►
From YouTube: January 17, 2023 Heritage Preservation Commission
Description
Additional information at:
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
A
B
C
A
A
The
first
order
of
business
is
to
adopt
the
agenda
for
this
meeting.
We
will
work
from
the
agendas
that
are
available
by
the
clerk.
I
will
go
through
the.
D
A
This
is
the
proposed
agenda.
The
consent
agenda
will
include
the
following
items:
item
number
four:
200
Third,
Avenue,
South,
Ward,
3.
item
number:
five,
four
hundred
Fourth
Street
South
418,
4th
Street,
South
and
301
4th
Avenue
South,
Ward,
3.
item
number;
six,
three
hundred
Sixth
Avenue
North
and
608
3rd
Street
North
Ward
3..
A
A
F
C
C
A
Those
opposed,
say,
nay,
abstain,
any
other
Obsession,
commissioner
van
Derek
abstains
as
well.
Thank
you,
commissioner
van
Derek
and
bjornenberg.
A
The
minutes
are
approved
next
I'm,
going
to
go
into
an
explanation
of
the
public
hearing
process
before
I
open
the
hearing
to
public
comments.
Let
me
summarize
the
process
for
conducting
the
public
hearing.
First,
we
will
act
on
the
consent
agenda.
We
just
set
once
items
on
the
consent
agenda
are
approved.
The
commission
is
done
with
those
items.
Applicants
may
contact
the
planning
staff
tomorrow
about
next
steps.
A
After
the
consent
agenda
items
are
approved,
we
will
take
each
remaining
agenda
item
in
order
planning
staff
will
present
its
report
and
Commissioners
may
ask
questions
of
staff.
If
you
wish
to
speak,
we
need
you
to
do
two
things,
please
be
sure
to
sign
up
on
the
sign
in
sheet
over
by
the
clerk,
and
if
you
haven't
done
this
already,
you
can
do
so
afterwards
and
when
you
come
to
testify,
you
must
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
keep
your
comments
specific
to
the
application
before
us
today.
A
If
you
have
any
materials
to
hand
out,
please
give
them
to
our
committee
clerk
so
that
they
can
be
distributed
to
the
commission
and
entered
into
the
record.
Do
not
approach
the
Commissioners
on
the
Deus
after
the
public
comments
are
complete,
I
will
close.
The
hearing
and
Commissioners
will
deliberate
and
act
on
the
applications
before
us.
G
A
C
A
A
So
then,
we
move
on
to
our
next
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
item
number
seven
Hiawatha
Golf
Course,
4553,
Longfellow,
Avenue,
Ward
12..
As
a
reminder,
we
do
not
hold
a
public
hearing
on
this
item,
as
is
customary
for
the
national
register
of
historic
places.
Nomination
process.
We
have
received
some
public
comments
which
we
will
take
into
account
in
our
discussion.
D
Good
afternoon
Vice
chair
sand
bolt
Commissioners.
My
name
is
Aaron
K
and
I'm,
a
city
planner
in
the
historic
preservation
section
of
the
Department
of
Community
planning
and
economic
development
or
cped
I'm.
Here
today
to
present
a
national
register
of
historic
places
or
nrhp
nomination
for
Hiawatha
Golf
Course
located
at
4553
Longfellow
Avenue.
As
the
vice
chair
has
noted.
D
Cped
staff
received
the
nrhp
nomination
for
Hiawatha
Golf
Course
on
December,
2nd
2022
from
the
Minnesota
state,
historic
preservation,
office
or
shippo
as
a
certified
local
government.
The
commission
is
required
to
comment
as
to
whether
or
not
the
commission
supports
the
nomination
prior
to
its
scheduled
presentation
at
the
state
review
board
meeting
on
February
7
2023..
D
D
Hiawatha
Golf
Course
is
located
in
Ward
12
and
comprises
approximately
140.3
acres
per
the
nomination.
As
you
can
see
on
this
map
from
the
nomination,
the
property
boundary
is
defined
by
43rd
Street
East
to
the
North
Lake
Hiawatha
to
the
East
Minnehaha
parkway
to
the
South
and
Longfellow
Avenue
to
the
West.
It
excludes
Lake
Hiawatha
property
developed
as
part
of
the
greater
Lake
Hiawatha
Park
to
the
Northeast
and
south
of
the
lake,
the
Minneapolis
Park
and
Recreation
board,
or
mprb
Hiawatha
District
service
center
in
the
southwest
and
two
small
areas
to
the
northwest.
D
The
nominated
property
includes
the
contributing
18-hole
golf
course
which
was
developed
starting
in
1929
and
opened
in
1934
with
nine
holes
and
an
additional
nine
holes
in
1935.
the
contributing
Golf
Club
House
labeled.
Here
as
B,
which
faces
longfell
Avenue,
it
was
built
in
1933
contributing
Bridges
from
the
1950s
labeled
as
e
f
and
g
one
non-contributing
Bridge
from
about
2005
labeled
as
h,
a
non-contributing
driving
range
called
The
Learning
Center
built
in
1999
labeled
as
c
and
a
non-contributing
shed
from
2002
labeled
as
d
I've
selected
a
few
photographs
from
the
nomination.
D
D
The
nomination
presents
a
brief
history
of
golf,
the
development
of
golf
courses
in
Minneapolis
and
a
history
of
this
specific
property,
focusing
primarily
on
its
chapter
as
a
golf
course.
According
to
the
nomination.
This
is
one
of
five
golf
courses
developed
by
the
Minneapolis
Board
of
Park
Commissioners
in
the
early
1900s.
At
a
time
when
golf
was
increasing
in
popularity.
D
As
shown
on
this
map
from
the
nomination,
the
property
is
close
to
the
South
Side
neighborhood,
which
is
outlined
in
a
yellow
and
black
dash
line
where
many
African-American
residents
lived
and
continue
to
live
as
such
the
course
was
and
continues
to
be
an
important
recreational,
social
and
Gathering
space
for
the
African-American
Community.
Since
it
opened
in
the
1930s.
However,
black
golfers
were
not
allowed
to
access
the
clubhouse
become
members
of
the
private
Hiawatha
Golf
Club,
or
enter
most
tournaments,
which
were
necessary
for
professional
advancement
within
the
sport.
D
Instead,
local
black
golfers
formed
their
own
club
called
the
Twin
City
Golf
Club
in
1931.
efforts
to
fight
these
discriminatory
practices
came
to
a
head
in
1952,
resulting
in
the
formal
recognition
of
the
Twin
City
Golf
Club.
As
a
club.
The
addition
of
non-discriminatory
language
in
the
Hiawatha
Golf
Club
bylaws
and
also
coincided
with
the
integration
of
the
clubhouse.
D
The
nomination
asserts
that
Hiawatha
Golf
Course
is
locally
significant
under
National
register.
Criterion,
a
in
the
areas
of
entertainment,
Recreation,
social
history
and
ethnic
Heritage,
black
as
a
significant
site
for
civil
rights
in
Minneapolis
period
of
significance,
is
from
1952
when
several
major
civil
rights
Milestones
occurred.
June
1972
due
to
the
National
register's
50-year
guideline
reviewing
the
seven
aspects
of
Integrity.
D
The
property
overall
retains
sufficient
Integrity
to
convey
its
historical
significance
under
Criterion
a
there
have
been
some
changes
to
the
property
over
time,
including
alterations
to
the
landscape
for
flood
mitigation
measures
and
minor
alterations
in
an
in-kind
addition
to
the
clubhouse.
However,
in
staff's
opinion,
these
changes
have
not
impacted
the
property
enough
to
obscure
its
historical
significance,
as
vice
versa.
Sandal
mentioned.
D
The
cped
report
approve
the
national
register
nomination
for
the
Hiawatha
Golf
Course,
located
at
4553,
Longfellow
Avenue
and
direct
staff
to
transmit
a
letter
summarizing
the
report
to
the
state,
historic
preservation
officer
staff
members
from
the
Minneapolis
Park
and
Recreation
board,
and
the
nomination
authors
are
present
at
this
meeting.
However,
as
this
is
a
discussion
item,
any
questions
from
the
commission
should
be
directed
to
staff.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
I'm
happy
to
respond
to
any
questions.
A
F
D
F
D
C
Thank
you,
they're
in
the
information
that
we
were
provided.
There
was
concern
about
Native
American
history
not
being
adequately
represented.
Could
you
speak
to
that.
D
When
writing
a
national
register
nomination
authors
can
take
many
different
approaches
and
can
focus
on
a
variety
of
areas
of
significance.
In
particular,
this
nomination
focuses
on
that
civil
rights.
History
I
think
that
you
might
find
in
a
review
of
many
national
registered
nominations
that
not
all
aspects
of
History
are
necessarily
addressed
but
could
be
addressed
in
the
future
through
amendments
to
those
nominations,.
A
C
C
If,
if
the
scope
of
it
was
broadened
to
include
the
Native
American
history
on
the
property.
C
I
have
more
does
the
does
the
nomination
change
the
way,
change
the
method
of
the
way
that
would
have
to
be
dealt
with
to
deal
with
the
issue
of
the
flood
mitigation
or
the
cost
to
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
the
park,
service
or
the
city,
but
it's
been
in
the
newspapers
for
the
last
couple
of
years
of
the
costs
to
the
community,
either
through
the
city
or
the
park
board
for
pumping
water
out
of
there.
So
how
do
you
know?
D
Sure,
commissioner
malbum,
so
the
should
this
proceed
and
be
approved
by
The
Keeper
of
the
national
park.
The
national
register
such
that
the
property
becomes
listed.
There
are
no
immediate
regulatory
implications
of
that
decision,
because
this
is
not
a
local
designation.
It
does
not
impact
the
city's
review
of
any
permits
or
anything
like
that.
Should
those
get
applied
for
for
the
property.
I
So,
just
to
clarify
you
mentioned
at
the
top
that
there
is
not
currently
a
local
designation
is
in
the
works.
Is
that
anything
on
the
register
for
the
City
of
Minneapolis?
At
this
stage?
Do
you
know
if
it's
a
priority
area.
D
Thank
you
for
that
question,
commissioner.
Vander
Ike
there
is
no,
no
local
designation
process
has
been
initiated.
E
You
so
in
some
of
the
material
that
we
received,
there's
a
reference
to
having
a
nomination
previously
go
to
the
state
review
board
and
have
that
sort
of
rejected
because
it
left
out
the
Dakota
history.
Do
you
have
any
additional
information
on
that.
D
J
A
And
Aaron
I'm
going
to
ask
you
one
question:
can
we
provide
comment
in
addition
to
either
so
our
support
letter,
or
is
it
just
kind
of
we
either
support
it
or
we
don't.
D
I
can
include
comments
from
the
Commission
in
the
letter
that
gets
sent
to
the
status
or
preservation
officer.
Okay,.
C
Is
there
any
precedent
for
carving
out
the
areas
that
are
non
that
are
non-contributing
like
the
that
area
C
on
the
map
that
you
showed
us,
or
is
that
just
silly.
D
That's
an
excellent
question,
commissioner:
Mel
Bloom
I
think
that
is
something
that
could
be
explored
and
we
can
get
more
information
about
that.
A
As
commissioner
dear
thank.
H
You
in
terms
of
carving
out
would
it
be
possible
for
the
Commissioners
to
support
protecting
part
of
the
area,
but
not
the
other.
The
part
that
is
currently
endangered
in
terms
of
the
park
board's
current
master
plan.
H
I
understand
I,
don't
I'm
not
aware
of
all
the
fine
details,
but
I
understand
that
the
Minneapolis
Park
Board,
this
fall
approved
a
master
plan
that
would
essentially
close
half
of
the
golf
course
and
to
be
able
to
mitigate
the
flooding
and
achieve
some
Environmental
Protection
of
areas
that
also
have
native
historical
significance.
D
D
You
can
certainly
provide
any
comments,
and
if
you
want
to
make
that
suggestion,
you
can,
but
it
may
not
have
an
impact
in
terms
of
what
would
be
protected
since
the
listing
itself
doesn't
offer
those
protections.
E
I
have
another
question
that
I
feel
bad
asking
because
I'm
not
sure
that
these
are
questions
that
you
can
answer.
Do
you
know
what
sort
of
Engagement
happened
as
this
nomination
was
being
prepared?
Thank.
D
You,
commissioner,
bjornberg
I,
do
not
know
the
extent
of
the
engagement
that
occurred.
I
do
know
by
reading
the
footnotes
of
the
nomination
that
several
oral
history
interviews
were
conducted.
A
A
I,
think
a
couple
of
important
items
came
out
of
that
number,
one
that
the
national
register,
while
it
offers
some
kind
of
designation
of
the
historic
significance
of
the
site,
does
not
limit
changes
occurring
on
the
site,
so
I
think
that's
one
important
thing
that
I'm
weighing
as
I'm
looking
at
this
and
I
think
a
another
thing
is
that
you
know
these
things
can
be
amended
and
changed
and,
like
we
said
you
know
there,
there
is
room
for
editing
the
site
and
making
changes
as
necessary,
but
they
would
probably
you
know
if
there's
state
or
federal
money
used
that
they
would
have
to
be
put
through
a
review
process
and
a
regulatory
process.
A
So
that
is
one
thing
that
the
designation
comes
with.
With
that
I'd
like
to
kind
of
open
our
discussion
and
hear
other
Commissioners
thoughts.
Commissioner
van
Derek.
I
I'll
start
us
off
yeah,
so
I'll
say
off
the
top
I'm
in
support
of
the
designation.
I
think
you
know
I'll
underscore
again,
the
the
honorary
nature
of
this
designation
and
I
think
that's
important.
It's
important
for
it
to
be
clarified
not
only
for
us
up
here,
but
for
the
public
and
I
just
want
to
maybe
touch
on
what
a
historic
nomination
National
register
nomination
does
do.
I
So
it
provides
an
added
potential
layer
for
discussion
when
changes
come
to
the
property,
particularly
through
Public
Funding,
particularly
through
Federal
funding,
as
Aaron
mentioned
through
the
section
106
project
process,
which
would
require
any
major
changes
to
the
property
be
viewed
through
a
preservation
lens.
It
again
does
not
mean
that
the
property
won't
be
changed
or
anything
like
that.
Just
means
that
there's
another
added
layer
of
review.
It
also
affords
the
owner
some
availability
of
funding
that
was
not
would
not
otherwise
be
available
to
them
because
of
the
national
register
listing.
I
So
that
is
it's
effectively
the
federal
government
saying
yep.
We
agree.
This
has
historic
relevance.
We
want
to
honor
it
in
that
way.
We
want
to
honor
its
history
and
where
we
can
step
in
as
the
Heritage
preservation
commission
is
add,
additional
more
tooth
to
to
the
requirements
on
changes
through
guidelines
and
things
like
that,
if
we
so
desire
to
add
a
local
designation
which,
at
this
point,
doesn't
sound
like
that's
on
the
table.
I
So
if
that's,
if
we
move
that
way
at
some
point,
then
there's
a
much
more
robust
discussion
to
be
had
about
about
design
guidelines
and
all
of
that.
But
you
know
I
think
what
this
provides:
an
opportunity
for
the
park
board
to
tap
into
tax
credits
or
other
funding
mechanisms
that
are
tied
to
the
National
registered
designation
as
they
look
towards
the
future
of
this
property.
So
I
think
it's
a
good
thing.
I
I
think
that
it's
it's
the
right
thing
given
the
extended
history,
not
just
that's
detailed
in
the
nomination
form,
but
also
like
we've
discussed
today,
the
Native
American
history.
It's
disappointing
that
that
isn't
touched
on
in
the
nomination
form
and
I'm
guessing
the
nominators
may
want
to
consider,
or
maybe
are
considering
amending
the
the
form
to
include
that
I
think
that
would
be
great
and
but
we
can
always
Lobby
to
have
it
amended
like,
like
you
said,
commissioner
sambalt.
I
So
all
that
to
say
you
know,
I
thought
I've
watched
a
lot
of
kind
of
public
discussion
about
this,
coming
up
on
our
on
our
agenda
from
the
Twitter
sphere
and
all
of
that
and
it
just
it
just
continues
to
it's.
It's
so
difficult.
This
is
a
really
complicated
legal
designation
that
it's
hard
to
fully
understand,
but
the
the
reality
of-
and
the
point
of
my
comments
is
to
say
that
this
is
a
way
for
us
to
honor.
I
E
I
really
appreciate
you
kicking
things
off
commissaryk
and
I
appreciate
what
you
said
and
sort
of
explaining
what
the
national
register
nomination
process
does.
I
think
that
that
is
something
that
is
really
helpful
to
sort
of
understand,
even
trying
to
go
through
okay.
What
is
this
step?
Where
are
we
at
and
what
is
the
next
step
here
and
sort
of?
What
is
the
end
goal?
E
I
would
also
say
that
you
know
I
think
it's
reassuring,
that
this
is
for
a
national
register
nomination
and
not
local
designation,
because
I
think
that
those
are
sort
of
different
things,
but
also
I
would
say
that
it
would
be
sort
of
encouraging
if
future
projects
had
to
go
through
a
106
review,
because
I
think
that
that
allows
for
a
different
level
of
public
input,
which
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
struggling
with
here
is
just
because
of
the
nature
of
this
item.
E
We
don't
have
a
public
comment
and
I
mean
we
have
the
letters,
but
you
know
it's
always
helpful
to
be
able
to
hear
people
speak
up,
so
I
would
really
look
towards
that.
E
I
will
say
you
know
it
is
really
challenging,
because
I
feel,
like
I'm
I'm,
left,
really
wondering
about
the
extent
of
the
sort
of
effort
that
had
gone
into
looking
into
history
outside
of
this
time
period,
and
that
is
something
that
I
would
encourage
us
to
really
ask
for
in
a
letter,
if
we
do
decide
to
put
forward
a
letter
of
support
on
this
and
just
to
sort
of
be
able
to
ensure
that
you
know
that
that
effort
has
been
made
and
that
has
been
looked
into
because
again
I'm
using
the
information
in
front
of
me
and
I
I,
don't
know
what
that
process
looked
like.
E
A
Thank
you,
commissioner
yarnberg.
As
we
talk
about
the
letter,
I
believe
I'm
also
in
support
of
this
nomination
and
would
support
a
letter
in
support.
But
I
think
one
of
the
comments
I
would
like
to
make
is
that
the
period
of
significance
be
strongly
considered
and
may
be
edited
based
on
the
comments
that
we
received,
but
also
on
the
other
kind
of
on
the
front
end
on
the
later
part
when
the
period
of
significance
starts,
but
also,
on
the
back
end,
to
say
that
it's
just
we're
cutting
it
off
at
the
1972
date.
A
Simply
because
that's
50
years
ago
seems
a
tad
arbitrary
to
me.
I
think
you
know
if
we're,
if
we're
looking
at
a
period
of
significance
that
Associates
with
some
of
the
historic
events
and
the
Civil
Rights
Movement
I,
think
period
that
ends
in
1968
when
the
popularity
of
the
bronze
term
tournament
was
at
its
peak.
I
understand
that
that's
just
four
years,
but
it's
it's
a
less
arbitrary
time
period.
So
that
would
be
a
recommendation.
A
I
would
make
on
the
on
the
ending
period
of
the
period
of
significance,
but
I
think
on
the
front
end
of
the
period
of
significance,
some
edits.
There
would
get
to
a
lot
of
the
commissioner's
comments
about
taking
into
account
some
of
the
histories
that
may
be
not
weren't
entirely
represented
in
the
study,
maybe
not
studied
for
far
enough
talking
about
things
like
the
the
potential
revisions
and
you
know,
do
we
want
to
parcel
out
some
of
the
pieces,
the
non-contributing
Maybe,
by
editing
the
period
of
significance
you
could
get
at
some
of
that.
A
Annie
I
might
have
a
question
for
you
actually.
Procedurally,
do
we
take
a
vote
to
for
a.
A
C
I
want
to
thank
the
people
that
wrote
the
nomination.
There
was
a
lot
of
detail
that
went
into
it
and
it
was
really
useful
and
I
think
the
my
assumption
is
that
it
was
written
from
the
point
of
view
of
the
people
who
asked
them
to
write
it
based
on
the
African-American
communities,
marginalization
and
discriminate
discrimination
shown
toward
them
in
our
community.
Historically,
so
I
think
it
represents
that
Viewpoint
and
I
think
the
approval
of
this
is
a
way
some
people
may
say
it's
symbolic
and
I.
C
So
with
that
in
mind,
I
do
think
it
would
be
useful
to
look
back
into
history
and
see
if
there
was
previous
times
that
there
should
be
included
in
the
period
of
historical
relevance,
to
make
sure
that
there
are
other
stories
told.
On
the
other
hand,
I
say
that
and
think
to
myself.
C
Okay,
are
we
opening
up
a
can
of
worms
only
in
the
sense
that
are
we
asking
the
park
board
to
spend
a
lot
more
money,
because
I
could
say
that
that's
a
could
be
a
huge
undertaking,
so
I
think
that
as
a
deliberative
body
of
the
city
representing
the
citizens
of
the
city,
we
should
be
careful
about
what
we're
asking
for
that.
We
don't
overburden
one
government
agency
with
our
own
decisions,
but
I
am
in
support
of
this
I.
Think
it's
a
it's
a
good
thing.
K
A
K
You
Vice
chair,
Samuel
I,
just
wanted
to
stress
two
other
points
that
I've
heard
and
then
just
make
one
clarification
to
a
commissioner's
comment
on
the
record,
stating
again
just
for
utter
crystal
clear
everything
here
today.
National
register
nominations
do
not
provide
regulatory
protections
full
stop.
Secondly,
because
the
Minneapolis
Park
and
Recreation
board
is
a
public
agency.
They
don't
necessarily
have
the
ability
to
apply
for
historic
tax
credits
which
is
generally
afforded
to
private
property
owners.
K
But
all
the
statements
relative
to
section
106
are
accurate
and
then
yes,
your
ultimate
goal
here
today
is
to
either
vote
and
support
or
not
support
of
the
nomination,
as
it
has
been
distributed
to
the
commission
as
they
are
a
CLG,
but
there
are
no
additional
strings
that
lead
directly
to
local
designation
from
your
vote
today.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
those
clarifications.
Does
anybody
have
other
comments?
Questions
commissioner,
Dreyer.
H
This
is
maybe
more
of
a
procedural
question.
I
know
that
a
period
of
public
notice
is
part
of
this
and
I'm
noticing
that
the
letters
we
received
are
largely
dated
today
or
yesterday.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
we've
given
adequate
time
for
that
consultation,
I,
don't
actually
know
the
answer,
but.
K
Thank
you
for
the
question,
commissioner
Dreyer.
We
as
part
of
procedure
for
this
before
the
HPC.
We
do
not
provide
public
notice
based
on
that.
Are
there
some
improvements
that
could
be
made
to
this
process?
Yes,
some
lines
get
a
little
blurred
in
terms
of
if
we
provide
public
notice,
then
what
where
the
line
is
in
between
what
is
coming
before
you
and
rules
to
land
use
applications,
but
historically
no,
we
have
not
provided
public
notice,
as
we
typically
do
for
other
land
use
applications
that
you
hear
and
decide
on.
Thank
you.
K
Yeah,
since
the
Minneapolis
HPC
is
a
certified
local
government,
you
do
have
a
requirement
under
federal
law
to
comment
and
either
support
or
not
support
the
national
register
nomination.
What
does
happen
is
Staff
takes
your
comments
here
today
with
an
overall
vote
of
either
supporting
or
not
supporting
it.
K
In
addition
to
any
other
comments
you
want
to
provide,
which
we
have
been
taking
notes
on
relative
to
the
period
of
significance,
boundaries,
effects
on
master
plan
comments
on
Native,
American
history,
and
then
we
transmit
that
those
comments
with
the
proceedings
from
the
meeting
in
a
letter
to
the
state
of
star
preservation
officer,
Amy
Spong,
and
they
take
that
into
consideration
before
their
state
review
board
meeting,
which
will
be
held
in
early
February.
We
do
have
so
many
days
to
do
this.
C
K
C
I
I
think
we
might
be,
we
might
be
benefited,
it's
not
a
bad.
That's
not
a
correct
way
to
say
that
I
think
it
might
be
beneficial
for
us
as
a
the
liberative
board
to
hold
this
over
until
our
next
meeting,
so
that
we
can
think
through
how
we
respond
to
say,
because
my
sense
is
that
we're
that
there's
several
of
us
that
want
to
say
yes,
but
yes,
we
agree
with
this,
but
there's
some
facts
that
we
would
like
addressed
or
at
least
looked
into
as
part
of
our
agreement.
C
A
E
I'm
not
ready
to
make
a
motion,
but
you
know
I
had
a
very
similar
thought
process
of
like
okay.
Do
we
wait?
You
know
that
gives
us
a
little
bit
of
time
to
to
think
this
over,
but
I
also
feel
like
hearing
the
conversations
that
we're
having
it
isn't.
It
doesn't
feel
like
anything,
is
going
to
change
like
and
it
is
just
a
conversation
of
okay.
E
What
are
the
things
that
we
making
a
general
statement,
support
the
nomination
and
want
to
see
more
from
it,
and
so
I
am
all
for
having
a
discussion
about
figuring
out
how
to
sort
of
make
that
possible
in
the
here
and
now.
E
I
know
that
I
would
support
sort
of
the
things
that
we
have
talked
about
here,
of
expanding
that
I
guess
requesting
to
right.
They
don't
have
to
do
any
of
this,
but
looking
at
the
period
of
significance
on
both
sides,
I
appreciated
that
and
and
sort
of
incorporating
additional
history.
A
Mel
Bloom
I
think
our
the
motion,
as
I
would
kind
of
talk
about.
It
would
be
to
author
a
letter
in
support
of
the
in
support
of
the
nomination
and
the
study
and
asked
that
shippo
strongly
consider
revising
the
period
of
significance
to
consider
the
other
historical
events
that
may
have
occurred
on
the
site
and
to
align
with
those
current
with
those
events,
I'd
be
willing
to
take
advice
and
comments
from
other
Commissioners
as
well,
who
have
also
done
many
of
these
things.
I
I
have
a
question:
I
mean
and
I've
never
written
a
national
register
nomination,
so
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
I
mean
I,
can
can
the
can
shipo
just
take
the
ability
to
amend
the
nomination
form
in
order
prior
to
approving
it,
or
is
that
maybe
something
that
the
nominator
would
need
to
do
to
amend
their
nomination?.
A
K
F
A
F
Looking
at
what
we
receive
from
staff-
and
it
would
seem
to
me
that
we
could
adopt
a
recommended
motion,
which
is
that
the
HPC
adopts
the
cped
report
approving
the
national
register
nomination
for
the
Hiawatha
Golf
Course
and
then
add
to
that.
That
staff
provide
comments
related
to
the
issues
that
we've
discussed
tonight
for
consideration
by
Chipotle.
A
K
A
C
A
I
A
Hearing
none
I
will
move
on
to
nominations
for
vice
chair.
A
Do
I,
hear
any
other
nominations
for
vice
chair
position.
A
Okay,
hearing
none
I'll,
move
on
to
the
final
position
of
secretary.
Do
I
have
any
nominations
for
the
secretary
position.
A
All
right,
any
other
nominations
for
secretary.
A
A
With
that
that
ends,
our
nomination
of
officers
do
Commissioners
or
staff
have
any
announcements
or
commission
business
to
discuss,
and
this
is
where
I
usually
look
at
Andrea.
First.
K
K
We
have
also
have
we'll
begin
our
kickoff
for
the
Washburn
Fair
Oaks
design
guidelines
in
about
two
weeks
to
be
initiate
that
project
with
some
of
the
engagement
included
and
also
rewriting
the
design
guidelines
for
that
District,
but
with
that,
I
am
actually
going
to
turn
the
announcements
over
to
Rob
scalecki,
who
will
give
an
update
about
the
HPC
Awards
this
year.
Thank
you.
G
Excuse
me
and
good
evening:
Commissioners
Rob,
skalucky
senior
city
planner
in
the
historic
preservation
section
of
cped
I
just
have
a
bit
of
an
update
here
about
the
Minneapolis
preservation
awards
for
this
year.
So,
as
you're
all
aware,
these
are
held
annually
last
year.
They
were
actually
in
May
at
the
Capri
theater
this
year
they
will
be
March
15th,
which
is
a
Wednesday,
and
they
will
also
be
at
the
Capri
theater.
G
With
that
being
stated,
we
are
looking
for
two
jurors,
as
we
do
every
year
from
the
HPC,
so
the
jurors
sit
on
the
jury
that
helps
decide
who
are
the
award
winners
every
year
and
that
night
will
either
happen
on
Tuesday,
February,
21st
or
Wednesday
February
22nd
this
year,
so
part
of
the
planning
committee
wants
the
the
planning
initiative
is
just
to
to
see
who's
interested
and
then
out
of
those
two
dates
of
who's
interested
see
which
one
works
best.
G
G
Discuss
if,
if
you
want
to
you,
know,
throw
your
name
in
there
as
a
juror,
then
definitely
just
contact
me
at
any
time
and
I
can
pass
along
the
information.
That's
it.
Thank
you.
I
Vanderig
I
haven't
been
here
for
a
while
and
I
apologize.
It
was
a
busy
end
of
the
last
year,
but
so
I'm
gonna
bug
you
are.
We
gonna
have
a
retreat
and
do
you
have
any
idea
when
that
might
be
they're.
K
K
A
Mm-Hmm
any
other
items,
Commissioners,
commission
business,
anything
else.
We
would
like
to
discuss
questions
for
staff,
okay,
hearing
none
with
that
we
will.
We
have
completed
all
the
agenda.
All
the
items
on
the
agenda
for
this
meeting
I
will
ask
members
and
staff
once
more
if
there
are
any
other
matters
to
come
before
this
meeting
there
being
no
other
business
to
come
before
this
meeting
and
without
objection,
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.