen.
So,
but
what
we
also
passed
was
a
legislative
directive
around
sustainable
funding
mechanisms
for
neighborhood
associations
which
I
just
want
to
highlight.
There
was
a
com.
F
The
component
that
I
specifically
was
co-authoring
on
was
around.
How
do
we
recognize
the
value
that
neighborhood
associations
bring
to
the
city
through
a
lot
of
efforts?
One
of
those
could
be
a
partnership
with
something
like
a
snow
ambassador
program
where
we
allocate
budget.
You
know
the
way
it's
modeled
in
front
of
us
today
is
two
ftes.
That
I
would
presume
are
Public
Works
employees,
but
I
could
Envision.
F
Another
way
for
this
to
happen
is
partnering
with
neighborhood
associations,
and
you
know
funding
it
into
some
capacity,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
volunteer
effort
that
happens
at
neighborhood
associations,
which
I
mean
how
common
is
it
for
us,
culturally
to
shovel
our
neighbors,
sidewalks
or
snow
snow
blow,
our
neighbor's
sidewalks,
because
we
notice
they're
out
of
town
right.
That's
like
such
a
the
way
that
we
just
are
in
Minneapolis
and
it's
you
know
one
way
that
we
might
be
able
to
codify.
J
Chairkowski,
thank
you,
chair
Johnson,
yes,
I
agree
when
we
took
over
my
my
dad's
snowblower
after
he
passed
away,
I
said
to
my
husband:
well,
we
can
take
this
only
if
we
snow
blow
everybody
on.
J
That
is,
that
is
what
we
try
to
do,
but
my
question
was
around
the
pilot
program
in
the
20
miles
and
has
it
been
identified
or
does
that
still
work
to
do
of
where
those
20
miles
would
be
I
saw?
It
was
the
pedestrian,
but
that's
a
lot
of
areas
there
any
have
you
zeroed
in
at
all.
Would
it
be
20
miles
and
like
five
miles
here
five
miles
here
or
any
thoughts
on
that.
I
Chair
Johnson,
Vice
chairkovski,
we
short
answer
is
we've
not
identified
that
you
know
at
this
moment.
This
is
an
idea
without
funding
that
I
think
we
would
learn
a
lot
because
I
I
think
that's
one
of
the
key
questions
I
have
is
how
much
how
much
can
we
cover
in?
Maybe
even
if
the
priority
is
just
focusing
on
sidewalks
and
not
maybe
other
things
you're
covering
more
ground,
so
it
I
think
it'll
be
very
interesting.
Learning
experience
for
us
to
kind
of
explore
in
a
smaller.
A
All
right,
thank
you
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
council
members,
not
seeing
any
I
want
to.
Thank
you
for
this
presentation
as
well.
It's
great
to
see
continued
progress
on
this
and
to
have
some
solid
recommendations
and
next
steps
moving
forward
on
this.
So
we'll
continue
working
on
the
council
side
have
some
discussions
on
budget
and
what
we
can
do
there,
if
not
this
year
next
year,
certainly
and
figure
out
a
way
to
move
this
forward.
So
not
seeing
any
other
comments
or
questions.
A
I'll
go
ahead
and
direct
the
clerk
to
receive
and
file
this
presentation
and
before
we
close
it
out,
I
just
want
to
express
my
gratitude
to
all
of
our
Public
Works
Crews
employees
out
there
over
these
last
I.
Don't
even
these
days
blur
together.
So
what
is
it
like?
60
hours,
I,
don't
know
something
like
that.
A
The
last
few
days
with
this
first
big
snowstorm
of
the
season
I,
know
they're
out
there
working
really
hard
to
make
sure
that
the
streets
are
safer
and
the
sidewalks
safer
for
everyone
in
Minneapolis,
and
it's
really
great
work
and
at
our
last
meeting
of
the
year,
it's
good
to
end
on
that
note
and
remind
ourselves
of
all
the
Public
Works
employees
out
there,
keeping
our
city
running
and
safe,
so
seeing
no
further
business
before
this
committee.
Without
any
objection,
I
will
declare
this
meeting
a
journey.
Wish
everyone
happy
holidays.
Thank
you,
foreign.